Evidence of a Viable but Nonculturable (VBNC) Phase in B. abortus S19 under Oxidative Stress (H2O2, -Fe2+, Bleach) and under Non-Oxidative Inhibitory Conditions (Isopropanol, Erythritol, Selenite)
Unit 14 Hospital Hygiene and Infection Prevention and Control, Robert Koch Institute, Nordufer 20, 13353 Berlin, Germany
Microorganisms 2024, 12(3), 491; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12030491
Submission received: 30 October 2023
/
Revised: 6 February 2024
/
Accepted: 27 February 2024
/
Published: 28 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Epidemiology and Control Strategies for Brucellosis)
Abstract
:The effect of oxidative stress on the survival of various Brucella species has not been fully investigated yet. We here conducted a study in which we investigated the effect of different types of oxidative stress (Fe2+, H2O2, bleach) versus non-oxidative inhibitory effects (selenite, erythritol, and isopropanol) on the survival of B. abortus S19, B. abortus S19 ∆mglA 3.14, and B. neotomae 5K33. The work focuses on the appearance of ATP–CFU quotient imbalances indicating the existence of a viable but nonculturable (VBNC) form of B. abortus S19, as has previously been shown.
1. Introduction
Bacteria of the genus Brucella are α-proteobacteria. They are phylogenetically closely related to plant pathogens and symbionts (e.g., Rhizobium and Agrobacterium) as well as to intracellular animal parasites like Bartonella and to opportunistic bacteria of the genus Ochrobactrum. Oxidative stress, caused by Fe2+, H2O2, or bleach acts via release of active oxygen radicals (O2−, OH−). Investigations into the effects of Fe2+ in the presence (Fenton effect) or absence of H2O2 on the survival of various Brucella species have already started [1,2].
As for non-oxidative stress, erythritol inhibits B. abortus S19 as a result of defective catabolism i.e., accumulation of toxic erythritol metabolism products. Previously, the products of the ERY operon were identified as an erythritol kinase (eryA), two putative dehydrogenases (eryB, eryC), and a repressor gene (eryD). B. abortus S19, which has been extensively used for vaccination of cattle against brucellosis, was spontaneously attenuated by a mutation deleting the 3′ end of eryC and the 5′ region of eryD genes, leading to a fused eryC-D polypeptide. Stress in B. abortus S19 is caused by accumulation of 3-keto-l-erythrose 4-phosphate [3,4].
The non-oxidative stress noxe selenium is widely known as an essential element acting as the central atom in glutathionperoxidase. However, excess of selenium causes competitive exclusion of S (sulfur) from incorporation into essential amino acids methionine and cysteine, leading to the mis-formation of selenomethionine and selenocysteine.
The non-oxidative isopropanol in aqueous systems causes the de-arrangement of lipids and, respectively, the precipitation of nucleic acids.
Viable but nonculturable (VBNC) form bacteria have previously been described for Camplyobacter [5,6], Helicobacter [7,8], Franchisella [9], Pseudomonas [10], and also for close relatives of Brucella, Rhizobiae, and Agrobacterium [11,12].
Because the first information about a VBNC Brucella resulted from our previous study [1], we here conducted a study in which we investigated the effects of iron, H2O2, and bleach, respectively, on the survival of B. abortus S19, B. abortus S19 ∆mglA 3.14, and B. neotomae 5K33, including in comparison to non-oxidative inhibitory substances, with special attention given to ATP–CFU imbalances.
In the study presented here, a significantly higher ATP–CFU ratio was described, concluding to the existence of a viable but nonculturable (VBNC) form of B. abortus S19.
The presented data point to a VBNC state of B. abortus S19 after exposure to oxidative stress. In order to investigate this phenomenon in detail, we conducted experiments using various forms of oxidative stress and different media for re-cultivation of B. abortus S19, B. abortus ∆mglA, and B. neotomae.
As the main tool for obtaining evidence for this VBNC form, we used different plating on a TSA and on a newly developed, charcoal-based (stress-scavenging) agar medium (CYE). However, the main indicator for the existence of this VBNC is a quotient that puts the ATP-RLU and the CFU counts in relation. This is based on the general assumption by the developers of the BAC Titer Glow® Kit (PROMEGA, Madison, WI, USA) that one bacterium possesses (by their definition) one energy unit/one organism; i.e., the measured ATP-RLU LUMI counts divided by the CFU/mL counts should be as per definition 1: “one standard energy unit per bacterium”.
If these quotients extend beyond 1, this is an indicator that not all bacteria are cultivable at that specific moment (partly in VBNC form) because one bacterium can possess only one energy unit. The parallel plating of both the CYE (charcoal based) agar indeed recovered such bacteria as were cultivable and which were not found growing on the TSA.
On the other hand, if these quotients drop toward 0, that indicates that the organism is running out of energy. For example, a quotient of 0.02 would mean that only 2% of the (“1”) standard energy unit, i.e., 100% standard energy content/bacterium, was detected.
2. Material and Methods
2.1. Bacterial Strains
B. abortus S19 [13], B. abortus ∆mglA 3.14 [14], B. neotomae 5K33 [15], B. microti CCM4915 [16], and Brucella 83/13 [17] were grown in tryptic soy broth (TSB) and on the activated-charcoal-based Brucella agar medium, CYE agar. Ingredients per liter were 35 g BCYE (buffered charcoal yeast extract agar, Fluka, art.-nr. 78123-55G), 17 g casein peptone, 5 g NaCl, and 5 g soybean peptone.
2.2. Survival Experiments under Oxidative Stress
For comparison of the effects of certain oxidative stress noxes in contrast to non-oxidative stress, the “not-oxidative” inhibiting substances erythritol and isopropanol were used. The respective substances were 0.2 mg/mL (1.6 mM) Fe2+, 0.5% H2O2, 0.5% bleach, 10 mM selenite, 10 mM erythritol, 70% isopropanol.
The experiments for testing oxidative stress were carried out in standardized aqueous systems [1].
For performing the assays, bacterial cells from −80 °C stocks with standardized viable cell counts of B. abortus S19, B. abortus S19 ∆mglA, B. neotomae 5K33, Brucella ssp. 83/13, and B. microti CCM4915, respectively, were used to yield initial experimental inoculums of 1 × 106 cells/mL. Survival of cells was determined by taking aliquots of 100 μL each and plating on tryptic soy agar (TSA) and the new Brucella medium CYE, respectively.
2.3. Determination of Viability of Bacteria
2.3.1. Determination of Colony Forming Units (CFU)
For counting the colony forming units (CFU), defined volumes of bacteria were plated on tryptic soy agar (TSA) and the Brucella (CYE) agar, respectively. Serial dilutions were prepared, plated, and incubated for up to 3 days at 37 °C.
2.3.2. Determination of Intracellular ATP Content
ATP luminescence was measured with a BacTiter-Glo® microbial viability assay (PROMEGA, cat. nr. G8231, Madison, WI, USA). All experiments were carried out in white, 96-well microplate dishes designed for luminescence measurements (THERMOSCIENTIFIC, cat. nr. 236105, Waltham, MA, USA).
The BacTiter-Glo® reagent was used according to the manufacturer’s manual.
For the setup of the experiments, the substances to be examined were 0.2 mg/mL (1.6 mM) Fe2+, 0.5% H2O2, 0.5% bleach, 10 mM selenite, 10 mM erythritol, 70% isopropanol.
They were spotted on the first row of the microtiter plate in the respective standardized aqueous systems and then diluted to 100 µL volume per well. Subsequently, the wells were inoculated with 10 µL of a suspension of bacteria, so that a concentration of 1 × 107 bacteria/mL was achieved. Experiments were performed as triplicates and a blank without inoculation of bacteria was carried out in parallel.
After 30 min. of aerobic incubation, 100 µL of freshly prepared Bac Titer-Glo® reagent was added and the plate covered with Adhesive Film® (NEOLAB, cat. nr.7-5170). In this step, the bacteria were lysed and ATP was measured via the luminescence reaction using the TECAN Infinite 200 M Pro (TECAN, Gröding, Austria) reader and expressed as relative light units (RLU), as described in the manual of the BacTiterGlow*Kit (BacTiter-Glo® microbial viability assay (PROMEGA, cat. nr. G8231, Madison, WI, USA), as outlined in detail previously (Jacob et al., 2020). For that, the “standard automatic” luminescence measurement program was used.
The ascertained RLU values of the bacteria were considered to be 100%. Colony forming units (CFUs) were determined in parallel by plating on TSA and CYE. They were counted after 3 days. In the case of the H2O2 experiments, the samples were subjected to neutralization with catalase (25 µg/mL). All luminescence experiments were repeated at least three times.
2.3.3. Membrane Integrity
The Live/Dead BacLight® bacterial viability kit (LIVE/DEAD BacLight® bacterial viability kit, cat. nr. L7012, MOLECULAR PROBES, Eugene, OR, USA) was used to test bacterial membrane integrity on the basis of the interaction of two fluorescing dyes, Syto 9 and propidium iodide (PI).
Syto 9 is a green fluorescing dye and stains both viable and dead cells. Propidium iodide (PI) is a red fluorescing dye and stains nucleoli and chromosomal structures. PI is used for staining dead cells within a population of cells because it can penetrate only into cells with damaged membranes.
2.4. Statistics
Graph Pad Prism 7.04 (San Diego, CA, USA) was used for statistical analysis (Mann–Whitney U test) of the data. Data of the survival assays were based on at least three independent experiments each using triplicates.
3. Results
3.1. Survival of Brucella in Fe2+ as Determined by CFU and ATP Content
In order to investigate the effects of Fe2+ on the survival of B. abortus S19, B. abortus S19 ∆mglA 3.14, and B. neotomae 5K33, we exposed these bacteria to Fe2+, as previously described [1].
Exposure of the various Brucellae used in this investigation demonstrated that B. neotomae (1d) survived longer than B. abortus in this environment (Figure 1, Table 1). B. abortus S19 was most susceptible with respect to drop of luminescence, whereas both B. abortus S19 and B. abortus S19 ΔmglA showed a comparable loss of cultivability with respect to the TSA agar. A part of this cultivability loss was recovered via growth on CYE agar. Table 1 reports the luminescence and CFU values, in case of Fe2+ exposition, and their relation, i.e., quotas. The increase in the quotas indicates that relatively more ATP was measured in comparison to the CFU counts in the cases of B. abortus S19 and B. abortus S19 ΔmglA. Concluding from that finding, we postulate that some of the (still alive, energy-possessing) bacteria were driven to the VBNC phase. That was not shown for B. neotomae 5K33.
3.2. Survival of Brucella in H2O2 as Determined by CFU and ATP Content
In order to investigate the effect of H2O2 on the survival of B. abortus S19, B. abortus S19 ∆mglA 3.14, and B. neotomae 5K33, we exposed these bacteria to H2O2 as previously described [1].
The exposure of the various Brucellae used in this investigation demonstrated that B. neotomae (1d) survived longer than B. abortus in this environment (Figure 2, Table 2). B. abortus S19 was most susceptible with respect to drop of luminescence, whereas both B. abortus S19 and B. abortus S19 ΔmglA showed a comparable loss of cultivability with respect to TSA agar. Part of this cultivability loss was recovered by growth on CYE agar. Table 2 reports the luminescence and CFU values in the case of H2O2 exposure in terms of their relation, i.e., quotas. The quotas that increased that relatively more ATP was measured in comparison to the CFU counts in the cases of B. abortus S19 and B. abortus S19 ΔmglA. Concluding from that finding, we postulate that some of the (still alive, energy-possessing) bacteria were driven to the VBNC phase, which was not shown for B. neotomae 5K33.
The latter was not shown for 1% H2O2, indicating that in this case, the bacteria were really dead under the stress of this H2O2 concentration.
3.3. Survival of Brucella in a Laboratory Standard Environment Containing Bleach as Determined by CFU and ATP Content
This standard laboratory environment included the use of bleach at pH 6. The exposition of the various Brucellae used in this investigation demonstrated that B. neotomae (1d) survived longer than B. abortus in this environment (Figure 3, Table 3). B. abortus S19 was most susceptible with respect to drop of luminescence, whereas both B. abortus S19 and B. abortus S19 ΔmglA showed a comparable loss of cultivability with respect to TSA agar. Part of the B. abortus S19 ΔmglA cultivability loss was recovered by growth on CYE agar. Table 3 reports the luminescence and CFU values in the case of bleach exposure according to their relation, i.e., quotas. The increased quotas indicate that relatively more ATP was measured in comparison to the CFU counts in the cases of B. abortus S19 and B. abortus S19 ΔmglA. Additionally, it is to be noted here that the effect of the bleach concentration used was so strong that no cultivability whatsover could be detected in some variants of the assay. However, concluding from these findings, we postulate too that some of the (still alive, energy-possessing) bacteria were driven to the VBNC phase, which was not shown for B. neotomae 5K33.
3.4. Effects of Selenite on CFU and ATP Content, Respectively, and ATP/CFU Quotients
The non-oxidative effect of selenite on ATP content and cultivability on TSA and CYE is reported in Table 4 and Figure 4, showing a similar decline (but presence) across the strains tested. There was no visible difference in recovery with CYE in contrast to TSA agar. Table 4 reports the luminescence and CFU values in relation in the case of selenite exposure, i.e., quotas. No increase in quotas was seen. This indicates that relatively no more ATP was measured in comparison to the CFU counts in the cases of B. abortus S19 and B. abortus S19 ΔmglA. Concluding from that finding, we assume that under these conditions, the bacteria were not driven to the VBNC phase.
3.5. Effect of Erythritol on CFU and ATP Content and Effect on ATP/CFU Ratios
B. abortus S19 is susceptible to erythritol, as previously known [3]. The nature of this visible inhibition is non-oxidative [3]. However, in this study, under the influence of erythritol, the formation of VBNC Brucellae was not observed (Figure 5, Table 5). This is because the luminescence values behaved similarly in B.abortus S19 and B. abortus S19 ΔmglA.
There were also no visible differences in the CFU counts obtained on TSA agar. Table 5 reports the luminescence and CFU values in the case of erythritol exposure in relation, i.e., quotas. The quotas did not increase, which indicates that relatively no more ATP was measured in comparison to the CFU counts in the cases of B. abortus S19 and B. abortus S19 ΔmglA. Concluding from these findings, we assume that none of the (still alive, energy-possessing) bacteria were driven to the VBNC phase.
3.6. Effects of Isopropanol on CFU and ATP Content and ATP/CFU Ratios
The non-oxidative effect of isopropanol on ATP content is indicated in Table 6 and Figure 6. The luminescence values behaved similarly for B. abortus S19 and B. abortus S19 ΔmglA. Table 6 shows a similar decline (but presence) of ATP in the strains tested. There was no visible difference in recovery by CYE in contrast to TSA agar. Additionally, Table 6 reports the luminescence and CFU values in case of isopropanol exposition in relation, i.e., quotas. The increase in quotas indicates that relatively more ATP was measured in comparison to the CFU counts in the cases of B. abortus S19 and B. abortus S19 ΔmglA. However, it is to be noted here that the effect of the isopropanol concentration used was so strong that no cultivability whatsoever could be detected in some variants of the assay, as also shown partly for bleach. Concluding from these findings, we assume that also under these non-oxidative isopropanol conditions, some of the bacteria were driven to the VBNC phase.
3.7. Determination of Membrane Integrity
Figure 7 shows membrane integrity as determined by live/dead experiments for B. abortus S19, B. abortus ΔmglA, and B. neotomae 5K33 with (a) +Fe2+, (b) isopropanol, and (c) H2O2. The decline of g/r rations in the case of isopropanol (c), i.e., interruption of membrane integrity, indeed shows that this non-oxidative noxe causes real death in contrast to the already assumed VBNC in Section 3.6.
In Figure 7a,b, the relative stability of the g/r values under Fe2+ and H2O2, respectively, indicates that the bacteria shifted to the VBNC phase, as already mentioned in Section 3.1 and Section 3.2.
3.8. Bacterial Growth Comparison on TSA versus CYE Agar (Standard Plating Efficacy without Oxidative Stress)
In this study, the plating efficiency of CYE/TSA for B. abortus S19, B. abortus ∆mglA, and B. neotomae 5K33 was assessed. The charcoal-based CYE agar was superior for all Brucella strains tested, mostly B. a. S19 and the B. a. ∆mglA mutant. Because of that, the CYE agar was used in the stress experiments to minimize oxidative stress, i.e., to rescue Brucella back into the cultivable state.
4. Discussion
Among the investigated bacteria, B. abortus showed the highest susceptibility to oxidative stress induced by Fe2+, H2O2, or bleach, respectively, according to different assays (CFU (TSA/CYE), ATP (RLU-LUMI), and membrane integrity (live/dead)). Higher tolerance was found in B. neotomae 5K33.
In addition to our previous findings about a VBNC phase in Brucella abortus S19 [1], our results presented here yield further evidence on the formation of a VBNC state in Brucella. The rise of the ATP (RLU-LUMI)/CFU quotients showed that under conditions of different types of oxidative stress (Fe2+, H2O2, bleach), the numbers of colony forming units dropped more quickly with the increase of ATP (RLU-LUMI) values.
We therefore conclude that the bacteria did not really die, i.e., they lost only cultivability but relatively preserved their ATP content. We proved that this hypothesis was right by plating on oxidative stress-reducing CYE agar. By means of that approach, we made cultivable a significant part of the former non-cultivable Brucella.
Our findings are in accordance with previous results for Campylobacter and Helicobacter, respectively, regarding a VBNC stage [8,18,19] and for (Brucella-related) Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Rhizobium leguminosarum [11] but also in general for VBNC bacteria [20].
This is the first report about the occurrence of VBNC (viable but nonculturable) Brucella confirmed on CYE agar.
We summarize that “viable but nonculturable” (VBNC) forms of Brucella abortus S19 were detected on the basis of shifted ATP–CFU ratios and comparable growth on TSA versus CYE agar.
Various types of non-oxidative stress (selenite erythritol, selenite, isopropanol) did not show the above-described phenomena.
With respect to the findings in the study presented here, strategies for the epidemiology and control of the economically important brucellosis disease should also now be re-evaluated.
The immanent need for that is indicated by recent findings regarding the detection and distribution of VBNC/viable pathogenic bacteria in full-scale drinking water treatment plants and mechanisms underlying the effects of chlorination and UV disinfection on the VBNC state of Escherichia coli isolated from hospital waste waters [21,22]. With respect to the environmental perspectives, a complete list of actual challenges of VBNC bacteria was published by Bodor et al. [23].
Funding
The study was solely financed by the RKI budget.
Data Availability Statement
Data supporting reported results are available by request from the author. For the moment these data are not deposited at publicly available datasets.
Acknowledgments
B. neotomae 5K33 and B. microti CCM4915 were obtained from AFFSA (Maison-Alfort, France). Brucella 83/13 was obtained from A. Whatmore, VLA (Weybridge, UK). The skillful technical assistance of Antje Finke is highly acknowledged.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Jacob, J.; Finke, A.; Mielke, M. Survival of Brucella abortus S19 and other Brucella spp. in the presence of oxidative stress and within macrophages. Folia Microbiol. 2020, 65, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moreno, E.; Moriyon, I. The genus Brucella. Prokaryotes 2006, 5, 315–456. [Google Scholar]
- Sangari, F.J.; Grilló, M.J.; De Bagüés, M.; González-Carrero, M.I.; García-Lobo, J.M.; Blasco, J.; Agüero, J. The defect in the metabolism of erythritol of the Brucella abortus B19 vaccine strain is unrelated with its attenuated virulence in mice. Vaccine 1998, 16, 1640–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barbier, T.; Zuniga-Ripab, A.; Moussaa, S.; Ploviera, H.; Sternon, J.F.; Lazaro-Anton, L.; Conde-Alvarez, R.; De Bolle, X.; Lriarte, M.; Moriyon, I.; et al. Brucella central carbon metabolism: An update. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2018, 44, 182–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rollins, D.M.; Colwell, R.R. Viable but nonculturable stage of Campylobacter jejuni and its role in survival in the natural aquatic environment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1986, 52, 531–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jacob, J.; Martin, W.; Höller, C. Characterization of Viable but Nonculturable Stage of C. coli, characterized with respect to Electron Microscopic findings, Whole Cell Protein and Lipooligosaccharide patterns. Zentralbl. Mikrobiol. 1993, 148, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Boehnke, K.F.; Eaton, K.A.; Fontaine, C.; Brewster, R.; Wu, J.; Eisenberg, J.N.S.; Valdivieso, M.; Baker, L.H.; Xi, C. Reduced infectivity of waterborne viable but nonculturable Helicobacter pylori strain SS1 in mice. Helicobacter 2017, 22, e12391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hua, J.; Ho, B. Is the coccoid form of Helicobacter pylori viable? Microbios 1996, 87, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Forsman, M.; Henningson, E.W.; Larsson, E.; Johansson, T.; Sandstrã¶M, G. Francisella tularensis does not manifest virulence in viable but non-culturable state. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2000, 31, 217–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Linke, S. Untersuchungen zur Erhöhten Toleranz von Biofilmassoziierten Mikroorganismen und Die Ausbildung von VBNC-Zuständen bei Pseudomonas aeruginosa Gegenüber Chlorabspaltenden Verbindungen. Ph.D. Thesis, Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Alexander, E.; Pham, D.; Steck, T.R. The Viable-but-Nonculturable Condition is induced by Copper in Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Rhizobium leguminosarum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65, 3754–3756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toffanin, A.; Basaglia, M.; Ciardi, C.; Vian, P.; Povolo, S.; Casella, S. Energy content decrease and viable-not-culturable status induced by oxygen limitation coupled to the presence of nitrogen oxides in Rhizobium “hedysari”. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2000, 31, 484–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crasta, O.R.; Folkerts, O.; Fei, Z.; Mane, S.P.; Evans, C.; Martino-Catt, S.; Bricker, B.; Yu, G.; Du, L.; Sobral, B.W. Genome sequence of Brucella abortus vaccine candidate S19 compared to virulent strains yields candidate virulence genes. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e2193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jacob, J.; Finke, A.; Mielke, M. The mglA gene and its flanking regions in Brucella: The role of mglA in tolerance to hostile environments, Fe-metabolism and in vivo persistence. Int. J. Med Microbiol. 2012, 302, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stoenner, H.G.; Lackman, D.B. A new species of Brucella isolated from the desert wood rat, Neotoma lepida Thomas. Am. J.Vet. Res. 1957, 99, 47–51. [Google Scholar]
- Audic, S.; Lescot, M.; Claverie, J.-M.; Scholz, H.C. Brucella microti: The genome sequence of an emerging pathogen. BMC Genom. 2009, 10, 352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tiller, R.V.; Gee, J.E.; Frace, M.A.; Taylor, T.K.; Setubal, J.C.; Hoffmaster, A.R.; De, B.K. Characterization of novel Brucella strains originating from wild native rodent species in North Queensland, Australia. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 5837–5845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fakruddin; Bin Mannan, K.S.; Andrews, S. Viable but Nonculturable Bacteria: Food Safety and Public Health Perspective. Int. Sch. Res. Not. 2013, 2013, 703813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliver, J.D. Recent findings on the viable but nonculturable state in pathogenic bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2009, 34, 415–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ramamurthy, T.; Ghosh, A.; Pazhani, G.P.; Shinoda, S. Current perspectives on viable but non-culturable (VBNC) pathogenic bacteria. Front. Public Health 2014, 2, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, L.; Wan, K.; Zhu, J.; Ye, C.; Chabi, K.; Yu, X. Detection and distribution of VBNC/viable pathogenic bacteria in full-scale drinking water treatment plants. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 406, 124335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, L.; Shuai, X.; Xu, L.; Sun, Y.; Lin, Z.; Zhou, Z.; Meng, L.; Chen, H. Mechanisms underlying the effect of chlorination and UV disinfection on VBNC state Escherichia coli isolated from hospital wastewater. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 423, 227–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bodor, A.; Bounedjoum, N.; Vincze, G.E.; Kis, A.E.; Laczi, K.; Bende, G.; Szilágyi, A.; Kovács, T.; Perei, K.; Rákhely, G. Challenges of unculturable bacteria: Environmental perspectives. Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio/Technol. 2020, 19, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1.
Susceptibility of B. abortus S19A, B. abortus ∆mglA 3.14, B. neotomae 5K33, B. microti CCM 4915, and B. 83/13 to Fe2+ after 30 min of exposition as determined via (a) ATP content, (b) CFUs on TSA, and (c) CFUs on CYE agar.
Figure 1.
Susceptibility of B. abortus S19A, B. abortus ∆mglA 3.14, B. neotomae 5K33, B. microti CCM 4915, and B. 83/13 to Fe2+ after 30 min of exposition as determined via (a) ATP content, (b) CFUs on TSA, and (c) CFUs on CYE agar.
Figure 2.
Susceptibility of B. abortus S19A, B. abortus ∆mglA 3.14, B. neotomae 5K33, B. microti CCM 4915, and B. 83/13 to H2O2 after 30 min of exposure as determined by (a) ATP content, (b) CFU (TSA), and (c) CFU (CYE).
Figure 2.
Susceptibility of B. abortus S19A, B. abortus ∆mglA 3.14, B. neotomae 5K33, B. microti CCM 4915, and B. 83/13 to H2O2 after 30 min of exposure as determined by (a) ATP content, (b) CFU (TSA), and (c) CFU (CYE).
Figure 3.
Effects of bleach on B. abortus S19A, B. abortus ∆mglA 3.14, and B.neotomae 5K33 after 30 min of exposure, as determined by ATP content (c), CFU on TSA (a), and CFU on CYE agar (b).
Figure 3.
Effects of bleach on B. abortus S19A, B. abortus ∆mglA 3.14, and B.neotomae 5K33 after 30 min of exposure, as determined by ATP content (c), CFU on TSA (a), and CFU on CYE agar (b).
Figure 4.
Selenite effect on B. abortus S19A and B. abortus ∆mglA 3.14 after 30 min of room temperature exposure as determined via ATP ontent (c), CFU on TSA (a), and CFU on CYE agar (b).
Figure 4.
Selenite effect on B. abortus S19A and B. abortus ∆mglA 3.14 after 30 min of room temperature exposure as determined via ATP ontent (c), CFU on TSA (a), and CFU on CYE agar (b).
Figure 5.
Erythritol effect on B. abortus S19A, B. abortus ∆mglA 3.14, and B. neotomae 5K33, after 1–24 h as determined via ATP content (a) and CFU on TSA (b).
Figure 5.
Erythritol effect on B. abortus S19A, B. abortus ∆mglA 3.14, and B. neotomae 5K33, after 1–24 h as determined via ATP content (a) and CFU on TSA (b).
Figure 6.
Effects of 70% isopropanol on B. abortus S19A, B. abortus ∆mglA 3.14, and B. neotomae 5K33 after 30 min of exposition as determined by ATP content (b), CFU on TSA (c), and CFU on CYE agar (a).
Figure 6.
Effects of 70% isopropanol on B. abortus S19A, B. abortus ∆mglA 3.14, and B. neotomae 5K33 after 30 min of exposition as determined by ATP content (b), CFU on TSA (c), and CFU on CYE agar (a).
Figure 7.
Membrane integrity as determined by live/dead experiments for B. abortus S19, B. abortus ΔmglA, and B. neotomae 5K33, (a) +Fe2+, (b) isopropanol, and (c) H2O2.
Figure 7.
Membrane integrity as determined by live/dead experiments for B. abortus S19, B. abortus ΔmglA, and B. neotomae 5K33, (a) +Fe2+, (b) isopropanol, and (c) H2O2.
Table 1.
Influence of “Low Iron” (0.2 mg/mL) conditions on the Brucella’s ATP content (RLU values) and cultivability (CFUs). Quota: RLU-LUMI/CFU (description of the VBNC phase).
Table 1.
Influence of “Low Iron” (0.2 mg/mL) conditions on the Brucella’s ATP content (RLU values) and cultivability (CFUs). Quota: RLU-LUMI/CFU (description of the VBNC phase).
| Species/Strain | Mean RLU/LUMI Values (×106) | RLU (%) | CFU/mL (TSA) | Quota RLU-LUMI/CFU (TSA) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B. abortus S19 | 1.1 | 100 | 5.5 × 106 | 0.2 |
| B. abortus S19 (+Fe2+) | 0.9 | 73 | 5.5 × 104 | 1636 |
| B. abortus S19 ∆mglA | 1.7 | 100 | 8.5 × 105 | 0.2 |
| B. abortus S19 ∆mglA (+Fe2+) | 1.5 | 93 | 2.7 × 103 | 556 |
| B. neotomae 5K33 | 3.1 | 100 | 1.6 × 107 | 0.2 |
| B. neotomae 5K33 (+Fe2+) | 3.4 | 110 | 4.9 × 106 | 0.7 |
Table 2.
Influence of H2O2 (0.5%) conditions on the Brucella’s ATP content (RLU values) and cultivability (CFUs). Quota: RLU-LUMI/CFU (description of the VBNC phase).
Table 2.
Influence of H2O2 (0.5%) conditions on the Brucella’s ATP content (RLU values) and cultivability (CFUs). Quota: RLU-LUMI/CFU (description of the VBNC phase).
| Species/Strain | Mean RLU/LUMI Values | RLU (%) | CFU/mL (TSA) | Quota RLU-LUMI/CFU(TSA) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B. abortus S19 | 2.0 × 106 | 100 | 6.3 × 106 | 0.3 |
| B. abortus S19 +0.5% H2O2 | 4.5 × 106 | 85.9 | 0 | 4.5 × 106 |
| B. abortus ∆mglA | 1.8 × 106 | 100 | 6.9 × 106 | 0.3 |
| B. abortus ∆mglA + 0.5% H2O2 | 1.9 × 106 | 94 | 0.15 × 106 | 12.7 |
| B. neotomae 5K33 | 1.7 × 104 | 100 | 23 × 106 | 0.01 |
| B. neotomae 5K33 + 0.5% H2O2 | 1.6 × 104 | 93 | 4 × 106 | 0.04 |
Table 3.
Effects of 0.002% NaOCl conditions on the Brucella’s ATP content (RLU values) and cultivability (CFUs). Quota: RLU-LUMI/CFU (description of the VBNC phase).
Table 3.
Effects of 0.002% NaOCl conditions on the Brucella’s ATP content (RLU values) and cultivability (CFUs). Quota: RLU-LUMI/CFU (description of the VBNC phase).
| Species/Strain | Mean RLU/LUMI Values | RLU (%) | CFU/mL (TSA) | Quota RLU/LUMI/CFU (TSA) | CFU/mL (CYE) | Quota RLU-LUMI/CFU (CYE) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B. abortus S19 | 1.1 × 106 | 100 | 1.6 × 107 | 0.07 | 5.0 × 107 | 0.02 |
| B. abortus S19 + 0.5% bleach | 1.0 × 106 | 91.5 | 0 | 1 × 106 | 0 | 1 × 106 |
| B. abortus ∆mglA | 3.2 × 106 | 100 | 7.4 × 106 | 0.4 | 7.3 × 107 | 0.04 |
| B. abortus ∆mglA + 0.5% bleach | 2.9 × 106 | 89.4 | 0 | 2.9 × 106 | 0 | 2.9 × 106 |
| B. neotomae 5K33 | 2.8 × 106 | 100 | 6.4 × 106 | 0.4 | 1.5 × 107 | 0.19 |
| B. neotomae 5K33 + 0.5% bleach | 2.8 × 106 | 97.6 | 0 | 2.8 × 106 | 1.9 × 103 | 1450 |
Table 4.
Effects of 10 mM selenite conditions on the Brucella’s ATP content (RLU values) and cultivability (CFUs on TSA and CYE). Quota: RLU-LUMI/CFU (description of the VBNC phase).
Table 4.
Effects of 10 mM selenite conditions on the Brucella’s ATP content (RLU values) and cultivability (CFUs on TSA and CYE). Quota: RLU-LUMI/CFU (description of the VBNC phase).
| Species/Strain | Mean RLU/LUMI Values | RLU (%) | CFU/mL (TSA) | Quota RLU/LUMI/CFU (TSA) | CFU/mL (CYE) | Quota RLU-LUMI/CFU (CYE) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B. abortus S19 control | 1.1 × 106 | 100 | 1.3 × 107 | 0.08 | 3.8 × 107 | 0.03 |
| B. abortus S19 + 10 mM selenite | 9.0 × 105 | 79.9 | 1.0 × 107 | 0.09 | 4.1 × 107 | 0.02 |
| B. abortus S19 + 100 mM selenite | 2.0 × 105 | 18.0 | 6.2 × 106 | 0.03 | 4.1 × 107 | 0.005 |
| B. abortus ∆mglA control | 3.2 × 106 | 100 | 6.7 × 106 | 0.5 | 7.7 × 107 | 0.04 |
| B. abortus ∆mglA + 10mM selenite | 2.1 × 106 | 64.5 | 3.8 × 106 | 0.6 | 3.6 × 107 | 0.06 |
| B. abortus ∆mglA +100 mM selenite | 6.5 × 105 | 20.3 | 1.6 × 106 | 0.4 | 5.6 × 107 | 0.01 |
Table 5.
Effects of 10 mM erythritol conditions on the Brucella’s ATP content (RLU values) and cultivability (CFUs on TSA and CYE). Quota: RLU-LUMI/CFU (description of the VBNC phase).
Table 5.
Effects of 10 mM erythritol conditions on the Brucella’s ATP content (RLU values) and cultivability (CFUs on TSA and CYE). Quota: RLU-LUMI/CFU (description of the VBNC phase).
| Species/Strain/Incubation Time 1 h Erythritol | Mean RLU/LUMI (×106) | RLU (%) | CFU/mL (TSA) | Quota RLU-LUMI/CFU (TSA) |
| B. abortus S19 | 1.5 | 100 | 7.0 × 106 | 0.2 |
| B. abortus S19 (+ erythritol) | 1.2 | 85.6 | 4.5 × 106 | 0.3 |
| B. abortus S19 ∆mglA | 1.4 | 100 | 1.2 × 107 | 0.1 |
| B. abortus S19 ∆mglA (+ erythritol) | 1.1 | 76.4 | 9.7 × 107 | 0.01 |
| B. neotomae 5K33 | 1.6 | 100 | 8.3 × 106 | 0.2 |
| B. neotomae 5K33 (+ erythritol) | 1.6 | 99.2 | 1.1 × 107 | 0.15 |
| Species/Strain/Incubation Time 24 h Erythritol | Mean RLU/LUMI Values (×106) | RLU (%) | CFU/mL (TSA) | Quota RLU/LUMI/CFU (TSA) |
| B. abortus S19 | 0.83 | 100 | 9.8 × 108 | 0.0001 |
| B. abortus S19 (+ erythritol) | 0.21 | 27.0 | 5.0 × 105 | 0.4 |
| B. abortus S19 ∆mglA | 0.9 | 100 | 1.3 × 109 | 0.001 |
| B. abortus S19 ∆mglA (+ erythritol) | 0.22 | 26.7 | 2.4 × 106 | 0.09 |
| B. neotomae 5K33 | 0.85 | 100 | 8.9 × 108 | 0.001 |
| B. neotomae 5K33 (+ erythritol) | 0.80 | 94.2 | 6.3 × 108 | 0.001 |
Table 6.
Effects of 70% isopropanol conditions on the Brucella’s ATP content (RLU values) and cultivability (CFUs on TSA and CYE). Quota: RLU-LUMI/CFU (description of the VBNC phase).
Table 6.
Effects of 70% isopropanol conditions on the Brucella’s ATP content (RLU values) and cultivability (CFUs on TSA and CYE). Quota: RLU-LUMI/CFU (description of the VBNC phase).
| Species/Strain | Mean RLU/LUMI Values | RLU (%) | CFU/mL (TSA) | Quota RLU-LUMI/CFU (TSA) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B. abortus S19 | 2.7 × 105 | 100 | 3.1 × 107 | 0.001 |
| B. abortus S19 + isopropanol | 4.5 × 103 | 1.7 | 0 | 4.5 × 103 |
| B. abortus S19 ∆mglA | 7.9 × 105 | 100 | 2.4 × 107 | 0.03 |
| B. abortus S19 ∆mglA + isopropanol | 1.3 × 104 | 1.5 | 0 | 1.3 × 104 |
| B. neotomae 5K33 | 2.1 × 105 | 100 | 6 × 106 | 0.04 |
| B. neotomae 5K33 + isopropanol | 2.2 × 104 | 4.5 | 0 | 2.2 × 104 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Jacob, J. Evidence of a Viable but Nonculturable (VBNC) Phase in B. abortus S19 under Oxidative Stress (H2O2, -Fe2+, Bleach) and under Non-Oxidative Inhibitory Conditions (Isopropanol, Erythritol, Selenite). Microorganisms 2024, 12, 491. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12030491
AMA Style
Jacob J. Evidence of a Viable but Nonculturable (VBNC) Phase in B. abortus S19 under Oxidative Stress (H2O2, -Fe2+, Bleach) and under Non-Oxidative Inhibitory Conditions (Isopropanol, Erythritol, Selenite). Microorganisms. 2024; 12(3):491. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12030491
Chicago/Turabian StyleJacob, Jens. 2024. "Evidence of a Viable but Nonculturable (VBNC) Phase in B. abortus S19 under Oxidative Stress (H2O2, -Fe2+, Bleach) and under Non-Oxidative Inhibitory Conditions (Isopropanol, Erythritol, Selenite)" Microorganisms 12, no. 3: 491. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12030491
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
