Next Article in Journal
Diet and Exercise Modulate GH-IGFs Axis, Proteolytic Markers and Myogenic Regulatory Factors in Juveniles of Gilthead Sea Bream (Sparus aurata)
Previous Article in Journal
Hepatic Proteomic Analysis Reveals That Enhanced Carboxylic Acid Metabolism and Oxidoreduction Promote Muscle and Fat Deposition in Muscovy Duck
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Effect of the Dietary Inclusion of Crude Glycerin in Pre-Starter and Starter Diets for Piglets
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Feeding Crude Glycerin to Finishing Iberian Crossbred Pigs: Effects on Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, and Blood Parameters

by
Silvia Martínez-Miró
*,
Josefa Madrid
,
Miguel José López
,
Juan Orengo
,
Cristian Jesús Sánchez
and
Fuensanta Hernández
Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Regional Campus of International Excellence “Mare Nostrum”, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2021, 11(8), 2181; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082181
Submission received: 11 June 2021 / Revised: 12 July 2021 / Accepted: 20 July 2021 / Published: 23 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Use of Cereal Byproducts in Animal Nutrition)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Crude glycerin can be used as a substitute for some feed ingredients in white pig diets. However, there are few reports on its use in Iberian crossbred pigs. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of three levels of crude glycerin (0, 50, and 100 g/kg) on performance parameters, nutrient digestibility, and blood parameters of Iberian × Duroc pigs during the last phase of fattening. The results show that the addition of glycerin did not affect average daily gain, average feed intake, or feed conversion ratio. Digestibility of dry matter, organic matter, and crude protein and serum parameter concentrations were statistically similar among the evaluated treatments. It is concluded that crude glycerin up to 100 g/kg could be included in the diets of Iberian pigs for the last fattening phase with no negative effects.

Abstract

A total of 192 Iberian × Duroc pigs kept under intensive conditions were used to investigate the effects of feeding crude glycerin on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and blood parameters. Animals were blocked by initial body weight (96.0 ± 11.3 kg) and allotted to pens (16 pigs per pen). Pens were assigned randomly to one of three dietary treatments (four pens per treatment). Dietary treatments contained 0, 5, or 10% of crude glycerin proportionally substituting for wheat (G0, G5, and G10, respectively). Diets were formulated to be isoenergetic and isoaminoacidic. No significant effect of crude glycerin was observed on average daily gain, average feed intake, or feed conversion ratio. The apparent total tract digestibility of dry matter, organic matter, and crude protein was no different between treatments. Total serum protein, albumin, glucose, insulin, and IGF-1 were not affected by glycerin inclusion. In conclusion, crude glycerin up to 100 g/kg can be included in the diets of finishing Iberian crossbred pigs without any negative effect on growth performance, digestibility, or serum metabolic parameters.

1. Introduction

The increasing demand for transportation fuels, coupled with decreasing crude oil reserves and a growing awareness of climate change has increased global interest in biodiesel. Biodiesel is produced by transesterification of vegetable oils or animal fats with an alcohol present as a catalyst. This reaction yields a considerable amount of crude glycerin as a byproduct, approximately 10% by weight of the biodiesel produced [1]. During recent years, there has been much interest in using crude glycerin as a feed ingredient for livestock. Several studies have reported that crude glycerin is well digested and utilized by pigs as a source of energy [2,3,4,5]. Different concentrations of crude glycerin have shown no effects on growth performance, carcass composition, or meat quality: up to 10% [5,6,7,8,9], 14% [10], and 16% [11]. Most studies conducted on pigs have focused on the use of crude glycerin to feed commercial and conventional breeds such as Large White and Landrace, with a slaughter weight of about 110 kg, but very little information is available regarding its use as a feed ingredient in diets for traditional pigs with high slaughter weight such as Iberian pigs (IB).
The IB is an autochthonous breed in the southwest of Spain for which the traditional production system is in outdoor conditions, based on the rearing of pure Iberian pigs [12]. The productivity of the sows (fewer than 14 weaned piglets /sow/year) and the fattening pigs is low (feed conversion ratio from 25 to 160 kg body weight (BW) greater than 4.0) [12,13]. However, the marbling of Iberian pig meat is typically abundant and evident, much more intense than the meat from commercial genotypes, which is a direct consequence of the high intramuscular fat (IMF) content [14]. The IB sector is of great economic importance in Spain due to the high acceptance of premium cured products. The increasing production of pigs of the IB type has allowed the sector to expand internationally to satisfy consumer demand for top quality meat.
Currently, only 20% of the IB pigs slaughtered in Spain are produced under traditional systems [12] while a high proportion are reared indoors, crossed with Duroc sire lines, fed concentrate-based diets, and slaughtered at 140–150 kg BW [13]. The use of non-conventional raw materials may provide greater flexibility in the formulation of their diets, especially when these pigs are reared under intensive growing systems.
A previous study reported that 100 g/kg of glycerin can partially replace wheat without affecting feed efficiency or nutrient digestibility in Iberian crossbred pigs from 50 to 100 kg BW [15], but the effects of adding glycerin in the late fattening stage of these pigs are still not known. Therefore, the objective of this research was to study the effects of supplementing the diet with crude glycerin on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and blood parameters in finishing Iberian crossbred pigs reared indoors.

2. Materials and Methods

All experimental procedures were approved by the University of Murcia Research and Ethics Committee (nº A-13170805) and followed the European Union guidelines for the care and use of research animals (Directive 2010/63/EU of the EU Parliament and the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes).

2.1. Experimental Design, Animals and Diets

The trial was conducted at a commercial fattening farm located in southeast Spain over a 74-days period. The study involved 192 Iberian × Duroc crossbred pigs sorted by initial body weight (average initial BW 96.0 ± 11.3 kg) and randomly allotted to pens balanced by gender (half barrows and half gilts). The pens were assigned to one of the three dietary treatments, with four pens per treatment. Each pen housed 16 animals (2 m2/pig) and it was provided with two feeders and two nipple drinkers in accordance with current Spanish legislation on minimum standards for the protection of pigs [16]. All pens were located in the same barn unit, and room temperature was kept between 18 and 26 °C. All animals were reared under the same environmental conditions under an intensive production regime. From the growing period to the beginning of the experimental fattening time (25–100 kg BW), animals were managed in accordance with standard commercial procedures. They received the same standard grower diets according to the Spanish Foundation for the Development of Animal Nutrition (Fundación Española para el Desarrollo de la Nutrición Animal (FEDNA) [17]. Pigs during experimental period received either a barley–wheat meal basal diet without glycerin (G0, control) or the basal diet with partial substitution of wheat with 5% (G5) or 10% (G10) crude glycerin. Diets were formulated to be isoenergetic and isoaminocidic, according to ideal protein concept, and to meet the recommendations for growing and finishing Iberian crossbred pigs [17] (net energy (NE) 9800 kJ/kg and ileal digestible standardized lysine (Lys), 4.6 g/kg). All feeds were manufactured using the same batch of ingredients. Ingredients and nutrient compositions of the diets are shown in Table 1. The crude glycerin used was obtained from a biodiesel production facility (Abengoa Bioenergía San Roque, Cadiz, Spain) that employs vegetable oils as feedstock. The crude glycerin had a content of 87.42% total glycerol, 7.98% moisture, 5.87% ash, 2.01% Na, 3.06% Cl, 0.05% K, 0.04% Ca, 0.24% P, and 0.05% methanol, and it was assumed a net energy of 12,057 kJ/kg in according to FEDNA [18]. Diets were presented in mash form and titanium dioxide (TiO2) at 5 g/kg (as-fed basis) was added as an indigestible marker to measure the apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD). Pigs were provided with feed and water ad libitum throughout the study.

2.2. Sample Collection and Analyses

All animals were weighed individually at the beginning and the end of the experimental period (days 0 and 74). The individual BW of pigs within each pen was used to calculate average daily gain (ADG) on an individual basis. Average daily feed intake (ADFI) per pen was recorded by weighing feed added to the feeders and feed remaining at the end of the experiment. The feed was administered in sacks, so it was controlled to avoid excessive wastage. Additionally, the feed conversion ratio (FCR) was calculated as the ratio between ADFI and ADG.
On day 49, blood samples were collected from four pigs from each pen (two barrows and two gilts) to determine serum concentrations of total protein, albumin, glucose, insulin, and IGF-1. Pigs within each pen were chosen according to their BW as being close to the average weight of the pen. Blood collection was performed via venipuncture of the jugular vein into 4.5 mL vacuum tubes without additives (Vacuette®, Greiner Bio-One, Kremsmünster, Austria). The samples were centrifuged for 10 min at 2500× g and the serum were stored at −80 °C until analysis.
On days 56 and 57, fecal samples were collected by stimulating-massaging the anus of two barrows and two gilts from each pen to calculate the ATTD of nutrients. The feces were pooled by pen and frozen at −20 °C for further analysis.
Feed samples were taken from each production batches. The dry matter (DM) content of the diets was determined by drying a sample in a convection oven at 105 °C for 8 h (AOAC 934.01 method, [19]). Fecal samples were dried at 60 °C until they reached a constant weight. Feed and fecal samples were ground to pass through a 1 mm mesh in an ultra-centrifugal mill (Retsch ZM 200; Retsch GmbH, Haan, Germany). Crude protein content was obtained through the Kjeldahl method (AOAC 984.13 A-D method) [18] and expressed as total N × 6.25. Diets were also analyzed for crude fiber (AOAC 920.39 method). The starch content was measured polarimetrically using the official analytical method [20]. The mineral content of diets and crude glycerin was determined by dry ashing using a muffle furnace at 550 °C for 4 h (AOAC 942.05 method), [18]). Ash was solubilized with 50 mL of 0.6 N nitric acid and subsequently filtered. The P content was determined by the official vanadate–molybdate method described in the Boletin Oficial del Estado [21]. The Ca content was detected by atomic absorption spectroscopy (Solaar M Series; Unicam, Cambridge, UK).
The moisture content of crude glycerin was determined by the Karl–Fischer method (AOAC 2001.12 method, [19]). The total glycerol and methanol contents of glycerin were analyzed by gas chromatography (TRACE GC Ultra, Thermo Electron Corporation, Rodano, Italy), using a 30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm capillary column (Tracsil TR-FFAP; Teknokroma, Barcelona, Spain) equipped with a flame ionization detector, as described by [4]. Titanium dioxide content in the diets and fecal samples was measured according to the method described by [22].
The apparent total tract digestibility of DM, organic matter (OM), and crude protein (CP) was calculated by using the equation:
ATTD (%) = (1 − ((nutrient in feces (g/kg DM) ÷ nutrient in diet (g/kg DM)) × (TiO2 in diet (g/kg DM) ÷ TiO2 in feces (g/kg DM)))) × 100
The serum samples were processed in the Interdisciplinary Laboratory of Clinical Analysis of the University of Murcia (Interlab-UMU, Spain). Serum total protein, glucose, and albumin were analyzed using an automatic analyzer (Olympus AU400; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Insulin was determined by an enzyme-linked immuno sorbent assay (ELISA) kit (Porcine Insulin ELISA, ref. 10-1200-01, Mercodia, Winston Salem, NC, USA). Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) was determined with an automated chemiluminescent immunoassay (Immulite System, Siemens Health Diagnostics, Deerfield, IL, USA).

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Data of growth performance, coefficients of ATTD, and serum metabolites were analyzed using a general linear model in IBM SPSS Statistics software (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). The model included the level of incorporation of glycerin (0%, 5%, and 10%) as the main effect for ADFI, FCR, and ATTD; and the level of incorporation of glycerin (0%, 5%, and 10%) and sex as the main effects and the first order interaction for BW, ADG, and blood parameters. The Shapiro–Wilks test was first used to assess whether serum data were normally distributed, and if not, the data were analyzed on a logarithmic scale. When the model was significant, differences between least squared means were investigated with Tukey’s test. The experimental unit was the pen for ADFI, FCR, and digestibility assay, while individual animals were taken as the experimental unit for BW, ADG, and serum parameters. The significance level was set at p ≤ 0.05 and trends at 0.10 ≥ p > 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Growth Performance and Nutrient Digestibility

The effects of diet on growth performance are described in Table 2 and Table 3. No differences for initial and final BW were found (p > 0.05) in pigs on all diets. The ADG, ADFI, and FCR were not affected by dietary treatment.
The effects of glycerin addition on ATTD are shown in Table 4. Dietary glycerin did not affect the ATTD of DM, OM, and CP.

3.2. Blood Parameters

Serum concentrations of total protein, albumin, insulin, and IGF-1 were not affected by dietary treatment (Figure 1). A trend of lower glucose levels was found in G5 compared to G10 (p = 0.094). A significant interaction between diet and sex was observed for albumin concentration.

4. Discussion

Crude glycerin has been used as an energy source to replace cereals in animal diets, thus increasing the supply of raw materials while reducing production costs [23,24,25]. Numerous studies have been performed using glycerin in diets at different stages of pig production: in sows [5,26], weaning pigs [2,9,27], growing and finishing pigs [4,28]. All of them were carried out with conventional pig genotypes. However, Iberian pigs represent 11% of the pig herds in Spain [29]. The breeding of IB is different, with a high potential for fat accumulation and lower performance compared with white pig genotypes [30]. As intensive rearing of IB pigs is becoming more common, the search for alternative ingredients that do not compete with human food and are locally available is essential for the sustainability of this type of production.
In this research, we used Iberian crossbred pigs in the late fattening stage and found no effects of incorporating crude glycerin up 10% on performance traits. Similarly, Orengo et al. [15] showed that 100 g/kg of glycerin could partially replace wheat without affecting feed efficiency in IB pigs up to 100 kg BW. Other researchers showed no effects or positive effects on growth performance by incorporating glycerin in commercial finishing pig diets at 5% [31], 8% [28], 15% [9], or 18% [32]. The origin and quality of glycerin, even the cereal replaced, in the above studies were not all the same, and this could partly explain the different results.
In a study on pigs with similar body weight to ours, Della Casa et al. [33] using Italian Duroc × Italian Large White pigs up to 160 kg BW, observed no effects of replacing corn with 5% glycerol in the diet, whereas pigs fed 10% glycerol showed reduced growth and a poorer feed–gain ratio. They attributed their results to free glycerol excretion via the urine, and they suggested that the higher the glycerol content of the diet, the greater the elimination due to liver glycerol kinase saturation. In this sense, Papadomichelakis et al. [34] concluded that pigs need to adapt to the inclusion of crude glycerin in their diet, and the efficiency of glycerol kinase may be related to the duration of crude glycerin consumption. They found that post-weaned pigs, after adapting to increasing levels of crude glycerin, efficiently absorbed and metabolized up to 150 g/kg diet as a dietary energy source.
The IB pig is a rustic breed that has not undergone intense genetic selection. It is characterized by its high appetite, fatness, and protein turnover ratio, which result in low lean growth efficiency, but high fat deposition compared with other breeds [30]. IB pigs have been suggested to have more active lipogenesis than other breeds [35]. Torres-Rovira et al. [36] assumed that when there is a positive energy balance, the Iberian sow’s fat deposition is first intramuscular throughout the carcass, then it is also subcutaneous and visceral. In growing animals, it has been shown that adipocyte hypertrophy is the most important issue affecting intramuscular fat content [30]. Hypertrophy is driven by triglyceride accumulation in mature adipocytes. In this sense, glycerin may contribute to the deposition of triglycerides in adipose tissue in these fatty breeds, which would make them more tolerant to higher amount of glycerin than lean breeds. Glycerol kinase saturation in these fatty breeds may be attained at higher levels than lean breeds. Although future studies are required to confirm it.
Glycerin is considered an energetic ingredient that is easily digested and metabolized by pigs [37]. In our case, incorporating up to 100 g/kg crude glycerin, with a similar energy value to wheat, achieved similar nutrient digestibility to the control. Morales et al. [38] showed that IB pigs have higher feed intake, increased stomach content, lower digesta content in the hindgut compartment, and a shorter time of digesta retention for fermentation than conventional pigs, and this leads to a lower digestibility coefficient of some nutrients. Most digestibility studies of conventional crossbred pigs conclude that the incorporation of crude glycerin does not affect nutrient digestibility in growing–finishing pigs [4,9,27]. Orengo et al. [15] showed no significant effect of incorporating of 10% glycerin in diets for IB crossbred pigs up to 100 kg on nutrient digestibility, as we observed for the last fattening phase in the current study.
Crude glycerin is not a standardized product, and its digestibility depends on its glycerol content [37]. Early studies used glycerin with at least 85% glycerol, so it was of good quality, and this is probably one of the reasons why an effect on digestibility was not found.
In pigs, dietary glycerol is absorbed by the stomach and intestines and transported to the liver to be metabolized. Depending on the nutritional status of the animal, glycerol can be used in lipid formation or energy production. Glycerol kinase is the liver enzyme that converts glycerol to glycerol 3-phosphate, which in turn is converted to glucose via gluconeogenesis or oxidized for energy via glycolysis or the citric acid cycle [39]. For this reason, incorporating glycerol in feed could alter some parameters related to metabolism. However, this hypothesis is not confirmed in our study, as we found no significant effect of glycerin in the diet on serum parameters, even at the highest levels (up to 10%).
These results are in line with numerous studies that incorporated glycerin at different levels in the diets of growing–finishing lean-type pigs: 18% [27], 16% [11], 14% [10], 10% [7], and 5% [4], and of IB crossbred pigs up to 100 kg [15], with no observed effect on blood parameters (total protein, albumin, glucose, insulin, and IGF-1) similar to our results. Thus, according to Mazzo et al. [40] we can suggest that the use of components with a high glycemic index such as glycerin does not necessarily lead to changes in energy metabolism parameters.
However, other parameters related to lipid metabolism, such as triglycerides and cholesterol, which were not analyzed in this study, are more frequently affected by glycerin addition [10,23,39,41,42]. In this sense, Narayan and Mcmullen [43] showed that glycerin metabolism in the livers of mice and birds after chronic intake has a stimulatory effect on the synthesis of free fatty acids, triglycerides, cholesterol, chylomicrons, and plasmatic lipoproteins.
The IB breed has greater potential for fat accumulation and more active lipid and glucose metabolism than other breeds [12,30,44]. Furthermore, differences in hepatic metabolism between IB and conventional breeds has been described [45]. Hepatocytes from IB pigs had greater glucose production from gluconeogenic precursors, increased albumin synthesis and lower hepatic IGF-1 synthesis. In this study, serum parameters were not affected by glycerin addition, but we observed an interaction between diet and sex for albumin concentration. A possible explanation for our results could be that males have greater backfat thickness and fat content than intact females [6,46]. This may condition the behavior of pigs fed glycerin diet since albumin is a liver protein related to the capacity for fatty acid transport from blood to adipocytes [44].

5. Conclusions

Our results show good acceptance of dietary glycerin by Iberian pigs, which may tolerate better than lean breeds. The inclusion of crude glycerin up to 10% in feeds of Iberian crossbred pigs during the 100 to 145 kg phase had similar growth performance, feed digestibility, or serum metabolites as total proteins, albumin, glucose, insulin, and IGF1 to control diet, so glycerin could be considered an energetic ingredient to partially replace wheat in the last stages of IB fattening.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.H. and J.M.; methodology, F.H. and J.M.; formal analysis, S.M.-M., M.J.L. and F.H.; investigation, S.M.-M., J.M., J.O., M.J.L., C.J.S. and F.H.; writing—original draft preparation, S.M.-M., and J.O.; writing—review and editing, S.M.-M., F.H., J.O., C.J.S. and M.J.L.; supervision, F.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Centre for Industrial Technological Development (CDTI, project No. 14312) and the Hermanos Sánchez Morales S.L. Company (Spain) for their financial support.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was carried out according to the protocol approved by the Animals Experimentation Ethics Committee of the University of Murcia and the Authorities of the Region of Murcia (4 August 2017, nº A-13170805), and following the European Union guidelines for the care and use of re-search animals (Directive 2010/63/EU of the EU Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dasari, M.A.; Kiatsimkul, P.P.; Sutterlin, W.R.; Suppes, G.J. Low-pressure hydrogenolysis of glycerol to propylene glycol. Appl. Catal. A-Gen. 2005, 281, 225–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lammers, P.J.; Kerr, B.J.; Weber, T.E.; Dozier, W.A.; Kidd, M.T.; Bregendahl, K.; Honeyman, M.S. Digestible and metabolizable energy of crude glycerol for growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2008, 86, 602–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Kovács, P.; Zsédely, E.; Kovács, A.; Virág, G.; Schmidt, J. Apparent digestible and metabolizable energy content of glycerol in feed of growing pigs. Livest. Sci. 2011, 142, 229–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Madrid, J.; Villodre, C.; Valera, L.; Orengo, J.; Martínez, S.; López, M.J.; Megías, M.D.; Hernández, F. Effect of crude glycerin on feed manufacturing, growth performance, plasma metabolites, and nutrient digestibility of growing-finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2013, 91, 3788–3795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Vida, O.; Fábián, J.; Bazar, G.; Egri, B.; Tóth, T. The effect of dietary glycerol supplementation on milk production and composition, blood parameters and performance of lactating sows. Livest. Sci. 2019, 230, 103859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Egea, M.; Linares, M.B.; Garrido, M.D.; Madrid, J.; Hernández, F. Feeding Iberian× Duroc cross pigs with crude glycerine: Effects of diet and gender on carcass and meat quality. Meat Sci. 2016, 111, 78–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lammers, P.J.; Kerr, B.J.; Weber, T.E.; Bregendahl, K.; Lonergan, S.M.; Prusa, K.J.; Ahn, D.U.; Stoffregen, W.C.; Dozier III, W.A.; Honeyman, M.S. Growth performance, carcass characteristics, meat quality, and tissue histology of growing pigs fed crude glycerin-supplemented diets. J. Anim. Sci. 2008, 86, 2962–2970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Mendoza, O.F.; Ellis, M.; Mckeith, F.K.; Gaines, A.M. Metabolizable energy content of refined glycerin and its effects on growth performance and carcass and pork quality characteristics of finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2010, 88, 3887–3895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Fischer, M.M.; Moraes, M.L.D.; Marcolla, C.S.; Kessler, A.D.M. Increased urinary losses in piglets fed diets containing high levels of glycerin. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 2019, 48, e20180039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Gallego, A.G.; Moreira, I.; Carvalho, P.L.D.O.; Perondi, D.; Pasquetti, T.J.; Gonçalves, L.M.P. Neutral semi-purified glycerin in growing and finishing pigs feeding. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2016, 15, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hansen, C.F.; Hernandez, A.; Mullan, B.P.; Moore, K.; Trezona-Murray, M.; King, R.H.; Pluske, J.R.A. Chemical analysis of samples of crude glycerol from the production of biodiesel in Australia, and the effects of feeding crude glycerol to growing-finishing pigs on performance, plasma metabolites and meat quality at slaughter. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2009, 49, 154–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nieto, R.; García-Casco, J.; Lara, L.; Palma-Granados, P.; Izquierdo, M.; Hernandez, F.; Dieguez, E.; Duarte, J.L.; Batorek-Lukač, N. Ibérico (Iberian) Pig. In European Local Pig Breeds—Diversity and Performance. A Study of Project TREASURE; Candek-Potokar, M., Nieto Linan, R., Eds.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  13. Serrano, M.P.; Valencia, D.G.; Fuentetaja, A.; Lázaro, R.; Mateos, G.G. Effect of gender and castration of females and slaughter weight on performance and carcass and meat quality of Iberian pigs reared under intensive management systems. Meat Sci. 2008, 80, 1122–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ventanas, S.; Ventanas, J.; Ruiz, J.; Estévez, M.; Pandalai, S.G. Iberian pigs for the development of high-quality cured products. Recent Res. Dev. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 6, 27–53. [Google Scholar]
  15. Orengo, J.; Villodre, C.; Madrid, J.; Martínez, S.; López, M.J.; Megías, M.D.; Valera, L.; Hernández, F. Effect of dietary crude glycerin on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and hormone levels of Iberian crossbred pigs from 50 to 100 kg body weight. Livest. Sci. 2014, 165, 95–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Real Decreto 1135/2002, de 31 de Octubre, Relativo a las Normas Mínimas para la Protección de Cerdos. Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación, BOE núm. 278, de 20 de Noviembre de 2002. Referencia: BOE-A-2002-22544. Available online: https://www.boe.es/buscar/pdf/2002/BOE-A-2002-22544-consolidado.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2021).
  17. De Blas, C.; Gasa, J.; Mateos, G.G. Necesidades Nutricionales Para Ganado Porcino, 2nd ed.; De Blas, C., Gasa, J., Mateos, G.G., Eds.; Fundación Española Para el Desarrollo de la Nutrición Animal: Madrid, Spain, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  18. FEDNA, 2010. Fundación Española para el Desarrollo de la Nutrición Animal. In Tablas FEDNA de Composición y Valor Nutritivo de Alimentos Para la Fabricación de Piensos Compuestos, 3rd ed.; de Blas, C., Mateos, G.G., García-Rebollar, P., Eds.; FEDNA: Madrid, Spain, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  19. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis, 18th ed.; Association off Analytical Chemists: Arlington, VA, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  20. Orden de 16 de Febrero de 2000 por la que se Modifica el Anexo del Real Decreto 2257/1994, de 25 de Noviembre, por el que se Aprueban los Métodos Oficiales de Análisis de Piensos o Alimentos para Animales y sus Primeras Materias y el Real Decreto 1999/1995, de 7 de Diciembre, Relativo a los Alimentos para Animales Destinados a Objetivos de Nutrición Específicos. Boletín Oficial del Estado, 2000, Referencia: BOE-A-2000-3195, 41, pp. 7211–7215. Available online: https://www.boe.es/buscar/doc.php?id=BOE-A-2000-3195 (accessed on 1 January 2021).
  21. MAPA; Métodos Oficiales de Análisis en la Unión Europea. Diario Oficial de las Comunidades Europeas; Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación: Madrid, Spain, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  22. Myers, W.D.; Ludden, P.A.; Nayigihugu, V.; Hess, B.W. A procedure for the preparation and quantitative analysis of samples for titanium dioxide. J. Anim. Sci. 2004, 82, 179–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Carvalho, P.L.D.O.; Moreira, I.; Martins, E.N.; Piano, L.M.; Toledo, J.B.; Costa Filho, C.D.L. Crude glycerine in diets for piglets. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 2012, 41, 1654–1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Gallego, A.G.; Moreira, I.; Pozza, P.C.; Carvalho, P.L.D.O.; Sierra, L.M.P.; Costa Filho, C.D.L. Neutral semi-purified glycerin in starting pigs feeding. Semin. Ciências Agrárias 2014, 35, 2831–2841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Lokesha, E.; Marappan, G.; Kumar, R.D.; Brijesh, P.; Banakar, P.S.; Revanasiddu, D.; Pruthviraj, D.R.; Bhanuprakash, V.; Mahesh, M.S. Crude glycerol: By-product of biodiesel industries as an alternative energy source for livestock feeding. J. Exp. Biol. Agric. Sci. 2017, 5, 756–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hernández, F.; Orengo, J.; Villodre, C.; Martínez, S.; López, M.J.; Madrid, J. Addition of crude glycerin to pig diets: Sow and litter performance, and metabolic and feed intake regulating hormones. Animal 2016, 10, 919–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Oliveira, L.; Madrid, J.; Ramis, G.; Martínez, S.; Orengo, J.; Villodre, C.; Valera, L.; López, M.J.; Pallarés, F.J.; Quereda, J.J.; et al. Adding crude glycerin to nursery pig diet: Effect on nutrient digestibility, metabolic status, intestinal morphology and intestinal cytokine expression. Livest. Sci. 2014, 167, 227–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Schieck, S.J.; Shurson, G.C.; Kerr, B.J.; Johnston, L.J. Evaluation of glycerol, a biodiesel coproduct, in grow-finish pig diets to support growth and pork quality. J. Anim. Sci. 2010, 88, 3927–3935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. MAPA. Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación. Indicadores Económicos del Sector Porcino. 2021. Available online: https://www.mapa.gob.es/es/ganaderia/temas/produccion-y-mercados-ganaderos/sectores-ganaderos/porcino/indicadoreseconomicos.aspx (accessed on 3 February 2021).
  30. Ayuso, M.; Fernández, A.; Núñez, Y.; Benítez, R.; Isabel, B.; Fernández, A.I.; Rey, A.I.; González-Bulnes, A.; Medrano, J.F.; Cánovas, Á.; et al. Developmental Stage, Muscle and Genetic Type Modify Muscle Transcriptome in Pigs: Effects on gene expression and regulatory factors involved in growth an metabolism. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0167858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Duttlinger, A.J.; DeRouchey, J.M.; Tokach, M.D.; Dritz, S.S.; Goodband, R.D.; Nelssen, J.L.; Houser, T.A.; Sulabo, R.C. Effects of increasing crude glycerol and dried distillers grains with solubles on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and carcass fat quality of finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2012, 90, 840–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Gonçalves, L.M.P.; Moreira, I.; Pozza, P.C.; Carvalho, P.L.D.O.; Toledo, J.B.; Peñuela-Sierra, L.M. Semi purified glycerins in growing and finishing pigs feeding (30–90 kg). Rev. Bras. Saúde Prod. Anim. 2014, 15, 221–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Della Casa, G.; Bochicchio, D.; Faeti, V.; Marchetto, G.; Poletti, E.; Rossi, A.; Garavaldi, A.; Panciroli, A.; Brogna, N. Use of pure glycerol in fattening heavy pigs. Meat Sci. 2009, 81, 238–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Papadomichelakis, G.; Zoidis, E.; Mountzouris, K.C.; Lippas, T.; Fegeros, K. Glycerine kinase gene expression, nutrient digestibility and gut microbiota composition in post-weaned pigs fed diets with increasing crude glycerine levels. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2012, 177, 247–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Benítez, R.; Fernández, A.; Isabel, B.; Núñez, Y.; De Mercado, E.; Gómez-Izquierdo, E.; Óvilo, C. Modulatory effects of breed, feeding status, and diet on adipogenic, lipogenic, and lipolytic gene expression in growing iberian and duroc pigs. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Torres-Rovira, L.; Astiz, S.; Caro, A.; Lopez-Bote, C.; Ovilo, C.; Pallares, P.; Gonzalez-Bulnes, A. Diet-induced swine model with obesity/leptin resistance for the study of metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes. Sci. World J. 2012, 2012, 510149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Kerr, B.J.; Weber, T.E.; Dozier III, W.A.; Kidd, M.T. Digestible and metabolizable energy content of crude glycerin originating from different sources in nursery pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2009, 87, 4042–4049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Morales, J.; Pérez, J.F.; Baucells, M.D.; Mourot, J.; Gasa, J. Comparative digestibility and lipogenic activity in Landrace and Iberian finishing pigs fed ad libitum corn-and corn–sorghum–acorn-based diets. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2002, 77, 195–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lin, E.C. Glycerol utilization and its regulation in mammals. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1977, 46, 765–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mazzo, H.C.; Bianconi, C.; Villela, S.B.; Ormieres, M.; Duarte, N.V.; do Vale Pombo, G.; de Carvalho, J.C.; de Oliveira Gobesso, A.A. Digestibility and palatability of adding crude glycerin to the diet of ponies. Livest. Sci. 2020, 240, 104159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Manzke, N.E.; Gomes, B.K.; Xavier, E.G.; de Lima, G.J.M.M. Efficacy of energy supplementation on growth performance and immune response of suckling pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 96, 4723–4730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Carvalho, P.L.O.; Pasquetti, T.J.; Gonçalves, L.M.P.; Sierra, L.M.P.; da Cruz, T.M.P.; Carvalho, S.T.; Genova, J.L.; Oliveira, A.D.C. Effect of including different levels of crude glycerin in feed on plasma triglyceride concentrations in pigs, and the composition and qualitative attributes of pork. Semin. Ciências Agrárias 2019, 40, 919–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Narayan, K.; McMullen, J. The interactive effect of dietary glycerol and corn oil on rat liver lipids, serum lipids and serum lipoproteins. J. Nutr. 1979, 109, 1836–1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Poklukar, K.; Čandek-Potokar, M.; Batorek Lukač, N.; Tomažin, U.; Škrlep, M. Lipid Deposition and Metabolism in Local and Modern Pig Breeds: A Review. Animals 2020, 10, 424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. González-Valero, L.; Rodríguez-López, J.; Lachica, M.; Fernández-Fígares, I. Metabolic differences in hepatocytes of obese and lean pigs. Animal 2014, 8, 1873–1880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Serrano, D.; Valencia, G.; Fuentetaja, A.; Lázaro, R.; Mateos, G.G. Influence of feed restriction and sex on growth per-formance and carcass and meat quality of Iberian pigs reared indoors. J. Anim. Sci. 2009, 87, 1676–1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Effects of adding glycerin to feed on serum (a) total protein, (b) albumin, (c) glucose, (d) insulin, (e) IGF1. G0: diet with 0% crude glycerin. G5: diet with 5% crude glycerin. G10: diet with 10% crude glycerin. Data show least squared means ± standard error. n= 16 animals per dietary treatments. * p > 0.05, except for albumin diet × sex p-value = 0.036.
Figure 1. Effects of adding glycerin to feed on serum (a) total protein, (b) albumin, (c) glucose, (d) insulin, (e) IGF1. G0: diet with 0% crude glycerin. G5: diet with 5% crude glycerin. G10: diet with 10% crude glycerin. Data show least squared means ± standard error. n= 16 animals per dietary treatments. * p > 0.05, except for albumin diet × sex p-value = 0.036.
Animals 11 02181 g001aAnimals 11 02181 g001b
Table 1. Ingredients and composition of diets (as fed-basis).
Table 1. Ingredients and composition of diets (as fed-basis).
ItemDiet 1
G0G5G10
Ingredient, %
Barley45.0045.0045.00
Wheat34.5227.4520.55
Wheat bran11.3511.5511.50
Soybean meal (47% crude protein)6.117.649.19
Crude glycerin-5.0010.00
Calcium carbonate1.131.431.78
Animal fat0.500.500.50
Titanium dioxide0.500.500.50
Salt0.350.300.25
Monocalcium phosphate0.320.320.33
Vitamin-trace mineral premix 20.300.300.30
L-Lys 50 (50% Lys)0.02--
Calculated composition 3
NE, kJ/kg980098009800
CP, %13.0013.0013.00
Ca, %0.650.760.90
P total, %0.470.470.46
Ether extract, %2.532.442.35
C18:2 Linoleic acid0.850.810.78
Starch47.4043.3039.20
Cellulose4.144.084.00
Standardized ileal digestible Lys, %0.460.460.46
Analyzed composition, % on dry matter (DM)basis except for DM
DM90.7091.1089.70
CP14.2213.3913.71
Crude fiber4.083.703.58
Ether extract2.752.662.60
Starch55.0051.1045.50
Ash6.076.637.54
Ca0.891.161.56
P total0.550.700.73
Glycerol0.005.598.59
EN, kJ/kg 410,97010,86710,702
1 Dietary treatments: 0, 5 and 10% crude glycerin included in G0, G5, and G10, respectively. 2 Provided (per kg of complete diet): 7000 IU vitamin A; 1500 IU vitamin D3, 20 mg vitamin E, 4 mg vitamin B2, 1.5 mg vitamin B6, 0.020 mg vitamin B12, 20 mg of niacin; 8 mg of calcium pantothenate; 100 mg of choline chloride; 75 mg of zinc oxide; 40 mg of manganese (II) oxide, 75 mg ferrous sulfate heptahydrate, 12 mg cupric sulfate pentahydrate, 0.15 mg sodium selenite, 1 mg potassium iodate, 0.1 mg basic cobaltous carbonate monohydrate, 500 FTU phytase (EC 3.1.3.8,(NeutralSCA, Cargill, Madrid, España). 3 According to FEDNA [18]. 4 Calculated from the Evapig® prediction equations. Energy value of glycerol was assumed as an available carbohydrate.
Table 2. Effects of sex and glycerin addition to feed on body weight and average daily gain of Iberian crossbreed pigs.
Table 2. Effects of sex and glycerin addition to feed on body weight and average daily gain of Iberian crossbreed pigs.
ItemDiet 1SexSEM 2p-Value
G0G5G10BarrowsGiltsDietSexD × S
N6464649696
Initial BW, kg95.4896.5295.4898.891.81.5660.8090.4520.473
Final BW, kg137.6142.8138.0141.3137.62.1960.6270.7650.332
ADG, kg0.570.620.600.570.620.0100.1520.4580.151
1 Dietary treatments: 0, 5 or 10% crude glycerin included in G0, G5, and G10, respectively. 2 SEM, standard error of the mean. BW, body weight; ADG, average daily gain. D × S, glycerin × sex.
Table 3. Effects of glycerin addition to feed on average daily feed intake and feed conversion ratio of Iberian crossbred pigs.
Table 3. Effects of glycerin addition to feed on average daily feed intake and feed conversion ratio of Iberian crossbred pigs.
ItemDiet 1p-Value
G0G5G10SEM 2Diet
N444
ADFI, kg2.672.782.760.0470.618
FCR, kg:kg4.694.454.650.0580.345
1 Dietary treatments: 0, 5, and 10% crude glycerin included in G0, G5, and G10, respectively. 2 SEM, standard error of the mean. ADFI, average daily feed intake; FCR, feed conversion ratio (kg feed:kg body weight).
Table 4. Effects of glycerin addition to feed on apparent total tract digestibility of nutrients in Iberian crossbred pigs.
Table 4. Effects of glycerin addition to feed on apparent total tract digestibility of nutrients in Iberian crossbred pigs.
ItemDiet 1SEMp-Value
G0G5G10Diet
Replicates444
DM 278.679.377.10.4210.141
OM81.682.381.40.3650.571
CP72.675.268.31.2520.118
1 Dietary treatments: 0, 5, and 10% crude glycerin included in G0, G5, and G10, respectively. 2 Percentage of apparent total tract digestibility of dietary components. DM, dry matter; OM, organic matter; CP, crude protein. SEM, standard error of the mean.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Martínez-Miró, S.; Madrid, J.; López, M.J.; Orengo, J.; Sánchez, C.J.; Hernández, F. Feeding Crude Glycerin to Finishing Iberian Crossbred Pigs: Effects on Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, and Blood Parameters. Animals 2021, 11, 2181. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082181

AMA Style

Martínez-Miró S, Madrid J, López MJ, Orengo J, Sánchez CJ, Hernández F. Feeding Crude Glycerin to Finishing Iberian Crossbred Pigs: Effects on Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, and Blood Parameters. Animals. 2021; 11(8):2181. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082181

Chicago/Turabian Style

Martínez-Miró, Silvia, Josefa Madrid, Miguel José López, Juan Orengo, Cristian Jesús Sánchez, and Fuensanta Hernández. 2021. "Feeding Crude Glycerin to Finishing Iberian Crossbred Pigs: Effects on Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, and Blood Parameters" Animals 11, no. 8: 2181. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082181

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop