Next Article in Journal
Learning of Basic Life Support through the Flipped Classroom in Secondary Schoolchildren: A Quasi-Experimental Study with 12-Month Follow-Up
Previous Article in Journal
A Novel Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Radiomics and Clinical Predictive Model for the Regrowth of Postoperative Residual Tumor in Non-Functioning Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumor
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluation of Headache Trends among Undergraduate First Responders for Medical Emergencies at Saudi University in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

by
Abdullah M. Alobaid
1,
Wajid Syed
2,* and
Mahmood Basil A. Al-Rawi
3
1
Department of Accident and Trauma, Prince Sultan bin Abdulaziz College for Emergency Medical Services, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
3
Department of Optometry, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2023, 59(9), 1522; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59091522
Submission received: 23 June 2023 / Revised: 11 August 2023 / Accepted: 20 August 2023 / Published: 23 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Neurology)

Abstract

:
Background and objective: Headache is more common among students and may be a crucial indication of mental health; it can have a detrimental impact if left untreated, especially on students, and may affect their academic performance. Thus, this study aimed to assess the headache trends among undergraduate first responders for medical emergencies at Saudi University in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Method: A cross-sectional study was undertaken over three months in 2023 to analyze headache patterns among emergency medical services (EMS) students using prevalidated questionnaires. The data were collected via convenience sampling and processed with the IBM SPSS Statistics 26 program (IBM Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Results: The current findings show that the majority 90.6% (n = 164) of the participants had at least one episode of headache in the last week. With regard to the number of days students had a headache during the last week, 21.5% (n = 39) of them reported 2 days, while 18.8% (n = 34) reported 1 day only. About slightly less than half (48.6% (n = 88)) of students reported that the usual site of the headache was frontal, followed by temporal 27.1% (n = 49), and 23.3% (n = 42) reported orbital. When students were asked whether a headache aggravates their routine activity, 40.3% agreed with this statement, and 44.2% of students reported that a headache causes them to avoid their routine activity (reading writing, attending college). The majority of the students considered taking analgesics (60.8%), followed by sleeping (26.5%), caffeine (14.4%), and herbal and alternative remedies (7.7%) for the relief of headaches. Although headache episodes were significantly associated with routine activities (reading writing, attending college) (p = 0.018, t = 2.282) daily activities (walking, running) (p = 0.022, t = 2.307). The findings showed that fourth-year EMS students were found to have higher headache pain intensity scores compared to other students (p = 0.046). Similarly, the pain intensity was significantly higher among the students between 1–3 and >7 episodes of headaches (p = 0.001) Conclusion: The findings of this study revealed that Saudi emergency medical services students suffer from headaches. However, the current findings revealed variation in the headache pain intensity scores concerning the year of study.

1. Introduction

The World Health Organization (WHO) reported that over half of the adult population had a headache in the preceding year, yet the afflicted individuals never went to a healthcare facility for seeking headache treatment, instead preferring to manage their headaches themselves using alternative treatments [1,2]. Earlier studies reported that headache is more prevalent among university students in comparison to other populations [3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Headache is a very common neurological disorder that affects people of all ages and genders. It is associated with personal and social difficulties such as discomfort, incapacity, decreased quality of life, and financial implications [1]. The incidence and prevalence of headaches are significantly different concerning population and headache types [5,6,7,8]. According to recent estimates, 75% of adults around the world suffer from headaches, and primary headaches are the most common public health concern that goes untreated [3]. Adults in the United States had a prevalence of 15.9%, whereas adults in the United Kingdom had a prevalence of 15% [4,5]. According to a recent assessment in a small region of Saudi Arabia, 3% of adults suffer from headaches [6]. On the contrary, data about students revealed a higher prevalence of headaches [7,8,9,10]. For instance, the prevalence of headaches among Saudi medical students was 53.8% [7], and among female students, it was 68.4% (Desouky et al., 2019) [8]. Among Ethiopian undergraduates, it was 34% [9]. A 73.1% prevalence was found in a recent study by Panigrahi et al. among Indian students [10]. On the other hand, the prevalence was very high, 96%, among Omani medical students [11]. Similar findings were found in recent research on pharmacy nursing students, showing that 66.1% of the participants experienced at least one episode of headache [12]. There was evidence that the prevalence of headaches among healthcare students in comparison to other categories of students is much higher, with an estimate of 91% [13,14,15,16]. Additionally, studies nationally and internationally reported that undergraduates suffer from a high frequency of headaches [7,8,9,10,11,12].
Despite being very common, headaches interrupt students’ academic behavior and workplace environment, and limitations in academic activities result in lower performance in their student life [17,18,19]. The incidence of headaches was increasingly more common among young adults [20]. The most common causes of headaches among students were exposure to extreme stress, which was related to curriculum, examinations, study load, sleeping issues, lifestyle behaviors such as smoking, excessive coffee/soft drink intake, family history, or genetics [21,22,23]. Other studies revealed that greater use of digital technology is connected with an increased risk of headache, as is prolonged computer usage and excessive (>4 h/day) use of video games among teenagers [4,5]. Furthermore, increased smartphone use has been connected to headache, sleep disruption, cognitive impairment, and weariness, with call frequency being strongly tied to headache risk [6].
Over the past several decades, both nationally and internationally, the number of patients visiting emergency departments (EDs) has constantly increased [24,25]. Because of how they care for patients in difficult circumstances, EMS professionals are in more demand every day. In emergencies or at the time of any disaster, they are required to act quickly and efficiently to save lives and minimize injuries. Natural and human-made disasters are becoming more common around the world, resulting in loss of life and property as well as infrastructure damage [24,25]. Today students are tomorrow’s professionals. It is well known that stress, the difference in working shifts, and workload are more common among EMS personnel, which increases the chances of having headaches, compared to other professionals or students, which raises the issues of mental disturbances among first responders for emergencies, since they are the healthcare providers in difficult situations or emergencies. Furthermore, EMS students are required to perform their activities in an emergency promptly, have longer class or practical hours, and have high levels of stress, which may impair their academic performance and general quality of life. A few studies have been conducted on headache disorders among medical, pharmacy, and healthcare students [7,8,9,10,11,12], but no study has examined headache disorders among EMS students. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the headache trends among healthcare students at a university in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

2. Methods

2.1. Design and Ethical Aspects

A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was performed among emergency medical service (EMS) students at King Saud University’s Prince Sultan College for Emergency Medical Services in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from March to May 2023. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of King Saud University (protocol code E-23-8027) College of Medicine, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

The target population consisted of all students over the age of 18 who commonly suffered from headaches, could speak Arabic or English, and agreed to participate in the study by signing a consent form. Students with headaches caused by viruses, hangovers, colds, or head injuries, as well as those who did not meet the inclusion requirements, were eliminated from the study. The participants were informed that the data would only be used for research purposes and would be kept anonymous during the study. Others who did not meet the inclusion criteria were ruled out.

2.3. Sample Size

The necessary sample size was determined using a computerized sample size calculator (http://www.raosoft.com/samplesize.html. accessed on 1 June 2023) that has been used in an array of prior studies [26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. On the KSU campus, in the College of EMS, there were about 300 students from whom the required sample size was obtained at a 95% confidence interval (CI) and a 5% margin of error (ME). To calculate the sample size, we used a 5% non-response rate, which led to a sample size of 194. Nevertheless, we ultimately included 200 students in our study to increase the reliability.

2.4. Questionnaire Design and Data Collection

The questionnaire intended to assess headaches and their trends among EMS students was adapted from similar studies [12]. The questionnaire was broken into three pieces. The first component included demographic and clinical measures that assessed participants’ characteristics such as age, gender, and information about their headaches. The second section included six items about the characteristics and patterns of headaches, such as the location of the headache, headache and routine activity, and symptoms that are accompanied or followed by headache. The final section discussed the severity of pain and other symptoms related to headaches, as well as management strategies (11 items). All of these questions were graded using binary responses, continuous scales, and multiple-choice answers.
The questionnaire draft was initially created in English, and a research team analyzed it to ensure that the text was clear and accurate. To ensure the readability and simplicity of administration of the questionnaires, a pilot study was conducted among a randomly chosen small sample of students (n = 30). The outcomes of the pilot investigation were excluded from the final analysis. Using Cronbach’s alpha, the questionnaire’s reliability was assessed, and the result was 0.79, indicating that the questionnaire was reliable for use in the study. The final study questionnaire was delivered by personally visiting students who were currently enrolled and present at the time of data collection each year. A team of researchers trailed students to collect as many responses as possible. To eliminate duplicate responses, participants were advised to complete the questionnaire just once, regardless of how they obtained it.

2.5. Data Analysis

The data were analyzed with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) (version 26 for Windows) (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The demographic and clinical variables were combined using frequencies (n) and percentiles (%), the mean (M), and the standard deviation (STD). To assess the differences between the variables at a 95% confidence interval (CI), and with p values of 0.05 indicating a significant difference, to compare means for two groups and more than two groups, independent t-tests and one-way ANOVA tests were utilized.

3. Results

3.1. Demographic and Clinical Characteristics

A total of 200 students were recruited for the study, and 181 of them completed the questionnaires, yielding a response rate of 90.5% (Figure 1). Ninety-five percent (n = 172) of the participants were between the ages of 18 and 22. The second-year students dominated with 38.7% (n = 70), followed by the third-year students with 35.4% (n = 64) and the fourth-year students with 17.1% (n = 31). The mean age of the students who suffered from headaches was 20.4 (SD = 1.90). The current findings show that the majority (n = 164; 90.6%) of the participants had at least one episode of headache in the last week. With regard to the number of days students had a headache during the last week, 21.5% (n = 39) of them reported 2 days, while 18.8% (n = 34) reported 1 day only. On the other hand, 74%(n = 134) of the participants reported 1 to 3 episodes of headache per day. Furthermore, 56.6% (n = 103) of the students reported 5–6 h, while 14.3% (n = 26) of the students reported that their headache lasted between 1 and 4 h. On the other hand, 18.1% (n = 33) of the students reported between 40 and 60 min, and only 1.6% (n = 3) of them reported 7–30 min (<30 min). Students’ frequencies for the demographic characteristics are shown in Table 1.

3.2. Characteristics of Headaches among Participants

About slightly less than half (48.6% (n = 88)) of students reported that the usual site of the headache was frontal, followed by temporal 27.1% (n = 49), and 23.3% (n = 42) reported orbital, although two-thirds of the students (60.8% (n = 110)) reported as bilateral while more than one-third (39.2% (n = 71)) reported a unilateral type of headache. Usually, 52.5% (n = 95) reported headache quality as pressing/tightening, while 40.9% (n = 74) described it as throbbing/pulsating. When students were asked whether a headache aggravates their routine activity, 40.3% agreed with this statement, and 44.2% of students reported that a headache causes them to avoid their routine activity. Detailed information is illustrated in Table 2.
For instance, students reported that headaches were usually associated with photophobia; 33.7% revealed that they were sensitive to light, and only 27.6% revealed that the headaches were phonophobic. More than one-third (38.1%) of the students had a family history of headaches. Only 13.3% of students sought medical attention for headaches; in this study, 22% of undergraduate EMS students reported that they did not have any aura symptoms, while 13.2% had wavy lines or spots as aura symptoms. Detailed information about aura symptoms is illustrated in Figure 2.
In this study, one hundred sixteen (61.1%) students reported that their headaches stopped upon the use of medications or therapies. When asked students about their headaches being usually accompanied or preceded by vomiting, only 6.6% agreed that they lightly vomited, while most of the students (86.7%) disagreed. Similarly, when asked about their headaches being usually accompanied or preceded by nausea, only 19.5% reported that they had nausea (Table 3).

3.3. Management of Headache

Participants’ usage of medications and therapies for headaches is shown in Figure 3. Of the participants, 60.8% considered taking analgesics, while 26.5% considered sleeping, followed by caffeine consumption (14.4%) and herbal and alternative remedies (7.7%). However, as indicated in Figure 3, 17.1% of the individuals did not consider using any headache drugs.

3.4. Association between Pain Intensity and Student Characteristics

Table 4 describes the differences between pain intensity scores and participant characteristics (episodes of headache and year of study). According to the findings, the year of study has a significant difference with regard to headache pain intensity (p = 0.046), where fourth-year students were found to have higher headache pain intensity compared to other students (2.0645 ± 2.43; p = 0.046). Similarly, the pain intensity was significantly higher among students suffering from 1–3 episodes and >7 episodes of headaches (p = 0.001), as shown in Table 4.

3.5. Association between Participant Headache Episodes and Characteristics

The current findings showed that photophobia and phonophobia are not significantly associated with the episodes of headache per day (p = 0.116, t = 2.054, 95% CI = 0.01827–0.91685) (p = 0.257, t = 1.385, 95% CI = −0.14244–0.81320). Similarly, the family history of the students was also not significantly associated with the episodes of headache (p = 0.579, t = 0.934, 95% CI = −0.23376–0.65393). However, headache episodes were significantly associated with routine activities (reading writing, attending college; p = 0.018, t = 2.282) and daily activities (walking, running) (p = 0.022, t = 2.307). A detailed description is given in Table 5.

4. Discussion

The discussion of this study includes a summary of some assessment studies that have been conducted on the prevalence, frequencies, and characteristics of headaches both nationally and internationally [9,10,11,12]. This cross-sectional study was carried out among EMS students at a college connected with King Saud University in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. According to our findings, 90.6% of the EMS students who took part in the survey reported at least one headache episode in the previous week. A study of female university students in Saudi Arabia found that 77% of them suffered headaches, with 58.4% having migraines and 41.6% having tension headaches [8]. In the regional context, a study conducted among health science university students of both sexes in India [20] and Ethiopia [36] found that headaches were prevalent in 63.9% and 67.22% of the participants, respectively [20,36]. The likely reasons for this discrepancy could be academic stress (studying for tests and/or examinations), altered sleeping patterns, absence of study breaks, and excessive workload.
The findings of the current study showed a negative attitude toward EMS students’ headaches and their routine activities, about 44.3% of students believed that headaches cause them to avoid routine activities. In contrast, other researchers reported that 71.3% of participants’ daily tasks were reduced due to the occurrence of headaches [37]. Conversely, a previous study by Menon and Kinnera in 2013 [38] reported 84% of students’ routine activities were aggravated by headaches. These findings were inconsistent with our findings where 40.3% of the EMS students in the current study agreed that their routine activities were aggravated by headaches. However, our findings were somewhat similar to previous findings by Bashatah et al., among pharmacy and nursing undergraduates, where the authors found that 34.7% of the participants were aggravated by headaches [12]. The current and previous findings indicate a heavy burden of stress, and it is important to identify the factors correlated with headaches and their aggravation.
A large proportion of EMS students in this study used analgesics and anti-inflammatories for treating headaches. However, our results were consistent with the other studies conducted by Ojini et al., among medical students at the University of Lagos, Nigeria [39]; Alkarrash et al., among healthcare students at the University of Aleppo [40]; and Al Hassan et al., among female students of King Faisal University, in Saudi Arabia [41], who reported that 68.2%, 66.4% and 64.9% of students used paracetamol for the management of headaches, respectively. In contrast, our study results were higher than those of a previous study conducted among female students in Taif (53.9%) and nursing students in India (36.76%) who preferred analgesics such as paracetamol for treating their headaches [8,20]. The most common reasons given as a justification to indulge in paracetamol, often recommended as one of the first treatments for headaches, are that it is one of the safest drugs and most widely used over-the-counter painkillers in the world and that side effects are rare [20,41]. Overall, the rate of using analgesics such as paracetamol for headaches observed here was similar to that in most of the studies conducted in Saudi Arabia and higher than that reported in other parts of the world. However, most of our students prefer sleeping and caffeine as other medications/therapies for headaches. Public health authorities such as the American Migraine Foundation and Medscape reported that good sleep often predicts relief from headaches. Outcome-based education could be an effective approach to bridging the gap between knowledge and practice [42,43].
The students’ low proclivity for any form of consultation was a noteworthy finding in our study; only 13.3% of them sought treatment from healthcare providers. A prior survey of medical students found that just 4.6% sought medical assistance [38]. A comparable study conducted among medical, dentistry, and pharmaceutical students at Aleppo University in Syria found that 15.9% sought medical advice [40]. A recent statewide survey of Polish cohorts, on the other hand, found that headache sufferers between the ages of 18 and 22 years waited an average of 2 years from the onset of symptoms to consult with medical specialists [44]. These data revealed that students and parents lacked knowledge regarding headache management and therapy [44], and it is worth noting that the student’s belief that headache is not a serious illness was also the main pretest finding among university students. An important point in our study was the students’ low tendencies to consult for medical assistance might be due to their belief that they were equipped with sufficient knowledge of self-medication to manage their headaches in addition to easy access to over-the-counter medicines. The majority (60.8%) of the study respondents had bilateral headaches, and this was also in line with the findings of the most comparable studies conducted by Bhat et al. among dental students (60.3%), Antonenko et al. among medical students (80.9%), and Bashatah et al. among pharmacy and nursing students (49.6%), which reported that respondents had a bilateral localization of their headaches [45,46].
In this study, 40.9% of the students indicated a throbbing/pulsating type of headache pain, followed by 52.5% with a pressing or tightening pain type, and 21% of them had sharp or stabbing headache pain. These findings were similar to previous findings presented by Bhat et al. and Bashatah et al. among healthcare students [12,45], of whom 61.9%, 22%, and 16.1% reported throbbing, pressing, and stabbing headache pain [12,45]. Similarly, another study reported that 23.7% of the students reported pressing headaches, 19.7% of the students reported stabbing headaches, and 23.7% of the students reported throbbing headaches [45]. It is perceived that students, particularly healthcare students, engage in many hours of reading, which may be a factor causing headaches among students [47,48].
The most common risk factors for headaches among students were anxiety, stress from their education, a lack of proper vacation time, and a family history of headaches [47,48]. Lack of sleep, intellectual exertion, and stress were also reported in other studies [48,49]. Similarly, Panigrahi et al. discovered that being a female, difficulty going to sleep, difficulty staying asleep, soft drink intake, and self-dissatisfaction with one’s health were all connected with headache [10]. As a result, it is crucial to address these factors by quick monitoring, and identifying triggering factors is an important step in reducing the frequency and severity of headaches and related difficulties. As a result, academics, health professionals, and all other interested parties must dedicate sufficient attention to developing headache prevention and treatment strategies.
In this study headache episodes had a significant association with routine activities (reading, writing, attending college) (p = 0.018, t = 2.282) and everyday activities (walking, jogging) (p = 0.022, t = 2.307). Furthermore, when compared to other students, fourth-year EMS students had greater headache pain intensity scores (p = 0.046). Similarly, the severity of discomfort was considerably higher among students who had 1–3 and >7 occurrences of headaches (p = 0.001). While a comparable study found that students’ age, gender, course of study, smoking habit, and kind of headache were all associated with headache intensity, headache intensity was also associated with routine activity (p = 0.0001). [12]. This indicates that undergraduates suffer from headaches, which may occur due to a variety of factors, factors related to learning to load in their academics, burden of exams and presentations, which may lead to sleeplessness and stress full days and nights. There may be certain limitations to our study. The study was conducted at a single college in a single university in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, so the results may not accurately reflect the headaches posed by all healthcare undergraduates in Saudi Arabia or other countries. Additionally, the data included in this study were restricted to only emergency medical services students. Third, as women are still not allowed to attend college alongside men in Saudi Arabia and because both male and female colleges have separate campuses, the survey did not include women because there were few responses and therefore excluded from the study. Although policymakers may be able to perform a timely assessment of social issues using the findings of this kind of assessment and make recommendations as a result.

5. Conclusions

Given the study’s findings, 90.6% of the students suffered from at least one episode of headache suggesting that headaches are the most frequently occurring neurological condition that disturbs their academic life and further leads to stressful days and nights. The current findings also revealed that headaches interfere with daily activities, which may lead to absenteeism, from college, and lower students’ grades or even cause them to fail in their academic careers. The analgesics, sleeping, and use of caffeine were the most common management approaches among the students. We advise headache sufferers to always try to stay hydrated, use relaxation techniques like head massage and hot or cold compresses to the head or neck, avoid mobile devices and screens to give their eyes breaks, rest in a quiet place, and recognize and avoid the foods that cause headaches for the best headache control. Additionally, having adequate sleep, use of little caffeine are other best ways to control the headache and its severity. Consequently, we advocate for the implementation of educational initiatives that would educate students about headache prevention and treatment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M.A. and W.S.; methodology, M.B.A.A.-R.; software, W.S.; validation, A.M.A., W.S. and M.B.A.A.-R.; formal analysis, W.S.; investigation, A.M.A.; resources, A.M.A.; data curation, A.M.A.; writing—original draft preparation, W.S.; writing—review and editing, A.M.A.; visualization, M.B.A.A.-R.; supervision, A.M.A.; project administration, A.M.A.; funding acquisition, W.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed the receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was funded by the Research Supporting Project number (RSPD-2023R1099), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of King Saud University (protocol code E-23-8027) College of medicine, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data used for this study will be made available from the corresponding author upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors of this study extend their appreciation to the Researcher Supporting Project, (RSPD-2023R1099), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, for supporting this study and for funding this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest concerning the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Headache Disorders. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/headache-disorders (accessed on 17 January 2022).
  2. GBD 2016 Headache Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of migraine and tension-type headache, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2018, 17, 954–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Goadsby, P.J.; Lantéri-Minet, M.; Michel, M.C.; Peres, M.; Shibata, M.; Straube, A.; Wijeratne, T.; Ebel-Bitoun, C.; Constantin, L.; Hitier, S. 21st century headache: Mapping new territory. J. Headache Pain 2021, 22, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Steiner, T.J.; Macgregor, E.A.; Davies, P.T.G. Guidelines for All Healthcare Professionals in the Diagnosis and Management of Migraine, Tension-Type, Cluster and Medication-Overuse Headache, 3rd ed.; 1st Revision; British Association for the Study of Headache: Kingston upon Hull, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  5. Burch, R.; Rizzoli, P.; Loder, E. The prevalence and impact of migraine and severe headache in the United States: Updated age, sex, and socioeconomic-specific estimates from government health surveys. Headache 2021, 61, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Almalki, D.; Shubair, M.M.; Al-Khateeb, B.F.; Alshammari, R.A.O.; Alshahrani, S.M.; Aldahash, R.; Angawi, K.; Alsalamah, M.; Al-Zahrani, J.; Al-Ghamdi, S.; et al. The Prevalence of Headache and Associated Factors in Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Pain Res. Manag. 2021, 2021, 6682094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Almesned, I.S.; Alqahtani, N.G.; Alarifi, J.; Alsaawy, T.N.; Agha, S.; Alhumaid, M. Prevalence of primary headache among medical students at King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. J. Fam. Med. Prim. Care 2018, 7, 1193–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Desouky, D.E.; Zaid, H.A.; Taha, A.A. Migraine, tension-type headache, and depression among Saudi female students in Taif University. J. Egypt. Public Health Assoc. 2019, 94, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Birkie, M.; Endris, M.; Asnakew, S. Determinants of migraine headache among regular undergraduate students, of Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia: Cross–sectional study. BMC Neurol. 2021, 21, 443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Panigrahi, A.; Behera, B.K.; Sarma, N.N. Prevalence, pattern, and associated psychosocial factors of headache among undergraduate students of health profession. Clin. Epidemiol. Glob. Health 2020, 8, 365–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Deleu, D.; Khan, M.; Humaidan, H.; Al Mantheri, Z.; Al Hashami, S. Prevalence and Clinical Characteristics of Headache in Medical Students in Oman. Headache 2001, 41, 798–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bashatah, A.S.; Syed, W.; Al-Rawi, M.B.; Arifi, M.N. Assessment of Headache Characteristics, Impact, and Managing Techniques among Pharmacy and Nursing Undergraduates—An Observational Study. Medicina 2023, 59, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Anaya, F.; Abu Alia, W.; Hamoudeh, F.; Nazzal, Z.; Maraqa, B. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of headache among medical students in Palestine: A cross sectional study. BMC Neurol. 2022, 22, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hering-Hanit, R.; Gadoth, N. Caffeine-Induced Headache in Children and Adolescents. Cephalalgia 2003, 23, 332–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Jennum, P.; Jensen, R. Sleep and headache. Sleep Med. Rev. 2002, 6, 471–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lebedeva, E.R.; Kobzeva, N.R.; Gilev, D.V.; Kislyak, N.V.; Olesen, J. Psychosocial factors associated with migraine and tension-type headache in medical students. Cephalalgia 2017, 37, 1264–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Linde, M.; Dahlöf, C. Attitudes and Burden of disease among Self-Considered Migraineurs—A Nation-wide Population-based Survey in Sweden. Cephalalgia 2004, 24, 455–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rasmussen, B.K.; Jensen, R.; Olesen, J. Impact of headache on sickness absence and utilisation of medical services: A Danish population study. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 1992, 46, 443–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zwart, J.-A.; Dyb, G.; Hagen, K.; Ødegård, K.J.; Dahl, A.A.; Bovim, G.; Stovner, L.J. Depression and anxiety disorders associated with headache frequency. The Nord-Trøndelag Health Study. Eur. J. Neurol. 2003, 10, 147–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nandha, R.; Chhabra, M. Prevalence and clinical characteristics of headache in dental students of a tertiary care teaching dental hospital in Northern India. Int. J. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. 2013, 2, 51–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Iliopoulos, P.; Damigos, D.; Kerezoudi, E.; Limpitaki, G.; Xifaras, M.; Skiada, D.; Tsagkovits, A.; Skapinakis, P. Trigger factors in primary headaches subtypes: A cross-sectional study from a tertiary centre in Greece. BMC Res. Notes 2015, 8, 393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Straube, A.; Pfaffenrath, V.; Ladwig, K.-H.; Meisinger, C.; Hoffmann, W.; Fendrich, K.; Vennemann, M.; Berger, K. Prevalence of chronic migraine and medication overuse headache in Germany—The German DMKG headache study. Cephalalgia 2010, 30, 207–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Samreen, S.; Siddiqui, N.A.; Mothana, R.A. Prevalence of Anxiety and Associated Factors among Pharmacy Students in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study. BioMed Res. Int. 2020, 2020, 2436538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Steeps, R.J.; Wilfong, D.A.; Hubble, M.W.; Bercher, D.L. Emergency Medical Services Professionals’ Attitudes About Community Paramedic Programs. West J. Emerg. Med. 2017, 18, 630–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Tang, N.; Stein, J.; Hsia, R.Y.; Maselli, J.H.; Gonzales, R. Trends and Characteristics of US Emergency Department Visits, 1997–2007. JAMA 2010, 304, 664–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Alhazmi, R.A.; Alobaid, A.M.; Althunayyan, S.M.; Syed, W.; Al-Rawi, M.B.A. A cross-sectional assessment of knowledge, awareness of risk factors, and perceptions of thyroid disease (TD) among adults living in Saudi Arabia-A community based study. Front. Public Health 2022, 10, 1041745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Syed, W.; Samarkandi, O.A.; Alsadoun, A.; Al Harbi, M.K.; Al-Rawi, M.B.A. Evaluation of clinical knowledge and perceptions about the development of thyroid cancer—An observational study of healthcare undergraduates in Saudi Arabia. Front. Public Health 2022, 10, 912424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Syed, W.; Samarkandi, O.A.; Al Sadoun, A.; Bashatah, A.S.; Al-Rawi, M.B.A.; Alharbi, M.K. Prevalence, Beliefs, and the Practice of the Use of Herbal and Dietary Supplements Among Adults in Saudi Arabia: An Observational Study. Inq. J. Health Care Organ. Provis. Financ. 2022, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Syed, W.; Alharbi, M.K.; Samarkandi, O.A.; Alsadoun, A.; Al-Rawi, M.B.A.; Iqbal, A.; Samreen, S. Evaluation of Knowledge, Awareness, and Factors Associated with Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Community-Based Study. Int. J. Endocrinol. 2022, 2022, 1921010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Syed, W.; Alsadoun, A.; Bashatah, A.S.; Al-Rawi, M.B.A.; Siddiqui, N. Assessment of the knowledge beliefs and associated factors among Saudi adults towards blood donation in Saudi Arabia. Hematology 2022, 27, 412–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wajid, S.; Samreen, S.; Sales, I.; Bawazeer, G.; Mahmoud, M.A.; Aljohani, M.A. What Has Changed in the Behaviors of the Public After the COVID-19 Pandemic? A Cross-Sectional Study From the Saudi Community Perspective. Front. Public Health 2022, 10, 723229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Syed, W.; Iqbal, A.; Siddiqui, N.A.; Mothana, R.A.; Noman, O. Attitudes and Associated Demographic Factors Contributing towards the Abuse of Illicit Drugs: A Cross-Sectional Study from Health Care Students in Saudi Arabia. Medicina 2022, 58, 322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Syed Snr, W.; Bashatah, A.; AAl-Rawi, M.B. Evaluation of Knowledge of Food–Drug and Alcohol–Drug Interactions Among Undergraduate Students at King Saud University–An Observational Study. J. Multidiscip. Healthc. 2022, 1, 2623–2633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bashatah, A.; Wajid, S. Knowledge and Disposal Practice of Leftover and Expired Medicine: A Cross-Sectional Study from Nursing and Pharmacy Students’ Perspectives. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Samreen, S.; Siddiqui, N.A.; Wajid, S.; Mothana, R.A.; Almarfadi, O.M. Prevalence and Use of Dietary Supplements Among Pharmacy Students in Saudi Arabia. Risk Manag. Health Policy 2020, 13, 1523–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Qazi, T.B.; Saleem, S.M.; Khan, M.S. Perceived cause and characteristics of headache among undergraduate medical students of Government Medical College, Srinagar: A cross-sectional study. Curr. Med. Issues 2020, 18, 285–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Basdav, J.; Haffejee, F.; Puckree, T. Impact of headaches on university students in Durban, South Africa. Springerplus 2016, 5, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Menon, B.; Kinnera, N. Prevalence and characteristics of migraine in medical students and its impact on their daily activities. Ann. Indian Acad. Neurol. 2013, 16, 221–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ojini, F.; Okubadejo, N.; Danesi, M. Prevalence and Clinical Characteristics of Headache in Medical Students of the University of Lagos, Nigeria. Cephalalgia 2009, 29, 472–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Alkarrash, M.S.; Shashaa, M.N.; Kitaz, M.N.; Rhayim, R.; Alhasan, M.M.; Alassadi, M.; Aldakhil, A.; Alkhamis, M.; Ajam, M.; Douba, M.; et al. Migraine and tension-type headache among undergraduate medical, dental and pharmaceutical students of University of Aleppo: A cross-sectional study. BMJ Neurol. Open 2021, 3, e000211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Al-Hassanl, E.S.; Al-Mulifi, A.A.; Al-Khudhayr, A.M.; Al-Quraini, A.W.; Al-Omran, A.M.; Al-Musallam, E.J.; Al-Rashed, B.A.; Al-Mubarak, D.A.; Al-Yousof, H.M.; Al-Khalifa, K.R.; et al. Prevalence of headache in female students in King Faisal University: A questionnaire study. Int. J. Sci. Res. 2013, 5, 256–260. [Google Scholar]
  42. Khairoalsindi, O.A.; Saber, W.K.; Althubaiti, N.A.; Alshareef, E.F.; Almekhlafi, M.A. Primary headache characters and coping strategies among medical students of Umm Al-Qura University in the Western Region of Saudi Arabia. Neurosciences (Riyadh) 2018, 23, 308–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Medscape. Migraine Headache Treatment & Management. Approach Considerations. Available online: https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1142556-treatment (accessed on 25 January 2023).
  44. Waliszewska-Prosół, M.; Straburzyński, M.; Czapińska-Ciepiela, E.K.; Nowaczewska, M.; Gryglas-Dworak, A.; Budrewicz, S. Migraine symptoms, healthcare resources utilization and disease burden in a large Polish migraine cohort: Results from ‘Migraine in Poland’—A nationwide cross-sectional survey. J. Headache Pain 2023, 24, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Bhat, N.; Jain, S.; Singh, A.; Wadhwani, A.; Mansuri, R.; Bhat, S.; Kaur, H.; Gandhi, N. Prevalence and Characteristic of Headache in Dental Professionals: A Questionnaire Based Survey. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2016, 10, ZC107-10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Antonenko, K.; Poliukhovych, O.; Antonenko, A.; Sokolova, L. Prevalence and severity of headache in medical students during quarantine due to COVID-19. Eur. J. Neurol. 2021, 28 (Suppl. 1), 485. [Google Scholar]
  47. Bhattarai, A.M.; Gurung, S.; Pathak, B.D.; Karki, S.; Adhikari, A.; Tandon, O.P.; Poudel, S.; Yadav, D.; Pant, C.; Dhakal, B. Prevalence and clinical characteristics of headache among medical students of Nepal: A cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0277821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Birru, E.M.; Abay, Z.; Abdelwuhab, M.; Basazn, A.; Sirak, B.; Teni, F.S. Management of headache and associated factors among undergraduate medicine and health science students of University of Gondar, North West Ethiopia. J. Headache Pain 2016, 17, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Mirghani, H.O.; Altemani, R.F.H.; Alharthi, Y.H.J.; Alotaibi, M.A.R.; Alamrani, A.M.A.; Altawili, A.A.; Mohammed, A.A.; Alzahrani, M.Y.M.; Bawadood, M.A.A.; Al Qurashi, A.M.; et al. Prevalence of Tension-Type Headache among Medical Students in Tabuk University, Saudi Arabia. J. Pharm. Res. Int. 2021, 33, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Flowchart of the responses.
Figure 1. Flowchart of the responses.
Medicina 59 01522 g001
Figure 2. Symptoms that are accompanied or followed by headache episodes.
Figure 2. Symptoms that are accompanied or followed by headache episodes.
Medicina 59 01522 g002
Figure 3. Medications/therapies used for headaches.
Figure 3. Medications/therapies used for headaches.
Medicina 59 01522 g003
Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of undergraduates (n = 181).
Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of undergraduates (n = 181).
ParametersFrequency (n)Percentage (%)
Year of Study
2nd year
3rd year
4th year
Final year

70
64
31
16

38.7%
35.4%
17.1%
8.8%
Marital status
Married
Single/unmarried

4
177

2.2%
97.8%
Have you experienced at least one headache in the recent week?
Yes
No

164
17

90.6%
9.4%
How many days have you had a headache in the last week?
0-days
1-day
2-days
3-days
4-days
5-days
6-days
7-days

22
34
39
28
19
20
08
11

12.2%
18.8%
21.5%
15.5%
10.5%
11.0%
4.4%
6.1%
Concerning the previous question, how many episodes do you have per day?
At least one episode
Between 1 and 3 episodes
Between 4 and 6 episodes
>7 episodes


33
134
12
2


18.2%
74%
6.6%
1.1%
The duration of each episode (in hours/seconds) *
7–30 min
40–60 min
1–4 h
5–6 h

3
33
26
103

1.6%
18.1%
14.3%
56.6%
* = missing response; n = frequency; % = percentile.
Table 2. Headache characteristics among participants.
Table 2. Headache characteristics among participants.
VariablesFrequency
n (%)
The site of the headache
Frontal
Occipital
Vertical
Temporal
Generalized
Orbital

88 (48.6%)
31 (17.1%)
16 (8.8%)
49 (27.1%)
21 (11.6%)
42 (23.2%)
Your headache is
Bilateral
Unilateral

110 (60.8%)
71 (39.2%)
Characteristics of the headache pain
Throbbing/pulsating
Pressing/tightening
Sharp/stabbing

74 (40.9%)
95 (52.5%)
38 (21.0%)
Do routine academic activities (like going to college, reading, and writing) increase your headache?
Yes
No

73 (40.3%)
108 (59.7%)
Do you avoid normal activities (walking, running) because of your headache?
Yes
No

80 (44.2%)
101 (55.8%)
n = frequency; % = percentile.
Table 3. The intensity of pain and other symptoms associated with headache and management approaches among healthcare students.
Table 3. The intensity of pain and other symptoms associated with headache and management approaches among healthcare students.
VariablesMean ± SDFrequency
n (%)
How severe is your headache on average? (0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst pain)
5.016 ± 1.92
(median = 5)
Is it common for your headache to be accompanied or preceded by vomiting?
Yes
No

16 (8.8%)
165 (91.2%)
The severity of your vomiting
No vomiting
Lightly vomited
Moderately vomited
Strongly vomited
Severely vomited

157 (86.7%)
12 (6.6%)
8 (4.4%)
2 (1.1%)
2 (1.1%)
Is your headache generally preceded by nausea?
Yes
No



36 (19.9%)
145 (80.1%)
The intensity of your nausea
No nausea
Light nausea
Moderate nausea
Strong nausea
Severe nausea

146 (80.5%)
26 (14.4%)
5 (2.8%)
3 (1.7%)
1 (0.6%)
Is your headache generally accompanied by light sensitivity?
Yes
No

61 (33.7%)
120 (66.3%)
Is your headache frequently accompanied by a fear of loud sounds?
Yes
No

50 (27.6%)
131 (72.4%)
Do you have a family history of headaches?
Yes
No

69 (38.1%)
112 (61.9%)
Have you ever sought medical help for a headache? (For example, a doctor’s appointment)
Yes
No


24 (13.3%)
157 (86.7%)
Does your headache go away after you take your medication?
Yes
No
I take no medications for my headache.

116 (64.1%)
29 (16.0%)
36 (19.9%)
n = frequency; % = percentile.
Table 4. Differences between pain intensity scores and participant year for study headache episodes per day.
Table 4. Differences between pain intensity scores and participant year for study headache episodes per day.
VariablesMeanStd. DeviationStd. Error95% Confidence Interval for Meanp-Value *
Lower BoundUpper Bound
Year of Study
Second year1.25711.085950.129800.99821.51610.046
Third year1.51561.259780.157471.20091.8303
Fourth year2.06452.434960.437331.17142.9577
Final year1.06250.680070.170020.70011.4249
Episodes per day
At least one episode 3.81252.235170.395133.00664.61840.001
Between 1 and 3 episodes 5.31341.774580.153305.01025.6167
Between 4 and 6 episodes4.91671.676490.483963.85155.9819
>7 episodes5.00000.000000.000005.00005.0000
* One-way ANOVA.
Table 5. Differences between participant headache episodes and characteristics.
Table 5. Differences between participant headache episodes and characteristics.
VariablesMean (Std)Standard Error Mean (SEM)tp-Value *
Have you ever sought medical attention for your headache?
Yes
No



1.70 (1.122)
1.45 (1.504)



0.22904
0.12081




0.802



0.641
Does your headache aggravate routine academic activities?
Yes
No



1.76 (1.837)
1.26 (1.098)



0.21504
0.10574



2.282



0.018
Does your headache cause you to avoid daily activities (walking, running)?
Yes
No


1.76 (1.77)
1.26 (1.10)


0.19829
0.11083


2.307


0.022
* Independent sample t-test.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alobaid, A.M.; Syed, W.; Al-Rawi, M.B.A. Evaluation of Headache Trends among Undergraduate First Responders for Medical Emergencies at Saudi University in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Medicina 2023, 59, 1522. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59091522

AMA Style

Alobaid AM, Syed W, Al-Rawi MBA. Evaluation of Headache Trends among Undergraduate First Responders for Medical Emergencies at Saudi University in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Medicina. 2023; 59(9):1522. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59091522

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alobaid, Abdullah M., Wajid Syed, and Mahmood Basil A. Al-Rawi. 2023. "Evaluation of Headache Trends among Undergraduate First Responders for Medical Emergencies at Saudi University in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia" Medicina 59, no. 9: 1522. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59091522

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop