Next Article in Journal
Diversity of Endophytic Yeasts from Agricultural Fruits Positive for Phytohormone IAA Production
Previous Article in Journal
Integrating Human Waste with Microbial Fuel Cells to Elevate the Production of Bioelectricity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Analysis and Modeling of Innovations in the Global Microalgae Lipids Market

by
Natália Santana Carvalho
1,
Luiggi Cavalcanti Pessôa
1,2,*,
Kricelle Mosquera Deamici
3,
Jania Betânia Alves da Silva
1,4,
Fernanda Aleluia de Souza Parga
5,
Carolina Oliveira de Souza
6,
Pedro Paulo Lordelo Guimarães Tavares
6 and
Denilson de Jesus Assis
1,7,*
1
Graduate Program in Chemical Engineering (PPEQ), Polytechnic School, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador 40210-630, Brazil
2
Senai Cimatec University Center, Environment Department, Salvador 41650-010, Brazil
3
GreenCoLab—Associação Oceano Verde, Algarve University, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal
4
Center of Science and Technology, Mechanical Engineering Collegiate, Federal University of Recôncavo of Bahia, Cruz das Almas 44380-000, Brazil
5
Undergraduate Program in Chemical Engineering, Salvador University, Salvador 41820-021, Brazil
6
Graduate Program in Food Science (PGALI), College of Pharmacy, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador 40170-115, Brazil
7
School of Exact and Technological Sciences, Salvador University, Salvador 41820-021, Brazil
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
BioTech 2022, 11(3), 37; https://doi.org/10.3390/biotech11030037
Submission received: 8 July 2022 / Revised: 15 August 2022 / Accepted: 18 August 2022 / Published: 24 August 2022

Abstract

:
Microalgae lipids offer numerous advantages over those of plants and animals, enabling the sustainable commercialization of high value-added products in different markets. Although these markets are in a vertiginous annual expansion, technological life cycle modeling is a tool that has been rarely used for microalgae. Life cycle modeling is capable of assisting with decision-making based on data and is considered as a versatile model, usable in multiple software analyzing and diagnostic tasks. Modeling technological trends makes it possible to categorize the development level of the market and predict phase changes, reducing uncertainties and increasing investments. This study aims to fill this gap by performing a global analysis and modeling of microalgal lipid innovations. The Espacenet and Orbit platforms were used by crossing the keywords “microalgae”, “lipid*”, and the IPC code C12 (biochemistry and microbiology). Different sigmoid growth models were used in the present study. A successive repetition of the Chlorella genus category was found in the keyword clusters regarding extraction and separation of lipids. The life cycle S curve indicates a market starting at the maturity phase, where the BiDoseResp model stands out. The main countries and institutions at the technological forefront are shown, as well as potential technological domains for opening new markets.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The growth of the population is increasing year by year, and it is estimated that the demand for the main sources to feed and maintain, such as energy, water and food, will increase until 2050 worldwide [1]. The use of waste for the development of products with high added value for human needs and the environment has become a worldwide trend, as it meets the challenges associated with the high costs of natural products, environmental impacts caused by waste disposal, and the energy crisis [2,3]. The high demand for lipids in the production of food, lubricants, detergents, biofuels, and nutritional supplements is conventionally derived from oilseed extraction and fossil fuels, which is one of the contributors responsible for the increase in the emission of polluting gases through the burning of organic matter [4]. However, this method may not satisfy the growing demand for this resource because of population growth, and, consequently, the decrease in available arable land and the increase in labor costs and environmental impacts [5,6].
An alternative to these limitations is the development of processes based on a circular economy, which can convert residual substrates into low-cost lipids [7]. To compete with plant-derived lipids in terms of cost, many microbial production technologies have been used in the cultivation of these organisms under specific conditions using agricultural residues as the carbon source. These microbial oils, also known as single-cell oils, have many advantages over plant-derived lipids, such as shorter life cycles, climate and season independence, no use of arable land, and ease of expansion [8].
Microalgae are simple microorganisms that stand out for their metabolic versatility and their ability to convert different compounds into high-value products, especially storage lipids [2,6]. Furthermore, they allow the integration of bioproduct synthesis and waste bioremediation. Pessôa et al. [9] carried out a comprehensive technological prospection involving microalgae biorefinery and effluent treatment, showing that this market, although promising, is still in its infancy, with technical challenges to be overcome. Rumin et al. [10] presented an overview of microalgae research with applications in potential markets until 2019, through the analysis of the main research concepts of the publications, the networks between them, the emerging concepts, and the annual production of articles. However, few studies have addressed technologies for obtaining and applying microalgal oils, encompassing their origins, evolution, market maturity, and socioeconomic context [11]. Thus, it is necessary to search for information on patent bases, as these documents provide information from across the world on technological innovations in the production and evolution of human inventive knowledge, providing data from various corporate and research sectors, which allows the identification of the level of technology maturity, inspiring actions, and providing opportunities for the perception of market needs.
Computational models are gaining attention with advanced software that may be employed for pathway prediction, data analysis, and optimization of bioproducts in microalgae cultivation [12,13]. Banerjee et al. [12] showed the importance of computational modeling and prediction of microalgae growth focused on improved lipid production. Mathematical models are usually included in the prediction behavior, reducing the cost and laboratory work time, and allowing prediction of the relation between microalgae growth with different cultivation conditions, linked to the formation of bioproducts.
Computational prediction makes it possible to reduce uncertainties and increase productivities, categorizing the level of the market and forecasting phase changes. Therefore, these tools are relevant in the long term since they could reduce the costs and the time involved in the process. Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge, studies encompassing technological trend modeling are scarce, and the present study aims to fill this gap. In this context, the objective of this study is to carry out a global technological prospection based on the analysis of patent documents on lipids from microalgae biomass and its main applications through Espacenet and Orbit platforms. A comprehensive technological panorama is shown, covering the main depositors, companies that have been outstanding in the area, their collaboration networks, and emerging technologies. Moreover, the study aims to demonstrate and characterize the global maturity of this market, through a mathematical modeling profile of the technologies over the last 27 years. This study is expected to contribute information that subsidizes the development of new technologies and helps emerging companies in the area to minimize risks in decision-making for investments in research and development.

2. Materials and Methods

Technology prospects were developed by searching patent documents in the European Patent Office (EPO) database, Espacenet (Munich, Germany), and Orbit (Paris, France). The search strategy consisted of combinations between the keywords “Microalgae” and “Lipid*”, in the title or abstract, and International Patent Classification Codes for the chemical and metallurgy areas, related to biochemistry, microbiology, enzymology, mutation, and genetic engineering (C12), and with specificity for microbiological processes (C12R). The combination was selected based on the specificity of the content and the number of documents to be analyzed. Espacenet data were retrieved in Excel (Redmond, United States of America) with the help of CSVed software and used to analyze the origin and annual evolution of documents, whereas Orbit was used to consult the predominant technological domains, the main depositors, and their collaboration networks. In addition, all abstracts were read, and the information contained in the documents made it possible to identify details of the innovations, such as microalgae genera and predominant applicators, characteristics of microbial lipids, and their applications.
The cumulative data on the number of documents over the years were adjusted to different sigmoid growth models (Boltziv, DoseResp, BiDoseResp, Logistic, Gompertz, and Richards) as they are widely used to adjust technology diffusion data and trace trends [14,15]. Technology diffusion is comprehensively accepted as tracing a sigmoidal curve that is similar to a biotic growth path. Therefore, those empirical growth models are useful for mimicking technology data [15].
OriginPro 8.1—OriginLab software was used to adjust the data. Non-linear models, including sigmoidal ones, are predefined in Origin. Figure 1 summarizes the methodology used in this study.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Table of Scope and Analysis of International Codes

Table 1 shows the results of the combinations of keywords and international classification codes. The search for “Microalgae”, “Lipid *”, and C12 code conditioned the retrieval of 274 documents, most likely to meet the scope of the research. It is also a feasible number for data refinement. The combination of the words “Microalgae” and “Lipid*” resulted in a greater number of documents (347). However, this strategy included documents dealing with technologies that go beyond the production and/or application of lipids of microalgal origin. In contrast, the use of the C12R code associated with keywords restricted the search for documents related to microbial processes, disregarding the subclasses of C12 related to the recovery of products, treatments, and applications.
The distribution of patent documents by international classification codes (IPC) is shown in Figure 2. IPC organizes patents according to their technical fields through a system that classifies patents according to the topic. The data revealed that 63% of the recovered documents were applied to topics such as propagation processes, maintenance, preservation, and composition of unicellular algae, as well as preparations containing microorganisms (C12N1/12). Technologies involving the use of microalgae and the production of fats, oils, and waxes (C12P7/64) represented 56% of the recovered documents, whereas 35% dealt with processes using algae (C12R1/89). Thus, a significant portion of the retrieved documents were included in the research boundaries. The portion represented by codes with less than 10% participation in the documents covers technologies applied to the development of equipment for characterizing microorganisms and their use as a catalyst (C12M1/00), the treatment of microorganisms with electrical or magnetic energy (C12N13/00), and genetic mutations for performance improvements (C12N15/79). It should be noted that the number of codes exceeds the total number of documents because many documents fall under more than one classification.

3.2. Technological Domains and Main Products

The portfolio of technological domains can be extracted from the IPC codes themselves, which is a more visual way of analyzing the landscape of technological applications. Figure 3 illustrates the diversity of the economic sectors associated with microalgal biomass lipids. Note that more than one patent can be associated with more than one technological domain. Therefore, the total number counted was 314, that is, greater than the total prospected documents. The greater the color intensity, the more documents are associated with the technological domain. The numbers show the quantity of documents in each technological domain.
Biotechnology (314), materials chemistry (54), and food chemistry (36) are the most prominent sectors; therefore, they are the most explored and prioritized market actions. Moreover, both computer technology (4) and microstructure and nanotechnology (2) are areas that present some interface with microalgal lipids but remain little explored. Notably, these are two key areas facing the new industrial revolution, the well-known Industry 4.0; therefore, they are developing markets in which startups can start exploring disruptive technologies. Among the applications reported in the literature, the most predominant was the production of biodiesel, present in 21.24% of the documents referring to production, followed by the production of biofuels, present in 7.96% of the documents (Figure 4).
Biodiesel is produced from vegetable oils and animal fat. In relation to microalgal biomass oil, conventional vegetable oils have two main disadvantages: first, they can be used for human consumption, which can generate an increase in the price of these oils used for food; and second, the high costs of biodiesel. Even if it has advantages over diesel oil, the high costs may limit production targets. Another disadvantage is that these raw materials can be grown in habitats that affect associated biological diversity. These concerns have increased the interest in the production of biofuels from non-food feedstocks. An alternative would be to use low-cost non-edible oils, such as used frying oils and animal fats; however, the quantities available are not sufficient to meet the current demand for biodiesel.
Thus, owing to these challenges, together with the high volatility of crude oil prices and the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, the use of microalgae for biodiesel production appears to be a viable alternative and arouses interest. Furthermore, compared to other crops, microalgae have a high oil content; therefore, in the long term, industrial microalgal use will offer greater opportunities and a rapid growth rate [16,17]. From an environmental perspective, the third generation of biofuels has been strongly encouraged in the world, especially from the primer on the water-energy-food nexus [9,18]. Algal fuels, unlike those derived from petroleum, are sulfur-free and have a low ecological footprint, reducing the impacts of climate change and the greenhouse effect [19,20]. From a marketing perspective, the evidence in Figure 4 suggests that biofuels from microalgal lipids have been one of the main applications. Biodiesel (48), biofuels (18), and bioenergy (4) patents have been added, totaling 70, against 90 unidentified patents. The Global Market Insight report highlights that algae-based biofuels can replace petroleum-based fuels and are among the fastest growing sectors worldwide [21].
The analysis carried out by the website’s analysts is that the leading companies in the global algal oil market should invest in Research and Development (R&D) during the period 2022–2028, improving the production of algal oil and increasing their collaborations, mainly in biofuels for the transport sector. This report also mentions that the main leading companies are: Cargill, Lonza Group, Seaweed Energy Solutions, TerraVia Holdings, Royal DSM, Cyanotech, Algix, Alltech, Diversified Energy, and DIC. However, as will be explained later, the evidence suggests that none of these companies have played a leading role in the deposition of technologies or cooperation with research centers.
Although this number is significant for biofuels and illustrates a technological race for the industrialization of algal biofuels, there is still energy infeasibility associated with the cultivation, harvesting, and processing of algae. Thus, for fossil fuel substitution to be fully considered, a biorefinery approach must be considered [22,23].
It should be noted that human health follows in the sequence, after biofuels. According to Global Market Insights [24], the EPA/DHA (omega-3) market will grow by 2026 at an annual rate of 7.2%, while the algal oil market for infant formula is estimated to grow by more than 8.5% per year until 2026 [25]. The report points out that changing consumer lifestyles and increasing urbanization are key factors for the growth of these markets.

3.3. Temporal Evolution of Documents and Mathematical Modeling of the Technological Life Cycle

The graph in Figure 5 represents the annual evolution of the number of patents filed regarding the use of microalgal biomass in the production of oils between 1993 and 2020. The historical context is a major factor for this growth in the number of patent applications. Since the oil crisis of the 1970s, there has been considerable interest in the search for alternative energy sources [26]. In the early 1970s, the oil crisis severely affected the French economy, and the French government sought to restructure its energy policy to reduce its dependence on imported oil supplies [27].
The data showed that the first patent application in the area was requested in 1993 by a French state-owned energy research company. Its innovation dealt with the development of a process responsible for the selective microalgal production of polyunsaturated lipids for energy application (EP0554162A1). The 1990s were also marked by the emergence of international agreements, such as the Kyoto Protocol, which was created in 1997 with a commitment to reduce the greenhouse effect and pollutants that cause global warming.
This context has further highlighted the importance of sustainable production and, consequently, the interest of industries, universities, and research institutes in developing technologies aimed at sustainable development [28]. These and other related events have corroborated the increasing number of patent documents in recent years. Since 2008, the number of patents requested has increased, which may have occurred as a result of greater interest in the biotechnological potential of microalgae because of their wide biodiversity and the large number of substances they can synthesize [29].
The apex of the global financial crisis occurred in 2008, together with the oil crisis, both of which encouraged the development of alternative energy sources [30]. In 2010, there was a significant increase in patents compared with previous years. In this period, scientific studies have demonstrated the potential of microalgae cultivation to produce oils for biodiesel, compared to the production from traditional land cultures [31]. Subsequently, worldwide interest has aroused in developing innovative methods to optimize the production and properties of microalgae oils. During the period evaluated, the largest number of patent filings occurred in 2014, with a total of 39 patent documents, which may be related to greater financial investment by investor countries [32,33].
In addition, 2013 was marked by the Conference of the Parties (COP-19), which may have been an important factor in the growth in the number of patents in 2014, as a new agreement to reduce emissions was established. The agreement includes measures that presuppose climate damage, and the financing of developing countries that already suffer from climate change due to the activities of developed countries. In other words, COP-19 sought to get governments to define projects to reduce the emission of gases that aggravate the greenhouse effect [34,35].
From 2017 onwards, there was a sharp decrease in the number of registered documents. This behavior is expected and is associated with confidential documents, which correspond to 18 months from the filing date, guaranteed by the Industrial Property Law to the depositor [36].
The life cycle of microalgae lipid technologies can be measured by calculating the parameters from fitted sigmoid empirical models. According to Cantú and Pedroza [37], the curve generated by the annual accumulation of patents allows us to classify the development stage of a technology as emerging, growing, mature, or declining. Thus, the models can characterize and justify which growth phase the prospected technologies are in by assisting start-ups, R&D decision makers, and investors. The statistical data of adjustment to the growth models, shown in Table 2, revealed that, except for the Richards model, the cumulative patent data showed good adjustments to the other models tested (R2 > 0.999). Among the well-fitted and significant models for the F test (p < 0.01), the BiDoseResp model showed the highest correspondence with the data (99.96%) and the highest F-value (15,665.72), indicating that its mean squares were greater than those of the residue; therefore, more significant than others.
The BiDoseResp model, represented in Equation (1), is characterized by double sigmoid behavior, according to its growth rate.
P D = A 1 + A 2 A 1 p 1 + 10 t 1 t h 1 + 1 p 1 + 10 t 2 t h 2
PD is the cumulative number of patent documents; A1 and A2 are asymptotic values at the bottom and top of the curve, respectively; p is the ratio of the two segments; h1 and h2 are the slope coefficients of the first and second segments, respectively; t1 and t2 are the characteristic times of the two segments, respectively. The technological trend of microalgae lipids adjusted to the BiDoseResp model is shown in Figure 6.
Adjustment of the technological trajectory of microalgae lipids to the BiDoseResp model (Figure 6) resulted in mathematical data (Table 3), which allowed the identification of the technology development stages.
The results showed an unclear difference between the phases (segments) of the technology in question. The first phase started in 1993 and showed a tendency to decline in approximately 2010, while the second was in progress. In addition, the ratio between the segments showed a value < 0 (p = −0.062). This indicates that the number of documents on the border of the two segments was closer to the initial value, and the amplitude of the first segment in the curve was smaller than that of the second [38].
The values of t1 and t2, shown in Table 2, indicate that the first and second phases of the technology reached state-of-the-art development stages in 2005 and 2013, respectively. At this stage, the patent application rate (h) is at its maximum. Thus, interest in innovations involving microalgae lipids showed a higher growth rate in the first phase (h1 = 0.389), 12 years after the first patent application. In the second phase, the growth rate was twice as low (h2 = 0.193) and reached 20 years after the beginning of the first phase.
A comparison of the curves shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6 indicates that the development of technologies related to microalgae lipids is in the early stage of maturity, according to the technology life cycle map shown in Figure 7.
Studies have pointed out that technologies in the maturity stage tend to become key technologies, characterized by their integration into products or processes and high levels of competitive impact [40,41]. Innovations involving microalgae lipids are at an opportune moment to be commercially explored to meet current socio-economic and environmental emergencies. It is noteworthy, however, that, as microalgae lipids cover a broad spectrum of applications and technological domains previously discussed, applications for human health seem to be much more advanced compared to biofuels.

3.4. Geographic Coverage, Main Investors, and Cooperation Networks

The data presented in Figure 8 reveal that South Korea presented the highest number of deposits related to oils accumulated by microalgae, approximately 32.12% of the total documents recovered. Next was China, followed by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and the United States of America. Other countries presented 17.15% of the total number of patents filed. Historically, East Asian countries, such as South Korea, China, and Japan, have sought to diversify their energy sources to reduce dependence on fossil oil and meet the global trend in sustainable production [42].
These countries have introduced technological and political initiatives for the development of biofuels and assert themselves as a potential source of ethanol and biodiesel, due to the pressure generated by their domestic needs and commitment to reducing greenhouse gas emissions [42]. In addition, these nations have incentives for R&D, which contribute to an increase in technological products. In South Korea, the Ministry of Land, Transport, and Maritime Affairs invested USD 200 million in research to develop a methodology for producing biofuel using algae and microalgae [44].
In 2016, China had a 60% increase in its foreign investment in renewable energy, reaching a record of USD 32 billion, which includes the investment abroad of 11 new businesses worth more than USD 1 billion each. In 2015, China invested more than USD 100 billion in clean energy, which represents more than double the US investment and was a stimulus for the considerable generation of jobs. In 2017, of the 8.1 million renewable energy jobs that existed globally, 3.5 million were in China, and less than a million were in the United States.
With this, China is a strong candidate to become a world leader in this sector, and with the growth of clean energy in the domestic market, the country has built fundamental economies of scale for the export of clean energy products and services at a competitive cost [45].
The analysis of the information contained in the document summaries made it possible to identify details of the innovations, such as applicants, microalgae genera, predominant objectives, production data, products obtained, energy/carbon sources used, and applications. The data showed that the teaching and research institutions that deposited the most documents related to microalgal biomass oils were located in South Korea. In the early 1990s, Korean companies sought to innovate and compete in the market. The following were among the measures adopted: the transfer, through formal mechanisms, of foreign technologies; hiring of highly qualified labor from other countries; investment in R&D, especially in the educational sector and biotechnology; and government investments in research centers and universities [46,47]. These actions were essential for establishing an intellectual property protection system in the country.
The data in Figure 9 show the distribution of documents by applicants, considering the ten main institutions framed in the following sectors: companies, universities, research institutes, and cooperation agreements. The main research institute was the Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, and the main company was Corbion Biotech. Considering its short existence, emphasis can be placed on the Advanced Biomass R&D Center (ABC). It was founded in 2010, to promote the development of microalgae-based biorefinery technologies with significant financial support (approximately USD 100 million over nine years) from the Korean Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning (MSIP), leading to the establishment of a comprehensive and diversified innovation ecosystem encompassing more than 25 research groups in the specialties of psychology, molecular biology, chemistry, and chemical engineering.
To better utilize microalgal biomass to produce biofuels and biomaterials at a commercial level, new strains of microalgae with prominent features and energy-efficient technologies for mass cultivation, harvesting, and conversion are being intensively developed [48]. The data in Figure 9 show the distribution of documents by applicants framed in the following sectors: universities, research centers, companies, and cooperation between inventor institutions.
Notably, the Dutch Corbion Biotech is among the companies that deposit the most patents. Its portfolio of sustainable products stands out for its omega-3 from algae, as an alternative to fish oil, supporting healthy diets, and reducing pressure on marine resources without affecting the carbon footprint [49]. With six patents in the area, the French company Fermentalg is also a company that sells vegan omega-3 in a sustainable way through strains of Schizochytrium sp. According to the company’s website, the products are obtained in the form of natural triglycerides, without any physicochemical concentration steps, through refining processes without complex chemistry [50].
Figure 9 illustrates that six of the top ten institutions are located in South Korea. South Korea has reached high levels in terms of technological and economic development. This progress is based on premises, such as investment in education and training of human resources, use of reverse engineering to favor assimilation capacity on the part of researchers, training for industrialization, and export incentives. South Korea’s efforts seek to conquer international markets, since a significant part of the Korean economy revolves around exports [46,47,51]. The data in Figure 10 show the distribution of documents categorized by institution according to the data extracted from Orbit for the 30 largest depositors.
Research institutes and companies have deposited more patent documents related to oils of microalgal origin, totaling 73% of the deposits. This information converges with the modeling of the patent documents presented in Figure 6 and Figure 7, showing that the life cycle is at the beginning of the maturation phase; that is, in the third phase. After reaching this stage, commercial risks tend to be reduced, and technology transfer takes place; therefore, the contribution of universities tends to be smaller than that of research centers and companies [52].
Figure 11 illustrates the cooperation networks between the portfolios of applicants. This figure is in line with Figure 8, Figure 9 and Figure 10, which illustrate the greater role of South Korea and its respective institutions. The larger the diameter of the circle and the thickness of the line, the greater the interaction between them. The numbers represent the quantity of interactions of the main depositors.
Two pieces of evidence can be inferred from this analysis: the prominence of South Korea in terms of the synergy between institutions and universities, and how these cooperations tend to be restricted to the national level. Institutions are mostly cooperating within their national innovation ecosystems. In the coming years, this successful model among institutions will inspire other countries, with expectations to reach beyond national borders.

3.5. Microalgae and Keyword Clusters

Figure 12 presents six clusters of keywords that are most repeated within the prospected patent portfolio: (i) microalgae cultivation, (ii) fatty acid, (iii) extracting lipid, (iv) genus Chlorella, (v) Isochrysis galbana, and (vi) Chlamydomonas. As word size refers to the number of repetitions, some key information can be extracted from each cluster. For example, regarding the first, microalgae cultivation, polyunsaturated acids seem to stand out, as well as carotenoids. For the second, the red cluster, marine microalgae species seem to be preferred, as well as patents aimed at optimizing lipid accumulation. For the third cluster, the majority presence of biofuels is noted, especially biodiesel, which is in line with Figure 4 regarding technological applications.
To a lesser extent, there is the presence of documents aimed at the extraction and separation of lipids, likely related to methods. Regarding the Chlorella genus, there is a successive repetition of this genus category. This correlates with the literature, given that studies have shown that this genus has metabolic characteristics that favor the synthesis of lipids, with the ability to accumulate lipids at 28–32% of its dry mass [53,54]. According to Feng et al. [55], the culture of Chlorella vulgaris reached the highest lipid content, 42%, in cultivation with wastewater treatment. The fifth cluster, in turn, portrays the minority presence of the Isochrysis genus, also focused on bioenergy.
The last cluster, of the genus Chlamydomonas, has the words “biomass”, “Euglena” and “lipid accumulation” highlighted. In a study by Fan and Zheng [56] the highest lipid content was 35.8% for this microalga in a combination of heterotrophic culture and multiple stresses (saline and light). Regarding the reading of patent documents, a similarity with Figure 12 was noted, as the genus Chlorella was mentioned in 14% of the documents, while Chlamydomonas was in second place, mentioned in 11%. On the other hand, 64% of the documents did not specify the microalgae genus; however, two genera appeared with tiny percentages of 5% (Phaeodactylum) and 3% (Tetraselmis). This difference can be attributed to the greater number of words covered by Orbit in comparison to Espacenet, given the greater scope of the search, so these two genres have not been identified by the clusters.

4. Conclusions

This study sought to analyze and model the technological trends encompassing microalgal lipids over the last 27 years. The analysis of the temporal evolution of innovations shows a technological race with the first growth peak in 2006, while the S-curve modeling suggests the beginning of the market maturity phase for the clustering of technologies prospected. To the best of our knowledge, modeling the technological life cycle of microalgae is still scarce in the literature and can be further explored in future studies. For example, knowledge of the individual life cycles for each third-generation biofuel, mainly biodiesel and bio-jet fuel, will be instrumental. Priority research can help companies promote competitive advantages and reduce risks in R&D managers’ decision making.
A limitation of this study was the use of the C12 code, which restricted the search to biochemistry, microbiology, mutation, and genetic engineering. As the “A” classification is designated for human health, future studies may complement the search by working with subclassifications of that group.
The experience of South Korea’s synergistic institutional arrangement can be mimicked by other countries to advance the technological frontiers of microalgae biotechnology more rapidly. Disruptive technologies in this sector hold promise because, as they are platforms for a variety of sustainable products with high added value, a circular economy based on algae benefits not only countries but, above all, the future of the next generation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.d.J.A., L.C.P. and N.S.C.; methodology, D.d.J.A., L.C.P. and N.S.C.; software, L.C.P., P.P.L.G.T. and N.S.C.; validation, K.M.D. and J.B.A.d.S.; formal analysis, D.d.J.A.; investigation, D.d.J.A., F.A.d.S.P., L.C.P. and N.S.C.; resources, C.O.d.S.; data curation, D.d.J.A., L.C.P. and N.S.C.; writing—original draft preparation, D.d.J.A., L.C.P. and N.S.C.; writing—review and editing, D.d.J.A., J.B.A.d.S., K.M.D., L.C.P. and P.P.L.G.T.; visualization, D.d.J.A., J.B.A.d.S., K.M.D., L.C.P. and P.P.L.G.T.; supervision, J.B.A.d.S.; project administration, C.O.d.S. and D.d.J.A.; funding acquisition, C.O.d.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors would like to thank FAPESB—Research Support Foundation of the State of Bahia for the financial support (BOL0642/2020). This study was funded in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Brazil (finance code 001).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the software support provided by Axonal Consultoria Tecnológica.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no financial conflict of interest or other interests that could be perceived to influence the outcomes of the research. All authors of this paper mutually agreed to authorship and submit the manuscript to BioTech.

References

  1. FAO. The Future of Food and Agriculture—Alternative Pathways to 2050|Global Perspectives Studies|Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; Food and Agriculture Organization: Rome, Italy, 2018; ISBN 978-92-5-130158-6. [Google Scholar]
  2. de Jesus, C.S.; Uebel, L.D.S.; Costa, S.S.; Miranda, A.L.; Morais, E.; de Morais, M.G.; Costa, J.A.V.; Nunes, I.L.; Ferreira, E.S.; Druzian, J.I. Outdoor pilot-scale cultivation of Spirulina sp. LEB-18 in different geographic locations for evaluating its growth and chemical composition. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 256, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhu, X.; Qi, J.; Cheng, L.; Zhen, G.; Lu, X.; Zhang, X. Depolymerization and conversion of waste-activated sludge to value-added bioproducts by fungi. Fuel 2022, 320, 123890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Stolarski, M.J.; Warmiński, K.; Krzyżaniak, M.; Olba-Zięty, E.; Stachowicz, P. Energy consumption and heating costs for a detached house over a 12-year period—Renewable fuels versus fossil fuels. Energy 2020, 204, 117952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chintagunta, A.D.; Zuccaro, G.; Kumar, M.; Kumar, S.P.J.; Garlapati, V.K.; Postemsky, P.D.; Kumar, N.S.S.; Chandel, A.K.; Simal-Gandara, J. Biodiesel Production from Lignocellulosic Biomass Using Oleaginous Microbes: Prospects for Integrated Biofuel Production. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 658284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xue, Z.; Li, S.; Yu, W.; Gao, X.; Zheng, X.; Yu, Y.; Kou, X. Research advancement and commercialization of microalgae edible oil: A review. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2021, 101, 5763–5774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kumar, S.P.J.; Banerjee, R. Enhanced lipid extraction from oleaginous yeast biomass using ultrasound assisted extraction: A greener and scalable process. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2019, 52, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jones, A.D.; Boundy-Mills, K.L.; Barla, G.F.; Kumar, S.; Ubanwa, B.; Balan, V. Microbial lipid alternatives to plant lipids. In Microbial Lipid Production; Balan, V., Ed.; Humana Press Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2019; Volume 1995, pp. 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pessôa, L.C.; Deamici, K.M.; Pontes, L.A.M.; Druzian, J.I.; Assis, D.D.J. Technological prospection of microalgae-based biorefinery approach for effluent treatment. Algal Res. 2021, 60, 102504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rumin, J.; Nicolau, E.; de Oliveira, R.G.; Fuentes-Grünewald, C.; Picot, L. Analysis of scientific research driving microalgae market opportunities in Europe. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shokravi, Z.; Shokravi, H.; Chyuan, O.H.; Lau, W.J.; Koloor, S.S.R.; Petrů, M.; Ismail, A.F. Improving ‘lipid productivity’ in microalgae by bilateral enhancement of biomass and lipid contents: A review. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Banerjee, A.; Kumar, N.; Varjani, S.J.; Guria, C.; Bandopadhyay, R.; Shukla, P.; Banerjee, C. Computational Modelling and Prediction of Microalgae Growth Focused Towards Improved Lipid Production. In Biosynthetic Technology and Environmental Challenges, Varjani, S.; Parameswaran, B., Kumar, S., Khare, S., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2018; pp. 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Barten, R.; Chin-On, R.; de Vree, J.; van Beersum, E.; Wijffels, R.H.; Barbosa, M.J.; Janssen, M. Growth parameter estimation and model simulation for three industrially relevant microalgae: Picochlorum, Nannochloropsis, and Neochloris. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2022, 119, 1416–1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Aferni, A.; Guettari, M.; Tajouri, T. Mathematical model of Boltzmann’s sigmoidal equation applicable to the spreading of the coronavirus (Covid-19) waves. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 40400–40408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Marinakis, Y.D. Forecasting technology diffusion with the Richards model. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2012, 79, 172–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mata, T.M.; Martins, A.A.; Caetano, N.S. Microalgae for biodiesel production and other applications: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2010, 14, 217–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Chen, J.; Li, J.; Dong, W.; Zhang, X.; Tyagi, R.D.; Drogui, P.; Surampalli, R.Y. The potential of microalgae in biodiesel production. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 90, 336–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hoff, H. Understanding the Nexus. Background Paper for the Bonn2011 Conference: The Water, Energy and Food Security Nexus; Stockholm Environment Institute: Stockholm, Sweden, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  19. Bwapwa, J.K.; Anandraj, A.; Trois, C. Possibilities for conversion of microalgae oil into aviation fuel: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 80, 1345–1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Datta, A.; Hossain, A.; Roy, S. An overview on biofuels and their advantages and disadvantages. Asian J. Chem. 2019, 31, 1851–1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Global Market Insights. Algae Oil Market Size, Regional Outlook, Application Growth Potential, COVID-19 Impact Analysis, Competitive Market Growth & Forecast, 2022–2028; Global Market Insights Inc.: Selbyville, DE, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  22. Show, P.L. Global market and economic analysis of microalgae technology: Status and perspectives. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 357, 127329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Uduman, N.; Qi, Y.; Danquah, M.K.; Forde, G.M.; Hoadley, A. Dewatering of microalgal cultures: A major bottleneck to algae-based fuels. J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 2010, 2, 012701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Global Market Insights. EPA/DHA (Omega 3) Ingredients Market Size by Source (Anchovy/Sardine Oil, High Concentrates, Medium Concentrates, Low Concentrates, Algae Oil, Tuna Oil, Cod Liver Oil, Salmon Oil, Krill Oil, Menhaden Oil), By Application (Dietary supplements, Pharmaceuticals, Functional Foods, Pet & Animal Feed, Infant Formulas), Industry Analysis Report, Regional Outlook, Application Development Potential, Price Trends, Competitive Market Share & Forecast, 2020–2026; Global Market Insights Inc.: Selbyville, DE, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  25. Global Market Insights. Global DHA Algae Oil for Infant Formula Market Size by Content (30%-40%, 40%-50%), By End-Use (0-3 Years Old, 3-6 Years Old), Industry Analysis Report, Regional Outlook, End-use Development Potential, Price Trend, Competitive Market Share & Forecast, 2020–2026; Global Market Insights Inc.: Selbyville, DE, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  26. Luna-Rubio, R.; Trejo-Perea, M.; Vargas-Vázquez, D.; Ríos-Moreno, G.J. Optimal sizing of renewable hybrids energy systems: A review of methodologies. Sol. Energy 2012, 86, 1077–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ang, J.B. CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and output in France. Energy Policy 2007, 35, 4772–4778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Miyamoto, M.; Takeuchi, K. Climate agreement and technology diffusion: Impact of the Kyoto Protocol on international patent applications for renewable energy technologies. Energy Policy 2019, 129, 1331–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Rosa, F.; Gouveia, L.; Reis, A. Microalgas: Um Futuro Mais Sustentável e Mais Verde. Available online: https://repositorio.lneg.pt/handle/10400.9/378 (accessed on 5 June 2022).
  30. Santos, M.A.; Luna, S.; Quintella, C.M. Prospecção tecnológica sobre o cenário brasileiro no que tange o petróleo e seus derivados com a substituição pelos biocombustíveis. Cad. De Prospecção 2013, 6, 337–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Defanti, L.S.; Siqueira, N.S.; Linhares, P.C. Produção de biocombustíveis a partir de algas fotossintetizantes. Bols. De Valor Rev. De Divulg. Do Proj. Univ. Petrobras E IF Flum. 2010, 1, 11–21. [Google Scholar]
  32. Almeida, L.M.R.; de Souza, C.O.; Ribeiro, P.L.L.; Druzian, J.I.; Miranda, M.S. Estudo prospectivo sobre produtos alimentares incorporados de biomassa de microalgas. Cad. De Prospecção 2017, 10, 893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Soares, C.C.; Druzian, J.I.; Lobato, A.K.D.C.L. Estudo prospectivo de patentes relacionadas a utilização do Bacillus subtilis em bioprocessos. Cad. De Prospecção 2018, 11, 295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. de Vasconcelos, D.C.; Marquesan, F.F.S. A Expectativa Para a Conferência de Paris (COP-21). In Proceedings of the XVII ENGEMA, São Paulo, Brazil, 30 September–1 October 2015. [Google Scholar]
  35. Vieira, A.C.F. A polidez climática através das Conferências das Partes: Ensaio político. Rev. Bras. De Gestão Ambient. E Sustentabilidade 2018, 5, 75–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Brazil. Lei n. 9.279, de 14 de maio de 1996. Available online: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l9279.htm#:~:text=LEI%20N%C2%BA%209.279%2C%20DE%2014,obriga%C3%A7%C3%B5es%20relativos%20%C3%A0%20propriedade%20industrial.&text=Art.,obriga%C3%A7%C3%B5es%20relativos%20%C3%A0%20propriedade%20industrial.&text=V%20%2D%20repress%C3%A3o%20%C3%A0%20concorr%C3%AAncia%20desleal (accessed on 5 June 2022).
  37. Cantú, S.O.; Pedroza, A. ¿Que es la Gestión de la Innovación y la Tecnología (GInnT)? J. Technol. Manag. Innov. 2006, 1, 64–82. [Google Scholar]
  38. Huo, J.-X.; Ma, F.-H.; Ji, X.-L. Porosity and permeability variations of a dam curtain during dissolution. Water Sci. Eng. 2019, 12, 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Taylor, M.; Taylor, A. The technology life cycle: Conceptualization and managerial implications. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2012, 140, 541–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gao, L.; Porter, A.L.; Wang, J.; Fang, S.; Zhang, X.; Ma, T.; Wang, W.; Huang, L. Technology life cycle analysis method based on patent documents. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2013, 80, 398–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Oliveira, A.S.; Silva, B.C.D.S.; Ferreira, C.V.; Sampaio, R.R.; Machado, B.A.S.; Coelho, R.S. Adding technology sustainability evaluation to product development: A proposed methodology and an assessment model. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Masiero, G. Developments of biofuels in Brazil and East Asia: Experiences and challenges. Rev. Bras. De Política Int. 2011, 54, 97–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Flourish.studio. Available online: https://flourish.studio (accessed on 4 June 2022).
  44. Yang, J.-W. Eeeforum. Algal Fuel Research in Korea. 2010. Available online: https://eeeforum.sec.tsukuba.ac.jp/3ef/3rd/pdf/IS5.pdf (accessed on 5 June 2022).
  45. Jaeger, J.; Joffe, P.; Song, R. WRI.org. China Is Leaving the US behind on Clean Energy Investment 2017. Available online: https://www.wri.org/insights/china-leaving-us-behind-clean-energy-investment (accessed on 6 July 2022).
  46. Kim, L. Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property Rights: Lessons from Korea’s Experience; International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD): Seoul, Korea, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  47. Alves, S.C.M. Propriedade Intelectual e Desenvolvimento Econômico: Um estudo comparativo entre Brasil e Coréia do Sul. Bachelor’s Thesis, Centro Universitário de Brasília-UniCEUB, Brasília, Brazil, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  48. Chang, Y.K. Introducing Advanced Biomass R&D Center. Available online: https://cbe.kaist.ac.kr/webzine/1708/sub04_01.php (accessed on 6 June 2022).
  49. Corbion. AlgaPrimeTM DHA—Sustainable, Affordable, and at Scale. Available online: https://www.corbion.com/en/Products/Algae-ingredients-products/AlgaPrimeDHA#:~:text=AlgaPrime%E2%84%A2%20DHA%20%E2%80%93%20sustainable%2C%20affordable%2C%20and%20at%20scale&text=AlgaPrime%E2%84%A2%20DHA%20is%20the,without%20impacting%20the%20carbon%20footprint (accessed on 4 June 2022).
  50. Fermentalg. DHA ORIGINS®, Sustainably-Produced Omega-3 for Natural Health. Available online: https://www.fermentalg.com/dha-origins/ (accessed on 6 June 2022).
  51. da Silva, J.P. Produção de Single Cell Protein (SCP) por Leveduras Utilizando o Glicerol Bruto Como Fonte de Carbono. Master’s Thesis, Federal University of Recôncavo Baiano-UFRB, Cruz das Almas, Brazil, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  52. Phaal, R.; Routley, M.; Athanassopoulou, N.; Probert, D. Charting exploitation strategies for emerging technology. Res. Technol. Manag. 2012, 55, 34–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Chisti, Y. Biodiesel from microalgae. Biotechnol. Adv. 2007, 25, 294–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. dos Santos, R.R. Estudo de diferentes condições de cultivo de Chlorella vulgaris visando o aumento da produtividade em biomassa e lipídios. Master’s Thesis, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro-UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  55. Feng, Y.; Li, C.; Zhang, D. Lipid production of Chlorella vulgaris cultured in artificial wastewater medium. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 101–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Fan, J.; Zheng, L. Acclimation to NaCl and light stress of heterotrophic Chlamydomonas reinhardtii for lipid accumulation. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2017, 124, 302–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Illustrative scheme of the methodological steps performed. Image created with BioRender. * Truncation symbol representing the sequence of characters of any length.
Figure 1. Illustrative scheme of the methodological steps performed. Image created with BioRender. * Truncation symbol representing the sequence of characters of any length.
Biotech 11 00037 g001
Figure 2. Distribution of patent documents by classification codes.
Figure 2. Distribution of patent documents by classification codes.
Biotech 11 00037 g002
Figure 3. Technological domains involved in the prospected codes. The numbers show the quantity of documents in each technological domain.
Figure 3. Technological domains involved in the prospected codes. The numbers show the quantity of documents in each technological domain.
Biotech 11 00037 g003
Figure 4. Number of documents by applications. “N.O” refers to unspecified.
Figure 4. Number of documents by applications. “N.O” refers to unspecified.
Biotech 11 00037 g004
Figure 5. Number of documents by years.
Figure 5. Number of documents by years.
Biotech 11 00037 g005
Figure 6. The technological trend of microalgae lipids.
Figure 6. The technological trend of microalgae lipids.
Biotech 11 00037 g006
Figure 7. Typical S-curve of the life cycle of technologies. Source: Adapted from Taylor and Taylor [39].
Figure 7. Typical S-curve of the life cycle of technologies. Source: Adapted from Taylor and Taylor [39].
Biotech 11 00037 g007
Figure 8. Distribution of patent filings by country. EP: European Patent Office; WO: World Intellectual Property Organization. Created with flourish.studio [43].
Figure 8. Distribution of patent filings by country. EP: European Patent Office; WO: World Intellectual Property Organization. Created with flourish.studio [43].
Biotech 11 00037 g008
Figure 9. Top ten applicants for documents in relation to microalgae lipids.
Figure 9. Top ten applicants for documents in relation to microalgae lipids.
Biotech 11 00037 g009
Figure 10. Number of documents by institutions.
Figure 10. Number of documents by institutions.
Biotech 11 00037 g010
Figure 11. Interaction networks between the main depositors and their respective institutions. The numbers represent the quantity of interactions of the main depositors.
Figure 11. Interaction networks between the main depositors and their respective institutions. The numbers represent the quantity of interactions of the main depositors.
Biotech 11 00037 g011
Figure 12. Clusters of the most repeated keywords in the document portfolio.
Figure 12. Clusters of the most repeated keywords in the document portfolio.
Biotech 11 00037 g012
Table 1. Search strategy based on patent documents.
Table 1. Search strategy based on patent documents.
KeywordsCodesTotal
MicroalgaeLipid *C12 1C12R 2
X X 4027
X X1472
XX 347
XX X110
XXX 274
1 Biochemistry, microbiology, enzymology, mutation and genetic engineering. 2 Processes involving microorganisms. * Truncation symbol representing the sequence of characters of any length. X: Symbol to indicate the codes and keywords used in the combinations.
Table 2. Adjustment of the accumulated number of documents to sigmoid growth models.
Table 2. Adjustment of the accumulated number of documents to sigmoid growth models.
ModelF-Valuep-ValueR2
BoltzIV11,042.05<0.010.9990
DoseResp14,390.94<0.010.9992
BiDoseResp15,665.72<0.010.9996
Logistic14,490.49<0.010.9992
Gompertz7888.21<0.010.9981
Richards42.11<0.010.7767
Table 3. BiDoseResp model parameters for technological trend of microalgae lipids.
Table 3. BiDoseResp model parameters for technological trend of microalgae lipids.
A1 A2 t1 t2 h1 h2 p
Value2.873287.1622005.9522013.1710.3890.193−0.062
Standard error0.6173.2010.1870.1380.2050.010.035
R20.9996
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Carvalho, N.S.; Pessôa, L.C.; Deamici, K.M.; da Silva, J.B.A.; de Souza Parga, F.A.; de Souza, C.O.; Tavares, P.P.L.G.; de Jesus Assis, D. Analysis and Modeling of Innovations in the Global Microalgae Lipids Market. BioTech 2022, 11, 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/biotech11030037

AMA Style

Carvalho NS, Pessôa LC, Deamici KM, da Silva JBA, de Souza Parga FA, de Souza CO, Tavares PPLG, de Jesus Assis D. Analysis and Modeling of Innovations in the Global Microalgae Lipids Market. BioTech. 2022; 11(3):37. https://doi.org/10.3390/biotech11030037

Chicago/Turabian Style

Carvalho, Natália Santana, Luiggi Cavalcanti Pessôa, Kricelle Mosquera Deamici, Jania Betânia Alves da Silva, Fernanda Aleluia de Souza Parga, Carolina Oliveira de Souza, Pedro Paulo Lordelo Guimarães Tavares, and Denilson de Jesus Assis. 2022. "Analysis and Modeling of Innovations in the Global Microalgae Lipids Market" BioTech 11, no. 3: 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/biotech11030037

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop