Next Article in Journal
Study on the Fracture Toughness of Softwood and Hardwood Estimated by Boundary Effect Model
Previous Article in Journal
Chemical Composition and Related Properties of Lime (Tilia cordata Mill.) Bark and Wood as Affected by Tree Growth Conditions
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 15
Issue 11
10.3390/ma15114031
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study on Photocatalytic Performance of Ag/TiO2 Modified Cement Mortar

by
Linsong Wu
1,
Xiaofang Pei
1,
Mengjun Mei
1,
Zhen Li
1,2 and
Shiwei Lu
1,*
1
School of Urban Construction, Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434023, China
2
Hubei Key Laboratory of Water System Science for Sponge City Construction, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(11), 4031; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15114031
Submission received: 15 May 2022 / Revised: 1 June 2022 / Accepted: 2 June 2022 / Published: 6 June 2022
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this paper, Ag-TiO2 photocatalysts with different Ag contents (1 mol%–5 mol%) were prepared and applied to cement mortar. The photocatalytic performance of Ag-TiO2 and photocatalytic cement mortar under UV light and simulated solar light was evaluated. The results showed that Ag loading on the surface of TiO2 could reduce its band gap width and increase its absorbance in the visible region, and 2% Ag-TiO2 had the highest photocatalytic activity under UV light, the degradation rate of methyl orange (MO) was 95.5% at 30 min, and the first-order reaction constant k was 0.0980 min−1, which was 61.7% higher than that of TiO2, and 5% Ag-TiO2 had the highest photocatalytic activity under solar light, the degradation rate of methylene blue (MB) was 69.8% at 40 min, and the first-order reaction constant k was 0.0294 min−1, which was 90.9% higher than that of TiO2. The photocatalytic mortar prepared by the spraying method has high photocatalytic performance, The MO degradation rate of sample S2 under UV light was 87.5% after 120 min, MB degradation rate of sample S5 under solar light was 75.4% after 120 min. The photocatalytic reaction conforms to the zero-order reaction kinetics, which was 1.5 times–3.3 times higher than that of the mixed samples and has no effect on the mechanical properties of mortar.

1. Introduction

The environmental pollution problems faced by the city restrict the sustainable development of the city [1,2,3]. Industrial waste gas and wastewater, automobile exhaust and runoff pollution endanger the urban environment and the health of the people [4,5]. Photocatalytic cement-based materials are effective in alleviating urban pollution and have been widely concerned by researchers [6,7]. At present, it has been applied to urban roads, building exterior walls and indoor materials [8,9,10,11].
Nano-TiO2 is the most widely used photocatalytic material with the advantages of strong redox, cheap, non-toxic, high stability and renewable recycling [12]. Under UV light irradiation, TiO2 valence band electrons will transfer to the conduction band, thus forming electron-hole pairs, and carriers diffuse to the TiO2 surface to generate hydroxyl radicals (OH•) and superoxide radicals (O2•−) with strong oxidizing properties and decompose pollutants by redox reaction on the TiO2 surface [13]. However, due to its wide band gap (3.2 eV), TiO2 can only be activated in ultraviolet light which accounts for 5% of the solar spectrum and cannot use visible light (45%). In addition, photogenerated electrons and holes have short lifetimes and high recombination rates, leading to low quantum efficiency, which all affect the photocatalytic performance of TiO2 [14,15]. Researchers have proposed several modification methods to improve the photocatalytic performance of TiO2, including:
(1)
Doping metal ions or nonmetal ions in TiO2 changes its photoelectric characteristics, Metal ions such as Fe3+, V4+, Cr3+ and In3+ and non-metal ions such as N, S, C and F can be doped into the TiO2 lattice to expand the light absorption range of nano- TiO2 from the ultraviolet band to the visible band and improve the photocatalytic and self-cleaning performance under visible light [16,17,18,19]. Pérez-Nicolás et al. [20] used TiO2, Fe3+-TiO2 and V4+-TiO2 as photocatalysts to prepare photocatalytic mortars and investigated their performance in NO removal under three irradiation conditions (UV, solar light, and visible light). The results show that the photocatalytic activity of Fe- TiO2 and V- TiO2 mortars were higher than that of TiO2 mortars under visible light, but the photocatalytic activity of Fe-TiO2 and V-TiO2 mortars was lower than that of TiO2 mortars in ultraviolet and solar light. Janus et al. [21] evaluated the photocatalytic activity of N, C-TiO2 photocatalyst. The results show that the cement board containing N, C-TiO2 photocatalyst has higher photocatalytic efficiency than the cement board with TiO2.
(2)
Coupling TiO2 with other low-bandgap semiconductors such as ZnO, WO3, SnO2, CdS, and Fe2O3 to form heterojunctions can also improve its photocatalytic performance [22,23,24,25]. Wu et al. [26,27] prepared SnO2/TiO2 and Fe2O3/TiO2 by gaseous detonation method, and the prepared SnO2/TiO2 and Fe2O3/TiO2 showed higher visible light absorption and photocatalytic efficiency than TiO2. Feng et al. [28] prepared TiO2/g-C3N4 modified cement paste and investigated its photocatalytic degradation performance. TiO2/g-C3N4 has a wide light absorption range and low photoinduced carrier recombination rate, degraded rhodamine B (RhB) dye by 97% after 40 min of irradiation.
(3)
Loading noble metals such as Ag, Au, and Pt on the surface of TiO2 can reduce the carrier recombination rate and improve the efficiency of TiO2 photocatalysis [29,30,31].
Ag loading on TiO2 is one of the successful methods to improve the photocatalytic performance of TiO2. Ag on the TiO2 surface can act as an electron trap to trap the electrons transferred from the TiO2 conduction band; Meanwhile, it creates a surface plasmon resonance (SPR) effect to extend the light absorption to the visible region; In addition, Ag nanoparticles have this excellent antibacterial property [32,33]. Ling et al. [34] reported the preparation of Ag/TiO2 composites using the photoreduction method for photocatalytic degradation of different organic pollutants and found that Ag could improve the photocatalytic degradation rate, promote the charge separation process, and enhance the adsorption of organic pollutants on the TiO2 surface. Shan et al. [35] successfully prepared a set of biochar-coupled Ag-TiO2 materials, and the results showed that the photocatalytic degradation performance of Ag-modified TiO2 was superior to that of pure TiO2 due to the synergistic effect of Ag, TiO2 and biochar. The application of Ag-TiO2 to cement-based materials can bring pollution removal, self-cleaning and antibacterial properties.
At present, researchers mainly focus on the photocatalytic performance of Ag-TiO2, but there are few studies on the application of Ag-TiO2 in cement mortar, and the research on the photocatalytic performance of Ag-TiO2 in cement mortar was not sufficient. Graziani et al. [36] applied Ag-TiO2 to brick samples and tested its inhibition effect on algae. The results confirmed that porosity and roughness play a key role in algal adhesion but did not find that Ag-TiO2 significantly improved the algal adhesion of samples. Ren et al. [37] synthesized bamboo charcoal loaded with Ag-doped TiO2 (Ag/TiO2-BC) and used it in cement-based slurry. Ag/TiO2-BC composite material has good hygroscopic and formaldehyde removal performance and has broad application prospects in improving indoor air environments. Yang et al. [38] loaded Ag on the surface of TiO2/Zeolite Fly Ash Bead (ZFAB) and found that the content of Ag particles in TiO2/ZFAB modified cementing material affected its photocatalytic performance. However, the photocatalytic enhancement of Ag-TiO2 on cement-based materials was not evaluated separately, it is necessary to study the photocatalytic properties of Ag-TiO2 in cement mortar.
Dye wastewater is one of the main causes of water pollution. The low degradation of this wastewater will cause pollution of surface water and groundwater, and adversely affect the health of animals and human beings. Therefore, it is crucial to remove dyes from water pollution [39,40,41,42,43]. Photocatalytic treatment of water pollution is one of the research hotspots. Mohammad et al. [44,45,46,47] prepared SnO2/TiO2, Ag@SnO2/g-C3N4, S doped g-C3N4 and SnO2/CeO2 nanomaterials and used them for the degradation of water pollutants such as methylene blue (MB), Congo red (CR) and Rhodamine B (RhB) and antibiotic tetracycline (TC) with high degradation rates. Cement mortar is one of the most versatile building materials used in construction projects and is widely used in building walls, ground, roads, and parking lots. Photocatalytic cement mortar is an ideal carrier for treating water pollution. The application of Ag-TiO2 to cement mortar has the potential to remove water pollution.
In this study, Ag-TiO2 samples with different Ag contents were prepared, its microstructure and optical characteristics were investigated, the cement mortar was prepared by direct incorporation method and spraying method, respectively, and the effects of the two methods on the mechanical properties of the mortar were investigated. The photocatalytic performance of nano-powder and photocatalytic cement mortar was evaluated by using a methyl orange degradation test under UV light and a methylene blue degradation test under simulated solar light.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

AgNO3 (AR, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.), P25 TiO2 (Evonik Industries AG, Essen, Germany), Methyl orange (AR, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.), Methylene blue (AR, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.), 42.5R Portland cement (Huaxin Cement Co., Ltd., Huangshi, China), Natural Sand, Deionized water and Normal Tap Water were used in this study.

2.2. Preparation of Ag-TiO2

Silver nitrate solution was prepared by weighing different masses of silver nitrate, and then a certain amount of P25 powder was added. The Ag: Ti mole ratios were 1%, 2% and 5%, respectively, and the nano-TiO2 was dispersed in silver nitrate solution by ultrasound for 30 min in a dark room, and then reacted under the irradiation of a 250 W mercury lamp for 2 h. After filtration, cleaning and drying, Ag-TiO2 powder was obtained. The prepared sample was shown in Figure 1a.

2.3. Preparation of Photocatalytic Mortar

Photocatalytic mortar with Ø 90×20 mm was prepared at the mass ratio of cement: sand: water = 1:2:0.5. For comparison purposes, two kinds of photocatalytic cement mortars were prepared: (1) 5% cement weight of different photocatalysts was ultrasonically dispersed in water for 20 min, added directly to the cement mortar mixture and stirred for 2 min, Nano TiO2 powder was directly and closely mixed with the cementing material, after 1 day, the samples were removed from the moulds and put into the standard curing room (25 °C and Relative Humidity > 95%) for 28 days until testing. The samples were designated as M0, M1, M2 and M5, respectively, and the photocatalyst content in each sample was about 2.17 g. (2) The suspension was prepared with different Ag-TiO2 and deionized water, and the concentration of the suspension was 20 g/L. After the blank cement mortar sample was demoulded, 20 mL suspension was sprayed on the surface of the sample three times, and the curing method was the same as that of the mixing sample. The samples were designated as S0, S1, S2 and S5, respectively, and the photocatalyst content in each sample was about 0.4 g. The prepared sample was shown in Figure 1b. Cube test blocks (100 mm × 100 mm × 100 mm) were also prepared for compressive strength.

2.4. Photocatalysis

The photocatalytic properties of Ag-TiO2 samples under UV light were evaluated by the methyl orange degradation test, and those under solar light were measured by the methylene blue degradation test. 250 W mercury lamp as UV light source and 300 W xenon lamp as simulated solar light sources. The initial concentration of MO and MB solution was 10 mg/L, 100 mg Ag-TiO2 powder was added to 400 mL MO solution and stirred in a dark room for 30 min to achieve adsorption-desorption equilibrium. After that, illumination was started, and samples were taken every 10 min. After centrifugation, the absorbance of the solution was tested by a 721-spectrophotometer (Shanghai Yoke Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China).
The photocatalytic performance of cement mortar was also determined by the MO degradation test and MB degradation test. Firstly, put the sample into a beaker, add 400 mL of MO (MB) solution and set it in a dark room for 30 min to achieve adsorption-desorption equilibrium. Second, turn on the illumination for photocatalytic reaction, and solution samples were collected every other 15 min. Finally, the absorbance of the sample solution was measured by 721 spectrophotometry.

2.5. Compressive Strength

Control mortar, M2 mortar and S2 mortar with 100 mm × 100 mm × 100 mm were prepared, the specimens were cured for 7 and 28 days, and the compressive strength was tested by a universal testing machine (Hongshan Testing Machine Co., Ltd., Tianshui, China) according to GB/T50081-2019, the loading speed of 0.5 MPa/s was applied during the test. For each different mortar, 6 specimens were prepared for testing (3 test blocks were tested for each age).

2.6. Characterization

Philps-PW3040/60 X-ray powder diffractometer (Cu, Kα, λ = 0.15418 nm) with 40 kV tube voltage, 30A tube current, 10–90° scanning angle, and 8°/min scanning speed and FEI-Quanta450 Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were used to analyze the structure and morphology of the samples. UV–vis (UV-550 UV spectrophotometer, JASCO Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) was used to analyze the optical properties of the samples.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. XRD Analysis of Ag-TiO2

Figure 2 is the XRD pattern of the sample. The diffraction peaks 2θ = 25.3, 36.9, 38.6, 48.1, 53.9, and 55.1° in the diffraction pattern correspond to the Anatase phases of TiO2 (JCPDS No. 21-1272). Other diffraction peaks 2θ = 27.4, 41.2, 54.3 and 56.6° correspond to the Rutile phase (JCPDS No. 21-1276). The intensity of the diffraction peaks of Ag-TiO2 is slightly reduced, indicating that the presence of Ag ions reduces its crystallinity, and the angles of the diffraction peaks of Ag-TiO2 are not changed, which proves that Ag does not enter the TiO2 lattice, which is consistent with the previous conclusions [31]. The samples 2% Ag-TiO2 and 5% Ag-TiO2 have AgO peaks at diffraction peak 2θ = 32.3°, which proves that a small amount of AgO particles exist on the surface of TiO2 from the oxidation of AgO in air. Bian et al. [48] demonstrated that the heterojunction structure of AgO and TiO2 is crucial in photocatalytic reactions, which can improve the visible light absorption efficiency of the system and delay the recombination of charge carriers. Similar conclusions were also obtained by Kulal et al. [49]. The diffraction peak of Ag at 2θ = 36.9° was not found in each sample, which was attributed to the coincidence of the diffraction peak with the anatase phase at 2θ = 36.9° or the low content of Ag. The average grain size of all the samples was calculated by Scherrer Formula, and the average grain size of all the samples ranged from 21–22 nm.

3.2. SEM and EDS Analysis of Ag-TiO2

Figure 3 is the SEM image of the prepared samples. It can be seen from the figure that the morphology of all samples is basically the same, and the particle distribution is relatively uniform, which is spherical particle size between 20–50 nm, consistent with the grain size calculated by the Scherrer formula. There are dendritic agglomerations between the particles, and it is obvious that there are macropore structures formed by particle aggregation connection and mesopores formed by particle accumulation. This indicates that the morphology of nano-TiO2 does not change after Ag was loaded, Shokri et al. [50] also observed that the photo-deposition method has no effect on the structure and morphology of TiO2, and Ag nanoparticles are located on the surface of TiO2 nanoparticles, making it more susceptible to light and improving its photocatalytic activity
Figure 4 shows the Elemental mapping and EDS analysis of the Ag-TiO2 sample. The results show that Ag is deposited on the surface of nano TiO2 in a point-like distribution. The distribution is not uniform, which may negatively affect its photocatalytic performance. EDS analysis showed that the atomic ratios of Ag/Ti of 1% Ag-TiO2, 2% Ag-TiO2 and 5% Ag-TiO2 were 0.4%, 1.2% and 1.6%, respectively, which were significantly different from the design values, due to the AgNO3 solution did not react completely in the reaction.

3.3. UV–Vis Spectral Analysis of Ag-TiO2

Figure 5 shows the UV-Vis absorption spectra of the samples, and all samples have obvious absorption peaks in the UV region. Compared with pure TiO2, the 5% Ag-TiO2 absorbance spectrum has a significant red shift. Meanwhile, the absorbance of 5% Ag-TiO2 samples is higher than pure TiO2 in the visible region. This contributes to the improvement of photocatalytic activity of the samples under solar light.
With hv as the horizontal coordinate and (Ahv)2 as the vertical coordinate for the graph, the Eg of each sample can be obtained after making a tangent line to the horizontal coordinate, and the Eg of each sample is 3.2 eV and 3.08 eV, respectively, which shows that Ag loading on the TiO2 surface can effectively reduce the forbidden bandwidth of the samples and extend their photo-response range. Furube et al. [51] pointed out that Ag loading on the TiO2 surface created a surface plasmon resonance (SPR) effect that extends light absorption into the visible region while increasing the photocatalysis efficiency of TiO2 under visible light.

3.4. Photocatalytic Analysis of Ag-TiO2

Figure 6a shows the degradation rate and photocatalytic rate of methyl orange solution under UV light. The degradation rates of each sample at 30 min were 86.7%, 90.5%, 95.5% and 88.7%, respectively, and all samples were completely degraded at 40 min. Compared with pure TiO2, different Ag-TiO2 can effectively improve the photocatalytic activity of the sample. Noreen et al. [52] showed that doping of Ag nanoparticles in TiO2 is one of the successful methods to inhibit carrier recombination and improve photocatalytic activity. Din et al. [53] pointed out that Ag loading on the surface of TiO2 can form Schottky barriers, and Ag acts as an electron trap to capture photo generated electrons and transfer them to oxygen to form superoxide radicals, thus promoting interfacial charge transfer, delaying the recombination of the carrier, and improving the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 under UV light. Mogal et al. [54] have also investigated the effect of Ag content on the photocatalytic performance of TiO2 and concluded that doping of 0.75 at% had the highest photocatalytic activity under UV light. Sun et al. [55] also found that the photocatalytic performance increased significantly with increasing Ag content until an optimal Ag content with the highest photocatalytic performance. After that, with the increase of Ag content, Ag particles would become carrier recombination centres, resulting in the decrease of TiO2 photocatalytic activity.
Figure 6b shows that the photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange solution basically conforms to the first-order reaction equation. The formula is shown below:
ln ( C t / C 0 ) = − k 1 t
where C0 is the initial concentration (mg/L), Ct is the current concentration (mg/L), t is the irradiation time (min), and k1 is the apparent reaction rate constant (min−1).
The apparent reaction rate constants k1 values of 0.0606, 0.0752, 0.0980 and 0.0628 min−1 can be obtained after fitting. The calculated results showed that the photocatalytic rate of the Ag-TiO2 samples was significantly higher than that of pure TiO2, and the photocatalytic rates of 1% Ag-TiO2, 2% Ag-TiO2 and 5% Ag-TiO2 were increased by 24.1%, 61.7% and 3.6%, respectively, compared with pure TiO2. With the increase of the content of Ag, the photocatalytic activity of the sample gradually improves and reaches the highest photocatalytic activity with 2% Ag-TiO2. After that, the photocatalytic activity gradually decreases with the increase of the content of Ag. Madhavi et al. and Hou et al. [53] also prepared Ag/TiO2 to degrade MO, and the photocatalytic reaction rate was 0.0031 and 0.0018, because of the different preparation methods and reaction conditions.
Figure 7a shows the degradation rate of methylene blue under simulated solar light. The degradation rates of each sample at 40 min were 46.4%, 53.0%, 67.8% and 69.8%, respectively. As shown in the figure, the degradation rate of methylene blue increases with the increase of Ag content in the sample. Komaraiah et al. [56] also evaluated the performance of Ag-TiO2 in the degradation of MO and MB under visible light irradiation, the increase of Ag content can enhance the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 in the visible region, the results showed that 5% Ag-doped TiO2 showed high degradation rate for methyl orange and methylene blue.
Figure 7b shows the fitting line of the degradation rate of methylene blue under solar light, and the results show that the photocatalytic reaction rate conforms to the first-order kinetic equation. The apparent reaction rate constants k1 values of 0.0154, 0.0184, 0.0275 and 0.0294 min−1 can be obtained after fitting. The calculated results showed that the photocatalytic rate of the Ag-TiO2 samples was significantly higher than that of pure TiO2 under the solar light, and the photocatalytic rates of 1% Ag-TiO2, 2% Ag-TiO2 and 5% Ag-TiO2 were increased by 19.5%, 78.6% and 90.9%, respectively. The higher photocatalytic rate of Ag-TiO2 under solar light is because Ag-TiO2 has a higher visible light absorption capacity than pure TiO2, thus improving its photocatalytic activity. 5% Ag-TiO2 has higher photocatalytic activity than 2% Ag-TiO2 under solar light, attributed to the fact that loading more Ag will increase the absorbance of TiO2 in the visible region and reduce the forbidden band width of TiO2, as shown in Figure 5. The same conclusion was reported by other researchers, Harikishore et al. [57] proved that 5 mol% of Ag can reduce the forbidden band width of TiO2 composites from 3.2 eV to 2.9 eV, redshift the absorption spectrum to the visible region. Hariharan et al. [58] demonstrated that the response of TiO2 nanoparticles to visible light was enhanced after doping with 0.01 M of Ag, resulting in improved photocatalytic performance. Andrade et al. and Muñoz-Fernandez et al. [53] prepared Ag/ZnO for MB degradation, and the photocatalytic reaction rate was 0.007 and 0.017, which proves that Ag-TiO2 has high photocatalytic performance.

3.5. Photocatalytic Analysis of Cement Mortar

Figure 8 depicts the relationship between the degradation rate of methyl orange and photocatalytic rate and the time of photocatalytic mortar sample under UV irradiation. After 120 min of UV light irradiation, the methyl orange degradation rates of the mixed samples were 25.2%, 29.6%, 30%, and 20.3%, respectively, and the methyl orange degradation rates of the sprayed samples were 83.4%, 84.6%, 87.5% and 73.5%, respectively. Figure 8 also shows that the photocatalytic reaction rate conforms to the zero-order kinetic equation. The formula is shown below:
k 0 t = ( C 0 − C t ) / C 0
The apparent reaction rate constants k0 values were shown in Figure 8. The degradation rate and photocatalytic reaction rate sequence of the samples was S2 > S0 > S1 > S5 > M2 > M0 > M1 > M5. Sprayed samples have a higher degradation rate and photocatalytic rate than mixed samples. The study by Kim et al. [59] also shows that the direct incorporation method is less efficient because most of the TiO2 is inside the cement mortar, which cannot be exposed to light and pollutants, and cannot participate in the photocatalytic reaction, resulting in lower utilization of TiO2. Meanwhile, the high ionic concentration and high pH environment of cement mortar also have a significant impact on photocatalytic properties [60], and Gupta et al. [61] found that the absorption of light or the competitive capture of redox substances by Ca2+, Fe2+ and Cl− ions affected the photocatalytic activity of Ag-TiO2. Furthermore, MO was negatively charged in solution and repelled by the cement mortar surface, which also leads to the loss of photocatalytic performance [62].
Figure 9 depicts the relationship between the degradation rate of MB and photocatalytic rate and time of photocatalytic mortar sample under solar light irradiation. After 120 min of solar light irradiation, the MB photolysis rate of the blank sample was 16%, and the MB degradation rates of the mixed samples were 30.5%, 33.1%, 33.1%, and 36.7%, respectively, and the MB degradation rates of the sprayed samples were 61.0%, 63.6%, 73.4% and 75.4%, respectively. Figure 9 also shows that the photocatalytic reaction rate conforms to the zero-order kinetic equation. The degradation rate and photocatalytic reaction rate sequence of the samples was S5 > S2 > S1 > S0 > M5 > M2 > M1 > M0. The MB degradation rate and photocatalytic activity of the mixed samples were low under solar light, and it can be considered that there was little difference between the samples. The sprayed samples had a higher MB degradation rate and photocatalytic activity under solar light, and the MB degradation rate and photocatalytic activity increased with the increase of Ag content, which is basically consistent with the aforementioned Ag-TiO2 degradation of MB, due to the fact that the spraying method exposes more TiO2 to solar light and participates in the oxidation of pollutants in water [5]. Meanwhile, the MB molecules are positively charged in the solution, MB molecule has a positive charge in the solution and is easily adsorbed by TiO2 on the surface of cement mortar [62], which also improves the degradation of the MB solution.

3.6. Compressive Strength of Cement Mortar

Figure 10 shows the compressive strength of samples Control, M2 and S2 at 7 and 28 days, the results show that the compressive strength at 7 days was 25.3 MPa, 22.4 MPa and 25.9 MPa respectively, and the compressive strength at 28 days was 30.2 MPa, 28.1 MPa and 31.2 MPa respectively. The spraying method basically has no effect on the compressive strength of cement mortar. However, adding 5 wt% Ag-TiO2 into cement mortar will reduce its mechanical properties and its 28-day compressive strength will decrease by 7%. Ren et al. [63] reported the same conclusion, which was attributed to the agglomeration phenomenon of excessive TiO2 in cement will be more aggravated, leading to the increase of internal pores and defects in cement mortar, reducing its mechanical properties.

4. Conclusions

In this study, Ag-TiO2 with different Ag contents was prepared by the photodeposition method, and the photocatalytic cement mortar was prepared by the direct incorporation method and the spraying method, respectively. The photocatalytic performance of the samples was evaluated by photodegradation of MB and MO, the main conclusions are as follows:
(1)
Loading Ag on TiO2 did not change the microscopic morphology and crystal structure of TiO2, but it could improve the absorbance of TiO2 in the visible region and reduce the forbidden bandwidth.
(2)
Ag-TiO2 has high photocatalytic activity under UV and solar light. 2% Ag-TiO2 has the highest photocatalytic activity under UV, with a degradation rate of methylene orange of 95.5% in 30 min and photocatalytic reaction rate 61.7% higher than that of TiO2; 5% Ag-TiO2 has the highest photocatalytic activity under solar light, with a degradation rate of methylene blue of 69.8% in 40 min and photocatalytic reaction rate 90.9% higher than that of TiO2.
(3)
The photocatalytic cement mortar prepared by the spraying method has high photocatalytic activity under UV and solar light, and its photocatalytic reaction rate was 1.5 times–3.3 times higher than that of the mixed sample, and the photocatalyst utilization rate is significantly higher than the mixed sample.
(4)
Adding Ag-TiO2 into cement mortar has a negative effect on its compressive strength, which was reduced by 9% at 28 days, while the spraying method has no effect on the mechanical properties of cement mortar.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.W.; Data curation, L.W.; Formal analysis, L.W.; Investigation, X.P. and M.M.; Methodology, Z.L. and S.L.; Resources, L.W., Z.L. and S.L.; Writing—original draft, L.W. and X.P.; Writing—review & editing, L.W., M.M. and S.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Open Foundation of Hubei Key Laboratory of Water System Science for Sponge City Construction (Wuhan University): 2020-04, Open Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Precision Blasting: BL2021-17 and the project of Jinzhou Science and Technology Bureau: 2021CC28-17.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Ambikakumari Sanalkumar, K.U.; Yang, E.-H. Self-cleaning performance of nano-TiO2 modified metakaolin-based geopolymers. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2021, 115, 103847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yang, L.; Hakki, A.; Zheng, L.; Jones, M.R.; Wang, F.; Macphee, D.E. Photocatalytic concrete for NOx abatement: Supported TiO2 efficiencies and impacts. Cem. Concr. Res. 2019, 116, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Guo, M.-Z.; Poon, C.S. Superior photocatalytic NOx removal of cementitious materials prepared with white cement over ordinary Portland cement and the underlying mechanisms. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2018, 90, 42–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pérez-Nicolás, M.; Navarro-Blasco, I.; Fernández, J.M.; Alvarez, J.I. Atmospheric NOx removal: Study of cement mortars with iron- and vanadium-doped TiO2 as visible light–sensitive photocatalysts. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 149, 257–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Guo, M.-Z.; Ling, T.-C.; Poon, C.S. Photocatalytic NOx degradation of concrete surface layers intermixed and spray-coated with nano-TiO2: Influence of experimental factors. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2017, 83, 279–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xu, M.; Bao, Y.; Wu, K.; Xia, T.; Clack, H.L.; Shi, H.; Li, V.C. Influence of TiO2 incorporation methods on NOx abatement in Engineered Cementitious Composites. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 221, 375–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Şahin, O.; Bay, S.; İlcan, H.; Yıldırım, G.; Şahmaran, M. Influence of mixing methods on the NOx reduction capability and electrical properties of photocatalytic cementitious systems. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2021, 115, 103840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Brattich, E.; Barbano, F.; Pulvirenti, B.; Pilla, F.; Bacchetti, M.; Di Sabatino, S. The effect of photocatalytic coatings on NOx concentrations in real-world street canyons. Build. Environ. 2021, 205, 108312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, C.; Tang, B.; Cao, X.; Gu, F.; Huang, W. Enhanced photocatalytic decomposition of NO on portland cement concrete pavement using nano-TiO2 suspension. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 275, 122135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Malayeri, M.; Haghighat, F.; Lee, C.-S. Modeling of volatile organic compounds degradation by photocatalytic oxidation reactor in indoor air: A review. Build. Environ. 2019, 154, 309–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jiang, Q.; Qi, T.; Yang, T.; Liu, Y. Ceramic tiles for photocatalytic removal of NO in indoor and outdoor air under visible light. Build. Environ. 2019, 158, 94–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pelaez, M.; Nolan, N.T.; Pillai, S.C.; Seery, M.K.; Falaras, P.; Kontos, A.G.; Dunlop, P.S.M.; Hamilton, J.W.J.; Byrne, J.A.; O’Shea, K.; et al. A review on the visible light active titanium dioxide photocatalysts for environmental applications. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2012, 125, 331–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Folli, A.; Pade, C.; Hansen, T.B.; De Marco, T.; Macphee, D.E. TiO2 photocatalysis in cementitious systems: Insights into self-cleaning and depollution chemistry. Cem. Concr. Res. 2012, 42, 539–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mandal, R.K.; Kundu, S.; Sain, S.; Pradhan, S.K. Enhanced photocatalytic performance of V2O5–TiO2 nanocomposites synthesized by mechanical alloying with morphological hierarchy. New J. Chem. 2019, 43, 2804–2816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhou, J.; Zhang, M.; Zhu, Y. Photocatalytic enhancement of hybrid C3N4/TiO2 prepared via ball milling method. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 3647–3652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hu, Z.; Xu, T.; Liu, P.; Jin, G. Developed photocatalytic semi-flexible pavement for automobile exhaust purification using iron-doped titanium dioxide. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 262, 119924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jaiswal, R.; Patel, N.; Kothari, D.C.; Miotello, A. Improved visible light photocatalytic activity of TiO2 co-doped with Vanadium and Nitrogen. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2012, 126, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fu, X.; Hu, Y.; Yang, Y.; Liu, W.; Chen, S. Ball milled h-BN: An efficient holes transfer promoter to enhance the photocatalytic performance of TiO2. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 244–245, 102–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Janus, M.; Madraszewski, S.; Zajac, K.; Kusiak-Nejman, E.; Morawski, A.W.; Stephan, D. Photocatalytic Activity and Mechanical Properties of Cements Modified with TiO2/N. Materials 2019, 12, 3756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Xu, M.; Clack, H.; Xia, T.; Bao, Y.; Wu, K.; Shi, H.; Li, V. Effect of TiO2 and fly ash on photocatalytic NOx abatement of engineered cementitious composites. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 236, 117559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Janus, M.; Zatorska, J.; Czyżewski, A.; Bubacz, K.; Kusiak-Nejman, E.; Morawski, A.W. Self-cleaning properties of cement plates loaded with N,C-modified TiO2 photocatalysts. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 330, 200–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bica, B.O.; de Melo, J.V.S. Concrete blocks nano-modified with zinc oxide (ZnO) for photocatalytic paving: Performance comparison with titanium dioxide (TiO2). Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 252, 119120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tokarský, J.; Martinec, P.; Mamulová Kutláková, K.; Ovčačíková, H.; Študentová, S.; Ščučka, J. Photoactive and hydrophobic nano-ZnO/poly(alkyl siloxane) coating for the protection of sandstone. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 199, 549–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Peng, F.; Ni, Y.; Zhou, Q.; Kou, J.; Lu, C.; Xu, Z. New g-C3N4 based photocatalytic cement with enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity by constructing muscovite sheet/SnO2 structures. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 179, 315–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Giampiccolo, A.; Tobaldi, D.M.; Jones, E.; Labrincha, J.A.; Kurchania, R.; Ansell, M.P.; Ball, R.J. UV/visible sol gel W–TiO2 photocatalytic coatings for interior building surfaces. Build. Environ. 2021, 205, 108203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wu, L.; Yan, H.; Xiao, J.; Li, X.; Wang, X.; Zhao, T. Characterization and photocatalytic properties of nano-Fe2O3–TiO2 composites prepared through the gaseous detonation method. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 14334–14339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wu, L.; Yan, H.; Li, X.; Wang, X. Characterization and photocatalytic properties of SnO2–TiO2 nanocomposites prepared through gaseous detonation method. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 1517–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Feng, S.; Li, F. Photocatalytic dyes degradation on suspended and cement paste immobilized TiO2/g-C3N4 under simulated solar light. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sadrieyeh, S.; Malekfar, R. Photocatalytic performance of plasmonic Au/Ag-TiO2 aerogel nanocomposites. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2018, 489, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, H.; Wang, D.; Sheng, C.; Ben, D.; Wu, H.; Mao, N. Reactive Radical Species in Photocatalytic Activities of PET-Ag-TiO2 Nanoparticles Composites Under Visible Light Irradiation. Fibers Polym. 2021, 22, 597–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yuan, X.; Liang, S.; Ke, H.; Wei, Q.; Huang, Z.; Chen, D. Photocatalytic property of polyester fabrics coated with Ag/TiO2 composite films by magnetron sputtering. Vacuum 2020, 172, 109103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chakhtouna, H.; Benzeid, H.; Zari, N.; Qaiss, A.E.K.; Bouhfid, R. Recent progress on Ag/TiO2 photocatalysts: Photocatalytic and bactericidal behaviors. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2021, 28, 44638–44666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Narges Elmi, F.; Reza, F. Optimization of Operating Parameters in Photocatalytic Activity of Visible Light Active Ag/TiO2 Nanoparticles. Russ. J. Phys. Chem. A 2019, 92, 2835–2846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ling, L.; Feng, Y.; Li, H.; Chen, Y.; Wen, J.; Zhu, J.; Bian, Z. Microwave induced surface enhanced pollutant adsorption and photocatalytic degradation on Ag/TiO2. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 483, 772–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Shan, R.; Lu, L.; Gu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Yuan, H.; Chen, Y.; Luo, B. Photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange by Ag/TiO2/biochar composite catalysts in aqueous solutions. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2020, 114, 105088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Graziani, L.; Quagliarini, E.; D’Orazio, M. The role of roughness and porosity on the self-cleaning and anti-biofouling efficiency of TiO2-Cu and TiO2-Ag nanocoatings applied on fired bricks. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 129, 116–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ren, Q.; Zeng, Z.; Xie, M.; Jiang, Z. Cement-based composite with humidity adsorption and formaldehyde removal functions as an indoor wall material. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 247, 118610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yang, L.; Gao, Y.; Wang, F.; Liu, P.; Hu, S. Enhanced photocatalytic performance of cementitious material with TiO2 @Ag modified fly ash micro-aggregates. Chin. J. Catal. 2017, 38, 357–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Foroutan, R.; Peighambardoust, S.J.; Peighambardoust, S.H.; Pateiro, M.; Lorenzo, J.M. Adsorption of Crystal Violet Dye Using Activated Carbon of Lemon Wood and Activated Carbon/Fe3O4 Magnetic Nanocomposite from Aqueous Solutions: A Kinetic, Equilibrium and Thermodynamic Study. Molecules 2021, 26, 2241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Pashaei-Fakhri, S.; Peighambardoust, S.J.; Foroutan, R.; Arsalani, N.; Ramavandi, B. Crystal violet dye sorption over acrylamide/graphene oxide bonded sodium alginate nanocomposite hydrogel. Chemosphere 2021, 270, 129419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Ahmadi, A.; Foroutan, R.; Esmaeili, H.; Peighambardoust, S.J.; Hemmati, S.; Ramavandi, B. Montmorillonite clay/starch/CoFe2O4 nanocomposite as a superior functional material for uptake of cationic dye molecules from water and wastewater. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2021, 284, 126088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Foroutan, R.; Mohammadi, R.; Ahmadi, A.; Bikhabar, G.; Babaei, F.; Ramavandi, B. Impact of ZnO and Fe3O4 magnetic nanoscale on the methyl violet 2B removal effciency of the activated carbon oak wood. Chemosphere 2022, 286, 131632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Foroutan, R.; Peighambardoust, S.J.; Hemmati, S.; Khatooni, H.; Ramavandi, B. Preparation of clinoptilolite/starch/CoFe2O4 magnetic nanocomposite powder and its elimination properties for cationic dyes from water and wastewater. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 189, 432–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mohammad, A.; Karim, M.R.; Khan, M.E.; Khan, M.M.; Cho, M.H. Biofilm-Assisted Fabrication of Ag@SnO2-g-C3N4 Nanostructures for Visible Light-Induced Photocatalysis and Photoelectrochemical Performance. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 20936–20948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mohammad, A.; Khan, M.E.; Cho, M.H.; Yoon, T. Graphitic-carbon nitride based mixed-phase bismuth nanostructures: Tuned optical and structural properties with boosted photocatalytic performance for wastewater decontamination under visible-light irradiation. NanoImpact 2021, 23, 100345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mohammad, A.; Khan, M.E.; Cho, M.H.; Yoon, T. Adsorption promoted visible-light-induced photocatalytic degradation of antibiotic tetracycline by tin oxide/cerium oxide nanocomposite. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 21, 01412–01414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mohammad, A.; Khan, M.E.; Cho, M.H.; Yoon, T. Fabrication of binary SnO2/TiO2 nanocomposites under a sonication-assisted approach: Tuning of band-gap and water depollution applications under visible light irradiation. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 15073–15081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bian, H.; Zhang, Z.; Xu, X.; Gao, Y.; Wang, T. Photocatalytic activity of Ag/ZnO /AgO/TiO2 composite. Phys. E Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct. 2020, 124, 114236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kulal, D.; Shetty Kodialbail, V. Visible light mediated photocatalytic dye degradation using Ag2O/AgO-TiO2 nanocomposite synthesized by extracellular bacterial mediated synthesis—An eco-friendly approach for pollution abatement. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Shokri, M.; Jodat, A.; Modirshahla, N.; Behnajady, M.A. Photocatalytic degradation of chloramphenicol in an aqueous suspension of silver-doped TiO2 nanoparticles. Environ. Technol. 2013, 34, 1161–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Furube, A.; Hashimoto, S. Insight into plasmonic hot-electron transfer and plasmon molecular drive: New dimensions in energy conversion and nanofabrication. NPG Asia Mater. 2017, 9, e454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Noreen, Z.; Khalid, N.R.; Abbasi, R.; Javed, S.; Ahmad, I.; Bokhari, H. Visible light sensitive Ag/TiO2/graphene composite as a potential coating material for control of Campylobacter jejuni. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2019, 98, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Din, M.I.; Khalid, R.; Hussain, Z. Minireview: Silver-Doped Titanium Dioxide and Silver-Doped Zinc Oxide Photocatalysts. Anal. Lett. 2018, 51, 892–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Mogal, S.I.; Gandhi, V.G.; Mishra, M.; Tripathi, S.; Shripathi, T.; Joshi, P.A.; Shah, D.O. Single-Step Synthesis of Silver-Doped Titanium Dioxide: Influence of Silver on Structural, Textural, and Photocatalytic Properties. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 5749–5758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sun, Y.; Gao, Y.; Zeng, J.; Guo, J.; Wang, H. Enhancing visible-light photocatalytic activity of Ag-TiO2 nanowire composites by one-step hydrothermal process. Mater. Lett. 2020, 279, 128506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Komaraiah, D.; Radha, E.; Sivakumar, J.; Ramana Reddy, M.V.; Sayanna, R. Photoluminescence and photocatalytic activity of spin coated Ag+ doped anatase TiO2 thin films. Opt. Mater. 2020, 108, 110401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Harikishore, M.; Sandhyarani, M.; Venkateswarlu, K.; Nellaippan, T.A.; Rameshbabu, N. Effect of Ag Doping on Antibacterial and Photocatalytic Activity of Nanocrystalline TiO2. Procedia Mater. Sci. 2014, 6, 557–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Hariharan, D.; Thangamuniyandi, P.; Jegatha Christy, A.; Vasantharaja, R.; Selvakumar, P.; Sagadevan, S.; Pugazhendhi, A.; Nehru, L.C. Enhanced photocatalysis and anticancer activity of green hydrothermal synthesized Ag@TiO2 nanoparticles. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2020, 202, 111636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Kim, H.-J.; Yoon, Y.-S.; Yang, K.-H.; Kwon, S.-J. Durability and purification performance of concrete impregnated with silicate and sprayed with photocatalytic TiO2. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 199, 106–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Macphee, D.E.; Folli, A. Photocatalytic concretes—The interface between photocatalysis and cement chemistry. Cem. Concr. Res. 2016, 85, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gupta, A.K.; Pal, A.; Sahoo, C. Photocatalytic degradation of a mixture of Crystal Violet (Basic Violet 3) and Methyl Red dye in aqueous suspensions using Ag+ doped TiO2. Dye. Pigment. 2006, 69, 224–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Feng, S.; Song, J.; Liu, F.; Fu, X.; Guo, H.; Zhu, J.; Zeng, Q.; Peng, X.; Wang, X.; Ouyang, Y.; et al. Photocatalytic properties, mechanical strength and durability of TiO2/cement composites prepared by a spraying method for removal of organic pollutants. Chemosphere 2020, 254, 126813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Ren, J.; Lai, Y.; Gao, J. Exploring the influence of SiO2 and TiO2 nanoparticles on the mechanical properties of concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 175, 277–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 15 04031 g001 550
Figure 1. Nano Ag-TiO2 powder sample (a) and Photocatalytic mortar test block (b).
Figure 1. Nano Ag-TiO2 powder sample (a) and Photocatalytic mortar test block (b).
Materials 15 04031 g001
Materials 15 04031 g002 550
Figure 2. XRD patterns of the sample.
Figure 2. XRD patterns of the sample.
Materials 15 04031 g002
Materials 15 04031 g003a 550Materials 15 04031 g003b 550
Figure 3. SEM images of Ag-TiO2.
Figure 3. SEM images of Ag-TiO2.
Materials 15 04031 g003aMaterials 15 04031 g003b
Materials 15 04031 g004a 550Materials 15 04031 g004b 550
Figure 4. Elemental mapping and EDS analysis of Ag-TiO2. (a) 1%Ag-TiO2. (b) 2%Ag-TiO2. (c) 5%Ag-TiO2).
Figure 4. Elemental mapping and EDS analysis of Ag-TiO2. (a) 1%Ag-TiO2. (b) 2%Ag-TiO2. (c) 5%Ag-TiO2).
Materials 15 04031 g004aMaterials 15 04031 g004b
Materials 15 04031 g005 550
Figure 5. UV-Vis absorption spectra of TiO2 and 5% Ag-TiO2.
Figure 5. UV-Vis absorption spectra of TiO2 and 5% Ag-TiO2.
Materials 15 04031 g005
Materials 15 04031 g006 550
Figure 6. Degradation rate of MO (a) and photocatalytic reaction rate (b) of TiO2 and Ag-TiO2 samples under UV light.
Figure 6. Degradation rate of MO (a) and photocatalytic reaction rate (b) of TiO2 and Ag-TiO2 samples under UV light.
Materials 15 04031 g006
Materials 15 04031 g007 550
Figure 7. Degradation rate of MB (a) and photocatalytic reaction rate (b) of TiO2 and Ag-TiO2 samples under solar light.
Figure 7. Degradation rate of MB (a) and photocatalytic reaction rate (b) of TiO2 and Ag-TiO2 samples under solar light.
Materials 15 04031 g007
Materials 15 04031 g008 550
Figure 8. Degradation rate of MO and photocatalytic reaction rate of photocatalytic mortar blocks under UV light.
Figure 8. Degradation rate of MO and photocatalytic reaction rate of photocatalytic mortar blocks under UV light.
Materials 15 04031 g008
Materials 15 04031 g009 550
Figure 9. Degradation rate of methylene blue and photocatalytic reaction rate of photocatalytic mortar blocks under solar light.
Figure 9. Degradation rate of methylene blue and photocatalytic reaction rate of photocatalytic mortar blocks under solar light.
Materials 15 04031 g009
Materials 15 04031 g010 550
Figure 10. Compressive strength of Control, M2 and S2 at 7 days and 28 days.
Figure 10. Compressive strength of Control, M2 and S2 at 7 days and 28 days.
Materials 15 04031 g010
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, L.; Pei, X.; Mei, M.; Li, Z.; Lu, S. Study on Photocatalytic Performance of Ag/TiO2 Modified Cement Mortar. Materials 2022, 15, 4031. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15114031

AMA Style

Wu L, Pei X, Mei M, Li Z, Lu S. Study on Photocatalytic Performance of Ag/TiO2 Modified Cement Mortar. Materials. 2022; 15(11):4031. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15114031

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wu, Linsong, Xiaofang Pei, Mengjun Mei, Zhen Li, and Shiwei Lu. 2022. "Study on Photocatalytic Performance of Ag/TiO2 Modified Cement Mortar" Materials 15, no. 11: 4031. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15114031

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop