Mating Interactions between Schistosoma bovis and S. mansoni and Compatibility of Their F1 Progeny with Biomphalaria glabrata and Bulinus truncatus
by
, , , , and
Amos Mathias Onyekwere
1,2
,
Alejandra De Elias-Escribano
3,4
,
Julien Kincaid-Smith
2,5,
Sarah Dametto
2,
Jean-François Allienne
2,
Anne Rognon
2,
Maria Dolores Bargues
3,4 and
Jérôme Boissier
2,* 1
Department of Biology, Alex Ekwueme Federal University, Ndufu-Alike, Abakaliki PMB 1010, Nigeria
2
IHPE, University Montpellier, CNRS, Ifremer, University Perpignan Via Domitia, 66000 Perpignan, France
3
Departamento de Parasitología, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Valencia, Av. Vicent Andrés Estellés s/n, 46100 Burjassot, Valencia, Spain
4
CIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Instituto de Salud Carlos IIII, C/Monforte de Lemos 3-5, Pabellón 11, Planta 0, 28029 Madrid, Spain
5
CBGP, IRD, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro, University Montpellier, 34980 Montpellier, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2022, 10(6), 1251; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061251
Submission received: 19 May 2022
/
Revised: 12 June 2022
/
Accepted: 14 June 2022
/
Published: 19 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Parasitology)
Abstract
:Contrary to the majority of other Trematoda, Schistosoma species are gonochoric. Consequently, in endemic areas where several schistosome species overlap and can co-infect the same definitive host, there may be frequent opportunities for interspecific pairing. Our experimental study provides novel insight on the pairing behavior between Schistosoma bovis and S. mansoni in mixed infections in mice. We used six mate choice experiments to assess mating interactions between the two schistosome species. We show that mating between the two Schistosoma species is not random and that S. mansoni exhibits greater mate recognition compared to S. bovis. We also performed reciprocal crosses (male S. mansoni × female S. bovis) and (female S. mansoni × male S. bovis) that produce active swimming miracidia. These miracidia were genotyped by ITS2 sequencing and proposed for mollusc infection. Molecular analyses show that all the miracidia are parthenogenetically produced (i.e., their harbor the mother ITS2 genotype) and as a consequence can only infect the mollusc of the maternal species. Offspring produced by male S. mansoni × female S. bovis pairing can only infect Bulinus truncatus whereas offspring produced by female S. mansoni × male S. bovis can only infect Biomphalaria glabrata snails. Evolutionary and epidemiological consequences are discussed.
1. Introduction
The class Trematoda is a diversified phylum of worms characterized by their parasitic way of life. Trematoda are usually hermaphroditic; however, the hundred species belonging to the family of Schistosomatidae are exceptional because they are gonochoric [1,2]. This family contains some species of considerable medical and veterinary importance [3,4]. Among them, the Schistosoma genus is the most important in terms of human health and social-economic impacts. Human schistosomiasis affects about 250 million people in about 78 countries worldwide, with the largest disease burden throughout sub-Saharan Africa [5]. The Schistosoma genus is composed of about 23 recognized species with at least 19 species that infect livestock and wild animals [6]. Although only five species are of veterinary importance to domestic animals, at least six species infect humans and are of medical interest [6]. Because several of these species are co-endemic and can share the same definitive host, interspecific crossing opportunities may occur. Several studies, both in the field and in the lab have addressed the potentiality of different Schistosoma species to encounter, to mate and to interbreed.
In the field, numerous studies have reported the existence of several potential interspecific crosses between different species of schistosomes [7]. Early reports were mainly based on the physical appearance of the eggs [8]. However, the viability of these eggs was not evaluated and these early physical observations have often been considered as misdiagnosis [7]. The use of molecular techniques has later confirmed hetero-specific pairing or resulting hybrid progeny between different schistosome species, when adult worms or miracidia were genotyped, respectively [7]. Natural interspecific hybridization may occur between human Schistosoma species (S. haematobium × S. guineensis or S. mansoni), animal schistosomes (S. bovis × S. curasonni) or between human and animal schistosomes (S. haematobium × S. bovis or mattheei or curasonni or S. mansoni × S. rodhaini). Interspecific pairing may induce some important outcomes for the parasites’ transmission in the field. For example, in Cameroon, hybridization between S. haematobium and S. guineensis has led to the local extinction of the latter species and the establishments of the former and their hybrid offspring [9,10]. Another major outcome is the zoonotic potential of some crosses as it has been observed in S. haematobium × S. bovis crosses [11,12].
In parallel to field identification, experimental approaches allowed to analyze interspecific interactions and to infer some biological aspects, such as mate choice, mate competition or the genetic outcome of the crosses, that cannot be address as easily in the field. Several interbreeding experiments in the laboratory have confirmed that Schistosoma species can successfully hybridize for several generations [13]. These experimental studies have evidenced either random mating or a preponderance of homo-specific pairing according to the phylogenetic distance of the interacting species [13]. When closely related species interact such as S. haematobium × S. bovis [14], S. bovis × S. curassoni [15], S. haematobium × S. intercalatum [16] or S. intercalatum × S. guineensis [17] the pairing is random. All these latter species are included in the same monophyletic S. haematobium group [3]. At the opposite when the species belong to two different evolutionary lineages mate preference is observed as evidenced for S. mansoni × S. intercalatum crosses [18]. The genetic background of the resulting progeny may also depend on the phylogenetic distance between the interacting species, ranging from parthenogenetic individuals [19] to substantial genomic introgression [14,20,21]. One visible consequence of such genetic signatures may be observed at the parasites’ life history trait level, and in particular for the parasite-mollusc compatibility. When the progeny is partheno-genetically produced, the mollusc host spectrum is limited to the host spectrum of the maternal schistosome species [19]. On the contrary,, for closely related species, hybridization can enlarge the host spectrum as evidenced in S. haematobium × S. intercalatum crosses [22].
The present study addresses inter-specific interactions between S. mansoni and S. bovis in the laboratory. These species belong to two different evolutionary lineages of schistosomes; the S. mansoni and the S. haematobium groups, respectively. S. mansoni is known to infect Humans, Non-Human Primates or rodents, while S. bovis is known to infect livestock and rodents [6]. In the field, both parasite species can share the same rodent host, as has been found in Mastomys huberti and Arvicanthis niloticus in Senegal [23]. This last study also evidenced interspecific pairing between an S. mansoni male and a S. haematobium × S. bovis hybrid female in Mastomys huberti [23]. A single study has experimentally exposed rodents to mixed infections between male S. bovis and female S. mansoni [24]. This last author has observed eggs with typical maternal species shape, but few contained viable miracidia and the work failed to infect Bulinus snail. In the current context of schistosomes’ potential zoonotic transmission, this study proposes to experimentally analyze S. mansoni and S. bovis interactions through: (i) mate interactions thanks to mate choice experiments; (ii) the compatibility between the progeny and the parental mollusc species (Biomphalara glabrata and Bulinus truncatus) after forced reciprocal crosses; and (iii) the nuclear genetic background of the progeny.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. The Ethics Statement
This research was carried out according to national ethical standards established in the write of 1st February 2013 (NOR: AGRG1238753A), setting the conditions for approval, planning and operation of establishments, breeders and suppliers of animals used for scientific purposes and controls. The experiments carried out for this study were approved and provided a permit A66040 for animal experimentation by the French Ministry of Agriculture and Fishery (Ministere de l’Agriculture et de la Peche), and the French Ministry for Higher Education, Research and Technology (Ministere de l’Education Nationale de la Recherché et de la Technologie). The investigator has the official certificate for animal experimentation, obtained from both ministries (Decret n° 87/848 du 19 octobre 1987; number of authorization 007083).
2.2. Origin and Maintenance of Schistosome Strains
Schistosoma bovis and S. mansoni were maintained in the laboratory using Bulinus truncatus (Spanish strain) and Biomphalaria glabrata (Brazilian strain), respectively. The definitive hosts used were Swiss OF1 mice (Charles River Laboratories L’abresle, Saint-Germain-Nuelles, France). The parasite strains S. bovis and S. mansoni originated from Yegua-Salamanca (Spain) and Recife (Brazil), respectively. The S. bovis strain isolated in the early 1980s originates from Villar de la Yegua-Salamanca, and was provided by Ana Oleaga from the Spanish laboratory of parasitology of the Institute of Natural Resources and Agrobiology in Salamanca [25]. The S. mansoni strain isolated in 1975 originates from Recife (Brazil) and was provide by Pr. Y. Golvan from the Faculty of Medicine St Antoine, Paris (France). Compatibility of the F1 progeny was tested on four mollusc strains: two B. truncatus (from Spain and from Morocco) and two B. glabrata (from Brazil and from Guadeloupe).
2.3. Experimental Protocol
2.3.1. Snail Infection and Obtention of Unisexual Clonal Population of Schistosome
Methods for miracidium recovery follow the previously published procedure [26,27]. Seventy-two Biomphalaria glabrata snails were exposed individually overnight to a single miracidium of S. mansoni each and 96 Bulinus truncatus snails were individually exposed overnight to a single miracidium of S. bovis each so that each infected snail would produce single-sex cercarial population. The molluscs were separated into two breeding tanks according to species and fed ad libitum for a duration of 35 days for miracidium to develop to cercariae. Molluscs placed in 24 well-plates according to species were stimulated under light for cercariae shedding. After 2–3 h, the 24 well-plates were examined under a binocular microscope for the presence of cercariae and any snail found to emit cercariae was assigned with an identity number. Three cercariae from each infected snail were individually captured for molecular sexing and each snail was separated into a plastic cup and fed ad libitum. Molecular sexing of S. mansoni and S. bovis cercariae was performed according to [14,28] respectively (see Supplementary Materials for detailed molecular biology protocols [28,29]). The snails were finally separated into four distinct tanks according to sex and species of cercariae.
2.3.2. Mice Infection, Parasite Recovery and Species Identification
Mice were infected using the paddling method and worms were recovered thanks to hepatic perfusion technique. Details for mice infection and parasite recovery follow previously published procedure [26,27]. The sex, species and number of cercariae combination used for each mouse exposure are shown in Table 1.
The experimental design to quantify the frequency of homo- and hetero-specific coupling between S. bovis and S. mansoni is composed of five experiments (n°1–5—Table 1). Experiments n°1–4 aimed to test the individual choice of each species and sex. In experiments n°1 and n°2, we tested the female choice for S. mansoni and S. bovis. In experiments n°3 and n°4, we tested the male choice for S. mansoni and S. bovis. Experiments n°1–4 served as a restricted choice of mate where excess of one sex of the two species competing for pairing will ensure that all individuals of the other sex (that had the choice for homo- or hetero-specific mating) will be paired. Experiment n°5 served as full choice of mate. Mice were infected with the same number of cercariae of both sexes and species so that we could evaluate all paring combinations simultaneously. Experiment n°6 consists in producing F1 and F1’ progeny through forced reciprocal mating experiments. These last crosses were designed to obtain a first generation of miracidia to know whether these progenies are compatible with the snail intermediate host.
After cercarial exposure, the mice were euthanized at two months and adult worms recovered by hepatic perfusion. We used a magnifier lens and a small paintbrush to separate the dimorphic worms according to their sex (male or female). Each worm, whether mated or unmated, was placed in a 1.5 micro tube and labeled appropriately. Tubes containing worms were stored in the freezer at −20 °C for genetic analysis. The species of all worms (mated and unmated) where identified after DNA extraction using amplification methods (see Supplementary Materials for detailed molecular biology protocols).
2.3.3. Mollusc Exposition with F1 and F1’ Miracidia
Albino mice exposed to male S. mansoni × female S. bovis cercariae and vice versa (F1 & F1’, see Experiments n°6, Table 1), were euthanized at two months post-cercarial exposure and eggs from the livers were hatched to recover first generation miracidia [26,27]. Forty miracidia of each cross were stored on Whatman FTA cards [30]. The sex of these miracidia was determined by PCR and a part of the ITS2 gene was sequenced for 66 specimens (see molecular biology methods Supplementary Materials for details). Sequences obtained were compared to reference sequences from Genbank database (AF531314.1 for S. mansoni and FJ588862.1 for S. bovis). We used 24 well-plates to expose 48 Biomphalaria glabrata snails each of Brazil and Guadeloupe strains individually overnight with 10 F1 or F1’ miracidia. The same procedure was used to expose 48 Bulinus truncatus (Morocco and Spain strains). The protocol for mollusc infection with F1 and F1’ miracidia is shown in Table 2 below. The molluscs were separated into eight breeding tanks according to their infected miracidia (F1 or F1’), snail species (B. glabrata or B. truncatus) and snail strain (Brazil, Guadeloupe, Morocco, or Spain). Snails were fed ad libitum for a duration of 60 days for miracidia to develop into cercariae. Molluscs placed in 24 well-plates according to group were stimulated under light to emit cercariae.
2.4. Statistical Analysis
The total number of adult worms recovered for each schistosome species was counted, e.g., homo-specific pairs, hetero-specific pairs, and single worms. We used the null hypothesis of random pairing to calculate the expected number of single and paired worms, e.g., in experiment 1 the expected number of homo-specific paired S. bovis females equals the total number of S. bovis females, times the total number of S. bovis males over the total number of males. We used the Chi-square tests with Yates correction for continuity to compare the expected and observed numbers of homo- and hetero-specific pairs. The p-value was adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Benjamini & Hochberg method. Statistical analysis was done using R Studio v1.4.1106.
3. Results
For each experiment, Table 3 shows the sex and species of the choosing partner. Random pairing is observed when S. bovis is the species that can choose whether male (x2 = 2.73; p = 0.8 after Benjamini & Hochberg correction) or female (x2 = 0.29; p = 1.00 after Benjamini & Hochberg correction). Homo-specific pairs are more numerous than heterospecific pairs when S. mansoni is the species that can choose whether male (x2 = 9.85; p = 0.016 after Benjamini & Hochberg correction) or female (x2 = 7.66; p = 0.048 after Benjamini & Hochberg correction). Table 4 shows the number of homo-, hetero-specific pairs and single worms when mice are exposed to equal number of cercariae whatever their sex and their species. The number of homo-specific pairs is bigger than expected under the hypothesis of random association (x2 = 31.86; p < 0.001 after Benjamini & Hochberg correction). However, no ♂Sb × ♀Sm pairs were observed because all S. mansoni female were monopolized by male S. mansoni.
Table 5 shows compatibility of F1 (female S. bovis x male S. mansoni) and F1’ (male S. bovis × female S. mansoni) miracidia with the intermediate snail hosts of both schistosomes’ parental species. F1’ miracidia readily infect B. glabrata from Brazil (50%) and from Guadeloupe (20.8%). F1 miracidia readily infect in B. truncatus from Spain (10.6%) and from Morocco (3.3%). Loss of compatibility was noted in F1 miracidia for Biomphalaria and in F1’ miracidia for Bulinus snail. Both sexes were identified in the F1 and F1’ progenies. Among the F1 miracidia, 9 and 24 were female and male, respectively. Among the F1’ miracidia, 15 and 18 were female and male, respectively. 505 base pairs of the ITS2 nuclear gene have been sequenced for 66 miracidia. On the 33 sequences of the F1 miracidia all exhibit a S. bovis gene profile (no heterozygous profile) and on the 33 sequences of the F1’ miracidia all exhibit a S. mansoni gene profile (no heterozygous profile).
4. Discussion
Several studies have shown that, in experimental mixed infections, there are no physiological barriers preventing encounters and mating of schistosomes of different species, even species belonging to a different genus in the definitive host [19]. Our overall findings on the experimental combinations between S. mansoni males’ × S. bovis females and vice versa demonstrated that (i) mating between the two Schistosoma species is not random; (ii) S. mansoni exhibits greater mate recognition compared to S. bovis; (iii) the progeny is parthenogenetic; and, as a consequence, (iv) the mollusc host spectrum of the F1 progeny is limited to the maternal schistosome species host spectrum.
Random pairing has been observed in crosses between S. haematobium × S. bovis [31], S. bovis × S. curasonni [15], S. haematobium × S. intercalatum [16] and S. intercalatum × S. guineensis [17]. Our study shows mate choice recognition, and is in tandem with results obtained in mixed infections of S. haematobium × S. mattheei [32] or S. mansoni × S. intercalatum [18]. Mate recognition seems to be dependent on the genetic proximity of the interacting species: S. bovis, S. curassoni, S. intercalatum, S. haematobium and S. guineensis are more related among each other compared to S. haematobium and S. mattheei, and even less so between S. mansoni and S. bovis or S. intercalatum.
Our study also shows that S. mansoni exhibited greater specific mate preference than S. bovis and this indicates that intra-S. mansoni recognition is stronger than intra-S. bovis; evidence of S. mansoni exhibiting greater mate recognition than S. intercalatum [18] and S. haematobium exhibiting greater mate recognition than S. mattheei [32] has been reported and our results further buttress the existence of mechanisms in Schistosoma species favoring the pairing of homo-specific partners. In addition, it has been reported that, whatever their genotype, S. mansoni males show a stronger competitiveness at coupling with females than S. intercalatum males [33,34]. It has been demonstrated that the former will change partner to mate with conspecific females in preference to hetero-specific females whenever the opportunity arises [33,34]. It has also been evidenced that, in the absence of S. mansoni female worms, unpaired S. mansoni male worms that arrive in a pre-established S. intercalatum infection are more competitive and can pull away female S. intercalatum from male S. intercalatum [33,34].
Depending on the evolutionary lineage of the species, the interspecies sexual interactions in schistosomes may lead to either hybrids or parthenogenetic offspring [19,24]. Our experimental design on mating interactions between S. mansoni males’ × S. bovis females (two species of schistosomes that belong to two different evolutionary lineages) and vice versa shows that the F1 progenies are parthenogenetically produced. Within the family of schistosomatidae, parthenogenesis has been reported in some species [13,19]. Apart from female Schistosomatium douthitti, which regularly mature and produce numerous viable eggs in unisexual infections [35], the induction of parthenogenesis in other female schistosomes has been evidenced in crosses with males from a different species group. Induced parthenogenesis has been observed in female S. mansoni stimulated by either S. japonicum, S. intercalatum or S. douthitti male, and in female S. japonicum or female S. mattheei stimulated by male S. mansoni [19]. Cytogenetic studies on the progeny of these last crosses have shown that all type of parthenogenesis can be observed: haploid, apomictic diploid or automictic diploic; the haploid parthenogenesis seems to be the most frequent mechanism [19]. Because the parthenogenetic status of the S. mansoni × S. bovis F1 progeny was assessed by sequencing a nuclear gene, we cannot infer the ploidy of this progeny. Finally, because F1 progeny only harbor the mother genotype, it can only infect the snail corresponding to the mother species (B. truncatus for S. bovis and B. glabrata for S. mansoni). A similar result has been observed in S. japonicum × S. mansoni crosses, where female S. japonicum × male S. mansoni can only infect Oncomelania hupensis snail while where female S. mansoni × male S. japonicum can only infect B. glabrata [36].
5. Conclusions
The production of hybrid offspring in laboratory experiments is a useful approach to determine levels of zoonotic potential in schistosome species. This can also help predict if hybrid offspring could be evidenced in the field. Our study demonstrated that pairing is possible between S. mansoni and S. bovis with the production of viable parthenogenetic offspring, but with a limitation in their ability to infect both parental mollusc hosts. Theoretically, F1 S. mansoni × S. bovis miracidia could be evidenced in the field at least in rodent host, where both parasites’ species can be found [23]. The barrier between schistosomes infecting human or animal has recently been challenged with the discovery of widespread S. haematobium × S. bovis hybrids in several West African countries [11,12,37,38,39]. Even if S. mansoni are not closely related to S. bovis, contrary to S. haematobium they have the same tropism for the mesenteric vein system and S. mansoni × S. bovis could therefore also be evidenced in human feces. Without molecular biology, a female S. mansoni × male S. bovis F1 progeny not be identified because it harbors the expected S. mansoni egg shape and infects the host attributed to S. mansoni transmission. However, S. bovis egg shape in human feces might attract attention. The presence of S. bovis egg shape in human feces has already been evidenced but attributed to contamination after the ingestion of cows infected by S. bovis parasite. However, this type of observation is very rare and the fact that the F1 individuals produced are parthenogenetic should strongly limit the spread of this hybrid. Interestingly our results may also have implications for schistosomiasis transmission and thus its control. They suggest that co-infection and the formation of heterospecific pairs in reservoir hosts such as rodents, although not leading to hybridization, is sufficient to allow female of each species to perpetuate the parasites life cycles even in the absence of conspecific mates. This supports the fact that focusing on reducing human schistosomiasis alone may not be sufficient for sustainable control, especially if animal-infecting species can stimulate the transmission of single-sex human-infecting species.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms10061251/s1. Molecular Biology Protocols. References [40,41] cited in Supplementary Materials.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, A.M.O., J.K.-S. and J.B.; Funding acquisition, A.M.O. and J.B.; Methodology, A.M.O., A.D.E.-E., S.D., J.-F.A. and A.R.; Project administration, M.D.B. and J.B.; Resources, M.D.B.; Supervision, J.B.; Writing—original draft, A.M.O.; Writing—review & editing, J.K.-S., S.D., M.D.B. and J.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by Campus France, France and Tertiary Education Trust Fund (TETfund), Nigeria and was supported by the program HySWARM (ANR-18-CE35-0001) from the French Research National Agency respectively awarded to J.B. and A.M.O. is funded by Campus France. M.D.B. and A.D.E.-E. were funded by the Red de Investigación de Centros de Enfermedades Tropicales—RICET (RD16/0027/0023) of the PN de I+D+I, ISCIII-Subdirección General de Redes y Centros de Investigación Cooperativa RETICS, Ministry of Health and Consumption, Madrid; by CIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas (CB21/13/00056), ISCIII, Ministry of Science and Education, Madrid, Spain; by the PROMETEO Program, Programa de Ayudas para Grupos de Investigación de Excelencia (2021/004), Generalitat Valenciana, Valencia, Spain and by BEFPI/2021/019. This study is set within the framework of the “Laboratoires d’Excellence (LABEX)” TULIP (ANR-10-LABX-41).
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Loker, E.S.; Brant, S.V. Diversification, dioecy and dimorphism in schistosomes. Trends Parasitol. 2006, 22, 521–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mone, H.; Boissier, J. Sexual biology of schistosomes. Adv. Parasitol. 2004, 57, 89–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lockyer, A.E.; Olson, P.D.; Ostergaard, P.; Rollinson, D.; Johnston, D.A.; Attwood, S.W.; Southgate, V.R.; Horak, P.; Snyder, S.D.; Le, T.H.; et al. The phylogeny of the Schistosomatidae based on three genes with emphasis on the interrelationships of Schistosoma Weinland, 1858. Parasitology 2003, 126, 203–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Boissier, J.; Mouahid, G.; Moné, H. Schistosoma spp.; Michigan State University, UNESCO: East Lansing, MI, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Lo, N.C.; Bezerra, F.S.M.; Colley, D.G.; Fleming, F.M.; Homeida, M.; Kabatereine, N.; Kabole, F.M.; King, C.H.; Mafe, M.A.; Midzi, N.; et al. Review of 2022 WHO guidelines on the control and elimination of schistosomiasis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2022, 22, S1473–S3099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Panzner, U.; Boissier, J. Natural Intra- and Interclade Human Hybrid Schistosomes in Africa with Considerations on Prevention through Vaccination. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leger, E.; Webster, J.P. Hybridizations within the Genus Schistosoma: Implications for evolution, epidemiology and control. Parasitology 2017, 144, 65–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Alves, W. Observations on S. mattheei and S. haematobium—Adults from experimental animals and man. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1948, 41, 430–4311. [Google Scholar]
- Tchuem Tchuente, L.A.; Southgate, V.R.; Jourdane, J.; Webster, B.L.; Vercruysse, J. Schistosoma intercalatum: An endangered species in Cameroon? Trends Parasitol. 2003, 19, 389–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Webster, B.L.; Tchuem Tchuente, L.A.; Jourdane, J.; Southgate, V.R. The interaction of Schistosoma haematobium and S. guineensis in Cameroon. J. Helminthol. 2005, 79, 193–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Savassi, B.; Dobigny, G.; Etougbetche, J.R.; Avocegan, T.T.; Quinsou, F.T.; Gauthier, P.; Ibikounle, M.; Mone, H.; Mouahid, G. Mastomys natalensis (Smith, 1834) as a natural host for Schistosoma haematobium (Bilharz, 1852) Weinland, 1858 x Schistosoma bovis Sonsino, 1876 introgressive hybrids. Parasitol. Res. 2021, 120, 1755–1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Savassi, B.; Mouahid, G.; Lasica, C.; Mahaman, S.K.; Garcia, A.; Courtin, D.; Allienne, J.F.; Ibikounle, M.; Mone, H. Cattle as natural host for Schistosoma haematobium (Bilharz, 1852) Weinland, 1858 x Schistosoma bovis Sonsino, 1876 interactions, with new cercarial emergence and genetic patterns. Parasitol. Res. 2020, 119, 2189–2205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Southgate, V.R.; Jourdane, J.; Tchuem Tchuenté, L.A. Recent studies on the reproductive biology of the schistosomes and their relevance to speciation in the digenea. Int. J. Parasitol. 1998, 28, 1159–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kincaid-Smith, J.; Tracey, A.; de Carvalho Augusto, R.; Bulla, I.; Holroyd, N.; Rognon, A.; Rey, O.; Chaparro, C.; Oleaga, A.; Mas-Coma, S.; et al. Morphological and genomic characterisation of the Schistosoma hybrid infecting humans in Europe reveals admixture between Schistosoma haematobium and Schistosoma bovis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2021, 15, e0010062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rollinson, D.; Southgate, V.R.; Vercruysse, J.; Moore, P.J. Observations on natural and experimental interactions between Schistosoma bovis and S. curassoni from West Africa. Acta Trop. 1990, 47, 101–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Southgate, B.A.; Rollinson, D.; Ross, A.G.; Knowles, N.G. Mating behaviour in mixed infections of Schistosoma haematobium and S. intercalatum. J. Nat. Hist. 1982, 16, 491–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pages, J.R.; Southgate, V.R.; Tchuem Tchuente, L.A.; Jourdane, J. Lack of prezygotic isolation by assortative mating between the two cryptic species of the polytypic Schistosoma intercalatum taxon. Parasitol. Res. 2001, 87, 888–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tchuem Tchuenté, L.A.; Imbert-Establet, D.; Delay, B.; Jourdane, J. Choice of mate, a reproductive isolating mechanism between Schistosoma intercalatum and S. mansoni in mixed reflexions. Int. J. Parasitol. 1993, 23, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jourdane, J.; Imbert-Establet, D.; Tchuente, L.A. Parthenogenesis in schistosomatidae. Parasitol. Today 1995, 11, 427–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Platt, R.N.; McDew-White, M.; Le Clec’h, W.; Chevalier, F.D.; Allan, F.; Emery, A.M.; Garba, A.; Hamidou, A.A.; Ame, S.M.; Webster, J.P.; et al. Ancient Hybridization and Adaptive Introgression of an Invadolysin Gene in Schistosome Parasites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2019, 36, 2127–2142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rey, O.; Toulza, E.; Chaparro, C.; Allienne, J.F.; Kincaid-Smith, J.; Mathieu-Begne, E.; Allan, F.; Rollinson, D.; Webster, B.L.; Boissier, J. Diverging patterns of introgression from Schistosoma bovis across S. haematobium African lineages. PLoS Pathog. 2021, 17, e1009313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Webster, B.L.; Southgate, V.R. Compatibility of Schistosoma haematobium, S. intercalatum and their hybrids with Bulinus truncatus and B. forskalii. Parasitology 2003, 127, 231–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Catalano, S.; Sene, M.; Diouf, N.D.; Fall, C.B.; Borlase, A.; Leger, E.; Ba, K.; Webster, J.P. Rodents as Natural Hosts of Zoonotic Schistosoma Species and Hybrids: An Epidemiological and Evolutionary Perspective from West Africa. J. Infect. Dis. 2018, 218, 429–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Taylor, M.G. Hybridisation experiments on five species of African schistosomes. J. Helminthol. 1970, 44, 253–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Silva, M.L.; Vicente, F.S.; Avelino, I.C.; Martin, V.R. Susceptibility of Planorbarius metidjensis from Portugal and Spain to Schistosoma bovis from Salamanca, Spain. Malacologia 1977, 16, 251–254. [Google Scholar]
- Boissier, J.; Chlichlia, K.; Digon, Y.; Ruppel, A.; Mone, H. Preliminary study on sex-related inflammatory reactions in mice infected with Schistosoma mansoni. Parasitol. Res. 2003, 91, 144–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Boissier, J.; Mone, H. Experimental observations on the sex ratio of adult Schistosoma mansoni, with comments on the natural male bias. Parasitology 2000, 121 Pt 4, 379–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Portela, J.; Grunau, C.; Cosseau, C.; Beltran, S.; Dantec, C.; Parrinello, H.; Boissier, J. Whole-genome in-silico subtractive hybridization (WISH)--using massive sequencing for the identification of unique and repetitive sex-specific sequences: The example of Schistosoma mansoni. BMC Genom. 2010, 11, 387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kincaid-Smith, J.; Boissier, J.; Allienne, J.F.; Oleaga, A.; Djuikwo-Teukeng, F.; Toulza, E. A Genome Wide Comparison to Identify Markers to Differentiate the Sex of Larval Stages of Schistosoma haematobium, Schistosoma bovis and their Respective Hybrids. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2016, 10, e0005138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kebede, T.; Bech, N.; Allienne, J.F.; Olivier, R.; Erko, B.; Boissier, J. Genetic evidence for the role of non-human primates as reservoir hosts for human schistosomiasis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2020, 14, e0008538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kincaid-Smith, J.; Mathieu-Begne, E.; Chaparro, C.; Reguera-Gomez, M.; Mulero, S.; Allienne, J.F.; Toulza, E.; Boissier, J. No pre-zygotic isolation mechanisms between Schistosoma haematobium and Schistosoma bovis parasites: From mating interactions to differential gene expression. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2021, 15, e0009363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Southgate, V.R.; Tchuem Tchuente, L.A.; Vercruysse, J.; Jourdane, J. Mating behaviour in mixed infections of Schistosoma haematobium and S. mattheei. Parasitol. Res. 1995, 81, 651–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tchuem Tchuenté, L.A.; Southgate, V.R.; Imbert-Establet, D.; Jourdane, J. Change of mate and mate competition between males of Schistosoma intercalatum and S. mansoni. Parasitology 1995, 110, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tchuem Tchuenté, L.A.; Southgate, V.R.; Jourdane, J. Mating competition between Schistosoma mansoni and S. intercalatum. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1995, 89, 246. [Google Scholar]
- Short, R.B. Uniparental Miracidia of Schistosomatium douthitti and their Progeny (Tremaoda, Schistosomatidae). Am. Midl. Nat. 1952, 48, 55–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Imbert-Establet, D.; Xia, M.; Jourdane, J. Parthenogenesis in the genus Schistosoma: Electrophoretic evidence for this reproduction system in S. japonicum and S. mansoni. Parasitol. Res. 1994, 80, 186–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huyse, T.; Webster, B.L.; Geldof, S.; Stothard, J.R.; Diaw, O.T.; Polman, K.; Rollinson, D. Bidirectional introgressive hybridization between a cattle and human schistosome species. PLoS Pathog. 2009, 5, e1000571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Onyekwere, A.M.; Rey, O.; Allienne, J.F.; Nwanchor, M.C.; Alo, M.; Uwa, C.; Boissier, J. Population Genetic Structure and Hybridization of Schistosoma haematobium in Nigeria. Pathogens 2022, 11, 425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Angora, E.K.; Boissier, J.; Menan, H.; Rey, O.; Tuo, K.; Toure, A.O.; Coulibaly, J.T.; Meite, A.; Raso, G.; N’Goran, E.K.; et al. Prevalence and Risk Factors for Schistosomiasis among Schoolchildren in two Settings of Cote d'Ivoire. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2019, 4, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Beltran, S.; Galinier, R.; Allienne, J.F.; Boissier, J. Cheap, rapid and efficient DNA extraction method to perform multilocus microsatellite genotyping on all Schistosoma mansoni stages. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. 2008, 103, 501–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Webster, B.L.; Rollinson, D.; Stothard, J.R.; Huyse, T. Rapid diagnostic multiplex PCR (RD-PCR) to discriminate Schistosoma haematobium and S. bovis. J. Helminthol. 2010, 84, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Table 1.
Number of cercariae used for each experiment according to sex and species of parasite.
| Experiment Number | S. bovis | S. mansoni | Number of Mice | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Males | Females | Males | Females | ||
| Limited choice experiments | |||||
| 1. limiting sex: female S. bovis | 60 | 60 | 60 | -- | 8 |
| 2. limiting sex: female S. mansoni | 60 | -- | 60 | 60 | 8 |
| 3. limiting sex: male S. bovis | 60 | 60 | -- | 60 | 8 |
| 4. limiting sex: male S. mansoni | -- | 60 | 60 | 60 | 8 |
| Full choice experiment | |||||
| 5. no limiting sex | 45 | 45 | 45 | 45 | 8 |
| Forced reciprocal mating experiment | |||||
| 6. F1 progeny | -- | 100 | 100 | -- | 4 |
| 6. F1’ progeny | 100 | -- | -- | 100 | 4 |
Table 2.
Snail infection with F1/F1’ miracidia for compatibility testing. Sb: S. bovis, Sm: S. mansoni.
Table 2.
Snail infection with F1/F1’ miracidia for compatibility testing. Sb: S. bovis, Sm: S. mansoni.
| Exp | Intermediate Snail Host (Strain) | Number of Snails Exposed | Progeny |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | Biomphalaria glabrata (Brazil) | 48 | ♂Sb × ♀Sm (F1’) |
| B | Biomphalaria glabrata (Guadeloupe) | 48 | ♂Sb × ♀Sm (F1’) |
| C | Biomphalaria glabrata (Brazil) | 48 | ♀Sb × ♂Sm (F1) |
| D | Biomphalaria glabrata (Guadeloupe) | 48 | ♀Sb × ♂Sm (F1) |
| E | Bulinus truncatus (Morocco) | 48 | ♂Sb × ♀Sm (F1’) |
| F | Bulinus truncatus (Spain) | 48 | ♂Sb × ♀Sm (F1’) |
| G | Bulinus trancatus (Morocco) | 48 | ♀Sb × ♂Sm (F1) |
| H | Bulinus trancatus (Spain) | 48 | ♀Sb × ♂Sm (F1) |
Table 3.
Summarized information (limited choice experiments: exp. 1–4), to show numbers of paired (homo- and hetero-specific) and unpaired worms recovered from mice exposed to a limited combination of cercariae. Expected numbers of pairs under random mating is shown in brackets. Sb: S. bovis, Sm: S. mansoni.
Table 3.
Summarized information (limited choice experiments: exp. 1–4), to show numbers of paired (homo- and hetero-specific) and unpaired worms recovered from mice exposed to a limited combination of cercariae. Expected numbers of pairs under random mating is shown in brackets. Sb: S. bovis, Sm: S. mansoni.
| Exp | Host | Choosing Partner | Homo-Specific Pairs | Hetero-Specific Pairs | Single Worms | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Mouse | ♀Sb | ♀Sb × ♂Sb | ♀Sb × ♂Sm | ♂Sm | ♂Sb |
| 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 4 | ||
| 2 | 8 | 4 | 7 | 4 | ||
| 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 4 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 3 | ||
| 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 7 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | ||
| Total | 28 (30) | 29 (27) | 32 | 24 | ||
| 2. | ♀Sm | ♀Sm × ♂Sm | ♀Sm × ♂Sb | ♂Sm | ♂Sb | |
| 1 | 5 | 1 | 7 | 8 | ||
| 2 | 13 | 4 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 3 | 8 | 1 | 6 | 4 | ||
| 4 | 12 | 0 | 6 | 13 | ||
| 5 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 6 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 3 | ||
| 7 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Total | 66 (54) | 18 (30) | 19 | 30 | ||
| 3. | ♂Sb | ♂Sb × ♀Sb | ♂Sb × ♀Sm | ♀Sm | ♀Sb | |
| 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | ||
| 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 4 | ||
| 3 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 2 | ||
| 4 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 8 | ||
| 5 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 4 | ||
| 6 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | ||
| 7 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 4 | ||
| 8 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | ||
| Total | 11 (16) | 29 (24) | 29 | 30 | ||
| 4. | ♂Sm | ♂Sm × ♀Sm | ♂Sm × ♀Sb | ♀Sm | ♀Sb | |
| 1 | 15 | 1 | 11 | 0 | ||
| 2 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 4 | ||
| 3 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 4 | ||
| 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 5 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 2 | ||
| 6 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 9 | ||
| 7 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 3 | ||
| Total | 67 (55) | 9 (21) | 17 | 23 | ||
Table 4.
Summarized information of homo-specific pairs, hetero-specific pairs and unpaired worms recovered from mice exposed to simultaneous infections to full combinations of cercariae. Expected number of pairs under random mating is shown in brackets. Sb: S. bovis, Sm: S. mansoni.
Table 4.
Summarized information of homo-specific pairs, hetero-specific pairs and unpaired worms recovered from mice exposed to simultaneous infections to full combinations of cercariae. Expected number of pairs under random mating is shown in brackets. Sb: S. bovis, Sm: S. mansoni.
| Exp 5. | Homo-Specific | Homo-Specific | Hetero-Specific | Hetero-Specific | Single Worms | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mouse | ♂Sm × ♀Sm | ♂Sb × ♀Sb | ♂Sm × ♀Sb | ♂Sb × ♀Sm | ♂Sm | ♂Sb | ♀Sm | ♀Sb |
| 1 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| 4 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| 6 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| 8 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 46 (30) | 27 (18) | 25 (36) | 0 (15) | 12 | 14 | 0 | 4 |
Table 5.
Compatibility of F1 progeny of S. bovis (male) × S. mansoni (female) and S. mansoni (male) × S. bovis (female) in Biomphalaria glabrata and Bulinus truncatus. Each snail was exposed to 12 miracidia. Sb: S. bovis, Sm: S. mansoni.
Table 5.
Compatibility of F1 progeny of S. bovis (male) × S. mansoni (female) and S. mansoni (male) × S. bovis (female) in Biomphalaria glabrata and Bulinus truncatus. Each snail was exposed to 12 miracidia. Sb: S. bovis, Sm: S. mansoni.
| Exp | Snail Species | Progeny | Snails Exposed | Snails Surviving | Snails Infected | % of Snails Infected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B. glabrata (Brazil) | ♂Sb × ♀Sm (F1’) | 48 | 46 | 23 | 50 |
| B | B. glabrata (Guadeloupe) | ♂Sb × ♀Sm (F1’) | 48 | 48 | 10 | 20.8 |
| C | B. glabrata (Brazil) | ♀Sb × ♂Sm (F1) | 48 | 48 | 0 | 0 |
| D | B. glabrata (Guadeloupe) | ♀Sb × ♂Sm (F1) | 48 | 48 | 0 | 0 |
| E | B. truncatus (Morocco) | ♂Sb × ♀Sm (F1’) | 48 | 29 | 0 | 0 |
| F | B. truncatus (Spain) | ♂Sb × ♀Sm (F1’) | 48 | 45 | 0 | 0 |
| G | B. truncatus (Morocco) | ♀Sb × ♂Sm ♂ (F1) | 48 | 30 | 1 | 3.3 |
| H | B. truncatus (Spain) | ♀Sb × ♂Sm ♂ (F1) | 48 | 47 | 5 | 10.6 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Onyekwere, A.M.; De Elias-Escribano, A.; Kincaid-Smith, J.; Dametto, S.; Allienne, J.-F.; Rognon, A.; Bargues, M.D.; Boissier, J. Mating Interactions between Schistosoma bovis and S. mansoni and Compatibility of Their F1 Progeny with Biomphalaria glabrata and Bulinus truncatus. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1251. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061251
AMA Style
Onyekwere AM, De Elias-Escribano A, Kincaid-Smith J, Dametto S, Allienne J-F, Rognon A, Bargues MD, Boissier J. Mating Interactions between Schistosoma bovis and S. mansoni and Compatibility of Their F1 Progeny with Biomphalaria glabrata and Bulinus truncatus. Microorganisms. 2022; 10(6):1251. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061251
Chicago/Turabian StyleOnyekwere, Amos Mathias, Alejandra De Elias-Escribano, Julien Kincaid-Smith, Sarah Dametto, Jean-François Allienne, Anne Rognon, Maria Dolores Bargues, and Jérôme Boissier. 2022. "Mating Interactions between Schistosoma bovis and S. mansoni and Compatibility of Their F1 Progeny with Biomphalaria glabrata and Bulinus truncatus" Microorganisms 10, no. 6: 1251. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10061251
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
