Next Article in Journal
Dietary Supplementation with Goji Berries (Lycium barbarum) Modulates the Microbiota of Digestive Tract and Caecal Metabolites in Rabbits
Next Article in Special Issue
Integrated Taxonomy Revealed Genetic Differences in Morphologically Similar and Non-Sympatric Scoliodon macrorhynchos and S. laticaudus
Previous Article in Journal
ACSL4 Directs Intramuscular Adipogenesis and Fatty Acid Composition in Pigs
Previous Article in Special Issue
Growth Modeling of the Giant Electric Ray Narcine entemedor in the Southern Gulf of California: Analyzing the Uncertainty of Three Data Sets
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Length at Maturity, Sex Ratio, and Proportions of Maturity of the Giant Electric Ray, Narcine entemedor, in Its Septentrional Distribution

by
Xchel Aurora Pérez-Palafox
1,
Enrique Morales-Bojórquez
2,
Hugo Aguirre-Villaseñor
3 and
Víctor Hugo Cruz-Escalona
1,*
1
Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Av. Instituto Politécnico Nacional S/N, Col. Playa Palo de Sta. Rita, La Paz 23096, Baja California Sur, Mexico
2
Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, Av. Instituto Politécnico Nacional 195, Col. Playa Palo de Santa Rita, La Paz 23096, Baja California Sur, Mexico
3
Instituto Nacional de Pesca y Acuacultura. Centro Regional de Investigación Acuícola y Pesquera, Calzada Sábalo-Cerritos S/N, Mazatlán 82112, Sinaloa, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2022, 12(1), 120; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12010120
Submission received: 11 November 2021 / Revised: 16 December 2021 / Accepted: 29 December 2021 / Published: 5 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sharks and Skates: Ecology, Distribution and Conservation)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The size at which 50 percent of a fish population reaches sexual maturity is an important parameter of life history and is useful for setting conservation goals and fishing efforts. Based on 305 individuals in a population of giant electric rays, Narcine entemedor, collected in artisanal fisheries in the Bahía de La Paz, Mexico in its northern distribution over a 2-year period, females were larger than males, but males dominated the sex ratio. Total length at maturity for females was 55.87 cm with mature females present all year; there was no apparent seasonality in the reproductive pattern. Using these data sets, there appeared to be continuous annual reproductive activity.

Abstract

The size at which a certain fraction of a fish population reaches sexual maturity is an important parameter of life history. The estimation of this parameter based on logistic or sigmoid models could provide different ogives and values of length at maturity, which must be analyzed and considered as a basic feature of biological reproduction for the species. A total of 305 individuals of Narcine entemedor (N. entemedor) were obtained from artisanal fisheries in the Bahía de La Paz, Mexico. For the organisms sampled, sexes were determined and total length (TL) in cm was measured from October 2013 to December 2015. The results indicated that the females were larger, ranging from 48.5 cm to 84 cm TL, while males varied from 41.5 cm to 58.5 cm TL. The sex ratio was dominated by males ranging from 45–55 cm TL, while females were more abundant from 60 to 85 cm TL. Mature females were present all year long, exhibiting a continuous annual reproductive cycle. The length at maturity data were described by the Gompertz model with value of 55.87 cm TL. The comparison between models, and the model selection between them, showed that the Gompertz model had maximum likelihood and smaller Akaike information criterion, indicating that this model was a better fit to the maturity proportion data of N. entemedor.

1. Introduction

The size at which a certain fraction of the fish population reaches sexual maturity is an important parameter of life history [1]. This information is relevant for demographic analysis, stock assessment, and providing information for fishery control rules, such as establishment of minimum legal length and closed fishing seasons [2,3]. In such analyses, one can achieve biological reference points, defined as metrics of stock statuses, such as fishing mortality values and biomass level [4,5].
The data used to estimate an appropriate size at sexual maturity should provide information on two aspects: (1) an observed proportion of physiologically mature individuals, meaning organisms capable of producing viable gametes, and (2) the proportion of these that are actually producing eggs at a given time [6]. Thus, the logistic model is most commonly used to describe the relation between body size and sexual maturity [1,7]. The plot of this model represents a proportion of mature females in each size class, consequently an S-shaped relationship with an asymptote approaching 1.0 for the largest sizes is commonly estimated. However, in some iteroparous species, not all females are physiologically mature during the reproductive season. In several cases reproduction occurs through batch fecundity (e.g., anchovies, sardines) and, for these species, the values of length at maturity are highly variable and the asymptote denoting the proportion of maturity will differ from 1.0 [6].
There are many methods for estimating the length at maturity, often referred to as the length at which 50% of the organisms are mature ( L 50 ) . These include the models of Gompertz [8], Lysack [9], and more recently White et al. [10]. In many studies, the criteria for selecting a model are often arbitrary [11,12]. Therefore, the estimation of L 50 parameters and their precision in these models are based solely on a single average model [13]. To have a better and more robust approach, the model selection based on information theory and maximum likelihood theory is a relatively new paradigm in which several models are compared to each other, evaluating the support of the observed data with respect to each model [13,14]. Studies in reproductive biology using multimodel inference to estimate L 50 are scarcely reported in the literature, and this is mainly in teleost fishes, such as bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) [15] and herring (Opistonema libertate) [3]. In elasmobranchs, particularly from Mexican waters, only the shark, Rhizoprionodon terraenovae [12], and the bat ray (Myliobatis californica) [16] have been analyzed using the approach previously described.
According to the data observed, the estimations of L 50 based on logistic or sigmoid models could provide different ogives, such that the choice of the candidate model influences the expected L 50 . In addition, its values could be biased whether the model used does not fitthe data set adequately, affecting the biological interpretation of the length at which 50% of the organisms are mature. This situation is crucial when the species exhibits viviparity, such as in several species of elasmobranchs. Biologically, the knowledge of L 50 does not indicate a maternity condition for all those females reaching this length. According to Walker [17] (pp. 81–127), the ogives of L 50 and the maturity condition are independent; particularly the L 50 could provide the beginning of the maternity condition. Therefore, the accuracy of L 50 is relevant because it would be indicating the females that are recruited to the reproductive stock. However, the adequate quantification of the number of births is necessary for the estimation of the size at maternity, which must be larger than the size at maturity. Hence, the first step is the estimation of an L 50 value that is sufficiently informative for simultaneously understanding the length at which 50% of the females are mature, as well as the beginning of their potential size at maternity. Consequently, the multimodel inference approach for estimating L 50 is a statistical procedure useful for this purpose.
According to this biological background, the giant electric ray, Narcine entemedor (Jordan and Starks, 1895), is identified as a viviparous species with a continuous annual reproductive cycle and limited histotrophy as a reproductive mode, exhibiting embryonic diapause [18]. The population is distributed from Bahía Magdalena, on the west coast of Baja California Sur to Peru, including the Gulf of California and Galapagos Islands [19,20]. This species is incidentally captured by artisanal fisheries in the Eastern Tropical Pacific and is bycatch from fisheries that target higher-valued teleost or crustaceans [21,22,23]. Given this incidental feature, the species has been poorly studied and there is limited biological information in the region. The information is mainly associated with descriptions about its reproductive biology, age, and growth, along with its food and feeding patterns; therefore, key population features based on quantitative analysis are necessary to understand the demography of this species. Thus, in this study, we reanalyzed the length at maturity for Narcine entemedor using a multimodel inference approach based on candidate models with different shapes, number of parameters, and biological assumptions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Collection of Samples

A total of 305 individuals were obtained from artisanal fisheries in the Bahía de La Paz, which is located in the Gulf of California, Mexico between 24°07′ and 24°21′ latitude north and 110°17′ and 110°40′ longitude west. The individuals collected are very common and abundant in the Gulf of California; the species is not protected throughout its range, and is a very well-known commercial species. Additionally, all applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. In this study, experimental use of organisms was not required. Sex was determined and total length was measured (TL, cm) for all individuals sampled from October 2013 through December 2015. The maturity data of N. entemedor were taken from Burgos-Vázquez et al. [18].

2.2. Criteria for Evaluating Maturity

Maturity in N. entemedor individuals was defined as immature (0) or mature (1), with macroscopic characteristics using the criteria proposed by Burgos-Vázquez et al. [18]. For females, the total length and degree of vitellogenesis of the ovarian follicles in the ovary, as well as the anterior oviduct and uterus condition, were considered. Females that presented ovaries with translucent ovarian follicles ≤5 cm and abundant ovarian stroma, slight differentiation between the anterior oviducts and the uterus, and uteri between 0.2 cm and 1.2 cm wide without eggs or embryos were considered as immature. Females that presented ovaries with yellow ovarian follicles ≥6 cm, a uterus that was well differentiated from the anterior oviducts, with widths ≥1.3 cm, with or without eggs or embryos were considered as mature. Based on this microscopic evidence, the macroscopic criteria for defining the binomial classification (0,1) were validated such that the macroscopic and microscopic condition of the ovaries and uterus showed matches [18]. Consequently, the uncertainty associated to the binomial classification describing the observed length at maturity from the macroscopic characteristics of N. entemedor is negligible.

2.3. Sex Ratio

Sex ratio was calculated monthly. The sex ratios were compared using a chi-squared (X2) test, assuming that the sex ratio was 0.5. The null hypothesis was rejected if the X2 estimated value was greater than 3.84 (α < 0.05, df = 1) [24,25]. Additionally, the sex ratio was also represented for each 5 cm (TL) length class.

2.4. Length at Maturity

Length at maturity of females was estimated using a binomial code (immature = 0 and mature = 1), the data were modeled into two length-at-maturity models (Table 1). Pi was the estimated proportion of mature fish in size class i, exp refers to the exponent which is the number of times a number is multiplied by itself, TLi was the total length of size class i, γ was the rate parameter related to the speed of size change from non-reproductive to reproductive status,   L 50 was the length at which 50% of the organisms were mature, ε was the maximum proportion of maturity reached, L 95 was the length at which 95% of the organisms are mature, and µ was the amplitude of the maturity ogive. The WHI equation was modified, expressing it as a three-parameter function for modeling changes in the proportion maturity; thus, the ε parameter varied as follows: 0 ≤ ε ≤ 1, which allowed for the maximum fraction of mature females to be less than 1 [6].
The objective function for estimating the parameters in the candidate length-at-maturity models were fitted by minimizing the negative log-likelihood ( ln ) [26]:
ln = i = 1 n [ m i × ln ( P i 1 P i ) + P i × ln ( k ) ]
where n i was the number of individuals in size class i, m i was the number of mature fish in size class i, and the quantity κ = ( n i m i ) was defined as the binomial coefficient and was computed as κ = n i ! m i ! × ( n i m i ) ! Given that these models exhibited a correlation between parameters, estimates of confidence intervals (CI) in each model were obtained using the likelihood contour method [27]. A chi-squared distribution with df = 2 was used, such that values that were equal to or less than 5.99 were accepted within the CI [24]. The chi-squared estimator was [28]:
C I = 2 [ ln ( θ e s t ) ( ln ( θ i ) ) ] χ d f , 1 α 2
where ln ( θ e s t ) was the negative log-likelihood of the most likely value of θ i , ln ( θ i ) was the negative log-likelihood based on hypotheses of the value of θ i , χ 1 α 2 was the value of the chi-squared distribution with a confidence level of 1-α = 0.05 and df = 2 [28]. Model performance was evaluated using Akaike’s information criterion (AIC), where the best model was the one with the lowest AIC value [29,30].

3. Results

In total, 260 females and 45 males were collected from October 2013 to December 2015 in the Bahía de La Paz, Mexico. Females ranged in size from 48.5 cm to 84 cm TL, males ranged from 41.5 cm to 58.5 cm TL. Thus, the females were larger than males in the biological samples during the study period. The sex ratio of Narcine entemedor showed that there was a dominance of males in the range of 45–55 cm TL; conversely, the females were more abundant from 60 cm to 85 cm TL (Figure 1). The monthly sex ratio showed a dominance of females and an absence of males was observed during January, April, and June. However, during July–September, the presence of males increased (Figure 2). Nonetheless, the sex ratio assessed from the X2 test (p < 0.05) showed that only during three months the sex ratio was 1:1. These months were March (X2 = 1.80, df = 1), September (X2 = 0.75, df = 1), and November (X2 = 1.80, df = 1) (Table 2).
All males analyzed in the present study were mature. Of the total number of females analyzed, 17.7% were immature. The proportion of maturity, expressed as the relationship between immature and mature females, showed that the larger females of 55 cm TL were mature, and the dominance of mature females was observed from 65 cm TL. An overlap between immature and mature females was identified for individuals smaller than 70 cm TL (Figure 3). The monthly proportions of maturity showed that mature females were present all year round, with the first change in proportions of immature females observed from January to April, with high values during January–February, and low proportions during March–April. A second change in the proportion of immature females occurred with a decrease from May to September, and the third change was an increase in proportions of immature females observed from October to December (Figure 4). These results suggested that there was no seasonality in the reproductive pattern for N. entemedor, given than the females were mature from 55 cm TL and in high proportions throughout the year.
The estimates of length at maturity and parameters for each model are shown in Table 3. The L 50 value estimated through GOM and WHI showed a difference of approximately 2 cm, where the GOM exhibited a smaller value. The parameterization of WHI indicated that the asymptotic value expressed from ε was 1, indicating that the females from 60.64 cm TL progressively increased their maturity proportions at length until reaching the total length of 85 cm, although the asymptote was promptly described by both models from 65 cm. The comparison between models and the model selection between them showed that the GOM model had the maximum likelihood (73.6) and smaller AIC, indicating that this model was a better fit to the maturity proportion data of N. entemedor. A partial overlap between trajectories estimated that mature proportions for the two models were observed. The trajectories computed for both models showed that the GOM underestimated the maturity proportions at length for smaller lengths (55 cm TL) (Figure 5).

4. Discussion

4.1. Length at Maturity

This study reanalyzed the length at maturity data for N. entemedor, mainly because an interesting feature was observed in previous studies. This feature was the symmetry of the model reported and its performance for fitting observed data, which was apparently well distributed around the model. Our results showed a lack of symmetry in the observed data fitted to the L 50 model. Commonly, the observations could be expected, assuming that the cumulative distribution function was symmetric; however, the data set provided more information close to the asymptotic value, therefore the functional form of both models and observed data were important for estimating L 50 . In this study, two models were statistically compared (GOM and WHI), avoiding an analysis based on mathematical expressions yielding similar estimates of L 50 , such as was documented by Oviedo-Pérez et al. [12] and García-Rodríguez et al. [16]. The estimates obtained from GOM indicated that the L 50 value for this species was similar to the length reported by Burgos-Vázquez et al. [18], while the WHI provided a larger L 50 value. This comparison suggested that the data set was distributed around the model, covering all the size classes. Whether this condition was observed or not could have caused misspecifications in the models, providing bias in L 50 estimates with evident poor fit [31,32,33].
Estimates of length at maturity were different between the two models used. The values associated with the Akaike information criterion indicated values of 151.16 (GOM) and 151.94 (WHI); consequently, the GOM was the best model selected using the maximum likelihood values estimated [30]. In this study, the WHI was implemented for the final estimation of L 50 , the main assumption was that the reproductive event in Narcine entemedor was a nonlinear process related to its total length, assuming that not all mature females had reproductive activity at the same time; thus, the maximum proportion of maturity reached will be different to an asymptotic value of 1 [6] (pp. 81–127, [17]). However, this assumption was not satisfied for this species. Conversely, the proportion of maturity observed in N. entemedor was sufficiently informative for an asymptote equal to 1, this was clearly influenced for females larger than the 65 cm size class (TL), indicating that it was a coincident with a continuous annual reproductive cycle and the absence of a reproductive peak for mature females.

4.2. Features of the Reproductive Biology Affecting L 50

This analysis was supported by biological information obtained from commercial artisanal fisheries, where N. entemedor was not a target species. Consequently, the data were limited, nonetheless there was the biological information necessary for analyzing the basic features of reproduction for the giant electric ray. We observed that the sex ratio of Narcine entemedor was dominated by males with a total length less than 55 cm, while the females with a total length above 65 cm were more abundant. Females were dominant across all months observed through the annual cycle. According to Villavicencio-Garayzar [19], the males of this species are scarce; thus, the annual sex ratio estimated during 1992 was ~11:1. This change in sex ratio could be attributed to differences in the growth pattern by sex. Smith et al. [34] reported for Hypanus dipterura, that the age structure of the population was sexually dimorphic, in that males had a longevity of 19 years while that of the females was 28 years. A similar age structure was found for Himatura astra, in which the males had 19 age classes and the females had 30 age classes [35]. A similar pattern was described for Platyrhina sinensis, with a maximum age reported for males of 5 years and for females the respective age was 12 years [36].
The length structure of Narcine entemedor was also different by sex, with females being larger than males. Similarly, for Hypanus sayi (H. sayi), Torpedo torpedo (T. torpedo), and Torpedo marmorata (T. marmorata) the females attained a larger size than the males [37,38]. For H. sayi, the largest female had a 72.9 cm disc width (DW) and the largest male had a 52.1 cm DW [37], while for T. torpedo, the total length reported for females was 47.7 cm TL and for males it was 44.5 cm TL. For T. marmorata, the difference was also 20 cm TL (55.3 cm TL for females and 36.4 cm TL for males). Additionally, in T. torpedo, the sex ratio did not differ among size groups, but in T. marmorata, the presence of females exceeded males at sizes >34.1 cm TL [38]. According to Rolim et al. [39], the length structure of Narcine brasiliensis is different between males (from 23.6 cm to 38.0 cm LT) and females (from 23.7 cm to 47.0 cm LT). The dominance of females measured from sex ratio for the populations of rays previously referred to were always higher than males, with females attaining larger sizes.
According to Koob and Callard [40], the reproductive cycles in elasmobranchs can be classified into three types, made up of distinct species assemblages: (1) continuous breeders, (2) seasonal breeders, and (3) punctuated breeders. Narcine entemedor is classified as an organism with lecithotrophic viviparity. Lecithotrophy is a developmental pattern in which yolk, produced by the maternal liver and sequestered in the yolk sac, provides embryonic nutrition [17]. However, Burgos-Vázquez et al. [18] suggested that the giant electric ray presented limited histotrophy as a reproductive mode and has a continuous annual reproductive cycle; one peak of ovulation occurs between July and September, but two peaks of parturition occur (minor peak in January–February and major peak in August–September). In the Bahía de La Paz, the reproductive period of Narcine entemedor was not temporally defined because the presence of a reproductive peak for mature females was not observed from the mature/immature ratio. This feature could be associated to its northernmost distribution zone, where the environmental conditions (e.g., food, temperature) have an influence on its population structure and reproductive strategy.
Species with lecithotrophic oviparity, in which a continuous annual reproductive cycle has been reported, are relatively commonly. These include Raja clavata (Gulf of Gabés) with an absence of a reproductive peak [41]. This species attains maturity at a younger age off the Strait of Sicily, meanwhile in North Wales the maturity is commonly observed at an older age [42,43]. Conversely, Leucoraja naevus (L. naevus) has a reproductive peak in Southern European waters (January–May), Celtic Seas (February), and the North Sea (September–December) [44]. Additionally, both species exhibit a latitudinal gradient in size structure: Raja clavate (R. clavate) was larger in the Celtic Seas (98 cm TL) than in the North Sea (92 cm TL). For L. naevus, the maximum total length was 69 cm in the Celtic Seas and 62 cm TL in the North Sea [45].
The length at maturity of N. entemedor off the southwest coast of the Baja California Peninsula (Bahía Magdalena) was reported to vary between 62 cm and 63 cm TL. This length interval represented approximately 68% of its maximum total length [19]. Meanwhile, Burgos-Vázquez et al. [18] estimated a value of 58.5 cm TL (CI = 51.7–65.4 cm TL) in the Bahía de la Paz (Gulf of California) using a logistic regression model. In this study, the length at maturity was less than that previously reported by Villavicencio-Garayzar [19]. This value was supported by a sigmoid model (GOM) with a different trajectory in comparison to WHI. The advantage of the GOM was that it had a more flexible form; it had a rapid inflexion point in the first length classes, showing a slower approach to the maximum fraction of mature females (asymptotic value). Thus, the comparison among the length-at-maturity models more frequently used and reported in the literature showed that the GOM fitted to the data was better than the logistic model.
For several batoid populations, changes in length structure and L 50 estimates have been found, mainly through latitudinal gradients. For N. entemedor, differences were found in the Equatorial zone, where this species attains larger sizes (110 cm TL) and L 50 = 70 cm TL [46]. This study reported lower values, with the maximum length being 84 cm TL and L 50 = 55.8 cm TL. Moreover, Raja clavata distributed in the Atlantic Ocean from Iceland to southern Africa [47] has differences in L 50 estimates. According to McCully et al. [45], the females inhabiting the North Sea showed the values L 50 = 73.7 cm and 77.1 cm TL, versus those from the Black Sea varying between L 50 = 66.7 cm and 74.6 cm TL. Similar results were reported for Leucoraja naevus distributed from Norway to Morocco and Tunisia, including in the Mediterranean Sea [48]. McCully et al. [45] found significant statistical differences between estimates from the North Sea ( L 50 = 53.6 cm TL) and the Celtic Sea ( L 50 = 59.8 cm TL).

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, considering that Narcine entemedor is distributed from the northwest Mexican Pacific to Peru, the population in this study inhabited the northernmost limit for the species. Therefore, reproductive biology values were different from populations elsewhere. This included sex ratio, proportions of maturity, and length at maturity over a year’s period. This species did not appear to have a reproductive peak and had a continuous annual reproductive cycle. The estimates of L 50 for this species showed that a sigmoid model (GOM) was better than the logistic model.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.A.P.-P., H.A.-V. and E.M.-B.; methodology, X.A.P.-P., H.A.-V. and E.M.-B.; validation, X.A.P.-P. and E.M.-B.; formal analysis, X.A.P.-P. and E.M.-B.; investigation, X.A.P.-P., E.M.-B. and V.H.C.-E.; resources, V.H.C.-E.; data curation, X.A.P.-P. and E.M.-B.; writing—original draft preparation, X.A.P.-P., E.M.-B. and V.H.C.-E.; writing—review and editing, X.A.P.-P., E.M.-B. and V.H.C.-E.; supervision, E.M.-B.; project administration, V.H.C.-E.; funding acquisition, V.H.C.-E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología de México (SEP-CONACyT/CB-2012/180894) and Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas (IPN-SIP/20210127). XAPP was a recipient of the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología México (CONACYT) postgraduate fellowship (contract number 290124). VHCE was supported by programs at the Instituto Politécnico Nacional: Estímulo al Desempeño de los Investigadores (EDI) and Comisión de Operación y Fomento de Actividades Académicas (COFAA). E.M.B., H.A.V. and V.H.C.E. are fellows of Sistema Nacional de Investigadores (CONACyT-SNI).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval was not required for the animal study because the specimens used within this analysis came from coastal artisanal fishermen from La Paz Bay, Mexico, who have legal licenses for the commercial harvest (CONAPESCA-103053993316-1). We used the animals captured by the fishermen once they are brought to their fishing grounds, at that time the specimens are dead, and we then took advantage for the collection of biological samples. We did not participate in fishing operations, therefore, at no time did we handle live specimens, and thus, the study complies with the ethical guidelines supported by our institution.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to technicians at the Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas of the Instituto Politécnico Nacional, México and students and researchers who assisted with field and laboratory work. The authors thank Juan Higuera for his collaboration in fieldwork and specimen processing. Gregor M. Cailliet, Moss Landing Marine Laboratories (MLML), and Mark S. Peterson (University of Southern Mississippi (USM)) provided useful comments that improved the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chen, Y.; Paloheimo, J.E. Estimating fish length and age at 50% maturity using a logistic type model. Aquat. Sci. 1994, 56, 206–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cerdenares-Ladrón de Guevara, G.; Morales-Bojórquez, E.; Rodriguez-Sánchez, R. Age and growth of the sailfish Istiophorus platypterus (Istiophoridae) in the Gulf of Tehuantepec, Mexico. Mar. Biol. Res. 2011, 7, 488–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jacob-Cervantes, M.L.; Aguirre-Villaseñor, H. Inferencia multimodelo y selección de modelos aplicados a la determinación de L50 para la sardina crinuda Opisthonema libertate del sur del golfo de California. Cienc. Pesq. 2014, 22, 61–68. [Google Scholar]
  4. Caddy, J.F.; Mahon, R. Reference Points for Fisheries Management; FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. No. 347; FAO: Rome, Italy, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  5. Midway, S.R.; Scharf, F.S. Histological analysis reveals larger size at maturity for southern flounder with implications for biological reference points. Mar. Coast. Fish. Dyn. Manag. Ecosyst. Sci. 2012, 4, 628–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Restrepo, V.R.; Watson, R.A. An approach to modeling crustacean egg-bearing fractions as a function of size and season. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1991, 48, 1431–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Roa, R.; Ernst, B.; Tapia, F. Estimation of size at sexual maturity: An evaluation of analytical and resampling procedures. Fish. Bull. 1999, 97, 570–580. [Google Scholar]
  8. Gompertz, B. On the nature of the function expressive of the law of human mortality, and on a new mode of determining the value of life contingencies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 1825, 115, 513–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lysack, W. 1979 Lake Winnipeg Fish Stock Assessment Program; Manitoba Department of Natural Resources; Fisheries Branch: Winnipeg, MB, Canada, 1980.
  10. White, T.; Hall, G.; Potter, C. Size and age compositions and reproductive biology of the nervous shark Carcharhinus cautus in a large subtropical embayment, including an analysis of growth during pre- and postnatal life. Mar. Biol. 2002, 1153–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Flores, L.; Ernst, B.; Parma, A.M. Growth pattern of the sea urchin, Loxechinus albus (Molina, 1782) in Southern Chile: Evaluation of growth models. Mar. Biol. 2010, 157, 967–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Oviedo-Pérez, J.L.; Zea-De la Cruz, H.; Aguirre-Villaseñor, H.; Meiners-Mandujano, C.; Jiménez-Badillo, L.; González-Ocarranza, L. Talla de madurez sexual del tiburón Rhizoprionodon terraenovae en Veracruz, México. Cienc. Pesq. 2014, 22, 37–45. [Google Scholar]
  13. Katsanevakis, S.; Maravelias, C.D. Modelling fish growth: Multi-model inference as a better alternative to a priori using von Bertalanffy equation. Fish Fish. 2008, 9, 178–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Morales-Bojórquez, E.; Aguirre-Villaseñor, H.; Cerdenares-Ladrón De Guevara, G. Confrontación de hipótesis múltiples en pesquerías, teoría de la información y selección de modelos. Cienc. Pesq. 2014, 22, 9–10. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhu, G.P.; Dai, X.J.; Song, L.M.; Xu, L.X. Size at sexual maturity of bigeye tuna Thunnus obesus (Perciformes: Scombridae) in the tropical waters: A comparative analysis. Turk. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2011, 11, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. García-Rodríguez, A.; Hernández-Herrera, A.; Galván-Magaña, F.; Ceballos-Vázquez, B.P.; Pelamatti, T.; Tovar-Ávila, J. Estimation of the size at sexual maturity of the bat ray (Myliobatis californica) in Northwestern Mexico through a multi-model inference. Fish. Res. 2020, 231, 105712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hamlett, W.C. Reproductive Biology and Phylogeny of Chondrichthyes: Sharks, Batoids and Chimaeras; Hamlett, W.C., Ed.; Reproductive Biology and Phylogeny; Science Publishers, Inc.: Enfield, NH, USA, 2005; ISBN 9781578082711. [Google Scholar]
  18. Burgos-Vázquez, M.I.; Mejía-Falla, P.A.; Cruz-Escalona, V.H.; Brown-Peterson, N.J. Reproductive strategy of the giant electric ray in the Southern Gulf of California. Mar. Coast. Fish. 2017, 9, 577–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Villavicencio-Garayzar, C.J. Taxonomía, Abundancia Estacional, Edad y Crecimiento y Biología Reproductiva de Narcine entemedor Jordan y Starks (Chondrichthyes; Narcinidae), en Bahía Almejas, B.C.S, México. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo Leon, San Nicolás de los Garza, México, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  20. Robertson, D.R.; Allen, G. Peces Costeros del Pacífico Oriental Tropical: Un Sistema de Información en Línea. Available online: https://biogeodb.stri.si.edu/sftep/es/pages (accessed on 8 November 2021).
  21. Clarke, T.M.; Espinoza, M.; Ahrens, R.; Wehrtmann, I.S. Elasmobranch bycatch associated with the shrimp trawl fishery off the Pacific Coast of Costa Rica, Central America. Fish. Bull. 2016, 114, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Márquez-Farías, J.F. The artisanal ray fishery in the Gulf of California: Development, fisheries research and management issues. IUCN/SSC Shark Spec. Group 2002, 14, 12–13. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ramírez-Amaro, S.R.; Cartamil, D.; Galvan-Magaña, F.; Gonzalez-Barba, G.; Graham, J.B.; Carrera-Fernandez, M.; Escobar-Sanchez, O.; Sosa-Nishizaki, O.; Rochin-Alamillo, A. The artisanal elasmobranch fishery of the Pacific Coast of Baja California, Mexico. Sci. Mar. 2013, 77, 473–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zar, J. Biostatistical Analysis; Pearson Prentice-Hall: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010; ISBN 9788578110796. [Google Scholar]
  25. Cerdenares-Ladrón de Guevara, G.; Morales-Bojórquez, E.; Rodríguez-Jaramillo, C.; Hernández-Herrera, A.; Abitia-Cárdenas, A. Seasonal reproduction of sailfish Istiophorus platypterus from the Southeast Mexican Pacific. Mar. Biol. Res. 2013, 9, 407–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Brouwer, S.L.; Griffiths, M.H. Reproductive biology of carpenter seabream (Argyrozona argyrozona) (Pisces: Sparidae) in a marine protected area. Fish. Bull. 2005, 103, 258–269. [Google Scholar]
  27. Luquin-Covarrubias, M.A.; Morales-Bojórquez, E.; González-Peláez, S.S.; Hidalgo-De-La-Toba, J.Á.; Lluch-Cota, D.B. Modeling of growth depensation of geoduck clam Panopea globosa based on a multimodel inference approach. J. Shellfish. Res. 2016, 35, 379–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Haddon, M. Modelling and Quantitative Methods in Fisheries; Statistics/Biology; Chapman and Hall: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2001; ISBN 9781584881773. [Google Scholar]
  29. Burnham, K.P.; Anderson, D.R. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information Theoretic Approach, 2nd ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2002; ISBN 0387953647. [Google Scholar]
  30. Okamura, H.; Punt, A.E.; Semba, Y.; Ichinokawa, M. Marginal increment analysis: A new statistical approach of testing for temporal periodicity in fish age verification. J. Fish Biol. 2013, 82, 1239–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Remya Mohan, S.; Harikrishnan, M.; Sherly Williams, E. Reproductive biology of a gobiid fish Oxyurichthys tentacularis (Valenciennes, 1837) inhabiting ashtamudi lake, S. India. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 2018, 34, 1099–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chelapurath Radhakrishnan, R.; Kuttanelloor, R.; Balakrishna, M.K. Reproductive biology of the endemic cyprinid fish Hypselobarbus thomassi (Day, 1874) from Kallada River in the Western Ghats, India. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 2020, 36, 604–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chang, H.-Y.; Sun, C.-L.; Yeh, S.-Z.; Chang, Y.-J.; Su, N.-J.; DiNardo, G. Reproductive biology of female striped marlin Kajikia audax in the Western Pacific Ocean. J. Fish Biol. 2018, 92, 105–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Smith, W.D.; Cailliet, G.M.; Melendez, E.M. Maturity and growth characteristics of a commercially exploited stingray, Dasyatis dipterura. Mar. Freshw. Res. 2007, 58, 54–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jacobsen, I.P.; Bennett, M.B. Life history of the blackspotted whipray Himantura astra. J. Fish Biol. 2011, 78, 1249–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kume, G.; Furumitsu, K.; Yamaguchi, A. Age, growth and age at sexual maturity of fan ray Platyrhina sinensis (Batoidea: Platyrhinidae) in Ariake Bay, Japan. Fish. Sci. 2008, 74, 736–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Snelson, F.F., Jr.; Williams-Hooper, S.E.; Schmid, T.H. Biology of the bluntnose stingray, Dasyatis sayi, in Florida Coastal Lagoons. Bull. Mar. Sci. 1989, 45, 15–25. [Google Scholar]
  38. Consalvo, I.; Scacco, U.; Romanelli, M.; Vacchi, M. Comparative study on the reproductive biology of Torpedo torpedo (Linnaeus, 1758) and T. Marmorata (Risso, 1810) in the Central Mediterranean Sea. Sci. Mar. 2007, 71, 213–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rolim, F.A.; Rotundo, M.M.; Vaske-Júnior, T. Notes on the reproductive biology of the brazilian electric ray Narcine brasiliensis (Elasmobranchii: Narcinidae). J. Fish Biol. 2016, 89, 1105–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Koob, T.J.; Callard, I.P. Reproductive endocrinology of female elasmobranchs: Lessons from the Little Skate (Raja erinacea) and Spiny Dogfish (Squalus acanthias). J. Exp. Zool. 1999, 284, 557–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kadri, H.; Marouani, S.; Saïdi, B.; Bradai, M.N.; Bouaïn, A.; Morize, E. Age, growth, sexual maturity and reproduction of the thornback ray, Raja clavata (L.), of the Gulf of Gabès (South-Central Mediterranean Sea). Mar. Biol. Res. 2014, 10, 416–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Cannizzaro, L.; Garofalo, G.; Levi, D.; Rizzo, P.; Gancitano, S. Raja clavata (Linneo,1758) Nel Canale Di Sicilia: Crescita, distribuzione e abbondanza. Biol. Mar. Mediterr. 1995, 2, 257–262. [Google Scholar]
  43. Whittamore, J.M.; McCarthy, I.D. The population biology of the thornback ray, Raja clavata in Caernarfon Bay, North Wales. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 2005, 85, 1089–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Maia, C.; Erzini, K.; Serra-Pereira, B.; Figueiredo, I. Reproductive biology of cuckoo ray Leucoraja naevus. J. Fish Biol. 2012, 81, 1285–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. McCully, S.R.; Scott, F.; Ellis, J.R. Lengths at maturity and conversion factors for skates (Rajidae) around the British Isles, with an analysis of data in the literature. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2012, 69, 1812–1822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Palma-Chávez, J.J. Biología Reproductiva de Las Rayas: Mariposa Gymnura marmorata (Cooper, 1863) y Torpedo Narcine entemedor (Jordan and Starks, 1895) Desembarcados En Santa Rosa-Salinas. Master’s Thesis, Universidad Laica Eloy Alfaro de Manabí, Manta, Ecuador, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  47. Ellis, J. Raja clavata. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: E.T39399A103110667; 2016; Available online: http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-3.RLTS.T39399A103110667.en (accessed on 8 November 2021).
  48. Ellis, J.; Dulvy, N.; Walls, R. Leucoraja naevus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015: E.T161626A48949434; 2015; Available online: http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2015-1.RLTS.T161626A48949434.en (accessed on 8 November 2021).
Figure 1. Sex ratio female:male (F:M) of giant electric rays, Narcine entemedor, by size intervals.
Figure 1. Sex ratio female:male (F:M) of giant electric rays, Narcine entemedor, by size intervals.
Animals 12 00120 g001
Figure 2. Monthly sex ratio (F:M) of giant electric rays, Narcine entemedor.
Figure 2. Monthly sex ratio (F:M) of giant electric rays, Narcine entemedor.
Animals 12 00120 g002
Figure 3. Proportion at length of immature (dark gray bars) and mature (light gray bars) females of Narcine entemedor throughout the study period (n = 214). The sample size is denoted above each bar.
Figure 3. Proportion at length of immature (dark gray bars) and mature (light gray bars) females of Narcine entemedor throughout the study period (n = 214). The sample size is denoted above each bar.
Animals 12 00120 g003
Figure 4. Monthly proportions of immature (dark gray bars) and mature (light gray bars) females of Narcine entemedor throughout the study period (n = 214). The sample size is denoted above each bar.
Figure 4. Monthly proportions of immature (dark gray bars) and mature (light gray bars) females of Narcine entemedor throughout the study period (n = 214). The sample size is denoted above each bar.
Animals 12 00120 g004
Figure 5. Sigmoid and logistic models (lines) fitted to the length at maturity data (points) for female giant electric rays, Narcine entemedor.
Figure 5. Sigmoid and logistic models (lines) fitted to the length at maturity data (points) for female giant electric rays, Narcine entemedor.
Animals 12 00120 g005
Table 1. Candidate length-at-maturity models used to estimate L 50 for Narcine entemedor.
Table 1. Candidate length-at-maturity models used to estimate L 50 for Narcine entemedor.
ModelAbbreviationFunctionSource
GompertzGOM P i = e x p e x p γ ( T L i L 50 ) [8]
WhiteWHI P i = ε 1 + e x p [ ln ( 19 ) ( T L i L 50 ) ( L 95 L 50 ) ] [10]
Table 2. Monthly values of chi-squared (X2) test estimated for Narcine entemedor from the Bahía de La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico.
Table 2. Monthly values of chi-squared (X2) test estimated for Narcine entemedor from the Bahía de La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico.
FemaleMaleX2
January21010.50
February37413.28
March821.80
April804.00
May35313.47
June1708.50
July33134.35
August33106.15
September1590.75
October1616.62
November821.80
December29113.07
Table 3. Parameters (in bold) and confidence intervals (in parenthesis) estimated from negative ln-likelihood contours (p < 0.05). L 50 is the length at which 50% of the organisms were mature, L 95 is the length at which 95% of the organisms are mature.
Table 3. Parameters (in bold) and confidence intervals (in parenthesis) estimated from negative ln-likelihood contours (p < 0.05). L 50 is the length at which 50% of the organisms were mature, L 95 is the length at which 95% of the organisms are mature.
ModelL50 γ L95ε ln AIC
GOM58.50
(56.2–60)
0.231
(0.16–0.31)
73.585151.16
WHI60.64
(58.6–62.2)
70.37
(67.6–74.4)
172.970151.94
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pérez-Palafox, X.A.; Morales-Bojórquez, E.; Aguirre-Villaseñor, H.; Cruz-Escalona, V.H. Length at Maturity, Sex Ratio, and Proportions of Maturity of the Giant Electric Ray, Narcine entemedor, in Its Septentrional Distribution. Animals 2022, 12, 120. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12010120

AMA Style

Pérez-Palafox XA, Morales-Bojórquez E, Aguirre-Villaseñor H, Cruz-Escalona VH. Length at Maturity, Sex Ratio, and Proportions of Maturity of the Giant Electric Ray, Narcine entemedor, in Its Septentrional Distribution. Animals. 2022; 12(1):120. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12010120

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pérez-Palafox, Xchel Aurora, Enrique Morales-Bojórquez, Hugo Aguirre-Villaseñor, and Víctor Hugo Cruz-Escalona. 2022. "Length at Maturity, Sex Ratio, and Proportions of Maturity of the Giant Electric Ray, Narcine entemedor, in Its Septentrional Distribution" Animals 12, no. 1: 120. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12010120

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop