Next Article in Journal
Parentage Analysis in Giant Grouper (Epinephelus lanceolatus) Using Microsatellite and SNP Markers from Genotyping-by-Sequencing Data
Previous Article in Journal
Identification of Distant Regulatory Elements Using Expression Quantitative Trait Loci Mapping for Heat-Responsive Genes in Oysters
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bioinformatics Analysis of Allele Frequencies and Expression Patterns of ACE2, TMPRSS2 and FURIN in Different Populations and Susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2

1
Bioinformatics Department, Armed Forces College of Medicine, Cairo 12622, Egypt
2
Institute of Global Health and Human Ecology, School of Science and Engineering, The American University in Cairo, Cairo 12622, Egypt
3
Department of Emergency Medicine, McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
4
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2021, 12(7), 1041; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12071041
Submission received: 24 April 2021 / Revised: 18 May 2021 / Accepted: 2 June 2021 / Published: 5 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Genetics and Genomics)

Abstract

:
The virus responsible for the COVID-19 global health crisis, SARS-CoV-2, has been shown to utilize the ACE2 protein as an entry point to its target cells. The virus has been shown to rely on the actions of TMPRSS2 (a serine protease), as well as FURIN (a peptidase), for the critical priming of its spike protein. It has been postulated that variations in the sequence and expression of SARS-CoV-2’s receptor (ACE2) and the two priming proteases (TMPRSS2 and FURIN) may be critical in contributing to SARS-CoV-2 infectivity. This study aims to examine the different expression levels of FURIN in various tissues and age ranges in light of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 expression levels using the LungMAP database. Furthermore, we retrieved expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) of the three genes and their annotation. We analyzed the frequency of the retrieved variants in data from various populations and compared it to the Egyptian population. We highlight FURIN’s potential interplay with the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 and showcase a myriad of variants of the three genes that are differentially expressed across populations. Our findings provide insights into potential genetic factors that impact SARS-CoV-2 infectivity in different populations and shed light on the varying expression patterns of FURIN.

1. Introduction

In February 2020, the most recent addition to the coronavirus family (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 or SARS-CoV-2 in short) was already taking the world by storm. It was spreading at such a rapid rate that the WHO made the announcement that the virus and its associated pneumonia were in fact a pandemic public health menace [1]. As of February 2021, over 110 million people have contracted SARS-CoV-2 worldwide, 2.5 million of whom have died [2]. One of the most intriguing phenomena of this disease is the variation in different populations’ susceptibility to it, as well as the variations in its severity [3]. Egypt has been one of the countries showcasing lower infectivity rates than anticipated, and speculations as to why this is the case include underdeveloped surveillance systems, underrated reporting, temperature and different viral strains, among others [4]. With the current ambiguity surrounding trends in SARS-CoV-2 infectivity, there is a dire need for attempts to gain insights into the mechanisms governing this infection. Evidence suggests that this variation in population infectivity and severity may be accounted for by expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) (genetic loci explaining part of the variations of gene expression phenotypes) and differences in their frequencies [5]. EQTLs are identified through genome-wide association studies (GWAS), which analyze associations between genetic variation markers and gene expression levels in large cohorts of individuals [6].
SARS-CoV-2 receptor recognition and binding are a deterministic factor in the success or failure of the process of viral infection. Similarly to SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2 utilizes the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as an entry point to its target cell [7]. ACE2 is widely expressed in a variety of organs in the human body, including the lungs, intestine, and testis [8]. Viral entry occurs through the high-affinity binding of the virus’s spike (S) protein to ACE2 [9]. However, the S protein requires priming, as only the surface unit, S1, of the S protein is capable of engaging ACE2. This priming process has been shown to occur mainly via the action of the cellular serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2) [10]. As such, TMPRSS2 activity is another deterministic factor in SARS-CoV-2’s colonization of host cells. DNA polymorphisms in both ACE2 and TMPRSS2 have been linked to variations in susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection [11]. Other cellular proteases have been suggested to play a role in SARS-CoV-2 infectivity. The MERS-CoV virus was already proven to undergo a two-step priming process that started with FURIN S1/S2 cleavage of the S protein in infected cells, followed by TMPRSS2-mediated S20 cleavage [12]. This same FURIN-mediated cleavage has been demonstrated to occur in the SARS-CoV-2 S protein, which contains a multibasic FURIN cleavage site [13].
ACE2 eQTLs, as well as TMPRSS2 eQTLs and their frequencies, have been compared across populations and linked to variations in SARS-CoV2 susceptibility [14,15,16]. FURIN eQTLs have been suggested to play a role in SARS-CoV-2 infectivity and their frequency in Middle Eastern populations has been found to differ from European populations [17]. FURIN cleavage has been regarded as a crucial event in the cellular entry of SARS-CoV-2; however, few investigations have focused on the expression patterns of this protease, in comparison to investigations focused on the cellular receptor ACE2 and TMPRSS2 [18]. In this paper, we attempt to explain variations in SARS-CoV-2 infectivity by further exploring the differential expression of FURIN in light of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 expression, as well as its potential role in the immune response. Furthermore, we identify ACE2, FURIN and TMPRSS2 variants and analyze their frequency in different populations (namely, comparing them to the Egyptian population). We also study possible correlations between the population frequencies of the aforementioned variants and indicators of mortality and transmission of SARS-CoV-2 within the same populations.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Analysis of FURIN Gene Expression Patterns in Human Lungs

The LungMAP database (http://www.lungmap.net, accessed on 12 March 2021) currently contains more than 6000 high-resolution lung images, as well as multi-omics data [19]. We used LungMAP to analyze and investigate the gene expression patterns of the FURIN protease in human lung development.
Public RNA-Seq expression data, archived in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) with accession number (GSE155286) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE155286, accessed on 12 March 2021), were retrieved and analyzed using the DESeq2 R package (1.30.1) [20]. The data were used to analyze the differential expression of TMPRSS2, ACE2 and FURIN in human lungs of SARS-CoV-2-infected human lung-only mice (LoMs) in different time points post-infection—2, 6 and 14 days in comparison to naïve controls [21]. Transcript counts were measured in transcripts-per-million (TPM) and the Z-scores and −log10 values (p-values) for each gene in every time point were recorded. Z-scores of Log2 TPMs were visualized in a separate heatmap using the Morpheus tool (https://software.broadinstitute.org/morpheus/, accessed on 12 March 2021).

2.2. eQTL Variant Retrieval

To evaluate the relationship between genetic variants and the gene expression profiles of ACE2, TMPRSS2 and FURIN, the expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) of the three genes were examined using the Genotype–Tissue Expression (GTEx) portal database (http://www.gtexportal.org/home, accessed on 12 March 2021) [22]. TMPRSS2 genetic variants in human lung tissue were obtained from the GTEx portal database. Annotations, such as location or type of variant, were retrieved from the Ensembl Genome Browser (https://www.ensembl.org/index.html, accessed on 12 March 2021) [23].

2.3. Retrieval of Population and Clinical Indicator Data

The genetic data and allele frequencies among African, East Asian and European (non-Finnish) populations were extracted from the GnomAD repository, which includes data on a total of 125,748 exomes and 71,702 genomes (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/, accessed on 12 March 2021) [24]. Similar Egyptian population data were retrieved from (https://www.egyptian-genome.org/, accessed on 12 March 2021) [25].
Furthermore, in order to study the relationship between eQTL frequencies and indicators of COVID-19 mortality and transmission, indicator data corresponding to case fatality ratio (CFR) percentages, the number of deaths per 100,000 people, and the number of cases per million people were retrieved from (https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/data/mortality, accessed on 12 March 2021) and (https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries, accessed on 12 March 2021). Clinical indicators were further studied in relation to eQTL frequencies in ten different populations of available eQTL frequency data in the GnomAD repository, namely, Korea, Japan, Egypt, Finland, Estonia, Bulgaria, Sweden, South America, Africa and Europe. Statistical analysis was conducted using GraphPad Prism V 8.0.2 and allele frequencies for different populations were compared using the Chi-squared test with Yates’s correction. p-values are presented as non-corrected values for multiple testing (p < 0.05).

2.4. Pathway Analysis of ACE2, FURIN and TMPRSS2 Interactome

Pathway Studio Software (version 11.0; Ariadne Genomics/Elsevier Inc., Rockville, MD, USA) was used to deduce relationships among differentially expressed proteomics protein candidates, using the Ariadne ResNet database [26,27]. The significance of the studied proteins was statistically assessed by means of a t-test, with p-values ≤ 0.05 with a fold change of >1.5 or <0.5. The “Subnetwork Enrichment Analysis” (SNEA) algorithm was selected to extract statistically significant altered biological and functional pathways pertaining to each identified set of protein hits. SNEA utilizes Fisher’s statistical test to determine if there are nonrandom associations between two categorical variables, organized by specific relationships. SNEA starts by creating a central “seed” from all relevant entities in the database, and retrieving associated entities based on their relationship with the seed (that is, binding partners, expression targets, protein modification targets, regulation). The algorithm compares the sub-network distribution to the background distribution using one-sided Mann–Whitney U-test, and calculates a p-value indicating the statistical significance of the difference between two distributions. Yellow rectangles, violet rectangles and orange hexagons reflect biological processes, disease processes and functional classes, respectively.

3. Results

3.1. Gene Expression Analysis in Human Lung Using the LungMAP Database

We analyzed the RNA-Seq differential expression of the (GSE155286) dataset, which compares gene expression in the human lungs of SARS-CoV-2-infected human lung-only mice (LoMs) at different time points post-infection to gene expression naïve controls. We found significant upregulation of ACE2 at day 2 post-infection (log2FC of 2.177817 and a p-value of 9.22 × 10−6). The differential expression analysis also showed the upregulation of ACE2 TMPRSS2 and FURIN at day 16 post-infection, as shown in the heatmap in Figure 1A. We concluded that the characteristic patterns of expression of FURIN, ACE2 and TMPRSS2 might provide important insights into the dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Furthermore, the analysis of subject genes on the LungMAP website demonstrated that FURIN gene expression levels were significantly higher in immune cells than in epithelial, mesenchymal and biopsy cell types (Figure 1B,C). FURIN gene expression in immune cells was highest in 21-month-old babies. In epithelial cells, expression was higher in 5-month-old babies and in young children compared to adults. FURIN expression was also higher in 40-year-olds than in 24-year-olds and nearly 30 times higher than ACE2 expression (Figure 1B,D).

3.2. Population-Based Frequency Analysis of the Three Studied Genes

Population allele frequencies for TMPRSS2, FURIN and ACE2 eQTLs in the Egyptian population in statistical comparison with each of the following populations: Africa, East Asia and non-Finnish European are summarized in Table 1. Evaluating the possible patterns of the relationship between eQTL frequencies and indicators of COVID-19 mortality (Figure 2), we found that countries with lower percentages of COVID-19 cases, CFR and deaths, such as Korea and Japan, tend to have lower frequencies of TMPRSS2, ACE2 and FURIN eQTL variants, as shown in the first row of Figure 2. Moreover, eQTL variant rs469390 of TMPRSS2 scored a strong Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.68, with a significant p-value of 0.02 at p < 0.05, in correlation with the percentages of CFR in the studied populations. Additionally, specific ACE2 eQTL variants (rs2158082, rs4646127, rs4830974 and rs5936011) (Second row, Figure 2) show overlapping patterns of allele frequencies in the studied populations in relation to mortality ratios and percentages of reported cases. Two eQTL variants of FURIN (rs6226 and rs8039305) (Third row, Figure 2) also showed comparable frequency patterns to values of studied indicators, showing relatively higher eQTL frequencies with countries with higher cases and/or mortality ratios, such as Swedish and South American populations. However, significant correlations could not be observed with other variants or in correlation with other indicators studied.

3.3. Population-Based Frequencies of FURIN eQTL Variants

To analyze the distribution of FURIN eQTLs in lung tissue, we used the GTEx database (https://www.gtexportal.org/home/datasets, accessed on 12 March 2021) (Table 2). Three eQTL variants were found to be associated with FURIN expression in lung tissue (rs78164913, rs79742014 and rs8039305). The rs78164913 TT genotype was associated with higher expression compared to the TG genotype, and the CC genotype of rs79742014 was also associated with higher FURIN expression in lung tissue compared with the CT genotype. Finally, the the TC genotype of rs8039305 was found to be associated with higher FURIN expression in lung tissues, compared with the CC and TT genotypes. The three aforementioned lung eQTL variants were found to be significantly more frequent in the Egyptian population in comparison to the EAS population (p < 0.001).
We found the rs6226 GG genotype variant to be significantly less frequent in the Egyptian population compared to the EAS population (p = 0.022). We found only one missense FURIN variant covered in the Egyptian-genome study data [28]. rs148110342 was absent in the EAS population and reported with a low AF in the Egyptian population (AF = 0.014). However, the difference in AF in both populations was significant (p < 0.001).

3.4. Population-Based Frequencies of TMPRSS2 eQTLs in the Lungs

3.4.1. Frequencies of Regulatory Intronic Variants of TMPRSS2

To identify eQTLs associated with TMPRSS2 expression in the lung tissue, the GTEx portal database was utilized. We identified a total of 203 eQTLs for TMPRSS2 in all tissues. Among them, 136 variants indicated predominant effects on TMPRSS2 expression in the lungs (Table S1). Only SNPs associated with clinical significance from the previous literature were considered for further analysis, namely, rs2070788, rs383510 and rs464397. Both rs2070788 GG and GG genotypes of rs383510 variants were found to be relatively more frequent in the Egyptian-genome study data (28) (AF = 0.528 and 0.56, respectively). The rs464397 TT genotype was associated with higher expression of TMPRSS2 in lung tissues and the variant has been found to be more frequent in the Egyptian population (28), with an allele frequency of 0.593, in relation to African and East-Asian populations (p = 0.0028 and p < 0.0001, respectively).

3.4.2. Frequencies of Common Exonic Variants of TMPRSS2

Our analysis also focused on common exonic variants of TMPRSS2; three SNPs showed significantly (p < 0.0002) different frequencies when comparing the Egyptian population with the East Asian population (rs2298659, rs17854725 and rs12329760) (p = 0.0002, p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001 respectively) (Table 1). After investigating their frequencies in the Egyptian-genome study data [28], we found that variant rs28401567 is significantly less frequent in the Egyptian population in comparison to the East-Asian population (p ≤ 0.0001).

3.5. Population-Based Frequencies of ACE2 Coding, eQTLs and Intronic Variants

We investigated two common ACE2 exonic variants (rs2285666 and rs35803318). We found that rs2285666 has a relatively lower allele frequency in the Egyptian population in comparison to East-Asians (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, we found the variant rs35803318 to be totally absent from the East-Asian population, with a very low allele frequency in the Egyptian population (AF = 0.00935). We investigated the frequency of five common intronic variants (rs2106809, rs4646142, rs714205, rs17264937, and rs5980163) and found that these five variants are relatively less frequent in the Egyptian population than in the East-Asian Population (p < 0.0001).
To analyze the distribution of eQTLs for ACE2, we used the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) database (https://www.gtexportal.org/home/datasets, accessed on 12 March 2021) (Table S3). Fifteen unique eQTL variants (14 SNPs and one INDEL) for ACE2 have been identified, as previously reported by (Cao et al.) [29] with p-values ≤  0.05 in 20 tissues from the GTEx database. By investigating the frequency of these eQTL variants in the Egyptian-genome study data, we found that the eQTL variants rs112171234 and rs12010448 showed significantly higher frequency in the Egyptian population compared to the EAS population (p < 0.001). However, the following eQTLs (rs200781818, rs2158082, rs4646127, rs4830974, rs5936011, rs5936029, rs6629110 and rs6632704) showed significantly higher frequency in the EAS population compared to other populations, including the Egyptian population (p < 0.001) (Table 1, Figure 3).
We also found that eQTL variants rs112171234 and rs12010448 show significantly higher frequency in the Egyptian population compared to the EAS population (p < 0.001). However, the following eQTLs (rs200781818, rs2158082, rs4646127, rs4830974, rs5936011, rs5936029, rs6629110 and rs6632704) showed significantly higher frequency in the EAS population compared to other populations [29], including the Egyptian population (p < 0.001) (Table 1). We found that ACE2 variant rs2285666 has a relatively lower allele frequency in the Egyptian population in comparison to East-Asians (p < 0.0001). Variant rs35803318 was totally absent for the East-Asian population, it was found to have a very low AF in the Egyptian population as well (AF = 0.00935). We also reported that the five common intronic variants of ACE2 (rs2106809, rs4646142, rs714205, rs17264937 and rs5980163) have been relatively less frequent in the Egyptian population than the East Asian Population (p < 0.0001).

3.6. Pathway Analysis and Interaction Network of ACE2, TMPRSS2 and FURIN

For the assessment of interactions and pathways, differential pathways were generated using the “direct interaction” algorithm to map the relationships between ACE2, TMPRSS2 and FURIN. We found that FURIN had a direct regulatory function, including in cell differentiation, protein cleavage and cell invasion. Unsupervised pathway assessments showed that TMPRSS2 is implicated in several biological pathways involving cell fusion, viral entry and vascularization, in addition to being associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome pathogenesis, along with ACE2 (Figure 4). Of interest, the protein network showed a centrality relation with ACE2, being an upstream regulator for several of the identified interactomes involving viral reproduction and the inflammatory response to viral infections (Figure 5). The statistical significance of the interaction was determined in silico for the validation process. A detailed depiction of these data is presented in Supplementary File (Tables S1–S3), describing protein entities and biological processes involved, along with the interaction types, directionality and the PubMed reference utilized to derive these interaction types.

4. Discussion

4.1. Shedding Light on FURIN Expression Patterns and Immune Responses in Relation to SARS-CoV-2 Infection

In this paper, we examined the expression of FURIN as an essential cleavage protease for SARS-CoV-2 cellular entry at the spike glycoprotein S1/S2 cleavage site [30] in light of previous reports of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 expression at different developmental stages of lung tissues [31]. We reported that FURIN expression shares similar patterns with ACE2 and TMPRSS2 in the epithelial cells of lung tissue. Similarly to ACE2 expression in lung epithelial cells, FURIN recorded the highest expression levels in 5-month-old babies. Additionally, FURIN expression showed a similar pattern of relatively higher expression in the adult alveolar epithelium, compared to that of TMPRSS2, in relation to ACE2 expression [17]. This may provide further evidence that there are significant differences in susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 among different developmental stages, in addition to the WHO’s general assumption that everyone is deemed susceptible [32], including older age (p < 0.0001) [33]. We also found the highest expression levels of FURIN to be in immune cells.
FURIN has been reported to be essential for peripheral immune tolerance [34] and cell-mediated immunity [35]. However, many pathogenic processes could potentially exploit the proprotein convertase FURIN and other convertases [36], for instance, FURIN has been found to be important for the cleavage of various viral glycoproteins, rendering the targeted cells entry-accessible [37,38,39,40,41,42]. Of note, FURIN cleavage of Ebola glycoprotein GP has been suspected to produce a decoy antigen (Ebola GP1), that could structurally induce the apoptosis of uninfected T lymphocytes [43]. As coronaviruses also exploit this cleavage protease [36], SARS-CoV-2 has been reported to depend on FURIN cleavage at S1/S2 as an essential mechanism for S-glycoprotein-mediated cellular fusion and entry [30]. FURIN has also been found to exhibit anti-cancer properties, some of which have been related to adaptive immunity in various cancers [44,45,46]. FURIN activity was found to be vital for cytotoxic T lymphocytes’ expression of immune checkpoints [47,48]. Intriguingly, FURIN inhibition in CD8+ T cells was found to prevent CTL exhaustion and reduce programmed death protein – 1 (PD-1) expression [34]. Additionally, FURIN inactivation has been associated with compromised T regulatory (T reg) functions and increased effector T Cell aggressiveness [49].
Despite exhibiting different roles in different cancer models, FURIN has been suggested as a potential therapeutic target for selective inhibition in different cancers and infectious diseases that exploit the cleavage protease. As SARS-CoV-2 infection has been found to exploit FURIN cleavage, one of the possible implications that should be of interest for further research is the clinical lymphopenia associated with COVID-19 cases [50]. Currently, no evidence of SARS-CoV-2 replication in lymphocytes is available, however, SARS-CoV has been shown to directly infect T lymphocytes, leading to lymphopenia, as well as degeneration of the lymphoreticular system [51]. It is worth investigating whether these clinical manifestations are due to a non-reproductive infection of T lymphocytes, exploiting the proprotein convertase FURIN. Thus, we recommend further research on the association between FURIN cleavage and clinical lymphopenia exhibited by COVID-19 patients.

4.2. Implications of Population-Based Variations of Studied Genes’ eQTL Frequencies

4.2.1. FURIN

This study focused on three eQTL variants and found them to be associated with variations in FURIN expression in lung tissues (rs78164913, rs79742014 and rs8039305). Their frequency in the Egyptian population was significantly different to that in the EAS population (p < 0.001). One particular eQTL variant, the rs6226 GG genotype, was associated with higher FURIN expression compared to GC and CC genotypes. It is worth mentioning that the former variant has not been found to be associated with hypercholesterolemia in the Kazakh general population [52]. We also investigated a set of previously reported [17] common and rare missense mutations of FURIN, of which only one variant (rs148110342) was absent in the EAS population and showed a low but significantly different AF in the Egyptian population. We consider the differences in AF of both rs8039305 and rs6226 to be intriguing and this may indicate that they might be implicated in the variation of TMPRSS2 expression levels in different populations, warranting further functional investigation.

4.2.2. TMPRSS2

We found the rs2070788 GG genotype to be linked to the higher expression of TMPRSS2 in lung tissues, as well as the GG genotype of rs383510. Both eQTL variants were reported by Cheng at al. to be significantly associated with susceptibility to A(H7N9) and severe A(H1N1)pdm09 influenza in humans [53]. Of note, the haplotype in which rs2070788 and two other SNPs (rs9974589 and rs7364083) are inherited was previously predicted to be associated with higher TMPRSS2 expression [54]. In this study, we linked the rs2070788 GG genotype to higher expression of TMPRSS2 in lung tissues, as well as GG genotype of rs383510, and found both eQTL variants to be relatively more frequent in the Egyptian population, with AF = 0.528 and AF = 0.56, respectively.
Interestingly, rs464397 has been reported to be associated with poor immune responses in patients co-infected with HIV and HCV [55]. We found the rs464397 TT genotype to be associated with higher expression of TMPRSS2 in lung tissues, with a higher frequency in the Egyptian-genome study data [25], with AF = 0.593 in relation to African and East-Asian populations (p = 0.0028 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Three SNPs showed significantly (p < 0.0002) different frequencies when comparing the Egyptian population with the East Asian population (rs2298659, rs17854725 and rs12329760) (p = 0.0002, p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001 respectively); only rs12329760 was found to be a missense substitution. This variant affects a residue far from the serine protease catalytic triad and was previously found to be significantly associated with TMPRSS2 rearrangements linked to the risk of prostate cancer [56] and a relatively shorter time to diagnosis for high-risk patients [57]. Interestingly, Lopera Maya et al. [58] recently reported TMPRSS2 variants that might be linked to some quantitative phenotypes related to SARS-CoV-2 infection. The strongest associations reported were rs150965978 and rs28401567. The latter is associated with thrombocyte counts that might be linked to clinical thrombocytopenia encountered in COVID-19 patients [59]. We also found that variant rs28401567 is significantly less frequent in the Egyptian population in comparison to the East-Asian population (p ≤ 0.0001) (Table 1, Figure 3).

4.2.3. ACE2

Recently, the potential contribution of common exonic variants of ACE2 to SARS-CoV-2 infection susceptibility at the cellular receptor level has been debated. The variant rs2285666 has been previously tagged as a potential risk factor for coronary artery disease, hypertension and diabetes mellitus [60,61]. Moreover, Wu et al. found a significant association between increases in ACE2 expression and the AA genotype of the variant [62]. Although the current GTEx dataset does not provide any association between the variant and ACE2 expression, it is worth investigating its frequency. The variant may be related to ACE2- and SARS-CoV-2-associated comorbidities, including hypertension, diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [63].
Five common non-coding variants (rs2106809, rs4646142, rs714205, rs17264937 and rs5980163) were previously investigated in SARS-CoV and showed no association with SARS-CoV susceptibility, outcome or prognosis in male patients [64]. Among this set of SNPs, rs2106809 and rs4646142 have been previously reported to be associated with essential hypertension (EH) and carotid arteriosclerosis stenosis (CAS) [65]. Our analyses have shown these variants to be less frequent in the Egyptian population than the EAS population; it may be of interest to explore their potential involvement or lack thereof in SARS-CoV-2 infection and outcomes.

4.3. Possible Contribution of eQTL Frequencies to COVID-19 Patterns of Transmission and Mortality; the Bigger Picture

Our analyses of eQTL frequencies showed strong inter-population variations in the frequency of FURIN, TMPRSS2 and ACE2 variants. Although the variants reported both in this study and in other literature might contribute to COVID-19-associated mortality and transmission, it is important to note that such relationships should be studied in the context of other factors, such as control measures implemented, gene expression profiles and population dynamics, as shown in Figure 5. With regards to the molecular landscape of the three studied genes, an abundance of literature is available documenting their interactions with other major cellular pathways, as well as potential therapeutic strategies.
TMPRSS2 might promote viral spread and pathogenesis by facilitating cellular fusion of the SARS-CoV viruses through cathepsin-independent cleavage of the spike glycoprotein. This implication is also supported by the fact that TMPRSS2 has been shown to diminish SARS-CoV recognition by antibodies [66,67]. The ERK/MAPK signaling pathway has been shown to be responsible for optimal induction of TMPRSS2 through both ERK1 and ERK2 [68] and TMPRSS2 expression was sensitive to the loss of expression of ERK2 or ERK1. Thus, the MAPK pathway could also be used for TMPRSS2 targeting [69]. Interestingly, Shirato et al. showed that simultaneous inhibition of TMPRSS2 and cathepsin L has blocked virus entry in-vitro [70]. Thus, the targeting of both cell surface and cathepsin L endosomal entry pathways have been reported as potential treatment strategies for COVID-19 patients [71,72].
Soluble ACE2 was previously shown to exhibit protective effects against severe acute respiratory syndrome as well, probably through catalytically inactive saturation of spike glycoproteins [73,74]. Furthermore, ACE2 overexpression inhibits inflammation, cell growth and VEGFa production in vitro [75]. FURIN expression was also shown to be associated with VEGF-C and TGFß-1 (Figure 4) expression, which creates a feed-forward loop, leading to the enhancement of FURIN expression, which is in turn responsible for cleavage of the aforementioned proteins [76]. FURIN inhibition showed increased secretion of VEGF [77]. In addition, FURIN inhibitors have been shown to block the spike cleavage of SARS-CoV-2, suppressing viral production. Thus, FURIN targeting strategies may be promising interventions for COVID-19 patients [78].
Furthermore, it has been shown that SARS-CoV infection was associated with downregulation of ACE2. Thus, different studies have shown the potential of soluble ACE2 and ACE2 antibodies in the prevention of spike-driven infection [73]. ACE2 deficiency was also associated with the overexpression of inflammatory mediators, including TNF-a, matrix metalloproteinases MMP-9 and interleukin-6 (IL-6). Of note, these mediators could be used as early indicators of COVID-19 infection [79]. Similarly, IL-4 and IFN-gamma have been shown to downregulate the cell surface expression of ACE2 [80]. Furthermore, IL-1beta and TNF alpha have been shown to induce the acute release of ACE2, which supports the protective role of ACE2 against spike-driven infection and ADAM10 regulation of ACE2 cleavage [81]. However, the upregulation of inflammatory mediators, including IFN-γ, has induced the upregulation of FURIN proteins in vitro [82]. Thus, ACE2 could be exploited as well for the pharmacological treatment of COVID-19 [83].

4.4. Study Limitations and Future Recommendations

The regulation of ACE2, TMPRSS2 and FURIN gene expression is critical for the pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our study explored the genetic variants responsible for this regulation network. Our study relied mainly on the computational analysis of eQTL frequencies and gene expression levels and was limited by a number of factors. Although the study of said frequencies might provide insight into the trends of transmission and clinical presentation of COVID-19 in different populations, there is a plethora of other factors that should be taken into account to reach plausible conclusions, as explained in Figure 1. Furthermore, we relied on massive genomic data from different general populations, not COVID-19-patient-specific data. Of note, lung-tissue eQTL variants for ACE2 have not been reported so far in the GTEx browser, which necessitates further investigation into this knowledge gap. In summary, further investigation into the genetic and non-genetic factors affecting COVID-19 infection, transmissibility and outcomes is direly needed both on the virus- and host-level. As more of this information comes to light, it could potentially guide treatment decisions and explain current epidemiological trends.

5. Conclusions

We have shed light on FURIN protease expression levels in lung tissues at different developmental stages in light of the expression patterns of the ACE2 receptor and TMPRSS2 protease. We also investigated the frequency of eQTL variants, governing the expression of TMPRSS2, FURIN and ACE2 in the Egyptian population in comparison with other populations. These insights might be helpful in understanding and estimating the genetic factors associated with the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in different populations and provide insights into the expression patterns of FURIN protease as an essential cleavage protease of SARs-CoV-2.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes12071041/s1, Table S1: Entity Table; Table S2: Interaction Table and References; Table S3: Interactions and COVID-19 pathways.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.T., A.A. and H.A.; methodology, M.T., H.A. and F.K.; software validation, M.T.; formal analysis, M.T., H.A. and F.K.; writing—original draft preparation, H.A. and M.T.; writing—review and editing, M.T., H.A., F.K., H.A.N.E.-F., M.M.S. and A.A.; visualization, M.T., H.A. and F.K.; supervision, A.A.; project administration, A.A.; funding acquisition, H.A.N.E.-F., M.M.S. and A.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by an AUC COVID-19 Pandemic Research and Innovation Initiative Grant to A.A.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not Applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not Applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not Applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

TermDefinition
SARS-CoV-2severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2
MERSMiddle East respiratory syndrome
ACE2angiotensin-converting enzyme 2
TMPRSS2transmembrane protease, serine 2
eQTLexpression quantitative trait loci are genomic loci that explain variations in the expression levels of mRNA transcripts.
GEOGene Expression Omnibus
LoMlung-only mice
GTExGenotype-Tissue Expression portal database
“GC”, “CC” Genotypes of rs-id of a variantthe nucleotides represent the genotype of a specific eQTL variant, labeled with its unique rs-id.
CFRcase fatality ratio
TPMtranscripts-per-million

References

  1. Wang, C.; Horby, P.W.; Hayden, F.G.; Gao, G.F. A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern. Lancet 2020, 395, 470–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. World Health Organization. WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard. Available online: https://covid19.who.int/ (accessed on 18 October 2020).
  3. Ali, H.; Alshukry, A.; Marafie, S.K.; AlRukhayes, M.; Ali, Y.; Abbas, M.B.; Al-Taweel, A.; Bukhamseen, Y.; Dashti, M.H.; Al-Shammari, A.A.; et al. Outcomes of COVID-19: Disparities by ethnicity. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2021, 87, 104639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Medhat, M.A.; El Kassas, M. COVID-19 in Egypt: Uncovered figures or a different situation? J. Glob. Health 2020, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shikov, A.E.; Barbitoff, Y.A.; Glotov, A.S.; Danilova, M.M.; Tonyan, Z.N.; Nasykhova, Y.A.; Mikhailova, A.A.; Bespalova, O.N.; Kalinin, R.S.; Mirzorustamova, A.M.; et al. Analysis of the Spectrum of ACE2 Variation Suggests a Possible Influence of Rare and Common Variants on Susceptibility to COVID-19 and Severity of Out-come. Front. Genet. 2020, 11. Available online: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2020.551220/full (accessed on 19 February 2021). [CrossRef]
  6. Nica, A.C.; Dermitzakis, E.T. Expression quantitative trait loci: Present and future. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2013, 368, 20120362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hoffmann, M.; Kleine-Weber, H.; Schroeder, S.; Krüger, N.; Herrler, T.; Erichsen, S.; Schiergens, T.S.; Herrler, G.; Wu, N.; Nitsche, A.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor. Cell 2020, 181, 271–280.e8. Available online: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867420302294 (accessed on 10 April 2020). [CrossRef]
  8. Vaarala, M.H.; Porvari, K.S.; Kellokumpu, S.; Kyllönen, A.P.; Vihko, P.T. Expression of transmembrane serine protease TMPRSS2 in mouse and human tissues. J. Pathol. 2001, 193, 134–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Devaux, C.A.; Rolain, J.-M.; Raoult, D. ACE2 receptor polymorphism: Susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2, hypertension, multi-organ failure, and COVID-19 disease outcome. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2020, 53, 425–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Strope, J.D.; Pharm, C.H.C.; Figg, W.D. TMPRSS2: Potential Biomarker for COVID-19 Outcomes. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2020, 60, 801–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hou, Y.; Zhao, J.; Martin, W.; Kallianpur, A.; Chung, M.K.; Jehi, L.; Sharifi, N.; Erzurum, S.; Eng, C.; Cheng, F. New insights into genetic susceptibility of COVID-19: An ACE2 and TMPRSS2 polymorphism analysis. BMC Med. 2020, 18, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Millet, J.K.; Whittaker, G.R. Host cell entry of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus after two-step, furin-mediated activation of the spike protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 15214–15219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Xia, S.; Lan, Q.; Su, S.; Wang, X.; Xu, W.; Liu, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, Q.; Lu, L.; Jiang, S. The role of furin cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-mediated membrane fusion in the presence or absence of trypsin. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2020, 5, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chaudhary, M. COVID-19 susceptibility: Potential of ACE2 polymorphisms. Egypt. J. Med. Hum. Genet. 2020, 21, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Milne, S.; Yang, C.X.; Timens, W.; Bossé, Y.; Sin, D.D. SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 gene expression and RAAS inhibitors. Lancet Respir. Med. 2020, 8, e50–e51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, J.; Jiang, Q.; Xia, X.; Liu, K.; Yu, Z.; Tao, W.; Gong, W.; Han, J.J. Individual variation of the SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 gene expression and regulation. Aging Cell 2020, 19, e13168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Al-Mulla, F.; Mohammad, A.; Al Madhoun, A.; Haddad, D.; Ali, H.; Eaaswarkhanth, M.; John, S.E.; Nizam, R.; Channanath, A.; Abu-Farha, M.; et al. ACE2 and FURIN variants are potential predictors of SARS-CoV-2 outcome: A time to implement precision medicine against COVID-19. Heliyon 2021, 7, e06133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Kong, Q.; Xiang, Z.; Wu, Y.; Gu, Y.; Guo, J.; Geng, F. Analysis of the susceptibility of lung cancer patients to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Mol. Cancer 2020, 19, 80. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7186321/ (accessed on 19 February 2021). [CrossRef]
  19. LungMAP-Home. Available online: https://lungmap.net/ (accessed on 19 February 2021).
  20. Love, M.I.; Huber, W.; Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Wahl, A.; Gralinski, L.; Johnson, C.; Yao, W.; Kovarova, M.; Dinnon, K.; Liu, H.; Madden, V.; Krzystek, H.; De, C.; et al. Acute SARS-CoV-2 Infection is Highly Cytopathic, Elicits a Robust Innate Immune Response and is Efficiently Prevented by EIDD-2801. Res. Sq. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. GTEx Portal. Available online: https://www.gtexportal.org/home/ (accessed on 19 February 2021).
  23. Ensembl Genome Browser 103. Available online: https://www.ensembl.org/index.html (accessed on 19 February 2021).
  24. gnomAD. Available online: https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/ (accessed on 19 February 2021).
  25. Egyptian Genome. Available online: https://www.egyptian-genome.org/ (accessed on 19 February 2021).
  26. Bonnet, A.; Lagarrigue, S.; Liaubet, L.; Robert-Granié, C.; Cristobal, M.S.; Tosser-Klopp, G. Pathway results from the chicken data set using GOTM, Pathway Studio and Ingenuity softwares. BMC Proc. 2009, 3, S11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Yuryev, A.; Kotelnikova, E.; Daraselia, N. Ariadne’s ChemEffect and Pathway Studio knowledge base. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2009, 4, 1307–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wohlers, I.; Künstner, A.; Munz, M.; Olbrich, M.; Fähnrich, A.; Calonga-Solís, V.; Ma, C.; Hirose, M.; El-Mosallamy, S.; Salama, M.; et al. An integrated personal and population-based Egyptian genome reference. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Cao, Y.; Li, L.; Feng, Z.; Wan, S.; Huang, P.; Sun, X. Comparative genetic analysis of the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV/SARS-CoV-2) receptor ACE2 in different populations. Cell Discov. 2020, 6, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Hoffmann, M.; Kleine-Weber, H.; Pöhlmann, S. A Multibasic Cleavage Site in the Spike Protein of SARS-CoV-2 Is Essential for Infection of Human Lung Cells. Mol. Cell 2020, 78, 779–784.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Saheb Sharif-Askari, N.; Saheb Sharif-Askari, F.; Alabed, M.; Temsah, M.-H.; Al Heialy, S.; Hamid, Q.; Halwani, R. Airways Expression of SARS-CoV-2 Receptor, ACE2, and TMPRSS2 Is Lower in Children Than Adults and Increases with Smoking and COPD. Mol. Ther. Methods Clin. Dev. 2020, 18, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. WHO Director-General’s Opening Remarks at the Media Briefing on COVID-19-28 February 2020. Available online: https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---28-february-2020 (accessed on 19 February 2021).
  33. Zhou, F.; Yu, T.; Du, R.; Fan, G.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Xiang, J.; Wang, Y.; Song, B.; Gu, X.; et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2020, 395, 1054–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pesu, M.; Watford, W.T.; Wei, L.; Xu, L.; Fuss, I.; Strober, W.; Andersson, J.; Shevach, E.M.; Quezado, M.; Bouladoux, N.; et al. T-cell-expressed proprotein convertase furin is essential for maintenance of peripheral immune tolerance. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008, 455, 246–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Oksanen, A.; Aittomäki, S.; Jankovic, D.; Ortutay, Z.; Pulkkinen, K.; Hämäläinen, S.; Rokka, A.; Corthals, G.L.; Watford, W.T.; Junttila, I.; et al. Proprotein convertase FURIN constrains Th2 differentiation and is critical for host resistance against Toxoplasma gondii. J. Immunol. 2014, 193, 5470–5479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Izaguirre, G. The Proteolytic Regulation of Virus Cell Entry by Furin and Other Proprotein Convertases. Viruses 2019, 11, 837. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6784293/ (accessed on 19 February 2021). [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Kieny, M.P.; Lathe, R.; Riviére, Y.; Dott, K.; Schmitt, D.; Girard, M.; Montagnier, L.; Lecocq, J.-P.; Kleny, M. Improved antigenicity of the HIV env protein by cleavage site removal. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 1988, 2, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Stieneke-Gröber, A.; Vey, M.; Angliker, H.; Shaw, E.; Thomas, G.; Roberts, C.; Klenk, H.; Garten, W. Influenza virus hemagglutinin with multibasic cleavage site is activated by furin, a subtilisin-like endoprotease. EMBO J. 1992, 11, 2407–2414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Volchkov, V.E.; Volchkova, V.A.; Ströher, U.; Becker, S.; Dolnik, O.; Cieplik, M.; Garten, W.; Klenk, H.D.; Feldmann, H. Proteolytic processing of Marburg virus gly-coprotein. Virology 2000, 268, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Junjhon, J.; Lausumpao, M.; Supasa, S.; Noisakran, S.; Songjaeng, A.; Saraithong, P.; Chaichoun, K.; Utaipat, U.; Keelapang, P.; Kanjanahaluethai, A.; et al. Differential Modulation of prM Cleavage, Extracellular Particle Distribution, and Virus Infectivity by Conserved Residues at Nonfurin Consensus Positions of the Dengue Virus pr-M Junction. J. Virol. 2008, 82, 10776–10791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Day, P.M.; Schiller, J.T. The role of furin in papillomavirus infection. Future Microbiol. 2009, 4, 1255–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Ito, K.; Kim, K.-H.; Lok, A.S.-F.; Tong, S. Characterization of Genotype-Specific Carboxyl-Terminal Cleavage Sites of Hepatitis B Virus e Antigen Precursor and Identification of Furin as the Candidate Enzyme. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 3507–3517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. De La Vega, M.-A.; Wong, G.; Kobinger, G.P.; Qiu, X. The Multiple Roles of sGP in Ebola Pathogenesis. Viral. Immunol. 2015, 28, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Vähätupa, M.; Aittomäki, S.; Cordova, Z.M.; May, U.; Prince, S.; Uusitalo-Järvinen, H.; Järvinen, T.A.; Pesu, M. T-cell-expressed proprotein convertase FURIN inhibits DMBA/TPA-induced skin cancer development. Oncoimmunology 2016, 5, e1245266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Declercq, J.; Brouwers, B.; Pruniau, V.P.E.G.; Stijnen, P.; Tuand, K.; Meulemans, S.; Prat, A.; Seidah, N.G.; Khatib, A.B.; Creemers, J.W.M. Liver-Specific Inactivation of the Proprotein Convertase FURIN Leads to Increased Hepatocellular Carcinoma Growth. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, e148651. Available online: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2015/148651/ (accessed on 19 February 2021). [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Huang, Y.-H.; Lin, K.-H.; Liao, C.-H.; Lai, M.-W.; Tseng, Y.-H.; Yeh, C.-T. Furin Overexpression Suppresses Tumor Growth and Predicts a Better Postoperative Disease-Free Survival in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e40738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Tomé, M.; Pappalardo, A.; Soulet, F.; López, J.J.; Olaizola, J.; Leger, Y.; Dubreuil, M.; Mouchard, A.; Fessart, D.; Delom, F.; et al. Inactivation of Proprotein Convertases in T Cells Inhibits PD-1 Expression and Creates a Favorable Immune Microenvironment in Colorectal Cancer. Cancer Res. 2019, 79, 5008–5021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. He, Z.; Khatib, A.-M.; Creemers, J.W. Loss of the proprotein convertase Furin in T cells represses mammary tumorigenesis in oncogene-driven triple negative breast cancer. Cancer Lett. 2020, 484, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Van der Veeken, J.; Gonzalez, A.J.; Cho, H.; Arvey, A.; Hemmers, S.; Leslie, C.S.; Rudensky, A.Y. Memory of Inflammation in Regulatory T Cells. Cell 2016, 166, 977–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Fathi, N.; Rezaei, N. Lymphopenia in COVID-19: Therapeutic opportunities. Cell Biol. Int. 2020, 44, 1792–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Gu, J.; Gong, E.; Zhang, B.; Zheng, J.; Gao, Z.; Zhong, Y.; Zou, W.; Zhan, J.; Wang, S.; Xie, Z.; et al. Multiple organ infection and the pathogenesis of SARS. J. Exp. Med. 2005, 202, 415–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wang, H.; Li, N.; Hong, J.; Luo, W.; Yan, Z.; Wang, X.; Zhu, Y.; Shen, Y. Relationship between genetic variation of furin gene and hypercho-lesterolemia and hyper-low-density lipoprotein cholesterolemia in Kazakh general population. Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao 2014, 36, 168–175. [Google Scholar]
  53. Cheng, Z.; Zhou, J.; To, K.K.-W.; Chu, H.; Li, C.; Wang, D.; Yang, D.; Zheng, S.; Hao, K.; Bossé, Y.; et al. Identification ofTMPRSS2as a Susceptibility Gene for Severe 2009 Pandemic A(H1N1) Influenza and A(H7N9) Influenza. J. Infect. Dis. 2015, 212, 1214–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Asselta, R.; Paraboschi, E.M.; Mantovani, A.; Duga, S. ACE2 and TMPRSS2 variants and expression as candidates to sex and country differences in COVID-19 severity in Italy. Aging 2020, 12, 10087–10098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. García-Álvarez, M.; Berenguer, J.; Jiménez-Sousa, M.Á.; Pineda-Tenor, D.; Aldámiz-Echevarria, T.; Tejerina, F.; Diez, C.; Vázquez-Morón, S.; Resino, S. Mx1, OAS1 and OAS2 polymorphisms are associated with the severity of liver disease in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients: A cross-sectional study. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 41516. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5282518/ (accessed on 19 February 2021). [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Fitzgerald, L.M.; Agalliu, I.; Johnson, K.; Miller, M.A.; Kwon, E.M.; Hurtado-Coll, A.; Fazli, L.; Rajput, A.B.; Gleave, M.E.; Cox, M.E.; et al. Association of TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion with clinical characteristics and outcomes: Results from a population-based study of prostate cancer. BMC Cancer 2008, 8, 230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Giri, V.N.; Ruth, K.; Hughes, L.; Uzzo, R.G.; Chen, D.Y.; Boorjian, S.A.; Viterbo, R.; Rebbeck, T.R. Racial differences in prediction of time to prostate cancer diagnosis in a prospective screening cohort of high-risk men: Effect of TMPRSS2 Met160Val. BJU Int. 2010, 107, 466–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Lopera Maya, E.A.; van der Graaf, A.; Lanting, P.; van der Geest, M.; Fu, J.; Swertz, M.; Franke, L.; Wijmenga, C.; Deelen, P.; Zhernakova, A.; et al. Lack of Association Between Genetic Variants at ACE2 and TMPRSS2 Genes Involved in SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Human Quantitative Phenotypes. Front. Genet 2020, 11, 613. Available online: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2020.00613/full (accessed on 19 February 2021). [CrossRef]
  59. Yang, X.; Yang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Xu, J.; Yu, Y.; Shang, Y. Thrombocytopenia and its association with mortality in patients with COVID-19. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2020, 18, 1469–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chaoxin, J.; Daili, S.; Yanxin, H.; Ruwei, G.; Chenlong, W.; Yaobin, T. The influence of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 gene polymorphisms on type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary heart disease. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2013, 17, 2654–2659. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  61. Yang, M.; Zhao, J.; Xing, L.; Shi, L. The association between angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 polymorphisms and essential hypertension risk: A meta-analysis involving 14,122 patients. J. Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2015, 16, 1240–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Wu, Y.-H.; Li, J.-Y.; Wang, C.; Zhang, L.-M.; Qiao, H. TheACE2G8790A Polymorphism: Involvement in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Combined with Cerebral Stroke. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2016, 31, e22033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Pinto, B.G.G.; Oliveira, A.E.R.; Singh, Y.; Jimenez, L.; Gonçalves, A.N.A.; Ogava, R.L.T.; Creighton, R.; Peron, J.P.S.; Nakaya, H.I. ACE2 Expression is Increased in the Lungs of Patients with Comorbidities Associated with Severe COVID-19. medRxiv 2020. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7276054/ (accessed on 19 February 2021).
  64. Chiu, R.W.; Tang, N.L.; Hui, D.S.; Chung, G.T.; Chim, S.; Chan, K.A.; Sung, Y.-M.; Chan, L.Y.; Tong, Y.-K.; Lee, W.-S.; et al. ACE2 Gene Polymorphisms Do Not Affect Outcome of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome. Clin. Chem. 2004, 50, 1683–1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Luo, Y.; Liu, C.; Guan, T.; Li, Y.; Lai, Y.; Li, F. Association of ACE2 genetic polymorphisms with hypertension-related target organ damages in south Xinjiang. Hypertens. Res. 2019, 42, 681–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Simmons, G.; Zmora, P.; Gierer, S.; Heurich, A.; Pöhlmann, S. Proteolytic activation of the SARS-coronavirus spike protein: Cutting enzymes at the cutting edge of antiviral research. Antivir. Res. 2013, 100, 605–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Glowacka, I.; Bertram, S.; Müller, M.A.; Allen, P.D.; Soilleux, E.J.; Pfefferle, S.; Steffen, I.; Tsegaye, T.S.; He, Y.; Gnirss, K.; et al. Evidence that TMPRSS2 Activates the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Spike Protein for Membrane Fusion and Reduces Viral Control by the Humoral Immune Response. J. Virol. 2011, 85, 4122–4134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Agoulnik, I.; Bingman, W.E.; Nakka, M.; Li, W.; Wang, Q.; Liu, X.S.; Brown, M.; Weigel, N.L. Target Gene-Specific Regulation of Androgen Receptor Activity by p42/p44 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase. Mol. Endocrinol. 2008, 22, 2420–2432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Grimes, J.M.; Grimes, K.V. p38 MAPK inhibition: A promising therapeutic approach for COVID-19. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2020, 144, 63–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Lu, L.; Liu, Q.; Zhu, Y.; Chan, K.-H.; Qin, L.; Li, Y.; Wang, Q.; Chan, J.F.-W.; Du, L.; Yu, F.; et al. Structure-based discovery of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus fusion inhibitor. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Liu, T.; Luo, S.; Libby, P.; Shi, G.-P. Cathepsin L-selective inhibitors: A potentially promising treatment for COVID-19 patients. Pharmacol. Ther. 2020, 213, 107587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Hoffmann, M.; Schroeder, S.; Kleine-Weber, H.; Müller, M.A.; Drosten, C.; Pöhlmann, S. Nafamostat Mesylate Blocks Activation of SARS-CoV-2: New Treatment Option for COVID-19. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 64, e00754-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Hofmann, H.; Pyrc, K.; Van Der Hoek, L.; Geier, M.; Berkhout, B.; Pöhlmann, S. Human coronavirus NL63 employs the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus receptor for cellular entry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 7988–7993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Moore, M.J.; Dorfman, T.; Li, W.; Wong, S.K.; Li, Y.; Kuhn, J.H.; Coderre, J.; Vasilieva, N.; Han, Z.; Greenough, T.C.; et al. Retroviruses Pseudotyped with the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Spike Protein Efficiently Infect Cells Expressing Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2. J. Virol. 2004, 78, 10628–10635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Purushothaman, K.-R.; Krishnan, P.; Purushothaman, M.; Wiley, J.; Alviar, C.L.; Ruiz, F.J. Expression of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 and its end product angiotensin 1-7 is increased in diabetic atheroma: Implications for inflammation and neo-vascularization. Cardiovasc. Pathol. 2013, 22, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Turpeinen, H.; Kukkurainen, S.; Pulkkinen, K.; Kauppila, T.; Ojala, K.; Hytönen, V.P.; Pesu, M. Identification of proprotein convertase substrates using genome-wide expression correlation analysis. BMC Genom. 2011, 12, 618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Won, Y.-W.; Lee, M.; Kim, H.A.; Bull, D.A.; Kim, S.W. Post-translational regulated and hypoxia-responsible VEGF plasmid for efficient secretion. J. Control. Release 2012, 160, 525–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Cheng, Y.-W.; Chao, T.-L.; Li, C.-L.; Chiu, M.-F.; Kao, H.-C.; Wang, S.-H.; Pang, Y.; Lin, C.; Tsai, Y.; Lee, W.; et al. Furin Inhibitors Block SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Cleavage to Suppress Virus Production and Cytopathic Effects. Cell Rep. 2020, 33, 108254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Ueland, T.; Holter, J.C.; Holten, A.R.; Müller, K.E.; Lind, A.; Bekken, G.K.; Dudman, S.; Aukrust, P.; Dyrhol-Riise, A.M.; Heggelund, L. Distinct and early increase in circulating MMP-9 in COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure. J. Infect. 2020, 81, e41–e43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. De Lang, A.; Osterhaus, A.D.M.E.; Haagmans, B.L. Interferon-gamma and interleukin-4 downregulate expression of the SARS coronavirus receptor ACE2 in Vero E6 cells. Virology 2006, 353, 474–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Jia, H.P.; Look, D.C.; Tan, P.; Shi, L.; Hickey, M.; Gakhar, L.; Chappell, M.C.; Wohlford-Lenane, C.; McCray, P.B. Ectodomain shedding of angiotensin converting enzyme 2 in human airway epithelia. Am. J. Physiol. Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2009, 297, L84–L96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Hipp, M.M.; Shepherd, D.; Gileadi, U.; Aichinger, M.C.; Kessler, B.M.; Edelmann, M.J.; Essalmani, R.; Seidah, N.G.; Sousa, C.R.E.; Cerundolo, V. Processing of Human Toll-like Receptor 7 by Furin-like Proprotein Convertases Is Required for Its Accumulation and Activity in Endosomes. Immunity 2013, 39, 711–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Elmorsi, R. The therapeutic potential of targeting ACE2 in COVID-19. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2020, 24, 9744–9747. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. (A) −log10 (p-value) for the TMPRSS2, ACE2 and FURIN expression levels in the human lungs of naïve human lung-only mice (LoMs) and SARS-CoV-2-infected LoMs, analyzed using expression data retrieved from the NCBI GE× archive (GSE155286). (B) RNA-Seq expression level trends of FURIN at different developmental stages in lung cells. (C) compares the fold change in the age-dependent expression of FURIN, ACE2 and TMPRSS2 in immune cells versus other cell types, using a two-tailed paired t-test. (D) RNA-Seq expression level trends of ACE2 at different developmental stages in lung cells.
Figure 1. (A) −log10 (p-value) for the TMPRSS2, ACE2 and FURIN expression levels in the human lungs of naïve human lung-only mice (LoMs) and SARS-CoV-2-infected LoMs, analyzed using expression data retrieved from the NCBI GE× archive (GSE155286). (B) RNA-Seq expression level trends of FURIN at different developmental stages in lung cells. (C) compares the fold change in the age-dependent expression of FURIN, ACE2 and TMPRSS2 in immune cells versus other cell types, using a two-tailed paired t-test. (D) RNA-Seq expression level trends of ACE2 at different developmental stages in lung cells.
Genes 12 01041 g001
Figure 2. Graphical relationships between frequencies of eQTL variants of TMPRSS2 (first row), ACE2 (second row) and FURIN (third row) in comparison with clinical indicators of mortality (case fatality ratio (CFR) in the first column and deaths per 100,000 people in the second column), as well as cases per million in the third column.
Figure 2. Graphical relationships between frequencies of eQTL variants of TMPRSS2 (first row), ACE2 (second row) and FURIN (third row) in comparison with clinical indicators of mortality (case fatality ratio (CFR) in the first column and deaths per 100,000 people in the second column), as well as cases per million in the third column.
Genes 12 01041 g002
Figure 3. Violin plots representing cis-expression for genotypes of each eQTL SNP for FURIN, TMPRSS2 and ACE2.
Figure 3. Violin plots representing cis-expression for genotypes of each eQTL SNP for FURIN, TMPRSS2 and ACE2.
Genes 12 01041 g003
Figure 4. Global Interaction Map and regulatory pathways of the ACE2, FURIN and TMPRSS2 interactome. Identified proteins are highlighted in light pink, showing direct regulatory relationships, including binding, post-translational modifications and transcriptional regulation. Differential pathways were generated using the “direct interaction” algorithm to map interactions and relationships. Based on biological process analysis and molecular functions, these proteins are implicated, including FURIN, in cell differentiation, protein cleavage and cell invasion. Unsupervised pathway assessment showed that TMPRSS2 is implicated in several biological pathways, involving cell fusion, viral entry and vascularization, in addition to being associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome pathogenesis, along with ACE2, which was found to be an upstream regulator for several of the identified interactomes involved in viral reproduction and the inflammatory response to viral infections. In silico validation included the protein entities and biological processes involved, along with the interaction types and directionality, along with the PubMed references utilized to derive these interaction types (Tables S1–S3).
Figure 4. Global Interaction Map and regulatory pathways of the ACE2, FURIN and TMPRSS2 interactome. Identified proteins are highlighted in light pink, showing direct regulatory relationships, including binding, post-translational modifications and transcriptional regulation. Differential pathways were generated using the “direct interaction” algorithm to map interactions and relationships. Based on biological process analysis and molecular functions, these proteins are implicated, including FURIN, in cell differentiation, protein cleavage and cell invasion. Unsupervised pathway assessment showed that TMPRSS2 is implicated in several biological pathways, involving cell fusion, viral entry and vascularization, in addition to being associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome pathogenesis, along with ACE2, which was found to be an upstream regulator for several of the identified interactomes involved in viral reproduction and the inflammatory response to viral infections. In silico validation included the protein entities and biological processes involved, along with the interaction types and directionality, along with the PubMed references utilized to derive these interaction types (Tables S1–S3).
Genes 12 01041 g004
Figure 5. The contribution of eQTL variant frequency, gene expression levels and preventive control measures to clinical indicators of mortality and the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 among different populations.
Figure 5. The contribution of eQTL variant frequency, gene expression levels and preventive control measures to clinical indicators of mortality and the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 among different populations.
Genes 12 01041 g005
Table 1. Allele frequencies of quantitative trait locus results for TMPRSS2, FURIN and ACE2 in the Egyptian population in statistical comparison with each of the following populations: Africa, East Asia and non-Finnish European.
Table 1. Allele frequencies of quantitative trait locus results for TMPRSS2, FURIN and ACE2 in the Egyptian population in statistical comparison with each of the following populations: Africa, East Asia and non-Finnish European.
RSIDGeneREFALTAFAC/AN (Egypt)AfricaEast AsiaEuropeanp-ValueNESTissue
rs78164913FURINTG0.04195004791.30 × 10−31−1.6Lung
2208710155815,420
<0.0001<0.00010.5416
rs79742014FURINCT0.03274804453.30 × 10−26−1.4Lung
2208712156015,418
<0.0001<0.00010.9603
rs6226FURINGC0.68215023,18010,58487,0760.0000080.14Esophagus—Mucosa
22024,86019,918128,088
0.00370.0220.9799
rs8039305FURINTC0.5109707426173051.70 × 10−170.23Esophagus—Mucosa
2188688155415,370
<0.0001<0.00010.7117
rs464397TMPRSS2TC0.5931287250155474580.00001−0.089Lung
2168696155815,392
0.0028<0.00010.0826
rs469390TMPRSS2GA0.53711711,136521676,8120.00000680.091Lung
21824,93019,938128,862
0.1244<0.00010.3904
rs2070788TMPRSS2GA0.5281146125103482078.90 × 10−9−0.11Lung
2168694155615,392
0.01550.06820.9765
rs383510TMPRSS2TC0.561215635105179081.20 × 10−8−0.11Lung
2168672156015,350
0.21610.140.5
rs112171234ACE2TG0.04391159070.000041−0.85Adipose—Visceral (Omentum)
2105882100310,875
<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001
rs12010448ACE2TC0.0234651020.0000980.43Muscle—Skeletal
1745757100910,497
0.0008<0.0001<0.0001
rs200781818ACE2GGGGCGCGGTCCTTACGTGT0.37474358278544922.00 × 10−160.27Nerve—Tibial
198531283610,036
<0.0001<0.00010.2122
rs2158082ACE2GA0.481103540997050411.00 × 10−160.28Nerve—Tibial
214581697210,610
<0.0001<0.00010.9632
rs4646127ACE2AG0.563107383485857567.50 × 10−90.2Nerve—Tibial
19049268589249
0.0097<0.00010.4479
rs4830974ACE2GA0.39276421995251403.70 × 10−170.27Nerve—Tibial
1945859100410,670
<0.0001<0.00010.1462
rs5936011ACE2CT0.46195478893649515.20 × 10−160.27Nerve—Tibial
206556094010,334
<0.0001<0.00010.8084
rs5936029ACE2CT0.44190476192749211.40 × 10−140.26Nerve—Tibial
2045504.00931.0010,198.00
<0.0001<0.00010.52
rs6629110ACE2TC0.3979.002459952.004996.003.40 × 10−150.25Nerve—Tibial
202.005772.00989.0010,571.00
0.57<0.00010.18
rs6632704ACE2CA0.3574.002868944.005088.004.60 × 10−160.26Nerve—Tibial
210.005757.00992.0010,604.00
0.01<0.00010.03
Table 2. Allele frequencies of common exonic and intronic regulatory variants of TMPRSS2, FURIN and ACE2 in the Egyptian population in statistical comparison with each of the following populations: Africa, East Asia and non-Finnish European.
Table 2. Allele frequencies of common exonic and intronic regulatory variants of TMPRSS2, FURIN and ACE2 in the Egyptian population in statistical comparison with each of the following populations: Africa, East Asia and non-Finnish European.
RSIDGeneREFALTAFAC/AN (Egypt)AfricaEast AsiaEuropeanAmino AcidsSIFTPOLYPHEN
rs148110342FURINCT0.014340206p.Arg81Cys0.040.59
21624,90219,940128,808
<0.0001<0.00010.0003
rs150965978TMPRSS2CA0.0045451830765Intron Variant
2208706156015,408
0.69130.25410.0046Intron Variant
rs28401567TMPRSS2CT0.24153288511473161-
2208696155215,404
0.0446<0.00010.3371
rs2298659TMPRSS2GA0.125274592517928,744p.Gly259Glysynonymous variantsynonymous variant
21623,85019,478122,880
0.04150.00020.0024
rs17854725TMPRSS2AG0.427939066254467,712p.Ile256Ilesynonymous variantsynonymous variant
21823,91819,604122,814
0.3754<0.00010.0438
rs12329760TMPRSS2CT0.188417265765129,831p.Val160Met00.938
21824,89619,934128,604
0.0118<0.00010.2485
rs3787950TMPRSS2TC0.18540500029059864p.Thr75Thrsynonymous variantsynonymous variant
21624,83219,600127,666
0.68890.2324<0.0001
rs2285666ACE2CT0.1560034.000004057.000007336.0000017,240.00000c.439+4G>Aintron variantsplice region variant
218.0000018,323.0000013,387.0000086,164.00000
0.06890<0.00010.20460
rs35803318ACE2CT0.009352.00000133.0000003935.00000p.Val749Valnon-coding transcript exon variantnon-coding transcript exon variant
214.0000018,549.0000013,918.0000088,946.00
0.97210<0.00010.02470
rs2106809ACE2AG0.1500032.00000707.00000533.000001938.00000intron variant
214.000005771.00000954.0000010,584.00000
0.35390<0.00010.33090
rs4646142ACE2GC0.1520032.000001372.00000557.000002162.00000intron variant
210.000005792.00000979.0000010,704.00000
0.0257<0.00010.16410
rs714205ACE2CG0.1320028.00000707544.000001927.00000intron variant
212.000005865969.0000010,714.00000
0.73400<0.00010.15010
rs17264937ACE2TC0.1600032.00000289.00000382.000003041.00000intron variant
200.000005698.00000946.0000010,493.00000
<0.0001<0.00010.00220
rs5980163ACE2CG0.024005.0000013.000000.00000128.00000intron variant
212.000005887.00000997.0000010,850.00000
<0.0001<0.00010.22400
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tarek, M.; Abdelzaher, H.; Kobeissy, F.; El-Fawal, H.A.N.; Salama, M.M.; Abdelnaser, A. Bioinformatics Analysis of Allele Frequencies and Expression Patterns of ACE2, TMPRSS2 and FURIN in Different Populations and Susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2. Genes 2021, 12, 1041. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12071041

AMA Style

Tarek M, Abdelzaher H, Kobeissy F, El-Fawal HAN, Salama MM, Abdelnaser A. Bioinformatics Analysis of Allele Frequencies and Expression Patterns of ACE2, TMPRSS2 and FURIN in Different Populations and Susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2. Genes. 2021; 12(7):1041. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12071041

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tarek, Mohammad, Hana Abdelzaher, Firas Kobeissy, Hassan A. N. El-Fawal, Mohammed M. Salama, and Anwar Abdelnaser. 2021. "Bioinformatics Analysis of Allele Frequencies and Expression Patterns of ACE2, TMPRSS2 and FURIN in Different Populations and Susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2" Genes 12, no. 7: 1041. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12071041

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop