Compliant, Tough, Anti-Fatigue, Self-Recovery, and Biocompatible PHEMA-Based Hydrogels for Breast Tissue Replacement Enabled by Hydrogen Bonding Enhancement and Suppressed Phase Separation
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Synthesis and Characterization of PHMx Hydrogels
2.2. Mechanical Properties of the PHMx Hydrogels
2.3. Energy Dissipating Capability, Self-Recovery Property, and Fatigue Resistance of the PHMx Hydrogels
2.4. Biocompatibility of the PHMx Hydrogels
3. Conclusions
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Materials
4.2. Preparation of Poly(HEMA-co-MAx) (PHMx) Hydrogels
4.3. Structural Characterization
4.4. Rheological Measurements
4.5. Mechanical Properties Measurements
4.6. In Vitro Cell Experiments
4.7. In Vivo Animal Experiments
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Nakshatri, H.; Kumar, B.; Burney, H.N.; Cox, M.L.; Jacobsen, M.; Sandusky, G.E.; D’Souza-Schorey, C.; Storniolo, A.M.V. Genetic Ancestry–dependent Differences in Breast Cancer–induced Field Defects in the Tumor-adjacent Normal Breast. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 25, 2848–2859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Su, S.; Xie, R.; Ding, X.; Lin, Y. Three cases of bilateral breast absence associated with familial congenital ectodermal defects. Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dermatol. 2021, 14, 377–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, R.; Nakshatri, H. Systemic Actions of Breast Cancer Facilitate Functional Limitations. Cancers 2020, 12, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ito, S.; Kai, Y.; Masuda, T.; Tanaka, F.; Matsumoto, T.; Kamohara, Y.; Hayakawa, H.; Ueo, H.; Iwaguro, H.; Hedrick, M.H.; et al. Long-term outcome of adipose-derived regenerative cell-enriched autologous fat transplantation for reconstruction after breast-conserving surgery for Japanese women with breast cancer. Surg. Today 2017, 47, 1500–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, L.; Wu, X.; Zha, L.; Feng, Y.; Xu, J.; Zheng, H.; Shao, J.; Zhao, M.; Cui, X.; Giuliano, A.E.; et al. Adjacent skin rotation flap for large defect in primary breast tumor. J. Surg. Oncol. 2018, 118, 1199–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.-J.; Yang, Y.; Wan, Q.; Li, H.; Long, Q.-M.; Zhang, P.-R. Clinical observation of the regeneration process of defects after breast cancer resection. BMC Women’s Health 2021, 21, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Illouz, Y.G.; Sterodimas, A. Autologous Fat Transplantation to the Breast: A Personal Technique with 25 Years of Experience. Aesthetic Plast. Surg. 2009, 33, 706–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simonacci, F.; Bertozzi, N.; Grieco, M.P.; Grignaffini, E.; Raposio, E. Autologous fat transplantation for breast reconstruction: A literature review. Ann. Med. Surg. 2016, 12, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaoutzanis, C.; Winocour, J.; Unger, J.; Gabriel, A.; Maxwell, G.P. The Evolution of Breast Implants. Semin. Plast Surg. 2019, 33, 217–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coombs, D.M.; Grover, R.; Prassinos, A.; Gurunluoglu, R. Breast augmentation surgery: Clinical considerations. Clevel. Clin. J. Med. 2019, 86, 111–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Spear, S.L.; Jespersen, M.R. Breast Implants: Saline or Silicone? Aesthetic Surg. J. 2010, 30, 557–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Banerdt, J.; Johnson, J.; Sandler, K.; Maldonado, F.; Aboudara, M. Silicone Lymphadenopathy after Rupture of Breast Implant. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2020, 201, e77–e78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chung, L.; Maestas, D.R.; Lebid, A.; Mageau, A.; Rosson, G.D.; Wu, X.; Wolf, M.T.; Tam, A.J.; Vanderzee, I.; Wang, X.; et al. Interleukin 17 and senescent cells regulate the foreign body response to synthetic material implants in mice and humans. Sci. Transl. Med. 2020, 12, eaax3799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cocarta, A.I.H.; Radka, H.; Trchova, M.; Svojgr, K.; Kodetova, M.; Pochop, P.; Uhlik, J.; Sirc, J. 2-Hydroxyethyl Methacrylate Hydrogels for Local Drug Delivery: Study of Topotecan and Vincristine Sorption/Desorption Kinetics and Polymer-Drug Interaction by ATR-FTIR Spectroscopy. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2021, 222, 2100086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laura, I.; Filippo, C.; Paolo Antonio, N. Coating process and early stage adhesion evaluation of poly(2-hydroxy-ethyl-methacrylate) hydrogel coating of 316L steel surface for stent applications. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2009, 20, 1541–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pereira, A.T.; Henriques, P.C.; Schneider, K.H.; Pires, A.L.; Pereira, A.M.; Martins, M.; Magalhes, F.D.; Bergmeister, H.; Gonalves, I.C. Graphene-based materials: The key for the successful application of pHEMA as a blood-contacting device. Biomater. Sci. 2021, 9, 3362–3377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yihang, C.; Shiming, Z.; Qingyu, C.; Jiahua, N.; Xiaochen, W.; Xuanbing, C.; Halima, A.; Peyton, T.; Chun, X.; Changliang, G.; et al. Microengineered poly(HEMA) hydrogels for wearable contact lens biosensing. Lab A Chip 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Basu, P.; Saha, N.; Alexandrova, R.; Andonova-Lilova, B.; Georgieva, M.; Miloshev, G.; Saha, P. Biocompatibility and Biological Efficiency of Inorganic Calcium Filled Bacterial Cellulose Based Hydrogel Scaffolds for Bone Bioengineering. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seok, J.M.; Jeong, J.E.; Lee, S.J.; Im, S.H.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, W.D.; Lee, K.; Park, S.A. Bio-plotted hydrogel scaffold with core and sheath strand-enhancing mechanical and biological properties for tissue regeneration. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2021, 205, 111919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diao, Q.; Liu, H.; Yang, Y. A Highly Mechanical, Conductive, and Cryophylactic Double Network Hydrogel for Flexible and Low-Temperature Tolerant Strain Sensors. Gels 2022, 8, 424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaur, M.; Bains, A.; Chawla, P.; Yadav, R.; Kumar, A.; Inbaraj, B.S.; Sridhar, K.; Sharma, M. Milk Protein-Based Nanohydrogels: Current Status and Applications. Gels 2022, 8, 432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, Y.; Cai, W.; Ren, Z.; Lu, Y.; Hamushan, M.; Cheng, P.; Xu, Z.; Shen, H.; Zhao, C.; Han, P.; et al. Chiral Supramolecular Hydrogel Loaded with Dimethyloxalyglycine to Accelerate Chronic Diabetic Wound Healing by Promoting Cell Proliferation and Angiogenesis. Gels 2022, 8, 437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ma, C.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Cao, Z.; Yu, H.; Huang, G.; Wu, Q.; Ling, F.; Zhuang, Z.; Wang, H.; et al. Wide-range linear viscoelastic hydrogels with high mechanical properties and their applications in quantifiable stress-strain sensors. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 399, 125697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El Fadl, F.I.A.; Elbarbary, A.M. Radiation synthesis and characterization of heterogeneous magnetic nanocomposites of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate for catalytic degradation of sandocryl blue dye. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 272, 118972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shin, Y.; Choi, M.Y.; Choi, J.; Na, J.H.; Kim, S.Y. Design of an Electro-Stimulated Hydrogel Actuator System with Fast Flexible Folding Deformation under a Low Electric Field. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 15633–15646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, K.; Ye, Y.N.; Sun, T.L.; Chen, L.; Li, X.; Kurokawa, T.; Nakajima, T.; Nonoyama, T.; Gong, J.P. Effect of Structure Heterogeneity on Mechanical Performance of Physical Polyampholytes Hydrogels. Macromolecules 2019, 52, 7369–7378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Ouyang, H.; Xie, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Zhao, L.; Peng, W.; Wu, J.; Bao, J.; Liu, Y.; Wu, J. Mechanically robust, biocompatible, and durable PHEMA-based hydrogels enabled by the synergic effect of strong intermolecular interaction and suppressed phase separation. Polymer 2022, 254, 125083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Antonio, P.A.J.; Arturo, Z.L.; Angel, L.C. Hydrogels of poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) reinforced with nanocrystalline cellulose as candidates for biomaterials. Polym. Compos. 2016, 39, E278–E285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, W.; Li, X.; Gao, S.; Feng, Y.; Huang, J. Understanding mechanical characteristics of cellulose nanocrystals reinforced PHEMA nanocomposite hydrogel: In aqueous cyclic test. Cellulose 2017, 24, 2095–2110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xueting, Z.; Xing, K.; Rongchun, Z.; Yue, Z.; Xiaoliang, W.; Qiang, W.; Tiehong, C.; Pingchuan, S. Viscoelasticity and Structures in Chemically and Physically Dual-Cross-Linked Hydrogels: Insights from Rheology and Proton Multiple-Quantum NMR Spectroscopy. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 9340–9352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Samples | HEMA (M) | MA (M) | 1173 (M) |
---|---|---|---|
PHEMA | 2.50 | 0 | 0.01 |
PHM1 | 2.50 | 0.35 | 0.01 |
PHM2 | 2.50 | 0.70 | 0.01 |
PHM3 | 2.50 | 1.05 | 0.01 |
PHM4 | 2.50 | 1.40 | 0.01 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ouyang, H.; Xie, X.; Xie, Y.; Wu, D.; Luo, X.; Wu, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, L. Compliant, Tough, Anti-Fatigue, Self-Recovery, and Biocompatible PHEMA-Based Hydrogels for Breast Tissue Replacement Enabled by Hydrogen Bonding Enhancement and Suppressed Phase Separation. Gels 2022, 8, 532. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels8090532
Ouyang H, Xie X, Xie Y, Wu D, Luo X, Wu J, Wang Y, Zhao L. Compliant, Tough, Anti-Fatigue, Self-Recovery, and Biocompatible PHEMA-Based Hydrogels for Breast Tissue Replacement Enabled by Hydrogen Bonding Enhancement and Suppressed Phase Separation. Gels. 2022; 8(9):532. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels8090532
Chicago/Turabian StyleOuyang, Hongyan, Xiangyan Xie, Yuanjie Xie, Di Wu, Xingqi Luo, Jinrong Wu, Yi Wang, and Lijuan Zhao. 2022. "Compliant, Tough, Anti-Fatigue, Self-Recovery, and Biocompatible PHEMA-Based Hydrogels for Breast Tissue Replacement Enabled by Hydrogen Bonding Enhancement and Suppressed Phase Separation" Gels 8, no. 9: 532. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels8090532