Next Article in Journal
Behavioral Effect of Terahertz Waves in C57BL/6 Mice
Next Article in Special Issue
Development of an Electrochemical CCL5 Chemokine Immunoplatform for Rapid Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis
Previous Article in Journal
Graphene Quantum Dots-Based Electrochemical Biosensing Platform for Early Detection of Acute Myocardial Infarction
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biosensors
Volume 12
Issue 2
10.3390/bios12020078
biosensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Sensitive Monoclonal-Antibody-Based ELISA for Forchlorfenuron Residue Analysis in Food Samples

by
Xinmei Liu
,
Bo Xie
,
Yongjian Cheng
,
Lin Luo
,
Yifan Liang
and
Zhili Xiao
*
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Food Quality and Safety, College of Food Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biosensors 2022, 12(2), 78; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12020078
Submission received: 25 November 2021 / Revised: 23 January 2022 / Accepted: 24 January 2022 / Published: 28 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanobiosensors and Immunoassay)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this study, forchlorfenuron (CPPU) was coupled with succinic anhydride to yield a CPPU hapten (CPPU-COOH), and a high-affinity monoclonal antibody (mAb) that can specifically recognize CPPU was produced. Using this mAb as a recognition reagent, a sensitive indirect competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (icELISA) for CPPU was optimized, which exhibits an IC50 of 1.04 ng/mL, a limit of detection of 0.16 ng/mL, and a linear range of 0.31–3.43 ng/mL for CPPU. Cross-reactivity percentages with six analogues were all below 6%. The average recovery rates for cucumber and orange samples were from 85.23% to 119.14%. The analysis results of this icELISA showed good consistency with those from liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. These results suggest that the proposed icELISA provides a sensitive, specific, and reliable strategy for CPPU detection in food samples.

1. Introduction

Forchlorfenuron (CPPU) is a widely used plant growth regulator that can boost the yields of vegetable and fruit crops [1,2]. Several studies have reported that excessive intake of CPPU can potentially damage human health [3,4,5]. Zhu et al. [6] found that CPPU exposure can stimulate estradiol secretion, resulting in an earlier time of vaginal opening and first estrus time in prepubertal female rats. Gong et al. [7,8] found that CPPU can induce cardiac morphology deformation and validated the cardiotoxicity of CPPU in a different experimental model. A chronic toxicity study on CPPU revealed its potentially negative effects on the ovaries [9]. In addition, long-term exposure to CPPU can induce acute and chronic intoxication and irritation to the eyes and skin [10]. Hence, to protect public health, many countries have issued a maximum residue limit (MRL) for CPPU. The MRL for CPPU in grapes and kiwifruit is 0.05 mg/kg in China, and 0.01 mg/kg in the European Union (EU). For cucumber and orange crops, the MRL is 0.1 mg/kg and 0.05 mg/kg, respectively, in China, and 0.01 mg/kg for both crops in the EU [11,12].
Many techniques have been developed for the purpose of analyzing CPPU residue levels in food samples, such as Raman spectroscopy [3,13] and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [4,14,15,16]. Most of these techniques can achieve the sensitive and accurate quantification of CPPU; however, they are quite time-consuming and require expensive instruments operated by professional personnel. In comparison, immunoassays (IAs) possess the merit of being cost-effective; they use high-throughput screening, have high specificity, and simple sample preparation. They have become a favorable complement to the use of instrumental methods when screening large numbers of samples [17,18].
Up to now, several IAs for the detection of CPPU have already been developed. Abad-Fuentes’ group [19,20,21] synthesized a set of haptens against CPPU by introducing linear aliphatic spacers at different sites of the phenyl ring or the pyridyl ring in CPPU; all the haptens were able to induce high-affinity antisera to CPPU (IC50 < 1 nM). A monoclonal-antibody-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for CPPU detection was developed with a limit of quantification of 5 μg/kg for kiwifruit, and a remarkable cross-reactivity (CR) of 71% with the herbicide thidiazuron (TDZ) was observed. Lu et al. [22] synthesized an immunogen and a coating antigen (CPPU-H1-BSA, CPPU-H2-OVA) by referring to the strategy of Abad-Fuentes [21] and established a monoclonal antibody (mAb)-based indirect competitive ELISA (icELISA) for CPPU. The IC50 was 3.89 ng/mL. Compared with the hapten synthetic routes of Abad-Fuentes, which involve three to five steps of reactions, Xiao [23] reported a CPPU hapten synthesized through a more convenient strategy. The CPPU was coupled with succinic anhydride via a one-step Friedel–Crafts reaction, and a spacer arm was introduced on the phenyl ring of the CPPU. The hapten was conjugated with carrier proteins to obtain artificial antigens. An icELISA was established based on a rabbit polyclonal antibody. The IC50 was 48 ng/mL, and the LOD was 1 ng/mL.
In this study, we synthesized a hapten (CPPU-COOH) via a one-step modification in the CPPU described in previous work [23] and produced a mAb with high sensitivity and specificity to the CPPU. BSA, OVA, KLH, and THY were used as the carrier proteins of artificial antigens. Based on this mAb, an icELISA for CPPU was characterized and optimized. The icELISA was applied in the determination of the CPPU levels in cucumber and orange samples, and its accuracy and reliability were validated by using LC-MS.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents and Instrumentals

Reagents and instrumentals are presented in Supplementary Materials.

2.2. Synthesis of Hapten

The hapten CPPU-COOH was synthesized by coupling succinic anhydride with CPPU via a one-step Friedel–Crafts reaction as previously described [23]. Briefly, DMF (5 mL) was dropwise added to anhydrous AlCl3 (6.75 g) under stirring at 0 °C. After the AlCl3 was completely dissolved, CPPU (1.24 g) and succinic anhydride (0.5 g) were added to the reaction mixture and stirred at 50 °C for 6 h. Next, the reaction mixture was poured into ice water (60 mL) with the addition of concentrated HCl (4 mL). The precipitate was collected and washed with distilled water to yield a raw product. After recrystallization in DMF/methanol, the hapten CPPU-COOH was obtained and identified by LC-MS and 1H NMR (Figure 1).

2.3. Preparation of Artificial Antigens

Artificial antigens CPPU-COOH-OVA, CPPU-COOH-BSA, CPPU-COOH-KLH, and CPPU-COOH-THY were synthesized through active ester methods [24,25]. Briefly, CPPU-COOH (0.04 mmol), DCC (0.05 mmol), and NHS (0.05 mmol) were dissolved in DMF (600 μL) and kept stirring at 4 °C for 12 h. Then, the activated hapten was added to 5 mL of conjugate buffer (CBS) containing 50 mg of carrier proteins. Next, the conjugate mixture was dialyzed against PBS (10 mM, pH 7.4) at 4 °C for 72 h, and finally stored at −20 °C for further use.

2.4. Production of mAb

At the first immunization, each eight-week-old Balb/c female mouse was injected subcutaneously with 200 µL of an emulsion containing an equal volume of immunogen (1.0 mg/mL) and Freund’s complete adjuvant. In the subsequent booster immunizations, Freund’s incomplete adjuvant was substituted for Freund’s complete adjuvant and was injected at two-week intervals. After the third booster injection, the antisera were collected 7 days after each injection and checked by icELISA.
Hybridoma preparation procedures were performed as described previously [26]. The positive hybridoma cells were subcloned three to four times via the process of limiting dilution. The optimal antibody-generating clone was selected to generate ascetic antibodies. The anti-CPPU mAb was purified from ascites by the protein G affinity column method [27]. The subtype of the mAb was identified by using antibody isotyping kits.

2.5. Optimization of ELISA Conditions

The icELISA protocol was performed as described previously [28,29,30]. Briefly, 100 µL/well of coating antigen (1 µg/mL in CBS) was added to 96-well microtiter plates and stored at 37 °C overnight. The plate was rinsed twice with washing buffer and blocked by PBST containing 5% skimmed milk powder (120 µL/well) for 3 h at 37 °C. Then, the plate was rinsed twice and dried at 37 °C for 60 min. CPPU standard in PBS (50 µL) and the antibodies diluted in PBS (50 µL) were added and incubated at 37 °C for 40 min. After rinsing five times, the goat anti-mouse IgG-HRP was added (100 µL/well), followed by incubation for 30 min at 37 °C. After rinsing five times, the TMB solution (100 µL/well) was added and incubated for another 10 min at 37 °C. Stopping reagent (50 µL/well) was injected into each well to stop the chromogenic reaction, and the absorbance at 450 nm was measured using a microplate reader.
Many reports have shown that the immunoassay is an equilibrium binding reaction, and the experimental parameters used can affect the performance of the ELISA [28,31,32,33]. In order to improve sensitivity of the established icELISA, the assay was optimized on concentrations of coating antigen and antibody, working buffer, and IgG-HRP dilution multiple. A standard curve for CPPU was obtained under optimal conditions by four-parameter sigmoidal fitting with Origin 9.0 software (OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA). The IC10, IC20, IC50, and IC80 values correspond to the CPPU concentration levels that inhibit 10%, 20%, 50%, and 80% of the binding between mAb and the coating antigen, respectively. The IC10 value represents the LOD of the assay. The concentration levels from IC20 to IC80 are the linear range of the assay [27,34,35,36].

2.6. Cross-Reactivity Test

To evaluate the specificity of the mAb against CPPU, CR values with six structural analogs were chosen for evaluation. The CR values were calculated using Equation (1) [26,37]:
CR (%) = IC50 CPPU/IC50 structural analogue × 100

2.7. Detection of CPPU in Spiked and Real Samples

Cucumber and orange samples obtained from a local supermarket were detected as CPPU-negative by LC-MS analysis. The negative samples were spiked with series concentrations of CPPU for a recovery test. Eight blind samples were also chosen to be tested with both icELISA and LC-MS.
The samples were pretreated according to the Chinese National Standard method for CPPU detection in foods with some modifications [38]. A 10.00 g sample was mixed with 10.0 mL of acetonitrile and extracted for 3 min, then 4.0 g of anhydrous magnesium sulfate and 1.0 g of sodium chloride were added and shaken for 1 min followed by a centrifugation (4000 r/min, 5 min). An amount of 8.0 mL of the supernatants was mixed with 200 mg of primary secondary amine (PSA), 50 mg of graphitized carbon black (GCB), and 700 mg anhydrous magnesium sulfate, then extracted for 2 min, followed by a centrifugation (4000 r/min, 5 min). The final supernatants were filtered through 0.22 µm membrane before being analyzed by the established icELISA. The accuracy of the method was validated by LC-MS. Chromatographic separation was achieved in an Eclipse plus C18 column (2.1 × 50 mm, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min (mobile phase A was 10% methanol; mobile phase B was pure acetonitrile). The injection volume was 1 µL. The samples were quantified by ESI in the positive mode.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Hapten Synthesis and Artificial Antigen Preparation

CPPU is a small molecule (Mw < 1000 Da) without immunogenicity. Hapten design and synthesis are crucial processes in the development of specific antibodies. A complicated synthetic route may lead to decreasing yield and purity. In this study, one hapten (CPPU-COOH) was synthesized via a Friedel–Crafts reaction to introduce a four-carbon spacer arm at the phenyl ring of CPPU and identified by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) and NMR. As shown in the mass spectrum (Figure S1), the highest peak at m/z 349 was consistent with the mass-to-charge ratio of the parent ion of CPPU-COOH. The 1H NMR spectrum of CPPU-COOH (Figure S2) revealed the presence of two methylene groups (δH 3.20 (t, J = 6.3 Hz, 2H) and 2.56 (t, J = 6.3 Hz, 2H)), which correspond to two methylene groups from succinic anhydride. The proton signals at δH 7.96 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H) and 7.61 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H) can be attributed to these four protons at the phenyl ring of hapten CPPU-COOH. The proton signals at δH 8.20 (d, J = 5.7 Hz, 1H), 7.66 (d, J = 1.9 Hz, 1H), and 7.35 (dd, J = 5.7, 1.9 Hz, 1H) can be attributed to these three protons at the pyridyl ring of CPPU-COOH. The proton signals of the carboxyl group in CPPU-COOH are matched with δH 12.14 (s, 1H). The proton signals at δH 9.48 (s, 1H), and 9.40 (s, 1H) can be attributed to the two protons of ureido in CPPU-COOH. These results indicated the successful synthesis of CPPU-COOH.
To produce a specific antibody, haptens should be coupled with proteins to form artificial antigens with both immunogenicity and immunoreactivity. BSA and OVA are commonly used proteins. In this study, BSA, KLH, and THY were selected as carriers and conjugated with CPPU hapten to obtain immunogens; BSA and OVA were chosen as substrates to obtain coating immunoreagents. The designed hapten CPPU-COOH contained a carboxyl group by which CPPU-COOH could be conjugated with amine groups in carrier proteins via the active ester method. The hapten–protein conjugates were characterized by UV spectrophotometry (Figure 2). As shown in Figure 2, CPPU-COOH has a characteristics absorption peak at 295 nm, whereas BSA, KLH, THY, and OVA displayed the characteristic absorption peak of proteins at ~280 nm. The obtained hapten–protein conjugates, CPPU-COOH-BSA, CPPU-COOH-KLH, CPPU-COOH-THY, and CPPU-COOH-OVA contained a distinct absorption peak at ~295 nm, which indicated that CPPU-COOH was successfully conjugated to the carrier protein [39].

3.2. Antisera and Coating Antigens Combination Selection

The titer and specificity of the antisera were assessed via icELISA. As shown in Table 1, antisera induced by immunogens CPPU-COOH-BSA and CPPU-COOH-KLH showed relatively low affinity to CPPU with lower inhibition rates (<55.9%), while antisera from immunogen CPPU-COOH-THY showed a significantly higher titer and inhibition rate than those of CPPU-COOH-BSA and CPPU-COOH-KLH. When using CPPU-COOH-BSA as a coating antigen, the inhibition rate was 83.3% to CPPU (1 μg/mL). As reported previously, THY was selected as a carrier protein of immunogen for its high immunogenicity [40,41,42]. CPPU-COOH-BSA and CPPU-COOH-THY were chosen for mAb production and the development of the icELISA.

3.3. Production of mAb and Establishment of icELISA

According to the results of the antisera detection, the mice immunized by CPPU-COOH-THY were selected for cell fusion. After four rounds of screening, the CPPU-specific mAb was produced from a selected hybridoma (CPPU-a). The subtype of the mAb was immunoglobulin G1 type. To enhance the assay sensitivity and stability, three parameters were optimized. The Amax/IC50 ratio was used as the index for evaluating the influence of each condition; a higher ratio demonstrates a higher level of sensitivity in the assay [44,45,46,47]. The optimized results are shown in Figure 3. The Amax was the highest at 500 ng/mL of coating antigen and it decreased as the coating concentration became lower. Usually, a higher coating concentration can result in a higher Amax value, but an overly high coating concentration may cause mutual interference or increase non-specific adsorption when the immobilized coating antigen binds with the antibody, so the absorbance value may decrease after the blank value is subtracted. The IC50 gradually decreased as the content of the coating antigen and the antibody reduced and was the lowest at a coating concentration of 250 ng/mL and an antibody with 1:8000 dilution (1 µg/mL). The Amax/IC50 ratio was also the highest at this concentration combination. So, these were chosen as the optimal working concentrations. The efficiency of icELISA can also be influenced by physicochemical factors related to the buffer [48]. The Amax and IC50 values varied when PBS, PBST, or Tris-HCl was used as a dilution solution of a standard analyte and antibodies. The Amax/IC50 was more efficacious with PBS than with PBST or Tris-HCl with moderate Amax and the lowest IC50. This indicated that PBS is more suitable for the reaction system of this assay. The IgG-HRP was diluted from 1:2000 to 1:5000, and the highest Amax with the second lowest IC50 were observed at the dilution multiple of 1:5000, which displayed the highest Amax/IC50 proportion. In an icELISA system, the content of the coating antigen, antibody, and secondary antibody (IgG-HRP) have a comprehensive effect on the sensitivity of the assay, so they should be optimized in accordance with each other. Under the optimum conditions, an icELISA standard curve was fitted. The IC50 value for CPPU was 1.04 ng/mL, the LOD was 0.16 ng/mL, and the linear range was between 0.31 and 3.43 ng/mL (Figure 4).

3.4. Cross-Reactions

The cross-reactivity (CR) is inversely related with the specificity. The CR was evaluated through IC50 of six CPPU structural analogues (Table 2). Low CR values were observed in the six listed compounds, which demonstrated that the mAb was specific and sensitive to CPPU. In a previous study [21], a CR with thidiazuron (TDZ) of 71% was observed, while in this study, the CR was 5.36% with TDZ and below 2% with the other analogues. This further confirmed the high specificity of the anti-CPPU mAb, which is vital to the established ELISA reaction system.

3.5. Detection of CPPU in Spiked and Real Samples

Generally, dilution of the sample can reduce the matrix effects on an immunoassay to a large extent [49,50]. In this study, spiked cucumber and orange samples were analyzed using icELISA. When diluted by PBS containing 5% acetonitrile to twenty-fold, the matrix effects were effectively eliminated (Figure 5).
Three different concentrations of CPPU were spiked in cucumber and orange samples and validated by icELISA. The average recovery rates of the samples were from 85.23% to 119.14% (Table 3), and the coefficients of variation (CV) were less than 10%.
Eight real samples were selected for detection with icELISA and the results were confirmed by LC-MS. As shown in Table 4, cucumbers number 1 and 3 and orange number 4 were detected positive by the established icELISA method. Good correlations were observed between icELISA and LC-MS, proving the high accuracy and reliability of the established icELISA method for CPPU quantitative determination in food samples.

4. Conclusions

In this study, a high-affinity and specific mAb against CPPU was produced and an icELISA was established for reliable CPPU residue analysis in food. The spiked and real food samples were analyzed with the icELISA, and the accuracy of the method was confirmed by LC-MS.
A hapten synthesis route with more simplicity and efficiency than previously reported methods [19,20,21,22] was utilized. With the mAb generated and the ELISA developed, CPPU was able to be detected at 0.16 ng/mL (3.2 μg/kg in food). The IC50 (1.04 ng/mL or 4.2 nM) was higher than that of the Abad-Fuentes group (IC50 < 1 nM); however, they obtained a limit of quantification of 5 μg/kg for kiwifruit, slightly higher than in this assay. They also reported a CR of 71% with the herbicide TDZ [21], while with this method, the CRs with TDZ and five other CPPU structural analogues were all less than 6%. Xiao [23] coupled CPPU with succinic anhydride via a one-step Friedel–Crafts reaction for the first time. IcELISA was developed by using a rabbit polyclonal antibody. The IC50 (48 ng/mL) and LOD (1 ng/mL) were both far higher than in this assay. In this study, we designed the synthesis route of hapten while referring to the synthetic method of Xiao. BSA (for immunogen) paired with OVA (for coating) were selected as carriers in previous studies [19,20,21,22,23]. In our work, KLH and THY were also selected as carriers for obtaining immunogens and compared to BSA. We found that antisera from THY immunogen showed significantly higher titer and inhibition rates than those from BSA and KLH, which indicated that carrier selection may be an effective way to improve CPPU antibody performance. A monoclonal antibody-based immunoassay is ideal for CPPU monitoring, due to its satisfactory accuracy, rapidity, and cost-effectiveness. Furthermore, this work aims to promote the application of more IAs in CPPU and in the detection of other agrochemicals.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/bios12020078/s1, Reagents and Instrumentals; Figure S1: The MS spectrum of CPPU-COOH; Figure S2: The NMR spectrum of CPPU-COOH.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.L.; data curation, X.L., B.X. and Y.C.; formal analysis, L.L. and Y.L.; supervision, Z.X.; Writing—original draft preparation, X.L.; Writing—review and editing, Z.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFC1602903) and Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2019A1515012107).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee for Laboratory Animal (protocol code 2019007 and approval date 23 January 2019).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest in this paper.

References

  1. Arena, M.; Auteri, D.; Barmaz, S.; Bellisai, G.; Brancato, A.; Brocca, D.; Bura, L.; Byers, H.; Chiusolo, A.; Marques, D.C.; et al. Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance forchlorfenuron. EFSA J. 2017, 15, 4874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Pesticide Fact Sheet, Forchlorfenuron. 2004. Available online: https://www3.epa.gov/pesticides/chem_search/reg_actions/registration/fs_PC-128819_01-Sep-04.pdf (accessed on 20 November 2021).
  3. Chen, X.M.; Yan, K.L.; Xiao, X.H.; Li, G.K. Analysis of forchlorfenuron and thidiazuron in fruits and vegetables by surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy after selective solid-phase extraction with modified β-cyclodextrin. J. Sep. Sci. 2016, 39, 2340–2346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hu, J.T.; Yu, L.Y.; Shuai, P.Q.; Yu, G.; He, K.R. Determination of Forechlorfenuron Residue in Fruits and Vegetables by QuEChERS Extraction and HPLC-MS/MS. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2017, 18, 1686–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ping, L.; Xu, B.; Zhou, Q.; Hong, Y.; Sun, Q.; Wang, J.; Zhu, D. Comparative pharmacokinetic study of Forchlorfenuron in adult and juvenile rats. Molecules 2021, 26, 4276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhu, D.F.; Ping, L.; Shen, X.F.; Hong, Y.W.; Weng, Q.J.; He, Q.J.; Wang, J.J. Effects of prepubertal exposure to forchlorfenuron through prenatal and postnatal gavage administration in developing Sprague-Dawley rats. Reprod. Toxicol. 2020, 98, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gong, G.; Kam, H.; Tse, Y.; Lee, S.M. Cardiotoxicity of forchlorfenuron (CPPU) in zebrafish (Danio rerio) and H9c2 cardiomyocytes. Chemosphere 2019, 235, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gong, G.; Kam, H.; Tse, Y.; Giesy, J.; Seto, S.; Lee, S.M. Forchlorfenuron (CPPU) causes disorganization of the cytoskeleton and dysfunction of human umbilical vein endothelial cells, and abnormal vascular development in zebrafish embryos. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 271, 115791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bu, Q.; Wang, X.Y.; Xie, H.C.; Zhong, K.; Wu, Y.P.; Zhang, J.Q.; Wang, Z.S.; Gao, H.; Huang, Y.N. 180 day repeated-dose toxicity study on forchlorfenuron in SpragueDawley rats and its effects on the production of steroid hormones. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 10207–10213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, M.H.; Guo, X.D.; Chen, Y.J.; Zhang, K.; Bai, Q.; Gao, Z.P.; Long, F.Y. The degradation of forchlorfenuron in the model kiwifruit juice by ultrasonic treatment. J. Food Processing Preserv. 2020, 44, e14424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. European Commission. Pesticides Residues. No 398/2014 Annex II. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32014R0398&from=EN (accessed on 20 November 2021).
  12. National Food Safety Standard-Maximum Residue Limits for Pesticides in Food. Available online: https://agrochemical.chemlinked.com/sites/default/files/preview-doc/sample_translation_of_gb2763-2019.pdf (accessed on 20 November 2021).
  13. Lu, D.; Zhao, W.; Gao, G.; Meng, Y.; Zeng, X.; Wu, N.; Lei, Y. Raman spectroscopy analysis of Forchlorfenuron based on two-dimensional correlation technique. Spectrosc. Spectr. Anal. 2019, 39, 1464–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, P.; Lu, Y.; Cao, J.; Li, M.; Yang, C.; Yan, H. Imidazolium ionic-liquid-modified phenolic resin for solid-phase extraction of thidiazuron and forchlorfenuron from cucumbers. J. Chromatogr. A 2020, 1623, 461192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Xu, X.; Hou, X.; Han, M.; Qiu, S.; Li, Y. Simultaneous determination of multiclass plant growth regulators in fruits using the quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe method and ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J. Sep. Sci. 2020, 43, 788–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ren, Y.; Xiang, P.; Xie, Q.; Yang, H.; Liu, S. Rapid analysis of forchlorfenuron in fruits using molecular complex-based dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction. Food Addit. Contam. A 2021, 38, 637–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wang, J.P.; Yu, G.C.; Sheng, W.; Shi, M.; Guo, B.X.; Wang, S. Development of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay based a monoclonal antibody for the detection of pyrethroids with phenoxybenzene multiresidue in river water. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 2997–3003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Lee, N.A.; Wang, S.; Allan, R.D.; Kennedy, I.R. A Rapid Aflatoxin B1 ELISA:  Development and Validation with Reduced Matrix Effects for Peanuts, Corn, Pistachio, and Soybeans. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 2746–2755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Suárez-Pantaleón, C.; Mercader, J.V.; Agulló, C.; Abad-Somovilla, A.; Abad-Fuentes, A. Production and Characterization of Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies to Forchlorfenuron. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 11122–11131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Suárez-Pantaleón, C.; Mercader, J.V.; Agulló, C.; Abad-Somovilla, A.; Abad-Fuentes, A. Hapten Synthesis and Polyclonal Antibody-Based Immunoassay Development for the Analysis of Forchlorfenuron in Kiwifruit. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 8502–8511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Suárez-Pantaleón, C.; Esteve-Turrillas, F.A.; Mercader, J.V.; Agulló, C.; Abad-Somovilla, A.; Abad-Fuentes, A. Development and validation of a direct competitive monoclonal antibody-based immunoassay for the sensitive and selective analysis of the phytoregulator forchlorfenuron. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2012, 403, 2019–2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lu, J.K.; Ai, M.Y.; Li, S.G. Preparation of anti-CPPU monoclonal antibody and development of an indirect competitive ELISA method. Hubei Agric. Sci. 2016, 55, 5584–5587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xiao, S.M. The Establishment of Gold Nanoparticles-Colorimetric and Immunoassay Analysis Method on Detection of Pesticide Residues in Environment and Food. Master’s Thesis, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  24. Ni, T.T.; Peng, D.P.; Wang, Y.X.; Pan, Y.H.; Chen, D.M.; Wang, Y.L.; Tao, Y.F.; Yuan, Z.H. Development of a broad-spectrum monoclonal antibody-based indirect competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the multi-residue detection of avermectins in edible animal tissues and milk. Food Chem. 2019, 286, 234–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, Z.J.; Liu, X.X.; Xiao, Z.L.; Fu, H.J.; Huang, Y.P.; Huang, S.Y.; Shen, Y.D.; He, F.; Yang, X.X.; Hammock, B.D.; et al. Production of a specific monoclonal antibody for 1-naphthol based on novel hapten strategy and development of an easy-to-use ELISA in urine samples. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 196, 110533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Xiao, Z.L.; Wang, Y.L.; Shen, Y.D.; Xu, Z.L.; Dong, J.X.; Wang, H.; Situ, C.; Wang, F.; Yang, J.Y.; Lei, H.T.; et al. Specifc monoclonal antibody- based enzyme immunoassay for sensitive and reliable detection of Alternaria mycotoxin iso-tenuazonic acid in food products. Food Anal. Methods 2018, 11, 635–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lu, P.; Yang, S.; Hu, D.Y.; Ding, X.Y.; Shi, M.M. Synthesis of Hapten and Development of Immunoassay Based on Monoclonal Antibody for the Detection of Dufulin in Agricultural Samples. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 10302–10309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Luo, L.; Shen, Y.D.; Wang, H.; Xiao, Z.L.; Sun, Y.M.; Lei, H.T.; Yang, J.Y.; Xu, Z.L. Production of Polyclonal Antibody and Development of a Competitive Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Benzoic Acid in Foods. Food Anal. Methods 2015, 8, 1101–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shen, Y.D.; Xiao, B.; Xu, Z.L.; Lei, H.T.; Wang, H.; Yang, J.Y.; Sun, Y.M. Hapten synthesis and development of an indirect competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for chlorpromazine in pork, chicken and swine liver. Anal. Methods 2011, 3, 2797–2803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, Y.; Xu, Z.L.; Xie, Y.Y.; Tian, Y.X.; Shen, Y.D.; Young, G.M.; Wang, H.; Lei, H.T.; Sun, Y.M. Development of polyclonal antibody-based indirect competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for sodium saccharin residue in food samples. Food Chem. 2011, 126, 815–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Paek, S.H.; Lee, S.H.; Cho, J.H.; Kim, Y.S. Development of Rapid One-Step Immunochromatographic Assay. Methods 2000, 22, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Marco, M.P.; Gee, S.J.; Cheng, H.M.; Liang, Z.Y.; Hammock, B.D. Development of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for carbaryl. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1993, 41, 423–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jiang, X.X.; Shi, H.Y.; Wu, N.; Wang, M.H. Development of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for diniconazole in agricultural samples. Food Chem. 2011, 125, 1385–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Henniona, M.C.; Barcelo, D. Strengths and limitations of immunoassays for effective and efficient use for pesticide analysis in water samples: A review. Anal. Chim. Acta 1998, 362, 3–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Qi, Y.H.; Shan, W.C.; Liu, Y.Z.; Zhang, Y.J.; Wang, J.P. Production of the polyclonal antibody against Sudan 3 and immunoassay of Sudan dyes in food samples. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 2116–2122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Cui, X.; Wu, P.; Lai, D.; Zheng, S.; Chen, Y.; Eremin, S.A.; Peng, W.; Zhao, S. Development of a highly specific fluorescence immunoassay for detection of Diisobutyl Phthalate in edible oil samples. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2015, 63, 9372–9378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhang, Y.Q.; Xu, Z.L.; Wang, F.; Cai, J.; Dong, J.X.; Zhang, J.R.; Si, R.; Wang, C.L.; Wang, Y.; Shen, Y.D.; et al. Isolation of Bactrian Camel Single Domain Antibody for Parathion and Development of One-Step dc-FEIA Method Using VHH-Alkaline Phosphatase Fusion Protein. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 12886–12892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. GB/T 23200.110-2018; Determination of Forchlorfenuron in Foods of Plant Origin-Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry. National Standards of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, December 2018.
  39. Chen, X.J. Application of Immunology in Plant Science; China Agricultural University Press: Beijing, China, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  40. Barnych, B.; Vasylieva, N.; Joseph, T.; Hulsizer, S.; Nguyen, H.M.; Cajka, T.; Pessah, I.; Wulff, H.; Gee, S.J.; Hammock, B.D. Development of tetramethylenedisulfotetramine (TETS) hapten library: Synthesis, electrophysiological studies and immune response in rabbits. Chem.-A Eur. J. 2017, 23, 8466–8472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Vasylieva, N.; Barnych, B.; Rand, A.A.; Inceoglu, B.; Gee, S.J.; Hammock, B.D. Sensitive Immunoassay for Detection and Quantification of the Neurotoxin, Tetramethylenedisulfotetramine. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 5612–5619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Vasylieva, N.; Ahn, K.C.; Barnych, B.; Gee, S.J.; Hammock, B.D. Development of an Immunoassay for the Detection of the Phenylpyrazole Insecticide Fipronil. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 10038–10047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chen, Z.J.; Fu, H.J.; Luo, L.; Sun, Y.M.; Yang, J.Y.; Zeng, D.P.; Shen, Y.D.; Xu, Z.L. Development of competitive indirect ELISAs with a flexible working range for the simple quantification of melatonin in medicinal foods. Anal. Methods 2017, 9, 1617–1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Liang, C.Z.; Jin, R.Y.; Gui, W.J.; Zhu, G.N. Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Based on a Monoclonal Antibody for the Detection of the Insecticide Triazophos:  Assay Optimization and Application to Environmental Samples. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 6783–6788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chen, L.Y.; Wang, M.C.; Xiang, H.F.; Lin, X.J.; Cao, D.H.; Ye, L.Y. Prediction of effect-site concentration of sufentanil by dose–response target controlled infusion of sufentanil and propofol for analgesic and sedation maintenance in burn dressing changes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 40, 455–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yang, X.; Wang, Y.; Song, C.; Hu, X.; Wang, F.; Zeng, X. Hapten synthesis and the development of an ultrasensitive indirect competitive ELISA for the determination of diethylstilbestrol in food samples. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 3270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mari, G.M.; Li, H.; Dong, B.; Yang, H.; Talpur, A.; Mi, J.; Guo, L.; Yu, X.; Ke, Y.; Han, D.; et al. Hapten synthesis, monoclonal antibody production and immunoassay development for direct detection of 4-hydroxybenzehydrazide in chicken, the metabolite of nifuroxazide. Food Chem. 2021, 355, 129598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Xu, Z.L.; Shen, Y.D.; Sun, Y.M.; Campbell, K.; Tian, Y.X.; Zhang, S.W.; Lei, H.T.; Jiang, Y.M. Novel hapten synthesis for antibody production and development of an enzymelinked immunosorbent assay for determination of furaltadone metabolite 3-amino-5-morpholinomethyl-2-oxazolidinone (AMOZ). Talanta 2013, 103, 306–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Sheng, Y.J.; Jiang, W.X.; Saeger, S.D.; Shen, J.Z.; Zhang, S.X.; Wang, Z.H. Development of a sensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of fumonisin B1 in maize. Toxicon 2012, 60, 1245–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Huo, J.Q.; Barnych, B.; Li, Z.F.; Wan, D.B.; Li, D.Y.; Vasylieva, N.; Knezevic, S.Z.; Osipitan, O.A.; Scott, J.E.; Zhang, J.L.; et al. Hapten Synthesis, Antibody Development, and a Highly Sensitive Indirect Competitive Chemiluminescent Enzyme Immunoassay for Detection of Dicamba. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 5711–5719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Biosensors 12 00078 g001 550
Figure 1. Synthesis route of the hapten. CPPU was coupled with succinic anhydride via Friedel–Crafts reaction, and a spacer arm was introduced on the phenyl ring of the CPPU.
Figure 1. Synthesis route of the hapten. CPPU was coupled with succinic anhydride via Friedel–Crafts reaction, and a spacer arm was introduced on the phenyl ring of the CPPU.
Biosensors 12 00078 g001
Biosensors 12 00078 g002 550
Figure 2. UV spectra of hapten, carrier proteins, and artificial antigens. (a) CPPU-COOH-BSA; (b) CPPU-COOH-KLH; (c) CPPU-COOH-THY; (d) CPPU-COOH-OVA. CPPU-COOH-BSA, CPPU-COOH-KLH, CPPU-COOH-THY, and CPPU-COOH-OVA exhibited a distinct pattern of absorbance, reflecting properties of the carboxyl on the hapten to amino groups of the carrier protein.
Figure 2. UV spectra of hapten, carrier proteins, and artificial antigens. (a) CPPU-COOH-BSA; (b) CPPU-COOH-KLH; (c) CPPU-COOH-THY; (d) CPPU-COOH-OVA. CPPU-COOH-BSA, CPPU-COOH-KLH, CPPU-COOH-THY, and CPPU-COOH-OVA exhibited a distinct pattern of absorbance, reflecting properties of the carboxyl on the hapten to amino groups of the carrier protein.
Biosensors 12 00078 g002
Biosensors 12 00078 g003a 550Biosensors 12 00078 g003b 550
Figure 3. The optimized reaction conditions for icELISA (n = 3). (a) Concentration of coating antigen and antibody; (b) working buffer for the analyte; (c) IgG-HRP dilution multiple. The coating antigen at a concentration of 250 ng/mL, the antibody with a 1:8000 dilution (1 µg/mL), PBS as a dilution solution, and IgG-HRP diluted 1:5000 were chosen as the optimal working conditions.
Figure 3. The optimized reaction conditions for icELISA (n = 3). (a) Concentration of coating antigen and antibody; (b) working buffer for the analyte; (c) IgG-HRP dilution multiple. The coating antigen at a concentration of 250 ng/mL, the antibody with a 1:8000 dilution (1 µg/mL), PBS as a dilution solution, and IgG-HRP diluted 1:5000 were chosen as the optimal working conditions.
Biosensors 12 00078 g003aBiosensors 12 00078 g003b
Biosensors 12 00078 g004 550
Figure 4. Standard curve for icELISA (n = 3). The IC50 for CPPU was 1.04 ng/mL, the LOD was 0.16 ng/mL, and the linear range was 0.31–3.43 ng/mL.
Figure 4. Standard curve for icELISA (n = 3). The IC50 for CPPU was 1.04 ng/mL, the LOD was 0.16 ng/mL, and the linear range was 0.31–3.43 ng/mL.
Biosensors 12 00078 g004
Biosensors 12 00078 g005 550
Figure 5. Matrix effects of cucumber and orange samples (n = 3). Standard curves were fitted using PBS containing 5% acetonitrile, spiked orange matrix (diluted with PBS containing 5% acetonitrile to twenty-fold), and spiked cucumber matrix (diluted with PBS containing 5% acetonitrile to twenty-fold). The three curves nearly overlap.
Figure 5. Matrix effects of cucumber and orange samples (n = 3). Standard curves were fitted using PBS containing 5% acetonitrile, spiked orange matrix (diluted with PBS containing 5% acetonitrile to twenty-fold), and spiked cucumber matrix (diluted with PBS containing 5% acetonitrile to twenty-fold). The three curves nearly overlap.
Biosensors 12 00078 g005
Table
Table 1. Characterization of mice antisera against CPPU with different coating antigens.
Table 1. Characterization of mice antisera against CPPU with different coating antigens.
ImmunogenCPPU-COOH-BSACPPU-COOH-KLHCPPU-COOH-THY
Coating
Antigens		Titer a (103)Inhibition b
of CPPU (%)		Titer a (103)Inhibition b
of CPPU (%)		Titer a
(103)		Inhibition b
of CPPU (%)
CPPU-COOH-BSA--1655.63283.3
CPPU-COOH-OVA3258.4855.91682.9
a Titer means the dilution factor of antiserum with an absorbance of 450 nm at about 1.0–1.5 [25,43]. b Inhibition = [(B − B0)/B] × 100%, at 1 μg/mL of competitor [25,43].
Table
Table 2. Cross-reactivity of CPPU and other structural analogues.
Table 2. Cross-reactivity of CPPU and other structural analogues.
AnalyteStructureIC50 (ng/mL)Cross-Reactivity (%)
Forchlorfenuron
(CPPU)		 Biosensors 12 00078 i0011.04100
3,6-Dichloropicolinic Biosensors 12 00078 i002166.200.63
Linuron Biosensors 12 00078 i003226.430.46
Thidiazuron
(TDZ)		 Biosensors 12 00078 i00419.425.36
Picloram Biosensors 12 00078 i005450.720.23
Chlortoluron Biosensors 12 00078 i00664.341.62
Diuron Biosensors 12 00078 i007823.790.13
Table
Table 3. Recoveries of CPPU-spiked food samples determined by icELISA (n = 3).
Table 3. Recoveries of CPPU-spiked food samples determined by icELISA (n = 3).
SamplesSpiked (ng/g)Measured ± SD (ng/g)Recovery (%)CV (%)
Cucumber4038.70 ± 0.1696.808.33
8079.00 ± 0.2598.806.25
160159.20 ± 0.4099.605.01
Orange4047.60 ± 0.14119.146.21
8070.20 ± 0.1185.233.11
120104.20 ± 0.3686.886.82
Table
Table 4. Comparison between icELISA and LC-MS quantitative results for CPPU residues in cucumbers and oranges.
Table 4. Comparison between icELISA and LC-MS quantitative results for CPPU residues in cucumbers and oranges.
SampleNumbericELISALC-MS
ng/mLng/gng/mLng/g
Cucumber15.12102.45.17103.4
2NDND0.132.6
31.9639.22.6252.4
4NDND0.122.4
Orange1NDND0.142.8
2NDND0.061.2
3NDND0.132.6
40.326.40.357.0
ND: Not detected.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, X.; Xie, B.; Cheng, Y.; Luo, L.; Liang, Y.; Xiao, Z. A Sensitive Monoclonal-Antibody-Based ELISA for Forchlorfenuron Residue Analysis in Food Samples. Biosensors 2022, 12, 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12020078

AMA Style

Liu X, Xie B, Cheng Y, Luo L, Liang Y, Xiao Z. A Sensitive Monoclonal-Antibody-Based ELISA for Forchlorfenuron Residue Analysis in Food Samples. Biosensors. 2022; 12(2):78. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12020078

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Xinmei, Bo Xie, Yongjian Cheng, Lin Luo, Yifan Liang, and Zhili Xiao. 2022. "A Sensitive Monoclonal-Antibody-Based ELISA for Forchlorfenuron Residue Analysis in Food Samples" Biosensors 12, no. 2: 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12020078

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop