Next Article in Journal
Integrated mRNA and miRNA Expression Profile Analysis of Female and Male Gonads in Acrossocheilus fasciatus
Previous Article in Journal
Optimization of Transcription Factor Genetic Circuits
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biology
Volume 11
Issue 9
10.3390/biology11091295
biology-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Gamma Radiation: An Eco-Friendly Control Method for the Rice Weevil, Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)

by
George M. Nasr
1,
El-Kazafy A. Taha
2,*,
Amal M. Hamza
1,
Eslam A. Negm
1,
Nevein L. Eryan
3,
Ahmed Noureldeen
4,
Hadeer Darwish
5,
Mohamed S. Zayed
6 and
El-Said M. Elnabawy
2,*
1
Agricultural Research Center, Plant Protection Research Institute, Stored Product Pests Department, Sakha, Kafrelsheikh 12611, Egypt
2
Department of Economic Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh 33516, Egypt
3
Agricultural Research Center, Field Crops Research Institute, Crop Physiological Research Department, Sakha, Kafrelsheikh 12611, Egypt
4
Department of Biology, College of Science, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia
5
Biotechnology Department, College of Sciences, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia
6
Department of Pesticides, Faculty of Agriculture, Damietta University, Damietta 34517, Egypt
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2022, 11(9), 1295; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11091295
Submission received: 5 July 2022 / Revised: 13 August 2022 / Accepted: 23 August 2022 / Published: 31 August 2022
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of gamma radiation at a dosage of 0.10, 0.25, 0.50, and 1.00 kGy on the mortality percentages of Sitophilus oryzae adults, their effects on weevil sterility, and seed germination. The dosage of 1.00 kGy caused 100% mortality after 96 h of irradiation. Moreover, the use of irradiation at a dosage of 1.00 kGy against S. oryzae adults has strong damage on histological alterations. It also has a negative impact on the germination percentage. Thus, the use of gamma radiation is a very important alternative method to protect stored grains and their products against rice weevils. On the contrary, it is not recommended to use irradiated grains for farming.

Abstract

The rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae (L.), is the most destructive insect pest of stored cereals worldwide. The current study was conducted to determine the lethal, reproductive, and histological effects of gamma irradiation on S. oryzae adults. In addition, the impact on germination, chlorophyll, and proline content in wheat seedlings from treated grains was determined. Wheat grains were infested with rice weevil adults and then irradiated by gamma rays. Gamma radiation was applied at a dosage of 0.10, 0.25, 0.50, and 1.00 kGy. Mortality percentage and LD50 were recorded after 48, 72, 96, and 120 h of treatment. The dosage of 1.00 kGy caused 100% mortality after 96 h of irradiation. The required dosage of gamma radiation to kill 50% (LD50) of adults after 48 h was 1.51 kGy. All tested doses caused complete sterility to 24 h old adults. A histological alteration was noticed at a dosage of 1.00 kGy, which showed cytoplasmic vacuolization, tissues exhibiting signs of putrefaction, and necrosis of cells; furthermore, gamma irradiation affected chlorophyll a and b. The highest amounts were detected in wheat seedlings from grains irradiated at 0.10 kGy. There was a significant increase in plant proline content at the higher doses (0.50 and 1.00 kGy) compared with seedlings from nonirradiated grains. It could be concluded that gamma radiation can be used as an eco-friendly trend to control stored-product pests without any residual effects.

1. Introduction

Some insect pests are the main problem of stored grains worldwide because they can significantly decrease the quantity and quality of grain and its products [1,2]. The rice weevil, S. oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), is the most widespread and destructive major insect pest of stored rice, other cereals, and their products worldwide and drastically decreases yields [3]. Control of this pest relies on the widespread use of various residual synthetic insecticides and fumigation with methyl bromide or hydrogen phosphide. However, methyl bromide was classified as an ozone-depleting substance, and its use was recently banned in many countries [4]. Increased public concern over the residual toxicity of insecticides applied to stored grain, the occurrence of insecticide-resistant insect strains [5], toxicity to nontarget organisms [6], and the precautions necessary to work with traditional chemical insecticides calls for alternative stored-product insect pest control methods.
Conventional insecticides have many negative effects, such as uncontrolled release into the environmental system [7]. Recently, some researchers have been focusing on nontraditional control methods, such as using plant inducers to enhance plant systemic resistance against insect pests [8], as well as using some plant essential oils for controlling Tribolium castaneum [9]. Furthermore, El-Nabawy et al. [10,11] demonstrated that using flowering plants and organic fertilizers enhanced natural enemies, which suppressed some associated insect pests. Shawer et al. [12] and Taha et al. [13] studied the effect of emergence time and cold storage durations on the fitness aspects of Trichogramma Evanecsens (Westwood).
In recent years, many researchers have demonstrated that ionizing irradiation, especially X-rays and gamma irradiation, can effectively control stored grain pests without detrimental effects on the commodity [14,15]. Gamma irradiation is safe and environmentally friendly [16,17] and is approved for stored product use in at least 33 countries. Gamma irradiation was studied for its lethal effect, as well as for inhibiting the reproduction of many stored grain pest species [18,19]. For instance, Tuncbilek et al. [20] found that 0.10 kGy was the effective dose against both larvae and adults of T. castaneum, and LD50 and LD99 values were determined as 19.75 and 42.97 Gy for larvae and 33.21 and 64.50 Gy for the adult stage. According to Salim et al. [15], a 0.50 kGy dose of gamma radiation can kill 100% of T. confusum adults and larvae in 22 days. Meanwhile, Abbas and Nouraddin [21] reported that the dose of 0.20 kGy caused 100% mortality in irradiated T. castaneum adults 28 days after treatment. A generic dose of 0.60 kGy has been efficacious for controlling the Angoumois grain moth, Sitotroga cerealella, and the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella [14]. In insects, gamma irradiation affects sites of ongoing cell division, which in the adult insect include the gonads and midgut. For example, exposure to an accumulated dose of 0.20 Gy gamma rays (0.66 rad/s dose rate) from the Cs137 source induces cellular perturbations in the midgut epithelium of the F1 progeny of the beetle Blaps polycresta [22]. At minimal gamma irradiation doses, which disrupt the functions of the digestive system, it was noticed that the midgut does not have a well-defined membrane, and the intercellular connection is decreased with adjacent cells [23]. The insects will not reproduce and will cease feeding because the midgut epithelium cannot process food.
Gamma radiation interacts with atoms or molecules in plant cells, producing free radicals [24]. These radicals can modify or damage important substances of plant cells and have been shown to impose considerable effects on the physiology, morphology, or biochemistry of plants [25,26]. Radiation of seeds with high doses of gamma rays can disturb hormone balance, enzyme activity, photosynthetic pigment content, and synthesis of protein [27,28]. Many studies found a positive correlation between proline accumulation and enhancing stress tolerance in plants [29,30,31]. Moreover, AlKahtani et al. [32] reported that one of the most crucial factors for evaluating environmental stress on plants is the chlorophyll content of the leaves, which declines under pressure.
Our objective was to evaluate the effect of different doses of gamma irradiation on the mortality percentages and the progeny production of S. oryzae. This study was also designed to assess the effect of gamma irradiation (1.0 kGy) on the cellular organization and other tissues of S. oryzae adults. Additionally, we study the effects of gamma radiation on the germination, chlorophyll, and proline contents of wheat seedlings to assess the suitability of irradiated grains in farming.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Mass Rearing of S. oryzae

Mass culture of S. oryzae was maintained at the laboratory of the Department of Stored-Product Pests, Plant Protection Research Institute, Sakha Agriculture Research Station, Kafrelsheikh, Egypt, without exposure to any insecticide. The colony was reared in a glass container and maintained under controlled laboratory conditions of 28 ± 1 °C, 65 ± 5% R.H, and continuous darkness. The insects were reared on clean wheat Triticum vulgare L. grains (variety Giza 171). All the experimental insects were newly emerged adults (1–7 days old).

2.2. Gamma Irradiation of S. oryzae Adults and Effects on Reproduction

Irradiation of S. oryzae was conducted at an irradiator facility with a 60Co gamma source at a dosage rate of 0.930 kGy/h, at the National Center for Radiation Research and Technology, Atomic Energy Authority, Cairo, Egypt. Radiation doses of 0.10, 0.25, 0.50, and 1.00 kGy were used. Fifty unsexed newly emerged adult weevils of S. oryzae were randomly selected from the stock culture by sieving and were transferred to Petri dishes containing 20 g of wheat (variety Giza 171) grains as food and then exposed to gamma irradiation with the previous concentrations. A control treatment was subjected to the same conditions without radiation exposure. Immediately after treatment, irradiated and nonirradiated weevils were returned to the laboratory, and Petri dishes were placed in an incubator at a temperature of 28 ± 1 °C and 65 ± 5% RH. Four replicates were used for each dose level and control. Adult weevil mortality was recorded after 48, 72, 96, and 120 h, and dead insects were removed. The median lethal dose (LD50) of gamma rays with a 95% confidence limit was estimated by probit analysis. All containers were returned to the incubator for 60 days. After 60 days of irradiation, all emerged S. oryzae adults were counted and recorded.

2.3. Histological Technique

Irradiated (dose 1.00 kGy) and nonirradiated S. oryzae adults treated as described previously were fixed in 10% buffered formalin (formaldehyde) for about 24–48 h. After the fixation, the insects were dehydrated in an ascending grade of ethanol alcohol for 2 min (100: 70%) and embedded in paraffin wax. Eighty µm thick paraffin sections were cut on a Reichert ultramicrotome with a diamond knife (RMC PT-XL Power Tome Ultra microtome) and mounted on microscope slides, then subjected to hematoxylin–eosin staining. The slides were soaked in an ascending alcohol series (70, 80, 90, and 96) and placed in absolute alcohol for 10 min, then passed into two changes of xylol. Finally, the slides were fixed in Canada balsam and covered with cover glass and desiccated at 40 °C for a day. The sections were observed by a light microscope.

2.4. Effect of Gamma Irradiation on Germination

Wheat seeds were irradiated with different doses as mentioned above. The seeds are sterilized and placed in Petri dishes on filter paper containing each 10 mL water 20 seeds for each treatment. Each irradiation dose was repeated in three replicates and germinated at 20 ºC with an average 8 h photo phase, under laboratory conditions. Germination percentages were considered when they exhibited a radical extension of >2 mm. Germination seeds were scored daily for 7 days. The final germination percentage (FGP) was calculated according to the following equation [33]:
FPG = (Nt × 100)/N
where Nt = the proportion of germination seeds in each treatment for measurement; N = the total number of seeds in the bioassay.

2.5. Determination of Chlorophyll and Proline Content of T. vulgare L. Seedlings

This phase was carried out to determine the effects of gamma radiation on the physiological characteristics of wheat seedlings during the growing seasons in 2019/2020 and 2020/2021. One kilogram of wheat grains (Giza 171) was selected for each irradiation dose. The nonirradiated grains served as control. The irradiated and nonirradiated grains were sown under natural growing conditions in the field of the Experimental Farm of Sakha Agricultural Research Station, Kafrelsheikh on a 2.40 m2 plot area with three replicates in a completely randomized block design. Each plot area consists of four rows 2 m long and 30 cm apart. Grains were sown by hand-drilled at 400 seeds m2.

2.5.1. Determination of Chlorophyll a and b

At the heading stage, a sample of flag leaves was randomly taken from each plot. Chlorophyll a and b contents in wheat leaves were measured using dimethyl sulfoxide [34]. Total chlorophyll was calculated and expressed as mg/g fresh weight (FW).

2.5.2. Determination of Proline Content

Free proline content in the wheat leaves was determined according to Bates et al. [35]. A sample of 0.50 g leaves was homogenized in 5 mL of sulfosalicylic acid (3%) using a mortar and pestle. A 2 mL volume of the extract was taken in a test tube, and 2 mL of glacial acetic acid and 2 mL of ninhydrin reagent were added. The mixture was boiled in a water bath at 100 °C for 30 min. After cooling the reaction mixture, 6 mL of toluene was added and then transferred to a separating funnel. After thorough mixing, the chromosphere containing toluene was separated and absorption was read at 520 nm on a spectrophotometer. Toluene was used as a blank. The concentration of the proline was estimated by referring to a standard curve of proline.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

For the bioassay test, the LC50 value was estimated according to [36] via (Ldp line). The normality was checked by the Shapiro–Wilk normality test in the original data, which showed the normal distribution for the data. The data were analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and by using mortality percentages, the number of progeny/female, germination percentages, chlorophyll, and proline content (mg/g FW). The comparison between treatments was conducted by Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test at (p ≤ 0.05) via SPSS [37].

3. Results

3.1. Effect of Gamma Radiation on Adults S. oryzae

The data show that the mortality percentages of S. oryzae adults increased with increasing gamma radiation dose (Table 1 and Table 2). A significant difference in the mortality rate of the nonirradiated and irradiated adults at the different doses of gamma radiation and different time intervals was observed. At 48 h post-irradiation, the mortality rates were 5.50, 19.80, 21.00, and 48.8% for adults irradiated at 0.10, 0.25, 0.50, and 1.00 kGy, respectively. At the same doses, the mortality rates after 72 h of irradiation were 25.53, 38.86, 73.30, and 89.96%, respectively. Meanwhile, the mortality rates at 96 h post-irradiation ranged between 46.63 and 100%, and between 61.06 and 100% at 120 h post-irradiation. In addition, the mortality percentages of S. oryzae adults at 0.50 and 1.00 kGy were higher than 0.10 and 0.25 kGy after 72, 96, and 120 h of irradiation. On the contrary, no mortality of the nonirradiated S. oryzae adults occurred. The values of LD50 were 1.51, 0.22, 0.14, and 0.04 kGy at 48, 72, 96, and 120 h, respectively (Table 3).

3.2. Effect of Gamma Radiation on the Progeny of S. oryzae

The gamma radiation had a negative impact on the progeny, and there was no progeny noticed from S. oryzae adults after 60 days of irradiation treatment with all tested doses F5,18 = 34,848.60, p < 0.01 (Table 4).

3.3. Histological Changes in Irradiated and Non-Irradiated S. oryzae Adults

The histological alteration in adult insects of S. oryzae subjected to the highest tested dose (1.0 kGy) of gamma radiation was illustrated in Figure 1a,b. The abdominal cross-sections in nonirradiated S. oryzae adults (Figure 1a) show normal tissue with the epithelial layer, peritrophic membrane, and its muscles; furthermore, different layers, thin per trophic membrane, transitional epithelial cells, and gut lumen were normal. Comparably to the control, there were vacuoles in a section of the epithelium cell, the cell was completely dissolved and separated from the peritrophic membrane. The adjacent cell adhesion was lost slowly. The gut cells were atrophied and disorganized (Figure 1b).

3.4. The Germination Sensitivity to Gamma Radiation

The high doses of gamma radiation decreased the germination percentage when compared with control and the lower doses (F4,10 = 1586.26, p < 0.01). As illustrated in Table 5, the maximum germination percentage was recorded in the nonirradiated seedling. The final germination percentage was decreased with increasing the gamma radiation doses by 9% at 0.10 kGy, 20% at 0.25 kGy, 31% at 0.50 kGy, and 51% at 1.00 kGy. Statistically, there were no significant differences between 0.10 kGy of gamma dose and control treatment. Meanwhile, the exposure to gamma doses ≥0.25 kGy significantly decreased the germination percentage capacity at 7 days from exposure.

3.5. Effect of Gamma Irradiation on Chlorophyll (a and b) and Proline Contents of Wheat, T. vulgare Seedlings Leaves

Chlorophyll a and b contents were influenced by gamma irradiation. As shown in Table 6 and Table 7 the content of chlorophyll a was higher than chlorophyll b in both seedlings derived from grains exposed to gamma radiation and nonirradiated seedlings during both growing seasons. At doses of 0.50 and 1.00 kGy, chlorophyll a, b, and total chlorophyll concentrations were significantly lower in seedlings from irradiated grains than in the nonirradiated grains. During the first growing season at doses of 0.50 and 1.00 kGy, the chlorophyll a content was 5.32 and 3.76 mg/g FW, respectively compared with the nonirradiated seedlings (9.98 mg/g FW), and the high doses of gamma radiation decreased the chlorophyll a content compared with low doses (F4,10 = 21,186.22, p < 0.01). Similarly, Chlorophyll b contents at 0.50 and 1.00 kGy were 1.94 and 0.89 mg/g FW, respectively compared with seedlings from nonirradiated grains (2.55 mg/g FW) and the high gamma radiation doses had a negative impacts on chlorophyll a content (F4,10 = 3247.94, p < 0.01). A similar trend was observed during the second growing season (Table 7).
During the first growing season, gamma radiation at doses of 0.1 and 0.25 kGy had no significant impact on wheat proline content (0.25 and 0.26 mg/g FW), respectively as compared with the nonirradiated plants (0.23 mg/g FW). However, there was a significant increase in plant proline content at the higher doses of 0.5 and 1.0 kGy (0.30 and 0.36 mg/g FW), respectively compared with nonirradiated plants (Table 6) (F4,10 = 61.52, p < 0.01). A similar trend in proline content was observed during the second growing season (Table 7).

4. Discussion

The purpose of this study was to determine whether gamma irradiation exposure could limit the survival of S. oryzae and to assess the impact of exposure on seed germination. In the present study, the results showed that increasing radiation doses increased the mortality of S. oryzae adults. The dose of 1.00 kGy caused 100% mortality at 96 h post-irradiation. Abbas and Nouraddin [21] reported that a dosage of radiation 0.20 kGy caused 100% mortality of gamma-irradiated adult T. castaneum 28 days after treatment. Meanwhile, 0.10 kGy was the effective dose for 13–15 days old T. castaneum adults [20]. The dosage of 0.20 kGy caused 100% mortality of irradiated saw-toothed grain beetle Oryzaephilus surinamensis L. adults 28 days after treatment [38]. Gamma irradiation of adult O. surinamensis at a dosage range of 0.17–1.00 kGy results in absolute death 15 days after irradiation [39]. The difference between the present results and those from the previous studies is perhaps due to differences in the age of the experimental insects at the time of irradiation or differences in the experimental insect species.
The gamma radiation doses required to kill 50% (LD50) of S. oryzae were 1.51, 0.22, 0.14, and 0.04 kGy at 48, 72, 96, and 120 h, respectively. The results corroborate those of Ayvaz et al. [40], Silva and Arthur [41], and Farias et al. [42], who employed doses between 1.80 and 5.00 kGy to control various pests of stored grains, including S. oryzae, Rhyzopersa dominica, T. castaneum, and T. confusum.
Tilton and Brower [43] reported that curculionids were sensitive to irradiation. In the present study, we found that gamma radiation doses between 0.10 and 1.00 kGy caused complete sterility of 24 h old S. oryzae adults. Our findings agree with those of Follett et al. [44], who indicated that the treatment of adult weevils of S. oryzae with a radiation dose of 120 Gy resulted in no living adults after two weeks, showing that this dose of radiation caused adult death and sterility. In addition, Ignatowicz [45] found that the dose of 0.3 kGy of gamma radiation fully prevents the growth of immatures and sterilizes adults of stored-goods pest beetles.
Our results indicated that there was no progeny found from S. oryzae adults after 60 days of irradiation with the tested doses. These findings may be due to many reasons, such as the eggs of S. oryzae after radiation were unable to hatch into adults, and the adults after irradiation become sterile [46]. Moreover, many authors applied doses of irradiation to prevent the reproduction of stored-product pests. Sterilizing effects of gamma radiation on adult insects were studied at different doses. Brown et al. [47] found that 0.01 kGy was sufficient to cause sterility in adults of S. granarius. The gamma radiation at 0.07 kGy caused complete sterility in T. castaneum [48]. For three days, old S. granarius adults could not produce progeny when treated with a dosage of 0.10 kGy or above [49]. Adult females of the hide beetle Dermestes maculatus were sterile after gamma irradiation with 0.30 kGy [18]. Doses above 0.08 kGy produced a sterilizing effect on S. oryzae [50]. Moreover, the adults of S. oryzae cannot produce progeny when treated with a dosage of 0.10 kGy [51]. Gamma radiation can make an insect reproductively sterile by damaging the chromosomes of gonadal cells, specifically causing germ-cell chromosome fragmentation (dominant lethal mutations, translocations, and other chromosomal aberrations), which leads to the production of imbalanced gametes and subsequently the inhibition of mitosis and death of fertilized eggs or embryos [52]. Furthermore, the gamma radiation had a strong effect on the abdominal sections of S. oryzae adults after 48 h of gamma irradiation at 1.00 kGy. These findings agreed with Ahmadi et al. [53], who indicated that the genital cells of S. oryzae were more sensitive to irradiation exposure and correlated with its high mortality percentage than Tribolium castaneum and Callosobruchus maculatus.
In the current study, the content of chlorophyll a was higher than chlorophyll b in both plants derived from seeds exposed to gamma radiation and control plants during both growing seasons. Seedlings from grains exposed to gamma radiation (0.50 and 1.00 kGy) exhibited lower chlorophyll a and b levels. Data presented herein are in agreement with the results of previous reports. For instance, Marcu et al. [28] showed that chlorophyll a and b contents significantly decreased in maize, Zea mays leaves derived from irradiated grains at 0.30 kGy than in control grains. Chloroplasts are sensitive to gamma radiation compared with other cells, especially thylakoids being heavily swollen [54]. The reduction in chlorophyll b is due to the destruction of chlorophyll b biosynthesis by gamma radiation or degradation of chlorophyll b precursors [26]. Increasing growth occurred as a result of the modification in photosynthesis by irradiated plants [54,55].
Proline content was considerably increased by increasing gamma irradiation dosages, and these findings agreed with previous studies that indicated a positive correlation between proline accumulation and enhancing stress tolerance in the plants [29,30,31]. Proline is a source of energy, carbon, and nitrogen for the recovering tissues. Accumulation of proline primarily occurs in response to various abiotic and biotic stresses that cause dehydration of the plant tissue [56]. Therefore, it can be suggested that proline accumulation can protect plant cells against damage induced by gamma radiation. Data presented herein revealed a significant increase in plant proline content at the higher doses of 0.50 and 1.00 kGy compared with nonirradiated plants. Relatively similar results were observed by other researchers, e.g., Borzouel et al. [27] found that the proline content of wheat seedlings irradiated at 0.10 kGy contained the highest amount of proline (1.71 mg/g FW), whereas only 0.92 mg/g FW of proline was detected in nonirradiated seedlings.

5. Conclusions

It could be concluded that the mortality percentages of S. oryzae adults enhanced with increasing gamma radiation doses. The 1.51 kGy dose of gamma radiation killed 50% of S. oryzae adults after 48 h, and the gamma radiation dose of 1.00 kGy killed 100% of S. oryzae adults after 96 h of exposure. Moreover, the gamma radiation enhanced the sterility of S. oryzae and all tested doses caused complete sterility to 24 h old adults, which could be considered a promising direction for protecting stored grains. A histological alteration was found at a gamma radiation dose of 1.00 kGy. Additionally, plant proline increased at the higher gamma radiation doses of 0.5 and 1.0 kGy. The total chlorophyll concentrations were lower in plants from irradiated grains than in nonirradiated grains. Finally, gamma radiation can be used as an eco-friendly method to control stored-product pests.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.M.N., E.-K.A.T., N.L.E., H.D. and E.-S.M.E.; Data curation, A.M.H., E.A.N., N.L.E., A.N., H.D. and M.S.Z.; Formal analysis, G.M.N., E.-K.A.T., A.N. and E.-S.M.E.; Funding acquisition, G.M.N., A.N. and M.S.Z.; Investigation, G.M.N., E.-K.A.T., A.M.H., E.A.N., N.L.E., M.S.Z. and E.-S.M.E.; Methodology, G.M.N., E.-K.A.T., A.M.H., E.A.N., N.L.E., M.S.Z. and E.-S.M.E.; Project administration, E.-K.A.T. and E.-S.M.E.; Resources, G.M.N., N.L.E., A.N., H.D. and M.S.Z.; Software, G.M.N., E.-K.A.T., A.M.H., E.A.N., N.L.E., A.N., H.D. and E.-S.M.E.; Supervision, E.-K.A.T. and E.-S.M.E.; Validation, G.M.N., E.-K.A.T., A.M.H., N.L.E., H.D. and M.S.Z.; Visualization, E.-K.A.T., E.A.N. and E.-S.M.E.; Writing—original draft, G.M.N., A.M.H., N.L.E., A.N., H.D. and M.S.Z.; Writing—review and editing, E.-K.A.T. and E.-S.M.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Taif University Researchers Supporting Project Number (TURSP-2020/141), Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sinha, R.N.; Watters, F.L. Insect Pests of Flour Mills, Grain Elevators, and Feed Mills and Their Control; Agriculture Canada, Publication 1776: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 1985.
  2. Madrid, F.J.; White, N.D.; Loschiavo, S.R. Insects in stored cereals and their association with farming practices in southern. Manit. Can. Entomol. 1990, 122, 515–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Longstaff, B.C. Biology of the grain pest species of the genus Sitophilus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). A critical review. Protect. Ecol. 1981, 2, 83–130. [Google Scholar]
  4. Anon. Annex III: Adjustment Agreed at Ninth Meeting of the Parties Relating to the Controlled Substance in Annex E; Report of the ninth meeting of the parties to the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer; United Nation Environment Programme: Nairobi, Kenya, 1997; 2p. [Google Scholar]
  5. Yusof, O.; Ho, S.H. A survey of insecticide resistance in Sitophilus zeamais Motsch. In Malaysia and Singapore. J. Plant Prot. Trop. 1992, 9, 219–225. [Google Scholar]
  6. Arthur, F.H. Grain protectants current status and prospects for the future. J. Stored Prod. Res. 1996, 32, 293–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Birnbaum, L.S. When environmental chemicals act like uncontrolled medicine. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2013, 24, 321–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zayed, M.S.; Taha, E.-K.A.; Hassan, M.M.; Elnabawy, E.-S.M. Enhance systemic resistance significantly reduces the silverleaf whitefly population and increases the yield of sweet pepper, Capsicum annuum L. var. annuum. Sustainability 2022, 14, 6583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Elnabawy, E.-S.M.; Hassan, S.; Taha, E.-K.A. Repellent and toxicant effects of eight essential oils against the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum Herbst (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Biology 2022, 11, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. El-Nabawy, E.M.; Tsuda, K.; Sakamaki, Y. Attractiveness of spiders and insect predators and parasitoids to flowering plants. Egypt. J. Biol. Pest Control 2015, 25, 245–250. [Google Scholar]
  11. El-Nabawy, E.M.; Tsuda, K.; Sakamaki, Y.; Oda, A.; Ushijima, Y. The effect of organic fertilizers and flowering plants on sheet-web and wolf spider populations (Araneae: Lycosidae and Linyphiidae) and its importance for pest control. J. Insect Sci. 2016, 16, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shawer, M.B.; Sharshir, F.A.; Taha, E.-K.A.; Shenishen, E.Z.; Hassan, M.M.; Elnabawy, E.S.M. The impact of cold storage durations on Trichogramma evanescens (Westwood) (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) during their pupal stage. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 28, 7202–7206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Taha, E.-K.A.; Shawer, M.B.; Sharshir, F.A.; Shenishen, E.Z.; Hassan, M.M.; Elshazly, H.; Elnabawy, E.S.M. Effect of emergence time on some biological aspects of Trichogramma evanescens (Westwood)(Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). J. King Saud Univ. -Sci. 2022, 34, 101981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hallman, G.J.; Phillips, T.W. Ionizing irradiation of adults of Angoumois grain moth (Lepidoptera: Gelechidae) and Indian meal moth (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) to prevent reproduction and implications for a generic irradiation treatment for insects. J. Econ. Entomol. 2008, 101, 1051–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Salim, S.; Ahmadi, M.M.; Moharramipour, S. Evaluating the interaction between gamma radiation and Carum copticum essential oil for the control of Tribolium confusum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). J. Crop Prot. 2018, 7, 231–242. [Google Scholar]
  16. World Health Organization. High-Dose Irradiation: Wholesomeness of Food Irradiated with Doses above 10 kGy; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1999; Volume 890.
  17. Kotwaliwale, N.; Singh, K.; Kalne, A.; Jha, S.N.; Seth, N.; kar, A. X-ray in aging methods for internal quality evaluation of agricultural produce. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 51, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Seal, D.R.; Tilton, E.W. Effect of gamma radiation on the metamorphic stages of Dermestes maculatus DeGeer (Coleoptera: Dermestidae). Appl. Radiat. Isot. 1986, 37, 531–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mastrangelo, T.; Walder, J. Use of radiation and isotopes in insects. In Radioisotopes—Application in Bio-Medical Science; Singh, N., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2011; pp. 67–92. [Google Scholar]
  20. Tuncbilek, A.S.; Ayvaz, A.; Ozturk, F.; Kaplan, B. Gamma radiation sensitivity of larvae and adults of the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum Herbst. Anz. Fur Schdlingskunde 2003, 76, 129–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Abbas, H.; Nouraddin, S. Application of gamma radiation for controlling the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum Herbest (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2011, 6, 3877–3882. [Google Scholar]
  22. Kheirallah, D.; El-Samad, L. Biochemical changes induced by gamma irradiation in the ground beetle Blapas polycresta. J. Adv. Biol. 2020, 9, 1937–1947. [Google Scholar]
  23. Moamen, S.; El Bakry, N. Histological variants induced by gamma irradiation in the alimentary tract of Callosbruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidea). Arab J. Nuci. Sci. Appl. 2020, 53, 118–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kovacs, E.; Keresztes, L. Effect of gamma and UV-B/C radiation on plant cell. Micron 2002, 33, 199–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ashraf, M.; Cheema, A.A.; Rashid, M.; Qamar, Z. Effect of gamma rays on M1 generation in Basmati rice. Pak. J. Bot. 2003, 35, 791–795. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kiong, A.A.; Ling Pick, S.H.; Grace, L.; Harun, A.R. Physiological response of Orthosiphon stamineus plantlets to gamma irradiation Am-Eurasim. J. Sustain Agric. 2008, 2, 135–149. [Google Scholar]
  27. Borzouel, A.; Kafi, M.; Khatami, H.; Aseriyan, B.N.; Majdabad, A. Effect of gamma radiation on germination and physiological aspects of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedling. Pak. J. Bot. 2010, 42, 2281–2290. [Google Scholar]
  28. Marcu, D.; Damian, G.; Cosma, C.; Cristea, V. Gamma radiation effects on seed germination, growth and pigment content, and ESR study of induced free radicals in maize (Zea mays). Biol. Phys. 2013, 39, 625–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Elewa, T.A.; Sadak, M.S.; Saad, A.M. Proline treatment improves physiological responses in quinoa plants under drought stress. Biosci. Res. 2017, 14, 21–33. [Google Scholar]
  30. Qirat, M.; Shahbaz, M.; Perveen, S. Beneficial role of foliar-applied proline on carrot (Daucus carota L.) under saline conditions. Pak. J. Bot. 2018, 50, 1735–1744. [Google Scholar]
  31. Sadeghipour, O. Cadmium toxicity alleviates by seed priming with proline or glycine betaine in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.). Egypt. J. Agron. 2020, 42, 163–170.32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Al Kahtani, M.D.; Hafez, Y.M.; Attia, K.; Rashwan, E.; Husnain, L.A.; Al Gwaiz, H.I.; Abdelaal, K.A. Evaluation of silicon and proline application on the oxidative machinery in drought-stressed sugar beet. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Anjum, T.; Bajwa, R. Importance of germination indices in interpretation of allelochemical effects. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2005, 7, 417–419. [Google Scholar]
  34. Moran, R. Formulae for determination of chlorophyll pigments with N, N-Dimethylformamide. Plant Physiol. 1982, 69, 1376–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bates, L.S.; Waldren, R.P.; Teare, I.D. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil 1973, 39, 205–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Finny, D.J. Profit Analysis; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1971; 333p. [Google Scholar]
  37. SPSS. SPSS 15.0 for Windows; SPSS Inc.: Chicago, IL, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  38. Hossein Zadeh, A.; Shayesteh, N.; Zolfagharieh, H.R.; Babaei, M.; Zareshahi, H.M.; Mostafavi, H.A.; Fatollahi, H. Gamma radiation sensitivity of different stages of saw-toothed grain beetle Oryzaephilus surinamensis L. (Coleoptera: Silvanidae). J. Plant Prot. Res. 2010, 50, 250–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Loya, N.N.; Sanzharovaa, N.I.; Gulinaa, S.N. Effect of ionizing radiation on radio sensitivity of Oryzaephilus Surinamensis. Russ. Agric. Sci. 2020, 46, 148–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ayvaz, A.; Oztur, k.; Karahcio, F. Effect of gamma irradiation and malathion on confused flour beetle, Tribolim confusum. J. Val. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2002, 5, 560–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Silva, L.K.F.; Arthur, V. Efeito do fracionamento de dose de radiação gama sobre Sitophilus oryzae (L., 1763) (Col., Curculionidae), Rhyzopertha dominica (F., 1792) (Col., Bostrichidae) e Tribolium custanum (Herb. 1797) (Col., Tenebrionidae). Arq. Lnst. Biol. 2004, 71, 253–256. [Google Scholar]
  42. Farias, A.A.; Potenza, M.R.; Reis, F.C.; Sato, M.E. Lethal dose determination of cobalt-60 for adult Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) and Cyptolests ferrugineus (Coleoptera: Laemophloeidae). In Proceedings of the International Nucllear Atlantic Conference INAC, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 4–9 October 2015. [Google Scholar]
  43. Tilton, E.W.; Brower, J.H. Ionizing radiation for insect control in grain and grain products. Cereal Foods World 1987, 32, 330–335. [Google Scholar]
  44. Follett, P.A.; Snook, K.; Janson, A.; Antonio, B.; Haruki, A.; Okamura, M.; Bisel, J. Irradiation quarantine treatment for control of Sitophilus oryzae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in rice. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2013, 52, 63–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ignatowicz, S. Irradiation as an alternative to methyl bromide fumigation of agricultural commodities infested with quarantine stored product pests. In Irradiation as a Phytosanitary Treatment of Food and Agricultural Commodities; IAEA: Vienna, Austria, 2004; pp. 51–66. [Google Scholar]
  46. Salehi, L.; Ranjbar, K.S. The effects of 60 Co gamma radiation on developmental stages and fecundity of the rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae L. (Col: Curculionidae). J. Agric. Agric. Sci. 2005, 11, 47. [Google Scholar]
  47. Brown, G.A.; Brower, J.H.; Tilton, E.W. Gamma radiation effects on Sitophilus zeamais and Sitophilus granarius. J. Econ. Entomol. 1972, 65, 203–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tandon, S.; Singh, A.; Kanaujia, S. Effect of gamma radiation on growth and development of rust red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum (Herbst.). J. Plant Prote. Res. 2009, 49, 280–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Aldryhim, Y.N.; Adams, E.E. Efficacy of gamma irradiation against Sitophilus granaries L. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J. Stored Prod. Res. 1999, 35, 225–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hu, T.; Che, C.C.; Kang, P.W. Lethal effect of gamma radiation on Sitophilus oryzae (L.). Formosan Entomol. 2002, 22, 229–236. [Google Scholar]
  51. Tuncbilek, A.S. Effect of 60Co gamma radiation on the rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae (L.). Anz. Fur Schadl. Pplanzenschutz Umweltschutz 1995, 68, 37–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bakri, A.; Mehta, K.; Lance, D.R. Sterilizing insects with ionizing radiation. In Sterile Insect Technique, Principles, and Practice in Area-Wide Integrated Pest Management; Dyck, V.A., Hendrichs, J., Robinson, A.S., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2005; pp. 233–268. [Google Scholar]
  53. Ahmadi, M.; Mozdarani, H.; Abd-Alla, A.M. Comparative toxicity and micronuclei formation in Tribolium castaneum, Callosobruchus maculatus and Sitophilus oryzae exposed to high doses of gamma radiation. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2015, 101, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Wi, S.G.; Chang, B.Y.; Kim, J.S. Effect of gamma irradiation on morphological changes and biological responses in plants. Micron 2007, 38, 553–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kim, J.H.; Baek, M.H.; Chung, B.Y.; Wi, S.G.; Kim, J.S. Alterations the photosynthesis pigments and antioxidant machineries of red pepper (capsicum annum L.) Seedling from gamma- –irradiated seeds. J. Plant Biotechnol. 2004, 47, 314–321. [Google Scholar]
  56. Shamsul, H.; Qaiser, H.; Mohammed, N.A.; Arif Shafi, W.; Aqil, A. Role of proline under changing environments. Plant Signal Behav. 2012, 7, 1456–1466. [Google Scholar]
Biology 11 01295 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Abdominal sections in the nonirradiated S. oryzae adults (control). (b) Abdominal sections in the S. oryzae adults after 48 h of gamma irradiation at 1.00 kGy. PM = Peritrophic membrane, M = Muscles, E = Epithelial cells.
Figure 1. (a) Abdominal sections in the nonirradiated S. oryzae adults (control). (b) Abdominal sections in the S. oryzae adults after 48 h of gamma irradiation at 1.00 kGy. PM = Peritrophic membrane, M = Muscles, E = Epithelial cells.
Biology 11 01295 g001
Table
Table 1. Mortality percentage of S. oryzae adults after exposure to different doses of gamma radiation at different times.
Table 1. Mortality percentage of S. oryzae adults after exposure to different doses of gamma radiation at different times.
Gamma Radiation Dose (kGy)Time (h) after Irradiation
48 7296120
0.00 (control)0.00 ± 0.00 d0.00 ± 0.00 c0.00 ± 0.00 c0.00 ± 0.00 c
0.105.5 ± 2.1 c25.53 ± 2.93 b46.63 ± 6.60 b61.06 ±5.53 b
0.2519.8 ± 1.8 b38.86 ± 2.94 b53.30 ± 5.09 b67.76 ±7.76 b
0.5021.0 ± 0.1 b73.30 ± 5.77 a79.96 ± 8.81 a97.76 ±2.23 a
1.0048.8 ± 4.8 a89.96 ± 3.83 a100 ±0.00 a100 ±0.00 a
Values are the mean ± S.E. The means of each column followed by the different letters are significantly different at 0.05 level according to Tukey’s multiple range test.
Table
Table 2. Analysis of variance of mortality percentage of S. oryzae after exposure to different doses of gamma radiation at different times.
Table 2. Analysis of variance of mortality percentage of S. oryzae after exposure to different doses of gamma radiation at different times.
VariableTime (h) after Irradiation
48 7296120
SS5731.5020,975.7022,935.3026,178.00
MS1432.875243.925733.826544.50
F value3306.6314,982.6410,118.5117,072.60
p-value<0.01<0.01<0.01<0.01
Variation source = gamma radiation doses, degree of freedom = 5, SS = sum of squares, MS = mean squares.
Table
Table 3. Lethal effect of gamma radiation on S. oryzae at different times (h).
Table 3. Lethal effect of gamma radiation on S. oryzae at different times (h).
Time (h) after IrradiationLD50 (kGy)Confidence LimitSlopeChi-Square
X2		p-Value
LowerUpper
48.001.510.851.731.08 ± 0.156.160.11
72.000.220.190.261.16 ± 0.143.880.01
96.000.140.100.161.72 ± 0.153.651.30
120.000.040.030.071.28 ± 0.174.850.18
Table
Table 4. Effect of different doses of gamma radiation on progeny production of S. oryzae after 60 days of irradiation.
Table 4. Effect of different doses of gamma radiation on progeny production of S. oryzae after 60 days of irradiation.
Gamma Radiation Dose (kGy)No. Progeny/Female
Control241.00 ± 3.46 a
0.1000.00 ± 0.00 b
0.2500.00 ± 0.00 b
0.5000.00 ± 0.00 b
1.0000.00 ± 0.00 b
Values are the mean ± S.E. The means of each column followed by the different letters are significantly different at 0.05 level according to Tukey’s multiple range test.
Table
Table 5. Effects of gamma irradiation on germination (%) after 7 days post-treatment.
Table 5. Effects of gamma irradiation on germination (%) after 7 days post-treatment.
Gamma Dose (kGy)Germination (%)
Control98.34 ± 1.66 a
0.1090.01 ± 2.88 a
0.2573.34 ± 1.66 b
0.5061.68 ± 1.66 c
1.0046.88 ± 1.66 d
Values are the mean ± S.E. The means of each column followed by the different letters are significantly different at 0.05 level according to Tukey’s multiple range test.
Table
Table 6. Effect of gamma irradiation on chlorophyll (a and b) and total proline content of wheat, T. vulgare leaves in 2019/2020 growing season.
Table 6. Effect of gamma irradiation on chlorophyll (a and b) and total proline content of wheat, T. vulgare leaves in 2019/2020 growing season.
Gamma
Dose (kGy)		Chlorophyll Content (mg/g FW)Proline
(mg/g FW)
ABTotal
Control9.98 ± 0.03 c2.55 ± 0.08 c12.530.23 ± 0.00 c
0.1010.56 ± 0.05 a3.01 ± 0.07 a13.570.25 ± 0.00 c
0.2510.03 ± 0.07 b2.89 ± 0.01 b12.920.26 ± 0.01 c
0.505.32 ± 0.01 d1.94 ± 0.32 d7.260.30 ± 0.08 b
1.003.76 ± 0.03 e0.89 ± 0.02 e4.650.36 ± 0.08 a
Values are the mean ± S.E. The means of each row followed by the different letters are significantly different at 0.05 levels according to Tukey’s multiple range test.
Table
Table 7. Effect of gamma irradiation on chlorophyll (a and b) and total proline content of wheat, T. vulgare leaves in 2020/2021 growing season.
Table 7. Effect of gamma irradiation on chlorophyll (a and b) and total proline content of wheat, T. vulgare leaves in 2020/2021 growing season.
Gamma
Dose (kGy)		Chlorophyll Content (mg/g FW)Proline
(mg/g FW)
ABTotal
Control9.98 ± 0.03 c2.56 ± 0.08 c12.540.23 ± 0.00 c
0.1011.04 ± 0.05 a3.01 ± 0.07 a14.050.25 ± 0.00 c
0.2510.35 ± 0.07 b3.05 ± 0.01 b13.400.27 ± 0.01 c
0.506.64 ± 0.01 d2.11 ± 0.32 d8.750.30 ± 0.07 b
1.004.71 ± 0.03 e1.16 ± 0.02 e5.870.37 ± 0.08 a
Values are the mean ± S.E. The means of each row followed by the different letters are significantly different at 0.05 levels according to Tukey’s multiple range test.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nasr, G.M.; Taha, E.-K.A.; Hamza, A.M.; Negm, E.A.; Eryan, N.L.; Noureldeen, A.; Darwish, H.; Zayed, M.S.; Elnabawy, E.-S.M. Gamma Radiation: An Eco-Friendly Control Method for the Rice Weevil, Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Biology 2022, 11, 1295. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11091295

AMA Style

Nasr GM, Taha E-KA, Hamza AM, Negm EA, Eryan NL, Noureldeen A, Darwish H, Zayed MS, Elnabawy E-SM. Gamma Radiation: An Eco-Friendly Control Method for the Rice Weevil, Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Biology. 2022; 11(9):1295. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11091295

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nasr, George M., El-Kazafy A. Taha, Amal M. Hamza, Eslam A. Negm, Nevein L. Eryan, Ahmed Noureldeen, Hadeer Darwish, Mohamed S. Zayed, and El-Said M. Elnabawy. 2022. "Gamma Radiation: An Eco-Friendly Control Method for the Rice Weevil, Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)" Biology 11, no. 9: 1295. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11091295

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop