Next Article in Journal
Catalyst-Free Trans-Selective Oxyiodination and Oxychlorination of Alkynes Employing N–X (Halogen) Reagents
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis and In Vivo Antiarrhythmic Activity Evaluation of Novel Scutellarein Analogues as Voltage-Gated Nav1.5 and Cav1.2 Channels Blockers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hydrogen Sulfide Removal via Sorption Process on Activated Carbon–Metal Oxide Composites Derived from Different Biomass Sources

by
Maria Baikousi
1,
Anna Gantzoudi
1,
Christina Gioti
1,
Dimitrios Moschovas
1,
Aris E. Giannakas
2,
Apostolos Avgeropoulos
1,
Constantinos E. Salmas
1,* and
Michael A. Karakassides
1,*
1
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
2
Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Patras, 30100 Agrinio, Greece
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2023, 28(21), 7418; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28217418
Submission received: 4 October 2023 / Revised: 24 October 2023 / Accepted: 2 November 2023 / Published: 3 November 2023

Abstract

:
Biomass exploitation is a global trend due to the circular economy and the environmentally friendly spirit. Numerous applications are now based on the use of biomass-derived products. Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is a highly toxic and environmentally hazardous gas which is emitted from various processes. Thus, the efficient removal of this toxic hazardous gas following cost-effective processes is an essential requirement. In this study, we present the synthesis and characterization of biomass-derived activated carbon/zinc oxide (ZnO@AC) composites from different biomass sources as potential candidates for H2S sorption. The synthesis involved a facile method for activated carbon production via pyrolysis and chemical activation of biomass precursors (spent coffee, Aloe-Vera waste leaves, and corncob). Activated carbon production was followed by the incorporation of zinc oxide nanoparticles into the porous carbon matrix using a simple melt impregnation method. The synthesized ZnO@AC composites were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), infrared spectroscopy (IR), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and nitrogen porosimetry. The H2S removal performance of the ZnO@AC composites was evaluated through sorption experiments using a handmade apparatus. Our findings demonstrate that the Aloe-Vera-, spent coffee-, and corncob-derived composites exhibit superior H2S sorption capacity up to 106 mgH2S/gads., 66 mgH2S/gads., and 47 mgH2S/gads., respectively.

1. Introduction

The continuous growth of industrial processes, in combination with the increasing demand for clean energy sources, has led to a substantial rise in the emission of hazardous gases into the atmosphere. Among these harmful emissions, hydrogen sulfide (H2S) poses significant environmental and health risks due to its corrosive nature and toxic properties [1,2]. Anthropogenic activities such as waste landfilling, home heating, and biogas production contribute substantially to H2S emissions. Industrial processes, such as petroleum refining, pulp and paper manufacturing, and wastewater treatment, are some sources which release H2S to the atmosphere [3]. Consequently, there is a growing urgency to develop efficient and sustainable processes for H2S removal from industrial flue gases, biogas, and natural gas streams.
Apart from the famous but expensive and non-environmentally friendly Clauss process [4], which is still applied in oil refineries for H2S removal and sulfur recovery, there are several other procedures for H2S removal such as H2S absorption by amines solution [5], biological processes, oxidation, physical separation, solid-phase reactions, dry scrubbing, and chemical absorption and adsorption [3,6,7]. Each method has its own benefits and challenges as well as drawbacks, and the selection of the appropriate method depends on the specific requirements of the application, efficiency considerations, and cost-effectiveness [7].
However, among the various techniques, adsorption has emerged as the most widely applied approach for H2S removal due to its favorable balance between cost and effectiveness for large and small-scale applications even at low concentrations and temperatures [1,7,8]. Different adsorbent materials have been used for this purpose such as zeolites, activated carbons, and metal oxides [7]. Among these materials, activated carbons are very promising materials as effective adsorbents for H2S because they exhibit an interesting surface chemistry, high surface area, and tunable porosity, which enhance their sorption capacity [3,9,10]. Such materials act both as catalysts for the oxidation of H2S by air and as adsorbents effectively eliminating sulfur and its oxides from the fuel gas stream [10]. Moreover, biomass-derived activated carbons, which are products from carbonized biomass waste, are very attractive and environmentally friendly materials for H2S adsorption applications because of their natural waste origin [11,12,13,14,15,16].
In the recent years, porous carbon/metal oxide composites have emerged as promising materials for H2S sorption due to their unique combination of properties [17,18,19,20,21]. The incorporation of metal oxides into the carbon matrix enhances the chemical reactivity, improving the overall sorption performance. Metal oxides, such as iron oxide (Fe2O3), zinc oxide (ZnO), and manganese oxide (MnO2), can chemically react with H2S to form stable metal sulfides, increasing the overall sorption capacity and efficiency [3]. Among various metal oxides, ZnO seems to exhibit the highest equilibrium constant for sulfidation, reducing H2S levels to fractions of 1 ppm [22], and several studies have been reported about desulfurization using ZnO [3,23,24]. The combination of activated carbon and zinc oxide in composites could exhibit synergistic effects in H2S capture [25,26]. High surface area and micropore hierarchical pore structure of activated carbons, support and enhance the physical and/or chemical adsorption of H2S molecules. There are several publications about the proposed mechanism for H2S removal by adsorption in zinc oxide/alkaline activated carbon composites [27]. According to these proposed mechanisms, physisorption, chemisorption, and oxidation phenomena occur simultaneously on pores’ surfaces. In more detail, physisorption occurs according to the following reactions:
H2S(gas) → H2S(ads.)
H2S(ads.) → H2S(ads.-liq.)
H2S(ads.-liq.) → HS(ads.) + H+
where H2S(gas), H2S(ads.), H2S(ads.-liq.) are different phases of hydrogen sulfide.
Chemisorption occurs according to the following reactions:
H2S(g) + KOH(q)-C → KHS(q) + H2O
H2S(g) + 2KOH(q)-C → K2S(q) + 2H2O
The produced water shown in Reactions (4) and (5) covers the KOH which is impregnated in the carbon pore surface and the system KOH(q)-C is produced. Finally, oxidation reactions are represented with Equations (6)–(9):
HS(ads.) + O*(ads.) → S(ads.) + OH
HS(ads.) + 3O*(ads.) → SO2(ads.) + OH
SO2(ads.) + O*(ads.) + H2O(ads.) → H2SO4(ads.)
H+ + OH → H2O
The O*(ads.) are adsorbed dissociative oxygen atoms and H2SO4(ads.) is the sulfuric acid produced in reaction (8) which is responsible for the gradually decreased adsorption capacity of the activated carbon [27].
As an overall equation representative of the sorption process, the following zinc oxide exothermic chemical reaction, which leads to the chemisorption of H2S, is proposed:
ZnO + H2S ↔ ZnS + H2O
This combined mechanism results in higher H2S sorption capacities and faster kinetics compared to individual components. Continued research and innovation in this field will lead to advanced technologies and will address the challenges posed by H2S pollution.
In this study, highly porous activated carbons derived from three different kinds of biomass waste materials (spent coffee, Aloe-Vera waste leaves, and corncob) have been investigated as effective matrices for zinc oxide incorporation and for hydrogen sulfide removal application. Inspired from Geng et al. [28], who adopted the novel melt infiltration technique to fabricate ZnO-based adsorbents, we produced novel composite ZnO@AC materials for H2S sorption, meeting the demands of modern times and fulfilling the criteria for simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and environmental friendliness. Overall, this study presents a promising possibility for the development of efficient H2S sorbents, emphasizing the significance of activated carbon/zinc oxide composites as potential candidates for mitigating H2S emissions in various industrial processes and environmental applications.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. XRD Analysis of Pure AC and ZnO@AC Composites

An X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was performed on the ZnO@AC composites to investigate their structural properties and phase composition. The obtained XRD patterns are shown in Figure 1 in comparison with the patterns of the initial activated carbon matrices (Figure 1-inset). The XRD patterns of the composite materials exhibit crystalline diffraction peaks (marked with purple circles in Figure 1) due to the presence of crystalline phases of ZnO particles (JCPDS 96-230-0113) within the composite. The presence of ZnO within the activated carbon matrix is further confirmed by the overlapping of the characteristic peaks of both materials. The characteristic broad peaks at 2θ~24° and 44° (marked with grey squares in Figure 1) come from the amorphous nature of the three activated carbon matrices, as shown in Figure 1 inset. This suggests successful incorporation and dispersion of ZnO nanoparticles into the activated carbon structure. By analyzing the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the peaks, it is possible to estimate the average crystalline size of ZnO nanoparticles within the composites using Scherrer’s equation [29,30] at 2θ~36°, which is the more intense peak for the ZnO phase. The average crystalline size for ZnO particles is calculated equal to 11, 8.3 and 13.4 nm for spent coffee, aloe leaves, and corncob ZnO@AC composites, respectively. Overall, the observed XRD patterns confirm the successful formation of ZnO@AC composite materials.

2.2. FTIR Spectroscopy of Pure AC and ZnO@AC Composites

The FT-IR spectroscopy analysis was conducted to examine the chemical bonding and functional groups present in the ZnO@AC composites. The FT-IR spectra of the ZnO@AC composites (Figure 2) exhibited a combination of characteristic absorption bands from both the activated carbon and ZnO components. The bands observed in the composite spectra were compared with the individual spectra of activated carbon to identify any shifts or new band, indicating potential chemical interactions. The band observed at 1700 cm−1 in all spectra is attributed to the C=O stretching vibration, indicating the presence of carbonyl groups. This band may arise from the surface functional groups of activated carbon, such as carboxylic acids or ketones [31]. The absorption bands at 1460, 1535, and 1631 cm−1 can be attributed to the bending vibrations of CH2, stretching vibrations of the C=C groups in aromatic rings, and/or to the –COO groups, as well as physically adsorbed water molecules [31,32,33]. The band at 1631 cm−1 is shifted at 1535 cm−1 in the composite’s spectra, probably due to the interaction of COO groups with ZnO nanoparticles [34]. Also, in the composite’s spectra, an increase of the intensity of the weak band at 1390 cm−1 is observed, which could, again, be assigned to the C-OH vibration modes of activated carbon’s functional groups due to the interactions of ZnO nanoparticles with these groups [34,35]. The broad absorption band at the ~1250–950 cm−1 region in all spectra can be assigned to the overlapping of the C-O-O stretching, C-O stretching, and O-H bending modes of the alcoholic, phenolic, and carboxylic groups [12,36]. Furthermore, the FT-IR spectra of the composites show two weak bands at low frequency ranges, 545 and 455 cm−1, which can be assigned to the characteristic stretching vibration of the Zn-O bond in ZnO nanoparticles [37]. This peak indicates the successful incorporation of ZnO into the activated carbon matrix. The FT-IR analysis confirmed that the ZnO@AC composite retains the characteristic functional groups of activated carbons, indicating the coexistence of its surface chemistry with ZnO particles in the composite structure without any significant chemical degradation or transformation during the synthesis process.

2.3. Thermogravimetric TG% Analysis of Pure AC and ZnO@AC Composites

The TG% curves obtained for the ZnO@AC composites in comparison with the corresponding curves of the initial activated carbon matrices are presented in Figure 3. All TG% curves show a small initial weight loss of approximately 4–15% in the temperature range of 30 °C to 120 °C due to the removal of adsorbed moisture on the surface of the materials. A significant weight loss of approximately 55–70% is observed between 300 °C and 560 °C due to thermal degradation/combustion of activated carbon. The residual mass at this point, in the case of the ZnO@AC composite materials, is attributed to the presence of inorganic components, particularly ZnO, which has a higher thermal stability compared to activated carbon. This mass is calculated equal to 26%, 21%, and 16% for spent coffee-, aloe leaves-, and corncob-derived ZnO@AC composites, respectively. Furthermore, according to Figure 3, the ZnO@AC composites’ degradation starts earlier compared to the relevant pure AC materials. This probably happens due to the catalytic activity of the ZnO on the degradation process. Similar behavior was reported in papers for coal combustion processes with Fe2O3, CeO2, and CaO [38,39,40] and for enhanced photodegradation processes using ZnO nanoparticles [41,42,43].

2.4. Nitrogen Porosimetry for Pore Structure Analysis of Pure AC and ZnO@AC Composites

The N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms were measured to investigate the pore structure properties and porosity of the AC and the Zn@AC composites. The resulting hysteresis loops for all materials, as well as the simulation of the nitrogen adsorption–desorption process using the CPSM model free code downloaded from [44], are shown in Figure 4. Such results can provide us some first general results. The isotherms of all the materials are type I, showing a steep increase in adsorption at low relative pressures (P/P0), suggesting the existence of a mainly microporous structure [45]. There is a significant decrease in the total sorbed volume in the isotherms of Zn@AC composites in comparison with the corresponding AC matrices. However, the isotherm’s shape, which remains similar, suggests that ZnO nanoparticles did not significantly alter the textural properties of the materials and are well-dispersed within the porous framework [26]. For more detailed information, CPSM and DFT pore size distributions were obtained and presented in Figure 5. It is obvious from this figure that the two methods indicated lower micropores in the range of 1–1.5 nm. The ZnO addition seems to block slightly the very low micropores, while new microporosity is formed due to the ZnO lay down in mesopores and higher micropore structures and the relevant diameters are reduced. This could be probably an explanation for the shift of the corncob microporous distribution peak from 1.20 nm for pure AC to 1.30 nm for the ZnO@AC composite. Also, the same explanation could fit the aloe material for the shift of the microporous distribution peak from 1.29 nm for pure AC to 1.24 nm for ZnO@AC and to the spent coffee material for the shift of the microporous distribution peak from 1.37 nm for pure AC to 1.29 nm for ZnO@AC. This hypothesis is also supported by the higher micropore peak shift, which is presented in Figure 5c,d.
Numerical details for specific pore surface areas according to BET, Rouquerol, Langmuir, and the CPSM model are presented in Table 1. The negative CBET values indicate a strong effect of the microporosity to the BET specific surface area calculation. This was expected because of the strong pore curvature effect in such cases, which is explained in detail in the literature [46] where calculations show that BET underestimates the specific surface close to 100%. Recently, Rouquerol et al. reported a new method for more realistic calculations of the BET surface area [47]. According to this method, higher and more realistic BET specific surface area values were estimated and are presented in the third column of Table 1, i.e., BETRouq.. Finally, CPSM specific surface area values which were based on CPSM pore volume distribution and are closer to the relevant values calculated using the Langmuir model seem to be more realistic also.
It is obvious from Table 1 that in all cases the underestimated specific surface areas according to the BET equation were around 1000–1100 m2/g when the real values seem to be around 1350–1600 m2/g. The ZnO addition in the AC matrix mostly affected the corncob-derived porous carbon and affected the least the aloe leave-derived porous carbon. Although in the case of pure AC the higher specific surface area belongs to the spent coffee-derived matrix, in the case of composites it belongs to aloe leaves.
The micropore fraction as well as the mean pore diameter in the low microporous region and the total pore volume of all the tested materials are presented in Table 2. The micropore fraction was estimated via two independent models, i.e., the Dubinin–Radushkevich and the CPSM model. It is obvious from such values that the majority of the pores are microporous; according to Figure 5c,d, a very small fraction is mesoporous. Furthermore, according to hysteresis loops of Figure 4, there is an extremely small fraction of macropores. The combination of these three observations could be supported by the hierarchy of the activated carbons, which is reported extensively in the literature [48,49,50]. Finally, the mean values of low micropore (i.e., from 1.0 nm to 1.5 nm) diameters is around 1.30 nm for all cases.

2.5. SEM-EDS Images Analysis of Pure AC and ZnO@AC Composites

Figure 6 shows SEM-EDS elemental mapping images from the AC matrices and ZnO@AC composites before and after the H2S sorption process, while Figure S1 displays the corresponding SEM images. It is obvious qualitatively from the change in color of Figure 6 columns 1 (pure) and 2 (composite) that the ZnO (green-yellow color) was spread homogeneously on the surface and inside the pores of the AC matrix. From the same figure, from column 4 (composite), we can observe that the sulfur (purple color) is much more abundant on the composite materials’ surface compared to the relevant, from column 3, pure AC. Thus, the composites were far more active for H2S removal compared to the pure AC probably because of the chemical reaction in Equation (10). Finally, from the a4 and b4 images, the spent coffee and aloe leave composites, ZnO@AC seems to be the most active materials.
These results are also supported by the EDS spectrum presented quantitatively in Figure 7. It is obvious from columns 1 (pure before) and 3 (composite before) that no sulfur exists in materials before the H2S removal process. It is also obvious from columns 2 (pure after) and 4 (composite after) that all materials exhibit activity in the H2S removal process more or less. According to the inset images, pure AC materials clearly exhibit lower sulfur concentration compared to AC composites. Thus, it is confirmed that ZnO@AC composite materials are more active compared to pure AC materials.
Table 3 reports the EDS analysis values of the % wt. presence on the materials’ surface area. It is shown by the differences between fresh and used materials that sorption and probably chemical reaction processes occur in all cases. Furthermore, despite the fact that, according to Table 1, the addition of ZnO decreases the pore surface area, the H2S removal activity is enhanced by this addition and the aloe leave-originated composite was the most active.

2.6. Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) Removal Experiments

Hydrogen sulfide sorption experiments were carried out using a handmade apparatus described in Section 3.5. Measurements were treated with Equations (11)–(15) and the total sorption capacity of each sample was calculated and is presented in Table 4. All AC matrices were prepared and activated via a pyrolysis process, using KOH as an activator, and under identical conditions. All ZnO@AC composites were developed via a melt-intrusion process under exactly the same conditions again. The sorption experiments were executed at ambient conditions of temperature and pressure.
Considering the column % yield, which refers to the % yield of AC using an amount of initial biomass, it is shown that corncob was the most productive source for AC. Aloe leaves were the least productive biomass probably because of the gel content which produces more gasses. Considering Table 1, the arrangement according to the specific surface area for the three sources was almost in reverse order compared to the % yield. Moreover, the H2S removal capacity of the pure AC originating from the corncob source is a little higher than the relevant of the spent coffee. The highest is that of pure AC produced from aloe leaves. When the porous carbon matrixes were impregnated with Zn salt and the composite ZnO@AC was formed, the composite originating from aloe leaves was again the most active material for H2S removal. The total capacity of 106 mgH2S/gads. is higher than the values referring to other activated carbons and different types of ZnO composite materials (Table 5).
Also, the total capacities of the other two ZnO@AC composites, i.e., 66 mgH2S/gads. for spent coffee and 47 mgH2S/gads. for corncob, are remarkable. Although the specific surface was decreased because of the ZnO presence, this oxide boosted the AC activity 6.5 times in the case of spent coffee, 5.8 times in the case of aloe leaves, and 3.8 times in the case of corncob. This indicates the presence of the chemical reaction presented in the introduction section as Equation (10). It is obvious that the results concerning the H2S removal activity obtained from the SEM-EDS analysis agree with the results obtained from sorption experiments. Finally, even though the specific surface area and the pore structure values of the spent coffee- and the aloe leave-derived ZnO@AC composites were close, there was a gap between the respective H2S sorption capacities. This observation could be explained assuming a different surface chemistry effect.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

Spent coffee (sc) was collected from the student café of the University of Ioannina and dried at 80 °C for 24 h. Aloe-Vera (av) waste leaves were supplied by the Greek Industrial Company, Hellenic Aloe, Ethnikis Antistaseos 21, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, whereas Corncob waste (cc) was supplied by Agricultural Cooperative Agrinio Union, Agrinio, Greece. Both of them were washed with tap water and dried at 80 °C for 24 h. The dried Aloe-Vera leaves and corncob were milled in order to produce fine brown powder. Potassium hydroxide (KOH, 85%), hydrochloric acid (HCl, 37%), and zinc nitrate (Zn(NO3)2·H2O, 98%), were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany) and used without further purification.

3.2. Preparation of Activated Carbons

Activated carbon (AC) was produced via the pyrolysis and chemical activation processes of spent coffee, Aloe-Vera leaves, and corncob. A certain amount of each biomass was pyrolyzed at 500 °C for 2 h under argon flow. The produced chars were ground and mixed with KOH (1/1 wt/wt) and pyrolyzed again under argon flow at 800 °C for 2 h. The pyrolysis process took place in a tubular furnace with a temperature increasing rate of 5 °C/min. The produced activated carbon was stirred for 24 h in an HCl solution (1 N), washed with deionized water to an approximately neutral pH of 7, and finally was dried at 80 °C for 24 h.

3.3. Preparation of ZnO@AC Composites

ZnO@AC composites were synthesized by the melt impregnation method [28] using Zn(NO3)2·H2O as metal precursor. An amount of 150 mg of pure AC was mixed and ground with 108 mg Zn(NO3)2·H2O, placed inside a 5 mL closed glass vial, and heated at 42 °C for 24 h to melt the zinc salt which was then introduced to the porous carbon. The mixture was further heated at 400 °C for 4 h under vacuum with a heating rate of 5 °C/min to produce zinc oxide molecules inside the activated carbon pores.

3.4. Characterization Techniques

For the chemical and structural characterization of the ZnO@AC composites, as well as of the initial activated carbon matrices, X-ray Diffraction (XRD), ThermoGravimetric analysis (TG%), Fourier Transformer–InfraRed spectroscopy (FT-IR), nitrogen (N2) porosimetry, Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), and EDX analysis were used. The XRD patterns were determined via the powder X-ray diffraction technique using a D8 Advance Bruker diffractometer equipped with a Cu Kα (40 kV, 40 mA, λ = 1.541 78 Å) radiation source and a secondary beam graphite monochromator (measuring conditions: 2 to 80° 2θ range, 0.02° steps, 2 s/step). The FT-IR spectra were collected using an FT/IR-6000 JASCO Fourier transform spectrometer in the wavenumber range of 4000–400 cm−1 and 4 cm−1 resolution. The samples were in powder form and dispersed in KBr to produce pellets. TG% analysis was performed using a Perkin Elmer Pyris Diamond TG/DTA instrument. About 5 mg of each sample was heated in air from 25 °C to 850 °C, with a temperature increasing rate of 5 °C/min. N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms were collected via porosimetry measurements at 77 K using a Quantachrome Autosorb iQ porosimeter. Before the analysis, the sample was outgassed at 150 °C for 20 h under a high vacuum (10−6 mbar). Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (SBET) [52], Langmuir (SLang.), and Corrugated Pore Structure Model (CPSM) [53,54] methods were applied to determine the specific surface area. The pore volume distribution of the material was estimated by applying the Density Functional Theory (DFT) [55] and the Corrugated Pore Structure Model (CPSM) [53,54]. The total pore volume was calculated by transforming the overall (i.e., at around P/P0 = 0.998) adsorbed gas nitrogen STP volume to liquid nitrogen volume. The micropore volume fraction estimations were carried out using the Dubinin–Radushkevich and the CPSM model [56,57], while the pore number (population) distribution was estimated using the CPSM model [53]. Finally, Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) images were obtained using a JEOM JSM 6510-LV instrument (Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) equipped with an X-Act EDS-detector from Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK, (an acceleration voltage of 20 kV was applied). EDX measurements were also carried out.

3.5. H2S Sorption Experimental Measurements

The H2S removal capacity of the prepared AC samples was estimated via experiments in an i.d. = 4.4 mm inox 316 adsorption column, total length of 22 mm, mounted on a handmade apparatus presented in Figure 8.
For the construction of this apparatus, we used PARKER 13HE inox 316 gas plug valves 1/8” (GPV), 172 bar, 38 °C, Parker Hannifin Sales Company, Kaarst, Germany, Pat-parker-platz 1, Kaarst, Germany, AALBORG calibrated ball gas flow meters (rotameter), Aalborg Instruments & Controls, Inc., 20 Corporate Drive, Orangeburg, NY, USA, an electrochemical instrument, CROWCON Xgard Bright, Ribble Enviro Ltd., Unit 4, Gisburn Business Park, Gisburn, Nr Clitheroe, UK for H2S sensing, and outlet concentration recording using an akYtec MSD200 4–20 mA Modbus Data Logger, GmbH, Vahrenwalder Str. 269 A, Hannover, Germany, recorder. The instrument is tuned to operate in the range of 0–6000 v/v ppm H2S (mL/m3) outlet concentration. Experiments were carried out under ambient conditions of temperature and pressure. After the adsorption column, the outlet H2S was firstly captured by a NaOH aqueous solution 0.25 M and secondly by a CdSO4 aqueous solution 0.1 M. The AC sample was placed in the adsorption column supported by glass wool in front of and behind the solid fixed bed. The length of this bed was measured before the experimental measurement started for Gas Hourly Space Velocity (GHSV) calculations. Outlet (v/v) ppm concentrations (mL/m3) versus time in (min) were recorded and the values were input into an excel file at the end (fully saturated AC) of each experiment. Concentration values were normalized with the maximum value, i.e., 6000 v/v ppm (mL/m3), and the breakthrough integral of Equation (11) and the saturation integral of Equation (12) were calculated numerically (Simpson or Trapezoid rule).
b r e a k t h r o u g h   i n t e g r a l = I b ( m i n ) = 0 t b 1 C ( t ) C i n × d t
s a t u r a t i o n   i n t e g r a l = I s m i n = 0 t s 1 C ( t ) C i n × d t
where tb (min) was the breakthrough time, i.e., time where C(t)/Cin = 0.05, and ts (min) was the fully saturated time, i.e., time where C(t)/Cin = 1.
The breakthrough adsorption capacity qb (mgH2S/gads.) was calculated using Equation (14), while the fully saturated adsorption capacity qs (mgH2S/gads.) was calculated using Equation (15). For such calculations, we assumed the ideality of the inlet gas and the inlet maximum concentration, i.e., 6000 v/v ppm (mL/m3), was converted to mgH2S/Lgas, according to Equation (13).
C i n m g H 2 S m l g a s = M W H 2 S g H 2 S m o l H 2 S 22400 m l H 2 S m o l H 2 S × 10 6 m g a s 3 m l g a s × C i n m l H 2 S m g a s 3 o r v v p p m
q b m g H 2 S g a d s . = C i n m g H 2 S m l g a s × V ˙ m l g a s m i n m a d s . g a d s . × I b m i n
q s m g H 2 S g a d s . = C i n m g H 2 S m l g a s × V ˙ m l m i n m a d s . g a d s . × I s m i n
where Cin is the inlet gas concentration, MWH2S is the H2S molecular weight, 22,400 is the molecular volume of ideal gasses, V ˙ is the gas volume flow rate, Ib and Is the breakthrough and fully saturated integral respectively, mads. is the adsorbent (AC) mass in the adsorption column, qb is the breakthrough adsorption capacity of the adsorbent (AC), and qs is the fully saturated adsorption capacity of the adsorbent (AC).

4. Conclusions

In this study, we successfully synthesized and characterized biomass-derived pure AC and ZnO@AC composites from three different biomass sources for efficient H2S removal. Using spent coffee, Aloe-Vera waste leaves, and corncob as biomass sources, three different activated carbon matrices were obtained by pyrolysis and chemical activation processes. Their ZnO@AC composites were also synthesized, and all the prepared materials exhibited mainly microporous structures with high specific surface area values. XRD results revealed the formation of crystalline zinc oxide particles inside the pore structure, with average crystallite sizes of 11, 8.3, and 13.4 nm for ZnO@AC derived from spent coffee, aloe leaves, and corncob, respectively. The H2S sorption measurements confirmed the results of the SEM-EDS analysis that the presence of ZnO significantly enhanced the material activity during this process. According to the Table 4 values, we can conclude that the biomass source for the AC production, and consequently the surface chemistry of such porous materials, plays a key role in processes such as H2S removal. Furthermore, as is obvious from the same table, the incorporation of ZnO with the AC matrix via a melting process significantly increases the adsorption capacity. This capacity is superior compared to other similar materials reported in Table 5.
Overall, the proposed biomass-derived ZnO@AC composites seem to be a very promising cost-effective and eco-friendly solution for H2S removal processes and the aloe leave-derived material, with 106 mgH2S/gads. adsorption capacity, was the most functional for this process. Future research should focus on regeneration conditions, the effectiveness of the developed materials, and on scaling up the production of these composites and exploring their performance under real-world conditions to accelerate their practical implementation.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules28217418/s1, Figure S1: SEM images for pure AC and ZnO@AC composites before and after H2S removal process.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.E.S. and M.A.K.; methodology, M.B., C.E.S. and M.A.K.; validation, C.E.S.; formal analysis, M.B. and C.E.S.; investigation, A.G., C.G., D.M., A.E.G., A.A. and M.B.; data curation, M.B. and C.E.S.; writing—original draft preparation, M.B., C.E.S. and M.A.K.; supervision, C.E.S. and M.A.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was co-funding by the European Union and Greek national funds through the Operational Program Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation, under the call RESEARCH—CREATE—INNOVATE (acronym: Eco-Bio-H2-FCs; project code: T2EDK-00955).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Ch. Papachristodoulou for the XRD measurements.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Thomou, E.; Basina, G.; Spyrou, K.; Wahedi, Y.A.; Rudolf, P.; Gournis, D. H2S Removal by Copper Enriched Porous Carbon Cuboids. Carbon Trends 2022, 7, 100145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wiheeb, A.D.; Shamsudin, I.K.; Ahmad, M.A.; Murat, M.N.; Kim, J.; Othman, M.R. Present Technologies for Hydrogen Sulfide Removal from Gaseous Mixtures. Rev. Chem. Eng. 2013, 29, 449–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Georgiadis, A.G.; Charisiou, N.D.; Goula, M.A. Removal of Hydrogen Sulfide From Various Industrial Gases: A Review of The Most Promising Adsorbing Materials. Catalysts 2020, 10, 521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gary, J.H.; Handwerk, G.E. Petroleum Refining Technology and Economics, 2nd ed.; Marcel Dekker, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1984; ISBN 0-8247-7150-8. [Google Scholar]
  5. Shoukat, U.; Pinto, D.D.D.; Knuutila, H.K. Study of Various Aqueous and Non-Aqueous Amine Blends for Hydrogen Sulfide Removal from Natural Gas. Processes 2019, 7, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Vikrant, K.; Kailasa, S.K.; Tsang, D.C.W.; Lee, S.S.; Kumar, P.; Giri, B.S.; Singh, R.S.; Kim, K.-H. Biofiltration of Hydrogen Sulfide: Trends and Challenges. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 187, 131–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pudi, A.; Rezaei, M.; Signorini, V.; Andersson, M.P.; Baschetti, M.G.; Mansouri, S.S. Hydrogen Sulfide Capture and Removal Technologies: A Comprehensive Review of Recent Developments and Emerging Trends. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 298, 121448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Khabazipour, M.; Anbia, M. Removal of Hydrogen Sulfide from Gas Streams Using Porous Materials: A Review. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 22133–22164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zulkefli, N.N.; Noor Azam, A.M.; Masdar, M.S.; Isahak, W.N. Adsorption–Desorption Behavior of Hydrogen Sulfide Capture on a Modified Activated Carbon Surface. Materials 2023, 16, 462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bashkova, S.; Baker, F.S.; Wu, X.; Armstrong, T.R.; Schwartz, V. Activated Carbon Catalyst for Selective Oxidation of Hydrogen Sulphide: On the Influence of Pore Structure, Surface Characteristics, and Catalytically-Active Nitrogen. Carbon 2007, 45, 1354–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sawalha, H.; Maghalseh, M.; Qutaina, J.; Junaidi, K.; Rene, E.R. Removal of Hydrogen Sulfide from Biogas Using Activated Carbon Synthesized from Different Locally Available Biomass Wastes—A Case Study from Palestine. Bioengineered 2020, 11, 607–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rambabu, N.; Azargohar, R.; Dalai, A.K.; Adjaye, J. Evaluation and Comparison of Enrichment Efficiency of Physical/Chemical Activations and Functionalized Activated Carbons Derived from Fluid Petroleum Coke for Environmental Applications. Fuel Process. Technol. 2013, 106, 501–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mochizuki, T.; Kubota, M.; Matsuda, H.; D’Elia Camacho, L.F. Adsorption Behaviors of Ammonia and Hydrogen Sulfide on Activated Carbon Prepared from Petroleum Coke by KOH Chemical Activation. Fuel Process. Technol. 2016, 144, 164–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nam, H.; Wang, S.; Jeong, H.-R. TMA and H2S Gas Removals Using Metal Loaded on Rice Husk Activated Carbon for Indoor Air Purification. Fuel 2018, 213, 186–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kazmierczak-Razna, J.; Gralak-Podemska, B.; Nowicki, P.; Pietrzak, R. The Use of Microwave Radiation for Obtaining Activated Carbons from Sawdust and Their Potential Application in Removal of NO2 and H2S. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 269, 352–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. De Oliveira, L.H.; Meneguin, J.G.; Pereira, M.V.; do Nascimento, J.F.; Arroyo, P.A. Adsorption of Hydrogen Sulfide, Carbon Dioxide, Methane, and Their Mixtures on Activated Carbon. Chem. Eng. Commun. 2019, 206, 1533–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, Y.; Ma, C.; Wu, Y.; Ke, C.; Liu, X.; Wang, J.; Qiao, W.; Ling, L. Efficient Removal of H2S with Zinc Oxide/Nitrogen-Doped Ordered Mesoporous Carbons at Room Temperature. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2022, 333, 111712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Elyassi, B.; Wahedi, Y.A.; Rajabbeigi, N.; Kumar, P.; Jeong, J.S.; Zhang, X.; Kumar, P.; Balasubramanian, V.V.; Katsiotis, M.S.; Andre Mkhoyan, K.; et al. A High-Performance Adsorbent for Hydrogen Sulfide Removal. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2014, 190, 152–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, L.-J.; Fan, H.-L.; Shangguan, J.; Croiset, E.; Chen, Z.; Wang, H.; Mi, J. Design of a Sorbent to Enhance Reactive Adsorption of Hydrogen Sulfide. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 21167–21177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Karvan, O.; Atakül, H. Investigation of CuO/Mesoporous SBA-15 Sorbents for Hot Gas Desulfurization. Fuel Process. Technol. 2008, 89, 908–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yang, J.H. Hydrogen Sulfide Removal Technology: A Focused Review on Adsorption and Catalytic Oxidation. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2021, 38, 674–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Portela, R.; Rubio-Marcos, F.; Leret, P.; Fernández, J.F.; Bañares, M.A.; Ávila, P. Nanostructured ZnO/Sepiolite Monolithic Sorbents for H2S Removal. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 3, 1306–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Samokhvalov, A.; Tatarchuk, B.J. Characterization of Active Sites, Determination of Mechanisms of H2S, COS and CS2 Sorption and Regeneration of ZnO Low-Temperature Sorbents: Past, Current and Perspectives. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2011, 13, 3197–3209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Awume, B.; Tajallipour, M.; Nemati, M.; Predicala, B. Application of ZnO Nanoparticles in Control of H2S Emission from Low-Temperature Gases and Swine Manure Gas. Water. Air Soil Pollut. 2017, 228, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hernández, S.P.; Chiappero, M.; Russo, N.; Fino, D. A Novel ZnO-Based Adsorbent for Biogas Purification in H2 Production Systems. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 176–177, 272–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yang, C.; Yang, S.; Fan, H.; Wang, Y.; Shangguan, J. Tuning the ZnO-Activated Carbon Interaction through Nitrogen Modification for Enhancing the H2S Removal Capacity. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 555, 548–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Yan, R.; Liang, D.T.; Tsen, L.; Tay, J.H. Kinetics and Mechanisms of H2S Adsorption by Alkaline Activated Carbon. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 4460–4466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Geng, Q.; Wang, L.-J.; Yang, C.; Zhang, H.-Y.; Zhao, Y.-R.; Fan, H.-L.; Huo, C. Room-Temperature Hydrogen Sulfide Removal with Zinc Oxide Nanoparticle/Molecular Sieve Prepared by Melt Infiltration. Fuel Process. Technol. 2019, 185, 26–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Scherrer, P. Nachrichten von Der Gesellschaft Der Wissenschaften Zu Göttingen. Gött. Nachr. Math. Phys. 1918, 2, 98–100. [Google Scholar]
  30. Patterson, A.L. The Scherrer Formula for X-ray Particle Size Determination. Phys. Rev. 1939, 56, 978–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Daffalla, S.; Mukhtar, H.; Shaharun, M. Properties of Activated Carbon Prepared from Rice Husk with Chemical Activation. Int. J. Glob. Environ. Issues 2012, 12, 107–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Baikousi, M.; Georgiou, Y.; Daikopoulos, C.; Bourlinos, A.B.; Filip, J.; Zbořil, R.; Deligiannakis, Y.; Karakassides, M.A. Synthesis and Characterization of Robust Zero Valent Iron/Mesoporous Carbon Composites and Their Applications in Arsenic Removal. Carbon 2015, 93, 636–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Altıntıg, E.; Yenigun, M.; Sarı, A.; Altundag, H.; Tuzen, M.; Saleh, T.A. Facile Synthesis of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Loaded Activated Carbon as an Eco-Friendly Adsorbent for Ultra-Removal of Malachite Green from Water. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 21, 101305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Fan, B.; Guo, H.; Shi, J.; Shi, C.; Jia, Y.; Wang, H.; Chen, D.; Yang, Y.; Lu, H.; Xu, H.; et al. Facile One-Pot Preparation of Silver/Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanocomposite for Cancer Photodynamic and Photothermal Therapy. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2016, 16, 7049–7054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rochman, R.; Wahyuningsih, S.; Ramelan, A.; Hanif, Q. Preparation of Nitrogen and Sulphur Co-Doped Reduced Graphene Oxide (rGO-NS) Using N and S Heteroatom of Thiourea. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 509, 012119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chunlan, L.; Shaoping, X.; Yixiong, G.; Shuqin, L.; Changhou, L. Effect of Pre-Carbonization of Petroleum Cokes on Chemical Activation Process with KOH. Carbon 2005, 43, 2295–2301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Handore, K.; Bhavsar, S.; Horne, A.; Chhattise, P.; Mohite, K.; Ambekar, J.; Pande, N.; Chabukswar, V. Novel Green Route of Synthesis of ZnO Nanoparticles by Using Natural Biodegradable Polymer and Its Application as a Catalyst for Oxidation of Aldehydes. J. Macromol. Sci. Part Pure Appl. Chem. 2014, 51, 941–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gao, Q.; Zhang, G.; Zheng, H.; Jiang, X.; Shen, F. Combustion Performance of Pulverized Coal and Corresponding Kinetics Study after Adding the Additives of Fe2O3 and CaO. Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater. 2023, 30, 314–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gong, X.; Guo, Z.; Wang, Z. Reactivity of Pulverized Coals during Combustion Catalyzed by CeO2 and Fe2O3. Combust. Flame 2010, 157, 351–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Saroyan, H.; Arampatzidou, A.; Voutsa, D.; Lazaridis, N.; Deliyanni, E. Activated Carbon Supported MnO2 for Catalytic Degradation of Reactive Black 5. Colloids Surf. Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2019, 566, 166–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tanji, K.; El Mrabet, I.; Fahoul, Y.; Jellal, I.; Benjelloun, M.; Belghiti, M.; El Hajam, M.; Naciri, Y.; El Gaidoumi, A.; El Bali, B.; et al. Epigrammatic Progress on the Photocatalytic Properties of ZnO and TiO2 Based Hydroxyapatite@photocatlyst toward Organic Molecules Photodegradation: A Review. J. Water Process Eng. 2023, 53, 103682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tanji, K.; El Mrabet, I.; Fahoul, Y.; Soussi, A.; Belghiti, M.; Jellal, I.; Naciri, Y.; El Gaidoumi, A.; Kherbeche, A. Experimental and Theoretical Investigation of Enhancing the Photocatalytic Activity of Mg Doped ZnO for Nitrophenol Degradation. React. Kinet. Mech. Catal. 2023, 136, 1125–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Belghiti, M.; Tanji, K.; El Mersly, L.; Lamsayety, I.; Ouzaouit, K.; Faqir, H.; Benzakour, I.; Rafqah, S.; Outzourhit, A. Fast and Non-Selective Photodegradation of Basic Yellow 28, Malachite Green, Tetracycline, and Sulfamethazine Using a Nanosized ZnO Synthesized from Zinc Ore. React. Kinet. Mech. Catal. 2022, 135, 2265–2278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Salmas, C.E. DOWNLOADS, CPSM_Nitrogen. Available online: http://users.uoi.gr/ksalmas/ (accessed on 1 August 2023).
  45. Thommes, M.; Kaneko, K.; Neimark, A.V.; Olivier, J.P.; Rodriguez-Reinoso, F.; Rouquerol, J.; Sing, K.S.W. Physisorption of Gases, with Special Reference to the Evaluation of Surface Area and Pore Size Distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2015, 87, 1051–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Salmas, C.E.; Androutsopoulos, G.P. Rigid Sphere Molecular Model Enables an Assessment of the Pore Curvature Effect upon Realistic Evaluations of Surface Areas of Mesoporous and Microporous Materials. Langmuir 2005, 21, 11146–11160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Rouquerol, J.; Llewellyn, P.; Rouquerol, F. Is the Bet Equation Applicable to Microporous Adsorbents? In Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis; Llewellyn, P.L., Rodriquez-Reinoso, F., Rouqerol, J., Seaton, N., Eds.; Characterization of Porous Solids VII; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007; Volume 160, pp. 49–56. [Google Scholar]
  48. Surya, K.; Michael, M.S. Hierarchical Porous Activated Carbon Prepared from Biowaste of Lemon Peel for Electrochemical Double Layer Capacitors. Biomass Bioenergy 2021, 152, 106175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ding, Y.; Qi, J.; Hou, R.; Liu, B.; Yao, S.; Lang, J.; Chen, J.; Yang, B. Preparation of High-Performance Hierarchical Porous Activated Carbon via a Multistep Physical Activation Method for Supercapacitors. Energy Fuels 2022, 36, 5456–5464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wei, H.; Wang, H.; Li, A.; Li, H.; Cui, D.; Dong, M.; Lin, J.; Fan, J.; Zhang, J.; Hou, H.; et al. Advanced Porous Hierarchical Activated Carbon Derived from Agricultural Wastes toward High Performance Supercapacitors. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 820, 153111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hussain, M.; Abbas, N.; Fino, D.; Russo, N. Novel Mesoporous Silica Supported ZnO Adsorbents for the Desulphurization of Biogas at Low Temperatures. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 188, 222–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Brunauer, S.; Emmett, P.H.; Teller, E. Adsorption of Gases in Multimolecular Layers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1938, 60, 309–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Androutsopoulos, G.P.; Salmas, C.E. A New Model for Capillary Condensation−Evaporation Hysteresis Based on a Random Corrugated Pore Structure Concept: Prediction of Intrinsic Pore Size Distributions. 1. Model Formulation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2000, 39, 3747–3763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Androutsopoulos, G.P.; Salmas, C.E. A New Model for Capillary Condensation−Evaporation Hysteresis Based on a Random Corrugated Pore Structure Concept: Prediction of Intrinsic Pore Size Distribution. 2. Model Application. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2000, 39, 3764–3777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Dombrowski, R.J.; Hyduke, D.R.; Lastoskie, C.M. Pore Size Analysis of Activated Carbons from Argon and Nitrogen Porosimetry Using Density Functional Theory. Langmuir 2000, 16, 5041–5050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Salmas, C.E.; Androutsopoulos, G.P. Preparation and Characterization of Anodic Aluminum Oxide Films Exhibiting Microporosity. Chem. Eng. Commun. 2008, 196, 407–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Marsh, H.; Rand, B. The Characterization of Microporous Carbons by Means of the Dubinin-Radushkevich Equation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1970, 33, 101–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. XRD patterns of ZnO@AC composites in comparison with the corresponding patterns of raw activated carbon matrices (inset figure). Grey squares correspond to activated carbon and purple circles correspond to ZnO.
Figure 1. XRD patterns of ZnO@AC composites in comparison with the corresponding patterns of raw activated carbon matrices (inset figure). Grey squares correspond to activated carbon and purple circles correspond to ZnO.
Molecules 28 07418 g001
Figure 2. Comparison of FT-IR spectra curves of pure AC and ZnO@AC composites.
Figure 2. Comparison of FT-IR spectra curves of pure AC and ZnO@AC composites.
Molecules 28 07418 g002
Figure 3. Comparison of TG% and DTG curves of pure AC and ZnO@AC composites. (a,b) Corncob biomass source, (c,d) aloe leaves biomass source, (e,f) spent coffee food waste source.
Figure 3. Comparison of TG% and DTG curves of pure AC and ZnO@AC composites. (a,b) Corncob biomass source, (c,d) aloe leaves biomass source, (e,f) spent coffee food waste source.
Molecules 28 07418 g003
Figure 4. Nitrogen porosimetry experimental loops (points) of AC originating from different biomass sources i.e., spent coffee, aloe leaves, and corncob, and the relevant CPSM simulation (continuous line) (a) before melt impregnation with Zn salt and (b) after melt impregnation with Zn salt.
Figure 4. Nitrogen porosimetry experimental loops (points) of AC originating from different biomass sources i.e., spent coffee, aloe leaves, and corncob, and the relevant CPSM simulation (continuous line) (a) before melt impregnation with Zn salt and (b) after melt impregnation with Zn salt.
Molecules 28 07418 g004
Figure 5. Pore volume distributions, according to CPSM and DFT models, for AC (left hand) and ZnO@AC composites (right hand), derived from different biomass sources and activated carbon composite materials. (a,b) Micro-pore region, (c,d) meso pore region, (e) DFT pore volume distribution for pure AC, (f) DFT pore volume distribution for ZnO@AC composites.
Figure 5. Pore volume distributions, according to CPSM and DFT models, for AC (left hand) and ZnO@AC composites (right hand), derived from different biomass sources and activated carbon composite materials. (a,b) Micro-pore region, (c,d) meso pore region, (e) DFT pore volume distribution for pure AC, (f) DFT pore volume distribution for ZnO@AC composites.
Molecules 28 07418 g005
Figure 6. SEM-EDS mapping images for pure AC and ZnO@AC composites before and after H2S removal process. (a) Spent coffee, (b) aloe leaves, (c) corncob. (1) Pure AC before H2S removal process, (2) ZnO@AC composites before H2S removal process, (3) pure AC after H2S removal process, (4) ZnO@AC composites after H2S removal process.
Figure 6. SEM-EDS mapping images for pure AC and ZnO@AC composites before and after H2S removal process. (a) Spent coffee, (b) aloe leaves, (c) corncob. (1) Pure AC before H2S removal process, (2) ZnO@AC composites before H2S removal process, (3) pure AC after H2S removal process, (4) ZnO@AC composites after H2S removal process.
Molecules 28 07418 g006
Figure 7. EDS quantitative analysis for pure AC and ZnO@AC composites before and after H2S removal process. (a) Spent coffee, (b) aloe leaves, (c) corncob. (1) Pure AC before H2S removal process, (2) pure AC after H2S removal process, (3) ZnO@AC composites before H2S removal process, (4) ZnO@AC composites after H2S removal process.
Figure 7. EDS quantitative analysis for pure AC and ZnO@AC composites before and after H2S removal process. (a) Spent coffee, (b) aloe leaves, (c) corncob. (1) Pure AC before H2S removal process, (2) pure AC after H2S removal process, (3) ZnO@AC composites before H2S removal process, (4) ZnO@AC composites after H2S removal process.
Molecules 28 07418 g007
Figure 8. Handmade apparatus for H2S adsorption measurements using an artificial H2S + Ar gas mixture of 6000 ppm. Inset figure is a graphical representation of adsorption capacity results after mathematical treatment.
Figure 8. Handmade apparatus for H2S adsorption measurements using an artificial H2S + Ar gas mixture of 6000 ppm. Inset figure is a graphical representation of adsorption capacity results after mathematical treatment.
Molecules 28 07418 g008
Table 1. Specific surface areas of activated carbon matrices and ZnO@AC composite materials according to BET, Rouquerol, Langmuir, and CPSM model.
Table 1. Specific surface areas of activated carbon matrices and ZnO@AC composite materials according to BET, Rouquerol, Langmuir, and CPSM model.
Material CodeSg(m2/g)
(BET)
Sg(m2/g)
(BETRouq.)
Sg(m2/g)
(Lang.)
Sg(m2/g)
(CPSM)
Decreasing Ratio
ACsc11951452164316531.5
ZnO@ACsc81898911211132
ACav11481498157715941.3
ZnO@ACav84699011561188
ACcc9531210130013411.6
ZnO@ACcc597726816832
Table 2. Pore structure properties of pure AC matrices and ZnO@AC composite materials.
Table 2. Pore structure properties of pure AC matrices and ZnO@AC composite materials.
Material CodeTotal Pore Volume (cm3/g)Dmean (nm) CPSM Low Micro%Microp.
(CPSM)
%Microp.
(Dubinin)
ACsc0.6151.379193
ZnO@ACsc0.4221.299193
ACav0.6131.298090
ZnO@ACav0.4741.247284
ACcc0.4841.208295
ZnO@ACcc0.3291.308187
Table 3. Sulfur % wt. presence on the surface of materials as it was calculated by the EDS instrument analysis.
Table 3. Sulfur % wt. presence on the surface of materials as it was calculated by the EDS instrument analysis.
(SEM-EDS) S % wt.
Material CodeFreshUsedIncreasing Ratio
ACsc0.322.394.84
ZnO@ACsc0.1210.13
ACav0.382.315.65
ZnO@ACav0.2311.13
ACcc02.464.05
ZnO@ACcc09.97
Table 4. Pure AC and ZnO@AC composites’ capacity in H2S removal process.
Table 4. Pure AC and ZnO@AC composites’ capacity in H2S removal process.
Material Code% YieldH2S Flow
(mL/min)
GHSV
(min−1)
Ads. Cap.
(mgH2S/gads.)
Ads. Cap.
(mmolH2S/gads.)
Times Increase
ACsc18.935.718310.210.2996.5
ZnO@ACsc37.420466.341.945
ACav17.635.712817.840.5235.9
ZnO@ACav35.7136106.033.109
ACcc23.035.728612.420.3643.8
ZnO@ACcc35.721746.901.375
Table 5. H2S uptake capacities of ZnO-based adsorbents cited in the literature.
Table 5. H2S uptake capacities of ZnO-based adsorbents cited in the literature.
AdsorbentAds. Cap.
(mgH2S/gads.)
Reference
AC2.7[26]
ZnO@AC30.5[26]
ZnO@N-AC62.5[26]
Commercial ZnO37.7[19]
AC6.2[15]
SBA-15@ZnO18.5[51]
SBA-15@ZnO41.0[28]
MCM-48@ZnO53.2[28]
MCM-41@ZnO54.9[28]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Baikousi, M.; Gantzoudi, A.; Gioti, C.; Moschovas, D.; Giannakas, A.E.; Avgeropoulos, A.; Salmas, C.E.; Karakassides, M.A. Hydrogen Sulfide Removal via Sorption Process on Activated Carbon–Metal Oxide Composites Derived from Different Biomass Sources. Molecules 2023, 28, 7418. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28217418

AMA Style

Baikousi M, Gantzoudi A, Gioti C, Moschovas D, Giannakas AE, Avgeropoulos A, Salmas CE, Karakassides MA. Hydrogen Sulfide Removal via Sorption Process on Activated Carbon–Metal Oxide Composites Derived from Different Biomass Sources. Molecules. 2023; 28(21):7418. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28217418

Chicago/Turabian Style

Baikousi, Maria, Anna Gantzoudi, Christina Gioti, Dimitrios Moschovas, Aris E. Giannakas, Apostolos Avgeropoulos, Constantinos E. Salmas, and Michael A. Karakassides. 2023. "Hydrogen Sulfide Removal via Sorption Process on Activated Carbon–Metal Oxide Composites Derived from Different Biomass Sources" Molecules 28, no. 21: 7418. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28217418

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop