Next Article in Journal
Tunable Electronic Properties of Few-Layer Tellurene under In-Plane and Out-of-Plane Uniaxial Strain
Previous Article in Journal
Merging Porphyrins with Gold Nanorods: Self Assembly Construct to High Fluorescent Polyelectrolyte Microcapsules
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 12
Issue 5
10.3390/nano12050873
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ag Decoration and SnO2 Coupling Modified Anatase/Rutile Mixed Crystal TiO2 Composite Photocatalyst for Enhancement of Photocatalytic Degradation towards Tetracycline Hydrochloride

by
Mao Tang
1,2,
Yangwen Xia
1,
Daixiong Yang
1,
Shiji Lu
1,
Xiaodong Zhu
1,2,*,
Renyong Tang
3 and
Wanming Zhang
4,*
1
School of Mechanical Engineering, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610106, China
2
Sichuan Province Engineering Technology Research Center of Powder Metallurgy, Chengdu 610106, China
3
School of Food and Biological Engineering, Chengdu University, Chengdu 610106, China
4
School of Resources and Environment, Xichang University, Xichang 615000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(5), 873; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12050873
Submission received: 28 January 2022 / Revised: 1 March 2022 / Accepted: 2 March 2022 / Published: 6 March 2022
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The anatase/rutile mixed crystal TiO2 was prepared and modified with Ag decoration and SnO2 coupling to construct a Ag@SnO2/anatase/rutile composite photocatalytic material. The crystal structure, morphology, element valence, optical properties and surface area were characterized, and the effects of Ag decoration and SnO2 coupling on the structure and photocatalytic properties of TiO2 were studied. Ag decoration and SnO2 coupling are beneficial to reduce the recombination of photogenerated electrons and holes. When the two modification are combined, a synergistic effect is produced in suppressing the photogenerated charge recombination, making Ag@SnO2/TiO2 exhibits the highest quantum utilization. After 30 min of illumination, the degradation degree of tetracycline hydrochloride (TC) by pure TiO2 increased from 63.3% to 83.1% with Ag@SnO2/TiO2.

1. Introduction

Antibiotics have been widely used in our daily life for decades. If they are not treated as non-toxic, these antibiotics will eventually enter the water and soil, threatening human health [1,2,3,4]. Employing photocatalytic technology to degrade antibiotics is a green and efficient route, which shows broad application prospects. Among various photocatalytic materials, TiO2-based photocatalysts have received the most attention in the degradation of antibiotics [5,6,7].
However, due to the low utilization of sunlight and the high recombination rate of photogenerated electrons and holes of pure TiO2, it is necessary to modify its energy band structure and improve the visible light utilization and quantum efficiency to increase the photocatalytic activity [8,9,10]. When TiO2 particles contact with precious metal, forming heterojunctions, the photogenerated electrons on the conduction band of TiO2 will migrate to the precious metal particles until the Fermi energy level is equal, which enhances the separation photogenerated charges [11,12,13]. In the research of noble metal decoration, Ag has attracted extensive attention because of its relatively cheap and excellent modification effects [14,15,16,17,18].
Li et al. [15] fabricated Ag nanoparticle-decorated porous TiO2 foams using the wet-impregnation method. Due to the surface plasmon resonance (SPR) effect of Ag nanoparticles, the absorption in visible light was greatly enhanced, and thus the photocatalytic performance of TiO2 was improved. In other modification methods, TiO2 coupling with else semiconductors promotes the migration of photogenerated charges at the two-phase interface, thus, increasing the quantum utilization and photocatalytic efficiency [19,20]. SnO2/TiO2 semiconductor systems have been widely studied as the band position of SnO2 matches TiO2.
When TiO2 is illuminated, photogenerated holes and photogenerated electrons are generated in the valence band and conduction band, respectively. The electrons will transfer to the conduction band of SnO2, and the holes in the SnO2 valence band will migrate to TiO2 valence band, which separates the photogenerated electrons and holes effectively. Therefore, SnO2/TiO2 exhibits better photocatalytic performance compared with pure TiO2 [21,22,23]. Xun et al. introduced SnO2 into TiO2 nanotube materials to improve the quantum efficiency and obtained a higher photocatalytic activity [22].
In addition to coupling with other semiconductor materials, TiO2 with different crystal structures to form mix crystal heterojunctions is also conducive to the transfer of photogenerated charges, showing higher photocatalytic activity than a single crystal structure [24,25,26]. Based on these advantages, anatase/rutile mixed crystal TiO2 was prepared by the sol-gel method and modified by Ag decoration and SnO2 coupling to fabricate Ag@SnO2/anatase/rutile composite photocatalyst in the present work.
The crystal structure, morphology, element valence, optical properties and surface area were characterized. The photocatalytic performance of the prepared photocatalysts was assessed by taking tetracycline hydrochloride aqueous solution as the target pollutant. The effects of Ag decoration and SnO2 coupling on the structure and photocatalytic performance of mixed crystal TiO2 were investigated in detail.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Material Preparation

Butyl titanate (Analytical Reagent, AR), absolute ethanol (AR), hydrochloric acid (AR), tin tetrachloride pentahydrate (AR), silver nitrate (AR), tetracycline hydrochloride (AR), benzoquinone (AR), ammonium oxalate (AR) and isopropanol (AR) were purchased from Chengdu Chron Chemicals Co., Ltd., (Chengdu, China).
We added 20 mL butyl titanate and 45 mL absolute ethanol to a beaker to form mixture A. We mixed 10 mL deionized water, 15 mL absolute ethanol and 2 mL hydrochloric acid to obtained mixture B, which was added into mixture A dropwise to form a gel. After aging and drying, the powder was calcined at 550 °C for 1 h to prepare pure TiO2.
Silver nitrate (AgNO3) or tin tetrachloride pentahydrate (SnCl4·5H2O) was added into mixture B. Keep the other steps unchanged to fabricate Ag decorated TiO2 and SnO2 coupled TiO2, which are labelled as Ag@TiO2 and SnO2/TiO2. The molar ratios of Ag:Ti and Sn:Ti were 1:100 and 75:100, separately. When AgNO3 and SnCl4·5H2O were added simultaneously, the Ag@SnO2/TiO2 composite photocatalyst was obtained.

2.2. Characterization

The crystal structure was analyzed using a DX-2700 X-ray diffractometer (Dandong Haoyuan Instrument Co. Ltd., Dandong, China, XRD). The test voltage was 40 kV, the current was 30 mA, and the scanning angle was 20°–70° with the scanning speed 0.06° /s. The morphology (SEM and TEM) was observed using a FEI-Inspect F50 scanning electron microscope and a FEI-Tecnai G2 F20 transmission electron microscope (FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA). Adopting an XSAM800 multifunctional surface analysis system to study the element composition and valence state (XSAM800, Kratos Ltd., Manchester, Britain, XPS). The recombination of photo-induced charges was analyzed by a F-4600 fluorescence spectrometer (F–4600, Shimadzu Group Company, Kyoto, Japan, PL). The optical absorption was tested by a UV-3600 UV-Vis spectrophotometer (UV–3600, Shimadzu Group Company, Kyoto, Japan, DRS). The BET specific surface area was analyzed by a Mike ASAP2460 analyzer (Mike Instrument Company, Atlanta, GA, USA).

2.3. Photocatalysis Experiment

Tetracycline hydrochloride (TC) was employed as the target pollutant to evaluate the photocatalytic performance. We added 100 mL (30 mg/L) TC aqueous solution and 0.1 g sample to a beaker and stirred for 30 min in dark. Then, a 250 W xenon lamp (Solar-350, Beijing NBeT Technology Co. Ltd., Beijing, China) was turned on as the light source for irradiation. The mixture was taken every 10 min and extracted after centrifugation, and the absorbance (A) of the supernatant at 355 nm was measured by an ultraviolet visible spectrophotometer. The degradation degree was computed by the formula as follows:
(A0 − At)/A0 × 100%

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. XRD Analysis

The XRD patterns of samples are shown in Figure 1. In the pattern of pure TiO2, the peaks at 25.3°, 37.9° and 48.1° correspond to the (101), (004) and (200) crystal planes of anatase, and the peaks at 27.4°, 36.1° and 54.3° are indexed to the (110), (101) and (211) crystal planes of rutile, indicating that pure TiO2 consists of anatase and rutile and shows mixed crystal structure [24,26,27,28]. The mass fractions of anatase and rutile are 23.8% and 76.2%, respectively.
In the pattern of Ag@TiO2, in addition to the anatase and rutile peaks, the peak appearing at 38.1° corresponds to the (111) crystal plane of elemental Ag [29], which implies that Ag@TiO2 heterojunctions are formed. The peaks at 26.7°, 34.0° and 51.9° in the patterns of SnO2/TiO2 are indexed to the (110), (101), (211) crystal planes of SnO2 [30], showing that SnO2/TiO2 semiconductor composites are generated. The diffraction peaks of SnO2 and Ag appear in the pattern of Ag@SnO2/TiO2, which shows that the Ag@SnO2/TiO2 composite photocatalyst was constructed through Ag decoration and SnO2 coupling.

3.2. SEM and TEM Analyses

Figure 2 depicts the SEM images of pure TiO2, Ag@TiO2, SnO2/TiO2 and Ag@SnO2/TiO2. Pure TiO2 presents a granular morphology with several agglomerates. Ag@TiO2 shows a similar morphology to pure TiO2. The particle size increases in SnO2/TiO2 and Ag@SnO2/TiO2 samples.
Figure 3 presents the TEM and HRTEM images of pure TiO2 (Figure 3a,c) and Ag@SnO2/TiO2 (Figure 3b,d). It is observed in Figure 3a that the particle size of pure TiO2 is about 20–30 nm. In Figure 3c, the marked interplanar spacing 0.348 nm corresponds to the anatase (101) crystal plane, and 0.326 nm corresponds to the rutile (110) crystal plane [7,31,32], indicating that pure TiO2 is composed of anatase and rutile and exhibits a mixed crystal structure. The particle size in Figure 3b is slightly smaller than pure TiO2, which is in the range of 15–20 nm.
The interplanar spacing 0.356 nm in Figure 3d corresponds to the anatase (101) crystal plane, which is larger than that of pure TiO2 (0.348 nm). As the radius of Sn4+ (0.0690 nm) is larger than that of Ti4+ (0.0605 nm), the replacement of Ti4+ by Sn4+ will cause a lattice expansion, resulting in the increase of interplanar spacing [33]. The marked interplanar spacing 0.330 nm corresponds to the rutile (110) crystal plane [34]. The interplanar spacing 0.334 nm can be attributed to the (110) crystal plane of SnO2 [35].

3.3. XPS Analysis

The XPS results of pure TiO2 and Ag@SnO2/TiO2 are shown in Figure 4. Figure 4a shows the full spectra. The constituent elements of Ag@SnO2/TiO2 are Ti, O, Sn, Ag and C. The signal of C element mainly comes from the pollution during the test. Figure 4b is the high-resolution spectra of Ti 2p. The binding energies of Ti4+ 2p3/2 and Ti4+ 2p1/2 are 458.5 and 464.1 eV, indicating that Ti element is +4 valence in pure TiO2 [36]. The Ti4+ 2p3/2 and Ti4+ 2p1/2 binding energies of Ag@SnO2/TiO2 shifts to higher binding energies, which are at 459.3 and 465.0 eV.
In addition, characteristic peaks at 458.2 and 463.7 eV corresponding to Ti3+ 2p1/2 and Ti3+ 2p3/2 appear, indicating that Ti exists as +3 and +4 in Ag@SnO2/TiO2 [37]. Figure 4c shows the O 1s high-resolution spectra. Pure TiO2 shows a characteristic peak at 530.0 eV, which corresponds to lattice oxygen (O2−), and the surface hydroxyl (OH−) peak is not obvious. The peaks of Ag@SnO2/TiO2 at 529.3 and 530.6 eV correspond to lattice oxygen (O2−) and surface hydroxyl (OH−) [34,36]. It can be observed from Figure 4d that Ag 3d shows two characteristic peaks at 366.6 and 372.6 eV corresponding to Ag 3d5/2 and Ag 3d3/2, respectively, indicating that the Ag element is in a zero-valent state [38,39]. Sn 3d (Figure 4e) exhibits two characteristic peaks at 486.5 and 494.9 eV, corresponding to Sn 3d5/2 and Sn 3d3/2, respectively, implying that Sn element is in a +4 state [34].

3.4. PL Analysis

When photo-induced electron-hole pairs recombine, their excess energy will be released in the form of light, which can be responsible for the photoluminescence spectra [40,41]. Figure 5 shows the PL spectra of samples. The PL peak intensity of Ag@TiO2 is lower than that of pure TiO2, indicating that Ag decoration inhibits the recombination of photogenerated electrons and holes. As the Fermi energy level of Ag particles is lower than the conduction band position of TiO2, the photogenerated electrons on the conduction band of TiO2 will migrate to the surface of Ag particles, reducing the probability of recombination with holes in the valence band [42].
SnO2/TiO2 shows less PL peak intensity compared with pure TiO2, which implies that the recombination of photogenerated charges is suppressed by SnO2 coupling. The electrons and holes transfer rapidly at the two-phase interface, which favors the photogenerated charge separation [43]. Remarkably, the PL peak intensity of Ag@SnO2/TiO2 is the lowest, which means that Ag decoration and SnO2 coupling produce a synergistic effect advancing the photogenerated charge separation. After Ag decoration and SnO2 coupling modification, the utilization of photogenerated charges is enhanced significantly, which is beneficial to the photocatalytic activity [44].

3.5. DRS Analysis

The UV-visible absorption spectra of samples are shown in Figure 6. All samples show strong absorption in the ultraviolet region. After Ag decoration and SnO2 coupling, the absorption edge does not change, indicating that the modification by Ag and SnO2 has little effect on the band gap of TiO2. The absorption merely slightly increases in the 400–600 nm region after modification.

3.6. BET Analysis

Figure 7 shows the nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherms and their corresponding pore size distribution curves of pure TiO2 (a) and Ag@SnO2/TiO2 (b). Both the two samples display type IV adsorption isotherm, showing mesoporous structure [45,46]. The pore size distribution of pure TiO2 is between 5 and 20 nm, and the specific surface area is 39.7 m2/g. The pore size distribution of Ag@SnO2/TiO2 is between 5 and 30 nm, and the specific surface area is 50.5 m2/g.
It can be seen from XRD that, after the addition of Ag or SnO2, the peak intensity decreases, and the half height width increases, indicating that the grain size is reduced, which is beneficial to obtain a higher specific surface area. [47,48,49]. The increased BET surface area indicates that Ag decoration and SnO2 coupling modification enhances the specific surface area of anatase/rutile mixed crystal TiO2, which contributes to more reactive sites and higher photocatalytic efficiency [50].

3.7. Photocatalytic Activity

The photocatalytic performance of samples is evaluated by the degradation of TC, and the results are shown in Figure 8. After 30 min of reaction, the degradation degree of pure TiO2 is 63.3%. The degradation degrees are improved by modification. The degradation degrees of Ag@TiO2, SnO2/TiO2 and Ag@SnO2/TiO2 are 78.4, 71.2 and 83.1%, respectively. Ag@SnO2/TiO2 shows the highest photocatalytic activity. The kinetic curves of photocatalytic degradation towards TC are shown in Figure 8b. It can be observed that time t and -ln (C/C0) presents a linear relationship, and the photolysis reaction conforms to the first-order reaction [14]. The reaction rate constants of pure TiO2, Ag@TiO2, SnO2/TiO2 and Ag@SnO2/TiO2 are 0.034, 0.050, 0.041 and 0.057 min−1, respectively.
Ag decoration and SnO2 coupling are beneficial to the separation of photogenerated charges and quantum efficiency, which has been proven by PL spectra. When Ag decoration and SnO2 coupling are implemented simultaneously, a synergistic effect on suppressing the recombination of photogenerated electrons and holes is yielded. Therefore, Ag@SnO2/TiO2 shows the lowest PL peak intensity, exhibiting the highest photocatalytic activity.
To determine the active species in photocatalytic reaction process, benzoquinone (BQ), ammonium oxalate (AO) and isopropanol (IPA) were added to capture the active groups, such as ·O2−, h+ and ·OH, during the TC photodegradation process by Ag@SnO2/TiO2 [51,52]. The results are shown in Figure 9. The degradation degree declines from 82.3 to 10.5% after adding BQ. The clearly decreased degradation degree indicates that ·O2− radicals are the main active groups. The degradation degrees are 40.9 and 67.9% after adding AO and IPA, separately, implying that the holes and ·OH radicals play secondary roles in the degradation process.

3.8. The Degradation Mechanism

The energy band structure and the diagram of photogenerated charges transfer of Ag@SnO2/TiO2 are shown in Figure 10. When electrons are excited by photons, they will jump from the valence band to the conduction band, thus, generating photo-induced electrons. Since the conduction band and valence band of anatase and rutile are higher than SnO2, the photogenerated electrons in anatase and rutile will migrate to the conduction band of SnO2, and the holes in the valence band of SnO2 will transfer to the valence band of anatase and rutile.
The SnO2/anatase/rutile three-phase coexistence structure is beneficial to accelerating the photogenerated charges transfer, improving the quantum utilization [42,53]. Moreover, when Ag particles deposit on the surface of SnO2/anatase/rutile, the photogenerated electrons will migrate to the surface of Ag particles, further advancing the separation of photo-induced charges [54,55]. The rapid transfer of photogenerated charges at the interfaces of Ag@SnO2/anatase/rutile composites is conducive to the formation of more radicals and the improvement of the photocatalytic efficiency [34].
The results of the cyclability of photocatalyst for TC degradation are shown in Figure 11. As the number of cycles increases, the degradation degree of TC decreases marginally. After four cycles, the degradation degree of TC by the Ag@SnO2/TiO2 composite photocatalyst decreases from 83.1 to 76.8%. The slight decrease in the degradation degree indicates that the composite photocatalyst shows relatively high reusability.
The XRD pattern of the Ag@SnO2/TiO2 composite photocatalyst after four cycles is shown in Figure 12. Compared with the initial sample, the positions of the diffraction peak do not change; however, the peak intensity decreases slightly. During the photocatalytic experiment, a very small amount of undegraded TC molecules may remain on the surface of photocatalyst, which decreases the diffraction peak intensity. On the other hand, the undegraded TC molecules occupy the active sites, resulting in a weak photocatalytic activity decrease [52,56,57]. This is also consistent with the repeated use experimental results.

4. Conclusions

We prepared anatase/rutile mixed crystal TiO2, Ag@TiO2, SnO2/TiO2, Ag decoration and SnO2 coupling modified TiO2 and constructed a Ag@SnO2/TiO2 composite photocatalytic material. XRD, SEM, TEM, XPS, PL, DRS and BET characterization and photocatalysis experiments were carried out on the samples. Ag exists in the form of 0 valence and Sn in the form of +4 valence. The results of the photocatalysis experiments showed that Ag decoration and SnO2 coupling enhanced the performance of anatase/rutile mixed crystal TiO2.
When Ag decoration and SnO2 coupling modification were implemented simultaneously, they had a synergistic effect on improving the charge separation and specific surface area, thus, exhibiting the highest photocatalytic activity. The first order reaction rate constant k of Ag@SnO2/TiO2 sample was 0.057 min−1, which was 1.7-times higher than that of pure TiO2 (0.034 min−1).

Author Contributions

Methodology, M.T., X.Z. and W.Z.; investigation, Y.X., D.Y. and S.L.; supervision, X.Z. and W.Z.; project administration, R.T. and X.Z.; formal analysis, M.T. and X.Z.; funding acquisition, M.T. and X.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Open Research Subject of Powder Metallurgy Engineering Technology Research Center of Sichuan Province (grant number SC-FMYJ2021-03), the Open Fund of Meat Processing Key Lab of Sichuan Province (grant number 21-R-21), the Open Project of Key Laboratory of Coarse Grain Processing, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China (2021HBZ001) and the Training Program for Innovation of Chengdu University (CDUCX2022006, S202011079053, CDU-CX-2021527).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, K.; Li, Y.; Zhang, G.K.; Li, J.; Wu, X.Y. 0D Bi nanodots/2D Bi3NbO7 nanosheets heterojunctions for efficient visible light photocatalytic degradation of antibiotics: Enhanced molecular oxygen activation and mechanism insight. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2018, 240, 39–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, S.J.; Wang, C.C.; Liu, Y.P.; Xue, B.; Jiang, W.; Liu, Y.; Mo, L.Y.; Chen, X.B. Photocatalytic degradation of antibiotics using a novel Ag/Ag2S/Bi2MoO6 plasmonic p-n heterojunction photocatalyst: Mineralization activity, degradation pathways and boosted charge separation mechanism. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 415, 12899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hajipour, P.; Eslami, A.; Bahrami, A.; Hosseini-Abari, A.; Saber, F.Y.; Mohammadi, R.; Mehr, M.Y. Surface modification of TiO2 nanoparticles with CuO for visible-light antibacterial applications and photocatalytic degradation of antibiotics. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 33875–33885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kuppusamy, S.; Kakarla, D.; Venkateswarlu, K.; Megharaj, M.; Yoon, Y.E.; Lee, Y.B. Veterinary antibiotics (VAs) contamination as a global agro-ecological issue: A critical view. Agric. Ecosysy. Environ. 2018, 257, 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. He, D.; Sun, Y.B.; Xin, L.; Feng, J.W. Aqueous tetracycline degradation by non-thermal plasma combined with nano-TiO2. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 258, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, Y.H.; Liu, L.F.; Yang, F.L. Destruction of tetracycline hydrochloride antibiotics by FeOOH/TiO2 granular activated carbon as expanded cathode in low-cost MBR/MFC coupled system. J. Membr. Sci. 2017, 525, 202–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, W.; Fang, J.J.; Shao, S.F.; Lai, M.; Lu, C.H. Compact and uniform TiO2@g-C3N4 core-shell quantum heterojunction for photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline antibiotics. Appl. Catal. B. 2017, 217, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shayegan, Z.; Lee, C.S.; Haghighat, F. TiO2 photocatalyst for removal of volatile organic compounds in gas phase–A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 334, 2408–2439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Nur, Y.; Lead, J.R.; Baalousha, M. Evaluation of charge and agglomeration behavior of TiO2 nanoparticles in ecotoxicological media. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 535, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Middepogu, A.; Hou, J.; Gao, X.; Lin, D.H. Effect and mechanism of TiO2 nanoparticles on the photosynthesis of Chlorella pyrenoidosa. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 161, 497–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Vinesh, V.; Shaheer, A.R.M.; Neppolian, B. Reduced graphene oxide (rGO) supported electron deficient B-doped TiO2 (Au/B-TiO2/rGO) nanocomposite: An efficient visible light sonophotocatalyst for the degradation of Tetracycline (TC). Ultrason. Sonochem. 2019, 50, 302–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Bahruji, H.; Bowker, M.; Davies, P.R.; Kennedy, J.; Morgan, D.J. The importance of metal reducibility for the photo-reforming of methanol on transition metal-TiO2 photocatalysts and the use of non-precious metals. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2015, 40, 1465–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tian, F.; Zhu, R.S.; Ouyang, F. Synergistic photocatalytic degradation of pyridine using precious metal supported TiO2 with KBrO3. J. Environ. Sci. 2013, 25, 2299–2305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, Y.; Wang, T.; Zhou, M.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Z.M. Hydrothermal preparation of Ag-TiO2 nanostructures with exposed {001}/{101} facets for enhancing visible light photocatalytic activity. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 3118–3126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, H.; Shen, L.; Zhang, K.; Sun, B.; Ren, L.; Qiao, P.; Pan, K.; Wang, L.; Zhou, W. Surface plasmon resonance-enhanced solar-driven photocatalytic performance from Ag nanoparticle-decorated self-floating porous black TiO2 foams. Appl. Catal. B Enviorn. 2018, 220, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Stucchi, M.; Bianchi, C.L.; Argirusis, C.; Pifferi, V.; Neppolian, B.; Cerrato, G.; Boffito, D.C. Ultrasound assisted synthesis of Ag-decorated TiO2 active in visible light. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2018, 40, 282–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ali, T.; Ahmed, A.; Alam, U.; Uddin, I.; Tripathi, P.; Muneer, M. Enhanced photocatalytic and antibacterial activities of Ag-doped TiO2 nanoparticles under visible light. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2018, 212, 325–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kong, J.H.; Song, C.X.; Zhang, W.; Xing, Y.H.; Wan, M.; Wang, Y.Q. Enhanced visible-light-active photocatalytic performances on Ag nanoparticles sensitized TiO2 nanotube arrays. Superlattice. Microst. 2017, 109, 579–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Odling, G.; Robertson, N. BiVO4-TiO2 Composite Photocatalysts for Dye Degradation Formed Using the SILAR Method. ChemPhysChem 2016, 17, 2872–2880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Golestanbagh, M.; Parvini, M.; Pendashteh, A. Preparation, Characterization and Photocatalytic Properties of Visible-Light-Driven CuO/SnO2/TiO2 Photocatalyst. Catal. Lett. 2018, 148, 2162–2178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Guo, X.L.; Wan, J.F.; Yu, X.J.; Lin, Y.H. Study on preparation of SnO2-TiO2/Nano-graphite composite anode and electro-catalytic degradation of ceftriaxone sodium. Chemosphere 2016, 164, 421–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xun, H.T.; Zhang, Z.B.; Yu, A.H.; Yi, J.X. Remarkably enhanced hydrogen sensing of highly-ordered SnO2-decorated TiO2 nanotubes. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 273, 983–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. De Mendonça, V.R.; Waldir, A.; Arenal, R.; Ribeiro, C. A building blocks strategy for preparing photocatalytically active anatase TiO2/rutile SnO2 heterostructures by hydrothermal annealing. J Colloid Interf. Sci. 2017, 505, 454–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Hu, W.Y.; Dong, F.Q.; Zhang, J.; Liu, M.X.; He, H.C.; Yang, D.M.; Deng, H.Q. A high-efficiency photocatalyst, flaky anatase@natural rutile composite using one-step microwave hydrothermal synthesis. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2018, 44, 705–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kampouri, S.; Ireland, C.P.; Valizadeh, B.; Oveisi, E.; Schouwink, P.; Mensi, M.; Stylianou, K.C. Mixed-phase MOF-derived Titanium Dioxide for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution: The Impact of the Templated Morphology. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2018, 1, 6541–6548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Scotti, R.; D’Arienzo, M.; Testino, A.; Morazzoni, F. Photocatalytic mineralization of phenol catalyzed by pure and mixed phase hydrothermal titanium dioxide. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2009, 88, 497–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lei, Y.C.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, P.L.; Zhou, J.J.; Wu, J.; Li, K.; Wang, W.W.; Chen, L.Y. Controllable One-Step Synthesis of Mixed-Phase TiO2 Nanocrystals with Equivalent Anatase/Rutile Ratio for Enhanced Photocatalytic Performance. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fu, W.; Li, G.; Wang, Y.; Zeng, S.; Yan, Z.; Wang, J.; Xin, S.; Zhang, L.; Wu, S.; Zhang, Z. Facile formation of mesoporous structured mixed-phase (anatase/rutile) TiO2 with enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity. Chem. Commun. 2017, 54, 58–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cheng, H.; Ye, J.; Sun, Y.; Yuan, W.; Tian, J.; Bogale, R.F.; Tian, P.; Ning, G. Template-induced synthesis and superior antibacterial activity of hierarchical Ag/TiO2 composites. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 80668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Khojasteh, F.; Mersagh, M.R.; Hashemipour, H. The influences of Ni, Ag-doped TiO2 and SnO2, Ag-doped SnO2/TiO2 nanocomposites on recombination reduction in dye synthesized solar cells. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 890, 161709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nakajima, T.; Nakamura, T.; Tsuchiya, T. Crystal-Plane Dependence of Nb-Doped Rutile TiO2 Single Crystals on Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. Catalysts 2019, 9, 725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. De, D.S.; Behara, D.K.; Saha, S.; Kumar, A.; Subramaniam, A.; Sivakumar, S.; Pala, R.G.S. Design of iso-material heterostructures of TiO2 via seed mediated growth and arrested phase transitions. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2020, 22, 25366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Yu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zou, K.; Chen, G.; Zhang, Y.; Li, H.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, Q.; He, Y.B. High energy density and efficiency in (Pb,La)(Zr,Sn,Ti)O3 antiferroelectric ceramics with high La3+ content and optimized Sn4+ content. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 24419–24424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jia, C.; Chen, H.-S.; Yang, P. Construction of hollow waxberry-like rutile-/anatase-TiO2/SnO2 towards enhanced photocatalysis. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2018, 58, 278–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jia, C.; Dong, T.; Li, M.; Wang, P.; Yang, P. Preparation of anatase/rutile TiO2/SnO2 hollow heterostructures for gas sensor. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 769, 521–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, Z.; Ma, Y.; Bu, X.; Wu, Q.; Hang, Z.; Dong, Z.; Wu, X. Facile one-step synthesis of TiO2/ Ag/SnO2 ternary heterostructures with enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 10532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Liu, H.; Fan, H.; Wu, R.; Tian, L.; Yang, X.; Sun, Y. Nitrogen-doped black TiO2 spheres with enhanced visible light photocatalytic performance. SN Appl. Sci. 2019, 1, 487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Sheng, J.; Tong, H.; Xu, H.; Tang, C. Preparation and photocatalytic activity of SnO2@TiO2 core-shell composites modified by Ag. Catal. Surv. Asia 2016, 20, 167–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Zhao, L.N.; Jia, Y.H.; You, H.; Wang, S.T.; Fu, L. Photocatalytic performance and application outlook of 3D TiO2/titanium mesh modified by GO-Ag joined-deposition. Catal. Today 2020, 340, 106–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Žerjav, G.; Arshad, M.S.; Djinović, P.; Junkar, I.; Kovač, J.; Zavašnik, J.; Pintar, A. Improved electron-hole separation and migration in anatase TiO2 nanorod/reduced graphene oxide composites and their significance on photocatalytic performance. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 4578–4592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Gao, Y.; Fang, P.; Chen, F.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Wang, D.; Dai, Y. Enhancement of stability of N-doped TiO2 photocatalysts with Ag loading. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 265, 796–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sun, B.; Chen, Y.; Tao, L.; Zhao, H.; Zhou, G.; Xia, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhao, Y. Nanorods array of SnO2 quantum dots interspersed multiphase TiO2 heterojunctions with highly photocatalytic water splitting and self-rechargeable battery-like applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2019, 11, 2071–2081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ye, J.; Xu, J.T.; Tian, D.; Zhao, X.; Wang, Q.; Wang, J.; Li, Y.; Zhao, C.; Liu, Z.; Fu, Y. Efficient photocatalytic reduction of CO2 by a rhenium-doped TiO2-x/SnO2 inverse opal S-scheme heterostructure assisted by the slow-phonon effect. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 277, 119431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Jia, T.; Liu, M.; Zheng, C.; Long, F.; Min, Z.; Fu, F.; Yu, D.; Li, J.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, N.H. One-Pot Hydrothermal Synthesis of La-Doped ZnIn2S4 Microspheres with Improved Visible-Light. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Adyani, S.M.; Ghorbani, M. A comparative study of physicochemical and photocatalytic properties of visible light responsive Fe; Gd and P single and tri-doped TiO2 nanomaterials. J. Rare Earths 2018, 36, 72–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lei, X.F.; Xue, X.X.; Yang, H. Preparation and characterization of Ag-doped TiO2 nanomaterials and their photocatalytic reduction of Cr (VI) under visible light. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 321, 396–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yu, J.; Yu, J.C.; Zhao, X.J. The Effect of SiO2 Addition on the Grain Size and Photocatalytic Activity of TiO2 Thin Films. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2002, 24, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chen, Y.; Liu, K.R. Fabrication of Ce/N co-doped TiO2/diatomite granule catalyst and its improved visible-light-driven photoactivity. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 324, 139–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sibu, C.P.; Kumar, S.R.; Mukundan, P.; Warrier, K.G.K. Structural modifications and associated properties of lanthanum oxide doped sol-gel nanosized titanium oxide. Chem. Mater. 2002, 14, 2876–2881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wu, D.; Li, C.; Zhang, D.S.; Wang, L.L.; Zhang, X.; Shi, Z.; Lin, Q. Photocatalytic improvement of Y3+ modified TiO2 prepared by a ball milling method and application in shrimp wastewater treatment. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 14609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Tang, M.; Xia, Y.; Yang, D.; Liu, J.; Zhu, X.; Tang, R. Effects of Hydrothermal Time on Structure and Photocatalytic Property of Titanium Dioxide for Degradation of Rhodamine B and Tetracycline Hydrochloride. Materials 2021, 14, 5674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wang, Y.; Qiao, M.; Lv, J.; Xu, G.; Zheng, Z.; Zhang, X.; Wu, Y. g-C3N4/g-C3N4 isotype heterojunction as an efficient platform for direct photodegradation of antibiotic. Fuller. Nanotub. Carbon Nanostruct. 2018, 26, 210–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhu, X.; Zhu, R.; Pei, L.; Liu, H.; Xu, L.; Wang, J.; Feng, W.; Jiao, Y.; Zhang, W. Fabrication, characterization, and photocatalytic activity of anatase/rutile/SnO2 nanocomposites. J. Mater. Sci. 2019, 30, 21210–21218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhang, Y.; Wang, L.; Yu, S.; Jiang, H.; Yun, Y.; Sun, Y.; Shi, J. Ag-induced synthesis of three dimensionally ordered macroporous anatase/rutile homojunction for solar light-driven Z-scheme photocatalysis. Sol. Energy 2018, 174, 770–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Qin, J.; Wang, J.; Yang, J.; Hu, Y.; Fu, M.; Ye, D. Metal organic framework derivative-TiO2 composite as efficient and durable photocatalyst for the degradation of toluene. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2020, 267, 118667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Prakash, K.; Kumar, P.S.; Pandiaraj, S.; Saravanakumar, K.; Karuthapandian, S. Controllable synthesis of SnO2 photocatalyst with superior photocatalytic activity for the degradation of methylene blue dye solution. J. Exp. Nanosci. 2021, 11, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Wu, D.; Guo, J.; Ge, Z.-H.; Feng, J. Facile Synthesis Bi2Te3 based nanocomposites: Strategies for enhancing charge carrier separation to improve photocatalytic activity. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 3390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 12 00873 g001 550
Figure 1. XRD patterns of pure TiO2, Ag@TiO2, SnO2/TiO2 and Ag@SnO2/TiO2.
Figure 1. XRD patterns of pure TiO2, Ag@TiO2, SnO2/TiO2 and Ag@SnO2/TiO2.
Nanomaterials 12 00873 g001
Nanomaterials 12 00873 g002 550
Figure 2. SEM images of pure TiO2 (a), Ag@TiO2 (b), SnO2/TiO2 (c) and Ag@SnO2/TiO2 (d).
Figure 2. SEM images of pure TiO2 (a), Ag@TiO2 (b), SnO2/TiO2 (c) and Ag@SnO2/TiO2 (d).
Nanomaterials 12 00873 g002
Nanomaterials 12 00873 g003 550
Figure 3. TEM and HRTEM images of pure TiO2 (a,c) and Ag@SnO2/TiO2 (b,d).
Figure 3. TEM and HRTEM images of pure TiO2 (a,c) and Ag@SnO2/TiO2 (b,d).
Nanomaterials 12 00873 g003
Nanomaterials 12 00873 g004 550
Figure 4. XPS spectra of pure TiO2 and Ag@SnO2/TiO2: total spectra (a), Ti 2p (b), O 1s (c), Ag 3d (d) and Sn 3d (e).
Figure 4. XPS spectra of pure TiO2 and Ag@SnO2/TiO2: total spectra (a), Ti 2p (b), O 1s (c), Ag 3d (d) and Sn 3d (e).
Nanomaterials 12 00873 g004
Nanomaterials 12 00873 g005 550
Figure 5. PL spectra of pure TiO2, Ag@TiO2, SnO2/TiO2 and Ag@SnO2/TiO2.
Figure 5. PL spectra of pure TiO2, Ag@TiO2, SnO2/TiO2 and Ag@SnO2/TiO2.
Nanomaterials 12 00873 g005
Nanomaterials 12 00873 g006 550
Figure 6. DRS spectra of pure TiO2, Ag@TiO2, SnO2/TiO2 and Ag@SnO2/TiO2.
Figure 6. DRS spectra of pure TiO2, Ag@TiO2, SnO2/TiO2 and Ag@SnO2/TiO2.
Nanomaterials 12 00873 g006
Nanomaterials 12 00873 g007 550
Figure 7. Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms and the corresponding pore size distribution curves of pure TiO2 (a) and Ag@SnO2/TiO2 (b).
Figure 7. Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms and the corresponding pore size distribution curves of pure TiO2 (a) and Ag@SnO2/TiO2 (b).
Nanomaterials 12 00873 g007
Nanomaterials 12 00873 g008 550
Figure 8. Degradation curves (a) and the kinetic curves of samples (b).
Figure 8. Degradation curves (a) and the kinetic curves of samples (b).
Nanomaterials 12 00873 g008
Nanomaterials 12 00873 g009 550
Figure 9. Degradation degrees of Ag@SnO2/TiO2 with different capture agents.
Figure 9. Degradation degrees of Ag@SnO2/TiO2 with different capture agents.
Nanomaterials 12 00873 g009
Nanomaterials 12 00873 g010 550
Figure 10. The energy band structure and the diagram of photogenerated charges transfer of Ag@SnO2/TiO2.
Figure 10. The energy band structure and the diagram of photogenerated charges transfer of Ag@SnO2/TiO2.
Nanomaterials 12 00873 g010
Nanomaterials 12 00873 g011 550
Figure 11. The cyclability of the Ag@SnO2/TiO2 photocatalyst for TC degradation.
Figure 11. The cyclability of the Ag@SnO2/TiO2 photocatalyst for TC degradation.
Nanomaterials 12 00873 g011
Nanomaterials 12 00873 g012 550
Figure 12. XRD patterns of Ag@SnO2/TiO2 photocatalyst before and after the photocatalytic experiment.
Figure 12. XRD patterns of Ag@SnO2/TiO2 photocatalyst before and after the photocatalytic experiment.
Nanomaterials 12 00873 g012
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tang, M.; Xia, Y.; Yang, D.; Lu, S.; Zhu, X.; Tang, R.; Zhang, W. Ag Decoration and SnO2 Coupling Modified Anatase/Rutile Mixed Crystal TiO2 Composite Photocatalyst for Enhancement of Photocatalytic Degradation towards Tetracycline Hydrochloride. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 873. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12050873

AMA Style

Tang M, Xia Y, Yang D, Lu S, Zhu X, Tang R, Zhang W. Ag Decoration and SnO2 Coupling Modified Anatase/Rutile Mixed Crystal TiO2 Composite Photocatalyst for Enhancement of Photocatalytic Degradation towards Tetracycline Hydrochloride. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12(5):873. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12050873

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tang, Mao, Yangwen Xia, Daixiong Yang, Shiji Lu, Xiaodong Zhu, Renyong Tang, and Wanming Zhang. 2022. "Ag Decoration and SnO2 Coupling Modified Anatase/Rutile Mixed Crystal TiO2 Composite Photocatalyst for Enhancement of Photocatalytic Degradation towards Tetracycline Hydrochloride" Nanomaterials 12, no. 5: 873. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12050873

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop