Next Article in Journal
Insight into the Antioxidant Activity of 1,8-Dihydroxynaphthalene Allomelanin Nanoparticles
Previous Article in Journal
Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Olive Leaf Extract and Its Bioactive Compounds Oleacin and Oleuropein-Aglycone on Senescent Endothelial and Small Airway Epithelial Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Differential Activities of Antioxidant Enzymes, Superoxide Dismutase, Peroxidase, and Catalase vis-à-vis Phosphine Resistance in Field Populations of Lesser Grain Borer (Rhyzopertha dominica) from India
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Midgut Cell Damage and Oxidative Stress in Partamona helleri (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Workers Caused by the Insecticide Lambda-Cyhalothrin

by
João Victor de Oliveira Motta
1,
Lenise Silva Carneiro
1,
Luís Carlos Martínez
2,
Daniel Silva Sena Bastos
1,
Matheus Tudor Candido Santos Resende
1,
Bárbara Monteiro Castro Castro
3,
Mariana Machado Neves
1,
José Cola Zanuncio
3 and
José Eduardo Serrão
1,*
1
Department of General Biology, Institute of Biotechnology Applied to Agriculture, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa 36570-900, Brazil
2
Faculdad de Ciencias Agricolas, Universidad de Narino, Pasto 522020, Colombia
3
Department of Entomology, Institute of Biotechnology Applied to Agriculture, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa 36570-900, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2023, 12(8), 1510; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12081510
Submission received: 6 July 2023 / Revised: 19 July 2023 / Accepted: 26 July 2023 / Published: 28 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant Defense in Insects)

Abstract

:
The stingless bee Partamona helleri plays a role in pollinating both native and cultivated plants in the Neotropics. However, its populations can be reduced by the pyrethroid insecticide lambda-cyhalothrin. This compound may cross the intestinal barrier and circulate through the hemolymph, affecting various non-target bee organs. The aim of the present study was to assess the extent of cellular damage in the midgut and the resulting oxidative stress caused by lambda-cyhalothrin in P. helleri workers. Bees were orally exposed to lambda-cyhalothrin. The lethal concentration at which 50% of the bees died (LC50) was 0.043 mg a.i. L−1. The P. helleri workers were fed this concentration of lambda-cyhalothrin and their midguts were evaluated. The results revealed signs of damage in the midgut epithelium, including pyknotic nuclei, cytoplasm vacuolization, changes in the striated border, and the release of cell fragments, indicating that the midgut was compromised. Furthermore, the ingestion of lambda-cyhalothrin led to an increase in the activity of the detoxification enzyme superoxide dismutase and the levels of the NO2/NO3 markers, indicating oxidative stress. Conversely, the activities of the catalase and glutathione S-transferase enzymes decreased, supporting the occurrence of oxidative stress. In conclusion, the ingestion of lambda-cyhalothrin by P. helleri workers resulted in damage to their midguts and induced oxidative stress.

1. Introduction

Animals, especially bees, assume an indispensable role in the pollination process, benefiting over 85% of cultivated angiosperms across the globe [1]. This crucial function makes them irreplaceable for the sustenance of life on our planet [2]. The significance of animals, particularly bees, in facilitating the reproductive success of flowering plants cannot be overstated, as their actions directly contribute to the diversity and abundance of various ecosystems. Due to their pivotal role, it is imperative to safeguard and support these pollinators to ensure the continuity of ecological balance and agricultural productivity.
Among bees, Apis mellifera Linnaeus (Hymenoptera: Apidae) holds significant importance in agriculture due to its ability to enhance crop yields by approximately 95% [3]. In Brazil, alongside honey bees, stingless bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Meliponini) also serve a crucial role in the ecosystem [4]. These stingless bees exhibit social behavior, display generalist feeding habits, and are commonly found in tropical and subtropical regions [5]. Remarkably, they are responsible for pollinating 90% of the native flora, encompassing economically valuable plants like eucalyptus and citrus [5,6]. Understanding the vital contributions of both A. mellifera and Meliponini in plant pollination is essential for sustainable agriculture and preserving biodiversity.
Partamona helleri Friese 1900 (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Meliponini), a eusocial stingless bee native to the Neotropical region, exhibits a remarkable characteristic of forming permanent colonies that can house hundreds to thousands of workers. However, this species and other bees are exposed to numerous threats that have contributed to a decline in their populations. Habitat loss, environmental degradation, climate change, lack of proper management [7,8,9], and the use of pesticides [10,11] are the main causes driving bee population decline. Of particular concern is the toxic effect of insecticides on pollinators, including bees. These chemicals can adversely affect bees through direct contact with treated plants or by inhaling airborne toxic particles while flying over contaminated areas [12]. Furthermore, studies have detected insecticide residues in nectar and pollen [13], suggesting that bees may suffer adverse effects through ingestion [14]. Recognizing and addressing these pressing issues is crucial to safeguard the survival and ecological contributions of P. helleri and other vital pollinators in the Neotropical region.
Since 2008, Brazil has witnessed a staggering surge in pesticide usage (nearly 200%), occupying the top position in the world consumption ranking [15]. Notably, among the various insecticides employed, pyrethroids constitute a prominent class of neurotoxic compounds, comprising synthetic analogs of the natural pyrethrins derived from the flowers of the Asteraceae Crisantemum cinerafolis [16]. Pyrethroids can be categorized into two classes, namely types I and II, with each exhibiting distinct symptomatic effect. However, type II pyrethroids differ from type I pyrethroids due to the presence of an α-cyano group in their chemical structure [14,16]. These insecticides demonstrate remarkable stability when exposed to light and environmental temperature, undergoing degradation through hydrolysis and oxidation [14]. Understanding the characteristics and complexities of pyrethroids is crucial for assessing their impact on the environment and the potential risks to both non-target organisms and human health.
Lambda-cyhalothrin, classified as a type II pyrethroid, possesses lipophilic properties that facilitate its rapid penetration into insect tissues [13,17]. Upon entering the insect body, this compound disrupts the conduction of nerve stimuli and feeding processes, leading to a cascade of detrimental effects. These include the loss of muscle control, resulting in paralysis and ultimately culminating in the death of the insect [17,18]. The potent neurotoxic action of lambda-cyhalothrin has made it an effective tool for pest control in various agricultural and public health applications. However, it is essential to balance its use with environmental considerations and potential impacts on non-target organisms, including beneficial insects like bees and other pollinators. Sustainable pest management strategies that minimize the risks to beneficial insects and ecosystems are critical for safeguarding biodiversity and long-term agricultural productivity.
Upon ingestion, insecticides initiate their interaction with the digestive tract [19], with the midgut being the primary organ responsible for absorption in bees [19]. The bee midgut comprises three distinct cell types: columnar digestive cells, which are crucial for nutrient absorption and digestive enzyme production [20]; endocrine cells, which are responsible for hormone peptide production [21]; and regenerative cells, which are tasked with cell replacement [22]. Additionally, the midgut serves as a site for detoxification following oral exposure to insecticides [23]. Once inside, insecticides cross the midgut epithelial barrier and disperse throughout the hemolymph, inflicting harm on non-target organs in bees, such as the brain, hypopharyngeal glands, fat body, and Malpighian tubules, and significantly impacting insect physiology and behavior [17,24,25,26,27,28]. Studies involving the midgut of honey bees and P. helleri have reported structural alterations in the brush border, the release of cell fragments into the gut lumen, and compromised food digestion and absorption after the ingestion of imidacloprid [27] and lambda-cyhalothrin [28].
Insecticides have the potential to trigger the production of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) through processes such as the dismutation of the superoxide radical anion (O2) by oxidase enzymes or the β-oxidation of fatty acids. This mechanism serves as a crucial cellular defense against oxidative stress, as observed in bees [28,29]. Mitochondria play a pivotal role as the primary source of O2, leading to an increase in the levels of the enzyme superoxide dismutase (SOD). SOD converts O2 into H2O2, which is partly eliminated by catalases (CAT) and glutathione S-transferase (GST) [30]. In the context of oxidative stress assessment, scientists often measure reactive nitrogen species levels, particularly nitrites (NO2) and nitrates (NO3). The conversion of nitrate to nitrite results in the production of nitrous acid (HNO2), which can lead to the deamination of DNA bases containing a free -NH2 group [30]. The comprehension of the biochemical responses to oxidative stress caused by insecticides is essential for understanding the potential impact of pesticides on bee health.
Given the vital role of bees in pollination and their significant contribution to the environment, it is concerning that the insecticide lambda-cyhalothrin has been detected to contaminate the food consumed by P. helleri bees [5], an essential Neotropical pollinator. Additionally, there is a lack of data on the specific impacts of this insecticide on P. helleri bees. Therefore, this study aimed to assess whether lambda-cyhalothrin exhibits toxicity against P. helleri and whether it causes damage to the midgut and induces oxidative stress within these bees. Understanding the potential risks of lambda-cyhalothrin on vital pollinators like P. helleri is crucial for developing informed conservation and regulatory measures to protect these essential species and maintain the delicate ecological balance in the Neotropical region.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bees

Workers of P. helleri (n = 210) were collected at the entrance of the nest of three colonies kept at the Central Apiary of the Federal University of Viçosa (UFV), municipality of Viçosa (20°45″ S 42°52″ W) state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. The bees were maintained at 25 °C and 65 ± 5% relative humidity in dark conditions in a laboratory at the Institute of Biotechnology Applied to Agriculture (BIOAGRO/UFV).

2.2. Concentration–Mortality

The mean lethal concentration (LC50) of the lambda-cyhalothrin (Karate Zeon® CS; 50 g a.i.; Syngenta AG—Basel, Switzerland) was evaluated by diluting this insecticide in distilled water and 50% sucrose solution, obtaining six concentrations: 312 µg, 156 µg, 78 µg, 39 µg, 19 µg, and 10 µg a.i. L−1. The bees were kept in 250 mL plastic containers (11 cm in diameter and 8 cm in height) perforated at the top for ventilation and with 1.5 mL perforated feeding tubes [31]. The food, with the insecticide concentrations and 50% sucrose syrup as the control, was available for 24 h, and in the subsequent 48 h, the bees received only 50% sucrose syrup. Three containers were used per concentration, each containing 10 bees from a different colony, totaling 30 workers per concentration for three different colonies.

2.3. Histopathology

Partamona helleri workers were fed on the estimated LC50 of the lambda-cyhalothrin, and 30 alive bees were randomly chosen and evaluated after 24 h (n = 10), 48 h (n = 10), and 72 h (n = 10); those of the control group (n = 10) were cryoanesthetized at −5 °C for 3 min and dissected in 125 mM NaCl before their midgut transferred to Zamboni’s fixative solution [32] for 48 h. Then, the midgut samples were dehydrated in a graded ethanol series (70%, 80%, 90%, and 95%) and embedded in glycol methacrylare resin (Leica Biosystem Nussloch GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions with modifications. Briefly, the midguts were submitted to infiltration in resin/ethanol (1:3 v/v) for 30 min, transferred to resin/ethanol (1:1 v/v) for 30 min, following transference to resin/ethanol (3:1 v/v) for 30 min (all at room temperature). Then, the samples were transferred to pure resin for 16 h at 4 °C, placed in silicone molds filled with resin plus hardener, and polymerized at room temperature for 24 h. Sections with 3 μm thickness were obtained with glass knives in a rotatory microtome Leica RM 2245 (Leica Biosystem Nussloch GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) stained with hematoxylin (12 min) and eosin (30 s) and subsequently mounted and analyzed using a light microscope Olympus BX60 (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Some midgut slices were submitted to mercury bromophenol blue (100 mL of 2% acetic acid; 0.05 g of bromophenol blue; 1.5 g of mercuric chloride) for 2 h and 15 min and transferred to 0.5% acetic acid for 10 min and washed in water to evidence proteins. Then, the samples were mounted and analyzed using a light microscope Olympus BX60 (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).

2.4. Analysis of Antioxidant Enzymes

Twenty-four P. helleri workers that survived after being exposed to LC50 lambda-cyhalothrin were randomly collected after 24 h (n = 8), 48 h (n = 8), and 72 h (n = 8), and those of the control group (n = 8) were carefully dissected for midgut removal. Each midgut was individually placed in a microtube containing 1 mL of 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (PBS). To ensure proper extraction of the enzymatic contents, the midguts were homogenized using the Tissue Master 125 homogenizer from OMNI. Following homogenization, the samples were centrifuged at 10,000× g for 10 min at 4 °C in a 5430R centrifuge (Eppendorf, Enfield, UK). The resulting supernatant was collected and stored at −80 °C for further analysis. Superoxide dismutase activity was determined by using the pyrogallol method, based on the dismutation of superoxide into hydrogen peroxide by this enzyme [33]. The reaction mixture contained 170 μL of potassium phosphate buffer (0,1 M, pH 7.8) and 10 μL of the sample. It was started by adding 20 μL of pyrogallol (50 mM). The final reaction was measured by absorbance at 320 nm. SOD activity was calculated as units per milligram of protein. One unit (U) of SOD was defined as the amount that inhibited the rate of pyrogallol autoxidation by 50%. The activity of the catalase enzyme was determined by the decomposition rate of the H2O2. Catalase activity was evaluated by incubating the enzyme sample in 1.0 mL of substrate (65 µmol/mL of hydrogen peroxide in 60 mmol/L of sodium potassium phosphate buffer, 1.1 g of Na2HPO4, and 0.27 g of KH2PO4 in 100 mL of distilled water, pH 7.4) at 37 °C for three minutes. The reaction was stopped with ammonium molybdate (32.4 mmol/L). A control test without hydrogen peroxide was conducted to exclude interferences. The yellow complex of molybdate and hydrogen peroxide was evaluated at 374 nm against the blank [34]. To calculate CAT activity, a standard curve was built with serial dilutions of hydrogen peroxide. CAT activity was expressed in CAT U/milligrams of protein. The glutathione-S-transferase activity was determined by the rate of formation of the glutathione conjugate with the substrate 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene [35]. Briefly, 5 μL of 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene (CDNB) (0.1 M) was added to the buffer containing 5 μL of GSH (0.1 M), 185 μL phosphate saline buffer, and an aliquot (10 μL) of the homogenate supernatant. Upon the addition of CDNB, the alteration was monitored by increasing the absorbance values at 340 nm for 120 s. The molar extinction coefficient used for CDNB was ɛ340 = 9.6 mmol/L × cm. GST activity was normalized by total protein content in homogenate and is expressed as U/ milligrams of protein.

2.5. Oxidative Stress Biomarkers

Nitric oxide concentrations in 24 random surviving P. helleri workers exposed to LC50 lambda-cyhalothrin for 24 h (n = 8), 48 h (n = 8), 72 h (n = 8), and the control group (n = 8), were determined by using the Greiss method [36]. Briefly, the midguts were homogenized (Tissue Master 125 homogenizer, OMNI) in 1 mL of ice-cold PBS and subsequently centrifuged at 10,000× g for 10 min at 4 °C (Hearaeus Fresco 15430R centrifuge, Eppendorf6, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and 50 μL of the supernatant was transferred to 50 μL of sulphanilamide solution (1% of sulphanilamide diluted in 5%phosphoric acid) into a microplate and incubated for 10 min at room temperature in the dark. Then, 50 μL of 0.1% N-(1-naphthyl)-ethylenediamine solution was added to the reaction, and the material was incubated for 10 min and analyzed using a microplate reader (Thermo Scientific Multiskan SkyHigh) with 540 nm wavelengths.

2.6. Statistics

The concentration mortality data were submitted to PROBIT analysis to estimate the concentration–mortality density curve using the PROC ROBIT procedure of the SAS program v.9.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Oxidative stress data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) with treatment as a fixed effect, and the means were compared post hoc using Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) test at 5% significance level. Residuals were verified for normality and homoscedasticity for all datasets, and no data transformations were necessary.

3. Results

3.1. Concentration–Mortality

The mortality data for the P. helleri workers fitted a concentration–response model (p > 0.05), with an estimated LC50 of 0.043 mg a.i. L−1 (Table 1). The mortality in the control group was <1%.

3.2. Histopathology

The midgut epithelium of the P. helleri workers was formed by columnar digestive cells with nuclei rich in decondensed chromatin, well-developed apical striated borders, and cytoplasm with a homogeneous aspect (Figure 1). There were also some nests of regenerative cells. The midgut lumen was lined by multiple layers of the peritrophic matrix (Figure 1).
In P. helleri, after 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h of exposure to the LC50 of lambda-cyhalothrin, the midgut epithelium presented cytoplasm vacuolization (Figure 2a–d), disorganization in the striated border (Figure 2a–d), pyknotic nuclei (Figure 2b), the release of cell fragments towards the gut lumen (Figure 2a,f), and the disruption of the peritrophic matrix (Figure 2b,c,e).
The histochemical test for evidence proteins revealed the midgut epithelium with uniform reaction, including the striated borders and the nuclei in the control group (Figure 3a). The midgut of the P. helleri bees exposed to LC50 lambda-cyhalothrin for 24 h showed epithelium with unstained vacuoles, striated borders, and nuclei with reactions to the histochemical test (Figure 3b). The histochemical test was stronger at 24 h of exposure to this insecticide than at 48 h and 72 h of exposure (Figure 3c,d).

3.3. Antioxidant Enzymes and Oxidative Stress Markers

The superoxide dismutase activity in the midgut of P. helleri workers exposed to LC50 lambda-cyhalothrin for 72 h was approximately 30 U/mg ptn, higher than those found in bees exposed for 24 h (approximately 10 U/mg ptn) and 48 h (approximately 15 U/mg ptn), which were similar to the control bees (Figure 4A). The catalase activity after 24 h and 48 h of exposure to the insecticide was similar between the treated bees and the control group (approximately 400 U/mg ptn) but decreased after 72 h of exposure to less than 200 U/mg ptn (Figure 4B). The glutathione S transferase activities were lower among all lambda-cyhalothrin-treated bees, approximately 40 U/mg ptn, compared to the control bees, for which the corresponding figure was approximately 60 U/mg ptn (Figure 4C). The values of the NO2/NO3 biomarkers were similar, approximately 6 μM in the control, and after 24 h and 48 h of exposure to LC50, and this decreased to approximately 4 μM after 72 h of exposure (Figure 4D).

4. Discussion

The estimated LC50 value (0.043 mg a.i. μL−1) for P. helleri treated with lambda-cyhalothrin is approximately 100-times lower than that reported for the honey bee A. mellifera (4.134 mg a.i. μL−1) [17], indicating that P. helleri is more vulnerable to this pyrethroid. Additionally, the LC50 of P. helleri treated with fipronil was four times lower than that of A. mellifera [28], and the LD50 value was higher for the stingless bee Megachile rotundata (1130 pg/bee) compared to A. mellifera (0.013 µg/bee) [37]. Furthermore, the stingless bee Tetragonista angustula Latreille (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Meliponini) demonstrated greater susceptibility to thiamethoxam and imidacloprid compared to A. mellifera [38]. On the other hand, the workers of the stingless bees Scaptotrigona postica Latreille (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Meliponini) exposed to the active ingredient imidacloprid present a LC50 value that is 40 times greater than that of A. mellifera, as shown by the authors of [27], indicating that the stingless bee S. postica was more resistant than A. mellifera. Finally, [25] shows that the estimated concentrations (LC50 and LC10) of the formulation of the herbicide mixture (Mesotrione + Atrazine-Calaris) are below the recommended concentration for use in the field, presenting a risk to adult workers and colonies of P. helleri.
The lambda-cyhalothrin exposure resulted in damage to the midgut cells of P. helleri, including disorganization in the striated border, nucleic pyknosis, the destruction of the peritrophic matrix, and the release of cell fragments into the midgut lumen. These effects are similar to those observed in the midgut of A. mellifera after exposure to lambda-cyhalothrin [17] and fipronil [28]. Disruptions in the striated border can lead to a decrease in the cell surface area available for nutrient absorption and compromise ion transport [39,40]. The partial destruction of the peritrophic matrix reduces the protection of the midgut epithelium against mechanical damage, pathogens, and toxins [41]. The release of cell fragments may be related to the elimination of dead cells due to the action of the insecticide lambda cyhalothrin [28]. Understanding these cellular mechanisms is essential for comprehending the broader implications of insecticide exposure on insect health.
The presence of heavily condensed chromatin (nuclear pyknosis), apical ridges, and the disorganization of the striated border in digestive epithelial cells treated with the insecticide lambda-cyhalothrin suggests cell necrosis and apoptotic death [42,43], mediated by the action of caspases and the activation of DNA degradation pathways [44,45]. These changes occur due to the phosphorylation of the cytoskeleton by effector caspases [42]. The cell cortex and microvilli of the striated border are maintained by actin filaments, a component of the cytoskeleton [46] which can undergo disorganization mediated by the action of caspases, causing a loss of cell shape and apical protrusions. The nests of regenerative cells found in the epithelium of P. helleri workers indicate the production of new digestive cells as a compensatory mechanism for cell death, maintaining midgut homeostasis [46,47]. However, reports have indicated that exposure to fipronil can result in disorganization in the nests of regenerative cells, compromising cell renewal in P. helleri [28]. In addition, damage to organelles, such as dilations in the lumen of the rough endoplasmic reticulum, mitochondrial damage, and disorganization of the nuclear envelope, were reported for the same insecticide in A. mellifera [17], for fipronil [28], and for a mixture (Mesotrione + Atrazine-Calaris) [25] in P. helleri [28], respectively.
The reduction in protein levels induced by lambda-cyhalothrin in the midgut of P. helleri is evidenced by the bromophenol blue histochemical test. This reduction was observed by the low reaction of the midgut epithelium over time. The previously stated damage indicators, such as the partial destruction of the striated border and peritrophic matrix [17,27,28], are more evident after 72 h of exposure to lambda cyhalothrin (when the reaction is weaker) compared to 24 and 48 h of exposure.
Oxidative stress induced by lambda-cyhalothrin can lead to various detrimental effects on P. helleri, including lipid peroxidation, disruption of the plasma membrane, and damage to DNA and cellular proteins [28,47], which aligns with the findings from the histochemical test and light microscopy. After 72 h of exposure to lambda-cyhalothrin, an increase in superoxide dismutase enzyme activity can be observed, indicating the cell’s attempt at detoxification through the dismutation of superoxide (O2) [48]. The higher superoxide dismutase activity, accompanied by a lower concentration of available superoxides, leads to a decrease in nitrite (NO2) and nitrate (NO3) markers, as superoxides are required for the formation of nitrous acid (HNO2) [48].
The catalase enzyme, responsible for the dismutation of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) into oxygen (O2) and water (H2O), exhibits intense activity within the first 48 h after exposure to lambda-cyhalothrin, indicating the initial responses of the cells to eliminate reactive oxygen species and minimize cell damage, thus promoting insect survival [49]. However, despite the elevated catalase activity, the midgut of the bees showed signs of damage, including cytoplasm vacuolization, disorganization in the striated border, nucleic pyknosis, the release of cell fragments towards the gut lumen, and disruptions in the peritrophic matrix. Conversely, the low activity of the glutathione S-transferase enzyme suggests issues in the detoxification process of P. helleri. The reduced catalyzation of harmful metabolite conjugation by glutathione S-transferase leads to an accumulation of toxins within the cells, contributing to oxidative stress [50,51]. The reduced activity of GST in bees exposed to the insecticide compromises the phase 2 detoxification process involving glutathione conjugation, potentially leading to the accumulation of toxins and increased oxidative stress. This impairment not only heightens their vulnerability to cellular damage and oxidative stress but also impacts vital physiological processes such as immune function and neurobiology, ultimately affecting the overall health of the bee and the colony [28,52,53,54]. Further research on the GST pathway and its regulation is necessary to enhance our understanding of bee detoxification mechanisms with respect to toxicity mediated by lambda-cyhalothrin.
Despite limited knowledge regarding the precise mechanism through which small insecticide molecules, like the pyrethroid lambda-cyhalothrin, cross the midgut epithelium and access the insect’s hemocoel, it is hypothesized that transcellular diffusion or transport proteins play a role in this process, given their lipophilic nature and low molecular weight [17,19]. These features emerge as plausible explanations for the substantial cellular damage observed in our experimental findings. Further studies in this area are necessary to fully unravel the intricacies of this phenomenon.

5. Conclusions

Our results reveal that the insecticide lambda-cyhalothrin is toxic for adult P. helleri workers and that the ingestion of lambda-cyhalothrin damages the midgut epithelium and induces oxidative stress and death in P. helleri workers. Overall, our results provide important information about the hazards associated with this pesticide’s toxicity to non-target organisms, including the Neotropical stingless bee pollinator, which should be taken in account in ecological risk assessments.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: J.V.d.O.M., L.C.M. and J.E.S.; methodology: J.V.d.O.M. and J.E.S.; validation: L.S.C., D.S.S.B. and M.T.C.S.R.; formal analysis: J.V.d.O.M., L.S.C., D.S.S.B. and M.T.C.S.R.; investigation: J.V.d.O.M., L.C.M. and J.E.S.; resources: J.E.S. and M.M.N.; writing—original draft preparation: J.V.d.O.M., B.M.C.C. and J.C.Z.; writing—review and editing: J.V.d.O.M., B.M.C.C., J.C.Z. and J.E.S.; supervision: J.E.S.; funding acquisition: J.E.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Brazilian research agencies Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq 303243/2022-8), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG, 02367-18; 00856-19), and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES, 001).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved according CEUA/UFV 57/2019 in agreement with the actual Brazilian legislation.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Núcleo de Microscopia e Microanálise department from the Federal University of Viçosa for their technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of the data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Ollerton, J.; Winfree, R.; Tarrant, S. How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals? Oikos 2011, 120, 321–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Garibaldi, L.A.; Steffan-Dewenter, I.; Winfree, R.; Aizen, M.A.; Bommarco, R.; Cunningham, S.A.; Kremen, C.; Carvalheiro, L.G.; Harder, L.D.; Afik, O.; et al. Wild pollinators enhance fruit set of crops regardless of honey bee abundance. Science 2017, 339, 1608–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Breeze, T.D.; Bailey, A.P.; Balcombe, K.G.; Potts, S.G. Pollination services in the UK: How important are bees? Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2013, 142, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Morais, C.R.; Travençolo, A.G.; Carvalho, S.M.; Beletti, M.E.; Santos, V.S.V.; Campos, C.F.; Júnior, E.O.C.; Pereira, B.B.; Naves, M.P.C.; Rezende, A.A.A.; et al. Ecotoxicological effects of the insecticide fipronil in Brazilian native stingless bees Melipona scutellaris (Apidae: Meliponini). Chemosphere 2018, 206, 632–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Padilha, A.C.; Piovesan, B.; Morais, M.C.; Pazini, J.B.; Zotti, M.J.; Botton, M.; Grützmacher, A.D. Toxicity of insecticides on neotropical stingless bees Plebeia emerina (Friese) and Tetragonisca fiebrigi (Schwarz) (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Meliponini). Ecotoxicology 2020, 29, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Carvalho, C.A.L.; Marchini, L.C.; Ross, P.B. Pollen sources used by Apis mellifera and Trigonini (Apidae) species in Piracicaba, State of São Paulo, Brazil. Bragantia 1999, 58, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Uhl, P.; Bruhl, A. The impact of pesticides on flower-visiting insects: A review with regard to European risk assessment. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2019, 38, 2355–2370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Goulson, D.; Nicholls, E.; Botias, C.; Rotheray, E.L. Bee declines drive by combined stress from parasites, pesticides, and lack flowers. Science 2015, 347, 1255957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Grab, H.; Branstetter, M.G.; Amon, N.; Urban-Mead, K.R.; Park, M.G.; Gibbs, J.; Blitzer, E.J.; Poveda, K.; Loeb, G.; Danforth, B.N. Agriculturally dominated landscapes reduce bee phylogenetic diversity and pollination services. Science 2019, 363, 282–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Porrini, C.; Sabatini, A.G.; Girotti, S.; Ghini, S. Honey bees and bee products as monitors of the environmental contamination. Apiacta 2002, 38, 63–70. [Google Scholar]
  11. Siviter, H.; Muth, S. Do novel insecticides pose a threat to beneficial insects? Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2020, 287, 20201265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Dively, G.P.; Kamel, A. Insecticides residues in pollen and nectar of a cucurbit cop and their potential exposure to pollinators. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 4449–4456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Choudhary, A.; Sharma, D.C. Dynamics of pesticide residues in nectar and pollen of mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) Czern.) grown in Himachal Pradesh (India). Environ. Monit. Assess. 2008, 144, 143–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. He, L.M.; Troiano, J.; Wang, A.; Goh, K. Environmental chemistry, ecotoxicity, and fate of lambda-cyhalothrin. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2008, 195, 71–91. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Lopes, M.P.; Fernandes, K.M.; Tomé, H.V.V.; Gonçalves, W.G.; Miranda, F.R.; Serrão, J.E.; Martins, G.F. Spinosad-mediated effects on the walking ability, midgut, and Malpighian tubules of Africanized honey bee workers. Pest Manag. Sci. 2018, 74, 1311–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Davies, T.G.E.; Field, L.M.; Usherwood, P.N.R.; Williamson, M.S. DDT, pyrethrins, pyrethroids and insect sodium channels. IUBMB Life 2007, 59, 151–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Arthidoro de Castro, M.B.; Martinez, L.C.; Cossolin, J.F.S.; Serra, S.R.; Serrão, J.E. Cytotoxic effects on the midgut, hypopharyngeal, glands and brain of Apis mellifera honey bee workers exposed to chronic concentrations of lambda-cyhalothrin. Chemosphere 2020, 248, 126075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Oliveira, A.H.; Gonçalves, W.G.; Fernandes, K.M.; Barcellos, M.S.; Sampaio, W.M.S.; Lopes, M.P.; Martins, G.F.; Serrão, J.E. Morphology and morphometry of the midgut in the stingless bee Friesella schrottkyi (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Insects 2019, 10, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Denecke, S.; Swevers, L.; Douris, V.; Vontas, J. How does oral insecticidal compound cross the insect midgut epithelium? Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2018, 103, 22–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cavalcante, V.M.; Cruz-Landim, C. Types of cells present in the midgut of the insects: A review. Naturalia 1999, 24, 19–40. [Google Scholar]
  21. Santos, A.D.; Zanetti, R.; Santos, J.C.D.; Biagiotti, G.; Evangelista, A.L.; Serrao, J.E.; Zanuncio, J.C. Persistence of fipronil residues in Eucalyptus seedlings and its concentration in the insecticide solution after treatment in the nursery. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2016, 188, 314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Martins, G.F.; Neves, C.A.; Campos, L.A.; Serrao, J.E. The regenerative cells during the metamorphosis in the midgut of bees. Micron 2006, 37, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kiljanek, T.; Niewiadowska, A.; Posyniak, A. Pesticide poisoning of honeybees: A review of symptoms, incident classification, and causes of poisoning. J. Apic. Sci. 2016, 60, 5–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Dai, P.L.; Wang, Q.; Sun, J.H.; Liu, F.; Wang, X.; Wu, Y.Y.; Zhou, T. Effects of sublethal concentrations of bifenthrin and deltamethrin on fecundity, growth, and development of the honey bee Apis mellifera ligustica. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2010, 29, 644–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Catae, A.F.; Alves, T.C.R.; Oliveira, R.A.D.; Nocelli, R.C.; Malapsina, O. Cytotoxic effects of thiamethoxam in the midgut and Malpighian tubules of Africanized Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Microsc. Res. Tech. 2014, 77, 274–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Delkash-Roudsari, S.; Chicas-Mosier, A.M.; Goldansaz, S.H.; Taleb-Jahromi, K.; Ashouri, A.; Abramson, C.I. Assessment of lethal and sublethal effects of imidacloprid, ethion, and glyphosate on aversive conditioning, motility, and lifespan in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 204, 111108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Carneiro, L.S.; Martinez, L.C.; Gonçalves, W.G.; Santana, L.M.; Serrão, J.E. The fungicide iprodione affects midgut cells of non-target honey bee Apis mellifera workers. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 189, 109991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Farder-Gomes, C.F.; Fernandes, K.M.; Bernardes, R.C.; Bastos, D.S.S.; Martins, G.F.; Serrão, J.E. Acute exposure to fipronil induces oxidative stress, apoptosis and impairs epithelial homeostasis in the midgut of the stingless bee Partamona helleri Friese (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 774, 145679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mittapalli, O.; Neal, J.J.; Shukle, R.H. Antioxidant defense response in a galling insect. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 1889–1894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Barreiros, A.L.B.S.; David, J.M.; David, J.P. Estresse oxidativo: Relação entre geração de espécies reativas e defesa do organismo. Química Nova 2006, 29, 113–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Williams, G.R.; Alaux, C.; Costa, C.; Csaki, T.; Doublet, V.; Eisenhardt, D.; Fries, I.; Kunh, R.; MachMahon, D.P.; Medrzycki, P.; et al. Standard methods for maintaining adult Apis mellifera in cages under in vitro laboratory conditions. J. Apic. Res. 2013, 52, 1–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Stefanini, M.; Demartino, C.; Zamboni, L. Fixation of ejaculated spermatozoa for electron microscopy. Nature 1967, 216, 173–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Marklund, S.; Marklund, G. Involvement of the superoxide anion radical in the autoxidation of pyrogallol and a convenient assay for superoxide dismutase. Eur. J. Biochem. 1974, 47, 469–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hadwan, M.H.; Abed, H.N. Data supporting the spectrophotometric method for the estimation of catalase activity. Data Brief 2016, 6, 194–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Habig, W.H.; Pabst, M.J.; Jakoby, W.B. Glutathione S-Transferases. J. Biol. Chem. 1974, 25, 7130–7139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tsikas, D. Analysis of nitrite and nitrate in biological fluids by assays based on the Griess reaction: Appraisal of the Griess reaction in the L-arginine/nitric oxide area of research. J. Chromatogr. B 2007, 851, 51–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mayer, D.F.; Lunden, J.D. Field and laboratory tests of the effects of fipronil on adult female bees of Apis mellifera, Megachile rotundata and Nomia melanderi. J. Apic. Res. 1998, 38, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jacob, C.R.O.; Zanardi, O.Z.; Malaquias, J.B.; Silva, C.A.S.; Yamamoto, P.T. The impact of four widely used neonicotinoid insecticides on Tetragonisca angustula (Latreille) (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Chemosphere 2019, 224, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Agrawal, S.; Kelkenberg, M.; Begum, K.; Steinfeld, L.; Williams, C.E.; Kramer, K.J.; Beeman, R.W.; Park, Y.; Muthukrishnan, S.; Merzendorfer, H. Two essential peritrophic matrix proteins mediate matrix barrier functions in the insect midgut. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2014, 49, 24–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Desneux, N.; Decourtye, A.; Delpuech, J.M. The sublethal effects of pesticides on beneficial arthropods. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2007, 52, 81–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hegedus, D.; Erlandson, M.; Gillott, C.; Toprak, U. New insights into peritrophic matrix synthesis, architecture, and function. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2008, 54, 285–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Taajes, D.J.; Sobel, B.E.; Budd, R.C. Morphological and cytochemical determination off cell death by apoptosis. Histochem. Cell Biol. 2007, 129, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Da Silva Cruz, A.; Da Silva-Zacarin, E.C.M.; Bueno, O.C. Morphological alterations induced by boric acid and fipronil in the midgut of worker honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) larvae: Morphological alterations in the midgut of A. mellifera. Cell Biol. Toxicol. 2010, 26, 165–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Hacker, G. The morphology of apoptosis. Cell Tissue Res. 2000, 301, 5–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Widlak, P. Endonuclease and its role in apoptosis. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2000, 47, 1037–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Salbreux, G.; Charras, G.; Paluch, E. Actin cortex mechanism and celullar morphogenesis. Trends Cell Biol. 2012, 22, 536–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Forkpah, C.; Dixon, L.R.; Farhbach, S.E.; Rueppe, O. Xenobiotic effects on intestinal cell proliferation on adult honey bee (Apis mellifera L) workers. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e91180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Spit, M.; Koo, B.; Maurice, M.M. Tales from the crypt: Intestinal niche signals in tissue renewal, plasticity and cancer. Open Biol. 2018, 8, 180120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Wang, X.; Martínez, M.A.; Wu, Q.; Ares, I.; Martínez-Larrañaga, M.R.; Anadón, A.; Yuan, Z. Fipronil insecticide toxicology: Oxidative stress and metabolism. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 2016, 46, 876–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Franco, A.A.; Odom, R.S.; Rando, T.A. Regulation of antioxidant enzyme gene expression in response to oxidative stress and during differentiation of mouse skeletal muscle. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1999, 27, 1122–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hung, S.H.; Yu, C.W.; Lin, C.H. Hydrogen peroxide functions as a stress signal in plants. Bot. Bull. Acad. Sin. 2005, 46, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  52. Yu, S.J. Detoxification Mechanisms in Insects. In Encyclopedia of Entomology; Capinera, J.L., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  53. Bartling, M.T.; Thümecke, S.; Russert, J.H.; Vilcinskas, A.; Lee, K.Z. Exposure to low doses of pesticides induces an immune response and the production of nitric oxide in honeybees. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 6819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Leska, A.; Nowak, A.; Nowak, I.; Górczyńska, A. Effects of insecticides and microbiological contaminants on Apis mellifera health. Molecules 2021, 26, 5080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Light micrographs of the midgut epithelium of the stingless Partamona helleri (Hymenoptera: Meliponini) bees in the control group, showing columnar digestive cells (DC) with a spherical nucleus (N), striated border (arrow) and the peritrophic matrix (MP) in the midgut lumen (L).
Figure 1. Light micrographs of the midgut epithelium of the stingless Partamona helleri (Hymenoptera: Meliponini) bees in the control group, showing columnar digestive cells (DC) with a spherical nucleus (N), striated border (arrow) and the peritrophic matrix (MP) in the midgut lumen (L).
Antioxidants 12 01510 g001
Figure 2. Light micrographs of the midgut of Partamona helleri bees (Hymenoptera: Meliponini) exposed to LC50 of lambda cyhalothrin for 24 h (a,b), 48 h (c,d), and 72 h (e,f). After exposure, they were stained in H.E. We observed a pyknotic nuclei (P), cytoplasmic vacuolation (*), changes in the striated borders (arrow), cell fragments released into the tissue (red circle), the peritrophic matrix (MP), and nucleolus with condensed chromatin (Nu).
Figure 2. Light micrographs of the midgut of Partamona helleri bees (Hymenoptera: Meliponini) exposed to LC50 of lambda cyhalothrin for 24 h (a,b), 48 h (c,d), and 72 h (e,f). After exposure, they were stained in H.E. We observed a pyknotic nuclei (P), cytoplasmic vacuolation (*), changes in the striated borders (arrow), cell fragments released into the tissue (red circle), the peritrophic matrix (MP), and nucleolus with condensed chromatin (Nu).
Antioxidants 12 01510 g002
Figure 3. Light micrographs of the midgut of Partamona helleri (Hymenoptera: Meliponini) treated in the control group (a) and exposed to LC50 of lambda cyhalothrin for 24 h (b), 48 h (c), and 72 h (d) and stained with bromophenol mercury. In the control group, spherical crystals were found in the epithelium (E), well-stained nucleus (N), and musculature of the digestive tract (Mu). In the treatments with 24 h (b), 48 h (c), and 72 h (d), after exposure to lambda cyhalothrin, a light blue striated border (arrow), cytoplasmic vacuolation (*), and the peritrophic matrix (PM) were observed.
Figure 3. Light micrographs of the midgut of Partamona helleri (Hymenoptera: Meliponini) treated in the control group (a) and exposed to LC50 of lambda cyhalothrin for 24 h (b), 48 h (c), and 72 h (d) and stained with bromophenol mercury. In the control group, spherical crystals were found in the epithelium (E), well-stained nucleus (N), and musculature of the digestive tract (Mu). In the treatments with 24 h (b), 48 h (c), and 72 h (d), after exposure to lambda cyhalothrin, a light blue striated border (arrow), cytoplasmic vacuolation (*), and the peritrophic matrix (PM) were observed.
Antioxidants 12 01510 g003
Figure 4. Activity (mean ± standard error-SE) of the enzymes superoxide dismutase (SOD) (A), catalase (CAT) (B), glutathione S-transferase (GST) (C), and nitrite/nitrate (NO2/NO3) (D) content in workers of Partamona helleri (Hymenoptera: Meliponini) in the control (C) and after exposure to lambda-cyhalothrin after different periods. Different letters on bars indicate differences after Tukey’s test at 5% significance level.
Figure 4. Activity (mean ± standard error-SE) of the enzymes superoxide dismutase (SOD) (A), catalase (CAT) (B), glutathione S-transferase (GST) (C), and nitrite/nitrate (NO2/NO3) (D) content in workers of Partamona helleri (Hymenoptera: Meliponini) in the control (C) and after exposure to lambda-cyhalothrin after different periods. Different letters on bars indicate differences after Tukey’s test at 5% significance level.
Antioxidants 12 01510 g004
Table 1. Estimated lethal concentrations (LC) of the lambda-cyhalothrin for orally exposed Partamona helleri (Hymenoptera: Meliponini) workers after 72 h, obtained from Probit analysis (d.f. = 5, intercept = 2.7990).
Table 1. Estimated lethal concentrations (LC) of the lambda-cyhalothrin for orally exposed Partamona helleri (Hymenoptera: Meliponini) workers after 72 h, obtained from Probit analysis (d.f. = 5, intercept = 2.7990).
LCEstimated Concentration (mg a.i. L−1)Confidence Interval 95%χ2 (p-Value)
250.0200.013–0.0274.75 (<0.001)
500.0430.033–0.055
750.0920.070–0.13
900.1810.128–0.310
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Motta, J.V.d.O.; Carneiro, L.S.; Martínez, L.C.; Bastos, D.S.S.; Resende, M.T.C.S.; Castro, B.M.C.; Neves, M.M.; Zanuncio, J.C.; Serrão, J.E. Midgut Cell Damage and Oxidative Stress in Partamona helleri (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Workers Caused by the Insecticide Lambda-Cyhalothrin. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1510. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12081510

AMA Style

Motta JVdO, Carneiro LS, Martínez LC, Bastos DSS, Resende MTCS, Castro BMC, Neves MM, Zanuncio JC, Serrão JE. Midgut Cell Damage and Oxidative Stress in Partamona helleri (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Workers Caused by the Insecticide Lambda-Cyhalothrin. Antioxidants. 2023; 12(8):1510. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12081510

Chicago/Turabian Style

Motta, João Victor de Oliveira, Lenise Silva Carneiro, Luís Carlos Martínez, Daniel Silva Sena Bastos, Matheus Tudor Candido Santos Resende, Bárbara Monteiro Castro Castro, Mariana Machado Neves, José Cola Zanuncio, and José Eduardo Serrão. 2023. "Midgut Cell Damage and Oxidative Stress in Partamona helleri (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Workers Caused by the Insecticide Lambda-Cyhalothrin" Antioxidants 12, no. 8: 1510. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12081510

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop