Next Article in Journal
Unique Evolution of SARS-CoV-2 in the Second Large Cruise Ship Cluster in Japan
Next Article in Special Issue
Cutaneous Complications of mRNA and AZD1222 COVID-19 Vaccines: A Worldwide Review
Previous Article in Journal
Transcriptional Shift and Metabolic Adaptations during Leishmania Quiescence Using Stationary Phase and Drug Pressure as Models
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Emerging and Re-Emerging Infectious Diseases: Humankind’s Companions and Competitors

by
Nikolaos Spernovasilis
1,*,
Sotirios Tsiodras
2,3 and
Garyphallia Poulakou
3,4
1
School of Medicine, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece
2
Fourth Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, 12462 Athens, Greece
3
School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
4
Third Department of Internal Medicine, Sotiria General Hospital, 11527 Athens, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2022, 10(1), 98; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10010098
Submission received: 24 December 2021 / Accepted: 30 December 2021 / Published: 4 January 2022
Infectious disease outbreaks had a significant impact on shaping the societies and cultures throughout human history. Major epidemics and pandemics such as the bubonic plague, yellow fever, cholera, typhus, and influenza have afflicted humanity over the centuries by determining outcomes of wars, extinguishing empires, and wiping out entire populations [1]. In the 1960s and 1970s, when the public health’s attention had shifted away from acute infections to chronic illnesses because of the emergence of antibiotics and vaccines, the belief that infectious diseases had been defeated was widespread [2,3]. The subsequent epidemics and pandemics, especially the one due to the HIV-1 virus, deconstructed that belief and reminded us of the threats that infectious diseases continued to pose to human health. However, it seems that lessons from these outbreaks were not well learned, and history repeated itself in the case of SARS-CoV-2, resulting in the severe global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Emerging infectious diseases (EIDs) and re-emerging infectious diseases (REIDs) are responsible for a significant proportion of the infectious disease outbreaks that have plagued humanity over the ages. EIDs are infectious diseases that have not occurred in humans before, have occurred previously in humans but affected only small populations in isolated areas, or have occurred in the past but were only recently recognized as distinct diseases caused by infectious agents [4]. REIDs are infectious diseases that constituted significant health problems in a particular geographic area or globally during a previous time period, then declined greatly, but are now again becoming health problems of major importance [4]. Remarkably, specific infectious pathogens, such as influenza viruses, continuously emerge and re-emerge.
Most EIDs and REIDs have a zoonotic origin, denoting that the disease has emerged from an animal and crossed the species barrier to infect humans [5]. The majority of these zoonoses come from wildlife, while others originate from domesticated animals and intensive animal farming [6,7,8]. They are transmitted from animals to humans through direct contact, droplets, water, food, vectors, or fomites [9]. However, as mentioned, not all EIDs and REIDs are zoonoses. Infections due to several multi-drug resistant organisms, such as vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Candida auris, are considered non-zoonotic EIDs that are related to antibiotic overuse and misuse. Irrespective of the origin of an EID or REID, in order for a pathogen to be established in the community, it must be introduced into a vulnerable population and have the ability to spread from human to human and cause disease [10].
The substantial developments in surveillance and diagnostics that have been achieved nowadays led to the realization that the incidence of EIDs and REIDs has increased considerably over the last few decades [11]. These developments improve the detection of outbreaks in general and facilitate the early implementation of response measures. Even after controlling for the reporting effect, the number of EID events worldwide still shows a highly significant relationship with time [7]. Certain geographic areas such as Asia, tropical Africa, and Latin America are more likely to experience EID and REID events [7,12,13,14]. Furthermore, pathogens with a previously distinct geographic distribution can be introduced to new regions more easily these days [15]. This appears to be the case with vector-borne pathogens such as dengue and West Nile viruses, with their expansion to higher latitudes due to climate change and changes in vector distribution [16]. Notably, the aforementioned EID and REID events have diverse potential to give rise to epidemics and pandemics, and their association with critical illness, adverse health outcomes, and the need for isolation measures is variable [17,18,19].
Many factors precipitate the occurrence and transmission of EIDs and REIDs by enabling the infectious agents to evolve in suitable ecological niches, reach and adopt to vulnerable hosts, and spread more easily among their hosts. Such factors include the expanding human population, population aging, urbanization, globalization, climate change, poverty and social inequality, conflicts, migration, wildlife trade and consumption, industrial livestock production, irrational antimicrobial use and the development of resistance in humans and livestock, as well as breaches in implementing public health measures, such as sanitation and vaccination programs (Figure 1; modified from [20]) [20,21,22]. Thus, it is obvious that the emergence and re-emergence of infectious diseases are tightly linked with the scale, pace, intensity, and nature of human activity.
The impact of EIDs and REIDs can be assessed in many different ways, including global mortality and morbidity, economic burden, and social and geopolitical implications. For example, with regard to the COVID-19 pandemic, as of December 2021 there were more than 275 million cases worldwide and more than 5 million recorded deaths [23]. However, the greatest proportion of morbidity (death plus disability) associated with COVID-19 is likely to be due to disability (e.g., long COVID) or delayed deaths due to secondary health sequelae, rather than direct death [24]. Thus, while direct COVID-19 mortality is substantial, it is likely to account for less morbidity (calculated as disability-adjusted life years, DALYs) overall than disability or organ damage in survivors does [24]. It is noteworthy that mental health effects may have huge implications and constitute a pandemic within the pandemic [25]. Regarding the socioeconomic fingerprint of the current pandemic, education, employment, global poverty, public psychology, tourism and the associated industry, global production, logistics, and global trade have all been negatively affected [26]. Although it cannot be quantified precisely, since the pandemic is still ongoing, there is already a huge, unparalleled in human history, loss of economic well-being and social capital, especially among the weaker sections of societies, such as economically and socially deprived citizens.
The above-mentioned discourse showcases the significance of a coordinated and sustained global response to address the threats that EIDs and REIDs pose to humans. This response should be based on a multifaceted approach, under a One Health perspective, which integrates different disciplines and sectors, including veterinary medicine, biology, epidemiology, immunology, human medicine, public health, behavioral and communication science, anthropology, sociology, psychology, education, and others. Focusing on and investing in proactive and preventive strategies and policies, especially in developing countries where resources are limited, along with strengthening surveillance, rapid risk assessment, and risk communication are of paramount importance in order to prevent or detect EIDs and REIDs at an early stage, when more rigorous control options are available. Investing in all aspects of research will lead to a better understanding of the physiology and specific risk factors affecting the spread of high-risk EIDs and REIDs, and to improved preventive and therapeutic interventions.
In this regard, newer epidemiological surveillance tools, such as artificial intelligence [27] and wastewater surveillance [28,29], the evolution of rapid, multiplex, and easy to use diagnostics [30], and the prompt development and evaluation of novel therapeutics with fewer regulatory, legal, and financial hurdles [31], will greatly facilitate a future response. In addition, one of the greatest scientific achievements during the current pandemic was the record-breaking speed in producing safe and effective vaccines against this novel virus, many of which are based on new technology, that have already saved millions of lives across the world [32]. Nevertheless, a critical appraisal of the response to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic will tremendously assist preparedness efforts for the future. Even if we do not completely succeed in outcompeting our emerging, re-emerging, and continuously emerging “companions”, we may identify ways to harmonize our co-existence in a way that minimizes the loss of human life.
In this Special Issue, entitled “Emerging Infectious Diseases and Strategies for Their Prevention and Control”, the contributions from leading authors in the field are intended to improve our understanding regarding the roots of EIDs and REIDs and to expand our knowledge of the appropriate actions to reduce their negative impact on humanity.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to the editorial office of Microorganisms for the assistance in managing and organizing this Special Issue and to all contributing authors and reviewers. We would also like to thank Ognyan Iskrenov for his assistance with Figure 1.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Piret, J.; Boivin, G. Pandemics Throughout History. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 631736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fauci, A.S. Infectious diseases: Considerations for the 21st century. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2001, 32, 675–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Spellberg, B. Dr. William H. Stewart: Mistaken or maligned? Clin. Infect. Dis. 2008, 47, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Tabish, S.A. Recent trends in emerging infectious diseases. Int. J. Health Sci. 2009, 3, V–VIII. [Google Scholar]
  5. World Health Organization. A Brief Guide to Emerging Infectious Diseases and Zoonoses. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/204722 (accessed on 23 December 2021).
  6. Wolfe, N.D.; Dunavan, C.P.; Diamond, J. Origins of major human infectious diseases. Nature 2007, 447, 279–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jones, K.E.; Patel, N.G.; Levy, M.A.; Storeygard, A.; Balk, D.; Gittleman, J.L.; Daszak, P. Global trends in emerging infectious diseases. Nature 2008, 451, 990–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Stephens, P.R.; Gottdenker, N.; Schatz, A.M.; Schmidt, J.P.; Drake, J.M. Characteristics of the 100 largest modern zoonotic disease outbreaks. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2021, 376, 20200535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rahman, M.T.; Sobur, M.A.; Islam, M.S.; Ievy, S.; Hossain, M.J.; El Zowalaty, M.E.; Rahman, A.T.; Ashour, H.M. Zoonotic Diseases: Etiology, Impact, and Control. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. McArthur, D.B. Emerging Infectious Diseases. Nurs. Clin. N. Am. 2019, 54, 297–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Peters, A.; Vetter, P.; Guitart, C.; Lotfinejad, N.; Pittet, D. Understanding the emerging coronavirus: What it means for health security and infection prevention. J. Hosp. Infect. 2020, 104, 440–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Coker, R.J.; Hunter, B.M.; Rudge, J.W.; Liverani, M.; Hanvoravongchai, P. Emerging infectious diseases in southeast Asia: Regional challenges to control. Lancet 2011, 377, 599–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fenollar, F.; Mediannikov, O. Emerging infectious diseases in Africa in the 21st century. New Microbes New Infect. 2018, 26, S10–S18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Yeh, K.B.; Parekh, F.K.; Borgert, B.; Olinger, G.G.; Fair, J.M. Global health security threats and related risks in Latin America. Glob. Secur. Health Sci. Policy 2021, 6, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ogden, N.H.; Gachon, P. Climate change and infectious diseases: What can we expect? Can. Commun. Dis. Rep. 2019, 45, 76–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Caminade, C.; McIntyre, K.M.; Jones, A.E. Impact of recent and future climate change on vector-borne diseases. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2019, 1436, 157–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Woolhouse, M.E.; Brierley, L.; McCaffery, C.; Lycett, S. Assessing the Epidemic Potential of RNA and DNA Viruses. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2016, 22, 2037–2044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Poulakou, G.; Bassetti, M.; Timsit, J.F. Critically ill migrants with infection: Diagnostic considerations for intensive care physicians in Europe. Intensive Care Med. 2016, 42, 245–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fragkou, P.C.; Moschopoulos, C.D.; Karofylakis, E.; Kelesidis, T.; Tsiodras, S. Update in Viral Infections in the Intensive Care Unit. Front. Med. 2021, 8, 575580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mazonakis, N.; Markaki, I.; Spernovasilis, N. How human behavior will lead to the next pandemic. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2021, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Spernovasilis, N.; Markaki, I.; Papadakis, M.; Tsioutis, C.; Markaki, L. Epidemics and pandemics: Is human overpopulation the elephant in the room? Ethics Med. Public Health 2021, 19, 100728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Poulakou, G.; Plachouras, D. Planet’s population on the move, infections on the rise. Intensive Care Med. 2016, 42, 2055–2058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. World Health Organization. Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19). Available online: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019 (accessed on 23 December 2021).
  24. Smith, M.P. Estimating total morbidity burden of COVID-19: Relative importance of death and disability. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2021, 142, 54–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Santomauro, D.F.; Mantilla Herrera, A.M.; Shadid, J.; Zheng, P.; Ashbaugh, C.; Pigott, D.M.; Abbafati, C.; Adolph, C.; Amlag, J.O.; Aravkin, A.Y.; et al. Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet 2021, 398, 1700–1712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wei, X.; Li, L.; Zhang, F. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on socio-economic and sustainability. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2021, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Bastani, H.; Drakopoulos, K.; Gupta, V.; Vlachogiannis, I.; Hadjicristodoulou, C.; Lagiou, P.; Magiorkinis, G.; Paraskevis, D.; Tsiodras, S. Efficient and targeted COVID-19 border testing via reinforcement learning. Nature 2021, 599, 108–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Petala, M.; Kostoglou, M.; Karapantsios, T.; Dovas, C.I.; Lytras, T.; Paraskevis, D.; Roilides, E.; Koutsolioutsou-Benaki, A.; Panagiotakopoulos, G.; Sypsa, V.; et al. Relating SARS-CoV-2 shedding rate in wastewater to daily positive tests data: A consistent model based approach. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 807, 150838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Galani, A.; Aalizadeh, R.; Kostakis, M.; Markou, A.; Alygizakis, N.; Lytras, T.; Adamopoulos, P.G.; Peccia, J.; Thompson, D.C.; Kontou, A.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 wastewater surveillance data can predict hospitalizations and ICU admissions. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 804, 150151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Subali, A.D.; Wiyono, L.; Yusuf, M.; Zaky, M.F.A. The potential of volatile organic compounds-based breath analysis for COVID-19 screening: A systematic review & meta-analysis. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2021, 102, 115589. [Google Scholar]
  31. Diallo, A.; Trøseid, M.; Simensen, V.C.; Boston, A.; Demotes, J.; Olsen, I.C.; Chung, F.; Paiva, J.A.; Hites, M.; Ader, F.; et al. Accelerating clinical trial implementation in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic: Challenges, lessons learned and recommendations from DisCoVeRy and the EU-SolidAct EU response group. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2022, 28, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mallapaty, S.; Callaway, E.; Kozlov, M.; Ledford, H.; Pickrell, J.; Van Noorden, R. How COVID vaccines shaped 2021 in eight powerful charts. Nature 2021, 600, 580–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Factors that precipitate the occurrence and transmission of EIDs and REIDs.
Figure 1. Factors that precipitate the occurrence and transmission of EIDs and REIDs.
Microorganisms 10 00098 g001
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Spernovasilis, N.; Tsiodras, S.; Poulakou, G. Emerging and Re-Emerging Infectious Diseases: Humankind’s Companions and Competitors. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10010098

AMA Style

Spernovasilis N, Tsiodras S, Poulakou G. Emerging and Re-Emerging Infectious Diseases: Humankind’s Companions and Competitors. Microorganisms. 2022; 10(1):98. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10010098

Chicago/Turabian Style

Spernovasilis, Nikolaos, Sotirios Tsiodras, and Garyphallia Poulakou. 2022. "Emerging and Re-Emerging Infectious Diseases: Humankind’s Companions and Competitors" Microorganisms 10, no. 1: 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms10010098

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop