Next Article in Journal
New Advances in Rapid Pretreatment for Small Dense LDL Cholesterol Measurement Using Shear Horizontal Surface Acoustic Wave (SH-SAW) Technology
Next Article in Special Issue
Insights into the Hormone-Regulating Mechanism of Adventitious Root Formation in Softwood Cuttings of Cyclocarya paliurus and Optimization of the Hormone-Based Formula for Promoting Rooting
Previous Article in Journal
Multi-Omics Approach to Improved Diagnosis and Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis and Psoriasis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Association of a Specific OsCULLIN3c Haplotype with Salt Stress Responses in Local Thai Rice

by
Bagus Herwibawa
1,†,
Chakkree Lekklar
2,†,
Supachitra Chadchawan
3,4 and
Teerapong Buaboocha
4,5,*
1
Program in Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
2
Biological Sciences Program, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
3
Center of Excellence in Environment and Plant Physiology, Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
4
Omics Science and Bioinformatics Center, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
5
Center of Excellence in Molecular Crop, Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(2), 1040; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25021040
Submission received: 1 December 2023 / Revised: 6 January 2024 / Accepted: 10 January 2024 / Published: 15 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Plant Genomics and Genetics)

Abstract

:
We previously found that OsCUL3c is involved in the salt stress response. However, there are no definitive reports on the diversity of OsCUL3c in local Thai rice. In this study, we showed that the CUL3 group was clearly separated from the other CUL groups; next, we focused on OsCUL3c, the third CUL3 of the CUL3 family in rice, which is absent in Arabidopsis. A total of 111 SNPs and 28 indels over the OsCUL3c region, representing 79 haplotypes (haps), were found. Haplotyping revealed that group I (hap A and hap C) and group II (hap B1 and hap D) were different mutated variants, which showed their association with phenotypes under salt stress. These results were supported by cis-regulatory elements (CREs) and transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs) analyses. We found that LTR, MYC, [AP2; ERF], and NF-YB, which are related to salt stress, drought stress, and the response to abscisic acid (ABA), have distinct positions and numbers in the haplotypes of group I and group II. An RNA Seq analysis of the two predominant haplotypes from each group showed that the OsCUL3c expression of the group I representative was upregulated and that of group II was downregulated, which was confirmed by RT-qPCR. Promoter changes might affect the transcriptional responses to salt stress, leading to different regulatory mechanisms for the expression of different haplotypes. We speculate that OsCUL3c influences the regulation of salt-related responses, and haplotype variations play a role in this regulation.

1. Introduction

The ten largest rice-producing countries are China, India, Indonesia, Bangladesh, Vietnam, Thailand, Myanmar, the Philippines, Japan, and Brazil [1]. Five of these countries are in Southeast Asia, which has long been producing yields of rice that exceed the regional demand and thus are exported to other countries [2]. Thailand is one of the largest rice-exporting countries, and its production has increased by 64.83% in the last 40 years [3]. Thus, Thailand has many opportunities in the future, mainly because global agriculture must increase its food supply by 56% to feed the growing population. Considering climate change, this estimate could reach 62% [4]. Sudden climate change caused by natural and anthropogenic factors has occurred in the last two decades, intensifying the threat of biotic and abiotic disturbances to crops. These global changes include a rise in sea level, which increases the salinity of surface water and groundwater through the intrusion of salt water [5]. It has been reported that the rise in the water surface affects salt intrusion in the Chao Phraya River, affecting the water quality in Bangkok, Samut Prakan, and Nonthaburi [6].
The seawater intrusion on agricultural soil properties in Nonthaburi increased the electric conductivity (EC) and sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) to approximately 0.21–4.38 dS m−1 and 8.29–41.89, respectively, which are higher than the annual average value [7]. Moreover, in the northeast of Thailand, approximately 17% of its land area is affected by salt from rock salt and the accumulated effects from human activities [8]. The effect of high salinity is continuing to expand in some regions, thus potentially threatening rice production in Thailand. Therefore, we must explore the genetic resources of rice to understand the underlying mechanism in its response to salt stress. Salt stress is an ionic imbalance because of the excessive accumulation of Na+ and Cl, thus disturbing the metabolism of other essential ions; a concentration of NaCl above 30 mM (EC~3 dS m−1) can decrease the production of modern rice by 12% per dS m−1 and the EC at 6 dS m−1 can decrease production by up to 50%. The selection of rice germplasm to identify genes related to salt tolerance has been previously carried out using genome [9], transcriptome comparison, and through combining genome and gene co-expression networks [10].
Moreover, a meta-analysis successfully detected 9366 salt-tolerant candidate genes. Interestingly, 81 genes are on chromosome 1; chromosome 12 has the lowest number of genes (14 genes) and chromosome 8 has the highest number of genes (868 genes) [11]. Among the candidate genes on chromosome 8 is a gene from cullin family based on a genome-wide association study (GWAS) in 104 local Thai rice: OsCUL3c (Os08g0170900) [12]. However, the role of OsCUL3c in rice remains unclear. A BLAST search against the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) GenBank database revealed that OsCUL3c is only found in rice. OsCUL3c can be differentiated from other rice CUL3s, such as OsCUL3a and OsCUL3b [13,14,15]. OsCUL3a has a role in negatively regulating cell death and immunity [16,17,18], while OsCUL3b influences the crown root number [15]. Rice CUL3s, together with the broad complex/tramtrack/bric-a-brac and ring-finger protein ring box protein 1 (CUL3-BTB-RBX) complex, is one of the four subtypes of cullin–RING ligases (CRLs) [19]. In a previous report, the presence and absence of variations (PAV), possibly caused by retrotransposon movement, may impact OsCUL3c expression and plant height phenotype [20].
CRLs are ubiquitin ligase enzymes (E3), which have many sub-types [21]. E3 ligases use cullins as a scaffold to form multisubunit E3 complexes, and then the cullins bind a target recognition subcomplex and the RBX1 docking protein, which delivers the activated ubiquitin. In plants, E3 is a single protein subunit or multi-subunit protein complex which performs a ubiquitination function via the ubiquitin–proteasome system (UPS) [22]. The UPS plays a role in decreasing the critical component of stress signaling [23]. UPS activity increases during oxidative stress because of the accumulation of damaged proteins [24]. Oxidative stress is caused by the excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that must be scavenged through detoxification as a strategy to protect against salt stress. The difference in UPS activities can also be viewed as one of the results of the variation in OsCUL3c, which can play an essential role in the response to salt stress. However, the association between haplotype variation on the OsCUL3c region and salt tolerance has never been confirmed. Moreover, Thailand has abundant local rice germplasm that has not yet been explored. This study used genome sequencing data to perform a haplotype-based association analysis. A total of 233 local Thai rice accessions were randomly selected as haplotype representatives in validation of their association with salt stress responses in rice under salt stress.

2. Results

2.1. Phylogenetic Analyses of the Cullins Family in Arabidopsis and Rice

Since the cullins family (CULs) in both Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and rice (Oryza sativa L.) data in public databases is not well annotated as a whole, we constructed phylogenetic trees based on DNA (71 members) and protein (65 members) sequences to investigate the relationship between these sequences and to group similar and homologous sequences. The model finder we used tested up to 286 DNA models and 546 proteins to increase the accuracy. The DNA-based phylogenetic tree constructed from 9 Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR), 14 MSU Rice Genome Annotation Project (MSU-RGAP), 14 Rice Annotation Project Database (RAP-DB), and 34 NCBI sequences was distributed among four clades (Figure 1a). Each clade showed a grouping based on each CUL type. This suggests that the separation of CUL genes from the four clades occurred earlier than the speciation of Arabidopsis and rice. Among them, clade I contained the group annotated as CUL1 in Arabidopsis and rice; however, there were other annotations, such as OsAPC2 and OsFBL27 from RAP-DB and OsCUL3b from NCBI with ambiguous annotations because they are not consistent with other sources. While clade II contained the group annotated as CUL2 that is only found in Arabidopsis, we have yet to see this annotation in rice from all the repositories we checked. Clades III and IV contained groups annotated as CUL3 and CUL4, respectively.
The protein-based phylogenetic tree constructed from 9 TAIR, 14 MSU-RGAP, 14 RAP-DB, and 28 NCBI sequences (Figure 1b) contained five clades. Slightly different from the previous results, clade I contained the group annotated as rice CUL1. Other annotations were also found, such as OsAPC2 and OsFBL27. Clade II contained the group annotated as Arabidopsis CUL2. Clade III contained the group annotated as Arabidopsis CUL1. Clades IV and V contained the group annotated as CUL3 and CUL4, respectively. Based on the DNA- and protein-based phylogenetic trees, we can observe that the CUL family sequences for Arabidopsis and rice present in public repositories have yet to be well annotated, especially the CUL1 and CUL2 groups. However, we can conclude that the CUL3 group is separated from the other CUL groups.

2.2. The Conservation of Gene Structure and Motifs among CUL3s in Arabidopsis and Rice

Subsequently, we focused on the CUL3s as there are at least two genes in Arabidopsis and rice, CUL3a and CUL3b, while rice has a third gene, CUL3c. A phylogenetic tree was constructed and was divided into three groups (Figure 2a). Group I consisted of AtCUL3a, AtCUL3b, and OsCUL3a, while groups II and III consisted of OsCUL3b and OsCUL3c, respectively. In both species, the lengths of the coding sequences (CDSs) were identical. However, the structures showed that CUL3s contain two introns in Arabidopsis, one in the 5′ untranslated region (5′ UTR), and one intron in rice. The position of the introns in the coding sequence is highly conserved and among them, with the OsCUL3b intron being the longest. This comparative analysis revealed the presence of CUL3s from the same group that share different gene structures, even though the CDS lengths are conserved.
Subsequently, we examined the predicted motif of the CUL3s using MEME. The smaller the p-value, the more significant the match. In total, 24 motifs were revealed, and each CUL3 contained 21 to 23 motifs (Figure 2b). Similar to the gene structure, the CUL3s members from the same group shared different motif compositions. Some motifs were present in specific proteins, implying the functional diversity of the CUL3s. For example, Motif 20 is identical in all members of group I, but different in size from groups II and III; Motifs 22 and 23 are present exclusively in the AtCUL3a and OsCUL3a, respectively, suggesting that they might be linked to functional specificity among these groups of proteins. Next, we focused on OsCUL3c as the third CUL3 of the CUL3 family in rice, which is not present in Arabidopsis.

2.3. Allele Variation and Haplotype Analysis of OsCUL3c

According to the reference genome, there was a total of 111 SNPs in OsCUL3c from 233 local Thai rice accessions (Table S1). We found 44 SNPs in the promoter region, 35 SNPs in the intron, 29 SNPs in the CDS, 1 SNP in the 3′-UTR, and 2 SNPs in the downstream sequence (Figure 3a). Based on the nucleotide substitutions, the detected SNPs were classified as transitions (C/T and G/A) and transversions (G/T, C/G, A/T, A/C). Transitions and transversions accounted for 75.68% (84) and 24.32% (27), respectively, with a ratio of 3.11. In the transitions, the number of C/T was lower than that of A/G, which totaled 32 (38.10%) and 52 (61.90%), respectively. For the transversions, the numbers of the four types are slightly different. The numbers of G/T, C/G, A/T, and A/C accounted for 25.93% (7), 22.22% (6), 33.33% (9), and 18.52% (5), respectively. We also observed 28 indels, including 8 indels in the promoter, 2 indels in the 5′-untranslated regions, 16 indels in the intron, and 2 indels in the 3′ untranslated regions (Figure 3b). It was obvious that mononucleotide indels were the most abundant type, accounting for 53.57% (15) of the total indel sites. At the same time, most non-repeat indels were 2 to 66 bp in length, with 10 insertion and 9 deletion types.
Using these 139 SNP and indel data, 79 distinct haplotypes (hap) were obtained (Figure 3a,b). We found that the number of SNPs in each haplotype ranged from 1 to 82, with the minimum number of SNPs in hap 6 and the maximum number in hap 18. At the same time, the number of SNPs for each haplotype in the CDS ranged from 0 to 25, with the minimum number of SNPs in hap 3, hap 6, hap 7, hap 16, hap 21, hap 25, hap 40, hap 41, hap 42, and hap 43, and the maximum number in hap 44. There were 10 haplotypes with no SNPs in the CDS, indicating that the haplotype variations are present in the introns, promoters, or UTRs. In addition, it also explains how the proteins from these haplotypes have the same characteristics as the reference protein. In all haplotypes, there were no C/G or A/C transversion in the CDS. It seems that G/T and A/T transversions are also very uncommon, with the maximum numbers being 1 and 3, respectively. In contrast, the C/T and G/A transitions showed higher values with the maximum numbers being 5 and 15, respectively.
We also noted that some of the differences among haplotypes are due to indels. The presence of indels is also often viewed as a potential source of triplet instability. We determined the indels distribution and revealed that the number in each haplotype ranged from 0 to 18, with the minimum number found in hap 6 and the maximum number in hap 18. Together with the SNP results, we can conclude that hap 6 is very similar to the reference, while hap 18 is the most different when compared to the reference. We did not examine indels in depth because we did not find them in the CDS, and they might not significantly affect regulation. Nevertheless, we needed to consider the indels in the promoter. The promoter determines the response factors, which ultimately affect gene expression. Eight indels were identified in the promoter with a range of 1 to 66 bp; however, indels were not found in 43 haplotypes (54.43%).
To further explore the roles of haplotypes in regulation related to salt stress, we selected some reliable main haplotypes. Among the 233 local Thai rice accessions included in this study, the highest frequency was for hap 1, which consisted of 33 accessions, while hap 2, hap 3, hap 4, hap 5, hap 6, and hap 7 consisted of 30, 27, 20, 12, 10, and 5 accessions, respectively. Hap 8 to hap 13 consisted of four accessions. Hap 14 and hap 15 consisted of three accessions. Hap 16 and hap 17 consisted of two accessions. Hap 18 to hap 79 were each represented by only one accession. We realize that most existing haplotypes are unreliable because many have only one accession. Therefore, we set a threshold value of 10 accessions per haplotype. For further insight, we specified only six main haplotypes, i.e., hap 1, hap 2, hap 3, hap 4, hap 5, and hap 6 (Figure 4).
The alignment of six main haplotypes based on coding sequences (CDSs) with 27 allele changes is shown in Figure S1. As expected, most of the allele changes were silent mutations as the amino acid (AA)-based haplotypes showed four residue changes (Figure S2). From the CDS and AA phylogenetic trees, we generated four new haplotype groups, i.e., hap A consisting of hap 1 and hap 2, hap B consisting of hap 3 and hap 6, hap C consisting of hap 4, and hap D consisting of hap 5 (Figure 5a,b). We can see the difference more clearly in the alignment of the six main haplotype promoters (Figure S3). The promoter phylogenetic tree showed slightly different haplotype groups; i.e., hap A consisted of hap 1 and hap 2, hap B1 consisted of hap 3, hap B2 consisted of hap 6, hap C consisted of hap 4, and hap D consisted of hap 5 (Figure 5c).

2.4. CREs and TFBSs in OsCUL3c Putative Promoter

The alignment of predominant haplotypes based on their promoters showed several variants (SNPs and indels) that might contribute to gene regulation. To identify the cis-regulatory elements (CREs) using PlantCARE and transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs) using PlantPan in the promoter, the 1500 bp upstream region upstream of the ATG was scanned (Figure 6a). Our analysis revealed 792, 813, 836, 782, and 797 binding sites that were found on hap A, hap B1, hap B2, hap C, and hap D from both databases, with minimum and maximum lengths of 4 bp and 21 bp, respectively. The CREs consisted of 38 elements, including salt- and drought-stress responsive (as-1, HD-Zip 3, LTR, MBS, Myb, MYB, MYB-like sequence, MYC, STRE, TGACG-motif), light-responsive (ACE, ARE, box 4, G-box, LAMP element, MRE, sp1, TCCC motif, TCT motif), anoxic-inducibility (GC motif), wounding- and pathogen-responsive (WRE3, WUN motif), abscisic acid-responsive (ABRE, ABRE3a, ABRE4, Unnamed__1), auxin-responsive (TGA element), methyl jasmonate-responsive (CGTCA motif), cellular development (Unnamed__4), core (CAAT box, AT~ABRE, AT~TATA box, TATA box) and unknown (A-box, CCGTCC motif, CCGTCC box, Unnamed__2, motif_sequence) (Figure S4a) elements. Signature response factors were detected: ABRE3a, ABRE4, ACE, and AT~ABRE were specific for hap C; ABRE was not found in hap B2; and LTR and MYC were differentially found between hap A/C and hap B1/D.
The TFBSs consisted of 33 factors, including salt-stress-responsive (bHLH, bZIP, WRKY), dehydration-responsive ([AP2; ERF], [AP2; ERF; ERF]), iron-responsive (B3), ethylene-responsive (AP2, ERF, EIN3, [AP2; B3; RAV]), auxin-responsive ([B3; ARF], [B3; ARF; ARF]), abscisic-acid-responsive (NF-YB), gibberellin-responsive ([Myb/SANT; MYB], MADF, Myb/SANT), growth and development (TCR, SBP, [NAC; NAM], alpha-amylase, LEA_5), and unknown (TBP, TCP, AT-Hook, GATA, [Dof; GATA], LOB, Homeodomain, [Homeodomain; ZF-HD], [Homeodomain; HD-ZIP], [Homeodomain; TALE], others, motif sequence only) factors (Figure S4b). Signature response factors were detected: ERF was not found in hap B1, and MADF was not found in hap A and hap D. To understand the relationships between the response factors and haplotype, we identified the variations in the positions of the response factors related to salt and drought stress and the response to abscisic acid (ABA), i.e., LTR, MYC, [AP2; ERF], and NF-YB, that have specific positions and numbers for group I (hap A and C) and group II (hap B1 and D) (Figure 6b–e). Moreover, WRE-3 is related to wounding and pathogen response, [Myb/SANT; MYB] is related to the gibberellin response, LOB and [Homeodomain; TALE] have unknown functions; these also have specific positions and numbers for each of the both haplotype groups (Figure S4a,b).

2.5. Salt Tolerance Index in Local Thai Rice Accessions

We used the phenotype data provided by Lekklar [12] (Figure S5) to analyze the associations between the stress susceptibility indices (SSI) of these phenotype parameters and the predominant haplotypes (group I (hap A and hap C) and group II (hap B1 and hap D)) (Figure 7). We used Pearson correlation to perform linear regression analyses of the haplotypes for each parameter. The results revealed that almost all parameters had the same trend in their response to salt stress. For Ci Day3, Ci Day9, CMS Day3, and CMS Day9, group II had lower values than group I, while E Day3, gs Day3, and gs Day9 were similar in both groups. Interestingly, Ci Day6, CMS Day6, E Day6, E Day9, gs Day6, PN Day3, PN Day6, PN Day9, FG, PAN, TIL, and UFG values in group II were higher than those in group I. It appears that more salt-tolerant rice varieties tend to have group II haplotypes than group I haplotypes.

2.6. OsCUL3c Gene Expression Based on RNA-Seq Data

We were interested in further dissecting the underlying genetic factors that may contribute to the phenotypes under salt stress. We used RNA-seq data from SRA NCBI with unique reads to compare relative changes in the transcriptome profiles of Khao Dawk Mali 105 and Luang Pratahn as representatives possessing group I and group II haplotypes, respectively. To identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) responsive to salt stress, we performed an analysis between the normal and salt stress data. Our results showed that the OsCUL3c gene was upregulated in Khao Dawk Mali 105 and downregulated in Luang Pratahn (Figure 8). The expression level of the DEGs was validated by reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). The result demonstrated a similar expression pattern as detected in the RNA-seq data analysis. We speculated, based on the box plot, that variations in gene expression of OsCUL3c influences the regulation of salt-related responses, and haplotype variations play a role in this regulation.

3. Discussion

Three ancestral cullins termed Culα, Culβ, and Culγ, appeared in the early evolution of eukaryotes, and evolved after the split of the unikonts (animals and fungi) and bikonts (plants) [27]. Recent findings have identified the cullins family in plants, particularly in Arabidopsis [28,29] and rice [14,30]. Several functions of this family have been revealed, including involvement in development, immune signaling, and stress regulation. However, our results clearly show that cullins diversity in Arabidopsis and rice has yet to be well annotated considering the information in the four main public repositories, i.e., TAIR, MSU-RGAP, RAP-DB, and NCBI. Four Cullins annotated in Arabidopsis can be found in these databases, AtCUL1, AtCUL2, AtCUL3, and AtCUL4. In rice, we found three annotated cullins, OsCUL1, OsCUL3, and OsCUL4. Still, there are many other cullins sequences for which the annotations are unclear or ambiguous. Using a phylogenetic analysis, they were successfully grouped and CUL3s were clearly separated from the other CULs. This is important because proteins containing a BTB-domain physically interact with CUL3s that are supposed to bridge the substrates for subsequent ubiquitylation [31]. Understanding the function and diversity of the ubiquitylation system is essential to help dissect the pathways in which the system is involved. Therefore, we further examined CUL3 genes in rice and Arabidopsis, which included OsCUL3a, OsCUL3b, OsCUL3c (annotated in this work), AtCUL3a, and AtCUL3b. The differences among these CUL3s were clearly shown by the gene structures and motifs. This work reports the annotation of OsCUL3c, which updates what Lekklar [12] reported on LOC_Os08g07400 and the annotation reported by Moin [14].
We then investigated the haplotypes in the OsCUL3c region using the whole-genome data of 233 local Thai rice accessions and found associations between the haplotypes and salt responses. Over the past two decades, functional genomic studies have demonstrated that the UPS acts as both a positive and negative regulator of the plant stress response. Hereafter, we discussed such roles on the basis of recent studies on the diverse functions of 29 selected Ub ligases, 27 of which are E3 ligases, in abscisic acid (ABA) signaling, dehydration-responsive element binding 2A (DREB2A)-mediated stress tolerance, reactive oxygen species (ROS) homeostasis, and innate immune responses [23]. Through direct or indirect mediation of plant hormones, the UPS selectively degrades key components in stress signaling to either negatively or positively regulate the plant’s response to a given stimulus.
The salt response is a complex trait controlled by genetic and environmental factors. The present study also used coding sequence-, amino acid-, and promoter-based haplotypes to construct phylogenetic trees. The results showed that the six main haplotypes can be categorized into five predominant haplotypes. These predominant haplotypes can be divided into group I, which consists of hap A and hap C, and group II, which consists of hap B1, hap B2, and hap D. Hap B2 contains a small number of accessions (only 10 accessions), so we excluded it from further analysis. The effect of salt stress on the haplotype representatives was examined. The results showed that salt stress had varying effects on the measured parameters. Among the representatives examined, the OsCUL3c expression was downregulated in group II and was upregulated in group I, which agreed with the findings of Sonsungsan et al. [26], who reported that Luang Pratahn is more salt-tolerant, and Suratanee et al. [25], who reported that Khao Dawk Mali 105 is less salt-tolerant. Moreover, we also found specific hits for CREs and TFBSs that were particular to both clusters (ABRE3a, ABRE4, LTR, MYC, [AP2; ERF], NF-YB), which have specific positions and numbers for group I and group II. These elements and factors involved in salt and drought stress and the abscisic acid response might contribute to modulating salt tolerance [32,33,34,35].
This study revealed that OsCUL3c haplotypes in local Thai rice accessions have specific associations with the salt stress response. A recent paper indicated that OsCUL3c expression levels were increased during salt stress and were dependent on the treatment duration [14]. We investigated the association between these haplotypes, group I and group II, and the salt response. Both haplotypes probably have different expression patterns in response to salt stress, which might be influenced by their different cis-regulatory elements and transcription factor binding sites. During salt stress, the increased level of OsCUL3c may cause target degradation in group I; on the contrary, in group II, the targets are maintained, which can result in indirect or direct activation of tolerance genes (Figure 9). In addition, amino acid differences between group I and group II haplotypes may affect interactions with their partner, resulting in the degradation of different sets of target proteins. In summary, our investigation of haplotypes associated with salt tolerance supported the role of OsCUL3c in the salt stress response. In addition, the pattern of the haplotype distribution supported the fact that variants of this gene can confer different salt responses, as we observed for OsCUL3c, with distinct haplotypes between less salt-tolerant (group I) and more salt-tolerant (group II) rice varieties.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Phylogenetic Construction

All DNA and protein sequences that contained the terms “cullin”, “Oryza sativa” and “Arabidopsis thaliana” were downloaded into a single FASTA file from various public repositories, including the Rice Genome Annotation Project Database (http://rice.uga.edu/, accessed on 24 March 2023), the Rice Annotation Project Database (https://rapdb.dna.affrc.go.jp/, accessed on 24 March 2023), the Arabidopsis Information Resource (https://www.arabidopsis.org/, accessed on 24 March 2023), and the National Center for Biotechnology Information (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 24 March 2023). Multiple sequence alignments of all retrieved sequences were carried out using MAFFT 7.511 (https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/software/, accessed on 24 April 2023) using the auto option of $ mafft --auto CUL.fasta > CUL_aln.fasta. The obtained alignments were used for phylogenetic constructions using IQ-TREE 2.0.3 (http://www.iqtree.org/, accessed on 24 April 2023). ModelFinder and a full tree search implemented in the program were used to determine the best-fitting model with a more accurate analysis to reconstruct the corresponding phylogenetic trees with 10,000 replicates of ultrafast bootstrapping; UFBoot was optimized for each bootstrap tree using a nearest-neighbor interchange search. The setting was $ iqtree -s CUL_aln.fasta -m MFP -mtree -B 10000 -bnni. Subsequently, the phylogenetic trees were visualized using iTOL v6 (https://itol.embl.de/, accessed on 25 April 2023). The feature size distribution of the non-redundant CUL3 family was ascertained by identifying gaps in the alignment of coding sequences (CDSs) with genomic sequences using GSDS 2.0 (http://gsds.gao-lab.org/, accessed on 25 April 2023). Their protein sequences were used to predict the conserved motifs using MEME (https://meme-suite.org/meme/tools/meme, accessed on 27 November 2023).

4.2. Haplotype Analysis

We created a dataset based on the specific region from the SNPs and indels VCF file [9] using the following command in vcftools (https://github.com/vcftools/vcftools, accessed on 6 June 2023) $ vcftools --vcf input.vcf --chr 8 --from-bp 4153366 --to-bp 4158536 --recode --out OsCUL3c (SNPs or indels, respectively). Both the SNP and indel outputs were then concatenated using a simple command in bcftools (https://github.com/samtools/bcftools, accessed on 6 June 2023): $ bcftools concat --allow-overlaps OsCUL3c.snps.vcf.gz OsCUL3c.indels.vcf.gz --output-type v --output OsCUL3c.snps.indels.vcf. To extract the annotations for chromosome 8, we used a command in awk (https://github.com/onetrueawk/awk, accessed on 10 June 2023) $ awk -F ‘\t’ ‘$1 == “8”’ Oryza_sativa.IRGSP-1.0.55.gff3 > chr8.gff3. The haplotype analysis of the OsCUL3c region of the 233 local Thai rice accessions was performed using the GeneHapR 1.1.9 [36] package of R 4.3.0 (https://cran.r-project.org/, accessed on 15 June 2023). To better analyze and draw actionable conclusions, we did not remove haplotypes with heterozygous or missing data. The number of accessions per haplotype was plotted in a bar graph using the ggplot2 [37] package of R. Haplotypes with a minimum of 10 accessions were selected for subsequent analyses. Variants (VCF format) within the coding sequence (CDS) and promoter regions of each selected haplotype were extracted and reconstructed into a FASTA file using a Python script. For the CDS, we used a vcf to fasta command from santiagosnchez (https://github.com/santiagosnchez/vcf2fasta, accessed on 27 June 2023) $ python3 vcf2fasta.py --fasta chr8.fa --vcf hap.vcf.gz --gff chr8.gtf --feat CDS --blend --out cds. The resulting CDSs automatically started from ATG (reverse complement). These sequences were pooled into a single FASTA file and aligned using MAFFT. The CDS-based alignment was colored by variant positions using the following command in alv (https://github.com/arvestad/alv, accessed on 27 June 2023) $ alv -t dna --only-variable cds_aln.fasta. These alignments were translated into their corresponding amino acid (AA) sequences using EMBOSS Transeq (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/st/emboss_transeq/, accessed on 27 June 2023). The AA-based alignment was colored using the command $ alv -t aa --only-variable aa_aln.fasta. For the promoter, we used the vcf to fasta command from rlebron88 (https://github.com/rlebron88/vcf2fasta, accessed on 3 July 2023) $ python3 vcf2fasta.py --vcf hap.vcf --fasta chr8.fa --output hap.fa. The resulting sequences were still in the same direction as the VCF input; therefore, we generated the reverse complements for these sequences. Furthermore, a file with the promoter sequence was created using the following command in samtools (https://github.com/samtools/samtools, accessed on 5 July 2023) $ samtools faidx hap.fa hap:4157037-4158536 > promoter.fasta. The promoter sequences were then manually curated. The promoter-based alignment was colored using the command $ alv --only-variable promoter_aln.fasta. For all alignments, IQ-TREE and iTOL were used for the phylogenetic tree construction and visualization, respectively.

4.3. Cis-Regulatory Elements and Transcription Factor Binding Site Prediction

Putative promoter sequences −1500 bp upstream of the translation start site (TSS) for each haplotype were used in the prediction. Potential cis-regulatory elements (CREs) in the putative promoters were predicted using PlantCARE (https://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/, accessed on 8 July 2023). For scanning transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs), the putative promoters were queried using PlantPAN 4.0 (http://plantpan.itps.ncku.edu.tw, accessed on 8 July 2023) with Oryza sativa as an option. The number of identified CREs and TFBSs was visualized in bar plots using the ggplot2 [37] R package. To visualize the elements and factors positions, the gene structure (reverse) was modeled from Oryza sativa Japonica Group (IRGSP-1.0.21). The coordinates of the features were visualized by loading the data frame into R using the genemodel [38] package. Salt and drought (dehydration) stress- and abscisic acid (ABA)-responsive factors positions were visualized using TBtools-II 1.119 (https://github.com/CJ-Chen/TBtools, accessed on 10 July 2023).

4.4. Phenotype Analysis

Ten rice accessions, categorized as haplotype A (Khao Gaw Diaw, Khao Dawk Mali 105, Pin Gaew 56, Tah Jeua), haplotype B1 (Khao Luang, Luang Pratahn), haplotype C (Kaset Daw, Dam Dahng, Chai Nat 1), and haplotype D (Khao Gaew), were retrieved based on the availability of phenotypic data from Lekklar [12]. Twenty-one-day-old seedlings were transplanted into a pot containing soil in randomized complete block design with four replicates. At the heading stage, the water on the soil surface was drained and the plants were watered with or without 900 mL of 150 mM NaCl (EC 8−9 dS m−1) for 9 days. Salt ions in the soil were washed using tap water until EC < 2 dS m−1. The data retrieved included net photosynthetic rate (PN), stomatal conductance (gs), transpiration rate (E), and intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), which were measured using a LI-6400 XT portable photosynthesis system (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA). Cell membrane stability (CMS) was measured using a modified method [39]. The numbers of tillers (TILs), panicles (PANs), filled grains (FGs) and unfilled grains (UFGs) were measured after harvesting. The data are expressed as stress susceptibility indices (SSIs), which were calculated by dividing the mean under salt stress by the mean under control conditions [40]. The SSIs were used to draw box plots using the ggplot2 [37] R package.

4.5. Gene Expression Analysis

We obtained two published Thai-rice RNA-seq datasets from representatives of group I (Khao Dawk Mali 105; 21 days old treated with 75 mM NaCl) and group II (Luang Pratahn; 14 days old, treated with 115 mM NaCl). Both representatives were recorded at 48 h after the salt stress treatment. The FASTQ files were retrieved from the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under NCBI project numbers PRJNA507040 [25] and PRJNA747995 [26]. The reads-to-count analysis was conducted on the GALAXY cloud server (https://usegalaxy.eu/, accessed on 10 July 2023). All retrieved files were uploaded to the server as compressed FASTQ files. FastQC 0.11.9 and MultiQC 1.11 were used to visualize the quality at each step. The adapter and low-quality bases were removed using Cutadapt 4.0. Trimmed reads were aligned and mapped to a reference genome (IRGSP-1.0) using Hisat2. From the mapped sequences, the number of reads per annotated genes was counted using FeatureCounts 2.0.0. DESeq2 was used to identify the differentially expressed genes (DEGs). We extracted the OsCUL3c log2 fold change data for further analysis. To validate the results obtained from the transcriptomic analysis, the expression level of OsCUL3c in the selected representative rice accessions was validated by RT-qPCR. Two varieties, Khao Dawk Mali 105 and Luang Pratahn, were used as representatives of group I and group II, respectively. Two-day-old rice seedlings were transferred into the hydroponic system containing Yoshida solution [41] and grown in a growth chamber (HumanLab, Republic of Korea). After 14 days, the seedlings were treated with and without 100 mM NaCl for 2 days. Leaf tissues were used for RNA extraction using the GENEzol Reagent (Geneaid, Taiwan). The RNA was treated with DNAse I (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) and the first-strand cDNA was synthesized using iScript Reverse Transcription Supermix for RT-qPCR (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Gene-specific primers were designed using Primer3PLUS (http://www.bioinformatics.nl/primer3plus) [42] (Table S3). RT-qPCR was conducted using the Luna Universal qPCR Master Mix (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) and CFX Connect Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, USA), with an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 60 s, followed by 45 cycles of a 2-step PCR: denaturation at 95 °C for 15 s, annealing and extension at 62.8 °C for 30 s. OsEF-1α was chosen as an internal reference for data normalization. Five independent biological replicates with three technical replicates of each representative were used. Finally, fold changes in the genes were calculated as mean values of 2−ΔΔCt (Livak) relative to controls and were converted to log2 fold change values. For visual representation, the R package ggplot2 [37] was used to draw the box plot.

5. Conclusions

Different transcriptional regulation mechanisms and amino acid substitutions indicated the OsCUL3c signature among local Thai rice accessions. Haplotyping revealed that group I (hap A and C) and group II (hap B1 and hap D) were different mutated variants, associated with salt responses. A larger genetic differentiation was observed in the OsCUL3c region, providing useful information for future research related to its role in salt stress tolerance and applications in breeding programs.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms25021040/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments, B.H. and T.B.; provided the seeds and genomic data, S.C.; provided the phenotype data, C.L.; performed the experiments, B.H. and T.B.; analyzed the data, B.H. and T.B.; writing—original draft preparation, B.H.; writing—review and editing, B.H., C.L., S.C. and T.B.; funding acquisition, T.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

B.H. was supported by the Second Century Fund (C2F) from Chulalongkorn University, Thailand, and Universitas Diponegoro Postgraduate Scholarship, Indonesia. C.L. was supported by the 100th Anniversary Chulalongkorn University Fund for Doctoral Scholarship and an Overseas Research Experience Scholarship for Graduate Students from the Graduate School, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw transcriptomic data are available in the NCBI BioProject database under accession numbers PRJNA507040 and PRJNA747995. Further detailed data supporting this study’s findings are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Center of Excellence in Environment and Plant Physiology, Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, for providing the local Thai rice seeds. We thank Prasit Khunsanit and Janwarang Ruangpat for technical support in seedling preparation, and Rujana Suwandaeng, Wirat Pipattanamaitree, and Adhityo Wicaksono for technical support in the RT-qPCR analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. FAOSTAT. Crops and Livestock Products. Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL/visualize (accessed on 24 March 2023).
  2. Yuan, S.; Stuart, A.M.; Laborte, A.G.; Edreira, J.I.R.; Dobermann, A.; Kien, L.V.N.; Thuy, L.T.; Paothong, K.; Traesang, P.; Tint, K.M.; et al. Southeast Asia must narrow down the yield gap to continue to be a major rice bowl. Nat. Food 2022, 3, 217–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Suwanmontri, P.; Kamoshita, A.; Fukai, S. Recent changes in rice production in rainfed lowland and irrigated ecosystems in Thailand. Plant Prod. Sci. 2021, 24, 15–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Van-Dijk, M.; Morley, T.; Rau, M.L.; Saghai, Y. A meta-analysis of projected global food demand and population at risk of hunger for the period 2010–2050. Nat. Food 2021, 2, 494–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ullah, A.; Bano, A.; Khan, N. Climate change and salt effects on crops and chemical communication between plants and plant growth-promoting microorganisms under stress. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2021, 5, 618092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jaroenongard, C.; Babel, M.S.; Shrestha, S.; Weesakul, S.; Nitivattananon, V.; Khadka, D. Projecting relative sea level rise under climate change at the Phrachula Chomklao Fort tide gauge in the upper gulf of Thailand. Water 2021, 13, 1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Phankamolsil, N.; Sonsri, K.; Phankamolsil, Y. Consequence of seawater intrusion on soil properties in agricultural areas of Nonthaburi Province, Thailand. Appl. Environ. Res. 2021, 43, 77–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yang, Y.; Ye, R.; Srisutham, M.; Nontasri, T.; Sritumboon, S.; Maki, M.; Yoshida, K.; Oki, K.; Homma, K. Rice production in farmer fields in soil salt classified areas in Khon Kaen, Northeast Thailand. Sustainability 2022, 14, 9873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lekklar, C.; Suriya-arunroj, D.; Pongpanich, M.; Comai, L.; Kositsup, B.; Chadchawan, S.; Buaboocha, T. Comparative genomic analysis of rice with contrasting photosynthesis and grain production under salt stress. Genes 2019, 10, 562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chutimanukul, P.; Saputro, T.B.; Mahaprom, P.; Plaimas, K.; Comai, L.; Buaboocha, T.; Siangliw, M.; Toojinda, T.; Chadchawan, S. Combining genome and gene co-expression network analyses for the identification of genes potentially regulating salt tolerance in rice. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 704549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mansuri, M.R.; Shobbar, Z.S.; Jelodar, N.B.; Ghaffari, M.; Mohammadi, S.M.; Daryani, P. Salt tolerance involved candidate genes in rice: An integrative meta-analysis approach. BMC Plant Biol. 2020, 20, 452. [Google Scholar]
  12. Lekklar, C. Photosynthesis and Yield Components of Local Thai Rice Oryza sativa L. under Salt Stress at Flowering Stage and Genome-Wide Association Study for Salt-Tolerant Gene Identification. Ph.D. Thesis, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  13. Gingerich, D.J.; Gagne, J.M.; Salter, D.W.; Hellmann, H.; Estelle, M.; Ma, L.; Vierstra, R.D. Cullins 3a and 3b assemble with members of the broad complex/tramtrack/bric-a-brac (BTB) protein family to form essential ubiquitin–protein ligases (e3s) in Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 18810–18821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Moin, M.; Bakshi, A.; Madhav, M.S.; Kirti, P.B. Comprehensive expression profiling reveals the possible involvement of Cullins in developmental and stress regulation in rice. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2019, 160, 101–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Teramoto, S.; Yamasaki, M.; Uga, Y. Identification of a unique allele in the quantitative trait locus for crown root number in japonica rice from Japan using genome-wide association studies. Breed. Sci. 2022, 72, 222–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Liu, Q.; Ning, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yu, N.; Zhao, C.; Zhan, X.; Wu, W.; Chen, D.; Wei, X.; Wang, G.L.; et al. OsCUL3a negatively regulates cell death and immunity by degrading OsNPR1 in rice. Plant Cell 2017, 29, 345–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Gao, Z.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Fang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Sinumporn, S.; Abbas, A.; Ning, Y.; Wang, G.; Cheng, S.; et al. A proteomic approach identifies novel proteins and metabolites for lesion mimic formation and disease resistance enhancement in rice. Plant Sci. 2019, 287, 110182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Gao, Z.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, D.; Zhan, X.; Deng, C.; Cheng, S.; Cao, L. OsCUL3a- associated molecular switches have functions in cell metabolism, cell death, and disease resistance. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 5471–5548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Wang, F.; Deng, X. Plant ubiquitin-proteasome pathway and its role in gibberellin signaling. Cell Res. 2011, 21, 1286–1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, J.; Yang, W.; Zhang, S.; Hu, H.; Yuan, Y.; Dong, J.; Chen, L.; Ma, Y.; Yang, T.; Zhou, L.; et al. A pangenome analysis pipeline provides insights into functional gene identification in rice. Genome Biol. 2023, 24, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ban, Z.; Estelle, M. CUL3 E3 ligases in plant development and environmental response. Nat. Plants 2021, 7, 6–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, W.; Tang, X.; Qi, X.; Fu, X.; Ghimire, S.; Ma, R.; Li, S.; Zhang, N.; Si, H. The ubiquitin conjugating enzyme: An important ubiquitin transfer platform in ubiquitin-proteasome system. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Doroodian, P.; Hua, Z. The ubiquitin switch in plant stress response. Plants 2021, 10, 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Bragoszewski, P.; Turek, M.; Chacinska, A. Control of mitochondrial biogenesis and function by the ubiquitin—Proteasome system. Open Biol. 2017, 7, 170007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Suratanee, A.; Chokrathok, C.; Chutimanukul, P.; Khrueasan, N.; Buaboocha, T.; Chadchawan, S.; Plaimas, K. Two-state co-expression network analysis to identify genes related to salt tolerance in Thai rice. Genes 2021, 9, 594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sonsungsan, P.; Chantanakool, P.; Suratanee, A.; Buaboocha, T.; Comai, L.; Chadchawan, S.; Plaimas, K. Identification of key genes in ‘Luang Pratahn’, Thai salt-tolerant rice, based on time-course data and weighted co-expression networks. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 744654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Sarikas, A.; Hartmann, T.; Pan, Z.Q. The cullin protein family. Genome Biol. 2011, 12, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hotton, S.K.; Callis, J. Regulation of cullin RING ligases. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 467–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Guo, L.; Nezames, C.D.; Sheng, L.; Deng, X.; Wei, N. Cullin-RING ubiquitin ligase family in plant abiotic stress pathways. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2012, 55, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Furniss, J.J.; Spoel, S.H. Cullin-RING ubiquitin ligases in salicylic acid-mediated plant immune signaling. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Dieterle, M.; Thomann, A.; Renou, J.P.; Parmentier, Y.; Cognat, V.; Lemonnier, G.; Müller, R.; Shen, W.H.; Kretsch, T.; Genschik, P. Molecular and functional characterization of Arabidopsis Cullin 3A. Plant J. 2005, 41, 386–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lang, L.; Xu, A.; Ding, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, N.; Tian, Z.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, X.; Liang, F.; et al. Quantitative trait locus mapping of salt tolerance and identification of salt-tolerant genes in Brassica napus L. front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1000. [Google Scholar]
  33. Wu, J.; Zhang, J.; Li, X.; Liu, J.; Niu, Z.; Wang, L. An overexpression of the AP2/ERF transcription factor from Iris typhifolia in Arabidopsis thaliana confers tolerance to salt stress. Biol. Plant 2019, 63, 776–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Feng, Y.; Zeng, S.; Yan, J.; Li, K.; Xu, H. Genome-wide analysis and expression of MYC family genes in tomato and the functional identification of slmyc1 in response to salt and drought stress. Agronomy 2023, 13, 757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bhattacharjee, B.; Hallan, V. NF-YB family transcription factors in Arabidopsis: Structure, phylogeny, and expression analysis in biotic and abiotic stresses. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 13, 1067427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Renliang, Z.; Guanqing, J. Package ‘geneHapR’, R Package Version 1.1.8. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/geneHapR/geneHapR.pdf (accessed on 24 March 2023).
  37. Wickham, H.; Chang, W.; Henry, L.; Pedersen, T.L.; Takahashi, K.; Wilke, C.; Woo, K.; Yutani, H.; Dunnington, D. Package ‘ggplot2’, R Package Version 3.4.1. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ggplot2/ggplot2.pdf (accessed on 24 March 2023).
  38. Monroe, J.G. Package ‘genemodel’, R Package Version 1.1.0. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/genemodel/genemodel.pdf (accessed on 16 April 2023).
  39. Blum, A.; Ebercon, A. Cell membrane stability as a measure of drought and heat tolerance in wheat. Crop Sci. 1981, 21, 43–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Habila, S.; Khunpolwattana, N.; Chantarachot, T.; Buaboocha, T.; Comai, L.; Chadchawan, S.; Pongpanich, M. Salt stress responses and SNP-based phylogenetic analysis of Thai rice cultivars. Plant Genome 2022, 15, e20189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yoshida, S.; Forno, D.A.; Cock, J.H.; Gomez, K.A. Laboratory Manual for Physiological Studies of Rice, 3rd ed.; International Rice Research Institute: Manila, Philippines, 1976; pp. 61–66. [Google Scholar]
  42. Untergasser, A.; Nijveen, H.; Rao, X.; Bisseling, T.; Geurts, R.; Leunissen, J.A. Primer3Plus, an enhanced web interface to Primer3. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35, W71–W74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic trees of the cullin family in Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa. (a) Phylogenetic analysis of 71 cullin genes and (b) 65 cullin proteins. The blue, purple, red, and black letters indicate the data retrieved from the RAP-DB, TAIR, MSU-RGAP, and NCBI repositories, respectively (accessed on 24 March 2023). The pink rectangle highlights the CUL3 family groups in both species.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic trees of the cullin family in Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa. (a) Phylogenetic analysis of 71 cullin genes and (b) 65 cullin proteins. The blue, purple, red, and black letters indicate the data retrieved from the RAP-DB, TAIR, MSU-RGAP, and NCBI repositories, respectively (accessed on 24 March 2023). The pink rectangle highlights the CUL3 family groups in both species.
Ijms 25 01040 g001
Figure 2. (a) Phylogenetic tree of the CUL3 genes from Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa, and (b) conserved motifs in CUL3 proteins from Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa. The red, green, and purple boxes represent the coding sequence (CDS), 5′- and 3′-untranslated regions (UTRs), respectively. The black line represents introns. Different conserved motifs are displayed as different-colored boxes.
Figure 2. (a) Phylogenetic tree of the CUL3 genes from Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa, and (b) conserved motifs in CUL3 proteins from Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa. The red, green, and purple boxes represent the coding sequence (CDS), 5′- and 3′-untranslated regions (UTRs), respectively. The black line represents introns. Different conserved motifs are displayed as different-colored boxes.
Ijms 25 01040 g002
Figure 3. (a) Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)- and (b) insertion/deletion (Indel)-based haplotype analysis of OsCUL3c in 233 accessions of local Thai rice. Light-orange-colored columns provide the list of haplotypes. Light-red-colored columns indicate all SNP variations. Light-green-colored columns represent variation sites for indels. Blank cells indicate reference alleles in those positions. A dash (-) indicates the position of an “unknown” nucleotide or generally refers to “N” (any nucleotide A, T, G, or C). Ambiguity codes W (A or T), S (G or C), M (A or C), K (G or T), R (A or G), and Y (C or T) represent positions when there is some uncertainty between two nucleotides. “Het” refers to “heterozygote”. “P, C, I, 5U, and 3U” in the CDS/intron bar refer to “promoter, coding sequences, intron, 5′- and the 3′-untranslated region”, respectively.
Figure 3. (a) Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)- and (b) insertion/deletion (Indel)-based haplotype analysis of OsCUL3c in 233 accessions of local Thai rice. Light-orange-colored columns provide the list of haplotypes. Light-red-colored columns indicate all SNP variations. Light-green-colored columns represent variation sites for indels. Blank cells indicate reference alleles in those positions. A dash (-) indicates the position of an “unknown” nucleotide or generally refers to “N” (any nucleotide A, T, G, or C). Ambiguity codes W (A or T), S (G or C), M (A or C), K (G or T), R (A or G), and Y (C or T) represent positions when there is some uncertainty between two nucleotides. “Het” refers to “heterozygote”. “P, C, I, 5U, and 3U” in the CDS/intron bar refer to “promoter, coding sequences, intron, 5′- and the 3′-untranslated region”, respectively.
Ijms 25 01040 g003
Figure 4. OsCUL3c haplotype frequency in 233 accessions of the local Thai rice collection (Table S2). The solid red line indicates the threshold number of accessions.
Figure 4. OsCUL3c haplotype frequency in 233 accessions of the local Thai rice collection (Table S2). The solid red line indicates the threshold number of accessions.
Ijms 25 01040 g004
Figure 5. (a) Phylogenetic trees of coding sequences-based haplotypes, (b) amino acid-based haplotypes, and (c) promoter-based haplotypes.
Figure 5. (a) Phylogenetic trees of coding sequences-based haplotypes, (b) amino acid-based haplotypes, and (c) promoter-based haplotypes.
Ijms 25 01040 g005
Figure 6. (a) Gene structure of OsCUL3c with the putative promoter region. The light blue, grey, and white boxes represent coding sequences (CDSs), untranslated regions (UTRs), and putative promoters, respectively. Solid blue lines represent introns. (b) The predicted cis-regulatory element (CRE) and (c) transcription factor binding site (TFBS) positions in the putative promoter sequences. The putative CREs and TFBSs at certain positions are illustrated by distinct colored rectangles. (d) The number of CREs and (e) TFBSs. Data are only shown for response factors related to salt and drought stress and the response to abscisic acid (ABA).
Figure 6. (a) Gene structure of OsCUL3c with the putative promoter region. The light blue, grey, and white boxes represent coding sequences (CDSs), untranslated regions (UTRs), and putative promoters, respectively. Solid blue lines represent introns. (b) The predicted cis-regulatory element (CRE) and (c) transcription factor binding site (TFBS) positions in the putative promoter sequences. The putative CREs and TFBSs at certain positions are illustrated by distinct colored rectangles. (d) The number of CREs and (e) TFBSs. Data are only shown for response factors related to salt and drought stress and the response to abscisic acid (ABA).
Ijms 25 01040 g006
Figure 7. Association of predominant OsCUL3c haplotypes and nineteen stress susceptibility indices (SSI) for salt tolerance-related traits. All phenotypes measured were evaluated under 150 mM NaCl for 3, 6, and 9 days [12]. The red line represents the linear line of best fit between the haplotypes and SSIs. Ci, intercellular CO2 concentration; CMS, cell membrane stability; E, transpiration rate; gs, stomatal conductance; PN, net photosynthetic rate; FG, number of filled grains; PAN, number of panicles; TIL, number of tillers; UFG, number of unfilled grains.
Figure 7. Association of predominant OsCUL3c haplotypes and nineteen stress susceptibility indices (SSI) for salt tolerance-related traits. All phenotypes measured were evaluated under 150 mM NaCl for 3, 6, and 9 days [12]. The red line represents the linear line of best fit between the haplotypes and SSIs. Ci, intercellular CO2 concentration; CMS, cell membrane stability; E, transpiration rate; gs, stomatal conductance; PN, net photosynthetic rate; FG, number of filled grains; PAN, number of panicles; TIL, number of tillers; UFG, number of unfilled grains.
Ijms 25 01040 g007
Figure 8. The box plot shows the log2 fold change in differentially expressed OsCUL3c genes from RNA-seq data and 2−ΔΔCt values from the RT-qPCR analysis of the representative rice varieties under salt stress conditions. Khao Dawk Mali 105 [25] and Luang Pratahn [26] were used as representatives of the group I and group II haplotypes, respectively.
Figure 8. The box plot shows the log2 fold change in differentially expressed OsCUL3c genes from RNA-seq data and 2−ΔΔCt values from the RT-qPCR analysis of the representative rice varieties under salt stress conditions. Khao Dawk Mali 105 [25] and Luang Pratahn [26] were used as representatives of the group I and group II haplotypes, respectively.
Ijms 25 01040 g008
Figure 9. Proposed functional impact of OsCUL3c mutations under salt stress. (a) Salt stress upregulates OsCUL3c expression, resulting in target degradation in group I. (b) During salt stress, the OsCUL3c target is activated to maintain homeostasis in group II. Green and red arrows depict upregulation and downregulation of OsCUL3c, respectively.
Figure 9. Proposed functional impact of OsCUL3c mutations under salt stress. (a) Salt stress upregulates OsCUL3c expression, resulting in target degradation in group I. (b) During salt stress, the OsCUL3c target is activated to maintain homeostasis in group II. Green and red arrows depict upregulation and downregulation of OsCUL3c, respectively.
Ijms 25 01040 g009
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Herwibawa, B.; Lekklar, C.; Chadchawan, S.; Buaboocha, T. Association of a Specific OsCULLIN3c Haplotype with Salt Stress Responses in Local Thai Rice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 1040. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25021040

AMA Style

Herwibawa B, Lekklar C, Chadchawan S, Buaboocha T. Association of a Specific OsCULLIN3c Haplotype with Salt Stress Responses in Local Thai Rice. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(2):1040. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25021040

Chicago/Turabian Style

Herwibawa, Bagus, Chakkree Lekklar, Supachitra Chadchawan, and Teerapong Buaboocha. 2024. "Association of a Specific OsCULLIN3c Haplotype with Salt Stress Responses in Local Thai Rice" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 2: 1040. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25021040

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop