Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Nutrition-Based Interventions on Nutritional Status and Metabolic Health in Small Island Developing States: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis
Next Article in Special Issue
The Role of Dietary Patterns and Dietary Quality on Body Composition of Adolescents in Chinese College
Previous Article in Journal
Comparison between the Choices Five-Level Criteria and Nutri-Score: Alignment with the Dutch Food-Based Dietary Guidelines
Previous Article in Special Issue
Meeting 24-Hour Movement and Dietary Guidelines: Prevalence, Correlates and Association with Weight Status among Children and Adolescents: A National Cross-Sectional Study in China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Does a Healthy Lifestyle Lower the Elevated Risk of Obesity Caused by Caesarian Section Delivery in Children and Adolescents?

1
Guangzhou First People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510180, China
2
Department of Microbiology, Sun Yat-sen University Zhongshan School of Medicine, Guangzhou 510080, China
3
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
4
School of Public Health & Institute of Child and Adolescent Health, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
5
Key Laboratory of Molecular Epidemiology of Hunan Province, School of Medicine, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2022, 14(17), 3528; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14173528
Submission received: 25 July 2022 / Revised: 20 August 2022 / Accepted: 23 August 2022 / Published: 26 August 2022

Abstract

:
Background: Both caesarean section (CS) and lifestyle were linked with child adiposity. This study aimed to investigate whether CS delivery is linked with elevated risk of child adiposity regardless of a healthy lifestyle. Methods: All the subjects in this study came from a baseline survey of a national school-based program on healthy lifestyle interventions against adiposity among Chinese children and adolescents. A questionnaire was used to collect the information on delivery mode and lifestyle. According to the weighted lifestyle score, subjects were categorized into healthy, intermediate, and unhealthy lifestyle. Results: A total of 44,961 children aged 6–18 years were enrolled in the current study. Overall, 41.9% (18,855/44,961) of children were delivered by CS. Compared with children delivered by vaginal delivery, children delivered by CS had a higher adiposity risk (OR = 1.56; 95%CI: 1.46–1.66; p < 0.001) after adjustment for age, sex, region, mother adiposity, ethnicity, and weighted lifestyle factors. Compared with children with a healthy lifestyle, children with an unhealthy lifestyle had a higher risk of child adiposity (OR = 1.31; 95%CI: 1.19–1.44). Children delivered by CS who had an unhealthy lifestyle had a 106% higher (OR = 2.06; 95%CI: 1.79–2.37) risk of child adiposity compared with children delivered by vaginal delivery who had a healthy lifestyle. However, keeping a healthy lifestyle in later life seems not to offset the increased risk of child adiposity caused by CS (OR = 1.59; 95%CI: 1.39–1.82). Conclusions: Both CS and unhealthy lifestyle were linked with child adiposity risk. Keeping a healthy lifestyle did not counteract the elevated risk of child adiposity caused by CS.

1. Introduction

Caesarean sections (CS) are the most frequently performed surgeries among women, and CS rates are increasing in most countries across the world [1,2,3,4]. In view of the World Health Organization statement in 1985 that “regional CS rates should not exceed 10~15%”, the CS rates are too high in the majority of countries or regions. Latest data (2010–2018) from 154 countries covering 94.5% of global live births show that 21.1% of women delivered by CS worldwide, but the prevalence differs between different countries and regions [4]. The CS rate is less than 3% in western Africa; however, CS rates are especially high in many countries and regions, such as the Dominican Republic (56.4%), and Brazil (55.6%). The CS rates are about 25% to 35% in many European countries, New Zealand, and the United States [2]. In China, the CS rate was 36.2% in 2011 [2].
Undoubtedly, CS is a life-saving surgical procedure that has dramatically decreased maternal and neonatal mortality rates during the 20th century [5]. Despite this clearly positive effect, the rapid increase in CS rates worldwide has become a growing public health challenge [6,7]. Previously, a meta-analysis showed that children delivered by CS had a significantly elevated 29% risk of child adiposity, even after adjusting for maternal pre-pregnancy weight [8].
Child obesity has become a major general health problem around the world, notably in developing and poor nations [9]. In the United States, adiposity prevalence among children and adolescents was 16.9% (95%CI, 14.9–19.2%) [10]. A national large-scale epidemiological survey showed that the overweight and obesity rate of Chinese students aged 7–18 years was 20.4% [11]. Childhood obesity has a documented adverse effect on physical and mental health [12]. Childhood obesity is more likely to lead to non-communicable diseases at a more youthful age [13,14,15,16]. A previous study conducted by our research group found that students with obesity were associated with an 86% higher risk of IFG [16].
Apart from CS being associated with childhood obesity, it has been documented that lifestyle is associated with childhood obesity. Keeping a healthy lifestyle meant a lower childhood obesity risk [17,18,19]. Currently, several research studies have integrated diet, sleeping, physical activity, and screen time to compute a lifestyle score to determine the effect of lifestyle on health outcomes [20]. In addition, factors generally do not lead to adiposity alone, they work together complexly, interact, or have combined effects to affect the risk of adiposity. Thus, we speculated that the elevated childhood obesity risk caused by CS might be counteracted by keeping a healthy lifestyle.
Therefore, the current study aimed to determine the hypothesis that keeping a healthy lifestyle may counteract the elevated childhood obesity risk caused by CS, based on the baseline survey data from a nationwide school-based project on healthy lifestyle interventions against obesity in Chinese children aged 6–18 years.

2. Materials and Methods

All the participants in this study were selected from a baseline survey of a nationwide school-based project on healthy lifestyle interventions against obesity in Chinese children. The Ethical Committee of the Peking University Medical Science Center had approved this project (IRB00001052-13034), and all the participants and their parents provided informed consents voluntarily.

2.1. Participants

The baseline survey of the nationwide school-based project on healthy lifestyle interventions against obesity in Chinese children aged 6–18 years was carried out in 2013. The survey involved more than 65,347 students aged 6–18 years from seven provinces or municipalities (Tianjin, Shanghai, Chongqing, Ningxia, Guangdong, Hunan, and Liaoning). A multistage sampling method was used to select the participants. About 12–16 primary and secondary schools, with a total of about 10,000 students aged 6–18 years, were enrolled in each province or municipality. The design details have been specified in a previous publication [21]. In the current study, we included 44,961 participants aged 6–18 years with complete data in the final analysis, after excluding 12,349 students without delivery mode data, 2324 students without BMI data, 3947 students with premature delivery, and 1766 students with inconsistent delivery mode between baseline and 6 months’ follow-up.

2.2. Data Collection and Questionnaire Survey

Data on students were collected by a standard questionnaire completed by students and one of their guardians. Information on common food intake, sleep, physical activity, and screen time was reported by the students themselves. Nevertheless, demographic information, feeding, parental education level, delivery mode, birth weight, gestation age, family history of obesity, and parent BMI were reported by their parents.
The intake of food, such as vegetables, fruits, meats, milk, sugar-sweetened drinks, fried foods, and desserts, was collected from students using a 7-day food frequency questionnaire. The average intake of a food over the past week was calculated by the number of days multiplied by the number of servings per day and then divided by 7 [22]. The Global Physical Activity Questionnaire was used to assess each respondent’s level of physical activity [23].

2.3. Anthropological Measurements

Height and weight were determined by trained investigators following a standardized procedure. A portable stadiometer (model TZG, Bengbu, China) was used to assess the height, and a lever-type weight scale (model RGT-140, Bengbu, China) was used to measure the body weight.

2.4. Definition of Obesity

The obesity of students aged 6–18 years was defined by the Chinese body mass index (BMI) percentile criterion. BMI ≥ 95th percentile was used as the cut-off for determining obesity [24]. Mother obesity was defined based on maternal BMI at the time of the survey. BMI ≥ 28.0 kg/m2 was used as the cut-off for determining obesity.

2.5. Delivery Mode

The information on delivery mode was obtained through a guardian questionnaire. Of these, 81.1% of guardians reported delivery mode of their baby based on the medical certificate of birth. For those without a birth certificate, we required their guardians to report the delivery mode of their baby. In addition, we repeated this survey six months later and observed that the difference in delivery mode between the two surveys was less than 10%. After excluding the students with inconsistent information for reported delivery mode, all the students were classified into CS and vaginal delivery.

2.6. Healthy Lifestyle Score

Four main obesity-related factors (diet, physical activity, sleeping, and screen time) were used to calculate a healthy lifestyle score [25,26,27]. These obesity-related factors were collected from a baseline survey using a standardized questionnaire. Sleep duration was defined as adequate sleep and inadequate sleep according to the Notice of the Chinese General Office of the Ministry of Education on Further Strengthening the Sleep Management of Primary and Middle School Students. The detailed method of healthy lifestyle score calculation has been described in our previous study [28]. Briefly, the weighted standardized lifestyle score was categorized as healthy, intermediate, and unhealthy lifestyle based on the distribution of the unweighted lifestyle score [29].

2.7. Statistical Analysis

IBM SPSS Statistics version 25.0 and S-PLUS 8.0 were used to perform all the analyses. Continuous variables were shown as mean and standard deviation (SD), and categorical variables were shown as numbers and percentages. The distribution difference of categorical variables between participants delivered by CS and participants delivered by vaginal delivery was compared by the Chi-square test. The associations of delivery mode with obesity risk, lifestyle with obesity risk, and the combination of delivery mode and lifestyle with obesity risk in children aged 6–18 years were evaluated by the binary logistic regression model. In all models, we adjusted for age, sex, region, ethnicity, and mother adiposity. Moreover, the effect-measure modification analysis was performed to evaluate the potential protective role of lifestyle on the effect of CS on childhood obesity with interaction on an additive scale using the S-PLUS 8.0 [30]. A 2-sided p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

The characteristics of participants are showed in Table 1. A total of 44,961 students were enrolled into the current study, including 18,855 (41.9%) students delivered by CS and 26,106 (58.1%) students delivered by vaginal delivery. The mean age was younger in students delivered by CS than that in students delivered by vaginal delivery (9.8 vs. 11.2 years; p < 0.001). The distribution was significantly different for sex, region, nationality, healthy diet, regular physical activity, regular screen time, adequate sleep time, the number of healthy lifestyle factors, and mother adiposity between students delivered by CS and students delivered by vaginal delivery (p < 0.05). Moreover, students delivered by CS had a higher adiposity prevalence than that of those delivered by vaginal delivery (14.8% vs. 8.9%; p < 0.001). Only 2.7% of students kept 4 healthy lifestyle factors, 25.6% of students kept 1 of 4 healthy lifestyle factors, and 45.4% of students kept 2 of 4 healthy lifestyle factors. Most of the students (62.1%) kept an intermediate lifestyle (weighted lifestyle scores ranging 46.7–88.0), 23.7% of students kept an unhealthy lifestyle (weighted lifestyle scores ranging 0–46.6), and only 14.2% of students kept a healthy lifestyle (weighted lifestyle scores ranging 88–100).
As shown in Table 2, compared with students delivered by vaginal delivery, students delivered by CS had a higher childhood adiposity risk (OR = 1.56; 95%CI: 1.47–1.67; p < 0.001) after adjustment for mother adiposity, age, sex, region, and ethnicity. Further adjustment for weighted lifestyle did not affect the associations (OR = 1.56; 95%CI: 1.46–1.66; p < 0.001). After stratification by age group, we observed similar associations.
Table 3 shows the association of lifestyle with obesity risk in children and adolescents. Compared with students keeping a healthy lifestyle, students keeping an unhealthy lifestyle had a substantially elevated risk of childhood obesity (OR = 1.30; 95%CI: 1.18–1.43; p < 0.001) after adjustment for potential confounders. Further adjustment of delivery mode resulted in an OR of 1.31 (95%CI: 1.19–1.44; p < 0.001). Additionally, stratification by age group did not modify the association in children aged 6–12 years.
When lifestyle groups and delivery mode were merged, there was a monotonic association between progressively unhealthy lifestyle factors and delivery mode (Figure 1). Compared with students delivered by vaginal delivery who kept a healthy lifestyle, students delivered by CS who kept an unhealthy lifestyle had a markedly enhanced obesity risk (OR = 2.06; 95%CI: 1.79–2.37; p < 0.001) in childhood and adolescence. Keeping a healthy lifestyle appears to lower the degree of the enhanced risk of obesity caused by CS but might not offset the enhanced risk of obesity caused by CS (OR= 1.59; 95%CI: 1.39–1.82). Moreover, we did not observe a significant interaction between lifestyle and delivery mode (Pinteraction = 0.254), which suggested that the association of lifestyle with obesity risk was similar on the basis of delivery mode.
The association between lifestyle and risk of childhood obesity stratified by delivery mode is shown in Table 4. Among students delivered by vaginal delivery, both students with a healthy (OR = 0.76; 95%CI: 0.66–0.87; p < 0.001) and an intermediate lifestyle (OR = 0.79; 95%CI: 0.71–0.88; p < 0.001) had a lower risk of obesity than students with an unhealthy lifestyle. Among students delivered by CS, compared with students with an unhealthy lifestyle, both students with a healthy (OR = 0.77; 95%CI: 0.67–0.88; p < 0.001) and an intermediate (OR = 0.82; 95%CI: 0.74–0.92; p = 0.001) lifestyle also had a significantly lower risk of childhood obesity. We furthermore performed effect-measure modification analysis to evaluate the potential protective role of lifestyle on the effect of CS on childhood obesity and found no interaction on an additive scale (Relative Excess Risk due to Interaction, RERI = 0.18; 95%CI: −0.12, 0.49) (Table S1).

4. Discussion

This study used the baseline survey data of a nationwide school-based program on healthy lifestyle interventions against childhood obesity and found that both delivery mode and lifestyle were markedly linked with risk of obesity in students aged 6–18 years. Students delivered by CS who maintained an unhealthy lifestyle had a higher risk of childhood obesity than those delivered by vaginal delivery who maintained a healthy lifestyle. We did not observe an interaction between delivery mode and lifestyle, and CS is associated with a higher risk of childhood obesity regardless of lifestyle.
China has one of the highest CS rates in the world. In this study, we observed that the prevalence of CS in Chinese children aged 6–18 years is 41.9% (18,855/44,961), which was lower than that reported in Shanghai, China. Liu M and his colleagues used the 40,621 live births recorded between 2012 to 2014 and found that the CS rate was 45.1% in Eastern Branch of Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital [31]. We speculated that the difference of the birth year and region might explain the divergence. The mean birth year of children in this study was 10 years earlier than that in Liu’s study. Moreover, the current study selected subjects from seven provinces across mainland China; however, Liu’s study just selected subjects from Shanghai based on a hospital. Thus, the CS rates reported in this study might be closer to the general CS rates in mainland China.
The increased risk of CS on childhood adiposity was similar to that found in a previous cohort study, which used the New Zealand birth cohort and found that planned CS was significantly associated with childhood adiposity (RR = 1.59; 95%CI 1.09–2.33) [32]. Although many previous studies have found that healthy lifestyle had a protective effect on childhood obesity risk [19,33,34], few studies determined the association between lifestyle and childhood obesity by a merged weighted lifestyle category. In the current study, we merged four main lifestyle factors linked with childhood obesity and computed a weighted score and observed that students who maintained an unhealthy lifestyle had 31% higher childhood obesity risk than those who maintained a healthy lifestyle. These findings suggested that maintaining an unhealthy lifestyle may elevate childhood obesity risk.
To our knowledge, few studies have explored the association between merged delivery mode and lifestyle and risk of obesity in children and adolescents. Fang and his colleagues explored the association between merged polygenic risk score and lifestyle and childhood obesity risk and observed that children with high polygenic risk who maintained a healthy lifestyle had an 85% lower obesity risk than those with high polygenetic risk score who maintained an unhealthy lifestyle [35]. Nevertheless, whether a healthy lifestyle could offset the elevated childhood adiposity risk of CS was unknown. In this research, we used the baseline survey data of a large-scale national sample to investigate the association between CS and lifestyle and the risk of childhood obesity.
The current research observed that CS significantly elevated the childhood obesity risk, but the elevated obesity risk might not be counteracted by a healthy lifestyle. Compared with children delivered by vaginal delivery, children delivered by CS had a 56% increased risk of childhood adiposity. Notably, if these children maintained a healthy lifestyle, they would reduce their risk of childhood adiposity by 23%, compared with those who maintained an unhealthy lifestyle. These findings suggested that the elevated risk of childhood adiposity caused by CS could be partly counteracted by a healthy lifestyle. It is a pity that children delivered by CS who maintained a healthy lifestyle still had a substantially elevated risk of childhood adiposity compared with children delivered by vaginal delivery who maintained a healthy lifestyle (OR = 1.59; 95%CI: 1.39–1.82). This finding indicated that the elevated risk of childhood adiposity caused by CS could not be counteracted by a healthy lifestyle. These results suggest that CS is an independent factor of childhood obesity.
Although the current research utilized baseline survey data of a large-scale national school-based program on healthy lifestyle interventions against childhood obesity and found that the increased risk caused by CS could not be counteracted by a healthy lifestyle in childhood, several limitations of the current study should be mentioned below. Firstly, the association found in the current study was from a cross-sectional survey, which might limit us in making a causality. Nevertheless, the CS is an inherent factor of participants. Accordingly, we can make causal inferences between CS and childhood adiposity risk. Secondly, the data of delivery mode were retrospectively obtained from guardians of students. Consequently, the association in the current study might be caused by the existence of information bias. However, delivery mode was obtained mainly from their medical certificate of birth. Moreover, we also excluded participants with inconsistent self-reported delivery mode between baseline and 6 months’ follow-up surveys. Thirdly, though we adjusted for numerous potential confounders, the unmeasured confounders and modifiers remain. Fourthly, all the lifestyle factors in this study were acquired through a questionnaire. Thus, recall bias possibly persisted and resulted in non-differential misclassification, which would cause these associations toward the null hypothesis. Fifthly, seasonal variations in dietary consumption may occur because we have just collected information about dietary consumption in the previous week. Finally, the association observed in this study has not been repeated in other independent samples.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, the current research utilized baseline survey data of a nationwide school-based program on healthy lifestyle interventions against childhood obesity and found that CS and unhealthy lifestyle were markedly linked with the risk of obesity in children and adolescents aged 6–18 years. However, the increased risk caused by CS could not be counteracted by a healthy lifestyle in childhood.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nu14173528/s1, Table S1: Output of logistic regression model with delivery mode and lifestyle as dichotomous determinants and product of delivery and lifestyle entered into the model. Outcome is obesity.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.L., Z.-Y.Z. and J.M.; Formal analysis, R.L., Z.-H.W., Y.-H.D. and Y.-D.Y.; Methodology, R.L., Z.-H.W. and Y.-H.D.; Supervision, J.M.; Writing—original draft, R.L., Z.-H.W., Z.-Y.Z. and Y.-H.D.; Writing—review and editing, Z.-H.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was funded by the Research Special Fund for Public Welfare Industry of Health (grant number 201202010) and Guangzhou Municipal Science and Technology Bureau (202201011070).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The Ethical Committee of the Peking University Medical Science Center approved this project (IRB00001052-13034), and all the participants and their guardians provided informed consent voluntarily.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Acknowledgments

The authors greatly appreciate the educational administration leadership and primary and middle school health nurses. The authors would additionally acknowledge all participants and investigators for their cooperation and efforts.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  1. Betran, A.P.; Merialdi, M.; Lauer, J.A.; Bing-Shun, W.; Thomas, J.; Van Look, P.; Wagner, M. Rates of caesarean section: Analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 2007, 21, 98–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Betran, A.P.; Ye, J.; Moller, A.B.; Zhang, J.; Gulmezoglu, A.M.; Torloni, M.R. The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990–2014. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0148343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Boerma, T.; Ronsmans, C.; Melesse, D.Y.; Barros, A.J.D.; Barros, F.C.; Juan, L.; Moller, A.B.; Say, L.; Hosseinpoor, A.R.; Yi, M.; et al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet 2018, 392, 1341–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Betran, A.P.; Ye, J.; Moller, A.B.; Souza, J.P.; Zhang, J. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: Global and regional estimates. BMJ Glob. Health 2021, 6, e005671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Todman, D. A history of caesarean section: From ancient world to the modern era. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2007, 47, 357–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Panda, S.; Begley, C.; Daly, D. Clinicians’ views of factors influencing decision-making for caesarean section: A systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0200941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Saeed, K.B.; Greene, R.A.; Corcoran, P.; O’Neill, S.M. Incidence of surgical site infection following caesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. BMJ Open 2017, 7, e013037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kuhle, S.; Tong, O.S.; Woolcott, C.G. Association between caesarean section and childhood obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2015, 16, 295–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ng, M.; Fleming, T.; Robinson, M.; Thomson, B.; Graetz, N.; Margono, C.; Mullany, E.C.; Biryukov, S.; Abbafati, C.; Abera, S.F.; et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980–2013: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2014, 384, 766–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ogden, C.L.; Carroll, M.D.; Kit, B.K.; Flegal, K.M. Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011–2012. JAMA 2014, 311, 806–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Dong, Y.; Lau, P.W.C.; Dong, B.; Zou, Z.; Yang, Y.; Wen, B.; Ma, Y.; Hu, P.; Song, Y.; Ma, J.; et al. Trends in physical fitness, growth, and nutritional status of Chinese children and adolescents: A retrospective analysis of 1.5 million students from six successive national surveys between 1985 and 2014. Lancet Child Adolesc. Health 2019, 3, 871–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sahoo, K.; Sahoo, B.; Choudhury, A.K.; Sofi, N.Y.; Kumar, R.; Bhadoria, A.S. Childhood obesity: Causes and consequences. J. Fam. Med. Prim. Care 2015, 4, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. McCrindle, B.W. Cardiovascular consequences of childhood obesity. Can. J. Cardiol 2015, 31, 124–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sanders, R.H.; Han, A.; Baker, J.S.; Cobley, S. Childhood obesity and its physical and psychological co-morbidities: A systematic review of Australian children and adolescents. Eur. J. Pediatrics 2015, 174, 715–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Praveen, P.A.; Tandon, N. Childhood obesity and type 2 diabetes in India. WHO South-East Asia J. Public Health 2016, 5, 17–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, Z.; Zou, Z.; Wang, H.; Jing, J.; Luo, J.; Zhang, X.; Luo, C.; Zhao, H.; Pan, D.; Ma, J.; et al. Prevalence and risk factors of impaired fasting glucose and diabetes among Chinese children and adolescents: A national observational study. Br. J. Nutr 2018, 120, 813–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, L.; Shen, T.; Wen, L.M.; Wu, M.; He, P.; Wang, Y.; Qu, W.; Tan, H.; He, G. Lifestyle factors associated with childhood obesity: A cross-sectional study in Shanghai, China. BMC Res. Notes 2015, 8, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Felso, R.; Lohner, S.; Hollody, K.; Erhardt, E.; Molnar, D. Relationship between sleep duration and childhood obesity: Systematic review including the potential underlying mechanisms. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2017, 27, 751–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ojeda-Rodriguez, A.; Zazpe, I.; Morell-Azanza, L.; Chueca, M.J.; Azcona-Sanjulian, M.C.; Marti, A. Improved Diet Quality and Nutrient Adequacy in Children and Adolescents with Abdominal Obesity after a Lifestyle Intervention. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bawaked, R.A.; Fernandez-Barres, S.; Navarrete-Munoz, E.M.; Gonzalez-Palacios, S.; Guxens, M.; Irizar, A.; Lertxundi, A.; Sunyer, J.; Vioque, J.; Schroder, H.; et al. Impact of lifestyle behaviors in early childhood on obesity and cardiometabolic risk in children: Results from the Spanish INMA birth cohort study. Pediatric Obes. 2020, 15, e12590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Dong, Y.; Zou, Z.; Yang, Z.; Wang, Z.; Jing, J.; Luo, J.; Zhang, X.; Luo, C.; Wang, H.; Zhao, H.; et al. Association between high birth weight and hypertension in children and adolescents: A cross-sectional study in China. J. Hum. Hypertens. 2017, 31, 737–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Rehm, C.D.; Penalvo, J.L.; Afshin, A.; Mozaffarian, D. Dietary Intake Among US Adults, 1999–2012. JAMA 2016, 315, 2542–2553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Craig, C.L.; Marshall, A.L.; Sjostrom, M.; Bauman, A.E.; Booth, M.L.; Ainsworth, B.E.; Pratt, M.; Ekelund, U.; Yngve, A.; Sallis, J.F.; et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2003, 35, 1381–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ji, C.; Working Group on Obesity in China. Report on childhood obesity in China (1)—Body mass index reference for screening overweight and obesity in Chinese school-age children. Biomed. Environ. Sci. 2005, 18, 390–400. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Liberali, R.; Kupek, E.; Assis, M.A.A. Dietary Patterns and Childhood Obesity Risk: A Systematic Review. Child. Obes. 2020, 16, 70–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Salvo, D.; Ranjit, N.; Nielsen, A.; Akhavan, N.; van den Berg, A. Characterizing Micro-scale Disparities in Childhood Obesity: Examining the Influence of Multilevel Factors on 4-Year Changes in BMI, Healthy Eating, and Physical Activity, Among a Cohort of Children Residing in Disadvantaged Urban Enclaves. Front. Public Health 2019, 7, 301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Parkes, A.; Green, M.; Pearce, A. Do bedroom screens and the mealtime environment shape different trajectories of child overweight and obesity? Research using the Growing Up in Scotland study. Int. J. Obes. (Lond.) 2020, 44, 790–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, Z.; Zou, Z.; Dong, Y.; Xu, R.; Yang, Y.; Ma, J. A Healthy Lifestyle Offsets the Increased Risk of Childhood Obesity Caused by High Birth Weight: Results From a Large-Scale Cross-Sectional Study. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 736900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jiao, L.; Mitrou, P.N.; Reedy, J.; Graubard, B.I.; Hollenbeck, A.R.; Schatzkin, A.; Stolzenberg-Solomon, R. A combined healthy lifestyle score and risk of pancreatic cancer in a large cohort study. Arch. Intern. Med. 2009, 169, 764–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Knol, M.; van der Tweel, I.; Grobbee, D.E.; Numans, M.E.; Geerlings, M.I. Estimating interaction on an additive scale between continuous determinants in a logistic regression model. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2007, 36, 1111–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Liu, M.; Xue, M.; Yang, Q.; Du, W.; Yan, X.; Tan, J.; Duan, T.; Hua, J. Association between migration status and caesarean section delivery based on a modified Robson classification in China. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021, 21, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Masukume, G.; McCarthy, F.P.; Russell, J.; Baker, P.N.; Kenny, L.C.; Morton, S.M.; Khashan, A.S. Caesarean section delivery and childhood obesity: Evidence from the growing up in New Zealand cohort. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2019, 73, 1063–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Pham, T.T.P.; Matsushita, Y.; Dinh, L.T.K.; Do, T.V.; Nguyen, T.T.T.; Bui, A.T.; Nguyen, A.Q.; Kajio, H. Prevalence and associated factors of overweight and obesity among schoolchildren in Hanoi, Vietnam. BMC Public Health 2019, 19, 1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. An, R. Diet quality and physical activity in relation to childhood obesity. Int. J. Adolesc. Med. Health 2017, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Fang, J.; Gong, C.; Wan, Y.; Xu, Y.; Tao, F.; Sun, Y. Polygenic risk, adherence to a healthy lifestyle, and childhood obesity. Pediatric Obes. 2019, 14, e12489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Risk of obesity according to delivery mode and lifestyle in children and adolescents aged 6–18 years.
Figure 1. Risk of obesity according to delivery mode and lifestyle in children and adolescents aged 6–18 years.
Nutrients 14 03528 g001
Table 1. Basic characteristics of study population in a study of the association between delivery and lifestyle with obesity in children and adolescents aged 6–18 years.
Table 1. Basic characteristics of study population in a study of the association between delivery and lifestyle with obesity in children and adolescents aged 6–18 years.
CharacteristicNo. (%)
Total (n = 44,961)CS Delivery (n = 18,855)Vaginal Delivery (n = 26,106)p-Value
Age, mean (SD), years10.6 (3.2)9.8 (3.0)11.2 (3.2)<0.001
Sex <0.001
 Male22,580 (50.2)9826 (52.1)12,754 (48.9)
 Female22,381 (49.8)9029 (47.9)13,352 (51.1)
Region <0.001
 Rural25,135 (55.9)8728 (46.3)16,407 (62.8)
 Urban19,826 (44.1)10,127 (53.7)9699 (37.2)
Nationality <0.001
 Han40,873 (90.9)17,279 (91.6)23,594 (90.4)
 Others4088 (9.1)1576 (8.4)2512 (9.6)
Healthy lifestyle factors
 Healthy diet13,993 (31.1)5551 (29.4)8442 (32.3)<0.001
 Regular physical activity25,671 (57.1)10,297 (54.6)15,374 (58.9)<0.001
 Regular screen time33,090 (73.6)14,351 (76.1)18,739 (71.8)<0.001
 Adequate sleep14,730 (32.8)6743 (35.8)7987 (30.6)<0.001
No. of healthy lifestyle factors 0.038
 01724 (3.8)712 (3.8)1012 (3.9)
 111,524 (25.6)4698 (24.9)6826 (26.1)
 220,397 (45.4)8615 (45.7)11,782 (45.1)
 310,098 (22.5)4306 (22.8)5792 (22.2)
 41218 (2.7)524 (2.8)694 (2.7)
Adiposity <0.001
 No39,865 (88.7)16,073 (85.2)23,792 (91.1)
 Yes5096 (11.3)2782 (14.8)2314 (8.9)
Mother adiposity <0.001
 No43,178 (96.0)25,224 (96.6)17,954 (95.2)
 Yes1783 (4.0)882 (3.4)901 (4.8)
Abbreviations: CS, Caesarean section; SD, standard deviation; No., number.
Table 2. Association between delivery mode and obesity in children and adolescents aged 6–18 years.
Table 2. Association between delivery mode and obesity in children and adolescents aged 6–18 years.
GroupnModel 1 aModel 2 b
CS Deliveryp ValueCS Deliveryp Value
Total44,9611.56 (1.47–1.67)<0.0011.56 (1.46–1.66)<0.001
Age group
6–12 years30,9171.57 (1.46–1.68)<0.0011.56 (1.45–1.67)<0.001
13–15 years97021.86 (1.59–2.16)<0.0011.86 (1.60–2.17)<0.001
16–18 years43421.41 (1.10–1.80)0.0071.42 (1.11–1.81)0.006
Abbreviations: CS, Caesarean section; Ref., reference; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. a Binary logistic regression model adjusted for age, sex, region, mother adiposity, and ethnicity. b Binary logistic regression model adjusted for model 1 and weighted lifestyle factors.
Table 3. Association between lifestyle and obesity in children and adolescents aged 6–18 years.
Table 3. Association between lifestyle and obesity in children and adolescents aged 6–18 years.
Healthy Lifestyle CategoryModel 1 aModel 2 b
HealthyIntermediateUnhealthyHealthyIntermediateUnhealthy
Total1 [Ref.]1.06 (0.99–1.15)1.30 (1.18–1.43)1 [Ref.]1.06 (0.98–1.14)1.31 (1.19–1.44)
p value 0.106<0.001 0.147<0.001
p value for trend<0.001<0.001
Age group
6–12 years1 [Ref.]1.07 (0.97–1.17)1.32 (1.18–1.48)1 [Ref.]1.06 (0.96–1.16)1.32 (1.18–1.48)
p value 0.172<0.001 0.243<0.001
p value for trend<0.001<0.001
13–15 years1 [Ref.]1.02 (0.85–1.21)1.04 (0.82–1.31)1 [Ref.]1.01 (0.85–1.21)1.07 (0.85–1.36)
p value 0.8750.761 0.8870.558
p value for trend0.3970.526
16–18 years1 [Ref.]0.93 (0.74–1.26)1.23 (0.87–1.75)1 [Ref.]0.96 (0.74–1.26)1.27 (0.89–1.81)
p value 0.7820.242 0.7830.181
p value for trend0.3790.003
Abbreviations: Ref., reference; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. a Binary logistic regression model adjusted for age, sex, region, mother adiposity, and ethnicity. b Binary logistic regression model adjusted for model 1 and delivery mode.
Table 4. Risk of obesity according to healthy lifestyle category within delivery mode in children and adolescents aged 6–18 years.
Table 4. Risk of obesity according to healthy lifestyle category within delivery mode in children and adolescents aged 6–18 years.
Healthy Lifestyle CategoryVaginal DeliveryCS Delivery
HealthyIntermediateUnhealthyHealthyIntermediateUnhealthy
Total0.76 (0.66–0.87)0.79 (0.71–0.88)1 [Ref.]0.77 (0.67–0.88)0.82 (0.74–0.92)1 [Ref.]
p value<0.001<0.001 0.001<0.001
p value for trend<0.001<0.001
Age group
6–12 years0.78 (0.66–0.92)0.78 (0.69–0.89)1 [Ref.]0.75 (0.65–0.88)0.82 (0.73–0.93)1 [Ref.]
p value<0.0010.004 <0.0010.002
p value for trend0.002<0.001
13–15 years0.77 (0.57–1.05)0.89 (0.69–1.15)1 [Ref.]1.23 (0.84–1.82)1.05 (0.74–1.48)1 [Ref.]
p value0.0950.377 0.2790.789
p value for trend0.026<0.001
16–18 years0.80 (0.53–1.21)0.72 (0.50–1.04)1 [Ref.]0.76 (0.37–1.53)0.82 (0.43–1.56)1 [Ref.]
p value0.2930.082 0.6430.824
p value for trend0.4110.466
Abbreviations: CS, Caesarean section; Ref., reference; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lian, R.; Wang, Z.-H.; Zou, Z.-Y.; Dong, Y.-H.; Yang, Y.-D.; Ma, J. Does a Healthy Lifestyle Lower the Elevated Risk of Obesity Caused by Caesarian Section Delivery in Children and Adolescents? Nutrients 2022, 14, 3528. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14173528

AMA Style

Lian R, Wang Z-H, Zou Z-Y, Dong Y-H, Yang Y-D, Ma J. Does a Healthy Lifestyle Lower the Elevated Risk of Obesity Caused by Caesarian Section Delivery in Children and Adolescents? Nutrients. 2022; 14(17):3528. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14173528

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lian, Rong, Zheng-He Wang, Zhi-Yong Zou, Yan-Hui Dong, Yi-De Yang, and Jun Ma. 2022. "Does a Healthy Lifestyle Lower the Elevated Risk of Obesity Caused by Caesarian Section Delivery in Children and Adolescents?" Nutrients 14, no. 17: 3528. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14173528

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop