Next Article in Journal
Let-7a-5p Regulates Animal Lipid Accumulation by Targeting Srebf2 and Thbs1 Signaling
Next Article in Special Issue
Protein Disorder in Plant Stress Adaptation: From Late Embryogenesis Abundant to Other Intrinsically Disordered Proteins
Previous Article in Journal
Bacteriophage T5 dUTPase: Combination of Common Enzymatic and Novel Functions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Identification of the Abscisic Acid-, Stress-, and Ripening-Induced (ASR) Family Involved in the Adaptation of Tetragonia tetragonoides (Pall.) Kuntze to Saline–Alkaline and Drought Habitats
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Understanding AP2/ERF Transcription Factor Responses and Tolerance to Various Abiotic Stresses in Plants: A Comprehensive Review

by
Ziming Ma
1,2,3,*,†,
Lanjuan Hu
1,† and
Wenzhu Jiang
1,*
1
Jilin Provincial Engineering Laboratory of Plant Genetic Improvement, College of Plant Science, Jilin University, Changchun 130062, China
2
Max-Planck-Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Am Muehlenberg 1, 14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany
3
Plant Genetics, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Emil Ramann Str. 4, 85354 Freising, Germany
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(2), 893; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25020893
Submission received: 13 December 2023 / Revised: 4 January 2024 / Accepted: 9 January 2024 / Published: 11 January 2024

Abstract

:
Abiotic stress is an adverse environmental factor that severely affects plant growth and development, and plants have developed complex regulatory mechanisms to adapt to these unfavourable conditions through long-term evolution. In recent years, many transcription factor families of genes have been identified to regulate the ability of plants to respond to abiotic stresses. Among them, the AP2/ERF (APETALA2/ethylene responsive factor) family is a large class of plant-specific proteins that regulate plant response to abiotic stresses and can also play a role in regulating plant growth and development. This paper reviews the structural features and classification of AP2/ERF transcription factors that are involved in transcriptional regulation, reciprocal proteins, downstream genes, and hormone-dependent signalling and hormone-independent signalling pathways in response to abiotic stress. The AP2/ERF transcription factors can synergise with hormone signalling to form cross-regulatory networks in response to and tolerance of abiotic stresses. Many of the AP2/ERF transcription factors activate the expression of abiotic stress-responsive genes that are dependent or independent of abscisic acid and ethylene in response to abscisic acid and ethylene. In addition, the AP2/ERF transcription factors are involved in gibberellin, auxin, brassinosteroid, and cytokinin-mediated abiotic stress responses. The study of AP2/ERF transcription factors and interacting proteins, as well as the identification of their downstream target genes, can provide us with a more comprehensive understanding of the mechanism of plant action in response to abiotic stress, which can improve plants’ ability to tolerate abiotic stress and provide a more theoretical basis for increasing plant yield under abiotic stress.

1. Introduction

Plants are often affected by biotic or abiotic stresses during growth and development. Biotic stress is the stress of various biological factors unfavourable to the survival and development of plants, mainly due to infection and competition, such as diseases, insect pests, and weed damage. Abiotic stresses are environmental conditions unfavourable to plant survival and development and even lead to injury, damage, and death. Abiotic stresses include drought, high salt, low temperature, high temperature, nutrient stress, and heavy metals [1,2,3]. With global climate change, the impact of these stresses on plants is increasing. It has caused the reduction of global production of major crops and ultimately has a serious impact on global food security [4,5]. This paper reviews the structural features and classification of AP2/ERF transcription factors that are involved in transcriptional regulation, reciprocal proteins, downstream genes, and hormone-dependent signalling and hormone-independent signalling pathways in response to abiotic stress. In the future, we can focus on studying AP2/ERF transcription factors as a signal regulatory gene network in response to abiotic stress to improve plant tolerance to abiotic stress from a signalling perspective and increase crop yields.
Abiotic stress negatively impacts plant growth and development, directly threatening plant survival and yield [6,7]. Plants have evolved a series of complex response mechanisms for normal growth in unfavourable environments, such as through the perception of abiotic stress signals, hormone-dependent signalling and hormone-independent signalling channel signal transduction, induction of abiotic stress gene expression, and further activation of physiological and metabolic responses [7,8,9]. The gene products of plants in response to abiotic stresses are divided into two categories: The first type is regulatory proteins, which consist of protein factors that regulate downstream signal transduction and the expression of abiotic stress-responsive genes. The second type is functional proteins, which directly affect plant adaptation to abiotic stresses [10]. Regulatory proteins include protein kinases, phosphokinases, and transcription factors (AP2, NAC, MYB, WRKY, and bZIP transcription factors) [11,12,13]. Functional proteins include proline, soluble sugars, late embryogenesis abundant protein (LEA), dehydrins, superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD) and catalase (CAT), water channel proteins, etc. These proteins can mitigate damage to plant cells from various abiotic stresses by maintaining plant cell expansion pressure, scavenging reactive oxygen species, and protecting the structure of intracellular biomolecules [14,15].
Transcription factors are proteins that regulate downstream gene expression by binding to specific sequences in DNA or other protein complexes. Transcriptional regulation refers to the combination of transcription factors with cis-acting elements upstream of stress-responsive genes to activate or repress gene expression during the process of gene expression [16,17]. Abiotic stresses such as drought, low temperature, and high salt lead to an increase in abscisic acid (ABA) biosynthesis, which activates the binding of transcription factors to cis-acting elements in specific sequences in the promoter regions of the corresponding downstream stress-responsive genes, regulating gene expression and, thus, modulating plant tolerance in response to abiotic stresses [18,19]. As one of the plant-specific transcription factor families, the AP2/ERF family of transcription factors is of great significance for plant survival and development. Nowadays, with the release of the whole genome sequences of many plants, their functional regulatory networks in crops such as rice (Oryza sativa L.), maise (Zea mays L.), and soybean (Glycine max L.) will be gradually revealed. This article discusses the structural features of AP2/ERF transcription factors, including their binding elements, regulation of transcription, and interaction with other proteins. It also discusses the progress of research on the role of AP2/ERF in regulating the response to abiotic stresses and provides references for future research on AP2/ERF transcription factors to improve plants’ ability to cope with abiotic stresses [20,21,22].

1.1. Classification and Structural Classification of AP2/ERF Transcription Factors

The AP2/ERF transcription factor family is a large group of plant-specific transcription factors that regulate plant growth, development, and abiotic stress response. Many AP2/ERF family genes were identified in the plant genome. They can be divided into five main groups based on the number of AP2/ERF structural domains, namely AP2 (APETALA2), ERF (ethylene-responsive factor), DREB (dehydration-responsive element binding protein), Soloist, and RAV (related to ABI3/VP1) (Supplementary Table S1). For example, AP2/ERF transcription factor genes, namely Dehydration responsive factor 2B (OsDREB2B), Reduced plant height 1 (OsRPH1), Ethylene response AP2/ERF factor (OsEATB), and APETALA-2-Like transcription factor gene 39 (OsAP2-39), are able to affect rice growth and development, and consequently plant height, by regulating the expression of Gibberellin (GA) metabolic genes [23,24,25,26]. Present-day studies are more extensive and in-depth for the AP2, DREB, and ERF subfamilies, whereas very few studies have been reported on the Soloist subfamily, whose nucleotide sequences are known to be highly conserved in most plants [27] (Figure 1). The structure of AP2/ERF transcription factors is characterised by four major functional regions, namely the DNA-binding domain, the transcription regulation domain, the oligomerisation site, and the nuclear localisation signal (NLS), and the AP2/ERF binding domain is highly conserved [28]. The AP2/ERF transcription factor structural domain contains 60–70 amino acid residues, forming a typical three-dimensional structure according to three β-folds and one α-helix. The YRG and RAYD elements in the AP2 domain play an important role in DNA binding activity. The YRG element at the N-terminal end of the domain consists of approximately 19–22 hydrophilic amino acid residues and promotes DNA binding through bases and hydrophilic groups. The RAYD element at the C-terminal end of the domain consists of about 42–43 residues and mediates protein–protein interactions through the α-helices or interacts with DNA through the hydrophobic surface of the α-helices [29]. Many studies have shown that AP2/ERF transcription factors are highly structurally similar, which may lead to a large amount of gene redundancy in the AP2/ERF family of transcription factors [23,24].

1.2. Cis-Acting Elements Recognized by AP2/ERF Transcription Factors

In previous promoter region analyses of AP2/ERF transcription factor-regulated genes, scientists have identified many AP2/ERF transcription factors capable of specifically binding to stress-responsive gene initiator cis-elements in the promoter region [30,31,32]. The ERF subfamily of transcription factor members can participate in the regulation of abiotic stress by binding to the ethylene-response element (ERE) (GCC-box, core sequence AGCCGCC). Members of the DREB subfamily of transcription factors specifically recognise and bind to a DRE/CRT element (dehydration-responsive element/C-repeat, core sequence A/GCCGAC) in the promoter region of another gene, regulating the expression of response genes related to drought, low temperature, and salt stress [33,34,35,36]. The AP2/ERF transcription factors bind not only to both DRE/CRT and ERE elements but also to other cis-elements, such as coupling element 1 (CE1, TGCCACCG), coupling element 3 (CE3, CGCG) and hypoxia-responsive promoter element (HRPE). The AP2/ERF transcription factors also bind to these cis-elements, for example, CAACA, ATCTA, CATGCA, CGNCCA, and ATCGAG [37,38,39,40].

2. AP2/ERF Transcriptional Regulation and Interacting Protein under Abiotic Stresses

2.1. AP2/ERF Transcriptional Regulation under Abiotic Stresses

Under abiotic stresses, some genes related to adversity in plants can bind to cis-acting elements conserved in AP2/ERF transcription factors to regulate the expression of their transcription factor gene, which include low-temperature responsive elements, heat shock-responsive elements, and ABA-responsive elements. It has been shown that heat shock factor 1 (HSF1) and ABA-responsive element binding protein (ABRE) can bind to the heat shock response element in the dehydration responsive factor 2A (DREB2A) promoter and regulate the expression of their respective transcription factor gene, thereby altering the plant’s ability to tolerate abiotic stresses [41,42,43,44]. Song et al. [45] showed that the interaction of the APETALA2/EREBP-type transcription factor 7 (AtERF7) with the protein kinase S3 (PKS3) is involved in the regulation of the plant ABA response. AtERF7 binds to the GCC box and is able to inhibit gene transcription. AtERF7 interacts with the transcriptional corepressor AtSin3, which in turn may interact with the histone deacetylase 19 (HDA19). HDA19 and SIN3-like 3 (AtSin3) enhance the transcriptional repression activity of AtERF7. Thus, AP2/ERF transcription can be regulated by histone modifications such as phosphorylation, ubiquitination, methylation, and acetylation by modulating the spatial state of chromatin [46,47,48,49]. Kavas et al. [50] identified 180 AP2/ERF superfamily genes in Phaseolus vulgaris. MicroRNA target transcript analyses identified in computer simulations identified almost all PvAP2-ERF genes as MicroRNA targets in 44 different plant species; the most abundant target gene was the AP2-ERF transcription factor gene (PvERF20, PvERF25, PvERF62, PvERF78, PvERF113, and PvERF173).

2.2. AP2/ERF Transcription Factors Interacting Protein under Abiotic Stresses

Transcription factor (TF), also known as trans-acting factor, is a DNA-binding protein that specifically interacts with cis-acting elements of eukaryotic genes and activates or inhibits gene transcription. Many studies have shown that AP2/ERF transcription factors interact with other transcription factors to form protein complexes or can directly bind to the promoters of their downstream target genes to repress or promote gene expression [51,52]. AP2/ERF family transcription factor OsDREB2B was able to regulate the expression of OsAP2-39 by binding to its promoter, and OsDREB2B interacted with OsWRKY21 to regulate the expression of GA metabolism genes and inhibit GA synthesis, leading to a decrease in GA content and, thus, exerting a negative effect on rice growth and development [23]. The AP2/ERF transcription factor OsRPH1 overexpression resulted in reduced plant height, and OsRPH1 interacted with the blue light receptor Cryptochrome 1 (OsCRY1b) [24]. Tiwari et al. [53] identified a short “EDLL” motif that is present in ethylene response factor 98 (AtERF98)/TDR1 and other branch members from the same AP2 subfamily. This motif has a unique arrangement of acidic amino acids and hydrophobic leucines and functions as a strong activation domain that partially overcomes the repression conferred by the homeobox protein 2 (AtHB2) transcription factor, which contains an ERF-associated amphiphilic repressor (EAR) motif. Overexpression of ethylene response factor 7 (AtERF7) plants has reduced the sensitivity of defence cells to ABA and increased water loss. Ethylene response factor 3 (ERF3) interacts with the subunit of the histone deacetylase complex SAP18 (SIN3-associated polypeptide P18) and co-recruits histone deacetylase 19 (HDA19) to form a complex which inhibits the expression of the associated genes [54]. Franco-Zorrilla et al. [55] analysed co-regulated gene and transcriptome data from transcription factor mutants. The results indicate that at least one target sequence for each transcription factor is functionally important and that the function of a transcription factor as an activator or a repressor can be predicted from specific DNA sequences. Therefore, genes co-regulated by AP2/ERF transcription factors are also enriched for AP2/ERF target genes, and future analyses of homologous sequences by scientists will help to identify putative targets of transcription factors and predict their biological functions.

3. AP2/ERF by Participating in the Regulation of Hormone-Mediated Abiotic Stresses

Phytohormones, also known as plant natural hormones or plant endogenous hormones, refer to a number of organic compounds produced by the plant body in minute quantities that can regulate (promote, inhibit) their own physiological processes. The main role of phytohormones is to regulate the ability of plants to resist the adverse external environment and plant growth and development. Studies have shown that AP2/ERF transcription factors can synergy with hormone signalling to form a cross-regulatory network, e.g., by participating in growth and development and abiotic stress responses mediated by the plant hormones abscisic acid (ABA), gibberellin (GA), auxin (IAA), ethylene (ET), brassinosteroid (BR) and cytokinin (CTK) [56,57,58,59,60].

3.1. AP2/ERF Transcription Factors Involved in ABA-Mediated Stress Response

The main role of ABA is to promote the shedding of organs such as plant leaves, fruits, and calyxes and to regulate plant growth and development. ABA is one of the key hormones in response to abiotic stresses such as drought, salt, cold, and heat. ABA promotes the synthesis of osmotic substances and protects against abiotic stresses by regulating stomatal opening, closure, and root architecture [61,62]. Overexpression of ethylene response factor 71 (OsERF71) plants reduced water loss, resulting in increased tolerance to drought stress. OsERF71 was able to regulate the expression of ABA-responsive and proline biosynthesis genes under drought stress, resulting in increased sensitivity to exogenous ABA treatment and proline accumulation [63]. Cheng et al. [64] identified 229 AP2/ERF genes in the latest maise reference genome, of which 32 ZmAP2/ERFs regulate biotic stress and 24 ZmAP2/ERFs are involved in abiotic stress response. Dehydration responsive factor (ZmDREB39) and ZmDREB89 were up-regulated in response to ABA. Xiong et al. [65] identified a total of 135 TkERF genes from Trichosanthes kirilowii. A co-expression network constructed using transcriptome data from different flowering stages showed that 67 of the AP2/ERF genes were associated with abscisic acid signalling pathway members. Seventeen genes were found to be up-regulated when tissue culture seedlings were treated with ABA, suggesting that some members of the TkERF gene family may be involved in phytohormone signalling pathways. Twenty genes were up-regulated under PEG treatment, suggesting that these selected genes may be involved in plant drought stress. AP2 transcription factor 10 (TaAP2-10) is able to be induced by abiotic stress and ABA hormone treatment [66]. The CBF (C-repeat binding factor) subfamily of transcription factors belongs to the AP2/ERF (Apetala 2/ethylene response factor) family of transcription factors. Research shows cis-acting elements in the promoter region of BpCBFs that are associated with environmental stress and hormones. Most of these transcription factors were found to be responsive to ABA or salt stress in different plant tissues after treatment using ABA or salt [67].

3.2. AP2/ERF Transcription Factors Involved in GA-Mediated Stress Response

The main physiological role of GA is to promote the elongation of plant cells, increase plant height, promote growth and development of lateral buds, promote flower bud differentiation and flowering, and inhibit ageing and shedding of leaves. Li et al. [68] identified a total of 218 AP2/ERF genes in the sugarcane genome, and the presence of multiple cis-regulatory elements (CREs) in the SsAP2/ERF promoter was associated with abiotic stress, suggesting that SsAP2/ERF activity may contribute to the adaptation of sugarcane to environmental changes. Soloist subfamily transcription factor 4 (SsSoloist4) was most significantly up-regulated in response to treatment with the exogenous hormone GA, suggesting that this gene may play a role in GA-associated response. OsDREB2B is an AP2/ERF family transcription factor; overexpression of OsDREB2B in rice can significantly improve rice drought tolerance [69]. Ma et al. [23] found that OsDREB2B overexpression resulted in shorter plant height, and the length of the second leaf sheath in overexpressed plants was restored to that of the wild type by exogenous GA3 application. Expression of GA biosynthesis genes was altered in overexpression OsDREB2B plants. Fu et al. [70] found that overexpression of AP2/EREBP transcription factor 20 (ZmEREB20) in Arabidopsis enhanced ABA sensitivity and caused delayed seed germination under salt stress by regulating ABA and GA-related genes. Zhang et al. [71] found that approximately 49 genes containing complete AP2/ERF structural domains were identified from the Taxus x media (Yew tree) transcriptome database. Nine of these TmERF genes could respond to low temperature and hormone treatments, and the expression of the AP2/ERF transcription factor gene (TmERF5, TmERF14, and TmERF36) was elevated under GA treatment. These findings indicate their potential involvement in crosstalk between abiotic stress response signalling pathways.

3.3. AP2/ERF Transcription Factors Involved in IAA-Mediated Stress Response

The main effects of IAA are to promote the division and elongation of plant cells, the growth of roots and stems, the development and ripening of fruits, and the regulation of plants’ form and growth direction. Cai et al. demonstrated a regulatory role for APETALA2/ethylene response factor (AP2/ERF) transcription factor 96 (OsERF096) in the cold stress response. Targeted metabolomics analyses revealed that OsERF096 can respond to cold stress by regulating IAA accumulation and signalling [72]. Huang et al. [73] found that AP2/ERF transcription factor 12 (ERF012) overexpression showed resistance to temperature, drought, salt, and heavy metal stresses. Overexpression ERF012 inhibited root growth and promoted root hair development and leaf senescence. The application of exogenous IAA effectively mitigated this effect. ERF012 may down-regulate its target genes Cinnamate-4-hydroxylase (AtC4H) and 4-coumarate CoA ligase 1 (At4CL1), resulting in reduced IAA accumulation leading to leaf senescence. Overexpression AP2/ERF transcription factor B1 (SlERF.B1) showed significantly higher sensitivity to salt treatment at both phenotypic and physiological levels. Plants that overexpressed SlERF.B1 showed low tolerance to mannitol and drought stresses. SlERF.B1 expression was induced by salt, mannitol, cold, heat, and ACC treatments but was inhibited by ABA, IAA, and 1-MCP treatments [74].

3.4. AP2/ERF Transcription Factors Involved in ET-Mediated Stress Response

ET can promote fruit ripening and leaf senescence, induce adventitious roots and root hairs, break the dormancy of plant seeds and buds, and inhibit flowering in many plants (but induces and promotes flowering in pineapple and its congeners). Ethylene, one of the six plant hormones, also plays a role in a variety of stress responses, such as salt, low temperature, and flooding [75]. AP2/ERF transcription factor submergence 1A (Sub1A) is a rice flooding tolerance gene, the expression of which was up-regulated under flooding conditions, while ET treatment induced its expression, but GA treatment did not. Flood-tolerant rice varieties containing the Sub1A gene synthesised ET in the plants under flooded conditions, and ethylene promoted the degradation of ABA on the one hand and the expression of Sub1A on the other [76,77]. The ethylene-responsive transcription factor RAP2-2 (RAP2.2) in Arabidopsis belongs to the same subfamily as Oryza sativa submergence tolerance gene Sub1A. RAP2.2 is induced by ET in shoots and functions in ET-controlled signal transduction pathways, and overexpression of RAP2.2 lines showed increased survival under hypoxia stress [78].

3.5. AP2/ERF Transcription Factors Involved in BR-Mediated Stress Response

BR has an important role in plant growth and development and, together with other plant hormones, is involved in the regulation of many aspects of plant development, including stem and leaf growth, root growth, vascular tissue differentiation, fertility, seed germination, maintenance of apical dominance, and plant photomorphogenesis [79]. Liu et al. [80] demonstrated that AP2/ERF family transcription factor 72 (ERF72) may be a candidate gene for cross-interaction between the BR signalling pathway and stress response. In Arabidopsis, ERF72/RAP2.3 antagonised BZR1 (brassinazole-resistant 1) and ARF6 (Auxin responsive factor 6) and inhibited hypocotyl elongation. Schmitz et al. [81] found SUB1A differentially regulates the expression of BR synthesis-related genes during plant flooding, activates BR biosynthesis and signal transduction, induces the expression of Gibberellin 2-oxidase 7 (GA2ox7), a key gene for GA degradation, and, thus, controls GA levels in rice plants.

3.6. AP2/ERF Transcription Factors Involved in CTK-Mediated Stress Response

The main physiological role of CTK is to promote cell division and prevent leaf senescence. The senescence and yellowing of green plant leaves occur due to the decomposition of proteins and chlorophylls within them. At the same time, CTK can maintain protein synthesis, thus keeping the leaves green and promoting the differentiation of buds, cell enlargement, the development of lateral buds and the removal of apical dominance [82]. Moreover, CTK also plays an important role in plant response to abiotic stresses [83]. AP2/ERF-N22(2) has an AP2 structural domain consisting of 55 amino acid residues and a set of acidic amino acid residues in the C-terminal region that can act as a trans-activating structural domain. Moreover, AP2/ERF-N22(2) belongs to group VI L. Members of Arabidopsis group VI L have been shown to be involved in the response to cytokinins under drought stress [84]. Cytokinin response factor (CRF) is an AP2/ERF family transcription factor that regulates plant cotyledon and embryo developmental processes and is also involved in cytokinin signalling [85,86]. In Arabidopsis, cytokinin response factor 6 (CRF6) is an AP2/ERF transcription factor that is induced by CTK. CRF6 is highly expressed in the veins of mature leaves, promotes CTK synthesis, and is induced by abiotic stress [87,88]. Zwack et al. [89] showed that cytokinin response factor 4 (CRF4) can be induced by cold exposure for a short period of time, especially in root and shoot tissues. Altered transcriptional expression of genes of the cold signalling pathway in c-repeat binding factors (CBF) and cold-regulated 15a (COR15a) in crf4 mutants and overexpression CRF4 lines suggests that CRF4 may be involved in this pathway. The specific regulatory mechanism of CRF is still unclear, so future identification of CRF target genes and upstream signalling molecules could help explain this.

4. Role of AP2/ERF Transcription Factors in Response to Abiotic Stresses (Not Dependent on Hormone Signalling Pathway)

Stresses such as drought, high salt, high temperature, low temperature, nutrients, and heavy metals are the major abiotic stress factors affecting plant growth and development, crop yield, and quality. In the course of plant evolution, complex defence mechanisms have been developed to adapt to abiotic stresses so that plants can improve their ability to tolerate abiotic stresses. Studies have shown that the AP2/ERF family of transcription factors is widely involved in regulating the plant response to various abiotic stresses [90].

4.1. AP2/ERF Transcription Factors in Response to Drought Stress

Water is a vital resource for the survival of all life and has played an important role in the evolution of life. Water is an essential constituent for photosynthesis in green plants, and if there is a lack of water, the plant’s photosynthesis will be weakened. Leaves will wilt and, in severe cases, can lead to the death of the plant [91]. Yu et al. [92] found that overexpression of the AP2/ERF family gene TaERF-6-3A increased sensitivity to drought and salt stress in Arabidopsis. Expression of stress-related and antioxidant-related genes was down-regulated in overexpressing TaERF-6-3A plants. Genome-wide analysis of the AP2/ERF genes in Pisum sativum (L.) identified 153 AP2/ERF genes. Jarambasa et al. [93] found that DREB2A, DREB2C, DREB2E, and DREB2F were induced in leaves under drought stress. Kumar et al. [94] showed that overexpressing the OsAP2/ERF-N22 line showed higher relative water content, membrane stability index, wax content, osmotic potential, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate activities. Kabir et al. [95] demonstrate that a total of 119 CoAP2/ERF genes were identified from the dark jute genome. CoDREB-11, CoDREB-14, and CoRAV-01 genes were significantly up-regulated under salinity and drought stress conditions. Kong et al. [96] demonstrate that the osmotic stress-induced PtoERF15 and its target gene PtoMYC2b, which is involved in mediating blood vessel size, density, and cell wall thickness in response to drought in poplar, were identified and characterised. Overexpression of PtoERF15 contributes to the maintenance of stem water potential, thereby increasing drought tolerance.

4.2. Molecular Mechanisms of AP2/ERF Associated with Salt Stress

Soil salinity affects around 6% of the world’s land and 23% of arable land, causing considerable economic losses through crop stress and reduced yields. Because salinity plays a vital role in plant growth, excess soluble salts will have a toxic effect on plants above a certain limit; this can greatly affect the growth and development of plants, ultimately resulting in reduced yields [97]. AP2/ERF transcription factor 19 (OsERF19) was identified in rice by Huang et al. [98]. The OsERF19 expression was inhibited by salt stress. Overexpressing the OsERF19 line increased the tolerance of plants to salt stress. In addition, Late embryogenesis abundant protein gene (OsLEA3), Vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter gene (OsNHX1), Low-affinity Na+ transporter (OsHKT6), and Overly tolerant to salt 1 (OsOTS1) genes were up-regulated in overexpressing lines when plants were subjected to salt stress. Within the AP2/ERF family, transcription factor 71 (AtERF71)/HRE2 is known to be involved in hypoxia and osmotic stress responses [99,100]. Seok et al. dissected the HRE2 promoter and showed that the -116 to -2 region is responsible for hypoxia and salt stress responses. This region contains both positive and negative cis-regulatory elements that may regulate HRE2 expression under salt stress [101].

4.3. AP2/ERF Transcription Factors Involved in Plant Response to Temperature Stress

4.3.1. AP2/ERF Transcription Factors and High Temperature Stress

Temperature is the main environmental factor affecting plant growth and development and the quality of life of the fruit after harvest; appropriate temperatures promote plant growth. High temperatures primarily harm plant growth and development, shorten the plant, cause localised burns on the leaves and stems, and reduce the number of flowers. High temperatures also encourage increased transpiration, disrupting the water balance and causing the plant to wilt and die [102]. Zhang et al. [103] found that the AP2/ERF transcription factor PlTOE3 can specifically activate the Tryptophan decarboxylase gene (PlTDC) promoter. High-temperature stress can affect the transcriptional level of PlTOE3. Overexpression of PlTOE3 in tobacco enhanced plant melatonin production and heat stress tolerance, whereas silencing of PlTDC expression gave the opposite results. The SHN/WIN evolutionary branch of the AP2/ERF transcription factor family is involved in many important processes. In fact, plants respond to heat stress through heat shock transcription factor (HSF) and heat shock protein (HSP)-mediated heat stress response (HSR), and some NSR genes can be activated in heat-activated stress. Knockout of heat shock transcription factor A1 (HSFA1) gene plants results in reduced activation of a large number of HSR genes and a heat stress-sensitive phenotype [42,104]. The Arabidopsis genome encodes 21 HSFs, which can be classified into three categories: HSFA, HSFB, and HSFC [105]. HSFA2 is the most heat-inducible HSF; its heat induction is dependent on HSFA1 [106]. The HSFA2 knockout plants exhibit a significant heat-sensitive phenotype [107]. AP2/ERF transcription factor DREB2A acts downstream of HSFA1 and is another important thermotropic transcriptional activator. Overexpression of a constitutively active variant of DREB2A up-regulates HSR genes in Arabidopsis [108,109]. Under heat stress, AP2/ERF transcription factor ERF1 positively regulates heat tolerance in plants by binding to DRE cis-elements in heat-responsive genes, such as HSFA3 and HSPs, and activating their expression [110]. Ectopic constitutive expression of ERF95 or ERF97 enhances basal heat tolerance in plants. AP2/ERF transcription factor ERF95 interacts with ERF97, and this interaction is enhanced at high temperatures, where they directly regulate a common transcriptional regulator, HSFA2, in response to heat stress [111]. REVEILLE4 (RVE4) and RVE8 play important roles in regulating heat tolerance in plants. The rve4 and rve8 double mutants are more susceptible to high temperatures. RVE4/8 regulates heat tolerance by a mechanism that is independent of hsfa1-mediated HSR and is partially influenced by the downstream transcription factors ERF53 and ERF54 [112]. RESPIRATORY BURST OXIDASE HOMOLOG D (RbohD) is an NADPH oxidase that contributes to the production of ROS. These ROS molecules act as signalling molecules to initiate heat stress responses and transduction. AP2/ERF transcription factors ERF74 and ERF75 regulate RbohD transcription in response to heat stress [113] (Figure 2A).

4.3.2. AP2/ERF Transcription Factors and Low Temperature Stress

Symptoms of low temperature are discolouration of plant leaves, necrosis, and the appearance of spots on the surface of the plant, making the plant grow slowly and inducing other changes in morphological characteristics; the photosynthetic rate is significantly reduced, resulting in lower yields and lower quality. However, low-temperature stress not only leads to a reduction in plant yield, but in severe cases, it can also cause plant death [114]. Ren et al. [115] identified the apetala/ethylene responsive factor (AP2/ERF) family apetala 2.4 (RAP2.4) in Chrysanthemum lavandulifolium and plays an important role in plant development and response to stress. The activities of superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, and proline content in leaves in the four overexpression lines were higher than those in the wild type (WT). In contrast, the electrical conductivity and malondialdehyde content were decreased, indicating that the tolerance of plants with ClRAP2.4 overexpression to cold stress was increased. The SOD and POD activities, as well as proline content, were higher in the overexpressing ClRAP2.4 strain than in the wild type, whereas conductivity and malondialdehyde content were reduced, suggesting that overexpression of ClRAP2.4 is increased in plants tolerance to cold stress. Heidari et al. [116] treated two tomato species with low temperatures and found increased ABA content in two tomato species but increased ZT content in cold-tolerant tomato species. The contents of IAA and GA in cold-sensitive tomato species are reduced by low temperatures. The CTK was also found to be an important plant hormone associated with low-temperature stress in tomatoes. They also found that the C-repeat/DRE binding factor 1 (CBF1) gene is less induced in response to low temperature in tomato, but transcription of the inducer of the CBF expression 1 (ICE1) gene was up-regulated under low temperature in both tomato species. ICE1 appears to regulate cold-regulated (COR) genes in a manner that is not dependent on CBF. Numerous studies have shown that ethylene signalling regulates freezing tolerance in plants by repressing C repeat binding factor (CBF) motifs [117]. The CBF genes are regulated by several transcription factors, such as Phytochrome-interacting factors (PIF3, PIF4, and PIF7), which are light signalling components, whereas Pseudo response regulators (PRR9, PRR7, and PRR5) are circadian oscillatory components that negatively regulate the expression of CBFs [118,119,120,121]. Circadian clock associated 1 (CCA1), late slender hypocotyl (LHY), and brassinosteroids (BRs) signalling pathway components BRASSINAZOLE-RESISTANT (BZR1)/BRI1-EMS-SUPPRESSOR1 (BES1) positively regulate the expression of CBFs by directly binding to the promoter region and increasing the freezing tolerance of the plant [122]. There are other transcription factors involved in cold-induced expression of CBFs, such as suppressors of overexpression of constant 1 (SOC1) and MYB transcription factor MYB15, which are negative regulators. In contrast, inducers of CBF expression (ICE1, ICE2) and calcium-binding activators of transcription (CAMTAs) act as positive regulators [123,124] (Figure 2B).

4.4. Role of Plant AP2/ERF in Response to Nutritional Element Stress

Nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K), which are essential nutrients for plants, play very important physiological roles in plant growth and development. N is found in both proteins and nucleic acids, and proteins, in turn, are the basic substances that make up protoplasm [125].
N is also a constituent of chlorophyll, which is indispensable for photosynthesis in higher green plants and is, therefore, essential for plant photosynthesis [126]. RNA-seq analysis by Joshi et al. [127] showed that N stress induced most of the transcriptome changes in spinach roots, identifying 1,346 differential expressed genes (DEGs). In the presence of high N in leaf tissues, a subset of AP2/ERF family member transcription factors were all overexpressed in tissues in response to N perturbation. Bacterial accommodation within living plant cells was restricted to nitrogen-fixing rhizobium symbiosis; bacterial uptake is mediated by tubular structures called infection threads. Cerri et al. [128] identified a gene encoding an AP2/ERF transcription factor known as ethylene-responsive transcription factor (ERN1). Rhizobium primordia were formed following mutation of the ern1 gene in Lotus japonicus, but the majority remained uninfected, and bacterial entry into the root epidermis via infection threads was eliminated.
P is a constituent of the nucleus and nucleic acids, which have a special role in plant life and hereditary processes [129]. Most terrestrial plants establish symbiotic relationships with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), providing them with lipids and sugars in exchange for phosphorus and nitrogen. Zhang et al. [130] identified the AP2/ERF transcription factor mycorrhisation 1 (MtERM1) as being able to bind directly to the AW-box and AW-box-like cis-elements in the two half-size ABCG transporters (MtSTR2 and MtSTR) promoters, which are required for host lipid efflux and tuft development. Chen et al. [131] identified that the AP2/ERF transcription factor gene PalERF2 overexpression lines enhanced tolerance to Pi deficiency. In addition, overexpression of PalERF2 up-regulated phosphate starvation-induced (PSI) gene expression level and increased phosphate uptake under drought conditions.
K is an activator of many of the enzymes of photosynthesis and enhances the activity of the enzymes and, hence, promotes photosynthesis. K also functions to control the opening and closing of the plant’s stomata and hence facilitates the conservation of water by the plant [132]. Kim et al. [133] showed that the AP2/ERF family transcription factor RAP2.11 was identified as a component of the low potassium response. The AP2/ERF family transcription factor RAP2.11 regulates the expression of the high-affinity K+ uptake transporter protein (AtHAK5) under low K+ conditions and also contributes to a coordinated response to low potassium conditions by regulating other genes in the low K+ signalling cascade. Chen et al. [134] demonstrated that AP2/ERF family transcription factor OsERF106 was expressed in germinating seeds, primary roots, and developing flowers. Overexpression of OsERF106 resulted in stunted growth, relatively high levels of malonic dialdehyde (MDA) and reactive oxygen species (ROS), reduced CAT activity, and excessive accumulation of sodium (Na+) and potassium (K+) ions in transgenic rice.

4.5. AP2/ERF Involved in Plant Response to Heavy Metals Stress

Heavy metals in soil are a stress factor for plants, affecting their survival in various ways, including growth, development, and reproduction. Excessive amounts of heavy metals affect photosynthesis in plants, thus causing symptoms such as yellowing and wilting of plant leaves and reducing the efficiency of light energy utilisation in plants. High concentrations of heavy metals in the soil affect the ability of plants to absorb and utilise nutrients, leading to a reduction in the number of leaves, changes in the root system, and a reduction in stem expansion [135,136,137,138]. Karanja et al. [139] identified a total of 247 ERF family genes in the radish genome, and a portion of the AP2/ERF genes were preferentially expressed under drought and heat stress, whereas they were repressed under heavy metal stress. Chen et al. [140] identified a large number of key heavy metal Cd-induced DEGs containing transcription factors such as AP2/ERF, MYB, NAC, and WRKY. DEGs are involved in antioxidants, heavy metal transport, and detoxification pathways, and AP2/ERF family transcription factors were suggested to play crucial roles in kenaf Cd tolerance. Tian et al. [141] conducted a study exposing Solanum tuberosum L. to heavy metals Cd/Pb/Zn/Ni/Cu. They identified 181 potential StAP2/ERF genes, and the StAP2075, StAP2077, and StAP2126 genes were found to promote Cd accumulation and yeast growth (Cd detoxification phenotype).

5. Conclusions and Prospects

Nowadays, there are many reports on the involvement of AP2/ERFs in the regulation of hormone signalling-mediated stress response. When a plant suffers from abiotic stress, the inducing hormones (ABA and ET) and growth-promoting hormones (GAs, IAA, CTK, and BRs) carry out their defence against the adverse external environment through a mechanism regulated by AP2/ERFs (Figure 3) [142].
ABA Pathway: Under abiotic stress conditions, when plants are subjected to water deficit, the rate-limiting ABA biosynthetic enzyme Nine-cis-Epoxycarotenoid Dioxygenase (NCED) is rapidly up-regulated to promote ABA biosynthesis [143]. Subsequently, ABA is sensed by ABA receptors (PYR/PLY/RCAR), which form a ternary complex with protein phosphatase 2Cs (PP2Cs) as a ternary complex, resulting in the removal of the inhibition of SnRK2 kinases (SnRK2s). Active SnRK2 phosphorylates downstream substrate proteins, including AREBs/ABFs, ion channels, and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidases, thereby inducing ABA response [144,145]. ERF18/ORA47 activates the PP2C family phosphatase gene ABI2. Meanwhile, ABI1 acts upstream of ORA47 to activate ORA47, forming an ABI1-ORA47-ABI2 regulatory loop that inhibits ABA signalling and drought tolerance [39]. RAV1 inhibits root growth sensitivity to ABA by repressing ABI3, ABI4, and ABI5 expression. SnRK2.2, SnRK2.3, and SnRK2.6 also interact and phosphorylate RAV1 to inhibit transcriptional repression of target genes [146]. GA Pathway: In the absence of GA, DELLA inhibits GA responses. Abiotic stress leads to reduced GA content and signalling by inhibiting AP2/ERF-mediated GA biosynthesis enzymes. DREB1E and DREB1F lead to salt stress-induced growth retardation mainly by inhibiting GA20oxes [147]. Overexpressing CBF1 and ERF6 plants are sensitive to stress-induced growth retardation due to increased expression of GA2oxs and accumulation of DELLA. ERF11 promotes plant internode elongation by activating GA biosynthesis, and the expression of GA3ox1 and GA20oxs is increased in overexpressing ERF11 plants [148]. IAA Pathway: Huang et al. found that overexpression of ERF012 showed resistance to temperature, drought, salt, and heavy metal stresses. Overexpression of ERF012 inhibited root growth and promoted root hair development and leaf senescence. The application of exogenous IAA effectively mitigated this effect. ERF012 may down-regulate its target genes, AtC4H and At4CL1 (key genes for phenylpropanoid metabolism and cell wall formation), resulting in reduced IAA accumulation [73]. CTK Pathway: More than half of the CTK-responsive genes are regulated by both CRF and B-type ARRs (typical cytokinin-responsive transcription factors), and CRF6 also cooperates with CTK signalling to inhibit stress-induced leaf senescence through a common subset of CTK-regulated genes. CRF6 also represses CTK-related target genes involved in CTK biosynthesis, signalling, and transport to mitigate the adverse effects of CTK on abiotic stresses [87,88]. BR Pathway: BR is detected by the plasma membrane receptor kinase BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE 1 (BR1), which represses the activity of the negative regulator BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE 2 (BIN2), leading to the accumulation of the transcription factor BRASSINAZOLE-RESISTANT 2/BRI1-EMS-SUPPRESSOR 1 (BES1/BZR1), which is responsible for regulating the genes involved response to plant growth and stress responses in relation to BR. BR positively regulates cold tolerance partly through the CBF-mediated cold response pathway, in which BZR1 binds and promotes CBF1/CBF2 expression in response to cold. Cold stress also promotes the accumulation of the unphosphorylated active form of BZR1 through unknown mechanisms [149,150]. ET Pathway: ET is synthesised by the rate-limiting enzyme ACC synthase (ACS), a major target for regulating ET production under stress conditions [151]. The binding of ET to its receptor ethylene-insensitive 1 (ETR1) inactivates constitutive triple response 1 (CTR1) kinase activity, releasing CTR1 from its inhibition of ethylene-insensitive 2 (EIN2). The C-terminus of EIN2 then translocates to the nucleus, activating ethylene insensitive 3 (EIN3) and the transcriptional cascade of ethylene-regulated genes [152,153]. ET represses CBF to regulate cold stress negatively, positively regulates ERF-VII-mediated flooding and inundation, and enhances salt tolerance by activating ERF1 and ESE. The ET-insensitive mutants etr1, ein2, and ein3 show enhanced freezing tolerance. EIN3 represses CBF expression by directly binding to its promoter. Flooding causes hypoxia, which promotes ET production and activates the expression of a group of ERF-VIIs; however, ERF-VIIs regulate the hypoxic response partly through an ET-independent pathway. ERF-VII may also negatively regulate ET signalling and homeostasis through feedback regulation [154]. The involvement of AP2/ERFs in the regulation of hormone signalling-mediated stress response has been widely reported. However, we do not know the exact regulatory mechanism; more scientific exploration is needed. Question 1: How does AP2/ERF feedback regulate hormone biosynthesis and metabolism when they receive hormone signals? Question 2: How do AP2/ERFs regulate the expression of downstream related genes by synergising or antagonising multiple hormone signal transduction groups? Question 3: Can AP2/ERFs interact with other family transcription factors to jointly regulate the expression of downstream related genes through hormone signal transduction? Explaining these three issues will help to systematically explain the regulatory network of AP2/ERFs in response to abiotic stress conditions in plants and provide a theoretical basis for subsequent plant stress tolerance breeding projects.
Plants respond to abiotic stress not only through the above hormone signalling networks but also through a series of other complex signalling pathways and gene expression regulatory networks that have been established during the long-term evolution of plants. When plants are affected by external stress, they are able to regulate their growth and development and their ability to cope with tolerance under abiotic stress. AP2/ERF family transcription factors can play a role in abiotic stress response through hormone-dependent or hormone-independent signalling pathways. In recent years, there have been many reports on the involvement of AP2/ERF family transcription factors in plants’ response to abiotic stresses (Table 1). But they are still focused on abiotic stresses, such as drought, high salt, high temperature, and low temperature; the molecular mechanisms of AP2/ERF transcription factors in response to chemical reagent stress are rarely reported, for example, pesticides, car exhaust, and haze. Car exhaust and haze, the main component of which is sulphide, can cause plants to develop leaf scorch and impede growth and development. Excessive use of pesticides can damage the ecosystem and lead to a decline in crop yields. Therefore, it is important to study AP2/ERF in response to chemical stress in plants. Our in-depth study of the molecular mechanisms of plant responses to abiotic stresses, specifically the AP2/ERF transcription factors, encompasses various aspects such as stress signal perception and transmission, transcriptional regulation, and expression of response genes. This research aims to guarantee plants’ normal growth and development under abiotic stresses, thereby ensuring food production. Ultimately, this contributes to global food security and enhances the quality of human life.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms25020893/s1.

Author Contributions

All the authors contributed to the present form of the manuscript. Z.M. collected the data and drafted the manuscript; Z.M., L.H. and W.J. edited the manuscript; Z.M. and L.H. created the figures and tables; Z.M. and W.J. supervised; Z.M., L.H. and W.J. finalised and approved the final version of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 32201695). Open access funding was provided by the Max Planck Society.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

  1. Gupta, B.; Shrestha, J. Editorial: Abiotic stress adaptation and tolerance mechanisms in crop plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1278895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ma, Z.; Hu, L. MicroRNA: A Dynamic Player from Signalling to Abiotic Tolerance in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 11364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mittler, R.; Zandalinas, S.I.; Fichman, Y.; Van Breusegem, F. Reactive oxygen species signalling in plant stress responses. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2022, 23, 663–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jiang, J.; Ma, S.; Ye, N.; Jiang, M.; Cao, J.; Zhang, J. WRKY transcription factors in plant responses to stresses. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2017, 59, 86–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Zhang, Y.; Xu, J.; Li, R.; Ge, Y.; Li, Y.; Li, R. Plants’ Response to Abiotic Stress: Mechanisms and Strategies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 10915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Nakabayashi, R.; Saito, K. Integrated metabolomics for abiotic stress responses in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2015, 24, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nadarajah, K.; Abdul, H.; Abdul, R.N. SA-Mediated Regulation and Control of Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Rice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Habibpourmehraban, F.; Atwell, B.J.; Haynes, P.A. Unique and Shared Proteome Responses of Rice Plants (Oryza sativa) to Individual Abiotic Stresses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 15552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Habibpourmehraban, F.; Wu, Y.; Masoomi-Aladizgeh, F.; Amirkhani, A.; Atwell, B.J.; Haynes, P.A. Pre-Treatment of Rice Plants with ABA Makes Them More Tolerant to Multiple Abiotic Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 9628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, H.; Zhu, J.; Gong, Z.; Zhu, J.K. Abiotic stress responses in plants. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2022, 23, 104–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kim, Y.H.; Jeong, J.C.; Park, S.; Lee, H.S.; Kwak, S.S. Molecular characterization of two ethylene response factor genes in sweetpotato that respond to stress and activate the expression of defense genes in tobacco leaves. J. Plant Physiol. 2012, 169, 1112–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. Gene networks involved in drought stress response and tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 221–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xiao, M.; Li, Z.; Zhu, L.; Wang, J.; Zhang, B.; Zheng, F.; Zhao, B.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Z. The Multiple Roles of Ascorbate in the Abiotic Stress Response of Plants: Antioxidant, Cofactor, and Regulator. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 598173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Khan, M.I.R.; Kumari, S.; Nazir, F.; Khanna, R.R.; Gupta, R.; Chhillar, H. Defensive Role of Plant Hormones in Advancing Abiotic Stress-Resistant Rice Plants. Rice Sci. 2023, 30, 15–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Saijo, Y.; Loo, E.P. Plant immunity in signal integration between biotic and abiotic stress responses. New Phytol. 2020, 225, 87–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lim, J.; Lim, C.W.; Lee, S.C. Role of pepper MYB transcription factor CaDIM1 in regulation of the drought response. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1028392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Hussain, S.; Cheng, Y.; Li, Y.; Wang, W.; Tian, H.; Zhang, N.; Wang, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Hussain, H.; Lin, R.; et al. AtbZIP62 Acts as a Transcription Repressor to Positively Regulate ABA Responses in Arabidopsis. Plants 2022, 11, 3037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Siemiatkowska, B.; Chiara, M.; Badiger, B.G.; Riboni, M.; D’Avila, F.; Braga, D.; Salem, M.A.A.; Martignago, D.; Colanero, S.; Galbiati, M.; et al. GIGANTEA Is a Negative Regulator of Abscisic Acid Transcriptional Responses and Sensitivity in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2022, 63, 1285–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Vanitha, P.A.; Vijayaraghavareddy, P.; Uttarkar, A.; Dawane, A.; Sujitha, D.; Ashwin, V.; Babitha, K.C.; Niranjan, V.; Sheshshayee, M.S.; Anuradha, C.V.; et al. Novel small molecules targeting bZIP23 TF improve stomatal conductance and photosynthesis under mild drought stress by regulating ABA. FEBS J. 2022, 289, 6058–6077. [Google Scholar]
  20. Michaud, O.; Krahmer, J.; Galbier, F.; Lagier, M.; Galvão, V.C.; Ince, Y.Ç.; Trevisan, M.; Knerova, J.; Dickinson, P.; Hibberd, J.M.; et al. Abscisic acid modulates neighbor proximity-induced leaf hyponasty in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2023, 191, 542–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Finkelstein, R.R.; Lynch, T.J. Overexpression of ABI5 Binding Proteins Suppresses Inhibition of Germination Due to Overaccumulation of DELLA Proteins. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 5537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Gupta, A.; Upadhyay, R.K.; Prabhakar, R.; Tiwari, N.; Garg, R.; Sane, V.A.; Sane, A.P. SlDREB3, a negative regulator of ABA responses, controls seed germination, fruit size and the onset of ripening in tomato. Plant Sci. 2022, 19, 111249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ma, Z.; Jin, Y.M.; Wu, T.; Hu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, W.; Du, X. OsDREB2B, an AP2/ERF transcription factor, negatively regulates plant height by conferring GA metabolism in rice. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1007811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ma, Z.; Wu, T.; Huang, K.; Jin, Y.M.; Li, Z.; Chen, M.; Yun, S.; Zhang, H.; Yang, X.; Chen, H.; et al. A Novel AP2/ERF Transcription Factor, OsRPH1, Negatively Regulates Plant Height in Rice. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Qi, W.; Sun, F.; Wang, Q.; Chen, M.; Huang, Y.; Feng, Y.Q.; Luo, X.; Yang, J. Rice ethylene-response AP2/ERF factor OsEATB restricts internode elongation by down-regulating a gibberellin biosynthetic gene. Plant Physiol. 2011, 157, 216–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yaish, M.W.; El-Kereamy, A.; Zhu, T.; Beatty, P.H.; Good, A.G.; Bi, Y.M.; Rothstein, S.J. The APETALA-2-like transcription factor OsAP2-39 controls key interactions between abscisic acid and gibberellin in rice. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6, e1001098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Sun, Z.M.; Zhou, M.L.; Wang, D.; Tang, Y.X.; Lin, M.; Wu, Y.M. Overexpression of the Lotus corniculatus soloist gene LcAP2/ERF107 enhances tolerance to salt stress. Protein Pept. Lett. 2016, 23, 442–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Abiri, R.; Shaharuddin, N.A.; Maziah, M.; Yusof, Z.N.B.; Atabaki, N.; Sahebi, M.; Valdiani, A.; Kalhori, N.; Azizi, P.; Hanafi, M.M. Role of ethylene and the APETALA 2/ethylene response factor superfamily in rice under various abiotic and biotic stress conditions. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2017, 134, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xie, W.; Ding, C.; Hu, H.; Dong, G.; Zhang, G.; Qian, Q.; Ren, D. Molecular Events of Rice AP2/ERF Transcription Factors. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 12013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lee, S.J.; Park, J.H.; Lee, M.H.; Yu, J.H.; Kim, S.Y. Isolation and functional characterization of CE1 binding proteins. BMC Plant Biol. 2010, 10, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lee, S.B.; Lee, S.J.; Kim, S.Y. AtERF15 is a positive regulator of ABA response. Plant Cell Rep. 2015, 34, 71–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ritonga, F.N.; Ngatia, J.N.; Wang, Y.; Khoso, M.A.; Farooq, U.; Chen, S. AP2/ERF, an important cold stress-related transcription factor family in plants: A review. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2021, 27, 1953–1968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Reboledo, G.; Agorio, A.; Ponce, D.L.I. Moss transcription factors regulating development and defense responses to stress. J. Exp. Bot. 2022, 73, 4546–4561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Javed, T.; Shabbir, R.; Ali, A.; Afzal, I.; Zaheer, U.; Gao, S.J. Transcription Factors in Plant Stress Responses: Challenges and Potential for Sugarcane Improvement. Plants 2020, 9, 491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Jan, R.; Asaf, S.; Numan, M.; Lubna; Kim, K.-M. Plant Secondary Metabolite Biosynthesis and Transcriptional Regulation in Response to Biotic and Abiotic Stress Conditions. Agronomy 2021, 11, 968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hussain, Q.; Asim, M.; Zhang, R.; Khan, R.; Farooq, S.; Wu, J. Transcription Factors Interact with ABA through Gene Expression and Signaling Pathways to Mitigate Drought and Salinity Stress. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Gasch, P.; Fundinger, M.; Müller, J.T.; Lee, T.; Bailey, S.J.; Mustroph, A. Redundant ERF-VII Transcription Factors Bind to an Evolutionarily Conserved cis-Motif to Regulate Hypoxia-Responsive Gene Expression in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2016, 28, 160–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Park, C.S.; Go, Y.S.; Suh, M.C. Cuticular wax biosynthesis is positively regulated by WRINKLED4, an AP2/ERF-type transcription factor, in Arabidopsis stems. Plant J. 2016, 88, 257–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chen, H.Y.; Hsieh, E.J.; Cheng, M.C.; Chen, C.Y.; Hwang, S.Y.; Lin, T.P. ORA47 (octadecanoid-responsive AP2/ERF-domain transcription factor 47) regulates jasmonic acid and abscisic acid biosynthesis and signaling through binding to a novel cis-element. New Phytol. 2016, 211, 599–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lee, S.Y.; Hwang, E.Y.; Seok, H.Y.; Tarte, V.N.; Jeong, M.S.; Jang, S.B.; Moon, Y.H. Arabidopsis AtERF71/HRE2 functions as transcriptional activator via cis-acting GCC box or DRE/CRT element and is involved in root development through regulation of root cell expansion. Plant Cell Rep. 2015, 34, 223–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kim, J.S.; Mizoi, J.; Yoshida, T.; Fujita, Y.; Nakajima, J.; Ohori, T.; Todaka, D.; Nakashima, K.; Hirayama, T.; Shinozaki, K.; et al. An ABRE promoter sequence is involved in osmotic stress-responsive expression of the DREB2A gene, which encodes a transcription factor regulating drought-inducible genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2011, 52, 2136–2146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Liu, H.C.; Liao, H.T.; Charng, Y.Y. The role of class A1 heat shock factors (HSFA1s) in response to heat and other stresses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ. 2011, 34, 738–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Owji, H.; Hajiebrahimi, A.; Seradj, H.; Hemmati, S. Identification and functional prediction of stress responsive AP2/ERF transcription factors in Brassica napus by genome-wide analysis. Comput. Biol. Chem. 2017, 71, 32–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Mizoi, J.; Kanazawa, N.; Kidokoro, S.; Takahashi, F.; Qin, F.; Morimoto, K.; Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. Heat-induced inhibition of phosphorylation of the stress-protective transcription factor DREB2A promotes thermotolerance of Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Biol. Chem. 2019, 294, 902–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Song, C.P.; Agarwal, M.; Ohta, M.; Guo, Y.; Halfter, U.; Wang, P.; Zhu, J.K. Role of an Arabidopsis AP2/EREBP-type transcriptional repressor in abscisic acid and drought stress responses. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 2384–2396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Pfluger, J.; Wagner, D. Histone modifications and dynamic regulation of genome accessibility in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2007, 10, 645–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Rando, O.J.; Ahmad, K. Rules and regulation in the primary structure of chromatin. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2007, 19, 250–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Klose, R.J.; Bird, A.P. Genomic DNA methylation: The mark and its mediators. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2006, 31, 89–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zemach, A.; Grafi, G. Methyl-CpG-binding domain proteins in plants: Interpreters of DNA methylation. Trends Plant Sci. 2007, 12, 80–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kavas, M.; Kizildogan, A.; Gökdemir, G.; Baloglu, M.C. Genome-wide investigation and expression analysis of AP2-ERF gene family in salt tolerant common bean. EXCLI J. 2015, 14, 1187–1206. [Google Scholar]
  51. Jisha, V.; Dampanaboina, L.; Vadassery, J.; Mithöfer, A.; Kappara, S.; Ramanan, R. Overexpression of an AP2/ERF Type Transcription Factor OsEREBP1 Confers Biotic and Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Rice. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0127831. [Google Scholar]
  52. Nakano, T.; Suzuki, K.; Fujimura, T.; Shinshi, H. Genome-wide analysis of the ERF gene family in Arabidopsis and rice. Plant Physiol. 2006, 140, 411–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Tiwari, S.B.; Belachew, A.; Ma, S.F.; Young, M.; Ade, J.; Shen, Y.; Marion, C.M.; Holtan, H.E.; Bailey, A.; Stone, J.K.; et al. The EDLL motif: A potent plant transcriptional activation domain from AP2/ERF transcription factors. Plant J. 2012, 70, 855–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Song, C.P.; Galbraith, D.W. AtSAP18, an orthologue of human SAP18, is involved in the regulation of salt stress and mediates transcriptional repression in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2006, 60, 241–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Franco-Zorrilla, J.M.; López-Vidriero, I.; Carrasco, J.L.; Godoy, M.; Vera, P.; Solano, R. DNA-binding specificities of plant transcription factors and their potential to define target genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 2367–2372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Waadt, R.; Seller, C.A.; Hsu, P.K.; Takahashi, Y.; Munemasa, S.; Schroeder, J.I. Plant hormone regulation of abiotic stress responses. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2022, 23, 680–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Xie, Z.; Nolan, T.M.; Jiang, H.; Yin, Y. AP2/ERF Transcription Factor Regulatory Networks in Hormone and Abiotic Stress Responses in Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yoon, Y.; Seo, D.H.; Shin, H.; Kim, H.J.; Kim, C.M.; Jang, G. The Role of Stress-Responsive Transcription Factors in Modulating Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants. Agronomy 2020, 10, 788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Mohanty, B. Genomic architecture of promoters and transcriptional regulation of candidate genes in rice involved in tolerance to anaerobic germination. Curr. Plant Biol. 2022, 29, 100236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zwack, P.J.; Rashotte, A.M. Interactions between cytokinin signalling and abiotic stress responses. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 4863–4871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Chen, M.; Yan, T.; Shen, Q.; Lu, X.; Pan, Q.; Huang, Y.; Tang, Y.; Fu, X.; Liu, M.; Jiang, W.; et al. GLANDULAR TRICHOME-SPECIFIC WRKY 1 promotes artemisinin biosynthesis in Artemisia annua. New Phytol. 2017, 214, 304–316. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  62. Li, Z.; Sheerin, D.J.; von Roepenack-Lahaye, E.; Stahl, M.; Hiltbrunner, A. The phytochrome interacting proteins ERF55 and ERF58 repress light-induced seed germination in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1656. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  63. Li, J.; Guo, X.; Zhang, M.; Wang, X.; Zhao, Y.; Yin, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Xiong, H.; Zhang, H.; et al. OsERF71 confers drought tolerance via modulating ABA signaling and proline biosynthesis. Plant Sci. 2018, 270, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Cheng, C.; An, L.; Li, F.; Ahmad, W.; Aslam, M.; Ul Haq, M.Z.; Yan, Y.; Ahmad, R.M. Wide-Range Portrayal of AP2/ERF Transcription Factor Family in Maize (Zea mays L.) Development and Stress Responses. Genes 2023, 14, 194. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  65. Xiong, R.; Chu, Z.; Peng, X.; Cui, G.; Li, W.; Dong, L. Transcript-wide identification and expression pattern analysis to comprehend the roles of AP2/ERF genes under development and abiotic stress in Trichosanthes kirilowii. BMC Plant Biol. 2023, 23, 354. [Google Scholar]
  66. Hu, Z.; Wang, X.; Wei, L.; Wansee, S.; Rabbani Nasab, H.; Chen, L.; Kang, Z.; Wang, J. TaAP2-10, an AP2/ERF transcription factor, contributes to wheat resistance against stripe rust. J. Plant Physiol. 2023, 288, 154078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zhang, X.; Yu, J.; Wang, R.; Liu, W.; Chen, S.; Wang, Y.; Yu, Y.; Qu, G.; Chen, S. Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Profiles of C-Repeat Binding Factor Transcription Factors in Betula platyphylla under Abiotic Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 10573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Li, P.; Chai, Z.; Lin, P.; Huang, C.; Huang, G.; Xu, L.; Deng, Z.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, X. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of AP2/ERF transcription factors in sugarcane (Saccharum spontaneum L.). BMC Genom. 2020, 21, 685. [Google Scholar]
  69. Chen, J.Q.; Meng, X.P.; Zhang, Y.; Xia, M.; Wang, X.P. Over-expression of OsDREB genes lead to enhanced drought tolerance in rice. Biotechnol. Lett. 2008, 30, 2191–2198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Fu, J.; Zhu, C.; Wang, C.; Liu, L.; Shen, Q.; Xu, D.; Wang, Q. Maize transcription factor ZmEREB20 enhanced salt tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 159, 257–267. [Google Scholar]
  71. Zhang, K.; Jiang, L.; Wang, X.; Han, H.; Chen, D.; Qiu, D.; Yang, Y. Transcriptome-wide analysis of AP2/ERF transcription factors involved in regulating taxol biosynthesis in Taxus × media. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 171, 113972. [Google Scholar]
  72. Cai, X.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Y.; Shen, Y.; Yang, J.; Jia, B.; Sun, X.; Sun, M. A comprehensive investigation of the regulatory roles of OsERF096, an AP2/ERF transcription factor, in rice cold stress response. Plant Cell Rep. 2023, 42, 2011–2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Huang, Y.; Liu, L.; Hu, H.; Tang, N.; Shi, L.; Xu, F.; Wang, S. Arabidopsis ERF012 Is a Versatile Regulator of Plant Growth, Development and Abiotic Stress Responses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 6841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Wang, Y.Q.; Xia, D.N.; Li, W.Q.; Cao, X.Y.; Ma, F.; Wang, Q.Q.; Zhan, X.Q.; Hu, T.X. Overexpression of a tomato AP2/ERF transcription factor SlERF.B1 increases sensitivity to salt and drought stresses. Sci. Hortic. 2022, 304, 111332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kazan, K. Diverse roles of jasmonates and ethylene in abiotic stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 2015, 20, 219–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Jung, K.H.; Seo, Y.S.; Walia, H.; Cao, P.; Fukao, T.; Canlas, P.E.; Amonpant, F.; Bailey-Serres, J.; Ronald, P.C. The submergence tolerance regulator Sub1A mediates stress-responsive expression of AP2/ERF transcription factors. Plant Physiol. 2010, 152, 1674–1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Peña-Castro, J.M.; van Zanten, M.; Lee, S.C.; Patel, M.R.; Voesenek, L.A.; Fukao, T.; Bailey-Serres, J. Expression of rice SUB1A and SUB1C transcription factors in Arabidopsis uncovers flowering inhibition as a submergence tolerance mechanism. Plant J. 2011, 67, 434–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Hinz, M.; Wilson, I.W.; Yang, J.; Buerstenbinder, K.; Llewellyn, D.; Dennis, E.S.; Sauter, M.; Dolferus, R. Arabidopsis RAP2.2: An ethylene response transcription factor that is important for hypoxia survival. Plant Physiol. 2010, 153, 757–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Altamura, M.M.; Piacentini, D.; Della Rovere, F.; Fattorini, L.; Falasca, G.; Betti, C. New Paradigms in Brassinosteroids, Strigolactones, Sphingolipids, and Nitric Oxide Interaction in the Control of Lateral and Adventitious Root Formation. Plants 2023, 12, 413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Liu, K.; Li, Y.; Chen, X.; Li, L.; Liu, K.; Zhao, H.; Wang, Y.; Han, S. ERF72 interacts with ARF6 and BZR1 to regulate hypocotyl elongation in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 3933–3947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Schmitz, A.J.; Folsom, J.J.; Jikamaru, Y.; Ronald, P.; Walia, H. SUB1A-mediated submergence tolerance response in rice involves differential regulation of the brassinosteroid pathway. New Phytol. 2013, 198, 1060–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Kurepa, J.; Shull, T.E.; Smalle, J.A. Friends in Arms: Flavonoids and the Auxin/Cytokinin Balance in Terrestrialization. Plants 2023, 12, 517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Gu, C.; Guo, Z.H.; Hao, P.P.; Wang, G.M.; Jin, Z.M.; Zhang, S.L. Multiple regulatory roles of AP2/ERF transcription factor in angiosperm. Bot. Stud. 2017, 58, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Mawlong, I.; Ali, K.; Tyagi, A. Cloning and characterization of a water deficit stress responsive transcription factor gene from Oryza sativa L. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 2016, 54, 26–36. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  85. Rashotte, A.M.; Mason, M.G.; Hutchison, C.E.; Ferreira, F.J.; Schaller, G.E.; Kieber, J.J. A subset of Arabidopsis AP2 transcription factors mediates cytokinin responses in concert with a two-component pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 11081–11085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Striberny, B.; Melton, A.E.; Schwacke, R.; Krause, K.; Fischer, K.; Goertzen, L.R.; Rashotte, A.M. Cytokinin Response Factor 5 has transcriptional activity governed by its C-terminal domain. Plant Signal Behav. 2017, 12, e1276684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Zwack, P.J.; Robinson, B.R.; Risley, M.G.; Rashotte, A.M. Cytokinin response factor 6 negatively regulates leaf senescence and is induced in response to cytokinin and numerous abiotic stresses. Plant Cell Physiol. 2013, 54, 971–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Zwack, P.J.; De Clercq, I.; Howton, T.C.; Hallmark, H.T.; Hurny, A.; Keshishian, E.A.; Parish, A.M.; Benkova, E.; Mukhtar, M.S.; Van Breusegem, F.; et al. Cytokinin Response Factor 6 Represses Cytokinin-Associated Genes during Oxidative Stress. Plant Physiol. 2016, 172, 1249–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Zwack, P.J.; Compton, M.A.; Adams, C.I.; Rashotte, A.M. Cytokinin response factor 4 (CRF4) is induced by cold and involved in freezing tolerance. Plant Cell Rep. 2016, 35, 573–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Golldack, D.; Li, C.; Mohan, H.; Probst, N. Tolerance to drought and salt stress in plants: Unraveling the signaling networks. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Kim, Y.; Chung, Y.S.; Lee, E.; Tripathi, P.; Heo, S.; Kim, K.H. Root Response to Drought Stress in Rice (Oryza sativa L.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Yu, Y.; Yu, M.; Zhang, S.; Song, T.; Zhang, M.; Zhou, H.; Wang, Y.; Xiang, J.; Zhang, X. Transcriptomic Identification of Wheat AP2/ERF Transcription Factors and Functional Characterization of TaERF-6-3A in Response to Drought and Salinity Stresses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 3272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Jarambasa, T.; Regon, P.; Jyoti, S.Y.; Gupta, D.; Panda, S.K.; Tanti, B. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the Pisum sativum (L.) APETALA2/ethylene-responsive factor (AP2/ERF) gene family reveals functions in drought and cold stresses. Genetica 2023, 151, 225–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Kumar, V.; Kumar, A.; Tewari, K.; Garg, N.K.; Changan, S.S.; Tyagi, A. Isolation and characterization of drought and ABA responsive promoter of a transcription factor encoding gene from rice. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2022, 28, 1813–1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Kabir, S.M.T.; Hossain, M.S.; Bashar, K.K.; Honi, U.; Ahmed, B.; Emdad, E.M.; Alam, M.M.; Haque, M.S.; Islam, M.S. Genome-wide identification and expression profiling of AP2/ERF superfamily genes under stress conditions in dark jute (Corchorus olitorius L.). Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 166, 113469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Kong, L.; Song, Q.; Wei, H.; Wang, Y.; Lin, M.; Sun, K.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, J.; Li, C.; Luo, K. The AP2/ERF transcription factor PtoERF15 confers drought tolerance via JA-mediated signaling in Populus. New Phytol. 2023, 240, 1848–1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Litalien, A.; Zeeb, B. Curing the earth: A review of anthropogenic soil salinization and plant-based strategies for sustainable mitigation. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 698, 134235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Huang, S.; Ma, Z.; Hu, L.; Huang, K.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, S.; Jiang, W.; Wu, T.; Du, X. Involvement of rice transcription factor OsERF19 in response to ABA and salt stress responses. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 167, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Licausi, F.; van Dongen, J.T.; Giuntoli, B.; Novi, G.; Santaniello, A.; Geigenberger, P.; Perata, P. HRE1 and HRE2, two hypoxia-inducible ethylene response factors, affect anaerobic responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2010, 62, 302–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Park, H.Y.; Seok, H.Y.; Woo, D.H.; Lee, S.Y.; Tarte, V.N.; Lee, E.H.; Lee, C.H.; Moon, Y.H. AtERF71/HRE2 transcription factor mediates osmotic stress response as well as hypoxia response in Arabidopsis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2011, 414, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Seok, H.Y.; Tran, H.T.; Lee, S.Y.; Moon, Y.H. AtERF71/HRE2, an Arabidopsis AP2/ERF Transcription Factor Gene, Contains Both Positive and Negative Cis-Regulatory Elements in Its Promoter Region Involved in Hypoxia and Salt Stress Responses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 5310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Posch, B.C.; Kariyawasam, B.C.; Bramley, H.; Coast, O.; Richards, R.A.; Reynolds, M.P.; Trethowan, R.; Atkin, O.K. Exploring high temperature responses of photosynthesis and respiration to improve heat tolerance in wheat. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 5051–5069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Zhang, T.; Tang, Y.; Luan, Y.; Cheng, Z.; Wang, X.; Tao, J.; Zhao, D. Herbaceous peony AP2/ERF transcription factor binds the promoter of the Tryptophan decarboxylase gene to enhance high-temperature stress tolerance. Plant Cell Environ. 2022, 45, 2729–2743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Mishra, S.K.; Tripp, J.; Winkelhaus, S.; Tschiersch, B.; Theres, K.; Nover, L.; Scharf, K.D. In the complex family of heat stress transcription factors, HsfA1 has a unique role as master regulator of thermotolerance in tomato. Genes Dev. 2002, 16, 1555–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Nover, L.; Bharti, K.; Döring, P.; Mishra, S.K.; Ganguli, A.; Scharf, K.D. Arabidopsis and the heat stress transcription factor world: How many heat stress transcription factors do we need? Cell Stress Chaperones 2001, 6, 177–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Busch, W.; Wunderlich, M.; Schöffl, F. Identification of novel heat shock factor-dependent genes and biochemical pathways in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2005, 41, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Charng, Y.Y.; Liu, H.C.; Liu, N.Y.; Chi, W.T.; Wang, C.N.; Chang, S.H.; Wang, T.T. A heat-inducible transcription factor, HsfA2, is required for extension of acquired thermotolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143, 251–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Sakuma, Y.; Maruyama, K.; Qin, F.; Osakabe, Y.; Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. Dual function of an Arabidopsis transcription factor DREB2A in water-stress-responsive and heat-stress-responsive gene expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 18822–18827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Schramm, F.; Larkindale, J.; Kiehlmann, E.; Ganguli, A.; Englich, G.; Vierling, E.; von Koskull-Döring, P. A cascade of transcription factor DREB2A and heat stress transcription factor HsfA3 regulates the heat stress response of Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2008, 53, 264–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Cheng, M.C.; Liao, P.M.; Kuo, W.W.; Lin, T.P. The Arabidopsis ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR1 regulates abiotic stress-responsive gene expression by binding to different cis-acting elements in response to different stress signals. Plant Physiol. 2013, 162, 1566–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Huang, J.; Zhao, X.; Bürger, M.; Wang, Y.; Chory, J. Two interacting ethylene response factors regulate heat stress response. Plant Cell 2021, 33, 338–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Li, B.; Gao, Z.; Liu, X.; Sun, D.; Tang, W. Transcriptional Profiling Reveals a Time-of-Day-Specific Role of REVEILLE 4/8 in Regulating the First Wave of Heat Shock-Induced Gene Expression in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2019, 31, 2353–2369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Yao, Y.; He, R.J.; Xie, Q.L.; Zhao, X.H.; Deng, X.M.; He, J.B.; Song, L.; He, J.; Marchant, A.; Chen, X.Y.; et al. ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR 74 (ERF74) plays an essential role in controlling a respiratory burst oxidase homolog D (RbohD)-dependent mechanism in response to different stresses in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 2017, 213, 1667–1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Kidokoro, S.; Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. Transcriptional regulatory network of plant cold-stress responses. Trends Plant Sci. 2022, 27, 922–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Ren, M.; Yang, W.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, L.; Quan, Y.; He, Z.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, F.; Yin, M.; Wang, Y.; et al. Overexpression of ClRAP2.4 in Chrysanthemum enhances tolerance to cold stress. Funct. Plant Biol. 2023, 50, 470–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Heidari, P.; Reza Amerian, M.; Barcaccia, G. Hormone Profiles and Antioxidant Activity of Cultivated and Wild Tomato Seedlings under Low-Temperature Stress. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Shi, Y.; Tian, S.; Hou, L.; Huang, X.; Zhang, X.; Guo, H.; Yang, S. Ethylene signaling negatively regulates freezing tolerance by repressing expression of CBF and type-A ARR genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 2578–2595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Nakamichi, N.; Kusano, M.; Fukushima, A.; Kita, M.; Ito, S.; Yamashino, T.; Saito, K.; Sakakibara, H.; Mizuno, T. Transcript profiling of an Arabidopsis PSEUDO RESPONSE REGULATOR arrhythmic triple mutant reveals a role for the circadian clock in cold stress response. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009, 50, 447–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Nakamichi, N.; Kiba, T.; Kamioka, M.; Suzuki, T.; Yamashino, T.; Higashiyama, T.; Sakakibara, H.; Mizuno, T. Transcriptional repressor PRR5 directly regulates clock-output pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 17123–17128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Lee, C.M.; Thomashow, M.F. Photoperiodic regulation of the C-repeat binding factor (CBF) cold acclimation pathway and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 15054–15059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Jiang, B.; Shi, Y.; Zhang, X.; Xin, X.; Qi, L.; Guo, H.; Li, J.; Yang, S. PIF3 is a negative regulator of the CBF pathway and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E6695–E6702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Dong, M.A.; Farré, E.M.; Thomashow, M.F. Circadian clock-associated 1 and late elongated hypocotyl regulate expression of the C-repeat binding factor (CBF) pathway in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 7241–7246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Chinnusamy, V.; Ohta, M.; Kanrar, S.; Lee, B.H.; Hong, X.; Agarwal, M.; Zhu, J.K. ICE1: A regulator of cold-induced transcriptome and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 2003, 17, 1043–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Kidokoro, S.; Yoneda, K.; Takasaki, H.; Takahashi, F.; Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. Different Cold-Signaling Pathways Function in the Responses to Rapid and Gradual Decreases in Temperature. Plant Cell 2017, 29, 760–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Yahaya, S.M.; Mahmud, A.A.; Abdullahi, M.; Haruna, A. Recent advances in the chemistry of N, P, K as fertilizer in soil: A review. Pedosphere 2022, 35, 385–406. [Google Scholar]
  126. Waqas, M.; Hawkesford, M.J.; Geilfus, C.M. Feeding the world sustainably: Efficient nitrogen use. Trends Plant Sci. 2023, 28, 505–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Joshi, V.; Joshi, M.; Penalosa, A. Comparative analysis of tissue-specific transcriptomic responses to nitrogen stress in spinach (Spinacia oleracea). PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0232011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Cerri, M.R.; Wang, Q.; Stolz, P.; Folgmann, J.; Frances, L.; Katzer, K.; Li, X.; Heckmann, A.B.; Wang, T.L.; Downie, J.A.; et al. The ERN1 transcription factor gene is a target of the CCaMK/CYCLOPS complex and controls rhizobial infection in Lotus japonicus. New Phytol. 2017, 215, 323–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Jezek, M.; Allan, A.C.; Jones, J.J.; Geilfus, C.M. Why do plants blush when they are hungry? New Phytol. 2023, 239, 494–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Zhang, Q.; Wang, S.; Xie, Q.; Xia, Y.; Lu, L.; Wang, M.; Wang, G.; Long, S.; Cai, Y.; Xu, L.; et al. Control of arbuscule development by a transcriptional negative feedback loop in Medicago. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 5743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Chen, N.; Qin, J.; Tong, S.; Wang, W.; Jiang, Y. One AP2/ERF Transcription Factor Positively Regulates Pi Uptake and Drought Tolerance in Poplar. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 5241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Parakkunnel, R.; Naik, K.B.; Vanishree, G.; Purru, S.; Bhaskar, K.U.; Bhat, K.V.; Kumar, S. Gene fusions, micro-exons and splice variants define stress signaling by AP2/ERF and WRKY transcription factors in the sesame pan-genome. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1076229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Kim, M.J.; Ruzicka, D.; Shin, R.; Schachtman, D.P. The Arabidopsis AP2/ERF transcription factor RAP2.11 modulates plant response to low-potassium conditions. Mol. Plant 2012, 5, 1042–1057. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  134. Chen, H.C.; Chien, T.C.; Chen, T.Y.; Chiang, M.H.; Lai, M.H.; Chang, M.C. Overexpression of a Novel ERF-X-Type Transcription Factor, OsERF106MZ, Reduces Shoot Growth and Tolerance to Salinity Stress in Rice. Rice 2021, 14, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Gavrilescu, M. Enhancing phytoremediation of soils polluted with heavy metals. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2022, 74, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Chot, E.; Reddy, M.S. Role of Ectomycorrhizal Symbiosis Behind the Host Plants Ameliorated Tolerance Against Heavy Metal Stress. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 855473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Asgher, M.; Rehaman, A.; Islam, S.N.u.; Arshad, M.; Khan, N.A. Appraisal of Functions and Role of Selenium in Heavy Metal Stress Adaptation in Plants. Agriculture 2023, 13, 1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Pandey, A.K.; Zori’c, L.; Sun, T.; Karanovi’c, D.; Fang, P.; Borišev, M.; Wu, X.; Lukovíc, J.; Xu, P. The Anatomical Basis of Heavy Metal Responses in Legumes and Their Impact on Plant-Rhizosphere Interactions. Plants 2022, 11, 2554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Karanja, B.K.; Xu, L.; Wang, Y.; Tang, M.; M’mbone Muleke, E.; Dong, J.; Liu, L. Genome-wide characterization of the AP2/ERF gene family in radish (Raphanus sativus L.): Unveiling evolution and patterns in response to abiotic stresses. Gene 2019, 718, 144048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Chen, P.; Li, Z.; Luo, D.; Jia, R.; Lu, H.; Tang, M.; Hu, Y.; Yue, J.; Huang, Z. Comparative transcriptomic analysis reveals key genes and pathways in two different cadmium tolerance kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) cultivars. Chemosphere 2021, 263, 128211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Tian, W.; Huang, Y.; Li, D.; Meng, L.; He, T.; He, G. Identification of StAP2/ERF genes of potato (Solanum tuberosum) and their multiple functions in detoxification and accumulation of cadmium in yest: Implication for Genetic-based phytoremediation. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 810, 152322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Verma, V.; Ravindran, P.; Kumar, P.P. Plant hormone-mediated regulation of stress responses. BMC Plant Biol. 2016, 16, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Takino, J.; Kozaki, T.; Ozaki, T.; Liu, C.; Minami, A.; Oikawa, H. Elucidation of biosynthetic pathway of a plant hormone abscisic acid in phytopathogenic fungi. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2019, 83, 1642–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Finkelstein, R. Abscisic Acid synthesis and response. Arab. Book 2013, 11, e0166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Sah, S.K.; Reddy, K.R.; Li, J. Abscisic Acid and Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crop Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Feng, C.Z.; Chen, Y.; Wang, C.; Kong, Y.H.; Wu, W.H.; Chen, Y.F. Arabidopsis RAV1 transcription factor, phosphorylated by SnRK2 kinases, regulates the expression of ABI3, ABI4, and ABI5 during seed germination and early seedling development. Plant J. 2014, 80, 654–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Magome, H.; Yamaguchi, S.; Hanada, A.; Kamiya, Y.; Oda, K. dwarf and delayed-flowering 1, a novel Arabidopsis mutant deficient in gibberellin biosynthesis because of overexpression of a putative AP2 transcription factor. Plant J. 2004, 37, 720–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Zhou, X.; Zhang, Z.L.; Park, J.; Tyler, L.; Yusuke, J.; Qiu, K.; Nam, E.A.; Lumba, S.; Desveaux, D.; McCourt, P.; et al. The ERF11 Transcription Factor Promotes Internode Elongation by Activating Gibberellin Biosynthesis and Signaling. Plant Physiol. 2016, 171, 2760–2770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Guo, H.; Li, L.; Aluru, M.; Aluru, S.; Yin, Y. Mechanisms and networks for brassinosteroid regulated gene expression. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2013, 16, 545–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Li, H.; Ye, K.; Shi, Y.; Cheng, J.; Zhang, X.; Yang, S. BZR1 Positively Regulates Freezing Tolerance via CBF-Dependent and CBF-Independent Pathways in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 2017, 10, 545–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Tao, J.J.; Chen, H.W.; Ma, B.; Zhang, W.K.; Chen, S.Y.; Zhang, J.S. The Role of Ethylene in Plants Under Salinity Stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Qiao, H.; Shen, Z.; Huang, S.S.; Schmitz, R.J.; Urich, M.A.; Briggs, S.P.; Ecker, J.R. Processing and subcellular trafficking of ER-tethered EIN2 control response to ethylene gas. Science 2012, 338, 390–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Müller, M.; Munné-Bosch, S. Ethylene Response Factors: A Key Regulatory Hub in Hormone and Stress Signaling. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Yang, C.Y.; Hsu, F.C.; Li, J.P.; Wang, N.N.; Shih, M.C. The AP2/ERF transcription factor AtERF73/HRE1 modulates ethylene responses during hypoxia in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2011, 156, 202–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Wei, T.; Deng, K.; Liu, D.; Gao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Yang, M.; Zhang, L.; Zheng, X.; Wang, C.; Song, W.; et al. Ectopic Expression of DREB Transcription Factor, AtDREB1A, Confers Tolerance to Drought in Transgenic Salvia miltiorrhiza. Plant Cell Physiol. 2016, 57, 1593–1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Mizoi, J.; Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. AP2/ERF family transcription factors in plant abiotic stress responses. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1819, 86–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Li, X.P.; Tian, A.G.; Luo, G.Z.; Gong, Z.Z.; Zhang, J.S.; Chen, S.Y. Soybean DRE-binding transcription factors that are responsive to abiotic stresses. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2005, 110, 1355–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Xing, L.; Di, Z.; Yang, W.; Liu, J.; Li, M.; Wang, X.; Cui, C.; Wang, X.; Wang, X.; Zhang, R.; et al. Overexpression of ERF1-V from Haynaldia villosa Can Enhance the Resistance of Wheat to Powdery Mildew and Increase the Tolerance to Salt and Drought Stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Feng, W.; Li, J.; Long, S.; Wei, S. A DREB1 gene from zoysiagrass enhances Arabidopsis tolerance to temperature stresses without growth inhibition. Plant Sci. 2019, 278, 20–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Liu, J.; Wang, F.; Yu, G.; Zhang, X.; Jia, C.; Qin, J.; Pan, H. Functional Analysis of the Maize C-Repeat/DRE Motif-Binding Transcription Factor CBF3 Promoter in Response to Abiotic Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 12131–12146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Yang, Y.; Shi, J.; Chen, L.; Xiao, W.; Yu, J. ZmEREB46, a maize ortholog of Arabidopsis WAX INDUCER1/SHINE1, is involved in the biosynthesis of leaf epicuticular very-long-chain waxes and drought tolerance. Plant Sci. 2022, 321, 111256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Zhu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, K.; Tian, C.; Aslam, M.; Zhang, B.; Liu, W.; Zou, H. Overexpression of ZmEREBP60 enhances drought tolerance in maize. J. Plant Physiol. 2022, 275, 153763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Liu, S.; Wang, X.; Wang, H.; Xin, H.; Yang, X.; Yan, J.; Li, J.; Tran, L.S.; Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K.; et al. Genome-wide analysis of ZmDREB genes and their association with natural variation in drought tolerance at seedling stage of Zea mays L. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9, e1003790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Yu, F.; Liang, K.; Fang, T.; Zhao, H.; Han, X.; Cai, M.; Qiu, F. A group VII ethylene response factor gene, ZmEREB180, coordinates waterlogging tolerance in maize seedlings. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2019, 17, 2286–2298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Saleh, A.; Lumbreras, V.; Lopez, C.; Dominguez-Puigjaner, E.; Kizis, D.; Pagès, M. Maize DBF1-interactor protein 1 containing an R3H domain is a potential regulator of DBF1 activity in stress responses. Plant J. 2006, 46, 747–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Wang, Z.; Zhao, X.; Ren, Z.; Abou-Elwafa, S.F.; Pu, X.; Zhu, Y.; Dou, D.; Su, H.; Cheng, H.; Liu, Z.; et al. ZmERF21 directly regulates hormone signaling and stress-responsive gene expression to influence drought tolerance in maize seedlings. Plant Cell Environ. 2022, 45, 312–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Wang, J.; Ren, Y.; Liu, X.; Luo, S.; Zhang, X.; Liu, X.; Lin, Q.; Zhu, S.; Wan, H.; Yang, Y.; et al. Transcriptional activation and phosphorylation of OsCNGC9 confer enhanced chilling tolerance in rice. Mol. Plant 2021, 14, 315–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Figueiredo, D.D.; Barros, P.M.; Cordeiro, A.M.; Serra, T.S.; Lourenço, T.; Chander, S.; Oliveira, M.M.; Saibo, N.J. Seven zinc-finger transcription factors are novel regulators of the stress responsive gene OsDREB1B. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 3643–3656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Mao, D.; Chen, C. Colinearity and similar expression pattern of rice DREB1s reveal their functional conservation in the cold-responsive pathway. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e47275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Tian, X.H.; Li, X.P.; Zhou, H.L.; Zhang, J.S.; Gong, Z.Z.; Chen, S.Y. OsDREB4 Genes in Rice Encode AP2-Containing Proteins that Bind Specifically to the Dehydration-Responsive Element. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2005, 47, 467–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Wang, Q.; Guan, Y.; Wu, Y.; Chen, H.; Chen, F.; Chu, C. Overexpression of a rice OsDREB1F gene increases salt, drought, and low temperature tolerance in both Arabidopsis and rice. Plant Mol. Biol. 2008, 67, 589–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Zhou, X.Y.; Jenks, M.A.; Liu, J.; Liu, A.L.; Zhang, X.W.; Xiang, J.H.; Zou, J.; Peng, Y.; Chen, X.B. Overexpression of Transcription Factor OsWR2 Regulates Wax and Cutin Biosynthesis in Rice and Enhances its Tolerance to Water Deficit. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2014, 32, 719–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Lee, D.K.; Jung, H.; Jang, G.; Jeong, J.S.; Kim, Y.S.; Ha, S.H.; Do, C.Y.; Kim, J.K. Overexpression of the OsERF71 Transcription Factor Alters Rice Root Structure and Drought Resistance. Plant Physiol. 2016, 172, 575–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Xiong, H.; Yu, J.; Miao, J.; Li, J.; Zhang, H.; Wang, X.; Liu, P.; Zhao, Y.; Jiang, C.; Yin, Z.; et al. Natural Variation in OsLG3 Increases Drought Tolerance in Rice by Inducing ROS Scavenging. Plant Physiol. 2018, 178, 451–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Ramegowda, V.; Basu, S.; Krishnan, A.; Pereira, A. Rice GROWTH UNDER DROUGHT KINASE is required for drought tolerance and grain yield under normal and drought stress conditions. Plant Physiol. 2014, 166, 1634–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Tang, Y.; Liu, K.; Zhang, J.; Li, X.; Xu, K.; Zhang, Y.; Qi, J.; Yu, D.; Wang, J.; Li, C. JcDREB2, a Physic Nut AP2/ERF Gene, Alters Plant Growth and Salinity Stress Responses in Transgenic Rice. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Serra, T.S.; Figueiredo, D.D.; Cordeiro, A.M.; Almeida, D.M.; Lourenço, T.; Abreu, I.A.; Sebastián, A.; Fernandes, L.; Contreras-Moreira, B.; Oliveira, M.M.; et al. OsRMC, a negative regulator of salt stress response in rice, is regulated by two AP2/ERF transcription factors. Plant Mol. Biol. 2013, 82, 439–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Schmidt, R.; Schippers, J.H.; Mieulet, D.; Watanabe, M.; Hoefgen, R.; Guiderdoni, E.; Mueller-Roeber, B. SALT-RESPONSIVE ERF1 is a negative regulator of grain filling and gibberellin-mediated seedling establishment in rice. Mol. Plant 2014, 7, 404–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Cheng, X.; Zhang, S.; Tao, W.; Zhang, X.; Liu, J.; Sun, J.; Zhang, H.; Pu, L.; Huang, R.; Chen, T. INDETERMINATE SPIKELET1 Recruits Histone Deacetylase and a Transcriptional Repression Complex to Regulate Rice Salt Tolerance. Plant Physiol. 2018, 178, 824–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Liu, D.; Chen, X.; Liu, J.; Ye, J.; Guo, Z. The rice ERF transcription factor OsERF922 negatively regulates resistance to Magnaporthe oryzae and salt tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 3899–3911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. AP2/ERF transcription factor family classification and structural features. They can be divided into five main groups based on the number of AP2/ERF structural domains, namely AP2 (APETALA2), DREB (dehydration-responsive element binding protein), ERF (ethylene-responsive factor), RAV (related to ABI3/VP1), and Soloist. The AP2 domain contains two AP2 structural domains; the DREB and ERF domains contain an AP2 structural domain; the RAV domain contains an AP2 structural domain and a B3 structural domain; and the Soloist domain contains an AP2-like structural domain. The ERF subfamily of transcription factor members can participate in the regulation of abiotic stress by binding to the ethylene response element (ERE) (GCC-box, core sequence AGCCGCC). Members of the DREB subfamily of transcription factors specifically recognise and bind to a DRE/CRT element (dehydration responsive element/C-repeat, core sequence A/GCCGAC) in the promoter region of another gene. The yellow background represents the AP2 domain, the green background represents the B3 domain, and the blue background represents the AP2 like domain.
Figure 1. AP2/ERF transcription factor family classification and structural features. They can be divided into five main groups based on the number of AP2/ERF structural domains, namely AP2 (APETALA2), DREB (dehydration-responsive element binding protein), ERF (ethylene-responsive factor), RAV (related to ABI3/VP1), and Soloist. The AP2 domain contains two AP2 structural domains; the DREB and ERF domains contain an AP2 structural domain; the RAV domain contains an AP2 structural domain and a B3 structural domain; and the Soloist domain contains an AP2-like structural domain. The ERF subfamily of transcription factor members can participate in the regulation of abiotic stress by binding to the ethylene response element (ERE) (GCC-box, core sequence AGCCGCC). Members of the DREB subfamily of transcription factors specifically recognise and bind to a DRE/CRT element (dehydration responsive element/C-repeat, core sequence A/GCCGAC) in the promoter region of another gene. The yellow background represents the AP2 domain, the green background represents the B3 domain, and the blue background represents the AP2 like domain.
Ijms 25 00893 g001
Figure 2. AP2/ERF transcription factor-mediated temperature stress response model in plants. (A) The AP2/ERF transcription factor-mediated heat stress response model. In the HSF-independent pathway, REVEILLE4 and 8 (RVE4/8) are the major transcription factors that regulate the downstream expression of ERF53 and ERF54 and mediate plant heat tolerance. In the HSF-dependent pathway, heat stress induces the expression of HSFA1, which is a master regulator of transcriptional regulation. Under non-stress conditions, heat-shock proteins (HSPs) repress HSFA1 expression, such as HSFA2, HSFA7, DREB2A, HSFBs, and multiprotein bridging factor 1c (MBF1c), which are involved in a key transcriptional regulatory cascade. DREB2A further activates HSFA3, which activates or fine-tunes the expression of HSPs, ROS scavenger enzymes, and other HSR gene expressions. (B) The AP2/ERF transcription factor-mediated cold stress response model. Cold stress induces the expression of C repeat binding factor/dehydration response element binding protein 1s (CBF/DREB1s). CBFs/DREB1 genes are regulated by multiple transcription factors and integrate multiple signalling pathways. The light signalling components Phytochrome-interacting factors (PIF3, PIF4, and PIF7), the circadian oscillator component Pseudo response regulator (PRR9, PRR7, and PRR5), as well as other transcription factors such as Suppressor of overexpression of constans 1 (SOC1) and MYB transcription factor MYB15, negatively regulate CBFs/DREB1 gene expression. The genes CCA1, LHY, BR, BZR1/BES1, ICE1, ICE2, CAMTA, and other transcription factor inducers directly enhance the expression of CBF/DREB1 by binding to its promoter region. The protein stability of CBF/DREB1 is positively regulated by basic transcription factor 3 (BTF3) phosphorylated by Open stomata 1 (OST1). AP2/ERF transcription factor ERF regulates CBF/DREB1 expression by binding directly and indirectly to the CBF/DREB1 promoter. ERF also directly regulates the expression of other COR genes by binding to their promoters. Arrow ends indicate the activation effect; bar ends indicate the repression effect.
Figure 2. AP2/ERF transcription factor-mediated temperature stress response model in plants. (A) The AP2/ERF transcription factor-mediated heat stress response model. In the HSF-independent pathway, REVEILLE4 and 8 (RVE4/8) are the major transcription factors that regulate the downstream expression of ERF53 and ERF54 and mediate plant heat tolerance. In the HSF-dependent pathway, heat stress induces the expression of HSFA1, which is a master regulator of transcriptional regulation. Under non-stress conditions, heat-shock proteins (HSPs) repress HSFA1 expression, such as HSFA2, HSFA7, DREB2A, HSFBs, and multiprotein bridging factor 1c (MBF1c), which are involved in a key transcriptional regulatory cascade. DREB2A further activates HSFA3, which activates or fine-tunes the expression of HSPs, ROS scavenger enzymes, and other HSR gene expressions. (B) The AP2/ERF transcription factor-mediated cold stress response model. Cold stress induces the expression of C repeat binding factor/dehydration response element binding protein 1s (CBF/DREB1s). CBFs/DREB1 genes are regulated by multiple transcription factors and integrate multiple signalling pathways. The light signalling components Phytochrome-interacting factors (PIF3, PIF4, and PIF7), the circadian oscillator component Pseudo response regulator (PRR9, PRR7, and PRR5), as well as other transcription factors such as Suppressor of overexpression of constans 1 (SOC1) and MYB transcription factor MYB15, negatively regulate CBFs/DREB1 gene expression. The genes CCA1, LHY, BR, BZR1/BES1, ICE1, ICE2, CAMTA, and other transcription factor inducers directly enhance the expression of CBF/DREB1 by binding to its promoter region. The protein stability of CBF/DREB1 is positively regulated by basic transcription factor 3 (BTF3) phosphorylated by Open stomata 1 (OST1). AP2/ERF transcription factor ERF regulates CBF/DREB1 expression by binding directly and indirectly to the CBF/DREB1 promoter. ERF also directly regulates the expression of other COR genes by binding to their promoters. Arrow ends indicate the activation effect; bar ends indicate the repression effect.
Ijms 25 00893 g002
Figure 3. AP2/ERF transcription factor participates in the regulation of hormone-mediated response networks during abiotic stresses. Abiotic stress can alter the production and distribution of plant hormones and subsequently mediate stress responses through AP2/ERF family transcription factors and hormone signalling components. ABA: abscisic acid; GA: gibberellin; IAA: auxin; BR: oleuropein lactone; CTK: cytokinin; ET: ethylene. Arrow ends indicate the activation effect; bar ends indicate the repression effect.
Figure 3. AP2/ERF transcription factor participates in the regulation of hormone-mediated response networks during abiotic stresses. Abiotic stress can alter the production and distribution of plant hormones and subsequently mediate stress responses through AP2/ERF family transcription factors and hormone signalling components. ABA: abscisic acid; GA: gibberellin; IAA: auxin; BR: oleuropein lactone; CTK: cytokinin; ET: ethylene. Arrow ends indicate the activation effect; bar ends indicate the repression effect.
Ijms 25 00893 g003
Table 1. Abiotic stress responsive AP2/ERF transcription factors in plants.
Table 1. Abiotic stress responsive AP2/ERF transcription factors in plants.
Abiotic Stress TypeAP2/ERF Transcription FactorsSpeciesReference
DroughtAtDREB1AArabidopsis thaliana L.[155]
ColdDREB1/CBFArabidopsis thaliana L.[156]
ColdDREB2Arabidopsis thaliana L.[156]
Cold, salt, droughtGmDREBaSoybean (Glycine max L.)[157]
Cold, salt, droughtGmDREBcSoybean (Glycine max L.)[157]
DroughtERF1-VWheat (Triticum aestivum)[158]
TemperatureZjDREB1.4Zoysiagrass (Zoysia japonica S.)[159]
Cold, salt, droughtZmEREB3Maize (Zea mays L.)[160]
SaltZmEREB20Maize (Zea mays L.)[70]
DroughtZmEREB46Maize (Zea mays L.)[161]
DroughtZmEREB60Maize (Zea mays L.)[162]
DroughtZmEREB137Maize (Zea mays L.)[163]
WaterloggingZmEREB180Maize (Zea mays L.)[164]
OsmoticZmEREB204Maize (Zea mays L.)[165]
DroughtZmEREB240Maize (Zea mays L.)[166]
ColdOsDREB1ARice (Oryza sativa)[167]
TemperatureOsDREB1BRice (Oryza sativa)[168]
Cold, salinityOsDREB1DRice (Oryza sativa)[169]
DroughtOsDREB1ERice (Oryza sativa)[169]
DroughtOsDREB1G; OsDREB1IRice (Oryza sativa)[69]
DroughtOsDREB2BRice (Oryza sativa)[69]
Salt, drought, temperatureOsDREB4-1Rice (Oryza sativa)[170]
Salt, drought, temperatureOsDREB1FRice (Oryza sativa)[171]
TemperatureOsWR2Rice (Oryza sativa)[172]
DroughtOsERF71Rice (Oryza sativa)[173]
DroughtOsLG3; OsERF62; OsRAFRice (Oryza sativa)[174]
DroughtOsAP37Rice (Oryza sativa)[175]
SaltOsAP23Rice (Oryza sativa)[176]
Salt, drought, temperatureOsEREBP2Rice (Oryza sativa)[177]
SaltSERF1Rice (Oryza sativa)[178]
SaltOsIDS1Rice (Oryza sativa)[179]
SaltOsERF922Rice (Oryza sativa)[180]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, Z.; Hu, L.; Jiang, W. Understanding AP2/ERF Transcription Factor Responses and Tolerance to Various Abiotic Stresses in Plants: A Comprehensive Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 893. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25020893

AMA Style

Ma Z, Hu L, Jiang W. Understanding AP2/ERF Transcription Factor Responses and Tolerance to Various Abiotic Stresses in Plants: A Comprehensive Review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(2):893. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25020893

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ma, Ziming, Lanjuan Hu, and Wenzhu Jiang. 2024. "Understanding AP2/ERF Transcription Factor Responses and Tolerance to Various Abiotic Stresses in Plants: A Comprehensive Review" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 2: 893. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25020893

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop