1. Introduction
Graves’ orbitopathy (GO) is the most frequent extrathyroidal manifestation of Graves’ disease [
1]. This autoimmune orbital disorder is characterized by pain, diplopia, disfiguring proptosis, swelling and redness of the eyelids [
2,
3]. The pathogenesis involves expansion of the orbital connective tissue and enlargement of the eye muscles caused by inflammation, adipogenesis and overproduction of glycosaminoglycans [
4,
5]. Dysthyroid optic neuropathy (DON) occurs in approximately 5% of patients with GO, and may lead to permanent loss of vision [
6,
7]. This severe complication results from optic nerve compression caused by swollen muscles and fat in the orbital apex [
7,
8]. Patients with DON may suffer from poor visual acuity (VA), impaired color vision and restricted visual field [
4,
6]. Diagnosis of DON is based on clinical, ophthalmological and radiological evaluation. Ophthalmological examination includes assessment of VA, color vision, visual fields, visual evoked potentials and optic fundus [
9]. Radiological evaluation in the diagnosis of DON can be performed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography. It is used to assess apical optic nerve compression (apical crowding) and optic nerve stretching, and to exclude other orbital pathologies. In patients with insufficient response to the recommended basic treatment, radiological reassessment should be considered to establish further therapeutic measures [
8,
10,
11].
It has been observed that a significant improvement in VA can be achieved by using very high doses of intravenous methylprednisolone (ivMP) or combination therapy with orbital decompression [
12,
13,
14]. The 2021 European Group on Graves’ Orbitopathy (EUGOGO) guidelines recommend ivMP pulse therapy (0.5–1 g for three consecutive days or on every second day) as the first-line treatment of DON, which may be repeated for another week. In case of poor or absent response, surgical decompression needs to be performed within 2 weeks. If DON has resolved or improved, it is suggested to include additional pulses of ivMP (0.5 g) in a weekly schedule as a further step of the therapeutic process [
11].
Previous EUGOGO guidelines recommended continuing ivMP treatment in a 12-week protocol (6 × 0.5 g and 6 × 0.25 g) when the basic treatment with very high doses of ivMP with/without decompression was completed [
15,
16]. Nevertheless, clear criteria of resolution of DON do not exist. The end point of basic therapy has not been specified. Improvement of VA is a crucial decision factor. However, some signs of DON often persist after completion of basic therapy (clinical: decreased visual acuity, visual field defects, reduced color vision; ophthalmic: swollen or pale optic disk; radiological: apical crowding). DON is a sight-threatening disease. Optimal therapy should be performed as early as possible because delay causes permanent changes in the optic nerve. The relapse or worsening of one or more signs of impaired optic nerve function after basic therapy were described in the previous studies [
17,
18].
Positive impact of the 12-week ivMP protocol on eye symptoms has been proven in moderate-to-severe and active GO [
19]. So far, the influence of the additional 12-pulse ivMP therapy on DON patients was analyzed regarding only quality of life [
20]. Therefore, we do not possess any data which verifies the purpose of the additional therapy with 12 pulses of ivMP or its effect on other features of DON once basic therapy has been completed.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the additional treatment with ivMP in a 12-week protocol on VA, color vision, clinical activity score (CAS) and proptosis in patients with DON.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Patients
Nineteen individuals diagnosed with DON were consecutively recruited from the Department of Internal Medicine and Endocrinology, Medical University of Warsaw, from 2011 to 2019. A total number of 26 eyes were affected with DON. The diagnosis of DON was based on at least two signs, including deterioration of VA (<1.0), loss of color vision (more than two errors in Ishihara plates), optic disc swelling and signs of DON in MRI (i.e., presence of apical crowding, optic nerve stretching) [
14]. The inclusion criterion was additional therapy with ivMP in a 12-week protocol after the treatment of DON. Patients who received at least 6 pulses were included. The exclusion criteria were other diseases affecting visual function, such as cataract, glaucoma, high myopia and corneal exposition.
2.2. Treatment
Treatment of DON was conducted as described in the EUGOGO guidelines [
15,
16]. Each individual received ivMP pulses in very high doses (0.5 g or 1 g for 3 consecutive days). Due to poor improvement, 9 individuals were administered two or more cycles of ivMP pulses (3 × 0.5 g or 3 × 1 g). Orbital decompression was performed in 11 individuals, in a total number of 15 eyes with DON. Afterwards, all patients were qualified for treatment with additional ivMP pulses in a 12-week protocol. A cumulative dose of 4.5 g (6 × 0.5 g and 6 × 0.25 g) was given to 18 individuals. One patient was qualified for 12 pulses of ivMP with a total dose of 7.5 g (6 × 0.75 g and 6 × 0.5 g), but due to the increased level of aspartate and alanine aminotransferases (AST and ALT, respectively) received 9 pulses of ivMP (cumulative dose 6 g).
2.3. Laboratory and Ophthalmological Evaluation
The serum levels of free triiodothyronine (fT3), free thyroxine (fT4), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and thyrotropin receptor antibodies (TSHR-Ab) were measured with an electro-chemiluminescent immunoassay performed on a Cobas 6000 analyzer from Roche Diagnostics (Mannheim, Germany). The reference ranges were as follows: TSH 0.27–4.2 μIU/mL; fT3 3.1–6.8 pmol/L; fT4 12–22 pmol/L; TSHR-Ab < 1.75 IU/L. VA was verified using Snellen charts and converted to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) for statistical analysis. Color vision was tested using Ishihara plates. CAS was estimated for each eye based on two symptoms (orbital ache and gaze-evoked pain) and five signs (eyelid erythema or oedema, conjunctival redness, chemosis and swelling of the plica or caruncle). Active GO was diagnosed if CAS was ≥3/7 [
11]. We used the Gorman score to evaluate and classify diplopia on a 4-point scale: 0, no diplopia; 1, intermittent diplopia; 2, inconstant diplopia; 3, constant diplopia [
21]. Due to monocular vision in one of the patients, assessment of diplopia was performed in 18 individuals. Proptosis was measured in millimeters with a Hertel exophthalmometer at the same intercanthal distance for each patient. All parameters were evaluated at three time points: prior to the administration of ivMP as the first-line treatment for DON, before (first pulse) and after (last pulse) the additional ivMP treatment in a 12-week protocol.
After the therapy, a follow-up evaluation of the patients was made including assessment of VA, color vision, CAS, proptosis and TSHR-Ab.
The serum levels of glucose (GLU), AST, ALT, triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC) were measured after a 10 h fasting period (Cobas 8000 System, Roche Diagnostics, Switzerland). The reference ranges were as follows: GLU < 100 mg/dL, AST 7–56 IU/L, ALT 7–56 IU/L, TG 50–150 mg/dL, TC 120–200 mg/dL, LDLC < 130 mg/dL, HDLC > 40 mg/dL. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated using the formula: BMI = weight (kg)/height (m2). Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was measured based on systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP, respectively) with the following formula: MAP = 1/3 SBP + 2/3 DBP. Each parameter was evaluated at the beginning and after the additional treatment with 12 pulses of ivMP.
2.4. Statistical Analysis
All analyses were performed using SPSS statistical software version 22.0 (IBM SPPS Statistics, New York, NY, USA). Continuous variables are expressed as median values with interquartile range (25th–75th percentile). The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to confirm or reject the normal distribution of each continuous variable. Comparisons between continuous data were performed using Wilcoxon rank sum test. Statistical significance was established for results with a two-tailed p-value < 0.05.
3. Results
Demographic details as well as clinical and laboratory characteristics are presented in
Table 1 and
Table 2, respectively. The diagnosis of DON was made in 19 patients in a total number of 26 eyes (12 patients with unilateral DON and 7 patients with bilateral DON). Patients received a median cumulative dose of 7.5 (7.5–10.5) g ivMP.
VA and color vision significantly improved between the first and last pulse of the ivMP treatment in a 12-week protocol (
p = 0.04 and
p = 0.003, respectively). CAS, proptosis and TSHR-Ab reduced remarkably after the last pulse of the 12-week ivMP protocol compared to the first pulse (
p < 0.001,
p = 0.04 and
p = 0.001, respectively). Median values of VA and color vision are shown in
Figure 1. Median values of CAS, proptosis and TSHR-Ab are presented in
Figure 2.
Assessment of double vision was constricted due to the orbital decompression that was performed in 11 patients; we observed deterioration of double vision in 5 of them. Increased levels of AST and ALT (49 IU/L and 67 IU/L) were observed in one of the patients after the ninth ivMP pulse. No significant changes in the serum levels of GLU, AST, ALT, TG, TC, LDLC and HDLC, nor in BMI and MAP, were found between the first and the last pulse of the additional ivMP treatment. Median values are presented in
Table 3.
Follow up was performed after the median time of 4.5 (3–10) months from the last ivMP pulse. Two patients (four eyes) were lost to follow up. VA and color vision remained stable comparing to the assessment after the last pulse in all 17 patients (22 eyes) available for evaluation (
p = 0.27 and
p = 0.16, respectively). In the additional analysis between the first pulse of the additional treatment and the follow up, stabilization of VA and improvement of color vision (
p = 0.41 and
p = 0.01, respectively) were stated in the patients available for the reassessment (22 eyes). Median values of VA and color vision at follow up are shown in
Figure 1, while those for CAS, proptosis and TSHR-Ab are shown in
Figure 2.
4. Discussion
According to the 2021 EUGOGO guidelines, the management of DON should involve the immediate administration of ivMP in very high doses followed by urgent orbital decompression in case of poor or absent response within 2 weeks. Furthermore, if DON has resolved or improved it is advised to implement additional pulses of ivMP (0.5 g) in every week schedule with cumulative dose < 8 g [
11]. However, no study has investigated the benefits of this additional therapy, whether its main goal is to maintain the results of basic DON treatment or to accomplish further improvement.
Our study showed an improvement of VA and color vision after the additional ivMP therapy compared to at its beginning. Moreover, significant reductions in CAS, proptosis and TSHR-Ab were achieved. The positive effect of the additional ivMP therapy was observed in overall assessment including follow up (four eyes were lost to the analysis): stabilization of VA and improvement of color vision were stated. Further ivMP therapy was not required. The results of our study indicate that patients with DON may benefit from additional treatment with ivMP after basic DON therapy.
Furthermore, we observed an increase of VA obtained after the basic therapy of DON (very high doses of ivMP with or without orbital decompression), which confirms the validity and efficacy of this treatment [
12,
13].
According to the current EUGOGO guidelines, due to the higher rate of adverse effects, cumulative doses of ivMP in GO treatment should not exceed 8.0 g per cycle, with the exception of DON treatment [
11]. Previous research proved that therapy of GO with higher doses (1.0 g) of ivMP in consecutive days is associated with higher risk of liver dysfunction than treatment with moderate doses (≤0.5 g) in a 12-week protocol [
22]. Another report showed that high doses of ivMP in a 12-week protocol may be considered relatively safe [
23]. In our study, the cumulative dose of ivMP during the basic and additional therapy altogether exceeded 8 g in nine patients. Adverse effects (mild increase of transaminases) were experienced only by one of the patients. Due to the risk of permanent deterioration or loss of vision, DON must be treated aggressively with high ivMP doses. Our study proved the effectiveness and the lack of serious side effects of the additional therapy in patients with DON, and therefore it should be applied in the management of DON.
To our knowledge, this is the first study evaluating the impact of the additional treatment with 12 pulses of ivMP on VA, color vision, CAS and proptosis in patients with DON. The main limitations of our study are its retrospective character and the small number of patients. However, the majority of the reports regarding DON have a small sample size due to the low prevalence of the disease. Moreover, delayed effects of basic DON treatment, especially after decompression, should be considered. The study would also have benefited from a randomized design: one group treated with additional ivMP therapy according to the 2021 EUGOGO guidelines, and the other without additional therapy.
5. Conclusions
Inclusion of additional treatment with 12 pulses of ivMP into the combined therapy of DON provided positive results in the study participants. Results suggest that once the basic treatment of DON is over (pulses with ivMP in very high doses with or without orbital decompression), stabilization or further improvement in clinical features of DON (e.g., VA, color vision) may be achieved. Moreover, clinical characteristics of GO, including CAS and proptosis, could be reduced significantly. Additional therapy may prevent the relapse of DON.
This study indicates that additional treatment with 12 pulses of ivMP improves or stabilizes the outcome of basic therapy in patients with DON.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, P.M.; data curation, M.P. and K.P.; formal analysis, M.P. and J.R.; investigation, M.P. and P.M.; methodology, P.M.; project administration, P.M.; resources, P.M.; supervision, P.M.; validation, M.P. and P.M.; visualization, M.P. and J.R.; writing—original draft, M.P.; writing—review and editing, M.P., K.P. and P.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Warsaw, Poland (KB 42/2011; 15 March 2011).
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
The data of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Bartalena, L.; Piantanida, E.; Gallo, D.; Lai, A.; Tanda, M.L. Epidemiology, Natural History, Risk Factors, and Prevention of Graves’ Orbitopathy. Front. Endocrinol. 2020, 11, 615993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Burch, H.B.; Wartofsky, L. Graves’ ophthalmopathy: Current concepts regarding pathogenesis and management. Endocr. Rev. 1993, 14, 747–793. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Weetman, A.P. Thyroid-associated eye disease: Pathophysiology. Lancet 1991, 338, 25–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wiersinga, W.M. Autoimmunity in Graves’ ophthalmopathy: The result of an unfortunate marriage between TSH receptors and IGF-1 receptors? J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011, 96, 2386–2394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Bahn, R.S.; Heufelder, A.E. Pathogenesis of Graves’ ophthalmopathy. N. Engl. J. Med. 1993, 329, 1468–1475. [Google Scholar]
- Bartley, G.B.; Fatourechi, V.; Kadrmas, E.F.; Jacobsen, S.J.; Ilstrup, D.M.; Garrity, J.A.; Gorman, C.A. Clinical features of Graves’ ophthalmopathy in an incidence cohort. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1996, 121, 284–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neigel, J.M.; Rootman, J.; Belkin, R.I.; Nugent, R.A.; Drance, S.M.; Beattie, C.W.; Spinelli, J.A. Dysthyroid optic neuropathy. The crowded orbital apex syndrome. Ophthalmology 1988, 95, 1515–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kennerdell, J.S.; Rosenbaum, A.E.; El-Hoshy, M.H. Apical optic nerve compression of dysthyroid optic neuropathy on computed tomography. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1981, 99, 807–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McKeag, D.; Lane, C.; Lazarus, J.H.; Baldeschi, L.; Boboridis, K.; Dickinson, A.J.; Hullo, A.I.; Kahaly, G.; Krassas, G.; Marcocci, C.; et al. Clinical features of dysthyroid optic neuropathy: A European Group on Graves’ Orbitopathy (EUGOGO) survey. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2007, 91, 455–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kahaly, G.J. Imaging in thyroid-associated orbitopathy. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2001, 145, 107–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bartalena, L.; Kahaly, G.J.; Baldeschi, L.; Dayan, C.M.; Eckstein, A.; Marcocci, C.; Marinò, M.; Vaidya, B.; Wiersinga, W.M. The 2021 European Group on Graves’ orbitopathy (EUGOGO) clinical practice guidelines for the medical management of Graves’ orbitopathy. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2021, 185, G43–G67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wakelkamp, I.M.M.J.; Baldeschi, L.; Saeed, P.; Mourits, M.P.; Prummel, M.F.; Wiersinga, W.M. Surgical or medical decompression as a first-line treatment of optic neuropathy in Graves’ ophthalmopathy? A randomized controlled trial. Clin. Endocrinol. 2005, 63, 323–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Currò, N.; Covelli, D.; Vannucchi, G.; Campi, I.; Pirola, G.; Simonetta, S.; Dazzi, D.; Guastella, C.; Pignataro, L.; Beck-Peccoz, P.; et al. Therapeutic outcomes of high-dose intravenous steroids in the treatment of dysthyroid optic neuropathy. Thyroid 2014, 24, 897–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Miśkiewicz, P.; Rutkowska, B.; Jabłońska, A.; Krzeski, A.; Trautsolt-Jeziorska, K.; Kęcik, D.; Milczarek-Banach, J.; Pirko-Kotela, K.; Samsel, A.; Bednarczuk, T. Complete recovery of visual acuity as the main goal of treatment in patients with dysthyroid optic neuropathy. Endokrynol. Pol. 2016, 67, 166–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bartalena, L.; Baldeschi, L.; Dickinson, A.; Eckstein, A.; Kendall-Taylor, P.; Marcocci, C.; Mourits, M.; Perros, P.; Boboridis, K.; Boschi, A.; et al. Consensus statement of the European Group on Graves’ orbitopathy (EUGOGO) on management of GO. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2008, 158, 273–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bartalena, L.; Baldeschi, L.; Boboridis, K.; Eckstein, A.; Kahaly, G.J.; Marcocci, C.; Perros, P.; Salvi, M.; Wiersinga, W.M. The 2016 European Thyroid Association/European Group on Graves’ Orbitopathy Guidelines for the Management of Graves’ Orbitopathy. Eur. Thyroid J. 2016, 5, 9–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ph Mourits, M.; Kalmann, R.; Sasim, I.V. Methylprednisolone pulse therapy for patients with dysthyroid optic neuropathy. Orbit 2001, 20, 275–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jeon, C.; Shin, J.H.; Woo, K.I.; Kim, Y.-D. Clinical profile and visual outcomes after treatment in patients with dysthyroid optic neuropathy. Korean J. Ophthalmol. 2012, 26, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bartalena, L.; Marcocci, C.; Bogazzi, F.; Panicucci, M.; Lepri, A.; Pinchera, A. Use of corticosteroids to prevent progression of Graves’ ophthalmopathy after radioiodine therapy for hyperthyroidism. N. Engl. J. Med. 1989, 321, 1349–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pelewicz, M.; Rymuza, J.; Pelewicz, K.; Miśkiewicz, P. Impact of additional intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy on the quality of life in patients with dysthyroid optic neuropathy. J. Med. Sci. 2021, 90, e519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bahn, R.S.; Gorman, C.A. Choice of therapy and criteria for assessing treatment outcome in thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. N. Am. 1987, 16, 391–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miśkiewicz, P.; Jankowska, A.; Brodzińska, K.; Milczarek-Banach, J.; Ambroziak, U. Influence of methylprednisolone pulse therapy on liver function in patients with graves’ orbitopathy. Int. J. Endocrinol. 2018, 2018, 1978590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Miśkiewicz, P.; Kryczka, A.; Ambroziak, U.; Rutkowska, B.; Główczyńska, R.; Opolski, G.; Kahaly, G.; Bednarczuk, T. Is high dose intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy in patients with Graves’ orbitopathy safe? Endokrynol. Pol. 2014, 65, 402–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
| Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).