In-Vitro Anticancer Evaluation of Some Novel Thioureido-Benzensulfonamide Derivatives

Abstract

A novel series of sulfonamide derivatives (14 compounds) bearing thiourea moieties were efficiently synthesized and evaluated for their possible in vitro anticancer activity against four human tumor cell lines. The results indicated that compound 6 was the most potent, showing effectiveness on all the tested cell lines. Compounds 7 and 10 also showed promising results.

1. Introduction

Cancer and carcinogenesis are complicated and multifactor processes that results in several biochemical alterations in a single cell. All diseases can most likely be attributed to multifactorial effects, and these factors may interact with each other, hence inducing biological changes in a single cell over a period of time. The interaction of the multifactorial effects aggravates the cancer. To solve the extraordinary complexity of cancer and provide excellent therapeutic drugs, several researchers have focused their work on discovering new multitarget drugs which are able to interact with multiple altered pathways [1,2]. In the efforts to find new drugs with these capabilities, scientists have focused on many different characteristics of cancer biology during their research. Among the anticancer drugs discovered recently, various sulfonamides possess potent anticancer properties [3,4] which is attributed to their ability to inhibit carbonic anhydrase enzymes [5]. Carbonic anhydrases is a family of Zn-based metalloenzymes that catalyze the interconversion between carbon dioxide and bicarbonate with generation of protons. The carbonic anhydrase isozyme IX (CA IX) is reported to be associated with tumorigenesis being highly expressed in hypoxic tumors with limited expression in normal tissues [6]. Thiourea derivatives represent one of the most promising classes of anticancer agents with a wide range of activities against various leukemia and solid tumors [7,8,9]. In previous work, combinations of sulfonamide and thiourea derivatives have produced promising anticancer agents [10,11,12]. The importance of this paper lies in that the next generation sulfonamide-thiourea derivatives might be more efficacious as anticancer agents. Since one of the common methods for drug design in medicinal chemistry is varying substituents, we report herein the synthesis and in vitro anticancer evaluation of a novel series of thioureido-sulfonamide derivatives as a continuation of our ongoing research project concerned with the synthesis of novel heterocyclic compounds as anticancer agents, where we have identified novel classes of pyrrole, pyrrolopyrimidine, 4-aminopyridine, quinolines and sulfonamides and these new derivatives showed significant anticancer activity on different biological targets and human cancer cell lines [13,14,15,16,17].

2. Results

2.1. Chemistry

The aim of this work was to design and synthesize a novel series of thioureido-sulfonamide derivatives and examine their potential anticancer activity starting with the reported isothiocyanatobenzenesulfonamide 2 which was prepared by the reaction of sulfanilamide with thiophosgene following a reported method [18].

Thus, interaction of compound 2 with several amines in dry DMF containing triethylamine as catalyst afforded the corresponding sulfonamide derivatives 3–16 (Scheme 1 and Scheme 2) according to the reported methods [11,12,19]. The structures of the obtained compounds were established on the basis of elemental analyses and spectral data. The IR spectra of compounds 3–16 showed the absence of N=C=S groups and presence of absorption bands for (NH), (CH arom.), (CH aliph.), (C=S) and (SO₂).

The ¹H-NMR spectra of compounds 3–16 exhibited a singlet at 9.3–14.4 ppm assigned to the 2NH groups of thiourea which were exchanged upon deuteration, in addition to the corresponding protons assigned to the introduced aromatic and heterocyclic moieties.

The ¹³C-NMR spectra of compounds 3–16 exhibited additional signals for the introduced C=S group of thiourea falling in the range of δ 163.7–188.9 ppm, which is in conformity with the assigned structures. The mass spectra of compound 3–16 showed molecular ion peaks at their respective m/z values, supported by the elemental analyses data which were found within the limit of 0.4% of theoretical values for all the synthesized compounds.

2.2. In-Vitro Anticancer Evaluation

The synthesized compounds were evaluated for their in vitro anticancer activity against human lung cancer cell line (A549), cervical (HeLa) cancer cell line, colorectal cell line (LoVo) and breast cancer cell line (MDA-MB-231) using doxorubicin as reference drug. Doxorubicin (CAS, 25316-40-9), an anthracycline intercalating agent, is the reference compound used in this study is a potent anticancer drug. It works by intercalating DNA and thus inhibiting macromolecular biosynthesis. It is mostly used against of a wide range of cancers, including acute leukemia’s Hodgkin’s disease, and other lymphomas and cancers of the breast, adrenal cortex, colorectal, cervical, endometrium, lung, ovary, colon, liver and other sites. By Plotting the relationship between surviving fraction and drug concentration we obtained the survival curve of cancer cell lines and calculated the IC₅₀ value, which corresponds to the concentration required for 50% inhibition of cell viability. The results are presented in

Table 1. In vitro anticancer screening of the synthesized compounds against four cell lines.

Sample Code	A549 (Lungs)	HeLa (Cervical)	LoVo (Colorectal)	MDA-MB-231 (Breast)
IC50(µM) ± SD (n = 3)
2	NA	NA	NA	446.1 ± 0.01
3	NA	NA	NA	NA
4	NA	259.6 ± 0.06	NA	NA
5	NA	Na	NA	NA
6	171.4 ± 0.32	137.5 ± 0.12	135.2 ± 0.01	121.9 ± 0.11
7	NA	NA	89.47 ± 0.09	283.9 ± 0.11
8	NA	NA	NA	NA
9	199.5 ± 0.12	NA	NA	NA
10	272.1 ± 0.07	149.3 ± 0.03	305.1 ± 1.00	NA
11	NA	NA	NA	NA
12	NA	150.9 ± 0.04	NA	163.2 ± 0.06
13	NA	NA	NA	267.3 ± 0.01
14	NA	NA	NA	NA
15	NA	NA	NA	NA
16	NA	NA	301.4 ± 1.00	134.4 ± 0.02
Doxorubicin	283.5 ± 0.01	120.7 ± 0.09	374.4 ± 1.00	26.5 ± 0.54

NA = Not Active.

, where some compounds exhibit fair activity compared to doxorubicin as reference drug. In case of human lung cancer cell line (A549) compounds 6, 9, and 10 were the most potent on this cell line with lower IC₅₀ values than doxorubicin ranging from 171.4–272.1 µM. Moreover, the most potent compounds on HeLa cell lines were the sulfonamide derivatives 4, 6, 10 and 12 (IC₅₀ range 137.5–259.6 µM). In case of the colorectal cell line (LoVo), four compounds (6, 7, 10 and 16) exhibited better activity than doxorubicin. Mild activity was observed for the synthesized compounds against breast cancer cell line (MDA-MB-231) where, the most potent compounds were compounds 2, 6, 7, 12, 13 and 16 which are found to be less active than doxorubicin. Generally, the breast cancer cell line (MDA-MB-231) was the most sensitive to the synthesized compounds. Considering broad spectrum anticancer activity, closer examination of the data presented in Table 1, revealed that compound 6 was the most active members of this study, showing effectiveness toward the four cell lines. By examining the SAR of the synthesized compounds, the starting isothiocyanate derivative 2 showed low activity on the tested cell lines, and findings for compounds 3–5, 8, 9 and 11–16 were similar. Meanwhile, introduction of a trichlorobenzene moiety in compound 6 significantly increased the activity against the four cell lines. We also concluded that the 2,3,4-position of chlorine atoms on the benzene ring was better than the 2,4,6-position in compound 7 which showed slightly lower activity towards the tested cell lines. In addition, introduction of a chloropyridine moiety in compound 10 also resulted in high activity from which we can suggest the importance of aryl/heteroaryl chlorine derivatives in these anticancer agents.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. General Information

Melting points (uncorrected) were determined in open capillary on a Gallen Kamp melting point apparatus (Sanyo Gallen Kamp, Southborough, UK). Precoated silica gel plates (Kieselgel 0.25 mm, 60 F254, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) were used for thin layer chromatography. A developing solvent system of chloroform/methanol (8:2) was used and the spots were detected by ultraviolet light. IR spectra (KBr disc) were recorded using an FT-IR spectrometer (Perkin Elmer, Norwalk, CT, USA). Mass spectra were recorded on a 600 GC/MS (Clarus, Middletown, CT, USA) and TQ 320 GC/MS/MS mass spectrometers (Varian, West Sussex, UK), ¹H-NMR spectra were scanned on a NMR spectrometer (Bruker AXS Inc., Flawil, Switzerland), operating at 500 MHz for ¹H-NMR and 125.76 MHz for ¹³C-NMR. Chemical shifts are expressed in δ-values (ppm) relative to TMS as an internal standard, using DMSO-d₆ as a solvent. Elemental analyses were done on a model 2400 CHNSO analyser (Perkin Elmer, Norwalk, CT, USA). All the values were within ±0.4% of the theoretical values. All reagents used were of AR grade. The starting material 4-chloro-2-phenylquinazoline was purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA) and was directly used for the preparation of target compounds.

3.2. Chemistry: General Procedure for the Synthesis of Sulfonamide Derivatives 3–16

A mixture of 4-isothiocyanato benzenesulfonamide 2 (2.14 g, 0.01 mol) and an appropriate amine (0.012 mol) in dry dimethylformamide (15 mL) containing trimethylamine (0.3 mL) was refluxed for 24 h., then left to cool. The solid product formed upon pouring onto ice/water was collected by filtration and recrystallized from ethanol-dimethylformamide to give 3–16, respectively.

2-(2-Cyanoacetyl)-N-(4-sulfamoylphenyl)hydrazine carbothioamide (3): Yield, 86%; m.p. 153.6 °C. IR (KBr, cm⁻¹): 3312, 3214 (NH, NH₂), 3099 (CH arom.), 2954, 2853 (CH aliph.), 1655 (C꞊O), 1387, 1157 (SO₂), 1250 (C=S). ¹H-NMR (DMSO-d₆): 3.3 [s, 2H, CH₂], 6.4–8.0 [m, 6H, Ar-H + SO₂NH₂], 9.3, 10.4, 13.0 [3s, 3NH, exchangeable with D₂O]. ¹³C-NMR (DMSO-d₆): 25.3, 120.3 (2), 126.1, 127.8 (2), 139.2, 141.5, 152.3, 163.7. MS m/z (%): 313 (M⁺) (13.44), 156 (100). Anal. Calcd. for C₁₀H₁₁N₅O₃S₂ (313): C, 38.33; H, 3.54; N, 22.35. Found: C, 38.09; H, 3.19; N, 22.64.

2-Amino-3-(2-carboxy-2-(3-(4-sulfamoylphenyl)thioureido)ethyl)disulfanyl)propanoic acid (4): Yield, 68%; m.p. 252.6 °C. IR (KBr, cm⁻¹): 3354 (OH), 3253, 3185 (NH, NH₂), 3030 (CH arom.), 2964, 2858 (CH aliph.), 1783 (2C=O), 1388, 1162 (SO₂). ¹H-NMR (DMSO-d₆): 3.0, 3.5 [m, 6H, CH-CH₂-S-S-CH₂-CH], 7.0–7.8 [m, 6H, Ar-H + SO₂NH₂], 8.0 [s, 2H, NH₂, exchangeable with D₂O], 10.9 [s, 2H, 2NH, exchangeable with D₂O], 13.9 [s, 2H, 2OH, exchangeable with D₂O], ¹³C-NMR (DMSO-d₆): 40.2, 40.3, 66.8 (2), 123.6 (2), 126.7 (2), 140.9, 142.1, 157.3, 168.1, 178.5. MS m/z (%): 455 (M⁺) (18.48), 152 (100). Anal. Calcd. for C₁₃H₁₈N₄O₆S₄ (455): C, 34.35; H, 3.99; N, 12.33. Found: C, 34.65; H, 4.33; N, 12.59.

4-(3-(3,4,5-Trimethoxyphenyl)thioureido)benzenesulfonamide (5): Yield, 78%; m.p. 203.7 °C. IR (KBr, cm⁻¹): 3345, 3231, 3155 (NH, NH₂), 3100 (CH arom.), 2967, 2829 (CH aliph.), 1328, 1180 (SO₂), 1258 (C=S). ¹H-NMR (DMSO-d₆): 3.8 [s, 9H, 3OCH₃], 6.6–7.7 [m, 8H, Ar-H + SO₂NH₂], 9.9 [s, 2H, 2NH, exchangeable with D₂O].¹³C-NMR (DMSO-d₆):56.3 (2), 60.5, 102.2 (2), 123.3 (2), 127.7 (2), 130.5, 135.0, 135.4, 139.6, 153.7 (2), 179.7. MS m/z (%): 397 (M⁺) (9.23), 229 (100). Anal. Calcd. for C₁₆H₁₉N₃O₅S₂ (397): C, 48.35; H, 4. 82; N, 10.57. Found: C, 48.71; H, 4.56; N, 10.27.

4-(3-(2,3,4-Trichlorophenyl)thioureido)benzensulfonamide (6): Yield, 89%; m.p. 231.3 °C. IR (KBr, cm⁻¹): 3353, 3245, 3211(NH), 3010 (CH arom.), 1330, 1159 (SO₂), 1268 (C=S), 725 (C–Cl).¹H-NMR (DMSO-d₆): 6.6–7.7 [m, 8H, Ar-H + SO₂NH_2,], 10.3[s, 2H, 2NH exchangeable with D₂O]. ¹³C-NMR (DMSO-d₆): 123.0 (2), 126.5, 128.8 (2), 129.5, 130.5, 131.6, 137.6, 139.8, 140.1, 142.6, 180.0. MS m/z (%): 411 (M⁺) (36.71), 74 (100). Anal. Calcd. for C₁₃H₁₀Cl₃N₃O₂S₂ (411): C, 38.02; H, 2.45; N, 10.23. Found: C, 38.32; H, 2.18; N, 10.54.

4-(3-(2,4,6-Trichlorophenyl)thiouredo)benzenesulfonamide (7): Yield, 76%; m.p. 225.2 °C. IR (KBr, cm⁻¹): 3425, 3369, 3327, 3249 (NH, NH₂), 3080 (CH arom.), 1393, 1181 (SO₂), 1299 (C=S), 854 (C–Cl).¹H-NMR (DMSO-d₆):7.3–7.8 [m, 8H, Ar-H + SO₂NH₂], 10.3 [s, 2H, 2NH, exchangeable with D₂O]. ¹³C-NMR (DMSO-d₆): 118.8 (2), 127.9, 128.7 (2), 133.1 (2), 136.2, 139.8, 140.1 (2), 141.0, 181.0. MS m/z (%): 411 (M⁺) (12.71), 93 (100). Anal. Calcd. for C₁₃H₁₀Cl₃N₃O₂S₂ (411): C, 38.02; H, 2.45; N, 10.23. Found: C, 37.82; H, 2.76; N, 9.91.

4-(3-(4-Fluoro-2-nitrophenyl)thioureido)benzenesulfonamide (8): Yield, 77%; m.p. 206.3 °C. IR (KBr, cm⁻¹): 3482, 3359, 3244 (NH, NH₂), 3105 (CH arom.), 1377, 1182 (SO₂), 1273 (C=S). ¹H-NMR (DMSO-d₆): 7.0–7.8 [m, 9H, Ar-H + SO₂NH₂], 10.3 [s, 2H, +2NH, exchangeable with D₂O]. ¹³C-NMR (DMSO-d₆): 110.1, 121.4, 123.2 (2), 125.3, 126.7, 129.1 (2), 139.8, 142.8, 143.9, 153.1, 180.1. MS m/z (%): 370 (M⁺) (8.76), 139 (100). Anal. Calcd. for C₁₃H₁₁ FN₄O₄S₂ (370): C, 42.16; H, 2.99; N, 15.13. Found: C, 42.51; H, 2.63; N, 15.41.

4-(3-Pyridin-4-ylthioureido)benzenesulfonamide (9): Yield, 81%; m.p. 295.6 °C. IR (KBr, cm⁻¹): 3411, 3332, 3215 (NH, NH₂), 3100 (CH arom.), 1590 (C=N), 1332, 1155 (SO₂), 1245 (C=S). ¹H-NMR (DMSO-d₆): 6.3–8.3 [m, 10H, Ar-H + SO₂NH₂], 10.1 [s, 2H, 2NH, exchangeable with D₂O].¹³C-NMR (DMSO-d₆): 109.2 (2), 127.1 (2), 127.3 (2), 141.1 (2), 149.7 (2), 159.8, 178.3. MS m/z (%): 308 (M⁺) (15.18), 77 (100). Anal. Calcd. for C₁₂H₁₂N₄O₂S₂ (308): C, 46.74; H, 3.92; N, 18.17. Found: C, 46.46; H, 3.64; N, 18.49.

4-(3-(2-Chloropyridin-3-yl)thioureido)benzenesulfonamide (10): Yield, 74%; m.p. 245.3 °C. IR (KBr, cm⁻¹): 3454, 3363, 3243 (NH, NH₂), 3102 (CH arom.), 1623 (C=N), 1381, 1155 (SO₂), 1253 (C=S), 794 (C–Cl). ¹H-NMR (DMSO-d₆): 7.4–8.3 [m, 9H, Ar-H + SO₂NH₂], 10.3 [s, 2H, 2NH, exchangeable with D₂O]. ¹³C-NMR (DMSO-d₆): 117.7 (2), 122.2, 122.9, 127.4 (2), 137.9, 140.0, 141.6, 143.2, 146.2, 182.3. MS m/z (%): 343 (M⁺) (1.89), 112 (100). Anal. Calcd. for C₁₂H₁₁ClN₄O₂S₂ (343): C, 42.04; H, 3.23; N, 16.34. Found: C, 42.29; H, 3.53; N, 16.05.

4-(3-4H-1,2,4-Triazol-4-ylthioureido)benzenesulfonamide (11): Yield, 66%; m.p. 247.8 °C. IR (KBr, cm⁻¹): 3346, 33235, 3175 (NH, NH₂), 3064 (CH arom.), 1593 (C=N), 1407, 1156 (SO₂), 1262 (C=S). ¹H-NMR (DMSO-d₆): 7.3–8.8 [m, 8H, Ar-H + SO₂NH₂], 10.1 [s, 2H, 2NH, exchangeable with D₂O]. ¹³C-NMR (DMSO-d₆): 125.2 (2), 127.5 (2), 137.9, 140.4, 142.2, 145.3, 180.6. MS m/z (%): 298(M⁺) (4.64), 68 (100). Anal. Calcd. for C₉H₁₀N₆O₂S₂ (298): C, 36.23; H, 3.38; N, 28.17. Found: C, 36.51; H, 3.07; N, 27.85.

4-(3-(5-(Trifluoromethyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)thioureido)benzenesulfonamide (12): Yield, 59%; m.p. 234.5 °C. IR (KBr, cm⁻¹): 3352, 3243, 3185 (NH, NH₂), 3009 (CH arom.), 1586 (C=N), 1407, 1181 (SO₂), 1290 (C=S).¹H-NMR (DMSO-d₆): 7.3–7.9 [m, 6H, Ar-H + SO₂NH₂], 10.3 [s, 2H, 2NH, exchangeable with D₂O]. ¹³C-NMR (DMSO-d₆): 116.4, 123.3 (2), 126.7 (2), 139.8, 142.8, 151.8, 158.6, 180.1. MS m/z (%): 383 (M⁺) (14.63), 169 (100). Anal. Calcd. for C₁₀H₈F₃N₅O₂S₃ (383): C, 31.33; H, 2.10; N, 18.27. Found: C, 31.62; H, 2.42; N, 18.55.

4-(3-(5-(Ethylthio)-1,3,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)thioureido)benzenesulfonamide (13): Yield, 89%; m.p. 232.2° C. IR (KBr, cm⁻¹): 3352, 3220, 3182 (NH, NH₂), 3078 (CH arom.), 2945, 2853 (CH aliph.), 1595 (C=N), 1402, 1182 (SO₂), 1243 (C=S). ¹H-NMR (DMSO-d₆): 1.3 [t, 3H, CH₃], 3.2 [q, 2H, CH₂], 7.2–7.9 [m, 6H, Ar-H + SO₂NH₂], 10.3, 10.7 [2s, 2H, 2NH, exchangeable with D₂O]. ¹³C-NMR (DMSO-d₆):15.2, 28.3, 122.2 (2), 127.8 (2), 139.8, 142.8, 154.6, 164.5, 180.0. MS m/z (%): 376 (M⁺) (17.26), 145 (100). Anal. Calcd. for C₁₁H₁₃N₅O₂S₄ (376): C, 35.18; H, 3.49; N, 18.65. Found: C, 35.49; H, 3.18; N, 18.36.

4-(3-(1,3-Dimethyl-2,6-dioxo-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyrimidin-4-yl)thioureido)benzene-sulfonamide (14): Yield, 90%; m.p. 247.4 °C. IR (KBr, cm⁻¹): 3398, 3254, 3225 (NH, NH₂), 3100 (CH arom.), 2946, 2880 (CH aliph.), 1692 (2C=O), 1381, 1183 (SO₂), 1235 (C=S).¹H-NMR (DMSO-d₆): 3.1, 3.2 [2s, 6H, 2NCH₃], 6.7 [s, 1H, CH], 7.3–7.9 [m, 6H, Ar-H + SO₂NH₂], 10.3, 14.4 [2s, 2H, 2NH,exchangeable with D₂O]. ¹³C-NMR (DMSO-d₆): 27.5, 29.6, 75.3, 123.2 (2), 126.0 (2), 141.4, 142.5, 152.0, 161.9, 163.8, 188.9. MS m/z (%): 369 (M⁺) (9.28), 138 (100). Anal. Calcd. for C₁₃H₁₅N₅O₄S₂ (369): C, 42.27; H, 4. 09; N, 18.96. Found: C, 42.51; H, 4.33; N, 18.62.

4-(3-(2,4-Dioxo-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyrimidin-5-yl)thioureido)benzenesulfonamide (15): Yield, 67%; m.p. >360 °C. IR (KBr, cm⁻¹): 3367, 3286, 3155 (NH, NH₂), 3013 (CH arom.), 1698, 1671 (2C=O), 1316, 1184 (SO₂), 1275 (C=S). ¹H-NMR (DMSO-d₆): 6.8–8.1 [m, 7H, Ar-H + SO₂NH₂], 9.3, 10.0, 10.7, 11.0 [4s, 4H, 4NH, exchangeable with D₂O]. ¹³C-NMR (DMSO-d₆):112.9, 122.4 (2), 126.5 (2), 127.9, 139.7, 142.9, 150.2, 161.9, 162.1, 180.4. MS m/z (%): 341 (M⁺) (2.77), 111 (100). Anal. Calcd. for C₁₁H₁₁N₅O₄S₂ (341): C, 38.70; H, 3.25; N, 20.52. Found: C, 38.37; H, 3.56; N, 20.24.

4-(3-Isoquinolin-1-ylthioureido)benzenesulfonamide (16): Yield, 87%; m.p. 217.1 °C. IR (KBr, cm⁻¹): 3313, 3286, 3174 (NH, NH₂), 3087 (CH arom.), 1635 (C=N), 1397, 1189 (SO₂), 1213 (C=S). ¹H-NMR (DMSO-d₆): 7.4–8.8 [m, 10H, Ar-H + SO₂NH₂], 10.8, 11.8 [2s, 2H, 2NH, exchangeable with D₂O].¹³C-NMR (DMSO-d₆): 111.6, 115.2, 119.7 (2), 122.2, 125.1, 126.6, 127.2 (2), 129.4, 135.6, 137.4, 140.4, 141.0, 170.0, 179.7. MS m/z (%): 358 (M⁺) (47.82), 129 (100). Anal. Calcd. for C₁₆H₁₄N₄O₂S₂ (358): C, 53.61; H, 3.94; N, 15.63. Found: C, 53.36; H, 3.62; N, 15.36.

3.3. In-Vitro Anticancer Evaluation

3.3.1. Cell Culture

Human cancer cell lines HeLa (cervical), A549 (lungs) and LoVo (colorectal) were grown in DMEM + GlutaMax (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and MDA-MB-231 (breast) were grown in DMEM-F12 + GlutaMax) medium (Invitrogen), supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated bovine serum (Gibco, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) and 1x penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco) at 37 °C in a humified chamber with 5% CO₂ supply.

3.3.2. Cytotoxicity Assay

The in vitro anticancer screening was done at pharmacognosy Department, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University Riyadh Saudi Arabia. Cells were seeded (10⁵ cells/well) in 96-well flat-bottom plates (Becton-Dickinson Labware, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) a day before treatment and grown overnight. Compounds were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; Sigma) and finally prepared as 1.0 mg/mL stocks, respectively in the culture media. The final concentration of DMSO never exceeded 0.1% in the treatment doses. Six different doses of compounds (400, 200, 100, 50, 25 and 10 µM) were further prepared by diluting the stocks in culture media, and cells were treated (in triplicate/dose). Doxorubicin was included as standard reference drug (positive control) and untreated culture was considered as negative control. The treated cultures were further incubated for 48 h. At 48 h post-treatment, cell viability test was performed using TACS MTT Cell Proliferation and Viability Assay Kit (TACS, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) as per manufacturer’s instructions. The optical density (OD) was recorded at 570 nm in a microplate reader (EL × 800, BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA) and cell survival fraction was determined. The cell survival fraction was calculated as [(A − B)/A], where A and B are the OD of untreated and of treated cells, respectively. The relation between surviving fraction and drug concentration is plotted to get the survival curve of each tumor cell line after the specified time. The concentration required for 50% inhibition of cell viability (IC₅₀) was calculated and compared with the reference drug doxorubicin. Compounds that fail to inhibit 50% of cell viability are considered to be inactive. The results are given in Table 1.

4. Conclusions

The present work describes the synthesis of a novel series of thioureido-sulfonamide derivatives. 4-(3-(2,3,4-Trichlorophenyl)thioureido)benzensulfonamide (6) 4-(3-(2,4,6-trichlorophenyl)-thio-ureido)benzenesulfonamide (7) and 4-(3-(2-chloropyridin-3-yl)thioureido)benzenesulfonamide (10) were the most potent candidates in the in vitro anticancer screening study, showing higher activity than doxorubicin. However, further investigation relating the structure and the activity of the sulfonamide and thiourea derivatives as well as their stability under biological conditions is required. These detailed investigations could be helpful in designing more potent anticancer agents for therapeutic use.