Next Article in Journal
Stereoselective Covalent Adduct Formation of Acyl Glucuronide Metabolite of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs with UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase
Previous Article in Journal
NVCL-Based Hydrogels and Composites for Biomedical Applications: Progress in the Last Ten Years
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Homozygous Deep Intronic Variant Causes Von Willebrand Factor Deficiency and Lack of Endothelial-Specific Secretory Organelles, Weibel–Palade Bodies
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Exploring Diverse Coagulation Factor XIII Subunit Expression Datasets: A Bioinformatic Analysis

Institute of Experimental Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital of Bonn, Building 043, Venusberg Campus 1, 53127 Bonn, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(9), 4725; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23094725
Submission received: 31 March 2022 / Accepted: 18 April 2022 / Published: 25 April 2022

Abstract

:
Coagulation factor XIII (FXIII) circulates in plasma as a pro-transglutaminase heterotetrameric complex (FXIIIA2B2), which upon activation by thrombin and calcium covalently crosslinks preformed fibrin polymers. The heterotetrameric complex is composed of a catalytic FXIIIA2 subunit and a protective/regulatory FXIII-B2 subunit coded by F13A1 and F13B genes, respectively. The catalytic FXIIIA2 subunit is encoded by the F13A1 gene, expressed primarily in cells of mesenchymal origin, whereas the FXIIIB subunit encoded by the F13B gene is expressed and secreted from hepatocytes. The plasma FXIIIA2 subunit, which earlier was believed to be secreted from cells of megakaryocytic lineage, is now understood to result primarily from resident macrophages. The regulation of the FXIII subunits at the genetic level is still poorly understood. The current study adopts a purely bioinformatic approach to analyze the temporal, time-specific expression array-data corresponding to both the subunits in specific cell lineages, with respect to the gene promoters. We analyze the differentially expressed genes correlated with F13A1 and F13B expression levels in an array of cell types, utilizing publicly available microarray data. We attempt to understand the regulatory mechanism underlying the variable expression of FXIIIA2 subunit in macrophages (M0, M1, M2 and aortic resident macrophages). Similarly, the FXIIIB2 subunit expression data from adult, fetal hepatocytes and embryonic stem cells derived hepatoblasts (hESC-hepatoblast) was analyzed. The results suggest regulatory dependence between the two FXIII subunits at the transcript level. Our analysis also predicts the involvement of the FXIIIA2 subunit in macrophage polarization, plaque stability, and inflammation.

1. Introduction

To prevent hemorrhagic trauma upon injury, activated fibrin molecules assemble to form strong mesh-like structures known as fibrin clot. Although the generation of fibrin clot marks the end of the blood coagulation cascade, the resulting soluble clot is still susceptible to premature fibrinolysis. The conversion of this soluble clot to an insoluble one resistant to premature fibrinolysis is ensured by the crosslinking of pre-formed fibrin polymers by coagulation Factor XIII (FXIII), by virtue of its transglutaminase activity. In plasma, FXIII exists with the heterotetramer zymogenic complex with dimeric catalytic FXIIIA subunits, and dimeric protective FXIIIB subunits bind non-covalently to each other. In plasma, the overall abundance of this pro-transglutaminase complex (FXIIIA2B2) is ≈68 nM, with the two subunits bound with high affinity (Kd 1.5 nM) [1]. Upon activation by thrombin and sequential calcium-binding, this complex dissociates, releasing the catalytically active monomeric FXIIIA subunit for cross-linking fibrin [2]. Only an insignificant amount of free FXIIIA is present in plasma, although there are almost two times the amount of FXIIIB in plasma compared to FXIIIA subunit, thereby resulting in a significant amount of free the FXIIIB subunit. Plasma FXIIIA is now understood to be contributed to by cells of myeloid lineage derived from the bone marrow, although it is expressed in several other cell types such as monocytes, monocyte-derived macrophages, and platelets. The FXIIIB subunit is expressed in hepatocytes [3]. The zymogenic FXIII circulates in plasma bound to fibrinogen (Kd 10 nM) [4]. Other than covalently crosslinking fibrin molecules to itself, FXIII crosslinks other fibrin stabilizers such as (α 2-PI, PAI, TAFI, etc.) to the growing fibrin clot as well [5,6]. The deficiency of FXIII, inherited or acquired, is known to cause bleeding predispositions, where congenital FXIII deficiency is due to defects either of the F13A1 (at genetic locus 6p24-25) or F13B genes (at genetic locus 1q32-32.1). The global prevalence of inherited FXIII deficiency is low (1–4 cases per million), which brings it under the category of rare bleeding disorders. Most defects associated with severe bleeding symptoms in inherited FXIII deficiency are largely due to defects in the F13A1 gene, whereas gene defects in the F13B gene have been shown to be causing mild to moderate symptoms [7]. More than 100 distinct FXIII mutations from F13A1 and F13B genes have been identified in patients with a broad spectrum of pathological phenotype severity that includes post-operative prolonged bleeding, delayed re-bleeding, and spontaneous abortion during the first trimester of pregnancy due to placental dysfunction. Over 500 cases of severe FXIII deficiency have been reported worldwide. In the past decade, clinical data have shown that although inherited FXIII deficiency is autosomal recessively inherited, the carriers or the heterozygous state of some of these FXIII gene defects can also bleed unusually when exposed to physical trauma [8].
Apart from its role in coagulation, several other roles outside coagulation have been discovered for the catalytic FXIIIA subunit. These roles encompass wound healing, chronic inflammatory bowel diseases, atherosclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, chronic inflammatory lung diseases, chronic rhinosinusitis, solid tumors, hematological malignancies, and obesity [9]. Our group has previously reported on the novel potential binding partners of FXIIIB subunit based on co-immunoprecipitation studies i.e., α2-MG and complement factor C1q [10]. However, we could not find the direct roles of FXIIIB in complement activation in spite of its strong sequence homology and expected structural similarity to the complement factor H protein [10,11]. The FXIIIA subunit is expressed in a wide range of cells, including platelets, megakaryocytes, monocytes, and monocyte-derived cells, while the primary source of the FXIIIB subunit is hepatocytes [3,12]. Recent reports on FXIIIA expression and secretion exclude platelets and all their precursors as a major source of plasma FXIIIA. Although intracellularly the level of expression, activation, and secretion of FXIIIA is independent of its plasma partner FXIIIB subunits, it has been reported in several cases that the defect/reduction in one subunit often is accompanied by a reduction in levels for the other subunit as well. While this effect is anticipated for F13B mutations, because the FXIIIB subunit is the protective partner in the heterotetrameric complex, it is a little bit harder to explain the same observation for defects in the F13A1 gene. This compels one to investigate if there is any co-regulatory mechanism shared by the two subunits that are expressed in different lineages yet define the final available dosage of potentially active FXIII transglutaminase in plasma. Previously, it has been reported that the pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages show lower to no expression of F13A1, compared to anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages [13]. In this context, F13A1 has also been reported to be associated with carcinomas lately [14]. In several reports published earlier, based on the RNA-seq data, groups have reported a correlation of F13A1 in diabetes-prone mice, osteoarthritis, and cancer, as one of the significant hits affected by altered cytokine signaling in these pathological states, indicating its role in these inflammatory states. A study performed in 2005 reported F13A1 differential gene expression during macrophage polarization by RT-PCR and single-cell analyses [15]. The revelation that FXIIIA protein could be used as an intracellular marker for alternatively activated macrophages (the fully polarized classically (type I) and alternatively (type II) activated macrophages) compels one to look deeper at whether F13A1 has any direct role in macrophage maturation and polarization.
The current availability of abundant data being submitted in expression databases such as gene expression omnibus (GEO) provides the opportunity to bioinformaticians to investigate trends and patterns within these datasets, which in turn provide us with valuable insights into several functional and physiological mechanisms. Advanced bioinformatics tools and increased computational power have made it possible for us to understand the dynamic behavior of these biological data sets. To understand the roles and involvement of FXIII subunits in dynamic biological processes intra and extracellularly considering the overall gene expression as read-outs, such as hepatocyte maturation, the development of atherosclerotic plaque, and macrophage polarization, we have utilized the publicly available RNA-microarray data sampled at different time points to understand and capture expression-switching with respect to time, and the behavior of transcriptome. Since the cells of bone-marrow and mesenchymal lineage have so far been reported to be responsible for stable F13A1 expression, we have investigated the micro-array data derived from macrophages, which are also major players in immunity. Similarly, microarray data derived from hepatocytes is investigated for F13B expression behavior. Recent reports on reduction in plasma levels of FXIIIA, upon acquired deficiency of FXIIIB subunit, also motivates one to investigate the pathways responsible for the common regulation of the two subunits [16]. This study, however, explains that such an acquired response does not affect the FXIIIA pool within the platelets. Interesting reports on platelet FXIIIA characterization also suggest that platelet FXIIIA is not responsible for the maintenance of the plasma pool of FXIII. After the identification of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) correlating with F13A and F13B expression levels in respective datasets, a common regulatory pathway is traced by characterizing the promoters and transcriptional regulators at each time point and cell type. To address the mode of FXIII expression regulation, for both of its subunits here we attempted to adopt a pure bioinformatics approach to analyze the temporal, time-specific expression array data corresponding to both the subunits in specific cell lineages with respect to the gene promoters. Differentially expressed genes with respect to the expression of the FXIII subunit genes in different cell lineages were predicted for their potential roles in cellular pathways.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Extraction

Expression data were extracted from NCBI GEO (GSE128303, GSE98324, GSE39157, and GSE41571) for macrophages (time-series), hepatic progenitor, hepatocytes, and human-embryonic-stem-cells-derived hepatoblasts, respectively, [13,17,18,19,20,21]. GSE128303 and GSE98324 were available for illumina human ht12-v4 expression beadchip arrays, whereas GSE39157 and GSE41571 were analyzed using Affymetrix Human Gene 1.0 ST arrays (HuGene-1_0-st) and Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array (HG-U133_Plus_2). As a summary, we put together the following purified human-derived expression data sets:
GSE128303: In the original study corresponding to this dataset, primary human monocyte-derived macrophages isolated from four donors were matured in the presence of recombinant human IL-4, followed by LPS treatment (Salmonella enterica, 200 ng/mL) for 90 min [17]. LPS-treated samples were diluted to a final concentration of 100 ng/mL LPS for the time following the initial 90-min incubation. Samples were collected at 6 h and 24 h post-initiation of infection for a total of 12 treatments in biological quadruplicate for 48 total samples. In this present analysis, out of the 12 treatments performed by Miller et al. resulting in 48 samples, we filtered 8 samples (LPS treated) derived from 4 donors, one for each time point (6 h and 24 h). Platform: Illumina HumanHT-12 V4.0 expression beadchip.
GSE98324: In the original study corresponding to this dataset, research groups at the National University of Singapore collected array data from 32 distinct human-derived samples [18]. From this comprehensive data set, we have used the array data for four samples attributed to hESCs (Human ESC-derived Hepatic Progenitor Under Base Condition). Platform: Illumina HumanHT-12 V4.0 expression beadchip.
GSE39157: In the original study corresponding to this dataset, array data derived from total RNA were obtained from cultured primary hepatocytes and hESC-derived hepatic populations [19]. In the present study, we have used the primary hepatocyte and hESC-derived untreated hepatoblast culture, derived expression array data. Platform: (HuGene-1_0-st) Affymetrix Human Gene 1.0 ST Array (transcript (gene) version).
GSE41571: In the original study corresponding to this dataset, expression data derived from genome-wide expression analyses of isolated macrophage-rich regions of stable and ruptured human atherosclerotic plaques were reported [20,21]. Platform: (HG-U133_Plus_2) Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array.

2.2. Data Processing

Illumina Human HT12-v4 Expression BeadChip: Raw data from GEO was downloaded as “idat” files for illumina human ht12-v4 platform. IDAT files were imported into R using “read.idat” function in “Iimma” package [22]. Data were background-corrected and quantile-normalized using “neqc” function in “limma” package. Finally, data were filtered for probes not detected in any cell type by using “detectionPvalues” method; this method identified the observed expression values of probes in comparison to the negative control probes and provides us with the p-values for probe expression. Data were also tested for batch effects using “ComBat” function in “sva” package, but no batch effect was removed as the data has a non-significant batch effect [23].
Affymetrix Arrays: The normalized series matrix file was downloaded from the NCBI GEO database for both Affymetrix array data, and this file was filtered for the detection p-value, where the probe signal was found to be statistically significant against background signal. Probes with non-significant probe signals were removed, and significant probes were further analyzed using the Qlucore Omics Explorer 3.5 (www.qlucore.com (accessed on 6 Jun 2020)) (Qlucore AB, Lund, Sweden).
Data Import: All expression arrays data were imported separately into Qlucore Omics Explorer 3.5 (www.qlucore.com (accessed on 6 Jun 2020)) using import wizard with sample annotation, as well as probes annotation for individual array platforms.

2.3. Differential Gene Expression Analysis

Differentially expressed genes (DEG) were identified using Qlucore Omics Explorer 3.5 (www.qlucore.com (accessed on 6 Jun 2020)). A Student t-test was used to compare two samples, whereas an ANOVA was used for multiple-sample comparison. Significance values of p < 0.05 or 5% of the false discovery rate were used as statistically significant. Fold changes were also calculated for volcano plots.
Gene Ontology and Pathway Analysis: Gene ontology analyses were carried out using Cytoscape 3.7.1 [24]. Biological processes were identified using “Bingo” plugin in Cytoscape [25]. Visualizations of significant ontologies were carried out using the “EnrichmentMap” plugin in Cytoscape [26]. Tox functions were identified using ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) (QIAGEN Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA, https://www.qiagen-bioinformatics.com/products/ingenuity-pathway-analysis (accessed on 6 Jun 2020)) [27].
Promoter Sequence: The F13A1 and F13B promoter sequences were downloaded from the eukaryotic promoter database (EPD, www.epd.epfl.ch (accessed on 6 Jun 2020)) [28,29]. The promoter sequence of 1 kb upstream and 1 kb downstream from the transcription start site was downloaded from EPD, and a 2 kb long sequence was downloaded as a “fasta” file for further transcription factor analysis.
Transcription factors analysis: The transcription factors binding to the promoter of F13A1 and F13B downloaded from EPD were identified using the TRANSFAC professional database from geneXplain [30,31,32]. Transcription factor binding sites were identified as transcription factor matrices (TF-matrices; each transcription factor matrix is comprised of multiple transcription factors with same binding sites; similarly, one transcription factor could bind to multiple binding sites. All TRANSFAC analyses were carried out using the data version of 2019.3 with the selected profile of matrices with a minimum sum of false positive and false negative, and only high-quality matrices were used for the analyses [32]. Further analyses of transcription factors matrices were carried out using R.

2.4. Visualization and Plots

Principal component analysis and heatmaps were generated using Qlucore Omics Explorer 3.5 (www.qlucore.com (accessed on 6 Jun 2020)). Volcano plots and correlation plots were generated using R programming. Box plots were generated using the GraphPad Prism 8. Pathways, gene networks, and tox functions plots were created using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. Gene ontology plots were generated using Cytoscape 3.6. Transcription factors binding consensus sequences were downloaded from TRANSFAC.

3. Results

3.1. Genes Correlated with F13A1 and F13B Have Specific Biological Processes as well as a Common Function of Immune Response

The F13A1 and F13B genes were observed to be expressed in macrophages and liver cells, respectively. Reversibly, no expression for the F13A1 and F13B genes was observed in macrophages and liver cells, respectively. The FXIIIA subunit expression reduces significantly with the maturation of macrophages. Macrophages at 6 h (monocyte-derived macrophages) showed high levels of the F13A1 transcript, which after 24 h goes down to ≈50% of its original expression (Figure 1A). Overall, macrophages showed 143 probes (114 probes upregulated at 6 h, 29 probes upregulated in 24 h) to be differentially expressed across 6 h and 24 h time-points at p ≤ 0.05, with a mean difference greater than 1. Additionally, 170 probes (positive correlated = 138 probes, negative correlated = 32 probes) were found to be significantly correlated with F13A1 expression in macrophages at correlation > 0.5 and with a mean difference greater than 1 (Figure 1B). The top hits reveal genes such as SERPINB2, CCL17, CCL2, CCL13, and SLC39A8 having a strong positive correlation to F13A1 expression (>0.5 Pearson’s correlation) (Figure 1C). The gene ontology analysis of negatively correlated genes showed no significant biological process, whereas positively correlated genes showed strong enrichment of response-based terms (i.e., immune response, stress response, response to wounding, etc.) (a detailed ontology list is shown in Figure 1D), sterol process biosynthetic, and endocytosis. F13B expression is not significantly different between liver progenitor and hepatocytes, but mildly high expression was observed in adult hepatocytes. No F13B transcript was observed in macrophages (i.e., above detection level) (Figure 2A). Liver progenitor and hepatocytes are very different cell types since liver progenitor cells differentiate into diverse cell types whereas hepatocytes are liver-specific cells. Differential gene expression analysis between hepatocytes and liver progenitor cells showed a high number of differentially expressed genes (14494 probes at p < 0.05 and mean difference greater than 1) (Figure 2B). Meanwhile, FXIIIB expression was showing non-significant expression difference between hepatocytes and liver progenitor; hence, only 245 probes (positive correlated = 165 probes, negative correlated = 80) were found to be significantly correlated (correlation > 0.5) with FXIIIB expression and have a mean difference above 1 between liver progenitor and hepatocytes (Figure 2C). The gene ontology analysis of correlated genes with F13B showed enrichment in terms of the immune response and wound healing-related biological processes (Figure 2D). The basal level of expression of F13B (in hepatocytes) as compared to F13A1 (in macrophages) was ≈four times higher. This might explain the higher levels of the FXIIIB2 subunit in plasma compared to the FXIIIA2 subunit (≈2 times), owing to which there is a significant amount of free unbound FXIIIB2 subunit in the plasma.

3.1.1. Genes for Both the FXIII Subunits Have a Common Inhibitor/Suppressor Transcription Factor Binding Site

On analyses of the extended 2 kb long promoter for both F13A1 and F13B genes, the transcription factors (TFs) binding to these extended promoters using TRANSFAC professionals, were identified. TRANSFAC predicted 100 and 96 TF-Matrices binding to 636 and 542 binding sites on F13A1 and F13B promoters, respectively (see Supplementary Figure S1 and Supplementary Table S1). These matrices correspond to 465 and 421 probes in the expression data of macrophages and liver cells, respectively. Differential gene expression analysis of these transcription factors gave us 68 probes when macrophages at the 6 h time point were compared with macrophages at the 24 h time point. A comparison between liver progenitor and hepatocytes gave 202 probes of differentially expressed transcription factors (see Supplementary). Further, the correlation between the differentially expressed transcription factors of F13A1 and F13B was calculated. It was found that the V$EBOX_Q6_01 transcription factor matrix was found both positively and negatively correlated with F13A1 expression. In the given matrix “MXD1, SERBF2, and MITF” were found to be highly positively correlated with F13A1 expression, whereas “TCF12, MAX, HES2, MNT, MXI1, and MYCN” were found to be highly negatively correlated (Figure 3A). Similarly, V$EBOX_Q6_01 also showed a statistically significant correlation with F13B, where “HES6” was found to be highly negatively correlated with F13B. The transcription factor binding elements “MXD1 and HES6” were found to be negatively correlated (with F13B) with a Pearson’s correlation below 0.75 and p-value < 0.01 (Figure 3B). A positive correlation was observed for V$RFX_01 binding sites, where the “RFX5” transcription factor was found to be highly positively correlated with F13B expression (Figure 3B). A closer comparison of these transcription factor binding elements revealed 375 TFs common to both F13A1 and F13B genes (Figure 4A). A similar expression pattern was observed for 196 TFs (115 upregulated, and 85 downregulated) out of 375 common TFs in time series macrophages, as well as liver progenitor vs. hepatocytes, whereas the opposite pattern was observed for the remaining common 179 TFs (86 upregulated in time series macrophages, and 93 upregulated in hepatocytes vs. liver progenitor), which were predicted to bind to both F13A1 and F13B yet show a reverse pattern of expression. An assessment of canonical pathways associated with all these ‘commonly regulating’ transcription factors revealed that the TFs correlated with F13 genes expression in the given cells are majorly responsible for cellular maturation, pluripotency, and development (Figure 4B).

3.1.2. Common TFs Binding to Both Subunits Are Related to Cardiac Anomaly

We have found that 80 transcription factor matrices were found to bind both F13A1 and F13B. These 80 transcription factor matrices corresponded to 375 transcription factors. Tox functions from the ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) of these 375 transcription factors showed enrichment in congenital heart anomaly, cardiac proliferation, cardiac enlargement, liver necrosis, and liver proliferation. This tox function shows that transcription factors binding to both F13A1 and F13B play a significant role in pathological conditions such as cardiac anomaly (Figure 4C).

3.1.3. F13A1 Expression Profiles Reveal Its Participation in Macrophage Polarization

Relative gene expression of F13A1 was significantly higher in M0 and M2 macrophages when compared to M1 (Figure 5A). A correlation gives us a measure of variability between two features with respect to the target variable, here being F13A expression. We found 4669 genes correlated to F13A1 expression during the M0-M1 switch, whereas we found 4817 genes in the case of M1-M2 switching (Figure 5C). The upstream regulator analysis of F13A1 and its correlated genes in both cases resulted in the prediction of common regulators (activation z scores >2 is considered significant). In the case of the M0-M1 switch, MAFB (z-score 3.945) and IL10RA (z-score 4.666) regulators are predicted to be inhibited in the genes that are correlated to F13A1 expression, whereas in the case of the M1-M2 switch, IL1B (z-score 4.249) and TFRG (z-score 3.097) are the predicted regulators to be activated, and TGFB1 (z-score 3.902), IL10RA z-score 4.972), IL-13 (z-score 4.446), and IL-4 (z-score 4.078) are the regulators predicted to be inactivated in the genes correlated to F13A1 expression (Figure 5D).

3.1.4. Stabilized Levels of F13A1 in Resident Macrophages Isolated from Ruptured and Stable Human Atheromatous Lesions

No differential expression for F13A1 was observed among the array data of resident microphages isolated from ruptured and stable human atheromatous lesions, most likely because all profiles were characteristic of activated macrophages, as also indicated by hierarchical clustering of the data set (Figure 6A,B). We found 1249 genes correlated to F13A1 gene expression between the ruptured thin fibrous cap arthromere and stable plaques, whereas 4425 genes correlated to F13A1 expression as in stable calcific plaque and Stable Thick Fibrous Cap Atheroma (Figure 6C). The upstream regulator analyses of the correlated genes predicted 1L1B (z-score 2.284) as the major regulator (activation z scores > 2 is considered significant) for these correlated genes for ruptured thin fibrous cap arthromere and stable calcific plaques, whereas, in case of progression from stable calcific plaques to Stable Thick Fibrous Cap Atheroma, IL4 (z-score 4.052), IL1B (z-score 4.272), IL13 (z-score 3.527), GATA2 (z-score 2.299), CTNNB1 (z-score 3.911), and MAF8 (z-score 3.327) were found to be significantly regulating the genes correlating to the F13A1 expression pattern (Figure 6D).

4. Discussion

The NCBI-GEO (gene expression and molecular abundance repository) serves as one of the largest publicly available repositories for raw as well as curated array-based expression data, deposited by the scientific fraternity for further analyses, interpretation, and validation. Such large datasets enable and promote meta-analyses where raw data generated and deposited from one working group can be accessed, analyzed, and validated using several other bioinformatics tools to derive a better understanding of biological data. In the present study, we have utilized the GSE data records for different array-data analyzed here, which defines sets of samples and how they are related (here, for example, macrophages (M1, M2, and M0), liver cells (hepatocytes and liver progenitor cells), and plaque-derived resident macrophages (from stable and ruptured plaques)). This work is an attempt to translate bioinformatics data into meaningful interpretive FXIII research that could direct future investigations into the cellular expression profile of FXIII.
The multitude of data sets described in the methods section is referred to and extracted for this present overview of FXIII subunit roles and its respective subunit expression, promoter specifications, and inter-related mode of regulation. We have tried to include the expression data from all stages of respective subunit-expressing cells (macrophages and hepatocytes, for F13A1 and F13B, respectively). FXIIIA has been long been understood to be a key molecule in the inflammation-coagulation-complement axis. The bench data from several meta-analyses suggest that F13A1 expression is strongly correlated to inflammation-like cellular responses; the temporal array data analyzed for cell-specific expression also reveal that the genes correlated with the F13A1 and F13B differential expression pattern are largely involved in a common function of the immune response. The presented data here reveal that F13A1 expression levels in macrophages are strongly positively correlated to genes responsible for cell differentiation and migration, largely in an immune setup (CCL17, CCL2, and CCL13); genes responsible for indirect clot stabilization (SERPINB2); and intracellular transporters such as SLC39A8 (Figure 1). These genes have earlier also been reported to act in synergy and to be involved in the coagulation-complement axis, e.g., in an earlier report, F13A1 has been shown to be correlated with SERPINB2, MAF, IGF1, MAFB, and IL10, although the primary take-home message for this regarded the effect of Activin A on macrophage polarization, as a result of M-CSF based activation [33]. The observation that reduced plasma levels of the FXIIIB domain secondarily reduces the plasma levels of the available active FXIIIA domain is also translated into the curated array data here, where we see the basal expression of F13B genes almost four-times higher than that of F13A1 (Figure 3 and Figure 4). The strong dependency of the two subunit plasma titers, which result in secondary deficiency of FXIIIB in the absence of FXIIIA in plasma and vice versa, draws attention towards the possible common regulation of the two subunits [34,35]. We observe that the FXIII subunit genes have a common inhibitor/suppressor predicted transcription factor binding site supporting the possibility of inter-regulation at the transcript level (Figure 4). This means that the defective activation of transcription in one partner gene might lead to no activation of transcription in the other partner. More experimental validation data in this context are needed to build upon this prediction. We further find that the Common TFs binding to both subunits are related to cardiac anomaly. The association of transcriptional regulation of the F13A1 gene with cardiac anomaly does not come as a surprise for us since FXIII has often been related to defects in the cardiovascular system [36].
High levels of intracellular FXIIIA (in monocyte-derived macrophages) are reported to perform functions related to cellular remodeling, crosslinking of the cytoskeleton, microtubule assembly, etc. (given that FXIIIA has several substrates within the cell) [37]. However, similar high levels of intracellular FXIIIA (as in monocyte-derived macrophages) are not detected in phagocytic or secretory vesicles, indicating that FXIIIA might play a direct role in cell-fate determination (M1 or M2), possibly by altering the cellular substructure [15]. More recently, work published by Alshehri et al. proposed that although monocytes do not contribute to plasma FXIIIA, in the case of VTE, entrapped monocytes expose FXIIIA on their surfaces to the fibrin clot surface [12]. The study reveals differential expression of F13A1 in the presence of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokine-based stimulation of monocytes. On profiling the array data from M1 and M2 macrophages, strong expression of F13A1 in M2 was observed; the time-based array indicates that FXIII-A most likely contributes to macrophage polarization (Figure 5). As discussed by Alshehri et al., the monocytes entrapped in thrombus largely have an M2 phenotype, and the fact they expose FXIII is not surprising as it has established roles in wound-healing. The presence of highly correlated genes (linear regression p < 0.05) with FXIII in macrophage polarization towards M2-switch supports this notion (See Supplementary Table S1). Additionally, the upstream regulator analyses predicted (by identifying F13A1 co-expressed genes) that upstream regulators such as growth factors, transcription factors, and interleukins are targeting both F13A1- and F13A1-correlated genes, which may suggest an association between F13A1 and macrophage polarization, i.e., macrophage polarization towards an M2 phenotype and increased expression of F13A1 occur in a temporal manner and are not mutually independent events (Figure 5). There is coexistence of a common upstream regulator covey for F13A1 and its correlated genes during M0/M1 and M1/M2 switch that conjoins these two events as a cause-and-effect (Figure 5).
Mice-based knock-out studies using the Cre/lox system indicated that the plasma FXIIIA pool is derived primarily from aortic resident macrophages and not from platelets [14]. The study suggests that not the monocyte-derived macrophages but resident macrophages are responsible for keeping up the plasma pool of FXIIIA, the primary aortic resident macrophages [14]. While we did not find time-point-based resident macrophage data to define the primary transcription factors that contribute to the eventual plasma FXIII levels, we were able to assess the resident macrophages, plaque-derived array data to be analyzed from another perspective. Our analysis from these resident macrophages reveals that the F13A1 gene acts as a coadjutant in plaque fate, rather than being detrimental towards its progression. The bioinformatics data reveal and support the existence of a strong role of FXIIIA in inflammation, cellular remodeling, and remodeling of atheroma as well. The lack of any significant differential expression in the three stages analyzed here strongly indicates that FXIIIA is directly involved in plaque stability; it plays no role in plaque formation, progression, rupture, and/or healing but in plaque maintenance (Figure 6, also see Supplementary Table S1). The significantly upregulated upstream regulatory element for F13A1 and its correlated genes is predicted to be “MafB” (z-score 3.945) (Figure 6), which is found to be quintessential for plaque growth by other groups by gene knock out studies [38]. However, the analyzed data set defines that the resident macrophages isolated from the plaque samples are activated. Recent data reported by Verma et al. reveal that F13A1 overexpression is seen only in the advanced stages of atherosclerotic plaques, and it is likely to be upregulated as a result of cytokine-storm in advanced stages of atherosclerotic plaque [39]. Secondly, our data only take into consideration the resident macrophages derived from plaque.
As a summary and conclusion, analyses and profiling of time-series-based micro-array expression data derived from different cell types expressing (and secreting) FXIIIA and FXIIIB subunit predict the inter-regulation of expression for both the genes. FXIIIA has roles beyond coagulation and is very likely to be involved in pro-inflammatory M2 phenotype switching of monocyte-derived macrophages. Owing to its role as a stabilizer, FXIIIA is likely to be indispensable for plaque maintenance at advanced stages of atherosclerotic plaque; however, is not needed for plaque initiation. Future studies are warranted for establishing effective, direct, and exclusive roles of FXIIIA molecule towards (a) macrophage polarization, (b) regulation of F13B gene expression, and (c) progression of early-stage plaque to advanced stages, in thrombus models.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms23094725/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: A.B.; methodology: M.A.J.; software: M.A.J.; validation: M.A.J., S.S. and A.B.; formal analysis: M.A.J. and S.S.; investigation: M.A.J. and S.S.; resources: A.B.; data curation: M.A.J., A.B. and S.S.; writing—original draft preparation: M.A.J. and S.S.; writing—review and editing: S.S., M.A.J., O.E.-M., J.O. and A.B.; visualization, M.A.J., A.B. and S.S.; supervision, A.B. and J.O.; project administration: A.B. and J.O.; and funding acquisition, S.S., O.E.-M., A.B. and J.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The position of S.S. is funded by DFG (SI 2767-1/1) under the individual research grant program awarded to S.S. The work in the lab of O.E.M. is partially supported by an investigator-initiated grant from TAKEDA (IIR-DE-002694). A.B has received funding from DFG for work on FXIII research (BI 1645/3-1).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The output files of evaluations done for this work are available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Singh, S.; Nazabal, A.; Kaniyappan, S.; Pellequer, J.-L.; Wolberg, A.S.; Imhof, D.; Oldenburg, J.; Biswas, A. The Plasma Factor XIII Heterotetrameric Complex Structure: Unexpected Unequal Pairing within a Symmetric Complex. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Singh, S.; Dodt, J.; Volkers, P.; Hethershaw, E.; Philippou, H.; Ivaskevicius, V.; Imhof, D.; Oldenburg, J.; Biswas, A. Structure functional insights into calcium binding during the activation of coagulation factor XIII A. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 11324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kaetsu, H.; Hashiguchi, T.; Foster, D.; Ichinose, K. Expression and Release of the a and b Subunits for Human Coagulation Factor XIII in Baby Hamster Kidney (BHK) Cells. J. Biochem. 1996, 119, 961–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Greenberg, C.; Miraglia, C.; Rickles, F.; Shuman, M. Cleavage of blood coagulation factor XIII and fibrinogen by thrombin during in vitro clotting. J. Clin. Investig. 1985, 75, 1463–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Folk, J.E.; Finlayson, J.S. The epsilon-(gamma-glutamyl)lysine crosslink and the catalytic role of transglutaminases. Adv. Protein Chem. 1977, 31, 1–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Adány, R.; Bárdos, H. Factor XIII subunit A as an intracellular transglutaminase. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2003, 60, 1049–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Karimi, M.; Bereczky, Z.; Cohan, N.; Muszbek, L. Factor XIII Deficiency. Semin. Thromb. Hemost. 2009, 35, 426–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Biswas, A.; Ivaskevicius, V.; Thomas, A.; Oldenburg, J. Coagulation factor XIII deficiency. Diagnosis, prevalence and management of inherited and acquired forms. Hamostaseologie 2014, 34, 160–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dull, K.; Fazekas, F.; Törőcsik, D. Factor XIII-A in Diseases: Role Beyond Blood Coagulation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Singh, S.; Akhter, M.S.; Dodt, J.; Volkers, P.; Reuter, A.; Reinhart, C.; Krettler, C.; Oldenburg, J.; Biswas, A. Identification of Potential Novel Interacting Partners for Coagulation Factor XIII B (FXIII-B) Subunit, a Protein Associated with a Rare Bleeding Disorder. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Akhter, M.S.; Singh, S.; Yadegari, H.; Ivaskevicius, V.; Oldenburg, J.; Biswas, A. Exploring the structural similarity yet functional distinction between coagulation factor XIII-B and complement factor H sushi domains. J. Thromb. Thrombolysis 2019, 48, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Alshehri, F.S.M.; Whyte, C.S.; Mutch, N.J. Factor XIII-A: An Indispensable “Factor” in Haemostasis and Wound Healing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Martinez, F.O.; Gordon, S.; Locati, M.; Mantovani, A. Transcriptional profiling of the human monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation and polarization: New molecules and patterns of gene expression. J. Immunol. 2006, 177, 7303–7311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Beckers, C.M.L.; Simpson, K.R.; Griffin, K.J.; Brown, J.M.; Cheah, L.T.; Smith, K.A.; Vacher, J.; Cordell, P.A.; Kearney, M.T.; Grant, P.J.; et al. Cre/lox Studies Identify Resident Macrophages as the Major Source of Circulating Coagulation Factor XIII-A. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2017, 37, 1494–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Töröcsik, D.; Bárdos, H.; Nagy, L.; Adány, R. Identification of factor XIII-A as a marker of alternative macrophage activation. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2005, 62, 2132–2139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Porrello, A.; Leslie, P.L.; Harrison, E.B.; Gorentla, B.K.; Kattula, S.; Ghosh, S.K.; Azam, S.H.; Holtzhausen, A.; Chao, Y.L.; Hayward, M.C.; et al. Factor XIIIA-expressing inflammatory monocytes promote lung squamous cancer through fibrin cross-linking. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Strilchuk, A.W.; Meixner, S.C.; Leung, J.; Safikhan, N.S.; Kulkarni, J.A.; Russell, H.M.; van der Meel, R.; Sutherland, M.R.; Owens, A.P.; Palumbo, J.S.; et al. Sustained depletion of FXIII-A by inducing acquired FXIII-B deficiency. Blood 2020, 136, 2946–2954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ang, L.T.; Tan, A.K.Y.; Autio, M.I.; Goh, S.H.; Choo, S.H.; Lee, K.L.; Tan, J.; Pan, B.; Lee, J.J.H.; Lum, J.J.; et al. A Roadmap for Human Liver Differentiation from Pluripotent Stem Cells. Cell Rep. 2018, 22, 2190–2205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. El-Maarri, O.; Jamil, M.A.; Oldenburg, J. Molecular Profiling of Liver Sinusoidal Endothelial Cells in Comparison to Hepatocytes: Reflection on Which Cell Type Should Be the Target for Gene Therapy. Hamostaseologie 2020, 40, S26–S31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Miller, J.L.; Hill, M.L.; Brun, J.; Pountain, A.; Sayce, A.C.; Zitzmann, N. Iminosugars counteract the downregulation of the interferon γ receptor by dengue virus. Antivir. Res. 2019, 170, 104551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lee, K.; Santibanez-Koref, M.; Polvikoski, T.; Birchall, D.; Mendelow, A.D.; Keavney, B. Increased expression of fatty acid binding protein 4 and leptin in resident macrophages characterises atherosclerotic plaque rupture. Atherosclerosis 2013, 226, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ogawa, S.; Surapisitchat, J.; Virtanen, C.; Ogawa, M.; Niapour, M.; Sugamori, K.S.; Wang, S.; Tamblyn, L.; Guillemette, C.; Hoffmann, E.; et al. Three-dimensional culture and cAMP signaling promote the maturation of human pluripotent stem cell-derived hepatocytes. Development 2013, 140, 3285–3296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Leek, J.T.; Johnson, W.E.; Parker, H.S.; Jaffe, A.E.; Storey, J.D. The sva package for removing batch effects and other unwanted variation in high-throughput experiments. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 882–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Maere, S.; Heymans, K.; Kuiper, M. BiNGO: A Cytoscape plugin to assess overrepresentation of gene ontology categories in biological networks. Bioinformatics 2005, 21, 3448–3449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Ritchie, M.E.; Phipson, B.; Wu, D.; Hu, Y.; Law, C.W.; Shi, W.; Smyth, G.K. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, e47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shannon, P.; Markiel, A.; Ozier, O.; Baliga, N.S.; Wang, J.T.; Ramage, D.; Amin, N.; Schwikowski, B.; Ideker, T. Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003, 13, 2498–2504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Krämer, A.; Green, J.; Pollard, J., Jr.; Tugendreich, S. Causal analysis approaches in Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 523–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Merico, D.; Isserlin, R.; Stueker, O.; Emili, A.; Bader, G.D. Enrichment map: A network-based method for gene-set enrichment visualization and interpretation. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e13984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dreos, R.; Ambrosini, G.; Périer, R.C.; Bucher, P. The Eukaryotic Promoter Database: Expansion of EPDnew and new promoter analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, D92–D96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Matys, V.; Kel-Margoulis, O.V.; Fricke, E.; Liebich, I.; Land, S.; Barre-Dirrie, A.; Reuter, I.; Chekmenev, D.; Krull, M.; Hornischer, K.; et al. TRANSFAC and its module TRANSCompel: Transcriptional gene regulation in eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, D108–D110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Qian, Z.; Cai, Y.-D.; Li, Y. Automatic transcription factor classifier based on functional domain composition. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2006, 347, 141–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Dreos, R.; Ambrosini, G.; Groux, R.; Cavin Périer, R.; Bucher, P. The eukaryotic promoter database in its 30th year: Focus on non-vertebrate organisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017, 45, D51–D55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Sierra-Filardi, E.; Puig-Kröger, A.; Blanco, F.J.; Nieto, C.; Bragado, R.; Palomero, M.I.; Bernabéu, C.; Vega, M.A.; Corbí, A.L. Activin A skews macrophage polarization by promoting a proinflammatory phenotype and inhibiting the acquisition of anti-inflammatory macrophage markers. Blood 2011, 117, 5092–5101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Biswas, A.; Ivaskevicius, V.; Thomas, A.; Varvenne, M.; Brand, B.; Rott, H.; Haussels, I.; Ruehl, H.; Scholz, U.; Klamroth, R.; et al. Eight novel F13A1 gene missense mutations in patients with mild FXIII deficiency: In silico analysis suggests changes in FXIII-A subunit structure/function. Ann. Hematol. 2014, 93, 1665–1676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Souri, M.; Osaki, T.; Ichinose, A. The Non-catalytic B Subunit of Coagulation Factor XIII Accelerates Fibrin Cross-linking. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 12027–12039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Gemmati, D.; Zeri, G.; Orioli, E.; Mari, R.; Moratelli, S.; Vigliano, M.; Marchesini, J.; Grossi, M.E.; Pecoraro, A.; Cuneo, A.; et al. Factor XIII-A dynamics in acute myocardial infarction: A novel prognostic biomarker? Thromb. Haemost. 2015, 114, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Jayo, A.; Conde, I.; Lastres, P.; Jiménez-Yuste, V.; González-Manchón, C. Possible role for cellular FXIII in monocyte-derived dendritic cell motility. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 88, 423–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Hasegawa, H.; Watanabe, T.; Kato, S.; Toshima, T.; Yokoyama, M.; Aida, Y.; Nishiwaki, M.; Kadowaki, S.; Narumi, T.; Honda, Y.; et al. The role of macrophage transcription factor MafB in atherosclerotic plaque stability. Atherosclerosis 2016, 250, 133–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Verma, S.; Kumar, A.; Narang, R.; Bisoi, A.K.; Mitra, D.K. Signature transcriptome analysis of stage specific atherosclerotic plaques of patients. medRxiv 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. An expression analysis of time-series macrophages (LPS treated) at 6 h and 24 h. (A) A box plot of F13A1 expression in macrophages at 6 h and macrophages at 24 h, as well as liver progenitor cells and hepatocytes. (B) A volcano plot of differentially expressed genes between 6 h and 24 h macrophages (red: significant p-value < 0.05 and absolute mean difference above 1; green: absolute mean difference above 1 and p-value > 0.05; and blue: significant p-value < 0.05 at absolute mean difference < 1) in dataset GSE128303. (C) Left: Bland–Altman plot between the correlation of F13A1 expression with other genes and the mean difference expression of genes between macrophages 6 h and 24 h; red = significantly positively correlated genes at Pearson’s correlation > 0.5 and absolute mean difference between 6 h and 24 h > 1; and green = significantly negatively correlated genes at Pearson’s correlation < −0.5 and absolute mean difference between 6 h and 24 h > 1. Right: top 6 markers from the Bland–Altmann plot between 6 h and 24 h. (D) Gene ontology (GO) analysis of significant genes from the Bland–Altman plot in part C-Left.
Figure 1. An expression analysis of time-series macrophages (LPS treated) at 6 h and 24 h. (A) A box plot of F13A1 expression in macrophages at 6 h and macrophages at 24 h, as well as liver progenitor cells and hepatocytes. (B) A volcano plot of differentially expressed genes between 6 h and 24 h macrophages (red: significant p-value < 0.05 and absolute mean difference above 1; green: absolute mean difference above 1 and p-value > 0.05; and blue: significant p-value < 0.05 at absolute mean difference < 1) in dataset GSE128303. (C) Left: Bland–Altman plot between the correlation of F13A1 expression with other genes and the mean difference expression of genes between macrophages 6 h and 24 h; red = significantly positively correlated genes at Pearson’s correlation > 0.5 and absolute mean difference between 6 h and 24 h > 1; and green = significantly negatively correlated genes at Pearson’s correlation < −0.5 and absolute mean difference between 6 h and 24 h > 1. Right: top 6 markers from the Bland–Altmann plot between 6 h and 24 h. (D) Gene ontology (GO) analysis of significant genes from the Bland–Altman plot in part C-Left.
Ijms 23 04725 g001
Figure 2. An expression analysis of F13B in liver progenitor cells and hepatocytes. (A) A box plot of F13B expression in liver progenitor cells, hepatocytes, and macrophages. (B) A volcano plot of differentially expressed genes between liver progenitor cells and hepatocytes at red: significant p-value < 0.05 and absolute mean difference between liver progenitor and hepatocytes above 1; green: the absolute mean difference between liver progenitor and hepatocytes above 1 but p-value > 0.05; and blue: statistical p-value < 0.05, but the absolute mean difference between liver progenitor and hepatocytes < 1. (C) The Bland–Altman plot between the correlation of F13B expression with other gene expressions and the mean expression difference of the genes between liver progenitor cells and hepatocytes; red: significantly positively correlated genes at Pearson’s-Correlation > 0.5 and the absolute mean difference between liver progenitor and hepatocytes > 1; green: significantly negatively correlated genes at Pearson’s Correlation < −0.5 and the absolute mean difference between liver progenitor and hepatocytes > 1. (D) A gene ontology analysis of significant genes from the Bland–Altman plot in part (C).
Figure 2. An expression analysis of F13B in liver progenitor cells and hepatocytes. (A) A box plot of F13B expression in liver progenitor cells, hepatocytes, and macrophages. (B) A volcano plot of differentially expressed genes between liver progenitor cells and hepatocytes at red: significant p-value < 0.05 and absolute mean difference between liver progenitor and hepatocytes above 1; green: the absolute mean difference between liver progenitor and hepatocytes above 1 but p-value > 0.05; and blue: statistical p-value < 0.05, but the absolute mean difference between liver progenitor and hepatocytes < 1. (C) The Bland–Altman plot between the correlation of F13B expression with other gene expressions and the mean expression difference of the genes between liver progenitor cells and hepatocytes; red: significantly positively correlated genes at Pearson’s-Correlation > 0.5 and the absolute mean difference between liver progenitor and hepatocytes > 1; green: significantly negatively correlated genes at Pearson’s Correlation < −0.5 and the absolute mean difference between liver progenitor and hepatocytes > 1. (D) A gene ontology analysis of significant genes from the Bland–Altman plot in part (C).
Ijms 23 04725 g002
Figure 3. The transcription factor analysis of F13A1 and F13B using TRANSFAC. (A) An illustration of the predicted transcription factor binding to the F13A1 promoter; pink: the positively correlated expression of transcription factor with F13A1 expression; green: the negatively correlated expression of transcription factor with F13A1 expression. Blue: the density of the transcription factor at a particular position on the gene-promoter. A heatmap of transcription factors binding to a specific binding site represented as a transcription factor matrix. (B) An illustration of predicted transcription factor binding to the F13B promoter; pink: the positively correlated expression of the transcription factor with F13B expression; green: the negatively correlated expression of the transcription factor with F13B expression. Blue: the density of the transcription factor at a particular position. The above heatmap of the correlation between transcription factors and F13B expression; the below heatmap of transcription factors binding to a specific binding site represented as a transcription factor matrix.
Figure 3. The transcription factor analysis of F13A1 and F13B using TRANSFAC. (A) An illustration of the predicted transcription factor binding to the F13A1 promoter; pink: the positively correlated expression of transcription factor with F13A1 expression; green: the negatively correlated expression of transcription factor with F13A1 expression. Blue: the density of the transcription factor at a particular position on the gene-promoter. A heatmap of transcription factors binding to a specific binding site represented as a transcription factor matrix. (B) An illustration of predicted transcription factor binding to the F13B promoter; pink: the positively correlated expression of the transcription factor with F13B expression; green: the negatively correlated expression of the transcription factor with F13B expression. Blue: the density of the transcription factor at a particular position. The above heatmap of the correlation between transcription factors and F13B expression; the below heatmap of transcription factors binding to a specific binding site represented as a transcription factor matrix.
Ijms 23 04725 g003
Figure 4. The common transcription regulation of F13A1 and F13B. (A) Left: the Venn Diagram of the positive and negative correlation of TFs binding to F13A1 and F13B, in macrophages 6 h vs. 24 h and liver progenitors cells vs. hepatocytes respectively. Right: the transcription factors expression difference in macrophage 6 h vs. 24 h and liver progenitor vs. hepatocytes for common transcription factors binding to both F13A1 and F13B. (B) The top 10 canonical pathways of common transcription factors binding to both F13A1 and F13B; red: the overlap transcription factor from our analysis; and grey: the total number of molecules in the pathway. (C) Left: the heatmap of all tox functions enriched with common transcription factors binding to both F13A1 and F13B; right: the Top 10 Tox functions of the common transcription factor binding to both F13A1 and F13B.
Figure 4. The common transcription regulation of F13A1 and F13B. (A) Left: the Venn Diagram of the positive and negative correlation of TFs binding to F13A1 and F13B, in macrophages 6 h vs. 24 h and liver progenitors cells vs. hepatocytes respectively. Right: the transcription factors expression difference in macrophage 6 h vs. 24 h and liver progenitor vs. hepatocytes for common transcription factors binding to both F13A1 and F13B. (B) The top 10 canonical pathways of common transcription factors binding to both F13A1 and F13B; red: the overlap transcription factor from our analysis; and grey: the total number of molecules in the pathway. (C) Left: the heatmap of all tox functions enriched with common transcription factors binding to both F13A1 and F13B; right: the Top 10 Tox functions of the common transcription factor binding to both F13A1 and F13B.
Ijms 23 04725 g004
Figure 5. An expression analysis of macrophage polarization. (A) F13A1 expression in macrophage polarization. (B) The 3D-PCA of macrophage polarization with Euclidean distance (ED) between every macrophage polarization. Blue: M0; yellow: M1; and dark pink: M2. (C) A heatmap and 3D-PCA of significant F13A1-expression-correlated genes at p < 0.05; left: significantly correlated genes with F13A1 expression in M0 to M1; right: significantly correlated genes with F13A1 expression in M1 to M2. (D) Significant upstream regulators of F13A1-expression-correlated genes in left: M0 to M1; right: M1 to M2; orange: predicted overexpressed; blue: predicted under expressed; red: overexpressed; and green: under expressed in M0 compared to M1 or M1 compared to M2.
Figure 5. An expression analysis of macrophage polarization. (A) F13A1 expression in macrophage polarization. (B) The 3D-PCA of macrophage polarization with Euclidean distance (ED) between every macrophage polarization. Blue: M0; yellow: M1; and dark pink: M2. (C) A heatmap and 3D-PCA of significant F13A1-expression-correlated genes at p < 0.05; left: significantly correlated genes with F13A1 expression in M0 to M1; right: significantly correlated genes with F13A1 expression in M1 to M2. (D) Significant upstream regulators of F13A1-expression-correlated genes in left: M0 to M1; right: M1 to M2; orange: predicted overexpressed; blue: predicted under expressed; red: overexpressed; and green: under expressed in M0 compared to M1 or M1 compared to M2.
Ijms 23 04725 g005aIjms 23 04725 g005b
Figure 6. The expression analysis of plaque stability. (A) F13A1 expression in plaque stability. (B) 3D-PCA of plaque-stability-derived data points. Blue: Ruptured Thin Fibrous Cap Atheroma; yellow: Stable Thick Fibrous Cap Atheroma; and dark pink: Stable Fibrocalcific Plaque. (C) 3D-PCA of significant F13A1-expression-correlated genes at p < 0.05; left: significantly correlated genes with F13A1 expression in Ruptured Thin Fibrous Cap Atheroma to Stable Fibrocalcific Plaque; and right: significantly correlated genes with F13A1 expression in Stable Fibrocalcific Plaque to Stable Thick Fibrous Cap Atheroma. (D) Significant upstream regulators of F13A1-expression-correlated genes in left: Ruptured Thin Fibrous Cap Atheroma to Stable Fibrocalcific Plaque; right: Stable Fibrocalcific Plaque to Stable Thick Fibrous Cap Atheroma; orange: predicted overexpressed; blue: predicted under-expressed; red: overexpressed; and green: under-expressed in Ruptured Thin Fibrous Cap Atheroma compared to Stable Fibrocalcific Plaque or Stable Fibrocalcific Plaque compared to Stable Thick Fibrous Cap Atheroma.
Figure 6. The expression analysis of plaque stability. (A) F13A1 expression in plaque stability. (B) 3D-PCA of plaque-stability-derived data points. Blue: Ruptured Thin Fibrous Cap Atheroma; yellow: Stable Thick Fibrous Cap Atheroma; and dark pink: Stable Fibrocalcific Plaque. (C) 3D-PCA of significant F13A1-expression-correlated genes at p < 0.05; left: significantly correlated genes with F13A1 expression in Ruptured Thin Fibrous Cap Atheroma to Stable Fibrocalcific Plaque; and right: significantly correlated genes with F13A1 expression in Stable Fibrocalcific Plaque to Stable Thick Fibrous Cap Atheroma. (D) Significant upstream regulators of F13A1-expression-correlated genes in left: Ruptured Thin Fibrous Cap Atheroma to Stable Fibrocalcific Plaque; right: Stable Fibrocalcific Plaque to Stable Thick Fibrous Cap Atheroma; orange: predicted overexpressed; blue: predicted under-expressed; red: overexpressed; and green: under-expressed in Ruptured Thin Fibrous Cap Atheroma compared to Stable Fibrocalcific Plaque or Stable Fibrocalcific Plaque compared to Stable Thick Fibrous Cap Atheroma.
Ijms 23 04725 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jamil, M.A.; Singh, S.; El-Maarri, O.; Oldenburg, J.; Biswas, A. Exploring Diverse Coagulation Factor XIII Subunit Expression Datasets: A Bioinformatic Analysis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4725. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23094725

AMA Style

Jamil MA, Singh S, El-Maarri O, Oldenburg J, Biswas A. Exploring Diverse Coagulation Factor XIII Subunit Expression Datasets: A Bioinformatic Analysis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(9):4725. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23094725

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jamil, Muhammad Ahmer, Sneha Singh, Osman El-Maarri, Johannes Oldenburg, and Arijit Biswas. 2022. "Exploring Diverse Coagulation Factor XIII Subunit Expression Datasets: A Bioinformatic Analysis" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 9: 4725. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23094725

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop