Next Article in Journal
Impact of South Korea’s Comprehensive Nursing Service Policy on Nurse and Patient Outcomes
Next Article in Special Issue
Correlation between Lung Function and Functional Movement in Healthy Adults
Previous Article in Journal
Clinical Care Conditions and Needs of Palliative Care Patients from Five Italian Regions: Preliminary Data of the DEMETRA Project
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Guidelines for the Evaluation of Cardiorespiratory Physiotherapy in Stroke Patients

1
Department of Physical Therapy, Nambu University, 23 Cheomdanjungang-ro, Gwangsan-gu, Gwangju 62271, Korea
2
Team of Rehabilitation Treatment, Chosun University Hospital, 365 Pilmun-daero, Dong-gu, Gwangju 61453, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Healthcare 2020, 8(3), 222; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8030222
Submission received: 26 June 2020 / Revised: 18 July 2020 / Accepted: 20 July 2020 / Published: 22 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Comprehensive Clinical Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation)

Abstract

:
Evaluation of stroke patients is prioritized over therapeutic interventions to restore cardiorespiratory capacity. This study aimed to develop a clinically applicable guideline to evaluate cardiorespiratory physiotherapy in stroke patients based on a literature review and a modified Delphi survey. The literature search included 13,498 articles in PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library electronic databases. We surveyed previous articles between January 2010 and June 2019. After the option elimination process, a total of 27 documents were selected and analyzed (draft: 18, modified Delphi survey: 9). The results of this research are roughly divided into two categories. First, 31 draft items were extracted, and a modified Delphi survey questionnaire was created from a literature review. Second, an expert was asked to make two modified Delphi surveys and to modify, delete, and supplement the entries in the statistical analysis at each level to finalize the steps to 20 items. The guidelines developed in this study reflect the selective use of cardiorespiratory physiotherapy evaluation methods in the clinical setting, based on the health status of individual patients. Moreover, the guidelines may help physiotherapists make informed decisions based on expert knowledge, thereby playing a crucial role in the patient-centered treatment planning process.

1. Introduction

The central nervous system regulates heart rate, cardiac contractility, blood pressure, and vasomotor tone, and diseases related to the regulation of autonomous blood flow occur after the onset of stroke [1]. Globally, stroke is the second leading cause of death and disability and is closely related to human mortality [2]. This necessitates an increased demand for rehabilitation programs to improve patient functional levels and quality of life.
A local brain injury in a stroke patient causes neurological damage, resulting in disorders such as a change in consciousness level, loss of motor and sensory function, and impaired cognitive and perceptual abilities. This results in limitations in functional movement and a decrease in physical activity [3]. Stroke requires a dynamic process of repair and remodeling to maintain neural circuits, which is shaped by the behavioral experience. Neuroplasticity depends on sufficient resolution of neurological dysfunction and restoration of blood flow, and the resolution of neural dysfunction may depend on neural plasticity [4]. The spontaneous and therapeutic-induced mechanisms of plasticity that promote functional activity along the site of the stroke injury provide a positive impact on recovery [5]. The rehabilitation strategy for stroke patients mainly focuses on posture and paralysis-related exercises [6]. However, focusing only on exercises that improve cardiac function is insufficient. As a result, physical activity is limited in most stroke patients, except during function-related therapy, which involves 1 h of therapy targeting the metabolic function of the heart and comprises 30 min of physiotherapy and 30 min of occupational therapy [7]. Thus, stroke patients have low cardiorespiratory endurance due to reduced physical activity [8]. Due to an inefficient energy metabolism, such as hemiplegic gait and spasticity, stroke patients exhibit increased muscle fatigue than the general population; incomplete cardiorespiratory control, abnormal oxygen transfer in the body, and decreased lung volume lead to an abnormal increase in the oxygen demand of the body and change in the cardiorespiratory function [9].
According to previous studies, the diaphragm and intercostal muscles, responsible for inhalation and exhalation in stroke patients, are mainly controlled by the unilateral cerebral cortex and subcortical spinal nerve pathways [10,11,12]. In particular, because the diaphragm is an important muscle responsible for approximately 10–70% of ventilation in the sitting and prone positions, a unilateral diaphragm paralysis can cause a significant decrease in respiratory function [13]. Based on this theory, previous studies have reported that for muscles on the paralyzed side, the gait speed correlates with the amount of oxygen intake, and muscle loss leads to low oxygen intake [14]. In addition, maximum oxygen intake, gait speed, and endurance in subacute stroke patients are less than 50% compared to those in healthy subjects [15].
For cardiac and respiratory rehabilitation, the American Heart Association (AHA) and the American Stroke Association (ASA) offer a multidisciplinary program that efficiently manages the exercise, diet, smoking, stress, and education of patients, and its psychological impact to reduce symptoms and help patients return to daily life [16,17]. Studies evaluating pulmonary function, cardiorespiratory endurance, and the 6-Minute Walk test (6MWT) have been actively conducted to evaluate the cardiorespiratory function of stroke patients [18,19]. However, there is still a lack of awareness of cardiorespiratory physiotherapy in stroke patients, and no studies have proposed a standardized guideline for evaluating cardiorespiratory physiotherapy conducted by researchers.
This study aimed to outline evaluation methods for cardiorespiratory physiotherapy in stroke patients, and a modified Delphi survey was used to achieve consensus between the literature review and an expert panel. The Delphi method, developed by the Research and Development (RAND) Corporation, is widely used to assist healthcare professionals to participate in developmental research by compensating for negative aspects such as time and location constraints [20].
Therefore, this study examined data from previous studies that evaluated cardiorespiratory physiotherapy in stroke patients and conducted a modified Delphi survey of experts’ opinions to develop clinically applicable guidelines and evaluation items for cardiorespiratory physiotherapy in stroke patients.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Search Strategy

To develop a guideline to evaluate cardiorespiratory physiotherapy in stroke patients, we systemically searched for articles published in accordance with the direction and purpose of this study between 1 January 2010 and 30 June 2019.
We used the PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, and Cochrane Library databases. To increase the sensitivity and specificity of the literature search, operators (AND, OR) and truncated search (*) functions were used, and synonyms and alternate words of the keyword and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), Emtree, and CINAHL subject headings were used (Table 1, Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4). In addition, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), key questions in the system developed to evaluate cardiorespiratory physiotherapy in stroke patients (participants, intervention, comparisons, outcomes, study design [PICO-SD]) were selected [21].

2.2. Inclusion Criteria

In accordance with the PICO-SD, the subjects were adult stroke patients over 18 years of age, and the intervention measures included a single intervention (the single intervention group) or a combination of two or more interventions (the combination group). The results consisted of a single variable or two or more variables, including exercise interventions related to cardiac and respiratory physiotherapy. The study design included descriptive observational studies, case series; observational analytical, cross-sectional, case-control, and cohort studies; systematic reviews; meta-analyses; and randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

2.3. Exclusion Criteria

Stroke patients under the age of 18 years were excluded. In order to capture the latest research trends, the literature search to develop the draft guidelines was limited to studies published after 2010, but after the first and second modified Delphi surveys, we did not limit the year of publication in order to reflect the different opinions of experts. In addition, the language was limited to English.

2.4. Draft Development Process

A draft guideline was developed by listing the evaluation items to be considered in applying cardiorespiratory physiotherapy in stroke patients. The final selected research papers were independently reviewed by two researchers and one expert as the third figure.

2.5. Modified Delphi Process

2.5.1. Ethical Considerations of Participants

Although this study has no human contact or human samples, it required the collection of personal information from the experts; therefore, the study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Nambu University in Gwangju Metropolitan City, Korea (HBU-IRB-1041478-2017-HR-017) and was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki.

2.5.2. Expert Selection

A panel of nine experts consisting of four full-time professors from the Department of Physical Therapy that oversaw academics and research in the field of cardiorespiratory physiotherapy and five clinical experts in charge of the clinical practice of cardiorespiratory physiotherapy was formed. We intended to fully reflect the opinions of experts in the development of clinically applicable guidelines.
The experts agreed to participate in the study and consisted of licensed physiotherapists with at least 10 years of clinical or research experience in cardiorespiratory physiotherapy. Most experts are active instructors in the Korean Academy of Cardiorespiratory Physiotherapy and are the core resources of cardiorespiratory physiotherapy in Korea.

2.5.3. Modified Delphi Data Collection

The aim and method of the study were explained to the experts via phone beforehand. The panel consisted of cardiorespiratory physiotherapy experts that agreed to participate in the study (first trial: 9, second trial: 9). From 15 July, 2019 to 31 August, 2019, drafts using Likert scales and free text responses were sent to experts, and data consultation and content collection were conducted in person or via email.

2.5.4. Confirmation of the Final Evaluation Items

The modified Delphi survey was repeated twice with the panel of experts, and after analyzing the survey results and reaching an agreement based on the statistical process, the final evaluation items were confirmed.

2.6. Data Analysis

The statistical analysis was conducted based on the data collected through the modified Delphi survey to the expert panel (first: 9 people, second: 9 people) using the SPSS version 20.0 statistical software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). In addition, descriptive statistical analysis was used to confirm the general characteristics of the expert panel and the verification of item understanding. In the modified Delphi survey, suitability of the items was measured using the Likert scale, with 1 point for “strongly disagree,” 2 points for “disagree”, 3 points for “neither agree nor disagree”, 4 points for “agree”, and 5 points for “strongly agree”, and the fitness values for each item were displayed.
Based on the displayed fitness values of the Likert scale, content validity and reliability were analyzed, and validity and suitability were calculated to revise and supplement the opinions of the expert panel.

2.6.1. Content Validity and Reliability

To measure the accuracy and consistency of the measurement tool to judge the panel, the Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Cronbach’s α coefficient were analyzed. In this study, based on 18 experts (9 in the first trial and 9 in the second trial), the minimum value of CVR was 0.78 [22].

2.6.2. Validity and Stability

Convergence and consensus were analyzed to assess the validity of the surveys, which served as a criterion for judging the degree of convergence of the responses and the degree of consensus among the panel members. To determine convergence and consensus, the indicator of convergence had to approach 0 and that of consensus had to approach 1, for a given item to have a high level of validity [23,24]. In addition, stability was measured to judge the consensus among the panel of experts [25]; a coefficient of variation of 0.50 or less will lead to no additional survey, and 0.50 to 0.80 indicates that the survey result is relatively stable, whereas 0.80 or more necessitates an additional survey [26].

3. Results

3.1. Data Extraction Criteria

A literature search was carried out using the electronic databases, and the following number of articles were retrieved: PubMed (2789 articles), EMBASE (7399 articles), CINAHL Plus with Full text (1250 articles), and Cochrane library (2060 articles). A total of 13,498 articles were identified, and through a systematic screening of the collected articles following the procedure of the PRISMA statement and using Endnote software (X9.1, Clarivate Analytics. Philadelphia, PA, USA), the final dataset to be analyzed was selected (Figure 1). We identified 10,876 documents, excluding duplicate documents. Disagreements among reviewers were resolved by consensus; otherwise, a third reviewer was consulted. If not, it was resolved by a third external expert who is a physical therapist and statistical expert. Later, 18 articles were selected for draft development. The selected drafts were revised and analyzed by a panel of experts through the first and second modified Delphi surveys, after which 9 articles were added based on the liberal opinions of each panel member in the first and second surveys, leaving a final set of 27 articles. Table 5 and Table 6 present the results of the surveys conducted in this study.

3.2. General Characteristics of Selected Studies

Characteristics of the studies relating to the evaluation of cardiorespiratory physiotherapy in stroke patients were examined based on three main categories: the publication type, publication year, and study design (Table 7). Concerning the publication type, all 27 articles (100%) were published in academic journals. Concerning the publication year, 5 articles (18.5%) were published before 2010, 11 (40.7%) were published from 2011 to 2015, and 11 (40.7%) were published from 2016 to the present date (June 2019). With regard to the study design, 7 articles (25.9%) were experimental studies, 17 (63.0%) were observational studies, 2 (7.4%) were systematic reviews, and 1 (3.7%) was a systematic review with meta-analysis.

3.3. Draft Analysis

Based on the PRISMA statement, the 18 selected articles were analyzed for draft development by two investigators in this study and by a third external expert. Based on the title and abstract, studies related to the evaluation of cardiorespiratory physiotherapy were categorized according to the study design, and after compliance with the structure summary items based on the PICO-SD, duplicated studies were deleted; finally, a total of 31 draft items were considered (Table 8).

3.4. Modified Delphi Study Analysis

3.4.1. First Modified Delphi Study

In the first modified Delphi survey, the mean goodness of fit of the evaluation items was 4.05 ± 0.43 points based on the Likert scale responses. Regarding the content validity ratio, 16 items had a minimum score (less than 0.78) evaluated by the panel of 9 experts and were deleted following the analysis (i.e., mini-mental state examination (MMSE-K), visual analog scale (VAS), and Faces pain rate scale (FPRS), temperature test, light touch and pressure test, proprioception test, Albert test, range of motion (ROM), manual muscle test (MMT), Hand dynamometry, modified Ashworth scale, functional reach test (FRT), Uni-pedal stance test (UPST), Berg balance scale (BBS), dynamic gait index (DGI), modified Barthel index, and functional independence measure (FIM)). Internal consistency reliability for the evaluation items was set at α = 0.895. The mean convergence was 0.57, while the mean consensus and mean stability were 0.69 and 0.21, respectively (Table 9).
The results of the first modified Delphi survey showed that the accuracy of the statements for each item and the item validity exceeded the minimum scores; nevertheless, appropriate revision and modification were carried out to accommodate additional opinions from the panel and the items of low content validity (Table 10). Six items were newly formulated by the expert panel, including the body mass index (BMI) [45], spatiotemporal gait parameters [51], thoracic contour and chest expansion test [49], the trunk impairment scale (TIS) [52], cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) [50], and the stroke impact scale (SIS) [48].

3.4.2. Second Modified Delphi Study

The results of the first modified Delphi survey showed stability of 0.21 points and no additional questionnaire was required [26]. On the other hand, a degree of convergence close to 0 and a degree of consensus closer to 1 indicates that the opinions and consensus among the panels are valid [23,24]. According to the first modified Delphi survey, the mean convergence was 0.57 points and the mean consensus was 0.69 points, which were not properly reached and agreed among the panels. In addition, we needed to respond to open questions from expert panels; therefore, we conducted a second modified Delphi survey.
We conducted the second modified Delphi survey with the same panel of 9 experts, and the collection rate was 100%. The mean goodness of fit of the evaluation items was 4.40 ± 0.35 points based on the Likert scale responses. For the content validity ratio, two items with scores less than 0.78 (the minimum score of a panel of 9 experts) were deleted (Glasgow coma scale (GCS) and TIS). Concerning the validity, all other items exceeded the minimum score. The internal consistency reliability was α = 0.815. Likewise, the mean convergence improved from 0.57 to 0.36, the mean consensus improved from 0.69 to 0.84, and the mean stability improved from 0.21 to 0.17 (Table 11).
The accuracy of the statements for each item and the item validity all exceeded the minimum score; nevertheless, appropriate revision and modification were carried out to account for additional opinions from the panel and the items of low content validity (Table 12). The respiratory rate or minute ventilation [44] and the 10-Meter Walking Test (10MWT) [47] were added by expert panelists.

3.5. Deriving Final Evaluation Items

To evaluate cardiorespiratory physiotherapy in stroke patients, 31 evaluation items were derived from the literature review and were reorganized through the modified Delphi surveys by expert panelists. Twenty-two items were derived from the first and second survey to achieve consensus, the final 20 items were selected and divided among five main categories (Table 13).

4. Discussion

Appropriate clinical decision-making is a prerequisite to achieve adequate levels of evaluation as well as diagnosis, prognosis, and intervention based on the health status of individual patients [53]. However, clinical guidelines to evaluate cardiorespiratory physiotherapy in stroke patients are not yet available. The purpose of this study was to ensure enhanced quality and expertise for cardiorespiratory physiotherapy in stroke patients by providing selected evaluation items with verified evidence and promoting their use in the clinical setting.
As a result, we collected and analyzed 13,498 research papers, 18 articles were selected for the draft development, and after adding 9 articles via the modified Delphi surveys with expert panelists, a total of 27 articles were ultimately selected to determine the evaluation items. In the first modified Delphi survey, the expert panelists were requested to select from a wide range of evaluation items, including those extracted from the literature review on the comprehensive evaluation of stroke patients and those directly related to the cardiorespiratory domain. After statistically assessing the results of the first modified Delphi survey, individual items were assessed and those with a content validity less than 0.78 were deleted, while the remaining items were revised and modified based on stability, convergence, and consensus results and the open opinions provided by the experts to establish the second modified Delphi survey.
After the first modified Delphi survey, 16 items with less than the minimum score of 0.78 for content validity ratio, that is, the MMSE-K, VAS, FPRS, Temperature test, Light touch and pressure test, Proprioception test, Albert test, ROM, MMT, Hand dynamometry, modified Ashworth scale, FRT, UPST, BBS, DGI, modified Barthel index, and FIM, were deleted. The deleted items were found to be those required for primary motor function recovery without direct relation to cardiorespiratory fitness. In addition, the item internal consistency reliability of the first evaluation items was shown to be considerably high at α = 0.895. In determining convergence and consensus, the indicator of convergence should approach 0 and that of consensus should approach 1, for a given item to have a high level of validity [23,24]. The first modified Delphi survey result showed insufficient levels of convergence and consensus among the expert panelists with the mean convergence for the evaluation items at 0.57 and the mean consensus at 0.69. Regarding the stability, which indicates congruency among the experts in their responses, a coefficient of variation of 0.50 or less leads to no additional survey, 0.50 to 0.80 indicates that the survey result is relatively stable, whereas 0.80 or more necessitates an additional survey [26]. The mean stability was 0.21 in this study; therefore, no additional survey was required. However, due to insufficient convergence and consensus among the expert panelists and the need for expert responses for open questions, the second modified Delphi survey was conducted.
In this study, convergence of the open opinions of the expert panels was achieved using a method in which the investigator provided individual feedback to the issues raised as open opinions after the first modified Delphi survey. The open opinions provided by the expert panels included the need to clearly divide the categories of the main theme according to individual items, the need to extract the items through a multidisciplinary approach, and the need to categorize them according to the advancement of each phase of the stroke. The main feedback from the investigator was as follows: first, the evaluation items were divided into five categories: basic physical examination, level of consciousness, balance, cardiorespiratory, and activities of daily living; second, a guideline based on a multidisciplinary approach seemed an ideal method [54]; however, obtaining cooperation among health professionals in different fields was challenging, and the study anticipated that a considerable length of time and high cost were required. Thus, this study developed a guideline based on the findings of previous studies for cardiorespiratory evaluation items that were required for stroke patients; and third, based on the suggestion that the evaluation items should be provided according to the stroke phase (acute, subacute, and chronic), a practical method based on the health status of individual patients in the clinical setting seemed to be the ideal application for the guideline. The items added by the expert panelists included six evaluation items, namely, BMI [45], spatiotemporal gait parameters [51], the thoracic contour and chest expansion test [49], TIS [52], CPET [50], and SIS [48]. For the item of CPET in particular, the description in the draft limited the item to cycle graded exercise test (GXT), but based on a previous study reporting the use of CPET in treadmill and cycle methods, the item was added [16].
After the second modified Delphi survey, items GCS and TIS had less than the minimum score of 0.78 for content validity ratio and were deleted together with the cycle GXT that coincided with the CPET. In the basic physical examination category, respiratory rate or minute ventilation was added, while peak flow and ECG were removed from the basic physical examination category to the cardiorespiratory category. In the first modified Delphi survey, the pulmonary function test was evaluated as two separate items because of a large number of subcategories, but in the second survey, it was treated as a single unified item. Note that the pulmonary function test has been reported to be highly important as it provides basic data for precise exercise diagnosis by measuring accurate pulmonary function and assessing functional capacity, and the diagnosis and prognosis of the condition [55]. Comparing the convergence, consensus, and stability of the second modified Delphi survey results with those of the first modified Delphi survey, the mean convergence was shown to have improved from 0.57 to 0.36, the mean consensus from 0.69 to 0.84, and the mean stability from 0.21 to 0.17, which indicates that the convergence and consensus among the expert panelists increased further in the second modified Delphi survey with a higher level of congruency, suggesting that the experts reached a consensus. The added items were the respiratory rate or minute ventilation [44] and ten-meter walking test (10MWT) [47], implying that a consensus was drawn from the open opinions provided by the expert panelists.
In the second modified Delphi survey, the feedback to the liberal opinions of the expert panelists was as follows: First, the CPET methods include treadmill, leg cycle, and arm cycle exercises, and among these, the lower leg cycle CPET is considered the most efficient based on high levels of maximal heart rate (MHR) and respiratory gas exchange ratio (RER) as a risk of accidental falls. In addition, the treadmill-based CPET is a protocol of load-bearing exercises using the degree of slope, such that it is suggested to be more useful in achieving increased heart rate and anaerobic threshold compared to the 6MWT or incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT) speed [31]. Second, as the application of the ISWT and 6MWT is determined based on the health status of the patient, these items should be applied according to the patient’s health status in the clinical setting [46]. Third, for a treadmill walk exercise at 3 km/h, the energy expenditure is 2.43 metabolic equivalents (METs), and when the degree of slope is increased by 10% at the same speed to achieve higher exercise intensity, the energy expenditure is 5 METs. However, on a flat slope, even if the treadmill speed is increased two-fold to 6 km/h, the energy expenditure is only 3.85 METs, suggesting that it is more beneficial to stroke patients if the exercise intensity is increased by increasing the degree of the slope than by increasing the speed [56]. Fourth, it was determined that the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) was a valid item from the Likert validity score of 4.11 ± 0.60. While the SIS seems to lack significant clinical evidence for its application, as no previous study has reported a definite association between stroke and cardiorespiratory parameters, it is possible that the items related to the movement correlate with mobility, activities of daily living (ADL)/instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), participation, and physical categories among the 9 categories, and above all, unlike the frequently used FIM and Barthel index, the SIS may be useful in determining the level of recovery for several symptoms of stroke [48]. Fifth, in the basic physical examination category, it was suggested that an additional respiratory test was required, such as the respiratory rate or minute ventilation [44]. Sixth, the 10MWT and 6MWT were suggested as additional items, as a previous study reported a significant correlation between the two tests with respect to physical activity and gait in stroke patients [57].
The present study has several limitations. First, when a given item is applied, the effect may vary according to the health status of individual stroke patients. This variation may be resolved through selective application of the proposed evaluation tool in a clinical setting. Second, the study did not take into consideration the impact of differences in clinical experience and academic background among the expert panelists. Third, the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), a separate physical therapy database, was not added because the Cochrane Library database contains a wide range of papers and guidelines for randomized and systematic studies and clinical trials. It is highly advisable that this factor be analyzed and implemented in future studies.
In conclusion, the evaluation items suggested in this study were derived from converging evidence from expert opinions and should serve as an efficient tool in the clinical setting for the evaluation of cardiorespiratory physiotherapy necessity in stroke patients.

5. Conclusions

This study that actively reflects the opinions of expert panels with a modified Delphi survey that utilizes the advantages of non-face-to-face review and prior literature review to present items that can be applied to evaluate cardiorespiratory physiotherapy for stroke patients could be used directly in clinical practice. It is, therefore, important to develop an evidence-based guideline. The final 20 evaluation items can be widely used as a checklist for evaluating and diagnosing patients in clinical practice by selectively providing customized evaluation tools for cardiorespiratory physiotherapy with respect to the level of recovery of motor function in individual stroke patients. In addition, it is expected that it will have a positive impact on programs to plan therapeutic interventions by providing basic data for individual patient evaluations. Future experimental studies investigating the role of cardiorespiratory physiotherapy in stroke patients, in addition to systematic meta-analysis studies to allow a qualitative evaluation to secure its conclusions, are warranted to validate these guidelines.

Author Contributions

Project administration, S.-H.C.; methodology, S.-H.C. and K.-B.C.; writing—original draft preparation, S.-H.C. and K.-B.C.; writing—review and editing, S.-H.C. and K.-B.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant by the Korean government (MSIT) (No. 2017R1C1B5076499).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Williamson, J.W.; Fadel, P.J.; Mitchell, J.H. New insights into central cardiovascular control during exercise in humans: A central command update. Exp. Physiol. 2006, 91, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Mozaffarian, D.; Benjamin, E.J.; Go, A.S.; Arnett, D.K.; Blaha, M.J.; Cushman, M.; de Ferranti, S.; Després, J.P.; Fullerton, H.J.; Howard, V.J.; et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2015 update. Circulation 2015, 131, 29–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. De Almeida, I.C.L.; Clementino, A.C.C.R.; Rocha, E.H.T.; Brandão, D.C.; Dornelas de Andrade, A. Effects of hemiplegy on pulmonary function and diaphragmatic dome displacement. Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 2011, 178, 196–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Jones, T.A. Motor compensation and its effects on neural reorganization after stroke. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2017, 18, 267–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Cassidy, J.M.; Cramer, S.C. Spontaneous and therapeutic-induced mechanisms of functional recovery after stroke. Transl. Stroke Res. 2017, 8, 33–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Hatem, S.M.; Saussez, G.; della Faille, M.; Prist, V.; Zhang, X.; Dispa, D.; Bleyenheuft, Y. Rehabilitation of motor function after stroke: A multiple systematic review focused on techniques to stimulate upper extremity recovery. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2016, 10, 442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Clark, B.; Whitall, J.; Kwakkel, G.; Mehrholz, J.; Ewings, S.; Burridge, J. Time spent in rehabilitation and effect on measures of activity after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2017, 3, CD012612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hafer-Macko, C.E.; Ryan, A.S.; Ivey, F.M.; Macko, R.F. Skeletal muscle changes after hemiparetic stroke and potential beneficial effects of exercise intervention strategies. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 2008, 45, 261–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dean, E.; Frownfelter, D. Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Physical Therapy: Evidence and Practice, 4th ed.; Mosby: St. Louis, MO, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  10. Yun, R.Y.; Park, H.E.; Hong, J.W.; Shin, Y.B.; Yoon, J.A. Correlation of swallowing function with bilateral diaphragmatic movement in hemiplegic stroke patients. Ann. Rehabil. Med. 2019, 43, 156–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Khedr, E.M.; El Shinawy, O.; Khedr, T.; Abdel Aziz Ali, Y.; Awad, E.M. Assessment of corticodiaphragmatic pathway and pulmonary function in acute ischemic stroke patients. Eur. J. Neurol. 2000, 7, 509–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Florêncio, R.B.; da Nobrega, A.J.S.; Lima, Í.N.D.F.; Gualdi, L.P.; Cabral, E.E.; Fagundes, M.L.L.C.; Aliverti, A.; Resqueti, V.R.; Fregonezi, G.A.D.F. Chest wall volume and asynchrony in stroke and Parkinson’s disease subjects: A case-control study. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0216641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Sutbeyaz, S.; Koseoglu, F.; Inan, L.; Coskun, O. Respiratory muscle training improves cardiopulmonary function and exercise tolerance in subjects with subacute stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Clin. Rehabil. 2010, 24, 240–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ryan, A.S.; Dobrovolny, C.L.; Smith, G.V.; Silver, K.H.; Macko, R.F. Hemiparetic muscle atrophy and increased intramuscular fat in stroke patients. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2002, 83, 1703–1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kelly, J.O.; Kilbreath, S.L.; Davis, G.M.; Zeman, B.; Raymond, J. Cardiorespiratory fitness and walking ability in subacute stroke patients. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2003, 84, 1780–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Billinger, S.A.; Arena, R.; Bernhardt, J.; Eng, J.J.; Franklin, B.A.; Johnson, C.M.; MacKay-Lyons, M.; Macko, R.F.; Mead, G.E.; Roth, E.J.; et al. Physical activity and exercise recommendations for stroke survivors: A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2014, 45, 2532–2553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Winstein, C.J.; Stein, J.; Arena, R.; Bates, B.; Cherney, L.R.; Cramer, S.C.; Deruyter, F.; Eng, J.J.; Fisher, B.; Harvey, R.L.; et al. Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2016, 47, e98–e169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Woodward, J.L.; Connolly, M.; Hennessy, P.W.; Holleran, C.L.; Mahtani, G.B.; Brazg, G.; Fahey, M.; Maganti, K.; Hornby, T.G. Cardiopulmonary responses during clinical and laboratory gait assessments in people with chronic stroke. Phys. Ther. 2019, 99, 86–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Zheng, G.H.; Zheng, X.; Li, J.Z.; Duan, T.J.; Tao, J.; Chen, L.D. Effect of Tai Chi on cardiac and static pulmonary function in older community-dwelling adults at risk of ischemic stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Chin. J. Integr. Med. 2019, 25, 582–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Morisset, J.; Johannson, K.A.; Jones, K.D.; Wolters, P.J.; Collard, H.R.; Walsh, S.L.F.; Ley, B. The HP Delphi Collaborators. Identification of diagnostic criteria for chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis. An international modified Delphi survey. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2018, 197, 1036–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Moher, D.; Shamseer, L.; Clarke, M.; Ghersi, D.; Liberati, A.; Petticrew, M.; Shekelle, P.; Stewart, L.A. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst. Rev. 2015, 4, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Lawshe, C.H. A quantitative approach to content validity. Pers. Psychol. 1975, 28, 563–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Forsyth, D.; Torr, P.; Zisserman, A. Computer Vision—ECCV 2008, 1st ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  24. Vedaldi, A.; Jin, H.; Favaro, P.; Soatto, S. KALMANSAC: Robust filtering by consensus. In Proceedings of the Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV’05), Beijing, China, 17–21 October 2005; pp. 633–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Odic, D.; Im, H.Y.; Eisinger, R.; Ly, R.; Halberda, J. PsiMLE: A maximum-likelihood estimation approach to estimating psychophysical scaling and variability more reliably, efficiently, and flexibly. Behav. Res. Methods 2016, 48, 445–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Sempik, J.; Aldridge, J.; Becker, S. Social and Therapeutic Horticulture: Evidence and Messages from Research; Loughborough University: Loughborough, UK, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  27. Baert, I.; Daly, D.; Dejaeger, E.; Vanroy, C.; Vanlandewijck, Y.; Feys, H. Evolution of cardiorespiratory fitness after stroke: A 1-year follow-up study. Influence of prestroke patients’ characteristics and stroke-related factors. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2012, 93, 669–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Barclay, R.E.; Stevenson, T.J.; Poluha, W.; Ripat, J.; Nett, C.; Srikesavan, C.S. Interventions for improving community ambulation in individuals with stroke. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015, 13, CD010200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Boyne, P.; Reisman, D.; Brian, M.; Barney, B.; Franke, A.; Carl, D.; Khoury, J.; Dunning, K. Ventilatory threshold may be a more specific measure of aerobic capacity than peak oxygen consumption rate in persons with stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2017, 24, 149–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Chang, W.H.; Kim, M.S.; Huh, J.P.; Lee, P.K.; Kim, Y.H. Effects of robot-assisted gait training on cardiopulmonary fitness in subacute stroke patients: A randomized controlled study. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 2012, 26, 318–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dunn, A.; Marsden, D.L.; Barker, D.; van Vliet, P.; Spratt, N.J.; Callister, R. Evaluation of three measures of cardiorespiratory fitness in independently ambulant stroke survivors. Physiother. Theory Pract. 2019, 35, 622–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dunn, A.; Marsden, D.L.; Van Vliet, P.; Spratt, N.J.; Callister, R. Independently ambulant, community–dwelling stroke survivors have reduced cardiorespiratory fitness, mobility and knee strength compared to an age- and gender-matched cohort. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2017, 24, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Han, E.Y.; Im, S.H. Effects of a 6-week aquatic treadmill exercise program on cardiorespiratory fitness and walking endurance in subacute stroke patients. J. Cardiopulm. Rehabil. Prev. 2018, 38, 314–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Harmsen, W.J.; Ribbers, G.M.; Slaman, J.; Heijenbrok-Kal, M.H.; Khajeh, L.; van Kooten, F.; Neggers, S.J.; van den Berg-Emons, R.J. The six-minute walk test predicts cardiorespiratory fitness in individuals with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2017, 24, 250–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Marzolini, S.; Oh, P.; Corbett, D.; Dooks, D.; Calouro, M.; MacIntosh, B.J.; Goodman, R.; Brooks, D. Prescribing aerobic exercise intensity without a cardiopulmonary exercise test post stroke: Utility of the six-minute walk test. J. Stroke Cereb. Dis. 2016, 25, 2222–2231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Menezes, K.K.; Nascimento, L.R.; Avelino, P.R.; Alvarenga, M.T.M.; Teixeira-Salmela, L.F. Efficacy of interventions to improve respiratory function after stroke. Respir. Care 2018, 63, 920–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Moura, L.M.; Quintão, M.M.; de Carvalho, K.S.; Carrapatoso, B.C.; Malfacini, S.L.; da Silva, A.C.; Orsini, M.; Nascimento, O.J.; Chermont, S.S. Controlled study of correlation of biomechanical profile of hemiparetic patients with distance travelled in six minutes. Neurol. Int. 2015, 7, 5417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ovando, A.C.; Michaelsen, S.M.; Carvalho, T.d.; Herber, V. Evaluation of cardiopulmonary fitness in individuals with hemiparesis after cerebrovascular accident. Arq. Bras. Cardiol. 2011, 96, 140–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Paz, A.L.; Doniz, L.G.; García, S.O.; Canosa, J.L.S.; Couto, C.M. Respiratory muscle strength in chronic stroke survivors and its relation with the 6-minute walk test. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2016, 97, 266–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Salbach, N.M.; Brooks, D.; Romano, J.; Woon, L.; Dolmage, T.E. Cardiorespiratory responses during the 6-minute walk and ramp cycle ergometer tests and their relationship to physical activity in stroke. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 2014, 28, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Söderholm, M.; Zia, E.; Hedblad, B.; Engström, G. Lung function as a risk factor for subarachnoid hemorrhage: A prospective cohort study. Stroke 2012, 43, 2598–2603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Smith, A.C.; Saunders, D.H.; Mead, G. Cardiorespiratory fitness after stroke: A systematic review. Int. J. Stroke 2012, 7, 499–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Tang, A.; Marzolini, S.; Oh, P.; McIlroy, W.E.; Brooks, D. Research article feasibility and effects of adapted cardiac rehabilitation after stroke: A prospective trial. BMC Neurol. 2010, 10, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Betensley, A.D.; Khalid, I.; Crawford, J.; Pensler, R.A.; DiGiovine, B. Patient comfort during pressure support and volume controlled-continuous mandatory ventilation. Respir. Care 2008, 53, 897–902. [Google Scholar]
  45. Chen, C.; Huang, M.; Liang, W.; Lin, R.; Juo, S. Early functional improvement after stroke correlates with cardiovascular fitness. Kaohsiung J. Med. Sci. 2018, 34, 643–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Clague-Baker, N.; Robinson, T.; Hagenberg, A.; Drewry, S.; Gillies, C.; Singh, S. The validity and reliability of the incremental shuttle walk test and six-minute walk test compared to an incremental cycle test for people who have had a mild-to-moderate stroke. Physiotherapy 2019, 105, 275–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Dalgas, U.; Severinsen, K.; Overgaard, K. Relations between 6-minute walking distance and 10-meter walking speed in patients with multiple sclerosis and stroke. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2012, 93, 1167–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Duncan, P.W.; Wallace, D.; Lai, S.M.; Johnson, D.; Embretson, S.; Laster, L.J. The stroke impact scale version 2.0. evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke 1999, 30, 2131–2140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Kim, K.; Fell, D.; Lee, J. Feedback respiratory training to enhance chest expansion and pulmonary function in chronic stroke: A double-blind, randomized controlled study. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 2011, 23, 75–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Kim, J.; Park, J.H.; Yim, J. Effects of respiratory muscle and endurance training using an individualized training device on the pulmonary function and exercise capacity in stroke patients. Med. Sci. Monit. 2014, 20, 2543–2549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Tang, A.; Sibley, K.M.; Thomas, S.G.; Bayley, M.T.; Richardson, D.; Mcllroy, W.E.; Brooks, D. Effects of an aerobic exercise program on aerobic capacity, spatiotemporal gait parameters, and functional capacity in subacute stroke. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 2009, 23, 398–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Verheyden, G.; Nieuwboer, A.; Mertin, J.; Preger, R.; Kiekens, C.; De Weerdt, W. The trunk impairment scale: A new tool to measure motor impairment of the trunk after stroke. Clin. Rehabil. 2004, 18, 326–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Shah, R.D.; Rasinski, K.A.; Alexander, G.C. The influence of surrogate decision makers on clinical decision making for critically Ill adults. J. Intensive Care Med. 2015, 30, 278–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Spruit, M.A.; Singh, S.J.; Garvey, C.; Zu Wallack, R.; Nici, L.; Rochester, C.; Hill, K.; Holland, A.E.; Lareau, S.C.; Man, W.D.C.; et al. An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: Key concepts and advances in pulmonary rehabilitation. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2013, 188, e13–e64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Skinner, J.S. Exercise Testing and Exercise Prescription for Special Cases: Theoretical Basis and Clinical Application, 3rd ed.; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  56. Bibi, K.W.; Niederpruem, M.G. ACSM’s Certification Review, 4th ed.; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  57. Sullivan, J.E.; Crowner, B.E.; Kluding, P.M.; Nichols, D.; Rose, D.K.; Yoshida, R.; Pinto Zipp, G. Outcome measures for individuals with stroke: Process and recommendations from the American Physical Therapy Association neurology section task force. Phys. Ther. 2013, 93, 1383–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Flow diagram showing the literature inclusion and exclusion criteria in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) format.
Figure 1. Flow diagram showing the literature inclusion and exclusion criteria in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) format.
Healthcare 08 00222 g001
Table 1. Search strategy using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms in PubMed.
Table 1. Search strategy using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms in PubMed.
Search QueriesSubject/MeSH Terms
User GroupField of Health Research
Stroke AND Cerebral AND ExerciseStroke
Cerebrum
Brain
Cardiac rehabilitation
Respiratory therapy
Patient outcome assessment
Cardiorespiratory fitness
Exercise
Heart
Rehabilitation
Stroke AND Cardiac rehabilitation AND Exercise
Stroke AND Respiratory therapy AND Exercise
Stroke AND Cardiorespiratory fitness AND Exercise
Stroke AND Respirat * AND Exercise
Stroke[abstract] AND Cerebral[abstract] AND Exercise[abstract] AND Rehabilitation[abstract] AND Respiratory[abstract] AND Cardiac[abstract]
Stroke AND Cardiac rehabilitation AND Patient outcome assessments
Stroke AND Cardiorespiratory fitness AND Patient outcome assessments
Stroke AND Respirat * AND Patient outcome assessments
Stroke[abstract] AND Cerebral[abstract] AND Respiratory[abstract] AND Cardiac[abstract] AND Patient outcome assessments[abstract]
Stroke[title] AND Exercise[title] AND Respiratory[title]
Stroke[title] AND Exercise[title] AND Cardiac[title]
Hemiparetic AND Exercise
Notes: Truncation search (*) is a comprehensive search method for searching terms.
Table 2. Search strategy using Emtree terms in EMBASE.
Table 2. Search strategy using Emtree terms in EMBASE.
IDSearch Queries
#1‘Cerebrovascular disease’/exp AND ‘Stroke patient’/exp AND ‘Exercise’/exp
#2‘Stroke patient’/exp OR ‘Cerebrovascular disease’/exp AND ‘Heart rehabilitation’/exp
#3‘Stroke patient’/exp OR ‘Cerebrovascular disease’/exp AND ‘Respiratory care’/exp
#4‘Stroke patient’/exp OR ‘Cerebrovascular disease’/exp AND ‘Cardiorespiratory fitness’/exp
#5‘Stroke patient’/exp OR ‘Cerebrovascular disease’/exp AND ‘Breathing’/exp
#6‘Stroke patient’/exp OR ‘Cerebrovascular disease’/exp AND ‘Breathing exercise’/exp
#7‘Stroke patient’/exp OR ‘Cerebrovascular disease’/exp AND ‘Lung function test’/exp
#8‘Stroke patient’/exp AND ‘Cerebrovascular disease’/exp AND ‘Outcome assessment’/exp
#9‘Stroke patient’/exp OR ‘Cerebrovascular disease’/exp AND ‘Checklist’/exp
#10‘Stroke patient’/exp OR ‘Cerebrovascular disease’/exp AND ‘Respiratory tract parameters’/exp AND ‘Breathing’/exp AND ‘Heart rehabilitation’/exp
#11‘Stroke patient’/exp OR ‘Cerebrovascular disease’/exp AND ‘Exercise’/exp AND ‘Rehabilitation’/exp AND ‘Respiratory care’/exp
Table 3. Search strategy in CINAHL.
Table 3. Search strategy in CINAHL.
IDSearch Queries
#1Stroke AND Cerebral AND Exercise
#2Stroke AND Cardiac rehabilitation AND Exercise
#3Stroke AND Respiratory therapy AND Exercise
#4Stroke AND Cardiorespiratory fitness AND Exercise
#5Stroke AND Respirat * AND Exercise
#6Stroke AND (MM “Breathing exercises”)
#7Stroke AND (MH “Cardiorespiratory fitness”) OR (MH “Respiratory therapy equipment and supplies”) OR (MM “Respiratory therapy”) OR (MH “American association for respiratory care”)
#8Stroke AND (MM “Outcome assessment”) OR (MM “Outcomes of education”) OR (MM “Patient assessment”)
#9Stroke AND (MM “Outcome assessment”) OR (MM “Outcomes of education”) OR (MM “Patient assessment”) AND Pulmonary
Notes: Truncation search (*) is a comprehensive search method for searching terms.
Table 4. Search strategy in the Cochrane Library.
Table 4. Search strategy in the Cochrane Library.
IDSearch Queries
#1Stroke AND Cerebral AND Exercise
#2Stroke AND Cardiac rehabilitation AND Exercise
#3Stroke AND Respiratory therapy AND Exercise
#4Stroke AND Cardiorespiratory fitness AND Exercise
#5Stroke AND Cardiac rehabilitation AND Patient outcome assessments
#6Stroke AND Cardiorespiratory fitness AND Patient outcome assessments
#7Stroke patient AND Cerebrovascular disease AND Outcome assessment
#8Stroke patient AND Cerebrovascular disease AND Breathing exercise
#9Stroke AND Cerebrovascular disease AND Exercise AND Rehabilitation AND Respiratory care
#10Stroke patient AND Cerebrovascular disease AND Lung function test
Table 5. Research characteristics selected for draft development.
Table 5. Research characteristics selected for draft development.
#Author (Country*)YearJournalDesignParticipantsInterventionComparison between InterventionsOutcome
1Baert et al. [27] (Belgium)2012Arch Phys Med RehabilDescriptive, prospective longitudinal studySample of patients with stroke (n = 33)CRF: VO2peak, OUES, workload peak, HRpeak, RERpeak, RPE scaleNACRF was reduced from 3 to 12 months poststroke and on average did not significantly change over time
2Barclay et al. [28] (Canada)2015Cochrane Database Syst RevSystematic Reviews and meta-analysis5 RCT studies (266 participants)Community ambulation (practice, rehearsal, or exercise)No treatment, usual treatment, other treatment, of placebo treatmentThere is insufficient evidence to establish the effect of community ambulation interventions of the support a change in clinical practice
3Boyne et al. [29] (USA)2017Top Stroke RehabilCross-sectional observational studyChronic stroke patients (n = 59)Incline and speed GXT protocol, Inter-rater reliability testing for VO2-VT determinationNAMotor dysfunction appears to artificially lower measured aerobic capacity. VO2-VT may provide more specific assessment of aerobic capacity post-stroke
4Chang et al. [30] (Korea)2012Neurorehabil Neural RepairExperimental study: Prospective single-blinded, RCT study37 subacute stroke patientsRobot-assisted gait training (40 min) + conventional physical therapy (60 min)Conventional physical therapy (100 min)Patients can be trained to increase their VO2 and lower-extremity strength using a robotic device for stepping during inpatient rehabilitation
5Dunn et al. [31] (Australia)2019Physiother Theory PractCross-sectional observational studySample of patients with stroke (n = 23)6MWT, ISWT, and GXT, during which VO2peak and HRpeakNACorrelations between VO2peak and performance measures within each test were high
6Dunn et al. [32] (Australia)2017Top Stroke RehabilCase-control observational study17 SS participating6MWT, ISWT, cycle GXT, walking speed, knee strength, body composition17 healthy control participantsPeak VO2 was lower in the stroke group for the ISWT and progressive cycle test, as were all CRF test
7Han and Im [33] (Korea)2018J Cardiopulm Rehabil PrevExperimental study: RCT (Two-group pretest-posttest design)Sample of patients with subacute stroke (n = 20)ATE (30 min) for 6 weeks, five times per weekLand-based exercise for 6 weeks, five times per weekATE group: significant improvements in 6MWT, VO2peak, HRpeak, exercise tolerance test duration, and K-MBI
8Harmsen et al. [34] (The Netherlands)2017Top Stroke RehabilCase series -descriptive studySample of patients with a-SAH (n = 27)6MWT, CPETNA6MWT is an easy to administer submaximal exercise test in groups of patients with a-SAH
9Marzolini et al. [35] (Canada)2016J Stroke Cerebrovasc DisCase series -descriptive studySample of post stroke patients (n = 60)6MWT, CPETNAIn combination with the CPET, the 6MWT will indicate when deficits preclude walking alone as the primary exercise modality for optimizing cardiovascular fitness
10Menezes et al. [36] (Brazil)2018Respir CareSystematic Reviews17 RCT studies (616 stroke patients)Interventions to improve respiratory functionControl groupMeta-analyses found no significant results for the effects of breathing exercise on lung function
11Moura et al. [37] (Brazil)2015Neurol IntCase series-descriptive study10 hemiparetic patients diagnosed with CVA (n = 10)The correlation between the 6MWD and the biomechanical profile of hemiparetic patientsNAThe negative correlation between the percentage of loss of 6MWD and the limitation in the ankle dorsiflexion movement
12Ovando et al. [38] (Brazil)2011Arq Bras CardiolCross-sectional observational study8 individuals with chronic hemiparesisEvaluation of cardiopulmonary test (CPT)NAThe CPT proved to be useful for prescribing physical activity in these individuals
13Paz [39] (Spain)2016Arch Phys Med RehabilCross-sectional observational study30 SS with 30 healthy people matched by age and sexRespiratory muscle strength (MEP and MIP), 6MWT, MI, SIS-16NAMIP and MEP are significantly decreased in SS. Inspiratory and expiratory muscle weakness was observed as a clinically relevant finding
14Salbach et al. [40] (Canada)2014Neurorehabil Neural RepairCase series -descriptive studyConsecutive sample of post-stroke patients (n = 16)Comparing cardiorespiratory responses to CET and 6MWTNAExercise intensity achieved during the 6MWT appeared sufficiently high for aerobic training, assuming CET VO2peak accurately reflects aerobic capacity
15Söderholm et al. [41] (Sweden)2012StrokeProspective cohort study20,534 men and 7237 womenLung function as a risk factor (incidence of SAH, smoking, and hypertension) for SAHNABaseline lung function, expressed as low FEV1 or FEV1/FVC, is a risk factor for SAH, independently of smoking
16Smith et al. [42] (UK)2012Int J StrokeSystematic Reviews41 studies (RCT: 16, UCT: 7, NRCT: 1, Obs: 14, Cohort Obs: 3)Maximal oxygen uptake in SSMaximal oxygen uptake with published data from age- and sex-matched controlsCRF levels are significantly lower in patients with stroke compared with healthy people of same age and gender
17Tang et al. [43] (Canada)2010BMC NeurolCohort observational studySample of patients with stroke who completed the study (n = 38)Feasibility (number of participants who completed the study, occurrence of adverse events and frequency, duration, and intensity of exercise), Effectiveness (aerobic capacity, 6MWT distance, and risk factors)Aerobic capacity (VO2peak, ventilatory threshold), 6MWT distance, and risk factors
(after 6 months)
CR is feasible after stroke and may be adapted to accommodate for those with a range of post-stroke disability
18Woodward et al. [18]
(USA)
2019Phys TherCross-sectional observational studySample of patients with chronic (>6 months) hemiparesis (n = 53)Cardiorespiratory responses during 6MWTs and GXTsNACardiac responses were higher than anticipated during 6MWTs and often exceeded recommended HR thresholds
Country* = refers to the location of the corresponding author. Abbreviations: 6MWD = Six-minute walk distance; 6MWT = Six-minute walk test; a-SAH = aneurysmal Subarachnoid hemorrhage; AIT = Aerobic interval training; ATE = Aquatic treadmill exercise; CET = Cycle ergometer test; CPET = Cardiopulmonary exercise testing; CPT = Cardiopulmonary testing; CRF = Cardiorespiratory fitness; FEV1 = Forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FVC = Forced vital capacity; GXT = Graded exercise test; HIIT = High-intensity interval training; HR = Heart rate; ISWT, Incremental shuttle walk test; MEP = Maximal expiratory pressure; MI = Motricity index; MIP = Maximal inspiratory pressure; NA = Not applicable; NRCT = Nonrandomized controlled trial; Obs = Observational study; OUES = Oxygen uptake efficiency slope; RCT = Randomized controlled trial; RER = Respiratory gas exchange ratio; RPE = Ratings of perceived exertion; SAH = Subarachnoid hemorrhage; SIS-16 = Impact of stroke version 16.0; SS = Stroke survivors; TAEX = Aerobic treadmill exercise; UCT = Uncontrolled trial; VO2 = Oxygen consumption; VO2peak = Peak oxygen uptake; VO2-VT = VO2 at the ventilatory threshold.
Table 6. Research characteristics selected after the first and second modified Delphi investigations surveys.
Table 6. Research characteristics selected after the first and second modified Delphi investigations surveys.
#Author (Country*)YearJournalDesignParticipantsInterventionComparison between InterventionsOutcome
1Betensley et al. [44] (USA)2008Respir CareRandomized prospective trial14 patients with intubated mechanically ventilated patientsPatient comfort: 100 cm visual analog scale (PRVC ventilation, PSV or VC-CMV)NAOn average the patients felt more comfortable during PSV than during VC-CMV or PRVC, so PSV may be the preferred mode for awake intubated patients
2Chen et al. [45] (Taiwan)2018Kaohsiung
J Med Sci
Experimental study: Single-group, pre-post test, intervention study37 acute stroke patients (Stroke onset less than two weeks)Early stroke rehabilitation (individualized treatment program) for three weeksNAImprovement of functional outcome (FMS, FIM) and Increase of cardiovascular fitness (peak workload, oxygen uptake, heart rate, oxygen pulse)
3Clague-Baker et al. [46] (UK)2019PhysiotherapyCross-sectional observational study40 stroke patients within six months of strokeValidity between VO2Peak, ISWT and 6MWT, Test re-test reliability of 6MWT and ISWTNAThe ISWT and 6MWT have a significant, modest correlation with the ICT for stroke patients in the subacute recovery phase
4Dalgas et al. [47] (Denmark)2012Arch Phys Med RehabilCross-sectional observational studyPatients with multiple sclerosis (n = 38), patients with stroke (n = 48), and healthy subjects (n = 46)Correlations between walking tests, relationship between walking speed from long and short walking testsNAWalking speeds of a short walking test and a long walking test are strongly correlated in Multiple sclerosis and stroke, whereas correlations in healthy subjects are weaker
5Duncan et al. [48] (USA)1999StrokeProspective cohort studySubjects with mild and moderate strokes completed the SIS at 1 month (n = 91), at 3 months (n = 80), and at 6 months after stroke (n = 69)Internal consistency and test-retest reliability, the validityNAThis new, stroke-specific outcome measure is reliable, valid, and sensitive to change
6Kim et al. [49] (Korea)2011J Phys Ther SciExperimental study: RCT (Two-group pretest-posttest control group design)Chronic stroke patients (n = 27)Feedback respiratory training (30 min) and Conventional physical therapy (30 min) for 4 weeks, three times per weekConventional physical therapy (30 min) for 4 weeks, three times per weekFeedback respiratory training is effective for the improvement of chest expansion and pulmonary function
7Kim et al. [50] (Korea)2014Med Sci MonitExperimental study: RCT (Two-group pretest-posttest control group design)Stroke patients (n = 20)The same exercise regimen as the control group (30 min) and respiratory muscle training regimen using a respiratory exercise device (20 min), 3 times per week for 4 weeksControl group: Basic exercise treatments for 30 min, followed by an automated full-body workout, 3 times per week for 4 weeksExercise of the respiratory muscles using an individualized respiratory device had a positive effect on pulmonary function and exercise capacity
8Tang et al. [51] (Canada)2009Neurorehabil
Neural Repair
Prospective matched control design45 subacute stroke patients (less than 3 months after stroke)30 min of aerobic cycle ergometry + conventional inpatient rehabilitation 3 days/weeks until dischargeConventional rehabilitationImprovement of aerobic capacity, Gait assessment, 6MWT, SIS
9Verheyden et al. [52] (Belgium)2004Clin RehabilCross-sectional observational studyChronic stroke patients (n = 28)Kappa and ICC of Test/retest agreement, Inter-observer agreementNAGuidelines for treatment and level of quality of trunk activity can be derived from the assessment
Country* = means the location of corresponding author. Abbreviations: 6MWT = Six-minute walk test; FIM = Functional independence measure; FITT = Frequency and intensity and time and type; FMS = Fugl-Meyer scale; ICC = Intraclass correlation; ICT = Incremental cycle test; ISWT = Incremental shuttle walk test; NA = Not applicable; PRVC = Pressure-regulated volume-control; PSV = Pressure-support ventilation; RCT = Randomized controlled trial; SIS = Stroke impact scale; VC-CMV = Volume controlled-continuous mandatory ventilation; VO2peak = Peak oxygen uptake.
Table 7. Characteristics of the analyzed studies (n = 27).
Table 7. Characteristics of the analyzed studies (n = 27).
Main CategorySub-CategoryNo (%) of Reports >
Publication year~20105 (18.6%)
2011~201511 (40.7%)
2016~present11 (40.7%)
Publication typeJournal27 (100%)
Study designExperimental study7 (25.9%)
Observational study17 (63.0%)
Systematic reviews2 (7.4%)
Systematic reviews and Meta-analysis1 (3.7%)
Table 8. Draft item.
Table 8. Draft item.
NoDraft Item
1Vital sign
2Saturation
3Peak flow
4ECG
5LOC
6GCS
7MMSE-K
8VAS and FPRS
9Temperature test
10Light touch and pressure test
11Proprioception test
12Albert test
13ROM test
14MMT
15MIP and MEP
16Hand dynamometry
17MAS
18FRT
19UPST
20BBS
21DGI
22TUG
23RPE
24modified Borg dyspnea scale
256MWT
26ISWT
27Pulmonary function test
28Cycle GXT
29SGRQ
30MBI
31FIM
Abbreviations: 6MWT = Six-minute walk test; BBS = Berg balance scale; DGI = Dynamic gait index; ECG = Electrocardiographic; FIM = Functional independence measure; FPRS = Faces pain rate scale; FRT = Functional reach test; GCS = Glasgow coma scale; GXT = Graded exercise test; ISWT = Incremental shuttle walk test; LOC = Level of consciousness; MAS = modified Ashworth scale; MBI = modified Barthel index; MEP = Maximal expiration pressure; MIP = Maximal inspiration pressure; MMT = Manual muscle test; MMSE-K = Mini-mental state examination; ROM = Range of motion; RPE = Rating of perceived exertion; TUG = Timed up and go test; UPST = Uni-pedal stance test; SGRQ = Saint George’s respiratory questionnaire; VAS = Visual analog scale.
Table 9. Results of items after the first modified Delphi investigation.
Table 9. Results of items after the first modified Delphi investigation.
NoEvaluation ItemMeanSDCVRQ1MedianQ3StabilityConvergenceConsensus
1Vital sign4.890.331.005.005.005.000.070.001.00
2Saturation5.000.001.005.005.005.000.000.001.00
3Peak flow4.560.730.784.005.005.000.160.500.80
4ECG5.000.001.005.005.005.000.000.001.00
5LOC4.330.710.784.004.005.000.160.500.75
6GCS4.220.670.784.004.005.000.160.500.75
7MMSE-K3.780.670.333.004.004.000.180.500.75
8VAS and FPRS3.780.97−0.113.003.005.000.261.000.33
9Temperature sensory test2.780.97−0.562.003.003.500.350.750.50
10Light touch and pressure test2.671.00−0.562.003.003.500.380.750.50
11Proprioception sensory test3.561.010.332.504.004.000.290.750.63
12Albert test3.220.97−0.332.503.004.000.300.750.50
13ROM test3.671.120.332.504.004.500.301.000.50
14MMT3.441.13−0.112.503.004.500.331.000.33
15MIP and MEP4.780.441.004.505.005.000.090.250.90
16Hand dynamometry4.221.090.563.505.005.000.260.750.70
17MAS3.331.00−0.112.503.004.000.300.750.50
18FRT3.220.970.112.004.004.000.301.000.50
19UPST3.331.220.112.504.004.000.370.750.50
20BBS3.891.050.333.004.005.000.271.000.63
21DGI3.331.410.112.004.004.500.421.250.38
22TUG4.221.300.784.005.005.000.310.500.80
23RPE4.780.441.004.505.005.000.090.250.90
24Modified Borg dyspnea scale4.890.331.005.005.005.000.070.001.00
256MWT4.780.670.785.005.005.000.140.001.00
26ISWT4.330.710.784.004.005.000.160.500.75
27Pulmonary function test5.000.001.005.005.005.000.000.001.00
28Cycle GXT4.560.730.784.005.005.000.160.500.80
29SGRQ4.560.531.004.005.005.000.120.500.80
31FIM3.561.01−0.113.003.004.500.290.750.50
Average4.050.430.453.504.194.650.210.570.69
Notes: The shadings are deleted items after first modified Delphi investigation. Abbreviations: 6MWT = Six-minute walk test; BBS = Berg balance scale; CVR = Content validity ratio; DGI = Dynamic gait index; ECG = Electrocardiographic; FIM = Functional independence measure; FPRS = Faces pain rate scale; FRT = Functional reach test; GCS = Glasgow coma scale; GXT = Graded exercise test; ISWT = Incremental shuttle walk test; LOC = Level of consciousness; MAS = modified Ashworth scale; MBI = modified Barthel index; MEP = Maximal expiration pressure; MIP = Maximal inspiration pressure; MMT = Manual muscle test; MMSE-K = Mini-mental state examination; Q1 = Lower quartile; Q3 = Upper quartile; ROM = Range of motion; RPE = Rating of perceived exertion; SD = Standard deviation; TUG = Timed up and go test; UPST = Uni-pedal stance test; SGRQ = Saint George’s respiratory questionnaire; VAS = Visual analog scale.
Table 10. Open opinions and researcher feedback after the first modified Delphi survey.
Table 10. Open opinions and researcher feedback after the first modified Delphi survey.
Open Opinion ContentFeedback Content
To address the need for clearly dividing the categories of the main theme according to individual items.-The evaluation items were divided into five categories: basic physical examination, level of consciousness, balance, cardiorespiratory, and activities of daily living.
To extract the evaluation items through a multidisciplinary approach.-Cooperation among health professionals of different fields was challenging.
-A considerable length of time and high cost were anticipated.
-Thus, a guideline has been developed in this study based on the findings of previous studies, for cardiorespiratory evaluation and intervention items that are required for stroke patients.
To extract the evaluation items according to the advancement of each phase of stroke.-The evaluation and intervention items showed differences according to the health status of individual patients, which are problematic.
-A practical method in the clinical setting seemed to be selective application based on the guideline developed in this study, according to each patient’s health status.
To include the description of factors to consider for the discontinuation of exercise by adding an evaluation parameter related to chest pain and leg pain.-For stroke, the rationale for discontinuation of exercise did not derive from a specific pain as in patients with angina or peripheral vascular disease.
-In general, discontinuation of exercise depended on the result of the basic indices such as SPO2, HR, and BP, or patient’s complaints on the symptoms of headache, vertigo, nausea, and vomit.
To include the description on additional items for the CPET.-In this study, due to a possibility of falls in stroke patients, GXT description by the cycle had been included based on previous studies; nevertheless, based on a previous study reporting the use of CPET in stroke patients, the item was added.
To add BMI in the basic physical examination category, as it is always included as a test item in cardiorespiratory tests and interventions, and as it is one of the important factors.-The BMI was added to the category of basic physical examination in evaluation items.
To add spatiotemporal gait parameters used as an indicator of balance in the category of exercise for stroke patients.-The spatiotemporal gait parameters were added to the category of balance in evaluation items.
To address the need for FVC test, as the stroke-related breathing difficulty is likely to be caused by restrictive lung disease due to reduced lung compliance.
To add the Thoracic contour and Chest expansion test, for an asymmetric thoracic cage may lead to local lung collapse. In addition, only after chest expansion test, the lobe and area of the lung with restricted expansion can be detected, for which a suitable chest expansion method or chest mobilization, or segmental breathing for local lung inflation, can be determined.
-FVC test was added as a pulmonary function test, as well as the items; Thoracic contour and Chest expansion test.
-The items; chest mobilization and segmental breathing, were added.
The items; MIP and MEP, should be moved to the cardiorespiratory category as they test the respiratory capacity, and the static lung capacity tests (TV, IRV, ERV, VC, IC) should be added.-For the pulmonary function test, the items, SVC and maximal-effort expiratory capacity, were revised and subsequently separated.
-The items; MIP and MEP, were moved to the cardiorespiratory category.
Cervical and thoracic mobilization.-Cervical and thoracic mobilization is anticipated to be more helpful during the intervention, rather than limiting to chest mobilization.
Abbreviations: BMI = Body mass index; CPET = Cardiopulmonary exercise test; ERV = Expiratory reserve volume; FVC = Forced vital capacity; GXT = Graded exercise test; IC = Inspiratory capacity; IRV = Inspiratory reserve volume; MEP = Maximal expiration pressure; MIP = Maximal inspiration pressure; SVC = Slow vital capacity; TV = Tidal volume; VC = Vital capacity.
Table 11. Results of items after the second modified Delphi investigation.
Table 11. Results of items after the second modified Delphi investigation.
DomainNoEvaluation ItemMeanSDCVRQ1MedianQ3StabilityConvergenceConsensus
Basic
physical
examination
1BMI4.670.710.784.505.005.000.150.250.90
2Vital sign4.890.331.005.005.005.000.070.001.00
3Saturation4.890.331.005.005.005.000.070.001.00
4Peak flow4.560.531.004.005.005.000.120.500.80
5ECG4.561.330.785.005.005.000.290.001.00
Level of consciousness6LOC4.330.501.004.004.005.000.120.501.00
7GCS3.890.930.563.504.004.500.240.500.75
Balance8Spatiotemporal gait parameters4.220.670.784.004.005.000.160.500.75
9TUG4.560.531.004.005.005.000.120.500.80
Cardiorespiratory10Thoracic contour and Chest expansion test4.220.970.784.004.005.000.230.500.75
11TIS3.561.010.332.504.004.000.290.750.63
12MIP and MEP4.560.531.004.005.005.000.120.500.80
13RPE4.670.501.004.005.005.000.110.500.80
14mMRC4.670.501.004.005.005.000.110.500.80
156MWT4.560.531.004.005.005.000.120.500.80
16ISWT3.781.090.784.004.004.000.290.001.00
17CPET4.001.220.784.004.005.000.310.500.75
18Cycle GXT4.001.220.784.004.005.000.310.500.75
19Pulmonary function test
1. SVC
4.780.441.004.505.005.000.090.250.90
20Pulmonary function test
2. Maximal-effort expiratory capacity
4.890.331.005.005.005.000.0700.001.00
Activities of
Daily Living
21SGRQ4.440.730.784.005.005.000.160.500.80
22SIS4.110.600.784.004.004.500.150.250.88
Average4.400.350.864.144.594.860.170.360.84
Notes: The shadings are deleted items after second modified Delphi investigation. Abbreviations. Abbreviations: 6MWT = Six-minute walk test; BMI = Body mass index; CPET = Cardiopulmonary exercise test; CVR = Content validity ratio; ECG = Electrocardiographic; GCS = Glasgow coma scale; GXT = Graded exercise test; ISWT = Incremental shuttle walk test; LOC = Level of consciousness; MEP = Maximal expiration pressure; MIP = Maximal inspiration pressure; mMRC = modified Medical research council; Q1 = Lower quartile; Q3 = Upper quartile; RPE = Rating of perceived exertion; SD = Standard deviation; SGRQ = Saint George’s respiratory questionnaire; SIS = Stroke impact scale; SVC = Slow vital capacity; TIS = Trunk impairment scale; TUG = Timed up and go test.
Table 12. Second survey after the second modified Delphi investigation, open opinions, and researcher feedback.
Table 12. Second survey after the second modified Delphi investigation, open opinions, and researcher feedback.
Open Opinion ContentFeedback Content
To combine the items; CPET and cycle GXT-The CPET includes the following methods: treadmill, leg cycle, and arm cycle, and among these, the lower leg cycle CPET shows high levels of MHR and RER, which is likely to be useful in evaluating patients with a risk of falls.
-The treadmill-based CPET is a protocol of load-bearing exercise using the degree of slope, so that it is likely to prove more useful in achieving increased heart rate and anaerobic threshold in comparison to 6MWT or ISWT using speed.
To suggest a method of application regarding ISWT and 6MWT-The use of ISWT and 6MWT is determined according to the patient’s health status, so that in the clinical setting, it is likely to be more efficient to apply based on the individual patient.
To consider inclusion of SIS items-Among the 9 categories, a correlation of the mobility, ADL/IADL, participation, and physical categories, for items related to movement, and above all, unlike the frequently used FIM and Barthel index, SIS items were likely to prove useful in determining the level of recovery for several symptoms of stroke in clinical setting.
To add the item; Respiratory rate or Minute ventilation, in the category of basic physical examination.-The items were added because the category of basic physical examination required a respiratory parameter such as respiratory rate or minute ventilation.
To add the item; 10MWT-10MWT and the 6MWT were added, as a previous study reported a significant correlation between the two tests with respect to the physical activity and gait in stroke patients.
To apply Thoracic contour and Chest expansion test-The two items are rarely applied in clinical setting; thus, further investigations are required.
To add an item related to quality of life with respect to the health of the heart-No study was found for the suggested parameter that can be applied to stroke patients.
Abbreviations: 6MWT = Six-minute walk test; 10MWT = Ten-meter walking test; ADL = Activities of daily living; CPET = Cardiopulmonary exercise test; FIM = Functional independence measure; GXT = Graded exercise test; IADL = Instrumental activities of daily living; ISWT = Incremental shuttle walk test; MHR = Maximal heart rate; RER = Respiratory exchange ratio; SIS = Stroke impact scale.
Table 13. Cardiorespiratory physiotherapy final evaluation items for stroke patients.
Table 13. Cardiorespiratory physiotherapy final evaluation items for stroke patients.
DomainNoFinal Item
Basic
physical
examination
1BMI
2Vital sign
3Saturation
4Respiratory rate or Minute ventilation
Level of consciousness5LOC
Balance6Spatiotemporal gait parameters
710MWT
8TUG
Cardiorespiratory9Peak flow
10ECG
11Thoracic contour and Chest expansion test
12MIP and MEP
13RPE
14mMRC
156MWT
16ISWT
17CPET
18Pulmonary function test
1. SVC
(1) TV
(2) ERV
(3) IRV
(4) IC
(5) VC

2. Maximal-effort expiratory capacity
(1) FVC
(2) FEV1
(3) FEV1/FVC
(4) FEF 25~75%
Activities of
Daily Living
19SGRQ
20SIS
Abbreviations: 6MWT = Six-minute walk test; 10MWT = Ten-meter walking test; BMI = Body mass index; CPET = Cardiopulmonary exercise test; ECG = Electrocardiographic; ERV = Expiratory reserve volume; FEF = Forced expiratory flow; FEV1 = Forced expiratory volume in 1 s, FVC = Forced vital capacity; IC = Inspiratory capacity; IRV = Inspiratory reserve volume; ISWT = Incremental shuttle walk test; LOC = Level of consciousness; MEP = Maximal expiration pressure; MIP = Maximal inspiration pressure; mMRC = modified Medical research council; RPE = Rating of perceived exertion; SGRQ = Saint George’s respiratory questionnaire; SIS = Stroke impact scale; SVC = Slow vital capacity; TUG = Timed up and go test; TV = Tidal volume; VC = Vital capacity.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cho, S.-H.; Choi, K.-B. Guidelines for the Evaluation of Cardiorespiratory Physiotherapy in Stroke Patients. Healthcare 2020, 8, 222. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8030222

AMA Style

Cho S-H, Choi K-B. Guidelines for the Evaluation of Cardiorespiratory Physiotherapy in Stroke Patients. Healthcare. 2020; 8(3):222. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8030222

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cho, Sung-Hyoun, and Ki-Bok Choi. 2020. "Guidelines for the Evaluation of Cardiorespiratory Physiotherapy in Stroke Patients" Healthcare 8, no. 3: 222. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8030222

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop