Next Article in Journal
Free Zinc as a Predictive Marker for COVID-19 Mortality Risk
Previous Article in Journal
Development of the Gastrointestinal Tract in Newborns as a Challenge for an Appropriate Nutrition: A Narrative Review
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 14
Issue 7
10.3390/nu14071406
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Low-Carbohydrate Diets and Mortality in Older Asian People: A 15-Year Follow-Up from a Prospective Cohort Study

by
Ce Sun
1,
Wei-Sen Zhang
2,
Chao-Qiang Jiang
2,
Ya-Li Jin
2,
Xue-Qing Deng
1,
Jean Woo
3,
Kar-Keung Cheng
4,
Tai-Hing Lam
2,5,
G. Neil Thomas
4,* and
Lin Xu
1,4,5,*
1
School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
2
Guangzhou Twelfth People’s Hospital, Guangzhou 510620, China
3
Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
4
Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
5
School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2022, 14(7), 1406; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14071406
Submission received: 3 February 2022 / Revised: 21 March 2022 / Accepted: 23 March 2022 / Published: 28 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Carbohydrates)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The long-term effects of a low-carbohydrate diet (LCD) on mortality, accounting for the quality and source of the carbohydrate, are unclear. Hence, we examined the associations of LCDs with all-cause and cause-specific mortality in a prospective cohort study. A total of 20,206 participants (13.8% diabetes) aged 50+ years were included. Overall, vegetable-based and meat-based LCD scores were calculated based on the percentage of energy as total and subtypes of carbohydrates, fat, and protein. Cox regression analysis was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). During 294,848 person-years of follow-up, 4624 deaths occurred, including 3661 and 963 deaths in participants without and with diabetes, respectively. In all participants, overall LCD score was not associated with all-cause and cause-specific mortality, after multivariable adjustment. However, for the highest versus the lowest quartiles of vegetable-based LCD, the adjusted HRs (95%CIs) of all-cause and CVD mortality were 1.16 (1.05–1.27) and 1.39 (1.19–1.62), respectively. The corresponding values for highest versus lowest quartiles of meat-based LCD for all-cause and CVD mortality were 0.89 (0.81–0.97) and 0.81 (0.70–0.93), respectively. Similar associations were found in participants without diabetes. In patients with diabetes, the adjusted HR (95%CI) of CVD mortality for the highest versus the lowest quartiles of vegetable-based LCD was 1.54 (1.11–2.14). Although there were no significant associations with overall LCD score, we found that the vegetable-based LCD score was positively, whereas the meat-based LCD score was negatively, associated with all-cause and CVD mortality in older Asian people.

1. Introduction

The primary source of energy from food worldwide is carbohydrates, providing over 50% of the daily energy intake, followed by sources from fat and protein [1]. However, there are substantial differences in the proportion of macronutrient intakes between Asia and Western countries [2,3]. The traditional Chinese diet is characterized by a high intake of carbohydrates and vegetables, as well as moderate intake of animal foods [4]. In a recent meta-analysis of predominantly Western populations (six of seven studies), high carbohydrate intake was associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease (CVD) [5]. Although low-carbohydrate diets (LCD) have been suggested to be useful in weight, blood pressure, and glucose management in short-term randomized controlled trials [6,7], studies on the long-term health effects of LCD remain controversial [8], probably due to different levels and sources of baseline carbohydrate intake in diverse populations. In addition, we found only one study in Asia showing a U-shaped association between LCD score and total mortality in adults (age range: 40–69 years) [9]. Since this study was launched in 1990 and 1993, and there has been a substantial worldwide improvement in nutrition over the past two decades, more contemporary evidence is needed.
In addition to the quantity of carbohydrate, the quality and source might also play a role in health outcomes [1,10]. Carbohydrates from refined grains and added sugar were associated with a higher risk of diabetes and CVD, whereas those from whole grains, non-starchy vegetables, and fruits were associated with a lower risk [1,11]. Likewise, high-quality carbohydrates (whole grains, non-starchy vegetables and fruits) or low-carbohydrate diets are recommended for patients with diabetes to manage glycemic index and glycemic load, although long-term compliance is low [12,13]. Despite the increasing popularity of LCD diets, we searched PubMed using the keywords “low carbohydrate diet” or “carbohydrate quality” and “mortality” up to 15 March 2022, and found no population-based cohort studies reporting the association of LCDs with mortality by considering both quality and sources of carbohydrates in Asians and non-Asians. In addition, a previous study showed that substituting unsaturated fat for saturated fat [14] or substituting plant protein for animal protein [15] was associated with a lower risk of CVD mortality in Western countries, indicating that the sources of protein and fat might also play a role in health outcomes.
We therefore conducted a prospective cohort study, using data from Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study (GBCS), to investigate the associations of types of LCD (total, meat-based, and plant-based LCD) with the risk of all-cause, cancer, and CVD mortality in an older sample. Furthermore, we also examined whether the associations of types of LCD with the risk of all-cause, cancer, and CVD mortality varied by diabetes status.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Design and Sample

The GBCS is a population-based cohort study in South China [16]. Briefly, GBCS is a three-way collaboration among the Guangzhou Twelfth People’s Hospital and the Universities of Hong Kong and Birmingham. All participants were recruited from a community social and welfare association, the Guangzhou Health and Happiness Association for the Respectable Elders (GHHARE), from 2003 to 2008. GHHARE is a large, unofficial organization with ten branches throughout all districts of Guangzhou. Membership in this association is open to Guangzhou residents aged 50 years or older for a nominal, monthly fee of CNY 4 (≈USD .50). Baseline information was collected using computer-assisted face-to-face interviews by trained nurses. Information on anthropometrics, blood pressure, fasting plasma glucose, lipids, and inflammatory markers was collected following standard protocols. The reliability of the questionnaire was tested 6 months into recruitment by recalling 200 randomly selected participants for re-interview, and the results were satisfactory [16]. Ethics approval was granted by the Guangzhou Medical Ethics Committee of the Chinese Medical Association, Guangzhou, China (IRB No. GWYL-2019-125). As the Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) was shortened in phase 3 of the baseline (2006–2008), participants from phase 3 were not included in the current analysis.

2.2. Assessment of LCD Score

Information on diet was collected using a FFQ validated by Woo et al. [17]. The LCD diet score was calculated as per the method described in a recent study by Shan et al. [8]. Briefly, percentages of energy from carbohydrate, fat, and protein for each participant were each calculated and used to rank the participants into 11 strata. For carbohydrates, participants in the lowest group received 10 points and those in the highest group received 0 points. The order of the strata for fat and protein was reversed. The scores of the three macronutrients were summed to create an overall LCD score, which ranged from 0 to 30. Two additional LCD scores were also created: (1) vegetable-based LCD scores were calculated according to the percentage of energy from high-quality carbohydrates, plant protein, and unsaturated fat; (2) meat-based LCD scores were calculated according to the percentage of energy from low-quality carbohydrates, animal protein, and saturated fat (Table S1). Based on the Healthy Eating Index (HEI) 2015, high-quality carbohydrate was defined as a carbohydrate from whole grains, whole fruits, legumes, and non-starchy vegetables, and low-quality carbohydrate as a carbohydrate from refined grains, added sugar, fruit juice, potatoes, and other starchy vegetables [3]. As we found a significant interaction between LCDs and diabetes in all-cause mortality (p for interaction < 0.001), we also conducted pre-specified analyses by diabetes status (Table S2). Diabetes was defined by having a history of diabetes or fasting glucose ≥7.0 mmol/L at baseline.

2.3. Ascertainment of Mortality

Details of the methods were described elsewhere, and information on the causes of death up to 19 April 2021 was obtained through record linkage with the Death Registry of the Guangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention (GCDC) [18]. Briefly, causes of death were coded by trained nosologists in each hospital according to the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10). If death certificates were not issued by medical institutions, the causes of death were verified by GCDC as part of its quality assurance program by cross-checking past medical history and conducting a verbal autopsy. Moreover, we also conducted verbal autopsy meetings in the Guangzhou Twelfth People’s Hospital to further clarify the deaths of unclear causes. In the present study, the primary outcome was mortality from all causes, and the secondary outcome was mortality from cancer and CVD.

2.4. Potential Confounders and Mediators

As sex, age, socioeconomic factors (education, family income) [19], lifestyle factors (smoking, drinking, and physical activity), body mass index (BMI) [20], and history of cancer and CVD were associated with both dietary pattern and mortality, these factors were considered as potential confounders and adjusted in the regression model. The potential mediators between LCD score and all-cause mortality risk included systolic blood pressure (SBP), fasting plasma-glucose (FPG), total cholesterol (TC), and self-rated health at baseline. Procedures for measuring these were reported previously [16].

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The chi-square test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to compare baseline categorical and continuous variables by quartiles of LCD scores, respectively. Person-years of follow-up were assessed from the date of baseline enrollment until death or the end of the present study on 19 April 2021, whichever came first. The LCD scores were categorized into quartiles. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of mortality associated with the LCD score. Schoenfeld residuals were used to test the proportional hazard assumption and no violations of the proportional hazard assumption were found. Model 1 was the crude model without any adjustment. In multivariable analyses, model 2 adjusted for sex and age, and model 3 additionally adjusted for education, family income, smoking, drinking, physical activity, BMI, and history of cancer and CVD. Model 4 adjusted for determinants considered potential mediators, namely, SBP, FPG, TC, and self-rated health. In addition, the non-linearity of the effect of the LCD score on mortality risk was estimated by adding a quadratic term to the model with the quartiles of LCD scores as a continuous variable, and the fitness of the models with and without the quadratic term was compared using the likelihood ratio (LR) test [21]. A non-significant p-value was interpreted as an indication of a linear effect of the LCD score on mortality risk.
Furthermore, a stratification analysis was performed for the associations between diet score and all-cause mortality according to several potential effect modifiers at the baseline. As many statistical tests were performed in the subgroup analysis, we used the Bonferroni correction to account for multiple testings, and the significance level was set at p < 0.002 (0.05/8 [subgroups] × 3 [dietary scores]). To assess the extent to which baseline risk factors explained the associations of the LCD score with mortality, the percentage of excess risk mediated (PERM) was calculated as PERM = [HR (E + C) − HR (E + C + M)]/[HR (E + C) − 1] × 100, where E = exposure (types of LCD score), C = covariates (sex, age, education, family income, smoking, drinking, BMI, physical activity, and history of cancer and CVD), and M = explanatory variable being tested [21]. The following four groups of explanatory variables, (1) SBP; (2) FPG; (3) TC; (4) self-rated health, were included the PERM model. Finally, all the explanatory variables were included in the same model simultaneously. To rule out potential bias due to reverse causality (i.e., disease pathology— possibly subclinical—having an adverse impact on both dietary pattern and survival), we conducted a sensitivity analysis excluding participants who died within the first three years of follow-up. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata (Statacorp LP, version 15). Two-sided p-values < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Participant Characteristics

Of 20,490 participants, 128 with potentially unreliable dietary intake (<800 or >4200 kcal/d in men, and <600 or >3500 kcal/d in women), 57 who were followed up for less than 1 year, and 99 lost to follow-up with unknown vital status were excluded (Figure S1). A total of 20,206 participants, mean (SD) age = 62.7 (6.7) years; 14,423 (71.4%) women, including 17,416 participants without diabetes, mean (SD) age = 62.5 (6.7) years; 12,364 (71.0%) women, and 2790 participants with diabetes, mean (SD) age = 64.1 (6.2) years; 2059 (73.8%) women, were included in the present analysis. During an average of 14.8 years (SD = 3.3) with 294,848 person-years of follow-up, 4624 deaths occurred, including 1534 from cancer, 1783 from CVD, and 1307 from other causes.
Table 1 shows that compared with a low LCD score (Q1), a high LCD score (Q4) was associated with being a woman and having a younger age, a higher education level and family income, lower physical activity, never smoked, and being a current alcohol consumer (all p < 0.05). Moreover, the potential mediators, lower FPG, SBP level, and good/very good self-rated health were found in those with a higher overall LCD score (p < 0.05). Similar results were found in those with a higher meat-based LCD score, although the BMI was lower, but with an increased history of cancer and CVD. In contrast, those with a higher vegetable-based LCD score had a lower education level, with a greater proportion of smokers and higher SBP and lower TC levels. A higher vegetable-based LCD score showed no association with sex, age, family income, drinking, BMI, or history of CVD. Participants without diabetes showed similar patterns to all participants (Table S3). In contrast, participants with diabetes showed no association of overall LCD score with sex, age, smoking, drinking, and FPG level, no association of vegetable-based LCD score with smoking, history of cancer, and SBP level, and no association of meat-based LCD score with age, BMI, history of CVD, and FPG level, but a negative association between meat-based LCD score and drinking (Table S3).

3.2. Mortality and LCD Score

Table 2 shows that in all participants, after adjusting for sex, age, education, family income, smoking, drinking, physical activity, BMI, and history of cancer and CVD, the overall LCD score showed no association with all-cause mortality. For the vegetable-based LCD score, the adjusted HR (95% CI) of all-cause mortality for the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th quartile versus the 1st quartile (Q1), was 0.99 (0.91–1.07), 1.11 (1.02–1.21), and 1.16 (1.05–1.27) (p for trend <0.001 and p for non-linear = 0.18), respectively. For the meat-based LCD score, the adjusted HR (95% CI) of all-cause mortality for Q2, Q3, and Q4 versus Q1 was 0.89 (0.83–0.97), 0.90 (0.83–0.97), and 0.89 (0.81–0.97) (p for trend = 0.007 and p for non-linear = 0.06), respectively.
Table S4 shows no association between overall LCD score and all-cause mortality in participants with or without diabetes. In those without diabetes, the results of the vegetable-based LCD and meat-based LCD scores were generally similar to those from the total population. Comparing with the Q1 group, participants in Q4 of the vegetable-based LCD scores showed a higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.01–1.23), whereas those with the highest quartile of meat-based LCD scores showed a lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.79–0.97). In participants with diabetes, no associations of the vegetable-based LCD score and meat-based LCD score quartiles with all-cause mortality were found, although there was a linear trend between the vegetable-based LCD score and all-cause mortality (p for trend = 0.04).
Table S5 shows no association of the overall LCD score with mortality from cancer, CVD, and other causes. The vegetable-based LCD score was associated with a higher risk of CVD mortality (Q1: reference, Q2: 1.18 (1.03–1.34), Q3: 1.36 (1.18–1.56), and Q4: 1.39 (1.19–1.62), p for trend < 0.001 and p for non-linear = 0.15), whereas the higher meat-based LCD score quartiles were associated with a lower risk of CVD mortality (Q1: reference, Q2: 0.84 (0.75–0.95), Q3: 0.82 (0.72–0.93), and Q4: 0.81 (0.70–0.93), p for trend = 0.02 and p for non-linear = 0.10). Table S6 shows similar results in participants without diabetes. In participants with diabetes, no association of overall LCD score and meat-based LCD score with CVD mortality was found. However, we found a positive association between vegetable-based LCD score quartiles and CVD mortality (Q1: reference, Q2: 1.21 (0.89–1.63), Q3: 1.59 (1.18–2.15), Q4: 1.54 (1.11–2.14), p for trend = 0.003 and p for non-linear = 0.25).
Figure 1 shows that the HR of all-cause mortality comparing Q4 to Q1 of vegetable-based LCD scores was 1.16 (1.05–1.27) after adjustment for potential confounders. The HR decreased by 14% after adjusting for SBP, 27% after adjusting for FPG, and 2% after adjusting for self-rated health, and increased by 3% after adjusting for TC. The overall attenuation after adjustment for mediators was 41%. Similar patterns were found for the association between vegetable-based LCD scores and cause-specific mortality. FPG appeared to be the strongest mediator in a vegetable-based LCD diet. For a meat-based LCD, the HR of all-cause mortality was 0.89 (0.81–0.97) after adjustment for potential confounders, which increased by 10% after adjusting for SBP, 24% after adjusting for FPG, and 1% after adjusting for self-rated health. FPG appeared to be the strongest mediator in a meat-based LCD diet.
Figure 2 shows that in participants without diabetes, the vegetable-based LCD score was associated with a higher risk of mortality from all-cause mortality (HR comparing Q4 to Q1 = 1.10, 95% CI 1.01–1.23) and CVD (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.06–1.51). After adjustment for mediators, the HRs of all-cause mortality became non-significant (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.96–1.18). SBP appeared to be the strongest mediator (PERM = 26% for all-cause mortality and 19% for CVD mortality). In participants with diabetes, no association of the vegetable-based LCD score with all-cause mortality was found. However, we found that the vegetable-based LCD score was associated with a higher risk of CVD mortality (adjusted HR 1.54, 95% CI, 1.11–2.13), for which TC appeared to be the strongest mediator (PERM = 16%). Figure 3 shows that in participants without diabetes, the meat-based LCD score was associated with a lower risk of all-cause and CVD mortality, which was partly mediated by SBP (PERM = 13% for all-cause and CVD mortality). No association of the meat-based LCD score with cancer and other-cause mortality was found.

3.3. Subgroup and Sensitivity Analyses

Figures S2–S7 show similar associations in most subgroups. After Bonferroni corrections for multiple testing, the association between the vegetable-based LCD score and all-cause mortality appeared to be stronger in obese than non-obese participants (Figure S3, p for interaction <0.001). A higher vegetable-based LCD score was associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR for Q4 versus Q1 = 1.55, 95% CI 1.18–2.04). Similar results were observed in participants without diabetes (Figure S6, all p for interaction <0.001). Similar results were also found after excluding deaths within the first three years of follow-up (Tables S7 and S8).

4. Discussion

After a long-term follow-up for nearly 15 years, no association of overall LCD scores with the risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality was found in our study. In prespecified subgroup analyses, however, we found that the vegetable-based LCD score was positively, whereas the meat-based LCD score was negatively, associated with all-cause and CVD mortality in older Asian people. Similar associations were observed for participants without diabetes. In participants with diabetes, a positive association of the vegetable-based LCD score with the risk of CVD mortality was found.

4.1. Comparison with Previous Studies

Most studies considered LCD based on animal-derived protein and fat sources as a risk factor of mortality, whereas an LCD based on plant-derived protein and fat reduced mortality [5,22,23]. Furthermore, studies show that higher levels of whole grain intake were associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality, whereas refined grain intake was associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality [24,25]. This highlights that a healthy LCD diet is not only dependent on the sources of macronutrients, but also on the quality of these nutrients. A previous study using a new classification approach for LCD scores found that participants with low low-quality carbohydrate, high unsaturated fat, and high plant protein intake had a lower all-cause and cancer mortality risk, while those with a low high-quality carbohydrate and high saturated fat and animal protein intake had a higher all-cause mortality risk [8]. Our results generally supported the intake of high-quality carbohydrate, and further showed that participants with low low-quality carbohydrate and high saturated fat and animal protein intake had lower all-cause and CVD mortality risk, and those with low high-quality carbohydrate and high unsaturated fat and plant protein intake had a higher mortality risk. This discrepancy might be due to the differential amount and sources of carbohydrate, fat, and protein in the Western and Eastern diets.
The percentage of energy from carbohydrates, fat, and protein in our study were similar with the results of China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS) [26]. Notably, the percentage of energy from carbohydrate (especially high-quality carbohydrate) in our study was higher than that reported in the US (total carbohydrate, 57.1% versus 50.5%; high-quality carbohydrate, 10.6% versus 8.6%, respectively), whereas the percentage of energy from animal protein and saturated fat intake was much lower than the US (animal protein, 7.4% versus 10.4%; saturated fat, 4.9% versus 11.9%, respectively) [3]. Moreover, compared with the US, total per capita consumption of meat in Asians was much lower (49.4 kg/year versus 122.8 kg/year), whereas the percentage of energy from fish/sea food consumption was higher (43.5% versus 26.0%) [27]. Some recent studies showed that fish/seafood consumption was associated with a lower risk of all-cause and CVD mortality in Asians, but not in the US populations [28,29]. Meta-analyses show that total mortality is higher in participants who have high intakes of both red and processed meat than in those with low meat intakes in Western high-income countries [30]. However, meat is good source of energy, as well as a range of essential nutrients, including protein and micronutrients such as iron, zinc, and vitamin B12 for low-income countries. A previous study showed that Indian vegetarians had a more favorable cardiovascular risk profile than did non-vegetarians [31]. Along with these findings, our results support the beneficial effects of moderate consumption of animal protein. In addition, the non-significant association between meat-based LCD and CVD mortality in patients with diabetes could also be explained by the lower levels of fish consumption in the diabetes group compared to those without diabetes [28]. A recent meta-analysis also showed that substituting fish with red and processed meat was associated with increased risks of all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes [32].
Apart from differential amounts of high-quality carbohydrates, saturated fat, and animal protein intake, the discrepancies could also be at least partly explained by the low-quality carbohydrate, unsaturated fat, and plant protein consumed. Notably, compared with the US, the percentage of energy from low-quality carbohydrate (46.4% versus 41.8%) and plant protein (8.5% versus 5.8%) intake was higher in our sample, whereas the percentage of energy from unsaturated fat was lower (monounsaturated fatty acids, 8.6% versus 13.1%; polyunsaturated fatty acids, 6.3% versus 8.2%) [3]. Regarding the results on the vegetable-based LCD, our results were generally consistent with previous studies in Asia showing positive associations between plant-based diets consisting of a high intake of refined carbohydrates and the risk of metabolic syndrome and CVD [33,34]. In our study, participants with a higher vegetable LCD score had higher levels of unsaturated fat consumption and higher risks of all-cause and CVD mortality, which could be partly explained by the cooking method. In traditional Chinese cuisine, plant oil is often used for stir-frying, pan-frying, and deep-frying, and it is heated to a high temperature [35]. High heat has been shown to cause partial hydrogenation of unsaturated plant oils to produce trans fats. Studies have consistently shown trans fats consumption to be associated with a higher risk of all-cause and CHD mortality [36]. Moreover, as CVD is a leading cause of mortality in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus [37], the stronger positive association between vegetable-based LCD and CVD mortality in participants with diabetes in our study also warrants further attention.
Regarding the null association between the overall LCD and mortality, our results were consistent with some [8,38] but not all [9,22] previous studies. For example, a recent study in Japan showed a U-shape association between overall LCD score and all-cause mortality [9]. The authors suggested that the sources of food might have modified the association [9]. Another study in the US showed a positive association between overall LCD and all-cause mortality [22]. The differences in the results could be partly due to the substantial variation in carbohydrate consumption across different populations (i.e., about 60% of the overall energy was from carbohydrate in Asians vs. 50.5% in the US) [2,3] and accounting for the quantity of carbohydrate intake. Higher low-quantity carbohydrate consumption could lead to a greater glycemic burden, and a subsequently higher risk of insulin resistance and vascular complications [39,40,41], which warrants further research in populations with a high carbohydrate intake.
In addition, we found that the meat-based LCD score was associated with a lower risks of all-cause and CVD mortality, which was generally consistent with the results of a previous study showing a beneficial effect of higher animal protein intake on all-cause mortality in older Chinese men [42]. However, such association was not evident, and even inverse, in a previous general population study in the US [43]. As previous population-based cohort studies did not report the association of LCDs with mortality, accounting for both quality and sources of carbohydrates in older people, our study adds to the literature by showing the long-term health effects related to LCD patterns and its subtypes in older Asians.

4.2. Strengths and Limitations

The strengths of our study included the large sample size, long duration of follow-up, and the comprehensive adjustment for potential confounders. However, there were some limitations in the present study. First, changes in dietary patterns were not assessed during follow-up. However, our previous study found that the dietary patterns of our sample were relatively stable [44,45]. Second, residual confounding could not be fully ruled out, although we adjusted for a wide range of potential confounding factors reported in previous literature. Third, our results may not be directly applicable to younger or Western populations. Fourth, the null association in the subgroup of participants with diabetes could be due to the relatively small sample size. Although a recent meta-analysis showed that patients adhering to an LCD for six months may experience remission of diabetes without adverse consequences [46], further studies on the health effects related to long-term and types of LCD patterns in patients with diabetes are warranted.

5. Conclusions

In this study of older Asian people, overall LCD score was not associated with all-cause or cause-specific mortality. However, we found that the vegetable-based LCD score was positively, whereas meat-based LCD score was negatively, associated with all-cause and CVD mortality in older Asian people. Inconsistencies in the literature on the health effects of an LCD may reflect the importance of the local diet and age-related nutrient composition of the diet.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nu14071406/s1, Table S1. The criteria for determining the low-carbohydrate-diet score. Table S2. The criteria for determining the low-carbohydrate-diet score in participants without and with diabetes. Table S3. The baseline characteristics by quartiles of low-carbohydrate-diet scores in 17,416 participants without diabetes and 2790 participants with diabetes recruited from 2003–2008 and followed up until 19 April 2021. Table S4. The association of low-carbohydrate-diet (LCD) score with all-cause mortality in participants without and with diabetes. Table S5. The hazard ratios (HRs) of mortality from all-cause, cancer, CVD, and other causes in low-carbohydrate score. Table S6. The hazard ratios (HRs) of mortality from all-cause, cancer, CVD, and other causes in low-carbohydrate score of participants without and with diabetes. Table S7. The hazard ratios (HRs) of mortality from all-cause, cancer, CVD, and other causes in low-carbohydrate score by excluding deaths during the first three years of follow-up. Table S8. The hazard ratios (HRs) of mortality from all-cause, cancer, CVD, and other causes with a low-carbohydrate score by excluding participants without and with diabetes during first three years follow-up. Table S9. A Guideline for Reporting Mediation Analyses Short-Form (AGReMA-SF) Checklist [47]. Figure S1. A flowchart showing selection of participants included in the main analysis from Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study. Figure S2. The association of overall LCD score with all-cause mortality by subgroup. Figure S3. The association of the vegetable-based LCD score with all-cause mortality by subgroup. Figure S4. The association of the meat-based LCD score with all-cause mortality by subgroup. Figure S5. The association of the overall LCD score with all-cause mortality in by subgroup (A: participants without diabetes; B: participants with diabetes). Figure S6. The association of the vegetable-based LCD score with all-cause mortality by subgroup (A: participants without diabetes; B: participants with diabetes). Figure S7. The association of the meat-based LCD score with all-cause mortality by subgroup (A: participants without diabetes; B: participants with diabetes).

Author Contributions

C.S., L.X., T.-H.L., C.-Q.J., W.-S.Z., Y.-L.J., X.-Q.D., G.N.T., J.W. and K.-K.C. made substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of funding, data, and interpretation of data; C.S. and L.X. analyzed the data; C.S., L.X., T.-H.L. and C.-Q.J. drafted the article; T.-H.L., L.X. and C.-Q.J. revised it critically for important intellectual content. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (81941019). The Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study was funded by the University of Hong Kong Foundation for Educational Development and Research, the Health Medical Research Fund (Grant number: HMRF/13143241) in Hong Kong; the Guangzhou Public Health Bureau, and the Guangzhou Science and Technology Bureau, Guangzhou, China, and the University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Guangzhou Medical Ethics Committee of the Chinese Medical Association, Guangzhou, China (IRB No. GWYL-2019-125).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Due to ethical restrictions protecting patient privacy, data available on request from the Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study Data Access Committee. Please contact us at [email protected] for fielding data accession requests.

Acknowledgments

We thank all the participants for contributing to and supporting our research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ludwig, D.S.; Hu, F.B.; Tappy, L.; Brand-Miller, J. Dietary carbohydrates: Role of quality and quantity in chronic disease. BMJ 2018, 361, k2340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Zhu, Z.; Yang, X.; Fang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Yang, Z.; Wang, Z.; Liu, A.; He, L.; Sun, J.; Lian, Y.; et al. Trends and Disparities of Energy Intake and Macronutrient Composition in China: A Series of National Surveys, 1982–2012. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Shan, Z.; Rehm, C.D.; Rogers, G.; Ruan, M.; Wang, D.D.; Hu, F.B.; Mozaffarian, D.; Zhang, F.F.; Bhupathiraju, S.N. Trends in Dietary Carbohydrate, Protein, and Fat Intake and Diet Quality Among US Adults, 1999–2016. JAMA 2019, 322, 1178–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Li, M.; Shi, Z. Dietary Pattern during 1991–2011 and Its Association with Cardio Metabolic Risks in Chinese Adults: The China Health and Nutrition Survey. Nutrients 2017, 9, 1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Seidelmann, S.B.; Claggett, B.; Cheng, S.; Henglin, M.; Shah, A.; Steffen, L.M.; Folsom, A.R.; Rimm, E.B.; Willett, W.C.; Solomon, S.D. Dietary carbohydrate intake and mortality: A prospective cohort study and meta-analysis. Lancet Public Health 2018, 3, e419–e428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Gardner, C.D.; Trepanowski, J.F.; Del, G.L.; Hauser, M.E.; Rigdon, J.; Ioannidis, J.; Desai, M.; King, A.C. Effect of Low-Fat vs Low-Carbohydrate Diet on 12-Month Weight Loss in Overweight Adults and the Association With Genotype Pattern or Insulin Secretion: The DIETFITS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2018, 319, 667–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Foster, G.D.; Wyatt, H.R.; Hill, J.O.; Makris, A.P.; Rosenbaum, D.L.; Brill, C.; Stein, R.I.; Mohammed, B.S.; Miller, B.; Rader, D.J.; et al. Weight and metabolic outcomes after 2 years on a low-carbohydrate versus low-fat diet: A randomized trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 2010, 153, 147–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shan, Z.; Guo, Y.; Hu, F.B.; Liu, L.; Qi, Q. Association of Low-Carbohydrate and Low-Fat Diets With Mortality among US Adults. JAMA Intern. Med. 2020, 180, 513–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Akter, S.; Mizoue, T.; Nanri, A.; Goto, A.; Noda, M.; Sawada, N.; Yamaji, T.; Iwasaki, M.; Inoue, M.; Tsugane, S. Low carbohydrate diet and all cause and cause-specific mortality. Clin. Nutr. 2021, 40, 2016–2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Reynolds, A.; Mann, J.; Cummings, J.; Winter, N.; Mete, E.; Te, M.L. Carbohydrate quality and human health: A series of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Lancet 2019, 393, 434–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Muraki, I.; Wu, H.; Imamura, F.; Laden, F.; Rimm, E.B.; Hu, F.B.; Willett, W.C.; Sun, Q. Rice consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease: Results from a pooled analysis of 3 U.S. cohorts. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2015, 101, 164–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Hardy, D.S.; Garvin, J.T.; Xu, H. Carbohydrate quality, glycemic index, glycemic load and cardiometabolic risks in the US, Europe and Asia: A dose-response meta-analysis. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2020, 30, 853–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Bolla, A.M.; Caretto, A.; Laurenzi, A.; Scavini, M.; Piemonti, L. Low-Carb and Ketogenic Diets in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes. Nutrients 2019, 11, 962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Sacks, F.M.; Lichtenstein, A.H.; Wu, J.; Appel, L.J.; Creager, M.A.; Kris-Etherton, P.M.; Miller, M.; Rimm, E.B.; Rudel, L.L.; Robinson, J.G.; et al. Dietary Fats and Cardiovascular Disease: A Presidential Advisory From the American Heart Association. Circulation 2017, 136, e1–e23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhong, V.W.; Allen, N.B.; Greenland, P.; Carnethon, M.R.; Ning, H.; Wilkins, J.T.; Lloyd-Jones, D.M.; Van Horn, L. Protein foods from animal sources, incident cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: A substitution analysis. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2021, 50, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jiang, C.; Thomas, G.N.; Lam, T.H.; Schooling, C.M.; Zhang, W.; Lao, X.; Adab, P.; Liu, B.; Leung, G.M.; Cheng, K.K. Cohort profile: The Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study, a Guangzhou-Hong Kong-Birmingham collaboration. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2006, 35, 844–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Woo, J.; Leung, S.S.; Ho, S.C.; Lam, T.H.; Janus, E.D. A food frequency questionnaire for use in the Chinese population in Hong Kong: Description and examination of validity. Nutr. Res. 1997, 17, 1633–1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lam, T.H.; Xu, L.; Jiang, C.Q.; Zhang, W.S.; Zhu, F.; Jin, Y.L.; Thomas, G.N.; Cheng, K.K. High relative risk of all-cause mortality attributed to smoking in China: Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e196610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Vathesatogkit, P.; Batty, G.D.; Woodward, M. Socioeconomic disadvantage and disease-specific mortality in Asia: Systematic review with meta-analysis of population-based cohort studies. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2014, 68, 375–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhu, N.; Yu, C.; Guo, Y.; Bian, Z.; Han, Y.; Yang, L.; Chen, Y.; Du, H.; Li, H.; Liu, F.; et al. Adherence to a healthy lifestyle and all-cause and cause-specific mortality in Chinese adults: A 10-year prospective study of 0.5 million people. Int J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2019, 16, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Castro-Espin, C.; Agudo, A.; Bonet, C.; Katzke, V.; Turzanski-Fortner, R.; Aleksandrova, K.; Schulze, M.B.; Tjønneland, A.; Dahm, C.C.; Quirós, J.R.; et al. Inflammatory potential of the diet and risk of breast cancer in the European Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2021, 36, 953–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Mazidi, M.; Katsiki, N.; Mikhailidis, D.P.; Sattar, N.; Banach, M. Lower carbohydrate diets and all-cause and cause-specific mortality: A population-based cohort study and pooling of prospective studies. Eur. Heart J. 2019, 40, 2870–2879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Fung, T.T.; van Dam, R.M.; Hankinson, S.E.; Stampfer, M.; Willett, W.C.; Hu, F.B. Low-carbohydrate diets and all-cause and cause-specific mortality: Two cohort studies. Ann. Intern. Med. 2010, 153, 289–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Swaminathan, S.; Dehghan, M.; Raj, J.M.; Thomas, T.; Rangarajan, S.; Jenkins, D.; Mony, P.; Mohan, V.; Lear, S.A.; Avezum, A.; et al. Associations of cereal grains intake with cardiovascular disease and mortality across 21 countries in Prospective Urban and Rural Epidemiology study: Prospective cohort study. BMJ 2021, 372, m4948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Aune, D.; Keum, N.; Giovannucci, E.; Fadnes, L.T.; Boffetta, P.; Greenwood, D.C.; Tonstad, S.; Vatten, L.J.; Riboli, E.; Norat, T. Whole grain consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease, cancer, and all cause and cause specific mortality: Systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. BMJ 2016, 353, i2716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Xu, X.; Byles, J.E.; Shi, Z.; Hall, J.J. Evaluation of older Chinese people’s macronutrient intake status: Results from the China Health and Nutrition Survey. Br. J. Nutr. 2015, 113, 159–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Lee, J.E.; McLerran, D.F.; Rolland, B.; Chen, Y.; Grant, E.J.; Vedanthan, R.; Inoue, M.; Tsugane, S.; Gao, Y.T.; Tsuji, I.; et al. Meat intake and cause-specific mortality: A pooled analysis of Asian prospective cohort studies. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2013, 98, 1032–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Shao, M.Y.; Jiang, C.Q.; Zhang, W.S.; Zhu, F.; Jin, Y.L.; Woo, J.; Cheng, K.K.; Lam, T.H.; Xu, L. Association of fish consumption with risk of all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality: An 11-year follow-up of the Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2021, 76, 389–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhong, V.W.; Van Horn, L.; Greenland, P.; Carnethon, M.R.; Ning, H.; Wilkins, J.T.; Lloyd-Jones, D.M.; Allen, N.B. Associations of Processed Meat, Unprocessed Red Meat, Poultry, or Fish Intake with Incident Cardiovascular Disease and All-Cause Mortality. JAMA Intern. Med. 2020, 180, 503–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Godfray, H.; Aveyard, P.; Garnett, T.; Hall, J.W.; Key, T.J.; Lorimer, J.; Pierrehumbert, R.T.; Scarborough, P.; Springmann, M.; Jebb, S.A. Meat consumption, health, and the environment. Science 2018, 361, eaam5324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Shridhar, K.; Dhillon, P.K.; Bowen, L.; Kinra, S.; Bharathi, A.V.; Prabhakaran, D.; Reddy, K.S.; Ebrahim, S. The association between a vegetarian diet and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in India: The Indian Migration Study. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e110586. [Google Scholar]
  32. Jayedi, A.; Soltani, S.; Abdolshahi, A.; Shab-Bidar, S. Fish consumption and the risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes: A dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Crit Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 61, 1640–1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Miller, V.; Mente, A.; Dehghan, M.; Rangarajan, S.; Zhang, X.; Swaminathan, S.; Dagenais, G.; Gupta, R.; Mohan, V.; Lear, S.; et al. Fruit, vegetable, and legume intake, and cardiovascular disease and deaths in 18 countries (PURE): A prospective cohort study. Lancet 2017, 390, 2037–2049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Kim, H.; Lee, K.; Rebholz, C.M.; Kim, J. Plant-based diets and incident metabolic syndrome: Results from a South Korean prospective cohort study. PLoS Med. 2020, 17, e1003371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cui, Y.; Hao, P.; Liu, B.; Meng, X. Effect of traditional Chinese cooking methods on fatty acid profiles of vegetable oils. Food Chem. 2017, 233, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. de Souza, R.J.; Mente, A.; Maroleanu, A.; Cozma, A.I.; Ha, V.; Kishibe, T.; Uleryk, E.; Budylowski, P.; Schünemann, H.; Beyene, J.; et al. Intake of saturated and trans unsaturated fatty acids and risk of all cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes: Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BMJ 2015, 351, h3978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Strain, W.D.; Paldánius, P.M. Diabetes, cardiovascular disease and the microcirculation. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2018, 17, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Tobias, D.K.; Chen, M.; Manson, J.E.; Ludwig, D.S.; Willett, W.; Hu, F.B. Effect of low-fat diet interventions versus other diet interventions on long-term weight change in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015, 3, 968–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Musa-Veloso, K.; Poon, T.; Harkness, L.S.; O’Shea, M.; Chu, Y. The effects of whole-grain compared with refined wheat, rice, and rye on the postprandial blood glucose response: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2018, 108, 759–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Vanegas, S.M.; Meydani, M.; Barnett, J.B.; Goldin, B.; Kane, A.; Rasmussen, H.; Brown, C.; Vangay, P.; Knights, D.; Jonnalagadda, S.; et al. Substituting whole grains for refined grains in a 6-wk randomized trial has a modest effect on gut microbiota and immune and inflammatory markers of healthy adults. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2017, 105, 635–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Welsh, J.A.; Sharma, A.; Abramson, J.L.; Vaccarino, V.; Gillespie, C.; Vos, M.B. Caloric sweetener consumption and dyslipidemia among US adults. JAMA 2010, 303, 1490–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Chan, R.; Leung, J.; Woo, J. High Protein Intake Is Associated with Lower Risk of All-Cause Mortality in Community-Dwelling Chinese Older Men and Women. J. Nutr. Health Aging 2019, 23, 987–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Song, M.; Fung, T.T.; Hu, F.B.; Willett, W.C.; Longo, V.D.; Chan, A.T.; Giovannucci, E.L. Association of Animal and Plant Protein Intake With All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality. JAMA Intern. Med. 2016, 176, 1453–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Xu, L.; Lam, T.H.; Jiang, C.Q.; Zhang, W.S.; Zhu, F.; Jin, Y.L.; Woo, J.; Cheng, K.K.; Thomas, G.N. Egg consumption and the risk of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study and meta-analyses. Eur. J. Nutr. 2019, 58, 785–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Schooling, C.M.; Ho, S.Y.; Leung, G.M.; Thomas, G.N.; McGhee, S.M.; Mak, K.H.; Lam, T.H. Diet synergies and mortality—A population-based case-control study of 32,462 Hong Kong Chinese older adults. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2006, 35, 418–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Goldenberg, J.Z.; Day, A.; Brinkworth, G.D.; Sato, J.; Yamada, S.; Jönsson, T.; Beardsley, J.; Johnson, J.A.; Thabane, L.; Johnston, B.C. Efficacy and safety of low and very low carbohydrate diets for type 2 diabetes remission: Systematic review and meta-analysis of published and unpublished randomized trial data. BMJ 2021, 372, m4743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lee, H.; Cashin, A.G.; Lamb, S.E.; Hopewell, S.; Vansteelandt, S.; VanderWeele, T.J.; MacKinnon, D.P.; Mansell, G.; Collins, G.S.; Golub, R.M.; et al. A Guideline for Reporting Mediation Analyses of Randomized Trials and Observational Studies. JAMA J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2021, 326, 1045–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nutrients 14 01406 g001a 550Nutrients 14 01406 g001b 550
Figure 1. The associations between the LCD score (Q4 versus Q1) and all-cause mortality, and the proportions of the associations attributable to systolic blood pressure, fasting plasma-glucose, total cholesterol, and self-rated health in all-participants (A: vegetable-based LCD score, B: meat-based LCD score).
Figure 1. The associations between the LCD score (Q4 versus Q1) and all-cause mortality, and the proportions of the associations attributable to systolic blood pressure, fasting plasma-glucose, total cholesterol, and self-rated health in all-participants (A: vegetable-based LCD score, B: meat-based LCD score).
Nutrients 14 01406 g001aNutrients 14 01406 g001b
Nutrients 14 01406 g002a 550Nutrients 14 01406 g002b 550
Figure 2. The associations between the vegetable-based LCD score (Q4 versus Q1) and mortality, and the proportions of the associations attributable to systolic blood pressure, fasting plasma-glucose, total cholesterol, and self-rated health (A: participants without diabetes, B: participants with diabetes).
Figure 2. The associations between the vegetable-based LCD score (Q4 versus Q1) and mortality, and the proportions of the associations attributable to systolic blood pressure, fasting plasma-glucose, total cholesterol, and self-rated health (A: participants without diabetes, B: participants with diabetes).
Nutrients 14 01406 g002aNutrients 14 01406 g002b
Nutrients 14 01406 g003a 550Nutrients 14 01406 g003b 550
Figure 3. The associations between the meat-based LCD score (Q4 versus Q1) and mortality, and the proportions of the associations attributable to systolic blood pressure, fasting plasma-glucose, total cholesterol, and self-rated health (A: participants without diabetes, B: participants with diabetes).
Figure 3. The associations between the meat-based LCD score (Q4 versus Q1) and mortality, and the proportions of the associations attributable to systolic blood pressure, fasting plasma-glucose, total cholesterol, and self-rated health (A: participants without diabetes, B: participants with diabetes).
Nutrients 14 01406 g003aNutrients 14 01406 g003b
Table
Table 1. The baseline characteristics by quartiles of low-carbohydrate-diet scores in 20,206 participants recruited from 2003–2008 a.
Table 1. The baseline characteristics by quartiles of low-carbohydrate-diet scores in 20,206 participants recruited from 2003–2008 a.
CharacteristicOverall Low-Carbohydrate-Diet Scorep-ValueVegetable-Based Low-Carbohydrate-Diet Scorep-ValueMeat-Based Low-Carbohydrate-Diet Scorep-Value
Quartile 1Quartile 4Quartile 1Quartile 4Quartile 1Quartile 4
Number of participants51004936 52783775 51634418
Age, mean (SD), year63.5 (6.5)62.1 (6.8)0.0462.7 (6.7)62.8 (6.6)0.7063.4 (6.6)62.0 (6.8)0.02
Sex <0.001 0.56 <0.001
Women1696 (33.3)3707 (75.1) 3740 (70.9)2677 (70.9) 3398 (65.8)3432 (77.7)
Men3404 (66.7)1229 (24.9) 1538 (29.1)1098 (29.1) 1765 (34.2)986 (22.3)
Education level <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Less than primary school2678 (52.5)1988 (40.3) 2231 (42.3)1878 (49.8) 2826 (54.8)1619 (36.6)
Middle school2009 (39.4)2445 (49.5) 2463 (46.7)1609 (42.6) 2003 (38.8)2305 (52.2)
College or above 413 (8.1)503 (10.2) 584 (11.0)288 (7.6) 330 (6.4)493 (11.2)
Family income, RMB/year <0.001 0.21 <0.001
<20,0001261 (24.7)820 (16.6) 992 (18.8)764 (20.2) 1297 (25.2)688 (15.6)
20,000–30,000986 (19.3)935 (18.9) 1062 (20.1)756 (20.0) 1004 (19.5)839 (19.0)
30,000–50,000781 (15.3)1063 (21.5) 979 (18.6)689 (18.3) 812 (15.7)943 (21.4)
≥50,000473 (9.3)902 (18.3) 768 (14.5)550 (14.6) 443 (8.6)880 (20.0)
Do not know1599 (31.4)1216 (24.7) 1474 (28.0)1016 (26.9) 1598 (31.0)1060 (24.0)
BMI, mean (SD), kg/m223.8 (3.3)23.7 (3.3)0.7123.7 (3.2)23.8 (3.3)0.6323.9 (3.3)23.7 (3.3)0.02
Physical activity <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Low305 (6.0)479 (9.7) 285 (5.4)498 (13.2) 378 (7.4)397 (9.0)
Moderate2113 (41.4)2630 (53.3) 2416 (45.8)1808 (47.9) 2155 (41.7)2347 (53.1)
High2682 (52.6)1827 (37.0) 2577 (48.8)1469 (38.9) 2630 (50.9)1674 (37.9)
Smoking <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
Never3944 (77.4)4045 (82.0) 4301 (81.5)2890 (76.6) 3915 (75.9)3731 (84.5)
Past581 (11.4)393 (7.9) 532 (10.1)380 (10.0) 600 (11.6)327 (7.4)
Current575 (11.3)498 (10.1) 445 (8.4)506 (13.4) 648 (12.5)360 (8.1)
Drinking 0.001 0.24 0.004
Never4139 (81.4)3919 (79.5) 4170 (79.2)3052 (81.0) 4164 (80.8)3547 (80.5)
Current823 (16.1)915 (18.5) 991 (18.7)639 (16.9) 869 (16.8)785 (17.7)
Past138 (2.6)102 (2.0) 116 (2.0)84 (2.1) 130 (2.4)86 (1.8)
Dietary intake, mean (SD)
Total energy, kcal/d1853 (520)1730 (502)0.0031817 (530)1783 (488)<0.0011835 (506)1781.0 (520)<0.001
Total carbohydrate, % of total energy intake67.6 (4.7)46.5 (5.4)<0.00160.9 (8.0)52.2 (8.7)<0.00165.9 (6.1)48.0 (7.4)<0.001
High-quality carbohydrate 10.1 (7.3)10.0 (6.1)<0.00115.1 (7.2)5.6 (3.8)<0.0017.4 (4.4)13.8 (8.5)<0.001
Low-quality carbohydrate57.4 (8.7)36.4 (7.1)<0.00145.8 (10.2)46.5 (9.7)<0.00158.4 (6.6)34.0 (6.9)<0.001
Total protein, % of total energy intake14.2 (1.9)18.0 (2.8)<0.00116.5 (2.9)15.3 (3.1)<0.00114.0 (2.0)18.3 (2.8)<0.001
Animal protein5.2 (1.8)10.1 (2.9)<0.0018.1 (3.1)6.8 (2.8)<0.0015.1 (1.7)10.1 (2.9)<0.001
Plant protein9.0 (1.3)7.9 (1.8)<0.0018.4 (1.6)8.5 (1.8)<0.0018.9 (1.3)8.2 (2.0)<0.001
Total fat, % of total energy intake12.9 (5.6)26.1 (7.2)<0.00114.5 (6.0)26.1 (7.8)<0.00113.2 (6.0)26.6 (7.3)<0.001
Saturated fat3.4 (1.5)6.2 (1.7)<0.0014.3 (1.8)5.6 (1.8)<0.0013.0 (1.0)7.0 (1.5)<0.001
Monounsaturated fat5.6 (2.5)11.4 (3.4)<0.0016.2 (2.7)11.4 (3.7)<0.0015.8 (2.7)11.4 (3.7)<0.001
Polyunsaturated fat3.9 (2.4)8.5 (3.5)<0.0014.0 (2.5)9.2 (3.7)<0.0014.4 (2.8)8.2 (3.7)<0.001
History of CVD 2058 (40.8)2.052 (42.1)0.202171 (41.7)1581 (42.4)0.702013 (39.4)1908 (43.7)<0.001
History of cancer98 (1.9)108 (2.2)0.63136 (2.6)57 (1.5)0.00598 (1.9)104 (2.4)0.004
Fasting plasma-glucose, mmol/L5.9 (1.6)5.7 (1.9)<0.0015.9 (1.6)5.7 (2.0)<0.0015.8 (1.7)5.8 (1.9)<0.001
Systolic blood pressure, mmHg133.4 (22.4)130.1 (22.2)<0.001130.3 (22.2)132.6 (22.3)<0.001133.4 (22.4)129.6 (22.2)<0.001
Total cholesterol, mmol/L3.7 (1.0)3.7 (0.9)0.513.7 (1.0)3.6 (1.0)<0.0013.7 (1.0)3.7 (1.0)0.90
Self-rated health
Good/very good4296 (85.1)4409 (83.0)0.024450 (85.5)3096 (83.1)0.0044353 (85.2)3604 (82.6)0.005
Poor/very poor752 (14.9)827 (17.0) 758 (14.6)632 (16.9) 754 (14.8)760 (17.4)
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CVD, Cerebrovascular disease; SD, Standard Deviation. a Data are presented as number (percentage) of study participants unless otherwise indicated. Note: USD 1 is nearly equal to RMB 7. Note: p-values for the differences in baseline variables by quartiles of LCD score and its subtypes.
Table
Table 2. The association of low-carbohydrate-diet (LCD) score with all-cause mortality.
Table 2. The association of low-carbohydrate-diet (LCD) score with all-cause mortality.
CharacteristicQuartiles of LCD Scoresp for Trendp for Non-Linear
1234
Overall LCD score a
Median score (IQR)6 (4, 8)13 (11, 14)18 (17, 19)24 (22, 26)
Person-years of follow-up74,19577,72471,28971,640
Mortality rate (per 1000 person-years)182.1156.3140.1147.8
Crude HR (95% CI)1.000.87 (0.80–0.94) *0.79 (0.72–0.85) **0.83 (0.77–0.90) **<0.0010.07
Adjusted HR (95% CI) d1.000.92 (0.85–0.99) *0.89 (0.82–0.96) *0.96 (0.88–1.04)0.170.008
Adjusted HR (95% CI) e1.000.95 (0.87–1.02)0.92 (0.85–1.02)0.99 (0.91–1.08)0.730.04
Adjusted HR (95% CI) f1.000.95 (0.88–1.03)0.92 (0.84–1.00) 0.97 (0.89–1.06)0.380.08
Vegetable-based LCD score b
Median score (IQR)11 (9, 12)14 (13, 15)17 (16, 18)20 (19, 21)
Person-years of follow-up77,35885,58477,51854,388
Mortality rate (per 1000 person-years)151.0148.2161.8171.7
Crude HR (95% CI)1.000.98 (0.91–1.07)1.08 (1.00–1.17) *1.16 (1.06–1.26) **<0.0010.15
Adjusted HR (95% CI) d1.000.99 (0.91–1.07)1.12 (1.04–1.22) **1.18 (1.09–1.29) **<0.0010.23
Adjusted HR (95% CI) e1.000.99 (0.91–1.07)1.11 (1.02–1.21) *1.16 (1.05–1.27) *<0.0010.18
Adjusted HR (95% CI) f1.000.98 (0.90–1.06)1.09 (1.00–1.18) 1.09 (0.99–1.20)0.010.20
Meat-based LCD score c
Median score (IQR)6 (3, 8)13 (11, 14)19 (17, 20)24 (23, 27)
Person-years of follow-up74,81675,83879,93664,259
Mortality rate (per 1000 person-years)186.9155.7143.2140.1
Crude HR (95% CI)1.000.84 (0.77–0.90) ***0.78 (0.72–0.84) ***0.77 (0.71–0.84) ***<0.0010.15
Adjusted HR (95% CI) d1.000.89 (0.82–0.96) **0.87 (0.80–0.94) **0.88 (0.81–0.96) **0.0010.12
Adjusted HR (95% CI) e1.000.89 (0.83–0.97) **0.90 (0.83–0.97) **0.89 (0.81–0.97) **0.0070.06
Adjusted HR (95% CI) f1.000.89 (0.82–0.97) **0.91 (0.84–0.98) *0.91 (0.83–0.99) *0.010.07
Abbreviations: IQR = Interquartile Range; a = Low carbohydrate, high total fat, and high protein intake; b = Low high-quality carbohydrate, high unsaturated fat, and high plant protein intake; c = Low low-quality carbohydrate, high saturated fat, and high animal protein intake; d = Adjusted for sex and age; e = Additionally adjusted for education, family income, smoking, drinking, physical activity, BMI and history of cancer and CVD; f = Additionally adjusted for systolic blood pressure, fasting plasma-glucose, total cholesterol and self-rated health at baseline. *: 0.05; **: 0.01; ***: 0.001.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, C.; Zhang, W.-S.; Jiang, C.-Q.; Jin, Y.-L.; Deng, X.-Q.; Woo, J.; Cheng, K.-K.; Lam, T.-H.; Thomas, G.N.; Xu, L. Low-Carbohydrate Diets and Mortality in Older Asian People: A 15-Year Follow-Up from a Prospective Cohort Study. Nutrients 2022, 14, 1406. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14071406

AMA Style

Sun C, Zhang W-S, Jiang C-Q, Jin Y-L, Deng X-Q, Woo J, Cheng K-K, Lam T-H, Thomas GN, Xu L. Low-Carbohydrate Diets and Mortality in Older Asian People: A 15-Year Follow-Up from a Prospective Cohort Study. Nutrients. 2022; 14(7):1406. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14071406

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Ce, Wei-Sen Zhang, Chao-Qiang Jiang, Ya-Li Jin, Xue-Qing Deng, Jean Woo, Kar-Keung Cheng, Tai-Hing Lam, G. Neil Thomas, and Lin Xu. 2022. "Low-Carbohydrate Diets and Mortality in Older Asian People: A 15-Year Follow-Up from a Prospective Cohort Study" Nutrients 14, no. 7: 1406. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14071406

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop