Next Article in Journal
Bambusicolous Fungi in Pleosporales: Introducing Four Novel Taxa and a New Habitat Record for Anastomitrabeculia didymospora
Next Article in Special Issue
Elevating Air Temperature May Enhance Future Epidemic Risk of the Plant Pathogen Phytophthora infestans
Previous Article in Journal
Sulfur-Containing Compounds from Endophytic Fungi: Sources, Structures and Bioactivities
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Barcode-Based Phylogenetic Characterization of Phytophthora cactorum Identifies Two Cosmopolitan Lineages with Distinct Host Affinities and the First Report of Phytophthora pseudotsugae in California
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Sexual Compatibility Types in F1 Progenies of Sclerospora graminicola, the Causal Agent of Pearl Millet Downy Mildew

1
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, Hyderabad 502324, Telangana, India
2
ICAR-Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Raebareili Road, Lucknow 226002, Uttar Pradesh, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2022, 8(6), 629; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8060629
Submission received: 19 March 2022 / Revised: 6 May 2022 / Accepted: 11 May 2022 / Published: 13 June 2022

Abstract

:
Sclerospora graminicola is primarily heterothallic in nature with two distinct mating types (G1 and G2); however, homothallism does exist in the pathogen populations. In this study, a cross was made between two self-sterile isolates (Sg 019, Mat-2, G2 × Sg 445-1, Mat-1, G1) of S. graminicola and a total of 39 F1 progenies were established. The study on sexual compatibility types in F1 progenies was conducted by crossing each F1 progeny with both the parents (Sg 445-1, Mat-1, G1; and Sg 019, Mat-2, G2). The results revealed the presence of four sexual compatibility types, viz. G1, G2, G1G2 and G0 (neuter) in the progenies. The G1G2 progenies that produced oospores with both the parents were found as self-fertile (homothallic) and self-sterile (heterothallic) types. Similarly, self-fertile parental type G1 and G2 progenies were designated as secondary homothallic, whereas self-sterile parental type G1 and G2 progenies were of heterothallic type. The result of the present study revealed Mendelian segregation of mating type locus in S. graminicola which indicates that sexual reproduction plays an important role in the evolution of new genetic recombinants in the pathogen. The study also helps in understanding the genetic structure of S. graminicola populations and potential for possible evolution of new virulences in the pathogen.

1. Introduction

Pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L) R. Br.] is a choice crop of more than 90 million people cultivated on approximately 27 million hectares in the arid and semi-arid tropics of the world [1]. In India, mainly the states of Rajasthan, Gujarat, Haryana, Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh, Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh produce 8.74 million tons of pearl millet. The crop is cultivated on 7.20 million hectares of land with a productivity of 1214 kg ha−1 [2]. Although average productivity of pearl millet in India has increased since the 1950s (305 kg ha−1) [3], it has also witnessed the devastating crop losses of up to 80% at periodic intervals caused by the downy mildew (DM) pathogen, Sclerospora graminicola [(Sacc). Schroet] [4]. The corresponding changes in the population structure of the pathogen over a period of time have played a key role in the destruction of the crop. The reason behind the evolution of new pathotype/s has been attributed to extreme selection pressure from the host along with sexual reproduction in S. graminicola populations [5].
The oospores formation in S. graminicola has been reported either through heterothallism, in which two self-sterile isolates having distinct sexual compatibility types, G1 and G2, fuse together [6,7], or through secondary homothallism in self-fertile isolates that contain the determinant of both compatibility types [8]. In general, one isolate produces functional antheridia and the other isolate forms oogonia during a reciprocal crossing between two self-sterile isolates and the evidence of relative sexuality within isolates determines the contribution of antheridia and oogonia by each parent [9]. However, the presence of multiple compatibility types has been reported in other oomycetes. Four compatibility types (A1, A2, A1A2 and neuter) have been observed in the F1 progenies of the crosses derived from two distinct mating type isolates (A1 × A2) of Phytophthora spp. [10,11]. The production of oospores in one mating type (G2) of S. graminicola isolate without fusion with any mating type [6] and no formation of oospores in isolate Sg 110-2 with any one of the designated mating types (G1 and G2) [12] indicated the presence of multiple compatibility types in S. graminicola [6]. Therefore, this study was planned to investigate the occurrence of self-sterile, self-fertile and neuter (sterile) isolates in S. graminicola to ascertain the multiple sexual compatibility types within the pathogen.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Collection and Maintenance of Isolates

A total of 52 isolates of S. graminicola were collected from different pearl millet growing areas of India during 1992 to 2012 (Table 1). The single zoospore isolates of each collection were established [12] and were maintained separately either on their original host or on another susceptible host in the isolation polyacrylic chambers (60 cm × 45 cm × 45 cm) in the glasshouse at ICRISAT, India.

2.2. Identification of Self-Sterile or Self-Fertile Isolates

To identify the homothallic or heterothallic isolates, the single zoospore isolates-infected plants were allowed to mature for formation of oospores in separate isolation chambers. Necrotic leaf pieces from 2-month-old seedlings infected with each isolate were collected in brown paper bags, cut into 1-centimeter-long pieces, dried under shade and stored at room temperature (25 ± 2 °C) until further observation. The small leaf pieces were surface sterilized with NaOCl (2%) and washed thoroughly with sterilized distilled water. These leaf pieces were cleared by incubating them at 40 °C in NaOH (5%) for 12 to 16 h. Cleared leaf pieces were rinsed in distilled water and observed under a microscope using a 10× objective for the presence of oospores. Isolates which did not show oospore formation were selected as self-sterile isolates for further studies.

2.3. Selection of Highly Virulent Self-Sterile Isolate

The sporangial inocula of all the self-sterile heterothallic isolates were raised on seedlings of a highly susceptible genotype 7042 S in isolation chambers in the glasshouse. The sporangia from sporulating leaves were harvested in ice-cold distilled sterile water and spore concentration was adjusted to 1 × 106 mL−1. Pot-grown seedlings of the pearl millet differential lines P 7-4, P 310-17, 700651, 7042 R, IP 18292, IP 18293 and 852 B and two known downy mildew (DM) susceptible lines—ICMP 451 and 7042 S—were spray-inoculated at coleoptile stage using an atomizer. The inoculated seedlings were incubated at 20 °C with >90% Relative Humidity (RH) for 20 h, and then transferred to greenhouse benches at 25 ± 2 °C and >90% RH for disease development for the next 2 weeks. DM incidence was recorded 14 days after inoculation as percentage of infected plants. The isolates with ≤10% disease incidence were considered avirulent and those with >50% disease incidence as virulent on the specific genotype.

2.4. Confirmations of Mating Type of Virulent Test Isolate (Sg 445-1)

The reference isolates Sg 018 (Mat-1, G1) and Sg 019 (Mat-2, G2) and test isolate Sg 445-1 (single zoospore selection from Sg 445) of S. graminicola were maintained separately on 7042 S. To detect the mating type of the test isolate, Sg 445-1 was crossed with both the reference mating type isolates (Sg 018 × Sg 445-1; and Sg 019 × Sg 445-1). Sporangial inoculum of each isolate (1 × 106 sporangia mL−1) was prepared individually in ice-cold distilled sterile water. Sporangial suspensions of Sg 018 and Sg 445-1, and Sg 019 and Sg 445-1 were mixed in equal proportion (1:1) and spray inoculated on the highly susceptible pearl millet line 7042 S separately. The inoculated seedlings were incubated and transferred to isolation chambers. The infected seedlings were grown in the isolation chambers and allowed to mature. The necrotic tissues from these infected seedlings (>2 months old) were observed for oospore formation.

2.5. Establishment of F1 Progenies from Oospores Generated from Sg 019 × Sg 445-1 Crosses

To generate progenies from F1 oospores (Sg 019 × Sg 445-1), infected leaf samples with oospores were dried in the shade, grinded and strained to make a fine powder. Oospores were checked again for their presence in the matured leaf powder. Sterilized potting mixture (soil, sand, and farmyard manure in a ratio of 3:2:2 by volume) was infested with oospore inoculum (20–25 g) and the pots (15 cm diameter) containing the infested mixture were sown with a susceptible genotype 7042 S (25 seeds per pot). Each pot was covered with a polythene bag and incubated at 40 °C for 3–4 days for rapid seed germination. Pots were transferred to isolation chambers in a glasshouse at 25 ± 2 °C to avoid any cross contamination from other isolates. Pots were watered adequately every day and observed regularly for DM symptoms on the seedlings. When the first infected seedling in a pot was noticed, it was removed from the pot and was transplanted into another pot containing sterilized soil and shifted to an isolation chamber. Sporangia from each seedling were maintained separately on 7042 S as an individual F1-progeny in isolation chambers at 25 ± 2 °C in the glasshouse. A total of 39 F1 progenies were established to determine sexual compatibility types in S. graminicola. Since infected seedlings occurred infrequently and rarely, each infected seedling was assumed to have infection from a single oospore.

2.6. Identification of Sexual Compatibility Types and Self-Sterile/Fertile Nature of F1 Progenies

To detect sexual compatibility types of F1 progenies, all the 39 F1 progenies derived from the cross Sg 019 × Sg 445-1 were crossed with both the parents (Sg 445-1, Mat-1, G1; and Sg 019, Mat-2, G2) separately. Sporangial inoculum (1 × 106 sporangia mL−1) of each of the F1 progenies and both the parents was prepared separately in ice-cold distilled sterile water, mixed in equal proportion (1:1) and spray inoculated on the highly susceptible pearl millet line 7042 S separately. The inoculated seedlings were incubated, transferred to isolation chambers and the infected seedlings were allowed to mature for production of oospores. In addition, to identifying the self-sterile or self-fertile nature of F1 progenies, the single-zoospore infected plants were allowed to mature in separate isolation chambers and observed for the presence of oospores.

3. Results

3.1. Selection of Self-Sterile Heterothallic Isolates

The 60-day-old, infected leaves of 52 single-zoosporic isolates of S. graminicola were checked for presence of oospores. No oospores were detected in 33 isolates, whereas oospores were formed by the remaining 19 isolates (Table 2). Isolates without oospores formation were designated as self-sterile or heterothallic while those producing oospores were designated as self-fertile or homothallic. Thus, a total of 33 heterothallic isolates were selected and the 19 homothallic isolates were excluded from the further studies.

3.2. Selection of Highly Virulent Self-Sterile Isolate

All the 33 self-sterile heterothallic isolates including reference mating type isolates Sg 018 (Mat-1/G1) and Sg 019 (Mat-2/G2) were screened on seven host differentials (P 7-4, P 310-17, 700651, 7042 R, IP 18292, IP 18293 and 852 B) and the two known DM susceptible lines (ICMP 451 and 7042 S). The screening identified Sg 445-1 as the most virulent isolate and Sg 018 and Sg 019, the two reference mating type isolates, as avirulent on specific genotypes; hence, they were selected for the crossing and generation of F1 progenies (Table 3).

3.3. Confirmations of Mating Type of Virulent Test Isolate (Sg 445-1)

The cross between virulent test isolate Sg 445-1 with both the reference mating types Sg 018, Mat-1, G1 and Sg 019 Mat-2, G2 isolates (Sg 018 × Sg 445-1 and Sg 019 × Sg 445-1) yielded oospore production in the cross Sg 019 × Sg 445-1, whereas no oospore formations were recorded in Sg 018 × Sg 445-1. This indicated Mat-1/G1 mating type of Sg 445-1. Thus, two parents Sg 019 (avirulent) and Sg 445-1 (virulent) of different mating types were selected for crossing and generation of 39 F1 progenies.

3.4. Identification of Sexual Compatibility Types and Self-Sterile/Fertile Nature of F1 Progenies

A total of 39 F1 progenies were derived from the cross of Sg 019 Mat-2, G2 × Sg 445-1 Mat-1, G1. In contrast to the distinct mating types of the parents (G1 and G2), progenies were of four compatibility types viz. G1, G2, G1G2 and G0 (neuter) (Table 4). Of 39 F1 progenies, four belonged to G1, 13 to G2, 21 G1G2 and one to neuter categories (Table 4 and Table 5). Further, the self-fertile or self-sterile nature of all the 39 F1 progenies was evaluated on the basis of production of oospores. Among 21 G1G2 progenies, 19 supported self-production of oospores while 2 were free of any oospores in the matured leaves. Out of four G1 progenies, oospores were observed in three progenies and one was recorded as a non-oospore producer when selfed. Of the 13 G2 progenies, 7 supported self-production of oospores whereas no oospore formation was observed in the matured leaves infected with the remaining 6 F1 progenies.
One unique neuter (G0) progeny was recorded as a non-oospore former, which was neither self-fertile nor produced oospore by crossing with any of the two parents. The F1 progenies which produced oospore by crossing with both the parents were designated as G1G2. Both self-sterile and self-fertile progenies were observed among G1G2s. In S. graminicola, it is reported that oospore formation is very low when isolates are selfed, whereas the number of oospores formed is quite high when the isolates of different mating types are crossed [6,12]. Similar observations were made in the present study. In the case of selfed G1G2 F1s, about 10 oospores were observed per leaf piece (1 cm2), whereas ~100-300 oospores were found when they were crossed with either of the parents. Thus, the 19 self-fertile (G1G2) progenies, which showed production of oospores with both parents, were designated as homothallic, while two self-sterile (G1G2) progenies were designated as heterothallic type (Table 5). Similarly, the self-fertile parental type G1 and G2 progenies were denoted as secondary homothallic whereas self-sterile parental type G1 and G2 progenies were of heterothallic type.

4. Discussion

The oospore formation in plant pathogenic oomycetes depends on the presence of two sexual compatibility types or their determinants [13,14,15,16,17]. In S. graminicola, two types of mating/compatibility types, viz. G1 and G2, have been proposed earlier [6,7,12] which are responsible for sexual reproduction between two self-sterile isolates, and within self-fertile isolates. Since sexual reproduction is dependent upon both compatibility types, it is speculated that the self-fertile isolates contain both compatibility types in the same seedling. The earlier studies [6,7,12] also reported self-fertile isolates and placed these isolates in G2 mating types tentatively and suggested that determination of sexual compatibility type in S. graminicola is likely to be complex and the nomenclature of G1/G2 compatibility types may not necessarily imply their distribution in a population. In addition, the neuter (sterile) type of S. graminicola isolate (Sg 110-2) was also observed [12], which failed to produce oospores with any of the parent isolates and was also placed under G1/G2 compatibility types.
Since vegetative structures of oomycetes exist in diploidy level, the mating type alleles have been reported to be controlled by a single mating type locus in Phytophthora spp. [11,18,19] due to equal numbers of A1 or A2 types in the progenies. However, skewed numbers of one or the other mating types have also been reported [10,20,21,22]. Although normal Mendelian segregation of alleles expects four different combinations of alleles for a given locus in the progenies of heterozygous parents, inheritance of mating type alleles of a single locus has been explained in three different ways to explicate the almost equal ratios of A1 and A2 progenies in Phytophthora spp. [11,18,20].
In the first model, one mating type is represented by heterozygous (A/a) condition and the other in homozygous (a/a) condition at the mating type locus [20] which can yield only two types of sexual compatibility types in the offspring. However, inconsistent ratios in the progenies of heterozygous (A/a) and homozygous (a/a) parents have been reported in contrast to this model [15,22,23]. The second model suggests the presence of balanced lethal loci due to survival of only two genotypes A1 (M1/Mn) and A2 (M2/Mn) instead of the four different genotypes (M1/Mn, M2/Mn, M1/M2 or MnMn) in the progenies of A1 (M1/Mn) and A2 (M2/Mn) mating type parents in Phytophthora infestans [18]. The third model, a hybrid of the earlier two, explains the existence of ambiguous A1-A2 genotype in P. parasitica, which was consistent with the first model in which the A1 mating type was represented by heterozygous (MA/Ma) and A2 in homozygous (Ma/Ma) conditions for the alleles at the mating-type locus [11]. In contrary to all three models, the present study revealed four different compatibility types (4G1, 13G2, 21G1G2 and one G0, neuter) in 39 F1 progenies from the cross of two distinct self-sterile heterothallic parents (Sg 445-1 Mat-1, G1 × Sg 019 Mat-2, G2) that indicated normal Mendelian segregation of mating types (Table 6) in S. graminicola. In the earlier studies [6,12], four different compatibility types were also noticed in S. graminicola though all the progenies were accommodated in G1/G2 compatibility types either due to skewed distribution of mating types or lack of nomenclature in S. graminicola. The discussed three models were found inadequate to explain the usual segregation in S. graminicola and unequal ratio of G1:G2 along with ambiguous G1G2 sexual compatibility types. Therefore, an alternative scheme for mating-type determination was considered and the segregation could be speculated due to presence of mating type alleles in heterozygous state in both parents [G1g1 (Mat-1) for G1 and G2g2 (Mat-2) for G2] at the same locus. In Phytophthora, isolates forming oospores only with the A1 or A2 testers are designated as A2 and A1, respectively, whereas the isolates which can form oospores with both A1 and A2 testers are designated as A1A2 and those that fail to form oospores are designated as A0 (sterile or neuter) [24] which supports the results of this study.
The mating system plays an important role in the evolution of plant pathogens during strong selection pressure from the resistant host or chemical control measures or harsh environmental conditions [25,26]. In oomycetes, the predominant co-existence of two mating types (G1 and G2 or A1 and A2) [6,7,11,12,18,19] and generation of multiple compatibility types (A1, A2, A1A2 and neuter) in the F1 progenies upon sexual reproduction between two distinct mating types (A1 × A2) [10,11] might provide advantage to pathogens during unfavorable conditions. Sclerospora graminicola has a high outcrossing capacity which renders the pathogen to evolve into new pathotype/s upon selection pressure and helps in adaptation to different ecosystems [12]. Therefore, effective management of downy mildew pathogen in pearl millet would be targeted towards understanding the change in population structure, particularly virulence pattern, and its utilization in resistance-breeding programs for the development of resistant cultivars.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.S.; methodology, R.S. and C.R.; formal analysis, C.R.; investigation, C.R.; resources, R.S.; writing—original draft preparation, C.R.; writing—review and editing, R.S.; supervision, R.S.; project administration, R.S.; funding acquisition, R.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India, and the CGIAR Research Program on Grain Legumes and Dryland Cereals (CRP-GLDC).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Acknowledgments

We thank P. Jaganmohan Rao for his help in establishing single zoospore isolates and greenhouse screenings.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gupta, S.K.; Patil, K.S.; Rathore, A.; Yadav, D.V.; Sharma, L.D.; Mungra, K.D.; Patil, H.T.; Kumar, R.; Chaudhary, V.; Das, R.R.; et al. Identification of heterotic groups in South-Asian-bred hybrid parents of pearl millet. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2020, 133, 873–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Chelpuri, D.; Sharma, R.; Durga, K.K.; Katiyar, P.; Mahendrakar, M.D.; Singh, R.B.; Yadav, R.S.; Gupta, R.; Srivastava, R.K. Mapping quantitative trait loci (QTLs) associated with resistance to major pathotype-isolates of pearl millet downy mildew pathogen. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2019, 154, 983–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yadav, O.P.; Rai, K.N. Genetic improvement of pearl millet in India. Agric. Res. 2013, 2, 275–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sharma, R.; Upadhyaya, H.D.; Sharma, S.; Gate, V.L.; Raj, C. New sources of resistance to multiple pathotypes of Sclerospora graminicola in the pearl millet mini core germplasm collection. Crop Sci. 2015, 55, 1619–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pushpavathi, B.; Thakur, R.P.; Rao, K.C. Inheritance of avirulence in Sclerospora graminicola, the pearl millet downy mildew pathogen. Plant Pathol. 2006, 5, 54–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Michelmore, R.W.; Pawar, M.N.; Williams, R.J. Heterothallism in Sclerospora graminicola. Phytopathology 1982, 72, 1368–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Idris, M.O.; Ball, S.L. Inter-and intracontinental sexual compatibility in Sclerospora graminicola. Plant Pathol. 1984, 33, 219–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Michelmore, R.W.; Ingram, D.S. Secondary homothallism in Bremia lactucae. Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 1982, 78, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Galindo, A.; Gallegly, M.E. The nature of sexuality in Phytophthora infestans. Phytopathology 1960, 50, 123–128. [Google Scholar]
  10. Khaki, I.A.; Shaw, D.S. The inheritance of drug resistance and compatibility type in Phytophthora drechsleri. Genet. Res. 1974, 23, 75–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fabritius, A.L.; Judelson, H.S. Mating-type loci segregate aberrantly in Phytophthora infestans but normally in Phytophthora parasitica: Implications for models of mating-type determination. Curr. Genet. 1997, 32, 60–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Pushpavathi, B.; Thakur, R.P.; Rao, K.C. Fertility and mating type frequency in Indian isolates of Sclerospora graminicola, the downy mildew pathogen of pearl millet. Plant Dis. 2006, 90, 211–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Bishop, H. A study of sexuality in Sapromyces reinschii. Mycologia 1940, 32, 505–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Papa, K.E.; Campbell, W.A.; Hendrix, F.F., Jr. Sexuality in Pythium sylvaticum: Heterothallism. Mycologia 1967, 59, 589–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gallegly, M.E. Genetics of pathogenicity of Phytophthora infestans. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1968, 6, 375–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Michelmore, R.W.; Sansome, E.R. Cytological studies of heterothallism and secondary homothallism in Bremia lactucae. Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 1982, 79, 291–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Brasier, C.M. Evolutionary biology of Phytophthora. Part I. Genetic system, sexuality and the generation of variation. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1992, 30, 153–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Judelson, H.S.; Spielman, L.J.; Shattock, R.C. Genetic mapping and non-Mendelian segregation of mating type loci in the oomycete, Phytophthora infestans. Genetics 1995, 141, 503–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Judelson, H.S. Genetic and physical variability at the mating type locus of the oomycete, Phytophthora infestans. Genetics 1996, 144, 1005–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gallegly, M.E. Genetics of Phytophthora. Phytopathology 1970, 60, 1135–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Timmer, L.W.; Castro, J.; Erwin, D.C.; Belser, W.L.; Zentmyer, G.A. Genetic evidence for zygotic meiosis in Phytophthora capsici. Am. J. Bot. 1970, 57, 1211–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shattock, R.C.; Tooley, P.W.; Fry, W.E. Genetics of Phytophthora infestans: Characterization of single-oospore cultures from A1 isolates induced to self by intraspecific stimulation. Phytopathology 1986, 76, 407–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Spielman, L.J.; Sweigard, J.A.; Shattock, R.C.; Fry, W.E. The genetics of Phytophthora infestans: Segregation of allozyme markers in F2 and backcross progeny and the inheritance of virulence against potato resistance genes R2 and R4 in F1 progeny. Exp. Mycol. 1990, 14, 57–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ho, H.H. The Taxonomy and Biology of Phytophthora and Pythium. J Bacteriol Mycol Open Access 2018, 6, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Francis, D.M.; Clair, D.A.S. Population genetics of Pythium ultimum. Phytopathology 1997, 87, 454–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Billiard, S.; López-Villavicencio, M.; Hood, M.E.; Giraud, T. Sex, outcrossing and mating types: Unsolved questions in fungi and beyond. J. Evol. Biol. 2012, 25, 1020–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Sources of Sclerospora graminicola isolates collected from different pearl millet growing states of India.
Table 1. Sources of Sclerospora graminicola isolates collected from different pearl millet growing states of India.
IdentityLocationStateYearMaintenance Host
Sg 018PatancheruTelangana19927042 S
Sg 019PatancheruTelangana19927042 S
Sg 021AhmednagarMaharashtra19937042 S
Sg 048MysoreKarnataka1994852 B
Sg 139JodhpurRajasthan1997Nokha Local
Sg 150JalnaMaharashtra1997834 B
Sg 151DurgapuraRajasthan1997Nokha Local
Sg 153PatancheruTelangana1997843 B
Sg 200JamnagarGujarat1998ICMP 451
Sg 212DurgapuraRajasthan1998ICMP 451
Sg 298IARI New Delhi1999W 504-1-1
Sg 334BhiwaniHaryana20017042 S
Sg 384BarmerRajasthan2003ICMP 451
Sg 409PatancheruTelangana2004PMB 11571-2
Sg 431PatancheruTelangana20057042 S
Sg 445BanaskanthaGujarat2005Pioneer 7777
Sg 457Sujnapur, JaipurRajasthan2006ICMP 451
Sg 492IglasUttar Pradesh2007ICMP 451
Sg 510BadaunUttar Pradesh20087042 S
Sg 519RewariHaryana20097042 S
Sg 520BhiwaniHaryana20097042 S
Sg 521RewariHaryana20097042 S
Sg 526JodhpurRajasthan20097042 S
Sg 528CAZRI, JodhpurRajasthan20097042 S
Sg 529CAZRI, JodhpurRajasthan20097042 S
Sg 530Karodi, AurangabadMaharashtra20097042 S
Sg 531NashikMaharashtra20097042 S
Sg 532Srirampur, AhmednagarMaharashtra20097042 S
Sg 533Newasa, AhmednagarMaharashtra20097042 S
Sg 535Gangapur, AurangabadMaharashtra20097042 S
Sg 540Jambal, AurangabadMaharashtra20107042 S
Sg 541Pimpalgaon, AurangabadMaharashtra20107042 S
Sg 542AurangabadMaharashtra20107042 S
Sg 543AurangabadMaharashtra20107042 S
Sg 544AurangabadMaharashtra20107042 S
Sg 545AurangabadMaharashtra20107042 S
Sg 546Tanda, AurangabadMaharashtra20107042 S
Sg 547JalnaMaharashtra20107042 S
Sg 548Dakkalgaon, JalnaMaharashtra20107042 S
Sg 549Hathnur, AurangabadMaharashtra20107042 S
Sg 550Kannad, AurangabadMaharashtra20107042 S
Sg 551Chalisgaon, JalgaonMaharashtra20107042 S
Sg 552Sindhkheda, DhuleMaharashtra20107042 S
Sg 553Dondaicha, DhuleMaharashtra20107042 S
Sg 554Indave, DhuleMaharashtra20107042 S
Sg 555NARP, AurangabadMaharashtra20107042 S
Sg 556Kothigaon, BanaskanthaGujarat20107042 S
Sg 557Lodhnoor, BanaskanthaGujarat20107042 S
Sg 558Gagana, BanaskanthaGujarat20107042 S
Sg 559Jamdi, BanaskanthaGujarat20107042 S
Sg 560SK Nagar, BanaskanthaGujarat20107042 S
Sg 561IARI New Delhi2010ICMP 451
Table 2. Observation on oospore formation in 52 selfed Sclerospora graminicola isolates.
Table 2. Observation on oospore formation in 52 selfed Sclerospora graminicola isolates.
S.No.Isolate No.Oospore FormationS.N.Isolate
No.
Oospore Formation
No OosporeOosporesNo OosporeOospores
1Sg 018 28Sg 532
2Sg.019 29Sg 533
3Sg 021 30Sg.535
4Sg 048 31Sg 540
5Sg 139 32Sg 541
6Sg 150 33Sg 542
7Sg 151 34Sg 543
8Sg 153 35Sg 544
9Sg 200 36Sg 545
10Sg 212 37Sg 546
11Sg 298 38Sg 547
12Sg 334 39Sg 548
13Sg 384 40Sg 549
14Sg 409 41Sg 550
15Sg 431 42Sg 551
16Sg 445 43Sg 552
17Sg 457 44Sg 553
18Sg 492 45Sg 554
19Sg 510 46Sg 555
20Sg 519 47Sg 556
21Sg.520 48Sg 557
22Sg 521 49Sg 558
23Sg 526 50Sg 559
24Sg 528 51Sg 560
25Sg 529 52Sg 561
26Sg 530
27Sg 531
Table 3. Differential reaction of the isolates selected for developing F1 progenies.
Table 3. Differential reaction of the isolates selected for developing F1 progenies.
PathotypeMating TypePercent Disease Incidence on Host Differential Lines
7006517042 R7042 S852 BICMP451IP18292IP18293P310-17P7-4
Sg 018Mat-1447970940408
Sg 019Mat-2038950910003
Sg 445?537510010010080466386
Table 4. Determination of sexual compatibility types of F1 progenies based on oospores formation with Sg 445, Mat-1 (G1) and Sg 019, Mat-2 (G2).
Table 4. Determination of sexual compatibility types of F1 progenies based on oospores formation with Sg 445, Mat-1 (G1) and Sg 019, Mat-2 (G2).
PopulationOospore Formation withMating Type of PopulationSelf-Fertile/
Sterile
Remarks
Sg 445-1 (G1)Sg 019 (G2)
P1NYG1NHeterothallic
P5YNG2NHeterothallic
P6YYG1G2YHomothallic
P7YNG2NHeterothallic
P8YNG2NHeterothallic
P10NYG1YSecondary homothallic
P11YYG1G2YHomothallic
P12YNG2YSecondary homothallic
P14YYG1G2YHomothallic
P18YYG1G2YHomothallic
P19YNG2NHeterothallic
P20NYG1YSecondary homothallic
P21YNG2NHeterothallic
P22YNG2YSecondary homothallic
P23YNG2NHeterothallic
P24YYG1G2YHomothallic
P25YYG1G2NHeterothallic
P26YYG1G2YHomothallic
P27YYG1G2YHomothallic
P28YNG2YSecondary homothallic
P29YYG1G2NHeterothallic
P30NNNeutralNNeuter
P31YYG1G2YHomothallic
P32YNG2YSecondary homothallic
P33YNG2YSecondary homothallic
P34YYG1G2YHomothallic
P35YYG1G2YHomothallic
P36YYG1G2YHomothallic
P37YNG2YSecondary homothallic
P38YYG1G2YHomothallic
P39NYG1YSecondary homothallic
P40YYG1G2YHomothallic
P41YNG2YSecondary homothallic
P42YYG1G2YHomothallic
P43YYG1G2YHomothallic
P44YYG1G2YHomothallic
P45YYG1G2YHomothallic
P46YYG1G2YHomothallic
P47YYG1G2YHomothallic
N = no oospore, Y = oospores formed.
Table 5. Summary of determination of sexual compatibility types of F1 populations based on oospore formation with Sg 445, Mat-1(G1) and Sg 019, Mat-2 (G2).
Table 5. Summary of determination of sexual compatibility types of F1 populations based on oospore formation with Sg 445, Mat-1(G1) and Sg 019, Mat-2 (G2).
No. of ProgeniesSelf-FertileOospore FormationCompatibility TypesRemarks
Sg 445-1Sg 019
19YYYG1 G2Homothallic
2NYYG1 G2Heterothallic
3YNYG1Secondary homothallic
1NNYG1Heterothallic
6NYNG2Heterothallic
7YYNG2Secondary homothallic
1NNNG0Neuter
N = no oospore, Y = oospores formed.
Table 6. Mendelian segregation of sexual compatibility types in two distinct self-sterile heterothallic parents (Sg 445-1, Mat-1, G1 × Sg 019, Mat-2, G2) of Sclerospora graminicola.
Table 6. Mendelian segregation of sexual compatibility types in two distinct self-sterile heterothallic parents (Sg 445-1, Mat-1, G1 × Sg 019, Mat-2, G2) of Sclerospora graminicola.
G1g1 (Mat-1) × G2g2 (Mat-2)
Jof 08 00629 i002G2g2
Jof 08 00629 i001
G1G1 G2
(Mat-1/Mat-2)
G1 g2
(Mat-1)
g1G2 g1
(Mat-2)
g1 g2
(G0, Neuter)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Raj, C.; Sharma, R. Sexual Compatibility Types in F1 Progenies of Sclerospora graminicola, the Causal Agent of Pearl Millet Downy Mildew. J. Fungi 2022, 8, 629. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8060629

AMA Style

Raj C, Sharma R. Sexual Compatibility Types in F1 Progenies of Sclerospora graminicola, the Causal Agent of Pearl Millet Downy Mildew. Journal of Fungi. 2022; 8(6):629. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8060629

Chicago/Turabian Style

Raj, Chandramani, and Rajan Sharma. 2022. "Sexual Compatibility Types in F1 Progenies of Sclerospora graminicola, the Causal Agent of Pearl Millet Downy Mildew" Journal of Fungi 8, no. 6: 629. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8060629

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop