Next Article in Journal
Correction: König et al. Cefiderocol in Critically Ill Patients with Multi-Drug Resistant Pathogens: Real-Life Data on Pharmacokinetics and Microbiological Surveillance. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 649
Previous Article in Journal
Population Pharmacokinetics and Dosing Simulation of Vancomycin Administered by Continuous Injection in Critically Ill Patient
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genetic Relatedness of 5-Year Isolates of Clostridioides difficile Polymerase Chain Reaction Ribotype 017 Strains in a Hospital

1
Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Korea
2
Molecular Research PCL, Inc., Seoul 08517, Korea
3
Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Seoul 04763, Korea
4
Department of Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2021, 10(10), 1229; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10101229
Submission received: 3 September 2021 / Revised: 29 September 2021 / Accepted: 7 October 2021 / Published: 9 October 2021

Abstract

:
The objective of this study was to analyse the genetic relatedness of Clostridioides difficile polymerase chain reaction ribotype 017 (RT017) strains from patients with hospital-acquired C. difficile infection (HA-CDI) in a hospital with a high RT017 prevalence. From 2009 to 2013, 200 RT017 strains (26.8%) were collected from 745 HA-CDI patient isolates. They comprised 64 MLVA types, and 197 (98.5%) strains were genetically related to 5 clonal complexes (CCs). The largest cluster, CC-A, included 163 isolates of 40 MLVA types. CC-A accounted for 20% of RT017 strains in 2009 and sharply increased to 94.9% in 2010, 94% in 2011, 86.2% in 2012, and 73.5% in 2013. The other 4 CCs included 20 isolates with 7 MLVA types. The resistance rates of antimicrobials were as follows: clindamycin 100%, moxifloxacin 99%, rifaximin 88.5%, and vancomycin 1%. All isolates were susceptible to metronidazole and piperacillin/tazobactam. Comparing antibiotic resistance among CCs, the geometric mean of the minimum inhibitory concentrations of moxifloxacin, vancomycin, and piperacillin/tazobactam were significantly higher for CC-A isolates than for the other CCs. RT017 clones constantly evolved over the 5 years studied with regard to genetic relatedness. The levels of antibiotic resistance may contribute to the persistence of organisms in the institution.

1. Introduction

Clostridioides difficile is a leading pathogen that frequently causes hospital infections. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) ribotype 017 (RT017) is a toxin A-negative and toxin B-positive strain that belongs to C. difficile clade 4 [1]. RT017 is among several clonal lineages of C. difficile known to cause parallel increases in disease severity, mortality, and recurrence [2,3], but has shown similar clinical outcomes to other lineages in some reports [4,5].
In Europe and North America, RT017 strains have been reported to have low prevalence along with common RT027 strains [6]. However, outbreaks of C. difficile infections (CDIs) caused by RT017 have been frequently noted in many countries, and a high prevalence of RT017 strains has been reported in Argentina, South Africa, and Asian countries such as Korea and China (especially the areas of Changsha and Fudan) [5,7,8,9,10]. In Korea, RT017 strains have increased in prevalence since 1995 [11], eventually becoming one of the most prevalent PCR RTs; R018 and R017 were the most prevalent RTs followed by R001, R015, R112, R014, R293, R012, R002, R078, R163, R106, and R267 in order of frequency [5]. Although the reason for distinct epidemics of RT017 is not clear, high-level antimicrobial resistance may be one of the key contributing factors.
C. difficile can be characterised by various methods, such as restriction endonuclease analysis, North American pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, multilocus sequence typing, multilocus variable-number tandem repeat (VNTR) analysis (MLVA), PCR ribotyping, and whole-gene sequencing [12,13].
In this study, we investigated the prevalence and genetic relatedness of RT017 at a single centre with a high prevalence of RT017 using MLVA and addressed the epidemiologic and genetic relationships among CDIs caused by RT017 strains.

2. Results

Over the 5-year period under study, 826 patients were diagnosed with HA-CDI, 745 C. difficile isolates were cultivated from stool samples, and toxinotyping and PCR ribotyping were performed. A total of 200 isolates (26.8%) were identified as RT017 strains. All the isolates of RT017 showed toxin A-negative and toxin B-positive toxinotypes (Supplementary Figure S1).
The proportion of RT017 strains among patients with HA-CDI varied by year (Figure 1).

2.1. Clonal Distribution of PCR RT017 Isolates

A total of 64 MLVA types were identified. The VNTR locus CDR4 was constant, except for one isolate. The locus CDR9 was the most variable locus. The diversity of MLVA types decreased by year: 16 types from 20 isolates in 2009, 22 types from 59 isolates in 2010, 19 types from 50 isolates in 2011, 11 types from 29 isolates in 2012, and 12 types from 42 isolates in 2013. A total of 12 common MLVA types comprised 131 of 200 RT017 isolates (65.5%), and they became dominant organisms in 2010 (Supplementary Table S1).
The MLVA types of RT017 strains were demonstrated using MST analysis (Figure 2). Of the 200 RT017 isolates, 197 showed genetically related clusters with 5 CCs. In CC-A, 163 (82.7%) strains were included in 40 MVLA types. Ten of the twelve common types were included in CC-A. CC-B was composed of MLVA types 112, 113, and 114, which were observed in 2009 and 2010. Each CC-D and -E was composed of one MLVA type.
According to the department breakdown, isolates from the pulmonary department comprised the largest group with 69 isolates, followed by the nephrology department with 29 isolates (Figure 3). Of the isolates from the pulmonary department, 44 strains (63.8%) were closely related to 1 STRD or less, and 22 strains (75.9%) were closely related to the isolates from the nephrology department.
The MLVA types of the isolates from 2010 and 2011 showed close relatedness, and six MLVA types were shared among them. Isolates from 2012 shared four MLVA types with those from 2013 with small STRD values. However, the association between the isolates from 2011 and 2012 was relatively low (Figure 2); they shared two MLVA types.

2.2. Antimicrobial Resistance of RT017 Strains

All RT017 isolates were resistant to clindamycin (CLI) and susceptible to metronidazole (MTZ) and piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP) (Table 1). In the case of vancomycin (VAN), two isolates showed resistance. In contrast, only 2 isolates were susceptible to moxifloxacin (MXF), and 177 isolates (88.5%) were resistant to rifaximin (RFX).
The geometric mean MIC of each antibiotic was determined. Regarding the comparison of MIC values according to isolates from each year, there was no significant difference. The amount of each antibiotic used did not show a statistical difference by year, and there was no significant correlation between the amount of antibiotics used and the geometric mean MIC of each antibiotic (Figure 4).
In terms of MLVA types, the isolates belonging to common MLVA types with more than five isolates showed a significantly higher RFX resistance rate than that of non-common MLVA types (93.9% vs. 78.3%, p = 0.002). However, two isolates from VAN-resistant strains belonged to non-common MLVA types.

2.3. Comparison of Antimicrobial Resistance among Isolates from CC-A and the Other CCs

The resistance rate of each antimicrobial agent did not show a statistical difference among the isolates of CC-A and the other CCs; the p values for MXF, VAN, and RFX were 0.337, 0.337, and 0.775, respectively (Supplementary Table S2). However, the geometric mean MIC of MXF was positively correlated with CC-A (rho = 0.46, p < 0.001). The values of VAN and TZP also showed positive correlations with CC-A (rho = 0.18, p = 0.011 and rho = 0.154, p = 0.03, respectively). The geometric mean MICs of CLI, RFX, and MTZ were not correlated with any CC type.

3. Discussion

This study analysed the genetic relatedness of C. difficile RT017 strains at a single centre with a high prevalence of RT017 using MLVA. The results indicated that the evolution of RT017 continually occurred within the genetic relatedness in endemic situations. One MLVA type (MLVA 78) persisted for 4 consecutive years, and the number of MLVA 78 increased from 1 isolate in 2010 and 2011 to 16 and 15 isolates in 2012 and 2013, respectively. In a report from Taiwan, 40 C. difficile RT017 isolates of 10 MLVA types were identified over 5 years, and some MLVA types were observed for 5 consecutive years [14]. In an outbreak in the Netherlands, 41 of 42 isolates (97.6%) were genetically related, and 88% were included in CCs [3]. In our previous study, RT017 infections occurred more frequently in chronically ill patients with higher Charlson’s comorbidity indices and longer durations of hospitalisation than infections by other RTs [5], which indicated that the RT017 infections were primarily hospital infections rather than community infections and persisted longer in the hospital setting.
Antimicrobial resistance is one of the reasons for the endemicity of RT017 strains in hospitals. RT017 strains are consistently resistant to CLI in most studies [3,15]. Susceptibility to rifampin has varied among studies [8,15,16]. In a tuberculosis hospital in South Africa, the rifampin resistance rate of RT017 strains was 99%, and RT017 strains comprised 95.5% of the total C. difficile isolates [8]. RT017 strains in a hospital in Hong Kong showed the second-highest resistance to rifampin (58%) [16]. In contrast, the rifampin resistance rate was only 7.7% in a study in North America, where the incidence of RT017 was relatively low [15]. In this study, all RT017 strains were resistant to CLI, and 88.5% of them were resistant to RFX. In our previous study, patients with RT017 infections used 2-fold more CLI or carbapenem and 10-fold more rifampin within the past 2 months than patients with infections by other RTs [5], suggesting a role of rifampin resistance in the spread of RT017 strains in our hospital. Furthermore, the isolates of the dominant CC-A presented the highest geometric mean MICs of MXF, VAN, and TZP, although the resistance rates of these antimicrobials did not differ among the isolates of different CCs. Interestingly, we observed that the isolates of CC-A spread rapidly from 2009 to 2010. These findings strongly suggest that higher antimicrobial resistance contributes to a high prevalence and endemicity of the organism in hospitals.
The fitness of the MLVA 78 type in the hospital setting is not clear. In terms of the antibiotic resistance, the MLVA 78 showed more resistance to MXF than the other MLVA types (data not shown, p = 0.042, Mann–Whitney U test). However, MLVA 78 isolates were more susceptible to VAN and TZP (data not shown, p < 0.001, p = 0.013, Mann–Whitney U test, respectively). TZP was prescribed about two-fold more than VAN or MXF in the hospital, and TZP and VAN use increased in 2012 and 2013 (Figure 4). Therefore, further study including whole-gene sequencing is necessary for the evaluation of fitness of the MLVA 78 type.
The role of environmental contamination via RT017 strains has been clearly documented in a hospital in England [17]. Despite hydrogen peroxide vapour decontamination, the environmental contaminant strains survived. Interestingly, the ancestor of the epidemic RT017 strains was traced back 4 years in the study [17]. Therefore, to reduce RT017 infections in our hospital, active interventions, including contact precautions among patients and environmental cleaning, are necessary.
Although we presented evidence that RT017 strains have constantly evolved over the past 5 years through MLVA, there is still a possibility that there has been a constant influx of new and diverse 017 strains from outside the hospital environment. For example, the community strains which were genetically similar to our strains might be popular in the community. However, as we proposed, RT017 infections occurred more frequently in chronically ill patients with higher Charlson’s comorbidity indices and longer durations of hospitalisation than infections by other RTs [5], and the genetic relatedness of our RT017 isolates from HA-CDI patients was very close, suggesting that the endemic persistence of those strains might be more possible although some RT017 strains influxed into the hospital from the community.
In this study, we presented the genetic relatedness and phenotypic characteristics of all RT017 isolates from a hospital over 5 years. Despite the advantage of the isolates being closely related, the study lacks genetic information; thus, we cannot show the true genetic evolution of important regions such as PaLoc locus. Therefore, it is necessary to study the genetic characteristics of these isolates in the near future.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Patients and Materials

From January 2009 to December 2013, all isolates of C. difficile from hospital-acquired C. difficile infections (HA-CDI) at Hanyang University Hospital, a 900-bed tertiary care facility in Seoul, Korea, were collected. HA-CDI was confirmed in patients who developed diarrhoea at least 72 h after hospitalisation or within 2 months of their last discharge [18]. According to the results of PCR ribotyping of the isolates, all patients with RT017 strains and isolates were included in this study. The admitted department and date of toxin A and B assays (VIDAS® C. difficile Toxin A and B; BioMerieux SA, Marcy l’Etoile, France) tested for each isolate were collected as clinical data via the review of medical records.
The study protocol was approved by the university’s institutional review board (HYG IRB 2018-07-037), and the requirement for written informed consent from patients was waived.

4.2. C. difficile Culture and Multiplex PCR for Toxin Gene Detection

After alcohol shock treatment, stool specimens were cultivated on C. difficile moxalactam–norfloxacin–taurocholate agar (CDMN-TA agar; Oxoid Ltd., Cambridge, UK) supplemented with 7% horse blood [19]. Colonies of C. difficile were identified using Rapid ID 32A (BioMerieux SA, Marcy I’Etoile, France). To identify toxin genes, multiplex PCR was performed using template DNA, as described previously [20]. Template genomic DNA was extracted using an i-genomic BYF DNA Extraction Mini Kit® (iNtRON Biotechnology, Inc., Seongnam-si, Korea). The positive controls were ATCC 43,598 (PCR RT017), ATCC 9689 (PCR RT027), VPI 10,643 (ATCC 43255, PCR RT087), and ATCC 700057, representing A B+ CDT, A+ B+ CDT+, A+ B+ CDT, and A B CDT RTs, respectively.

4.3. PCR Ribotyping

PCR ribotyping was performed using genomic DNA, as described previously [21]. After electrophoresis of the amplified products, the clustering of banding patterns was compared visually with the reference RT017 strain (American Type Culture Collection [ATCC] 43598; Manassas, VA, USA).

4.4. MLVA

To trace genetic relatedness, we used MLVA. The six VNTR loci, CDR4, CDR5, CDR9, CDR48, CDR49, and CDR60, were used to perform MLVA [22,23]. The PCR products were sent to Solgent Inc. (Seoul, Korea; http://www.solgent.com/ (accessed on 6 June 2018)) for GENSCAN analysis. Genetic relationships among the genotypes were determined by clustering them according to MLVA type using the number of differing loci and the summed absolute distance as coefficients for calculating the minimum spanning tree (MST). MST analysis was performed using BioNumerics software (version 5.1; Applied Maths NV, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium) [24].
When the summed tandem-repeat difference (STRD) was 2 or less and the number of isolates was 2 or more, the cluster was regarded as a clonal complex (CC) [22]. When the STRD was 10 or less, the cluster was regarded as genetically related [25]. MLVA types that included more than five isolates were regarded as common types.

4.5. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Susceptibility tests were conducted with RT017 strains, and the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of six antimicrobial agents, specifically MTZ, VAN, TZP, CLI, MXF, and RFX, were determined [26]. Brucella agar containing hemin (5 μg/mL), vitamin K1 (10 μg/mL), and 5% horse blood was used for the ASTs, as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [27]. The MICs of CLI, MXF, and VAN were measured using the E-test (AB-BIODISK, Solna, Sweden), and those of RFX, TZP, and MTZ were determined using the agar dilution test (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). C. difficile ATCC 700,057 was used as a quality control strain for the susceptibility tests.
The resistance breakpoints used were defined as stated by the CLSI and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing [27,28].

4.6. Amount of Antibiotic Use

The use of six antimicrobial agents in hospitalised patients during the study period was calculated. Rifampin usage was substituted for rifaximin. The total amount of antimicrobial agents was divided by the defined daily dose (DDD) according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical/DDD Index 2018 [29].

4.7. Statistical Analysis

IBM SPSS Statistics version 24.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Pearson’s chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used to analyse categorical variables, and the independent t-test or Mann–Whitney U-test was used to analyse continuous variables. Spearman’s rank correlation analysis was performed to assess trends between CCs. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

5. Conclusions

In summary, RT017 clones have constantly evolved over the 5 years with regard to genetic relatedness. The levels of antibiotic resistance may contribute to the persistence of organisms in the institution.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antibiotics10101229/s1, Figure S1: Agarose gel electrophoresis of multiplex PCR for toxin genes of Clostridioides difficile, Table S1: common multilocus variable-number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) types of Clostridioides difficile by year. Table S2: Comparison of antimicrobial resistance among isolates from CC-A and the other CCs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, H.P. and J.K. (Jieun Kim); methodology, J.K. (Jieun Kim) and M.-R.S.; validation, M.-R.S. and M.-H.B.; formal analysis, J.K. (Jieun Kim) and M.-R.S.; investigation, J.K. (Jieun Kim); resources, M.-H.B. and J.K. (Jinyeoung Kim); data curation, B.K. and J.K. (Jinyeoung Kim); writing—original draft preparation, J.K. (Jieun Kim); writing—review and editing, H.P.; funding acquisition, H.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the research fund of Hanyang University (HY-2012).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Hanyang University (protocol code 2018-07-037 and date of approval), and the requirement for written informed consent from patients was waived.

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board due to the retrospective design of the study. There was no intervention and harm to patients and there was no way to contact with the patients without personal information.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Knight, D.R.; Elliott, B.; Chang, B.J.; Perkins, T.T.; Riley, T.V. Diversity and Evolution in the Genome of Clostridium difficile. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2015, 28, 721–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Kim, J.; Seo, M.R.; Kang, J.O.; Kim, Y.; Hong, S.P.; Pai, H. Clinical characteristics of relapses and re-infections in Clostridium difficile infection. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2014, 20, 1198–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Goorhuis, A.; Debast, S.B.; Dutilh, J.C.; van Kinschot, C.M.; Harmanus, C.; Cannegieter, S.C.; Hagen, E.C.; Kuijper, E.J. Type-specific risk factors and outcome in an outbreak with 2 different Clostridium difficile types simultaneously in 1 hospital. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2011, 53, 860–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Kim, J.; Pai, H.; Seo, M.R.; Kang, J.O. Clinical and microbiologic characteristics of tcdA-negative variant Clostridium difficile infections. BMC Infect. Dis. 2012, 12, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Kim, J.; Kim, Y.; Pai, H. Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes of Clostridium difficile Infections by PCR Ribotype 017 and 018 Strains. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0168849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Davies, K.A.; Ashwin, H.; Longshaw, C.M.; Burns, D.A.; Davis, G.L.; Wilcox, M.H. Diversity of Clostridium difficile PCR ribotypes in Europe: Results from the European, multicentre, prospective, biannual, point-prevalence study of Clostridium difficile infection in hospitalised patients with diarrhoea (EUCLID), 2012 and 2013. Euro Surveill. 2016, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Goorhuis, A.; Legaria, M.C.; van den Berg, R.J.; Harmanus, C.; Klaassen, C.H.; Brazier, J.S.; Lumelsky, G.; Kuijper, E.J. Application of multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis to determine clonal spread of toxin A-negative Clostridium difficile in a general hospital in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2009, 15, 1080–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Kullin, B.; Wojno, J.; Abratt, V.; Reid, S.J. Toxin A-negative toxin B-positive ribotype 017 Clostridium difficile is the dominant strain type in patients with diarrhoea attending tuberculosis hospitals in Cape Town, South Africa. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2017, 36, 163–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Collins, D.A.; Hawkey, P.M.; Riley, T.V. Epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection in Asia. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2013, 2, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Hawkey, P.M.; Marriott, C.; Liu, W.E.; Jian, Z.J.; Gao, Q.; Ling, T.K.; Chow, V.; So, E.; Chan, R.; Hardy, K.; et al. Molecular epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection in a major chinese hospital: An underrecognized problem in Asia? J. Clin. Microbiol. 2013, 51, 3308–3313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Kim, H.; Riley, T.V.; Kim, M.; Kim, C.K.; Yong, D.; Lee, K.; Chong, Y.; Park, J.W. Increasing prevalence of toxin A-negative, toxin B-positive isolates of Clostridium difficile in Korea: Impact on laboratory diagnosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2008, 46, 1116–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Killgore, G.; Thompson, A.; Johnson, S.; Brazier, J.; Kuijper, E.; Pepin, J.; Frost, E.H.; Savelkoul, P.; Nicholson, B.; van den Berg, R.J.; et al. Comparison of seven techniques for typing international epidemic strains of Clostridium difficile: Restriction endonuclease analysis, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, PCR-ribotyping, multilocus sequence typing, multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis, amplified fragment length polymorphism, and surface layer protein A gene sequence typing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2008, 46, 431–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Crobach, M.J.T.; Voor Int Holt, A.F.; Knetsch, C.W.; van Dorp, S.M.; Bras, W.; Harmanus, C.; Kuijper, E.J.; Vos, M.C. An outbreak of Clostridium difficile infections due to new PCR ribotype 826: Epidemiologic and microbiologic analyses. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2018, 24, 309.e301–309.e304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Chia, J.H.; Lai, H.C.; Su, L.H.; Kuo, A.J.; Wu, T.L. Molecular epidemiology of Clostridium difficile at a medical center in Taiwan: Persistence of genetically clustering of A(-)B(+) isolates and increase of A(+)B(+) isolates. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e75471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Tenover, F.C.; Tickler, I.A.; Persing, D.H. Antimicrobial-resistant strains of Clostridium difficile from North America. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 2929–2932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Chow, V.C.Y.; Kwong, T.N.Y.; So, E.W.M.; Ho, Y.I.I.; Wong, S.H.; Lai, R.W.M.; Chan, R.C.Y. Surveillance of antibiotic resistance among common Clostridium difficile ribotypes in Hong Kong. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 17218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cairns, M.D.; Preston, M.D.; Lawley, T.D.; Clark, T.G.; Stabler, R.A.; Wren, B.W. Genomic Epidemiology of a Protracted Hospital Outbreak Caused by a Toxin A-Negative Clostridium difficile Sublineage PCR Ribotype 017 Strain in London, England. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2015, 53, 3141–3147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Mulvey, M.R.; Boyd, D.A.; Gravel, D.; Hutchinson, J.; Kelly, S.; McGeer, A.; Moore, D.; Simor, A.; Suh, K.N.; Taylor, G.; et al. Hypervirulent Clostridium difficile strains in hospitalized patients, Canada. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2010, 16, 678–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Clabots, C.R.; Gerding, S.J.; Olson, M.M.; Peterson, L.R.; Gerding, D.N. Detection of asymptomatic Clostridium difficile carriage by an alcohol shock procedure. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1989, 27, 2386–2387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Seo, M.R.; Kim, J.; Kang, J.O.; Choi, T.Y.; Pai, H. Multiplex PCR method for detection of Clostridium difficile tcdA, tcdB and binary toxin genes. In Proceedings of the 2012 Annual Meeting of the Korean Society of Infectious Disease and the Korean Society for Chemotherapy, Jeju, Korea, 1–2 September 2012. [Google Scholar]
  21. Bidet, P.; Barbut, F.; Lalande, V.; Burghoffer, B.; Petit, J.C. Development of a new PCR-ribotyping method for Clostridium difficile based on ribosomal RNA gene sequencing. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1999, 175, 261–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Marsh, J.W.; O’Leary, M.M.; Shutt, K.A.; Pasculle, A.W.; Johnson, S.; Gerding, D.N.; Muto, C.A.; Harrison, L.H. Multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis for investigation of Clostridium difficile transmission in Hospitals. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2006, 44, 2558–2566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Curry, S.R.; Muto, C.A.; Schlackman, J.L.; Pasculle, A.W.; Shutt, K.A.; Marsh, J.W.; Harrison, L.H. Use of multilocus variable number of tandem repeats analysis genotyping to determine the role of asymptomatic carriers in Clostridium difficile transmission. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2013, 57, 1094–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Guo, C.; Liao, Y.; Li, Y.; Duan, J.; Guo, Y.; Wu, Y.; Cui, Y.; Sun, H.; Zhang, J.; Chen, B.; et al. Genotyping analysis of Helicobacter pylori using multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeats analysis in five regions of China and Japan. BMC Microbiol. 2011, 11, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Bakker, D.; Corver, J.; Harmanus, C.; Goorhuis, A.; Keessen, E.C.; Fawley, W.N.; Wilcox, M.H.; Kuijper, E.J. Relatedness of human and animal Clostridium difficile PCR ribotype 078 isolates determined on the basis of multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis and tetracycline resistance. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2010, 48, 3744–3749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Freeman, J.; Vernon, J.; Morris, K.; Nicholson, S.; Todhunter, S.; Longshaw, C.; Wilcox, M.H. Pan-European longitudinal surveillance of antibiotic resistance among prevalent Clostridium difficile ribotypes. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2015, 21, 248.e9–248.e16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Anaerobic Bacteria; approved standard; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  28. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint Tables for Interpretation of MICs and Zone Diameters. 2016. Available online: https://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/Breakpoint_tables/v_6.0_Breakpoint_table.pdf (accessed on 6 June 2018).
  29. WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology. ATC/DDD Index 2018. Available online: https://www.whocc.no/atc_ddd_index/ (accessed on 6 June 2018).
Figure 1. The incidence of healthcare-associated Clostridioides difficile infections and proportion of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) ribotype 017 over 5 years. The grey bars represent the number of hospital-acquired C. difficile infection (HA-CDI) patients. The black lines represent the proportion of PCR ribotype 017 among HA-CDI patients.
Figure 1. The incidence of healthcare-associated Clostridioides difficile infections and proportion of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) ribotype 017 over 5 years. The grey bars represent the number of hospital-acquired C. difficile infection (HA-CDI) patients. The black lines represent the proportion of PCR ribotype 017 among HA-CDI patients.
Antibiotics 10 01229 g001
Figure 2. Minimum spanning tree analysis of Clostridioides difficile polymerase chain reaction ribotype 017 isolates characterized by multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA) over 5 years. Each circle represents a unique MLVA type. The numbers between the circles represent the summed tandem-repeat differences (STRDs) between MLVA types. Clonal complexes (CC-A to CC-E) are marked clusters containing two or more isolates whose MLVA types generated an STRD ≤ 2.
Figure 2. Minimum spanning tree analysis of Clostridioides difficile polymerase chain reaction ribotype 017 isolates characterized by multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA) over 5 years. Each circle represents a unique MLVA type. The numbers between the circles represent the summed tandem-repeat differences (STRDs) between MLVA types. Clonal complexes (CC-A to CC-E) are marked clusters containing two or more isolates whose MLVA types generated an STRD ≤ 2.
Antibiotics 10 01229 g002
Figure 3. Minimum spanning tree analysis of Clostridioides difficile polymerase chain reaction ribotype 017 isolates typed by multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA) according to admitted hospital department. Each circle represents a unique MLVA type. (A) Pulmonology 66 isolates; (B) Nephrology 30 isolates; (C) Hemato-oncology 15 isolates; (D) Neurosurgery 20 isolates.
Figure 3. Minimum spanning tree analysis of Clostridioides difficile polymerase chain reaction ribotype 017 isolates typed by multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA) according to admitted hospital department. Each circle represents a unique MLVA type. (A) Pulmonology 66 isolates; (B) Nephrology 30 isolates; (C) Hemato-oncology 15 isolates; (D) Neurosurgery 20 isolates.
Antibiotics 10 01229 g003
Figure 4. The results of antimicrobial susceptibility tests and geometric mean minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of Clostridioides difficile polymerase chain reaction ribotype 017 against each antibiotic over 5 years. Dark grey areas indicate resistance, and light grey areas indicate susceptibility. The black lines indicate geometric mean MICs, and the yellow lines indicate total defined daily dose (DDD), which is divided by 10 to 10,000. R, resistant; S, sensitive.
Figure 4. The results of antimicrobial susceptibility tests and geometric mean minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of Clostridioides difficile polymerase chain reaction ribotype 017 against each antibiotic over 5 years. Dark grey areas indicate resistance, and light grey areas indicate susceptibility. The black lines indicate geometric mean MICs, and the yellow lines indicate total defined daily dose (DDD), which is divided by 10 to 10,000. R, resistant; S, sensitive.
Antibiotics 10 01229 g004
Table 1. Antimicrobial susceptibility tests of Clostridioides difficile polymerase chain reaction ribotype 017 strains by year.
Table 1. Antimicrobial susceptibility tests of Clostridioides difficile polymerase chain reaction ribotype 017 strains by year.
Antimicrobial AgentsYear (n)Resistance Rate (%)MIC (mg/L)
MIC50MIC90Geometric Mean
Clindamycin (R ≥ 8 μg/mL)2009 (20)100>256>256430.54
2010 (59)100>256>256512
2011 (50)100>256>256471.14
2012 (29)100>256>256512
2013 (42)100>256>256420.01
Total (200)100>256>256472.77
Moxifloxacin (R ≥ 8 μg/mL)2009 (20)10032>3229.86
2010 (59)100>32>3261.78
2011 (50)100>32>3263.12
2012 (29)100>32>3264
2013 (42)95.2>32>3255.17
Total (200)99>32>3256.69
Vancomycin (R > 2 μg/mL)2009 (20)50.190.50.16
2010 (59)00.380.750.21
2011 (50)20.510.44
2012 (29)00.190.50.13
2013 (42)00.0160.250.04
Total (200)10.380.750.16
Piperacillin/Tazobactam (R ≥ 128/4 μg/mL)2009 (20)016168.57
2010 (59)0161612.21
2011 (50)0161611.31
2012 (29)0161611.45
2013 (42)016169.75
Total (200)0161610.93
Rifaximin (R ≥ 32 μg/mL)2009 (20)90>64>6445.19
2010 (59)89.8>64>6445.5
2011 (50)88>64>6439.37
2012 (29)93.1>64>6461.01
2013 (42)83.3>64>6424.54
Total (200)88.5>64>6440.19
Metronidazole (R > 2 μg/mL)2009 (20)00.2510.3
2010 (59)00.250.250.2
2011 (50)00.250.250.22
2012 (29)00.250.50.2
2013 (42)00.250.250.15
Total (200)00.250.250.2
MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, J.; Seo, M.-R.; Kim, B.; Kim, J.; Bae, M.-H.; Pai, H. Genetic Relatedness of 5-Year Isolates of Clostridioides difficile Polymerase Chain Reaction Ribotype 017 Strains in a Hospital. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1229. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10101229

AMA Style

Kim J, Seo M-R, Kim B, Kim J, Bae M-H, Pai H. Genetic Relatedness of 5-Year Isolates of Clostridioides difficile Polymerase Chain Reaction Ribotype 017 Strains in a Hospital. Antibiotics. 2021; 10(10):1229. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10101229

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Jieun, Mi-Ran Seo, Bongyoung Kim, Jinyeong Kim, Mi-Hyun Bae, and Hyunjoo Pai. 2021. "Genetic Relatedness of 5-Year Isolates of Clostridioides difficile Polymerase Chain Reaction Ribotype 017 Strains in a Hospital" Antibiotics 10, no. 10: 1229. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10101229

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop