Next Article in Journal
A Comparison of Emotional Triggers for Eating in Men and Women with Obesity
Previous Article in Journal
Does Consumption of Ultra-Processed Foods Matter for Liver Health? Prospective Analysis among Older Adults with Metabolic Syndrome
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 14
Issue 19
10.3390/nu14194143
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Transgenic Rice Seed Extracts Exert Immunomodulatory Effects by Modulating Immune-Related Biomarkers in RAW264.7 Macrophage Cells

by
Chaiwat Monmai
,
Jin-Suk Kim
and
So-Hyeon Baek
*
Department of Agricultural Life Science, Sunchon National University, Suncheon 59722, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2022, 14(19), 4143; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14194143
Submission received: 1 August 2022 / Revised: 17 September 2022 / Accepted: 4 October 2022 / Published: 5 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Nutritional Immunology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Protopanaxadiol (PPD), a native active triterpenoid present in Panax ginseng, has been reported to exert immune-related effects. We previously created PPD-producing transgenic rice by introducing the P. ginseng protopanaxadiol synthase and dammarenediol-II synthase genes into Dongjin rice. In the present study, the seeds of the T4 generation of this transgenic rice were tested for their immunomodulatory effects in RAW264.7 macrophage cells. Treatment with transgenic rice seed extract in RAW264.7 cells (i) significantly enhanced nitric oxide (NO) production in a dose-dependent manner without any cytotoxicity (up to 100 µg/mL), (ii) upregulated the expression of immune-related genes and increased production of the inflammation mediator prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), and (iii) activated nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) by promoting the phosphorylation of NF-κB p65, p38 MAPK, and c-Jun N-terminal protein kinase (JNK). In lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-treated RAW264.7 cells used to mimic the inflammation condition, treatment with transgenic rice seed extract significantly reduced NO production, proinflammatory cytokine expression, and PGE2 production, all of which are LPS-induced inflammation biomarkers, by inhibiting the phosphorylation of NF-κB p65, p38 MAPK, and JNK. Collectively, these results indicate that PPD-producing transgenic rice has immunomodulatory effects.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The immune system in the host cells plays an important role in defense against pathogens and various other stimuli. Depending on the functional activities, it is divided into two groups—innate and adaptive immune responses [1,2]. Macrophages, which are active in both types of immune responses, offer protection against foreign microorganisms through phagocytosis as well as the release of proinflammatory cytokines and mediators, e.g., interleukin (IL), tumor necrosis factor (TNF), and nitric oxide (NO) [3,4,5]. Macrophages can exhibit different phenotypes depending on their activation mode [6]. Based on their polarization, they are mainly categorized as classical (M1) and alternative (M2) macrophages [7]. M1 macrophage is associated with an inflammatory microenvironment, whereas M2 macrophage is associated with an anti-inflammatory microenvironment [8]. Immune protection against pathogens also involves the activation of various signaling pathways, including mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) pathways [2].
Ginseng (Panax ginseng Meyer) is widely used as a natural pharmaceutical herb worldwide, particularly in Asia [9]. Ginseng is recognized for its potential to enhance immune responses, homeostasis, and self-healing [10,11]. The active compounds isolated from ginseng include ginsenosides [12], polyacetylenes [13], polysaccharides [14], and phenolics [15]. Ginsenoside is the main active compound of ginseng and can be divided into two major groups: protopanaxadiol (PPD) and protopanaxtriol glycosides [8]. Several studies have reported the immune-related effects of PPD, which include anticancer [16,17,18], antistress [19], immune boosting [20,21], and anti-inflammatory effects [19,22,23].
We previously created transgenic rice that overexpresses the P. ginseng dammarenediol-II synthase and protopanaxadiol synthase genes [24]. This transgenic rice produces PPD and dammarenediol-II, which are not found in normal [Dongjin (DJ)] rice. In the present study, we evaluated the immune-related effects of the seed extract of this transgenic rice in RAW264.7 macrophage cells with and without lipopolysaccharide (LPS) induction (used to mimic inflammation). Overall, our study shows that PPD-producing transgenic rice exerts immunomodulatory effects in RAW264.7 macrophage cells.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Extract Preparation

Brown rice grains were collected and ground using a blender. To prepare sample extracts, 5 g of each sample powder was added to 100% methanol and sonicated for 1 h. The mixture sample was then filtered through 5 µm filter paper (Hyundai Micro, Seoul, Korea). The filtered solution was concentrated by removing the solvent using a rotary evaporator at 50 °C, and lyophilization was used to collect the crude extract. Crude extracts were adjusted to concentrations of 10, 25, 50, and 100 mg/mL using dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) in preparation for an in vitro immunomodulatory assay.

2.2. RAW264.7 Macrophage Culture

RAW264.7 cells were obtained from Korean Cell Line Bank (Seoul, Korea) and cultured in RPMI-1640 medium. The culture medium contained fetal bovine serum (10%) and antibiotics [penicillin/streptomycin (1%)]. The cells were incubated in a humidity-controlled incubator at 37 °C with 5% CO2 and maintained through weekly cell passaging.

2.3. NO Production and Cell Viability Assays

Cells (1 × 105 cells/well) were seeded and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The culture medium was replaced with various concentrations of the rice seed extract treatments. After 1 h of pretreatment, some cells received LPS (1 µg/mL) stimulation, whereas some cells received no stimulation, and the assay plate was incubated for a further 24 h. NO production was evaluated using Griess reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and quantified by constructing a standard curve of sodium nitrite (NaNO2). An EZ-Cytox Cell Viability Assay Kit was used to measure the cytotoxicity of the crude extracts. Cell viability was calculated based on the following formula:
Cell   viability   % = A 450   of   treatment   -   A 450   of   blank   A 450   of   control   -   A 450   of   blank × 100 ,
where A450 represents the absorbance at 450 nm and “control” represents the nontreatment group.

2.4. RNA Extraction and cDNA Synthesis

The cells with or without LPS stimulation were harvested after 6 h. TRI reagent™ (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to extract total RNA, and 100% isopropanol was used to precipitate RNA. RNA was collected via centrifugation at 13,000 rpm and 4 °C for 10 min. The RNA pellet obtained was washed with 70% EtOH. After drying, the total RNA pellet was resuspended in 20 µL of nuclease-free water. Total RNA was quantified using a SpectraMax® ABS Plus Microplate Reader (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA), and cDNA was synthesized using 500 ng of this RNA and a Power cDNA Synthesis Kit (Intron Biotechnology, Seongnam-Si, Korea), according to manufacturer’s instructions.

2.5. Quantification of the mRNA Expression of Immune-Related Genes Using Real-Time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR)

The mRNA expression of immune-related genes was evaluated using RealMOD™ Green W2 2× qPCR Mix (Intron Biotechnology, Seongnam-Si, Korea) in a CFX Connect Real-Time PCR System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The PCR reaction included 5 ng of cDNA template and 0.375 µM of each specific primer and was conducted as follows: predenaturation (95 °C for 10 min), 40 cycles of PCR (denaturation: 95 °C for 20 s; annealing: 60 °C for 20 s; extension: 72 °C for 30 s), and final extension (72 °C for 5 min). The sequences of IL-1β, IL-6, COX-2, iNOS, TNF-α, and β-actin were used as described by Monmai et al. [25]; moreover, the sequences of TLR-4 (NM_021297.3; forward: 5′-CGC TCT GGC ATC ATC TTC AT-3’; reverse: 5′-GTT GCC GTT TCT TGT TCT TCC-3′) were used. The results were analyzed using CFX Maestro software, and β-actin was used as the reference gene.

2.6. Prostaglandin E2 Quantification

The supernatant was collected via centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 10 min, and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) production was evaluated using a PGE2 ELISA Kit (Enzo Life Sciences, Farmingdale, NY, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. This experiment was performed twice, and PGE2 production was calculated based on a standard curve.

2.7. Phagocytosis Assay

The phagocytosis activity of RAW264.7 cells was evaluated using a neutral red uptake method [26] with slight modifications. The cells were treated with transgenic rice seed extract samples at 100 µg/mL or with 1 µg/mL of LPS. After 24 h of incubation, the culture medium was removed, and the cells were washed with 1× phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Neutral red (0.075%; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was added to each well, and the plate was incubated at room temperature for 2 h. The cells were then washed five times with 1× PBS to remove excess dye and dried. Images of the cells were captured under an IM-3 Series microscope (Optika, Bergamo, Italy). Subsequently, lysis solution [50% EtOH:glacial acetic acid (1:1)] was added to each well. After 2 h of lysis, the absorbance was measured at 540 nm.

2.8. Western Blot Assay

Cells were lysed on ice for 30 min with radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (Geneall Biotechnology, Seoul, Korea) supplemented with 1× Protease Inhibitor Cocktail Kit 5 (Bio-Medical Science Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea). Proteins were collected via centrifugation at 13,000 rpm and 4 °C for 30 min, and their concentrations were quantified using Bradford reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and compared with a bovine serum albumin standard curve. An equal amount (30 µg) of protein sample from each treatment was separated using 10% sodium dodecyl-sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. The membranes were incubated with antibodies specific to the phosphorylation of NF-κB p-65, p38 MAPK, and c-Jun N-terminal protein kinase (JNK) (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA). Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA) was used as the protein loading control. Protein signaling was detected using Clarity™ Western ECL Substrate (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), and the detected signals were imaged and quantified in terms of intensity using a ChemiDoc Imaging System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).

2.9. PPD Quantification Using Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (LC–MS)

Brown rice grain powder was mixed with 100% methanol and sonicated at 40 °C for 30 min. The mixture was then centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 30 min, and the supernatant was filtered through a SepPak C-18 Cartridge (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) before LC–MS injection. The calibration curve was constructed using six calibration standard samples of PPD (Figure 1) that included a concentration range of 0.01562–0.50000 ppm. The amount of PPD in each treatment group was quantified using the area under the curve comparison with the calibration curve.

2.10. Statistical Analysis

Data are shown as means ± standard deviations. Statistix (Version 8.1; Statistix, Tallahassee, FL, USA) was used to conduct statistical analysis. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance followed by post hoc Duncan’s multiple range tests. The differences between two groups were assessed using t-tests (p < 0.05).

3. Results

3.1. Viability and NO Production of LPS-Stimulated RAW264.7 Cells Incubated with Transgenic Rice Seed Extracts

To evaluate the effects of the transgenic rice seed extracts on cell viability, RAW264.7 cells were pretreated with various concentrations of each sample and stimulated with 1 µg/mL of LPS. Compared with no treatment [nontreated (RPMI) cells], treatment with transgenic rice seed extract (up to 100 µg/mL) did not exert cytotoxic effects on LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells (Figure 2a). Moreover, the transgenic rice seed extracts exerted proliferative effects on the cells at 10–100 µg/mL. Similar results were observed in the DMSO group; however, no significant difference was observed between the aspirin and RPMI groups.
The inhibition of LPS-induced NO production was assessed using the Griess reagent. The increasing concentration of transgenic rice seed extract resulted in significant suppression of NO production in RAW264.7 cells (Figure 2b). Treatment with sample #8 at 100 µg/mL led to the highest suppression of NO production among the transgenic rice seed extracts.

3.2. Viability and NO Production of RAW264.7 Cells Incubated with Transgenic Rice Seed Extracts

The cytotoxicity of transgenic rice seed extracts was also determined in RAW264.7 cells without LPS treatment (Figure 3). Treatments of each sample up to 100 µg/mL did not cause cytotoxicity in the cells; compared with no treatment [nontreated (RPMI) group], treatment with transgenic rice seed extracts was able to enhance cell proliferation (Figure 3a). However, for samples #557, #564, and #595, cell viability declined when the cells were treated with higher concentrations (50 and 100 µg/mL), although the cell viability of these groups did not differ significantly from that observed in the RPMI group. Compared with no treatment, treatment with DJ rice seed extract increased NO production (Figure 3b). In the group treated with transgenic rice seed extracts, NO production significantly increased with the increase in the concentration of the extract.

3.3. Effects on the mRNA Expression Levels of Immune-Associated Genes in LPS-Stimulated RAW264.7 Cells

Treatment with LPS is known to induce the expression of proinflammatory cytokines [27]. The mRNA levels of proinflammation-related genes were evaluated to determine the anti-inflammatory effects of the transgenic rice seed extracts. Treatment with the transgenic rice seed extracts significantly reduced the mRNA expression levels of proinflammation biomarkers in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells (Figure 4). Moreover, the expression of the proinflammation-related genes was dramatically suppressed by pretreatment with transgenic rice seed extracts at 100 µg/mL. Compared with the treatment with DJ rice seed extracts, treatment with a low concentration of transgenic rice seed extracts (10 µg/mL) did not lead to a significant difference in cytokine expressions. However, compared with the treatment with DJ rice seed extracts, treatment with transgenic rice seed extracts at 100 µg/mL significantly decreased the expression of immune-related genes.

3.4. Effects on the mRNA Expression Levels of Immune-Associated Genes in RAW264.7 Cells

Treatment with transgenic rice seed extracts increased the expression levels of immune-associated genes in RAW264.7 cells. Treatment with 100 µg/mL of the transgenic rice seed extracts significantly increased the expression levels of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α) and inflammation biomarkers (COX-2 and iNOS) (Figure 5). Interestingly, treatment with sample #8 at 100 µg/mL (not at 10 µg/mL) led to the highest increase in the expression of TLR-4, which encodes for a key receptor involved in LPS recognition [28]. These results indicated that compared with lower concentrations of transgenic rice seed extracts, higher concentrations led to a higher PPD production; a higher amount of PPD exerted higher immunomodulatory effects. Therefore, treatments with transgenic rice seed extracts at 100 µg/mL were used for further experiments.

3.5. Production of PGE2

PGE2 production increased when RAW264.7 cells were stimulated with LPS (Figure 6). However, pretreatments with the transgenic rice seed extracts led to the suppression of LPS-induced PGE2 production (Figure 6a). DJ rice seed extracts, treatment with transgenic rice seed extracts led to a markedly higher inhibitory effect on PGE2 production, particularly treatment with sample #8. No significant differences in PGE2 production were observed among the RPMI, DMSO, and DJ groups (Figure 6b). However, compared with the treatment with DJ rice seed extracts, treatment with transgenic rice seed extracts significantly enhanced the production of PGE2 in RAW264.7 cells.

3.6. Phagocytosis Activity

Treatment with LPS significantly increased the phagocytosis activity in RAW264.7 cells. Indeed, phagocytosis activity in the LPS-treated group was increased 2.80-fold compared with that in the nontreated (RPMI) group (Figure 7). Treatment with DJ and transgenic rice seed extracts resulted in the promotion of phagocytosis activity in RAW264.7 cells. Compared with the treatment with DJ rice seed extracts, pretreatment with the transgenic rice seed extracts increased phagocytosis activity in RAW264.7 cells, and the highest increase in activity was observed following treatment with sample #8 (1.62-fold increase).

3.7. Pathway Signaling

To further assess the immunomodulatory effects of the transgenic rice seed extracts, the production of NF-κB- and MAPK-associated proteins was evaluated using a western blot assay. As shown in Figure 8, LPS activated the NF-κB and MAPK pathways via the upregulation of phosphorylated (p)-NF-κB p65, -p38 MAPK, and -JNK. Treatment with transgenic rice seed extracts significantly suppressed the production of LPS-induced phosphorylated proteins in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells (Figure 8a). Moreover, compared with no treatment [nontreated (RPMI) group], treatment with transgenic rice seed extracts promoted the production of p-NF-κB p65, p-p38 MAPK, and p-JNK in RAW264.7 cells without LPS stimulation (Figure 8b). Similar to the effects of LPS, the upregulation of these proteins significantly activated the NF-κB and MAPK pathways. Treatment with sample #8 at 100 µg/mL led to the highest inhibition of p-NF-κB p65, p-p38 MAPK, and p-JNK production in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells and caused the highest increase in the upregulation of these proteins in RAW264.7 cells without LPS treatment.

3.8. LC–MS Analysis

The amount of PPD in the transgenic rice seeds was quantified using LC–MS. The peak at the retention time of 7.344 min was the PPD signal used to identify PPD in the standard chromatogram. The peak at the retention time of 7.334 min was observed in the chromatograms of transgenic rice seed extracts but not in those of DJ extract (Figure 9a). The amount of PPD in the transgenic rice seeds from line #8 was significantly higher than that observed in the other transgenic lines (Figure 9b). The content of PPD in sample #8 was 7.28 ± 0.64 µg/g dry-weight, which was 3-fold higher than that in #595 and approximately 6-fold higher than that in #503, #557, and #564.

4. Discussion

Macrophages play important roles in protecting the body against harmful pathogens by facilitating immune responses [8]. The activation of macrophages is associated with the activation of immune-associated pathways. Activation of the MAPK and NF-κB signaling pathways leads to the production of immune-related cytokines and mediators (e.g., NO, iNOS, COX-2, PGE2, IL-1β, and IL-6) [29,30]. The release of NO directly damages foreign microorganisms [31,32]. IL-1β is secreted by activated macrophages to increase the viability of T cells and antigen-presenting activity [33]. TNF-α is a crucial element in the normal immune responses associated with the pathogenesis of various inflammatory diseases and enhancement of macrophage phagocytosis activity [34,35]. IL-6 promotes the differentiation of T cells and B cells [36] and increases phagocytosis activity [37]. In the present study, compared with no treatment, treatment with PPD-producing transgenic rice seed extracts significantly increased the production of immunomodulatory factors, such as NO (Figure 3), proinflammatory cytokines (Figure 5), and proinflammatory mediators (COX-2 and PGE2; Figure 6b), in RAW264.7 cells. Moreover, treatment with 100 µg/mL of the transgenic rice seed extracts increased phagocytosis activity in RAW264.7 cells (Figure 7). Treatment with transgenic rice seed extracts enhanced the activation of macrophages through the MAPK and NF-κB pathways by increasing the phosphorylation of p38 MAPK, JNK, and NF-κB p65. Shin et al. [38] reported similar results, i.e., that heat-processed ginseng containing ginsenosides activated the MAPK and NF-κB signaling pathways, causing an increase in TNF-α and IL-6 production. Kim and Cho [21] reported that PPD upregulates the production of proinflammatory cytokines by activating the NF-κB and MAPK signaling pathways. In addition, PPD has been shown to affect the innate immune response by increasing the phagocytic uptake of macrophages [21,38].
LPS, which is a component of the outer membrane of gram-negative bacteria, is often used to mimic the inflammatory condition [39,40,41]. LPS triggering the innate immune response is recognized by TLRs. TLR-4 is reportedly an LPS receptor (see the review of Beutler [42]), and several studies have demonstrated that LPS activates the NF-κB and MAPK signaling pathways via TLR-4 [43,44,45]. In the present study, we showed that PPD-producing transgenic rice can suppress the activation of LPS-induced NF-κB and MAPK pathways in RAW264.7 cells. In the transgenic rice seed extract groups, the phosphorylation of NF-κB, p38 MAPK, and JNK was decreased significantly compared with that in the LPS treatment group (Figure 8a). This suppression led to the inhibition of NO (Figure 2) and PGE2 production (Figure 6a) in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells, and the expression levels of immune-related mRNAs (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, iNOS, and COX-2) were also downregulated in the transgenic rice seed extract treatment groups (Figure 4). These results are supported by the findings of Ahmmed et al. [46], who reported that PPD-type ginsenosides reduce NF-κB signaling pathway activity. In addition, Kim et al. [47] demonstrated the protective effects of PPD against LPS-induced inflammation, including the inhibition of NO production and proinflammatory enzyme expression (iNOS and COX-2). Furthermore, PPD treatment has also been shown to reduce the LPS-stimulated mRNA expression levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α by blocking the activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway [48]. Similarly, PPD-enriched red ginseng extracts potently inhibit the mRNA expression of proinflammatory genes and proinflammatory mediator genes without causing cytotoxicity (up to 20 µg/mL) in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells [49]. We found that treatment with sample #8 led to the highest change in immune-boosting effects in RAW264.7 cells and anti-inflammatory effects in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells. This may be attributed to the high amount of PPD produced in transgenic rice line #8 (Figure 9), which was much higher than that produced in other transgenic rice lines. Consequently, the enhancement of immunity in RAW264.7 cells and inhibition of proinflammatory factors during LPS-induced inflammation are considered to be caused by the accumulation of PPD in transgenic rice seeds.

5. Conclusions

Our study demonstrated the anti-inflammatory and immune-boosting effects of PPD-producing transgenic rice seed extracts in RAW264.7 macrophage cells. Transgenic rice seed extracts induced macrophage activation through TLR-4-associated activation of the NF-κB and MAPK pathways in RAW264.7 cells. These activations led to a significant increase in NO production, phagocytosis activity, proinflammatory cytokine expression, and PGE2 production in RAW264.7 cells treated with transgenic rice seed extracts compared with their production in cells treated with normal rice seed extracts (DJ group). Moreover, the LPS-induced activation of the NF-κB and MAPK pathways was suppressed by treatment with the transgenic rice seed extracts. Depending on cell conditions, transgenic rice seeds containing PPD act as both stimulatory and anti-inflammatory agents. We suggest that PPD-producing transgenic rice could be developed and used as an immunomodulation agent following further research.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.-H.B.; methodology, C.M. and J.-S.K.; software, C.M.; validation, C.M., J.-S.K. and S.-H.B.; formal analysis, C.M.; investigation, C.M. and J.-S.K.; resources, S.-H.B.; data curation, C.M.; writing—original draft preparation, C.M.; writing—review and editing, S.-H.B.; visualization, S.-H.B.; supervision, S.-H.B.; project administration, S.-H.B.; funding acquisition, S.-H.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Research Foundation of Korea by the Ministry of Education (2020R1I1A3071908).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the applicable data have been provided in the manuscript. The authors will provide additional details if necessary.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yang, Y.; Chen, J.; Lei, L.; Li, F.; Tang, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, S.; Yin, R.; Ming, J. Acetylation of polysaccharide from Morchella angusticeps peck enhances its immune activation and anti-inflammatory activities in macrophage RAW264.7 cells. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2019, 125, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zhang, W.; Yan, J.; Wu, L.; Yu, Y.; Ye, R.D.; Zhang, Y.; Liang, X. In vitro immunomodulatory effects of human milk oligosaccharides on murine macrophage RAW264.7 cells. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 207, 230–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hirayama, D.; Iida, T.; Nakase, H. The phagocytic function of macrophage-enforcing innate immunity and tissue homeostasis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 19, 92–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Wang, H.; Ma, C.; Sun-Waterhouse, D.; Wang, J.; Neil Waterhouse, G.I.; Kang, W. Immunoregulatory polysaccharides from Apocynum venetum L. flowers stimulate phagocytosis and cytokine expression via activating the NF-κB/MAPK signaling pathways in RAW264.7 cells. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 2022, 11, 806–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lee, J.S.; Kwon, D.S.; Lee, K.R.; Park, J.M.; Ha, S.J.; Hong, E.K. Mechanism of macrophage activation induced by polysaccharide from Cordyceps militaris culture broth. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 120, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chen, F.; Guo, N.; Cao, G.; Zhou, J.; Yuan, Z. Molecular analysis of curcumin-induced polarization of murine RAW264.7 macrophages. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 2014, 63, 544–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Martinez, F.O.; Sica, A.; Mantovani, A.; Locati, M. Macrophage activation and polarization. Front. Biosci. 2008, 13, 453–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Atri, C.; Guerfali, F.Z.; Laouini, D. Role of human macrophage polarization in inflammation during infectious diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1801–1815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Baek, S.H.; Bae, O.F.; Park, J.H.; Park, J.H. Recent methodology in ginseng analysis. J. Ginseng Res. 2012, 36, 119–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Babiker, L.B.; Gadkariem, E.A.; Alashban, R.M.; Aljohar, H.I. Investigation of stability of Korean ginseng in herbal drug product. Am. J. Appl. Sci. 2013, 11, 160–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kim, S.; Lee, Y.; Cho, J. Korean red ginseng extract exhibits neuroprotective effects through inhibition of apoptotic cell death. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2014, 37, 938–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Jegal, J.; Jeong, E.J.; Yang, M.H. A review of the different methods applied in ginsenoside extraction from Panax ginseng and Panax quinquefolius roots. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2019, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Yeo, C.R.; Yong, J.J.; Popovich, D.G. Isolation and characterization of bioactive polyacetylenes Panax ginseng Meyer roots. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2017, 139, 148–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhao, B.; Lv, C.; Lu, J. Natural occurring polysaccharides from Panax ginseng C. A. Meyer: A review of isolation, structures, and bioactivities. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 133, 324–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Parikh, M.; Raj, P.; Yu, L.; Stebbing, J.A.; Prashar, S.; Petkau, J.C.; Tappia, P.S.; Pierce, G.N.; Siow, Y.L.; Brown, D.; et al. Ginseng berry extract rich in phenolic compounds attenuates oxidative stress but not cardiac remodeling post myocardial infarction. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 983–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Dong, H.; Bai, L.P.; Wong, V.K.W.; Zhou, H.; Wang, J.R.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, Z.H.; Liu, L. The in vitro structure-related anti-cancer activity of ginsenosides and their derivatives. Molecules 2011, 16, 10619–10630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Jin, J.; Shahi, S.; Kang, H.K.; van Veen, H.W.; Fan, T.-P. Metabolites of ginsenosides as novel BCRP inhibitors. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2006, 345, 1308–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lee, J.I.; Ha, Y.W.; Choi, T.W.; Kim, H.J.; Kim, S.M.; Jang, H.J.; Choi, J.H.; Choi, M.H.; Chung, B.C.; Sethi, G.; et al. Cellular uptake of ginsenosides in Korean white ginseng and red ginseng and their apoptotic activities in human breast cancer cells. Planta Med. 2011, 77, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Oh, H.A.; Kim, D.E.; Choi, H.J.; Kim, N.J.; Kim, D.H. Anti-stress effects of 20(S)-protopanaxadiol and 20(S)-protopanaxatriol in immobilized mice. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2015, 38, 331–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Cho, J.Y.; Kim, A.R.; Yoo, E.S.; Baik, K.U.; Park, M.H. Ginsenosides from Panax ginseng differentially regulate lymphocyte proliferation. Planta Med. 2002, 68, 497–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kim, M.Y.; Cho, J.Y. 20S-dihydroprotopanaxadiol, a ginsenoside derivative, boosts innate immune responses of monocytes and macrophages. J. Ginseng Res. 2013, 37, 293–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Yang, Y.; Lee, J.; Rhee, M.H.; Yu, T.; Baek, K.S.; Sung, N.Y.; Kim, Y.; Yoon, K.; Kim, J.H.; Kwak, Y.S.; et al. Molecular mechanism of protopanaxadiol saponin fraction-mediated anti-inflammatory actions. J. Ginseng Res. 2015, 39, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Lee, W.M.; Kim, S.D.; Kim, K.S.; Song, Y.B.; Kwak, Y.S.; Cho, J.Y.; Park, H.J.; Oh, J.W.; Rhee, M.H. Protopanaxadiol modulates LPS-induced inflammatory activity in murine macrophage RAW264.7 cells. J. Ginseng Res. 2006, 30, 181–187. [Google Scholar]
  24. Han, J.Y.; Baek, S.H.; Jo, H.J.; Yun, D.W.; Choi, Y.E. Genetically modified rice produces ginsenoside aglycone (protopanaxadiol). Planta 2019, 250, 1103–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Monmai, C.; Jang, A.Y.; Kim, J.E.; Lee, S.M.; You, S.; Kang, S.; Park, W.J. Immunomodulatory activities of body wall fatty acids extracted from Halocynthia aurantium on RAW264.7 cells. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 30, 1927–1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, M.; Tian, X.; Wang, Y.; Wang, D.; Li, W.; Chen, L.; Pan, W.; Mehmood, S.; Chen, Y. Immunomodulating activity of the polysaccharide TLH-3 from Tricholomalobayense in RAW264.7 macrophages. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 107, 2679–2685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, W.; Yang, S.; Kim, S.O.; Reid, G.; Challis, J.R.G.; Bocking, A.D. Lipopolysaccharide-induced profiles of cytokine, chemokine, and growth factors produced by human decidual cells are altered by Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 supernatant. Reprod. Sci. 2014, 21, 939–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Maeshima, N.; Fernandez, R. Recognition of lipid A variants by the TLR4-MD-2 receptor complex. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2013, 3, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Cho, J.W.; Lee, K.S.; Kim, C.W. Curcumin attenuates the expression of IL-1beta, IL-6, and TNF-alpha as well as cyclin E in TNF-alpha-treated HaCaT cells; NF-kappaB and MAPKs as potential upstream targets. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2007, 19, 469–474. [Google Scholar]
  30. Guha, M.; Mackman, N. LPS induction of gene expression in human monocytes. Cell. Signal. 2001, 13, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Olefsky, J.M.; Glass, C.K. Macrophages, inflammation, and insulin resistance. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2010, 72, 219–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Nathan, C.; Shiloh Michael, U. Reactive oxygen and nitrogen intermediates in the relationship between mammalian hosts and microbial pathogens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 8841–8848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Seillet, C.; Belz, G.T.; Mielke, L.A. Complexity of cytokine network regulation of innate lymphoid cells in protective immunity. Cytokine 2014, 70, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Bradley, J.R. TNF-mediated inflammatory disease. J. Pathol. 2008, 214, 149–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jang, D.I.; Lee, A.H.; Shin, H.Y.; Song, H.R.; Park, J.H.; Kang, T.B.; Lee, S.R.; Yang, S.H. The role of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) in autoimmune disease and current TNF-α inhibitors in therapeutics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2719–2734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tanaka, T.; Narazaki, M.; Kishimoto, T. IL-6 in inflammation, immunity, and disease. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2014, 6, a016295–a016309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Geum, N.G.; Son, H.J.; Yu, J.H.; Yeo, J.H.; Choi, M.Y.; Lee, J.W.; Baek, J.K.; Eo, H.J.; Park, G.H.; Jeong, J.B. Kadsura japonica fruits exert immunostimulatory and anti-obesity activity in RAW264.7 and 3T3-L1 cells. Food Agric. Immunol. 2022, 33, 65–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Shin, M.S.; Song, J.H.; Choi, P.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, S.Y.; Shin, K.S.; Ham, J.; Kang, K.S. Stimulation of innate immune function by Panax ginseng after heat processing. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 4652–4659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cheng, D.; Zhu, C.; Liang, Y.; Xing, Y.; Shi, C. MiR-424 overexpression protects alveolar epithelial cells from LPS-induced apoptosis and inflammation by targeting FGF2 via the NF-κB pathway. Life Sci. 2020, 242, 117213–117220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, Y.; Cui, X.L.; Liu, Y.F.; Gao, F.; Wei, D.; Li, X.W.; Wang, H.N.; Tan, Q.R.; Jiang, W. LPS inhibits the effects of fluoxetine on depression-like behavior and hippocampal neurogenesis in rats. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2011, 35, 1831–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ostos, M.A.; Recalde, D.; Zakin, M.M.; Scott-Algara, D. Implication of natural killer T cells in atherosclerosis development during a LPS-induced chronic inflammation. FEBS Lett. 2002, 519, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Beutler, B. Tlr4: Central component of the sole mammalian LPS sensor. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2000, 12, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lu, Y.C.; Yeh, W.C.; Ohashi, P.S. LPS/TLR4 signal transduction pathway. Cytokine 2008, 42, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Grylls, A.; Seidler, K.; Neil, J. Link between microbiota and hypertension: Focus on LPS/TLR4 pathway in endothelial dysfunction and vascular inflammation, and therapeutic implication of probiotics. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 137, 111334–111349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ciesielska, A.; Matyjek, M.; Kwiatkowska, K. TLR4 and CD14 trafficking and its influence on LPS-induced pro-inflammatory signaling. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2021, 78, 1233–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ahmmed, B.; Kampo, S.; Khan, M.; Faqeer, A.; Kumar, S.P.; Yulin, L.; Liu, J.W.; Yan, Q. Rg3 inhibits gemcitabine-induced lung cancer cell invasiveness through ROS-dependent, NF-κB- and HIF-1α-mediated downregulation of PTX3. J. Cell. Physiol. 2019, 234, 10680–10697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kim, J.I.; Narantuya, N.; Choi, Y.W.; Kang, D.O.; Kim, D.W.; Lee, K.; Ko, S.R.; Moon, J.Y. Prototypes of panaxadiol and panaxatriol saponins suppress LPS-mediated iNOS/NO production in RAW264.7 murine macrophage cells. J. Life Sci. 2016, 26, 1422–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Yu, Q.; Zeng, K.W.; Ma, X.L.; Jiang, Y.; Tu, P.F.; Wang, X.M. Ginsenoside Rk1 suppresses pro-inflammatory responses in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated RAW264.7 cells by inhibiting the Jak2/Stat3 pathway. Chin. J. Nat. Med. 2017, 15, 751–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Saba, E.; Jeong, D.; Irfan, M.; Lee, Y.Y.; Park, S.J.; Park, C.K.; Rhee, M.H. Anti-inflammatory activity of Rg3-enriched Korean red ginseng extract in murine model of sepsis. J. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2018, 2018, 6874692–6874703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nutrients 14 04143 g001 550
Figure 1. The calibration curve of PPD over the concentration range of 0.0156–0.50000 ppm.
Figure 1. The calibration curve of PPD over the concentration range of 0.0156–0.50000 ppm.
Nutrients 14 04143 g001
Nutrients 14 04143 g002 550
Figure 2. Effects of transgenic rice seed extracts on LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells. Effects on (a) cell viability and (b) NO production. The concentration of DMSO and aspirin were 0.1% and 200 µg/mL, respectively. Data are presented as means ± standard deviations. Significant differences at p value of <0.05 (*) were determined via comparisons with the RPMI group. Lowercase letters (a, b, c, and d) indicate significant differences at p value of <0.05 among treatments at the same concentration.
Figure 2. Effects of transgenic rice seed extracts on LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells. Effects on (a) cell viability and (b) NO production. The concentration of DMSO and aspirin were 0.1% and 200 µg/mL, respectively. Data are presented as means ± standard deviations. Significant differences at p value of <0.05 (*) were determined via comparisons with the RPMI group. Lowercase letters (a, b, c, and d) indicate significant differences at p value of <0.05 among treatments at the same concentration.
Nutrients 14 04143 g002
Nutrients 14 04143 g003 550
Figure 3. Effects of transgenic rice extracts on RAW264.7 cells without LPS stimulation. Effects on (a) cell viability and (b) NO production. The concentrations of DMSO and LPS were 0.1% and 1 µg/mL, respectively. Data are presented as means ± standard deviations. Significant differences at p value of <0.05 (*) were determined via comparisons with the RPMI group. Lowercase letters (a, b, c, and d) indicate significant differences at p value of <0.05 among treatments at the same concentration.
Figure 3. Effects of transgenic rice extracts on RAW264.7 cells without LPS stimulation. Effects on (a) cell viability and (b) NO production. The concentrations of DMSO and LPS were 0.1% and 1 µg/mL, respectively. Data are presented as means ± standard deviations. Significant differences at p value of <0.05 (*) were determined via comparisons with the RPMI group. Lowercase letters (a, b, c, and d) indicate significant differences at p value of <0.05 among treatments at the same concentration.
Nutrients 14 04143 g003
Nutrients 14 04143 g004 550
Figure 4. Effects of transgenic rice seed extracts on the expression of immune-associated genes in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells. The expression levels of (a) IL-1β, (b) IL-6, (c) COX-2, (d) iNOS, (e) TLR-4, and (f) TNF-α expression levels are shown. The concentrations of DMSO and aspirin were 0.1% and 200 µg/mL, respectively. Data are presented as means ± standard deviations. Lowercase letters (a, b, c, and d) indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 among treatments at the same concentration.
Figure 4. Effects of transgenic rice seed extracts on the expression of immune-associated genes in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells. The expression levels of (a) IL-1β, (b) IL-6, (c) COX-2, (d) iNOS, (e) TLR-4, and (f) TNF-α expression levels are shown. The concentrations of DMSO and aspirin were 0.1% and 200 µg/mL, respectively. Data are presented as means ± standard deviations. Lowercase letters (a, b, c, and d) indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 among treatments at the same concentration.
Nutrients 14 04143 g004
Nutrients 14 04143 g005 550
Figure 5. Effects of transgenic rice seed extracts on the expression of immune-associated genes in RAW264.7 cells without LPS stimulation. The expression levels of (a) IL-1β, (b) IL-6, (c) COX-2, (d) iNOS, (e) TLR-4, and (f) TNF-α expression levels are shown. The concentrations of DMSO and LPS were 0.1% and 1 µg/mL, respectively. Data are presented as means ± standard deviations. Lowercase letters (a, b, c, and d) indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 among treatments at the same concentration.
Figure 5. Effects of transgenic rice seed extracts on the expression of immune-associated genes in RAW264.7 cells without LPS stimulation. The expression levels of (a) IL-1β, (b) IL-6, (c) COX-2, (d) iNOS, (e) TLR-4, and (f) TNF-α expression levels are shown. The concentrations of DMSO and LPS were 0.1% and 1 µg/mL, respectively. Data are presented as means ± standard deviations. Lowercase letters (a, b, c, and d) indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 among treatments at the same concentration.
Nutrients 14 04143 g005
Nutrients 14 04143 g006 550
Figure 6. Effects of transgenic rice seed extracts (100 µg/mL) on PGE2 production. Effects on (a) RAW264.7 cells with LPS stimulation and (b) RAW264.7 cells without LPS stimulation. The concentrations of DMSO and aspirin were 0.1% and 200 µg/mL, respectively. Data are presented as means ± standard deviations. Lowercase letters (a, b, c, d, e, f, and g) indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 among the treatments.
Figure 6. Effects of transgenic rice seed extracts (100 µg/mL) on PGE2 production. Effects on (a) RAW264.7 cells with LPS stimulation and (b) RAW264.7 cells without LPS stimulation. The concentrations of DMSO and aspirin were 0.1% and 200 µg/mL, respectively. Data are presented as means ± standard deviations. Lowercase letters (a, b, c, d, e, f, and g) indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 among the treatments.
Nutrients 14 04143 g006
Nutrients 14 04143 g007 550
Figure 7. Effects of transgenic rice seed extracts (100 µg/mL) on phagocytosis activity in RAW264.7 cells. The concentrations of DMSO and LPS were 0.1% and 1 µg/mL, respectively. Data are presented as means ± standard deviations. Lowercase letters (a, b, c, d, and e) indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 among the treatments.
Figure 7. Effects of transgenic rice seed extracts (100 µg/mL) on phagocytosis activity in RAW264.7 cells. The concentrations of DMSO and LPS were 0.1% and 1 µg/mL, respectively. Data are presented as means ± standard deviations. Lowercase letters (a, b, c, d, and e) indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 among the treatments.
Nutrients 14 04143 g007
Nutrients 14 04143 g008 550
Figure 8. Effects of transgenic rice seed extracts (100 µg/mL) on the activation of the NF-κB and MAPK signaling pathways. Effects on (a) LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells and (b) RAW264.7 cells without LPS stimulation. The concentrations of DMSO and LPS were 0.1% and 1 µg/mL, respectively. Data are presented as means ± standard deviations. Lowercase letters (a, b, c, d, e, f, and g) indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 among the treatments.
Figure 8. Effects of transgenic rice seed extracts (100 µg/mL) on the activation of the NF-κB and MAPK signaling pathways. Effects on (a) LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells and (b) RAW264.7 cells without LPS stimulation. The concentrations of DMSO and LPS were 0.1% and 1 µg/mL, respectively. Data are presented as means ± standard deviations. Lowercase letters (a, b, c, d, e, f, and g) indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 among the treatments.
Nutrients 14 04143 g008
Nutrients 14 04143 g009 550
Figure 9. PPD production in the transgenic rice seed extracts. (a) Representation of the MS chromatograms of PPD detected in transgenic rice seed extracts (the Y axis of sample #8 is ×100,000, whereas the Y axes of the other samples are ×10,000). (b) The amount of PPD in each transgenic rice line. Data are presented as means ± standard deviations. Lowercase letters (a, b, c, and d) indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 among the treatments.
Figure 9. PPD production in the transgenic rice seed extracts. (a) Representation of the MS chromatograms of PPD detected in transgenic rice seed extracts (the Y axis of sample #8 is ×100,000, whereas the Y axes of the other samples are ×10,000). (b) The amount of PPD in each transgenic rice line. Data are presented as means ± standard deviations. Lowercase letters (a, b, c, and d) indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 among the treatments.
Nutrients 14 04143 g009
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Monmai, C.; Kim, J.-S.; Baek, S.-H. Transgenic Rice Seed Extracts Exert Immunomodulatory Effects by Modulating Immune-Related Biomarkers in RAW264.7 Macrophage Cells. Nutrients 2022, 14, 4143. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14194143

AMA Style

Monmai C, Kim J-S, Baek S-H. Transgenic Rice Seed Extracts Exert Immunomodulatory Effects by Modulating Immune-Related Biomarkers in RAW264.7 Macrophage Cells. Nutrients. 2022; 14(19):4143. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14194143

Chicago/Turabian Style

Monmai, Chaiwat, Jin-Suk Kim, and So-Hyeon Baek. 2022. "Transgenic Rice Seed Extracts Exert Immunomodulatory Effects by Modulating Immune-Related Biomarkers in RAW264.7 Macrophage Cells" Nutrients 14, no. 19: 4143. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14194143

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop