Next Article in Journal
Differences in Bacterial Communities of Retail Raw Pork in Different Market Types in Hangzhou, China
Previous Article in Journal
Exploitation of Selected Sourdough Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains for the Production of a Craft Raspberry Fruit Beer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Physicochemical, Rheological, and Sensory Characteristics of Yogurt Fermented by Lactic Acid Bacteria with Probiotic Potential and Bioprotective Properties
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Oxidative Stress Response of Probiotic Strain Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum GT15

1
Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia
2
Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 117997 Moscow, Russia
3
Department of Biotechnology, University of Food Technologies, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
4
Department of Microbiology, University of Food Technologies, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
5
Food Microbiology and Biotechnology Laboratory, Food and Nutritional Science Program, North Carolina A&T State University, Greensboro, NC 27411-1064, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2023, 12(18), 3356; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12183356
Submission received: 30 June 2023 / Revised: 1 September 2023 / Accepted: 2 September 2023 / Published: 7 September 2023

Abstract

:
Bifidobacterium is a predominant and important genus in the bacterial population of the human gut microbiota. Despite the increasing number of studies on the beneficial functionality of bifidobacteria for human health, knowledge about their antioxidant potential is still insufficient. Several in vivo and in vitro studies of Bifidobacterium strains and their cellular components have shown good antioxidant capacity that provided a certain protection of their own and the host’s cells. Our work presents the data of transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic analyses of the growing and stationary culture of the probiotic strain B. longum subsp. longum GT15 after exposure to hydrogen peroxide for 2 h and oxygen for 2 and 4 h. The results of the analysis of the sequenced genome of B. longum GT15 showed the presence of 16 gene-encoding proteins with known antioxidant functions. The results of the full transcriptomic analysis demonstrated a more than two-fold increase of levels of transcripts for eleven genes, encoding proteins with antioxidant functions. Proteomic data analysis showed an increased level of more than two times for glutaredoxin and thioredoxin after the exposure to oxygen, which indicates that the thioredoxin-dependent antioxidant system may be the major redox homeostasis system in B. longum bacteria. We also found that the levels of proteins presumably involved in global stress, amino acid metabolism, nucleotide and carbohydrate metabolism, and transport had significantly increased in response to oxidative stress. The metabolic fingerprint analysis also showed good discrimination between cells responding to oxidative stress and the untreated controls. Our results provide a greater understanding of the mechanism of oxidative stress response in B. longum and the factors that contribute to its survival in functional food products.

1. Introduction

Functional foods are traditional or novel foods or dietary components that are considered to have health benefits in addition to providing basic nutrition. Thus, functional foods can help to reduce the prevalence of diseases by optimizing and regulating the capacity of the human microbiome and immune system to prevent and control both infections caused by pathogens, and pathologies resulting from functional alterations in the host. Bifidobacterium is one of the important and predominant bacterial genera of the human gut microbiota. Their positive functional roles for human health are well documented [1]. The amount of bifidobacteria in the gut microbiota of vaginally delivered breast-fed infants reaches 90%. During the later stages of life, it is reduced to 5%, and even less in elderly people [2].
Bifidobacteria are high-G+C Gram-positive microorganisms belonging to the subclass Actinobacteridae of phylum Actinobacteria. Like other colon bacteria, bifidobacteria are strict anaerobes, so the presence of oxygen is an important stress factor for them. Exposure to oxygen can lead to the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which is lethal to cells. ROS leads to protein misfolding and aggregation, DNA damage, and lipid peroxidation. Several in vivo and in vitro studies have demonstrated great antioxidant capacity of certain strains of the genus Bifidobacterium and their components, which provides a certain degree of protection from oxidative damage for both the bacterial and host cells [3]. Bifidobacteria can exert antioxidative (AO) activity via various mechanisms: synthesis of AO enzymes, peptides, and thiols; compounds with AO properties, and chelation of toxic ions (Fe2+ and Cu2+). AO functions are strain-specific [4,5,6]. Strains of the dominant species of bifidobacteria, Bifidobacterium longum subsp. Longum, are oxygen-sensitive (grow in the presence of 5% O2 in liquid culture) [7]. Additionally, strains of B. longum could grow in L-shaped tubes with occasional shaking [8]. Genome sequence analysis has indicated that the genomes of B. longum strains do not have genes encoding NADH peroxidase or superoxide dismutase (SOD), although they do have genes for NADH oxidase [9], alkyl hydroperoxide reductase (AhpC) [10], thioredoxin reductase [11], and other AO enzymes [3].
Bifidobacteria, due to their health-promoting properties in humans, are considered probiotics. In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in bifidobacteria as an accompanying drug for the treatment and prevention of various diseases, including neurological diseases, accompanied by the development of oxidative stress (OS). Successful commercial application of probiotic bifidobacteria depends on their ability to survive during industrial production and storage [12]. ROS damage is one of the main reasons for the loss of viability of anaerobic probiotics such as bifidobacteria. Current knowledge about the mechanism of antioxidant protection of bifidobacteria is still insufficient. In this regard, more attention should be paid to the study of the antioxidant potential of bifidobacteria, especially in the more common and dominant species inhabiting the human intestine, such as B. longum subsp. longum. Different omics technologies for the analysis of probiotic strains of bifidobacteria allow detecting the intrinsic defense systems that protect cells from OS.
With modern biotechnology, the levels of important biologically active and functional compounds in food can be improved. For instance, advancements in the fields of genomics, proteomics nutrigenomics, and metabolomics could be applied in order to enhance the production of functional compounds in food products as functional foods. Our work presents the data from genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic analyses of a probiotic strain of B. longum subsp. longum GT15 after exposure to hydrogen peroxide for 2 h and oxygen for 2 and 4 h. This strain was isolated from the stool of a healthy volunteer from the Moscow region (Russia). The full-length genome sequence of this strain has been completed (GenBank accession no. CP006741) [13]. The immunomodulatory properties of B. longum GT15 have previously been shown [14] and its AO properties are described in this work. This allows recommending its application in functional products aimed at reducing the inflammatory process accompanying various diseases.
To understand the mechanism of antioxidant protection in B. longum in their ecological environment, a growing and a stationary culture of the strain were studied.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strains, Media, Culture Condition

B. longum subsp. longum strain GT15 was deposited on 8 June 2012 in the Russian National Collection of Industrial Microorganisms at the Institute of Genetics and Selection of Industrial Microorganisms (VKPM): No. AC-1928. B. longum GT15 from the laboratory culture collection was grown at 37 °C in de Mann Rogosa Sharpe (MRS) broth, supplemented with 0.05% L-cysteine HCl, under anaerobic conditions in an anaerobic gas chamber (HiAnaerobic System Mark III, HiMedia, India).

2.2. Treatment of B. longum Culture by Oxidative Stress

To study oxidative stress responses, the culture of bifidobacteria was treated with 1 mM of H2O2 for 2 h and incubated on a shaker for 2 and 4 h at 37 °C.
A culture grown in a MRS broth with cysteine HCl to the middle of the exponential growth phase (OD600—0.5–0.6) under anaerobic conditions at 37 °C was divided into two portions: control and experiment. For the control, a portion of the culture was not subjected to oxidative stress, and samples were taken after 2 h and 4 h of incubation under anaerobic conditions. For the experiment, after centrifugation at 28 °C and 7500× g, removal of the medium with cysteine HCl, and the addition of an equivalent volume of MRS broth, the culture was divided into three parts: two parts were put on a shaker and incubated at 250 rpm and 37 °C, and in the other part, H2O2 was added up to 1 mM and was incubated at 37 °C in aerobic conditions. Samples were taken after 2 h and 4 h of incubation on the shaker and after 2 h from the culture with 1 mM of H2O2 added.

2.3. Total RNA Isolation and Sequencing

Cells grown in MRS broth (108 cfu/mL) were harvested (centrifugation for 1 min at 12,000× g) and the pellet was resuspended in 100 µL of TE buffer (30 mM/L Trise HCl, 1 mM/L ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), pH 8.0), supplemented with lysozyme (20 mg/mL) and incubated for 10 min at 37 °C. Then, 350 µL of lysis/binding buffer (4.5 mol/1 guanidine/HC1, 50 mM/L TrisHCI, 30% Triton X-100, pH 6.6) was added to the solution. The cells were disrupted by vortexing with silica beads (150–212 mm diameter). The RNA extraction process was carried out according to the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA) manufacturer’s guidelines. DNase I degraded the double-stranded and single-stranded DNA present in the RNA samples. The purity of the RNA samples was tested by NanoDropTM. Using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent RNA 6000 Nano Kit), the total RNA samples’ concentration, RIN, 23S/16S, and size were detected. Total RNA samples were treated with Vazyme Ribo-off rRNA Depletion Kit Bacteria to deplete rRNA. The RNA molecules were fragmented into small pieces using a fragmentation reagent. The synthesized cDNA was subjected to end-repair and was then 3′ adenylated. Adapters were ligated to the ends of these 3′ adenylated cDNA fragments. PCR was performed to amplify the cDNA fragments with adapters from the previous step. The PCR products were purified with the XP beads and dissolved in TE solution. The libraries were assessed for quality and quantity by two methods: checking for the distribution of the fragments’ size using the Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer and quantifying the library using real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) (TaqMan Probe). The double-stranded PCR products were heat-denatured and circularized by the splint oligo sequence. The single-strand circle DNA (ssCir DNA) were formatted as the final library. The qualified libraries were displayed on cBot to generate the cluster on the flow cell, and the amplified flow cells were paired-end sequenced on the DNBSEQ System (BG I). The sequenced transcriptome was analyzed for quality errors using FastQCv0.11.5 [15]. The sequencing quality was improved using Trimmomaticv0.39 [16].

2.4. Whole Transcriptome Analysis

The whole transcriptome analysis of the sequenced samples was conducted using the following workflow: First, the reference genomes and their annotations were downloaded from the Ref Seq database by the corresponding ID GCF_000772485.1 for B. longum subsp. longum GT15. Next, hisat2 v2.2.1 [17] was used for mapping of the quality-checked reads of the sequenced samples. The mappings were filtered using the SAM tools package v1.10 [18]. The read counts were assessed using HTSeq-count v2.0.2 [19].

2.5. Forming a Reference Catalog of Orthologs of Genes of Antioxidant Function

For the analysis of the genes responsible for the antioxidative properties, reference catalogs of amino acid sequences were assembled for the Bifidobacterium genus. For that purpose, the following algorithm was used: First, the list of antioxidants produced by the bacteria of the genus was constructed using published materials, including research papers, curated databases, etc. Next, the reference amino acid sequences for the genes encoding enzymes responsible for the production and metabolism of the chosen antioxidants were searched for. Only sequences experimentally approved in the research papers were collected. After that, these reference sequences were used for the search of the orthologs in other species of the corresponding genus using BLAST [20] and the NCBI (NCBI Resource Coordinators, Database Resources, Protein Database 2022). Thus, the catalog of the orthologs was constructed.

2.6. Genetic Analysis of Genomes of B. longum Genera

For the analysis of the distribution of the genes from the catalog, concerning B. longum, the published genomes of this species were obtained from the NCBI Assembly database. Only genomes with the assembly status ‘complete’ were used. Overall, genomes of 54 strains were analyzed. For identification of the homologs of the genes from the reference catalog, the BlastX program was used. The thresholds for the alignments’ filtering were a minimal identity of 60%, and a minimal relative alignment length of 80%.

2.7. Analysis of Expression Levels of the Genes Responsible for Antioxidative Properties

The expression levels of the genes responsible for the antioxidative properties in the sequenced strain were analyzed using the reference catalog. The transcriptome reads were mapped on the amino acid sequences using DIAMOND v2.0.13 [21]. The hits were filtered using custom scripts written in Perl according to the following thresholds: identity ≥ 60% and relative alignment length ≥ 90%. Multiple alignments were also filtered. After that, the number of reads aligned to each gene was counted and normalized.

2.8. Sample Preparation for Proteomic Analysis

After exposure to H2O2 or O2, the bacterial cells were collected by centrifugation at 5700× g for 30 min at 40 °C. The cell pellets were washed three times in PBS solution (pH 7.4), containing 1 mM of PMSF. The PBS solution was heated at 95 °C for 20 min, after which the cell pellets were resuspended in the PBS solution at a ratio of 1:10 and incubated at 95 °C for 10 min. Cells were broken using ultrasound disintegration with a VibraCell™ Ultrasonic Processor (Sonics, USA). The processing mode consisted of an 80% amplitude, 15 s of sonication, and 10 s intervals between sonications for a total period of 30–45 min at 4 °C. Cellular debris was centrifuged at 25,000× g for 20 min at 40 °C. Protein preparations were kept at −20 °C. The concentration of the isolated proteins was measured by a Qubit fluorimeter (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA).

2.9. Digestion of Proteins with Trypsin in Solution

Digestion of the proteins and desalting of the peptides were performed as described previously [22]. Briefly, cells were lysed by heating for 10 min at 95 °C in a 100 mM TRIS buffer, pH 8.5, containing 1% sodium deoxycholate (SDC), 10 mM of TCEP, and 20 mM of 2-chloroacetamide. After cooling the sample to room temperature, the equal volume of trypsin solution in 100 mM of TRIS, pH 8.5, was added in a 1:100 (w/w) ratio. After overnight digestion, the sample was acidified by 1% TFA, and a volume containing 20 μg of peptides was desalted using SDB-RPS StageTips. The eluted material was vacuum-dried and stored at −80 °C.

2.10. Liquid Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry

The LC-MS/MS analyses of the peptides were performed with an Ultimate 3000 Nano LC System (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) coupled to the Q Exactive Plus Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). The peptide solution in 2% acetonitrile/0.1% TFA was loaded into a home-made trap-column, of 50 × 0.1 mm, packed with Inertsil ODS3 3 µm (GL Sciences Inc., Fukushima, Japan) at 4 µL/min and separated at room temperature in a home-made fused silica column of 300 × 0.1 mm, packed with Reprosil PUR C18AQ 1.9 (Dr. Maisch HPLC GmbH, Ammerbuch, Germany) into an emitter, as described earlier [23]. Solution A (0.1% formic acid in LC-MS-grade water) and solution B (80% acetonitrile (v/v), 19.9% LC-MS-grade water, 0.1% formic acid) were used for gradient LC separation. Peptides were eluted from the column with a linear gradient of: 3–40% B for 58 min, 40–60% B for 4 min, 60% B for 3 min, 60–99% B for 0.1 min, 99% B for 10 min, and 99–2% B for 0.1 min at a flow rate of 500 nl/min. MS1 scan parameters were as follows: resolution—70,000, scan range—350–1600, max injection time—35 ms, AGC target—3 × 106, isolation window—1.4 m/z, preferred peptide match and isotope exclusion, and dynamic exclusion—30 s. MS2 fragmentation parameters were as follows: HCD mode with collision energy of 30%, resolution—17,500, max injection time—80 ms, AGC target—1 × 105, charge exclusion—unassigned, 1, >7.

2.11. Proteomic Data Analysis

The MS raw files were analyzed by Peaks Studio 10.0 (Bioinformatics Solutions Inc., Waterloo, ON, Canada) [24]. Identification of proteins was performed by searching against the Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum GT15 Uniprot FASTA database version of 19 September 2022, with carbamidomethyl Cys as a fixed modification and deamidation Asn/Gln and Met oxidation as variable modifications. The false discovery rate for peptide–spectrum matches was determined by searching a reverse database and was set to 0.01. Enzyme specificity was set as C-terminal to arginine and lysine, and a maximum of two missed cleavages were allowed in the database search. Peptide identification was performed with an allowed initial precursor mass deviation of up to 10 ppm and an allowed fragment mass deviation of 0.05 Da.
A quantitative comparison of the relative content of proteins in the different groups of samples was carried out by a label-free quantification method (top 3 peptides) using the Peaks Studio 10.0 program. The statistical significance of the observed differences was assessed using the PEAKS Q method built into the program.

2.12. DPPH Radical Scavenging Assay

The ability of the samples to donate an electron and to scavenge 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radicals by electron donation was determined by the slightly modified (by Mihaylova et al. [25]) method of Brand-Williams et al. [26]. A freshly prepared 4 × 10−4 M solution of DPPH was mixed with the samples in a ratio of 2:0.5 (v/v). After incubation at room temperature for 30 min, the absorption was measured at 517 nm. The DPPH radical scavenging activity is presented as a function of the concentration of Trolox and is defined as the concentration of Trolox with equivalent antioxidant activity, expressed as μM TE/g for the cell biomass and μM TE/mL for the culture liquid.

2.13. ABTS•+ Radical Scavenging Assay

The radical scavenging activity of the samples toward 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS•+) was evaluated as described by Re et al. [27]. The ABTS radical cation (ABTS•+) was produced by reacting ABTS stock solution (7 mM) with 2.45 mM of potassium persulfate (final concentration) and allowing the mixture to stand in the dark at room temperature for 12–16 h before use. Afterward, the ABTS•+ solution was diluted with ethanol to an absorbance of 0.7 ± 0.02 at 734 nm and equilibrated at 30 °C. The reaction mixture consists of 1.0 mL of diluted ABTS•+ solution added to 0.01 mL of samples and was incubated at 30 °C for 6 min. Afterward, the absorbance reading was taken at 734 nm and 30 °C. The results are expressed as μM TE/g for the cell biomass and μM TE/mL for the culture liquid.

2.14. Ferric-Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) Assay

The FRAP assay was carried out according to the procedure of Benzie and Strain [28], with slight modifications. The FRAP reagent was prepared fresh daily and was warmed to 37 °C prior to use. Then, 150 µL of sample was allowed to react with 2850 µL of the FRAP reagent for 4 min at 37 °C, and the absorbance was recorded at 593 nm. The results are expressed as μM TE/g for the cell biomass and μM TE/mL for the culture liquid.

2.15. Cupric Ion-Reducing Antioxidant Capacity (CUPRAC) Assay

The CUPRAC assay was carried out according to the procedure of Apak et al. [29]. Here, 1 mL of CuCl2 solution (1.0 × 10−2 M) was mixed with 1 mL of neocuproine methanolic solution (7.5 × 10−3 M), 1 mL of CH3COONH4 buffer solution (pH 7.0), and 0.1 mL of sample, followed by the addition of 1 mL of water (total volume = 4.1 mL), and then mixed well. Absorbance against a reagent blank was measured at 450 nm after 30 min. Trolox was used as a standard, and the results are expressed as μM TE/g for the cell biomass and μM TE/mL for the culture liquid.

2.16. Determination of an Intracellular Metabolic Profile

After exposure to H2O2 and O2, the bacterial cells were separated from the nutrient medium through centrifugation of 10 mL of culture medium for 10 min at 6000 min−1 and the obtained biomass was washed twice with 0.5% NaCl solution. The biomass was lyophilized using a Biobase BK-FD18P apparatus for 24 h. The biomass was pre-frozen to −40 °C. Lyophilization took place at a working pressure of 25 Pa. The process ended at a post-drying temperature of 30 °C. The resulting lyophilizates were subjected to extraction, where 15 mg of dry biomass was extracted with 1 mL of solvent containing CH3OH, CHCl3, and water in a ratio of 2.5:1:1. Then, 0.5 mL of distilled water was added to the samples and centrifuged for 10 min at 6000 min−1, and 0.5 mL of the supernatant was separated and lyophilized under the same conditions as the biomass. The obtained dry cell extracts were dissolved in pyridine and subjected to derivatization with N-trimethylsilyl-N-methyl trifluoroacetamide (MSTFA) for 30 min at a temperature of 37 °C.
The intracellular metabolites were analyzed with a Trace 1300 GC GC/MS system equipped with an ISQ QD single-quadrupole mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), with a TR-5MS column (length, 30 m; id, 0.25 mm; film thickness, 0.25 μm; Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). Helium was used as the mobile phase at a rate of 1 mL/min.
Samples with a volume of 1 µL were injected into the gas chromatograph injector at a temperature of 270 °C and a split flow of 25 mL/min. The analysis started at a temperature of 110 °C, which was held constant for 3 min, then increased to 330 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min and held for 5 min. The ion source and transfer line temperatures were 220 °C and 260 °C, respectively. Mass spectra from each sample were recorded using a scan range of 45 to 650 m/z.
Cellular metabolites were identified by comparing their mass spectra with those in the National Institute of Standards and Technology database (NIST MS Search 2.2, 2014). SIMCA 14 2015 software was used to create the OPLS-DA and OPLS models (Sartorius AG, Göttingen, Germany).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Genomic and Transcriptomic Data of Antioxidative Response of B. longum GT15

3.1.1. Genes for Antioxidative Response of B. longum

First, enzymes and other cells compounds involved in the oxidative stress response of B. longum and the genes encoding them were selected and assembled in Table S1 after analysis of the published data. The orthologs to the selected genes were found in the genomes of B. longum and a catalog was assembled of their amino acid sequences from the reference literature, as described in Section 2. The final version of the catalog comprised of 203 sequences for 27 enzymes (Table S2). Then, we analyzed the presence of the genes from the reference catalog in the complete genomes of different strains of the B. longum species. The data on the distribution of the genes encoding the following: alkyl hydroperoxide reductase AhpC and AhpF, NADH oxidase, P-type ATPase, DSBA oxidoreductase, dihydroorotate dehydrogenase, glutaredoxin grxC2 (nrdH), class I pyridine nucleotide disulfideoxidoreductase, glutathione import ATP-binding protein GsiA, linoleic acid isomerase, glutathione peroxidase, permease, peroxiredoxin, thioredoxin, thioredoxin domain protein, thioredoxin peroxidase, thioredoxin reductase, and peroxiredoxin, are presented in Table S3. This table includes data for the genome of the B. longum GT15 strain, which indicates the presence of 16 of the studied genes. The distribution of AO genes demonstrates their conservativeness and the general mechanism of AO protection in representatives of the species B. longum. However, the strain-specificity of antioxidant activity in bifidobacteria is a known fact [3].
To identify the functionality of the revealed genes and to identify other genes with AO properties, a general transcriptomic analysis of a growing culture of B. longum GT15 exposed to oxidative stress was performed.

3.1.2. Transcriptomic Data for Antioxidative Response of B. longum GT15

For transcriptomic analysis, a culture of B. longum GT15 in an exponential growth phase was used, which was exposed to hydrogen peroxide for 2 h and oxygen for 2 and 4 h. These conditions were used as approximations to the environment of bifidobacteria in the intestinal tract with possible oxidative stress during inflammatory processes or during the industrial processes of probiotic production.
Total RNA was isolated from the culture cells selected before (control) and after the exposure to oxidative stress and sequenced on the DNBSEQ System device after the libraries’ preparation. The transcriptome samples of B. longum GT15 were sequenced as paired-end reads of 100 bp. The full parameters of the samples are presented in Table S4. The quality-checking procedures showed that the samples were good, and their sizes did not reduce much after trimming. The overall amount of data was almost evenly distributed across the samples. The transcriptomic reads were aligned at the reference catalog with DIAMOND and filtered as described in Section 2. The numbers of remaining reads used for the estimation of the expression levels for the 5 samples were: 443,467 (control 1), 407,245 (control 2), 460,909 (H2O2—2 h), 441,397 (O2—2 h), and 394,653 (O2—4 h) reads.
The transcriptomic reads were mapped at the B. longum GT15 genome using HTSeq-2. The total numbers of reads used for further estimation of the expression levels in the 5 samples were: 27,580,604 (control 1), 29,076,210 (control 2), 24,965,322 (H2O2—2 h), 28,207,704 (O2—2 h), and 27,838,820 (O2—4 h) reads.
The total number of genes with identified transcripts was 1974, of which a more than two-fold increase in the levels of transcripts was detected for the genes, as follows: in response to H2O2 for 190 genes, in response to the action of O2 for 2 h for 117 genes, and in response to the action of O2 for 4 h for 177 genes (Table S5).
The genes encoding products with antioxidant action were identified among the transcripts by using the catalog of orthologs (Table 1). Mostly, a more than 2-fold increase of transcript levels was detected for 11 genes after the oxidative stress response (Table 1). The transcripts for the genes encoding glutaredoxin, thioredoxin, thioredoxin_reductase, p-type_ATPase, and dihydroorotate dehydrogenase were upregulated more than 3-fold after H2O2 and O2 exposure. The genes encoding glutaredoxin, thioredoxin, and thioredoxin reductase were also highly upregulated—more than 6-fold, after 60 min of oxygen exposure in the B. longum BBMN68 strain [30]. The thioredoxin-dependent reduction system plays an important role in the oxidative stress response by directly reducing H2O2, scavenging hydroxyl radicals, quenching singlet oxygen, and maintaining the intracellular thiol-disulfide balance [31]. The gene encoding P-type ATPase was highly (more than 5-fold) upregulated in B. longum GT15 after the action of all oxidative stresses. It has been reported that zntA1, encoding P-type ATPase, was upregulated 2.01-fold after 60 min of oxygen exposure in strain BBMN68 [30]. P-type ATPase might be involved in taking up Mn2+, which then scavenges superoxide anions in bifidobacteria [11]. Mn2+ not only replaces superoxide dismutase in scavenging superoxide anions, but it can also scavenge H2O2 [32]. The gene encoding dihydroorotate dehydrogenase was also highly upregulated in B. longum GT15 after H2O2 (more than 6-fold) and oxygen exposure (more than 8-fold). Dihydroorotate dehydrogenase could be involved in H2O2 production in highly aerated environments in bifidobacteria [33]. When exposed to oxygen, the transcript for the gene encoding DSBA oxidoreductase was upregulated more than 8-fold (2 h) and 18-fold (4 h), and for the genes encoding thioredoxin domain_protein was upregulated more than 2-fold (2 h) and 8-fold (4 h). The genes encoding NADH_oxidase and thioredoxin_peroxidase were upregulated 3.74- and 6.76-fold, correspondingly, after only 4 h of oxygen exposure in B. longum GT15. The NADH oxidase homologue, together with other predicted proteins, decreased oxidative damage in bifidobacteria [9]. The gene encoding Class I pyridine nucleotide-disulfide oxidoreductase was upregulated in the cells of B. longum GT15 by more than 9-fold after H2O2 and more than 2-fold after O2 (2 h) exposure, similar to the process in the cells of the B. longum BBMN68 strain after oxygen exposure (60 min) [30]. However, an increase in protein levels in the cells of B. longum GT15 was observed only after the action of H2O2. The transcript for the gene encoding linoleic_acid_isomerase was upregulated more than 3-fold after H2O2 exposure. Conjugated linoleic acid, formed by some types of bifidobacteria, itself does not have AO properties, but its metabolites exhibit the ability to protect cells from harmful oxidative effects [34,35]. The levels of transcripts of the other genes encoding antioxidant products were upregulated by less than 2-fold.
To identify the translation products of the AO genes under the same conditions of oxidative stress, a proteomic analysis of the growing cell culture of B. longum GT15 was carried out.

3.2. Proteomic Data for Antioxidative Response of B. longum GT15 in Comparison with Transcriptomics Data

For proteomic analysis, a growing culture of B. longum GT15 in an exponential growth phase was also used, which was exposed to hydrogen peroxide for 2 h and oxygen for 2 and 4 h.
Proteins were isolated from the culture cells selected before (control) and after the action of oxidative stress and analyzed using the proteomic approach through liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry. As a result of the proteomic analysis, 1270 proteins were identified. The volcano slot for proteins of B. longum GT15 after inducing a stress response, as seen in Figure 1, shows the difference in levels of proteins after the exposure to various types of oxidative stress. Under the action of H2O2, a difference was detected for 37 proteins, under the action of O2 for 2 h, a variation was detected for 125 proteins, and under the action of O2 for 4 h, for 68 proteins. For the analysis, only increased levels of proteins after exposure to oxidative stress were used. An increase in levels of more than twice was detected for the proteins: in response to H2O2 for 13 proteins, in response to the action of O2 after 2 h for 19 proteins, and in response to the action of O2 after 4 h for 14 proteins (Table S6).
Five known proteins with antioxidant functionality were identified in the stress response (Table 2). The levels of the proteins glutaredoxin and thioredoxin were increased under the action of oxygen, and pyridine nucleotide-disulfide oxidoreductase levels were increased under the action of H2O2. Proteins ribonucleoside-triphosphate reductase and P-type ATPase more than doubled in the cells of B. longum GT15 after the action of oxygen for 2 h. Class_I pyridine nucleotide-disulfide oxidoreductase increased after the addition of H2O2.
Thus, the increased levels of both transcripts and the proteins glutaredoxin and thioredoxin in the cells of the B. longum GT15 strain after exposure to oxygen indicate that the thioredoxin-dependent AO system may be the major redox homeostasis system in B. longum bacteria, which has been indicated in other published studies [30].
Other identified proteins with more than twice increased levels in cells after the action of oxidative stress are involved in the processes of the multiple stress response in the cells, amino acid metabolism, nucleotide and carbohydrate metabolism, and transport. In the cells of B. longum GT15, after exposure to oxidative stress, the level of proteins, involved in proper protein folding (Co-chaperonin GroES) and degradation of damaged protein (serine protease); taking part in repair, removing, proofreading, protecting DNA during starvation, and oxidative stress (DNA polymerase sliding clamp subunit, nucleotidyl transferase, DNA topoisomerase); modifying RNA secondary structures or intermolecular RNA interactions, and modulating RNA–protein complexes (DEAD/DEAH box helicase), were increased. In B. longum GT15 cells, excessive levels were identified for the proteins: XRE family transcriptional regulator, MerR family transcriptional regulator, LexA repressor, cystathionine beta-synthase, and general stress protein, after oxygen or H2O2 exposure. These proteins play an important role in the adaptation of bacteria to changing environments and in their response to stress conditions, including oxidative stress. These results are supported by other authors, reporting that chaperones and proteases related to several stress conditions were induced in B. longum BBMN68 in response to oxygen [30]. The GroEL/GroES complex is required for proper protein folding and is frequently involved in responses to heat, low pH, and bile-salt stresses in bifidobacteria [36].
Several genes encoding proteases and peptidases were upregulated in B. longum BBMN68 after 60 min of exposure to oxygen [30]. These proteins play a major role in the degradation and turnover of damaged proteins [30]. The SOS response in bacteria is a global regulatory network for DNA-damage repair, produced by reactive forms of oxygen, governed by the repressor LexA and the inducer RecA [37]. In B. longum BBMN68, LexA expression was upregulated 3.50-fold after 60 min of oxygen exposure [30]. The transcription elongation factor GreA was increased in the cells after 2 h of exposure to oxygen. GreA aids in adaptation to stressful environments in various bacteria [38].
Interestingly, under the action of hydrogen peroxide, the levels of proteins involved in nucleotide (orotate phosphoribosyl transferase, multifunctional fusion protein cytidylate kinase) and carbohydrate metabolism (gluconate kinase and alpha-amylase) were upregulated in B. longum GT15. Only the transcript of the gene encoding alpha-amylase was upregulated after exposure to H2O2. Alpha-amylase is a metal-activated extracellular endo-acting enzyme that randomly hydrolyzes α-1,4 glycosidic linkages of starch.
Several proteins, involved in the metabolism and transport of amino acids—cystathionine gamma-synthase, chorismate synthase, and amino acid ABC transporter—were increased in the cells of B. longum GT15 after H2O2 and oxygen exposure compared to control cells. Cystathionine gamma-synthase catalyzes the committed step of de novo methionine biosynthesis. Methionine in proteins acts as an endogenous antioxidant and defends cells against oxidative stress [39]. Chorismate synthase participates in phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan biosynthesis. Tyrosine and tryptophan residues, accumulated in the transmembrane domains, especially in the region of the highest lipid density, perform vital antioxidant functions inside lipid bilayers and protect cells from oxidative destruction [40]. The ABC transporter is a member of a large family of ATP-binding proteins that transport a variety of molecules across biological membranes. It is possible that bifidobacteria cells require multiple amino acid transporters to fulfill their metabolic requirements during oxidative stress.
Three uncharacterized proteins were upregulated in B. longum GT15 after oxygen exposure at the level of transcription and translation. In the future, we need to pay attention to the characterization of the functions of these proteins.
Thus, the obtained data indicate that B. longum GT15, in addition to the known mechanisms of protection against OS, also uses the mechanism of common stress response to ensure its survival.
Not all proteins with an increased level of translation showed an increase in the level of transcripts, and vice versa. An increase in levels of more than twice was detected for the proteins and their transcripts: in response to H2O2 for 8 proteins, in response to the action of O2 after 2 h for 14 proteins, and in response to the action of O2 after 4 h for 13 proteins (Table S7). An insignificant difference in the expression levels for a number of genes and proteins can be explained by their instability when using the described methods for proteomic or transcriptomic analysis. Part of the proteins may be secreted from the cell and not considered when determining the total cellular proteins. The regulation of a number of proteins can be carried out post-transcriptionally. Oxidants can suppress translation. Our results demonstrate that the reaction of gene transcription in response to OS was much stronger than protein synthesis, as it has been shown in other studies [41].

3.3. Metabolomic Data for Antioxidative Response of B. longum GT15

3.3.1. Antioxidant Activity of B. longum GT15

The in vitro antioxidant activity of the culture fluid and cell biomass of B. longum GT15 was investigated when hydrogen peroxide and oxygen were applied as stress agents (Table 3). Since the metabolites synthesized by the strain can be both exo and endo, both the cell biomass and the culture fluid were examined to evaluate the antioxidant potential. When examining the culture fluid, the reaction to oxygen, assessed at 4 h intervals, showed less sensitivity compared to hydrogen peroxide, which provoked a decrease in the antioxidant potential. The antioxidant activity restored at the end of oxidative stress is reflected in a better potential when oxygen is applied as a stress factor.
From the obtained results, it is clear that the effect of oxygen compared to hydrogen peroxide is weaker and the decrease in the activity of the culture liquid is greater compared to that under the influence of hydrogen peroxide.
As for the biomass of the B. longum GT15 strain, the observed antioxidant effect was different. In general, the effect of hydrogen peroxide provokes an increase in the antioxidant activity of the cellular biomass, which can be attributed to internal metabolites and a systemic stress response.
The results of the four in vitro methods indicate the need to perform more than three assays and to extend the studies with an in vivo assay if possible/in the future.
Amaretti et al. [42] investigated the antioxidant properties of various Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Lactococcus, and Streptococcus thermophiles and reported that the antioxidant mechanism and degree of antioxidant activity were specific for each individual bacterial strain.
As is known, oxidative stress is a condition that occurs as a result of an imbalance of the internal antioxidant–prooxidant system of the cell, which can lead to apoptosis and cell death. In this regard, the consumption of probiotic strains with antioxidant potential is considered beneficial to human health due to the reduction of oxidative damage [43].
The use of probiotics promotes hemostasis, improves immune responses, and prevents many diseases caused by oxidation in the host, so the interest in investigating less studied potential strains is worthwhile [43].
The outcomes found in the present study (Table 3) can be attributed to the established antioxidant enzymes and the above-mentioned thioredoxin-dependent antioxidant system.
The differences in the responses to oxidative stress could be explained by the different responses in the transcriptomic analysis [44]. As mentioned above, a high level of transcripts of oxidative factors was observed for genes encoding glutaredoxin, thioredoxin, and thioredoxin reductase. The effect of both oxidants leads to a different response in terms of the transcriptome and the identified metabolites.
The differential response to oxidizing agents and the results of the validated proteomic and transcriptomic analyses were consistent with the in vitro antioxidant potential of the cell biomass and culture fluid of B. longum GT15.

3.3.2. Metabolic Fingerprinting and Data Analysis

Metabolomic analyses and their correlation with the antioxidant activity of the cells would also provide adequate information about the cellular response as a result of oxidative stress. The cell biomass of B. longum GT15 after the application of oxidative stress by H2O2 and O2 was subjected to metabolic fingerprinting. The resulting fingerprints of the intracellular low-molecular-weight metabolites were analyzed with the software SIMCA 14. As input data for OPLS-DA (orthogonal projections to latent structures discriminant analysis) and OPLS (orthogonal projections to latent structures), we used the complete metabolic fingerprints for each sample.
The OPLS-DA method allowed distinct separation between the control (cells without oxidative stress) and the samples subjected to stress by oxygen and hydrogen peroxide (Figure 2). The first component presented 31.2% of the total variance and showed the separation between the three groups. The second component presented 11.8% of the total variance and separated the control from the samples subjected to oxidative stress.
OPLS regression models show how the obtained metabolomic fingerprints correlate to the data from conventional methods for antioxidant activity analysis. If the correlation is high enough, GC-MS fingerprints (a fast and reliable method) can be used to determine the antioxidant activity. The results from the OPLS models are presented in Figure 3 and Figure S1–S3, and they show varying correlations between the predicted and the observed results. The best correlation was observed for the CUPRAC method for the determination of antioxidant activity (R2 = 0.8777), with a relatively low estimation error (RMSEE = 0.0530688) and cross-validation error (RMSEcv = 0.0920637) (Figure 3). The results from the modeling of the ABTS method data showed a smaller correlation (R2 = 0.7248) and a higher estimation error (RMSEE = 0.096024) and cross-validation error (RMSEcv = 0.127565) (Figure S1). For the DPPH and FRAP methods, the OPLS models had a much lower correlation with the experimental data (Figures S2 and S3)—R2 = 0.4638 and 0.3335, respectively.
The results obtained from the four applied methods for the evaluation of antioxidant activity are difficult to compare due to the different mechanisms, redox potentials, pH values, solvent dependencies, etc., of the various analyses [45]. However, the CUPRAC assay stands out as a widely used method to evaluate the antioxidant potential of biological fluids because it is performed at a realistic pH value close to physiological pH and a favorable redox potential, but is also applicable to lipophilic antioxidants, as well as hydrophilic ones [46]. In our investigation, the results from the CUPRAC method correlated best to the OPLS model and they showed the lowest estimation and cross-validation errors.
The OPLS-DA showed good discrimination between different phenotypes, and a larger fingerprint database would potentially allow identifying strains with high antioxidant activity. The differential response to oxidizing agents and the results of the validated metabolomic analyses were consistent with the in vitro antioxidant potential of the cell biomass and culture fluid of B. longum GT15.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/foods12183356/s1. Table S1: List of genes and their products with antioxidant functionality of bifidobacteria [9,10,11,33,34,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63]. Table S2: Catalog of the orthologs of antioxidant genes of B. longum. Table S3: Distribution genes of antioxidant functionality in the genomes of B. longum. Table S4: Parameters of the analyzed transcriptomic samples. Table S5: The total number of upregulated transcripts in cells of B. longum GT15 under the action of a certain oxidative stress factor. Table S6: The total number of proteins detected at an increased level in cells of B. longum GT15 under the action of a certain oxidative stress factor. Table S7: The total number of transcripts and proteins detected at an increased level in cells of B. longum GT15 under the action of a certain oxidative stress factor. Figure S1: OPLS regression models on metabolic fingerprints of B. longum GT15 cells and their antioxidant activity (ABTS•+ method). Figure S2: OPLS regression models on metabolic fingerprints of B. longum GT15 cells and their antioxidant activity (DPPH method). Figure S3: OPLS regression models on metabolic fingerprints of B. longum GT15 cells and their antioxidant activity (FRAP method).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, O.V.A., V.N.D., A.K. and S.A.I.; methodology, O.V.A., D.A.M., R.H.Z., D.M., D.B., A.S. and M.B.; investigation, O.V.A., D.A.M., A.S.K., R.H.Z., D.M., D.B., A.S. and M.B.; resources, A.K., S.A.I. and V.N.D.; data curation, O.V.A., D.A.M., A.S.K., R.H.Z., D.M., D.B., A.S. and M.B.; writing—original draft preparation, O.V.A., A.S.K., D.M., D.B., A.S. and M.B.; writing—review and editing, O.V.A., V.N.D., D.B. and A.K.; supervision, O.V.A., V.N.D., S.A.I. and A.K.; project administration, O.V.A., M.B. and A.K.; funding acquisition, O.V.A. and A.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Bulgarian National Science Fund, project no. KП-06-Pycия/27, the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project no. 20-54-18006, and the Russian Science Foundation, project no. 20-14-00132.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wong, C.B.; Odamaki, T.; Xiao, J.Z. Insights into the reason of Human-Residential Bifidobacteria (HRB) being the natural inhabitants of the human gut and their potential health promoting benefits. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2020, 44, 369–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Arboleya, S.; Watkins, C.; Stanton, C.; Ross, R.P. Gut Bifidobacteria Populations in Human Health and Aging. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, e1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Averina, O.V.; Poluektova, E.U.; Marsova, M.V.; Danilenko, V.N. Biomarkers and utility of the antioxidant potential of probiotic lactobacilli and bifidobacteria as representatives of the human gut microbiota. Biomedicines 2021, 9, e1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Domej, W.; Oetll, K.; Renner, W. Oxidative stress and free radicals in COPD—Implications and relevance for treatment. Int. J. Chronic Obstr. Pulm. Dis. 2014, 9, 1207–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Calabrese, V.; Santoro, A.; Monti, D.; Crupi, R.; di Paola, R.; Latteri, S.; Cuzzocrea, S.; Zappia, M.; Giordano, J.; Calabrese, E.J.; et al. Aging and Parkinson’s Disease: Inflammaging, neuroinflammation and biological remodeling as key factors in pathogenesis. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2018, 115, 80–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Senoner, T.; Schindler, S.; Stättner, S.; Öfner, D.; Troppmair, J.; Primavesi, F. Associations of Oxidative Stress and Postoperative Outcome in Liver Surgery with an Outlook to Future Potential Therapeutic Options. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2019, 3950818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kawasaki, S.; Watanabe, M.; Fukiya, S.; Yokota, A. Chapter 7—Stress Responses of Bifidobacteria: Oxygen and Bile Acid as the Stressors. The Bifidobacteria and Related Organisms. Biol. Taxon. Appl. 2018, 10, 131–143. [Google Scholar]
  8. Shimamura, S.; Abe, F.; Ishibashi, N.; Miyakawa, H.; Yaeshima, T.; Araya, T.; Tomita, M. Relationship between oxygen sensitivity and oxygen metabolism of Bifidobacterium species. J. Dairy Sci. 1992, 75, 3296–3306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Huang, G.; Pan, H.; Zhu, Z.; Li, Q. The complete genome sequence of Bifidobacterium longum LTBL16, a potential probiotic strain from healthy centenarians with strong antioxidant activity. Genomics 2020, 112, 769–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xiao, M.; Xu, P.; Zhao, J.; Wang, Z.; Zuo, F.; Zhang, J.; Ren, F.; Li, P.; Chen, S.; Ma, H. Oxidative stress-related responses of Bifidobacterium longum subsp. Longum BBMN68 at the proteomic level after exposure to oxygen. Microbiology 2011, 157, 1573–1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Klijn, A.; Mercenier, A.; Arigoni, F. Lessons from the genomes of Bifidobacterial. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2005, 29, 491–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Blazheva, D.; Mihaylova, D.; Averina, O.V.; Slavchev, A.; Brazkova, M.; Poluektova, E.U.; Danilenko, V.N.; Krastanov, A. Antioxidant potential of probiotics and postbiotics: A biotechnological approach to improving their stability. Russ. J. Genet. 2022, 58, 1036–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zakharevich, N.V.; Averina, O.V.; Klimina, K.M.; Kudryavtseva, A.V.; Kasianov, A.S.; Makeev, V.J.; Danilenko, V.N. Complete Genome Sequence of Bifidobacterium longum GT15: Identification and Characterization of Unique and Global Regulatory Genes. Microb. Ecol. 2015, 70, 819–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Averina, O.V.; Ermolenko, E.I.; Ratushniy, A.Y.; Tarasova, E.A.; Borschev, Y.Y.; Leontieva, G.F.; Kramskaya, T.A.; Kotyleva, M.P.; Danilenko, V.N. Influence of probiotics on cytokine production in the in Vitro and in Vivo Systems. Med. Immunol. 2015, 17, 443–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Andrews, S. FastQC: A Quality Control Tool for High Throughput Sequence Data. 2010. Available online: http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc (accessed on 29 June 2023).
  16. Bolger, A.M.; Lohse, M.; Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2114–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kim, D.; Paggi, J.M.; Park, C.; Bennett, C.; Salzberg, S.L. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 907–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Danecek, P.; Bonfield, J.K.; Liddle, J.; Marshall, J.; Ohan, V.; Pollard, M.O.; Whitwham, A.; Keane, T.; McCarthy, S.A.; Davies, R.M.; et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience 2021, 10, giab008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Putri, G.H.; Anders, S.; Pyl, P.T.; Pimanda, J.E.; Zanini, F. Analysing high-throughput sequencing data in Python with HTSeq 2.0. Bioinformatics 2022, 38, 2943–2945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Madden, T.L.; Tatusov, R.L.; Zhang, J. Applications of network BLAST server. Methods Enzymol. 1996, 266, 131–141. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  21. Buchfink, B.; Reuter, K.; Drost, H.G. Sensitive protein alignments at tree-of-life scale using DIAMOND. Nat. Methods 2021, 18, 366–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kulak, N.A.; Pichler, G.; Paron, I.; Nagaraj, N.; Mann, M. Minimal, encapsulated proteomic-sample processing applied to copy-number estimation in eukaryotic cells. Nat. Methods 2014, 11, 319–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kovalchuk, S.I.; Jensen, O.N.; Rogowska-Wrzesinska, A. FlashPack: Fast and Simple Preparation of Ultrahigh-performance Capillary Columns for LG-MS. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2019, 18, 383–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ma, B.; Zhang, K.; Hendrie, C.; Liang, C.; Li, M.; Doherty-Kirby, A.; Lajoie, G. PEAKS: Powerful software for peptide de novo sequencing by tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2003, 17, 2337–2342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mihaylova, D.; Lante, A.; Krastanov, A. Total phenolic content, antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of Haberlea rhodopensis extracts obtained by pressurized liquid extraction. Acta Aliment. 2015, 44, 326–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Brand-Williams, W.; Cuvelier, M.E.; Berset, C. Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 1995, 28, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Re, R.; Pellegrini, N.; Proteggente, A.; Pannala, A.; Yang, M.; Rice-Evans, C. Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1999, 26, 1231–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Benzie, I.F.F.; Strain, J.J. Ferric reducing/antioxidant power assay: Direct measure of total antioxidant activity of biological fluids and modified version for simultaneous measurement of total antioxidant power and ascorbic acid concentration. In Oxidants and Antioxidants Part A; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1999; Volume 299, pp. 15–27. ISBN 0076-6879. [Google Scholar]
  29. Apak, R.; Özyürek, M.; Karademir Çelik, S.; Güçlü, K. CUPRAC method 2004, JAFC. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 7970–7981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zuo, F.; Yu, R.; Xiao, M.; Khaskheli, G.B.; Sun, X.; Ma, H.; Ren, F.; Zhang, B.; Chen, S. Transcriptomic analysis of Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum BBMN68 in response to oxidative shock. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, e17085. [Google Scholar]
  31. Zeller, T.; Klug, G. Thioredoxins in bacteria: Functions in oxidative stress response and regulation of thioredoxin genes. Naturwissenschaften 2006, 93, 259–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Horsburgh, M.J.; Wharton, S.J.; Karavolos, M.; Foster, S.J. Manganese: Elemental defence for a life with oxygen. Trends Microbiol. 2002, 10, 496–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kawasaki, S.; Satoh, T.; Todoroki, M.; Nimura, Y. b-Type Dihydroorotate Dehydrogenase Is Purified as a H2O2-Forming NADH Oxidase from Bifidobacterium bifidum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 629–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. MacDonald, H.B. Conjugated Linoleic Acid and Disease Prevention: A Review of Current Knowledge. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2000, 19, 1115–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Raimondi, S.; Amaretti, A.; Leonardi, A.; Quartieri, A.; Gozzoli, C.; Rossi, M. Conjugated linoleic acid production by Bifidobacteria: Screening, kinetic, and composition. BioMed Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 8654317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rezzonico, E.; Lariani, S.; Barretto, C.; Cuanoud, G.; Giliberti, G.; Delley, M.; Arigoni, F.; Ressi, G. Global transcriptome analysis of the heat shock response of Bifidobacterium longum. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2007, 271, 136–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Erill, I.; Campoy, S.; Barbй, J. Aeons of distress: An evolutionary perspective on the bacterial SOS response. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2007, 31, 637–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, K.; Jiang, T.; Yu, B.; Wang, L.; Gao, C.; Ma, C.; Xu, P.; Ma, Y. Transcription Elongation Factor GreA Has Functional Chaperone Activity. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e47521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Luo, S.; Levine, R.L. Methionine in proteins defends against oxidative stress. FASEB J. 2009, 23, 464–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Moosmann, B.; Behl, C. Cytoprotective antioxidant function of tyrosine and tryptophan residues in transmembrane proteins. Eur. J. Biochem. 2000, 267, 5687–5692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Xu, H.; Wu, L.; Pan, D.; Zeng, X.; Cai, Z.; Guo, Y.; Wang, W.; Wu, Z. Adhesion characteristics and dual transcriptomic and proteomic analysis of Lactobacillus reuteri SH23 upon Gastrointestinal Fluid Stress. J. Proteome Res. 2021, 20, 2447–2457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Amaretti, A.; di Nunzio, M.; Pompei, A.; Raimondi, S.; Rossi, M.; Bordoni, A. Antioxidant properties of potentially probiotic bacteria: In vitro and in vivo activities. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 809–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Heydari, A.; Parvini, F.; Allahyari Fard, N. Functional foods and antioxidant effects: Emphasizing the role of probiotics. In Current Topics in Functional Food; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Feng, T.; Wang, J. Oxidative stress tolerance and antioxidant capacity of lactic acid bacteria as probiotic: A systematic review. Gut Microbes 2020, 12, 1801944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Apak, R.; Gorinstein, S.; Böhm, V.; Schaich, K.; Özyürek, M.; Güçlü, K. Methods of measurement and evaluation of natural antioxidant capacity/activity (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2013, 85, 957–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Apak, R.; Güçlü, K.; Ozyürek, M.; Bektaşoğlu, B.; Bener, M. Cupric ion reducing antioxidant capacity assay for antioxidants in human serum and for hydroxyl radical scavengers. Methods Mol. Biol. 2010, 594, 215–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Kwak, W.; Kim, K.; Lee, C.; Lee, C.; Kang, J.; Cho, K.; Yoon, S.H.; Kang, D.K.; Kim, H.; Heo, J.; et al. Comparative analysis of the complete genome of Lactobacillus plantarum GB-LP2 and potential candidate genes for host immune system en-hancement. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 26, 684–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Kot, E.; Haloftis, G.; Bezkorovainy, A. Iron accumulation by bifidobacteria at low pO2 and in air: Action of putative ferrox-idase. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1994, 42, 685–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. O’Callaghan, A.; van Sinderen, D. Bifidobacteria and their role as members of the human gut microbiota. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Elias, R.J.; Kellerby, S.S.; Decker, E.A. Antioxidant activity of proteins and peptides. Crit. Rev. Food Scien. Nutr. 2008, 48, 430–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jia, F.-F.; Zhang, L.-J.; Pang, X.-H.; Gu, X.-X.; Abdelazez, A.; Liang, Y.; Sun, S.-R.; Meng, X.-C. Complete genome sequence of bacteriocin-producing Lactobacillus plantarum KLDS1.0391, a probiotic strain with gastrointestinal tract resistance and adhesion to the intestinal epithelial cells. Genomics 2017, 109, 432–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zuo, F.; Yu, R.; Khaskheli, G.B.; Ma, H.; Chen, L.; Zeng, Z.; Mao, A.; Chen, S. Homologous overexpression of alkyl hydroperoxide reductase subunit C (ahpC) protects Bifidobacterium longum strain NCC2705 from oxidative stress. Res. Microbiol. 2014, 165, 581–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Dubbs, J.M.; Mongkolsuk, S. Peroxiredoxins in Bacterial Antioxidant Defense. Subcell. Biochem. 2007, 44, 143–193. [Google Scholar]
  54. Oberg, T.S.; Broadbent, J.R. Hydrogen Peroxide Resistance in Bifidobacterium Animalis Subsp. Lactis and Bifidobacterium Longum. In Stress and Environmental Regulation of Gene Expression and Adaptation in Bacteria, II; de Bruijn, F.J., Ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2016; Volume 2, pp. 638–656. [Google Scholar]
  55. Serata, M.; Iino, T.; Yasuda, E.; Sako, T. Roles of thioredoxin and thioredoxin reductase in the resistance to oxidative stress in Lactobacillus casei. Microbiology 2012, 158, 953–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Ruiz, L.; Gueimonde, M.; Ruas-Madiedo, P.; Ribbera, A.; de los Reyes-Gavilán, C.G.; Ventura, M.; Margolles, A.; Sánchez, B. Molecular clues to understand the aerotolerance phenotype of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 644–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Delcardayre, S.B.; Davies, J.E. Staphylococcus aureus coenzyme A disulfide reductase, a new subfamily of pyridine nucleotide-disulfide oxidoreductase. Sequence, expression, and analysis of cdr. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 5752–5757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Oberg, T.S.; Warda, R.E.; Steele, J.L.; Broadbent, J.R. Transcriptome analysis of Bifidobacterium longum strains that show a differential response to hydrogen peroxide stress. J. Biotechnol. 2015, 212, 58–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Halsey, T.A.; Vazquez-Torres, A.; Gravdahl, D.J.; Fang, F.C.; Libby, S.J. The Ferritin-Like Dps Protein Is Required for Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Oxidative Stress Resistance and Virulence. Am. Soc. Microbiol. Infect. Immun. 2004, 72, 1155–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Guo, Q.; Li, S.; Xie, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, M.; Xu, Z.; Sun, H.; Yang, Y. The NAD+-dependent deacetylase, Bifidobacterium longum Sir2 in response to oxidative stress by deacetylating SigH (σH) and FOXO3a in Bifidobacterium longum and HEK293T cell respectively. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2017, 108, 929–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kelly, S.M.; O’Callaghan, J.; Kinsella, M.; Van Sinderen, D. Characterisation of a Hydroxycinnamic Acid Esterase from the Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum Taxon. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Wada, M.; Fukiya, S.; Suzuki, A.; Matsumoto, N.; Matsuo, M.; Yokota, A. Methionine utilization by bifidobacteria: Possible existence of a reverse transsulfuration pathway. Biosci. Microbiota Food Health 2021, 40, 80–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Chang, O.; Seol, K.-H.; Jeong, S.-G.; Oh, M.-H.; Park, B.-Y.; Perrin, C.; Ham, J.-S. Casein hydrolysis by Bifidobacterium longum KACC91563 and antioxidant activities of peptides derived therefrom. J. Dairy Sci. 2013, 96, 5544–5555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The volcano plot for proteins of B. longum GT15 after: (a) H2O2 induced a stress response, (b) O2 induced a stress response during 2 h of incubation, and (c) O2 induced a stress response during 4 h of incubation. LFQ quantification was performed via the ‘top 3 peptide’ method, and significance was estimated by the Peaks Q method, built into Peaks Studio 10.0.
Figure 1. The volcano plot for proteins of B. longum GT15 after: (a) H2O2 induced a stress response, (b) O2 induced a stress response during 2 h of incubation, and (c) O2 induced a stress response during 4 h of incubation. LFQ quantification was performed via the ‘top 3 peptide’ method, and significance was estimated by the Peaks Q method, built into Peaks Studio 10.0.
Foods 12 03356 g001
Figure 2. OPLS-DA of the intracellular metabolites extracted from B. longum GT15 cells subjected to oxidative stress.
Figure 2. OPLS-DA of the intracellular metabolites extracted from B. longum GT15 cells subjected to oxidative stress.
Foods 12 03356 g002
Figure 3. OPLS regression models on metabolic fingerprints of B. longum GT15 cells and their antioxidant activity (CUPRAC method).
Figure 3. OPLS regression models on metabolic fingerprints of B. longum GT15 cells and their antioxidant activity (CUPRAC method).
Foods 12 03356 g003
Table 1. Changes in transcript levels of genes encoding enzymes of the antioxidative response of the Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum GT15 before and after the action of oxidative stress.
Table 1. Changes in transcript levels of genes encoding enzymes of the antioxidative response of the Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum GT15 before and after the action of oxidative stress.
No.Product of the GeneLocus_tag* H2O2/
Control
O2 2 h/
Control
O2 4 h/
Control
1GlutaredoxinBLGT_RS071253.511.428.6
2ThioredoxinBLGT_RS0248013.076.87.75
3DSBA_oxidoreductaseBLGT_RS002101.248.5518.35
4Thioredoxin_reductaseBLGT_RS002655.474.354.35
5P-type_ATPaseBLGT_RS0139518.115.889.80
6Thioredoxin_domain_proteinBLGT_RS017101.422.488.05
7Thioredoxin_peroxidaseBLGT_RS048351.541.376.76
8Linoleic_acid_isomeraseBLGT_RS068703.610.991.88
9Class_I_pyridine_nucleotide-disulfideoxidoreductaseBLGT_RS085409.022.791.34
10NADH_oxidaseBLGT_RS092800.740.723.74
11Dihydroorotate dehydrogenaseBLGT_RS025406.599.028.68
*: Fold ratio to the abundance across different samples before and after oxidative stress.
Table 2. Comparative data from proteomic and transcriptomic analyses of cells of B. longum GT15 in the exponential growth phase before and after exposure to H2O2 and O2.
Table 2. Comparative data from proteomic and transcriptomic analyses of cells of B. longum GT15 in the exponential growth phase before and after exposure to H2O2 and O2.
No.Product of the GeneLocus_TagH2O2 2 h/
Control
O2 2 h/ControlO2 4 h/
Control
COG *** Category
Oxidative response
1GlutaredoxinBLGT_RS07125NS
3.5
2.89 *
11.4 **
2.15
28.6
O
2ThioredoxinBLGT_RS02480NS
13.07
2.59
6.8
2.71
7.75
O
3Class_I pyridine nucleotide-disulfide oxidoreductaseBLGT_RS085402.17
9.01
NS
2.79
NS
1.32
C
4Ribonucleoside-triphosphate reductaseBLGT_RS07845NS
0.84
2.17
0.68
NS
1.32
H
5P-type ATPaseBLGT_RS01395NS
17.40
2.24
5.65
NS
9.48
RP
Stress response
6Cystathionine gamma-synthaseBLGT_RS030202.63
11.43
5.78
2.86
5.74
2.96
E
7Co-chaperonin GroESgroESNS
35.69
NS
4.84
2.18
46.57
O
8Transcription elongation factor GreABLGT_RS03800NS
0.73
2.23
4.47
NS
5.28
K
9DEAD/DEAH box helicaseBLGT_RS079302.63
2.7
2.27
1.26
NS
1.04
L
10LexA repressorBLGT_RS06740NS
1.19
2.33
1.38
2.93
3.21
KT
11General stress proteinBLGT_RS078652.77
1.89
NS
1.27
NS
2.3
R
12DNA topoisomeraseBLGT_RS061152.17
0.95
NS
1.1
NS
1.19
L
13Nucleotidyl transferaseBLGT_RS07810NS
3.5
4.65
3.9
3.25
5
-
14DNA polymerase sliding clamp subunitBLGT_RS00420NS
7.84
7.47
11.32
14.46
43.6
VP
Nucleotide metabolism
15Orotate phosphoribosyl transferaseBLGT_RS049752.27
0.77
NS
1.02
NS
1.23
-
16Multifunctional fusion protein cytidylate kinaseBLGT_RS053053.84
1.0
NS
0.63
NS
0.29
J
17Ribonucleoside-diphosphate reductase subunit betaBLGT_RS00155NS
0.7
2.08
1.98
NS
2.1
F
Amino acid metabolism and transport
18Cystathionine beta-synthaseBLGT_RS030153.22
6.62
7.00
1.69
7.38
1.99
E
19Chorismate synthaseBLGT_RS045803.12
0.45
3.10
0.85
NS
1.17
E
20Amino acid ABC transporterBLGT_RS07135NS
3.6
3.96
11
3.89
3.6
E
Carbohydrate metabolism
21Gluconate kinaseBLGT_RS068252.77
0.67
NS
0.70
NS
1.04
G
22Alpha-amylaseBLGT_RS008402.13
13.0
NS
1.21
NS
1.35
G
Regulation of transcription and biosynthesis
23XRE family transcriptional regulatorBLGT_RS061957.14
17.1
11.55
6.1
14.17
25.9
K
24MerR family transcriptional regulatorBLGT_RS008952.08
9.34
NS
1.72
NS
4.81
K
Transport
25Membrane proteinBLGT_RS07320NS
0.62
8.21
1.9
10.07
1.27
H
26Cation transporter
BLGT_RS06745NS
1.61
NS
2.42
2.06
3.0
P
Uncharacterized proteins
27Uncharacterized proteinBLGT_RS00505NS
1.05
3.02
2.42
2.31
4.12
-
28Uncharacterized proteinBLGT_RS06485NS
6.4
3.04
5.3
3.50
13
-
29Uncharacterized proteinBLGT_RS07070NS
5.4
3.58
7.7
3.94
17.8
-
*—Fold ratio to the average abundance of proteins across different samples before and after oxidative stress; **—fold ratio to the abundance of transcripts across different samples before and after oxidative stress; *** COGs—Database of Clusters of Orthologous Genes.
Table 3. In vitro antioxidant activity of culture liquid (µMTE/mL) and cell biomass (µMTE/g) of B. longum GT15 under oxidative stress.
Table 3. In vitro antioxidant activity of culture liquid (µMTE/mL) and cell biomass (µMTE/g) of B. longum GT15 under oxidative stress.
Sample/Assay *DPPHABTSFRAPCUPRAC
Culture liquid
Control **—0 h0.61 ± 0.016.50 ± 0.041.26 ± 0.032.04 ± 0.02
Control—2 h0.82 ± 0.007.30.031.94 ± 0.022.43 ± 0.04
Control—4 h0.75 ± 0.016.15 ± 0.070.92 ± 0.022.10 ± 0.02
O2—0 h0.61 ± 0.016.50 ± 0.041.26 ± 0.032.04 ± 0.02
O2—2 h0.81 ± 0.06.69 ± 0.021.44 ± 0.022.25 ± 0.01
O2—4 h0.63 ± 0.016.38 ± 0.081.33 ± 0.012.40 ± 0.06
H2O2—0 h0.53 ± 0.006.39 ± 0.040.74 ± 0.022.93 ± 0.05
H2O2—2 h0.50 ± 0.016.49 ± 0.080.92 ± 0.022.89 ± 0.04
Cell biomass
Control *—0 h0.06 ± 0.000.87 ± 0.020.084 ± 0.0030.41 ± 0.01
Control—2 h0.08 ± 0.000.91 ± 0.010.048 ± 0.0000.53 ± 0.01
Control—4 h0.07 ± 0.001.06 ± 0.0160.09 ± 0.000.58 ± 0.02
O2—0 h0.06 ± 0.000.87 ± 0.020.084 ± 0.0030.41 ± 0.01
O2—2 h0.10 ± 0.001.15 ± 0.030.08 ± 0.000.51 ± 0.01
O2—4 h0.08 ± 0.000.94 ± 0.020.21 ± 0.010.62 ± 0.01
H2O2—0 h0.06 ± 0.000.87 ± 0.020.084 ± 0.0030.41 ± 0.01
H2O2—2 h0.06 ± 0.001.03 ± 0.020.09 ± 0.000.73 ± 0.02
*—In vitro antioxidant activity assessed against 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical activity (DPPH), 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) radical activity (ABTS), ferric-reducing antioxidant power assays (FRAP), and copper ion reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC) assays. **—B. longum GT15 without oxidative stress exposure.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Averina, O.V.; Kovtun, A.S.; Mavletova, D.A.; Ziganshin, R.H.; Danilenko, V.N.; Mihaylova, D.; Blazheva, D.; Slavchev, A.; Brazkova, M.; Ibrahim, S.A.; et al. Oxidative Stress Response of Probiotic Strain Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum GT15. Foods 2023, 12, 3356. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12183356

AMA Style

Averina OV, Kovtun AS, Mavletova DA, Ziganshin RH, Danilenko VN, Mihaylova D, Blazheva D, Slavchev A, Brazkova M, Ibrahim SA, et al. Oxidative Stress Response of Probiotic Strain Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum GT15. Foods. 2023; 12(18):3356. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12183356

Chicago/Turabian Style

Averina, Olga V., Aleksey S. Kovtun, Dilara A. Mavletova, Rustam H. Ziganshin, Valery N. Danilenko, Dasha Mihaylova, Denica Blazheva, Aleksandar Slavchev, Mariya Brazkova, Salam A. Ibrahim, and et al. 2023. "Oxidative Stress Response of Probiotic Strain Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum GT15" Foods 12, no. 18: 3356. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12183356

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop