Next Article in Journal
Role of DNA Damage Response in Suppressing Malignant Progression of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia and Polycythemia Vera: Impact of Different Oncogenes
Next Article in Special Issue
F-Box Proteins and Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Development of a Model for Chemical Screening Based on Collateral Sensitivity to Target BTK C481S Mutant
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cellular Functions of OCT-3/4 Regulated by Ubiquitination in Proliferating Cells
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Drug Development Targeting the Ubiquitin–Proteasome System (UPS) for the Treatment of Human Cancers

1
Masonic Cancer Center and Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women’s Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
2
Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
3
Department of Immunology, Genetics, and Pathology, Uppsala University, 751 05 Uppsala, Sweden
4
Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, SE-58183 Linköping, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2020, 12(4), 902; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12040902
Submission received: 25 February 2020 / Revised: 1 April 2020 / Accepted: 2 April 2020 / Published: 7 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Targeting the Ubiquitin Pathway in Cancer)

Abstract

:
Cancer cells are characterized by a higher rate of protein turnover and greater demand for protein homeostasis compared to normal cells. In this scenario, the ubiquitin–proteasome system (UPS), which is responsible for the degradation of over 80% of cellular proteins within mammalian cells, becomes vital to cancer cells, making the UPS a critical target for the discovery of novel cancer therapeutics. This review systematically categorizes all current reported small molecule inhibitors of the various essential components of the UPS, including ubiquitin-activating enzymes (E1s), ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes (E2s), ubiquitin ligases (E3s), the 20S proteasome catalytic core particle (20S CP) and the 19S proteasome regulatory particles (19S RP), as well as their mechanism/s of action and limitations. We also discuss the immunoproteasome which is considered as a prospective therapeutic target of the next generation of proteasome inhibitors in cancer therapies.

1. The Ubiquitin–Proteasome System Is Essential for the Maintenance of Protein Homeostasis

In mammalian cells, protein turnover must be strictly regulated as nearly one-third of the newly synthesized proteins are rapidly degraded with a half-life no more than 10 min [1]. At the same time, proteins that are damaged or misfolded also require prompt degradation to keep a functional cellular metabolism [2]. The ubiquitin–proteasome system (UPS) is a specialized proteolysis system that controls protein degradation and plays an essential role in cellular protein homeostasis [3,4]. Evidence has revealed that up to 80% of cellular proteins are degraded through the UPS which speaks about its importance not only in the regulation of protein homeostasis, but also in the management of numerous cellular regulators relating to DNA damage and repair, cell proliferation and survival, cell differentiation as well as drug resistance [5,6,7,8,9,10,11].
A series of essential components—ubiquitin, ubiquitin-activating enzymes (E1s), ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes (E2s), ubiquitin ligases (E3s), deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs), as well as the 26S proteasome—constitute the UPS [12,13]. Ubiquitin is a highly conserved 76 amino acid proteins that oversees marking to-be-degraded proteins by covalent attachment through an isopeptide bond between the carboxy glycine residue (G76) of ubiquitin to the ε-amino groups of lysine residues [14]. The 26S proteasome is a large multi-subunit shredder where ubiquitin-tagged proteins are degraded into smaller peptides which are either further degraded into amino acids or recycled for further application during other cellular metabolic processes. For example, Cyclin B1 is degraded by proteasome into multiple short chains to regulate cell cycle [15,16]. Oxidized histone protein Htb2, a core component of the nucleosome, which is critical for transcription and cell cycle, is recognized and linked by Lysine Residue 48 (K48) and further degraded by the proteasome [17,18]; DbpB (also named Y-box protein 1), a transcription factor, is reported to selectively recognize the Y-box promoter element. Studies showed that its terminal 105-amino-acid-long fragment is removed after a specific proteolytic cleavage by the proteasome complex [19,20]; NF-κB (nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells) is located outside the nucleus and is reported to be involved in DNA transcription as well as cell survival [21,22]. The NF-κB p105 is the precursor of NF-κB p50. It is evident that NF-κB p105 is cleaved and selectively degraded at the C-terminus by proteasome, generating the active form of NF-κB p50 [23]. Products of UPS degradation can also be further degraded into single amino acids by aminopeptidases [24]. Aminopeptidases are the class of enzymes that catalyze the final steps in the ubiquitin–proteasome pathway by breaking down shorter peptides (<5 residues) into even smaller fragments [25]. Many, but not all, of aminopeptidases, are zinc metalloenzymes, such as leucine aminopeptidases (lAPs) and methionine aminopeptidases (metAPs) [26,27]. Studies showed that blocking the activity of the aminopeptidases by inhibitor of bestatin could generate a major accumulation of peptides which are ∼2–5 residues long [28].
The 26S proteasome contains one/two 19S regulatory particles (19S RP) which mainly regulate the translocation of ubiquitinated proteins to the 20S CP and one 20S core particle (20S CP) in which proteolysis finally occurs [29,30]. In general, two main processes are associated with the process of degradation of proteins by the UPS: (1) tagging the to-be-degraded proteins by polyubiquitination (normally more than four ubiquitins), and (2) proteolytic degradation of the polyubiquitinated protein by the 26S proteasome complex [31,32]. Each step incorporates an intricate and complex spectrum of protein interactions and biochemical reactions (Figure 1).

1.1. Tagging the to-Be-Degraded Proteins by Polyubiquitination

This step, typically considered as a post-translational modification of lysine residues, involves the UPS components of ubiquitin, ubiquitin-activating enzymes (E1s), ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes (E2s), ubiquitin ligases (E3s), and deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs). The human genome contains two E1 genes which are mainly responsible for ubiquitination—UBA1 (UBE1) and UBA6 (UBE6). UBA1 (UBE1) and UBA6 (UBE6) are expressed ubiquitously and have been thought to be interchangeable in many ubiquitination events by transferring Ub to a shared pool of E2s and E3s [33,34]. There are about fifty E2 enzymes and more than six hundred E3 enzymes, each of which has a specific function of modulating the activity of downstream protein substrates [12,13]. Firstly, the 76-amino acid ubiquitin polypeptide is activated through the assistance of the activating enzyme E1. Activation occurs following a covalent linkage between the carboxyl-terminus of ubiquitin and a cysteine residue convey on E1 to form a thioester bond (E1-Ub). Secondly, the ubiquitin activated by E1 is designed to be presented to an E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (E2-Ub). Lastly, a substrate-specific E3 ligase enzyme transfers the ubiquitin from E2 to a specific substrate protein. Since E3 proteins are responsible for recognizing and binding to a specific substrate, it is not surprising that over six hundred E3 enzymes appear to be encoded by the human genome. These E3 ligases are generally classified into three groups of the ‘really interesting new gene’ (RING) class, the ‘homologous to E6-AP carboxy-terminus’ (HECT) class, and the ‘RING-between-RING’ (RBR) class. The RING class, the greater part of the E3 ligases, acts as a mediator by proving a docking site to bring the to-be-degraded substrates close to E2-Ub, thus allowing E2-Ub to transfer Ub directly to the substrates without forming thioester bonds with ubiquitin [35]. The HECT class undergo a catalytic cysteine-dependent transthiolation reaction with E2–Ub, forming a covalent E3–Ub intermediate [36,37]. RBR class have a canonical RING domain linking to an accessorial domain [38]. The step of tagging the to-be-degraded proteins normally needs to proceed at least four cycles in order to form substrate-polyubiquitins which could be recognized by the 26S proteasome complex [14,31,33,39].
It is important to point out that ubiquitin contains seven different lysine residues (Lys6, Lys11, Lys27, Lys29, Lys33, Lys48 and Lys63), any of which can be covalently linked by other ubiquitin molecules and determine a specific fate of the substrate protein. In general, Lys-48 and Lys-11 attached chains are further involved in proteasome degradation [40,41], whereas those linked by Lys63-linked chains generally undergo nonproteolytic processes such as DNA repair, DNA replication and signal transduction [42]. Other linkage types are less well understood so far, even though reports have shown that polyubiquitinated chains covalently linked by Lys6, Lys27, Lys29, or Lys33 are reported to target proteins for proteasome-mediated degradation [43]. The process of ubiquitination is highly dynamic and can be reversed by enzymes known as deubiquitinases (DUBs). Until now, more than ninety deubiquitinases (DUB) have been discovered which are generally classified into five different groups based on the presence of conserved catalytic domains: the ubiquitin-specific proteases (USP), ubiquitin-C terminal hydrolases (UCH), Machado–Joseph domain (MJD), ovarian tumor domain (OTU), and the Jab1/MPN (JAMM) class [44,45]. It is worth noting that DUBs are increasingly shown to play essential roles in the initiation and progression of multiple cancer types [46].

1.2. Proteolytic Degradation of the Polyubiquitinated Protein by the Proteasome Complex

Proteins that have been properly polyubiquitinated from the first step are further recognized by the 19S RP where the poly-Ub groups are removed from the substrates [47]. As the proteasomal channel is too narrow for a folded protein to go through to 20S CP, it is assumed that the 19S particle also unfolds substrates and helps to insert them into the 20S CP for further proteolysis. The energy required in steps of the opening channel and unfolding substrates are supplied by six different ATPase subunits in the base of the 19S RP [31]. The 20S CP includes four layers of ring-like structures [40]. The outer ring layers are composed of seven “alpha” subunits, α1-α7 and the inner “beta” rings contain seven ‘beta’ subunits, β1-β7. The β1 subunits present caspase-like (C-L) proteolytic activity, the β2 subunits have trypsin-like (T-L) activity and the β5 subunits exhibit chymotrypsin-like (CT-L) activity. Following substrate degradation in 20S CPs, short peptides generated from the degraded substrates are recycled and reused for other cellular functions [48].

2. The UPS Affects Tumorigenesis, Tumor Metabolism and Survival

Several evidences indicate that cancer cells are highly dependent on a functional UPS system for tumor initiation, tumor metabolism and survival. Thus, components of the UPS have attracted extreme attention for the treatment of cancer in the last decades [49,50].

2.1. The UPS and Tumorigenesis

As expression levels of proteins regulating the cell cycle are often under the control of the UPS, aberrancies in the UPS pathway can result in abnormal cell-cycle control and contribute to tumor initiation and development. Kip1, for instance, is an inhibitor of the cyclin-dependent kinase (Cdk) whose levels are “high” in quiescent cells. During tumorigenesis, Kip1 levels drop due to its proteasome-mediated degradation [51,52]. High expression levels of mutant p53 have been reported in human cancers but not in non-transformed cells. These high expression levels are accompanied by deregulation of E3 ubiquitin ligases Murine Double Minute 2 (MDM2) [53,54], suggesting a role of the UPS in the regulation of protein levels of mutant p53 in cancer cells. F-box/WD repeat-containing protein 7 (FBXW7), a general tumor suppressor in human tumorigenesis, is another key E3 ubiquitin ligase. Mutations on this ligase cause an accumulation of MYC and upregulation of m-TOR at the early stage of transformation [35,55,56]. In order to escape proteotoxic stress which normally accompanies fast protein turnover and high proliferative rate, 26S proteasome assembly is significantly stimulated in the process of tumorigenesis [57].

2.2. The UPS and Tumor Metabolism

Several studies have suggested that the UPS modulates the physiology and the morphology of mitochondria, the powerhouse of mammalian cells, by ubiquitinating the outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM) proteins, including BAX, DRP1, MFN1/2, and VDAC [58,59,60,61,62]. Another study has shown that the UPS pathway plays an indispensable role in the regulation of mitochondrial energy metabolism by regulating the turnover of several mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) proteins such as the succinate dehydrogenase subunit A (SDHA), the mitochondrial respiratory complex II [63,64]. Findings also indicate a mechanism of crosstalk between the proteasome and autophagy pathway [65,66,67,68,69]. This includes the degradation of synaptosomal-associated protein 29 (SNAP29) and syntaxin 17 (STX17) by the ubiquitin-independent 20S proteasome [70].
The UPS, especially the 26S proteasome complex, is also essential in regulating redox balance by recognizing and removing oxidized, damaged or misfolded proteins [71,72]. The inhibition of proteasome function leads to the induction of oxidative stress, because of excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which is mainly from mitochondria [71,72,73,74]. On the other hand, continuous exposure to ROS also affects the function of the proteasome [75]. Proteasome-mediated degradation has been shown to be enhanced more than 10-fold upon exposure to H2O2 or O2- [76]. However, acute oxidative stress caused by environmental insults or mitochondrial defects results in the destruction of 26S proteasome activity and rapid disassembly of 26S proteasomes into 20S CP and 19S RP 19S RP subunits [77]. Due to this, the interplay between the proteasome and oxidative stress needs to be strictly balanced for cells to maintain the basic cellular metabolism (Figure 2).

2.3. UPS and Tumor Survival

The UPS system could also regulate the fate of cancer cells by modulating the proapoptotic factors of the Bcl-2 superfamily. Mcl-1, an anti-apoptotic protein, is essential for survival and reported to be regulated by TRIM17, MULE and FBW7 of the E3 ligases of the UPS [78,79,80]. Bim, another pro-apoptotic member which regulates stress-induced signals to the core apoptotic machinery [81,82], has been proved to be regulated by the UPS mediated by MAPK/ERK [83,84]. The toxic signaling of TNFα and other death receptors are reported to have multiple sites regulated by the UPS [85].

3. Inhibitors of the UPS in Cancer Therapies

As the UPS system is important in regulating aspects of cellular pathways in cancer cells, such as tumor initiation and progression, inhibiting the activities of different components of the UPS has been proposed as a promising therapeutic strategy for the treatment of cancer. Here, we described inhibitors targeting different components of the UPS which are currently at different development stages in clinical studies (Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3).

3.1. Inhibitors of Ubiquitin-Activating Enzymes (E1s)

As only two E1s have been reported so far and the step of ubiquitin activation is just the start process of protein degradation, it is important to find inhibitors targeting other enzymes rather than E1s. PYR-41, a pyrazone derivative, is the first cell-permeable inhibitor targeting the E1 enzyme UBA1. This compound is able to irreversibly bind to the active cysteine in UBA1 and abrogate its catalytic activity [86]. The mechanism through which PYR-41 causes cell death is via p53-mediated apoptosis. Thus, its use is particularly promising for the treatment of cancers characterized by p53 mutations [87,88]. Recently, another inhibitor found to be targeting the E1 activation step is MLN4924 (Pevonedistat), a small molecule inhibitor of the E1 NEDD8-activating enzyme [89,90,91,92,93,94]. This small molecule is an adenosine sulfamate analog that covalently binds the nucleotide-binding site of NAE and generates a NEDD8-MLN4924 adduct that further undermines the cullin-RING ligase-mediated protein turnover leading to apoptosis in cancer cells by accumulating proteins of p27, NRF2, CDC25A, HIF1α and IκB [89]. MLN4924 was also reported to inhibit angiogenesis during tumor development [95]. MLN4924 is being currently evaluated for the treatment of patients diagnosed with both hematological and solid tumors [96,97]. Please see Table 1.
Table 2. Inhibitors of the constitutive proteasome complex.
Table 2. Inhibitors of the constitutive proteasome complex.
CompoundsTargetModes of ActionTargeted Cancer Types in Preclinical StudiesTargeted Cancer Types in Clinical Studies or TherapiesOther DiseaseRef.
Inhibitors targeting 20S core particle of the proteasome
Bortezomibβ5 > β1Inhibits the chymotrypsin-like activity of the proteasome by reversible binding to the β5 subunit thus inhibits proteasomal activity and leads to accumulation of polyubiquitinated proteins in cells Multiple Myeloma
Mantle cell lymphoma
Acute myeloid leukemia
lung cancers hepatocellular carcinoma
Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Neuroblastoma
Colorectal Cancer
Head and Neck Cancer
Thyroid Carcinoma
More cases to https://clinicaltrials.gov
Haemolytic anaemia
Immune thrombocytopenia
Lung disease
Cold agglutinin disease
Amyloidosis
Macroglobulinemia
[98,99,100,101,102,103,104]
Carfilzomibβ5Covalent bonds to proteasome catalytic subunits, predominantly β5 Multiple myeloma
Relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma
Lymphoma
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia
Thyroid cancer
Refractory renal cell carcinoma
Lung cancer
More cases to https://clinicaltrials.gov
Pulmonary arterial hypertension[105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112]
Ixazomibβ5 > β1First orally bioavailable proteasome inhibitor drug, predominantly targeting β5 Multiple myeloma
Refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma
Acute myeloid leukemia
Relapsed refractory acute myeloid leukemia
Hodgkin and T-cell lymphoma
Mantle cell lymphoma
Non-hematologic malignancies lymphoma
Breast cancer
Glioblastoma
Bladder cancer
Renal cell carcinoma
Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia
Solitary osseous plasmacytoma
More cases to https://clinicaltrials.gov
Al amyloidosis
Autoimmune cytopenia
HIV
Lupus nephritis
Kidney diseases
[113,114,115,116,117,118,119]
Oprozomibβ5 > β1A structural homologue of CFZ, orally available and applied to patients with relapsed after receiving BTZ- and CFZ-based therapies Multiple Myeloma
Relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia
Non-central nervous system malignancies
No reported applications[120,121,122,123]
Marizomibβ5 > β2 > β1Irreversibly inhibits the activity of proteasome and more effectively induces apoptosis in tumor cells from MM and chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients, while shows a lower toxicity to normal cells than BTZ Multiple Myeloma
Relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma
Ependymoma
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer
Melanoma
Lymphoma
Glioblastoma
No reported applications[124,125,126,127,128]
Inhibitors targeting 19S regulatory particle of the proteasome
IU1
IU1-47
USP14Targets the thiol group in the active cysteine site in USP14 protease and significantly decrease cell proliferation, migration, and invasion.Breast cancer
Lung cancer
No reported applications[129,130]
b-AP15USP14
UCHL5
Targets both UCHL5 and USP14, disrupts the aggresome formation in cancer cells by activating caspase to further induce apoptosis relating to an upregulation of oxidative stressAcute myeloid leukemia
Multiple myeloma
Large b cell lymphoma
Mantle cell lymphoma
Neuroblastoma
Prostate cancer
Breast cancer
Lung cancer
Head and neck cancer
Colon cancer
Ovarian cancer
No reported applications[131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141]
VLX1570USP14
UCHL5
An analog of b-AP15, more effective than b-AP15 in inhibiting tumor progression See targeted cancer types of b-AP15 Multiple MyelomaNo reported applications[142,143,144,145]
RA-9USP14Reacts with the sulfurs in the active site cysteine and inhibits proteasome-associated DUBsBreast cancer Ovarian cancer Cervical cancer Rheumatoid arthritis[146,147]
WP1130UCHL5
USP14
USP9X
Directly inhibits USP9X in addition to UCHL5 and USP14, induces apoptosis and prevents drug resistance in malignancies through Mcl-1 degradationAcute myeloid leukemia
Chronic myelogenous leukemia
Human mesothelioma
Lung cancer
Colon cancer Prostate cancer
Hepatocellular carcinoma
No reported applications[148,149,150,151,152,153,154]
OPARPN11A zinc ion chelator, inhibits the activity of RPN11 metal-containing enzymes of 19S and induces apoptosis including cell lines which are BTZ resistantMultiple myeloma Hepatocellular carcinoma
Cervical cancer Breast carcinoma
Sarcoidosis[155,156,157,158,159,160,161]
8TQRPN11A strong RPN11-specific inhibition of proteasome 19S subunit and is a potent apoptosis inducer in MM cellsLung carcinoma
Colon cancer
No reported applications[162]
ThiolutinRPN11The reduced form of Thiolutin is an inhibitor of JAB1/MPN/Mov34 (JAMM) domain-containing metalloprotease RPN11 by chelating Zn2+-ions which is specifically toxic to cancer cells by hampering protein turnoverOnly in cell free system No reported applications[163]
Table 3. Inhibitors of immunoproteasome complex.
Table 3. Inhibitors of immunoproteasome complex.
CompoundsTargetModes of ActionTargeted Cancer Types in Preclinical StudiesTargeted Cancer Types in Clinical Studies or TherapiesOther DiseaseRef.
ONX-0914β5iThe first epoxyketone-based peptidyl immunoproteasome selective inhibitor towards β5i Rheumatoid arthritis
(mouse model)
[164,165]
PR-924β5iAn epoxyketone-based peptidyl selective inhibitor of β5i immunoproteasome, displays a much stronger inhibitory activity (β5c/β5i = 91) and blocks the growth of multiple myeloma in vitro and in vivo.Multiple myeloma [166,167]
KZR-616β5i, β2i and β1iThe only epoxyketone-based peptidyl immunoproteasome selective inhibitor tested in clinic so far Systemic lupus erythematosus
(NCT03393013)
[168]

3.2. Ubiquitin-Conjugating Enzymes (E2s) Inhibitors

E2 enzymes, which act as intermediates between the E1 and E3 proteins, determine the type of the polyubiquitin chain linkage. However, each E2 needs to associate and cooperate with a specific set of E3s; the more applicable approach is to block the E2–E3 association through the inhibition of E3s. Thus, E2 enzymes have received far less attention as drug targets in discovering novel proteasome inhibitors. Among the few compounds developed, CC0651—an allosteric inhibitor of human E2 enzyme hCdc34—causes large-scale structural rearrangements that affect the discharge of ubiquitin acceptor lysine residues [169]. NSC697923 is another inhibitor targeting the Ubc13–Uev1A E2 enzyme and blocks the formation of the E2–Ub thioester conjugate, further inhibiting the activation of NF-κB signaling, leading to the reduced proliferation and viability of cancer cells [170]. Please see Table 1.

3.3. Ubiquitin Ligases (E3s) Inhibitors

So far, more than six hundred E3 enzymes have been discovered and found to diversely regulate the activity of downstream substrates [171]. E3 ligases are closely and specifically related to fundamental cellular processes in human cancers by regulating the degradation of tumor promoters or suppressors, thus inhibiting the activity of tumor-related E3 ligases could enhance the efficiency of cancer therapy by minimizing off-target side effects. More importantly, unlike E1 or E2, E3 ligases exhibit high specificity to a certain substrate. In this scenario, the targeting of E3 can be achieved in several ways, including through the inhibition of its expression levels, altering of its subcellular localization and via preventing its proper assembly [13,40] and/or interaction with cellular substrates [172,173]. The current main approach for the development of anti-E3-based therapies is via small-molecule screening technologies. As such, a number of studies have identified compounds targeting different E3 ligases and further impact the function and activity of UPS.
The most studied E3 ligase is MDM2, which negatively regulates p53 and is important for cell survival [174,175,176], losing Mdm2 is reported to induce cell death both in vitro and in vivo in a p53-dependent manner [177]. Nutlin-3a, the first molecule described targeting MDM2, inhibits the interaction between Mdm2 and p53 [178], eventually arrests cell cycle, inhibits growth of cancer cells, and induces cell death in vitro and in vivo. The derivatives of nutlin-3a, such as (R05503781) [179] and RG7112 (R05045337) [180], have exhibited greater activities in vitro; however, the first result report of RG7112 in clinical trials for the treatment of liposarcoma is not so encouraging, due to the reason that even the expression levels of p53 and p21 increased in response to the treatment of RG7112, out of twenty patients, only one (1/20) showed a partial response. Furthermore, even though it specifically inhibits the activity of MDM2, RG7112 still shows relatively severe side effects including thromboycytopaenia and neutropaenia [180]. This illustrates one of the main concerns about the activation of p53 on normal cells when p53 is stabilized in therapies.
Another E3 ligase which has shown potential as a drug target is a protein family named inhibitors of apoptosis (IAPs). GDC-0152 and SM-406 are potent and orally bioavailable SMAC mimetic and an antagonist of the inhibitor of IAPs. It has good oral bioavailability and is highly effective in the induction of apoptosis in xenograft tumors and is capable of completely inhibiting tumor growth [181,182]. However, the clinical trial was terminated at phase I in 2009 without further notice.
Several other E3 ligases have also been considered as targets for the development of novel anticancer drugs (Please see Table 1). However, it is still worth noticing that: (a) E3 ligases can act as both tumor suppressors and promoters in a substrate-dependent and context-dependent manner due to the complex regulation of cellular activities; thus, targeting a specific E3 ligase requires a deep understanding its mechanism in both tissue-dependent and tumor-dependent conditions, (b) the ideal inhibitors would only disrupt the interactions of an E3 with substrates that are critical to cancer biology but not normal cell populations. Efforts have been made by targeting E3 ligases; however, the inhibitory specificity on cancer cells still needs to be stressed when considering the normal tissue, (c) since the mechanism underlying E3 ligases regulating cellular processes is complex, it is of paramount importance to understand how this post-translational modification mediated by E3 ligases is actively regulated, not only in cancer cells, but also in normal tissues.

3.4. Inhibitors Targeting the Proteasome Complex

Proteins that have been adequately polyubiquitinated (Ub ≥ 4) are further identified and broken down by the 26S macromolecular proteasome complex. The 26S complex consists of a 20S catalytic core particle that is capped at both ends by 19S regulatory particles [47], thus inhibitors targeting the proteasome complex are generally divided by two groups: inhibitors of 20S catalytic core particle and inhibitors of 19S regulatory particles (Figure 3 and Table 2).

3.5. Inhibitors of 20S Proteasome Catalytic core Particle

3.5.1. Bortezomib: First-in-Class Proteasome Inhibitor

Bortezomib (BTZ, Velcade®) inhibits the chymotrypsin-like activity of the proteasome by reversible binding to the β5 subunit of the 20S proteasome thus impedes all proteasomal activity and leads to accumulation of polyubiquitinated proteins in cells [98,99]. Supported by strong preclinical data, BTZ entered an early phase clinical trial in late 2001. In early-phase clinical trials BTZ was generally well tolerated and showed mild adverse events, such as moderate fever and fatigue which were generally accompanied by thrombocytopenia and peripheral neuropathy [183]. Because of the promising results from early phase clinical trials, BTZ received US FDA fast-track approval for the treatment of relapsed and refractory MM in 2003 [184]. Later, it was approved in clinical trials for relapsed mantle cell lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [185,186]. When combined with other therapeutic anticancer agents, BTZ could achieve even better clinical efficacy, thus leading to a full US FDA approval in 2005 as a second-line MM therapy [187,188], and as a first-line therapy for patients with newly diagnosed MM after only three years [189].Unfortunately, the therapeutic window of BTZ is relatively narrow and toxic side effects gradually started to appear, ranging from peripheral neuropathy, myelosuppression and cardiotoxicity. This is probably due to the accumulation of misfolded proteins in normal tissues [190,191,192]. Additionally, there is a relatively high incidence of developing an acquired resistance during treatment with BTZ. This is mainly explained by the increased mRNA and protein expression of the β5-subunit of the proteasome that mutations occur in the subunit binding of BTZ, constitutive activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway and upregulation of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) chaperone protein GRP78 and P-glycoprotein, as well as a multidrug resistance protein [193,194,195]. Thus, a second proteasome inhibitor, Carfilzomib, with the same target proteasome, has been developed and further approved by the FDA in 2012 for the treatment of multiple myeloma for patients who have shown a resistance to BTZ [196].

3.5.2. Carfilzomib: Second-in-Class Proteasome Inhibitor

Carfilzomib (CFZ, PR-171, Kyprolis®) was initially discovered by the identification of the proteasome as the major target of the natural product epoxomicin [197]. Then a library of epoxomicin analogy was set up and a lead candidate YU-101 was identified due to its potent anticancer activities [198,199]. After a structure modulation, CFZ was further developed and displayed very solid preclinical results as a proteasome inhibitor [200]. Structurally, CFZ has a different structure (tetrapeptide epoxyketone) comparing with BTZ (dipeptide boronate) [201] and it forms an irreversible, covalent bond with proteasome catalytic subunits, predominantly β5. In 2005, phase I clinical trials with CFZ began and the drug was successfully investigated in additional clinical trials [105,106]. This included phase III clinical trials where it was shown that CFZ was effective in patients with relapsed and BTZ-chemoresistant disease [202,203]. Owing to its more selective mechanisms of action, CFZ had fewer side effects as compared to BZT including less pronounced neuropathy. Of note, CFZ showed some mild cardiotoxicity but these events were generally manageable and reversible [203,204]. The drawbacks of CFZ are that the drug is poorly soluble in water, not orally available and requires a large (50-fold) excess of cyclodextrin for injectable preparations. These problems, along with the onset of chemoresistance, warrants for developing additional next-generation proteasome inhibitors which could overcome drug resistance generated from a continuous treatment of BTZ or CFZ.

3.5.3. Ixazomib: First Oral Proteasome Inhibitor Drug

Both BTZ and CFZ can only be administered via subcutaneous or intravenous injection, thus there is a need to develop orally available proteasome inhibitors. In 2015, Ixazomib (IXZ, MLN9708, Ninlaro®) received its US FDA approval as the first orally bioavailable proteasome inhibitor drug [113,114]. IXZ orally administered once a week (4 mg on days 1, 8, and 15 of 28-day cycles) in combination with lenalidomide plus dexamethasome, has now been approved in 40 countries including the USA and the EU for the treatment of MM patients who have received either BTZ or CFZ in their previous treatments [205,206]. IXZ displays an encouraging positive safety profile including no effects on the mitochondrial serine protease HtrA2/Omi which was found to be an off-target of BTZ and the main reason for BTZ-related neurophaty [113,207,208]. Giving these promising results, the effect IXZ is currently under investigation as either a single or combined therapeutic approach for a number of cancers. The results of this trial will answer the question of whether IXZ has therapeutic advantages over BTZ or CFZ especially in patients affected by MM.

3.5.4. Oprozomib: A Structural Homologue of CFZ

Oprozomib (OPZ, ONX-0912, PR-047), OPZ is a structural homologue of CFZ but more orally available. The drug is currently being investigated in several clinical trials in patients with hematological malignancies. The first promising results of these clinical trials show an overall response rate of 25% and 27.3% in patients with MM relapsed which had previously received BTZ- and CFZ-based therapy, respectively [120,121]. Of note, an Ib trial showed moderate to severe side-effects including vomiting, suggesting that the correct dosing of OPZ is crucial to avoid too high concentrations that are likely to result in proteasome inhibition in non-targeted tissues, especially tissues in the GI tract [209,210].

3.5.5. Marizomib

Marizomib (NPI-0052, Salinosporamide A) is derived from the bacteria Salinospora tropica and is currently being investigated as a novel orally available proteasome inhibitor [211]. Unlike other peptide-based proteasome inhibitors, marizomib has a β-lactone-γ-lactam bicyclic ring structure without a linear peptide backbone [126,212,213]. Surprisingly, Marizomib could irreversibly inhibit the activity of proteasomes at the nanomolar range in MM cells [214,215]. Preclinical studies conducted with Marizomib show that following intravenous administration, proteasomal activity was inhibited in various tissues but slowly recovered over time with a course of recovery depending on the tissue but generally persisting up to 72 hours in blood [215,216]. Marizomib was shown to selectively affect the cell viability of MM and Lymphocytic Leukaemia (CLL) cancer cells and have less toxicity on normal cells as compared to BTZ [215,217]. Marizomib was also effective in killing MM cells derived from patients with resistance to BTZ [124,215,218]. Clinical trials in patients with refractory or relapsed MM showed an overall response rate of 11% when marizomib was used as monotherapy [128], with the rate increasing to 53% when the drug was combined with pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone [218]. Note worthily, marizomib treatment has been associated with some central neurotoxicity and has been shown to induce apoptosis glioma cells, these effects indicating that the drug penetrates the blood–brain barrier and that its use would be worth exploring as a potential treatment for brain cancer [124,219].

3.6. Inhibitors of 19S Proteasome Regulatory Particles

Acquired drug resistance, which is common in many cancer therapies, is also a major hurdle in proteasome inhibitor-based chemotherapies. MM patients who initially respond to proteasome inhibitors targeting 20S CP almost always eventually develop a resistance. There are currently few effective treatment options left, once patients relapse with MM refractory to proteasome inhibitor-based therapy. Current studies on the mechanism of resistance to the 20S CP proteasome inhibitors has provided important guidance for the screening of novel proteasome inhibitors that can potentially overcome the resistance generated by currently available proteasome inhibitors. Inhibitors of 19S proteasome regulatory particles (Table 2), especially the deubiquitinases (DUBs), are believed to be one of the potential targets for overcoming the acquired drug resistances of proteasome 20S inhibitors, as they have different target sites sites [131,220,221]. UCHL5 (or UCH37), USP14 and POU1 (Rpn11) are the three DUBs of the 19S proteasome that have been massively investigated and targeted due to their great potency on cancer cells [132,222,223,224,225].

3.6.1. IU1

IU1, a pyrrolyl pyrrolidinyl-ethanone, is the first USP14-specific inhibitor discovered from a high-throughput assay [226]. Its structure indicates that the drug targets the thiol group in the active site cysteine in USP14 proteases. Studies further suggested that the inhibition of USP14 decreases the proliferation of breast cancer cells [129]. IU1-47, an analog of IU1, was synthesized and tested in cultured neurons. It was reported that IU1-47 was tenfold more potent than the parental IU1. It has also been reported that IU1-47 causes a degradation of wild-type tau in neurons at a significantly higher rate than IU1 due to its extra targets on lysine-174 in tau protein, which may contribute to the higher specificity and efficacy [227]. A recent study has tested IU1-47 in lung cancer and proved that the inhibition of proteasome USP14 by IU1-47 could significantly decrease cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in lung cancer [130].

3.6.2. b-AP15

b-AP15 was discovered as an inhibitor targeting both UCHL5 and USP14 in 19S proteasome regulatory particles. The α,β-unsaturated carbonyl group is thought to be directly involved in the Michael addition with the thiol in the active site cysteine [131,132]. Gene expression signatures of b-AP15 from the connectivity map database suggested that b-AP15 shared similarities with other potent proteasome inhibitors, such as BTZ. However, b-AP15 and BTZ target different subunits of proteasome, and due to the different inhibition of the proteasome, b-AP15 is able to disrupt the protect mechanism of forming aggresomes in cancer cells exposed to BTZ [228]. Additionally, the data showed that b-AP15 induced a dose-dependent aggregation of conjugated ubiquitin, suggesting inhibition of the degradation activity of the DUBs [131]. Further studies indicated that b-AP15 is an inhibitor of both USP14 and UCHL5 and has an IC50 value of 2.1 μM when using purified 19S proteasome [131]. It has been shown that b-AP15 could overcome BTZ induced resistance in MM cell lines by activating caspase to further induce apoptosis relating to an upregulation of oxidative stress [229]. In vivo studies revealed that tumor growth was blocked by b-AP15 in several human xenografts [132].

3.6.3. VLX1570

VLX1570 was developed as an analog of b-AP15 to increase the in vivo selectivity and efficacy [143]. Structurally, the α,β-unsaturated carbonyls or the Michael acceptor was not modified from b-AP15. However, the structure of VLX1570 differs in that two 4-nitrobenzylidne groups in b-AP15 were replaced by two 4-fluoro-3-nitrobenzylidene groups in VLX1570, thus the electron-withdrawing property on the side aryls is enhanced. Results suggested an increased inhibition of USP14 by VLX1570 compared with b-AP15. Adversely, the competitive binding assay using Ub-VS showed that the analog displayed a greater specificity to USP14 rather than UCHL5 compared with b-AP15 [143]. In vivo studies on MM cells revealed that VLX1570 was more effective than b-AP15 in inhibiting tumor progression in mice [142]. As there is a strong outcome of VLX1570 in xenograft models, VLX1570 was then promoted to clinical trials.

3.6.4. RA-9

RA-9 is another compound with a structure very similar to b-AP15. RA-9 belongs to the family of chalcone-based derivatives with α,β-unsaturated carbonyls that are thought to react with the sulfurs in the active site cysteine [230,231,232]. RA-9 was shown to have inhibitory properties for proteasome-associated DUBs. There was a dose-dependent relationship found in a Ub-AMC assay of 19S DUBs treated with RA-9, which supports the proposed specificity by the authors [233]. Moreover, RA-9 was reported to selectively induce apoptosis in primary cultures from donors. Loss of cell viability following RA-9 exposure was associated with an unfolded protein response in ovarian cancers. In vivo treatment with RA-9 retards tumor growth, increases overall survival, and was well tolerated by the host [233].

3.6.5. WP1130

WP1130 is described as a small molecule activating a novel Bcr/Abl destruction pathway further inducing the apoptosis of chronic myelogenous leukemia, which leads to aggresome formation. It was found that WP1130 can directly inhibit USP9X as well as DUBs of UCHL5, and USP14. As USP9X inhibition has been linked to apoptosis and prevention of drug resistance in malignancies through Mcl-1 degradation, WP1130 is thought to target a Bcr-Abl-/Mcl-1-specific pathway as a USP inhibitor, suggesting a capacity for cancer treatment [148,149]. The inhibition of deubiquitinases by the compound WP1130 has further been reported to inhibit ULK1 activity and block the autophagic flux [234].

3.6.6. RA190

RA190 is an orally available bis-benzylidine piperidone derivative that inhibits the proteasome functions by covalently binding to cysteine 88 of ubiquitin receptor RPN13 in the 19S regulatory particle [235]. Biophysical analyses in combination with cell-based assays indicate that RA190 directly binds and inactivates Uch37 [236]. This compound can trigger the rapid accumulation of polyubiquitinated proteins followed by proteotoxic stress and apoptosis in cancer cells [235]. RA190 was originally described to be effective even in MM cells resistant to BTZ and has been preclinically tested in several cancer models including MM, ovarian, cervical and gastric cancers either alone or in combination with other chemotherapy agents [237,238,239,240,241].

3.6.7. Ortho-Phenanthroline (OPA)

1,10-Phenanthroline, also known as OPA, is a zinc ion chelator [155]. While USPs and UCHs mostly do not contain an incorporated metal, Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase RPN11 does have a zinc-bound active site. It has been reported that OPA inhibits the activity of purified RPN11 [156]. Furthermore, it was shown that OPA does not affect proteasome activity when added to proteasome harboring RPN11-mutated extract compared with unmodified extract, which further supports that OPA specifically targets RPN11 [156]. Research on the efficacy of OPA as a potential cancer treatment has been started in MM. Studies indicate that OPA’s metallopeptidase inhibition activity is linked to apoptosis in myeloma cell lines including cell lines, which were BTZ resistant [157].

3.6.8. Quinoline-8-Thiol/Capzimin

Quinoline-8-thiol (8TQ) is a first-in-class inhibitor with a strong inhibition specificity to RPN11 of 19S proteasome subunit. A fragment-based drug discovery approach was instrumental in the identification of the RPN11 inhibitor. Studies describe that slight modifications to 8TQ may increase its inhibition activity. 8TQ and its analogs are proposed to chelate the zinc ion bound to the active site of RPN11. 8TQ has been proposed as a possible novel treatment for MM and other cancers. 8TQ and its associated compounds were shown to be potent apoptosis inducers in MM cells. After the development of analogs of 8TQ, a derivative named ‘capzimin’ was selected for further investigation. Capzimin was shown to have more than fivefold selectivity for the metalloprotein RPN11. Capzimin stabilized proteasome substrates, induced an unfolded protein response, and reduced the proliferation rate of cancer cells, including those resistant to bortezomib. Proteomic analysis revealed that capzimin stabilized a subset of polyubiquitinated substrates. The identification of capzimin offers an alternative path to develop proteasome inhibitors for cancer therapy [162].

3.6.9. Thiolutin

Thiolutin (THL) was originally discovered as an antibiotic that is able to inhibit bacterial and fungal RNA polymerases [242,243,244]. The latest data have indicated that the reduced form of THL is an inhibitor of JAB1/MPN/Mov34 (JAMM) domain-containing metalloprotease RPN11 by chelating Zn2+-ions, which are specifically toxic to cancer cells by hampering protein turnover and inducing ubiquitylation [163]. As with 8TQ, a reduced form of thiolutin harbors a totally different chemical structure and targets distinct components of the UPS which merits further investigation of the mechanism underlying and provides up-and-coming orientations of overcoming the obstacle of drug resistance to BTZ in cancer therapies.

4. Targeting the Ubiquitin–Proteasome System (UPS) and Immune System in Cancer Therapies

Cells in the immune system express an inducible form of the proteasome called the immunoproteasome [245] which has different compositions of proteasome 20S core compared with the constitutive proteasome complex described above (Figure 4). In immunoproteasome, β5 (PSMB5), β1 (PSMB6), and β2 (PSMB7) of the constitutive proteasome complex are replaced by their respective inducible counterparts β5i (LMP7) β1i (LMP2), and β2i (MECL-1), under inflammatory conditions and certain pathological states including cancer [246]. It has been reported that immunoproteasomes are more efficient than constitutive particles in degrading polyubiquitinated proteins and are essential for removing damaged proteins in inflammatory states because they can efficiently digest misfolded proteins that form aggresome-like protein conjugates [247]. Several studies [248,249,250] have revealed that the expression level of immunoproteasome is much higher compared with that of constitutive subunits in B-cell malignancies, indicating the importance of the immunoproteasome in the regulation of protein homeostasis of hematologic diseases [251] and suggesting that targeting the function of immunoproteasomes could be a possible strategy for the treatment of cancer.
Another reason for targeting the immunoproteasomes in the cancer setting is because of its essential role in acquired resistance to bortezomib. The clinical impact of acquired resistance has been demonstrated in poor responses of MM patients who were re-treated with bortezomib [252]. To understand the underlying possible mechanisms of bortezomib resistance, in vitro cell line models of hematologic malignancies have been developed in which acquired resistance to bortezomib was developed by chronic exposure to gradually increasing bortezomib concentrations [193,253]. These bortezomib-resistant cell lines displayed a cross-resistance to other proteasome inhibitors that target constitutive proteasome subunit β5 (PSMB5) of the proteasome. Furthermore, these bortezomib-resistant cell lines were characterized by an increased expression of the constitutive proteasome subunit β5 (PSMB5) harboring mutations in the bortezomib-binding pocket, along with a decreased expression of non-mutated immunoproteasome subunits [193]. Original studies showed that inflammatory cytokines such as IFN-γ and TNFα were efficient inducers of immunoproteasomes in MM cell lines [254]. Functional studies indicated that exposure to interferon-γ (IFN-γ) enhanced bortezomib-sensitivity in B-cell lines by 50% [255]. From a therapeutic perspective, this could indicate that modulating the expression balance of immunoproteasomes and constitutive proteasomes could re-confer the sensitivity of cancer cells to bortezomib or develop the next generation of immunoproteasomes inhibitors, a strategy for the treatment of cancer (Table 3).

4.1. Non-Selective Inhibitors of Immunoproteasome

Most inhibitors of the constitutive proteasomes, such as the 20S CP inhibitors Bortezomib, Carfilzomib and Ixazomib are non-selective immunoproteasome inhibitors [256]. For example, the inhibitory activity of Bortezomib against proteasome β5c is IC50 7nM and against immunoproteasome β5i is IC50 3.3nM [257]. Unfortunately, resistance to 20S CP inhibitors is common and is characterized by an upregulated expression of the constitutive proteasome subunit β5 (PSMB5). Therefore, more specific immunoproteasome inhibitors are needed to provide therapeutic opportunities when resistance to proteasome inhibitors occurs.

4.2. Selective Inhibitors of Immunoproteasome

4.2.1. ONX-0914

ONX-0914 (also called PR957) is the first epoxyketone-based peptidyl immunoproteasome-selective inhibitor. ONX-0914 displayed a higher inhibitory activity towards immunoproteasome β5i (IC50 5.7 nM) as compared to the constitutive proteasome β5c subunit (IC50 54 nM) [258]. ONX-0914 has been proven to be effective in the treatment of inflammatory disorders by specifically targeting immunoproteasome [164,259]. This indicates a therapeutic potential for anticancer therapies where the activity of immunoproteasome is upregulated.

4.2.2. PR-924

PR-924 is another tripeptide epoxyketone immunoproteasome β5i-selective inhibitor. As compared to ONX-0914, PR-924 displayed a much stronger inhibitory activity towards immunoproteasome (IC50 2.5 nM) compared to the constitutive proteasome β5c subunit (IC50 227 nM) [256]. PR-924 was shown to inhibit the growth of multiple myeloma cells in vitro and in vivo with no significant side effects on normal peripheral blood mononuclear cells [167]. A further study also demonstrated that PR-924 is effective in killing bortezomib-resistant leukemia cells [166]. This indicates a therapeutic opportunity when bortezomib-resistance occurs.

4.2.3. KZR-616

KZR-616 is the third tripeptide epoxyketone immunoproteasome-selective inhibitor developed based on the optimization of the inhibitors ONX-0914 and PR-924. KZR-616 is currently the only immunoproteasome-selective inhibitor that was approved by the FDA and tested in clinic [168]. It is worth noting that the derivatives of KZR-616 also display an improved inhibitory activity towards the β1i subunit of immunoproteasome, with an IC50 0.425 nM towards β1i, but an IC50 > 250 nM towards β1c (β5c/β5i > 602) [256].

5. Concluding Remarks

The Ubiquitin–Proteasome System (UPS) plays an important role in cancer initiation and progression as well as in the onset of chemoresistance. This makes the UPS an attractive, albeit complex, molecular target for cancer treatment. A number of small-molecule inhibitors of various components of the UPS have been successfully used in a clinical setting as anti-cancer agents, including as a first line of treatment. However, a number of challenges remain when developing cancer drugs targeting the UPS. These include (a) drug resistance acquired after the continuous treatment of proteasome inhibitors, (b) limited efficacy in the treatment of solid tumors, and (c) the yet to be determined clinical efficacy of immunoproteasome inhibitors for the treatment of human cancers. Despite these challenges, the current literature indicates that the development of anticancer drugs that target single or multiple components of the UPS for cancer treatment is worth further exploration.

Author Contributions

Conception and literature review: X.Z., S.L. and M.B. Writing of the manuscript: X.Z. and M.B. All authors have read and agree to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Department of Defense Ovarian Cancer Research Program Grant OC160377, the Minnesota Ovarian Cancer Alliance, the Randy Shaver Cancer Research Funds and the NIH grant 1R01GM130800-01A1 to Martina Bazzaro. The funders had no role in the decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We thank Mihir Shetty for the critical reading of this review.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

References

  1. Schubert, U.; Anton, L.C.; Gibbs, J.; Norbury, C.C.; Yewdell, J.W.; Bennink, J.R. Rapid degradation of a large fraction of newly synthesized proteins by proteasomes. Nature 2000, 404, 770–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ciechanover, A.; Orian, A.; Schwartz, A.L. The ubiquitin-mediated proteolytic pathway: Mode of action and clinical implications. J. Cell. Biochem. Suppl. 2000, 34, 40–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ciechanover, A. The ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway. Cell 1994, 79, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Goldberg, A.L.; Akopian, T.N.; Kisselev, A.F.; Lee, D.H.; Rohrwild, M. New insights into the mechanisms and importance of the proteasome in intracellular protein degradation. Biol. Chem. 1997, 378, 131–140. [Google Scholar]
  5. Mocciaro, A.; Rape, M. Emerging regulatory mechanisms in ubiquitin-dependent cell cycle control. J. Cell. Sci. 2012, 125, 255–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Liu, C.H.; Goldberg, A.L.; Qiu, X.B. New insights into the role of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway in the regulation of apoptosis. Chang Gung Med. J. 2007, 30, 469–479. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Orlowski, R.Z. The role of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway in apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 1999, 6, 303–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Boutillier, A.L.; Kienlen-Campard, P.; Loeffler, J.P. Depolarization regulates cyclin D1 degradation and neuronal apoptosis: A hypothesis about the role of the ubiquitin/proteasome signalling pathway. Eur. J. Neurosci. 1999, 11, 441–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Daulny, A.; Tansey, W.P. Damage control: DNA repair, transcription, and the ubiquitin-proteasome system. DNA Repair (Amst) 2009, 8, 444–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Strous, G.J.; Govers, R. The ubiquitin-proteasome system and endocytosis. J. Cell. Sci. 1999, 112, 1417–1423. [Google Scholar]
  11. Rahimi, N. The ubiquitin-proteasome system meets angiogenesis. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2012, 11, 538–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Okamoto, Y.; Ozaki, T.; Miyazaki, K.; Aoyama, M.; Miyazaki, M.; Nakagawara, A. UbcH10 is the cancer-related E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme. Cancer Res. 2003, 63, 4167–4173. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Pickart, C.M.; Eddins, M.J. Ubiquitin: Structures, functions, mechanisms. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2004, 1695, 55–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Hershko, A.; Heller, H.; Elias, S.; Ciechanover, A. Components of ubiquitin-protein ligase system. Resolution, affinity purification, and role in protein breakdown. J. Biol. Chem. 1983, 258, 8206–8214. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Kirkpatrick, D.S.; Hathaway, N.A.; Hanna, J.; Elsasser, S.; Rush, J.; Finley, D.; King, R.W.; Gygi, S.P. Quantitative analysis of in vitro ubiquitinated cyclin B1 reveals complex chain topology. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006, 8, 700–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hershko, A. Mechanisms and regulation of the degradation of cyclin B. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1999, 354, 1571–1575, discussion 1575–1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Manohar, S.; Jacob, S.; Wang, J.; Wiechecki, K.A.; Koh, H.W.L.; Simoes, V.; Choi, H.; Vogel, C.; Silva, G.M. Polyubiquitin Chains Linked by Lysine Residue 48 (K48) Selectively Target Oxidized Proteins In Vivo. Antioxid. Redox. Signal. 2019, 31, 1133–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Mirzaei, H.; Rogers, R.S.; Grimes, B.; Eng, J.; Aderem, A.; Aebersold, R. Characterizing the connectivity of poly-ubiquitin chains by selected reaction monitoring mass spectrometry. Mol. Biosyst. 2010, 6, 2004–2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Sorokin, A.V.; Selyutina, A.A.; Skabkin, M.A.; Guryanov, S.G.; Nazimov, I.V.; Richard, C.; Th’ng, J.; Yau, J.; Sorensen, P.H.; Ovchinnikov, L.P.; et al. Proteasome-mediated cleavage of the Y-box-binding protein 1 is linked to DNA-damage stress response. EMBO J. 2005, 24, 3602–3612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Didier, D.K.; Schiffenbauer, J.; Woulfe, S.L.; Zacheis, M.; Schwartz, B.D. Characterization of the cDNA encoding a protein binding to the major histocompatibility complex class II Y box. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1988, 85, 7322–7326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Alberti, C.; Pinciroli, P.; Valeri, B.; Ferri, R.; Ditto, A.; Umezawa, K.; Sensi, M.; Canevari, S.; Tomassetti, A. Ligand-dependent EGFR activation induces the co-expression of IL-6 and PAI-1 via the NFkB pathway in advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer. Oncogene 2012, 31, 4139–4149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Seitz, C.S.; Freiberg, R.A.; Hinata, K.; Khavari, P.A. NF-kappaB determines localization and features of cell death in epidermis. J. Clin. Invest. 2000, 105, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Moorthy, A.K.; Savinova, O.V.; Ho, J.Q.; Wang, V.Y.; Vu, D.; Ghosh, G. The 20S proteasome processes NF-kappaB1 p105 into p50 in a translation-independent manner. EMBO J. 2006, 25, 1945–1956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Taylor, A. Aminopeptidases: Structure and function. FASEB J. 1993, 7, 290–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Saric, T.; Graef, C.I.; Goldberg, A.L. Pathway for degradation of peptides generated by proteasomes: A key role for thimet oligopeptidase and other metallopeptidases. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 46723–46732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Matsui, M.; Fowler, J.H.; Walling, L.L. Leucine aminopeptidases: Diversity in structure and function. Biol. Chem. 2006, 387, 1535–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lowther, W.T.; Matthews, B.W. Structure and function of the methionine aminopeptidases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2000, 1477, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Botbol, V.; Scornik, O.A. Measurement of instant rates of protein degradation in the livers of intact mice by the accumulation of bestatin-induced peptides. J. Biol. Chem. 1991, 266, 2151–2157. [Google Scholar]
  29. Groll, M.; Ditzel, L.; Lowe, J.; Stock, D.; Bochtler, M.; Bartunik, H.D.; Huber, R. Structure of 20S proteasome from yeast at 2.4 A resolution. Nature 1997, 386, 463–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Glickman, M.H.; Rubin, D.M.; Coux, O.; Wefes, I.; Pfeifer, G.; Cjeka, Z.; Baumeister, W.; Fried, V.A.; Finley, D. A subcomplex of the proteasome regulatory particle required for ubiquitin-conjugate degradation and related to the COP9-signalosome and eIF3. Cell 1998, 94, 615–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Ciechanover, A. Proteolysis: From the lysosome to ubiquitin and the proteasome. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005, 6, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Orlowski, M.; Wilk, S. Catalytic activities of the 20 S proteasome, a multicatalytic proteinase complex. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2000, 383, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Schulman, B.A.; Harper, J.W. Ubiquitin-like protein activation by E1 enzymes: The apex for downstream signalling pathways. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 10, 319–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Jin, J.; Li, X.; Gygi, S.P.; Harper, J.W. Dual E1 activation systems for ubiquitin differentially regulate E2 enzyme charging. Nature 2007, 447, 1135–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Mani, A.; Gelmann, E.P. The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway and its role in cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2005, 23, 4776–4789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Scheffner, M.; Nuber, U.; Huibregtse, J.M. Protein ubiquitination involving an E1-E2-E3 enzyme ubiquitin thioester cascade. Nature 1995, 373, 81–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Huibregtse, J.M.; Scheffner, M.; Beaudenon, S.; Howley, P.M. A family of proteins structurally and functionally related to the E6-AP ubiquitin-protein ligase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 2563–2567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Wenzel, D.M.; Lissounov, A.; Brzovic, P.S.; Klevit, R.E. UBCH7 reactivity profile reveals parkin and HHARI to be RING/HECT hybrids. Nature 2011, 474, 105–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Voges, D.; Zwickl, P.; Baumeister, W. The 26S proteasome: A molecular machine designed for controlled proteolysis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1999, 68, 1015–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hershko, A.; Ciechanover, A. The ubiquitin system. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1998, 67, 425–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gilon, T.; Chomsky, O.; Kulka, R.G. Degradation signals for ubiquitin system proteolysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 1998, 17, 2759–2766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Haglund, K.; Dikic, I. Ubiquitylation and cell signaling. EMBO J. 2005, 24, 3353–3359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Xu, P.; Duong, D.M.; Seyfried, N.T.; Cheng, D.; Xie, Y.; Robert, J.; Rush, J.; Hochstrasser, M.; Finley, D.; Peng, J. Quantitative proteomics reveals the function of unconventional ubiquitin chains in proteasomal degradation. Cell 2009, 137, 133–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Amerik, A.Y.; Hochstrasser, M. Mechanism and function of deubiquitinating enzymes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2004, 1695, 189–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Nijman, S.M.; Luna-Vargas, M.P.; Velds, A.; Brummelkamp, T.R.; Dirac, A.M.; Sixma, T.K.; Bernards, R. A genomic and functional inventory of deubiquitinating enzymes. Cell 2005, 123, 773–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. D’Arcy, P.; Linder, S. Molecular pathways: Translational potential of deubiquitinases as drug targets. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014, 20, 3908–3914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Gallastegui, N.; Groll, M. The 26S proteasome: Assembly and function of a destructive machine. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2010, 35, 634–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Pickart, C.M.; Cohen, R.E. Proteasomes and their kin: Proteases in the machine age. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2004, 5, 177–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Xie, P.; Fan, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Y.; She, M.; Gu, D.; Patterson, C.; Li, H. CHIP represses myocardin-induced smooth muscle cell differentiation via ubiquitin-mediated proteasomal degradation. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 29, 2398–2408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Dalla Via, L.; Nardon, C.; Fregona, D. Targeting the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway with inorganic compounds to fight cancer: A challenge for the future. Future Med. Chem. 2012, 4, 525–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tam, S.W.; Theodoras, A.M.; Pagano, M. Kip1 degradation via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Leukemia 1997, 363–366. [Google Scholar]
  52. Nakayama, K.I.; Nakayama, K. Ubiquitin ligases: Cell-cycle control and cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2006, 6, 369–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Oren, M.; Damalas, A.; Gottlieb, T.; Michael, D.; Taplick, J.; Leal, J.F.; Maya, R.; Moas, M.; Seger, R.; Taya, Y.; et al. Regulation of p53: Intricate loops and delicate balances. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2002, 973, 374–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Bouska, A.; Lushnikova, T.; Plaza, S.; Eischen, C.M. Mdm2 promotes genetic instability and transformation independent of p53. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 28, 4862–4874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Crusio, K.M.; King, B.; Reavie, L.B.; Aifantis, I. The ubiquitous nature of cancer: The role of the SCF(Fbw7) complex in development and transformation. Oncogene 2010, 29, 4865–4873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Mao, J.H.; Kim, I.J.; Wu, D.; Climent, J.; Kang, H.C.; DelRosario, R.; Balmain, A. FBXW7 targets mTOR for degradation and cooperates with PTEN in tumor suppression. Science 2008, 321, 1499–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Levin, A.; Minis, A.; Lalazar, G.; Rodriguez, J.; Steller, H. PSMD5 Inactivation Promotes 26S Proteasome Assembly during Colorectal Tumor Progression. Cancer Res. 2018, 78, 3458–3468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Benard, G.; Bellance, N.; Jose, C.; Melser, S.; Nouette-Gaulain, K.; Rossignol, R. Multi-site control and regulation of mitochondrial energy production. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2010, 1797, 698–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Burchell, V.S.; Nelson, D.E.; Sanchez-Martinez, A.; Delgado-Camprubi, M.; Ivatt, R.M.; Pogson, J.H.; Randle, S.J.; Wray, S.; Lewis, P.A.; Houlden, H.; et al. The Parkinson’s disease-linked proteins Fbxo7 and Parkin interact to mediate mitophagy. Nat. Neurosci. 2013, 16, 1257–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Guan, K.; Zheng, Z.; Song, T.; He, X.; Xu, C.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, S.; Wang, Y.; Xu, Q.; Cao, Y.; et al. MAVS regulates apoptotic cell death by decreasing K48-linked ubiquitination of voltage-dependent anion channel 1. Mol. Cell Biol. 2013, 33, 3137–3149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Karbowski, M.; Youle, R.J. Regulating mitochondrial outer membrane proteins by ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. Curr. Opin Cell Biol. 2011, 23, 476–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Nakamura, N.; Kimura, Y.; Tokuda, M.; Honda, S.; Hirose, S. MARCH-V is a novel mitofusin 2- and Drp1-binding protein able to change mitochondrial morphology. EMBO Rep. 2006, 7, 1019–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Lavie, J.; De Belvalet, H.; Sonon, S.; Ion, A.M.; Dumon, E.; Melser, S.; Lacombe, D.; Dupuy, J.W.; Lalou, C.; Benard, G. Ubiquitin-Dependent Degradation of Mitochondrial Proteins Regulates Energy Metabolism. Cell Rep. 2018, 23, 2852–2863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Courage, C.; Jackson, C.B.; Hahn, D.; Euro, L.; Nuoffer, J.M.; Gallati, S.; Schaller, A. SDHA mutation with dominant transmission results in complex II deficiency with ocular, cardiac, and neurologic involvement. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2017, 173, 225–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Mooneyham, A.; Bazzaro, M. Targeting Deubiquitinating Enzymes and Autophagy in Cancer. Methods Mol. Biol. 2017, 1513, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  66. Vogel, R.I.; Coughlin, K.; Scotti, A.; Iizuka, Y.; Anchoori, R.; Roden, R.B.; Marastoni, M.; Bazzaro, M. Simultaneous inhibition of deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs) and autophagy synergistically kills breast cancer cells. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 4159–4170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Vogel, R.I.; Pulver, T.; Heilmann, W.; Mooneyham, A.; Mullany, S.; Zhao, X.; Shahi, M.; Richter, J.; Klein, M.; Chen, L.; et al. USP14 is a predictor of recurrence in endometrial cancer and a molecular target for endometrial cancer treatment. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 30962–30976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Bazzaro, M.; Lee, M.K.; Zoso, A.; Stirling, W.L.; Santillan, A.; Shih Ie, M.; Roden, R.B. Ubiquitin-proteasome system stress sensitizes ovarian cancer to proteasome inhibitor-induced apoptosis. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 3754–3763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Bazzaro, M.; Lin, Z.; Santillan, A.; Lee, M.K.; Wang, M.C.; Chan, K.C.; Bristow, R.E.; Mazitschek, R.; Bradner, J.; Roden, R.B. Ubiquitin proteasome system stress underlies synergistic killing of ovarian cancer cells by bortezomib and a novel HDAC6 inhibitor. Clin. Cancer Res. 2008, 14, 7340–7347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Njomen, E.; Tepe, J.J. Regulation of Autophagic Flux by the 20S Proteasome. Cell Chem. Biol. 2019, 26, 1283–1294 e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Aiken, C.T.; Kaake, R.M.; Wang, X.; Huang, L. Oxidative stress-mediated regulation of proteasome complexes. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2011, 10, R110 006924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Goldberg, A.L. Protein degradation and protection against misfolded or damaged proteins. Nature 2003, 426, 895–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Maharjan, S.; Oku, M.; Tsuda, M.; Hoseki, J.; Sakai, Y. Mitochondrial impairment triggers cytosolic oxidative stress and cell death following proteasome inhibition. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 5896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Zhang, X.; Espinosa, B.; Saei, A.A.; D’Arcy, P.; Zubarev, R.A.; Linder, S. Oxidative Stress Induced by the Deubiquitinase Inhibitor b-AP15 Is Associated with Mitochondrial Impairment. Oxid Med. Cell Longev. 2019, 2019, 1659468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Reinheckel, T.; Ullrich, O.; Sitte, N.; Grune, T. Differential impairment of 20S and 26S proteasome activities in human hematopoietic K562 cells during oxidative stress. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2000, 377, 65–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Davies, K.J.; Goldberg, A.L. Oxygen radicals stimulate intracellular proteolysis and lipid peroxidation by independent mechanisms in erythrocytes. J. Biol. Chem. 1987, 262, 8220–8226. [Google Scholar]
  77. Livnat-Levanon, N.; Kevei, E.; Kleifeld, O.; Krutauz, D.; Segref, A.; Rinaldi, T.; Erpapazoglou, Z.; Cohen, M.; Reis, N.; Hoppe, T.; et al. Reversible 26S proteasome disassembly upon mitochondrial stress. Cell Rep. 2014, 7, 1371–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Magiera, M.M.; Mora, S.; Mojsa, B.; Robbins, I.; Lassot, I.; Desagher, S. Trim17-mediated ubiquitination and degradation of Mcl-1 initiate apoptosis in neurons. Cell Death Differ. 2013, 20, 281–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Ren, H.; Koo, J.; Guan, B.; Yue, P.; Deng, X.; Chen, M.; Khuri, F.R.; Sun, S.Y. The E3 ubiquitin ligases beta-TrCP and FBXW7 cooperatively mediates GSK3-dependent Mcl-1 degradation induced by the Akt inhibitor API-1, resulting in apoptosis. Mol. Cancer 2013, 12, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Czabotar, P.E.; Lee, E.F.; van Delft, M.F.; Day, C.L.; Smith, B.J.; Huang, D.C.; Fairlie, W.D.; Hinds, M.G.; Colman, P.M. Structural insights into the degradation of Mcl-1 induced by BH3 domains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 6217–6222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Cory, S.; Adams, J.M. The Bcl2 family: Regulators of the cellular life-or-death switch. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2002, 2, 647–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Puthalakath, H.; Strasser, A. Keeping killers on a tight leash: Transcriptional and post-translational control of the pro-apoptotic activity of BH3-only proteins. Cell Death Differ. 2002, 9, 505–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Ley, R.; Ewings, K.E.; Hadfield, K.; Howes, E.; Balmanno, K.; Cook, S.J. Extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 are serum-stimulated “Bim(EL) kinases” that bind to the BH3-only protein Bim(EL) causing its phosphorylation and turnover. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 8837–8847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Ley, R.; Balmanno, K.; Hadfield, K.; Weston, C.; Cook, S.J. Activation of the ERK1/2 signaling pathway promotes phosphorylation and proteasome-dependent degradation of the BH3-only protein, Bim. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 18811–18816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. O’Donnell, M.A.; Legarda-Addison, D.; Skountzos, P.; Yeh, W.C.; Ting, A.T. Ubiquitination of RIP1 regulates an NF-kappaB-independent cell-death switch in TNF signaling. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17, 418–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Yang, Y.; Kitagaki, J.; Dai, R.M.; Tsai, Y.C.; Lorick, K.L.; Ludwig, R.L.; Pierre, S.A.; Jensen, J.P.; Davydov, I.V.; Oberoi, P.; et al. Inhibitors of ubiquitin-activating enzyme (E1), a new class of potential cancer therapeutics. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 9472–9481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. You, X.; Xu, D.D.; Zhang, D.; Chen, J.; Gao, F.G. PYR-41 and Thalidomide Impair Dendritic Cell Cross-Presentation by Inhibiting Myddosome Formation and Attenuating the Endosomal Recruitments of p97 and Sec61 via NF-kappaB Inactivation. J. Immunol. Res. 2018, 2018, 5070573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Matsuo, S.; Sharma, A.; Wang, P.; Yang, W.L. PYR-41, A Ubiquitin-Activating Enzyme E1 Inhibitor, Attenuates Lung Injury in Sepsis. Shock 2018, 49, 442–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Soucy, T.A.; Smith, P.G.; Milhollen, M.A.; Berger, A.J.; Gavin, J.M.; Adhikari, S.; Brownell, J.E.; Burke, K.E.; Cardin, D.P.; Critchley, S.; et al. An inhibitor of NEDD8-activating enzyme as a new approach to treat cancer. Nature 2009, 458, 732–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Assumpcao, A.; Lu, Z.; Marlowe, K.W.; Shaffer, K.S.; Pan, X. Targeting NEDD8-activating enzyme is a new approach to treat canine diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Vet. Comp. Oncol. 2018, 16, 606–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Luo, Z.; Pan, Y.; Jeong, L.S.; Liu, J.; Jia, L. Inactivation of the Cullin (CUL)-RING E3 ligase by the NEDD8-activating enzyme inhibitor MLN4924 triggers protective autophagy in cancer cells. Autophagy 2012, 8, 1677–1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Nawrocki, S.T.; Griffin, P.; Kelly, K.R.; Carew, J.S. MLN4924: A novel first-in-class inhibitor of NEDD8-activating enzyme for cancer therapy. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2012, 21, 1563–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Luo, Z.; Yu, G.; Lee, H.W.; Li, L.; Wang, L.; Yang, D.; Pan, Y.; Ding, C.; Qian, J.; Wu, L.; et al. The Nedd8-activating enzyme inhibitor MLN4924 induces autophagy and apoptosis to suppress liver cancer cell growth. Cancer Res. 2012, 72, 3360–3371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Lin, J.J.; Milhollen, M.A.; Smith, P.G.; Narayanan, U.; Dutta, A. NEDD8-targeting drug MLN4924 elicits DNA rereplication by stabilizing Cdt1 in S phase, triggering checkpoint activation, apoptosis, and senescence in cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2010, 70, 10310–10320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Yao, W.T.; Wu, J.F.; Yu, G.Y.; Wang, R.; Wang, K.; Li, L.H.; Chen, P.; Jiang, Y.N.; Cheng, H.; Lee, H.W.; et al. Suppression of tumor angiogenesis by targeting the protein neddylation pathway. Cell Death Dis. 2014, 5, e1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Sarantopoulos, J.; Shapiro, G.I.; Cohen, R.B.; Clark, J.W.; Kauh, J.S.; Weiss, G.J.; Cleary, J.M.; Mahalingam, D.; Pickard, M.D.; Faessel, H.M.; et al. Phase I Study of the Investigational NEDD8-Activating Enzyme Inhibitor Pevonedistat (TAK-924/MLN4924) in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016, 22, 847–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Tong, S.; Si, Y.; Yu, H.; Zhang, L.; Xie, P.; Jiang, W. MLN4924 (Pevonedistat), a protein neddylation inhibitor, suppresses proliferation and migration of human clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 5599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Hideshima, T.; Richardson, P.; Chauhan, D.; Palombella, V.J.; Elliott, P.J.; Adams, J.; Anderson, K.C. The proteasome inhibitor PS-341 inhibits growth, induces apoptosis, and overcomes drug resistance in human multiple myeloma cells. Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 3071–3076. [Google Scholar]
  99. Adams, J. The development of proteasome inhibitors as anticancer drugs. Cancer Cell 2004, 5, 417–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Martin, P.; Ruan, J.; Furman, R.; Rutherford, S.; Allan, J.; Chen, Z.; Huang, X.; DiLiberto, M.; Chen-Kiang, S.; Leonard, J.P. A phase I trial of palbociclib plus bortezomib in previously treated mantle cell lymphoma. Leuk. Lymphoma 2019, 60, 2917–2921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Tomlinson, B.K.; Tuscano, J.M.; Abedi, M.; Welborn, J.; Arora, M.; O’Donnell, R.T.; Wun, T.; Jonas, B.A. A phase II study of bortezomib in combination with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for acute myeloid leukemia. Am. J. Hematol. 2019, 94, E291–E294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Fadlallah, J.; Michel, M.; Crickx, E.; Limal, N.; Costedoat, N.; Malphettes, M.; Fieschi, C.; Galicier, L.; Oksenhendler, E.; Godeau, B.; et al. Bortezomib and dexamethasone, an original approach for treating multi-refractory warm autoimmune haemolytic anaemia. Br. J. Haematol. 2019, 187, 124–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Drilon, A.; Schoenfeld, A.J.; Arbour, K.C.; Litvak, A.; Ni, A.; Montecalvo, J.; Yu, H.A.; Panora, E.; Ahn, L.; Kennedy, M.; et al. Exceptional responders with invasive mucinous adenocarcinomas: A phase 2 trial of bortezomib in patients with KRAS G12D-mutant lung cancers. Cold Spring Harb Mol. Case Stud. 2019, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Huang, I.T.; Dhungel, B.; Shrestha, R.; Bridle, K.R.; Crawford, D.H.G.; Jayachandran, A.; Steel, J.C. Spotlight on Bortezomib: Potential in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2019, 28, 7–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. O’Connor, O.A.; Stewart, A.K.; Vallone, M.; Molineaux, C.J.; Kunkel, L.A.; Gerecitano, J.F.; Orlowski, R.Z. A phase 1 dose escalation study of the safety and pharmacokinetics of the novel proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib (PR-171) in patients with hematologic malignancies. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009, 15, 7085–7091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Alsina, M.; Trudel, S.; Furman, R.R.; Rosen, P.J.; O’Connor, O.A.; Comenzo, R.L.; Wong, A.; Kunkel, L.A.; Molineaux, C.J.; Goy, A. A phase I single-agent study of twice-weekly consecutive-day dosing of the proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma or lymphoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2012, 18, 4830–4840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Gu, J.J.; Hernandez-Ilizaliturri, F.J.; Kaufman, G.P.; Czuczman, N.M.; Mavis, C.; Skitzki, J.J.; Czuczman, M.S. The novel proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib induces cell cycle arrest, apoptosis and potentiates the anti-tumour activity of chemotherapy in rituximab-resistant lymphoma. Br. J. Haematol. 2013, 162, 657–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Gupta, S.V.; Hertlein, E.; Lu, Y.; Sass, E.J.; Lapalombella, R.; Chen, T.L.; Davis, M.E.; Woyach, J.A.; Lehman, A.; Jarjoura, D.; et al. The proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib functions independently of p53 to induce cytotoxicity and an atypical NF-kappaB response in chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013, 19, 2406–2419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Mehta, A.; Zhang, L.; Boufraqech, M.; Zhang, Y.; Patel, D.; Shen, M.; Kebebew, E. Carfilzomib is an effective anticancer agent in anaplastic thyroid cancer. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2015, 22, 319–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Hasanov, E.; Tidwell, R.S.S.; Fernandez, P.; Park, L.; McMichael, C.; Tannir, N.M.; Jonasch, E. Phase II Study of Carfilzomib in Patients With Refractory Renal Cell Carcinoma. Clin. Genitourin. Cancer 2019, 17, 451–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Arnold, S.M.; Chansky, K.; Leggas, M.; Thompson, M.A.; Villano, J.L.; Hamm, J.; Sanborn, R.E.; Weiss, G.J.; Chatta, G.; Baggstrom, M.Q. Phase 1b trial of proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib with irinotecan in lung cancer and other irinotecan-sensitive malignancies that have progressed on prior therapy (Onyx IST reference number: CAR-IST-553). Invest. New Drugs 2017, 35, 608–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Wang, X.; Ibrahim, Y.F.; Das, D.; Zungu-Edmondson, M.; Shults, N.V.; Suzuki, Y.J. Carfilzomib reverses pulmonary arterial hypertension. Cardiovasc. Res. 2016, 110, 188–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Chauhan, D.; Tian, Z.; Zhou, B.; Kuhn, D.; Orlowski, R.; Raje, N.; Richardson, P.; Anderson, K.C. In vitro and in vivo selective antitumor activity of a novel orally bioavailable proteasome inhibitor MLN9708 against multiple myeloma cells. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011, 17, 5311–5321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Kupperman, E.; Lee, E.C.; Cao, Y.; Bannerman, B.; Fitzgerald, M.; Berger, A.; Yu, J.; Yang, Y.; Hales, P.; Bruzzese, F.; et al. Evaluation of the proteasome inhibitor MLN9708 in preclinical models of human cancer. Cancer Res. 2010, 70, 1970–1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Passero, F.C., Jr.; Ravi, D.; McDonald, J.T.; Beheshti, A.; David, K.A.; Evens, A.M. Combinatorial ixazomib and belinostat therapy induces NFE2L2-dependent apoptosis in Hodgkin and T-cell lymphoma. Br. J. Haematol. 2020, 188, 295–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Advani, A.S.; Cooper, B.; Visconte, V.; Elson, P.; Chan, R.; Carew, J.; Wei, W.; Mukherjee, S.; Gerds, A.; Carraway, H.; et al. A Phase I/II Trial of MEC (Mitoxantrone, Etoposide, Cytarabine) in Combination with Ixazomib for Relapsed Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 25, 4231–4237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Rinnerthaler, G.; Gampenrieder, S.P.; Petzer, A.; Burgstaller, S.; Fuchs, D.; Rossmann, D.; Balic, M.; Egle, D.; Rumpold, H.; Singer, C.F.; et al. Ixazomib in combination with carboplatin in pretreated women with advanced triple-negative breast cancer, a phase I/II trial of the AGMT (AGMT MBC-10 trial). BMC Cancer 2018, 18, 1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Gupta, N.; Hanley, M.J.; Venkatakrishnan, K.; Wang, B.; Sharma, S.; Bessudo, A.; Hui, A.M.; Nemunaitis, J. The Effect of a High-Fat Meal on the Pharmacokinetics of Ixazomib, an Oral Proteasome Inhibitor, in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors or Lymphoma. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2016, 56, 1288–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Sanchorawala, V.; Palladini, G.; Kukreti, V.; Zonder, J.A.; Cohen, A.D.; Seldin, D.C.; Dispenzieri, A.; Jaccard, A.; Schonland, S.O.; Berg, D.; et al. A phase 1/2 study of the oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib in relapsed or refractory AL amyloidosis. Blood 2017, 130, 597–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Rajan, A.M.; Kumar, S. New investigational drugs with single-agent activity in multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer J. 2016, 6, e451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Shah, J.; Usmani, S.; Stadtmauer, E.A.; Rifkin, R.M.; Berenson, J.R.; Berdeja, J.G.; Lyons, R.M.; Klippel, Z.; Chang, Y.L.; Niesvizky, R. Oprozomib, pomalidomide, and Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma. Clin. Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2019, 19, 570–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Hari, P.; Matous, J.V.; Voorhees, P.M.; Shain, K.H.; Obreja, M.; Frye, J.; Fujii, H.; Jakubowiak, A.J.; Rossi, D.; Sonneveld, P. Oprozomib in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer J. 2019, 9, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Vandewynckel, Y.P.; Coucke, C.; Laukens, D.; Devisscher, L.; Paridaens, A.; Bogaerts, E.; Vandierendonck, A.; Raevens, S.; Verhelst, X.; Van Steenkiste, C.; et al. Next-generation proteasome inhibitor oprozomib synergizes with modulators of the unfolded protein response to suppress hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 34988–35000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  124. Richardson, P.G.; Zimmerman, T.M.; Hofmeister, C.C.; Talpaz, M.; Chanan-Khan, A.A.; Kaufman, J.L.; Laubach, J.P.; Chauhan, D.; Jakubowiak, A.J.; Reich, S.; et al. Phase 1 study of marizomib in relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: NPI-0052–101 Part 1. Blood 2016, 127, 2693–2700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Millward, M.; Price, T.; Townsend, A.; Sweeney, C.; Spencer, A.; Sukumaran, S.; Longenecker, A.; Lee, L.; Lay, A.; Sharma, G.; et al. Phase 1 clinical trial of the novel proteasome inhibitor marizomib with the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat in patients with melanoma, pancreatic and lung cancer based on in vitro assessments of the combination. Invest. New Drugs 2012, 30, 2303–2317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Ma, L.; Diao, A. Marizomib, a potent second generation proteasome inhibitor from natural origin. Anticancer Agents Med. Chem. 2015, 15, 298–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Levin, N.; Spencer, A.; Harrison, S.J.; Chauhan, D.; Burrows, F.J.; Anderson, K.C.; Reich, S.D.; Richardson, P.G.; Trikha, M. Marizomib irreversibly inhibits proteasome to overcome compensatory hyperactivation in multiple myeloma and solid tumour patients. Br. J. Haematol. 2016, 174, 711–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Harrison, S.J.; Mainwaring, P.; Price, T.; Millward, M.J.; Padrik, P.; Underhill, C.R.; Cannell, P.K.; Reich, S.D.; Trikha, M.; Spencer, A. Phase I Clinical Trial of Marizomib (NPI-0052) in Patients with Advanced Malignancies Including Multiple Myeloma: Study NPI-0052–102 Final Results. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016, 22, 4559–4566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Xia, X.; Huang, C.; Liao, Y.; Liu, Y.; He, J.; Guo, Z.; Jiang, L.; Wang, X.; Liu, J.; Huang, H. Inhibition of USP14 enhances the sensitivity of breast cancer to enzalutamide. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 38, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Han, K.H.; Kwak, M.; Lee, T.H.; Park, M.S.; Jeong, I.H.; Kim, M.J.; Jin, J.O.; Lee, P.C. USP14 Inhibition Regulates Tumorigenesis by Inducing Autophagy in Lung Cancer In Vitro. Int J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 5300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. D’Arcy, P.; Brnjic, S.; Olofsson, M.H.; Fryknas, M.; Lindsten, K.; De Cesare, M.; Perego, P.; Sadeghi, B.; Hassan, M.; Larsson, R.; et al. Inhibition of proteasome deubiquitinating activity as a new cancer therapy. Nat. Med. 2011, 17, 1636–1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Tian, Z.; D’Arcy, P.; Wang, X.; Ray, A.; Tai, Y.T.; Hu, Y.; Carrasco, R.D.; Richardson, P.; Linder, S.; Chauhan, D.; et al. A novel small molecule inhibitor of deubiquitylating enzyme USP14 and UCHL5 induces apoptosis in multiple myeloma and overcomes bortezomib resistance. Blood 2014, 123, 706–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Mofers, A.; Perego, P.; Selvaraju, K.; Gatti, L.; Gullbo, J.; Linder, S.; D’Arcy, P. Analysis of determinants for in vitro resistance to the small molecule deubiquitinase inhibitor b-AP15. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0223807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  134. Zhang, X.; Pellegrini, P.; Saei, A.A.; Hillert, E.K.; Mazurkiewicz, M.; Olofsson, M.H.; Zubarev, R.A.; D’Arcy, P.; Linder, S. The deubiquitinase inhibitor b-AP15 induces strong proteotoxic stress and mitochondrial damage. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2018, 156, 291–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  135. Wang, X.; Stafford, W.; Mazurkiewicz, M.; Fryknas, M.; Brjnic, S.; Zhang, X.; Gullbo, J.; Larsson, R.; Arner, E.S.; D’Arcy, P.; et al. The 19S Deubiquitinase inhibitor b-AP15 is enriched in cells and elicits rapid commitment to cell death. Mol. Pharmacol. 2014, 85, 932–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  136. Jiang, L.; Sun, Y.; Wang, J.; He, Q.; Chen, X.; Lan, X.; Chen, J.; Dou, Q.P.; Shi, X.; Liu, J. Proteasomal cysteine deubiquitinase inhibitor b-AP15 suppresses migration and induces apoptosis in diffuse large B cell lymphoma. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 38, 453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Kropp, K.N.; Maurer, S.; Rothfelder, K.; Schmied, B.J.; Clar, K.L.; Schmidt, M.; Strunz, B.; Kopp, H.G.; Steinle, A.; Grunebach, F.; et al. The novel deubiquitinase inhibitor b-AP15 induces direct and NK cell-mediated antitumor effects in human mantle cell lymphoma. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2018, 67, 935–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Cai, J.; Xia, X.; Liao, Y.; Liu, N.; Guo, Z.; Chen, J.; Yang, L.; Long, H.; Yang, Q.; Zhang, X.; et al. A novel deubiquitinase inhibitor b-AP15 triggers apoptosis in both androgen receptor-dependent and -independent prostate cancers. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 63232–63246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Xia, X.; Liao, Y.; Guo, Z.; Li, Y.; Jiang, L.; Zhang, F.; Huang, C.; Liu, Y.; Wang, X.; Liu, N.; et al. Targeting proteasome-associated deubiquitinases as a novel strategy for the treatment of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Oncogenesis 2018, 7, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Yu, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Fan, Y.; Chen, Z.; Li, H.; Lu, J.; Guo, K.; Woodfield, S.E.; Vasudevan, S.A.; Yang, J.; et al. Inhibition of Ubiquitin-Specific Protease 14 Suppresses Cell Proliferation and Synergizes with Chemotherapeutic Agents in Neuroblastoma. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2019, 18, 1045–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Sooman, L.; Gullbo, J.; Bergqvist, M.; Bergstrom, S.; Lennartsson, J.; Ekman, S. Synergistic effects of combining proteasome inhibitors with chemotherapeutic drugs in lung cancer cells. BMC Res. Notes 2017, 10, 544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  142. Paulus, A.; Akhtar, S.; Caulfield, T.R.; Samuel, K.; Yousaf, H.; Bashir, Y.; Paulus, S.M.; Tran, D.; Hudec, R.; Cogen, D.; et al. Coinhibition of the deubiquitinating enzymes, USP14 and UCHL5, with VLX1570 is lethal to ibrutinib- or bortezomib-resistant Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia tumor cells. Blood Cancer J. 2016, 6, e492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Wang, X.; D’Arcy, P.; Caulfield, T.R.; Paulus, A.; Chitta, K.; Mohanty, C.; Gullbo, J.; Chanan-Khan, A.; Linder, S. Synthesis and evaluation of derivatives of the proteasome deubiquitinase inhibitor b-AP15. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2015, 86, 1036–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  144. Wang, X.; Mazurkiewicz, M.; Hillert, E.K.; Olofsson, M.H.; Pierrou, S.; Hillertz, P.; Gullbo, J.; Selvaraju, K.; Paulus, A.; Akhtar, S.; et al. The proteasome deubiquitinase inhibitor VLX1570 shows selectivity for ubiquitin-specific protease-14 and induces apoptosis of multiple myeloma cells. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 26979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Shukla, N.; Somwar, R.; Smith, R.S.; Ambati, S.; Munoz, S.; Merchant, M.; D’Arcy, P.; Wang, X.; Kobos, R.; Antczak, C.; et al. Proteasome Addiction Defined in Ewing Sarcoma Is Effectively Targeted by a Novel Class of 19S Proteasome Inhibitors. Cancer Res. 2016, 76, 4525–4534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  146. Issaenko, O.A.; Amerik, A.Y. Chalcone-based small-molecule inhibitors attenuate malignant phenotype via targeting deubiquitinating enzymes. Cell Cycle 2012, 11, 1804–1817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. De Winter, L.M.; Hansen, W.L.; van Steenbergen, H.W.; Geusens, P.; Lenaerts, J.; Somers, K.; Stinissen, P.; van der Helm-van Mil, A.H.; Somers, V. Autoantibodies to two novel peptides in seronegative and early rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2016, 55, 1431–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Kapuria, V.; Peterson, L.F.; Fang, D.; Bornmann, W.G.; Talpaz, M.; Donato, N.J. Deubiquitinase inhibition by small-molecule WP1130 triggers aggresome formation and tumor cell apoptosis. Cancer Res. 2010, 70, 9265–9276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Sun, H.; Kapuria, V.; Peterson, L.F.; Fang, D.; Bornmann, W.G.; Bartholomeusz, G.; Talpaz, M.; Donato, N.J. Bcr-Abl ubiquitination and Usp9x inhibition block kinase signaling and promote CML cell apoptosis. Blood 2011, 117, 3151–3162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  150. Bartholomeusz, G.A.; Talpaz, M.; Kapuria, V.; Kong, L.Y.; Wang, S.; Estrov, Z.; Priebe, W.; Wu, J.; Donato, N.J. Activation of a novel Bcr/Abl destruction pathway by WP1130 induces apoptosis of chronic myelogenous leukemia cells. Blood 2007, 109, 3470–3478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  151. Peddaboina, C.; Jupiter, D.; Fletcher, S.; Yap, J.L.; Rai, A.; Tobin, R.P.; Jiang, W.; Rascoe, P.; Rogers, M.K.; Smythe, W.R.; et al. The downregulation of Mcl-1 via USP9X inhibition sensitizes solid tumors to Bcl-xl inhibition. BMC Cancer 2012, 12, 541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  152. Wang, S.; Kollipara, R.K.; Srivastava, N.; Li, R.; Ravindranathan, P.; Hernandez, E.; Freeman, E.; Humphries, C.G.; Kapur, P.; Lotan, Y.; et al. Ablation of the oncogenic transcription factor ERG by deubiquitinase inhibition in prostate cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 4251–4256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  153. Akiyama, H.; Umezawa, Y.; Ishida, S.; Okada, K.; Nogami, A.; Miura, O. Inhibition of USP9X induces apoptosis in FLT3-ITD-positive AML cells cooperatively by inhibiting the mutant kinase through aggresomal translocation and inducing oxidative stress. Cancer Lett. 2019, 453, 84–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Liu, H.; Chen, W.; Liang, C.; Chen, B.W.; Zhi, X.; Zhang, S.; Zheng, X.; Bai, X.; Liang, T. WP1130 increases doxorubicin sensitivity in hepatocellular carcinoma cells through usp9x-dependent p53 degradation. Cancer Lett. 2015, 361, 218–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Hubert, P.; Porath, J. Metal chelate affinity chromatography. I. Influence of various parameters on the retention of nucleotides and related compounds. J. Chromatogr. 1980, 198, 247–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Guterman, A.; Glickman, M.H. Complementary roles for Rpn11 and Ubp6 in deubiquitination and proteolysis by the proteasome. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 1729–1738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  157. Song, Y.; Li, S.; Ray, A.; Das, D.S.; Qi, J.; Samur, M.K.; Tai, Y.T.; Munshi, N.; Carrasco, R.D.; Chauhan, D.; et al. Blockade of deubiquitylating enzyme Rpn11 triggers apoptosis in multiple myeloma cells and overcomes bortezomib resistance. Oncogene 2017, 36, 5631–5638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  158. Almenoff, J.; Teirstein, A.S.; Thornton, J.C.; Orlowski, M. Identification of a thermolysin-like metalloendopeptidase in serum: Activity in normal subjects and in patients with sarcoidosis. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 1984, 103, 420–431. [Google Scholar]
  159. Lv, J.; Zhang, S.; Wu, H.; Lu, J.; Lu, Y.; Wang, F.; Zhao, W.; Zhan, P.; Lu, J.; Fang, Q.; et al. Deubiquitinase PSMD14 enhances hepatocellular carcinoma growth and metastasis by stabilizing GRB2. Cancer Lett. 2020, 469, 22–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Kato, Y.; Yamashita, T.; Ishikawa, M. Relationship between expression of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and matrix metalloproteinase-9 and invasion ability of cervical cancer cells. Oncol. Rep. 2002, 9, 565–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  161. Harayama, T.; Ohuchi, E.; Aoki, T.; Sato, H.; Seiki, M.; Okada, Y. Shedding of membrane type 1 matrix metalloproteinase in a human breast carcinoma cell line. Jpn J. Cancer Res. 1999, 90, 942–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Li, J.; Yakushi, T.; Parlati, F.; Mackinnon, A.L.; Perez, C.; Ma, Y.; Carter, K.P.; Colayco, S.; Magnuson, G.; Brown, B.; et al. Capzimin is a potent and specific inhibitor of proteasome isopeptidase Rpn11. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2017, 13, 486–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  163. Lauinger, L.; Li, J.; Shostak, A.; Cemel, I.A.; Ha, N.; Zhang, Y.; Merkl, P.E.; Obermeyer, S.; Stankovic-Valentin, N.; Schafmeier, T.; et al. Thiolutin is a zinc chelator that inhibits the Rpn11 and other JAMM metalloproteases. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2017, 13, 709–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  164. Muchamuel, T.; Basler, M.; Aujay, M.A.; Suzuki, E.; Kalim, K.W.; Lauer, C.; Sylvain, C.; Ring, E.R.; Shields, J.; Jiang, J.; et al. A selective inhibitor of the immunoproteasome subunit LMP7 blocks cytokine production and attenuates progression of experimental arthritis. Nat. Med. 2009, 15, 781–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  165. Huber, E.M.; Heinemeyer, W.; Groll, M. Bortezomib-resistant mutant proteasomes: Structural and biochemical evaluation with carfilzomib and ONX 0914. Structure 2015, 23, 407–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  166. Niewerth, D.; van Meerloo, J.; Jansen, G.; Assaraf, Y.G.; Hendrickx, T.C.; Kirk, C.J.; Anderl, J.L.; Zweegman, S.; Kaspers, G.J.; Cloos, J. Anti-leukemic activity and mechanisms underlying resistance to the novel immunoproteasome inhibitor PR-924. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2014, 89, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Singh, A.V.; Bandi, M.; Aujay, M.A.; Kirk, C.J.; Hark, D.E.; Raje, N.; Chauhan, D.; Anderson, K.C. PR-924, a selective inhibitor of the immunoproteasome subunit LMP-7, blocks multiple myeloma cell growth both in vitro and in vivo. Br. J. Haematol. 2011, 152, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  168. Johnson, H.W.B.; Lowe, E.; Anderl, J.L.; Fan, A.; Muchamuel, T.; Bowers, S.; Moebius, D.C.; Kirk, C.; McMinn, D.L. Required Immunoproteasome Subunit Inhibition Profile for Anti-Inflammatory Efficacy and Clinical Candidate KZR-616 ((2 S,3 R)- N-(( S)-3-(Cyclopent-1-en-1-yl)-1-(( R)-2-methyloxiran-2-yl)-1-oxopropan-2-yl)-3-hydroxy-3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2-(( S)-2-(2-morpholinoacetamido)propanamido)propenamide). J. Med. Chem. 2018, 61, 11127–11143. [Google Scholar]
  169. Ceccarelli, D.F.; Tang, X.; Pelletier, B.; Orlicky, S.; Xie, W.; Plantevin, V.; Neculai, D.; Chou, Y.C.; Ogunjimi, A.; Al-Hakim, A.; et al. An allosteric inhibitor of the human Cdc34 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme. Cell 2011, 145, 1075–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  170. Pulvino, M.; Liang, Y.; Oleksyn, D.; DeRan, M.; Van Pelt, E.; Shapiro, J.; Sanz, I.; Chen, L.; Zhao, J. Inhibition of proliferation and survival of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma cells by a small-molecule inhibitor of the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Ubc13-Uev1A. Blood 2012, 120, 1668–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Jiang, X.; Chen, Z.J. The role of ubiquitylation in immune defence and pathogen evasion. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2011, 12, 35–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  172. Landre, V.; Rotblat, B.; Melino, S.; Bernassola, F.; Melino, G. Screening for E3-ubiquitin ligase inhibitors: Challenges and opportunities. Oncotarget 2014, 5, 7988–8013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  173. Skaar, J.R.; Pagan, J.K.; Pagano, M. SCF ubiquitin ligase-targeted therapies. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2014, 13, 889–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  174. Haupt, Y.; Maya, R.; Kazaz, A.; Oren, M. Mdm2 promotes the rapid degradation of p53. Nature 1997, 387, 296–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Kubbutat, M.H.; Jones, S.N.; Vousden, K.H. Regulation of p53 stability by Mdm2. Nature 1997, 387, 299–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Midgley, C.A.; Lane, D.P. p53 protein stability in tumour cells is not determined by mutation but is dependent on Mdm2 binding. Oncogene 1997, 15, 1179–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  177. De Rozieres, S.; Maya, R.; Oren, M.; Lozano, G. The loss of mdm2 induces p53-mediated apoptosis. Oncogene 2000, 19, 1691–1697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  178. Vassilev, L.T.; Vu, B.T.; Graves, B.; Carvajal, D.; Podlaski, F.; Filipovic, Z.; Kong, N.; Kammlott, U.; Lukacs, C.; Klein, C.; et al. In vivo activation of the p53 pathway by small-molecule antagonists of MDM2. Science 2004, 303, 844–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  179. Ding, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, J.J.; Jiang, N.; Zhang, J.; Ross, T.M.; Chu, X.J.; Bartkovitz, D.; Podlaski, F.; Janson, C.; et al. Discovery of RG7388, a potent and selective p53-MDM2 inhibitor in clinical development. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 56, 5979–5983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Ray-Coquard, I.; Blay, J.Y.; Italiano, A.; Le Cesne, A.; Penel, N.; Zhi, J.; Heil, F.; Rueger, R.; Graves, B.; Ding, M.; et al. Effect of the MDM2 antagonist RG7112 on the P53 pathway in patients with MDM2-amplified, well-differentiated or dedifferentiated liposarcoma: An exploratory proof-of-mechanism study. Lancet Oncol. 2012, 13, 1133–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Cai, Q.; Sun, H.; Peng, Y.; Lu, J.; Nikolovska-Coleska, Z.; McEachern, D.; Liu, L.; Qiu, S.; Yang, C.Y.; Miller, R.; et al. A potent and orally active antagonist (SM-406/AT-406) of multiple inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAPs) in clinical development for cancer treatment. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 2714–2726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  182. Flygare, J.A.; Beresini, M.; Budha, N.; Chan, H.; Chan, I.T.; Cheeti, S.; Cohen, F.; Deshayes, K.; Doerner, K.; Eckhardt, S.G.; et al. Discovery of a potent small-molecule antagonist of inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) proteins and clinical candidate for the treatment of cancer (GDC-0152). J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 4101–4113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Adams, J. Development of the proteasome inhibitor PS-341. Oncologist 2002, 7, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  184. Orlowski, R.Z.; Stinchcombe, T.E.; Mitchell, B.S.; Shea, T.C.; Baldwin, A.S.; Stahl, S.; Adams, J.; Esseltine, D.L.; Elliott, P.J.; Pien, C.S.; et al. Phase I trial of the proteasome inhibitor PS-341 in patients with refractory hematologic malignancies. J. Clin. Oncol. 2002, 20, 4420–4427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Molineaux, S.M. Molecular pathways: Targeting proteasomal protein degradation in cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2012, 18, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  186. Kawabata, S.; Gills, J.J.; Mercado-Matos, J.R.; Lopiccolo, J.; Wilson, W., 3rd; Hollander, M.C.; Dennis, P.A. Synergistic effects of nelfinavir and bortezomib on proteotoxic death of NSCLC and multiple myeloma cells. Cell Death Dis. 2012, 3, e353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Orlowski, R.Z. Is bortezomib superior to high-dose dexamethasone for the treatment of relapsed multiple myeloma? Nat. Clin. Pract. Oncol. 2006, 3, 16–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Richardson, P.G.; Sonneveld, P.; Schuster, M.W.; Irwin, D.; Stadtmauer, E.A.; Facon, T.; Harousseau, J.L.; Ben-Yehuda, D.; Lonial, S.; Goldschmidt, H.; et al. Bortezomib or high-dose dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005, 352, 2487–2498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  189. San Miguel, J.F.; Schlag, R.; Khuageva, N.K.; Dimopoulos, M.A.; Shpilberg, O.; Kropff, M.; Spicka, I.; Petrucci, M.T.; Palumbo, A.; Samoilova, O.S.; et al. Bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone for initial treatment of multiple myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 359, 906–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  190. Nowis, D.; Maczewski, M.; Mackiewicz, U.; Kujawa, M.; Ratajska, A.; Wieckowski, M.R.; Wilczynski, G.M.; Malinowska, M.; Bil, J.; Salwa, P.; et al. Cardiotoxicity of the anticancer therapeutic agent bortezomib. Am. J. Pathol 2010, 176, 2658–2668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Shin, Y.K.; Jang, S.Y.; Lee, H.K.; Jung, J.; Suh, D.J.; Seo, S.Y.; Park, H.T. Pathological adaptive responses of Schwann cells to endoplasmic reticulum stress in bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy. Glia 2010, 58, 1961–1976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Miceli, T.; Colson, K.; Gavino, M.; Lilleby, K.; Board, I.M.F.N.L. Myelosuppression associated with novel therapies in patients with multiple myeloma: Consensus statement of the IMF Nurse Leadership Board. Clin. J. Oncol. Nurs. 2008, 12, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Oerlemans, R.; Franke, N.E.; Assaraf, Y.G.; Cloos, J.; van Zantwijk, I.; Berkers, C.R.; Scheffer, G.L.; Debipersad, K.; Vojtekova, K.; Lemos, C.; et al. Molecular basis of bortezomib resistance: Proteasome subunit beta5 (PSMB5) gene mutation and overexpression of PSMB5 protein. Blood 2008, 112, 2489–2499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  194. Suzuki, E.; Demo, S.; Deu, E.; Keats, J.; Arastu-Kapur, S.; Bergsagel, P.L.; Bennett, M.K.; Kirk, C.J. Molecular mechanisms of bortezomib resistant adenocarcinoma cells. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e27996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  195. Olejniczak, S.H.; Blickwedehl, J.; Belicha-Villanueva, A.; Bangia, N.; Riaz, W.; Mavis, C.; Clements, J.L.; Gibbs, J.; Hernandez-Ilizaliturri, F.J.; Czuczman, M.S. Distinct molecular mechanisms responsible for bortezomib-induced death of therapy-resistant versus -sensitive B-NHL cells. Blood 2010, 116, 5605–5614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  196. Kuhn, D.J.; Chen, Q.; Voorhees, P.M.; Strader, J.S.; Shenk, K.D.; Sun, C.M.; Demo, S.D.; Bennett, M.K.; van Leeuwen, F.W.; Chanan-Khan, A.A.; et al. Potent activity of carfilzomib, a novel, irreversible inhibitor of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, against preclinical models of multiple myeloma. Blood 2007, 110, 3281–3290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  197. Meng, L.; Mohan, R.; Kwok, B.H.; Elofsson, M.; Sin, N.; Crews, C.M. Epoxomicin, a potent and selective proteasome inhibitor, exhibits in vivo antiinflammatory activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 10403–10408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  198. Elofsson, M.; Splittgerber, U.; Myung, J.; Mohan, R.; Crews, C.M. Towards subunit-specific proteasome inhibitors: Synthesis and evaluation of peptide alpha’,beta’-epoxyketones. Chem. Biol. 1999, 6, 811–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  199. Kim, K.B.; Myung, J.; Sin, N.; Crews, C.M. Proteasome inhibition by the natural products epoxomicin and dihydroeponemycin: Insights into specificity and potency. Bioorg Med. Chem. Lett. 1999, 9, 3335–3340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Schrader, J.; Henneberg, F.; Mata, R.A.; Tittmann, K.; Schneider, T.R.; Stark, H.; Bourenkov, G.; Chari, A. The inhibition mechanism of human 20S proteasomes enables next-generation inhibitor design. Science 2016, 353, 594–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  201. Arastu-Kapur, S.; Anderl, J.L.; Kraus, M.; Parlati, F.; Shenk, K.D.; Lee, S.J.; Muchamuel, T.; Bennett, M.K.; Driessen, C.; Ball, A.J.; et al. Nonproteasomal targets of the proteasome inhibitors bortezomib and carfilzomib: A link to clinical adverse events. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011, 17, 2734–2743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  202. Vesole, D.H.; Bilotti, E.; Richter, J.R.; McNeill, A.; McBride, L.; Raucci, L.; Anand, P.; Bednarz, U.; Ivanovski, K.; Smith, J.; et al. Phase I study of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, vorinostat, and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. Br. J. Haematol. 2015, 171, 52–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  203. Stewart, A.K.; Rajkumar, S.V.; Dimopoulos, M.A.; Masszi, T.; Spicka, I.; Oriol, A.; Hajek, R.; Rosinol, L.; Siegel, D.S.; Mihaylov, G.G.; et al. Carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 372, 142–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Korde, N.; Roschewski, M.; Zingone, A.; Kwok, M.; Manasanch, E.E.; Bhutani, M.; Tageja, N.; Kazandjian, D.; Mailankody, S.; Wu, P.; et al. Treatment With Carfilzomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone With Lenalidomide Extension in Patients With Smoldering or Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma. JAMA Oncol. 2015, 1, 746–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  205. Richardson, P.G.; Baz, R.; Wang, M.; Jakubowiak, A.J.; Laubach, J.P.; Harvey, R.D.; Talpaz, M.; Berg, D.; Liu, G.; Yu, J.; et al. Phase 1 study of twice-weekly ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients. Blood 2014, 124, 1038–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  206. Kumar, S.K.; Berdeja, J.G.; Niesvizky, R.; Lonial, S.; Laubach, J.P.; Hamadani, M.; Stewart, A.K.; Hari, P.; Roy, V.; Vescio, R.; et al. Safety and tolerability of ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma: An open-label phase 1/2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2014, 15, 1503–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Moreau, P.; Masszi, T.; Grzasko, N.; Bahlis, N.J.; Hansson, M.; Pour, L.; Sandhu, I.; Ganly, P.; Baker, B.W.; Jackson, S.R.; et al. Oral Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 374, 1621–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Kumar, S.K.; LaPlant, B.; Roy, V.; Reeder, C.B.; Lacy, M.Q.; Gertz, M.A.; Laumann, K.; Thompson, M.A.; Witzig, T.E.; Buadi, F.K.; et al. Phase 2 trial of ixazomib in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma not refractory to bortezomib. Blood Cancer J. 2015, 5, e338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  209. Ghobrial, I.M.; Vij, R.; Siegel, D.; Badros, A.; Kaufman, J.; Raje, N.; Jakubowiak, A.; Savona, M.R.; Obreja, M.; Berdeja, J.G. A Phase Ib/II Study of Oprozomib in Patients with Advanced Multiple Myeloma and Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 25, 4907–4916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Hari, P.; Paba-Prada, C.E.; Voorhees, P.M.; Frye, J.; Chang, Y.L.; Moreau, P.; Zonder, J.; Boccia, R.; Shain, K.H. Efficacy and safety results from a phase 1b/2, multicenter, open-label study of oprozomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. Leuk. Res. 2019, 83, 106172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Feling, R.H.; Buchanan, G.O.; Mincer, T.J.; Kauffman, C.A.; Jensen, P.R.; Fenical, W. Salinosporamide A: A highly cytotoxic proteasome inhibitor from a novel microbial source, a marine bacterium of the new genus salinospora. Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2003, 42, 355–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Groll, M.; Huber, R.; Potts, B.C. Crystal structures of Salinosporamide A (NPI-0052) and B (NPI-0047) in complex with the 20S proteasome reveal important consequences of beta-lactone ring opening and a mechanism for irreversible binding. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 5136–5141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  213. Potts, B.C.; Albitar, M.X.; Anderson, K.C.; Baritaki, S.; Berkers, C.; Bonavida, B.; Chandra, J.; Chauhan, D.; Cusack, J.C., Jr.; Fenical, W.; et al. Marizomib, a proteasome inhibitor for all seasons: Preclinical profile and a framework for clinical trials. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets 2011, 11, 254–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  214. Macherla, V.R.; Mitchell, S.S.; Manam, R.R.; Reed, K.A.; Chao, T.H.; Nicholson, B.; Deyanat-Yazdi, G.; Mai, B.; Jensen, P.R.; Fenical, W.F.; et al. Structure-activity relationship studies of salinosporamide A (NPI-0052), a novel marine derived proteasome inhibitor. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 3684–3687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Chauhan, D.; Catley, L.; Li, G.; Podar, K.; Hideshima, T.; Velankar, M.; Mitsiades, C.; Mitsiades, N.; Yasui, H.; Letai, A.; et al. A novel orally active proteasome inhibitor induces apoptosis in multiple myeloma cells with mechanisms distinct from Bortezomib. Cancer Cell 2005, 8, 407–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  216. Singh, A.V.; Palladino, M.A.; Lloyd, G.K.; Potts, B.C.; Chauhan, D.; Anderson, K.C. Pharmacodynamic and efficacy studies of the novel proteasome inhibitor NPI-0052 (marizomib) in a human plasmacytoma xenograft murine model. Br. J. Haematol. 2010, 149, 550–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  217. Ruiz, S.; Krupnik, Y.; Keating, M.; Chandra, J.; Palladino, M.; McConkey, D. The proteasome inhibitor NPI-0052 is a more effective inducer of apoptosis than bortezomib in lymphocytes from patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2006, 5, 1836–1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  218. Spencer, A.; Harrison, S.; Zonder, J.; Badros, A.; Laubach, J.; Bergin, K.; Khot, A.; Zimmerman, T.; Chauhan, D.; Levin, N.; et al. A phase 1 clinical trial evaluating marizomib, pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (NPI-0052-107): Final study results. Br. J. Haematol. 2018, 180, 41–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  219. Di, K.; Lloyd, G.K.; Abraham, V.; MacLaren, A.; Burrows, F.J.; Desjardins, A.; Trikha, M.; Bota, D.A. Marizomib activity as a single agent in malignant gliomas: Ability to cross the blood-brain barrier. Neuro Oncol. 2016, 18, 840–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Ruschak, A.M.; Slassi, M.; Kay, L.E.; Schimmer, A.D. Novel proteasome inhibitors to overcome bortezomib resistance. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2011, 103, 1007–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  221. Emmings, E.; Mullany, S.; Chang, Z.; Landen, C.N., Jr.; Linder, S.; Bazzaro, M. Targeting Mitochondria for Treatment of Chemoresistant Ovarian Cancer. Int J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  222. Peth, A.; Besche, H.C.; Goldberg, A.L. Ubiquitinated proteins activate the proteasome by binding to Usp14/Ubp6, which causes 20S gate opening. Mol. Cell 2009, 36, 794–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  223. Kawahara, H.; Kasahara, M.; Nishiyama, A.; Ohsumi, K.; Goto, T.; Kishimoto, T.; Saeki, Y.; Yokosawa, H.; Shimbara, N.; Murata, S.; et al. Developmentally regulated, alternative splicing of the Rpn10 gene generates multiple forms of 26S proteasomes. EMBO J. 2000, 19, 4144–4153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  224. Sakata, E.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Kurimoto, E.; Kikuchi, J.; Yokoyama, S.; Yamada, S.; Kawahara, H.; Yokosawa, H.; Hattori, N.; Mizuno, Y.; et al. Parkin binds the Rpn10 subunit of 26S proteasomes through its ubiquitin-like domain. EMBO Rep. 2003, 4, 301–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  225. Chitta, K.; Paulus, A.; Akhtar, S.; Blake, M.K.; Caulfield, T.R.; Novak, A.J.; Ansell, S.M.; Advani, P.; Ailawadhi, S.; Sher, T.; et al. Targeted inhibition of the deubiquitinating enzymes, USP14 and UCHL5, induces proteotoxic stress and apoptosis in Waldenstrom macroglobulinaemia tumour cells. Br. J. Haematol. 2015, 169, 377–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Lee, B.H.; Lee, M.J.; Park, S.; Oh, D.C.; Elsasser, S.; Chen, P.C.; Gartner, C.; Dimova, N.; Hanna, J.; Gygi, S.P.; et al. Enhancement of proteasome activity by a small-molecule inhibitor of USP14. Nature 2010, 467, 179–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  227. Boselli, M.; Lee, B.H.; Robert, J.; Prado, M.A.; Min, S.W.; Cheng, C.; Silva, M.C.; Seong, C.; Elsasser, S.; Hatle, K.M.; et al. An inhibitor of the proteasomal deubiquitinating enzyme USP14 induces tau elimination in cultured neurons. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 19209–19225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  228. Hillert, E.K.; Brnjic, S.; Zhang, X.; Mazurkiewicz, M.; Saei, A.A.; Mofers, A.; Selvaraju, K.; Zubarev, R.; Linder, S.; D’Arcy, P. Proteasome inhibitor b-AP15 induces enhanced proteotoxicity by inhibiting cytoprotective aggresome formation. Cancer Lett. 2019, 448, 70–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  229. Brnjic, S.; Mazurkiewicz, M.; Fryknas, M.; Sun, C.; Zhang, X.; Larsson, R.; D’Arcy, P.; Linder, S. Induction of tumor cell apoptosis by a proteasome deubiquitinase inhibitor is associated with oxidative stress. Antioxid. Redox. Signal. 2014, 21, 2271–2285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  230. Anchoori, R.K.; Khan, S.R.; Sueblinvong, T.; Felthauser, A.; Iizuka, Y.; Gavioli, R.; Destro, F.; Isaksson Vogel, R.; Peng, S.; Roden, R.B.; et al. Stressing the ubiquitin-proteasome system without 20S proteolytic inhibition selectively kills cervical cancer cells. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e23888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Bazzaro, M.; Anchoori, R.K.; Mudiam, M.K.; Issaenko, O.; Kumar, S.; Karanam, B.; Lin, Z.; Isaksson Vogel, R.; Gavioli, R.; Destro, F.; et al. alpha,beta-Unsaturated carbonyl system of chalcone-based derivatives is responsible for broad inhibition of proteasomal activity and preferential killing of human papilloma virus (HPV) positive cervical cancer cells. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 449–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  232. Rivard, C.; Bazzaro, M. Measurement of deubiquitinating enzyme activity via a suicidal HA-Ub-VS probe. Methods Mol. Biol. 2015, 1249, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  233. Coughlin, K.; Anchoori, R.; Iizuka, Y.; Meints, J.; MacNeill, L.; Vogel, R.I.; Orlowski, R.Z.; Lee, M.K.; Roden, R.B.; Bazzaro, M. Small-molecule RA-9 inhibits proteasome-associated DUBs and ovarian cancer in vitro and in vivo via exacerbating unfolded protein responses. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014, 20, 3174–3186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  234. Wang, X.; Bao, Y.; Dong, Z.; Chen, Q.; Guo, H.; Ziang, C.; Shao, J. WP1130 attenuates cisplatin resistance by decreasing P53 expression in non-small cell lung carcinomas. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 49033–49043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  235. Anchoori, R.K.; Karanam, B.; Peng, S.; Wang, J.W.; Jiang, R.; Tanno, T.; Orlowski, R.Z.; Matsui, W.; Zhao, M.; Rudek, M.A.; et al. A bis-benzylidine piperidone targeting proteasome ubiquitin receptor RPN13/ADRM1 as a therapy for cancer. Cancer Cell 2013, 24, 791–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  236. Lu, X.; Nowicka, U.; Sridharan, V.; Liu, F.; Randles, L.; Hymel, D.; Dyba, M.; Tarasov, S.G.; Tarasova, N.I.; Zhao, X.Z.; et al. Structure of the Rpn13-Rpn2 complex provides insights for Rpn13 and Uch37 as anticancer targets. Nat. Commun 2017, 8, 15540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Soong, R.S.; Anchoori, R.K.; Yang, B.; Yang, A.; Tseng, S.H.; He, L.; Tsai, Y.C.; Roden, R.B.; Hung, C.F. RPN13/ADRM1 inhibitor reverses immunosuppression by myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 68489–68502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  238. Song, Y.; Ray, A.; Li, S.; Das, D.S.; Tai, Y.T.; Carrasco, R.D.; Chauhan, D.; Anderson, K.C. Targeting proteasome ubiquitin receptor Rpn13 in multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2016, 30, 1877–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  239. Randles, L.; Anchoori, R.K.; Roden, R.B.; Walters, K.J. The Proteasome Ubiquitin Receptor hRpn13 and Its Interacting Deubiquitinating Enzyme Uch37 Are Required for Proper Cell Cycle Progression. J. Biol. Chem. 2016, 291, 8773–8783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  240. Fejzo, M.S.; Anderson, L.; Chen, H.W.; Anghel, A.; Zhuo, J.; Anchoori, R.; Roden, R.; Slamon, D.J. ADRM1-amplified metastasis gene in gastric cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2015, 54, 506–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Jiang, R.T.; Yemelyanova, A.; Xing, D.; Anchoori, R.K.; Hamazaki, J.; Murata, S.; Seidman, J.D.; Wang, T.L.; Roden, R.B.S. Early and consistent overexpression of ADRM1 in ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma. J. Ovarian Res. 2017, 10, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  242. Tipper, D.J. Inhibition of yeast ribonucleic acid polymerases by thiolutin. J. Bacteriol 1973, 116, 245–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  243. Jimenez, A.; Tipper, D.J.; Davies, J. Mode of action of thiolutin, an inhibitor of macromolecular synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1973, 3, 729–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  244. Khachatourians, G.G.; Tipper, D.J. Inhibition of messenger ribonucleic acid synthesis in Escherichia coli by thiolutin. J. Bacteriol 1974, 119, 795–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  245. Basler, M.; Kirk, C.J.; Groettrup, M. The immunoproteasome in antigen processing and other immunological functions. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2013, 25, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  246. Aki, M.; Shimbara, N.; Takashina, M.; Akiyama, K.; Kagawa, S.; Tamura, T.; Tanahashi, N.; Yoshimura, T.; Tanaka, K.; Ichihara, A. Interferon-gamma induces different subunit organizations and functional diversity of proteasomes. J. Biochem. 1994, 115, 257–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Seifert, U.; Bialy, L.P.; Ebstein, F.; Bech-Otschir, D.; Voigt, A.; Schroter, F.; Prozorovski, T.; Lange, N.; Steffen, J.; Rieger, M.; et al. Immunoproteasomes preserve protein homeostasis upon interferon-induced oxidative stress. Cell 2010, 142, 613–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  248. Parlati, F.; Lee, S.J.; Aujay, M.; Suzuki, E.; Levitsky, K.; Lorens, J.B.; Micklem, D.R.; Ruurs, P.; Sylvain, C.; Lu, Y.; et al. Carfilzomib can induce tumor cell death through selective inhibition of the chymotrypsin-like activity of the proteasome. Blood 2009, 114, 3439–3447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  249. Roccaro, A.M.; Sacco, A.; Aujay, M.; Ngo, H.T.; Azab, A.K.; Azab, F.; Quang, P.; Maiso, P.; Runnels, J.; Anderson, K.C.; et al. Selective inhibition of chymotrypsin-like activity of the immunoproteasome and constitutive proteasome in Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia. Blood 2010, 115, 4051–4060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  250. Niewerth, D.; Franke, N.E.; Jansen, G.; Assaraf, Y.G.; van Meerloo, J.; Kirk, C.J.; Degenhardt, J.; Anderl, J.; Schimmer, A.D.; Zweegman, S.; et al. Higher ratio immune versus constitutive proteasome level as novel indicator of sensitivity of pediatric acute leukemia cells to proteasome inhibitors. Haematologica 2013, 98, 1896–1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Kuhn, D.J.; Orlowski, R.Z. The immunoproteasome as a target in hematologic malignancies. Semin. Hematol. 2012, 49, 258–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  252. Kumar, S.K.; Lee, J.H.; Lahuerta, J.J.; Morgan, G.; Richardson, P.G.; Crowley, J.; Haessler, J.; Feather, J.; Hoering, A.; Moreau, P.; et al. Risk of progression and survival in multiple myeloma relapsing after therapy with IMiDs and bortezomib: A multicenter international myeloma working group study. Leukemia 2012, 26, 149–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  253. Franke, N.E.; Niewerth, D.; Assaraf, Y.G.; van Meerloo, J.; Vojtekova, K.; van Zantwijk, C.H.; Zweegman, S.; Chan, E.T.; Kirk, C.J.; Geerke, D.P.; et al. Impaired bortezomib binding to mutant beta5 subunit of the proteasome is the underlying basis for bortezomib resistance in leukemia cells. Leukemia 2012, 26, 757–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  254. Altun, M.; Galardy, P.J.; Shringarpure, R.; Hideshima, T.; LeBlanc, R.; Anderson, K.C.; Ploegh, H.L.; Kessler, B.M. Effects of PS-341 on the activity and composition of proteasomes in multiple myeloma cells. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 7896–7901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  255. Busse, A.; Kraus, M.; Na, I.K.; Rietz, A.; Scheibenbogen, C.; Driessen, C.; Blau, I.W.; Thiel, E.; Keilholz, U. Sensitivity of tumor cells to proteasome inhibitors is associated with expression levels and composition of proteasome subunits. Cancer 2008, 112, 659–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  256. Xi, J.; Zhuang, R.; Kong, L.; He, R.; Zhu, H.; Zhang, J. Immunoproteasome-selective inhibitors: An overview of recent developments as potential drugs for hematologic malignancies and autoimmune diseases. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 182, 111646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Berkers, C.R.; Verdoes, M.; Lichtman, E.; Fiebiger, E.; Kessler, B.M.; Anderson, K.C.; Ploegh, H.L.; Ovaa, H.; Galardy, P.J. Activity probe for in vivo profiling of the specificity of proteasome inhibitor bortezomib. Nat. Methods 2005, 2, 357–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Huber, E.M.; Basler, M.; Schwab, R.; Heinemeyer, W.; Kirk, C.J.; Groettrup, M.; Groll, M. Immuno- and constitutive proteasome crystal structures reveal differences in substrate and inhibitor specificity. Cell 2012, 148, 727–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  259. Liong, S.; Lim, R.; Nguyen-Ngo, C.; Barker, G.; Parkington, H.C.; Lappas, M. The immunoproteasome inhibitor ONX-0914 regulates inflammation and expression of contraction associated proteins in myometrium. Eur. J. Immunol. 2018, 48, 1350–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. An overview of the ubiquitin–proteasome system (UPS). UPS-mediated protein degradation requires a series of essential components: ubiquitin, ubiquitin-activating enzymes (E1s), ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes (E2s), ubiquitin ligases (E3s) and the 26S proteasome. Within the UPS a reversed reaction of protein deubiquitylation catalyzed by deubiquitinases (DUBs) is also performed. Proteasome inhibitors targeting different components of the UPS are included (additional inhibitors targeting the 26S proteasome and the immunoproteasome are shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4, respectively).
Figure 1. An overview of the ubiquitin–proteasome system (UPS). UPS-mediated protein degradation requires a series of essential components: ubiquitin, ubiquitin-activating enzymes (E1s), ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes (E2s), ubiquitin ligases (E3s) and the 26S proteasome. Within the UPS a reversed reaction of protein deubiquitylation catalyzed by deubiquitinases (DUBs) is also performed. Proteasome inhibitors targeting different components of the UPS are included (additional inhibitors targeting the 26S proteasome and the immunoproteasome are shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4, respectively).
Cancers 12 00902 g001
Figure 2. UPS plays a role in regulating tumor metabolism. The UPS, especially the 26S proteasome complex, modulates both mitochondrial morphology and dynamics as well as cross-talks with the autophagy pathway.
Figure 2. UPS plays a role in regulating tumor metabolism. The UPS, especially the 26S proteasome complex, modulates both mitochondrial morphology and dynamics as well as cross-talks with the autophagy pathway.
Cancers 12 00902 g002
Figure 3. Structure and inhibitors of the 26S proteasome complex. The 26S complex consists of a 20S catalytic core particle which is capped at both ends by 19S regulatory particles. Inhibitors targeting the proteasome complex are generally divided into two groups: inhibitors of 20S catalytic core particle and inhibitors of 19S regulatory particles.
Figure 3. Structure and inhibitors of the 26S proteasome complex. The 26S complex consists of a 20S catalytic core particle which is capped at both ends by 19S regulatory particles. Inhibitors targeting the proteasome complex are generally divided into two groups: inhibitors of 20S catalytic core particle and inhibitors of 19S regulatory particles.
Cancers 12 00902 g003
Figure 4. Structure and inhibitors of the immunoproteasome complex. In immunoproteasome, β5 (PSMB5), β1 (PSMB6), and β2 (PSMB7) of the constitutive proteasome complex are replaced by their respective inducible counterparts β5i (LMP7) β1i (LMP2), and β2i (MECL-1), under inflammatory conditions and certain pathological states, including cancer. ONX-0914, PR-924 and KZR-616 are reported as selective inhibitors of immunoproteasome (Table 3).
Figure 4. Structure and inhibitors of the immunoproteasome complex. In immunoproteasome, β5 (PSMB5), β1 (PSMB6), and β2 (PSMB7) of the constitutive proteasome complex are replaced by their respective inducible counterparts β5i (LMP7) β1i (LMP2), and β2i (MECL-1), under inflammatory conditions and certain pathological states, including cancer. ONX-0914, PR-924 and KZR-616 are reported as selective inhibitors of immunoproteasome (Table 3).
Cancers 12 00902 g004
Table 1. Inhibitors targeting E1s, E2s and E3s.
Table 1. Inhibitors targeting E1s, E2s and E3s.
CompoundsTargetModes of ActionTargeted Cancer Types in Preclinical StudiesTargeted Cancer Types in Clinical Studies or TherapiesOther DiseaseRef.
Inhibitors targeting E1s of the UPS
PYR-41UBA1Irreversibly binds to the active cysteine in UBA1 and kill tumor cells by inhibiting cytokine-induced NF-κB activation, and promoting p53 accumulationProstate cancer
Thyroid cancer
Hypertensive heart diseases/
Sepsis
[1,2,3,4,5,6]
MLN4924NAECovalently binds the nucleotide-binding site of NAE and generates a NEDD8-MLN4924 adduct that further undermines protein turnover leading to apoptosis in cancer cellsLiver cancer
Pancreatic cancer
Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML)
Multiple Myeloma
Lymphoma
Melanoma
Lung Cancer
Mesothelioma
Pulmonary inflammation/
Ipopolysaccharide-induced kidney damage/
Spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion injury/
Myelodysplastic Syndromes
[7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]
Inhibitors targeting E2s of the UPS
CC0651hCdc34An allosteric inhibitor of human E2 enzyme hCdc34, causes large-scale structural rearrangements and affects the discharge of ubiquitin to acceptor lysine residuesProstate cancer
Colon cancer
No reported applications[17]
NSC697923Ubc13–Uev1A E2Blocks the formation of the E2–Ub thioester conjugate and inhibits the activation of NF-κB signaling leading to reduced proliferation and cell viabilityMelanoma
B-cell lymphoma
Neuroblastoma
Colorectal Cancer
Diabetic nephropathy[18,19,20,21,22]
Inhibitors targeting E3s of the UPS
Nutlin-3aMdm2Competitively binds the Mdm2-P53 interacting site, activates P53 pathway, and thus results in cell cycle arrest, cell death, and growth inhibitionAcute/Chronic lymphocytic leukemia
Hodgkin lymphoma
Pancreatic cancer
Glioblastoma
Sarcoma
Colon cancer
Breast cancer
Ovarian cancer
Lung cancer
Ewing sarcoma
Pulmonary arterial hypertension[23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]
RG7388 (R05503781)
RG7112 (R05045337)
Mdm2The derivatives of nutlin-3a and Inhibits Mdm2-P53 binding site Acute myeloid leukemia
Relapsed or refractory Acute myeloid leukemia
Multiple myeloma
Relapsed multiple myeloma
Glioblastoma
Ovarian cancer
Childhood sarcoma
Neuroblastoma
Breast cancer
Lung cancer
Polycythemia vera/
Essential Thrombocythemia
[36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43]
GDC-0152
SM-406
IAPsPotent and orally bioavailable SMAC mimetic and antagonists of the inhibitor of IAPs with highly effective in induction of apoptosis in xenograft tumors, and is capable of inhibition of tumor growthOsteosarcoma
Leukemia
Thyroid cancer
Glioblastomas
Breast cancer
No reported applications[44,45,46,47,48]
SCF-12FBW7Blocks the substrate-binding pocket and impedes substrate recognition via inhibiting Cdc4 thus hinders tumor progression in colon and prostate cancersColon cancer
Prostate cancer
No reported applications[49]
OridoninFBW7Targets FBW7-c-Myc pathway and activates GSK-3, decreases c-Myc and induces apoptosis in leukemia and lymphoma cellsMyelogenous leukemia
Breast cancer
Myocardial ischemia
Reperfusion injury
[50,51,52]
Compound #25SKP2Directly binds SKP2, selectively suppresses Skp2 E3 ligase activity and exhibits potent antitumor activities in multiple animal modelsProstate cancerNo reported applications[53]
NAHACdc20Decreases Cdc20 expression and inhibits tumor proliferation in vitro and in vivo associated with the induction of apoptosisBreast cancerNo reported applications[54]
CM11-1E6APActs as an E6AP inhibitor that prevents polyubiquitination of Prx1 and p53 in E6-independent and E6-dependent mannerOnly in RaPID System cell free systemNo reported applications[55]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, X.; Linder, S.; Bazzaro, M. Drug Development Targeting the Ubiquitin–Proteasome System (UPS) for the Treatment of Human Cancers. Cancers 2020, 12, 902. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12040902

AMA Style

Zhang X, Linder S, Bazzaro M. Drug Development Targeting the Ubiquitin–Proteasome System (UPS) for the Treatment of Human Cancers. Cancers. 2020; 12(4):902. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12040902

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Xiaonan, Stig Linder, and Martina Bazzaro. 2020. "Drug Development Targeting the Ubiquitin–Proteasome System (UPS) for the Treatment of Human Cancers" Cancers 12, no. 4: 902. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12040902

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop