Next Article in Journal
Snake Fungal Disease in Free-Ranging Northern Pine Snakes (Pituophis melanoleucus melanoleucus) in New Jersey: Lesions, Severity of Sores and Investigator’s Perceptions
Previous Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Identification and Characterization of the Medium-Chain Dehydrogenase/Reductase Superfamily of Trichosporon asahii and Its Involvement in the Regulation of Fluconazole Resistance
Previous Article in Special Issue
Closing the Gap in Proteomic Identification of Histoplasma capsulatum: A Case Report and Review of Literature
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JoF
Volume 10
Issue 2
10.3390/jof10020124
jof-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Histoplasmosis in Solid Organ Transplantation

by
Nicolas Barros
1,2,3,* and
L. Joseph Wheat
3
1
Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
2
Division of Infectious Diseases, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
3
Miravista Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN 46241, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Fungi 2024, 10(2), 124; https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10020124
Submission received: 20 December 2023 / Revised: 24 January 2024 / Accepted: 26 January 2024 / Published: 2 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Histoplasma and Histoplasmosis 2023)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Histoplasma capsulatum, the etiological agent for histoplasmosis, is a dimorphic fungus that grows as a mold in the environment and as a yeast in human tissues. It has a broad global distribution with shifting epidemiology during recent decades. While in immunocompetent individuals infection is usually self-resolving, solid organ transplant recipients are at increased risk of symptomatic disease with dissemination to extrapulmonary tissue. Diagnosis of histoplasmosis relies on direct observation of the pathogen (histopathology, cytopathology, and culture) or detection of antigens, antibodies, or nucleic acids. All transplant recipients with histoplasmosis warrant therapy, though the agent of choice and duration of therapy depends on the severity of disease. In the present article, we describe the pathogenesis, epidemiology, clinical manifestations and management of histoplasmosis in solid organ transplant recipients.

1. Introduction

Histoplasma capsulatum is a dimorphic fungus that grows as a mold in the environment and as a yeast in human tissue. Historically, the genus Histoplasma capsulatum has been classified by its geographic distribution, morphology, and clinical symptoms. This classification includes three varieties: var. capsulatum, var. duboisii and var. farciminosum [1]. Human histoplasmosis occurs due to infections with H. capsulatum var. capsulatum or H. capsulatum var. duboisii. The latter only occurs in small pockets of Africa [2]. More recent studies have shown that the genus Histoplasma is a complex of cryptic species with multiple genetically distinct genetic groups. There are five discrete genetic clusters (Nam1, Nam2, LAmA, Panama and Africa) [3]. In the current article, we will describe histoplasmosis based on its historical classification, though we acknowledge that this is an incomplete and old classification. Given that most cases are caused by H. capsulatum var. capsulatum, in the current review article, we will refer to it as H. capsulatum.
H. capsulatum has a worldwide distribution with presence in every continent except Antarctica. In North America, the areas with highest endemicity include the valleys of the Mississippi and Ohio rivers, where the incidence is estimated to be 6.1 cases per 100,000 individuals and almost 90% of the population will be exposed to histoplasmosis during their lifetime [4,5]. In a study from a hyperendemic area, 24% of the solid organ transplant candidates had evidence of prior exposure to histoplasmosis [6]. During past decades, there have been significant changes in the epidemiology of histoplasmosis [7]. This may be related to disruption of the environment, climate change, anthropomorphic activities and increased immunosuppressive conditions, including solid organ transplantation [8].
Seroprevalence in Central and South America has a wide range of regional variability, but prior exposure may be as high as 30% of the population [9,10]. While in most immunocompetent patients histoplasmosis is usually a self-resolving infection [11,12], solid organ transplant recipients and other immunocompromised hosts have a propensity to developed severe forms of the disease with dissemination to extrapulmonary organs [13]. Here, we will describe important aspects of human histoplasmosis in solid organ transplantation.

2. Pathogenesis

H. capsulatum can be found in microfoci of soil enriched with nitrogen with pH levels of 5–10. This environment is present in areas were copious amounts of bird excreta or bat guano is present [14,15].
In the environment, the mycelial phase has two types of conidia. The macroconidia measures 8–14 µm in diameter and displays distinct tuberculate projections (ship’s wheel). The microconidia measure 2–5 µm in diameter and are considered an infectious form. Given their size, microconidia can easily aerosolize with any disruption of their microenvironment (e.g., farming, demolition of old buildings, exposure to chicken coops, caves, etc.) [16].
The onset of infection occurs following inhalation of microconidia or mycelial fragments which reach the pulmonary alveoli. A temperature shift leads to conversion into the pathogenic yeast form. Upregulation of the proteins from the RYP family (Ryp1, Ryp2, Ryp3 and Ryp4) regulate the fungal morphology in response to temperature [17].
Upon reaching the alveoli, H. capsulatum must evade soluble pattern recognition receptors that display direct fungicidal activity. The collectins, surfactant protein A and surfactant protein D, have been shown to have direct fungicidal activity through a calcium-dependent mechanism of yeast permeabilization [18]. Surfactant protein A has been shown to be substantially reduced in patients co-infected with HIV and H. capsulatum, which may be associated with a higher fungal burden [19]. While the role of surfactant protein A and macrophage activation in diverse infectious pathogens has been studied in immunocompetent hosts, little is known about SP-A and SP-D in solid organ transplant recipients. In lung transplantation, low levels of surfactant protein A in exhaled particles has been associated with an increased risk of bronchiolitis obliterans [20].
H. capsulatum yeast is internalized by macrophages, and to a lesser extent, by dendritic cells and neutrophils, using three different complement receptors (CR3, CR4 and LFA-1) [11]. The Heat shock Protein 60 (Hsp60) of H. capsulatum is a major surface adhesin to macrophages and binds to the β subunit (CD18) of CR3 (CD11b/CD18) [12]. Macrophages can also respond to H. capsulatum by recognizing other pathogen-associated molecular patterns through pattern recognition receptors, including Dectin-1 [21]. This C-type lectin recognizes 1-3-β-D-glucan, which is a major polysaccharide in the cell wall of most fungal pathogens. While the interaction of Dectin-1 and 1-3-β-D-glucan is not directly involved in phagocytosis, it mediates pro-inflammatory cytokine expression (TNF-α and IL-6) in a mechanism dependent on CR3 association [22].
In order to achieve successful internalization without triggering a proinflammatory cascade, H. capsulatum yeasts must avoid the interaction of Dectin-1 and 1-3-β-D-glucan without compromising Hsp-60 and CR3 engagement. To accomplish this, H. capsulatum expresses an outer layer of 1-3-α-glucan, concealing 1-3-β-D-glucan which, in turn, impairs the recognition by Dectin-1 [23]. Furthermore, H. capsulatum yeasts express 1-3-β-glucanase (Eng1 protein) which hydrolyzes exposed 1-3-β-D-glucan that has not been concealed by 1-3-α-glucan [24]. The H antigen is a beta-glucosidase that remodels the yeast cell wall and is involved in nutrient acquisition [25].
Once in the phagosome, H. capsulatum evades both reactive oxygen and nitrogen species by secreting a Cu/Zn-type superoxide dismutase 3 (Sod3), Catalases (CatB [M antigen]) and CatP) and nitric oxide reductase (Nor1) [26,27,28,29]. Phagolysosome acidification is subsequently inhibited by the enzyme HMG CoA lyase [30].
Macrophages play a dual role by containing infection and providing an environment where replication and/or dormancy can occur. H. capsulatum uses them as a trojan horse for dissemination. Their infection may induce granuloma formation in different tissues which are, in turn, required to contain fungal growth and dissemination while protecting from widespread collateral inflammatory tissue damage [31]. Macrophages represented 70% of all cells in a murine model of Histoplasma-induced granulomas. Dendritic cells and T cells were also present within the granulomas. Dendritic cells provide the link between the innate and adaptive immune responses by acting as antigen-presenting cells [32]. Human dendritic cells drive CD4+ T cell differentiation and proliferation. CD4+ T cell polarization into the Th1 phenotype leads to the production of IFN-γ and TNF-α which activates intracellular killing and is pivotal for controlling infection [33]. CD4+ T cells are the main producer of IFN-γ and TNF-α within the granulomas [31].
Granuloma formation may be impaired in the event of immunosuppression which can lead to dissemination. Blockage of TNF-α has been associated with increased fungal burden and disseminated disease [34]. While about 90% of people exposed to H. capsulatum remain asymptomatic or have mild self-resolved symptoms, some develop severe histoplasmosis [16]. Therefore, the outcome of infection and clinical presentations depends on the interplay and delicate balance between the host’s innate and adaptive immunity and the fungal virulence factors (Figure 1).

3. Epidemiology and Risk Factors

In North America, the geographic distribution was first described in the 1950s and 1960s using antigen skin testing of persons living in a single county with no history of travel [5,35]. Since then, the geographic distribution of histoplasmosis has expanded to regions beyond their historical border (Figure 2) [36]. This may be related to changes in climate and human land use, with increased cultivation in several regions and urbanization of others [8]. Using a weighted analysis of three environmental soil characteristics measured across the continental United States, Maiga et al. showed that the soils suitable for growth of histoplasmosis have expanded into the upper Missouri River Basin, with pockets of suitability in almost all states [15].
Transplant-associated histoplasmosis can occur as a de novo infection from environmental exposures, as a donor-derived infection or as reactivation from a latent infection, though the latter remains controversial [37]. In a prior autopsy series in which calcified granulomas were examined, two thirds had yeast forms consistent with Histoplasma spp. However, fungal cultures remained sterile and inoculation in experimental animal models failed to cause infection which refutes the possibility of reactivation from prior infections [38]. Histoplasmosis has been reported after several years after returning from an endemic country, though it is possible that the patient in question may have had a low-level infection that never cleared but progressed following an increased net state of immunosuppression [39].
Despite their increased susceptibility to fungal pathogens, infections due to dimorphic fungi remain uncommon in solid organ transplant recipients. Of the dimorphic fungi, Histoplasma is the most common pathogen leading to clinical disease following solid organ transplantation. In a large prospective surveillance study among transplant recipients at 23 centers throughout the United States between 2001 and 2006 (Transplant-Associated Infection Surveillance Network, TRANSNET), histoplasmosis represented 75% of all dimorphic fungal infections, with a 12 month cumulative incidence rate of 0.102%. About 50% of all the infections occurred in kidney transplant recipients, though this is likely a representation of the increased number of kidney transplant recipients in the underlying cohort. The median time from transplantation was 274 days, and 15% of the patients with histoplasmosis died within 3 months of diagnosis [40].
In a more recent cohort of 24 solid organ transplant (SOT) centers between 2003 and 2010, Assi et al. identified 152 cases of histoplasmosis which occurred at a median time from transplantation of 27 months, though over a third occurred during the first year [13].
Another group showed that the global incidence of post-transplantation active histoplasmosis was 1 case per 1000 person-years [41]. The incidence was highest among pancreas transplant recipients (10.7 cases per 1000 person-years) followed by kidney–pancreas (2.6 cases per 1000 person-years), lung (2 cases per 1000 person-years), heart (1.2 cases per 1000 person-years), kidneys (0.6 cases per 1000 person-years) and liver transplant recipients (0.4 cases per 1000 person-years).
Several reports indicate that the rate of infections may be increasing. Freifeld et al. showed a 17-fold rise in histoplasmosis cases among SOT patients during 2002–2004, compared with the prior 5 year period [42]. This may be related to increased awareness and improved diagnostics. Benedict et al. showed that from 2001 to 2012, histoplasmosis-associated hospitalizations in transplant recipients had an annual percentage increase of 12.9% [43].
The risk factors for post-transplant histoplasmosis include increased net state of immunosuppression and environmental exposures. Of note, exposure to birds, bats or their droppings are described in more than 75% of outbreaks, but only 25% of the sporadic cases [36]. Given that over 95% of the cases are sporadic, the vast majority of patients do not recall having a clear exposure [36]. In another study of enhanced surveillance in nine states during 2018 and 2019, the patients reported exposures including handling plants (48%) and bird or bat droppings (24%). However, 22% of the patients did not report any specific exposures [40].
Data on the epidemiology of histoplasmosis in SOT outside North America are limited. In a large retrospective study of 1754 liver or kidney transplant recipients in Brazil, Batista et al. reported that the rate of infection was 0.2% [44]. Another Brazilian cohort showed that histoplasmosis was the second most common invasive fungal infection following Cryptococcosis and occurred in 1.1% of all their kidney transplant recipients. The median time to diagnosis was 24 months (IQR 11 to 38 months). The use of anti-thymocyte immunoglobulin and methylprednisolone pulses was associated with earlier cases of infections [45]. In a study of 102 autopsies of kidney transplant recipients in Brazil from 1968 to 1991, histoplasmosis was the underlying cause of death in 3% [46].

4. Clinical Presentation

While most immunocompetent individuals will have asymptomatic infections or self-resolved mild symptomatic disease, solid organ transplant recipients usually present with significant symptomatic disease [47]. Clinical presentations may be highly variable, non-specific and with a wide range of severity (Table 1). This often leads to a significant delay in diagnosis. Diagnosis is usually delayed by 1–3 weeks following initiation of symptoms [41,42,48]. Most patients experience fever (89–93%), shortness of breath and cough (57%) but symptoms may also include fatigue, diaphoresis, headache and weight loss (all). Histoplasmosis has also been identified as a cause of fever of unknown origin [49].
In a large cohort of 125 cases of histoplasmosis in SOT, only 8% of the patients presented with mild disease, while 63% presented with moderate disease, and 27% had severe disease requiring intensive care management [13]. In a smaller cohort of 23 SOTs, the severity of disease at presentation was almost identical (4%, 61%, 35%, respectively) [50]. Disseminated disease is the most common presentation, occurring in 81% of patients with no difference in severity related to the type of transplanted organ [13]. The lungs are most often involved (81%), regardless of the type of presentation (pulmonary vs disseminated) [13]. Pulmonary infiltrates were identified in 50–70% of the patients by chest X ray but 87–100% by chest CT. The most common type of infiltrates include multiple nodular disease (with or without miliary pattern 6%) and diffuse bibasilar infiltrates. Splenomegaly and lymphadenopathy were present in 50% of cases [41,50].
Other organs involved included bone marrow (32%), liver (22%), spleen (13%), gastrointestinal (11%), central nervous system (7%) and skin (3%) [41]. Interestingly, liver allograft was associated with 80% of the liver transplant recipients with histoplasmosis [48,51].
Laboratory abnormalities are frequent. These include pancytopenia, transaminitis, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, hypercalcemia and elevated inflammatory markers (e.g., ferritin) [41,52,53,54]. Histoplasmosis-induced hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) has been reported [55]. This syndrome is the result of defects in NK cell cytotoxicity resulting in a positive feedback loop of uncontrolled intracellular infection, ongoing immune activation, and a lack of immune downregulation. HLH is characterized by the presence of fever, hepatosplenomegaly, cytopenias, hyperferritinemia, elevated soluble IL-2R and decreased NK function. The optimal treatment is unknown, though most clinicians only treat underlying infection.

5. Diagnostics

Diagnosis of histoplasmosis relies on direct observation of the pathogen (histopathology, cytopathology, and culture) or detection of antigens, antibodies, or nucleic acids (Table 2).

5.1. Culture, Histopathology and Cytopathology

Isolation of H. capsulatum from clinical specimens remains the gold standard for diagnosis of histoplasmosis, though histopathologic or direct microscopic identification are also considered definitive diagnosis [56]. However, having a trained pathologist/microbiologist is imperative for accurate reports.
Fungemia is present in 63% of patients and is higher in patients with disseminated compared to mild-to-moderate disease (90% vs. 49%). Lung or respiratory cultures were positive in 72% of patients and were more common in disseminated compared to mild-to-moderate disease (77% vs. 60%) [13]. Direct visualization of organisms in bone marrow occurred in 71% of patients [13].

5.2. Antigen

Detection of H. capsulatum polysaccharides in urine and serum was first developed in 1986 as a sandwich radioimmunoassay. Since then, it has been improved to a second-generation EIA, which allowed for semiquantitative results and reduced the number of false-positive results caused by human anti-rabbit antibodies, and subsequently, a third-generation quantitative test with improved sensitivity (MVista Histoplasma galactomannan EIA, Indianapolis, IN, USA) [57].
In a study of 18 solid organ transplant recipients with proven histoplasmosis from two university medical centers in the Midwest, antigenuria was present in all the cases [42]. Another report from an endemic area, showed that 12/14 (85%) of SOT patients with disseminated disease had a positive urine antigen test [41]. The lower sensitivity in this study may be related to the use of an older generation test for antigen detection as the study spanned from 1997 to 2007.
In a large multicenter study involving 152 SOTs (kidney: 51%, liver: 16%, kidney/pancreas: 14%, heart: 9%, lung: 5%, pancreas: 2%, others: 2%) with histoplasmosis, Assi et al. showed that urinary antigen testing was the most sensitive test, being positive in 93% of all patients [13]. Antigenemia was present in 86%. However, the test performed differently depending on the burden of disease. Antigenuria was present in 73% of the patients with pulmonary disease vs. 97% of those with progressive disseminated disease (p = 0.01). In addition, antigenemia was present in 59% of the patients with pulmonary disease vs. 89% of those with progressive disseminated disease (p = 0.03) [13].
While the MVista assays are laboratory-developed tests requiring processing in a central laboratory, an in vitro urine Histoplasma galactomannan EIA by IMMY (IMMY Alpha EIA, Norman, OK, USA) was FDA approved in 2007 and has the advantage of being available for use at local facilities. This is particularly useful in settings outside the United States. The IMMY alpha EIA has a sensitivity of 67% for progressive disseminated histoplasmosis in patients living with HIV [58]. Subsequently, IMMY developed a new platform using an analyte-specific reagent H. capsulatum antigen EIA (Clarus IMMY Histoplasma GM EIA, IMMY, USA). This in vitro test has been FDA cleared [59]. In their initial reports, the Clarus IMMY had a sensitivity of 64.5%. with a cutoff of >0.5 ng/mL which increased to 80.7% if the cutoff was lowered to >0.15 ng/mL [60]. The specificity at those cutoff levels was 99.8% and 96.3%, respectively. In a reevaluation of those cutoff levels, Theel et al. showed an improved positive and negative agreement with MVD EIA (82.3%). Of note, all indeterminates result were removed from the analysis [61]. A subsequent study from clinical samples, showed it had a lower overall sensitivity compared to MVista EIA (72% vs. 96%) [62]. Of note, both tests detected all patients with progressive disseminated histoplasmosis. A more recent study in patients living with HIV/AIDS with progressive disseminated disease showed that the sensitivity of Clarus IMMY EIA was 91.3% with a specificity of 90.9% [59]. It is unclear if the differences observed in the prior studies are related to study populations (immunocompetent vs. immunocompromised) and disease burden (pulmonary histoplasmosis vs progressive disseminated histoplasmosis).
The detection of Histoplasma galactomannan in other body fluids including bronchoalveolar lavage and cerebrospinal fluid has been described for the diagnosis of pulmonary and central nervous system histoplasmosis, respectively. Of note, the galactomannan tested in body fluids of patients with histoplasmosis is identical to galactomannan detected in blastomycosis [63]. Histoplasma galactomannan was detected in 84% of cases of pulmonary histoplasmosis and 83.3% of patients with pulmonary blastomycosis. The test had a specificity of 98% in patients with other pulmonary infections [64]. The sensitivity of the test in CSF for central nervous system histoplasmosis was 78% with a specificity of 97% [65].
Recently, a Histoplasma galactomannan antigen qualitative lateral flow assay was developed (MVD Histoplasma LFA). The test can be read manually and by an automated reader. It has an overall sensitivity of 78.8% with a specificity of 99.3%. While positive in only 50% of patients with pulmonary histoplasmosis, it was positive in 91.3% with disseminated histoplasmosis [66]. Furthermore, its sensitivity in immunocompromised patients was 93.6%.
In a study of patients living with HIV and progressive disseminated histoplasmosis in Mexico, the sensitivity of the MV LFA was 90.4%, which was similar to Clarus IMMY EIA (91.3%) [59]
In a study by Caceres et al. in Colombian patients living with HIV, the Histoplasma LFA showed an excellent analytical performance, with a sensitivity of 96% and specificity of 90% [67,68].
OptimumIDX recently developed another lateral flow platform (OIDx Histoplasma LFA). The test had a sensitivity of 92% but a specificity of 32% [69]. In a study from Ghana, the OIDx Histoplasma LFA had a positive concordance with Clarus IMMY of 98.4%, though negative concordance was not reported [70].
The galactomannan detected in the MiraVista antigen assay has almost the same molecular characteristics as those in Blastomyces dermatidis, Paracoccidioides braziliensis and Talaromyces marnefii [71]. Hence, they express almost complete cross-reactivity. Low-level cross-reactivity occurs with the galactomannan detected in coccidioidomycosis and other dimorphic fungi [71,72,73,74,75,76,77].

5.3. 1-3-β-D-Glucan

1-3 β-D-glucan is a component of the cell wall of most fungi and its detection in serum has been used to identify patients with invasive fungal diseases [78]. Previous studies have shown that serum 1-3-β-D-glucan is present in over 85% of all patients with histoplasmosis [79,80]. However, the lack of specificity and high false-positive rate in patients without an invasive fungal infection limits its use as a diagnostic tool for histoplasmosis.

5.4. Aspergillus Galactomannan

The test for the detection of Aspergillus galactomannan (Platelia, Bio-Rad, Marnes-La-Coquette, France) is widely used to diagnose invasive aspergillosis [81]. Several studies have shown that 67–100% of patients with disseminated histoplasmosis have a positive Aspergillus galactomannan test [82,83,84]. In an experimental model of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis, specimens that were positive for Aspergillus galactomannan (including those with very high levels) were negative for Histoplasma antigen EIA [84]. Cross-reactivity has also been noted with paracoccidioidomycosis (50%) and cryptococcosis (50%) [82].
Of note, patients with aspergillosis do not have positive urine or serum Histoplasma antigen EIA [84]. For that reason, it is important to rule out histoplasmosis and other fungi in the setting of a positive Aspergillus galactomannan.

5.5. Serology

The most common tests assessing antibodies against histoplasmosis include complement fixation (CF), immunodiffusion (ID) and ELISA immunoassay (EIA). CF detects antibodies against two antigens: histoplasmin and a yeast antigen. Historically, titers of 1:32 or above are suggestive of active histoplasmosis, while titers of 1:8 and 1:16 are considered presumptive evidence of histoplasmosis. A four-fold increase is suggestive of progression of the disease [85].
CF fixation or ID were positive in 33% to 36% of all cases, but detection of antibodies by CF was the basis for diagnosis in only 1 of 142 cases in the Assi report [13,41]. While 62% of the pulmonary cases were positive, only 28% of the disseminated cases were positive [13].
The ID test detects the presence of antibodies against antigens M and H. The M band is detectable in most immunocompetent patients with histoplasmosis (80%) but persists over time and does not distinguish between prior exposures or active disease. The presence of antibodies against H antigen detects active infection, though it lacks sensitivity (20%) [86].
ID and CF are complex and less standardized than EIA and not widely available in clinical laboratories. Prior reports indicate that antibodies by ID and CF are positive in 36–70% of cases [13,73]. In those reports, the authors do not provide the individual sensitivity of each test. However, data in solid organ transplant recipients are lacking. In patients with solid organ transplantation, antibody detection by EIA was positive in 50% of the patients (unpublished data).
Combining the detection of antigens and antibodies by EIA increased the sensitivity for the diagnosis of pulmonary histoplasmosis from 67% for antigen alone and 89% for antibody alone to 96.3% [87]. However, this cohort did not include patients with solid organ transplantation. The combination of detecting antigen and antibodies by EIA has also been studied in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with central nervous system histoplasmosis. In that study, Bloch et al. showed that the sensitivity of the test increased from 78% for antigen alone and 82% for antibody alone to 98% [88].
Of not, antibodies are detectable only 4–8 weeks after the initial infection and have lower sensitivity in the immunocompromised hosts [86].

5.6. Molecular Tests

Currently, there are no FDA-approved assays to detect histoplasmosis from human samples. However, a chemiluminescent DNA probe (AccuProbe test; Gen-Probe Incorporated 2011) is commercially available which decreases the time to identify the pathogen growing in culture [89]. A proteome-based technique, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time of light mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), has been shown to be highly accurate for the identification of H. capsulatum from cultures. This test can identify yeast forms and early mycelial cultures [90]. Of note, MALDI-TOF is only useful for the identification of Histoplasmosis in instruments with Vitek MS v3.0 database but not on MALDI Biotyper, Bruker Daltonics. The latter was unable to identify dimorphic fungi due to the lack of the fungal reference spectrum in its database [91].
There are multiple laboratory-developed Histoplasma-specific PCR assays, though clinical performance has not been described. Broad-range PCR of fungal 28S ribosome and internal transcribed spacers (ITS) have been used for the isolation of histoplasmosis in different tissues (e.g., paraffin-embedded biopsies) [92]. In recent years, metagenomics next-generation sequencing has been used for the identification of rare infections [93]. Recently, this assay was able to correctly identify two different cases of disseminated histoplasmosis [94].

6. Management

While most immunocompetent patients do not require therapy, all solid organ transplant recipients with histoplasmosis require therapy [47]. The agent of choice and duration of therapy depends on the severity of the clinical presentation (Table 3).
Most of the data have been extrapolated from trials in patients living with HIV. In patients presenting with disseminated disease, amphotericin B is associated with an increased clearance of cultures and a more rapid decline in median antigen levels in serum [95]. Liposomal amphotericin B is associated with less toxicity and mortality and is considered the agent of choice for induction therapy in patients with severe disease [96]. The American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice recommends continuation of induction therapy for a minimum of 1 to 2 weeks with clinical evidence of improvement [37]. In patients with CNS involvement, longer courses of induction therapy are recommended (i.e., 4 to 6 weeks) [37,97]. Following completion of induction therapy, therapy should step down to oral itraconazole. While the concomitant use of itraconazole and amphotericin B has not been associated with any antagonistic effects, in animal models, fluconazole has been shown to antagonize amphotericin’s reduction of fungal burden [98]. Itraconazole is preferred over fluconazole due to concerns of lower efficacy and development of resistance [98]. Other triazoles, including voriconazole, posaconazole and isavuconazole, have been studied. Voriconazole has been shown to have a low barrier for resistance, while posaconazole remained active in strains with fluconazole resistance [99]. Furthermore, voriconazole has been associated with increased mortality in the first 42 days when compared to itraconazole [100]. Isavuconazole also displayed a higher barrier to resistance and may be effective as step-down oral therapy for histoplasmosis [101]. Patients with mild-to-moderate infection may be treated with itraconazole monotherapy [102].
Conventional itraconazole (referred to here as itraconazole), is only available in oral formulations (i.e., capsules and solution). It has a suboptimal absorption with variable pharmacokinetics [99]. Absorption of oral capsules can be improved by consumption with acidic drinks (e.g., sodas) and fatty meals. Conversely, the oral solution is better absorbed on an empty stomach and is not affected by acid-suppressive therapies. Given the variable pharmacokinetic, therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended in all patients [100]. The metabolism of itraconazole produces an extensive number of metabolites; of those, hydroxyitraconazole has been found to have antifungal activity which is comparable to the parent drug [99]. When measuring serum concentrations by chromatographic tests (high-performance liquid chromatography [HPLC] or liquid chromatography mass spectrometry [LC-MS]), the sum of itraconazole and hydroxyitraconazole provide the total bioactive drug concentration.
The therapeutic target level of itraconazole/hydroxyitraconazole for the treatment of histoplasmosis is unknown, and the current recommendations of maintaining levels of at least 1.0 mcg/mL are derived from extrapolation of other fungal infections [100,101,102]. In patients with oropharyngeal candidiasis, itraconazole serum concentrations <1.0 mcg/mL were associated with treatment failures [103]. A recent study has shown that subtherapeutic concentrations (<1.0 mcg/mL) of itraconazole and hydroxyitraconazole were associated with increased mortality in patients with blastomycosis [104]. It is unclear if a concentration above 1.0 mcg/mL of the parent drug (itraconazole) or a combination of parent drug + metabolite (Itraconazole/hydroxyitraconazole) is required for improved outcomes in the management of histoplasmosis.
A newer formulation of itraconazole labeled super bioavailable (SUBA)-itraconazole has been developed with less variability under fasted condition [105]. However, its use has been limited due to its increased cost.
It is important to assess drug interactions as triazoles are strong inhibitors of the cytochrome P450 isoenzymes, particularly CYP3A4. Careful adjustment and drug level monitoring of other medications, including calcineurin inhibitors is pivotal, as it could lead to supratherapeutic levels [100] (Table 4).
Immune reconstitution syndrome has been observed in solid organ transplant recipients during therapy of Histoplasmosis. Withdrawal of immunosuppression and recovery of CD4+ T cell and CD8+ lymphocytes leads to a proinflammatory state. The management of immune reconstitution syndrome is predominately supportive, though in cases with severe inflammation, corticosteroids can be considered [106,107].
The 2007 Infectious Disease Society of America Histoplasmosis Treatment Guidelines and the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice recommend that therapy should be continued for a minimum of 12 months [97,101]. Assi et al. showed that relapses occur in up to 6% of patients, with two thirds occurring in the first 2 years following diagnosis. Of the patients who relapsed, 50% were treated with less than 7 months of therapy. The only risk factor associated with relapse was failure to reduce calcineurin inhibitor dosage [13].
The 2007 Infectious Disease Society of America Histoplasmosis Treatment Guidelines and the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice recommend monitoring urine and serum Histoplasma antigen levels measured by EIA at the time treatment is initiated, at 2 weeks, 1 month, then every 3 months during therapy and up to 6 months following completion of therapy [97,101]. Persistent low-level antigenuria is not infrequent, though patients with a urine Histoplasma antigen EIA level of >2 ng/mL at the time of stopping therapy are more likely to relapse [13]. The current guidelines recommend continuation of therapy until a urine Histoplasma antigen EIA level of <2 ng/mL is achieved [97,101].

7. Novel Antifungal Therapies and Strategies

Recently, the World Health Organization has endorsed a single high-dose regimen of amphotericin B for the treatment of cryptococcal meningitis [108,109]. This regimen is not only associated with fewer side effects, but it also has the advantage of limiting hospitalization costs. A recent prospective randomized multicenter open-label trial comparing a one- or two-dose induction therapy with liposomal amphotericin B versus the standard of care (daily liposomal amphotericin B for 2 weeks) has been reported [110]. The authors used a single dose (10 mg/Kg of LAmB) or two doses (10 mg/Kg of LAmB on D1 and 5 mg/Kg of LAmB on day 3) followed by step-down therapy with itraconazole. The authors concluded that one-day induction therapy with 10 mg/Kg of LAmB was safe and was not inferior to the standard of care. However, this regimen has not been tested in solid organ transplant recipients, and further data from the phase 3 study are warranted before this regimen could be extrapolated to other populations (clinical trial number 05814432).
A new oral formulation of amphotericin B (oral lipid nanocrystal amphotericin B) has been developed. In a recent randomized control trial, Boulware et al. evaluated the antifungal efficacy of oral lipid nanocrystal amphotericin B with flucytosine vs. the standard of care for the treatment of cryptococcal meningitis. They found that the newer oral formulation demonstrated similar antifungal activity, similar survival and was associated with fewer adverse side effects compared to the standard of care [111]. There are no trials assessing its activity for treatment of histoplasmosis.

8. Peri-Transplant Donor and Recipient Considerations

Donor-derived histoplasmosis is estimated to occur in approximately 1:10,000 transplants, though this incidence varies according to the endemicity of the area. In a large study of 449 patients in a hyperendemic area that underwent solid organ transplantation, 24% of the recipients were seropositive (M precipitins band or CF titer ≥ 1:8), though there were no post-transplant infections noted at the 16 month follow up. The authors concluded that the risk of reactivation is low and that routine prophylaxis with antifungal agents for those with radiographic or serological evidence of a prior infection (over 2 years) is not indicated [6]. The current guidelines state that active histoplasmosis within 2 years from transplantation may warrant prophylaxis, but did not specify the duration of prophylaxis [112].
A recent report summarized the cases of donor-derived endemic mycoses including seven cases of donor-derived histoplasmosis [113]. None of the donors were known or suspected to have histoplasmosis at the time of donation. In donors in whom there are concerns for active infection (e.g., granulomatous disease or history of histoplasmosis), cultures of the allograft, Histoplasma antigen and antibody results should be measured before the organs are procured. If a donor has evidence of active disease, is Histoplasma antigen positive in urine or serum, or Histoplasma antibody positive by EIA, transplantation should be delayed until there is evidence that the donor does not have active histoplasmosis.
If there is evidence of histoplasmosis in the explanted organ (e.g., positive fungal stains or presence of granulomas), graft cultures and serologies should be performed. If the cultures are negative but the serologies show an H and/or M precipitin band, or CF ≥ 1:32, then the recipient should receive prophylaxis with itraconazole for 3–6 months. If there is only evidence of granuloma and the CF is between 1:8 and 1:16, then urine and serum antigen monitoring every 3 months for 1 year is reasonable. If the donor died due to histoplasmosis (recognized after transplantation has occurred, as otherwise the donation is not advised) or if the cultures or antigens are positive, then the recipient should be treated for at least 1 year [112].

9. Conclusions

Histoplasma capsulatum, is the etiological agent for histoplasmosis. It is a dimorphic fungus that grows as a mold in the environment and as a yeast in human tissues. It has a broad global distribution with shifting epidemiology, likely due to climate change and anthropomorphic activity. Infection in immunocompetent recipients is usually asymptomatic or with mild respiratory symptoms, though severe forms including progressive disseminated disease can occur. Solid organ transplant recipients are at increased risk for developing symptomatic disease with progressive disseminated histoplasmosis. Antigen detection in bodily fluids remains the most sensitive test for diagnosis. Most data on treatment recommendations have been derived from other populations, including advanced HIV. Treatment is indicated in all solid organ transplant recipients for at least 12 months.
More research is required to test the efficacy of the current treatment recommendations in solid organ transplant recipients and to develop less toxic treatment regimens with fewer drug interactions. Furthermore, further research is needed to tailor the length of therapy in immunocompromised hosts.

Author Contributions

Writing—review and editing, N.B. and L.J.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Nicolas Barros and L. Joseph Wheat are employed by the company Miravista Diagnostics. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Teixeira Mde, M.; Patane, J.S.; Taylor, M.L.; Gomez, B.L.; Theodoro, R.C.; de Hoog, S.; Engelthaler, D.M.; Zancope-Oliveira, R.M.; Felipe, M.S.; Barker, B.M. Worldwide Phylogenetic Distributions and Population Dynamics of the Genus Histoplasma. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2016, 10, e0004732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ocansey, B.K.; Kosmidis, C.; Agyei, M.; Dorkenoo, A.M.; Ayanlowo, O.O.; Oladele, R.O.; Darre, T.; Denning, D.W. Histoplasmosis in Africa: Current perspectives, knowledge gaps, and research priorities. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2022, 16, e0010111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sepulveda, V.E.; Marquez, R.; Turissini, D.A.; Goldman, W.E.; Matute, D.R. Genome Sequences Reveal Cryptic Speciation in the Human Pathogen Histoplasma capsulatum. mBio 2017, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Baddley, J.W.; Winthrop, K.L.; Patkar, N.M.; Delzell, E.; Beukelman, T.; Xie, F.; Chen, L.; Curtis, J.R. Geographic distribution of endemic fungal infections among older persons, United States. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2011, 17, 1664–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Edwards, L.B.; Acquaviva, F.A.; Livesay, V.T.; Cross, F.W.; Palmer, C.E. An atlas of sensitivity to tuberculin, PPD-B, and histoplasmin in the United States. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1969, 99, 1–132. [Google Scholar]
  6. Vail, G.M.; Young, R.S.; Wheat, L.J.; Filo, R.S.; Cornetta, K.; Goldman, M. Incidence of histoplasmosis following allogeneic bone marrow transplant or solid organ transplant in a hyperendemic area. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2002, 4, 148–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Bahr, N.C.; Antinori, S.; Wheat, L.J.; Sarosi, G.A. Histoplasmosis infections worldwide: Thinking outside of the Ohio River valley. Curr. Trop. Med. Rep. 2015, 2, 70–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Mazi, P.B.; Sahrmann, J.M.; Olsen, M.A.; Coler-Reilly, A.; Rauseo, A.M.; Pullen, M.; Zuniga-Moya, J.C.; Powderly, W.G.; Spec, A. The Geographic Distribution of Dimorphic Mycoses in the United States for the Modern Era. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2023, 76, 1295–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Adenis, A.A.; Valdes, A.; Cropet, C.; McCotter, O.Z.; Derado, G.; Couppie, P.; Chiller, T.; Nacher, M. Burden of HIV-associated histoplasmosis compared with tuberculosis in Latin America: A modelling study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2018, 18, 1150–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Ashraf, N.; Kubat, R.C.; Poplin, V.; Adenis, A.A.; Denning, D.W.; Wright, L.; McCotter, O.; Schwartz, I.S.; Jackson, B.R.; Chiller, T.; et al. Re-drawing the Maps for Endemic Mycoses. Mycopathologia 2020, 185, 843–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Azar, M.M.; Loyd, J.L.; Relich, R.F.; Wheat, L.J.; Hage, C.A. Current Concepts in the Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Management of Histoplasmosis Syndromes. Semin. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2020, 41, 13–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Benedict, K.; Mody, R.K. Epidemiology of Histoplasmosis Outbreaks, United States, 1938–2013. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2016, 22, 370–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Assi, M.; Martin, S.; Wheat, L.J.; Hage, C.; Freifeld, A.; Avery, R.; Baddley, J.W.; Vergidis, P.; Miller, R.; Andes, D.; et al. Histoplasmosis after solid organ transplant. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2013, 57, 1542–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Colombo, A.L.; Tobon, A.; Restrepo, A.; Queiroz-Telles, F.; Nucci, M. Epidemiology of endemic systemic fungal infections in Latin America. Med. Mycol. 2011, 49, 785–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Maiga, A.W.; Deppen, S.; Scaffidi, B.K.; Baddley, J.; Aldrich, M.C.; Dittus, R.S.; Grogan, E.L. Mapping Histoplasma capsulatum Exposure, United States. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2018, 24, 1835–1839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wheat, L.J.; Azar, M.M.; Bahr, N.C.; Spec, A.; Relich, R.F.; Hage, C. Histoplasmosis. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2016, 30, 207–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Beyhan, S.; Gutierrez, M.; Voorhies, M.; Sil, A. A temperature-responsive network links cell shape and virulence traits in a primary fungal pathogen. PLoS Biol. 2013, 11, e1001614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. McCormack, F.X.; Gibbons, R.; Ward, S.R.; Kuzmenko, A.; Wu, H.; Deepe, G.S., Jr. Macrophage-independent fungicidal action of the pulmonary collectins. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 36250–36256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Carreto-Binaghi, L.E.; Tenorio, E.P.; Morales-Villarreal, F.R.; Aliouat, E.M.; Zenteno, E.; Martinez-Orozco, J.A.; Taylor, M.L. Detection of Cytokines and Collectins in Bronchoalveolar Fluid Samples of Patients Infected with Histoplasma capsulatum and Pneumocystis jirovecii. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Ericson, P.A.; Mirgorodskaya, E.; Hammar, O.S.; Viklund, E.A.; Almstrand, A.R.; Larsson, P.J.; Riise, G.C.; Olin, A.C. Low Levels of Exhaled Surfactant Protein A Associated With BOS After Lung Transplantation. Transplant. Direct 2016, 2, e103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kimberg, M.; Brown, G.D. Dectin-1 and its role in antifungal immunity. Med. Mycol. 2008, 46, 631–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Huang, J.H.; Lin, C.Y.; Wu, S.Y.; Chen, W.Y.; Chu, C.L.; Brown, G.D.; Chuu, C.P.; Wu-Hsieh, B.A. CR3 and Dectin-1 Collaborate in Macrophage Cytokine Response through Association on Lipid Rafts and Activation of Syk-JNK-AP-1 Pathway. PLoS Pathog. 2015, 11, e1004985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rappleye, C.A.; Eissenberg, L.G.; Goldman, W.E. Histoplasma capsulatum alpha-(1,3)-glucan blocks innate immune recognition by the beta-glucan receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 1366–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Garfoot, A.L.; Shen, Q.; Wuthrich, M.; Klein, B.S.; Rappleye, C.A. The Eng1 beta-Glucanase Enhances Histoplasma Virulence by Reducing beta-Glucan Exposure. mBio 2016, 7, e01388-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fisher, K.L.; Woods, J.P. Determination of beta-glucosidase enzymatic function of the Histoplasma capsulatum H antigen using a native expression system. Gene 2000, 247, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Valdez, A.F.; Miranda, D.Z.; Guimaraes, A.J.; Nimrichter, L.; Nosanchuk, J.D. Pathogenicity & virulence of Histoplasma capsulatum—A multifaceted organism adapted to intracellular environments. Virulence 2022, 13, 1900–1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nittler, M.P.; Hocking-Murray, D.; Foo, C.K.; Sil, A. Identification of Histoplasma capsulatum transcripts induced in response to reactive nitrogen species. Mol. Biol. Cell 2005, 16, 4792–4813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Holbrook, E.D.; Smolnycki, K.A.; Youseff, B.H.; Rappleye, C.A. Redundant catalases detoxify phagocyte reactive oxygen and facilitate Histoplasma capsulatum pathogenesis. Infect. Immun. 2013, 81, 2334–2346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Youseff, B.H.; Holbrook, E.D.; Smolnycki, K.A.; Rappleye, C.A. Extracellular superoxide dismutase protects Histoplasma yeast cells from host-derived oxidative stress. PLoS Pathog. 2012, 8, e1002713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Isaac, D.T.; Coady, A.; Van Prooyen, N.; Sil, A. The 3-hydroxy-methylglutaryl coenzyme A lyase HCL1 is required for macrophage colonization by human fungal pathogen Histoplasma capsulatum. Infect. Immun. 2013, 81, 411–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Heninger, E.; Hogan, L.H.; Karman, J.; Macvilay, S.; Hill, B.; Woods, J.P.; Sandor, M. Characterization of the Histoplasma capsulatum-induced granuloma. J. Immunol. 2006, 177, 3303–3313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Gildea, L.A.; Morris, R.E.; Newman, S.L. Histoplasma capsulatum yeasts are phagocytosed via very late antigen-5, killed, and processed for antigen presentation by human dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 2001, 166, 1049–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. McDermott, A.J.; Klein, B.S. Helper T-cell responses and pulmonary fungal infections. Immunology 2018, 155, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Vergidis, P.; Avery, R.K.; Wheat, L.J.; Dotson, J.L.; Assi, M.A.; Antoun, S.A.; Hamoud, K.A.; Burdette, S.D.; Freifeld, A.G.; McKinsey, D.S.; et al. Histoplasmosis complicating tumor necrosis factor-alpha blocker therapy: A retrospective analysis of 98 cases. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2015, 61, 409–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Schwarz, J.; Furcolow, M.L. Some epidemiologic factors and diagnostic tests in blastomycosis, coccidioidomycosis and histoplasmosis. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1955, 25, 261–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Benedict, K.; Toda, M.; Jackson, B.R. Revising Conventional Wisdom About Histoplasmosis in the United States. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2021, 8, ofab306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Saullo, J.L.; Miller, R.A. Updates on Histoplasmosis in Solid Organ Transplantation. Curr. Fungal Infect. Rep. 2022, 16, 165–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hage, C.; Kleiman, M.B.; Wheat, L.J. Histoplasmosis in solid organ transplant recipients. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2010, 50, 122–123; author reply 123–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Brunet, K.; Alanio, A.; Lortholary, O.; Rammaert, B. Reactivation of dormant/latent fungal infection. J. Infect. 2018, 77, 463–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Benedict, K.; McCracken, S.; Signs, K.; Ireland, M.; Amburgey, V.; Serrano, J.A.; Christophe, N.; Gibbons-Burgener, S.; Hallyburton, S.; Warren, K.A.; et al. Enhanced Surveillance for Histoplasmosis-9 States, 2018–2019. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2020, 7, ofaa343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Cuellar-Rodriguez, J.; Avery, R.K.; Lard, M.; Budev, M.; Gordon, S.M.; Shrestha, N.K.; van Duin, D.; Oethinger, M.; Mawhorter, S.D. Histoplasmosis in solid organ transplant recipients: 10 years of experience at a large transplant center in an endemic area. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2009, 49, 710–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Freifeld, A.G.; Iwen, P.C.; Lesiak, B.L.; Gilroy, R.K.; Stevens, R.B.; Kalil, A.C. Histoplasmosis in solid organ transplant recipients at a large Midwestern university transplant center. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2005, 7, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Benedict, K.; Derado, G.; Mody, R.K. Histoplasmosis-Associated Hospitalizations in the United States, 2001–2012. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2016, 3, ofv219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Batista, M.V.; Pierrotti, L.C.; Abdala, E.; Clemente, W.T.; Girao, E.S.; Rosa, D.R.; Ianhez, L.E.; Bonazzi, P.R.; Lima, A.S.; Fernandes, P.F.; et al. Endemic and opportunistic infections in Brazilian solid organ transplant recipients. Trop. Med. Int. Health 2011, 16, 1134–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Guimaraes, L.F.; Halpern, M.; de Lemos, A.S.; de Gouvea, E.F.; Goncalves, R.T.; da Rosa Santos, M.A.; Nucci, M.; Santoro-Lopes, G. Invasive Fungal Disease in Renal Transplant Recipients at a Brazilian Center: Local Epidemiology Matters. Transplant. Proc. 2016, 48, 2306–2309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Reis, M.A.; Costa, R.S.; Ferraz, A.S. Causes of death in renal transplant recipients: A study of 102 autopsies from 1968 to 1991. J. R. Soc. Med. 1995, 88, 24–27. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  47. Barros, N.; Wheat, J.L.; Hage, C. Pulmonary Histoplasmosis: A Clinical Update. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Grim, S.A.; Proia, L.; Miller, R.; Alhyraba, M.; Costas-Chavarri, A.; Oberholzer, J.; Clark, N.M. A multicenter study of histoplasmosis and blastomycosis after solid organ transplantation. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2012, 14, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sethi, J.; Gupta, K.L.; Mohanty, T.; Gupta, S.; Ahluwalia, J.; Kohli, H.S. Fever of Unknown Origin in a Renal Transplant Recipient: Lactate Dehydrogenase as an Important Clue to Diagnosis. Exp. Clin. Transplant. 2020, 18, 390–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Luckett, K.; Dummer, J.S.; Miller, G.; Hester, S.; Thomas, L. Histoplasmosis in Patients With Cell-Mediated Immunodeficiency: Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection, Organ Transplantation, and Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha Inhibition. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2015, 2, ofu116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Washburn, L.; Galvan, N.T.; Dhingra, S.; Rana, A.; Goss, J.A. Histoplasmosis hepatitis after orthotopic liver transplantation. J. Surg. Case Rep. 2017, 2017, rjx232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Giordani, M.C.; Villamil Cortez, S.K.; Diehl, M.; Barcan, L.A.; Rosa-Diez, G.; Groppa, S.R.; Schreck, C.; Mombelli, C.; Imperiali, N. Hypercalcemia as an Early Finding of Opportunistic Fungal Pneumonia in Renal Transplantation: A Case Series Report. Transplant. Proc. 2020, 52, 1178–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Jagadish, I.; Chen, W.J.; Agarwal, R.; Shoela, R. Case Report of Disseminated Adrenal Histoplasmosis and Secondary Adrenal Insufficiency. Cureus 2022, 14, e30614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Kauffman, C.A. Histoplasmosis: A clinical and laboratory update. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2007, 20, 115–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Townsend, J.L.; Shanbhag, S.; Hancock, J.; Bowman, K.; Nijhawan, A.E. Histoplasmosis-Induced Hemophagocytic Syndrome: A Case Series and Review of the Literature. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2015, 2, ofv055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. De Pauw, B.; Walsh, T.J.; Donnelly, J.P.; Stevens, D.A.; Edwards, J.E.; Calandra, T.; Pappas, P.G.; Maertens, J.; Lortholary, O.; Kauffman, C.A.; et al. Revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2008, 46, 1813–1821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Connolly, P.A.; Durkin, M.M.; Lemonte, A.M.; Hackett, E.J.; Wheat, L.J. Detection of histoplasma antigen by a quantitative enzyme immunoassay. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2007, 14, 1587–1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Torres-Gonzalez, P.; Niembro-Ortega, M.D.; Martinez-Gamboa, A.; Ahumada-Topete, V.H.; Andrade-Villanueva, J.; Araujo-Melendez, J.; Chaparro-Sanchez, A.; Crabtree-Ramirez, B.; Cruz-Martinez, S.; Gamboa-Dominguez, A.; et al. Diagnostic accuracy cohort study and clinical value of the Histoplasma urine antigen (ALPHA Histoplasma EIA) for disseminated histoplasmosis among HIV infected patients: A multicenter study. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2018, 12, e0006872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Martinez-Gamboa, A.; Niembro-Ortega, M.D.; Torres-Gonzalez, P.; Santiago-Cruz, J.; Velazquez-Zavala, N.G.; Rangel-Cordero, A.; Crabtree-Ramirez, B.; Gamboa-Dominguez, A.; Reyes-Gutierrez, E.; Reyes-Teran, G.; et al. Diagnostic accuracy of antigen detection in urine and molecular assays testing in different clinical samples for the diagnosis of progressive disseminated histoplasmosis in patients living with HIV/AIDS: A prospective multicenter study in Mexico. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2021, 15, e0009215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Theel, E.S.; Jespersen, D.J.; Harring, J.; Mandrekar, J.; Binnicker, M.J. Evaluation of an enzyme immunoassay for detection of Histoplasma capsulatum antigen from urine specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2013, 51, 3555–3559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Theel, E.S.; Harring, J.A.; Dababneh, A.S.; Rollins, L.O.; Bestrom, J.E.; Jespersen, D.J. Reevaluation of commercial reagents for detection of Histoplasma capsulatum antigen in urine. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2015, 53, 1198–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhang, C.; Lei, G.S.; Lee, C.H.; Hage, C.A. Evaluation of two new enzyme immunoassay reagents for diagnosis of histoplasmosis in a cohort of clinically characterized patients. Med. Mycol. 2015, 53, 868–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Krishnan, G.; Power, M.; Bariola, J.R.; Dare, R. Comparison of Indirect Fungal Diagnostic Tests in Patients With Proven Histoplasmosis. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2022, 9, ofac609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Hage, C.A.; Davis, T.E.; Egan, L.; Parker, M.; Fuller, D.; Lemonte, A.M.; Durkin, M.; Connelly, P.; Joseph Wheat, L.; Blue-Hnidy, D.; et al. Diagnosis of pulmonary histoplasmosis and blastomycosis by detection of antigen in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid using an improved second-generation enzyme-linked immunoassay. Respir. Med. 2007, 101, 43–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Bloch, K.C.; Myint, T.; Raymond-Guillen, L.; Hage, C.A.; Davis, T.E.; Wright, P.W.; Chow, F.C.; Woc-Colburn, L.; Khairy, R.N.; Street, A.C.; et al. Improvement in Diagnosis of Histoplasma Meningitis by Combined Testing for Histoplasma Antigen and Immunoglobulin G and Immunoglobulin M Anti-Histoplasma Antibody in Cerebrospinal Fluid. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2018, 66, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Abdallah, W.; Myint, T.; LaRue, R.; Minderman, M.; Gunn, S.; Wheat, L.J.; Hage, C.A. Diagnosis of Histoplasmosis Using the MVista Histoplasma Galactomannan Antigen Qualitative Lateral Flow-Based Immunoassay: A Multicenter Study. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2021, 8, ofab454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Caceres, D.H.; Gomez, B.L.; Tobon, A.M.; Chiller, T.M.; Lindsley, M.D. Evaluation of a Histoplasma antigen lateral flow assay for the rapid diagnosis of progressive disseminated histoplasmosis in Colombian patients with AIDS. Mycoses 2020, 63, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Caceres, D.H.; Gomez, B.L.; Tobon, A.M.; Minderman, M.; Bridges, N.; Chiller, T.; Lindsley, M.D. Validation and Concordance Analysis of a New Lateral Flow Assay for Detection of Histoplasma Antigen in Urine. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Caceres, D.H.; Gomez, B.L.; Tobon, A.M.; Chiller, T.M.; Lindsley, M.D. Evaluation of OIDx Histoplasma Urinary Antigen EIA. Mycopathologia 2022, 187, 129–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ocansey, B.K.; Otoo, B.; Asamoah, I.; Ganu, V.; Berko, K.P.; Oladele, O.; Amankwa, E.A.; Opoku-Asare, B.; Agyei, M.; George, L.; et al. Cryptococcal and Histoplasma Antigen Screening Among People With Human Immunodeficiency Virus in Ghana and Comparative Analysis of OIDx Histoplasma Lateral Flow Assay and IMMY Histoplasma Enzyme Immunoassay. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2022, 9, ofac277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wheat, J.; Wheat, H.; Connolly, P.; Kleiman, M.; Supparatpinyo, K.; Nelson, K.; Bradsher, R.; Restrepo, A. Cross-reactivity in Histoplasma capsulatum variety capsulatum antigen assays of urine samples from patients with endemic mycoses. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1997, 24, 1169–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Kuberski, T.; Myers, R.; Wheat, L.J.; Durkin, M.; Connolly, P.; Kubak, B.M.; Bruckner, D.; Pegues, D. Diagnosis of coccidioidomycosis by antigen detection using cross-reaction with a Histoplasma antigen. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2007, 44, e50–e54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Hage, C.A.; Ribes, J.A.; Wengenack, N.L.; Baddour, L.M.; Assi, M.; McKinsey, D.S.; Hammoud, K.; Alapat, D.; Babady, N.E.; Parker, M.; et al. A multicenter evaluation of tests for diagnosis of histoplasmosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2011, 53, 448–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Hage, C.A.; Azar, M.M.; Bahr, N.; Loyd, J.; Wheat, L.J. Histoplasmosis: Up-to-Date Evidence-Based Approach to Diagnosis and Management. Semin. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2015, 36, 729–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Ghorra, N.; Goushchi, A.; Konopnicki, D.; Libois, A.; Lagrou, K.; Wind, A.; Montesinos, I.; Hallin, M.; Deyi, V.Y.M. Disseminated histoplasmosis diagnosed by cross-reactivity with the Aspergillus galactomannan antigen in an HIV-positive patient. J. Mycol. Med. 2022, 32, 101244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Assi, M.; Lakkis, I.E.; Wheat, L.J. Cross-reactivity in the Histoplasma antigen enzyme immunoassay caused by sporotrichosis. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2011, 18, 1781–1782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Maphanga, T.G.; Naicker, S.D.; Gomez, B.L.; Mhlanga, M.; Mpembe, R.S.; Schwartz, I.S.; Bamford, C.; Nel, J.; Govender, N.P. Cross-reactivity of a Histoplasma capsulatum antigen enzyme immunoassay in urine specimens from persons with emergomycosis in South Africa. Med. Mycol. 2021, 59, 672–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Koo, S.; Bryar, J.M.; Page, J.H.; Baden, L.R.; Marty, F.M. Diagnostic performance of the (1→3)-beta-D-glucan assay for invasive fungal disease. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2009, 49, 1650–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Pickering, J.W.; Sant, H.W.; Bowles, C.A.; Roberts, W.L.; Woods, G.L. Evaluation of a (1→3)-beta-D-glucan assay for diagnosis of invasive fungal infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 5957–5962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Egan, L.; Connolly, P.; Wheat, L.J.; Fuller, D.; Dais, T.E.; Knox, K.S.; Hage, C.A. Histoplasmosis as a cause for a positive Fungitell (1→3)-beta-D-glucan test. Med. Mycol. 2008, 46, 93–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Cadena, J.; Thompson, G.R., 3rd; Patterson, T.F. Aspergillosis: Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Infect. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2021, 35, 415–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Xavier, M.O.; Pasqualotto, A.C.; Cardoso, I.C.; Severo, L.C. Cross-reactivity of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis, Histoplasma capsulatum, and Cryptococcus species in the commercial Platelia Aspergillus enzyme immunoassay. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2009, 16, 132–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Ranque, S.; Pelletier, R.; Michel-Nguyen, A.; Dromer, F. Platelia Aspergillus assay for diagnosis of disseminated histoplasmosis. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2007, 26, 941–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Wheat, L.J.; Hackett, E.; Durkin, M.; Connolly, P.; Petraitiene, R.; Walsh, T.J.; Knox, K.; Hage, C. Histoplasmosis-associated cross-reactivity in the BioRad Platelia Aspergillus enzyme immunoassay. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2007, 14, 638–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Toscanini, M.A.; Nusblat, A.D.; Cuestas, M.L. Diagnosis of histoplasmosis: Current status and perspectives. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 105, 1837–1859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Azar, M.M.; Hage, C.A. Laboratory Diagnostics for Histoplasmosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2017, 55, 1612–1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Richer, S.M.; Smedema, M.L.; Durkin, M.M.; Herman, K.M.; Hage, C.A.; Fuller, D.; Wheat, L.J. Improved Diagnosis of Acute Pulmonary Histoplasmosis by Combining Antigen and Antibody Detection. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2016, 62, 896–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Wheat, J.; Myint, T.; Guo, Y.; Kemmer, P.; Hage, C.; Terry, C.; Azar, M.M.; Riddell, J.; Ender, P.; Chen, S.; et al. Central nervous system histoplasmosis: Multicenter retrospective study on clinical features, diagnostic approach and outcome of treatment. Medicine 2018, 97, e0245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Padhye, A.A.; Smith, G.; McLaughlin, D.; Standard, P.G.; Kaufman, L. Comparative evaluation of a chemiluminescent DNA probe and an exoantigen test for rapid identification of Histoplasma capsulatum. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1992, 30, 3108–3111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Valero, C.; Buitrago, M.J.; Gago, S.; Quiles-Melero, I.; Garcia-Rodriguez, J. A matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry reference database for the identification of Histoplasma capsulatum. Med. Mycol. 2018, 56, 307–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Cosio, T.; Gaziano, R.; Fontana, C.; Pistoia, E.S.; Petruccelli, R.; Favaro, M.; Pica, F.; Minelli, S.; Bossa, M.C.; Altieri, A.; et al. Closing the Gap in Proteomic Identification of Histoplasma capsulatum: A Case Report and Review of Literature. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Vasconcellos, I.; Dalla Lana, D.F.; Pasqualotto, A.C. The Role of Molecular Tests in the Diagnosis of Disseminated Histoplasmosis. J. Fungi 2019, 6, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Gu, W.; Miller, S.; Chiu, C.Y. Clinical Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for Pathogen Detection. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2019, 14, 319–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Wang, N.; Zhao, C.; Tang, C.; Wang, L. Case Report and Literature Review: Disseminated Histoplasmosis Infection Diagnosed by Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing. Infect. Drug Resist. 2022, 15, 4507–4514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Wheat, L.J.; Cloud, G.; Johnson, P.C.; Connolly, P.; Goldman, M.; Le Monte, A.; Fuller, D.E.; Davis, T.E.; Hafner, R.; Group, A.C.T.; et al. Clearance of fungal burden during treatment of disseminated histoplasmosis with liposomal amphotericin B versus itraconazole. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2001, 45, 2354–2357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Johnson, P.C.; Wheat, L.J.; Cloud, G.A.; Goldman, M.; Lancaster, D.; Bamberger, D.M.; Powderly, W.G.; Hafner, R.; Kauffman, C.A.; Dismukes, W.E.; et al. Safety and efficacy of liposomal amphotericin B compared with conventional amphotericin B for induction therapy of histoplasmosis in patients with AIDS. Ann. Intern. Med. 2002, 137, 105–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Wheat, L.J.; Freifeld, A.G.; Kleiman, M.B.; Baddley, J.W.; McKinsey, D.S.; Loyd, J.E.; Kauffman, C.A. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of patients with histoplasmosis: 2007 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2007, 45, 807–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. LeMonte, A.M.; Washum, K.E.; Smedema, M.L.; Schnizlein-Bick, C.; Kohler, S.M.; Wheat, L.J. Amphotericin B combined with itraconazole or fluconazole for treatment of histoplasmosis. J. Infect. Dis. 2000, 182, 545–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Ashbee, H.R.; Barnes, R.A.; Johnson, E.M.; Richardson, M.D.; Gorton, R.; Hope, W.W. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antifungal agents: Guidelines from the British Society for Medical Mycology. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2014, 69, 1162–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. McCreary, E.K.; Davis, M.R.; Narayanan, N.; Andes, D.R.; Cattaneo, D.; Christian, R.; Lewis, R.E.; Watt, K.M.; Wiederhold, N.P.; Johnson, M.D. Utility of triazole antifungal therapeutic drug monitoring: Insights from the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists: Endorsed by the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium. Pharmacotherapy 2023, 43, 1043–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Miller, R.; Assi, M.; The AST Infectious Diseases Community of Practice. Endemic fungal infections in solid organ transplant recipients-Guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice. Clin. Transplant. 2019, 33, e13553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Laverdiere, M.; Bow, E.J.; Rotstein, C.; Autmizguine, J.; Broady, R.; Garber, G.; Haider, S.; Hussaini, T.; Husain, S.; Ovetchkine, P.; et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring for triazoles: A needs assessment review and recommendations from a Canadian perspective. Can. J. Infect. Dis. Med. Microbiol. 2014, 25, 327–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Cartledge, J.D.; Midgely, J.; Gazzard, B.G. Itraconazole solution: Higher serum drug concentrations and better clinical response rates than the capsule formulation in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome patients with candidosis. J. Clin. Pathol. 1997, 50, 477–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Firkus, D.; Abu Saleh, O.M.; Enzler, M.J.; Jannetto, P.J.; Mara, K.; Vergidis, P.; Rivera, C.G.; Stevens, R.W. Does metabolite matter? Defining target itraconazole and hydroxy-itraconazole serum concentrations for blastomycosis. Mycoses 2023, 66, 412–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Rauseo, A.M.; Mazi, P.; Lewis, P.; Burnett, B.; Mudge, S.; Spec, A. Bioavailability of Single-Dose SUBA-Itraconazole Compared to Conventional Itraconazole under Fasted and Fed Conditions. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2021, 65, e0013421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Gupta, A.O.; Singh, N. Immune reconstitution syndrome and fungal infections. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2011, 24, 527–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Jazwinski, A.; Naggie, S.; Perfect, J. Immune reconstitution syndrome in a patient with disseminated histoplasmosis and steroid taper: Maintaining the perfect balance. Mycoses 2011, 54, 270–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. World Health Organization. Guidelines for Diagnosing, Preventing and Managing Cryptococcal Disease Among Adults, Adolescents and Children Living with HIV; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  109. Jarvis, J.N.; Lawrence, D.S.; Meya, D.B.; Kagimu, E.; Kasibante, J.; Mpoza, E.; Rutakingirwa, M.K.; Ssebambulidde, K.; Tugume, L.; Rhein, J.; et al. Single-Dose Liposomal Amphotericin B Treatment for Cryptococcal Meningitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2022, 386, 1109–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Pasqualotto, A.C.; Lana, D.D.; Godoy, C.S.M.; Leitao, T.; Bay, M.B.; Damasceno, L.S.; Soares, R.B.A.; Kist, R.; Silva, L.R.; Wiltgen, D.; et al. Single High Dose of Liposomal Amphotericin B in Human Immunodeficiency Virus/AIDS-Related Disseminated Histoplasmosis: A Randomized Trial. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2023, 77, 1126–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Boulware, D.R.; Atukunda, M.; Kagimu, E.; Musubire, A.K.; Akampurira, A.; Tugume, L.; Ssebambulidde, K.; Kasibante, J.; Nsangi, L.; Mugabi, T.; et al. Oral Lipid Nanocrystal Amphotericin B for Cryptococcal Meningitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2023, 77, 1659–1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Singh, N.; Huprikar, S.; Burdette, S.D.; Morris, M.I.; Blair, J.E.; Wheat, L.J.; the American Society of Transplantation, Infectious Diseases Community of Practice, Donor-Derived Fungal Infection Working Group. Donor-derived fungal infections in organ transplant recipients: Guidelines of the American Society of Transplantation, infectious diseases community of practice. Am. J. Transplant. 2012, 12, 2414–2428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Abad, C.L.R.; Razonable, R.R. Donor-derived endemic mycoses after solid organ transplantation: A review of reported cases. Clin. Transplant. 2023, 38, e15199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jof 10 00124 g001
Figure 1. Pathogenesis of histoplasmosis. Aerosolized microconidia are inhaled by the host. Host temperature (37 °C) triggers upregulation of RYP genes, leading to thermal morphological transformation to yeast forms. Once in the alveoli, soluble pathogen recognition receptors (Collectins: surfactant A and D) display a direct fungicidal role through a calcium-dependent mechanism of yeast permeabilization. Heat shock protein 60 (Hsp60) binds to complement receptor 3 (CR3) which prompts phagocytosis. Binding of Dectin-1 and 1-3-β-D-glucan triggers an inflammatory cascade. Histoplasma yeast forms, expresses 1-3 α glucan to conceal 1-3-β-D-glucan and expresses 1-3 glucanase and H antigen (glucosidase) to hydrolyzes exposed 1-3-β-D-glucan. Once in the phagolysosome, Histoplasma produces catalase B (M antigen) to counteract the radical oxygen species and HMG CoA lyase to present phagolisosome acidification. Dendritic cells interact with naïve T lymphocytes, leading to Th1 polarization. Macrophages can migrate to any part of the reticuloendothelial system and develop granulomas. Image created in BioRender.
Figure 1. Pathogenesis of histoplasmosis. Aerosolized microconidia are inhaled by the host. Host temperature (37 °C) triggers upregulation of RYP genes, leading to thermal morphological transformation to yeast forms. Once in the alveoli, soluble pathogen recognition receptors (Collectins: surfactant A and D) display a direct fungicidal role through a calcium-dependent mechanism of yeast permeabilization. Heat shock protein 60 (Hsp60) binds to complement receptor 3 (CR3) which prompts phagocytosis. Binding of Dectin-1 and 1-3-β-D-glucan triggers an inflammatory cascade. Histoplasma yeast forms, expresses 1-3 α glucan to conceal 1-3-β-D-glucan and expresses 1-3 glucanase and H antigen (glucosidase) to hydrolyzes exposed 1-3-β-D-glucan. Once in the phagolysosome, Histoplasma produces catalase B (M antigen) to counteract the radical oxygen species and HMG CoA lyase to present phagolisosome acidification. Dendritic cells interact with naïve T lymphocytes, leading to Th1 polarization. Macrophages can migrate to any part of the reticuloendothelial system and develop granulomas. Image created in BioRender.
Jof 10 00124 g001
Jof 10 00124 g002
Figure 2. Geographic distribution of histoplasmosis. The dark green represents areas considered hyperendemic, the green represents areas where histoplasmosis infections occur regularly, and the light green represents areas where local infection has been reported.
Figure 2. Geographic distribution of histoplasmosis. The dark green represents areas considered hyperendemic, the green represents areas where histoplasmosis infections occur regularly, and the light green represents areas where local infection has been reported.
Jof 10 00124 g002
Table 1. Clinical manifestations of histoplasmosis in solid organ transplant recipients. Numbers in parenthesis represent the frequency at which the events occur.
Table 1. Clinical manifestations of histoplasmosis in solid organ transplant recipients. Numbers in parenthesis represent the frequency at which the events occur.
Clinical PresentationSeverity of DiseaseClinical SymptomsRadiographic ChangesLaboratory Abnormalities
Pulmonary (19–36%)Mild (4–8%)Fever (90%)Abnormal chest X ray (50–70%)Pancytopenia
  Acute (symptoms less than 1 month)Moderate (61–63%)Shortness of breath (60%)Abnormal CT chest (87–100%)Transaminitis
  Subacute (symptoms over 1 month)Severe-Critical (27–35%)Cough (39%)  Multiple nodules Elevated lactate dehydrogenase
  Chronic (symptoms over 1 month with
cavitary lesions)		 Diarrhea (35%)   Miliary nodules (6%)Elevated inflammatory markers
Progressive Disseminated Histoplasmosis (64–81%) Fatigue  Bibasilar infiltratesHypercalcemia
  Pulmonary (79–86%) Malaise  Adenopathy (25%)Elevated creatinine
  Bone marrow (21–37%) DiaphoresisAbnormal CT abdomen
  Liver (18–22%) HeadacheHepatosplenomegaly (25–60%)
  Spleen (9–21%) Weight loss
  Gastrointestinal (7–12%) Fever of unknown origin
  Central nervous system (6–9%)
  Skin (2–4%)
Table 2. Sensitivity of diagnostic tests for histoplasmosis in solid organ transplant. Numbers with * represent a combination of detection of both MVD EIA antigen and antibody. Numbers with ** represent unpublished data.
Table 2. Sensitivity of diagnostic tests for histoplasmosis in solid organ transplant. Numbers with * represent a combination of detection of both MVD EIA antigen and antibody. Numbers with ** represent unpublished data.
OverallPulmonary DisseminatedCNS
Culture
  Blood27–63%49%90%
  Lung, respiratory 57–72%60–82%77%
Pathology, Cytology
  Lung, respiratory pathology or cytology77%86%74%
   Bone Marrow71%-71%
Antigen
  MVD Ag EIA
   Urine85–100%73%90–100%
   Blood86%50–59%89–93%
   BAL 83%
   CSF-- 78–98% *
  IMMY Clarus (urine) 58%72–91%
  MVD LFA 93%50%90–96%
Serology
  ID and/or CF33–36%62–90%28–71%51%
  MVD IgG/IgM EIA52% ** 82–98% *
Table 3. Clinical forms and treatment recommendations.
Table 3. Clinical forms and treatment recommendations.
Clinical FormTreatment Recommendation
Pulmonary
Mild to moderateItraconazole for 12 months
Moderately severe or severeLipid Amphotericin B for 1–2 weeks followed by Itraconazole for at least 12 months
and negative or low (<2 ng/mL) urine antigen
Methylprednisolone 0.5–1 mg/Kg during the first 1–2 if the patient develops ARDS
Progressive disseminated
  Mild to moderateItraconazole for 12 months
  Moderately severe or severeLipid Amphotericin B for 1–2 weeks followed by Itraconazole for at least 12 months
and negative or low (<2 ng/mL) urine antigen
Methylprednisolone 0.5–1 mg/Kg during the first 1–2 if the patient develops ARDS
Central nervous system
Lipid Amphotericin B for 4–5 weeks followed by Itraconazole for at least 12 months
and negative or low (<2 ng/mL) antigen
Donor derived considerations
Active infection
  Died of histoplasmosisItraconazole for 12 months
  Positive culture and/or positive antigen
  Presence of granuloma or positive serologyItraconazole for 3–6 months
  Negative culture and/or negative antigen
Pulmonary noduleNo treatment required
  without signs of active infection
Table 4. Commercially available agents for the treatment of histoplasmosis.
Table 4. Commercially available agents for the treatment of histoplasmosis.
Usual DosageCommon Adverse ReactionsIndications for TDM and TimingTarget Trough and Toxicity ConcentrationsSuggested Dose AdjustmentsMajor Drug InteractionsComments
Triazole
     Itraconazole (oral therapy of choice)
     Conventional capsule and oral solutionLoading dose: Congestive heart failureAll patients (treatment or prophylaxis)Level goal: ≥1.0 µg/mL<0.25 µg/mL     Increase by 50%ITZ is an inhibitor of CYP3A4 ITZ capsules: Take with fatty food and acidic beverages (e.g., soda)
     200 mg TID × 3 daysGI effects(Sum of ITZ + Hydroxy-ITZ)≥0.25–1 µg/mLIncrease by 25%ITZ will increase the concentration of the following:     Avoid any gastric acid reduction therapy
Maintenance dose:Hepatotoxicity~7 days following loading dose, ~14 days without loading dose      Cyclosporine: Dose of CSA may require 50% reductionITZ solution: Take on empty stomach
     200 mg BIDPeripheral edema      Tacrolimus: Dose of TAC may require a one-third reductionSUBA-ITZ: Take with food
QT prolongationToxicity concentration: Not established      Sirolimus: Dose of SIR may require 50% to 90% reduction
SUBA-itraconazoleInitial dose: Sample obtained at any point in the dosing interval (random level)      Rifamycins: Coadministration is usually contraindicated
     130 mg D (max dose: 130 mg BID)Headache      Statins: Dose reduction may be required. Monitor for
Hearing loss rhabdomyolysis
Calcium channel blockers: Monitor for toxicity
Fluconazole
     IV or Oral Induction: HepatotoxicityNot recommended FCZ is an inhibitor of CYP3A4 and CYP2C9Single point mutation in CYP51p leads to increased MIC and resistance
     FCZ 800 mg D × 12 weeksGI effects      CSA, TAC and SIR: Close monitoring of recommendedExposure to fluconazole has been associated with a reduction in susceptibility to voriconazole in 40% of the isolates
Maintenance: QT prolongation      Rifamycins: Coadministration is not advised
     FCZ 400 mg D Headaches Increased failure, relapse rate and mortality compared to ITZ
Voriconazole
     IVLoading dose: 6 mg/Kg IV BID × 2 doses QT prolongationAll patients (treatment or prophylaxis)Trough goal: <0.5 µg/mLIncrease by 50%VCZ is an inhibitor of CYP3A4, CYP2C19, CYP2C9VCZ should be taken on an empty stomach
Visual disturbances     ≥1.0–<5.5 µg/mL≥0.5–1 µg/mLIncrease by 25%VCZ will increase the concentration of the following:Other triazole recommended, particularly in patients with prior fluconazole exposure due to increased risk of resistance
Maintenance dose: 4 mg/Kg IV BIDFluorosis~7 days following loading dose      Cyclosporine: Dose of CSA may require 50% reduction
HepatotoxicityToxicity concentrations:≥1.0–<5.5 µg/mL      Tacrolimus: Dose of TAC may require a one-third reductionA study showed increased early mortality when compared to ITZ
     OralLoading dose: 400 mg BID × 2 dosesSkin cancer (long term use)Sample obtained prior to any dosing (trough level)     ≥5.5 µg/mL      Sirolimus: Coadministration is usually contraindicatedCyclodextrin in IV formulation has not been associated with increased side effects in patients with CrCL < 50 mL/min
Hallucinations ≥5.5 µg/mLDecrease by 25%. If severe side effects, hold     Rifamycins: Coadministration is usually contraindicated
Maintenance dose: 200 mg BIDGI effects      Statins: Dose reduction may be required. Monitor for
     rhabdomyolysis
therapy until level is <5.5 µg/mL     Calcium channel blockers: Monitor for toxicity
     Sulfonylurea: Monitor for signs of hypoglycemia
Posaconazole
     IVLoading dose: HepatotoxicityAll patients (treatment or prophylaxis)Trough goal: <1.5 µg/mLIncrease by 33%PCZ is an inhibitor of CYP3A4 PCZ immediate release suspension:
     PO (immediate release suspension or delayed release table)     300 mg BID × 2 dosesGI effects     ≥1.5 µg/mL      PCZ will increase the concentration of the following:     Take with fatty food and acidic beverages (e.g. soda)
Maintenance dose:QT prolongation~7 days following initiation of therapy      Cyclosporine: Dose of CSA may require 50% reduction     Avoid any gastric acid reduction therapy
     300 mg DHeadachesToxicity concentrations:      Tacrolimus: Dose of TAC may require a one-third reductionPCZ delayed release tablet:
Sample obtained prior to any dosing (trough level)Not clearly stablished      Sirolimus: Dose of SIR may require 50% to 90% reduction     Take with food
     ≥3 µg/mL to 3.75 µg/mL      Rifamycins: Coadministration is usually contraindicated
     Statins: Dose reduction may be required. Monitor for
      rhabdomyolysis
     Calcium channel blockers: Monitor for toxicity
     Sulfonylurea: Monitor for signs of hypoglycemia
Isavuconazole
     IV or POLoading dose: Shortening of QT intervalNot recommended ISZ is an inhibitor of CYP3A4 Limited data on efficacy for treatment of histoplasmosis
372 mg TID × 6 dosesHepatotoxicity ISZ will increase the concentration of the following:
Maintenance dose:GI effects      Cyclosporine: Monitor levels
372 mg DHypokalemia      Tacrolimus: Monitor levels
Peripheral edema      Sirolimus: Monitor levels
     Rifamycins: Coadministration is usually contraindicated
     Statins: Dose reduction may be required. Monitor for
     rhabdomyolysis
     Calcium channel blockers: Monitor for toxicity
     Sulfonylurea: Monitor for signs of hypoglycemia
Polyenes
Amphotericin B (AmB)
     AmB-deoxycholate0.7–1 mg/kg/dayAcute infusion reactionsNot recommended Digitalis glycosidesClose monitoring of electrolyte disturbances with aggressive repletion needed
     Liposomal AmB3–5 mg/kg/day     Fever, back pain, hypotension, GI effects Antiarrhythmic medications
     Lipid-based AmB5 mg/kg/day Requires pre- and post- infusion hydration to reduce the risk of nephrotoxicity
     Electrolyte abnormalities
     Hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia Infusion-related reactions can be pretreated with antihistamines and antipyretics
Nephrotoxicity Infusion-related reactions tend to subside during subsequent infusions
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Barros, N.; Wheat, L.J. Histoplasmosis in Solid Organ Transplantation. J. Fungi 2024, 10, 124. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10020124

AMA Style

Barros N, Wheat LJ. Histoplasmosis in Solid Organ Transplantation. Journal of Fungi. 2024; 10(2):124. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10020124

Chicago/Turabian Style

Barros, Nicolas, and L. Joseph Wheat. 2024. "Histoplasmosis in Solid Organ Transplantation" Journal of Fungi 10, no. 2: 124. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10020124

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop