Next Article in Journal
Understanding Psychosocial Wellbeing in the Context of Complex and Multidimensional Problems
Next Article in Special Issue
Is Organizational Communication Climate a Precondition for Patient-Centered Care? Insights from a Key Informant Survey of Various Health and Social Care Organizations
Previous Article in Journal
Study on the Oxygen Enrichment Effect of Individual Oxygen-Supply Device in a Tunnel of Plateau Mine
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effectiveness and Efficiency of Persuasive Space Graphics (PSG) in Motivating UK Primary School Children’s Hand Hygiene
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Greater Engagement with Health Information Is Associated with Adoption and Maintenance of Healthy Lifestyle Behaviours in People with MS

1
Neuroepidemiology Unit, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
2
Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7000, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(16), 5935; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165935
Submission received: 8 July 2020 / Revised: 11 August 2020 / Accepted: 12 August 2020 / Published: 15 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Health Communication)

Abstract

:
Health communication offers an important means for patients to make informed decisions for illness self-management. We assessed how the level of engagement with selected health information at baseline is associated with the adoption and maintenance of lifestyle behaviours at a 5-year follow-up in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Non-engagers were compared to engagers of information delivered online and print (medium), and with engagers who additionally attended a live-in workshop (high). Engagement was assessed against lifestyle behaviours by log-binomial regression. Information engagers had higher education, and were less likely to have severe disability, clinically significant fatigue, or obesity. Medium and high baseline engagement was associated with adopting healthy behaviours for omega 3 supplementation (RR = 1.70; 95%CI: 1.02–2.84), physical activity (RR = 2.16; 95%CI: 1.03–4.55), and dairy non-consumption (RR = 3.98; 95%CI: 1.85–8.56) at 5 years; associations were stronger among high engagers. Only high baseline engagement was associated with maintaining behaviours from baseline to 5 years, specifically for omega-3 (RR = 1.26; 95%CI: 1.06–1.49) and vitamin D supplementation (RR = 1.26; 95%CI: 1.04–1.54) and dairy non-consumption (RR = 1.47; 95%CI: 1.03–2.10). Health communication that includes face-to-face information delivery and practical tools for implementation in daily living may be optimal for adopting and maintaining lifestyle behaviours in people with MS.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a progressive autoimmune neurological disorder, which manifests in a diverse range of cognitive, physical, and psychological symptoms, that can impact upon daily living and reduce health-related quality of life [1,2,3]. While the precise aetiology is unknown, MS appears to result from a complex interaction of genetic predisposition, early life exposure to certain viral infections, and environmental factors, including smoking, childhood obesity, low sun exposure, and low fish/polyunsaturated fatty acid intake [4,5]. Some of these environmental risk factors have also been associated with disease progression. However, inconsistent results across studies, and the absence of randomised control trials, limit their interpretation and translation for effectiveness for disease prevention and treatment. Nevertheless, many people with MS (pwMS) undertake lifestyle modification to assist in disease management [6], either alone or in combination with drug therapy.
In the context of secondary prevention and self-management of chronic illnesses through lifestyle modifications, health communication can play a role in facilitating behavioural change. Health communication refers to the communication of health information to patients via multiple channels, including online, print, and individual and group interventions. Health communication, which provides updated information, relevant resources, and empowers patients through targeted and tailored skills and strategies, may increase participation in health behaviours [7,8,9].
Face-to-face interventions in individual and group settings are traditional approaches to inform patients that have been shown to be effective in conveying information to promote health behaviours for pwMS and other chronic conditions [10]. Online health information is regarded as a convenient and low-cost complementary resource for symptom management and behaviour changes [11]. Survey responses from over 8000 pwMS in the USA revealed that, although physicians remain the most trusted source of health information, the internet was the first source for more than 85% of respondents [12]. Although the reliability, adequacy, and relevance of online information remain challenging, pwMS in general find rapidly updated online information useful in helping cope with symptoms and being more active in health decision-making [13]. Patient-centred workshops effectively increase self-efficacy, which ultimately stimulate behavioural change [14,15]. PwMS reported that their confidence and knowledge improved through experiential learning and daily living skills practice, both enablers for adherence to lifestyle behaviours [16].
We propose pwMS who engage with health information are more likely to modify their health behaviours, and assess this through analysis of data extracted from the Health Outcomes and Lifestyle In a Sample of people with Multiple sclerosis (HOLISM) study. This is an international longitudinal observational study comprising of self-reported lifestyle, socio-demographic, and health status data on pwMS [17,18]. Also queried is participant engagement with select information resources promoting healthy lifestyle behaviours—a book recommending lifestyle behaviours based on scientific evidence [19]; a website communicating the recommendations from the book, including recipes and guided meditation to aid in incorporating lifestyle behaviours into daily life; and live-in workshops providing interactive sessions delivered by health professionals, and a program of wellbeing and support, including daily meditation, cooking demonstrations, and shared storytelling [14,20].
We previously showed that pwMS who engaged with health information delivered by either this book, website, or workshops were associated with better health-related quality of life and lower rates of depression and fatigue risk [20]. Engagement with all three forms of information resources had the strongest associations with positive health outcomes; these outcomes may be associated with changed behaviours. We thus sought to assess whether pwMS who engaged with health information resources changed lifestyle behaviours differently from participants who did not. Understanding how health communication impacts behavioural change may enable informed decision-making for implementation of self-management strategies for pwMS.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Participants

PwMS were invited to participate in the continuing HOLISM longitudinal observational study as described previously [17]. In brief, pwMS aged ≥ 18 years were recruited via online platforms relating to MS in 2012, and consenting participants invited to complete an online survey via SurveyMonkey® at 2.5-year intervals. The 100-question survey captures self-reported data on socio-demographics, and clinical, lifestyle, and health outcomes. The study was approved by the Health Sciences Human Ethics Subcommittee at The University of Melbourne (HESC 1545102). At baseline, 2466 participants self-reporting a clinician-confirmed diagnosis of MS completed the survey; of whom, 952 (38.6%) completed both baseline and 5-year surveys and were included in our analysis.

2.2. Data Collection and Measurement

2.2.1. Demographics

A range of demographic factors, including age, sex, level of education, employment, and marital status, were captured. Age was calculated from the difference between the reported date of birth and the date of survey completion and categorised to the interquartile year range. Sex (male, female), highest level of education (no formal schooling, primary school, secondary school, vocational training, graduate degree, post-graduate degree), employment status (work full-time, work part-time, self-employed, unspecified paid work, stay at home parent/carer, full-time student, unemployed, seeking/not seeking employment, retired due to age/medical reasons/disability, work status not specified), and marital status (married, cohabiting/partnered, separated/divorced/widower, single) were queried at each review; the latter three variables were re-categorised as indicated in the tables.

2.2.2. Clinical Variables

Researcher-devised items assessed the self-reported type of MS diagnosed and duration since onset in years. MS type was grouped into relapsing-remitting (RR)MS/benign and progressive (secondary progressive (SP)MS/primary progressive (PP)MS/progressive relapsing (PR)MS), and duration since MS onset was categorised into quartiles. Disability status was measured using the Patient-Determined Disease Steps (PDDS), a self-reported measure of ambulatory disability, which has been cross-validated against the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) [21,22]. The PDDS is scored ordinally from 0 (normal) to 8 (bed-bound). We categorised the validated survey scores into three groups for analyses: Low disability (no walking impairment) = 0–2, moderate disability (gait disability/single cane) = 3–5, severe disability (requirement for two canes/wheelchair/bed) = 6–8. Fatigue was measured by the 9-item Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), which queries 9 statements each with a 7-point Likert scale from disagree = 1 to agree = 7. A mean total score > 5 denotes clinically significant fatigue [23]. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated from participant-reported height (m) and weight (kg) using the function weight/height2, and classified as underweight/normal, overweight, and obese according to World Health Organisation classifications [24].

2.2.3. Health Communication

The information source for lifestyle modification was queried by the frequency of visits (selection from a 6-option drop-down menu from rarely to daily) to the website http://www.overcomingms.org, a binary no/yes response to have read the book “Overcoming Multiple Sclerosis” [25] and attendance at a live-in workshop based on these resources. We chose to use a hierarchical categorisation reflecting increasing engagement with these three sources of health information: 1. None—participants responding “no” to all of website visits, book and workshop; 2. Medium—participants visiting the website and/or yes to having read the book; and 3. High—attendance at a live-in workshop and satisfying medium participant criteria.

2.2.4. Lifestyle Behaviours

Participant self-reported consumption of omega-3 supplements was queried as a binary no/yes response. Vitamin D was measured based on self-reported IU dose and frequency, from which the average daily dose was estimated. A minimum of 5000 IU/day of vitamin D supplementation, as recommended by health information resources, was used as a cut off for data analysis. Participants were also asked whether they intentionally exposed themselves to the sun to increase their vitamin D level (no/yes). Two binary variables of whether participants consumed dairy and meat were derived from responses to the items within the modified Diet Habits Questionnaire (DHQ) [17,26]. Participants who responded, ‘I do not consume dairy’ to the question “When having dairy, how often use reduce/low-fat products?” were considered dairy free. For meat consumption, participants were asked “How often do you eat processed meat?” and “How often do you trim visible fat/remove skin from meat/poultry before cooking?” A dichotomized variable (0 = do not consume meat; 1 = consume meat) was created based on responses of “I do not eat meat” to either question. Current smoking status was queried and dichotomised as current versus never/ex-smoker. Two researcher-devised items measured the frequency and duration of meditation practice in the last 12 months. For analyses, we collapsed two items and created a binary variable of meditation (1 = meditated ≥ 10 min/week vs. 0 = less frequently). Physical activity was assessed using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF); a validated 7-day recall of frequency and duration of walking, and moderate- and vigorous-intensity activities [27]. For analysis, a binary variable for vigorous physical activity ≥ 30 min/day ≥ 3 times/week was derived.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

All analyses were conducted in Stata version 14.2 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA) with the statistical significance threshold set at p < 0.05. Log-binomial regression models were used to evaluate associations of the health communication mode with lifestyle behaviours at baseline and a 5-year follow-up, estimating prevalence ratios (PRs). Changes in lifestyle behaviours were analysed using dichotomous outcome variables created according to the difference in reported lifestyle behaviours at baseline and 5-year reviews. Results were presented as risk ratios (RRs). All multivariable models were adjusted for age, sex, education, duration since MS onset, employment status, clinically significant fatigue, and disability at baseline.

Adoption and Maintenance of Lifestyle Behaviours

We assessed whether the level of resource engagement at baseline was associated with health behaviours at a five-year follow-up. Information resources recommend the following lifestyle behaviours: Consume omega-3 supplement, consume ≥ 5000 IU/day vitamin D supplement, seek sun exposure to increase vitamin D levels, undertake vigorous activity for ≥ 30 min/day ≥ 3 times/week, meditate ≥ 10 min/week, no dairy and meat consumption, and abstinence from smoking.
Binary variables (no/yes) were created based on participants’ health behaviours at both time points (Table 1) and the following associations determined:
Adoption of health behaviours: Participants who changed from “no” at baseline to “yes” at 5 years for omega-3 and vitamin D supplementation, sun exposure, meditation, and physical activity were considered to have adopted healthy behaviours, and were compared to the reference group of participants who were “no” at both time-points. For smoking and dairy and meat consumption, participants who changed from “yes” to “no” were considered to have adopted healthy behaviours and were compared to those who were “yes” at both time-points.
Maintenance of health behaviours: Participants who remained “yes” at both time-points for omega-3 and vitamin D supplementation, sun exposure, meditation, and physical activity were classified as maintaining healthy behaviours and were compared to the reference group of participants who changed from “yes” at baseline to “no” at 5 years. For smoking and dairy and meat consumption, participants who remained “no” at both time-points were compared to those who changed from “no” to “yes” in order to assess the maintenance of healthy behaviours.

3. Results

3.1. Cohort Characteristics

The study cohort comprised 952 participants who completed both baseline and 5-year follow-up surveys. Compared to participants who did not complete the 5-year survey, participants who did were generally well-educated, employed, married, with benign/RRMS, less severe disability, less fatigue, lower BMI, higher resource engagement, and a healthier lifestyle (consume omega-3 and vitamin D supplements, seek sun exposure to raise vitamin D, practice meditation, vigorously exercise frequently, do not smoke, and do not consume meat or dairy; Table S1). The included 952 participants had a similar age distribution across the three levels of engagement, with the mean age of mid- to late-40 s at baseline (Table 2). Benign/RRMS was the predominant MS type. Compared to non-engagers, engagers had lower proportions of female participants (88.3% none; 81.7% medium; 80.3% high), and higher proportions of university-qualified (59.1% none; 69.2% medium; 73.2% high) and married (75.0% none; 78.8% medium; 85.1% high) participants. Compared to non-engagers (23.0%), high engagers were more likely to be employed (40.4%); no difference in employment status was observed between non and medium engagers. Lower proportions of engagers were overweight (27.3% none vs. 18.2% medium) or obese (25.9% none; 13.1% medium; 9.2% high), reported clinically significant fatigue (73.0% none; 56.3% medium; 45.9% high), or had moderate (45.1% none; 27.8% medium; 32.4% high) or severe disability (9.1% none; 6.0% medium; 5.6% high). Compared to non-engagers (median = 15.4), medium engagers also had a shorter duration since MS onset (median = 10.4). At 5 years, cohort characteristics across baseline engagement groups were mostly comparable with cohort characteristics at baseline, with only employment and marital status changing to being similar across three groups (data not shown).

3.2. Cross-Sectional Associations

Baseline associations between resource engagement and lifestyle behaviours (Table 3) showed that, compared to non-engagers, medium-level engagers were more likely to consume omega-3 (PR = 1.42; 95%CI: 1.21–1.66) and ≥ 5000 IU/day of vitamin D (PR = 1.85; 95%CI: 1.44–2.37) supplements, seek sun exposure to raise their vitamin D (PR = 1.49; 95%CI: 1.26–1.76), and practice meditation ≥ 10 min/week (PR = 1.65; 95%CI: 1.09–2.48). These associations were stronger in high engagers (omega-3: PR = 1.56; 95%CI: 1.32–1.83; vitamin D: PR = 2.70; 95%CI: 2.09–3.49; sun exposure: PR = 1.57; 95%CI: 1.31–1.89; mediation: PR = 3.94; 95%CI: 2.60–5.97). Medium-level engagers were less likely to vigorously exercise regularly compared to non-engagers at baseline (PR = 0.58; 95%CI: 0.42–0.80). No associations were seen with physical activity and high engagers. Compared to non-engagers, medium and high engagers were less likely to be current smokers (medium: PR = 0.53; 95%CI: 0.32–0.87; high: PR = 0.12; 95%CI: 0.03–0.54), and consume dairy (medium: PR = 0.69; 95%CI: 0.62–0.78; high: PR = 0.20; 95%CI: 0.13–0.31) or meat (medium: PR = 0.67; 95%CI: 0.61–0.74; high: PR = 0.19; 95%CI: 0.13–0.28). All associations observed at baseline, except for meditation and physical activity for medium-level engagers, persisted at the 5-year follow-up (Table S2). Cross-sectionally, resource engagement was significantly associated with lifestyle behaviours at both baseline and 5-year follow-up.

3.3. Adopting Lifestyle Behaviours

To determine whether resource engagement at baseline could predict the adoption of healthy lifestyle behaviours at 5 years, we compared participants who adopted healthy lifestyle behaviours from baseline to 5 years to those who did not (Table 4). Of the 30% (281/952) of participants who did not consume omega-3 supplements at baseline, 33% (93/281) consumed the supplement at 5 years. Nearly half (47.5%; 453/952) of all participants did not consume ≥ 5000 IU/day vitamin D supplements at baseline, 45% (205/453) of whom consumed this daily dose at 5 years. Twenty-seven percent (257/952) of all participants did not seek out sun exposure for vitamin D at baseline, of whom 27% (70/257) adopted this behaviour at 5 years. Around 40% (391/952) of the population did not meditate for ≥ 10min/week at baseline, and 36% (140/391) adopted this behaviour at 5 years. The majority of participants (81%; 768/952) did not undertake frequent vigorous physical activity at baseline, of whom only 15% met the criteria at 5 years. Participants also stopped unhealthy lifestyle behaviours over 5 years. At baseline, 7.7% (73/952) of participants were smokers, of whom 48% (35/73) identified as non-smokers by 5 years. Half of the participants (480/952) consumed dairy at baseline, of whom 17% (81/480) reported being dairy free at 5 years. Similarly, 54.3% (517/952) consumed meat at baseline, of whom 12% followed a meat-free diet at 5 years. The adoption of healthy lifestyle behaviours varied from 12% to 48% from baseline to the 5-year follow-up. Quitting smoking and consuming vitamin D supplements achieved the highest adoption rates, while stopping meat consumption had the lowest adoption rates.
The adoption of certain behaviours was associated with baseline resource engagement (Table 4, Figure 1). Compared to non-engagers, resource engagers were more likely at 5 years to consume omega-3 supplements (medium: RR = 1.70; 95%CI: 1.02–2.84; high: RR = 2.50; 95%CI: 1.29–4.85), undertake frequent vigorous physical activity (medium: RR = 2.16; 95%CI: 1.03–4.55; high: RR = 2.71; 95%CI: 1.22–6.01), and stop dairy consumption (medium: RR = 3.98; 95%CI: 1.85–8.56; high: RR = 4.94; 95%CI: 1.90–12.88); the strongest associations were seen with high engagers. Only medium-, not high-, level engagement was associated with meat non-consumption at 5 years (RR = 3.42; 95CI% = 1.47–7.91). No significant associations were found between resource engagement and change in vitamin D supplementation, sun exposure, smoker status, or meditation practice; it is possible that the participants numbers were too few.

3.4. Maintaining Lifestyle Behaviours

To assess whether baseline resource engagement was associated with maintaining lifestyle behaviours, we compared participants who maintained healthy behaviours from baseline to 5 years to those who did not (Table 5, Figure 1). Seventy percent (671/952) of all participants consumed omega-3 supplements at baseline, of whom 73% (493/671) maintained this at 5 years. Of 49% (471/952) of participants who consumed ≥ 5000 IU/day vitamin D supplements at baseline, 79% (372/471) maintained this dose at 5 years. More than two-thirds (638/952) of participants sought sun exposure for vitamin D at baseline, and 74% (470/638) maintained this behaviour at 5 years. Among 19% (184/952) of participants who practiced meditation ≥ 10 min/week at baseline, 56% (103/184) maintained this practice at 5 years. Of the 19% of participants (182/952) who undertook frequent vigorous physical activity at baseline, 54% (99/182) maintained this level at 5 years. Almost 90% (847/952) of participants did not smoke at baseline, nearly all (98%) of whom remained as non-smokers at 5 years. Near half of the participants did not consume dairy at baseline (431/952), and the majority (79%, 339/431) remained dairy free at 5 years. Likewise, 81% (328/403) of the 42% of participants who did not consume meat at baseline remained meat free at 5 years. Maintenance of healthy behaviours from baseline to 5 years varied from 54% (vigorous physical activity) to 98% (abstinence from smoking).
Maintenance of some lifestyle behaviours were significantly associated with high-level (but not medium) resource engagement at baseline. Compared to non-engagers, high engagers were more likely to maintain intake of omega-3 (RR = 1.26; 95%CI: 1.06–1.49) and vitamin D supplements (RR = 1.26; 95%CI: 1.04–1.54), and remain dairy free (RR = 1.47; 95%CI: 1.03–2.10) at 5 years. No material associations were observed for maintaining sun exposure, meditation practice, and frequent vigorous physical activity.

4. Discussion

Health communication is important for informed decision-making for patients with chronic conditions. Patients feel more empowered and are more likely to adhere to treatment recommendations when they are involved in the choices they make to manage their health. We sought to examine the relationship between engagement with reading and workshop resources for a particular patient-centred and evidence-based program promoting healthy lifestyle behaviours for pwMS, with adoption and maintenance of healthy behaviours. The three engagement levels were no engagement, engagement with resources via either website and/or book (medium level), and engagement with reading resources as well as attendance at a live-in workshop (high level).
Across the three levels of engagement, participant characteristics were generally similar, with notable differences in non-engagers having more severe disability, longer duration of diagnosis, more likely progressive MS types, and the presence of clinically significant fatigue. These differences align with prior studies showing people with more severe MS tend to have lower self-efficacy, more perceived barriers to healthy behaviours, and higher levels of depression [28,29,30], all of which adversely affect intention and engagement in health interventions [31]. In our study, non-engagers were additionally more likely to be obese, possibly reflective of unhealthy diet and inactive behaviours. Further studies on larger populations would enable determination of the impact of cohort characteristics on health information-seeking behaviours, thereby allowing targeted communication for different populations.
Cross-sectionally, baseline engagement was associated with baseline and 5-year behaviours for supplement use, diet, meditation practice, sun seeking, and smoking abstinence, with higher-level engagement reflected in stronger associations. Baseline medium-level engagement was associated with physical activity; however, these engagers were less likely to meet the recommended 30 min or more, at least 3 times a week, of vigorous physical activity. These associations confirm that engagement with health information is related to lifestyle behaviour, and thus we further assessed how engagement relates to changed behaviours.
Adoption of new healthy dietary behaviours from baseline to 5 years was associated with both levels of engagement. Engagers who did not meet recommended healthy behaviours at baseline were more likely to commence omega-3 supplementation, meet physical activity recommendations, and stop consuming dairy at the 5-year follow-up. Medium-level engagers additionally adopted a meat-free diet at 5 years. Associations were strongest in pwMS who engaged with both reading and workshop resources consistent with studies showing small group programs are effective in altering dietary behaviours [32], with interactive health promotion better for the adoption of healthy behaviours than other forms of learning [33,34,35,36].
Maintaining recommended lifestyle behaviours from baseline to the 5-year follow-up was associated with engagement with both reading and workshop resources but not with engagement with reading material alone. Delivery of health information through diverse methods, including print, web-based interventions, and face-to-face live-in workshops, are associated with changes in behaviour. The success of such interventions appears to be related to the combination of the delivery of evidence from experts and practical interventions tailored to personalised goals [13,16]. Moreover, focus groups have revealed pwMS want a variety of information from a variety of sources and that this information should be both stratified, interactive, and provided by subject experts to aid in the uptake of positive lifestyle behaviours [37,38,39]. The workshops meet these criteria and where possible utilised medically trained facilitators who themselves had been diagnosed with MS, providing expert knowledge as well as personal experience.
Long-term maintenance of behaviours was restricted to most dietary modifications: Omega-3 and vitamin D supplement use and dairy consumption. These findings align with studies showing 67–81% of pwMS use dietary supplements and 37–41% follow specific diets [40]. The maintenance of behaviours that utilised a physical component—seeking sun to increase vitamin D, meditation practice, and physical activity—were not associated with health information engagement. Similarly, other active wellness programs have shown improved self-efficacy and perceived health, but no change in physical activity, for pwMS [41,42]. PwMS are known to be less active than the general population [43,44,45], and due to symptom heterogeneity, it may be that the implementation of active behaviours requires tailored and personalised recommendations. Of the physical behaviours, only meditation practice included online guided practice videos, and daily group participation in the workshops. Education on methods to incorporate a variety of accessible and disability-inclusive daily physical behaviours were introduced to the website towards the end of the period studied. Sun- seeking behaviour may not be maintained possibly due to participants not being vitamin D deficient, achieving a healthy dose potentially through dietary supplementation, or due to public health messages discouraging sun exposure.
For individuals with chronic conditions, learning information and skills to adopt and maintain healthy lifestyle behaviours offers self-empowerment through better self-management. Both medium- and high-level engagement were associated with the adoption, and only high engagement with maintenance, of mostly dietary behaviours in pwMS. This is in line with our previous cross-sectional baseline study [20] which showed a higher level of engagement with health resources was associated with better health outcomes. However, as cost and time investment may limit attendance at workshops, providing affordable and accessible education resources that can be widely disseminated is essential. Web-based interventions are accepted by pwMS due to their easy accessibility, convenience, and low cost [46,47]. Consideration should be given to transforming the unique qualities of the live-in workshops into interactive web-based learning, delivered by health professionals for small groups to complete together, and include online support groups to mitigate attrition, as well as practical lifestyle options with consideration of sociodemographics and disease stage.
Health communication, either through reading alone or combined with attendance at a face-to-face workshop, was not associated with all health behaviours for pwMS in our study. Behavioural changes are shaped by numerous individual, social, and environmental factors. Behaviours that require more time commitments or adjustments may be especially difficult to modify. In our previous qualitative study of pwMS who attended live-in workshops 3–5 years prior, participants continued to follow dietary but not physical behaviours, stating barriers to adherence to all recommended behaviours included disease symptoms, environment, support at home, time and financial constraints, and lack of patient-centred support and motivation, amongst others [16]. PwMS reported that supplementation and dietary changes were easiest because they were less effortful and had less impact on social or family life. In contrast, initiating new habits that were time consuming, such as meditation and exercise, were challenging for most PwMS. Enablers for adherence to healthy behaviours were identified as experiential learning, peer support, and practical strategies [16]. Future studies to understand how health communication may assist to overcome barriers and incorporate enablers for adopting and maintaining changes in these behaviours is required.
The generalisability of our findings is limited as attrition was significant (61.4%) at 5 years, although this may be expected in long-term online research. The reasons for loss to follow-up, which includes a change in email address and death, were not captured. We queried only a specific source of lifestyle information for pwMS; other sources of lifestyle information may have been accessed by participants and contributed to their behaviour. Given the previously reported healthy participant bias in HOLISM participants [18] and cohort characteristics by missingness at the 5-year review, a larger and more diverse population of pwMS may provide a better understanding of associations between behavioural change and health information engagement. It is possible that changes in lifestyle occurred earlier than the 5-year follow-up, with some participants returning to previous behaviours; the temporality of healthy behaviour and engagement is difficult to establish. Additionally, self-reported adherence to healthy behaviours may be overestimated with social desirability to meet guidelines [48,49]; validated tools deriving a score for healthy behaviours may offer better assessments [50]. Nevertheless, our findings demonstrate that engagement with health information is associated with adoption and long-term maintenance of healthy lifestyle behaviours.

5. Conclusions

Lifestyle interventions are increasingly popular for self-management of long-term health conditions. To facilitate knowledge translation and therefore allow informed decision-making for self-management, effective health communication is critical. Our findings suggest that engagement with reading resources combined with face-to-face interactive educational workshops that demonstrate implementation of behaviours in daily life may be optimal for long-term adoption and maintenance of dietary behavioural change in pwMS. This may assist to develop and implement health information resources for self-management through lifestyle modifications.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/16/5935/s1, Supplementary Table S1: Sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics of HOLISM main cohort by missingness at 5-year review; Table S2: Associations of baseline resource engagement with lifestyle behaviours at five-year.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.N.; methodology, N.N., X.L., S.S.-Y., and M.Y.; validation, M.Y.; formal analysis, X.L. and M.Y.; resources, G.A.J. and S.N.; data curation, X.L. and S.S.-Y.; original draft preparation, N.N., M.Y., and X.L.; writing—review and editing, N.N., M.Y., X.L., G.A.J., S.S.-Y., and S.N.; visualization, N.N., X.L., and M.Y.; supervision, N.N.; project administration, N.N.; funding acquisition, G.A.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by philanthropic gifts from Wal Piscotta and anonymous donors.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank HOLISM study participants for their voluntary contribution.

Conflicts of Interest

G.A.J. is the author of “Overcoming Multiple Sclerosis”, founder of the OMS Foundation, a facilitator for the live-in workshops, and the data custodian for the HOLISM study. S.N. is a facilitator for the live-in workshops. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Compston, A.; Coles, A. Multiple sclerosis. Lancet 2008, 372, 1502–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ziemssen, T. Multiple sclerosis beyond edss: Depression and fatigue. J. Neurol. Sci. 2009, 277 (Suppl. 1), S37–S41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Simmons, R. Life issues in multiple sclerosis. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2010, 6, 603–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Waubant, E.; Lucas, R.; Mowry, E.; Graves, J.; Olsson, T.; Alfredsson, L.; Langer-Gould, A. Environmental and genetic risk factors for ms: An integrated review. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol. 2019, 6, 1905–1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Olsson, T.; Barcellos, L.F.; Alfredsson, L. Interactions between genetic, lifestyle and environmental risk factors for multiple sclerosis. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2017, 13, 25–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yadav, V.; Shinto, L.; Bourdette, D. Complementary and alternative medicine for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Expert Rev. Clin. Immunol. 2010, 6, 381–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Noar, S.M.; Grant Harrington, N.; Van Stee, S.K.; Shemanski Aldrich, R. Tailored health communication to change lifestyle behaviors. Am. J. Lifestyle Med. 2011, 5, 112–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Weymann, N.; Harter, M.; Petrak, F.; Dirmaier, J. Health information, behavior change, and decision support for patients with type 2 diabetes: Development of a tailored, preference-sensitive health communication application. Patient Prefer Adherence 2013, 7, 1091–1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Hadgkiss, E.J.; Jelinek, G.A.; Weiland, T.J.; Rumbold, G.; Mackinlay, C.A.; Gutbrod, S.; Gawler, I. Health-related quality of life outcomes at 1 and 5 years after a residential retreat promoting lifestyle modification for people with multiple sclerosis. Neurol. Sci. 2013, 34, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Taggart, J.; Williams, A.; Dennis, S.; Newall, A.; Shortus, T.; Zwar, N.; Denney-Wilson, E.; Harris, M.F. A systematic review of interventions in primary care to improve health literacy for chronic disease behavioral risk factors. BMC Fam. Pract. 2012, 13, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Motl, R.W.; Dlugonski, D.; Wójcicki, T.R.; McAuley, E.; Mohr, D.C. Internet intervention for increasing physical activity in persons with multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. J. 2011, 17, 116–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Marrie, R.A.; Salter, A.R.; Tyry, T.; Fox, R.J.; Cutter, G.R. Preferred sources of health information in persons with multiple sclerosis: Degree of trust and information sought. J. Med. Internet Res. 2013, 15, e67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Webb, T.; Joseph, J.; Yardley, L.; Michie, S. Using the internet to promote health behavior change: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy. J. Med. Internet Res. 2010, 12, e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Li, M.P.; Jelinek, G.A.; Weiland, T.J.; Mackinlay, C.A.; Dye, S.; Gawler, I. Effect of a residential retreat promoting lifestyle modifications on health-related quality of life in people with multiple sclerosis. Qual. Prim. Care 2010, 18, 379–389. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Naidoo, D.; Schembri, A.; Cohen, M. The health impact of residential retreats: A systematic review. BMC Complement Med. Ther. 2018, 18, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Barnard, E.; Brown, C.R.; Weiland, T.J.; Jelinek, G.A.; Marck, C.H. Understanding barriers, enablers, and long-term adherence to a health behavior intervention in people with multiple sclerosis. Disabil. Rehabil. 2020, 42, 822–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hadgkiss, E.J.; Jelinek, G.A.; Weiland, T.J.; Pereira, N.G.; Marck, C.H.; van der Meer, D.M. Methodology of an international study of people with multiple sclerosis recruited through web 2.0 platforms: Demographics, lifestyle, and disease characteristics. Neurol. Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 580596. [Google Scholar]
  18. Weiland, T.J.; De Livera, A.M.; Brown, C.R.; Jelinek, G.A.; Aitken, Z.; Simpson Jr, S.L.; Neate, S.L.; Taylor, K.L.; O’Kearney, E.; Bevens, W. Health outcomes and lifestyle in a sample of people with multiple sclerosis (holism): Longitudinal and validation cohorts. Front. Neurol. 2018, 9, 1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jelinek, G. Overcoming Multiple Sclerosis: The Evidence-Based 7 Step Recovery Program, 2nd ed.; Allen and Unwin: Sydney, Australia, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hadgkiss, E.J.; Jelinek, G.A.; Taylor, K.L.; Marck, C.H.; van der Meer, D.M.; Pereira, N.G.; Weiland, T.J. Engagement in a program promoting lifestyle modification is associated with better patient-reported outcomes for people with ms. Neurol. Sci. 2015, 36, 845–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Hohol, M.; Orav, E.; Weiner, H. Disease steps in multiple sclerosis: A simple approach to evaluate disease progression. Neurology 1995, 45, 251–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hohol, M.; Orav, E.; Weiner, H. Disease steps in multiple sclerosis: A longitudinal study comparing disease steps and edss to evaluate disease progression. Mult. Scler. J. 1999, 5, 349–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Krupp, L.B.; LaRocca, N.G.; Muir-Nash, J.; Steinberg, A.D. The fatigue severity scale. Application to patients with multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Arch. Neurol. 1989, 46, 1121–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. WHO. Body Mass Index. Available online: Http://www.Euro.Who.Int/en/health-topics/disease-prevention/nutrition/a-healthy-lifestyle/body-mass-index-bmi (accessed on 19 April 2018).
  25. Jelinek, G.A. Overcoming Multiple Sclerosis: An Evidence-Based Guide to Recovery; Allen and Unwin: Sydney, Australia, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  26. McKellar, S.; Horsley, P.; Chambers, R.; Bauer, J.; Vendersee, P.; Clarke, C.; Callum, H.; Pullen, M. Development of the diet habits questionnaire for use in cardiac rehabilitation. Aust. J. Prim. Health 2008, 14, 43–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Craig, C.L.; Marshall, A.L.; Sjöström, M.; Bauman, A.E.; Booth, M.L.; Ainsworth, B.E.; Pratt, M.; Ekelund, U.; Yngve, A.; Sallis, J.F. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2003, 35, 1381–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Chwastiak, L.; Ehde, D.M.; Gibbons, L.E.; Sullivan, M.; Bowen, J.D.; Kraft, G.H. Depressive symptoms and severity of illness in multiple sclerosis: Epidemiologic study of a large community sample. Am. J. Psychiatry. 2002, 159, 1862–1868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Vanner, E.A.; Block, P.; Christodoulou, C.C.; Horowitz, B.P.; Krupp, L.B. Pilot study exploring quality of life and barriers to leisure-time physical activity in persons with moderate to severe multiple sclerosis. Disabil. Health. J. 2008, 1, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tan-Kristanto, S.; Kiropoulos, L.A. Resilience, self-efficacy, coping styles and depressive and anxiety symptoms in those newly diagnosed with multiple sclerosis. Psychol. Health Med. 2015, 20, 635–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tulloch, H.; Reida, R.; D’Angeloa, M.S.; Plotnikoff, R.C.; Morrina, L.; Beatona, L.; Papadakisa, S.; Pipe, A. Predicting short and long-term exercise intentions and behaviour in patients with coronary artery disease: A test of protection motivation theory. Psychol. Health 2009, 24, 255–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Smith, M.L.; Lee, S.; Towne, S.D., Jr.; Han, G.; Quinn, C.; Peña-Purcell, N.C.; Ory, M.G. Impact of a behavioral intervention on diet, eating patterns, self-efficacy, and social support. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 2020, 52, 180–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Carey, K.B.; Scott-Sheldon, L.A.; Elliott, J.C.; Garey, L.; Carey, M.P. Face-to-face versus computer-delivered alcohol interventions for college drinkers: A meta-analytic review, 1998 to 2010. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2012, 32, 690–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Järvelä-Reijonen, E.; Karhunen, L.; Sairanen, E.; Muotka, J.; Lindroos, S.; Laitinen, J.; Puttonen, S.; Peuhkuri, K.; Hallikainen, M.; Pihlajamäki, J. The effects of acceptance and commitment therapy on eating behavior and diet delivered through face-to-face contact and a mobile app: A randomized controlled trial. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2018, 15, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Moss-Morris, R.; McCrone, P.; Yardley, L.; van Kessel, K.; Wills, G.; Dennison, L. A pilot randomised controlled trial of an internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy self-management programme (ms invigor8) for multiple sclerosis fatigue. Behav. Res. Ther. 2012, 50, 415–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Motl, R.W.; Hubbard, E.A.; Bollaert, R.E.; Adamson, B.C.; Kinnett-Hopkins, D.; Balto, J.M.; Sommer, S.K.; Pilutti, L.A.; McAuley, E. Randomized controlled trial of an e-learning designed behavioral intervention for increasing physical activity behavior in multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. J. Exp. Transl. Clin. 2017, 3, 2055217317734886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Casey, B.; Coote, S.; Hayes, S.; Gallagehr, S. Changing physical activity behavior in people with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2018, 99, 2059–2075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Learmonth, Y.C.; Adamson, B.C.; Balto, J.M.; Chiu, C.y.; Molina-Guzman, I.; Finlayson, M.; Riskin, B.J.; Motl, R.W. Multiple sclerosis patients need and want information on exercise promotion from healthcare providers: A qualitative study. Health Expect. Int. J. Public Particip. Health Care Health Policy 2017, 20, 574–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Casey, B.; Hayes, S.; Browne, C.; Coote, S. What do people with ms want from a web-based resource to encourage increased physical activity behaviour? Disabil. Rehabil. 2016, 38, 1557–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Silbermann, E.; Senders, A.; Wooliscroft, L.; Rice, J.; Cameron, M.; Waslo, C.; Orban, A.; Chase, E.; Yadav, V.; Bourdette, D.; et al. Cross-sectional survey of complementary and alternative medicine used in oregon and southwest washington to treat multiple sclerosis: A 17-year update. Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2020, 41, 102041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ng, A.; Kennedy, P.; Hutchinson, B.; Ingram, A.; Vondrell, S.; Goodman, T.; Miller, D. Self-efficacy and health status improve after a wellness program in persons with multiple sclerosis. Disabil. Rehabil. 2013, 35, 1039–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Marck, C.H.; De Livera, A.M.; Brown, C.R.; Neate, S.L.; Taylor, K.L.; Weiland, T.J.; Hadgkiss, E.J.; Jelinek, G.A. Health outcomes and adherence to a healthy lifestyle after a multimodal intervention in people with multiple sclerosis: Three year follow-up. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0197759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Kinnett-Hopkins, D.; Adamson, B.; Rougeau, K.; Motl, R. People with ms are less physically active than healthy controls but as active as those with other chronic diseases: An updated meta-analysis. Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2017, 13, 38–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ploughman, M. Breaking down the barriers to physical activity among people with multiple sclerosis–a narrative review. Phys. Ther. Rev. 2017, 22, 124–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Richardson, E.V.; Barstow, E.A.; Motl, R.W. A narrative exploration of the evolving perception of exercise among people with multiple sclerosis. Qual. Res. Sport. Exerc. Health 2019, 11, 119–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Paul, L.; Coulter, E.H.; Miller, L.; McFadyen, A.; Dorfman, J.; Mattison, P.G.G. Web-based physiotherapy for people moderately affected with multiple sclerosis; quantitative and qualitative data from a randomized, controlled pilot study. Clin. Rehabil. 2014, 28, 924–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Tallner, A.; Pfeifer, K.; Mäurer, M. Web-based interventions in multiple sclerosis: The potential of tele-rehabilitation. Ther. Adv. Neurol. Disord. 2016, 9, 327–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Carvalho, F.A.; Morelhão, P.K.; Franco, M.R.; Maher, C.G.; Smeets, R.J.; Oliveira, C.B.; Júnior, I.F.F.; Pinto, R.Z. Reliability and validity of two multidimensional self-reported physical activity questionnaires in people with chronic low back pain. Musculoskelet. Sci. Pract. 2017, 27, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Brenner, P.S.; DeLamater, J.D. Social desirability bias in self-reports of physical activity: Is an exercise identity the culprit? Soc. Indic. Res. 2014, 117, 489–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Steene-Johannessen, J.; Anderssen, S.A.; Van der Ploeg, H.P.; Hendriksen, I.J.; Donnelly, A.E.; Brage, S.; Ekelund, U. Are self-report measures able to define individuals as physically active or inactive? Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2016, 48, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Associations of resource engagement with modifying lifestyle behaviours. Relative risk (RR) estimates for adoption and maintenance of lifestyle behaviours are illustrated by resource engagement levels (none, black with RR = 1; medium, blue; high, orange). Arrow direction indicate recommended lifestyle behaviour (upward = increase, downward = no).
Figure 1. Associations of resource engagement with modifying lifestyle behaviours. Relative risk (RR) estimates for adoption and maintenance of lifestyle behaviours are illustrated by resource engagement levels (none, black with RR = 1; medium, blue; high, orange). Arrow direction indicate recommended lifestyle behaviour (upward = increase, downward = no).
Ijerph 17 05935 g001
Table 1. Reference and outcome groups for lifestyle behaviour change from baseline to the 5-year review.
Table 1. Reference and outcome groups for lifestyle behaviour change from baseline to the 5-year review.
Adoption (Baseline to 5 Year) *Maintenance (Baseline to 5 Year) *
BehaviourHealthyUnhealthyHealthyUnhealthy
ReferenceNo → NoYes → YesYes → NoNo → Yes
OutcomeNo → YesYes → NoYes → YesNo → No
* Adoption and maintenance were categorized as binary variables, with the reference category being no adoption/maintenance and the outcome category being adoption/maintenance.
Table 2. Cohort characteristics by engagement with resources at baseline.
Table 2. Cohort characteristics by engagement with resources at baseline.
Baseline Resource Engagement
NoneMediumHigh
n = 205n = 605n = 142
Frequency (percentage)
Sex
Male24 (11.7%)111 (18.3%)28 (19.7%)
Female181 (88.3%)494 (81.7%) 114 (80.3%)
Education
No/basic schooling48 (23.6%)107 (17.8%)25 (17.6%)
Vocational training35 (17.2%)78 (13.0%)13 (9.2%)
University degree120 (59.1%)416 (69.2%) 104 (73.2%)
Employment
Unemployed94 (46.1%)338 (56.0%)58 (41.1%)
Paid employment47 (23.0%)143 (23.7%)57 (40.4%)
Retired63 (30.9%)123 (20.4%) 26 (18.4%)
Marital status
Single23 (11.5%)81 (13.5%)13 (9.2%)
Married/partnered150 (75.0%)473 (78.8%)120 (85.1%)
Separated/divorced/widowed27 (13.5%)46 (7.7%) 8 (5.7%)
MS type
Benign/RRMS131 (75.7%)435 (81.6%)102 (81.0%)
SPMS/PPMS/PRMS42 (24.3%)98 (18.4%)24 (19.0%)
Disability (PDDS)
Normal/mild80 (45.7%)401 (66.3%)88 (62.0%)
Moderate79 (45.1%)168 (27.8%) 46 (32.4%)
Severe16 (9.1%)36 (6.0%)8 (5.6%)
Clinical fatigue (FSS>5)
No43 (27.0%)252 (43.8%)73 (54.1%)
Yes116 (73.0%)324 (56.3%) 62 (45.9%)
BMI category
Underweight/normal96 (46.8%)416 (68.8%)95 (66.9%)
Overweight56 (27.3%)110 (18.2%) 34 (23.9%)
Obese53 (25.9%)79 (13.1%) 13 (9.2%)
Mean (SD; range)
Age46.7 (9.7; 20.4–66.2)45.1 (10.4; 19.1–70.4)48.3 (10.8; 23.2–78.5)
Median (interquartile range)
Duration since onset (years)15.4 (8.5–25.4)10.4 (5.3–17.4) 13.4 (6.5–22.4)
PDDS3 (1–4)1 (0–3) 1 (0–3)
Differences of variables by baseline health communication engagement were assessed using log binomial regression. p < 0.05 for differences between medium/high engagers with non-engagers (reference). p < 0.001 for differences between medium/high engagers with non-engagers (reference). Abbreviations: BMI = Body mass index; PDDS = Patient-determined disease steps; PPMS = Primary progressive multiple sclerosis; PRMS = Progressive-relapsing multiple sclerosis; RRMS = Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.
Table 3. Baseline associations of lifestyle with resource engagement.
Table 3. Baseline associations of lifestyle with resource engagement.
Baseline Lifestyle
No at BaselineYes at BaselineUnadjustedAdjusted *
n/N (Percentage)n/N (Percentage)PR Est.(95%CI)PR Est.(95%CI)
Taking omega-3 supplement?
Engagement
None114/281 (40.6%)91/671 (13.6%)Ref Ref
Medium146/281 (52.0%)459/671 (68.4%)1.71(1.46, 2.01)1.42(1.21, 1.66)
High21/281 (7.5%)121/671 (18.0%)1.92(1.62, 2.27)1.56(1.32, 1.83)
PTREND< 0.001PTREND< 0.001
Taking ≥ 5000 IU/d vitamin D supplement?
Engagement
None155/460 (33.7%)49/480 (10.2%)Ref Ref
Medium275/460 (59.8%)322/480 (67.1%)2.25(1.74, 2.90)1.85(1.44, 2.37)
High30/460 (6.5%)109/480 (22.7%)3.26(2.52, 4.23)2.70(2.09, 3.49)
PTREND< 0.001PTREND< 0.001
Seeking sun exposure to raise vitamin D level?
Engagement
None86/262 (32.8%)86/653 (13.2%)Ref Ref
Medium149/262 (56.9%)454/653 (69.5%)1.51(1.29, 1.76)1.49(1.26, 1.76)
High27/262 (10.3%)113/653 (17.3%)1.61(1.36, 1.91)1.57(1.31, 1.89)
PTREND< 0.001PTREND< 0.001
Meditating ≥ 10 min/week?
Engagement
None147/677 (21.7%)22/232 (9.5%)Ref Ref
Medium468/677 (69.1%)131/232 (56.5%)1.68(1.11, 2.55)1.65(1.09, 2.48)
High62/677 (9.2%)79/232 (34.1%)4.30(2.84, 6.53)3.94(2.60, 5.97)
PTREND< 0.001PTREND< 0.001
Vigorous physical activity ≥ 30 min/d ≥ 3 times/week?
Engagement
None166/769 (21.6%)39/182 (21.4%)Ref Ref
Medium495/769 (64.4%)109/182 (59.9%)0.95(0.68, 1.32)0.58(0.42, 0.80)
High108/769 (14.0%)34/182 (18.7%)1.26(0.84, 1.89)0.76(0.51, 1.14)
PTREND= 0.35PTREND= 0.23
Current smoker?
Engagement
None149/848 (17.6%)28/73 (38.4%)Ref Ref
Medium560/848 (66.0%)43/73 (58.9%)0.45(0.29, 0.70)0.53(0.32, 0.87)
High139/848 (16.4%)2/73 (2.7%)0.09(0.02, 0.37)0.12(0.03, 0.54)
PTREND< 0.001PTREND< 0.001
Consuming dairy?
Engagement
None30/435 (6.9%)146/482 (30.3%)Ref Ref
Medium287/435 (66.0%)313/482 (64.9%)0.63(0.57, 0.70)0.69(0.62, 0.78)
High118/435 (27.1%)23/482 (4.8%)0.20(0.13, 0.29)0.20(0.13, 0.31)
PTREND< 0.001PTREND< 0.001
Consuming meat?
Engagement
None19/405 (4.7%)158/519 (30.4%)Ref Ref
Medium267/405 (65.9%)338/519 (65.1%)0.63(0.57, 0.68)0.67(0.61, 0.74)
High119/405 (29.4%)23/519 (4.4%)0.18(0.12, 0.26)0.19(0.13, 0.28)
PTREND< 0.001PTREND< 0.001
Note: Associations with p < 0.050 in bold. * Adjusted for baseline age, sex, education, employment, clinical fatigue, disability, and duration since onset.
Table 4. Associations of adopting lifestyle behaviours at five years with baseline health communication modes.
Table 4. Associations of adopting lifestyle behaviours at five years with baseline health communication modes.
Lifestyle Adoption
No at Baseline and 5-yrNo at Baseline; Yes at 5-yrUnadjustedAdjusted *
n/N (Percentage)n/N (Percentage)RR Est.(95%CI)RR Est.(95%CI)
Taking omega-3 supplement?
Engagement
None80/188 (42.6%)34/93 (36.6%)Ref Ref
Medium97/188 (51.6%)49/93 (52.7%)1.13(0.78, 1.62)1.70(1.02, 2.84)
High11/188 (5.9%)10/93 (10.8%)1.60(0.94, 2.71)2.50(1.29, 4.85)
PTREND= 0.16PTREND= 0.005
Taking ≥ 5000 IU/d vitamin D supplement?
Engagement
None86/248 (34.7%)66/205 (32.2%)Ref Ref
Medium144/248 (58.1%)128/205 (62.4%)1.08(0.87, 1.35)1.19(0.90, 1.57)
High18/248 (7.3%)11/205 (5.4%)0.87(0.53, 1.44)0.98(0.57, 1.67)
PTREND= 0.91PTREND= 0.55
Seeking sun exposure to raise vitamin D level?
Engagement
None66/187 (35.3%)19/70 (27.1%)Ref Ref
Medium100/187 (53.5%)46/70 (65.7%)1.41(0.89, 2.24)1.19(0.73, 1.94)
High21/187 (11.2%)5/70 (7.1%)0.86(0.36, 2.08)1.04(0.44, 2.42)
PTREND= 0.62PTREND= 0.67
Meditating ≥ 10 min/week?
Engagement
None116/529 (21.9%)19/93 (20.4%)Ref Ref
Medium368/529 (69.6%)67/93 (72.0%)1.09(0.68, 1.75)1.14(0.69, 1.89)
High45/529 (8.5%)7/93 (7.5%)0.96(0.43, 2.14)1.09(0.47, 2.50)
PTREND= 0.93PTREND= 0.72
Vigorous physical activity ≥ 30 min/d for ≥ 3 times/week?
Engagement
None152/651 (23.3%)14/117 (12.0%)Ref Ref
Medium412/651 (63.3%)83/117 (70.9%)1.99(1.16, 3.41)2.16(1.03, 4.55)
High87/651 (13.4%)20/117 (17.1%)2.22(1.17, 4.20)2.71(1.22, 6.01)
PTREND= 0.006PTREND= 0.007
Lifestyle adoption
Yes at baseline and 5-yrYes at baseline; No at 5-yrUnadjustedAdjusted *
n/N (Percentage)n/N (Percentage)RR Est.(95%CI)RR Est.(95%CI)
Current smoker?
Engagement
None16/38 (42.1%)12/35 (34.3%)Ref Ref
Medium21/38 (55.3%)22/35 (62.9%)1.19(0.71, 2.01)1.46(0.83, 2.56)
High1/38 (2.6%)1/35 (2.9%)1.17(0.27, 5.03)2.29(0.58, 9.04)
PTREND= 0.52PTREND= 0.14
Consuming dairy?
Engagement
None135/399 (33.8%)10/81 (12.4%)Ref Ref
Medium248/399 (62.2%)64/81 (79.0%)2.97(1.57, 5.63)3.98(1.85, 8.56)
High16/399 (4.0%)7/81 (8.6%)4.41(1.87, 10.44)4.94(1.90, 12.88)
PTREND< 0.001PTREND< 0.001
Consuming meat?
Engagement
None150/453 (33.1%)7/64 (10.9%)Ref Ref
Medium283/453 (62.5%)54/64 (84.4%)3.59(1.67, 7.72)3.42(1.47, 7.91)
High20/453 (4.4%)3/64 (4.7%)2.93(0.81, 10.53)3.01(0.73, 12.40)
PTREND< 0.001PTREND= 0.002
Note: Associations with p < 0.050 in bold. * Adjusted for baseline age, sex, education, employment, clinical fatigue, disability, and duration since onset.
Table 5. Associations of maintaining lifestyle behaviours at five years with baseline health communication modes.
Table 5. Associations of maintaining lifestyle behaviours at five years with baseline health communication modes.
Lifestyle Maintenance
Yes at Baseline; No at 5-yrYes at Baseline & 5-yrUnadjustedAdjusted *
n/N (Percentage)n/N (Percentage)RR Est.(95%CI)RR Est.(95%CI)
Taking omega-3 supplement?
Engagement
None29/178 (16.3%)62/493 (12.6%)Ref Ref
Medium130/178 (73.0%)329/493 (66.7%)1.05(0.90, 1.22)1.08(0.92, 1.26)
High19/178 (10.7%)102/493 (20.7%)1.24(1.05, 1.45)1.26(1.06, 1.49)
PTREND= 0.003PTREND= 0.003
Taking ≥ 5000 IU/d vitamin D supplement?
Engagement
None13/99 (13.1%)35/372 (9.4%)Ref Ref
Medium77/99 (77.8%)239/372 (64.2%)1.04(0.86, 1.25)1.05(0.86, 1.29)
High9/99 (9.1%)98/372 (26.3%)1.26(1.05, 1.51)1.26(1.04, 1.54)
PTREND< 0.001PTREND= 0.001
Seeking sun exposure to raise vitamin D level?
Engagement
None22/168 (13.1%)63/470 (13.4%)Ref Ref
Medium121/168 (72.0%)323/470 (68.7%)0.98(0.85, 1.13)0.98(0.84, 1.13)
High25/168 (14.9%)84/470 (17.9%)1.04(0.88, 1.22)0.99(0.83, 1.18)
PTREND= 0.58PTREND= 0.97
Meditating ≥ 10 min/week?
Engagement
None8/81 (9.9%)10/103 (9.7%)Ref Ref
Medium47/81 (58.0%)52/103 (50.5%)0.95(0.60, 1.49)0.97(0.61, 1.55)
High26/81 (32.1%)41/103 (39.8%)1.10(0.70, 1.74)1.10(0.69, 1.75)
PTREND= 0.40PTREND= 0.51
Vigorous physical activity ≥ 30 min/d for ≥ 3 times/week?
Engagement
None18/83 (21.7%)21/99 (21.2%)Ref Ref
Medium46/83 (55.4%)63/99 (63.6%)1.08(0.78, 1.51)0.92(0.63, 1.34)
High19/83 (22.9%)15/99 (15.2%)0.82(0.51, 1.32)0.67(0.41, 1.10)
PTREND= 0.45PTREND= 0.10
Lifestyle maintenance
No at baseline; Yes at 5-yrNo at baseline and 5-yrUnadjustedAdjusted *
n/N (Percentage)n/N (Percentage)RR Est.(95%CI)RR Est.(95%CI)
Current smoker?
Engagement
None6/16 (37.5%)142/831 (17.1%)Ref Ref
Medium9/16 (56.3%)551/831 (66.3%)1.03(0.99, 1.06)1.02(0.99, 1.06)
High1/16 (6.3%)138/831 (16.6%)1.03(1.00, 1.07)1.03(0.99, 1.07)
PTREND= 0.062PTREND= 0.13
Consuming dairy?
Engagement
None13/92 (14.1%)17/339 (5.0%)Ref Ref
Medium59/92 (64.1%)225/339 (66.4%)1.40(1.02, 1.92)1.39(0.98, 1.97)
High20/92 (21.7%)97/339 (28.6%)1.46(1.06, 2.02)1.47(1.03, 2.10)
PTREND= 0.019PTREND= 0.023
Consuming meat?
Engagement
None5/75 (6.7%)14/328 (4.3%)Ref Ref
Medium55/75 (73.3%)212/328 (64.6%)1.08(0.82, 1.42)1.04(0.79, 1.36)
High15/75 (20.0%)102/328 (31.1%)1.18(0.90, 1.56)1.13(0.86, 1.49)
PTREND= 0.039PTREND= 0.076
Note: Associations with p-value < 0.050 are shown in bold. * Adjusted for baseline age, sex, education, employment, clinical fatigue, disability, and duration since onset.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lin, X.; Yu, M.; Jelinek, G.A.; Simpson-Yap, S.; Neate, S.; Nag, N. Greater Engagement with Health Information Is Associated with Adoption and Maintenance of Healthy Lifestyle Behaviours in People with MS. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 5935. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165935

AMA Style

Lin X, Yu M, Jelinek GA, Simpson-Yap S, Neate S, Nag N. Greater Engagement with Health Information Is Associated with Adoption and Maintenance of Healthy Lifestyle Behaviours in People with MS. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(16):5935. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165935

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lin, Xin, Maggie Yu, George A. Jelinek, Steve Simpson-Yap, Sandra Neate, and Nupur Nag. 2020. "Greater Engagement with Health Information Is Associated with Adoption and Maintenance of Healthy Lifestyle Behaviours in People with MS" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 16: 5935. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165935

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop