Next Article in Journal
Risks after Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Taiwanese Women: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Integrating Chinese Herbs and Western Medicine for New Wound Dressings through Handheld Electrospinning
Previous Article in Journal
Renin–Angiotensin System Components and Arachidonic Acid Metabolites as Biomarkers of COVID-19
Previous Article in Special Issue
Application of I-Optimal Design for Modeling and Optimizing the Operational Parameters of Ibuprofen Granules in Continuous Twin-Screw Wet Granulation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomedicines
Volume 11
Issue 8
10.3390/biomedicines11082119
biomedicines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Advances and Prospects for Hydrogel-Forming Microneedles in Transdermal Drug Delivery

by
Xiaolin Hou
1,†,
Jiaqi Li
1,
Yongyu Hong
2,†,
Hang Ruan
1,
Meng Long
1,
Nianping Feng
1,* and
Yongtai Zhang
1,*
1
Department of Pharmaceutics, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 1200 Cailun Road, Pudong New Area, Shanghai 201203, China
2
Xiamen Hospital of Chinese Medicine, No. 1739 Xiangyue Road, Huli District, Xiamen 361015, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Biomedicines 2023, 11(8), 2119; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11082119
Submission received: 31 May 2023 / Revised: 12 July 2023 / Accepted: 21 July 2023 / Published: 27 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Drug Delivery Systems: Design, Evaluation and Application)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Transdermal drug delivery (TDD) is one of the key approaches for treating diseases, avoiding first-pass effects, reducing systemic adverse drug reactions and improving patient compliance. Microneedling, iontophoresis, electroporation, laser ablation and ultrasound facilitation are often used to improve the efficiency of TDD. Among them, microneedling is a relatively simple and efficient means of drug delivery. Microneedles usually consist of micron-sized needles (50–900 μm in length) in arrays that can successfully penetrate the stratum corneum and deliver drugs in a minimally invasive manner below the stratum corneum without touching the blood vessels and nerves in the dermis, improving patient compliance. Hydrogel-forming microneedles (HFMs) are safe and non-toxic, with no residual matrix material, high drug loading capacity, and controlled drug release, and they are suitable for long-term, multiple drug delivery. This work reviewed the characteristics of the skin structure and TDD, introduced TDD strategies based on HFMs, and summarized the characteristics of HFM TDD systems and the evaluation methods of HFMs as well as the application of HFM drug delivery systems in disease treatment. The HFM drug delivery system has a wide scope for development, but the translation to clinical application still has more challenges.

1. Introduction

Transdermal drug delivery (TDD) is a route of drug delivery for treating or preventing disease by absorbing drugs through the skin, permeating into the skin and further into the blood circulation [1]. TDD avoids first-pass effects, prolongs the action of drugs with short half-lives through slow release and avoids fluctuations in blood levels, reduces side effects and improves patient compliance [2]. The stratum corneum barrier plays a key role in TDD, and many methods have been used to improve the efficiency of TDD, including the use of chemical penetration enhancers and different physical enhancement approaches, such as microneedling [2,3], iontophoresis [4], electroporation [5], laser ablation [6] and ultrasound facilitation [7,8,9].
In recent years, microneedles have gained widespread interest in TDD and have shown brilliant achievements in delivering both chemical small molecules and biomacromolecules whilst being minimally invasive and painless [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Microneedles usually consist of micrometer-sized needles (50–900 μm in length) in the form of microneedle arrays that can successfully penetrate the stratum corneum and deliver drugs in a minimally invasive manner below the stratum corneum without damaging blood vessels and nerves in the dermis [18,19], improving patient compliance and allowing drugs exposed in the epidermis or dermis to be rapidly absorbed by surrounding capillaries and lymph nodes [20,21,22]. Some of the microneedle products approved for marketing by the FDA and undergoing clinical trials are shown in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively. As shown in Table 1, microneedling devices are often intended for aesthetic use rather than medical purposes. Additionally, clinical trials (Table 2) of microneedles for disease treatment, such as influenza, psoriasis, and diabetes, have gradually increased in recent years.
Microneedles can be fabricated with different materials and can be classified into five main types (Figure 1), namely solid microneedles, coated microneedles, hollow microneedles, dissolving microneedles and hydrogel-forming microneedles (HFMs) [23,24,25]. Among these, HFMs, an attractive type of microneedles first reported in 2012, consist of a swellable polymer (cross-linked hydrogel) that enables the sustained delivery of drugs for long periods of time by either incorporating the drug into the polymer structure during preparation or by loading the drug into a separate reservoir and attaching it to the HFMs [26]. In the following, the application and evaluation methods of HFMs in TDD are analyzed and discussed in detail.

2. Characteristics of HFMs as TDD System

HFMs are safe, have no residual matrix material and are suitable for long-term, multiple-drug delivery. HFMs have the advantages of resisting the closure of skin tissue pores after puncture into the skin, and no matrix material remains when the HFM patch is removed due to the inherent swelling insolubility and viscoelastic properties of the matrix material [26,27]. HFMs also bring benefits from avoiding drug deposition after microneedle tip penetration [28].
HFMs are characterized by water absorption and swelling, and sustainable and controlled drug release. Drugs can be loaded in HFMs in two ways, either by incorporating the drug into the microneedle matrix during preparation or by loading the drug into a separate reservoir and then attaching it to the hydrogel microneedle as a substrate [29]. Both methods of preparation allow for the continuous delivery of the drug over a long period of time. Materials used to prepare HFMs are non-toxic, degradable and biocompatible [30], and commonly used materials include natural compounds such as gelatin and polymer copolymers such as poly (methyl vinyl ether-co-maleic acid) cross-linked with polyethylene glycol (PMVE/MAPEG) [10,31]. Among these, PMVE/MAPEG has an excellent water absorption capacity and allows the preparation of super-swollen HFMs that can absorb fluids and swell up to 20 times their original size [11,32]. HFMs pierce the skin and rapidly absorb interstitial fluid, causing the hydrogel to swell, creating a continuous, unobstructed hydrogel conduit for the drug permeating into the skin [33].
HFMs are able to control the drug release behavior through the crosslinking density of the hydrogel microneedle matrix material, thus achieving controlled drug delivery kinetics [34]. For example, the degree of swelling of PMVE/MAPEG decreases with increasing cross-linkage. When the PMVE/MAPEG ratio was 2:1 and 4:3, respectively, the degree of swelling increased by 294% and 250%, respectively [35]. In addition, increasing the concentration of the cross-linking agent ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA) decreases the release of the loaded drug, and the t1/2 of the drug increased from 2.64 h to 45.67 h when EGDMA was added from 1% to 8%. It indicates that by increasing the cross-linking agent, the cross-linking degree can be increased and the swelling degree can be decreased, which results in lower and more sustained drug release [36]. Some main characteristics of different HFM formulations have been summarized in Table 3.

3. Materials for Forming HFMs

Similar to other types of microneedles, the common preparation method for HFMs is mainly micromolding [43,44], where a microneedle matrix in its flowing hydrogel state is injected into the mold using centrifugal and decompression methods and then dried. The release and permeation behavior of the active ingredients is mainly controlled by the nature of the polymers that make up the microneedle matrix, independent of the microneedle preparation process.
Preferred microneedle materials should be biocompatible and non-immunogenic, have fine-mechanical strength, and be able to carry potentially large and complex drugs without damage. The commonly used materials for HFMs include Gantrez S-97, a co-polymer of poly(methylvinylether co. maleic acid) (PMVE/MA) [12,45], methacrylated hyaluronic acid (MeHA) [46], Gantrez AN-139, a co-polymer of poly(methylvinylether co. maleic anhydride) (PMVE/MAH) [47,48], polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)/polymer blends [49,50] and crosslinked PVA [51], crosslinked 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (pHEMA) [39], poly(styrene-b-acrylic acid) (PS-b-PAA) [52], modified silk [2] and clay/polymer blends [53].
Some cross-linked polymers, such as those prepared through esterification reactions, have different degrees of polymerization, resulting in widely varying structures and therefore different properties of water absorption and swelling. This results in different rates of swelling after the microneedle tips are inserted into the skin, leading to different drug release profiles, such as burst and sustained drug release [11]. For example, HFMs based on the ‘super-swelling’ polymer PMVE/MAPEG consisted of drug reservoirs and microneedle tips which did not contain the drug [11]. When the tips were inserted into the skin, the microneedle tips rapidly absorbed the interstitial fluid, creating continuous conduits between the dermal microcirculation and the attached patch-type drug reservoirs, which sustainedly released the drug. In another report, HFMs (two layers) assembled from a lyophilized drug reservoir layer and a microneedle layer consisting of 20% (w/w) poly(methyl vinyl-maleic acid) crosslinked by esterification with 7.5% (w/w) poly(ethylene glycol) (Mw 10,000 Da) significantly enhanced the penetration of metformin hydrochloride in subcutaneous neonatal pig skin in vitro. The combined HFMs delivered 27.6-fold and 71.2-fold more drug over 6 h and 24 h, respectively, than controls using only drug reservoirs [12]. In addition, on-demand drug release can be achieved using HFMs through stimulation control. Hardy et al. prepared HFMs using the light-responsive materials 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) and ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA) to achieve on-demand delivery of ibuprofen [39]. In another report, the glucose-sensitive molecule 4-(2-acrylamidoethylcarbamoyl)-3-fluorophenylboronic acid (AFPBA) was chosen for integration with the hydrogel scaffold for its suitable equilibrium association constant with glucose (Figure 2C). After immersion in a glucose solution, the pore size of Gel-AFPBA-ins hydrogel (a hydrogel in which GelMA and AFPBA are cross-linked and then copolymerized with insulin) (Figure 2B) increased and insulin was released faster and more with an increasing glucose solution concentration (Figure 3) [54].

4. Evaluation Methods for HFMs

The materials, design, and preparation process of HFMs are important parameters in determining the properties of microneedles, while effective drug delivery also depends on the mechanical strength, skin penetration and release kinetics of HFMs.

4.1. Appearance and Morphology

The morphology and dimensions of HFMs (including the tip radius, height, width, length and spacing) can be characterized by optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) or optical coherence tomography (OCT), confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), and multiphoton microscopy (MPM).
Optical microscopy and SEM are commonly used to image and measure the morphology of HFM arrays and the height, width and spacing of microneedles [55]. OCT imaging is highly accurate, has a certain imaging depth and imaging speed, and is often used to observe, in situ, the penetration depth of microneedle patches after puncturing into isolated or in vivo skin or to record the process of microneedle changes within the skin [56,57]. By loading the microneedles with fluorescent dyes similar to the physicochemical properties of the drug, the distribution of the drug in the microneedles can be assessed by CLSM [58].

4.2. Swellability and Water Insolubility

The swelling properties of HFMs were determined by placing the microneedle array in distilled water or PBS and removing and weighing at specific time intervals to calculate the percentage of swelling [59]. Ex vivo skin such as porcine skin was also used, with the subcutaneous tissue layer carefully removed and the skin placed on tissue paper equilibrated with PBS (pH 7.4). HFM patches were punctured into the isolated skin and then removed at specific time intervals and their base-width swelling capacity was measured using digital microscopy [60].
Water insolubility is an important property of HFMs. The solubility of HFMs was calculated by swelling them sufficiently and then placing them at 90 °C to dry completely to a constant weight and comparing the weight before swelling with the weight after swelling and drying to a constant weight [59].

4.3. Mechanical Strength

The shape of the microneedle determines how much force can be applied to the microneedle before the needle breaks. The diameter and angle of the needle tip, as well as the height and basal measurement of the microneedle, determine whether the microneedle can be safely and reliably inserted into the skin [61]. In general, smaller tip diameters, smaller tip angles and higher tip height-to-width ratios facilitate successful skin penetration. It was found that the average depth of penetration, as determined for the nine microneedles, was significantly higher for the triangular and square base geometries, (340 μm and 343 μm, respectively) than for microneedle arrays with a hexagonal base (197 μm). Accordingly, the average distance between the microneedle base plate and the stratum corneum was estimated at 660 μm, 657 μm and 803 μm for the triangular (34% penetration), square (34% penetration) and hexagonal (20% penetration) base geometries, respectively [62]. Mechanical strength is generally tested using a texturizer or a motorized force-measuring table [63,64]. For fracture testing, arrays of microneedles are microscopically observed before and after testing to determine height differences.

4.4. Skin Piercing and Transdermal Permeation Properties

Microneedles act on the skin surface, puncturing the epidermis and creating microscopic pores through which the drug diffuses into the dermal microcirculation. The success of microneedle puncture can be assessed using a paraffin membrane or porcine skin. The porcine skin has similar physical properties to human skin and can be used as a simulated human skin model [63,65,66]. When conducting relevant experiments, the skin was first washed with PBS (pH 7.4), and then the skin was placed dermally downwards on a wax sheet [67]. The HFMs were then pressed into the skin with the thumb for 30 s. The microneedle arrays were removed from the skin and stained with 150 µL of 1% methylene blue solution for 5 min to assess the position of the stained microneedle pinholes. Excess staining solution was gently washed away with PBS. The stained skin was imaged with a digital microscope and the percentage of stained blue microneedles was calculated to assess the skin puncture performance of the microneedle arrays. The 100% success rate indicated that all microneedle arrays would be observed in the skin [68]. In general, parameters such as the microneedle tip diameter, basal width, length, type of microneedle and its mechanical strength play a crucial role in forming the size of the microchannel in the skin [69].
OCT can be used for in situ observation of the depth of microneedle puncture into the skin in vitro. Kaiyue et al. inserted microneedle patches into rat skin in vitro and imaged the microneedle patches together with the treated skin with OCT; the microneedle tips reach a depth of about 300 μm into the skin and do not break during the insertion process [58].
Fluorescence microscopy can be used to examine the distribution and accumulation of the drug in the skin. Using fluorescence imaging, Aljuffali et al. observed that after transdermal administration, fluorescence was only detected on the skin surface in the free fluorescent probe group and only a weak fluorescent signal was present in the hair follicles, whereas fluorescence was significantly enhanced in the skin of the fluorescently labelled nanocarrier group, suggesting a pro-permeation effect of the nanocarriers [70].
When the drug itself is fluorescent or the drug delivery system is labelled with fluorescence, CLSM is often used to observe fluorescence at different skin depths, allowing verification of the depth of penetration of the agent into the skin tissue and visualization of the accumulation of the agent in the skin tissue. Alvarez-Roman et al. used CLSM to determine the penetration, distribution and accumulation of polymeric nanoparticles in isolated porcine skin [71]. Moreover, by loading coumarin 6 and rhodamine B into the inter-layer and tip-layer of the microneedles, respectively, and inserting into the skin of the knee joint of hairless rats for 30 min, the depth and distribution of the microneedles in the skin were evaluated by tracing the fluorescence of coumarin 6 and rhodamine B by using CLSM and performing 3D reconstruction [58].
MPM is suitable for the characterization of human skin and allows the assessment of skin morphology and layers at a subcellular level. The two-photon excitation principle overcomes the limitations of fluorescence imaging and allows for in vivo non-toxic manipulation. Excitation occurs almost exclusively at the target inspection site without damaging surrounding tissue [72]. MPM also extends the applicability of fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM), and MPM-FLIM allows non-invasive, high-resolution examination of human skin for in vitro, ex vivo, and even clinical in vivo applications [73]. MPM has been used to evaluate the pathophysiological features of inflamed skin, skin permeation and delivery of drugs [74,75,76].

4.5. In Vitro Release and Transdermal Behaviour

The in vitro TDD can be assessed by Franz diffusion in the donor compartment of the diffusion cell, with the stratum corneum of porcine skin fixed face up to the receiving cell, with PBS (pH 7.4) kept constantly at 37 °C as the receiving medium [77]. The microneedle arrays were applied to the isolated skin and samples were taken from the receiving cell at set intervals. For measuring in vitro drug release, microneedles are placed in PBS (pH 7.4, 37 °C), and samples are taken at set intervals to determine drug concentrations. Skin permeation of drugs can also be evaluated by in vivo animal models, often in suitable rats or mice. The hair of the anaesthetized animal is removed and the skin is then punctured using a microneedle patch, whilst other parameters associated with drug efficacy can be assessed, such as the microneedle strength, permeation efficiency and irritation [78].
It has been noted that skin structure and immune responses in animal models differ significantly from those in humans. In addition, the biochemical properties of ex vivo human skin are different compared to in vivo human skin [79]. Therefore, human trials need to be included in the study when conducting pharmacodynamic studies [80].

4.6. Biosafety and Stability

Biosafety and stability are two important issues that limit the widespread use of HFMs. One of the safety aspects of HFM systems for clinical use is biocompatibility. To ensure that HFM products are acceptable for human exposure, several tests are required to assess their biocompatibility, based on exposure times of less than 24 h, 24 to 30 h, and more than 30 h [81]. Cytotoxicity, sensitization, irritation, intracutaneous reactivity tests, genotoxicity and subacute/subchronic systematic toxicity tests are recommended for the different periods of HFM use [81].
The hemolytic assay is one of the early ways to assess toxicity [82]. Elim et al. used red blood cells from rats to evaluate the hemolytic of HFMs, and no hemolytic was observed, indicating that the materials used were haemocompatible [40]. Vicente-Perez et al. investigated the effect of repeated application HFMs arrays prepared by Gantrez® S-97 BF and polyethylene glycol in the mouse skin, which displayed mild erythema, but did not stimulate the humoral immune system or cause infection or trigger an inflammatory response cascade [83]. Al-Kasasbeh et al. demonstrated for the first time in human volunteers that repeat HFM application and wear did not induce prolonged skin reactions or prolonged disruption of skin barrier function. Importantly, concentrations of specific systemic biomarkers of inflammation (C-reactive protein (CRP); tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α)), infection (interleukin-1β (IL-1β), allergy (immunoglobulin E (IgE)) and immunity (immunoglobulin G (IgG)) were all recorded over the course of this fixed study period. No biomarker concentrations above the normal, documented adult ranges were recorded over the course of the study, indicating that no systemic reactions were initiated in volunteers [84].
The stability of HFMs can be evaluated to ensure that active ingredients are protected during storage. This is usually done by storing HFMs and their cargo at various temperatures, including −25 ℃, 4 ℃, 20 ℃, 40 ℃ and 60 ℃, followed by analytical assessments. Generally, the protein cargo of HFMs has better storage stability and a longer shelf-life due to the rigid glassy microneedle matrices restraining molecular mobility and limiting access to atmospheric oxygen. Water should be particularly focused when non-vacuum storage conditions are present, as they can not only destroy the stability of cargo but also the mechanical properties of the HFMs themselves [85].

5. Application of HFMs in Disease Treatment

HFMs have been widely used for the treatment of various diseases, such as cardiovascular diseases, metabolism-related diseases and cancer, due to their outstanding advantages mentioned above.

5.1. Anticancer

Using HFMs for transdermal anticancer drug delivery can overcome the disadvantages of low bioavailability and side effects of oral administration and can also be used for the local administration of drugs for the treatment of superficial tumors such as melanoma, improving bioavailability while avoiding systemic exposure of the drug. Taking advantage of the abundant immune cells including antigen-presenting cells and Langerhans cells in the epidermis and dermis, the activation of the skin’s immune microenvironment can act synergistically with the drugs delivered by HFMs.
Chen et al. prepared HFMs with cross-linking polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) and PVA as a matrix, loaded with 1-methyltryptophan and indocyanine green-encapsulated nanoparticles for the treatment of melanoma [86]. This system successfully induced immunogenic cell death, enhanced immune response and provided a promising melanoma treatment (Figure 4).
Huang et al. prepared HFMs loaded with doxorubicin (DOX) and trametinib (Tra) using photo-cross-linked dextrose methacrylate (DexMA) as the microneedle matrix and successfully achieved the slow release of the drugs and exploited the synergistic effect of DOX and Tra (Figure 5) [87].

5.2. Treating Diabetes

HFMs are a promising drug delivery system for the treatment of diabetes because they are minimally invasive, painless, have no microneedle matrix residue and can be repeatedly administered multiple times.
Chen et al. used silk protein and phenylboronic acid/acrylamide as a microneedle matrix loaded with insulin to prepare glucose-responsive smart HFMs [88]. After the microneedles penetrated the skin, insulin was released autonomously to control the blood glucose concentration when the glucose concentration in the skin tissue increased. The HFMs also retain their original needle shape after a week in water, offering the potential for safe, residue-free and sustained drug release.
Wang et al. fabricated HFMs by using PVA as a microneedle matrix, loaded with glucose oxidase (core) and catalase (shell) and loaded 4-nitrophenyl 4-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxol-2yl) benzyl carbonate (insulin NBC) modified insulin into PVA, and PVA was further gelated by an H2O2-labile linker: N1-(4-boronobenzyl)-N3-(4-boronophenyl)-N1,N1,N3,N3-tetramethylpropane-1,3-diaminium (TSPBA) [89]. When microneedles were exposed to high glucose concentrations, local high levels of H2O2 were produced and insulin NBC was oxidized and hydrolyzed, leading to the rapid release of free insulin and control of blood glucose concentrations (Figure 6).

5.3. Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis is a systemic disease involving multiple joints. Early drug treatment is mostly oral administration, but long-term oral anti-rheumatoid arthritis medication often brings about serious side effects, while local injection drug treatment methods not only require specialist handling but may also pose the risk of joint damage and infection. HFMs are suitable for the delivery of drugs for this disease because of their painless and minimally invasive delivery of various active molecules.
Cao et al. designed modified hyaluronic-acid-fabricated HFMs, loaded with reverse deoxythymidine and cholesterol-modified deoxythymidine, which had a protective effect against cartilage/bone erosion in mice joints [90]. Compared to dissolving microneedles, HFMs not only increased the loading of nucleic acid aptamers into the cavity of the microneedle mold but also allowed the loading of HFMs to be controlled by adjusting the concentration of the aptamer solution, avoiding waste and loss of aptamers during preparation.

6. Summary and Outlook

As a new type of TDD method, HFMs have been increasingly researched for TDD, mainly in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases, tumors and diabetes mellitus, with the greatest advantage being the controlled release of the drug and the targeted drug delivery in the original lesion. In addition, the HFMs are prepared with certain functional modifications, such as some photothermal materials (e.g., gold nanorods, Prussian blue, and indocyanine green) and photosensitizers (e.g., protoporphyrin, zinc titanocyanine, and titanium dioxide), which induce the HFMs to produce exogenous stimuli (changes in temperature, magnetic fields, and light) or endogenous stimuli (changes in pH, enzymes, and redox gradients), while combining the delivered drug molecules, antibodies, nucleic acids, etc., to achieve targeted treatment of diseases. However, HFM development still faces potential biosafety issues during prolonged use, batch industrial production and sterilization challenges, which poses a huge challenge for their clinical application and is a hot topic for future research.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.Z. and N.F.; methodology, X.H. and J.L.; software, X.H., J.L. and H.R.; validation, J.L. and M.L.; investigation; Y.Z., N.F. and Y.H.; writing—original draft preparation, X.H. and J.L.; writing—review and editing, Y.Z., N.F. and Y.H.; supervision, Y.Z., N.F., H.R. and M.L.; project administration, X.H. and J.L.; funding acquisition, Y.Z., N.F. and Y.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number 82074031), the Program for Professor of Special Appointment (Eastern Scholar) at Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning (Grant number TP2020054), and the Program for Shanghai High-Level Local University Innovation Team (SZY20220315).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alkilani, A.Z.; McCrudden, M.T.; Donnelly, R.F. Transdermal Drug Delivery: Innovative Pharmaceutical Developments Based on Disruption of the Barrier Properties of the stratum corneum. Pharmaceutics 2015, 7, 438–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Yin, Z.; Kuang, D.; Wang, S.; Zheng, Z.; Yadavalli, V.K.; Lu, S. Swellable silk fibroin microneedles for transdermal drug delivery. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 106, 48–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Verbaan, F.J.; Bal, S.M.; van den Berg, D.J.; Groenink, W.H.; Verpoorten, H.; Luttge, R.; Bouwstra, J.A. Assembled microneedle arrays enhance the transport of compounds varying over a large range of molecular weight across human dermatomed skin. J. Control. Release 2007, 117, 238–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kanikkannan, N. Iontophoresis-based transdermal delivery systems. BioDrugs 2002, 16, 339–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Denet, A.R.; Vanbever, R.; Preat, V. Skin electroporation for transdermal and topical delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2004, 56, 659–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wenande, E.; Tam, J.; Bhayana, B.; Schlosser, S.K.; Ishak, E.; Farinelli, W.A.; Chlopik, A.; Hoang, M.P.; Pinkhasov, O.R.; Caravan, P.; et al. Laser-assisted delivery of synergistic combination chemotherapy in in vivo skin. J. Control. Release 2018, 275, 242–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Svenskaya, Y.I.; Genina, E.A.; Parakhonskiy, B.V.; Lengert, E.V.; Talnikova, E.E.; Terentyuk, G.S.; Utz, S.R.; Gorin, D.A.; Tuchin, V.V.; Sukhorukov, G.B. A Simple Non-Invasive Approach toward Efficient Transdermal Drug Delivery Based on Biodegradable Particulate System. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 17270–17282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Azagury, A.; Khoury, L.; Enden, G.; Kost, J. Ultrasound mediated transdermal drug delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2014, 72, 127–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Polat, B.E.; Hart, D.; Langer, R.; Blankschtein, D. Ultrasound-mediated transdermal drug delivery: Mechanisms, scope, and emerging trends. J. Control. Release 2011, 152, 330–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Courtenay, A.J.; McCrudden, M.T.C.; McAvoy, K.J.; McCarthy, H.O.; Donnelly, R.F. Microneedle-Mediated Transdermal Delivery of Bevacizumab. Mol. Pharm. 2018, 15, 3545–3556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Donnelly, R.F.; McCrudden, M.T.C.; Alkilani, A.Z.; Larraneta, E.; McAlister, E.; Courtenay, A.J.; Kearney, M.C.; Singh, T.R.R.; McCarthy, H.O.; Kett, V.L.; et al. Hydrogel-Forming Microneedles Prepared from “Super Swelling” Polymers Combined with Lyophilised Wafers for Transdermal Drug Delivery. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e111547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Migdadi, E.M.; Courtenay, A.J.; Tekko, I.A.; McCrudden, M.T.C.; Kearney, M.C.; McAlister, E.; McCarthy, H.O.; Donnelly, R.F. Hydrogel-forming microneedles enhance transdermal delivery of metformin hydrochloride. J. Control. Release 2018, 285, 142–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Koutsonanos, D.G.; del Pilar Martin, M.; Zarnitsyn, V.G.; Sullivan, S.P.; Compans, R.W.; Prausnitz, M.R.; Skountzou, I. Transdermal influenza immunization with vaccine-coated microneedle arrays. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e4773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Lee, S.J.; Lee, H.S.; Hwang, Y.H.; Kim, J.J.; Kang, K.Y.; Kim, S.J.; Kim, H.K.; Kim, J.D.; Jeong, D.H.; Paik, M.J.; et al. Enhanced anti-tumor immunotherapy by dissolving microneedle patch loaded ovalbumin. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0220382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Paredes, A.J.; Ramoller, I.K.; McKenna, P.E.; Abbate, M.T.A.; Volpe-Zanutto, F.; Vora, L.K.; Kilbourne-Brook, M.; Jarrahian, C.; Moffatt, K.; Zhang, C.; et al. Microarray patches: Breaking down the barriers to contraceptive care and HIV prevention for women across the globe. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2021, 173, 331–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Volpe-Zanutto, F.; Ferreira, L.T.; Permana, A.D.; Kirkby, M.; Paredes, A.J.; Vora, L.K.; Bonfanti, A.P.; Charlie-Silva, I.; Raposo, C.; Figueiredo, M.C.; et al. Artemether and lumefantrine dissolving microneedle patches with improved pharmacokinetic performance and antimalarial efficacy in mice infected with Plasmodium yoelii. J. Control. Release 2021, 333, 298–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Vora, L.K.; Moffatt, K.; Tekko, I.A.; Paredes, A.J.; Volpe-Zanutto, F.; Mishra, D.; Peng, K.; Raj Singh Thakur, R.; Donnelly, R.F. Microneedle array systems for long-acting drug delivery. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2021, 159, 44–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Donnelly, R.; Douroumis, D. Microneedles for drug and vaccine delivery and patient monitoring. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 2015, 5, 311–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Zhang, Y.; Yu, J.; Kahkoska, A.R.; Wang, J.; Buse, J.B.; Gu, Z. Advances in transdermal insulin delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2019, 139, 51–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rzhevskiy, A.S.; Singh, T.R.R.; Donnelly, R.F.; Anissimov, Y.G. Microneedles as the technique of drug delivery enhancement in diverse organs and tissues. J. Control. Release 2018, 270, 184–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Huang, Y.; Park, Y.S.; Moon, C.; David, A.E.; Chung, H.S.; Yang, V.C. Synthetic skin-permeable proteins enabling needleless immunization. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2010, 49, 2724–2727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ye, Y.; Yu, J.; Wen, D.; Kahkoska, A.R.; Gu, Z. Polymeric microneedles for transdermal protein delivery. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2018, 127, 106–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. McAlister, E.; Dutton, B.; Vora, L.K.; Zhao, L.; Ripolin, A.; Zahari, D.; Quinn, H.L.; Tekko, I.A.; Courtenay, A.J.; Kelly, S.A.; et al. Directly Compressed Tablets: A Novel Drug-Containing Reservoir Combined with Hydrogel-Forming Microneedle Arrays for Transdermal Drug Delivery. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2021, 10, e2001256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, M.; Vora, L.K.; Peng, K.; Donnelly, R.F. Trilayer microneedle array assisted transdermal and intradermal delivery of dexamethasone. Int. J. Pharm. 2022, 612, 121295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yadav, P.R.; Dobson, L.J.; Pattanayek, S.K.; Das, D.B. Swellable microneedles based transdermal drug delivery: Mathematical model development and numerical experiments. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2022, 247, 117005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Donnelly, R.F.; Singh, T.R.; Garland, M.J.; Migalska, K.; Majithiya, R.; McCrudden, C.M.; Kole, P.L.; Mahmood, T.M.; McCarthy, H.O.; Woolfson, A.D. Hydrogel-Forming Microneedle Arrays for Enhanced Transdermal Drug Delivery. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22, 4879–4890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Lutton, R.E.; Larraneta, E.; Kearney, M.C.; Boyd, P.; Woolfson, A.D.; Donnelly, R.F. A novel scalable manufacturing process for the production of hydrogel-forming microneedle arrays. Int. J. Pharm. 2015, 494, 417–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Ita, K. Transdermal Delivery of Drugs with Microneedles-Potential and Challenges. Pharmaceutics 2015, 7, 90–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Donnelly, R.F.; Mooney, K.; Mccrudden, M.T.C.; Vicente-Perez, E.M.; Belaid, L.; Gonzalez-Vazquez, P.; Mcelnay, J.C.; Woolfson, A.D. Hydrogel-Forming Microneedles Increase in Volume During Swelling in Skin, but Skin Barrier Function Recovery is Unaffected. J. Pharm. Sci. 2014, 103, 1478–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Martin, C.J.; Allender, C.J.; Brain, K.R.; Morrissey, A.; Birchall, J.C. Low temperature fabrication of biodegradable sugar glass microneedles for transdermal drug delivery applications. J. Control. Release 2012, 158, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, Y.S.; Khademhosseini, A. Advances in engineering hydrogels. Science 2017, 356, eaaf3627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Rajoli, R.K.R.; Flexner, C.; Chiong, J.; Owen, A.; Donnelly, R.F.; Larraneta, E.; Siccardi, M. Modelling the intradermal delivery of microneedle array patches for long-acting antiretrovirals using PBPK. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2019, 144, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Eltayib, E.; Brady, A.J.; Caffarel-Salvador, E.; Gonzalez-Vazquez, P.; Zaid Alkilani, A.; McCarthy, H.O.; McElnay, J.C.; Donnelly, R.F. Hydrogel-forming microneedle arrays: Potential for use in minimally-invasive lithium monitoring. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2016, 102, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Dimatteo, R.; Darling, N.J.; Segura, T. In situ forming injectable hydrogels for drug delivery and wound repair. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2018, 127, 167–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Singh, T.R.R.; McCarron, P.A.; Woolfson, A.D.; Donnelly, R.F. Investigation of swelling and network parameters of poly(ethylene glycol)-crosslinked poly(methyl vinyl ether-co-maleic acid) hydrogels. Eur. Polym. J. 2009, 45, 1239–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tsou, T.L.; Tang, S.T.; Huang, Y.C.; Wu, J.R.; Young, J.J.; Wang, H.J. Poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) wound dressing containing ciprofloxacin and its drug release studies. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2005, 16, 95–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chew, S.W.T.; Shah, A.H.; Zheng, M.; Chang, H.; Wiraja, C.; Steele, T.W.J.; Xu, C. A self-adhesive microneedle patch with drug loading capability through swelling effect. Bioeng. Transl. Med. 2020, 5, e10157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Tsioris, K.; Raja, W.K.; Pritchard, E.M.; Panilaitis, B.; Kaplan, D.L.; Omenetto, F.G. Fabrication of Silk Microneedles for Controlled-Release Drug Delivery. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22, 330–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hardy, J.G.; Larraneta, E.; Donnelly, R.F.; McGoldrick, N.; Migalska, K.; McCrudden, M.T.; Irwin, N.J.; Donnelly, L.; McCoy, C.P. Hydrogel-Forming Microneedle Arrays Made from Light-Responsive Materials for On-Demand Transdermal Drug Delivery. Mol. Pharm. 2016, 13, 907–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Elim, D.; Fitri, A.M.N.; Mahfud, M.A.S.; Afika, N.; Sultan, N.A.F.; Hijrah; Asri, R.M.; Permana, A.D. Hydrogel forming microneedle-mediated transdermal delivery of sildenafil citrate from polyethylene glycol reservoir: An ex vivo proof of concept study. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2023, 222, 113018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yu, M.; Lu, Z.; Shi, Y.; Du, Y.T.; Chen, X.G.; Kong, M. Systematic comparisons of dissolving and swelling hyaluronic acid microneedles in transdermal drug delivery. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 191, 783–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sabbagh, F.; Kim, B.S. Ex Vivo Transdermal Delivery of Nicotinamide Mononucleotide Using Polyvinyl Alcohol Microneedles. Polymers 2023, 15, 2031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ruan, S.; Zhang, Y.; Feng, N. Microneedle-mediated transdermal nanodelivery systems: A review. Biomater. Sci. 2021, 9, 8065–8089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sabbagh, F.; Kim, B.S. Recent advances in polymeric transdermal drug delivery systems. J. Control. Release 2022, 341, 132–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Romanyuk, A.V.; Zvezdin, V.N.; Samant, P.; Grenader, M.I.; Zemlyanova, M.; Prausnitz, M.R. Collection of analytes from microneedle patches. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 10520–10523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Chang, H.; Zheng, M.; Yu, X.; Than, A.; Seeni, R.Z.; Kang, R.; Tian, J.; Khanh, D.P.; Liu, L.; Chen, P.; et al. A Swellable Microneedle Patch to Rapidly Extract Skin Interstitial Fluid for Timely Metabolic Analysis. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1702243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Caffarel-Salvador, E.; Brady, A.J.; Eltayib, E.; Meng, T.; Alonso-Vicente, A.; Gonzalez-Vazquez, P.; Torrisi, B.M.; Vicente-Perez, E.M.; Mooney, K.; Jones, D.S.; et al. Hydrogel-Forming Microneedle Arrays Allow Detection of Drugs and Glucose In Vivo: Potential for Use in Diagnosis and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0145644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Kearney, M.C.; Caffarel-Salvador, E.; Fallows, S.J.; McCarthy, H.O.; Donnelly, R.F. Microneedle-mediated delivery of donepezil: Potential for improved treatment options in Alzheimer’s disease. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2016, 103, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. He, R.; Niu, Y.; Li, Z.; Li, A.; Yang, H.; Xu, F.; Li, F. A Hydrogel Microneedle Patch for Point-of-Care Testing Based on Skin Interstitial Fluid. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2020, 9, e1901201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yang, S.; Feng, Y.; Zhang, L.; Chen, N.; Yuan, W.; Jin, T. A scalable fabrication process of polymer microneedles. Int. J. Nanomed. 2012, 7, 1415–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Kamoun, E.A.; Chen, X.; Eldin, M.S.M.; Kenawy, E.R.S. Crosslinked poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogels for wound dressing applications: A review of remarkably blended polymers. Arab. J. Chem. 2015, 8, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Yang, S.Y.; O’Cearbhaill, E.D.; Sisk, G.C.; Park, K.M.; Cho, W.K.; Villiger, M.; Bouma, B.E.; Pomahac, B.; Karp, J.M. A bio-inspired swellable microneedle adhesive for mechanical interlocking with tissue. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Sabbagh, F.; Kim, B.S. Microneedles for transdermal drug delivery using clay-based composites. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2022, 19, 1099–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Guo, Z.; Liu, H.; Shi, Z.; Lin, L.; Li, Y.; Wang, M.; Pan, G.; Lei, Y.; Xue, L. Responsive hydrogel-based microneedle dressing for diabetic wound healing. J. Mater. Chem. B 2022, 10, 3501–3511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Arsalan, A.; Raya, D.; Hala, D.; Haytam, K.; Aiman, A.A. Preparation and characterization of flexible furosemide-loaded biodegradable microneedles for intradermal drug delivery. Biomater. Sci. 2022, 10, 6486–6499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Yang, L.; Yang, Y.; Chen, H.; Mei, L.; Zeng, X. Polymeric microneedle-mediated sustained release systems: Design strategies and promising applications for drug delivery. Asian J. Pharm. Sci. 2022, 17, 70–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Courtenay, A.J.; McAlister, E.; McCrudden, M.T.C.; Vora, L.; Steiner, L.; Levin, G.; Levy-Nissenbaum, E.; Shterman, N.; Kearney, M.C.; McCarthy, H.O.; et al. Hydrogel-forming microneedle arrays as a therapeutic option for transdermal esketamine delivery. J. Control. Release 2020, 322, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yu, K.Y.; Yu, X.M.; Cao, S.S.; Wang, Y.X.; Zhai, Y.H.; Yang, F.D.; Yang, X.Y.; Lu, Y.; Wu, C.B.; Xu, Y.H. Layered dissolving microneedles as a need-based delivery system to simultaneously alleviate skin and joint lesions in psoriatic arthritis. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2021, 11, 505–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Suksaeree, J.; Charoenchai, L.; Madaka, F.; Monton, C.; Sakunpak, A.; Charoonratana, T.; Pichayakorn, W. Zingiber cassumunar blended patches for skin application: Formulation, physicochemical properties, and in vitro studies. Asian J. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 10, 341–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Aung, N.N.; Ngawhirunpat, T.; Rojanarata, T.; Patrojanasophon, P.; Pamornpathomkul, B.; Opanasopit, P. Fabrication, characterization and comparison of alpha-arbutin loaded dissolving and hydrogel forming microneedles. Int. J. Pharm. 2020, 586, 119508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Bal, S.M.; Caussin, J.; Pavel, S.; Bouwstra, J.A. In vivo assessment of safety of microneedle arrays in human skin. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2008, 35, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Loizidou, E.Z.; Inoue, N.T.; Ashton-Barnett, J.; Barrow, D.A.; Allender, C.J. Evaluation of geometrical effects of microneedles on skin penetration by CT scan and finite element analysis. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2016, 107, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Vora, L.K.; Courtenay, A.J.; Tekko, I.A.; Larraneta, E.; Donnelly, R.F. Pullulan-based dissolving microneedle arrays for enhanced transdermal delivery of small and large biomolecules. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 146, 290–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. He, M.C.; Chen, B.Z.; Ashfaq, M.; Guo, X.D. Assessment of mechanical stability of rapidly separating microneedles for transdermal drug delivery. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 2018, 8, 1034–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Chen, B.Z.; Ashfaq, M.; Zhang, X.P.; Zhang, J.N.; Guo, X.D. In vitro and in vivo assessment of polymer microneedles for controlled transdermal drug delivery. J. Drug Target. 2018, 26, 720–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Lee, I.C.; He, J.S.; Tsai, M.T.; Lin, K.C. Fabrication of a novel partially dissolving polymer microneedle patch for transdermal drug delivery. J. Mater. Chem. B 2015, 3, 276–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Donnelly, R.F.; Morrow, D.I.; McCrudden, M.T.; Alkilani, A.Z.; Vicente-Perez, E.M.; O’Mahony, C.; Gonzalez-Vazquez, P.; McCarron, P.A.; Woolfson, A.D. Hydrogel-forming and dissolving microneedles for enhanced delivery of photosensitizers and precursors. Photochem. Photobiol. 2014, 90, 641–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Donadei, A.; Kraan, H.; Ophorst, O.; Flynn, O.; O’Mahony, C.; Soema, P.C.; Moore, A.C. Skin delivery of trivalent Sabin inactivated poliovirus vaccine using dissolvable microneedle patches induces neutralizing antibodies. J. Control. Release 2019, 311–312, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kalluri, H.; Banga, A.K. Formation and closure of microchannels in skin following microporation. Pharm. Res. 2011, 28, 82–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Roy, R.K.; Thakur, M.; Dixit, V.K. Hair growth promoting activity of Eclipta alba in male albino rats. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 2008, 300, 357–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Aljuffali, I.A.; Sung, C.T.; Shen, F.M.; Huang, C.T.; Fang, J.Y. Squarticles as a Lipid Nanocarrier for Delivering Diphencyprone and Minoxidil to Hair Follicles and Human Dermal Papilla Cells. Aaps J. 2014, 16, 140–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Wang, W.; Chen, L.; Huang, X.; Shao, A. Preparation and Characterization of Minoxidil Loaded Nanostructured Lipid Carriers. AAPS PharmSciTech 2017, 18, 509–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Yazdani-Arazi, S.N.; Ghanbarzadeh, S.; Adibkia, K.; Kouhsoltani, M.; Hamishehkar, H. Histological evaluation of follicular delivery of arginine via nanostructured lipid carriers: A novel potential approach for the treatment of alopecia. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2017, 45, 1379–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zhang, L.W.; Yu, W.W.; Colvin, V.L.; Monteiro-Riviere, N.A. Biological interactions of quantum dot nanoparticles in skin and in human epidermal keratinocytes. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2008, 228, 200–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Tang, L.; Zhang, C.; Song, G.; Jin, X.; Xu, Z. In vivo skin penetration and metabolic path of quantum dots. Sci. China Life Sci. 2013, 56, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Filipe, P.; Silva, J.N.; Silva, R.; de Castro, J.L.C.; Gomes, M.M.; Alves, L.C.; Santus, R.; Pinheiro, T. Stratum Corneum Is an Effective Barrier to TiO2 and ZnO Nanoparticle Percutaneous Absorption. Skin Pharmacol. Phys. 2009, 22, 266–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Gonzalez-Vazquez, P.; Larraneta, E.; McCrudden, M.T.C.; Jarrahian, C.; Rein-Weston, A.; Quintanar-Solares, M.; Zehrung, D.; McCarthy, H.; Courtenay, A.J.; Donnelly, R.F. Transdermal delivery of gentamicin using dissolving microneedle arrays for potential treatment of neonatal sepsis. J. Control. Release 2017, 265, 30–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Shende, P.; Sardesai, M.; Gaud, R.S. Micro to nanoneedles: A trend of modernized transepidermal drug delivery system. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2018, 46, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Coulman, S.A.; Birchall, J.C.; Alex, A.; Pearton, M.; Hofer, B.; O’Mahony, C.; Drexler, W.; Povazay, B. In Vivo, In Situ Imaging of Microneedle Insertion into the Skin of Human Volunteers Using Optical Coherence Tomography. Pharm. Res. Dordr. 2011, 28, 66–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Arya, J.; Henry, S.; Kalluri, H.; McAllister, D.V.; Pewin, W.P.; Prausnitz, M.R. Tolerability, usability and acceptability of dissolving microneedle patch administration in human subjects. Biomaterials 2017, 128, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. ISO 10993-1; FDA Guidance. Use of International Standards. Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices—Part 1: Evaluation and Testing within a Risk Management Process. FDA: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2020.
  82. Ananda, P.W.R.; Elim, D.; Zaman, H.S.; Muslimin, W.; Tunggeng, M.G.R.; Permana, A.D. Combination of transdermal patches and solid microneedles for improved transdermal delivery of primaquine. Int. J. Pharm. 2021, 609, 121204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Vicente-Perez, E.M.; Larraneta, E.; McCrudden, M.T.C.; Kissenpfennig, A.; Hegarty, S.; McCarthy, H.O.; Donnelly, R.F. Repeat application of microneedles does not alter skin appearance or barrier function and causes no measurable disturbance of serum biomarkers of infection, inflammation or immunity in mice in vivo. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2017, 117, 400–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Al-Kasasbeh, R.; Brady, A.J.; Courtenay, A.J.; Larraneta, E.; McCrudden, M.T.C.; O’Kane, D.; Liggett, S.; Donnelly, R.F. Evaluation of the clinical impact of repeat application of hydrogel-forming microneedle array patches. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 2020, 10, 690–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Chu, L.Y.; Ye, L.; Dong, K.; Compans, R.W.; Yang, C.; Prausnitz, M.R. Enhanced Stability of Inactivated Influenza Vaccine Encapsulated in Dissolving Microneedle Patches. Pharm. Res. 2016, 33, 868–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Chen, M.; Quan, G.; Wen, T.; Yang, P.; Qin, W.; Mai, H.; Sun, Y.; Lu, C.; Pan, X.; Wu, C. Cold to Hot: Binary Cooperative Microneedle Array-Amplified Photoimmunotherapy for Eliciting Antitumor Immunity and the Abscopal Effect. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 32259–32269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Huang, S.; Liu, H.; Huang, S.; Fu, T.; Xue, W.; Guo, R. Dextran methacrylate hydrogel microneedles loaded with doxorubicin and trametinib for continuous transdermal administration of melanoma. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 246, 116650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Chen, S.; Matsumoto, H.; Moro-Oka, Y.; Tanaka, M.; Miyahara, Y.; Suganami, T.; Matsumoto, A. Smart Microneedle Fabricated with Silk Fibroin Combined Semi-interpenetrating Network Hydrogel for Glucose-Responsive Insulin Delivery. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 5, 5781–5789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Wang, J.; Ye, Y.; Yu, J.; Kahkoska, A.R.; Zhang, X.; Wang, C.; Sun, W.; Corder, R.D.; Chen, Z.; Khan, S.A.; et al. Core-Shell Microneedle Gel for Self-Regulated Insulin Delivery. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 2466–2473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Cao, J.; Su, J.; An, M.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zuo, J.; Zhang, N.; Zhao, Y. Novel DEK-Targeting Aptamer Delivered by a Hydrogel Microneedle Attenuates Collagen-Induced Arthritis. Mol. Pharm. 2021, 18, 305–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biomedicines 11 02119 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic representation of methods of traditional (A) and hydrogel (B) microneedles mediated drug delivery across skin (arrows point to the order of operations). The figure was adopted from ref. [11] with permission from WILEY-VCH VERLAG GMBH & CO. KGAA.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of methods of traditional (A) and hydrogel (B) microneedles mediated drug delivery across skin (arrows point to the order of operations). The figure was adopted from ref. [11] with permission from WILEY-VCH VERLAG GMBH & CO. KGAA.
Biomedicines 11 02119 g001
Biomedicines 11 02119 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic representation of responsive microneedle dressing for diabetic wound healing. (A) Diabetic wounds in mice treated with the hydrogel-based microneedle dressing. (B) Preparation of glucose-responsive insulin-releasing Gel–AFPBA–ins hydrogels. (C) Mechanism of glucose-responsive insulin release from the prepared hydrogels. The figure was cited from ref. [54] with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of responsive microneedle dressing for diabetic wound healing. (A) Diabetic wounds in mice treated with the hydrogel-based microneedle dressing. (B) Preparation of glucose-responsive insulin-releasing Gel–AFPBA–ins hydrogels. (C) Mechanism of glucose-responsive insulin release from the prepared hydrogels. The figure was cited from ref. [54] with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry.
Biomedicines 11 02119 g002
Biomedicines 11 02119 g003 550
Figure 3. Schematic representation of glucose responsiveness and insulin release of the Gel–AFPBA–ins hydrogels. (A) Scanning electron microscope images of the cross-sectional morphology of the hydrogels after reaction with different glucose solutions. The insets show the appearance of the corresponding hydrogels. (B) Surface area and (C) average pore size of the hydrogels after reaction with different glucose solutions. (D) Insulin release kinetics from the hydrogels in different glucose solutions. Mean ± s.d. (n = 5 for 3 repetitions). The figure was cited from ref. [54] with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 3. Schematic representation of glucose responsiveness and insulin release of the Gel–AFPBA–ins hydrogels. (A) Scanning electron microscope images of the cross-sectional morphology of the hydrogels after reaction with different glucose solutions. The insets show the appearance of the corresponding hydrogels. (B) Surface area and (C) average pore size of the hydrogels after reaction with different glucose solutions. (D) Insulin release kinetics from the hydrogels in different glucose solutions. Mean ± s.d. (n = 5 for 3 repetitions). The figure was cited from ref. [54] with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry.
Biomedicines 11 02119 g003
Biomedicines 11 02119 g004 550
Figure 4. Schematic illustration of the mechanism of antitumor immunity. The figure was cited from ref. [61] with permission from the American Chemical Society.
Figure 4. Schematic illustration of the mechanism of antitumor immunity. The figure was cited from ref. [61] with permission from the American Chemical Society.
Biomedicines 11 02119 g004
Biomedicines 11 02119 g005 550
Figure 5. Characterization of DexMA hydrogel microneedles (MNs). (A–C) Images of blank MNs, methylene blue-loaded MNs, and DOX-loaded MNs, respectively. (D–F) Images of a single microneedle corresponding to ((A–C), marked with a dotted box), respectively. (G) SEM image of MNs. (H) MNs mechanical property. (I) In vitro drug release from MNs. The figure was adopted from ref. [87] with permission from Elsevier, Limited.
Figure 5. Characterization of DexMA hydrogel microneedles (MNs). (A–C) Images of blank MNs, methylene blue-loaded MNs, and DOX-loaded MNs, respectively. (D–F) Images of a single microneedle corresponding to ((A–C), marked with a dotted box), respectively. (G) SEM image of MNs. (H) MNs mechanical property. (I) In vitro drug release from MNs. The figure was adopted from ref. [87] with permission from Elsevier, Limited.
Biomedicines 11 02119 g005
Biomedicines 11 02119 g006 550
Figure 6. Schematic representation of the glucose-responsive insulin delivery system using H2O2-responsive PVA-TSPBA gel. (A) Insulin is triggered to release by a hyperglycemic state from the core matrix of the PVA-TSPBA MN patch, and the local inflammation can be greatly reduced by the catalase-embedded PVA-TSPBA shell. (B) Modification of insulin with NBC and H2O2-responsive release. (C) H2O2 responsiveness mechanism. The figure was adopted from ref. [89] with permission from the American Chemical Society.
Figure 6. Schematic representation of the glucose-responsive insulin delivery system using H2O2-responsive PVA-TSPBA gel. (A) Insulin is triggered to release by a hyperglycemic state from the core matrix of the PVA-TSPBA MN patch, and the local inflammation can be greatly reduced by the catalase-embedded PVA-TSPBA shell. (B) Modification of insulin with NBC and H2O2-responsive release. (C) H2O2 responsiveness mechanism. The figure was adopted from ref. [89] with permission from the American Chemical Society.
Biomedicines 11 02119 g006
Table
Table 1. Microneedle products approved by the FDA.
Table 1. Microneedle products approved by the FDA.
Products NameApplicantDe Novo or 510 (k) NumberDate ApprovedDesign of the ProductUse
DP4 Micro needling deviceEquipmed USA LLC, Newport Beach, CA, USAK22107020 December 2022Powered MN device with 16 stainless steel microneedle plate adapts to the skin’s surface and has a maximal needle length of 3 mm.Aesthetic use
SkinPen Precision systemCrown Aesthetics, Dallas, TX, USAK2205067 March 2022The microneedling pen handpiece comes with a sterile needle cartridge and includes 14 total solids medical-grade stainless steel, maximum needle length of 1.5 mm.Aesthetic use
K2022432 April 2021
INTRAcel RF Microneedle SystemJeisys Medical Inc., Seoul, Republic of KoreaK18328415 January 2020Fractional radio frequency combined with insulated microneedlingGeneral and plastic surgery
Exceed Microneedling deviceMT. DERM GmbH, Berlin, GermanyK18240719 July 2019Powered microneedling device with 6 stainless steel microneedle plate adapts to the skin’s surface and has a maximal needle length of 1.5 mm.Aesthetic use
K1807787 September 2018
SkinPen precision systemBellus Medical, LLC, Lindon, UT, USADEN1600291 March 2018Microneedling pen handpiece with a sterile needle cartridgeAesthetic use
MICRONJET 600NANOPASS TECHNOLOGIES LTD., Ness Ziona, IsraelK0927463 February 2010Hollow microneedles that consist of a needle holder, a needle tube, a needle tube liner and a protective sleeveIntradermal injection
Table
Table 2. Microneedle products approved by the FDA for clinical trials.
Table 2. Microneedle products approved by the FDA for clinical trials.
Number of Clinical TrialsStudy TitleConditionsInterventionsStudy PhaseStatus
00837512Insulin Delivery Using Microneedles in Type 1 DiabetesType 1 Diabetes MellitusDevice: Microneedle;
Device: Subcutaneous insulin catheter		Phase 2
Phase 3		Completed
03855397Pain and Safety of Microneedles
in Oral Cavity		Oral Cavity DiseaseOther: Microneedle
Other: Hypodermic needle
Other: Flat patch		Not ApplicableCompleted
04583852Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Brightening Micro-needle Patch on Facial Solar LentiginesSolar LentiginesOther: AIVÍA, Ultra-Brightening Spot Microneedle Patch
Other: Placebo Micro-needle Patch		Not ApplicableCompleted
05108714Intradermal Lidocaine Via MicronJet600 Microneedle DeviceLocal AnaesthesiaDevice: Intravenous cannulation after intradermal injection of lidocaine via MicronJet600 microneedle device (1)
Device: Intravenous cannulation after intradermal injection of saline via MicronJet600 microneedle device
Device: Intravenous cannulation after intradermal injection of lidocaine via MicronJet600 microneedle device (2)
Procedure: Intravenous cannulation after without prior interventions		Not ApplicableCompleted
05267938Microneedle Pretreatment as a Strategy to Improve the Effectiveness of Topical Anesthetics FormulationsOral Cavity DiseaseDrug: Topical Anesthetic
Drug: Local anesthetic		Phase 1Completed
04989361Soluble Hyaluronic Acid Microneedle VS. Non-ablative Fractional Laser on Infraorbital WrinklesWrinkleProcedure: Soluble Hyaluronic Acid Microneedle
Procedure: Nonfractional laser		Not ApplicableRecruiting
05377905Microneedle Array Plus Doxorubicin in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Cancer (cSCC)Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Skin Cancers-Squamous Cell Carcinoma		Drug: Microneedle Array Doxorubicin (MNA-D)Phase 1
Phase 2		Not yet recruiting
02966067A Split Mouth Trial to Compare Microneedles vs. Standard Needles in Dental Anaesthetic DeliveryDental Pain
Anesthesia, Loca		Device: Microneedle Device (Experimental)
Device: 30-gauge Short Hypodermic Needle		Not ApplicableCompleted
03054480Fractional Micro-Needle Radiofrequency and I Botulinum Toxin A for Primary Axillary HyperhidrosisPrimary Axillary HyperhidrosisDevice: Fractional Micro-Needle Radiofrequency
Drug: Botulinum toxin type A		Not ApplicableCompleted
03207763Microneedle Patch Study in Healthy Infants/Young ChildrenVaccination
Skin Absorption		Device: Microneedle Formulation 1
Device: Microneedle Formulation 2		Not ApplicableCompleted
02682056Glucose Measurement Using Microneedle PatchesDiabetesDevice: Microneedle patch
Device: Intravenous (IV) catheter
Device: Lancet		Not ApplicableCompleted
04732195Pilocarpine Microneedles for Sweat Induction (PMN-SI)Cystic FibrosisDevice: Pilocarpine microneedle patch
Device: Pilocarpine Iontophoresis		Not ApplicableCompleted
05694858Transdermal Microneedle Lignocaine Delivery Versus EMLA Patch for Topical Analgesia Before Venepuncture Procedure To Adults in Clinical SettingGlaucoma
Cataract		Combination Product: Lignocaine loaded maltose microneedle array patch
Drug: EMLA 5% patch		Phase 1
Phase 2		Not yet
recruiting
02995057Safety Demonstration of Microneedle InsertionAllergic Reaction to NickelDevice: Gold- or silver-coated, or uncoated nickel microneedlesNot ApplicableCompleted
04552015Microneedles for Diagnosis of LTBILatent TuberculosisDiagnostic Test: TST vs. PPD microneedle testNot ApplicableTerminated
03203174The Use of Microneedles With Topical Botulinum Toxin for Treatment of Palmar HyperhidrosisHyperhidrosisDevice: Microneedle
Device: Sham Microneedle
Drug: Botulinum Toxin Type A
Other: Saline		Phase 1Completed
03332628Racial/Ethnic Differences in Microneedle ResponseHealthyDevice: Microneedle patchNot ApplicableCompleted
05078463Efficacy of Transdermal Microneedle Patch for Topical Anesthesia Enhancement in Paediatric Thalassemia PatientsThalassemia in ChildrenDevice: Microneedle
Drug: 1 Finger Tip Unit (FTU) EMLA Cream (30-min application time)
Drug: 1 Finger Tip Unit (FTU) EMLA (15-min application time)
Drug: 0.5 Finger Tip Unit (FTU) EMLA (30-min application time)
Device: Sham Patch		Phase 2Completed
00539084A Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of a Microneedle Device for Local AnesthesiaLocal Anesthesia
Intradermal Injections		Device: MicronJetNot ApplicableCompleted
02596750The Effect of Microneedle Pretreatment on Topical AnesthesiaPainDevice: Microneedle Roller
Device: Sham microneedle Roller		Not ApplicableCompleted
01812837The Use of Microneedles in Photodynamic TherapyActinic KeratosisDevice: Microneedle
Drug: Aminolevulinic Acid
Radiation: Blue light		Not ApplicableCompleted
05710068Effects of RF Microneedle on Photoaging SkinPigmentation
Pigmentation Disorder		Device: RF Microneedle
Drug: Combination cream		Not ApplicableCompleted
03629041A Study of the Use of Microneedle Patches to Deliver Topical Lidocaine in the Oral CavityTopical AnaesthesiaDevice: Microneedle Patch
Device: Patch with no microneedles		Phase 1Completed
03795402Analysis of Non-Invasively Collected Microneedle Device Samples From Mild Plaque Psoriasis for Use in Transcriptomics ProfilingPsoriasis VulgarisDevice: Microneedle DeviceNot ApplicableCompleted
02594644The Use of Microneedles to Expedite Treatment Time in Photodynamic TherapyKeratosis, ActinicDevice: Microneedle Roller
Drug: Aminolevulinic Acid
Radiation: Blue Light		Not ApplicableCompleted
03415373Clinical Evaluation of Healthy Subjects Receiving Intradermal Saline Using the Microneedle Adapter (Model UAR-2S)Intradermal InjectionDevice: Microneedle Adapter (Model UAR-2S)
Device: Hypodermic needle + syringe		Not ApplicableCompleted
03607903Adalimumab Microneedles in Healthy VolunteersPain
Injection Site		Biological: Adalimumab ID
Biological: Adalimumab SC
Other: Saline ID
Other: Saline SC		Phase 1
Phase 2		Completed
04394689Measles and Rubella Vaccine Microneedle Patch Phase 1–2 Age De-escalation TrialMeasles
Rubella
Vaccination
Healthy		Biological: Measles Rubella Vaccine (MRV-SC)
Biological: MRVMNP
Other: PLA-MNP
Other: PLA-SC		Phase 1
Phase 2		Completed
03739398A Study on the Effectiveness and Safety Evaluation of Combination Therapy With 1927 nm Thulium Laser and Fractional Microneedle Radiofrequency Equipment for Improvement of Skin AgingWrinkleDevice: LUTRONIC GENUS laser (Fractional Microneedle Radiofrequency (FMR))
Device: LASEMED laser (The Thulium laser with 1927 nm wavelength)		Not ApplicableCompleted
02438423Inactivated Influenza Vaccine Delivered by Microneedle Patch or by Hypodermic NeedleInfluenzaBiological: Inactivated influenza vaccine
Other: Placebo		Phase 1Completed
04928222Placebo Microneedles in Healthy Volunteers (Part I) and Efficacy/Safety of Doxorubicin Microneedles in Basal Cell Cancer Subjects (Part II)Basal Cell CarcinomaCombination Product: Doxorubicin containing MNA
Drug: Placebo containing MNA		Phase 1
Phase 2		Active, not recruiting
02632110Microneedle Lesion Preparation
Prior to Aminolevulinic Acid Photodynamic Therapy (ALAPDT) for AK on Face		Actinic KeratosisDrug: ALA
Drug: Topical Solution Vehicle
Device: IBL 10 mW
Procedure: Microneedle lesion preparation
Device: IBL 20 mW		Phase 2Completed
02745392Safety and Efficacy of ZPZolmitriptan Intracutaneous Microneedle Systems for the Acute Treatment of MigraineAcute MigraineDrug: ZPZolmitriptan
Drug: Placebo		Phase 2
Phase 3		Completed
01789320Safety Study of Suprachoroidal Triamcinolone Acetonide Via Microneedle to Treat UveitisUveitis
Intermediate Uveitis
Posterior Uveitis
Panuveitis
Noninfectious Uveitis		Drug: triamcinolone acetonide (Triesence®)Phase 1
Phase 2		Completed
Table
Table 3. Characteristics of different HFM formulations.
Table 3. Characteristics of different HFM formulations.
CompoundsPolymerCharacteristicsRef.
Fluorescein, FITC-Dextran, DoxorubicinMethacrylated hyaluronic acidMethacrylated hyaluronic acid microneedles fully swelled within 1 min, with swelling ratio of ~2.74; >80% of fluorescein, FITC-Dextran, and >50% of doxorubicin were released from the microneedle patches within 30 min.[37]
HRPSilkThe beta sheet content in the microneedle devices was increased from 14% to 15% and 21% as the water vapor annealing time increased from 0 h to 2 h and 8 h, and the HRP release reduced to 37% and 18%.[38]
FITC-dextranSilk fibroin, urea, N-dimethylformamidee, glycine and 2-ethoxyethanol The swelling-modified silk fibroin microneedles with different microscopic pore size attains 250–650% swelling ratio after PBS immersion;
the swelling-modified silk fibroin microneedles display significantly enhanced transdermal drug release kinetics compared with the controlled silk fibroin films, with 2–10-times larger accumulative release ratio than the corresponding control groups during the entire release process in vitro.		[2]
Light-responsive ibuprofen conjugatesCrosslinked 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylateThe crosslinked 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate hydrogel shows maximum swelling degrees of around 50% after 24 h; the system allows the release of ibuprofen during prolonged periods of time (up to 160 h).[39]
Sildenafil citratePolyvinyl alcohol and polyvinylpyrrolidone crosslinked by tartaric acid The hydrogel’s swelling percentage was 348.07–72,897% with different formulations.[40]
DoxorubicinMethacrylated hyaluronic acidThe swelling ratio increased rapidly and reached a maximum of 337% at 10 min; the release profile of doxorubicin/SMNs dramatically turned into a slow rate after 90 min and less than 90% doxorubicin was released at the end of the detection point (12 h). The maximum doxorubicin concentration that appeared at 1 h was 0.58 ± 0.35 μg/mL for the doxorubicin/DMNs group, and was 1.28 ± 0.32 μg/mL for the doxorubicin/SMNs group at 2 h, respectively. The crosslinking network of SMNs significantly retarded the diffusion of small molecule drugs within the needle matrix, and extended the drug release duration, increasing the drug transdermal efficacy.[41]
Nicotinamide mononucleotidePolyvinyl alcohol, carboxymethyl cellulose, DMSOFormulations of microneedles containing 2.9% carboxymethyl cellulose have a higher swelling ratio (186%) in comparison with the 0% carboxymethyl cellulose composite (48%) and a higher nicotinamide mononucleotide release of 91.94 ± 4.03% at 18 h compared with the carboxymethyl cellulose-free polyvinyl alcohol matrix of 50.48 ± 3.73% at 18 h.[42]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hou, X.; Li, J.; Hong, Y.; Ruan, H.; Long, M.; Feng, N.; Zhang, Y. Advances and Prospects for Hydrogel-Forming Microneedles in Transdermal Drug Delivery. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 2119. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11082119

AMA Style

Hou X, Li J, Hong Y, Ruan H, Long M, Feng N, Zhang Y. Advances and Prospects for Hydrogel-Forming Microneedles in Transdermal Drug Delivery. Biomedicines. 2023; 11(8):2119. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11082119

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hou, Xiaolin, Jiaqi Li, Yongyu Hong, Hang Ruan, Meng Long, Nianping Feng, and Yongtai Zhang. 2023. "Advances and Prospects for Hydrogel-Forming Microneedles in Transdermal Drug Delivery" Biomedicines 11, no. 8: 2119. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11082119

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop