Next Article in Journal
Using Ex Situ Seedling Baiting to Capture Seedling-Associated Mycorrhizal Fungi in Medicinal Orchid Dendrobium officinale
Previous Article in Journal
Identifying the Main Drivers in Microbial Diversity for Cabernet Sauvignon Cultivars from Europe to South Africa: Evidence for a Cultivar-Specific Microbial Fingerprint
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JoF
Volume 8
Issue 10
10.3390/jof8101035
jof-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

High-Performance Liquid Chromatography for Ultra-Simple Determination of Plasma Voriconazole Concentration

by
Takeo Yasu
1,2,*,
Yuka Nomura
1,
Yoshito Gando
1,
Yasuhiko Matsumoto
3,
Takashi Sugita
3,
Nobuharu Kosugi
4 and
Masayuki Kobayashi
4
1
Department of Medicinal Therapy Research, Pharmaceutical Education and Research Center, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, 2-522-1 Noshio, Kiyose, Tokyo 204-8588, Japan
2
Bokutoh Hospital-Meiji Pharmaceutical University Joint Research Center, 4-23-15, Kotobashi, Sumida-ku, Tokyo 130-8575, Japan
3
Department of Microbiology, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, 2-522-1 Noshio, Kiyose, Tokyo 204-8588, Japan
4
Department of Haematology, Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital, 4-23-15, Kotobashi, Sumida-ku, Tokyo 130-8575, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2022, 8(10), 1035; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8101035
Submission received: 5 August 2022 / Revised: 27 September 2022 / Accepted: 28 September 2022 / Published: 29 September 2022
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Voriconazole is an antifungal drug used to treat invasive aspergillosis. Voriconazole exhibits nonlinear behavior and considerable individual variability in its pharmacokinetic profile. Invasive aspergillosis has a poor prognosis, and failure of treatment owing to low voriconazole blood levels is undesirable. Thus, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of voriconazole is recommended. However, plasma voriconazole concentration is rarely measured in hospitals, and the TDM of voriconazole is not widely practiced in Japan. We aimed to develop an ultra-simple method to measure plasma voriconazole concentration. Ten microliters of plasma sample was extracted, and proteins were precipitated using methanol extraction. Voriconazole and ketoconazole (internal standard) were separated using high-performance liquid chromatography. A calibration curve was prepared, which was linear over plasma voriconazole concentrations of 0.125–12.5 µg/mL, with a coefficient of determination of 0.9999. The intra-day and inter-day validation coefficients were 0.9–2.2% and 1.3–6.1%, respectively. The assay accuracy was −4.2% to 1.6%, and recovery was >97.8%. Our ultra-simple, sensitive, and inexpensive high-performance liquid chromatography ultraviolet method to determine plasma voriconazole concentration will help improve the voriconazole TDM implementation rate and contribute to effective and safe voriconazole use.

1. Introduction

Voriconazole is a broad-spectrum triazole antifungal agent used as the first-line treatment against invasive aspergillosis [1]; it is also used as an alternative therapy for candidemia [2]. Voriconazole is also used as a prophylaxis for patients who are at a high risk for invasive fungal diseases (IFDs), such as those undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. However, voriconazole exhibits nonlinear behavior and shows considerable individual variability in its pharmacokinetic profile [3]. One reason for the individual variability is that poor metabolizers, owing to genetic polymorphisms of cytochrome P450 2C19 (an enzyme involved in voriconazole metabolism), have higher plasma voriconazole concentrations and are more likely to experience hepatotoxicity and other adverse events [4]. Moreover, plasma voriconazole concentration increases in patients with inflammatory conditions [5,6]. In contrast, IFDs, including invasive aspergillosis, have a poor prognosis [7]; thus, failure of treatment or the occurrence of breakthrough IFDs owing to low plasma voriconazole concentration must be avoided. Thus, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is recommended for voriconazole [8,9,10]. At trough concentrations (Cmin), the recommended therapeutic range for voriconazole is 1–5 μg/mL on days 5–7 (day 3 for dosage regimen with loading dose) after the first dose [11].
Several reports have outlined various methods to determine plasma voriconazole concentration using high-performance liquid chromatography ultraviolet (HPLC-UV) [12,13,14,15,16] and liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) [17,18,19,20,21] Globally, HPLC-UV instruments are more widely used than LC-MS/MS instruments. Furthermore, HPLC-UV setups have low initial costs compared with LC-MS/MS setups. However, the measurement of plasma voriconazole concentration using both HPLC-UV and LC-MS/MS, in terms of learning operating techniques and preparing samples, is time consuming; hence, only a few hospitals currently measure voriconazole concentration using HPLC-UV or LC-MS/MS in regular clinical settings. Therefore, in Japan, the measurement of voriconazole concentration using LC-MS/MS is frequently outsourced. A limitation of outsourcing is there is a delay of approximately 5 days in receiving the results. Voriconazole dosage optimization can result in failure of IFD treatment if TDM is not performed within 1 week after the initial dose. As voriconazole-induced hepatotoxicity occurs approximately 10 days (median value) after the first dose [22], outsourcing voriconazole measurements may hamper the identification of the cause of hepatotoxicity or adjustment of dose. Therefore, the rate of voriconazole TDM in Japan is low, ranging from 11% to 37.4% [23,24]. The situation in Australia is similar, where the rate of voriconazole TDM is 35% [25]. Voriconazole measurements should be performed in-house at all hospitals treating IFDs. Hence, the development of a simple and rapid assay using HPLC is warranted. In this study, we developed an ultra-simple method for measuring voriconazole concentration in human plasma using HPLC-UV, such that the results can be obtained on the same day as blood collection in clinical settings. We also developed an organic solvent extraction process to eliminate the protein removal step that does not include the use of solid-phase extraction columns; this leads to a shorter process time, lower costs, and less blood requirements for the assay.

2. Materials and Methods

The HPLC apparatus comprised a pump (PU-4180; Jasco, Tokyo, Japan), a UV detector (UV-4075; Jasco), and an auto-sampler (AS-4550; Jasco). An octadecylsilyl column (Capcell Pak C18 MG II; 250 mm × 4.6 mm; I.D., 5 µm; Osaka Soda, Tokyo, Japan) with a Capcell Pak C18 MG II guard column (10 mm × 4.0 mm; Osaka Soda) was used for the analysis. Voriconazole and ketoconazole were obtained from Tokyo Chemical Industry, Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan). HPLC-grade acetonitrile, methanol, water (Kanto Chemical, Co., Inc., Tokyo, Japan), and KH2PO4 (Wako, Osaka, Japan) were used in the mobile phase. Human plasma (pool) and EDTA-2Na was purchased from Cosmo Bio Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan).
The detection wavelength was set as 260 nm for the analysis. The mobile phase comprised acetonitrile and 0.5% KH2PO4 (pH 3.0; 39:61 v/v), and the flow rate was maintained at 1.0 mL/min.
Stock solutions (1 mg/mL) of both voriconazole and ketoconazole were prepared in methanol. A calibration curve was prepared independently using the working stock solution. The voriconazole stock solution was diluted with methanol to obtain working solutions of 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1.25, 2.5, 5.0, 10, and 12.5 µg/mL. The ketoconazole stock solution was diluted with methanol to obtain a working solution of 1.0 µg/mL. Both stock and working solutions were stored at −60 °C until use.
The voriconazole working solution (10 µL) was vortexed with 10 µL of plasma for 30 s in a 2.0-mL microtube (ClickFit 2.0 mL; Trerf Lab, Switzerland). Voriconazole-spiked plasma (20 µL), the internal standard (10 µL; 1.0 µg/mL ketoconazole), and methanol (70 µL) that had been chilled to −20 °C were mixed, vortexed for 1 min, and centrifuged at 15,000× g for 10 min at 4 °C. The resulting supernatant (30 µL) was used as the sample for HPLC analysis. The sample preparation method for patient plasma was shown in Figure 1.
For the calibration of voriconazole, 10 µL of blank human plasma was added to 10 µL of voriconazole working solution, at the following working concentrations: 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1.25, 2.5, 5.0, 10, and 12.5 µg/mL. The recovery, accuracy, and precision of the assay in human blank plasma were determined using the working solution at these concentrations. Using the working solution at the abovementioned concentrations, five sets of spiked plasma samples were assayed on the same day (intra-day) and on five different days (inter-day) to confirm assay precision. Specificity was tested by analyzing blank human plasma to ensure that no endogenous substances in the plasma would interfere with voriconazole or the internal standard. Selectivity was evaluated by comparing chromatograms obtained from blank plasma and spiked plasma. The stability of voriconazole in the plasma samples was evaluated at three different concentrations (0.125, 1.25, and 12.5 µg/mL). Bench-top stability was evaluated using five samples (n = 5) stored at 25 °C for 6 h. The stabilities of the processed samples (n = 5) were evaluated after they had been stored at 4 °C for 24 h. One-week stabilities were evaluated using samples (n = 5) that had been stored at –60 °C for 1 week. The freeze-and-thaw stabilities of five samples (n = 5) were evaluated after three cycles of freezing at –60 °C and thawing.

2.1. Clinical Application

After obtaining written informed consent, blood samples were collected from a patient with acute myeloid leukemia starting 13 days after the administration of voriconazole. Blood was also collected each day before the oral administration of voriconazole, and the Cmin of voriconazole was evaluated. Plasma was obtained by centrifuging the blood samples at 1500× g for 15 min. The resulting supernatants were stored at −20 °C until analysis. In addition, the plasma voriconazole concentrations in five blood samples from the patient obtained using our HPLC-UV method were compared with those obtained using LC-MS/MS through outsourcing (BML, Inc., Tokyo, Japan).

2.2. Statistical Analysis

The Spearman rank correlation coefficient was calculated to assess the correlation between the voriconazole concentrations obtained through our method and the outsourced measurement. We also evaluated the agreement between our method and the outsourced method using the Bland–Altman analysis method [26]. Statistical analysis was performed using EZR [27], and results with p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

Typical chromatograms of plasma voriconazole at concentrations 0.125 and 5.0 µg/mL are presented in Figure 2. The retention times of voriconazole and ketoconazole were 11.9 and 7.0 min, respectively. Each measurement cycle lasted 13.0 min.
The eight-point voriconazole standard calibration curve was linear over the range of 0.125–12.5 µg/mL. The calibration curve was defined using the following equation: y = 0.1866x + 0.0044 (r2 = 0.9999), where y and x are the peak height ratio and plasma voriconazole concentration (µg/mL), respectively. The recovery of voriconazole was 0.125–12.5 µg/mL (>97.8%). At these concentrations, the intra-day and inter-day precision (coefficients of variation, %) were 0.9–2.2% and 1.3–6.1%, respectively (Table 1). The assay accuracy was −4.2% to 1.6%. The stability of voriconazole in plasma was assessed under various conditions (Table 2). No significant degradation of voriconazole was observed, and the final concentration was within 97.4–101.3% of the theoretical value.
The plasma voriconazole concentration was determined using blood samples obtained from a patient with acute myeloid leukemia. At the start, the patient received 200 mg of voriconazole orally twice daily. The day 3 Cmin measurement after voriconazole administration was outsourced; thus, Cmin was identified on day 10. The Cmin on day 3 was 2.42 µg/mL, which was within the target concentration range. However, owing to the patient’s advanced age, the dose was reduced to 150 mg twice daily on day 10. The patient had concurrently been using nicorandil, rosuvastatin, tocopherol nicotinate, furosemide, amiodarone, venetoclax, epinastine, and levofloxacin. Blood was collected on days 13, 22, 37, 47, and 54, before voriconazole administration. Using our method, the plasma voriconazole concentrations in the samples collected on days 13, 22, 37, 47, and 54 were 4.69, 2.69, 1.45, 1.61, and 1.29 µg/mL, respectively (Figure 3).
The plasma voriconazole concentrations measured on days 13, 22, 37, 47, and 54 by BML, Inc., the outsourcing vendor, using LC-MS/MS, were 3.91, 2.62, 1.47, 1.59, and 1.34 µg/mL, respectively. The Cmin of voriconazole determined using our method significantly correlated with that obtained via outsourcing (r = 1; p = 0.017). The Bland–Altman plot showed that the mean bias ± SD of voriconazole Cmin between our method and the outsourced method was 0.16 ± 0.30 µg/mL, and the limits of agreement were −0.274 and 0.594, respectively (Figure 4b).

4. Discussion

We developed an ultra-simple, sensitive, and inexpensive HPLC-UV-based analytical method to determine plasma voriconazole concentration in clinical settings. Our results will contribute to the treatment of patients with IFDs receiving voriconazole.
The results of precision (intra-assay and inter-assay variations, accuracy, and stability under various conditions) obtained using our method comply with the recommendations of the Food and Drug Administration [28]. The therapeutic ranges for the Cmin of voriconazole are 1–2 µg/mL (lower limit) and 4–5 µg/mL (upper limit) [8,9]. The developed method can detect voriconazole in the range of 0.125–25 µg/mL, and it is suitable for the TDM of voriconazole in clinical settings.
The sample preparation process for previously-reported methods to determine plasma voriconazole concentration using HPLC-UV requires complex steps, including protein removal and long evaporation times for sample concentration [12,13,14,15,16]. Unlike our method, the protein removal process in previously-reported methods involves solid-phase extraction columns, which are expensive and require time-consuming column conditioning and washing processes. There is no need to consider drug adsorption in our method, as it does not require solid-phase extraction columns, resulting in high recovery rates and low variability. Furthermore, because the supernatant can be directly injected into the HPLC system after protein removal, the total time required for sample pre-treatment is only approximately 15 min. This simplicity of sample preparation makes it possible to learn the sample preparation techniques quickly, enabling even healthcare professionals involved in routine medical care to use this method to measure plasma voriconazole concentration. Reportedly, the minimum volume of plasma sample required for voriconazole measurement is 49.75 µL [12]; however, our method requires a minimum volume of just 10 µL. Moreover, no additional invasive procedures are required, because plasma voriconazole concentration can be measured using the blood that remains after use in routine blood tests. Our method is also easily applicable to pediatric patients because only limited amounts of blood can be collected from these patients. Voriconazole TDM is recommended in pediatric patients because of large individual differences in clearance; moreover, target trough concentrations may not be achieved using adult doses [29,30,31]. As the target voriconazole Cmin in pediatric patients is the same as that in adults, the accuracy and measurement range can also be assumed to be similar. Furthermore, the results of the comparison among the five samples measured using LC-MS/MS via outsourcing and the plasma voriconazole concentrations measured using our HPLC method exhibited a significant correlation (p = 0.017), and the accuracy of our method was considered comparable with that of the LC-MS/MS method. However, in the Bland–Altman analysis, no agreement was observed in the measurement of only one sample (day 13) among the five samples. The agreement may be poor when the plasma voriconazole concentration is approximately 4.0 µg/mL. In a future study, the agreement with LC-MS/MS will be reexamined by measuring a larger number of samples using our method. If the outsourcing results pertaining to day 3 Cmin of our patient were obtained even 1 day later, the Cmin on day 13 might have been above the target range. The voriconazole dose was reduced from 200 to 150 mg on day 10 based on the Cmin of voriconazole. This change allowed the patient to continue taking the treatment without developing adverse effects, such as hepatotoxicity and visual disturbance.
Measuring voriconazole in the hospital yields rapid results and enables rapid optimization of drug therapy. Our ultra-simple and inexpensive HPLC method allows in-hospital measurement of voriconazole by healthcare professionals; hence, there is no need for outsourcing. We expect that our method will enable voriconazole TDM in not only Japan, but also other countries, and contribute to enhancing clinical outcomes, including maximizing therapeutic efficacy and minimizing adverse events. An increase in voriconazole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus has recently been reported [32]. Voriconazole is the first choice in the treatment of invasive aspergillosis [1,33]. Our method may help stop the development of voriconazole resistance by improving the rate of voriconazole TDM implementation.
The novelty of this study lies in the fact that the experimental system, which combines sample preparation using methanol and HPLC-UV analysis, has been improved so that it can be easily performed with a small sample volume for clinical applications. The advantages of our method are as follows: (1) only 10 µL of plasma is required for the measurement, (2) a solid-phase column is not required for protein removal, (3) the results can be obtained quickly and the procedure is ultra-simple, and (4) the initial and maintenance costs are lower than those of LC-MS/MS.
Our study has some limitations. First, the samples assessed using our method were obtained from just one patient. Therefore, it remains unknown whether voriconazole concentration can be accurately measured in patients using drugs other than the eight drugs the patient was using. Second, we could not assess the accuracy and precision of voriconazole measurement performed by healthcare professionals in a hospital setting using our method. Third, we have not performed dilution assays. In the future, we hope to use this method to measure large numbers of patient samples and to evaluate the accuracy of voriconazole measurements obtained by healthcare professionals in hospital settings.

5. Conclusions

We developed an ultra-simple, sensitive, and inexpensive method to determine plasma voriconazole concentration using HPLC-UV for clinical application; our process shortens the time required for protein removal and is cost effective. This method will improve the implementation rate of voriconazole TDM and contribute to effective and safe use of voriconazole.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.Y. and Y.M.; methodology, T.Y.; validation, T.Y; formal analysis, T.Y.; investigation, Y.N. and Y.G.; resources, N.K. and M.K.; data curation, T.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, T.Y.; writing—review and editing, Y.M. and T.S.; visualization, T.Y. and Y.N.; supervision, T.Y.; project administration, T.Y.; funding acquisition, T.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI, grant number JP20K16095.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from the patient involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the physicians and staff at Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital for their help with this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Patterson, T.F.; Thompson, G.R., III; Denning, D.W.; Fishman, J.A.; Hadley, S.; Herbrecht, R.; Kontoyiannis, D.P.; Marr, K.A.; Morrison, V.A.; Nguyen, M.H.; et al. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of aspergillosis: 2016 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2016, 63, e1–e60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pappas, P.G.; Kauffman, C.A.; Andes, D.R.; Clancy, C.J.; Marr, K.A.; Ostrosky-Zeichner, L.; Reboli, A.C.; Schuster, M.G.; Vazquez, J.A.; Walsh, T.J.; et al. Clinical practice guideline for the management of candidiasis: 2016 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2016, 62, e1–e50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Theuretzbacher, U.; Ihle, F.; Derendorf, H. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile of voriconazole. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2006, 45, 649–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wang, T.; Zhu, H.; Sun, J.; Cheng, X.; Xie, J.; Dong, H.; Chen, L.; Wang, X.; Xing, J.; Dong, Y. Efficacy and safety of voriconazole and CYP2C19 polymorphism for optimised dosage regimens in patients with invasive fungal infections. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2014, 44, 436–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Veringa, A.; Ter Avest, M.; Span, L.F.; van den Heuvel, E.R.; Touw, D.J.; Zijlstra, J.G.; Kosterink, J.G.; van der Werf, T.S.; Alffenaar, J.C. Voriconazole metabolism is influenced by severe inflammation: A prospective study. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2017, 72, 261–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Yasu, T.; Konuma, T.; Kato, S.; Kurokawa, Y.; Takahashi, S.; Tojo, A. Serum C-reactive protein levels affect the plasma voriconazole trough levels in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. Leuk. Lymphoma 2017, 58, 2731–2733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Donnelly, J.P.; Chen, S.C.; Kauffman, C.A.; Steinbach, W.J.; Baddley, J.W.; Verweij, P.E.; Clancy, C.J.; Wingard, J.R.; Lockhart, S.R.; Groll, A.H.; et al. Revision and update of the consensus definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 71, 1367–1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Pascual, A.; Calandra, T.; Bolay, S.; Buclin, T.; Bille, J.; Marchetti, O. Voriconazole therapeutic drug monitoring in patients with invasive mycoses improves efficacy and safety outcomes. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2008, 46, 201–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Park, W.B.; Kim, N.H.; Kim, K.H.; Lee, S.H.; Nam, W.S.; Yoon, S.H.; Song, K.H.; Choe, P.G.; Kim, N.J.; Jang, I.J.; et al. The effect of therapeutic drug monitoring on safety and efficacy of voriconazole in invasive fungal infections: A randomized controlled trial. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2012, 55, 1080–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Luong, M.L.; Al-Dabbagh, M.; Groll, A.H.; Racil, Z.; Nannya, Y.; Mitsani, D.; Husain, S. Utility of voriconazole therapeutic drug monitoring: A meta-analysis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2016, 71, 1786–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Matsumoto, K.; Takesue, Y.; Ohmagari, N.; Mochizuki, T.; Mikamo, H.; Seki, M.; Takakura, S.; Tokimatsu, I.; Takahashi, Y.; Kasahara, K.; et al. Practice guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring of vancomycin: A consensus review of the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and the Japanese Society of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring. J. Infect. Chemother. 2013, 19, 365–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pennick, G.J.; Clark, M.; Sutton, D.A.; Rinaldi, M.G. Development and validation of a high-performance liquid chromatography assay for voriconazole. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2003, 47, 2348–2350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chhun, S.; Rey, E.; Tran, A.; Lortholary, O.; Pons, G.; Jullien, V. Simultaneous quantification of voriconazole and posaconazole in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultra-violet detection. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2007, 852, 223–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Langman, L.J.; Boakye-Agyeman, F. Measurement of voriconazole in serum and plasma. Clin. Biochem. 2007, 40, 1378–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kahle, K.; Langmann, P.; Schirmer, D.; Lenker, U.; Keller, D.; Helle, A.; Klinker, H.; Heinz, W.J. Simultaneous determination of voriconazole and posaconazole concentrations in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009, 53, 3140–3142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yamada, T.; Mino, Y.; Yagi, T.; Naito, T.; Kawakami, J. Rapid simultaneous determination of voriconazole and its N-oxide in human plasma using an isocratic high-performance liquid chromatography method and its clinical application. Clin. Biochem. 2012, 45, 134–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Farowski, F.; Cornely, O.A.; Vehreschild, J.J.; Hartmann, P.; Bauer, T.; Steinbach, A.; Rüping, M.J.; Müller, C. Quantitation of azoles and echinocandins in compartments of peripheral blood by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010, 54, 1815–1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pauwels, S.; Vermeersch, P.; Van Eldere, J.; Desmet, K. Fast and simple LC–MS/MS method for quantifying plasma voriconazole. Clin. Chim. Acta 2012, 413, 740–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Yahaya, N.; Sanagi, M.M.; Abd Aziz, N.; Wan Ibrahim, W.A.; Nur, H.; Loh, S.H.; Kamaruzaman, S. A rapid MCM-41 dispersive micro-solid phase extraction coupled with LC/MS/MS for quantification of ketoconazole and voriconazole in biological fluids. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2017, 31, e3803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yoon, S.J.; Lee, K.; Oh, J.; Woo, H.I.; Lee, S.Y. Experience with therapeutic drug monitoring of three antifungal agents using an LC-MS/MS method in routine clinical practice. Clin. Biochem. 2019, 70, 14–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Li, J.; Ma, J.; Wagar, E.A.; Liang, D.; Meng, Q.H. A rapid ultra-performance LC-MS/MS assay for determination of serum unbound fraction of voriconazole in cancer patients. Clin. Chim. Acta 2018, 486, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hamada, Y.; Ueda, T.; Miyazaki, Y.; Nakajima, K.; Fukunaga, K.; Miyazaki, T.; Nakada-Motokawa, N.; Nagao, M.; Kawamura, H.; Shigemi, A.; et al. Effects of antifungal stewardship using therapeutic drug monitoring in voriconazole therapy on the prevention and control of hepatotoxicity and visual symptoms: A multicentre study conducted in Japan. Mycoses 2020, 63, 779–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Satoh, N.; Watanabe, A.; Kokeguchi, S. National survey of therapeutic drug monitoring of antimicrobial agents and antifungal agents. Jpn. J. Environ. Infect. 2009, 24, 53–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Miyai, T.; Imai, S.; Momo, K.; Kashiwagi, H.; Sato, Y.; Sugawara, M.; Takekuma, Y. Implementation Status of Voriconazole Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Analysis of Data from a Large Japanese Health Insurance Claims Database; Japanese Society of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Kyodo City, Japan, 2021; Volume 38, pp. 39–48. [Google Scholar]
  25. Imani, S.; Alffenaar, J.W.; Cotta, M.O.; Daveson, K.; van Hal, S.; Lau, C.; Marriott, D.; Penm, J.; Roberts, J.A.; Tabah, A.; et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring of commonly used anti-infective agents: A nationwide cross-sectional survey of Australian hospital practices. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020, 56, 106180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Bland, J.M.; Altman, D.G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986, 327, 307–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kanda, Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013, 48, 452–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. United States Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration. In Bioanalytical Method Validation Guidance for Industry. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/bioanalytical-method-validation-guidance-industry (accessed on 1 April 2022).
  29. Neely, M.; Rushing, T.; Kovacs, A.; Jelliffe, R.; Hoffman, J. Voriconazole pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in children. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2010, 50, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Friberg, L.E.; Ravva, P.; Karlsson, M.O.; Liu, P. Integrated population pharmacokinetic analysis of voriconazole in children, adolescents, and adults. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 3032–3042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Allegra, S.; Fatiguso, G.; De Francia, S.; Favata, F.; Pirro, E.; Carcieri, C.; De Nicolò, A.; Cusato, J.; Di Perri, G.; D’Avolio, A. Therapeutic drug monitoring of voriconazole for treatment and prophylaxis of invasive fungal infection in children. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2018, 84, 197–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rivero-Menendez, O.; Alastruey-Izquierdo, A.; Mellado, E.; Cuenca-Estrella, M. Triazole resistance in Aspergillus spp.: A worldwide problem? J. Fungi 2016, 2, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Ullmann, A.J.; Aguado, J.M.; Arikan-Akdagli, S.; Denning, D.W.; Groll, A.H.; Lagrou, K.; Lass-Flörl, C.; Lewis, R.E.; Munoz, P.; Verweij, P.E.; et al. Diagnosis and management of Aspergillus diseases: Executive summary of the 2017 ESCMID-ECMM-ERS guideline. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2018, 24 (Suppl. S1), e1–e38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Jof 08 01035 g001 550
Figure 1. Simple flowchart of the patient plasma sample preparation method.
Figure 1. Simple flowchart of the patient plasma sample preparation method.
Jof 08 01035 g001
Jof 08 01035 g002 550
Figure 2. Typical chromatograms showing the determination of plasma voriconazole. (a) Blank plasma sample. Spiked plasma samples containing voriconazole (VRCZ) at (b) 0.125 µg/mL (lower limit of quantification) or (c) 5.0 µg/mL. (d) Patient plasma sample on day 22 (2.69 µg/mL).
Figure 2. Typical chromatograms showing the determination of plasma voriconazole. (a) Blank plasma sample. Spiked plasma samples containing voriconazole (VRCZ) at (b) 0.125 µg/mL (lower limit of quantification) or (c) 5.0 µg/mL. (d) Patient plasma sample on day 22 (2.69 µg/mL).
Jof 08 01035 g002
Jof 08 01035 g003 550
Figure 3. Clinical course of both voriconazole trough concentrations.
Figure 3. Clinical course of both voriconazole trough concentrations.
Jof 08 01035 g003
Jof 08 01035 g004 550
Figure 4. Agreement between two voriconazole trough concentrations (Cmin) by our method (HPLC) and by outsourced measurement (LC-MS/MS) of the same samples. (a) Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, (b) Bland–Altman plot.
Figure 4. Agreement between two voriconazole trough concentrations (Cmin) by our method (HPLC) and by outsourced measurement (LC-MS/MS) of the same samples. (a) Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient, (b) Bland–Altman plot.
Jof 08 01035 g004
Table
Table 1. Intra-day and inter-day accuracy and precision.
Table 1. Intra-day and inter-day accuracy and precision.
Intra-Day (n = 5)Inter-Day (n = 5)
Theoretical Voriconazole
Concentration (µg/mL)		Mean ± SD (µg/mL)Precision (%)Accuracy (%)Mean ± SD (µg/mL)Precision (%)Accuracy (%)Recovery (%)
0.1250.13 ± 0.001.11.60.12 ± 0.006.1−2.899.2
0.250.25 ± 0.001.20.70.25 ± 0.002.10.797.8
0.50.50 ± 0.002.20.70.49 ± 0.012.7−1.9101.4
1.251.22 ± 0.011.1−2.51.21 ± 0.011.8−3.4100.6
2.52.46 ± 0.052.1−1.72.44 ± 0.051.7−2.2100.2
54.96 ± 0.102.1−0.94.93 ± 0.101.3−1.5101.7
109.83 ± 0.202.1−1.79.58 ± 0.202.6−4.2101.6
12.512.5 ± 0.110.90.112.4 ± 0.112.0−0.6100.8
Table
Table 2. Stability analysis under various conditions (n = 5).
Table 2. Stability analysis under various conditions (n = 5).
Stability Condition (%)
Added Voriconazole (µg/mL)Benchtop
Mean ± SD		Processed Sample
Mean ± SD		One-Week
Mean ± SD		Freeze and Thaw
Mean ± SD
0.12597.6 ± 4.698.1 ± 6.298.0 ± 5.798.7 ± 7.1
1.2598.5 ± 2.097.4 ± 1.899.9 ± 2.5100.1 ± 3.8
12.599.6 ± 5.598.9 ± 4.4101.3 ± 4.998.9 ± 2.2
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yasu, T.; Nomura, Y.; Gando, Y.; Matsumoto, Y.; Sugita, T.; Kosugi, N.; Kobayashi, M. High-Performance Liquid Chromatography for Ultra-Simple Determination of Plasma Voriconazole Concentration. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 1035. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8101035

AMA Style

Yasu T, Nomura Y, Gando Y, Matsumoto Y, Sugita T, Kosugi N, Kobayashi M. High-Performance Liquid Chromatography for Ultra-Simple Determination of Plasma Voriconazole Concentration. Journal of Fungi. 2022; 8(10):1035. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8101035

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yasu, Takeo, Yuka Nomura, Yoshito Gando, Yasuhiko Matsumoto, Takashi Sugita, Nobuharu Kosugi, and Masayuki Kobayashi. 2022. "High-Performance Liquid Chromatography for Ultra-Simple Determination of Plasma Voriconazole Concentration" Journal of Fungi 8, no. 10: 1035. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8101035

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop