Next Article in Journal
Full versus Trophic Feeds in Critically Ill Adults with High and Low Nutritional Risk Scores: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Next Article in Special Issue
Genetically Guided Mediterranean Diet for the Personalized Nutritional Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Previous Article in Journal
Characterizing Dietary Intakes in Rural Australian Adults: A Systematic Literature Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of a Mediterranean Diet-Based Nutritional Intervention on the Risk of Developing Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Other Maternal-Fetal Adverse Events in Hispanic Women Residents in Spain
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 12
Issue 11
10.3390/nu12113516
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Low Reported Adherence to the 2019 American Diabetes Association Nutrition Recommendations among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Indicating the Need for Improved Nutrition Education and Diet Care

by
Savvas Katsaridis
1,
Maria G. Grammatikopoulou
1,2,
Konstantinos Gkiouras
3,
Christos Tzimos
4,
Stefanos T. Papageorgiou
5,
Anastasia G. Markaki
6,
Triada Exiara
7,
Dimitrios G. Goulis
2,*,† and
Theodora Papamitsou
8,*,†
1
Department of Nutritional Sciences & Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Alexander Campus, International Hellenic University, Sindos, GR-57400 Thessaloniki, Greece
2
Unit of Reproductive Endocrinology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Papageorgiou General Hospital, GR-56429 Thessaloniki, Greece
3
Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, GR-54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
4
Northern Greece Statistics Directorate, Hellenic Statistical Authority, 218 Delfon Str, GR-54646 Thessaloniki, Greece
5
Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, GR-54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
6
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hellenic Mediterranean University, PO Box 8556, Trypitos, GR-72300 Sitia, Greece
7
Department of Internal Medicine, Sismanoglio General Hospital, 45 Sismanogliou Str, GR-69133 Komotini, Greece
8
Laboratory of Histology and Embryology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, GR-54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Nutrients 2020, 12(11), 3516; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12113516
Submission received: 24 October 2020 / Revised: 9 November 2020 / Accepted: 13 November 2020 / Published: 15 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Nutrition of Diabetes and Gestational Diabetes)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Patient adherence to guidelines is important for improved outcomes and prognosis. Nevertheless, many patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) do not comply with the recommendations regarding medication, physical activity, diet or self-care. The present cross-sectional study aimed to assess the level of adherence to the dietary recommendations issued by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) among patients with T2DM in Komotini, Greece. A total of 162 adults with T2DM (64.7 ± 10.6 years old), of which 41.4% were men, were recruited from the Sismanoglio Hospital and participated in the study. The level of adherence to individual recommendations issued by the ADA was assessed using yes/no questions. The overall adherence rate to the guidelines was low (41.2%). According to the multivariable analysis, age and medication therapy were identified as contributors to the compliance rate. No differences were noted in the total compliance rate between patients of different religious denominations (Muslims/Christians). Patients on oral antidiabetic agents (OAA) were more adherent compared with those on insulin therapy. A mere 3.7% of the participants had received nutrition education by a registered dietitian, 9.9% were following an individualized diet plan to improve glycemia, and 3.1% had set specific energy goals to reduce body weight. These findings are indicative of the need for the delivery of improved nutrition education.

1. Introduction

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic condition affecting more than 451 million adults worldwide [1]. In Greece, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has been estimated to affect 12% of the total adult population [2], demonstrating an increased prevalence as compared to older cross-sectional studies [3,4]. Depending on the type of the disease and the age of patients, treatment options include medication or insulin, self-management and lifestyle advice [5]. For patients with T2DM, adherence to non-insulin medication therapy is a challenging task, greatly dependent on the disease’s duration, with newly diagnosed patients being the less adherent ones [6,7]. In addition, 4% of patients with T2DM are “primary” non-adherents (i.e., they have never filled their prescriptions) [8]. Regarding insulin, only 62–64% of patients with T2DM comply with the prescribed dose [7], leaving approximately 1/3 of them without therapy. Among insulin-naïve patients, the rate of non-adherence is high: 4.5% are “primary” and an additional 25.5% “secondary” non-adherents (i.e., they fill their prescriptions in an inconsistent way) [7,9,10].
With regard to self-management, assessment of blood glucose concentrations is performed on average on 0.2–2.2 days each week, whereas foot care is implemented for approximately 2.2–4.3 days/weekly [11].
Following the lifestyle recommendations is another issue of concern among patients with DM [12]. Anxiety, depression and stress are associated with reduced compliance to the lifestyle-recommendations [13]. Long-term compliance to exercise goals can vary greatly, ranging between 10 to 80%, mainly due to lack of motivation and the fact that exercise is not monitored [10,14]. Concerning diet, patients often report disliking the foods listed in their meal plans [10] and tend to comply with the dietary recommendations for approximately 2.3–4.6 days every week [11]. Longer disease duration and the attainment of nutrition education appear to positively affect the rate of adherence [15].
Poor compliance is associated with poorer disease prognosis, an increased risk for developing comorbidities and complications [16], and a higher mortality ratio [10,17]. Understanding the level of adherence to the treatment recommendations is important to evaluate the quality of provided care, implement changes in the delivery of care and related education, and identify those less likely to adhere and improve patient outcomes. With this in mind, the present cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate adherence to the American Diabetes Association (ADA) nutrition recommendations among patients with T2DM.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Recruitment and Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

A total of 171 patients with a diagnosis of DM were recruited from the “Sismanoglio” General Hospital in Komotini, Northern Greece, during the year 2019 (25 June to 16 December). All out-patients visiting the clinic at the time of the study, fulfilling the inclusion criteria, were recruited. Pre-existing nutrition education was not a pre-requisite for participation. Given that the number of recruited patients with type 1 DM was low (n = 9), they were excluded from the analysis. Thus, the final sample consisted of 162 patients with T2DM.
Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) adult patients, (2) diagnosis of T2DM, (3) ability to understand and articulate effortlessly in the Greek language, (4) willingness to participate, and (5) provision of informed consent. Exclusion criteria involved (1) patients not capable of consenting, (2) those unable to understand and communicate in Greek and (3) underage patients. The characteristics of the sample are provided in Table 1.
The study’s permission was granted by the “Sismanoglio” General Hospital Directorate (Approval ID: 457/20-June-2020), and all patients provided informed consent before participation. Data were handled according to the Helsinki Declaration for research on humans.

2.2. Adherence to the ADA Dietary Recommendations

According to the World Health Organization (WHO) [18,19], adherence for long-term treatment refers to “the extent to which a person’s behavior—taking medication, following a diet, and/or executing lifestyle changes, corresponds with agreed recommendations from a health care provider”. With this in mind, all ADA [20] nutrition recommendations issued in the same year of the present research (2019) were extracted by two researchers independently and included in a questionnaire with binary answers (yes/no). A total of 17 distinct recommendations were extracted from the guidelines [20] (Table 2). These were used to assess the degree of adherence to the guidelines. Two questions referring to insulin use were only addressed to those on insulin therapy (numbers 6 and 7—Table 2). No time restrictions were applied to participants regarding the completion of the questionnaire.
The percentage (%) of adherence to the ADA’s recommendations was calculated based on the sum of adherence (positive answers; “yes”) according to the 17 questions for patients on insulin therapy and based on the sum adherence of 15 questions for patients on therapy with oral antidiabetic agents (OAA) only.
For the purpose of the study, an experienced registered nutritionist dietitian (RDN) (S.K.) was present at the outpatient clinic for DM every day, throughout the study’s recruitment period. Participating patients were interviewed by the RDN on a one-on-one basis, and their reported adherence to the ADA recommendations was recorded on the questionnaire, on paper form, by the same RDN. No training was provided to the participants prior to participation.
For specific questions, participants were assisted with photographs of common food portion sizes and the micronutrient content of selected food groups, by the RDN. For instance, with regard to fiber, adequate intake was presented as daily portions of vegetables, fruit, or grains. Concerning sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), commercially available choices were presented to participants in order for them to report their intake. Alcohol portions were also presented in picture format, for participants to better understand and report their consumption. Commercially available sugar substitutes and dietary supplements were also presented, to achieve a more valid reporting.

2.3. Anthropometric and Other Characteristics of the Participants

The participants’ body weight and height were measured during morning hours with a digital scale (SECA 813, SECA Group, Hamburg, Germany) and a wall-mounted stadiometer (SECA 216, SECA Group, Hamburg, Germany). Body mass index (BMI) was calculated for each patient by dividing body weight (kg) by the stature (m) squared. Weight status was identified according to the World Health Organization thresholds for BMI [21].
Data concerning disease duration, comorbidities, latest HbA1c assessment, education level, and medication therapy for DM were recorded for each participant. Given that Komotini has the greatest Muslim population in Greece, the religious denomination of participants was also recorded.

2.4. Statistical Analyses

Normality in distribution was assessed both visually and with the Shapiro–Wilk test. Normally distributed variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and non-normally distributed as median with the respective interquartile range (IQR). Descriptive statistics for qualitative data are presented as frequencies (n) with their respective percentages in parentheses. Chi-square tests and the Mann–Whitney test were utilized to examine differences among qualitative and quantitative variables, respectively.
A univariable linear regression analysis was conducted in order to assess the impact on percentage adherence to the ADA’s recommendations total score (dependent variable) of the following study variables: age in years (continuous), sex (male vs. female), BMI in kg/m2 (continuous), educational level (primary vs. secondary or tertiary), religious denomination (Christian vs. Muslim), diabetes duration in years (continuous), HbA1c in % (continuous), and therapy type (insulin vs. OAA only). A multivariable linear regression analysis was conducted, which included those independent variables selected by the augmented backward selection procedure as previously described [22]. Normality assumption and homoscedasticity were examined on the residuals, and multicollinearity was assessed by calculating tolerance and variance inflation factor (VIF). All analyses were carried out on the Statistical Software for Social Studies (SPSS) v. 25.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics, Armonk, NY, USA) and the SAS University Edition (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). The significance level was set at α = 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Adherence to the Dietary Recommendations

Total sample adherence to the ADA dietary recommendations [20] and adherence per participant group are presented in Table 2. The sample’s median percentage of adherence to the ADA dietary recommendations was suboptimal, reaching 41.2% (35.3%, 53.3%).
A mere 3.7% of the sample had received nutrition education by an RDN. The majority of participants reported adhering to the fiber (87.7%) and fish intake (78.4%) recommendations; most reported being aware of how to combat hypoglycemia (97.5%) and of the fact that supplements cannot improve glycemic control (79.6%). Only 9.9% of the patients followed an individualized diet plan to improve glycemic control, and 3.1% had specific energy targets set to reduce their body weight. Among those on insulin therapy, only 1.2% were competent to count their meals’ carbohydrate content, and 3.7% were receiving fixed insulin doses paired with a consistent carbohydrate intake. Recommendations regarding alcohol intake were only adhered to by 3.7% of the sample. The vast majority (87.7%) reported maintaining the pleasure of eating. Only 17.9% and 21.6% of the participants were able to control their blood lipid and blood pressure levels by diet alone, without pharmacotherapy.
Patients on OAA therapy only, exhibited increased adherence compared with those receiving insulin (medians: 46.7% vs. 38.2% respectively; p ≤ 0.001). In parallel, men were more compliant compared with women (medians: 46.7% vs. 41.2%, respectively; p ≤ 0.01) and younger patients compared with the older ones (medians: 46.9% vs. 41.2%, respectively; p ≤ 0.01).

3.2. Assessment of the Impact of Study Variables on Percentage of ADA Adherence Score

In a univariable assessment (Table 3), patients on OAA were associated with an increased percentage of ADA adherence score (β = 9.56, 95% CI = 6.45 to 12.63). A positive association was also observed among participants having attained education on the secondary or tertiary level (β = 6.28, 95% CI = 2.61 to 9.95). On the other hand, female sex and age were associated with a decreased percentage of ADA adherence score (β = −4.30, 95% CI = −7.56 to −1.04, and β = −0.22, 95% CI = −0.37 to −0.04). DM-related variables including diabetes duration (years) and HbA1c (%) demonstrated a negative association with percentage of ADA adherence score (β = −0.51, 95% CI = −0.72 to −0.30, and β = 1.48, 95% CI = −2.50 to −0.46). Religious beliefs and BMI were not associated with the ADA adherence score (p-values > 0.05).
In the multivariable model (Table 3), patients on OAA therapy demonstrated increased adherence to the guidelines (by 8.36%), whereas adherence was decreased by 0.23% with every year of increasing age.

4. Discussion

Patients with T2DM exhibited low compliance to the ADA dietary recommendations for DM. Among those on OAA therapy only, men and younger patients reported a better adherence rate compared with patients receiving insulin, women and older patients. Based on the univariable analysis, age, BMI, DM duration, HbA1c, and Muslin denomination reduced compliance, whereas, having attained secondary or tertiary education and being on OAA therapy only, were associated with increased compliance. In the multivariable analysis, only OAA therapy and DM duration were associated with the rate of adherence to the recommendations.
In the present sample, only 3.7% of the participants had received nutrition education by an RDN. According to a systematic review and meta-analysis, the delivery of dietary education by RDNs consists of the most effective medium to improve patient outcomes [23]. Previous studies in Greece have revealed suboptimal nutrition knowledge among patients with DM [24,25,26], highlighting the need for an integrated approach to patient education. In parallel, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have unanimously revealed improvements in glycemic control and disease prognosis following the implementation of nutrition education sessions [27,28]. In a study conducted in the USA [29] (Table 4), patients with T1DM and T2DM were educated on nutritional issues by an RDN and set individual goals based on the ADA/Morrison Health Care (MHC) recommendations. Post-intervention, 40% of participants attained the dietary goals excellently, 32.7% were adequately meeting their goals, and the remaining 27% adhered to the dietary goals fairly. A similar pattern was observed for exercise goals. After the intervention, an improvement was noted in the HbA1c concentrations. In an RCT comparing adherence to the ADA dietary recommendations against a low-fat vegan diet, an improved overall adherence rate was noted in the latter compared with the former [30], indicating that many factors impeding adherence to the guidelines may exist. Interestingly, a mixed-methods study [31] failed to correlate DM knowledge to the rate of compliance with the guidelines (assessed by personal interviews). Several barriers were identified affecting the degree of compliance to the recommendations, including external stress, a conflict between advice and personal beliefs, lack of time and personal motivation, gaps in knowledge and living in an obesogenic environment [31]. Based on the latter observation, according to a recent meta-analysis [32], changing the dietary environment is more important for glycemic control compared with changing the dietary behavior; nevertheless, both are clinically effective for managing HbA1c concentrations.
Apart from nutrition education, delivery of medical nutrition therapy (MNT) is important, as it involves the nutrition care process model, setting individual goals and guiding patients towards their attainment, close monitoring and evaluation. In the present sample, 9.9% of the patients were following an individualized diet plan to improve glycemia, whereas 3.1% had set specific energy targets and adhered to an MNT scheme aiming to reduce body weight. Individualized nutrition therapy carries more benefits for the patient than receiving dietary advice alone [33]. This is due to the low nutrition-related competencies and often inadequate education received by medical doctors in Greece and throughout the world [34,35] and the fact that RDNs are the most competent professionals for the delivery of MNT [36,37]. According to an econometric study [38], MNT is associated with a 9.5% reduction in the hospitalization of patients with DM, and a concurrent 23.5% decline in the use of physician services; thus, it should be considered as necessary instead of optimal, for all patients with DM [39].
Among participants in the present sample, complying with the alcohol recommendations proved to be a difficult task, as only 3.7% of them reported adhering to this goal. In contrast to the findings herein, in Northern California [40], most patients with DM complied with the ADA recommendations regarding alcohol intake. Alcohol intake is considered an indicator of poorer adherence to DM self-care behaviors [40]. In Greece, although alcohol use is not widespread, it holds a prominent position at celebrations and family meal tables. Thus, it might be difficult for patients with T2DM to control alcohol consumption in such habitual cases. Based on studies performed on humans and preclinical models, acute ethanol intake induces either a reduction, or a null effect on circulating glucose concentrations [41]. The first appears more likely to occur in fasted individuals, with only a small amount of evidence suggesting alcohol hypoglycemia in well-nourished patients [41,42,43,44]. Among patients with T2DM on different treatment regimes, it has been suggested that those on diet therapy do not experience hypoglycemia, whereas sulphonylurea-treated individuals might carry this risk [45].
Concerning the use of oral nutrient supplements (ONS) to improve glycemic control, most participants (79.6%) were aware that they are not efficient unless a deficiency is apparent, and subsequently, most patients herein abstained from their use. Nevertheless, 6.8% reported consuming cinnamon supplements, 1.9% received aloe vera ONS, 0.6% were reliant on curcumin to aid glycemic control, and 8% were consuming other supplements, with a special focus on poly-unsaturated fatty acids (PUFA). According to a recent scoping review [46], for many of the ONS postulated as efficient for DM care, a lack of scientific background is apparent. Thus, it is important to elaborate that these supplements often carry adverse effects and increase the cost of DM care, without offering any positive outcomes [47]. These issues can only be realized by educating patients on topics related to nutrition.
An individual’s diet is greatly dependent on an interplay of religious, familial, psychological, financial, and personal factors [48]. According to the ADA [49,50], structured interventions destined for patients with DM should be offered for diverse populations and audiences, integrating both culture and religion. In particular, religion is an integral part of the culture, often directing food habits through Lent, fasting or beliefs related to certain foods [48]. Concerning the effect of the religious denomination on the rate of adherence to the dietary guidelines, no differences were observed in the total compliance score herein, apart from a greater proportion of patients with Christian denomination following specific energy targets for bodyweight reduction and reporting using sugar substitutes to a greater extend. Although having a Muslim denomination was associated with a decreased adherence score in the univariable analysis, this effect failed to remain significant when all other factors were considered. This fact indicates that in Komotini’s multicultural community, healthcare equity does not allow for disparities based on religion, offering an individually adapted DM-care model.
Based on the multivariable model, each yearly increment in the age reduced total adherence score by −0.23%, whereas those on OAA therapy only had an increased dietary compliance score by 8.36%. These findings agree with previous research on patients with T2DM, suggesting that the use of insulin is associated with a decreased adherence to the therapy [51]. With regard to age, although a study in Rio de Janeiro revealed a decreased compliance rate among older patients [52], conflicting evidence exists in the literature concerning this issue. Concerning diet, studies have revealed an improved adherence rate with a more recent DM diagnosis (and subsequently, younger age) [53]; concerning medication, increasing age appears to ameliorate adherence [6,7,54,55].
The results also indicated a reduced adherence rate among women participants as compared to their male counterparts. Previous research on Greek patients with DM has also revealed a reduced nutritional knowledge and self-management practices among women with T2DM inhabiting the city of Agrinio, in Central Greece [24,26]. Apart from the fact that older women inhabiting mainland Greece are likely to have received less education in general, women are also responsible for preparing the meals for all the family. This increased preoccupation with food, including frequent tasting of the prepared dishes, is likely a factor reducing adherence to the dietary recommendations among women [25]. In parallel, according to Fitzgerald [56], gender differences are also apparent in diabetes attitudes. On the other hand, according to a study in Singapore [57], lower adherence was demonstrated in men with DM as compared to women. Therefore, the exact extent of the effect of gender on DM adherence remains unclear.
Table 4 summarizes available evidence assessing adherence to the dietary recommendations among patients with DM. In Canada [58], patients with T2DM exceeded daily sodium and saturated fatty acid (SFA) recommendations issued by the Canadian Diabetes Association (CDA). Cured meats, fast foods and snack foods were all major contributors to the intake of sodium and saturated fat [58]. In Pakistan [59], 36.5% of patients with DM complied with the ADA dietary recommendations. In further detail, greater adherence was noted among those feeling comfortable with their diet plan, and those aware of which diet was harmful to them. In Italy, a great proportion of patients with T2DM adhered to the recommendations for protein and added sugars, but the respective percentage of those meeting SFA and fiber goals was lower [60]. A similar pattern was noted in Thailand [61], with the majority of patients with T2DM failing to meet local SFA and fiber recommendations, issued based on the ADA respective guidelines. In Finland [62], a mere 28% of patients with T1DM with nephropathy restricted their SFA intake according to the recommended levels of less than 10% of the total energy intake based on the Finish Diabetes Association (FDA) guidelines. In parallel, 4% of the participants met the recommended fiber intake values, and 25% exceeded the suggested goal regarding sugar intake [62]. Nevertheless, more than 50% of the participants perceived themselves as adherers to the dietary recommendations either “most of the time”, or “always” [62].
Concerning adolescents with T1DM [64], according to a study from Norway, apart from the intake of fat and fiber, which were over- and under-consumed, respectively, all intakes of remaining macronutrients were adequate according to the recommendations of the relevant International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes (ISPAD). Improved dietary intakes were also noted among adolescents with better glycemic control.
The present study indicates that MNT and nutrition education are often neglected areas of DM care in Greece. Most hospitals fail to employ an adequate number of RDNs, and, thus, nutritional education and care are often offered in private practice to those patients who have the financial means to address relevant out-of-pocket expenses. On the other hand, multidisciplinary teams are required for the management of all conditions/diseases, and as far as DM is concerned, systematic reviews and meta-analyses have highlighted the importance of including RDNs in routine DM care for improved patient outcomes [65].
The limitations of this study include the assessment of adherence to the ADA guidelines instead of relevant recommendations from a Greek society/authority. Furthermore, the cross-sectional design does not allow for causal associations. In parallel, using a relatively small sample from one hospital only might not allow for extrapolation of the findings (external validity).

5. Conclusions

According to the WHO, among patients with chronic disease, the rate of adherence to lifestyle recommendations is lower as compared to medication ones [19]. A salient explanation for this phenomenon might be that medication therapy does not require particular effort from the part of the patient, whereas on the other hand, lifestyle treatment is greatly dependent on the stage of motivational readiness [66,67]. The present cross-sectional study demonstrated a low reported adherence rate to the dietary recommendations for DM among patients with T2DM, indicating the need for improved nutrition education and diet care.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.G.G. and M.G.G.; methodology, D.G.G. and M.G.G.; formal analysis, K.G. and C.T.; investigation, S.K. and T.E.; resources, T.P.; data curation, S.K.; writing—original draft preparation, M.G.G., D.G.G. and S.T.P.; writing—review and editing, D.G.G., M.G.G. and A.G.M.; supervision, T.P., M.G.G. and D.G.G.; project administration, T.P.; funding acquisition, T.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the “MSc in Health and Environmental Factors”, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece (Grant No: 97509).

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the help and cooperation of all participating patients.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cho, N.H.; Shaw, J.E.; Karuranga, S.; Huang, Y.; da Rocha Fernandes, J.D.; Ohlrogge, A.W.; Malanda, B. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2017 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2018, 138, 271–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tsirona, S.; Katsaros, F.; Alexandra, A.; Polyzos, S.; Arapoglou, G.; Koukoulis, G. Prevalence and determinants of type 2 diabetes mellitus in a Greek adult population. Hormones 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Panagiotakos, D.B.; Pitsavos, C.; Chrysohoou, C.; Stefanadis, C. The epidemiology of Type 2 diabetes mellitus in Greek adults: The ATTICA study. Diabet. Med. 2005, 22, 1581–1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lionis, C.D.; Sasarolis, S.M.; Koutis, A.D.; Antonakis, N.A.; Benos, A.; Papavasiliou, S.; Fioretos, M. Measuring the prevalence of diabetes mellitus in a Greek primary health care district. Fam. Pract. 1996, 13, 18–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Paschou, S.A.; Ljlijana, M.V.; Spartalis, E.; Anagnostis, P.; Alexandrou, A.; Goulis, D.G.; Lambrinoudaki, I. Therapeutic strategies for type 2 diabetes mellitus in women after menopause. Maturitas 2019, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kirkman, M.S.; Rowan-Martin, M.T.; Levin, R.; Fonseca, V.A.; Schmittdiel, J.A.; Herman, W.H.; Aubert, R.E. Determinants of adherence to diabetes medications: Findings from a large pharmacy claims database. Diabetes Care 2015, 38, 604–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Cramer, J.A. A systematic review of adherence with medications for diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004, 27, 1218–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Karter, A.J.; Parker, M.M.; Moffet, H.H.; Ahmed, A.T.; Schmittdiel, J.A.; Selby, J. New prescription medication gaps: A comprehensive measure of adherence to new prescriptions. Health Serv. Res. 2009, 44, 1640–1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Karter, A.J.; Subramanian, U.; Saha, C.; Crosson, J.C.; Parker, M.M.; Swain, B.E.; Moffet, H.H.; Marrero, D.G. Barriers to insulin initiation: The translating research into action for diabetes insulin starts project. Diabetes Care 2010, 33, 733–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. García-Pérez, L.-E.; Alvarez, M.; Dilla, T.; Gil-Guillén, V.; Orozco-Beltrán, D. Adherence to therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Ther. 2013, 4, 175–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Mogre, V.; Johnson, N.A.; Tzelepis, F.; Shaw, J.E.; Paul, C. A systematic review of adherence to diabetes self-care behaviours: Evidence from low- and middle-income countries. J. Adv. Nurs. 2019, 75, 3374–3389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Aladhab, R.A.; Alabbood, M.H. Adherence of Patients with Diabetes to a Lifestyle Advice and Management Plan in Basra, Southern Iraq. Int. J. Diabetes Metab. 2019, 25, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Albuquerque, C.; Correia, C.; Ferreira, M.; Centro, B.; Tondela-Viseu, H.; Rei, A.; Duarte, D. Adherence to the therapeutic regime in person with type 2 diabetes. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2015, 171, 350–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Praet, S.F.E.; van Loon, L.J.C. Exercise therapy in type 2 diabetes. Acta Diabetol. 2009, 46, 263–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Mohammed, M.A.; Sharew, N.T. Adherence to dietary recommendation and associated factors among diabetic patients in Ethiopian teaching hospitals. Pan Afr. Med. J. 2019, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Katsiki, N.; Anagnostis, P.; Kotsa, K.; Goulis, D.G.; Mikhailidis, D.P. Obesity, Metabolic Syndrome and the Risk of Microvascular Complications in Patients with Diabetes mellitus. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2019, 25, 2051–2059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bailey, C.J.; Kodack, M. Patient adherence to medication requirements for therapy of type 2 diabetes. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2011, 65, 314–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Osterberg, L.; Blaschke, T. Adherence to medication. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005, 353, 487–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Sabaté, E. Adherence to Long-Term Therapy: Evidence for Action; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2003; ISBN 9241545992. [Google Scholar]
  20. Evert, A.B.; Dennison, M.; Gardner, C.D.; Garvey, W.T.; Lau, K.H.K.; MacLeod, J.; Mitri, J.; Pereira, R.F.; Rawlings, K.; Robinson, S.; et al. Nutrition Therapy for Adults With Diabetes or Prediabetes: A Consensus Report. Diabetes Care 2019, 42, 731–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. World Health Organization. Obesity: Preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ. Tech. Rep. Ser. 2000, 894, 1–253. [Google Scholar]
  22. Dunkler, D.; Plischke, M.; Leffondré, K.; Heinze, G. Augmented Backward Elimination: A Pragmatic and Purposeful Way to Develop Statistical Models. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e113677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sun, Y.; You, W.; Almeida, F.; Estabrooks, P.; Davy, B. The Effectiveness and Cost of Lifestyle Interventions Including Nutrition Education for Diabetes Prevention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2017, 117, 404–421.e36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Poulimeneas, D.; Grammatikopoulou, M.G.; Bougioukli, V.; Iosifidou, P.; Vasiloglou, M.F.; Gerama, M.A.; Mitsos, D.; Chrysanthakopoulou, I.; Tsigga, M.; Kazakos, K. Diabetes knowledge among Greek Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus patients. Endocrinol. Nutr. 2016, 63, 320–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Digkliou, L.; Kazakos, K.; Kotsa, K.; Goulis, D.G. Disease-specific knowledge and lifestyle behavior in patients with diabetes mellitus. Obes. Med. 2016, 1, 29–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Grammatikopoulou, M.G.; Iosifidou, P.; Maraki, M.I.; Baltzis, D.; Mitsos, D.; Tsigga, M. Nutritional surveillance and diabetes knowledge among patients with type 2 diabetes. Obes. Med. 2017, 5, 44–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Vasconcelos, C.; Almeida, A.; Cabral, M.; Ramos, E.; Mendes, R. The Impact of a Community-Based Food Education Program on Nutrition-Related Knowledge in Middle-Aged and Older Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Results of a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Thuita, A.W.; Kiage, B.N.; Onyango, A.N.; Makokha, A.O. Effect of a nutrition education programme on the metabolic syndrome in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients at a level 5 Hospital in Kenya: “A randomized controlled trial”. BMC Nutr. 2020, 6, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Christensen, N.K.; Steiner, J.; Whalen, J.; Pfister, R. Contribution of Medical Nutrition Therapy and Diabetes Self-Management Education to Diabetes Control as Assessed by Hemoglobin A1c. Diabetes Spectr. 2000, 13, 72. [Google Scholar]
  30. Barnard, N.D.; Gloede, L.; Cohen, J.; Jenkins, D.J.A.; Turner-McGrievy, G.; Green, A.A.; Ferdowsian, H. A Low-Fat Vegan Diet Elicits Greater Macronutrient Changes, but Is Comparable in Adherence and Acceptability, Compared with a More Conventional Diabetes Diet among Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2009, 109, 263–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Han, C.Y.; Chan, C.G.B.; Lim, S.L.; Zheng, X.; Woon, Z.W.; Chan, Y.T.; Bhaskaran, K.; Tan, K.F.; Mangaikarasu, K.; Chong, M.F.-F. Diabetes-related nutrition knowledge and dietary adherence in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus: A mixed-methods exploratory study. Proc. Singapore Healthc. 2020, 29, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cradock, K.A.; Gearóid, G.G.; Gearóid´olaighin, G.; Finucane, F.M.; Mckay, R.; Quinlan, L.R.; Ginis, K.A.M.; Gainforth, H.L. Diet Behavior Change Techniques in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 2017, 40, 1800–1810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Møller, G.; Andersen, H.K.; Snorgaard, O. A systematic review and meta-analysis of nutrition therapy compared with dietary advice in patients with type 2 diabetes. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2017, 106, 1394–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Crowley, J.; Ball, L.; Hiddink, G.J. Nutrition in medical education: A systematic review. Lancet Planet. Health 2019, 3, e379–e389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Grammatikopoulou, M.G.; Katsouda, A.; Lekka, K.; Tsantekidis, K.; Bouras, E.; Kasapidou, E.; Poulia, K.-A.; Chourdakis, M. Is continuing medical education sufficient? Assessing the clinical nutrition knowledge of medical doctors. Nutrition 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Raynor, H.A.; Davidson, P.G.; Burns, H.; Nadelson, M.D.H.; Mesznik, S.; Uhley, V.; Moloney, L. Medical Nutrition Therapy and Weight Loss Questions for the Evidence Analysis Library Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes Project: Systematic Reviews. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2017, 117, 1578–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Early, K.B.; Stanley, K. Position Paper Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: The Role of Medical Nutrition Therapy and Registered Dietitian Nutritionists in the Prevention and Treatment of Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2018, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Sheils, J.F.; Rubin, R.; Stapleton, D.C. The estimated costs and savings of medical nutrition therapy: The Medicare population. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1999, 99, 428–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Pastors, J.G.; Warshaw, H.; Daly, A.; Franz, M.; Kulkarni, K. The evidence for the effectiveness of medical nutrition therapy in diabetes management. Diabetes Care 2002, 25, 608–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Ahmed, A.T.; Karter, A.J.; Warton, E.M.; Doan, J.U.; Weisner, C.M. The relationship between alcohol consumption and glycemic control among patients with diabetes: The Kaiser Permanente Northern California diabetes registry. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Steiner, J.L.; Crowell, K.T.; Lang, C.H. Impact of Alcohol on Glycemic Control and Insulin Action. Biomolecules 2015, 5, 2223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Searle, G.L.; Shames, D.; Cavalieri, R.R.; Bagdade, J.D.; Porte, D. Evaluation of ethanol hypoglycemia in man: Turnover studies with C-6 14C glucose. Metabolism 1974, 23, 1023–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Field, J.B.; Williams, H.E.; Mortimore, G.E. Studies on the mechanism of ethanol-induced hypoglycemia. J. Clin. Investig. 1963, 42, 497–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Lang, C.H.; Derdak, Z.; Wands, J.R. Strain-dependent differences for suppression of insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in skeletal and cardiac muscle by ethanol. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2014, 38, 897–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Pietraszek, A.; Gregersen, S.; Hermansen, K. Alcohol and type 2 diabetes. A review. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2010, 20, 366–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hannon, B.A.; Fairfield, W.D.; Adams, B.; Kyle, T.; Crow, M.; Thomas, D.M. Use and abuse of dietary supplements in persons with diabetes. Nutr. Diabetes 2020, 10, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Campbell, A.P. Diabetes and Dietary Supplements. Clin. Diabetes 2010, 28, 35–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Tripp-Reimer, T.; Choi, E.; Kelley, L.S.; Enslein, J.C. Cultural Barriers to Care: Inverting the Problem. Diabetes Spectr. 2001, 14, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Zeh, P.; Sandhu, H.K.; Cannaby, A.M.; Sturt, J.A. The impact of culturally competent diabetes care interventions for improving diabetes-related outcomes in ethnic minority groups: A systematic review. Diabet. Med. 2012, 29, 1237–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. American Diabetes Association (ADA). 1. Promoting Health and Reducing Disparities in Populations. Diabetes Care 2017, 40, S6–S10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Mendes, R.; Martins, S.; Fernandes, L. Adherence to Medication, Physical Activity and Diet in Older Adults With Diabetes: Its Association With Cognition, Anxiety and Depression. J. Clin. Med. Res. 2019, 11, 583–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Marinho, F.S.; Moram, C.B.M.; Rodrigues, P.C.; Leite, N.C.; Salles, G.F.; Cardoso, C.R.L. Treatment Adherence and Its Associated Factors in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Results from the Rio de Janeiro Type 2 Diabetes Cohort Study. J. Diabetes Res. 2018, 2018, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Alhariri, A.; Daud, F.; Almaiman, A.; Ayesh, S.; Saghir, M. Diabetes Management Factors associated with adherence to diet and exercise among type 2 diabetes patients in Hodeidah city, Yemen. Diabetes Manag. 2017, 7, 264–271. [Google Scholar]
  54. Patel, S.; Abreu, M.; Tumyan, A.; Adams-Huet, B.; Li, X.; Lingvay, I. Effect of medication adherence on clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetes: Analysis of the SIMPLE study. BMJ Open Diabetes Res. Care 2019, 7, e000761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Jannoo, Z.; Mamode Khan, N. Medication Adherence and Diabetes Self-Care Activities Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Value Health Reg. Issues 2019, 18, 30–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Fitzgerald, J.T.; Anderson, R.M.; Davis, W.K. Gender differences in diabetes attitudes and adherence. Diabetes Educ. 1995, 21, 523–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Lin, L.-K.; Sun, Y.; Heng, B.H.; Chew, D.E.K.; Chong, P.-N. Medication adherence and glycemic control among newly diagnosed diabetes patients. BMJ Open Diabetes Res. Care 2017, 5, e000429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Raj, G.D.; Hashemi, Z.; Soria Contreras, D.C.; Babwik, S.; Maxwell, D.; Bell, R.C.; Chan, C.B. Adherence to Diabetes Dietary Guidelines Assessed Using a Validated Questionnaire Predicts Glucose Control in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes. Can. J. Diabetes 2018, 42, 78–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Gillani, A.H.; Ahmed, A.B.; Bashir, S.; Ibrahim, M.I.M.; Fang, Y. Associated Factors with Diet and Exercise Compliance and Smoking Habits in Diabetic Patients of Punjab, Pakistan. Rev. Med. Univ. 2019, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Vitale, M.; Masulli, M.; Calabrese, I.; Rivellese, A.A.; Bonora, E.; Signorini, S.; Perriello, G.; Squatrito, S.; Buzzetti, R.; Sartore, G.; et al. Impact of a mediterranean dietary pattern and its components on cardiovascular risk factors, glucose control, and body weight in people with type 2 diabetes: A real-life study. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Thewjitcharoen, Y.; Chotwanvirat, P.; Jantawan, A.; Siwasaranond, N.; Saetung, S.; Nimitphong, H.; Himathongkam, T.; Reutrakul, S. Evaluation of dietary intakes and nutritional knowledge in Thai patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J. Diabetes Res. 2018, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Ahola, A.J.; Mikkilä, V.; Mäkimattila, S.; Forsblom, C.; Freese, R.; Groop, P.H. Energy and nutrient intakes and adherence to dietary guidelines among Finnish adults with type 1 diabetes. Ann. Med. 2012, 44, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Krige, S.M.; Booley, S.; Levitt, N.S.; Chivese, T.; Murphy, K.; Harbron, J. Dietary Intake and Beliefs of Pregnant Women with Gestational Diabetes in Cape Town, South Africa. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Øverby, N.C.; Margeirsdottir, H.D.; Brunborg, C.; Andersen, L.F.; Dahl-Jørgensen, K. The influence of dietary intake and meal pattern on blood glucose control in children and adolescents using intensive insulin treatment. Diabetologia 2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. García-Molina, L.; Lewis-Mikhael, A.-M.; Riquelme-Gallego, B.; Cano-Ibáñez, N.; Oliveras-López, M.-J.; Bueno-Cavanillas, A. Improving type 2 diabetes mellitus glycaemic control through lifestyle modification implementing diet intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Nutr. 2020, 59, 1313–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Bulc, M.; Švab, I.; Godycki-Cwirko, M. Factors that affect readiness to change lifestyle: A 22-country survey from primary care. Eur. J. Gen. Pract. 2015, 21, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Livia, B.; Elisa, R.; Claudia, R.; Roberto, P.; Cristina, A.; Emilia, S.T.; Chiara, P.; Alberto, T.; Angelo, R.; Pierpaolo, D.F.; et al. Stage of Change and Motivation to a Healthier Lifestyle before and after an Intensive Lifestyle Intervention. J. Obes. 2016, 2016, 6421265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Table
Table 1. Patient characteristics (n and %, or mean ± SD) (n = 162).
Table 1. Patient characteristics (n and %, or mean ± SD) (n = 162).
Men/Women (n, %)67 (41.4%)/95 (58.6%)
Age (years)64.7 ± 10.6
Bodyweight (kg)86.7 ± 18.0
Height (cm)164 ± 8
BMI (kg/m2)32.4 ± 6.6
Weight status (normoweight/overweight/obese) (n, %)13 (8%)/60 (37%)/89 (55%)
Educational level (primary/secondary/tertiary) (n, %)122 (75.3%)/24 (14.8%)/16 (9.9%)
Religion (Christian/Muslim)101 (62.3%)/61 (37.7%)
Diabetes diagnosis (years)10.7 ± 7.3
HbA1c (%)7.1 ± 1.6
Therapy (insulin/pharmacotherapy/both)22 (13.6%)/104 (64.4%)/36 (22.2%)
SBP (mm Hg)129.1 ± 18.3
DBP (mm Hg)80.3 ± 7.6
Triglycerides (mg/dL)157.8 ± 98.5
HDL (mg/dL)46.5 ± 11.9
LDL (mg/dL)95.0 ± 31.4
TSH (mU/L)2.2 ± 1.0
BMI, body mass index; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SD, standard deviation; TSH, thyroid-stimulating hormone. Missing values: LDL (n = 41), HDL (n = 37), Triglycerides (n = 70), SBP (n = 24), DBP (n = 24), and TSH (n = 137).
Table
Table 2. Patient adherence to individual nutrition recommendations suggested by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) (n = 162) (n, % or median, interquartile range (IQR)).
Table 2. Patient adherence to individual nutrition recommendations suggested by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) (n = 162) (n, % or median, interquartile range (IQR)).
Individual Nutrition Recommendations:TherapySexReligious DenominationAge GroupTotal
(n = 162)
On OAA Only
(n = 104)		On Insulin $
(n = 58)		Men
(n = 67)		Women
(n = 95)		Christian
(n = 101)		Muslim
(n = 61)		<60 Years Old
(n = 50)		≥60 Years Old
(n = 112)
1Follow an individualized diet plan based on personal needs to improve glycemia12 (11.5%)4 (6.9%)9 (13.4%)7 (7.4%)12 (11.9%)4 (6.6%)8 (16%)8 (7.1%)16 (9.9%)
2Consumption of nutrient-dense foods in appropriate portion sizes in order to improve overall health33 (56.9%)55 (52.9%)35 (52.2%)53 (55.8%)59 (58.4%)29 (47.5%)27 (54%)61 (54.5%)88 (54.3%)
3Follow an intensive lifestyle intervention program including individualized goals and/or to individualized MNT (for people with prediabetes or overweight/obesity)37 (35.6%) *11 (19%)22 (32.8%)26 (27.4%)36 (35.6%) *12 (19.7%)19 (38%)29 (25.9%)48 (29.6%)
4Consumption of a specific energy target each day based on the individualized body weight goals and needs4 (3.8%)1 (1.7%)3 (4.5%)2 (2.1%)5 (5%)0 (0%)3 (6%)2 (1.8%)5 (3.1%)
5Consumption of adequate dietary fiber (preferably through food (vegetables, pulses (beans, peas and lentils), fruits, and whole intact grains)96 (92.3%)46 (79.3%)62 (92.5%)80 (84.2%)91 (90.1%)51 (83.6%)43 (86%)99 (88.4%)142 (87.7%)
6Able to count carbohydrate content of foods to calculate appropriate insulin dose0 (0%) ∂2 (3.4%)2 (3%) *0 (0%)1 (1%)1 (1.6%)2 (4%) **0 (0%)2 (1.2%)
7Use fixed daily insulin doses, consistent carbohydrate intake with respect to time and amount0 (0%) ∂6 (10.3%)5 (7.5%)1 (1.1%)4 (4%)2 (3.3%)5 (10%)1 (0.9%)6 (3.7%)
8Consumption of SSBs (including juice with sugar, energy drinks and soft-drinks) #35 (33.7%)22 (37.9%)22 (32.8%)35 (36.8%)30 (29.7%)27 (44.3%)22 (44%)35 (31.3%)57 (35.2%)
9In the case of hypoglycemic episodes:
a. Consumption of carbohydrate in the form of juice or sugar101 (97.1%)57 (98.3%)63 (94%) *95 (100%)99 (98%)59 (96.7%)49 (89%)109 (97.3%)258 (97.5%)
b. Consumption of carbohydrate food with high protein content (i.e., bread or cereals)3 (2.9%)1 (1.7%)4 (6%) *0 (0%)2 (2%)2 (3.3%)5 (10%)1 (0.9%)4 (2.5%)
10Consumption of one serving of fish (particularly fatty fish), at least twice/weekly83 (79.8%)44 (75.9%)53 (79.1%)74 (77.9%)84 (83.2%)43 (70.5%)36 (72%)91 (81.3%)127 (78.4%)
11Routine use of the following supplements for improving glycemia:
Vitamin D ‡3 (2.9%)2 (3.4%)0 (0%)5 (5.3%)4 (4%)1 (1.6%)1 (2%)4 (3.6%)5 (3.1%)
Chromium ‡0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
Curcumin ‡1 (1%)0 (0%)1 (1.5%)0 (0%)0 (0%)1 (1.6%)1 (2%)4 (3.6%)1 (0.6%)
Cinnamon ‡9 (8.7%)2 (3.4%)3 (4.5%)8 (8.4%)9 (8.9%)2 (3.3%)6 (12%)5 (4.5%)11 (6.8%)
Aloe vera ‡3 (2.9%)0 (0%)2 (3%)1 (1.1%)3 (3%)0 (0%)1 (2%)2 (1.8%)3 (1.9%)
Any supplement ƒ6 (5.8%)7 (12.1%)6 (9%)7 (7.4%)12 (11.9%)1 (1.6%)4 (8%)9 (8%)13 (8%)
No supplement82 (78.8%)47 (81%)55 (82.1%)74 (77.9%)73 (72.3%)56 (91.8%)37 (74%) **92 (82.1%)129 (79.6%)
12When alcohol is consumed, this is done in moderation (≤1 drink/day for women and ≤2 drinks/day for men)4 (3.8%)2 (3.4%)6 (9%) **0 (0%)4 (4%)2 (3.3%)1 (2%)5 (4.5%)6 (3.7%)
13Use of sugar substitutes (i.e., stevia, saccharin, acesulfame-K, aspartame, sucralose, etc.) †18 (17.3%) *20 (34.5%)20 (29.9%)18 (18.9%)29 (28.7%) *9 (14.8%)12 (24%)26 (23.2%)38 (23.5%)
14Maintenance of the pleasure of eating96 (92.3%)46 (79.3%)62 (92.5%)80 (84.2%)91 (90.1%)51 (83.6%)45 (90%)97 (86.6%)142 (87.7%)
15Controlling blood lipid levels through diet22 (21.2%)7 (12.1%)17 (25.4%)12 (12.6%)21 (20.8%)8 (13.1%)14 (28%)15 (13.4%)29 (17.9%)
16Controlling arterial blood pressure with diet27 (26%)8 (13.8%)21 (31.3%) *14 (14.7%)26 (25.7%)9 (14.8%)20 (40%) ***15 (13.4%)35 (21.6%)
17Received comprehensive nutrition education provided by a RDN, preferably one with DM knowledge and experience4 (3.8%)2 (3.4%)4 (6%)2 (2.1%)6 (5.9%)0 (0%)3 (6%)3 (2.7%)6 (3.7%)
Adherence to the recommendations (% of correct answers) ∝§46.7
(40, 53.3) ***		38.2
(29.4, 41.2)		46.7
(40, 53.3) **		41.2
(35.3, 52.9)		46.7
(40, 53.3)		41.2
(35.3, 47.1)		46.9
(40, 53.3) **		41.2
(35.3, 50.2)		41.2
(35.3, 53.3)
ADA, American Diabetes Association; CVD, cardiovascular; DM, diabetes mellitus; IQR, interquartile range; MNT, medical nutrition therapy; OAA, oral antidiabetic agents; RDN, registered dietitian -nutritionist; SSBs, sugar-sweetened beverages. $ Some were additionally receiving OAA; # should be avoided; † do not appear to reduce long-term CVD risk or body weight; ‡ not recommended; ƒ not recommended, unless a deficiency is present; ∂ For those on OAA, these two questions were omitted from the adherence score; ∝ Based on 17 questions for those on insulin and 15 questions for those on OAA therapy only; * Significantly different compared to the opposite group (on insulin therapy/women/Muslim denomination/age ≥ 60 years old) as follows *** p ≤ 0.001, ** p ≤ 0.01, * p ≤ 0.05; § Tested with the Mann–Whitney test.
Table
Table 3. Univariable and multivariable linear regression assessment of the impact of study variables on the percentage of the total adherence score.
Table 3. Univariable and multivariable linear regression assessment of the impact of study variables on the percentage of the total adherence score.
Independent VariableUnivariableMultivariable †
β Coef (95% CI)Significanceβ Coef (95% CI)p-Value
Age −0.22 (−0.37 to−0.04)0.006−0.13 (−0.29 to 0.03) 0.115
Female−4.30 (−7.56 to −1.04)0.010−2.26 (−5.15 to 0.63) 0.125
BMI (kg/m2)−0.10 (−0.35 to 0.15)0.450-
Secondary/tertiary education6.28 (2.61 to 9.95) 0.0013.84 (−0.003 to 7.69) 0.050
Muslim denomination−3.01 (−6.36 to 0.34)0.077−2.31 (−5.58 to 0.96) 0.165
Diabetes duration (years)−0.51 (−0.72 to −0.30)<0.001−0.23 (−0.46 to −0.01)0.042
HbA1c (%)−1.48 (−2.50 to −0.46)0.005-
OAA therapy only9.56 (6.48 to 12.63)<0.0018.36 (5.24 to 11.74) <0.001
β Coef, linear regression coefficients; BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence intervals; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; OAA, oral antidiabetic agents. † included variables selected by the augmented backward selection procedure [22] with adjusted R2: 0.306.
Table
Table 4. Cross-sectional studies assessing adherence to the dietary guidelines among patients with diabetes.
Table 4. Cross-sectional studies assessing adherence to the dietary guidelines among patients with diabetes.
First AuthorOriginRecruitmentPatient CharacteristicsRR (%)Guidelines EvaluatedToolsResults
DM TypeAge (Years)N
Ahmed [40]USKaiser Permanente Northern California Diabetes Registry, and patients from the pharmacy, laboratory, outpatient clinics, ER and hospitalizationT1DM and T2DM58.1 ± 13 *77,722 (Alcohol drinkers: 38,564)83ADASurvey by mail, computer-assisted telephone interview, HbA1c and further DM-related testsAmong current drinkers, 92% of men (2 drinks/day) and 94% of women (1 drink/day) adhered to the guidelines. Alcohol consumption was inversely associated with HbA1c.
Ahola [62]FIPatients of the Finnish Diabetic Nephropathy Study “FinnDiane”T1DMMen: 51 (40–60) †
Women: 47 (37–54) †		81763FDAFFQ, self-reported compliance with guidelines, 3-day food records concerning food intake, PA, Ins dose, and BG levels Only 28% of participants restricted SFA to the recommendation. Almost 1/4 had higher than recommended sucrose intake. Fiber goals were met by 4% of participants.
Gillani [59]PKPatients from hospitals in Multan, Bahawalpur, and Rahim Yar KhanT1DM and T2DM48.8 ± 14.6 *39844.3ADA3-day recalls were used to assess dietary history and diet complianceDiet compliance was 36.5%. Patients feeling comfortable with their diet plan and those aware of which diet was harmful to them were more compliant.
Krige [63]ZAWomen were diagnosed during pregnancy from two hospitalsGDM/IGT32.2 ± 5.3 *239--SEMDSAInterview administered picture-quantified FFQ and beliefs concerning food consumptionThe average protein constituted 14.7% of TEI (goal 20%), with 93.5% of patients consuming protein below the cut-off point. The average carbohydrate intake was 53% (goal 40%), with 92.2% exceeding the goal. Mean fat intake was 33% of TEI (goal 40%), and 80.4% of patients were below the goal. Overall, patients demonstrated moderate adherence.
Nedra [29]USHospital outpatients, a freestanding and an endocrinology clinicT1DM and T2DM56 ± 16.7 *102NRADA and MHCData from chart notes and phone calls for patients’ self-rating of their DM knowledge, before and after nutrition education by an RDNApproximately 40% of participants attained their goals excellently, 32.7% rated meeting their goals as good, and the remaining 27% considered their adherence as fair.
Øverby [64]NONorwegian Childhood Diabetes and Quality project T1DM11.3 ± 3.4 *55034DNSG4-day food records, FFQ, questionnaire on parental education, diabetes examinationsApart from the intake of fat and fiber, which were higher and lower respectively than recommended, all intakes of macronutrients were adequate according to current recommendations.
Raj [58]CAThrough advertisingT2DM61.2 ± 10.4 *8080CDAPDAQ, 3-day food records, anthropometry and DM examinationsReported mean daily intakes of Na and SFA exceeded the recommendations. Cured meats, fast foods and snack foods were all major contributors to intake of Na and SFA. SFA, Na intakes and total PDAQ scores did not correlate with HbA1c concentration.
Thewjitcharoen [61]YHOutpatients of the DM clinics from the Theptarin and Ramathibodi hospitals T2DM57.4 (25–85) †304NRThailand guidelines based on the ADA 3- or 7-day food records, nutritional knowledge and a dietary self-care behavior questionnaireLow adherence to the local guidelines was observed. The recommended intake of SFA was met by only 32.7% of free sugars by 11.8% and fiber by 1.6%.
Vitale [60]IT57 centers throughout ItalyT2DM62.1 ± 6.5 *2568NRDNSG and SIDEPIC FFQ, and specific software to convert dietary data to average daily amounts of foodsAdherence to the recommendations was high for the consumption of protein (77.8%) and added sugars (97.3%), while adherence for the intake of recommended quantities of SFA (17.9%) and fiber (6.9%) was lower.
ADA, American Diabetes Association; BG, blood glucose; CDA, Canadian Diabetes Association; DGA, Dietary Guidelines for Americans; DNSG, Diabetes and Nutrition Study Group; DM, diabetes mellitus; EPIC, European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition; ER, emergency room; FDA, Finish Diabetes Association; FFQ, food frequency questionnaire; GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; HEI, Healthy Eating Index; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; Ins, insulin; ISPAD, International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes; MDG, Malaysian Dietary Guidelines; MHC, Morrison Health Care; Na, sodium; NCDQ, Norwegian Childhood Diabetes and Quality; NR, not reported; PA, physical activity; PDAQ, Perceived Dietary Adherence Questionnaire; RDN, registered nutritionist dietitian; RR, response rate; SD, standard deviation; SEMDSA, Society for Endocrinology Metabolism an Diabetes of South Africa; SID, Italian Diabetes Society; SFA, saturated fatty acids; T1DM, type 1 diabetes mellitus; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; TEI, total energy intake; USDA, United States Department of Agriculture. † Mean (range); * Mean ± SD.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Katsaridis, S.; Grammatikopoulou, M.G.; Gkiouras, K.; Tzimos, C.; Papageorgiou, S.T.; Markaki, A.G.; Exiara, T.; Goulis, D.G.; Papamitsou, T. Low Reported Adherence to the 2019 American Diabetes Association Nutrition Recommendations among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Indicating the Need for Improved Nutrition Education and Diet Care. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3516. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12113516

AMA Style

Katsaridis S, Grammatikopoulou MG, Gkiouras K, Tzimos C, Papageorgiou ST, Markaki AG, Exiara T, Goulis DG, Papamitsou T. Low Reported Adherence to the 2019 American Diabetes Association Nutrition Recommendations among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Indicating the Need for Improved Nutrition Education and Diet Care. Nutrients. 2020; 12(11):3516. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12113516

Chicago/Turabian Style

Katsaridis, Savvas, Maria G. Grammatikopoulou, Konstantinos Gkiouras, Christos Tzimos, Stefanos T. Papageorgiou, Anastasia G. Markaki, Triada Exiara, Dimitrios G. Goulis, and Theodora Papamitsou. 2020. "Low Reported Adherence to the 2019 American Diabetes Association Nutrition Recommendations among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Indicating the Need for Improved Nutrition Education and Diet Care" Nutrients 12, no. 11: 3516. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12113516

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop