Next Article in Journal
Poly(ADP-ribose) Polyremase-1 (PARP-1) Inhibition: A Promising Therapeutic Strategy for ETS-Expressing Tumours
Next Article in Special Issue
Optimization of Antibacterial Activity and Biosafety through Ultrashort Peptide/Cyclodextrin Inclusion Complexes
Previous Article in Journal
RNA-Seq and Comparative Transcriptomic Analyses of Asian Soybean Rust Resistant and Susceptible Soybean Genotypes Provide Insights into Identifying Disease Resistance Genes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Identification and Characterization of RK22, a Novel Antimicrobial Peptide from Hirudinaria manillensis against Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

1
School of Life Sciences, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
2
Key Laboratory of Bioactive Peptides of Yunnan Province, National & Local Joint Engineering Center of Natural Bioactive Peptides, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, China
3
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 101408, China
4
School of Medical Engineering and Translational Medicine, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
5
KIZ-CUHK Joint Laboratory of Bioresources and Molecular Research in Common Diseases, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650107, China
6
National Resource for Non-Human Primates, Kunming Primate Research Center, National Research Facility for Phenotypic & Genetic Analysis of Model Animals (Primate Facility), Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650107, China
7
Sino-African Joint Research Center, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650223, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(17), 13453; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241713453
Submission received: 23 July 2023 / Revised: 23 August 2023 / Accepted: 28 August 2023 / Published: 30 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Antibacterial Drugs: Discovery, Synthesis and Design)

Abstract

:
Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) infections are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, which are compounded by drug resistance. By manipulating the coagulation system, S. aureus gains a significant advantage over host defense mechanisms, with hypercoagulation induced by S. aureus potentially aggravating infectious diseases. Recently, we and other researchers identified that a higher level of LL-37, one endogenous antimicrobial peptide with a significant killing effect on S. aureus infection, resulted in thrombosis formation through the induction of platelet activation and potentiation of the coagulation factor enzymatic activity. In the current study, we identified a novel antimicrobial peptide (RK22) from the salivary gland transcriptome of Hirudinaria manillensis (H. manillensis) through bioinformatic analysis, and then synthesized it, which exhibited good antimicrobial activity against S. aureus, including a clinically resistant strain with a minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 6.25 μg/mL. The RK22 peptide rapidly killed S. aureus by inhibiting biofilm formation and promoting biofilm eradication, with good plasma stability, negligible cytotoxicity, minimal hemolytic activity, and no significant promotion of the coagulation system. Notably, administration of RK22 significantly inhibited S. aureus infection and the clinically resistant strain in vivo. Thus, these findings highlight the potential of RK22 as an ideal treatment candidate against S. aureus infection.

1. Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), a common colonizer of the human population, is recognized as a significant opportunistic bacterial pathogen responsible for a considerable burden of morbidity and mortality [1]. This bacterium can colonize various body sites and organs, posing a risk for the development of infections, ranging from mild skin and soft tissue infections to severe invasive diseases [2,3]. While the introduction of penicillin and methicillin initially exhibited favorable therapeutic efficacy against S. aureus, their extensive use has ultimately led to the emergence of antibiotic resistance [4]. Despite the mitigating effects of vancomycin, the subsequent identification of vancomycin-resistant S. aureus has necessitated further research into novel antibacterial agents [5,6] to ensure that effective treatment options for emerging drug-resistant S. aureus infections do not become scarce.
Antimicrobial peptides offer a promising alternative to traditional antibiotics, displaying several advantages, such as slower emergence of drug resistance, broad-spectrum antibiofilm activity, and the ability to modulate the host immune response [7]. Among these peptides, defensins and cathelicidins represent two major families of endogenous antimicrobial peptides found in humans [8], which demonstrate a notable bacteriostatic or bactericidal effects on S. aureus [9]. However, in addition to their antimicrobial effects, elevated levels of these endogenous antimicrobial peptides are also associated with the pathogenesis of various diseases, including psoriasis [10], atherosclerosis [11,12], colitis [13], Alzheimer’s disease [14], and viral infections [15,16], thereby limiting their applicability in microbial infections related to these diseases. Furthermore, S. aureus infections can manipulate and activate the human hemostatic system, gaining an advantage over host defense mechanisms [17,18,19]. Thus, the induction and promotion of coagulation and platelet activation by defensins [12,20,21,22] and LL-37 [16,23,24], the only human member of the cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide family, may aggravate these infections. As such, there is an urgent need for the development of novel antimicrobial peptides that exhibit minimal potentiation of the human hemostatic system.
The salivary glands of hematophagous leeches secrete an abundance of anticoagulant substances [25,26,27,28,29], and recently several novel antimicrobial peptides have been identified from these leeches such as Hirudo nipponica Whitman and Hirudo medicinalis [30,31,32]. H. manillensis is the most commonly available leech from the Chinese commercial leech market, and we and other researchers have identified a variety of anticoagulant peptides, analgesic peptides, and other active molecules from the salivary gland of H. manillensis [33,34,35,36,37]. However, no antimicrobial peptides from H. manillensis have been reported. In the current study, we screened several positively charged peptides and identified a novel antimicrobial peptide (RK22) from the transcriptome of the salivary glands of H. manillensis through bioinformatic analysis, and then determined the effects of synthesized RK22 against S. aureus. Results showed that RK22 has good antimicrobial activity against S. aureus, which suggested the potential of RK22 as an ideal treatment candidate against S. aureus infection.

2. Results

2.1. Identification and Characterization of Antimicrobial Peptides from the Salivary Gland Transcriptome of H. manillensis

Antimicrobial peptides, predominantly cationic in nature, were discovered in abundance in the transcriptome of the salivary glands of H. manillensis (Table 1). To assess their potential as antimicrobial peptides, we conducted a bioinformatic prediction analysis of these peptides using the Antimicrobial Peptide Scanner v2. As illustrated in Table 2, VF-21 and RK22 were predicted as antimicrobial peptides based on random forest class and earth class predictions, while another four were suggested as antimicrobial peptides based on only one prediction. Subsequently, we synthesized these six peptides and determined their MICs against the standard strain. As shown in Table 3, RK22 exhibited potent antibacterial activity against S. aureus ATCC6538, A. baumannii ATCC19606, and E. coli ATCC8739, with MIC values of 6.25, 100, and 25 μg/mL, respectively. However, it showed no antibacterial activity against P. aeruginosa ATCC27853, even at concentrations exceeding 100 μg/mL. Among the other peptides, KS14, KT20, and RA19 exhibited antimicrobial activity against S. aureus ATCC6538, with MIC values of 50, 50, and 12.5 μg/mL, respectively, but showed no antibacterial activity against A. baumannii ATCC19606, P. aeruginosa ATCC27853, or E. coli ATCC8739, even at concentrations above 100 μg/mL. KS34 and VF21 showed no antibacterial activity against any of the four bacterial strains. Thus, we identified four antimicrobial peptides from the salivary gland transcriptome of H. manillensis, among which RK22 was the most promising candidate for further development.

2.2. RK22 Exerts Antimicrobial Activity against Clinically Isolated S. aureus and Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus Strain

To further evaluate the antimicrobial activity of RK22 against S. aureus, two clinically isolated strains (SA220823 and SA15772), and three clinically isolated methicillin-resistant strains (MRSA-Z, MRSA11, and MRSA22) were selected. As depicted in Table 4, RK22 exhibited potent antibacterial activity against the three clinically isolated methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains with MIC values of 6.25 μg/mL and two clinically isolated S. aureus strains with MIC values of 12.5 μg/mL. Although slightly weaker than vancomycin (MIC of 1.56 μg/mL), RK22 displayed potent antibacterial activity against both standard and antibiotic-resistant strains of S. aureus.

2.3. RK22 Exhibits Rapid Killing Ability against S. aureus ATCC6538 and MRSA-Z by Cell Membrane Permeabilization

To explore the potential mechanism underlying the antimicrobial activity of RK22 against S. aureus, we employed SEM and TEM to examine the morphology of S. aureus ATCC6538 and MRSA-Z. Results showed that RK22 treatment led to an obvious disruption of the plasma membrane in both S. aureus ATCC6538 (Figure 1A) and MRSA-Z (Figure 1B), whereas the plasma membrane in the untreated groups remained intact.
Furthermore, to assess the bactericidal kinetics of RK22 against S. aureus ATCC6538 and MRSA-Z, we measured its rate of bactericidal activity. Results demonstrated that RK22 administration exerted more rapid killing effects against S. aureus ATCC6538 (Figure 1C) compared to MRSA-Z (Figure 1D), even surpassing the speed of vancomycin at the equivalent MIC. Notably, RK22 achieved a kill rate of more than 90% against S. aureus ATCC6538at 1 × MIC and 5 × MIC within 3 h and at 10 × MIC within 1 h, whereas vancomycin required 6 h to achieve a kill rate of more than 90% against S. aureus ATCC6538 at 5 × MIC and 10 × MIC (Figure 1C). Both RK22 and vancomycin exhibited slower bactericidal activity against MRSA-Z compared to the standard S. aureus strain ATCC6538. However, RK22 demonstrated the ability to eradicate almost all MRSA-Z at 10 × MIC within 6 h, while vancomycin only inhibited about 80% of MRSA-Z at the same MIC and time point (Figure 1D). Thus, these findings provide evidence that RK22 exhibits more rapid antibacterial activity against both S. aureus ATCC6538 and MRSA-Z in comparison to vancomycin.

2.4. RK22 Exhibits Biofilm Inhibition and Eradication Activities

To further investigate the potential mechanism underlying the antimicrobial activity of RK22, we investigated its effects on S. aureus ATCC6538 and MRSA-Z biofilm formation and eradication. Results showed that RK22 exhibited a dose-dependent inhibition of biofilm formation in both S. aureus ATCC6538 (Figure 2A) and MRSA-Z (Figure 2B). Furthermore, RK22 demonstrated the ability to effectively eliminate preformed biofilms of S. aureus ATCC6538 (Figure 2C) and MRSA-Z (Figure 2D) in a dose-dependent manner.

2.5. RK22 Maintains Antibacterial Activity in Plasma

The antimicrobial function of antimicrobial peptides can be neutralized by various plasma proteins, while degradation by specific plasma proteases can diminish their antimicrobial efficacy [38]. Here, we investigated the effects of plasma on the antibacterial activity of RK22. As shown in Table S1, the antimicrobial activity of RK22 against S. aureus ATCC6538 and MRSA-Z remained consistent at 6.25 μg/mL, even after 10 h of in vitro plasma incubation. These findings suggest that incubation of RK22 in plasma did not significantly affect its antibacterial activity against S. aureus ATCC6538 and MRSA-Z.

2.6. RK22 Shows Negligible Hemolytic Activity and Cytotoxicity in Mammalian Cells

The potent hemolytic activity and cytotoxicity exhibited by certain highly effective antimicrobial peptides have hindered their application in vivo. To assess the hemolytic activity of RK22 in blood cells, we performed hemolysis assays. As illustrated in Figure S1A, RK22 did not exhibit any obvious hemolytic activity, even at a concentration of 400 μg/mL. Additionally, we evaluated the cytotoxicity of RK22 against HEK293T cells. Results indicated that RK22 did not demonstrate any noticeable cytotoxic effects on HEK293T cells, even at a concentration of 400 μg/mL (Figure S1B). Thus, these findings suggest that treatment with RK22 is unlikely to induce hemolytic activity or cytotoxicity in mammalian cells in vivo.

2.7. RK22 Induces No Potentiation of Coagulation Factor Activity and Platelet Activation

Upon infection, S. aureus bacteria can manipulate and activate the human hemostatic system, providing them an advantage over host defense mechanisms [17,18,19]. It has recently been confirmed that LL-37 can induce and promote coagulation and platelet activation [16,23,24]. Thus, we compared the effects of LL-37 and RK22 on coagulation factor activity and platelet activation. Results showed that while LL-37 demonstrated significant potentiation activity, RK22 did not exhibit similar enhancement of the enzymatic activity of thrombin (Figure 3A,B) or FXa (Figure 3C,D) in the same molar concentration of LL-37. Similarly, while LL-37 exhibited significant and dose-dependent effects on platelet activation, RK22 did not exert any such effects (Figure 3E,F). Thus, these findings suggest that RK22 is unlikely to induce hypercoagulation similar to the effects induced by LL-37.

2.8. RK22 Shows No Acute Toxicity In Vivo

To determine the acute toxicity of RK22 in vivo, male C57BL/6 mice (6–8 weeks old) were injected with a single dose of RK22 at concentrations of 20 and 40 mg/kg. Mouse survival was then monitored for a period of 96 h. As shown in Figure S2A, treatment with RK22 at both 20 and 40 mg/kg did not result in any fatalities, suggesting low toxicity. The mice were sacrificed after 96 h of RK22 treatment, and blood and tissue samples were collected for further analysis. Results showed that treatment with RK22 did not induce any changes in white blood cells (Figure S2B), red blood cells (Figure S2C), hemoglobin (HGB) (Figure S2D), or platelets (Figure S2E). Furthermore, histopathological analysis with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining suggested no obvious tissue injury after stimulation with RK22 (Figure S2F).

2.9. RK22 Suppresses S. aureus Dissemination

To evaluate the therapeutic potential of RK22 as a candidate drug for S. aureus infection, we determined the suppression of S. aureus by RK22 in vivo. As shown in Figure 4A,B, treatment with RK22 following S. aureus ATCC6538 infection significantly inhibited the dissemination of standard S. aureus ATCC6538 from the peritoneal cavity to the blood (Figure 4A) and lung (Figure 4B), similar to the effects of vancomycin. Additionally, histopathological examination revealed that treatment with RK22 (8 mg/kg) and vancomycin (4 mg/kg) significantly alleviated S. aureus ATCC6538 infection-induced hemorrhage and inflammatory cell infiltration in the lung (Figure 4C). Furthermore, RK22 significantly suppressed the dissemination of MRSA-Z from the peritoneal cavity to the blood (Figure 4D) and lung (Figure 4E). Consistently, treatment with RK22 (8 mg/kg) and vancomycin (4 mg/kg) significantly alleviated MRSA-Z infection-induced tissue injury in the lung (Figure 4F). These findings confirm the ability of RK22 to suppress the dissemination of S. aureus ATCC6538 and MRSA-Z to target organs in vivo.

3. Discussion

S. aureus and MRSA infections represent a significant threat to human health, emphasizing the critical need for the development of novel antimicrobial drugs. In the present study, we identified a novel antimicrobial peptide (RK22), which selectively inhibited infection of S. aureus and clinically resistant S. aureus strains in vitro and in vivo. Notably, RK22 exhibited rapid bactericidal activity against S. aureus by inhibiting biofilm formation and promoting biofilm eradication, while simultaneously showing good plasma stability, negligible cytotoxicity, minimal hemolytic activity, and no significant promotion of the coagulation system.
Hematophagous leeches have garnered increasing attention as potential sources of novel antimicrobial molecules due to their ability to store ingested blood for extended periods without significant changes. Indeed, previous studies have identified several antimicrobial peptides derived from such leeches [30,31,32,39,40]. Vakhrusheva et al. discovered that certain leech-derived antimicrobial peptides can prolong activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and prothrombin time (PT), indicating their inhibitory effects on coagulation [40]. However, these peptides also displayed obvious hemolysis, which could be mitigated by the presence of blood plasma and albumin [40]. In contrast, our findings demonstrated that RK22 exhibits excellent antimicrobial activity without potentiating coagulation factor enzymatic activity or platelet activation.
Endogenous antimicrobial peptides, such as LL-37, have demonstrated significant bacteriostatic or bactericidal effects on S. aureus through direct bacterial killing or regulation of the immune system [41]. However, although LL-37 exhibits good antibacterial, antifungal, and antiviral activity, research has also indicated that higher levels of LL-37 may contribute to the pathogenesis of various diseases. Notably, recent studies have revealed that LL-37 can induce hypercoagulation by potentiating the enzymatic activities of coagulation factors [16] and promoting platelet activation [23,24], which may exacerbate S. aureus infections [42], thus highlighting the need for further research. In the current study, we compared the effects of RK22 and LL-37 on coagulation factor activity and platelet activation. Our results showed that RK22 did not enhance the enzymatic activity of thrombin or FXa or induce platelet activation, unlike LL-37, which exhibited significant hypercoagulation effects at the same concentrations as RK22 (Figure 3).
Results of SEM and TEM suggested the direct bacterial killing effects of RK22 (Figure 1A,B), and experiments of the biofilm inhibition assay and biofilm eradication assay suggested the mechanisms of RK22 against S. aureus (Figure 2). RK22 showed the most excellent activity with a +10 net charge and VF21 showed no antibacterial activity with a +1 net charge (Table 1 and Table 3), which suggested the more net positive charge, the better antimicrobial activity. However, KS14, RA19, KT20, and KS34 with the same net charge (+7) showed different antimicrobial activity (Table 1 and Table 3). Furthermore, almost all the positively charged peptides (KS14, RA19, KT20, and RK22) showed excellent antimicrobial activity against S. aureus, which suggested that positively charged peptides are prone to kill S. aureus. Meanwhile, KS34 and VF21 were the exceptions, which suggests that the charge and structure of antimicrobial peptides might determine the activity and the selectivity. More experiments on the activity and selectivity of antimicrobial peptides need to be investigated in the future.
In addition to endogenous antimicrobial peptides, researchers have identified thousands of antimicrobial peptides, leading to the establishment of several antimicrobial peptide databases. These databases provide valuable bioinformatics support for the identification and design of novel antimicrobial peptides, including antimicrobial peptides against S. aureus [43], Candida albicans [44], P. aeruginosa, and A. baumannii [45], as reported in our previous research. In the present study, RK22 exhibited antimicrobial activity against S. aureus, A. baumannii, and E. coli, with MIC values of 6.25, 100, and 25 μg/mL, respectively (Table 3). In the future, we aim to utilize RK22 as a foundation for developing more active and specific antimicrobial peptides through amino acid substitutions and modifications. Furthermore, we anticipate that further bioinformatics analyses of the salivary gland transcriptome of H. manillensis will uncover additional potent antimicrobial peptides.
While antimicrobial efficacy is a crucial factor determining the applicability of antimicrobial peptides, additional properties, such as plasma stability, hemolytic activity, and cytotoxicity, can significantly influence their potential use [46]. Remarkably, RK22 maintained its antibacterial activity against both S. aureus and MRSA, even after 10 h of incubation in plasma (Table S1). Furthermore, RK22 showed no hemolytic activity and cytotoxicity even at the concentration of 400 μg/mL (Figure S1), which may explain its lack of acute toxicity even at the high concentration of 40 mg/kg (Figure S2).

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Bacterial Strain Preparation and Growth Conditions

The bacterial strains used in this study included Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa, ATCC27853), Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii, ATCC19606), Escherichia coli (E. coli, ATCC8739), and S. aureus (ATCC6538, two clinically isolated strains (SA220823 and SA15772)), and three clinically isolated methicillin-resistant strains (MRSA-Z, MRSA11, and MRSA22). All strains were grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth.

4.2. Animals

C57BL/6 male mice (20–22 g, 6–8 weeks of age) were obtained from SPF (Beijing, China) Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China) for the in vivo experiments, and were maintained on a 12-h light/12-h dark cycle at 24 °C. All experiments were approved by the Institutional Review Board and Animal Care and Use Committee at the Kunming Institute of Zoology, China (IACUC-RE-2023-05-009).

4.3. Antibacterial Peptide Identification, Prediction, and Synthesis

Using the assembled high-quality transcriptome data obtained from the salivary gland of H. manillensis, we predicted and analyzed positively charged amino acid-rich peptides using the Antimicrobial Peptide Scanner vr.2 (https://www.dveltri.com/ascan/v2/index.html) and ExPASy Swiss Bioinformatics Resource Portal (https://www.expasy.org/), respectively. All peptides used were synthesized by GL Biochem (Shanghai, China) to a purity of more than 95%, as confirmed through reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) and mass spectrometry.

4.4. In Vitro Antimicrobial Testing

The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for all strains was determined using the tube microdilution assay based on a previous study with minor modifications [47]. Initially, strains in the exponential phase were diluted to a concentration of 2 × 105 CFU/mL using RPMI 1640 medium (Corning, New York, NY, USA). Next, 100 μL of the bacterial suspension was mixed with 100 μL of the sample solution (final concentration 0–200 μg/mL in RPMI 1640 medium) in 96-well plates. The plates were then incubated at 37 °C for 12–16 h. After incubation, the absorbance at 600 nm was measured, and the MIC was determined as the lowest concentration of the test sample in which no bacterial growth was detected in the well.

4.5. Hemolysis and Cytotoxicity Assays

The hemolysis and cytotoxicity assays were performed according to previous research with some modifications [48]. In the hemolysis assay, mouse blood was collected in anticoagulant tubes, centrifuged (1000× g, 5 min), and washed with normal saline three times to obtain red blood cells. The red blood cells were then resuspended to prepare a 10% red blood cell suspension. The suspension was mixed with an equal volume solution of RK22 (final concentration 0–400 μg/mL), then incubated at 37 °C for 1 h and centrifuged (1000× g, 10 min). After this, 150 μL of the supernatant was transferred to a new 96-well plate, with absorbance then measured at 540 nm. Additionally, 1% Triton X-100 and sterile saline treatment groups accounted for 100% and 0% hemolysis, respectively.
In the cytotoxicity assay, HEK293T cells were cultured with Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) (Corning, New York, NY, USA) consisting of 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Corning, New York, NY, USA) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin liquid (Solarbio, Beijing, China). After digestion using trypsin (Gibco, New York, NY, USA), the cell suspension (100 μL, 1 × 105 cells/mL, 200 µL/well) was inoculated into each well of a 96-well plate. Once the cells were completely adherent, the supernatant was discarded, and fresh medium with or without 100 μL of RK22 (final concentration 6.25–400 μg/mL) was added to the 96-well plates. After incubation at 37 °C for 24 h, 10 μL of CCK8 (MedChemExpress, South Brunswick Township, NJ, USA) solution was added to each well. The plate was then incubated at 37 °C for an additional 1–4 h, with absorbance then measured at 450 nm.

4.6. Changes in Antimicrobial Activity of RK22 in Plasma

We determined the stability of RK22 in plasma according to the previously reported method [45]. Briefly, an equal volume of RK22 was mixed with human plasma and diluted to a concentration of 5 mg/mL. The MICs of RK22 against S. aureus ATCC6538 and methicillin-resistant S. aureus MRSA-Z were determined after incubation at 37 °C for different times (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 h).

4.7. Evaluation of Bacterial Membrane Morphology

Bacterial membrane morphology was observed using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) following previous research with minor modifications [49]. First, S. aureus ATCC6538 or methicillin-resistant S. aureus MRSA-Z was cultured in LB broth until reaching the exponential growth phase. The bacterial solution was then washed three times and diluted to 4 × 107 CFU/mL, then treated with RK22 (final concentration 100 μg/mL) or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, Corning, New York, NY, USA) and incubated at 37 °C for 4 h. The bacterial liquid was centrifuged (400× g, 10 min, 4 °C), the remaining bacterial pellets were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde (Servicebio, Wuhan, China) at 4 °C for 4 h, and then post-fixed with 1% buffered osmium tetroxide and 1.5% potassium ferricyanide for 2 h. After fixation, dehydration, embedding, and staining processes, membrane morphology was observed using SEM (JEOL, JEM-1400 Plus, Tokyo, Japan) and TEM (Hitachi, SU-8100, Tokyo, Japan).

4.8. Bacterial Killing Kinetic Assay

The bactericidal killing kinetic assay was performed according to a previous study with minor modifications [50]. Firstly, S. aureus ATCC6538 or methicillin-resistant S. aureus MRSA-Z was diluted to 2 × 105 CFU/mL using RPMI 1640 medium. Equal volumes of either RK22 (final concentration 1, 5, 10 × MIC) or vancomycin (Macklin, Shanghai, China) (final concentration 1, 5, 10 × MIC) solutions were added to the bacterial suspension. The mixtures were then incubated at 37 °C for different times (0, 15, 30, 60, 180, and 360 min). At each time point, the bacterial solution was inoculated on LB agar culture medium, and colony forming units (CFUs) were counted after 24 h.

4.9. Biofilm Inhibition Assay

To determine the ability of RK22 to inhibit biofilms, a biofilm inhibition assay was performed based on previous research with minor modifications [45]. In brief, S. aureus ATCC6538 or methicillin-resistant S. aureus MRSA-Z was diluted to a concentration of 2 × 106 CFU/mL using RPMI 1640 medium. Subsequently, 100 μL of the bacterial suspension and 100 μL of RK22 (final concentration 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 × MIC) were mixed in 96-well plates. The plates were then incubated at 37 °C for 24 h, then washed three times with PBS, and fixed with 99% methanol (Damao Chemical Reagent Factory, Tianjin, China) for 15 min. After drying, the methanol was aspirated, and the biofilms were stained with 100 μL of 0.1% crystal violet (Solarbio, Beijing, China) for 5 min. The plates were thrice washed with sterile normal saline solution, and the stain was resolubilized in 95% ethanol (Damao Chemical Reagent Factory, Tianjin, China). Finally, absorbance was measured at 600 nm after 30 min.

4.10. Biofilm Eradication Assay

S. aureus ATCC6538 or methicillin-resistant S. aureus MRSA-Z (2 × 106 CFU/mL) was grown in 100 μL of RPMI 1640 medium in 96-well plates, followed by incubation at 37 °C for 24 h to generate biofilms. After washing three times with PBS, 100 μL of PBS or RK22 (final concentration 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 × MIC) was added to each well. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h, then washed three times with PBS, and fixed with 99% methanol for 15 min. After drying the well, the methanol was aspirated and 100 μL of 0.1% crystal violet was added for staining for 5 min. The plates were then washed with sterile normal saline solution three times. Finally, the stain was resolubilized in 95% ethanol and absorbance was measured at 600 nm after 30 min.

4.11. In Vivo Acute Toxicity

Male C57BL/6 mice (6–8 weeks of age) were randomly divided into three groups of eight mice per group. Either normal saline or RK22 (20 and 40 mg/kg) was injected intravenously via the tail vein. Mice were observed for survival status within 96 h of the injection and blood was collected via retro-orbital bleeding for routine blood analysis. For histopathological analysis, sections of lung, liver, spleen, and kidney were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin wax, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E).

4.12. S. aureus-Induced Bacteremia Model

S. aureus ATCC6538 or methicillin-resistant S. aureus MRSA-Z were diluted to a concentration of 1 × 109 CFU/mL with normal saline. Male C57BL/6 mice (6–8 weeks of age) were randomly divided into seven groups of 10–12 mice per group. S. aureus ATCC6538 (100 μL) or methicillin-resistant S. aureus MRSA-Z (200 μL) were injected intravenously. At the end of 1 h, mice received an intraperitoneal injection of normal saline, vancomycin (dissolved in saline with the concentration of 2 and 4 mg/kg), or RK22 (dissolved in saline with the concentration of 2, 4, and 8 mg/kg). At 4 h post-administration, the mice were sacrificed, and blood and lung samples were collected. Lungs were then weighed and placed in 1 mL of PBS and homogenized on ice with a tissue grinder. Homogenates and clarified blood were plated in LB agar culture medium and CFUs were counted after 24 h. For histopathological analysis, sections of lung were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin wax, and stained with H&E.

4.13. Enzymatic Activity Assay of Coagulation Factors

The enzymatic activity of RK22 and LL-37 against coagulation factors was measured using the chromogenic substrate method [16]. In brief, 5 μL of FXa (Enzymeresearch, Lake Oswego, OR, USA) (final concentration 3 μg/mL) or thrombin (Enzymeresearch, Lake Oswego, OR, USA) (final concentration 0.1056 μg/mL) and 5 μL of sample (final concentration 40, 200, and 1000 nM) were incubated for 10 min in 96-well plates, respectively. Following incubation, thrombin substrate (S-2238, Chromogenix, Milano, Italy, 45 μg/mL) or FXa substrate (S-2222, Chromogenix, Milano, Italy, 90 μg/mL) dissolved with 90 μL of enzyme dynamic buffer (100 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris, 5 mM CaCl2, pH 8.0) were added and absorbance was measured at 405 nm every 1 min for 90 min.

4.14. Platelet Activity Assay

Platelets were isolated from the mice as described in a previous study with minor modifications [24]. The effect of RK22 and LL-37 on platelet activity was detected by flow cytometry. Mouse blood was mixed with Tyrode’s buffer A (137 mM NaCl, 2 mM KCl, 0.3 mM NaH2PO4, 12 mM NaHCO3, 5.5 mM glucose, 0.35% BSA, 1 mM MgCl2, and 0.2 mM EDTA, pH 6.5) and centrifuged (150× g, 10 min, room temperature) to obtain platelet-rich plasma (PRP), which was then pelleted (400× g, 5 min, room temperature), washed with Tyrode’s buffer A, and finally resuspended in Tyrode’s buffer B (137 mM NaCl, 2 mM KCl, 0.3 mM NaH2PO4, 12 mM NaHCO3, 5.5 mM glucose, 0.35% BSA and 2 mM CaCl2, pH 7.4). Antibodies against P-selectin (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA) were added to the platelets, followed by incubation for 10 min at room temperature. Samples (20, 10, 5, and 2.5 μg/mL) or normal saline were added, respectively, and analyzed by flow cytometry (BD, LSRFortessaTM, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA).

4.15. Statistical Analysis

The data obtained from independent experiments are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). For normal continuous variables, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used. All analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism v5. Asterisks represent p-value classifications: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, we identified RK22 as a novel and highly effective antimicrobial peptide against S. aureus and MRSA, with good plasma stability, negligible cytotoxicity, minimal hemolytic activity, and no significant promotion of the coagulation system. These findings establish RK22 as an excellent candidate or template for the development of therapeutic agents aimed at treating S. aureus and MRSA infections.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms241713453/s1.

Author Contributions

R.L. and Z.D. designed the study and wrote and revised the manuscript. X.L., M.Y. and S.Z. performed most of the experiments and wrote the manuscript. S.Y., X.C., M.K., K.W., Y.F. and C.W. participated in some of the experiments and assisted in the analysis of the data. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFC2105003), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U2002219), Chinese Academy of Sciences (KFJ-BRP-008-003 and SAJC202103), Yunnan Provincial Science and Technology Department (202003AD150008 and 202302AA310035), Kunming Science and Technology Bureau (2022SCP007), New Cornerstone Investigator Program from Shenzhen New Cornerstone Science Foundation (NCI202238), Yunnan Characteristic Plant Extraction Laboratory (2022YKZY006), and Bureau of Industry and Information Technology of Kunming (2120784001315 and 2120784001310).

Institutional Review Board Statement

All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee at the Kunming Institute of Zoology (Accreditation Code: IACUC-RE-2023-05-009) and conformed to the US National Institutes of Health’s Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (Na-tional Acade-mies Press, 8th Edition, 2011).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

For original data, please contact [email protected] (Z.D.) and [email protected] (R.L.).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Howden, B.P.; Giulieri, S.G.; Wong Fok Lung, T.; Baines, S.L.; Sharkey, L.K.; Lee, J.Y.H.; Hachani, A.; Monk, I.R.; Stinear, T.P. Staphylococcus aureus host interactions and adaptation. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2023, 21, 380–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Vella, V.; Galgani, I.; Polito, L.; Arora, A.K.; Creech, C.B.; David, M.Z.; Lowy, F.D.; Macesic, N.; Ridgway, J.P.; Uhlemann, A.C.; et al. Staphylococcus aureus Skin and Soft Tissue Infection Recurrence Rates in Outpatients: A Retrospective Database Study at 3 US Medical Centers. Clin. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Infect. Dis. Soc. Am. 2021, 73, e1045–e1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lowy, F.D. Staphylococcus aureus infections. N. Engl. J. Med. 1998, 339, 520–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lee, A.S.; de Lencastre, H.; Garau, J.; Kluytmans, J.; Malhotra-Kumar, S.; Peschel, A.; Harbarth, S. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2018, 4, 18033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Deresinski, S. Vancomycin in combination with other antibiotics for the treatment of serious methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Infect. Dis. Soc. Am. 2009, 49, 1072–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gardete, S.; Tomasz, A. Mechanisms of vancomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Investig. 2014, 124, 2836–2840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Magana, M.; Pushpanathan, M.; Santos, A.L.; Leanse, L.; Fernandez, M.; Ioannidis, A.; Giulianotti, M.A.; Apidianakis, Y.; Bradfute, S.; Ferguson, A.L.; et al. The value of antimicrobial peptides in the age of resistance. Lancet. Infect. Dis. 2020, 20, e216–e230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Izadpanah, A.; Gallo, R.L. Antimicrobial peptides. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2005, 52 Pt 1, 381–390, quiz 391–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ryu, S.; Song, P.I.; Seo, C.H.; Cheong, H.; Park, Y. Colonization and infection of the skin by S. aureus: Immune system evasion and the response to cationic antimicrobial peptides. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 8753–8772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Takahashi, T.; Yamasaki, K. Psoriasis and Antimicrobial Peptides. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Döring, Y.; Drechsler, M.; Wantha, S.; Kemmerich, K.; Lievens, D.; Vijayan, S.; Gallo, R.L.; Weber, C.; Soehnlein, O. Lack of neutrophil-derived CRAMP reduces atherosclerosis in mice. Circ. Res. 2012, 110, 1052–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Quinn, K.L.; Henriques, M.; Tabuchi, A.; Han, B.; Yang, H.; Cheng, W.E.; Tole, S.; Yu, H.; Luo, A.; Charbonney, E.; et al. Human neutrophil peptides mediate endothelial-monocyte interaction, foam cell formation, and platelet activation. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2011, 31, 2070–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Duan, Z.; Fang, Y.; Sun, Y.; Luan, N.; Chen, X.; Chen, M.; Han, Y.; Yin, Y.; Mwangi, J.; Niu, J.; et al. Antimicrobial peptide LL-37 forms complex with bacterial DNA to facilitate blood translocation of bacterial DNA and aggravate ulcerative colitis. Sci. Bull. 2018, 63, 1364–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chen, X.; Deng, S.; Wang, W.; Castiglione, S.; Duan, Z.; Luo, L.; Cianci, F.; Zhang, X.; Xu, J.; Li, H.; et al. Human antimicrobial peptide LL-37 contributes to Alzheimer’s disease progression. Mol. Psychiatry 2022, 27, 4790–4799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ogawa, Y.; Kawamura, T.; Matsuzawa, T.; Aoki, R.; Gee, P.; Yamashita, A.; Moriishi, K.; Yamasaki, K.; Koyanagi, Y.; Blauvelt, A.; et al. Antimicrobial peptide LL-37 produced by HSV-2-infected keratinocytes enhances HIV infection of Langerhans cells. Cell Host Microbe 2013, 13, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Duan, Z.; Zhang, J.; Chen, X.; Liu, M.; Zhao, H.; Jin, L.; Zhang, Z.; Luan, N.; Meng, P.; Wang, J.; et al. Role of LL-37 in thrombotic complications in patients with COVID-19. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. CMLS 2022, 79, 309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Skjeflo, E.W.; Christiansen, D.; Fure, H.; Ludviksen, J.K.; Woodruff, T.M.; Espevik, T.; Nielsen, E.W.; Brekke, O.L.; Mollnes, T.E. Staphylococcus aureus-induced complement activation promotes tissue factor-mediated coagulation. J. Thromb. Haemost. JTH 2018, 16, 905–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liesenborghs, L.; Verhamme, P.; Vanassche, T. Staphylococcus aureus, master manipulator of the human hemostatic system. J. Thromb. Haemost. JTH 2018, 16, 441–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Vanassche, T.; Kauskot, A.; Verhaegen, J.; Peetermans, W.E.; van Ryn, J.; Schneewind, O.; Hoylaerts, M.F.; Verhamme, P. Fibrin formation by staphylothrombin facilitates Staphylococcus aureus-induced platelet aggregation. Thromb. Haemost. 2012, 107, 1107–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Abdeen, S.; Bdeir, K.; Abu-Fanne, R.; Maraga, E.; Higazi, M.; Khurram, N.; Feldman, M.; Deshpande, C.; Litzky, L.A.; Heyman, S.N.; et al. Alpha-defensins: Risk factor for thrombosis in COVID-19 infection. Br. J. Haematol. 2021, 194, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kim, K.C.; Lee, W.; Lee, J.; Cha, H.J.; Hwang, B.H. Newly Identified HNP-F from Human Neutrophil Peptide-1 Promotes Hemostasis. Biotechnol. J. 2019, 14, e1800606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Higazi, A.A.; Barghouti, I.I.; Abu-Much, R. Identification of an inhibitor of tissue-type plasminogen activator-mediated fibrinolysis in human neutrophils. A role for defensin. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270, 9472–9477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Pircher, J.; Czermak, T.; Ehrlich, A.; Eberle, C.; Gaitzsch, E.; Margraf, A.; Grommes, J.; Saha, P.; Titova, A.; Ishikawa-Ankerhold, H.; et al. Cathelicidins prime platelets to mediate arterial thrombosis and tissue inflammation. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Salamah, M.F.; Ravishankar, D.; Kodji, X.; Moraes, L.A.; Williams, H.F.; Vallance, T.M.; Albadawi, D.A.; Vaiyapuri, R.; Watson, K.; Gibbins, J.M.; et al. The endogenous antimicrobial cathelicidin LL37 induces platelet activation and augments thrombus formation. Blood Adv. 2018, 2, 2973–2985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Harvey, R.P.; Degryse, E.; Stefani, L.; Schamber, F.; Cazenave, J.P.; Courtney, M.; Tolstoshev, P.; Lecocq, J.P. Cloning and expression of a cDNA coding for the anticoagulant hirudin from the bloodsucking leech, Hirudo medicinalis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1986, 83, 1084–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhang, Y.; Yang, R.; Wang, L.; Li, Y.; Han, J.; Yang, Y.; Zheng, H.; Lu, M.; Shen, Y.; Yang, H. Purification and characterization of a novel thermostable anticoagulant protein from medicinal leech Whitmania pigra Whitman. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2022, 288, 114990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Müller, C.; Lukas, P.; Sponholz, D.; Hildebrandt, J.P. The hirudin-like factors HLF3 and HLF4-hidden hirudins of European medicinal leeches. Parasitol. Res. 2020, 119, 1767–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhang, Z.; Shen, C.; Fang, M.; Han, Y.; Long, C.; Liu, W.; Yang, M.; Liu, M.; Zhang, D.; Cao, Q.; et al. Novel contact-kinin inhibitor sylvestin targets thromboinflammation and ameliorates ischemic stroke. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. CMLS 2022, 79, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Deckmyn, H.; Stassen, J.M.; Vreys, I.; Van Houtte, E.; Sawyer, R.T.; Vermylen, J. Calin from Hirudo medicinalis, an inhibitor of platelet adhesion to collagen, prevents platelet-rich thrombosis in hamsters. Blood 1995, 85, 712–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Du, Y.; Shi, H.; Guo, Q.; Liu, C.; Zhao, K. Hirudomacin: A Protein with Dual Effects of Direct Bacterial Inhibition and Regulation of Innate Immunity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2023, 89, e0052723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Grafskaia, E.; Pavlova, E.; Babenko, V.V.; Latsis, I.; Malakhova, M.; Lavrenova, V.; Bashkirov, P.; Belousov, D.; Klinov, D.; Lazarev, V. The Hirudo Medicinalis Microbiome Is a Source of New Antimicrobial Peptides. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Grafskaia, E.N.; Nadezhdin, K.D.; Talyzina, I.A.; Polina, N.F.; Podgorny, O.V.; Pavlova, E.R.; Bashkirov, P.V.; Kharlampieva, D.D.; Bobrovsky, P.A.; Latsis, I.A.; et al. Medicinal leech antimicrobial peptides lacking toxicity represent a promising alternative strategy to combat antibiotic-resistant pathogens. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 180, 143–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wang, C.; Chen, M.; Lu, X.; Yang, S.; Yang, M.; Fang, Y.; Lai, R.; Duan, Z. Isolation and Characterization of Poeciguamerin, a Peptide with Dual Analgesic and Anti-Thrombotic Activity from the Poecilobdella manillensis Leech. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 11097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Huang, Q.; Tang, J.; Chai, X.; Ren, W.; Wang, J.; Gan, Q.; Shi, J.; Wang, M.; Yang, S.; Liu, J.; et al. Affinity ultrafiltration and UPLC-HR-Orbitrap-MS based screening of thrombin-targeted small molecules with anticoagulation activity from Poecilobdella manillensis. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2021, 1178, 122822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Shao, G.Y.; Tian, Q.Q.; Li, W.B.; Wang, S.Y.; Lu, Y.X.; Liu, F.; Cheng, B.X. Cloning and functional identification of pmKPI cDNA in Poecilobdella manillensis. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2023, 50, 299–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lukas, P.; Melikian, G.; Hildebrandt, J.P.; Müller, C. Make it double: Identification and characterization of a Tandem-Hirudin from the Asian medicinal leech Hirudinaria manillensis. Parasitol. Res. 2022, 121, 2995–3006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Electricwala, A.; Sawyer, R.T.; Jones, C.P.; Atkinson, T. Isolation of thrombin inhibitor from the leech Hirudinaria manillensis. Blood Coagul. Fibrinolysis Int. J. Haemost. Thromb. 1991, 2, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. De Breij, A.; Riool, M.; Cordfunke, R.A.; Malanovic, N.; de Boer, L.; Koning, R.I.; Ravensbergen, E.; Franken, M.; van der Heijde, T.; Boekema, B.K.; et al. The antimicrobial peptide SAAP-148 combats drug-resistant bacteria and biofilms. Sci. Transl. Med. 2018, 10, eaan4044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Schikorski, D.; Cuvillier-Hot, V.; Leippe, M.; Boidin-Wichlacz, C.; Slomianny, C.; Macagno, E.; Salzet, M.; Tasiemski, A. Microbial challenge promotes the regenerative process of the injured central nervous system of the medicinal leech by inducing the synthesis of antimicrobial peptides in neurons and microglia. J. Immunol. 2008, 181, 1083–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Vakhrusheva, T.V.; Moroz, G.D.; Basyreva, L.Y.; Shmeleva, E.V.; Gusev, S.A.; Mikhalchik, E.V.; Grafskaia, E.N.; Latsis, I.A.; Panasenko, O.M.; Lazarev, V.N. Effects of Medicinal Leech-Related Cationic Antimicrobial Peptides on Human Blood Cells and Plasma. Molecules 2022, 27, 5848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ho, J.; Zhang, L.; Liu, X.; Wong, S.H.; Wang, M.H.T.; Lau, B.W.M.; Ngai, S.P.C.; Chan, H.; Choi, G.; Leung, C.C.H.; et al. Pathological Role and Diagnostic Value of Endogenous Host Defense Peptides in Adult and Neonatal Sepsis: A Systematic Review. Shock 2017, 47, 673–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liesenborghs, L.; Meyers, S.; Vanassche, T.; Verhamme, P. Coagulation: At the heart of infective endocarditis. J. Thromb. Haemost. JTH 2020, 18, 995–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Nagarajan, D.; Nagarajan, T.; Roy, N.; Kulkarni, O.; Ravichandran, S.; Mishra, M.; Chakravortty, D.; Chandra, N. Computational antimicrobial peptide design and evaluation against multidrug-resistant clinical isolates of bacteria. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 3492–3509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kakar, A.; Holzknecht, J.; Dubrac, S.; Gelmi, M.L.; Romanelli, A.; Marx, F. New Perspectives in the Antimicrobial Activity of the Amphibian Temporin B: Peptide Analogs Are Effective Inhibitors of Candida albicans Growth. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Mwangi, J.; Yin, Y.; Wang, G.; Yang, M.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Lai, R. The antimicrobial peptide ZY4 combats multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 26516–26522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Greco, I.; Molchanova, N.; Holmedal, E.; Jenssen, H.; Hummel, B.D.; Watts, J.L.; Håkansson, J.; Hansen, P.R.; Svenson, J. Correlation between hemolytic activity, cytotoxicity and systemic in vivo toxicity of synthetic antimicrobial peptides. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 13206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yusuf, E.; van Westreenen, M.; Goessens, W.; Croughs, P. The accuracy of four commercial broth microdilution tests in the determination of the minimum inhibitory concentration of colistin. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2020, 19, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Mohammadi, M.; Taheri, B.; Momenzadeh, N.; Salarinia, R.; Nabipour, I.; Farshadzadeh, Z.; Bargahi, A. Identification and Characterization of Novel Antimicrobial Peptide from Hippocampus comes by In Silico and Experimental Studies. Mar. Biotechnol. 2018, 20, 718–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Geng, H.; Yuan, Y.; Adayi, A.; Zhang, X.; Song, X.; Gong, L.; Zhang, X.; Gao, P. Engineered chimeric peptides with antimicrobial and titanium-binding functions to inhibit biofilm formation on Ti implants. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2018, 82, 141–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wei, L.; Gao, J.; Zhang, S.; Wu, S.; Xie, Z.; Ling, G.; Kuang, Y.Q.; Yang, Y.; Yu, H.; Wang, Y. Identification and Characterization of the First Cathelicidin from Sea Snakes with Potent Antimicrobial and Anti-inflammatory Activity and Special Mechanism. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 16633–16652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. RK22 kills S. aureus ATCC6538 and MRSA-Z by permeabilizing the cell membrane. After treatment with or without RK22 (100 μg/mL) for 4 h, the membrane morphology of S. aureus ATCC6538 (A) and MRSA-Z (B) was determined by SEM and TEM. Killing kinetics of RK22 against S. aureus ATCC6538 (C) and MRSA-Z (D) were investigated. Data represent means ± SD of 3 individual experiments.
Figure 1. RK22 kills S. aureus ATCC6538 and MRSA-Z by permeabilizing the cell membrane. After treatment with or without RK22 (100 μg/mL) for 4 h, the membrane morphology of S. aureus ATCC6538 (A) and MRSA-Z (B) was determined by SEM and TEM. Killing kinetics of RK22 against S. aureus ATCC6538 (C) and MRSA-Z (D) were investigated. Data represent means ± SD of 3 individual experiments.
Ijms 24 13453 g001
Figure 2. RK22 exhibits biofilm inhibition and eradication activities. Biofilm was measured at 600 nm after staining with 0.1% crystal violet. Inhibitory effects of RK22 on the biofilm formation of S. aureus ATCC6538 (A) and MRSA-Z (B) were analyzed after incubation with RK22 (final concentration 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 × MIC) with the bacteria for 24 h. Furthermore, to determine the effects of RK22 on the biofilm eradication, RK22 (final concentration 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 × MIC) was added into the wells with an established biofilm of S. aureus ATCC6538 (C) and MRSA-Z (D). Data represent means ± SD of 3 individual experiments. ns: difference was not significant. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 2. RK22 exhibits biofilm inhibition and eradication activities. Biofilm was measured at 600 nm after staining with 0.1% crystal violet. Inhibitory effects of RK22 on the biofilm formation of S. aureus ATCC6538 (A) and MRSA-Z (B) were analyzed after incubation with RK22 (final concentration 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 × MIC) with the bacteria for 24 h. Furthermore, to determine the effects of RK22 on the biofilm eradication, RK22 (final concentration 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 × MIC) was added into the wells with an established biofilm of S. aureus ATCC6538 (C) and MRSA-Z (D). Data represent means ± SD of 3 individual experiments. ns: difference was not significant. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Ijms 24 13453 g002
Figure 3. Effects of RK22 on the enzymatic activity of coagulation factors and platelet activation. Compared with the enhancement of LL-37 (final concentration 40 nM (0.18 μg/mL), 200 nM (0.9 μg/mL), 1000 nM (4.5 μg/mL)) on the enzymatic activity of thrombin and FXa, RK22 (final concentration 40 nM (0.112 μg/mL), 200 nM (0.56 μg/mL), 1000 nM (2.8 μg/mL)) showed no significant promotion on thrombin (A,B) and FXa (C,D). Furthermore, RK22 or LL-37 (20, 10, 5, 2.5 μg/mL) was incubated with washed platelets for 10 min, and then platelet activation was determined and analyzed by flow cytometry (E,F). Data represent means ± SD of 3 individual experiments. ns: difference was not significant. *** p < 0.001.
Figure 3. Effects of RK22 on the enzymatic activity of coagulation factors and platelet activation. Compared with the enhancement of LL-37 (final concentration 40 nM (0.18 μg/mL), 200 nM (0.9 μg/mL), 1000 nM (4.5 μg/mL)) on the enzymatic activity of thrombin and FXa, RK22 (final concentration 40 nM (0.112 μg/mL), 200 nM (0.56 μg/mL), 1000 nM (2.8 μg/mL)) showed no significant promotion on thrombin (A,B) and FXa (C,D). Furthermore, RK22 or LL-37 (20, 10, 5, 2.5 μg/mL) was incubated with washed platelets for 10 min, and then platelet activation was determined and analyzed by flow cytometry (E,F). Data represent means ± SD of 3 individual experiments. ns: difference was not significant. *** p < 0.001.
Ijms 24 13453 g003
Figure 4. RK22 suppresses the dissemination of S. aureus (ATCC6538) and MRSA-Z in vivo. Mice (n = 10–12 mice per group) were injected with S. aureus (ATCC6538 1 × 108 CFU/mouse, ip or MRSA-Z, 2 × 108 CFU/mouse, ip); 1 h later, samples (RK22: 2, 4, 8 mg/kg; vancomycin: 2, 4 mg/kg, saline as the negative control group) were intraperitoneally injected with the concentration indicated. After 4 h of administration, mice were sacrificed, blood (A,D) and lung (B,E) were collected for the measurement of bacterial loads. Additionally, the sections of lung were stained with hematoxylin & eosin (H&E) for histopathological analysis (C,F), scale bar: 100 μm. Data represent mean ± SD values of six independent experiments. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 4. RK22 suppresses the dissemination of S. aureus (ATCC6538) and MRSA-Z in vivo. Mice (n = 10–12 mice per group) were injected with S. aureus (ATCC6538 1 × 108 CFU/mouse, ip or MRSA-Z, 2 × 108 CFU/mouse, ip); 1 h later, samples (RK22: 2, 4, 8 mg/kg; vancomycin: 2, 4 mg/kg, saline as the negative control group) were intraperitoneally injected with the concentration indicated. After 4 h of administration, mice were sacrificed, blood (A,D) and lung (B,E) were collected for the measurement of bacterial loads. Additionally, the sections of lung were stained with hematoxylin & eosin (H&E) for histopathological analysis (C,F), scale bar: 100 μm. Data represent mean ± SD values of six independent experiments. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Ijms 24 13453 g004
Table 1. Physicochemical properties of peptides.
Table 1. Physicochemical properties of peptides.
PeptideSequenceLNCHPR (n/%)NPR (n/%)
KS14KSSNTKAKKKKKNN14+7−0.58913/92.861/7.14
RA19RAVLCPKPKPKKKKVCVVL19+70.3627/36.8412/63.16
KT20KTRRRNRKHKKTINTETVQI20+7−0.20317/853/15
VF21VFLICFSLISPASFENVRAKW21+10.7907/33.3314/66.67
RK22RKYKEKKDKSQNKKKKRKCMIL22+10−0.31617/77.275/22.73
KS34KSKSKKPSKSKPKKKKTSVVQQELQDVISFDFGC34+70.02924/70.5910/29.41
L: length; NC: Net charge; H: Hydrophobicity; PR: Polar residues; NPR: Nonpolar residues.
Table 2. Prediction score of peptides.
Table 2. Prediction score of peptides.
PeptideRandom Forest ClassEarth ClassEarth Prob. SourceE. coli Prob.S. aureus Prob.
KS14Non-AMPAMP0.520.630.37
RA19AMPNon-AMP0.210.930.07
KT20AMPNon-AMP0.020.740.26
VF21AMPAMP0.660.30.7
RK22AMPAMP0.50.520.48
KS34AMPNon-AMP0.150.860.14
Prob.: probability.
Table 3. Antimicrobial activity of the peptides against four standard strains.
Table 3. Antimicrobial activity of the peptides against four standard strains.
Bacteria StrainMIC (μg/mL)
KS14KS34KT20RK22VF21RA19
S. aureus (ATCC6538)50>100506.25>10012.5
A. baumannii, ATCC19606>100>100>100100>100>100
P. aeruginosa, ATCC9027>100>100>100>100>100>100
E. coli, ATCC25922>100>100>10025>100>100
Table 4. Antimicrobial activity of RK22 against S. aureus and five clinical isolates of S. aureus.
Table 4. Antimicrobial activity of RK22 against S. aureus and five clinical isolates of S. aureus.
Bacteria StrainMIC (μg/mL)
RK22Vancomycin
S. aureus (ATCC6538)6.251.56
MRSA-Z6.251.56
MRSA116.251.56
MRSA226.251.56
SA22082312.51.56
SA1577212.51.56
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lu, X.; Yang, M.; Zhou, S.; Yang, S.; Chen, X.; Khalid, M.; Wang, K.; Fang, Y.; Wang, C.; Lai, R.; et al. Identification and Characterization of RK22, a Novel Antimicrobial Peptide from Hirudinaria manillensis against Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 13453. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241713453

AMA Style

Lu X, Yang M, Zhou S, Yang S, Chen X, Khalid M, Wang K, Fang Y, Wang C, Lai R, et al. Identification and Characterization of RK22, a Novel Antimicrobial Peptide from Hirudinaria manillensis against Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(17):13453. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241713453

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lu, Xiaoyu, Min Yang, Shengwen Zhou, Shuo Yang, Xiran Chen, Mehwish Khalid, Kexin Wang, Yaqun Fang, Chaoming Wang, Ren Lai, and et al. 2023. "Identification and Characterization of RK22, a Novel Antimicrobial Peptide from Hirudinaria manillensis against Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 17: 13453. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241713453

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop