Next Article in Journal
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Fasting and Lifestyle Modification in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome: Effects on Patient-Reported Outcomes
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring the Potential of Human Milk and Formula Milk on Infants’ Gut and Health
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Use of Probiotics Combined with Exercise Affects Thiol/Disulfide Homeostasis, an Oxidative Stress Parameter

by
Yıldırım Kayacan
1,
Aybike Zeynep Kola
1,
Stefano Guandalini
2,*,
Hayrullah Yazar
3 and
Mehtap Ünlü Söğüt
4
1
Faculty of Yasar Dogu Sports Sciences, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun 55139, Turkey
2
Pediatrics-Gastroenterology, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
3
Department of Medical Biochemistry, Sakarya University Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya 54050, Turkey
4
Faculty of Health Sciences Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun 55139, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2022, 14(17), 3555; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14173555
Submission received: 26 July 2022 / Revised: 22 August 2022 / Accepted: 26 August 2022 / Published: 29 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Prebiotics and Probiotics)

Abstract

:
Background: Intestinal microbiota play a role in the health and performance of athletes, and can be influenced by probiotics. Thus, in this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of the use of probiotics combined with chronic exercise on the thiol/disulfide homeostasis, a novel marker of oxidative stress. Methods: Male Wistar rats were randomly divided into four groups: control (Cn), exercise (Ex), probiotics (P), and probiotics + exercise (PEx). A capsule containing 6 × 108 CFU of L. rhamnosus, L. paracasei, L. acidophilus, and B. lactis was given daily for eight weeks to all the experimental animals. The total thiol (TT, μmol/L) and native thiol (NT, μmol/L) concentrations were measured to determine the oxidative stress parameters. The dynamic disulfide (DD, %), reduced thiol (RT, %), oxidized thiol (OT, %), and thiol oxidation reduction (TOR, %) ratios were analyzed. Results: The TT level was found to be significantly higher in the Ex group (p = 0.047, η2 = 0.259). The DD level, a marker of oxidation, was significantly lower in the PEx group (p = 0.042, η2 = 0.266); the highest value of this parameter was found in the Ex group. The use of probiotics alone had no effect on thiol/disulfide homeostasis. Conclusions: We showed, for the first time, that probiotics administered “with exercise” decreased dynamic disulfide and significantly reduced oxidative damage. Therefore, we speculate that the use of probiotics in sports involving intense exercise might be beneficial to reduce oxidative stress.

1. Introduction

Intestinal microbiota are very important to the health and performance of athletes. Today, there is evidence-based information that indicates intestinal microbiota are regulated by various environmental conditions (nutrition, stress, mode of delivery, etc.), including exercise [1]. Intestinal microbiota are composed of about 1014 microorganisms and various disorders are known to affect the intestinal microorganism balance [2]. Probiotics are recommended to prevent or reverse such changes.
Probiotics are live microorganisms that have a positive effect on a host when given in sufficient amounts [3]. It has been reported that Lactobacillus group bacteria possess antioxidant effects; Lactobacillus fermentum strains, which have antioxidant properties, in fact, cause the release of manganese superoxide dismutase (Mn-SOD) which is an important defense tool in the prevention of lipid peroxidation, and contain significant levels of glutathione [4].
Microbiota may also positively affect exercise performance. In fact, it has been reported that, in athletes, healthy microbiota positively affect critically important metabolic parameters such as energy metabolism, oxidative stress, and hydration status [5]. Additionally, it has been reported that healthy microbiota have curative effects on the immune system suppression that athletes often experience due to strenuous and long-term exercise [6]. In recent years, new studies have been conducted on the importance of gut microbiota in controlling oxidative stress and inflammatory response in athletes, and their key roles in exercise metabolism and energy use [7,8].
Thiol groups are organic, essential, and powerful antioxidant molecules that contain the sulfhydryl (-SH) group which defends organisms against the destructive effects of oxidative stress. High-intensity exercises induce high oxygen consumption, especially in skeletal muscles. With an increase in metabolic activity during exercise, oxygen activity also increases. As a result, reactive oxygen species (ROS) are released. Long-term, high-intensity exercises lead to an excessive increase in blood and skeletal muscle oxidative stress, resulting in the breakdown of macromolecules [9,10]. Thiols can enter oxidation reactions via oxidants and cause disulfide formation. When oxidative stress is increased, oxidation of cysteine residues can lead to the formation of disulfides. However, this process is always reversible. Disulfide bonds can also be reduced in thiol groups, thus, resulting in thiol/disulfide homeostasis. Dynamic thiol/disulfide homeostasis plays important roles in cell signaling mechanisms, transcription factors, enzymatic regulation, activation, apoptosis and signal transduction, antioxidant protection, and detoxification [11].
In our previous studies, we determined the effects of exercise and supplement use on the thiol-disulfide balance [10,12]. We hypothesized that, in order to reduce the oxidative damage induced by exercise, the use of probiotics might beneficially affect the microbiota, and thus, control inflammation and redox levels in rats that exercise. In this context, for this study, we formed the following hypotheses: (1) Chronic intense exercise affects redox metabolism. (2) Probiotics are effective in reducing oxidative stress. (3) The use of probiotics combined with exercise positively affects the thiol-disulfide balance. This study was designed with the aim of examining these hypotheses and analyzing the emerging relationships.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals

The experimental protocol was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee (no. 2016/36). A total of 32 male albino Wistar rats, weighing from 180 to 200 g and 12 weeks old, were kept under standard environmental conditions for temperature (21.5 °C) and humidity (60 § 1%) and on a 12:12 h light/dark cycle. The rats were kept in a well-ventilated room and allowed free access to a standard pellet diet along with water ad libitum. The rats were randomly divided into four groups: control (Cn), exercise (Ex), probiotics (P), and probiotics + exercise (PEx) groups. The research protocol is schematically reported in Figure 1.

2.2. Probiotic Administration Protocol

A pool of probiotics that included L. rhamnosus, L. paracasei, L. acidophilus, and B. lactis (Solgar, NJ, USA) were given for eight weeks daily (6 × 108 CFU of each strain, final concentration of 1.8 × 109 CFU of bacteria). Prior to gavage, the probiotics were diluted in 1 mL of sterile water [13]. This product was chosen because it contains important and major phyla of intestinal microbiota, it possesses a high number of microorganisms per tablet, and it is standardized.

2.3. Exercise Protocol

Exercise and the administration of probiotics were performed 5 day/week for 8 weeks. The Conformite Europeene (CE)-certified four-lane animal treadmill (May Time 0804, Animal Treadmill) with adjustable settings for rate, distance, running time, speed, and inclination, and a built-in memory to store data was used for the exercise experiments. To avoid any stress that may have arisen during physical exercise, all rats were preliminarily subjected to a conditioning exercise series at the lowest speed in 5-min sessions for 10 d. After the treadmill adaptation period, the control group rats were put in cages with the standard conditions until surgery, whereas the exercised groups continued to be trained according to the treadmill exercise protocol. The exercise workload consisted of running at a speed of 2 m/min for the first 5 min, 5 m/min for the next 5 min, and then 8 m/min for the last 20 min, with a 0° angle inclination.

2.4. Biochemical Parameters

At the end of the experiment, the rats in all groups were starved overnight for 12 h, and sacrificed under ketamine hydrochloride (10 mg/kg intraperitoneally) anesthesia. Blood from the heart was collected after entering the abdominal and thoracic cavities, into biochemistry tubes using 10 mL syringes (5 mL). The samples were centrifuged (1500 g for 10 min) after waiting 30 min. Subsequently, the separated serums were stored in tubes with Eppendorf (Isolab centrifuge tubes 2.0 mL, flat cap, without skirt) with −80° cap. The samples were transferred to the laboratory with a dry ice system at 24 h before the working day. The incoming samples were again microcentrifuged, and the test parameters were studied in Rel Assay Diagnostics kits. The biochemical analysis of this study was also performed at the Research Hospital Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory (Beckman Coulter, fully automated chemistry analyzer AU 680, serial number 2016024580, made in Japan). In this study, dynamic thiol/disulfide homeostasis in the serum samples of rats was identified by using an automated method developed by Erel and Neselioglu [14].

2.5. Thiol/Disulfide Analyses

2.5.1. Precision

Three levels of plasma pools were tested to determine the precision of the new test. The plasma pool that had high disulfide levels was obtained from the samples of patients with diabetes mellitus. The plasma pool with medium disulfide levels was obtained from the samples of healthy persons. The plasma pool with low disulfide levels was obtained from the samples of patients with urinary bladder cancer. The percentage coefficient variation (%CV) was 4 ( X ¯ = 29.12 and σX = 1.2) for high levels, 5 ( X ¯ = 16.03 and σX = 0.79) for medium levels, and 13 ( X ¯ = 7.15 and σX = 0.98) for low levels.
Total thiol (–SH + –S–S–) and native thiol (–SH) concentrations in the samples were measured by using Ellmann’s and modified Ellmann’s reagent. The native thiol content was subtracted from the total thiol content, and half of this difference gave the amount of dynamic disulfide bonds (–S–S–). In addition, the (–S–S–) × 100/(–SH), (–S–S–) × 100/(–SH + –S–S–), and –SH × 100/(–SH + –S–S–) ratios were calculated using these parameters.

2.5.2. Analytical Recovery

The percentage of recovery of the novel method was determined via the addition of 200 μM oxidized glutathione to plasma samples. The mean percent recovery was 98–101%.

2.5.3. Linearity

The linearity of the native thiol measurement was the same as that of the Ellman’s reagent assay. Serial dilutions of the glutathione solution were generated. The upper limit of the linearity for the native thiol measurement was 4000 μM. Linearity of the total thiol measurement was also dependent on the amounts of NaBH4 and formaldehyde concentrations. Serial dilutions of the oxidized glutathione solution were also generated. The upper limit of the linearity for the disulfide measurement was 2000 μM. Dilution of plasma samples did not affect the novel assay.

2.5.4. Lower Detection Limit

The detection limit of the assay was determined by evaluating the zero calibrator 10 times. The detection limit, defined as the mean value of zero calibrator + 3 standard deviations (SD), was 2.8 μM.

2.5.5. Analytical Sensitivity

As the slope of the calibration line, analytical sensitivity was found to be 7.9 × 10−4 absorbance/amount, (A × (μM) −1).

2.5.6. Interference

It was found that hemoglobin, EDTA, citrate, and oxalate did not interfere with the assay developed, but bilirubin did negatively interfere with the assay. Lipaemic and uraemic plasma samples did not interfere with the assay. The plasma and serum samples could be used as samples.

2.5.7. Storage

Storage at 4 °C for 1 day led to a 7% decrease in the native thiol amount and 170% increase in the disulfide amount (total thiol, native thiol, and disulfide levels of fresh and stored plasma samples were 391 μmol/L, 357 μmol/L, 17 μmol/L (fresh) and 391 μmol/L, 333 μmol/L, 29 μmol/L (stored), respectively). Plasma native thiol, total thiol, and disulfide concentrations were not affected by storage at −80 °C for 3 months.

2.6. Statistical Analyses

All results are presented as the means ± standard error of the mean (SEM). The statistical analyses were performed using SPSS ver. 21.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The normality of the data was tested before the analyses. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD post hoc tests were performed for normal distribution data. The Eta squared (η2) formula was used to calculate the effect size. (η2 = SS between/SS total). For all statistical tests, p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

3. Results

There were no statistical differences found among the groups in NT (η2 = 0.228), RT (η2 = 0.129), OT (η2 = 0.187), and TOR (η2 = 0.074) levels. However, it was determined that treadmill exercise (Ex) significantly increased the total thiol (TT) values in rats as compared with the PEx group (η2 = 0.259, p = 0.047, PEx 490.14 ± 17.87 vs. Ex 569.29 ± 19.753 μmol/L, Table 1 and Figure 2). The highest rate of oxidized thiol was observed in the PEx group (TOR 19.29 ± 0.286%). However, despite this finding, the dynamic disulfide value, which has been accepted as an important indicator of oxidation, was also detected in the lowest PEx group (η2 = 0.266, p = 0.042, 706.29 ± 28.052%). This value was highest in the Ex group (829.43 ± 32.162%, Figure 3). Descriptive statistical findings and significance levels of the groups are given in Table 1.
Descriptive statistical findings and significance levels of native thiol (NT), total thiol (TT), dynamic disulfide (DD), RT, oxide thiol (OT), and TOR values of the groups are indicated. The highest serum DD, OT, NT, and TT values were observed in the Ex group. These parameters were detected at the lowest level in the PEx group.

4. Discussion

In this study, the effect of probiotic supplementation on thiol/disulfide homeostasis was investigated in rats that were subjected to chronic treadmill exercise for 8 weeks. Although the effect of probiotics on oxidative stress has been investigated in studies in humans and animals [15,16], no other study was found that investigated the effect of multi-strain probiotics (1.25 billion × 4 varieties, 5 billion live microorganisms in total) on oxidative stress caused by chronic exercise. We believe that this study will contribute to research on the use of probiotics in the redox mechanism.

4.1. The Use of Probiotics Alone Did Not Affect Oxidative Stress

In our study, the use of probiotics alone did not have a significant effect on oxidative stress. Nevertheless, probiotics have been clinically proven to be beneficial in chronic diseases such as gastrointestinal disorders, autoimmune diseases, obesity, insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease [17,18,19]. These effects are achieved through alternative pathways, possibly including the displacement of other microorganisms due to a competitive environment created by probiotics [20]. In addition, it has been reported that probiotics function as protective agents against oxidative stress such as lactoperoxidase, suppressing bacterial infections by reducing intestinal pH, producing some digestive enzymes and vitamins, and producing antibacterial substances such as hydrogen peroxide, diacetyl, acetaldehyde, and lactoperoxidase [21]. The findings in different studies have shown that the use of probiotics improves antioxidant capacity in humans and experimental animals [21,22]. However, in this study, it was determined that the use of probiotics alone did not have a positive effect on oxidative stress. It has been reported in the literature that factors such as the strain used, duration of use, gender, and disease level play roles in the effect of probiotics on oxidative stress [23,24]. Thus, in spite of a commonly held opinion that probiotics exert positive effects on antioxidant levels, we think that their effects detected on thiol/disulfide homeostasis may well be due to the other factors, as mentioned above.

4.2. The Use of Probiotics Combined with Exercise Reduced Oxidative Stress

In the present study, we showed that chronic exercise combined with the use of probiotics significantly reduced oxidative stress. Our findings, therefore, open the way to further research on the role of probiotics in ameliorating athletes’ response profiles to oxidative stress. Although it has been stated that athletes will be more exposed to the risk of exercise-induced free radical flow, especially with increased intensity and duration [25,26,27], different studies have shown that people who exercise regularly and athletes adapt to such a program over time and are more resistant to oxidative damage [28,29]. As a general principle, antioxidant enzyme activity increases significantly in humans and in rats who exercise regularly. An increase in antioxidant activity also responds by preventing lipid peroxidation caused by increased oxidative stress induced by exercise [30]. In addition, individuals who exercise regularly have an additional advantage over sedentary people. In fact, training supports the development of the activity of many major antioxidant enzymes and the general antioxidant level [31]. An increase in antioxidant activity also responds by preventing lipid peroxidation, a marker of exercise-induced oxidative stress [30]. Several published investigations support the findings of our study. For example, Martarelli et al. investigated the effects of Lactobacillus rhamnosus IMC 501 and Lactobacillus paracasei IMC 502 probiotic strains on oxidative stress in athletes during 4 weeks of intense training (~109 cfu per day). As a result of the study, it was determined that these probiotic strains neutralized reactive oxygen types [32]. In a study by Michalickova et al., Lactobacillus helveticus was given to elite athletes (cyclists and endurance athletes) for 3 months and oxidative markers were evaluated. These authors showed that this probiotic had an antioxidant effect and reduced oxidative stress [33]. Similarly, in a study by Lamprecht et al., 23 athletes were given multi-strain probiotics (Enterococcus faecium, Lactobacillus, and Bifidobacterium strains) and intense exercise was applied for 14 weeks. The probiotics reduced intestinal permeability and positively affected exercise-induced protein oxidation [34]. In a state of chronic exercise metabolism, the maximal metabolic rate can reach 20 times higher than normal [35]. However, the metabolizing properties of probiotics also differ [36]. We interpret our findings to imply that the administration of the probiotic preparation utilized positively affected the exercise, thus, leading to the superior effects seen in the probiotics + exercise group.

5. Conclusions

In the present study, the effects of combining exercise and multi-strain probiotics were investigated, for the first time, on thiol/disulfide homeostasis as an oxidative stress parameter. We showed that the probiotics alone did not affect oxidative stress, but when used together with exercise, they significantly supported antioxidant capacity. As stated above, the opinion that the use of probiotics has a positive effect on antioxidant capacity contradicts the findings obtained in the group using only probiotics in our study. Considering that the composition of the gut microbiota of specific probiotic strains can affect gut neuro-motor function in different ways, it is thought that different types of probiotics may cause different physiological and biological responses. Thus, we believe that the types of probiotics we used in our study have the potential to be effective in reducing the damage that occurs at the cellular level, and therefore, to be possibly used to support athletes in sports that require intense and endurance training.

Author Contributions

Y.K. and A.Z.K. created the idea of the manuscript; Y.K., A.Z.K., H.Y. and M.Ü.S. worked on the statistical approach; Y.K. and A.Z.K. provided the data of the measurements; Y.K., H.Y., A.Z.K., S.G. and M.Ü.S. analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript; Y.K., S.G., H.Y. and A.Z.K. edited and revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This research was reviewed and approved by the local Animal Ethics Committee (no. 2016/36). The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

List of Abbreviations

CEConformite Europeene
CnControl
CVCoefficient variation
DDDynamic disulfide
ExExercise
Mn-SODManganese superoxide dismutase
NTNative thiol
OTOxidized-thiol
PProbiotic
PExProbiotic + exercise
ROSReactive oxygen species
RTReduced thiol
SEMStandard error of the mean
SHSulfhydryl
TORThiol oxidation reduction
TTTotal thiol
η2Eta Squared

References

  1. Carey, R.A.; Montag, D. Exploring the relationship between gut microbiota and exercise: Short-chain fatty acids and their role in metabolism. BMJ Open Sport Exerc. Med. 2021, 7, e000930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gill, H.S.; Guarner, F. Probiotics and human health: A clinical perspective. Postgrad. Med. J. 2004, 80, 516–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Li, C.; Niu, Z.; Zou, M.; Liu, S.; Wang, M.; Gu, X.; Lu, H.; Tian, H.; Jha, R. Corrigendum to “Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics regulate the intestinal microbiota differentially and restore the relative abundance of specific gut microorganisms”. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103, 5816–5829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhang, Z.; Fan, S.-T.; Huang, D.; Xiong, T.; Nie, S.; Xie, M.-Y. Polysaccharides from fermented Asparagus officinalis with Lactobacillus plantarum NCU116 alleviated liver injury via modulation of glutathione homeostasis, bile acid metabolism, and SCFA production. Food Funct. 2020, 11, 7681–7695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hughes, R.L.; Holscher, H.D. Fueling Gut Microbes: A Review of the Interaction between Diet, Exercise, and the Gut Microbiota in Athletes. Adv. Nutr. Int. Rev. J. 2021, 12, 2190–2215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Riazi-Rad, F.; Behrouzi, A.; Mazaheri, H.; Katebi, A.; Ajdary, S. Impact of gut microbiota on immune system. Acta Microbiol. Immunol. Hung. 2021, 68, 135–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Ma, F.; Sun, M.; Song, Y.; Xu, D.; Mu, G.; Tuo, Y. Lactobacillus plantarum Y44 alleviates oxidative stress by regulating gut microbiota and colonic barrier function in Balb/C mice with subcutaneous d-galactose injection. Food Funct. 2020, 12, 373–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wu, M.; Luo, Q.; Nie, R.; Yang, X.; Tang, Z.; Chen, H. Potential implications of polyphenols on aging considering oxidative stress, inflammation, autophagy, and gut microbiota. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 61, 2175–2193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kayacan, Y.; Çetinkaya, A.; Yazar, H.; Makaracı, Y. Oxidative stress response to different exercise intensity with an automated assay: Thiol/disulphide homeostasis. Arch. Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 127, 504–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kayacan, Y.; Yazar, H.; Cerit, G.; Ghojebeigloo, B.E. A new oxidative stress indicator: Effect of 5-hydroxytryptophan on thiol-disulfide homeostasis in exercise. Nutrition 2019, 63–64, 114–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Eren, M.A.; Koyuncu, I.; Incebıyık, H.; Karakaş, H.; Erel, Ö.; Sabuncu, T. The evaluation of thiol/disulphide homeostasis in diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2019, 148, 249–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kayacan, Y.; Yazar, H.; Kisa, E.C.; Ghojebeigloo, B.E. A novel biomarker explaining the role of oxidative stress in exercise and l-tyrosine supplementation: Thiol/disulphide homeostasis. Arch. Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 124, 232–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Bagarolli, R.A.; Tobar, N.; Oliveira, A.G.; Araújo, T.G.; Carvalho, B.M.; Rocha, G.Z.; Vecina, J.F.; Calisto, K.; Guadagnini, D.; Prada, P.D.O.; et al. Probiotics modulate gut microbiota and improve insulin sensitivity in DIO mice. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2017, 50, 16–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Erel, O.; Neselioglu, S. A novel and automated assay for thiol/disulphide homeostasis. Clin. Biochem. 2014, 47, 326–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Asemi, Z.; Zare, Z.; Shakeri, H.; Sabihi, S.-S.; Esmaillzadeh, A. Effect of Multispecies Probiotic Supplements on Metabolic Profiles, hs-CRP, and Oxidative Stress in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2013, 63, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Mehrabadi, S.; Sadr, S.S. Assessment of Probiotics Mixture on Memory Function, Inflammation Markers, and Oxidative Stress in an Alzheimer’s Disease Model of Rats. Iran. Biomed. J. 2020, 24, 220–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Alipour, B.; Homayouni-Rad, A.; Vaghef-Mehrabany, E.; Sharif, S.K.; Vaghef-Mehrabany, L.; Asghari-Jafarabadi, M.; Nakhjavani, M.R.; Mohtadi-Nia, J. Effects ofLactobacillus caseisupplementation on disease activity and inflammatory cytokines in rheumatoid arthritis patients: A randomized double-blind clinical trial. Int. J. Rheum. Dis. 2014, 17, 519–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sáez-Lara, M.J.; Robles-Sanchez, C.; Ruiz-Ojeda, F.J.; Plaza-Diaz, J.; Gil, A. Effects of Probiotics and Synbiotics on Obesity, Insulin Resistance Syndrome, Type 2 Diabetes and Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Review of Human Clinical Trials. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zuccotti, G.; Meneghin, F.; Raimondi, C.; Dilillo, D.; Agostoni, C.; Riva, E.; Giovannini, M. Probiotics in Clinical Practice: An Overview. J. Int. Med. Res. 2008, 36, 1A–53A. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mishra, V.; Prasad, D. Application of in vitro methods for selection of Lactobacillus casei strains as potential probiotics. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2005, 103, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kullisaar, T.; Zilmer, M.; Mikelsaar, M.; Vihalemm, T.; Annuk, H.; Kairane, C.; Kilk, A. Two antioxidative lactobacilli strains as promising probiotics. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2002, 72, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, B.-G.; Xu, H.-B.; Xu, F.; Zeng, Z.-L.; Wei, H. Efficacy of oral Bifidobacterium bifidum ATCC 29521 on microflora and antioxidant in mice. Can. J. Microbiol. 2016, 62, 249–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Akkasheh, G.; Kashani-Poor, Z.; Tajabadi-Ebrahimi, M.; Jafari, P.; Akbari, H.; Taghizadeh, M.; Memarzadeh, M.R.; Asemi, Z.; Esmaillzadeh, A. Clinical and metabolic response to probiotic administration in patients with major depressive disorder: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Nutrition 2016, 32, 315–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zamani, B.; Sheikhi, A.; Namazi, N.; Larijani, B.; Azadbakht, L. The Effects of Supplementation with Probiotic on Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress in Adult Subjects: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2020, 12, 102–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Avloniti, A.; Chatzinikolaou, A.; Deli, C.K.; Vlachopoulos, D.; Gracia-Marco, L.; Leontsini, D.; Draganidis, D.; Jamurtas, A.Z.; Mastorakos, G.; Fatouros, I.G. Exercise-Induced Oxidative Stress Responses in the Pediatric Population. Antioxidants 2017, 6, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Paschalis, V.; Theodorou, A.A.; Margaritelis, N.V.; Kyparos, A.; Nikolaidis, M.G. N-acetylcysteine supplementation increases exercise performance and reduces oxidative stress only in individuals with low levels of glutathione. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2018, 115, 288–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Safdar, A.; Annis, S.; Kraytsberg, Y.; Laverack, C.; Saleem, A.; Popadin, K.; Woods, D.C.; Tilly, J.L.; Khrapko, K. Amelioration of premature aging in mtDNA mutator mouse by exercise: The interplay of oxidative stress, PGC-1α, p53, and DNA damage. A hypothesis. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2016, 38, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Evans, L.W.; Omaye, S.T. Use of Saliva Biomarkers to Monitor Efficacy of Vitamin C in Exercise-Induced Oxidative Stress. Antioxidants 2017, 6, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Radak, Z.; Taylor, A.W.; Ohno, H.; Goto, S. Adaptation to exercise-induced oxidative stress: From muscle to brain. Exerc. Immunol. Rev. 2001, 7, 90–107. [Google Scholar]
  30. Zwetsloot, K.A.; Nieman, D.C.; Knab, A.; John, C.S.; Lomiwes, D.D.; Hurst, R.D.; Gillitt, N.D.; Lila, M.A. Effect of 4 weeks of high-intensity interval training on exercise performance and markers of inflammation and oxidative stress. FASEB J. 2017, 31, 839-1. [Google Scholar]
  31. Radak, Z.; Ishihara, K.; Tekus, E.; Varga, C.; Posa, A.; Balogh, L.; Boldogh, I.; Koltai, E. Exercise, oxidants, and antioxidants change the shape of the bell-shaped hormesis curve. Redox Biol. 2017, 12, 285–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Martarelli, D.; Verdenelli, M.C.; Scuri, S.; Cocchioni, M.; Silvi, S.; Cecchini, C.; Pompei, P. Effect of a Probiotic Intake on Oxidant and Antioxidant Parameters in Plasma of Athletes During Intense Exercise Training. Curr. Microbiol. 2011, 62, 1689–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Michalickova, D.; Kotur-Stevuljevic, J.; Miljkovic, M.; Dikic, N.; Kostic-Vucicevic, M.; Andjelkovic, M.; Koricanac, V.; Djordjevic, B. Effects of Probiotic Supplementation on Selected Parameters of Blood Prooxidant-Antioxidant Balance in Elite Athletes: A Double-Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study. J. Hum. Kinet. 2018, 64, 111–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lamprecht, M.; Bogner, S.; Schippinger, G.; Steinbauer, K.; Fankhauser, F.; Hallstroem, S.; Schuetz, B.; Greilberger, J.F. Probiotic supplementation affects markers of intestinal barrier, oxidation, and inflammation in trained men; a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. J. Int. Soc. Sports Nutr. 2012, 9, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Weibel, E.R.; Hoppeler, H. Exercise-induced maximal metabolic rate scales with muscle aerobic capacity. J. Exp. Biol. 2005, 208, 1635–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Østlie, H.M.; Helland, M.H.; Narvhus, J.A. Growth and metabolism of selected strains of probiotic bacteria in milk. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2003, 87, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Experimental protocol of the study.
Figure 1. Experimental protocol of the study.
Nutrients 14 03555 g001
Figure 2. Total thiol levels. The total thiol level was found to be significantly higher in the EX group as compared with in the PEx group. The use of probiotics alone did not have any effect on the total thiol level.
Figure 2. Total thiol levels. The total thiol level was found to be significantly higher in the EX group as compared with in the PEx group. The use of probiotics alone did not have any effect on the total thiol level.
Nutrients 14 03555 g002
Figure 3. Dynamic disulfide levels. The dynamic disulfide level, which is considered to be an important indicator of oxidation, was found to be significantly lower in the PEx group as compared with in the Ex group. In addition, it was observed that the use of probiotics alone did not have any effect on cellular oxidation.
Figure 3. Dynamic disulfide levels. The dynamic disulfide level, which is considered to be an important indicator of oxidation, was found to be significantly lower in the PEx group as compared with in the Ex group. In addition, it was observed that the use of probiotics alone did not have any effect on cellular oxidation.
Nutrients 14 03555 g003
Table 1. Findings of the thiol/disulfide parameters of the groups.
Table 1. Findings of the thiol/disulfide parameters of the groups.
ParametersGroupMeanStd.D.SEMEta Squared (η2)P
NT
(μmol/L)
Cn147.8613.1714.9780.228NS
Ex154.579.9473.760
P150.4317.5876.647
PEx137.0010.8934.117
TT
(μmol/L)
Cn539.2945.47417.1880.2590.047
Ex569.2952.26119.753
P548.8665.16224.629
PEx490.1447.29117.874
DD
(%)
Cn782.8665.52224.7650.2660.042
Ex829.4385.09432.162
P796.8696.02036.292
PEx706.2974.22028.052
RT
(%)
Cn27.430.5350.2020.129NS
Ex27.140.9000.340
P27.430.9760.369
PEx28.001.0000.378
OT
(%)
Cn145.141.2150.4590.187NS
Ex145.711.8900.714
P145.001.2910.488
PEx143.861.5740.595
TOR
(%)
Cn18.860.6900.2610.074NS
Ex18.860.6900.261
P18.860.6900.261
PEx19.290.7560.286
Eta Squared (η2) = small, 0.01; medium, 0.059; large, 0.138.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kayacan, Y.; Kola, A.Z.; Guandalini, S.; Yazar, H.; Söğüt, M.Ü. The Use of Probiotics Combined with Exercise Affects Thiol/Disulfide Homeostasis, an Oxidative Stress Parameter. Nutrients 2022, 14, 3555. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14173555

AMA Style

Kayacan Y, Kola AZ, Guandalini S, Yazar H, Söğüt MÜ. The Use of Probiotics Combined with Exercise Affects Thiol/Disulfide Homeostasis, an Oxidative Stress Parameter. Nutrients. 2022; 14(17):3555. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14173555

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kayacan, Yıldırım, Aybike Zeynep Kola, Stefano Guandalini, Hayrullah Yazar, and Mehtap Ünlü Söğüt. 2022. "The Use of Probiotics Combined with Exercise Affects Thiol/Disulfide Homeostasis, an Oxidative Stress Parameter" Nutrients 14, no. 17: 3555. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14173555

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop