Next Article in Journal
The Association of Annexin A1 and Chemosensitivity to Osimertinib in Lung Cancer Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
The “K-Sign”—A Novel CT Finding Suggestive before the Appearance of Pancreatic Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Blood-Based Multi-Cancer Detection Using a Novel Variant Calling Assay (DEEPGENTM): Early Clinical Results
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hyperspectral Imaging (HSI)—A New Tool to Estimate the Perfusion of Upper Abdominal Organs during Pancreatoduodenectomy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Skeletal Muscle Loss and Octogenarian Status Are Associated with S-1 Adjuvant Therapy Discontinuation and Poor Prognosis after Pancreatectomy

1
Department of Innovative Cancer Immunotherapy, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22 Showa-Machi, Maebashi 371-8511, Japan
2
Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Integrative Center of General Surgery, Gunma University Hospital, 3-39-15 Showa-Machi, Maebashi 371-8511, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2021, 13(16), 4105; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13164105
Submission received: 1 August 2021 / Accepted: 13 August 2021 / Published: 15 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Highly Advanced Surgery for Pancreatic Cancer)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Significant advances in surgical techniques and perioperative care, together with adjuvant chemotherapy, have contributed to the increasing number of patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing surgery. However, the results of some studies suggest that the postoperative complications and mortality might be higher in elderly patients undergoing pancreatectomy. We aimed to identify the utility of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with resected pancreatic cancer. In our cohort of 80 patients, including 16 octogenarians, univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved prognosis in patients with pancreatic cancer. However, we also observed that skeletal muscle loss and age of 80 years or older predicted the failure to complete adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1. We propose that evaluation of skeletal muscle mass should be considered as a useful preoperative assessment approach for determining feasibility of adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients.

Abstract

The efficacy and prognosis of adjuvant chemotherapy for resected pancreatic cancer remain unclear. We investigated the utility and risk factors of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing pancreatectomy. This study comprised 80 patients, including 58 patients who received S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy. Skeletal muscle loss was defined using cutoff values of skeletal muscle mass index. In total, 16 (20%) octogenarian patients underwent pancreatectomy. Skeletal muscle loss was present in 56 (70%) patients. The entire course of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy for 6 months was completed in 33 patients (41%). S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy <6 months was an independent prognostic indicator of poor overall survival. Patients who completed S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy exhibited significantly longer overall and relapse-free survival rates than those did not complete the chemotherapy (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0003, respectively). Being an octogenarian and skeletal muscle loss were independent variables associated with the discontinuation of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy. Finally, the S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy rates were 6.3% (1/16) and 28.6% (16/56) in octogenarian patients and those with skeletal muscle loss, respectively. S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy completion was associated with improved prognosis in patients with pancreatic cancer. Skeletal muscle loss and octogenarian status predicted the failure of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy completion.

1. Introduction

Pancreatic cancer, one of the most lethal malignancies, is associated with poor prognosis, with a five-year relative survival rate of only 9% [1], and surgical resection is the only potentially curative treatment option. The safety profile of surgical resection of pancreatic cancer has improved with advances in surgical techniques and perioperative care during the last decade, and postoperative outcomes have displayed continuous improvement. Therefore, an increasing number of patients, including those who are elderly, are considered for surgical resection.
The continual increase in the aging population worldwide is accompanied with an increase in the number of elderly patients eligible for surgical procedures. In Japan, the percentage of individuals aged 65 years and older, which was 28.4% in 2019, is projected to exceed 35% in 2040 [2]. Additionally, the proportion of individuals aged 80 years and older, i.e., octogenarians, was 8.9% in 2019 in Japan. Several studies have previously reported that pancreatic resection can be performed safely in certain elderly patients [3,4,5,6]. However, other reports have indicated increased rates of postoperative complications and mortality and longer hospital stays in elderly patients undergoing resection for pancreatic malignancies [7,8,9], and the survival benefit of surgical resection in elderly patients remains uncertain [10].
Adjuvant chemotherapy is a standard option in patients undergoing pancreatic cancer resection. Specifically, the Japan Adjuvant Study Group of Pancreatic Cancer (JASPAC)-01 trial demonstrated that S-1 was an effective adjuvant chemotherapy in Japanese patients [11]. The efficacy of chemotherapy for the prognosis of elderly patients with pancreatic cancer is unclear because few studies have investigated the feasibility of adjuvant chemotherapy in these patients.
Numerous recent studies have suggested an association between sarcopenia and postoperative outcomes in patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing pancreatectomy [12]. The impact of sarcopenia, which is defined as loss of skeletal muscle mass and strength [13], has also been investigated in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer during chemotherapy. For example, sarcopenia was an independent prognostic factor in patients with pancreatic cancer receiving FOLFIRINOX (leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) [14]. However, the impact of preoperative skeletal muscle mass on outcomes in patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy is unclear.
The purpose of the present study was to investigate the utility of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy and risk factors associated with worse outcomes in patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing pancreatectomy.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patient Selection

This was a retrospective analysis of 80 patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent pancreatic resection between January 2016 and August 2019 in the Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery at Gunma University Hospital. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the study hospital (No. 1378), and all clinical samples were used in accordance with institutional guidelines and the Declaration of Helsinki after signed informed consent was obtained from all participants.

2.2. Treatment and Data Collection

Baseline clinical and demographic characteristics and treatment-related details of all patients were collected from the medical records. Surgical procedures were performed according to institutional policies and the institutional cancer board recommendations. Eight patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel regimen were included. The Clavien–Dindo classification was used to evaluate postoperative complications [15]. Complications requiring surgical intervention during the first 30-day period after surgery were defined as Clavien–Dindo grade III or higher complications. Resected tumors were classified according to the TNM staging system of the International Union Against Cancer [16].
The patients who received S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy were treated following a 6-week schedule, with each course comprising S-1 doses of 80, 100, and 120 mg/day for 4 weeks based on body surface areas of <1.25 m2, between ≥1.25 m2 and <1.5 m2, and ≥1.5 m2, respectively, followed by 2 weeks of rest. Progression-free survival was defined as the period from the date of surgery until the date of documented disease progression or death from any cause. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the period from the date of surgery to the date of death from any cause.

2.3. Definition and Determination of Skeletal Muscle Loss

In all patients, the area of skeletal muscle mass at the inferior aspect of the third lumbar vertebra (L3) was measured using computed tomography images obtained within 30 days prior to surgery. To minimize measurement bias, a trained investigator blinded to all anthropometric and surgical characteristics identified and measured the skeletal muscle area using a dedicated processing system, the volume analyzer SYNAPSE VINCENT (Fujifilm Medical, Tokyo, Japan). Cross-sectional area (cm2) of the skeletal muscle in the L3 region were measured by rough manual outlining on computed tomography images, and total cross-sectional area of the segmented tissue was automatically calculated. Muscle area computed from each image was normalized as follows: skeletal muscle index = cross-sectional area of the skeletal muscle in the L3 region/height [2] (cm2/m2). The cutoff values for skeletal muscle mass index were defined as 42 cm2/m2 for male patients and 38 cm2/m2 for female patients, according to the Japan Society of Hepatology guidelines [17]. Skeletal muscle loss was defined based on these cutoff values, and the patients were classified accordingly into those with and without skeletal muscle loss.

2.4. Evaluation of Inflammatory and Nutritional Factors

We evaluated inflammatory and nutritional status of patients using prognostic nutritional index and modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) [18], which were calculated based on the data at the time of first visit. Preoperative prognostic nutritional index was calculated as 10× serum albumin (g/dL) + 0.005 × total lymphocyte count (/mm3) [19]. The mGPS was calculated based on C-reactive protein (CRP) and albumin concentrations as follows. Patients with an elevated CRP level and hypoalbuminemia (<3.5 g/dL) were allocated a score of 2, patients with only an elevated CRP level (>1.0 mg/dL) were allocated a score of 1, and patients with normal CRP (≤1.0 mg/dL) and albumin (≥3.5 g/dL) levels were allocated a score of 0 [20].

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Categorical variables were assessed using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to analyze continuous variables. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and the log-rank test was used to analyze differences between the curves. Survival time was calculated from the date of surgery. Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors were calculated with the Cox proportional hazards model. The impact of factors on completion of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy was examined using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. A p-value of <0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. All statistical analyses were performed using the JMP Pro 14 statistical software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Clinical Characteristics

The clinical characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table 1. There were 43 male and 37 female patients, with a median age of 72 (range, 42–88) years at the time of surgery. The study cohort included 16 (20%) octogenarian patients who underwent pancreatectomy, and 56 (70%) patients had skeletal muscle loss according to the skeletal muscle mass index. Surgical procedures included pancreaticoduodenectomy (n = 52), distal pancreatectomy (n = 26), and total pancreatectomy (n = 2). The R0 resection rate was 79%. There were 19 (24%) Clavien–Dindo grade ≥III complications. In total, 33 (41%) patients completed the 6-month adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1, whereas S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy was not administered in 22 patients due to poor general condition (n = 14), no consent (n = 4), early postoperative recurrence (n = 2), other concurrent cancer (n = 1), and nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine as adjuvant setting (n = 1). The planned S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy was discontinued in 25 patients because of chemotherapy-related adverse events (n = 11) and postoperative recurrence (n = 14). Recurrence was observed in 70% of the patients. Disease recurrence during S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy was observed in 16 patients.

3.2. Prognostic Factors Associated with OS

Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to analyze factors associated with OS in patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent pancreatectomy (Table 2). Univariate analysis revealed that octogenarian status (p = 0.008), mGPS ≥1 (p = 0.029), and S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy for <6 months (p < 0.0001) were significantly associated with OS. Multivariate analysis revealed that S-1 adjuvant therapy for <6 months (odds ratio [OR], 3.99; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.76–9.03; p = 0.0009) were independent prognostic indicators of poor survival.

3.3. Association between S-1 Adjuvant Chemotherapy Completion and Prognosis

The prognostic significance of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy is shown in Figure 1. The median follow-up period was 18.2 months (range, 4.5 to 54.9 months) for all patients. The median OS was significantly longer in patients who completed S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy compared to those who did not complete the treatment (41.4 vs. 15.5 months, p < 0.0001; Figure 1a). The median relapse-free survival was significantly longer in patients who completed S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy compared to those who did not complete S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy (21.8 vs. 7.0 months, p = 0.0003; Figure 1b).
Among the 47 patients who did not complete S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy, 16 patients experienced recurrence during S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy. We analyzed the prognostic significance of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy in 64 patients after the exclusion of these 16 patients and found that the median OS was significantly longer in patients who completed S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy compared with those who did not complete the S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy (41.4 vs. 19.4 months, p = 0.003; Figure 1c).

3.4. Factors Associated with S-1 Adjuvant Chemotherapy Completion

Based on our analysis showing that the completion of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly associated with prognosis after surgery in patients with pancreatic cancer, we next investigated risk factors associated with S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy. By univariate and multivariate analyses, octogenarian status and skeletal muscle loss were independent factors associated with S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy discontinuation (OR, 15.94; 95%CI, 1.82–140.06; p = 0.013 and OR, 6.37; 95%CI, 1.99–20.37; p = 0.002, respectively; Table 3). The rate of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy completion was 6.3% (1/16; p = 0.001; Figure 2a) among octogenarian patients and 28.6% (16/56; p = 0.001; Figure 2b) among patients with skeletal muscle loss.

4. Discussion

In the present study, which aimed to determine factors that might affect adjuvant chemotherapy completion and prognosis after pancreatectomy in patients with pancreatic cancer, our analyses revealed that failure to complete S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy was an independent prognostic indicator of poor survival. Moreover, octogenarian status and skeletal muscle loss were independent variables associated with the discontinuation of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy. Overall, these findings suggest that surgical indications should be evaluated with more care and stronger perioperative management should be provided for octogenarians and patients with skeletal muscle loss.
Since the JASPAC-01 trial [11], S-1 has been recognized as a standard adjuvant chemotherapy and is routinely recommended for patients with resected pancreatic cancer in Japan. Both OS and relapse-free survival of patients with resected pancreatic cancer are significantly higher with S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy than with gemcitabine (median OS, 46.5 vs. 25.5 months; median relapse-free survival, 22.9 vs. 11.3 months) [11]. In the present study, S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy completion was an independent prognostic factor and patients who completed S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy experienced significantly longer overall and relapse-free survival compared to those who did not complete the treatment (median OS, 41.4 vs. 15.5 months; median relapse-free survival, 21.8 vs. 7.0 months).
In parallel, with the increasing percentage of elderly population, surgeons are increasingly faced with the prospect of performing surgery and administering adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients. In the present study, the median age was 72 years, with 16 (20%) patients aged over 80 years. Numerous studies have investigated the outcomes of pancreatic surgery in elderly patients including octogenarian patients [21]. Hardacre et al. reported that pancreatectomy could be performed in patients over the age of 80 years with low risk of mortality but that the procedure was associated with significant morbidity [22]. Hatzaras et al. reported that there were no significant differences in perioperative complication rate and OS between the patients aged younger than 80 years and those older than 80 years [23]. The overall perioperative complication and postoperative mortality rates in octogenarian patients appear to be similar to those in younger patients [24,25]. However, few studies have investigated outcomes of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with pancreatic cancer. Patients 70 years and older are less likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy although this treatment approach is associated with prolonged survival [26]. Aoyama et al. reported that the safety and feasibility of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy were similar between patients older than 70 years of age and those younger than 70 years of age [27]. In the JASPAC-01 trial [11], including participants aged 20 years or older, the median age of patients assigned to the S-1 arm was 66 (range, 60–73) years. Most clinical trials exclude patients aged over 80 years. Therefore, the safety and feasibility of adjuvant chemotherapy for octogenarian patients with pancreatic cancer remains controversial.
The purpose of adjuvant chemotherapy is to eradicate micrometastases and to prevent early tumor recurrence. S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy requires 6 months of treatment for patients with resected pancreatic cancer. In the JASPAC-01 trial [11], 52 of the 187 patients (28%) who received S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy discontinued treatment before completion. The most common reasons for discontinuation were adverse events in 40 (21%) patients and recurrence in 9 (5%) patients. Shimoda et al. reported that the planned S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy was completed in 11 (38%) of 29 patients [28]. In the present study, 33 (41%) patients completed S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy whereas 22 (28%) patients were untreated and 25 (31%) patients discontinued S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy before completion. We demonstrated that octogenarian status and skeletal muscle loss were independent variables associated with the failure to complete S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy.
In general, elderly patients often have comorbidities and age-related issues including a progressive decrease in muscle mass and strength. Loss of muscle mass is termed sarcopenia [29]. The prevalence of sarcopenia ranges from 30–65% in studies on patients with pancreatic cancer [30,31]. Sarcopenia is a significant predictor of poor prognosis in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer receiving systemic chemotherapy [14,32]. A recent study has described the association of sarcopenia with postoperative complications after pancreatectomy. Centonze et al. reported that sarcopenia was an independent risk factor for postoperative complications and was related to a higher rate of grade C postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreatoduodenectomy [33]. However, no study has reported the significance of sarcopenia in patients with resected pancreatic cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Our analyses revealed that the rate of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy completion was significantly lower in patients with skeletal muscle loss than in those without skeletal muscle loss. Sarcopenia was also shown to be associated with toxicity caused by 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy [34]. Cousin et al. found that low skeletal muscle mass was associated with severe toxicity events in patients included in phase I trials [35]. Several candidate mechanisms have been proposed to underlie the increased risk of toxicity associated with sarcopenia. Sarcopenia might be related to possible drug overdose because chemotherapeutic drug dosages are conventionally determined based on body surface area [35,36]. Inflammation has been suggested as another mechanism since sarcopenia is often associated with inflammation. However, the relationship between sarcopenia and the risk of toxicity is not well established.
Kinoshita et al. compared octogenarian patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent pancreatectomy with those who received chemotherapy as an initial treatment and found that pancreatectomy was safe and feasible, although the prognosis was not superior to chemotherapy [37]. In the present study, there was an increased risk of failure to complete adjuvant chemotherapy in octogenarian patients and in those with skeletal muscle loss, which limited the overall benefit of pancreatectomy. Careful patient selection and perioperative management are therefore important in pancreatectomy.
The present study has several limitations. First, this was a retrospective observational study with a small sample size, particularly comprising octogenarians, and larger prospective studies are warranted to confirm and update the study conclusions. Second, there was a selection bias in the study; pancreatectomy is often avoided in elderly patients because of high morbidity and mortality rate. Third, the indications for adjuvant chemotherapy and initiation dose were based primarily on the attending physician, which could have led to the selection bias for patient inclusion for adjuvant chemotherapy. Fourth, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not analyzed in this study. In fact, neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an increasingly adopted strategy for patients with resectable pancreatic cancer, and further studies are necessary to confirm and update the conclusions obtained in this study. Despite these limitations, the present study demonstrated that skeletal muscle loss and octogenarian status were predictors of the discontinuation of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 after pancreatectomy in patients with pancreatic cancer.

5. Conclusions

Octogenarian status and skeletal muscle loss were independent variables associated with the completion of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing pancreatectomy. Therefore, patients younger than 80 years of age without sarcopenia should be considered as good candidates for surgical resection. However, the increasing number of elderly patients with cancer is undeniable. Evaluation of skeletal muscle mass is a good preoperative assessment tool for determining feasibility of adjuvant chemotherapy. In future, active perioperative nutrition and rehabilitation should be considered for the prevention of sarcopenia and successful completion of adjuvant chemotherapy, especially in elderly patients with pancreatic cancer.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: M.T., N.H. and K.S.; methodology: M.T., N.H. and, K.A.; formal analysis: M.T. and N.H.; investigation: M.T., T.I., N.I., T.Y. (Takahiro Yamanaka), K.H. (Kei Hagiwara), K.H. (Kouki Hoshino), and R.M.; writing—original draft preparation: M.T.; writing—review and editing: M.T., N.H., K.A., N.K., A.W. and K.S.; visualization: A.W. and T.I.; supervision: T.Y. (Toshiki Yajima). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of Gunma University Hospital (protocol code: 1378 and date of approval: 28 October 2015).

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article. The authors have presented all the necessary information in the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Jemal, A. Cancer Statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2019, 69, 7–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Statistics Bureau Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. Available online: https://www.stat.go.jp/data/topics/topi1211.html (accessed on 1 August 2021).
  3. Beltrame, V.; Gruppo, M.; Pastorelli, D.; Pedrazzoli, S.; Merigliano, S.; Sperti, C. Outcome of Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Octogenarians: Single Institution’s Experience and Review of the Literature. J. Visc. Surg. 2015, 152, 279–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ansari, D.; Aronsson, L.; Fredriksson, J.; Andersson, B.; Andersson, R. Safety of Pancreatic Resection in the Elderly: A Retrospective Analysis of 556 Patients. Ann. Gastroenterol. 2016, 29, 221–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Ito, Y.; Kenmochi, T.; Irino, T.; Egawa, T.; Hayashi, S.; Nagashima, A.; Kitagawa, Y. The Impact of Surgical Outcome After Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Elderly Patients. World J. Surg. Oncol. 2011, 9, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Kow, A.W.; Sadayan, N.A.; Ernest, A.; Wang, B.; Chan, C.Y.; Ho, C.K.; Liau, K.H. Is Pancreaticoduodenectomy Justified in Elderly Patients? Surgeon 2012, 10, 128–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lahat, G.; Sever, R.; Lubezky, N.; Nachmany, I.; Gerstenhaber, F.; Ben-Haim, M.; Nakache, R.; Koriansky, J.; Klausner, J.M. Pancreatic Cancer: Surgery is a Feasible Therapeutic Option for Elderly Patients. World J. Surg. Oncol. 2011, 9, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Riall, T.S.; Reddy, D.M.; Nealon, W.H.; Goodwin, J.S. The Effect of Age on Short-Term Outcomes after Pancreatic Resection: A Population-Based Study. Ann. Surg. 2008, 248, 459–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Sukharamwala, P.; Thoens, J.; Szuchmacher, M.; Smith, J.; DeVito, P. Advanced Age is a Risk Factor for Post-Operative Complications and Mortality After a Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. HPB 2012, 14, 649–657. [Google Scholar]
  10. Oguro, S.; Shimada, K.; Kishi, Y.; Nara, S.; Esaki, M.; Kosuge, T. Perioperative and Long-Term Outcomes after Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Elderly Patients 80 Years of Age and Older. Langenbecks Arch. Surg. 2013, 398, 531–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Uesaka, K.; Boku, N.; Fukutomi, A.; Okamura, Y.; Konishi, M.; Matsumoto, I.; Kaneoka, Y.; Shimizu, Y.; Nakamori, S.; Sakamoto, H.; et al. JASPAC 01 Study Group. Adjuvant Chemotherapy of S-1 Versus Gemcitabine for Resected Pancreatic Cancer: A phase 3, Open-Label, Randomised, Non-Inferiority Trial (JASPAC 01). Lancet 2016, 388, 248–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bundred, J.; Kamarajah, S.K.; Roberts, K.J. Body Composition Assessment and Sarcopenia in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. HPB 2019, 21, 1603–1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fielding, R.A.; Vellas, B.; Evans, W.J.; Bhasin, S.; Morley, J.E.; Newman, A.B.; Abellan van Kan, G.; Andrieu, S.; Bauer, J.; Breuille, D.; et al. Sarcopenia: An Undiagnosed Condition in Older Adults. Current Consensus Definition: Prevalence, Etiology, and Consequences. International Working Group on Sarcopenia. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2011, 12, 249–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Kurita, Y.; Kobayashi, N.; Tokuhisa, M.; Goto, A.; Kubota, K.; Endo, I.; Nakajima, A.; Ichikawa, Y. Sarcopenia Is a Reliable Prognostic Factor in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Receiving FOLFIRINOX Chemotherapy. Pancreatology 2019, 19, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dindo, D.; Demartines, N.; Clavien, P.A. Classification of Surgical Complications: A New Proposal with Evaluation in a Cohort of 6336 Patients and Results of a Survey. Ann. Surg. 2004, 240, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Sobin, L.H.; Gospodarowicz, M.K.; Wittekind, C. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours, 7th ed.; Wiley-Liss: New York, NY, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  17. Nishikawa, H.; Shiraki, M.; Hiramatsu, A.; Moriya, K.; Hino, K.; Nishiguchi, S. Japan Society of Hepatology guidelines for sarcopenia in liver disease (1st edition): Recommendation from the working group for creation of sarcopenia assessment criteria. Hepatol. Res. 2016, 46, 951–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kinoshita, A.; Onoda, H.; Imai, N.; Iwaku, A.; Oishi, M.; Fushiya, N.; Koike, K.; Nishino, H.; Tajiri, H. Comparison of the Prognostic Value of Inflammation-Based Prognostic Scores in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Br. J. Cancer 2012, 107, 988–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Chan, A.W.; Chan, S.L.; Wong, G.L.; Wong, V.W.; Chong, C.C.; Lai, P.B.; Chan, H.L.; To, K.F. Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) Predicts Tumor Recurrence of Very Early/Early Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Surgical Resection. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2015, 22, 4138–4148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Proctor, M.J.; Morrison, D.S.; Talwar, D.; Balmer, S.M.; O’Reilly, D.S.; Foulis, A.K.; Horgan, P.G.; McMillan, D.C. An Inflammation-Based Prognostic Score (mGPS) Predicts Cancer Survival Independent of Tumour Site: A Glasgow Inflammation Outcome Study. Br. J. Cancer 2011, 104, 726–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Papis, D.; Vagliasindi, A.; Maida, P. Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery in the Elderly: Current Status. Ann. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2020, 24, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hardacre, J.M.; Simo, K.; McGee, M.F.; Stellato, T.A.; Schulak, J.A. Pancreatic Resection in Octogenarians. J. Surg. Res. 2009, 156, 129–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hatzaras, I.; Schmidt, C.; Klemanski, D.; Muscarella, P.; Melvin, W.S.; Ellison, E.C.; Bloomston, M. Pancreatic Resection in the Octogenarian: A Safe Option for Pancreatic Malignancy. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2011, 212, 373–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Lee, M.K.; Dinorcia, J.; Reavey, P.L.; Holden, M.M.; Genkinger, J.M.; Lee, J.A.; Schrope, B.A.; Chabot, J.A.; Allendorf, J.D. Pancreaticoduodenectomy Can Be Performed Safely in Patients Aged 80 Years and Older. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2010, 14, 1838–1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kim, J.H.; Min, S.K.; Lee, H.; Hong, G.; Lee, H.K. The Safety and Risk Factors of Major Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery in Patients Older than 80 Years. Ann. Surg. Treat. Res. 2016, 91, 288–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Nagrial, A.M.; Chang, D.K.; Nguyen, N.Q.; Johns, A.L.; Chantrill, L.A.; Humphris, J.L.; Chin, V.T.; Samra, J.S.; Gill, A.J.; Pajic, M.; et al. Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients with Pancreatic Cancer. Br. J. Cancer 2014, 110, 313–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Aoyama, T.; Katayama, Y.; Murakawa, M.; Atsumi, Y.; Yamaoku, K.; Kanazawa, A.; Higuchi, A.; Shiozawa, M.; Kobayashi, S.; Ueno, M.; et al. Safety and Feasibility of S-1 Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer in Elderly Patients. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2015, 75, 1115–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Shimoda, M.; Kubota, K.; Shimizu, T.; Katoh, M. Randomized Clinical Trial of Adjuvant Chemotherapy with S-1 Versus Gemcitabine After Pancreatic Cancer Resection. Br. J. Surg. 2015, 102, 746–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Rosenberg, I.H. Sarcopenia: Origins and Clinical Relevance. J. Nutr. 1997, 127, 990S–991S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Chan, M.Y.; Chok, K.S.H. Sarcopenia in Pancreatic Cancer—Effects on Surgical Outcomes and Chemotherapy. World J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 2019, 11, 527–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ozola Zalite, I.; Zykus, R.; Francisco Gonzalez, M.; Saygili, F.; Pukitis, A.; Gaujoux, S.; Charnley, R.M.; Lyadov, V. Influence of Cachexia and Sarcopenia on Survival in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review. Pancreatology 2015, 15, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ishii, N.; Iwata, Y.; Nishikawa, H.; Enomoto, H.; Aizawa, N.; Ishii, A.; Miyamoto, Y.; Yuri, Y.; Hasegawa, K.; Nakano, C.; et al. Effect of Pretreatment Psoas Muscle Mass on Survival for Patients with Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer Undergoing Systemic Chemotherapy. Oncol. Lett. 2017, 14, 6059–6065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Centonze, L.; Di Sandro, S.; Lauterio, A.; De Carlis, R.; Botta, F.; Mariani, A.; Bagnardi, V.; De Carlis, L. The Impact of Sarcopenia on Postoperative Course Following Pancreatoduodenectomy: Single-Center Experience of 110 Consecutive Cases. Dig. Surg. 2020, 37, 312–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Prado, C.M.; Baracos, V.E.; McCargar, L.J.; Mourtzakis, M.; Mulder, K.E.; Reiman, T.; Butts, C.A.; Scarfe, A.G.; Sawyer, M.B. Body Composition as an Independent Determinant of 5-Fluorouracil-Based Chemotherapy Toxicity. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007, 13, 3264–3268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Cousin, S.; Hollebecque, A.; Koscielny, S.; Mir, O.; Varga, A.; Baracos, V.E.; Soria, J.C.; Antoun, S. Low Skeletal Muscle Is Associated with Toxicity in Patients Included in Phase I Trials. Investig. New Drugs 2014, 32, 382–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Choi, Y.; Oh, D.Y.; Kim, T.Y.; Lee, K.H.; Han, S.W.; Im, S.A.; Kim, T.Y.; Bang, Y.J. Skeletal Muscle Depletion Predicts the Prognosis of Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Undergoing Palliative Chemotherapy, Independent of Body Mass Index. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0139749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Kinoshita, S.; Sho, M.; Yanagimoto, H.; Satoi, S.; Akahori, T.; Nagai, M.; Nishiwada, S.; Yamamoto, T.; Hirooka, S.; Yamaki, S.; et al. Potential Role of Surgical Resection for Pancreatic Cancer in the Very Elderly. Pancreatology 2015, 15, 240–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Kaplan–Meier plots of (a) overall survival, (b) relapse-free survival, and (c) overall survival of 64 patients, with the exclusion of those with recurrence during S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy.
Figure 1. Kaplan–Meier plots of (a) overall survival, (b) relapse-free survival, and (c) overall survival of 64 patients, with the exclusion of those with recurrence during S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy.
Cancers 13 04105 g001aCancers 13 04105 g001b
Figure 2. S-1 adjuvant therapy completion rates in (a) octogenarian patients and (b) those with skeletal muscle loss.
Figure 2. S-1 adjuvant therapy completion rates in (a) octogenarian patients and (b) those with skeletal muscle loss.
Cancers 13 04105 g002
Table 1. Patient characteristics.
Table 1. Patient characteristics.
FactorsPatients (N = 80)
Age, years72 (42–88)
Octogenarian16 (20%)
Sex (male/female)43/37
Skeletal muscle loss56 (70%)
ASA PS classification (I/II/III/IV/V/VI)1/67/12/0/0/0
Operation
pancreaticoduodenectomy52
distal pancreatectomy26
total pancreatectomy2
Disease stage
IA, IB, IIA28
IIB, IV52
R0 resection63 (79%)
Complications (Clavien–Dindo grade ≥III)19 (24%)
S-1 adjuvant therapy completion33 (41%)
Recurrence56 (70%)
ASA PS, American Society of Anesthesiology Physical Status. Data are expressed as medians (interquartile range) or number of patients (%).
Table 2. Univariate and multivariate analyses of variables for OS in patients with pancreatic cancer.
Table 2. Univariate and multivariate analyses of variables for OS in patients with pancreatic cancer.
VariablesUnivariate AnalysisMultivariate Analysis
Odds Ratio95%CIpOdds Ratio95%CIp
Octogenarian2.691.29–5.620.008 *1.190.50–2.810.698
Female sex1.020.54–1.910.950
BMI <18.5 kg/m21.180.45–3.060.740
Skeletal muscle loss1.790.87–3.680.115
ASA PS ≥30.900.35–2.310.898
PNI <451.140.55–2.380.723
mGPS ≥12.761.11–6.850.029 *2.300.85–6.190.100
Operation (PD, TP vs. DP)1.140.58–2.240.710
R1 resection0.970.44–2.100.929
Tumor size ≥30 mm1.730.88–3.400.114
Lymph node metastasis1.620.79–3.340.189
Stage ≥IIB1.850.87–3.900.108
Complications (Clavien–Dindo grade ≥III)0.840.38–1.820.652
S-1 adjuvant therapy <6 months4.622.15–9.94<0.0001 *3.991.76–9.030.0009 *
OS, overall survival; CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; ASA PS, American Society of Anesthesiology Physical Status; PNI, prognostic nutritional index; mGPS, modified Glasgow prognostic score. * p value < 0.05
Table 3. Univariate and multivariate analyses of variables for the discontinuation of S-1 adjuvant therapy.
Table 3. Univariate and multivariate analyses of variables for the discontinuation of S-1 adjuvant therapy.
VariablesUnivariate AnalysisMultivariate Analysis
Odds Ratio95%CIpOdds Ratio95%CIp
Octogenarian15.001.87–120.390.011 *15.941.82–140.060.013 *
Female sex1.300.53–3.190.566
BMI <18.5 kg/m21.270.34–4.740.723
Skeletal muscle loss6.072.12–17.420.0008 *6.371.99–20.370.002 *
ASA PS ≥30.980.28–3.400.975
PNI <451.420.49–4.140.517
mGPS ≥12.270.43–12.110.337
Operation (PD, TP vs. DP)1.350.52–3.470.537
Complications (Clavien–Dindo grade ≥III)0.720.26–2.030.536
CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; ASA PS, American Society of Anesthesiology Physical Status; PNI, prognostic nutritional index; mGPS, modified Glasgow prognostic score. * p value < 0.05.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tsukagoshi, M.; Harimoto, N.; Araki, K.; Kubo, N.; Watanabe, A.; Igarashi, T.; Ishii, N.; Yamanaka, T.; Hagiwara, K.; Hoshino, K.; et al. Skeletal Muscle Loss and Octogenarian Status Are Associated with S-1 Adjuvant Therapy Discontinuation and Poor Prognosis after Pancreatectomy. Cancers 2021, 13, 4105. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13164105

AMA Style

Tsukagoshi M, Harimoto N, Araki K, Kubo N, Watanabe A, Igarashi T, Ishii N, Yamanaka T, Hagiwara K, Hoshino K, et al. Skeletal Muscle Loss and Octogenarian Status Are Associated with S-1 Adjuvant Therapy Discontinuation and Poor Prognosis after Pancreatectomy. Cancers. 2021; 13(16):4105. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13164105

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tsukagoshi, Mariko, Norifumi Harimoto, Kenichiro Araki, Norio Kubo, Akira Watanabe, Takamichi Igarashi, Norihiro Ishii, Takahiro Yamanaka, Kei Hagiwara, Kouki Hoshino, and et al. 2021. "Skeletal Muscle Loss and Octogenarian Status Are Associated with S-1 Adjuvant Therapy Discontinuation and Poor Prognosis after Pancreatectomy" Cancers 13, no. 16: 4105. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13164105

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop