Next Article in Journal
Statistical and Artificial Neural Networks Models for Electricity Consumption Forecasting in the Brazilian Industrial Sector
Previous Article in Journal
Efficiency of PBT Impellers with Different Blade Cross-Sections
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Switching Frequency Effects on the Efficiency and Harmonic Distortion in a Three-Phase Five-Level CHBMI Prototype with Multicarrier PWM Schemes: Experimental Analysis

1
Department of Engineering, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Parco d’Orleans, 90128 Palermo, Italy
2
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Nisantasi University, Istanbul 34406, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2022, 15(2), 586; https://doi.org/10.3390/en15020586
Submission received: 9 December 2021 / Revised: 6 January 2022 / Accepted: 13 January 2022 / Published: 14 January 2022

Abstract

:
The current climatic scenario requires the use of innovative solutions to increase the production of electricity from renewable energy sources. Multilevel Power Inverters are a promising solution to improve the penetration of renewable energy sources into the electrical grid. Moreover, the performance of MPIs is a function of the modulation strategy employed and of its features (modulation index and switching frequency). This paper presents an extended and experimental analysis of three-phase five-level Cascaded H-Bridges Multilevel Inverter performance in terms of efficiency and harmonic content considering several MC PWM modulation strategies. In detail, the CHBMI performance is analyzed by varying the modulation index and the switching frequency. For control purposes, the NI System On Module sbRIO-9651 control board, a dedicated FPGA-based control board for power electronics and drive applications programmable in the LabVIEW environment, is used. The paper describes the modulation strategies implementation, the test bench set-up, and the experimental investigations carried out. The results obtained in terms of Total Harmonic Distorsion (THD) and efficiency are analyzed, compared, and discussed.

1. Introduction

In the last decade, the interests of scientific, industrial, and political communities focused on environmental issues, in particular on future catastrophic climate scenarios currently foreseen with temperature increases of up to 2 °C [1,2]. Therefore, several efforts of these communities to find new solutions to improve greenhouse gas reduction and decarbonize of energy sources have been detected. In detail, the European Commission launched the European Green Deal [3] that provides for a substantial reduction in polluting emissions by 2050 with policies that encourage member states to adopt innovative and advanced solutions. Many efforts of scientific and industrial communities have focused on the research and development of innovative technologies to increase the penetration of renewable sources into the production of electrical energy, trying to satisfy the goals of sustainable development and energy savings. In detail, the power electronics technologies, owing to their features and potentiality, play a fundamental role in this scenario.
At present, most applications of energy production from renewable sources employ traditional two-level Voltage Source Inverters (VSIs) that present several operative limitations for greater penetration of renewable energy sources into the electrical grid, such as high harmonic content and control flexibility. Indeed, the main performance indicator of a power converter is the harmonic distortion in the output voltages. For this reason, in order to evaluate the harmonic distortion of a VSI and its impact in different fields of applications, several indices have been proposed in the literature, as discussed in [4]. Moreover, currently, a new concept of the power conversion systems, called “Smart Inverters”, is developing, in which inverters perform additional functions (e.g., self-governing, self-adapting, and self-healing features), as reported in [5].
In this context, Multilevel Power Inverters (MPIs) are a promising solution since they present, with respect to the traditional three-phase two-level inverters, reduced harmonic content in the output voltages, lower voltage stress in the power components, and reduced Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) [6,7]. Therefore, multilevel power inverters, because of these features, represent a valid solution in many fields of application where high performance is required [8,9,10].
According to [11,12], the MPIs can be classified into single DC source and multiple DC sources. The classical single DC source multilevel inverters are Neutral-Point Clamped (NPC), Flying Capacitor Inverter (FCI), and Modular Multilevel Converter (MMC). The Cascaded H-Bridge Multilevel Inverter (CHBMI) is a multiple DC sources type. Moreover, there are new reduced switch count topologies that have a common objective of reducing the number of the power components to increase the reliability of the converter. Nevertheless, all of these topologies generally present higher hardware complexity and a lower or absent modular feature.
Among classical and new topology structures of MPIs, the CHBMI stands out in particular for its modular structure, high flexibility, and intrinsically fault-tolerant capability. Moreover, in many applications where the DC sources are naturally separated, e.g., Photovoltaic (PV) systems and vehicles propulsion, the CHBMI is particularly fascinating since it allows easy expansion and reconfiguration of the PV plant or the battery package, also in fault condition [13,14]. Furthermore, the CHBMI performance is a function of the modulation strategy employed, especially regarding the efficiency and the harmonic content in the output voltage and current waveforms [15,16]. Moreover, the modulation strategy choice is also fundamental for the optimal and economic design of LCL filters, especially for grid-connected applications [17].
The typical modulation strategies employed for CHBMI are the Multicarrier Pulse Width Modulations (MC PWM) that are an evolution of conventional PWM modulation strategies employed for traditional VSIs. In detail, the main features of these modulation strategies are simple implementation in the common electronic devices (e.g., microcontrollers and FPGA systems) and control flexibility owing to the simple adaptation in closed-loop controls. Moreover, the MC PWM schemes allow for obtaining a good response in terms of the harmonic distribution in the frequency domain because the low order harmonics are absent and significant harmonics start at the switching frequency. Indeed, there are several kinds of MC PWM that present different behavior and impact on CHBMI performance in terms of harmonic content and conversion efficiency. Furthermore, advanced multicarrier PWM modulation strategies are proposed in the literature. By way of example, in [18], a modified MC PWM scheme, based on the phase shifted as carrier pattern, for a five-level three-phase CHBMI has been proposed. The authors aim is to improve the lifetime and reliability by reducing the switching losses through clamped modulation signals where each leg conducts switching operations at different frequencies. Although a power loss reduction was demonstrated through experimental tests, a complete analysis that takes into account the impacts on the harmonic distortion and conversion efficiency, in different operation conditions, is missing. In [19], the authors propose a modified level-shifted pulse width modulation to improve the fault-tolerant capabilities of CHBMI. In this case, the authors demonstrate that the proposed method allows for balancing line voltage and currents in case of a fault of the converter. Nevertheless, the impact of the proposed method in terms of harmonic distortion and efficiency is missing.
In high power and medium-high voltage applications, low-switching frequency modulation schemes such as Selective Harmonic Elimination (SHE) and Selective Harmonic Mitigation (SHM) algorithms are used to obtain high converter efficiency [20]. These algorithms allow for elimination or mitigation of low-order voltage harmonics by using a set of nonlinear transcendental equations systems, in which the order depends on the number of converter voltage levels. In the literature, different approaches are proposed to overcome and simplify the applications of the SHE and SHM algorithms [21,22,23]. Nevertheless, these algorithms provide good performance when converter voltage levels are high, in which it is possible to eliminate or mitigate a greater number of the harmonics. By changing point of view, SHE and SHM algorithms are hardly used because of their high computational costs; extensive electronic hardware resources are required for real-time implementation.
Another interesting method to drive a converter is the Space Vector PWM (SVPWM) that, as well known, is particularly adapted in electric drives and traction applications. The Space Vector PWM (SVPWM) strategies are widely adopted for good DC-link voltage utilization, for flexibility in switching states selection, and for lower THD, as discussed in [24]. According to [25], a novel SVPWM for an electrical drive system-based Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machine (PMSM) fed by CHBMI has been proposed with the purpose of reducing the computational complexity. The authors have demonstrated a significant reduction of the switching losses, but the analysis does not account for the harmonic distortion impact in the motor with the proposed method.
Although most of the contributions in the literature are focused on the study and definition of new modulation schemes to improve the performance of multilevel converters, there are few comparative studies focused on multilevel converter performance as a function of modulation technique and its parameters such as switching frequency and dead-time, especially regarding the CHBMI circuit topology.
In [26], the authors study the main difference between space vector modulation and carrier-based PWM modulation schemes by analyzing the output voltage harmonic content of a five-level three-phase NPC inverter. Additionally, in this work, the study is focused on the harmonic distortion while a comparison between the conversion efficiency in different operation conditions is missing.
In [27], the energy performance of various types of voltage and current source inverters, including multilevel inverters, is examined and the inverter efficiency is evaluated for fixed switching frequency value as a function of output power or modulation index.
In [28], the authors compare the performance of a modular multilevel single-delta bridge-cell (SDBC) inverter, for utility-scale grid-tied photovoltaic applications, in terms of power-balancing capability and harmonic performance by using phase-shifted PWM and level-shifted PWM. Additionally, in this case, the analysis was carried out for different load conditions but without varying the switching frequency.
In [29], the authors present a new cascaded H-bridge multilevel inverter configuration and its performance in terms of total harmonic distortion, distortion factor, and power losses, which are analyzed as a function of the modulation index.
Some conference papers [30,31] address the effect of switching frequency on multilevel inverter performance in terms of harmonic content, although not extensively and they do not investigate the effects on inverter efficiency. In [32], CHBMI efficiency and voltage waveforms THD are evaluated by varying the switching frequency for fixed amplitude modulation index; only two MC PWM schemes are compared and the analysis is performed in simulation. In [33,34], switching and conduction losses in CHBMI are analyzed, owing to the implementation of a power loss model; SHE soft switching and LS-SPWM control techniques are compared. In [35,36], the impact of CHBMI in powertrains is evaluated; in detail, switching losses, torque ripple, and THD are evaluated by varying the number of CHBMI levels per phase and the amplitude modulation index; PS PWM control technique is chosen and the switching frequency is fixed.
In [37], an advanced power loss model is developed; IGBT-based traditional inverter, IGBT-based CHBMI and SiC MOSFET-based CHBMI are compared in order to evaluate the impact of different inverter topologies and different fully controlled switching devices technologies on electric vehicle performance and cost. Only the PS-PWM scheme is taken into account and the switching frequency is fixed. In [38], the switching loss model is developed, and LS PWM, PS PWM, and SHE control schemes are compared for fixed switching frequency.
As can be seen, regarding the converter efficiency, several analyses have been carried out on inverter losses and voltage THD; however, on a side, switching frequency is treated as a fixed parameter, on the other, only a small number of PWM control strategies are taken into account and compared for the same conditions. In addition, most of the cited works are carried out only in the simulation environment.
In summary, it is possible to claim that the switching frequency effects in the harmonic distortion and conversion efficiency have been rarely investigated and reported in the literature. In particular, a detailed comparison among the commonly used MC PWM schemes and their behavior, in terms of the conversion efficiency and harmonic distortion, are missing in a unique work. Indeed, if on the one hand, the increase in the switching frequency determines a shift in the voltage harmonic spectrum, with consequent advantages in terms of power quality and sizing of the filtering system, then, on the other hand, it determines a reduction in the inverter efficiency. In some grid-connected applications, in order to reduce the impact of the grid–interface filter size, in terms of inductance and capacitance, high switching frequencies are chosen to result in a reduction of the conversion efficiency. Therefore, an extended performance analysis of multilevel inverters as a function of switching frequency can be of considerable importance for identifying optimal working conditions of the inverter, depending on the application, both in terms of harmonic distortion and efficiency.
This paper aims to perform an extended and experimental analysis of a three-phase five-level CHBMI performance in terms of efficiency and harmonic content when ten MC PWM modulation strategies are employed. In detail, three different carrier dispositions, one phase-shifted and one suppressed carrier arrangement modulation strategies have been considered, and, for each one, the sinusoidal and switching frequency optimal modulation signals have been employed. Moreover, in this analysis, the CHBMI performances are evaluated by varying, for each modulation strategy, the modulation index and the switching frequency. The implementation of the modulation strategies and, therefore, the control of CHBMI are carried out on NI System On Module sbRIO-9651 (SOM sbRIO-9651) that is a control board designed and distributed for power electronics and drive control applications. This control board presents an FPGA control unit and a real-time processor that can be programmed separately with consequent benefits in terms of control flexibility. Moreover, the SOM sbRIO-9651 can be programmed in the LabVIEW environment with the benefits of graphical language [39]. Therefore, the results obtained can be usefully employed for the optimal choice of modulation strategy of CHBMI according to the application requirements.
The paper consists of the following sections: Section 2 presents the MC PWM modulation strategies considered and their main features; Section 3 describes the implementation on the SOM sbRIO-9651 control board and computational cost analysis; Section 4 presents the test bench set-up and the CHBMI prototype analyzed; Section 5 presents the experimental investigations carried out and the results obtained.

2. Overview of Multicarrier PWM Schemes for Three-Phase Five-Level CHBMI

In this section, a brief description and comparison of the main multicarrier PWM schemes considered in this work are reported. In detail, the comparison is carried out by taking into account the harmonic distribution in function of the switching frequency, the DC power absorption among the voltage levels, and the implementation resources required.
In detail, the circuit diagram of a three-phase five-level CHBMI is shown in Figure 1.
As shown in Figure 1, a three-phase five-level CHBMI converter is composed of six H-bridge modules that can be easily changed in case of a fault. Moreover, in the case of a fault of a power component or an H-bridge module inside a leg of the converter, the CHBMI can be reconfigured to work with reduced voltage, thus maintaining continuous operation.
Generally, the performance of the converter depends by the modulation schemes in terms of harmonic distortion. In particular, Multi-Carrier Pulse Width Modulations (MC PWM) are commonly used in many fields of applications due to the simple implementation in the common electronic devices (microcontroller or FPGA) and the good response in terms of the harmonic content that allows for easy voltage and current filtering. Moreover, owing to the new technologies of the power components that allow increasing the operation speeds, the MC PWM is attracting growing interest in industrial applications.
According to [11], the MC PWM can be classified in Carrier Disposition (CD) scheme and Phase Shifted (PS) scheme. Generally, these modulation strategies represent an evolution of the classical PWM scheme for three-phase three or two-level converters in which are present modulations and carrier signals. In particular, by comparing in real-time modulation signal and carrier signal, the gate commands are generated for each power component.
The CD schemes, called also level shifted modulations, are composed with a number of the carrier signals nC,CD equal to:
n C , C D = n l 1
where nl is the number of the voltage levels of the converter. Thus, for a five-level converter, a CD scheme is composed of four carrier signals. In the CD scheme, the four carrier signals present the same time variable profile, with identical peak-to-peak amplitude, but are amplitude-shifted with a nonzero average value and the phase among the carrier signals can be equal to 0 or ±π.
In the phase disposition function among the carrier signals, there are three types of CD modulation schemes:
  • Phase Disposition (PD);
  • Phase Opposition Disposition (POD);
  • Alternative Phase Opposition Disposition (APOD).
In the PD scheme, all carrier signals have the same phase. In the POD scheme, the carrier signals have the same phase, two by two. In the APOD scheme, all carrier signals are in phase-opposition. The carrier patterns CD-based in a period of the modulation signals are shown in Figure 2.
In terms of the harmonic distribution in the frequency domain, the CD schemes present similar harmonic distribution in which the harmonics are centered at the switching frequency and integer multiplies, similar to a traditional two- or three-level inverter. Moreover, the commutations number is limited because each H-bridge works in an alternative way and the DC power absorption is not uniform among the voltage levels.
The PS scheme is composed of a number of the carrier signals nC,PS equal to:
n C , P S = n l 1 2
that is half of the CD schemes. Moreover, the carrier signals in the PS scheme present the same peak-to-peak amplitude, an average value equal to zero, and the carrier signals are shifted of an angle given by:
φ i = ( i 1 ) · 180 N
where i is the ith H-bridge and N is the number of the H-bridges cascaded connected. Thus, for a three-phase five-level CHBMI, the PS scheme is composed of two carrier signals that are shifted by an angle equal to 90°. The carrier pattern PS-based is shown in Figure 3a.
It should be noted that with PS modulation each H-bridge works similar to a classical tree-level single-phase inverter. In this way, each H-bridge module absorbs the same DC power from the sources and the commutations number in each PWM period is four times the commutations number of CD schemes. Therefore, a shifted harmonic distribution towards the high frequency is expected with respect to the CD schemes and, in particular, the first voltage harmonics are centered at a frequency equal to:
f h = ( n l 1 ) · f s w
where fsw is the switching frequency. Thus, by using the PS scheme the converter works with a virtual frequency fh that depends on the voltage levels nl. In detail, for a five-level three-phase CHBMI, the first voltage harmonics are centered at a frequency four times that of the switching frequency. Nevertheless, a major commutations number generates an increase of the switching losses.
A hybrid modulation scheme is called Suppressed Carried Arrangement Modulation (SCAMOD). As described in [40,41], the SCAMOD is carried out by using the same concept of the level-shifted schemes, and the converter is controlled the same as in the PS scheme. The number of the carrier signals is the same as the PS scheme and the modulation pattern is made similar to a phase disposition scheme. Thus, for a three-phase five-level, the SCAMOD pattern is composed of two carrier signals with the same phase and the same peak-to-peak amplitude but are amplitude-shifted with a non-zero average value. The carrier pattern PS-based is shown in Figure 3b.
In terms of the harmonic distribution in the frequency domain, the SCAMOD present an intermediate behavior between CD and PS carrier patterns. In particular, the first voltage harmonics are centered at a frequency equal to:
f h = ( n l 1 ) · f s w 2
that is half of the PS scheme. Moreover, the SCAMOD scheme allows for uniforming the DC power absorption between the sources such as the PS scheme. Furthermore, the performance of the converter is affected by the waveform of the modulation signals. In detail, the common waveform modulation signals are sinusoidal and Switching Frequency Optimal (SFO) as shown in Figure 4a,b, respectively. The first is commonly used in grid-connected applications and the second is commonly used in electrical drive applications.
The SFO modulation signals for three-phase converters can be expressed as:
{ v a * = v a v o f f s e t v b * = v b v o f f s e t v c * = v c v o f f s e t
where va, vb,, and vc are the sinusoidal modulation signals, and voffset is an offset signal determined as:
v o f f s e t = max ( v a , v b , v c ) + min ( v a , v b , v c ) 2 .
In detail, the voffset is a signal with a triangle waveform and a frequency equal to three times the fundamental voltage harmonic.
According to [42], the SFO modulation signals allow for obtaining the same overall harmonic content of a Space Vector PWM (SV PWM) and the modulation index can be extended up to 1.15.
As previously described, this work aims to analyze the performance of the converter with the commonly used MC PWM schemes. Thus, the CD-based modulation schemes adopted and tested in this work follow:
  • Sinusoidal Phase Disposition—SPD (Figure 5a);
  • Sinusoidal Phase Opposition Disposition—SPOD (Figure 5b);
  • Sinusoidal Alternative Phase Opposition Disposition—SAPOD (Figure 5c);
  • Switching Frequency Optimal Disposition—SFOPD (Figure 5d);
  • Switching Frequency Optimal Phase Opposition Disposition—SFOPOD (Figure 5e);
  • Switching Frequency Optimal Alternative Phase Opposition Disposition—SFOAPOD (Figure 5f).
The PS-based and SCAMOD-based modulation schemes tested and considered in this work follow:
  • Sinusoidal Phase Shifted—SPS (Figure 6a);
  • Sinusoidal Suppressed Carried Arrangement Modulation—SCAMOD (Figure 6b);
  • Switching Frequency Optimal Alternative Phase Shifted—SFOPS (Figure 6c);
  • Switching Frequency Optimal Suppressed Carried Arrangement Modulation—SFOSCAMOD (Figure 6d).
In the next section, a brief discussion regarding implementation issues and improvements to obtain high performance with minimal hardware resources is presented.

3. Control Software Design and MC PWM Implementation

All the techniques described in the previous section were implemented on a sbRIO 9651 System on Module (SOM). The controller consists of two different units: an ARM Cortex-A9 processor, used for real-time process management, and an Artix-7 FPGA unit, used for high-frequency control. Both units can be programmed individually, choosing the desired target in the LabVIEW project [39]. Furthermore, the sbRIO 9651 SOM is equipped with some peripherals that allow an easy and user-friendly approach to the realization of Power Electronics and Drive applications (PED) control. Commercially, this system is called a PED-board. The PED-board main features are summarized in Table 1.
To highlight the improvement brought to the new implementation of the control approach with respect to that carried out in the previous work [40], the last one here is briefly summarized. In the FPGA target, a Flat Sequence Structure (FSS) with two frames is placed. In the first frame, the initialization of PWM I/O nodes is implemented, placing in there the PWM I/O Driver. The second frame contains the control itself; in particular, two structures are placed there: a Timed Loop (TL) and a While Loop (WL).
Into the TL, the generation of carrier signals is carried out by four up–down counters; the arrangement of the carriers can be set by the user, acting on the counter parameters, i.e., the initial value of counting, maximum value, minimum value, and counting direction. PWM signal generation is carried out by the comparison of carriers and modulating signals by relational operators. In TL, a reset counter is also placed that generates an Aux Clock and, subsequently, the operations in WL are enabled. TL operations are executed at a 120 MHz clock, while operations in WL are executed at a clock frequency that is a function of desired modulating signal frequency. The generation of the modulating signals is realized in the WL. In particular, three reset counters (one for each phase) are used to extract elements by a pre-allocated vector of 1000 elements, representing one sinewave signal period. Subsequently, the sinewave amplitude is matched with the carriers’ amplitude and, if required, SFO modulating signals are generated.
In [40], the entire control algorithm has been implemented on the FPGA target only, including all operations related to the carrier’s parameter calculation, for fixed control strategy and the carrier’s frequency. This kind of operation is implemented as single precision floating point data; thus, on one hand, a high computational cost is required, on the other hand, this kind of operation could be performed with a very low clock frequency or, at the most, only once. Based on these considerations, all operations for the aux parameter calculation were moved from the FPGA target to the Real-Time Target (RTT). Therefore, the FPGA target contains only the control main structure, and it is completed by the complementary operations executed in RTT. In particular, in RTT, another two-frame FSS is placed. The first frame contains all operations to be executed only once, i.e., dead-time conversion from seconds to clock ticks and the carrier’s parameter calculations. To realize parameter calculation, the MathScript Node is used: it allows for implementing operations with a textual language instead of linking blocks. Parameter calculation is generalized; for each carrier arrangement, introducing an Overlap Factor k, owing to the Carrier Overlap PWM (CO-PWM), can be realized. In this work, k is constantly set to 0; thus, no carrier overlap is realized.
The second frame contains the timed loop that addresses the signals exchanged with the FPGA target and the signal monitoring. The LabVIEW FPGA and real-time block diagrams are synthesized in Figure 7.
The user interface is developed in the real-time target front panel and is shown in Figure 8. There, carrier signals, modulating signals, and relative parameters can be monitored; modulation index amplitude ma, switching frequency fsw, and modulating signals frequency f, can be set by the user, owing to the relative sliders; desired carriers arrangement can be set, introducing in the text box the relative symbol (PD, POD, APOD, SCA, PS). The enable button allows for setting the PWM outputs to zero value.
Owing to the RT and FPGA target coordination, the control algorithm computational cost is drastically reduced.
Table 2 reports the computational cost comparison obtained with the control algorithm implementation on the FPGA target [40] and the proposed control algorithm implementation on FPGA and real-time targets. It can be noted that the number of total slices in percentage used is reduced from 88.5% to 38.2%; thus, a drastic reduction of FPGA resources is obtained.
Concerning the control complexity, once the main structure operating principles are known, the control realization is extremely easy; in detail, an interesting way to simplify the programming workflow is to create Sub-VI-containing structures that are often repeated along with the code, such as the up–down counters for generation of the carriers and the dead-time generators. By way of an example, in Figure 9, the front panel in FPGA target is presented: the structure of the up–down counter is presented in the red square, while the dead-time generation structure is in the green square.
This programming approach is modular, so that all of the LabVIEW structures and SubVIs can be reused to implement the control of any kind of inverter.
It is interesting to make a comparison between the three-phase five-level CHBMI (3P5L CHBMI) and traditional Three-Phase Two-Level Inverter (3P2L Inverter) control complexity. The difference between the two control programs lies in the number of up–down counters and dead-time generators required: in the 3P5L CHBMI four counters and twelve dead-time generators are required, while in the 3P2L Inverter one counter and three dead-time generators are required. Regardless, since both these structures are implemented using Boolean or long-int 32-bits signals, the number of structures used does not drastically change the required control computational cost.

4. Measurement Test Bench

The experimental investigations were carried out on a CHBMI H-bridge prototype present at SDESLAB (Sustainable Development and Energy Saving Laboratory) of the University of Palermo. In detail, the CHBMI prototype is a MOSFET-based six-power H-bridge (DigiPower s.r.l., model IRFB4115Pbf) whose technical data are reported in Table 3. Six DC power supply RSP-2400 units with 48 V, whose technical data are reported in Table 4, were used to power each CHBMI H-bridge.
To investigate the CHBMI performance with fixed load power factor, three constantan rheostats and a three-phase inductive load with resistance equal to 20 Ω and inductance equal to 3 mH are employed, respectively. Since the CHBMI input electrical quantities have a continuous waveform, the CHBMI active input power is measured by two three-phase Yokogawa power meters models WT130 and WT330, respectively. More attention was paid to the measurement of CHBMI output active power since the modulation strategies considered introduce non-negligible voltage and current harmonic components. In detail, only the combination of current and voltage harmonic isofrequential components contributes to the generation of active power. Therefore, the CHBMI voltage and current output quantities are sensed by the use of two Yokogawa 700924 voltage differential probes and the use of two Yokogawa 701933 current probes, respectively, and acquired by the use of Teledyne LeCroy WaveRunner 640Zi oscilloscope. Since the international standards IEC 61800-9-1 [43] and IEC 61800-9-2 [44] for accurate active power measurement prescribe a measurement bandwidth ranging from 0 to 10 times of the switching frequency fsw for traditional two-level inverters, a sampling frequency equal to 10 MS/s is chosen. In detail, this choice allows for performing an accurate analysis in the frequency domain of electrical quantities and accurate CHBMI output power measurement with switching frequency values up to 1 MHz. A schematic representation and a picture of the test bench are shown in Figure 10 and Figure 11, respectively.

5. Experimental Results and Discussions

This section is devoted to the presentation of the experimental results obtained in this work by using all modulation schemes discussed in Section 2. This work aims to evaluate the switching frequency effects in the harmonic distortion of the output voltages and the conversion efficiency. In detail, the experimental tests are conducted by supplying the RL load for different values of the AC output power, by changing the modulation index, and for different values of the switching frequency. Table 5 summarizes the main electric quantities of the converter system and highlights the switching frequency and modulation index variation ranges.
In detail, seven different switching frequency values from 10 to 70 kHz, with a step of 10 kHz, and four different index modulation values equal to 0.3, 0.6, 0.1, and 1.15 are considered in the experimental investigations.
As described in Section 4, the DC and AC electrical quantities are acquired and subsequently elaborated to evaluate voltage THD% and conversion efficiency.
Figure 12 and Figure 13 show, for each modulation schemes taken into account in this work, the phase voltages (yellow and red curves in the first grid), line currents (blue and green curves in the first grid), and corresponding voltage harmonic distribution in the frequency domain (blue bar graph in the second grid) for phase A and B of the system, respectively. In detail, in Figure 12 the acquisitions are carried out for a modulation index equal to 0.9 and a switching frequency equal to 10 kHz. Moreover, the voltage scale is set to 100 V/div and 10 ms/div, the current scale is set to 5 A/div, and the harmonic spectra in the frequency domain is set to 10 V/div and 20 kHz/div.
It should be noted that for the CD-based schemes, shown in Figure 12a–f, the first harmonics are centered at the switching frequency, equal to 10 kHz in this case, and the more significant harmonics are up to four times the switching frequency equal to 50 kHz.
The PS-based schemes, shown in Figure 12g,h, present a harmonic spectrum in which the first harmonics are centered at four times the switching frequency, equal to 40 kHz in this case, and the more significative harmonics are up to sixteen times the switching frequency equal to 160 kHz. Instead, the SCAMOD-based schemes, shown in Figure 12i,j, present an intermediate behavior between CD-based and PS-based schemes. In particular, the first harmonics are centered at two times the switching frequency, equal to 20 kHz in this case, and more significative harmonics are up to eight times the switching frequency equal to 80 kHz.
Figure 13 shows the same electric quantities of Figure 12 with the same settings but for a switching frequency equal to 40 kHz. By analyzing Figure 13, it is possible to observe that the same phenomena, previously described, is also observed in this case. Thus, these results confirm that each modulation scheme presents the same response in terms of the harmonics distribution in the frequency domain for different values of the switching frequency. Moreover, it is possible to demonstrate the effectiveness of the control algorithm implemented, as described in Section 3.
In addition, the knowledge of the exactly harmonics distribution in the frequency domain and their entity toward high-frequency spectra allows for accurately designing the filter system.
The harmonic distortion analysis and the evaluation of the conversion efficiency are reported in the following two subsections.

5.1. Harmonic Distortion Analysis

To investigate the performance of the converter in terms of the harmonic distortion, the Total Harmonic Distortion (THD%) index [4] is used as comparing tool and expressed in percent as
T H D % = h = 2 V h 2 V 1 2 · 100
where Vh is the generic voltage harmonic and V1 is the fundamental voltage harmonic. As described in Section 4, by using a sampling frequency equal to 10 MS/s in the THD% evaluation, the harmonics up to 5 MHz are considered, according to the Shannon theory.
Figure 14, Figure 15 and Figure 16 show the THD% and first voltage harmonic trends as a function of the modulation index and for switching frequency from 10 to 70 kHz, obtained with CD-based schemes (PD, POD, and APOD) with sinusoidal and SFO modulation signals.
It is interesting to observe that the switching frequency effects are more evident for lower values of the modulation index, which generates a low increase of the THD%. Moreover, the fundamental amplitude appreciable variations are not detected in the switching frequency variation. Thus, it is possible to claim that CR-based schemes do not provide harmonic distortion significant variations to the switching frequency variation.
The THD% and first voltage harmonic trends obtained with PS-based schemes with sinusoidal and SFO modulation signals are illustrated in Figure 17. In this case, an enhanced increase of the THD% trend and, in particular, for lower values of the modulation index, is observed. In detail, for a modulation index equal to 0.6, the THD% varies from about 28% at 10 kHz to approximately 60% at 70 kHz by using SPS modulation.
In the case of SFOPS, the THD% varies from about 34% at 10 kHz to approximately 77% at 70 kHz for the same value of the modulation index. For higher values of the modulation index, which correspond to higher values of AC output power, the switching frequency effects on the THD% values are significantly reduced.
By analyzing first voltage harmonic trends, for both SPS and SFOPS schemes a reduction of the voltage amplitude as the switching frequency increases is observed, which is more evident for lower values of the modulation index. By taking into account the expression (8), the reduction of the first voltage harmonic as the switching frequency increase explains the higher values of the THD%. The reduction of the first voltage harmonic is due to the high virtual switching frequency of the PS schemes and by the presence of the dead-time in the gate signals. In detail, by increasing the switching frequency, the time-width of the gate signals is reduced and becomes similar to the dead-time. Thus, this phenomenon generates the cancellation of some gate signals and the increasing overall distortion with respect to the ideal gate signals without dead-time.
Figure 18 shows the THD% and first voltage harmonic trends as a function of the modulation index and for switching frequency ranging from 10 to 70 kHz, obtained with SCAMOD-based schemes with sinusoidal and SFO modulation signals, respectively. In this case, a lower increase of the THD% values and a lower decrease of the first voltage harmonic values emerge as the switching frequency increases with respect to the SPS and SFOPS schemes. It should be noted that SCAMOD-based schemes are affected by the same phenomenon as the PS-based schemes but in a more contained way.
Another interesting consideration concerns the comparison between sinusoidal and SFO schemes as modulation signals with the same carrier pattern. In particular, it is observed that the sinusoidal-based schemes present lower values of the THD% in all cases examined.
Figure 19 shows the switching frequency effects on the THD% among MC PWM schemes under test as a function of the switching frequency and for fixed modulation index. In detail, it is interesting to observe the THD% trends in the case of modulation index equal to 0.6, where the converter works with five voltage levels. The PS-based schemes show a significant increase of the THD% values as the switching frequency increases and a similar phenomenon can be observed with SCAMOD-based schemes. Instead, CD-based schemes show a constant trend as the switching frequency increases and lower values are obtained with the SFOPD scheme. For higher values of the modulation index, all THD% values present a constant trend as the switching frequency increases among the schemes considered.
To complete the voltage waveforms harmonic analysis, in Table 6 some waveform features are summarized; in detail, the number of phase voltage and line-to-line voltage levels, the amplitude of the phase voltage, and the harmonic order with the maximum harmonic amplitude are presented. It is interesting to note that these features depend on the modulation scheme and modulating signals chosen, but they are not affected by the switching frequency, while the amplitude of each harmonic can depend on the switching frequency.

5.2. Conversion Efficiency Analysis

The second quantity analyzed and used for converter performance comparison purpose is the conversion efficiency η expressed in percent as:
η = P A C i = 1 n H B P D C , i · 100
where PAC is the AC output power, PDC,i is the ith DC input power of the corresponding H-bridge, and nHB is the H-bridge overall number of the converter.
Figure 20, Figure 21 and Figure 22 show the conversion efficiency trends as a function of the modulation index and for switching frequency values from 10 to 70 kHz, obtained with CD-based schemes (PD, POD, and APOD) with sinusoidal and SFO modulation signals, respectively.
As shown in Figure 20, Figure 21 and Figure 22, the increase of the switching frequency generates a reduction of the conversion efficiency, which is further reduced as the modulation index decreases. This phenomenon is mainly due to the increase of the commutations number that generates an increase of the switching losses. Indeed, for higher values of the modulation index, which correspond to higher values of the AC output power, the conduction losses are predominant, and, for this reason, switching frequency effects on the conversion efficiency are reduced.
Another interesting consideration concerns the impact of the modulation signals in the scheme. In detail, by using SFO as modulation signals an increase of the efficiency for lower values of the switching frequency, is observed in all cases of the CD-based schemes.
Figure 23 shows the conversion efficiency trends as a function of the modulation index and for switching frequency values from 10 to 70 kHz, obtained with a PS-based scheme with sinusoidal and SFO modulation signals, respectively.
In the case of the PS-based scheme, the switching frequency effects are highlighted to the CD-base schemes. Moreover, for lower values of the modulation index, the reduction of the converter efficiency is about 25%. Regardless, the same behavior emerges for the CD-based schemes for higher values of the modulation index. Moreover, also, in this case, the use of the SFO as modulation signals allows for increasing the efficiency values for lower values of the switching frequency.
In the last case studied, SCAMOD-based schemes and the corresponding efficiency trends as a function of the modulation index and for different values of the switching frequency are shown in Figure 24.
Additionally, the efficiency trends of the SCAMOD-based schemes are affected by the switching frequency effects. In detail, a reduction of the conversion efficiency has been observed as the switching frequency increases. Moreover, in the SCAMOD-based schemes, the SFO modulation signals do not generate any effects on the efficiency values.
Figure 25 shows the comparison among modulation schemes with the same modulation signal as a function of the switching frequency and for different values of modulation index.
It is interesting to observe that through the analysis of Figure 25 the switching frequency effects are more evident. In particular, for modulation index values less than 0.5, the converter works with three voltage levels. Thus, in these operating conditions, the worst efficiency results are obtained. Although all efficiency values present decreasing trends toward the high switching frequencies, CD-based schemes have higher values of efficiency and, in particular, the best results are obtained with the SFOPD scheme (blue curve).
For modulation index values over 0.5, the converter works with five voltage levels. Indeed, as shown in Figure 25, the best efficiency results are obtained. The CD-based schemes present the same values of efficiency and, in detail, the best results for higher values of the switching frequency.
The worst efficiency results are obtained with PS-based schemes and, in particular, for higher values of the switching frequency. Regardless, it is necessary to observe that for switching frequency up to 30 kHz, efficiency values are comparable with the CD-based schemes. Moreover, it is necessary to consider that by using PS-based scheme voltage and current filtering are simpler with respect to the CD-based schemes with the same switching frequency.
The SCAMOD-based schemes present higher efficiency values with respect to the PS-based schemes. In detail, for higher values of the modulation index SCMAOD-based schemes present comparable efficiency values with the CD-based schemes. Regardless, the analysis carried out confirms that CHBMI performance obtained with the SCAMOD-based are intermediate between CD-based and PS-based schemes.
The case with a modulation index equal to 1.15 is very interesting. It should be noted that in this case higher values of the efficiency are obtained for all cases. Nevertheless, by using sinusoidal-based schemes in this condition, the converter works in the over-modulation region that, as well known, is an operating condition in transient time. By using SFO-based schemes, the converter works inside the linear-modulation region for modulation index values up to 1.15.

6. Conclusions

In this paper, switching frequency effects on the efficiency and harmonic distortion in a three-phase five-level CHBMI prototype are investigated. The experimental analysis is concerned with the converter performance characterization by using common MC PWM strategies for MPIs for different values of the switching frequency and modulation index. Moreover, the implementation issues and some practical considerations to optimize the implementation, reduce the computational costs, and minimize the modulation control algorithms device utilization are discussed and proposed.
Experimental results show that the CD-based schemes are only slightly sensitive to the switching frequency effects in terms of the harmonic distortion. A decrease of the efficiency conversion, enhanced for lower values of the modulation index, is observed. Instead, the switching frequency effects affect the CHBMI performance controlled with PS-based schemes in terms of harmonic distortion and conversion efficiency. Regardless, for switching frequency values up to 30 kHz and for higher values of the modulation index the results are comparable to the CD-based schemes. The SCAMOD-based schemes provide CHBMI intermediate performance between CD-based and PS-based schemes in terms of harmonic distortion and conversion efficiency.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.S. (Giuseppe Schettino), I.C. and C.N.; methodology, G.S. (Giuseppe Schettino) and C.N.; software, G.S. (Gioacchino Scaglione); validation, G.S. (Giuseppe Schettino), C.N. and G.S. (Gioacchino Scaglione); formal analysis, G.S. (Giuseppe Schettino), C.N., I.C. and G.S. (Gioacchino Scaglione); investigation, G.S. (Giuseppe Schettino), C.N. and G.S. (Gioacchino Scaglione); data curation, I.C., G.S. (Giuseppe Schettino) and C.N.; writing—original draft preparation, G.S. (Giuseppe Schettino), C.N. and G.S. (Gioacchino Scaglione); writing—review and editing, G.S. (Giuseppe Schettino), C.N., G.S. (Gioacchino Scaglione), F.V., I.C., A.O.D.T. and R.M.; visualization, F.V., A.O.D.T. and R.M.; supervision, F.V., A.O.D.T., I.C. and R.M.; project administration, R.M. and A.B.; funding acquisition, R.M. and A.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported financially through the University of Palermo, by H2020-ECSEL-2017-1-IA-two-stage, by “first and european sic eightinches pilot line-REACTION”, by Prin 2017- Settore/Ambito di intervento: PE7 linea C—Advanced power-trains and -systems for full electric aircrafts Prot. 2017MS9F49.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Derbeli, M.; Napole, C.; Barambones, O.; Sanchez, J.; Calvo, I.; Fernández-Bustamante, P. Maximum Power Point Tracking Techniques for Photovoltaic Panel: A Review and Experimental Applications. Energies 2021, 14, 7806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ala, G.; Colak, I.; Di Filippo, G.; Miceli, R.; Romano, P.; Silva, C.; Valtchev, S.; Viola, F. Electric Mobility in Portugal: Current Situation and Forecasts for Fuel Cell Vehicles. Energies 2021, 14, 7945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wagner, O.; Götz, T. Presentation of the 5Ds in Energy Policy: A Policy Paper to Show How Germany Can Regain Its Role as a Pioneer in Energy Policy. Energies 2021, 14, 6799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Arranz-Gimon, A.; Zorita-Lamadrid, A.; Morinigo-Sotelo, D.; Duque-Perez, O. A Review of Total Harmonic Distortion Factors for the Measurement of Harmonic and Interharmonic Pollution in Modern Power Systems. Energies 2021, 14, 6467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mirafzal, B.; Adib, A. On Grid-Interactive Smart Inverters: Features and Advancements. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 160526–160536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Di Benedetto, M.; Lidozzi, A.; Solero, L.; Crescimbini, F.; Grbović, P.J. High-Performance 3-Phase 5-Level E-Type Multilevel–Multicell Converters for Microgrids. Energies 2021, 14, 843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ali Khan, M.Y.; Liu, H.; Yang, Z.; Yuan, X. A Comprehensive Review on Grid Connected Photovoltaic Inverters, Their Modulation Techniques, and Control Strategies. Energies 2020, 13, 4185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Elsanabary, A.I.; Konstantinou, G.; Mekhilef, S.; Townsend, C.D.; Seyedmahmoudian, M.; Stojcevski, A. Medium Voltage Large-Scale Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Systems Using Cascaded H-Bridge and Modular Multilevel Converters: A Review. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 223686–223699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nguyen, T.H.; Hosani, K.A.; Moursi, M.S.E.; Blaabjerg, F. An Overview of Modular Multilevel Converters in HVDC Transmission Systems with STATCOM Operation during Pole-to-Pole DC Short Circuits. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2019, 34, 4137–4160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ali, M.; Hafeez, G.; Farooq, A.; Shafiq, Z.; Ali, F.; Usman, M.; Mihet-Popa, L. A Novel Control Approach to Hybrid Multilevel Inverter for High-Power Applications. Energies 2021, 14, 4563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Choudhury, S.; Bajaj, M.; Dash, T.; Kamel, S.; Jurado, F. Multilevel Inverter: A Survey on Classical and Advanced Topologies, Control Schemes, Applications to Power System and Future Prospects. Energies 2021, 14, 5773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bughneda, A.; Salem, M.; Richelli, A.; Ishak, D.; Alatai, S. Review of Multilevel Inverters for PV Energy System Applications. Energies 2021, 14, 1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Miceli, R.; Schettino, G.; Viola, F. A Novel Computational Approach for Harmonic Mitigation in PV Systems with Single-Phase Five-Level CHBMI. Energies 2018, 11, 2100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Roemer, F.; Ahmad, M.; Chang, F.; Lienkamp, M. Optimization of a Cascaded H-Bridge Inverter for Electric Vehicle Applications Including Cost Consideration. Energies 2019, 12, 4272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Poorfakhraei, A.; Narimani, M.; Emadi, A. A Review of Modulation and Control Techniques for Multilevel Inverters in Traction Applications. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 24187–24204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pham, K.D.; Nguyen, Q.V.; Nguyen, N.-V. PWM Strategy to Alleviate Common-Mode Voltage with Minimized Output Harmonic Distortion for Five-Level Cascaded H-Bridge Converters. Energies 2021, 14, 4476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Viola, F. Experimental Evaluation of the Performance of a Three-Phase Five-Level Cascaded H-Bridge Inverter by Means FPGA-Based Control Board for Grid Connected Applications. Energies 2018, 11, 3298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Lee, E.; Kim, S.; Lee, K. Modified Phase-Shifted PWM Scheme for Reliability Improvement in Cascaded H-Bridge Multilevel Inverters. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 78130–78139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kim, S.; Lee, J.; Lee, K. A Modified Level-Shifted PWM Strategy for Fault-Tolerant Cascaded Multilevel Inverters with Improved Power Distribution. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2016, 63, 7264–7274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Edpuganti, A.; Rathore, A.K. A Survey of Low Switching Frequency Modulation Techniques for Medium-Voltage Multilevel Converters. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2015, 51, 4212–4228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Al-Hitmi, M.; Ahmad, S.; Iqbal, A.; Padmanaban, S.; Ashraf, I. Selective Harmonic Elimination in Wide Range of Modulation Using Modified Newton Raphson and Pattern Generation Method for Multilevel Inverter. Energies 2018, 11, 458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Ahmad, S.; Al-Hitmi, M.; Iqal, A.; Ashraf, I.; Meraj, M.; Padmanaban, S. Low-order harmonics control in staircase waveform useful in high power application by a novel technique. Int. Trans. Electr. Energy Syst. 2018, 29, e2769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yang, K.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, J.; Yuan, R.; Guan, Q.; Yu, W.; Wang, J. Unified Selective Harmonic Elimination for Multilevel Converters. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2017, 32, 1579–1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jayakumar, V.; Chokkalingam, B.; Munda, J.L. A Comprehensive Review on Space Vector Modulation Techniques for Neutral Point Clamped Multi-Level Inverters. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 112104–112144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yao, H.; Yan, Y.; Shi, T.; Zhang, G.; Wang, Z.; Xia, C. A Novel SVPWM Scheme for Field-Oriented Vector-Controlled PMSM Drive System Fed by Cascaded H-Bridge Inverter. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2021, 36, 8988–9000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yao, W.; Hu, H.; Lu, Z. Comparisons of Space-Vector Modulation and Carrier-Based Modulation of Multilevel Inverter. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2008, 23, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wiechmann, E.P.; Aqueveque, P.; Burgos, R.; Rodriguez, J. On the Efficiency of Voltage Source and Current Source Inverters for High-Power Drives. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2008, 55, 1771–1782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sochor, P.; Akagi, H. Theoretical and Experimental Comparison between Phase-Shifted PWM and Level-Shifted PWM in a Modular Multilevel SDBC Inverter for Utility-Scale Photovoltaic Applications. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2017, 53, 4695–4707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Prabaharan, N.; Palanisamy, K. Analysis of cascaded H-bridge multilevel inverter configuration with double level circuit. IET Power Electron. 2017, 10, 1023–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Seth, N.; Goel, V.; Kulkarni, R.D.; Joshi, V.P. Performance analysis of seven level three phase asymmetric multilevel Inverter at various modulation indices. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Electrical Power and Energy Systems (ICEPES), Bhopal, India, 14–16 December 2016; pp. 407–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kumar, B.H.; Lokhande, M.M. Analysis of PWM techniques on multilevel cascaded H-Bridge three phase inverter. In Proceedings of the 2017 Recent Developments in Control, Automation & Power Engineering (RDCAPE), Noida, India, 26–27 October 2017; pp. 465–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Brovanov, S.V.; Egorov, S.D.; Dubkov, I.S. Study on the efficiency at h-bridge cascaded VSI for different PWM methods. In Proceedings of the 2014 15th International Conference of Young Specialists on Micro/Nanotechnologies and Electron Devices (EDM), Novosibirsk, Russia, 30 June–4 July 2014; pp. 440–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Alamri, B.; Darwish, M. Precise modelling of switching and conduction losses in cascaded h-bridge multilevel inverters. In Proceedings of the 2014 49th International Universities Power Engineering Conference (UPEC), Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 2–5 September 2014; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Alamri, B.; Alshahrani, S.; Darwish, M. Losses investigation in SPWM-controlled cascaded H-bridge multilevel inverters. In Proceedings of the 2015 50th International Universities Power Engineering Conference (UPEC), Trent, UK, 1–4 September 2015; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Patel, V.; Tinari, M.; Buccella, C.; Cecati, C. Analysis on Multilevel Inverter Powertrains for E-transportation. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 13th International Conference on Compatibility, Power Electronics and Power Engineering (CPE-POWERENG), Sonderborg, Denmark, 23–25 April 2019; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Patel, V.; Buccella, C.; Saif, A.M.; Tinari, M.; Cecati, C. Performance Comparison of Multilevel Inverters for E-transportation. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference of Electrical and Electronic Technologies for Automotive, Milan, Italy, 9–11 July 2018; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chang, F.; Ilina, O.; Lienkamp, M.; Voss, L. Improving the Overall Efficiency of Automotive Inverters Using a Multilevel Converter Composed of Low Voltage Si mosfets. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2019, 34, 3586–3602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kouro, S.; Perez, M.; Robles, H.; Rodriguez, J. Switching loss analysis of modulation methods used in cascaded H-bridge multilevel converters. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference, Rhodes, Greece, 15–19 June 2008; pp. 4662–4668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lidozzi, A.; di Benedetto, M.; Sabatini, V.; Solero, L.; Crescimbini, F. Towards LabVIEW and system on module for power electronics and drives control applications. In Proceedings of the IECON 2016—42nd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Florence, Italy, 23–26 October 2016; pp. 4995–5000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nevoloso, C.; Schettino, G.; Scaglione, G.; Di Tommaso, A.O.; Miceli, R.; Viola, F.; Busacca, A. Implementation on NI-SOM sbRIO-9651 and Experimental Validation of Multi-Carrier PWM Techniques for Three-Phase Five Level Cascaded H-Bridge Inverter. In Proceedings of the 2021 10th International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Application (ICRERA), Istanbul, Turkey, 26–29 September 2021; pp. 276–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Schettino, G.; Nevoloso, C.; Miceli, R.; Di Tommaso, A.O.; Scaglione, G.; Cecati, C.; Buccella, C. Experimental Comparative Analysis of Efficiency and THD for a Three-phase Five-level Cascaded H-Bridge Inverter Controlled by Several MC-PWM Schemes. In Proceedings of the IECON 2021—47th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Toronto, ON, Canada, 13–16 October 2021; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Holmes, G.; Lipo, T.A. Pulse Width Modulation for Power Converters: Principle and Practice; IEEE Press: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  43. IEC 61800-9-1; Adjustable Speed Electrical Power Drive Systems—Part 9-1: Ecodesign for Power Drive Systems, Motor Starters, Power Electronics and Their Driven Applications—General Requirements for Setting Energy Efficiency Standards for Power Driven Equipment Using the Extended Product Approach (EPA) and Semi Analytic Model (SAM). IEC: London, UK, 2017.
  44. IEC 61800-9-2; Adjustable Speed Electrical Power Drive Systems—Part 9-2: Ecodesign for Power Drive Systems, Motor Starters, Power Electronics & Their Driven Applications—Energy Efficiency Indicators for Power Drive Systems and Motor Starters. IEC: London, UK, 2017.
Figure 1. Circuit diagram of a three-phase five-level CHB.
Figure 1. Circuit diagram of a three-phase five-level CHB.
Energies 15 00586 g001
Figure 2. Carrier patterns: (a) Phase Disposition—PD; (b) Phase Opposition Disposition—POD; (c) Alternative Phase Opposition Disposition—APOD.
Figure 2. Carrier patterns: (a) Phase Disposition—PD; (b) Phase Opposition Disposition—POD; (c) Alternative Phase Opposition Disposition—APOD.
Energies 15 00586 g002
Figure 3. Carrier pattern: (a) Phase Shifted—PS; (b) Suppressed Carrier Arrangement Modulation—SCAMOD.
Figure 3. Carrier pattern: (a) Phase Shifted—PS; (b) Suppressed Carrier Arrangement Modulation—SCAMOD.
Energies 15 00586 g003
Figure 4. Modulation signals with modulation index equal to 1: (a) sinusoidal; (b) Switching Frequency Optimal—SFO.
Figure 4. Modulation signals with modulation index equal to 1: (a) sinusoidal; (b) Switching Frequency Optimal—SFO.
Energies 15 00586 g004
Figure 5. Carrier-disposition-based modulation schemes: (a) Sinusoidal Phase Disposition—SPD; (b) Sinusoidal Phase Opposition Disposition—SPOD; (c) Sinusoidal Alternative Phase Opposition Disposition—SAPOD; (d) Switching Frequency Optimal Phase Disposition—SFOPD; (e) Switching Frequency Optimal Phase Opposition Disposition—SFOPOD; (f) Switching Frequency Optimal Alternative Phase Opposition Disposition—SFOAPOD.
Figure 5. Carrier-disposition-based modulation schemes: (a) Sinusoidal Phase Disposition—SPD; (b) Sinusoidal Phase Opposition Disposition—SPOD; (c) Sinusoidal Alternative Phase Opposition Disposition—SAPOD; (d) Switching Frequency Optimal Phase Disposition—SFOPD; (e) Switching Frequency Optimal Phase Opposition Disposition—SFOPOD; (f) Switching Frequency Optimal Alternative Phase Opposition Disposition—SFOAPOD.
Energies 15 00586 g005aEnergies 15 00586 g005b
Figure 6. Carrier-disposition-based modulation schemes: (a) Sinusoidal Phase Shifted—SPS; (b) Sinusoidal Suppressed Carrier Arrangement Modulation—SCAMOD; (c) Switching Frequency Optimal Phase Shifted—SFOPS; (d) Switching Frequency Optimal Suppressed Carrier Arrangement Modulation—SFOSCAMOD.
Figure 6. Carrier-disposition-based modulation schemes: (a) Sinusoidal Phase Shifted—SPS; (b) Sinusoidal Suppressed Carrier Arrangement Modulation—SCAMOD; (c) Switching Frequency Optimal Phase Shifted—SFOPS; (d) Switching Frequency Optimal Suppressed Carrier Arrangement Modulation—SFOSCAMOD.
Energies 15 00586 g006
Figure 7. FPGA and real-time block diagram synthesis.
Figure 7. FPGA and real-time block diagram synthesis.
Energies 15 00586 g007
Figure 8. Front panel user interface in the case of phase-shifted as the carriers pattern and sinusoidal waveforms as modulation signals.
Figure 8. Front panel user interface in the case of phase-shifted as the carriers pattern and sinusoidal waveforms as modulation signals.
Energies 15 00586 g008
Figure 9. Block diagram of FPGA target including generation of carriers, modulating signals, and PWM signal.
Figure 9. Block diagram of FPGA target including generation of carriers, modulating signals, and PWM signal.
Energies 15 00586 g009
Figure 10. Schematic representation of the test bench.
Figure 10. Schematic representation of the test bench.
Energies 15 00586 g010
Figure 11. Test bench.
Figure 11. Test bench.
Energies 15 00586 g011
Figure 12. Real-time acquisition at switching frequency equal to 10 kHz of the phase voltages, line currents, and corresponding harmonic spectra in the frequency domain of the modulation schemes: (a) SPD; (b) SFOPD; (c) SPOD; (d) SFO POD; (e) SAPOD; (f) SFOAPOD; (g) SPS; (h) SFOPS; (i) SCAMOD; (j) SFO SCAMOD.
Figure 12. Real-time acquisition at switching frequency equal to 10 kHz of the phase voltages, line currents, and corresponding harmonic spectra in the frequency domain of the modulation schemes: (a) SPD; (b) SFOPD; (c) SPOD; (d) SFO POD; (e) SAPOD; (f) SFOAPOD; (g) SPS; (h) SFOPS; (i) SCAMOD; (j) SFO SCAMOD.
Energies 15 00586 g012aEnergies 15 00586 g012b
Figure 13. Real-time acquisition at switching frequency equal to 40 kHz of the phase voltages, line currents, and corresponding harmonic spectra in the frequency domain of the modulation schemes: (a) SPD; (b) SFOPD; (c) SPOD; (d) SFO POD; (e) SAPOD; (f) SFOAPOD; (g) SPS; (h) SFOPS; (i) SCAMOD; (j) SFO SCAMOD.
Figure 13. Real-time acquisition at switching frequency equal to 40 kHz of the phase voltages, line currents, and corresponding harmonic spectra in the frequency domain of the modulation schemes: (a) SPD; (b) SFOPD; (c) SPOD; (d) SFO POD; (e) SAPOD; (f) SFOAPOD; (g) SPS; (h) SFOPS; (i) SCAMOD; (j) SFO SCAMOD.
Energies 15 00586 g013aEnergies 15 00586 g013b
Figure 14. Experimental THD% and fundamental amplitude trends of SPD and SFOPD schemes.
Figure 14. Experimental THD% and fundamental amplitude trends of SPD and SFOPD schemes.
Energies 15 00586 g014
Figure 15. Experimental THD% and fundamental amplitude trends of SPOD and SFOPOD schemes.
Figure 15. Experimental THD% and fundamental amplitude trends of SPOD and SFOPOD schemes.
Energies 15 00586 g015
Figure 16. Experimental THD% and fundamental amplitude trends of SAPOD and SFOAPOD schemes.
Figure 16. Experimental THD% and fundamental amplitude trends of SAPOD and SFOAPOD schemes.
Energies 15 00586 g016
Figure 17. Experimental THD% and fundamental amplitude trends of SPS and SFOPS schemes.
Figure 17. Experimental THD% and fundamental amplitude trends of SPS and SFOPS schemes.
Energies 15 00586 g017
Figure 18. Experimental THD% and fundamental amplitude trends of SCAMOD and SFOSCAMOD schemes.
Figure 18. Experimental THD% and fundamental amplitude trends of SCAMOD and SFOSCAMOD schemes.
Energies 15 00586 g018
Figure 19. Experimental comparison of THD% trends as a function of the switching frequency among the schemes under test.
Figure 19. Experimental comparison of THD% trends as a function of the switching frequency among the schemes under test.
Energies 15 00586 g019
Figure 20. Experimental conversion efficiency trends of SPD and SFOPD schemes.
Figure 20. Experimental conversion efficiency trends of SPD and SFOPD schemes.
Energies 15 00586 g020
Figure 21. Experimental conversion efficiency trends of SPOD and SFOPOD schemes.
Figure 21. Experimental conversion efficiency trends of SPOD and SFOPOD schemes.
Energies 15 00586 g021
Figure 22. Experimental conversion efficiency trends of SAPOD and SFOAPOD schemes.
Figure 22. Experimental conversion efficiency trends of SAPOD and SFOAPOD schemes.
Energies 15 00586 g022
Figure 23. Experimental conversion efficiency trends of SPS and SFOPS schemes.
Figure 23. Experimental conversion efficiency trends of SPS and SFOPS schemes.
Energies 15 00586 g023
Figure 24. Experimental conversion efficiency trends of SCAMOD and SFOSCAMOD schemes.
Figure 24. Experimental conversion efficiency trends of SCAMOD and SFOSCAMOD schemes.
Energies 15 00586 g024
Figure 25. Comparison of the efficiency trend among modulation schemes with the same modulation signal.
Figure 25. Comparison of the efficiency trend among modulation schemes with the same modulation signal.
Energies 15 00586 g025
Table 1. The sbRIO Module and PED-board main features.
Table 1. The sbRIO Module and PED-board main features.
ProcessorTypeXilinx Zynq-7000, XC7z020 All Programmable SoC
ArchitectureARM Cortex-A9
Speed667 MHz
Cores2
Reconfigurable FPGATypeXilinx Zynq-7000, XC7z020 All Programmable SoC
No. of Logic Cells85,000
No. of flip-flops106,400
No. of LUTs53,200
No. of DSP slices220
PED Board
Features
PWM Channels30×
-
0–5 V or 0–15 V selectable voltage
14 bit ADC, 8 Channels
-
Simultaneous Sampling
-
1.45 µs conversion time
-
Differential inputs
-
−5–+5 V or 0–10 V configurable inputs
10 bit ADC, 8 Channels
-
Up to 200 kS/s
-
0–5 V inputs
12 bit DAC, 4 Channels
-
10 µs settling time
Resolver Interface
-
Fully configurable electrical interface
-
Speed and position Measurement
-
Resolver fault detection
Digital I/O 3.3 V standard46×
-
Hall-effect position sensors interface
-
Encoder interface
-
Relay control
-
Additional PWM
-
General purpose I/O
Ethernet1× RS485
-
Isolated transceiver
-
Half-duplex and full-duplex communication
Table 2. Comparison of the control algorithm computational costs.
Table 2. Comparison of the control algorithm computational costs.
Device UtilizationAvailable ResourcesFPGA Only (%)FPGA + RT (%)
Total slices13,30088.538.2
Slice registers106,40031.912.4
Slice LUTs53,20072.927.8
Block RAMs14055
DSP48s2207.72.7
Table 3. CHBMI MOSFET IRFB4115PBF technical data.
Table 3. CHBMI MOSFET IRFB4115PBF technical data.
QuantitySymbolValue
VoltageVdss150 V
ResistanceRdSon9.3 mΩ
CurrentID104 A
Turn on delayTDon18 ns
Rise timeTR73 ns
Turn off delayTDoff41 ns
Fall timeTF39 ns
Reversal RecoveryTRR86 ns
Table 4. DC power supply RSP-2400 technical data.
Table 4. DC power supply RSP-2400 technical data.
QuantitySymbolValue
Rated output voltageVout48 V
Rated output currentIout50 A
Rated powerPN2400 W
RippleΔV200 mVp-p
Input voltage rangeVin180~264 VAC
Power factorcosφ0.95
Efficiencyη91.5%
Input currentIin12 A
Table 5. Main electric quantities of the converter system.
Table 5. Main electric quantities of the converter system.
QuantitySymbolValue
DC voltageVDC48 V
Fundamental frequencyf50 Hz
Switching frequencyfsw10–70 kHz
Modulation indexM0.3–1.15
Dead-timedt1 μs
Table 6. Voltage waveform features.
Table 6. Voltage waveform features.
TypeHarmonic Order with Maximum Harmonic AmplitudeNumber of Phase Voltage VaN LevelsNumber of Line to Line Voltage Vab LevelsAmplitude of Van, Sinusoidal Modulating SignalsAmplitude of Van, SFO Modulating Signals
PD m f 597/3 VDC7/3 VDC
POD m f 597/3 VDC8/3 VDC
APOD m f 592 VDC8/3 VDC
PS 4 m f 592 VDC8/3 VDC
SCAMOD 2 m f 592 VDC8/3 VDC
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Busacca, A.; Di Tommaso, A.O.; Miceli, R.; Nevoloso, C.; Schettino, G.; Scaglione, G.; Viola, F.; Colak, I. Switching Frequency Effects on the Efficiency and Harmonic Distortion in a Three-Phase Five-Level CHBMI Prototype with Multicarrier PWM Schemes: Experimental Analysis. Energies 2022, 15, 586. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15020586

AMA Style

Busacca A, Di Tommaso AO, Miceli R, Nevoloso C, Schettino G, Scaglione G, Viola F, Colak I. Switching Frequency Effects on the Efficiency and Harmonic Distortion in a Three-Phase Five-Level CHBMI Prototype with Multicarrier PWM Schemes: Experimental Analysis. Energies. 2022; 15(2):586. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15020586

Chicago/Turabian Style

Busacca, Alessandro, Antonino Oscar Di Tommaso, Rosario Miceli, Claudio Nevoloso, Giuseppe Schettino, Gioacchino Scaglione, Fabio Viola, and Ilhami Colak. 2022. "Switching Frequency Effects on the Efficiency and Harmonic Distortion in a Three-Phase Five-Level CHBMI Prototype with Multicarrier PWM Schemes: Experimental Analysis" Energies 15, no. 2: 586. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15020586

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop