Use of Hydrolyzed Chinese Gallnut Tannic Acid in Weaned Piglets as an Alternative to Zinc Oxide: Overview on the Gut Microbiota
by
,
Junying Sun
1,†, 
Kaijun Wang
1,†
,
Baichang Xu
1,†,
Xiaomin Peng
1,
Beibei Chai
1,
Siwei Nong
2,
Zheng Li
1,
Shuibao Shen
1 and
Hongbin Si
1,* 1
College of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
2
School of Education Science, Baise University, Baise 533000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship.
Animals 2021, 11(7), 2000; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11072000
Submission received: 27 May 2021
/
Revised: 25 June 2021
/
Accepted: 29 June 2021
/
Published: 5 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nutrition, Physiology and Gut Microbiota Interaction in Pigs)
Abstract
:Simple Summary
The effects of dietary hydrolyzed Chinese gallnut tannic acid (GCT) as a replacement for ZnO were investigated on weaned piglets. A total of 72 piglets (31 ± 1 day) were selected and divided randomly into two groups: a control group, with a basal diet of + 1600 mg/kg ZnO; and a treated group, with a basal diet of + 1899.5 mg/kg GCT. The diarrhea rate of piglets in the treated group declined on days 14–21 than in the control group. Additionally, we found GCT can reduce the crypt depth of the ileum and improve antioxidant capacity. High throughput sequencing showed that the GCT increased the richness of bacteria (Lachnospiraceae, Prevotella, and Lactobacillus amylovorus) associated with the degradation of cellulose and hemicellulose. These data indicate that 1899.5 mg/kg GCT could be an alternative for 1600 mg/kg ZnO in the diet of piglets.
Abstract
The effects of dietary hydrolyzed Chinese gallnut tannic acid(GCT) as a replacement for ZnO were investigated on weaned piglets. A total of 72 weaned piglets at 31 ± 1 day (six replicate pens per treatment with six piglets per pen) were selected and divided randomly into two groups: a control group, with a basal diet of + 1600 mg/kg ZnO; and a treated group, with a basal diet of + 1899.5 mg/kg GCT. Data analysis showed that the significance of average daily gain and average daily feed intake between the two groups was p = 0.731 and p = 0.799, respectively. Compared with the control group, the diarrhea rate of piglets in the treated group underwent no noticeable change on days 0–7 (p = 0.383) and 7–14 (p = 0.263), but decreased significantly on days 14–21 (p < 0.05). Additionally, we found GCT can reduce the crypt depth of the ileum and improve its antioxidant capacity (p < 0.05). High throughput sequencing showed that GCT increased the richness of the bacteria Lachnospiraceae (p = 0.005), Prevotella_2 (p = 0.046) and Lactobacillus amylovorus (p = 0.081), which are associated with the degradation of cellulose and hemicellulose. The study indicated that 1899.5 mg/kg GCT could be an alternative for 1600 mg/kg ZnO in the diet of piglets.
1. Introduction
Weaning can bring enormous stress to piglets, leading to a decline in piglet growth performance [1]. In recent years, high doses of ZnO have been used to reduce the harm of weaning to piglets [2]. However, the demand for zinc in piglets is 80–100 mg/kg [3], and piglets cannot absorb zinc completely, which leads to a large amount of zinc discharged from the body, causing potential harm to the environment [4]. Announcement No.2625 of the Ministry of Agriculture of China stipulates that the maximum allowable concentration of ZnO in piglets’ diet is 1600 mg/kg. In 2017, the CVMP intends to prohibit the use of high-dose ZnO in piglets within 5 years. Therefore, it is necessary to find a potential alternative to ZnO to maintain the normal growth of weaned piglets.
Some studies have found that tannic acid has good physiological functions: bacteriostasis, anti-diarrhea, anti-oxidation, and anti-inflammation [5,6,7]. However, tannic acid contains a large number of hydroxyl groups [8], which can easily combine with proteins and digestive enzymes to form insoluble complexes [9]. Sathe et al. also found that tannic acid can inhibit pepsin activity [10]. We choose to add stearic acid to hydrolyzed Chinese gallnut tannic acid and to reduce the combination between hydrolyzed Chinese gallnut tannic acid and pepsin. A recent study showed that a dietary supplement of 0.2% tannic acid could effectively alleviate diarrhea in weaned piglets, which may be achieved by improving the integrity and function of intestinal barrier [11]. In this study, we compared the production performance, diarrhea rate, antioxidant capacity, gut morphology, and intestinal flora of two groups of piglets to explore whether 1899.5 mg/kg GCT (0.2%) could replace 1600 mg/kg ZnO as a new piglet feed.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Diets for Piglets
Hydrolytic Chinese gallnut tannic acid was purchased from Ropeedar Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shaoxing, Zhejiang, China), which was derived from Chinese gallnut. The hydrolytic tannic acid of Galla chinensis was wrapped by stearic acid, and the effective content of tannic acid was 70.38% (calculated by absolute dry weight).
2.2. Animals and Management
The Animal Experimental Ethics Committee of Guangxi University approved the experiment (Gxu2018-052). Seventy-two weaned piglets (average initial weight 10 ± 0.2 kg) of 31 days old were randomly divided into two groups: (1) A control group, with a basal diet including + 1600 mg/kg ZnO; ZnO and premix were mixed into diet. (2) A treated group, with a basal diet including + 1899.5 mg/kg GCT (0.2%); tannic acid was evenly added to the premix for feeding.
The whole experiment lasted 21 days. Diets were formulated according to nutritional requirements recommended by NRC (2012) and adjusted according to the situation [3]; detailed information is shown in Table 1. During the experiment, weaned piglets drank water freely and fed regularly 4 times per day. The weight of every piglet was recorded before fasting at 07:00 a.m. in the morning every week, as was the daily feed intake of each pen. Finally, we calculated an average value to obtain the average daily gain (ADG), average daily feed intake (ADFI), FCR (= average daily feed intake (ADFI)/average daily gain (ADG)), and diarrhea rate. Diarrhea monitoring was assessed by fecal score, recorded daily using the score scheme previously proposed by Girard et al. [7].
2.3. Sampling and Collection
Blood samples were taken from the jugular vein and put into a heparin anticoagulant tube quickly before feeding (08:00 a.m.) on day 21st. A total of 72 blood samples were collected, 3 of which showed hemolysis due to mis-operation, so only 69 samples were assayed. They were centrifuged at 3000 rpm at 4 °C for 15 min to collect serum and stored in a refrigerator at −80 °C to assay the malondialdehyde (MDA), glutathione (GSH), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and D-lactic acid in serum. MDA, GSH and SOD were assayed with commercial assay kits (Jiangsu Yutong Biological Technology Co., Ltd., Yancheng, China). All blood samples were collected and assayed according to the kit instructions.
2.4. Analysis of Intestinal Morphology and Intestinal Flora
We collected 1–2 cm segments of the middle of duodenum, jejunum, and the end of ileum, and put them into a formalin solution for hematoxylin-eosin staining. The pictures were measured using 40× field of view by a light microscope with a computer-assisted morphometric system. We made the tissue fill the entire field when taking pictures, and ensured that the background light of each photo was consistent. Five intact villi and the crypt near the villus were selected for each slice and measured by Image-Pro Plus 6.0 software.
Pigs were euthanized by the intravenous injection of pentobarbital sodium (lethal dose). The cecal contents were collected by gently squeezing the lumen contents from the tissue into the sterile collection tube, then stored in refrigerator at −80 °C to measure the changes of intestinal flora. Genomic DNA isolation of cecal contents was performed according to the instructions of a DNA Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). DNA isolation was performed by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis. The bacterial universal V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified according to polymerase chain reaction barcoded primers 515F (5′-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3′) and the reverse primer 806R (5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′). PCR was run at 95 °C for three minutes to denaturation, followed by twenty seven cycles of 95 °C for thirty seconds, annealing at 55 °C for thirty seconds, 72 °C for forty-five seconds and a final extension at 72 °C for ten minutes. Briefly, paired-end sequencing was performed on the Illumina MiSeq platform at the Majorbio Bio-Pham Technology (Shanghai, China).
2.5. Statistical Analysis
Analysis was conducted by Excel of Microsoft (Redmond, WA, USA, Office 2019) and analyzed by SPSS 19.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA, 2009). Firstly, the data were evaluated through the Shapiro–Wilk test to check whether the distribution of the variables exhibited a normal distribution. Then, the variables that showed a normal distribution and a non-normal distribution were analyzed by the independent sample t-test and the Kruskal–Wallis test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 and tendencies at 0.05 ≤ p ≤ 0.10.
3. Results
3.1. Production Performance
The results presented in Table 2 show the influence of GCT on the production performance of weaned piglets. Compared with the ZnO diet, the addition of GCT in their diet had no influence on the ADFI (p = 0.799), ADG (p = 0.731) and FCR of weaned piglets (p = 0.411).
3.2. Diarrhea Rate
The Table 3 showed the diarrhea rate of piglets. Compared with the ZnO diet, the GCT had no effect on diarrhea rate of weaned piglets on days 0–7 (p = 0.383) and 7–14 (p = 0.263), but reduce the diarrhea rate of piglets on days 14–21 (p = 0.049).
3.3. Antioxidant Capacity
The data of Table 4 showed the activity of GSH, MDA, and SOD in serum. The activity of GSH (p = 0.012) and SOD (p = 0.036) in the serum of the piglets increased in the treated group significantly compared with the CON. The activity of MDA in the serum of the piglets in the treated group decreased (p = 0.032) compared with the ZnO diet.
3.4. Intestinal Tissue Morphology and Intestinal Barrier
The effect of the GCT supplementation on tissue morphology and the intestinal barrier of the gut are shown in Table 5. Compared with the ZnO diet, the crypt depth of the ileum decreased (p = 0.036). In addition, D-lactate acid in the serum of the piglets decreased (p = 0.004) further in the treated group than in the CON.
3.5. Changes of Intestinal Flora
Analyzing the samples at OTU (operational taxonomic unit) level, it was found that there was no difference (p > 0.05) in community richness, evenness, or diversity between the ZnO diet and the hydrolyzed Chinese gallnut tannic acid diet (Table 6).
Distribution of piglets’ cecal microflora is shown in Figure 1 (at the phylum level); Bacteroides and Sclerenchyma represent the main microbial communities in the cecum of piglets. Clustering the cecum samples showed that the dominant communities in the control group were Alloprevotella and Clostridium sensu stricto 1. The dominant communities in the GCT-treated group were Clostridium sensu stricto 1 and Prevotella 9 (Figure 2).
The difference in richness of the top 30 bacteria of the cecum community in piglets was analyzed at species level, and it was found that GCT reduced (p < 0.05) the richness of Alloprevotella and improved (p < 0.05) the richness of Prevotella_2 and Lachnospiraceae in the cecum of the piglets (Figure 3). All the differences of microbes in the cecum of piglets between the control group and treated group were analyzed at phylum to species level; there were 11 species of microbes with differences (p < 0.05) between the CON and GCT group at species level (Figure 4).
4. Discussion
It has always been a controversial issue whether tannic acid can improve the diet utilization rate of piglets. Tannic acid has long been considered an “anti-nutritional” factor. However, Bee et al. have found that hydrolyzed tannins seem to have less impact on growth performance than concentrated tannins [12]. Kotrotsios et al. have found that high doses of condensed tannin (9.7 g/kg) can reduce ADFI for piglets [13]. Although high-dose hydrolyzed tannin (4.5 g/kg) fed piglets can also reduce the FCR, it has no effect on ADFI and ADG [14]. We used stearic acid to wrap hydrolyzed Chinese gallnut tannic acid to reduce its effect on pepsin, but the effect of tannic acid on digestive enzymes in the small intestine is unavoidable [15]. The results show no influence on ADG, ADFI and FCR between the two diets. It is suggested that some beneficial changes may have taken place in the intestine, but these changes are still unknown.
A previous review explained that tannic acid hydrolysis can reduce the rate and duration of diarrhea in piglets [16]. Our study also proved this point: compared with the control group, we found that GCT can reduce the diarrhea rate, and the effect is increasingly obvious with the extension of time. Within the first 14 days, the duration of diarrhea in the treatment group was generally 1–2 days, while that in the control group was about 3 days, which is consistent with the previous report [16]. From 14 to 21 days, the piglets in the control group still had diarrhea, which is different from the results reported by Madec [17]. We must, however, take into account that Madec’s research was conducted in a pathogen-free environment, not in traditional pig farms.
Piglets are prone to stress in the early stage of weaning; the immune organs in the body are not fully developed and mature, and coupled with the stress of the feeding environment, it is easy to produce free radicals, which reduce the body’s resistance and growth performance [18]. MDA is a marker of oxidative stress, which reflects the degree of free radical attack on body cells. SOD and GSH are important components of the antioxidant defense system, which can scavenge free radicals or lipid peroxides. Therefore, we also studied the effect of GCT on the antioxidant capacity of piglets. Ye et al. found that tannic acid can improve the antioxidant capacity of piglets [19]. The data showed that the GCT reduced the MDA and increased the SOD and GSH, improving the antioxidant capacity of piglets and improving weaning stress.
One limitation of our study is that we did not assess the content of butyric acid in the piglets’ intestines. In vitro experiments showed that the decomposition products of tannic acid contain butyric acid [13]. Butyric acid is the preferred energy substrate for ileal mucosa [20]. It has been proved that 2.25 mg/kg tannic acid can reduce the depth of ileal crypt and increase the content of butyric acid in intestine [13]. In agreement with Kotrotsios et al., in our experiment, the depth of ileal crypt decreased in the treated group. The crypts of the small intestine have a secretory function, so reducing its surface may help to reduce the severity of diarrhea in weaned piglets [21]. Ampting et al. found that tannic acid was beneficial for the intestinal barrier of piglets [22]. Lactic acid is one of the main products of rapid fermentation of an animal’s stomach, and a large amount of lactic acid can cause subacute rumen acidosis in ruminants [23]. The production of lactic acid is negatively correlated with animal health; it can pass through the gastrointestinal wall, dissolve in the blood, and finally lead to an increase in the blood [24]. In agreement with these reports, we found that GCT could significantly reduce D-lactic acid in serum. It is suggested that GCT can improve the intestinal barrier.
When we analyzed the samples at OTU level, we found no significant influence on the community richness, evenness, or diversity of the two groups. Most of the bacteria in Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes are anaerobic, and the cecum is an absolutely anaerobic environment, so it is predictable that Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes account for about 95% of the cecum bacteria, regardless of the treatment group. This result is similar to that reported by Wang et al. [25]. When we analyzed the samples at the species level, we detected that the richness of some bacteria in the GCT diet decreased, such as the opportunistic pathogen Allprevotella. Therefore, GCT could reduce opportunistic pathogens in the cecum of piglets. When piglets are newly weaned, their food is changed from sow milk to feed containing cellulose and hemicellulose (soybean and corn). Prevotella is the leader in the degradation of hemicellulose in piglets’ cecum [25,26]. Lachnospiraceae also has a strong ability to degrade polysaccharides, even cellulose and hemicellulose [27]. In our experiment, GCT significantly increased the richness of Lachnospiraceae and Prevotella in piglets’ cecum. In addition, some articles have reported that Lachnospiraceae can reduce the incidence of colitis by reducing the colonization of Clostridium difficile in the intestine [28,29]. Lactobacillus amylovorus has a strong ability to hydrolyze starch, and its hydrolysis efficiency is 10 times higher than that of Lactobacillus plantarum [30]. In this experiment, GCT increased the richness of Lactobacillus amylovorus in the cecum of piglets. Overall, GCT may support weaned piglet production performance by promoting the growth of bacteria specialized in the degradation of polysaccharides in the cecum. These results indicate that 1899.5 mg/kg GCT could be an alternative to 1600 mg/kg ZnO in the post-weaning diets of piglets.
5. Conclusions
We found that GCT could reduce the depth of ileal crypt and oxidative stress in piglets. Meanwhile, GCT improve intestinal barrier and reduce diarrhea rate. Furthermore, GCT could improve the richness of bacteria associated with the degradation of cellulose and hemicellulose. Thus, adding GCT could be an alternative to ZnO in the post-weaning diets of piglets.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, S.S. and H.S.; Data curation, J.S., B.X., X.P., B.C., S.N. and Z.L.; Formal analysis, J.S.; Funding acquisition, H.S.; Investigation, H.S.; Project administration, H.S.; Resources, S.S.; Validation, K.W.; Visualization, K.W. and Z.L.; Writing—original draft, J.S. and K.W.; Writing—review & editing, K.W., B.X., and H.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31760746), the Key Research and Development Plan of Guangxi (AB19245037) and the Science and Technology Major Project of Guangxi (China) (AA17204057).
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study approved by the Laboratory Animal Welfare and Animal Experimental Ethical Inspection Committee at the Guangxi University (Nanning, China). (protocol code, Gxu2018-052).
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable for studies not involving humans.
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The availability of the data is restricted to investigators based in academic institutions.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Hu, C.H.; Xiao, K.; Luan, Z.S.; Song, J. Early weaning increases intestinal permeability, alters expression of cytokine and tight junction proteins, and activates mitogen-activated protein kinases in pigs1. J. Anim. Sci. 2013, 91, 1094–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kloubert, V.; Blaabjerg, K.; Dalgaard, T.S.; Poulsen, H.D.; Rink, L.; Wessels, I. Influence of zinc supplementation on immune parameters in weaned pigs. J. Trace Elements Med. Biol. 2018, 49, 231–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- National Research Council (NRC). Nutrient Requirements of Swine, 11th ed.; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Jondreville, C.; Revy, P.; Dourmad, J. Dietary means to better control the environmental impact of copper and zinc by pigs from weaning to slaughter. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2003, 84, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tosi, G.; Massi, P.; Antongiovanni, M.; Buccioni, A.; Minieri, S.; Marenchino, L.; Mele, M. Efficacy Test of a Hydrolysable Tannin Extract Against Necrotic Enteritis in Challenged Broiler Chickens. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2013, 12, e62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rezar, V.; Salobir, J.; Levart, A.; Tomažin, U.; Škrlep, M.; Lukač, N.B.; Čandek-Potokar, M. Supplementing entire male pig diet with hydrolysable tannins: Effect on carcass traits, meat quality and oxidative stability. Meat Sci. 2017, 133, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Girard, M.; Thanner, S.; Pradervand, N.; Hu, D.; Ollagnier, C.; Bee, G. Hydrolysable chestnut tannins for reduction of postweaning diarrhea: Efficacy on an experimental ETEC F4 model. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0197878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bhat, T.K.; Kannan, A.; Singh, B.; Sharma, O.P. Value Addition of Feed and Fodder by Alleviating the Antinutritional Effects of Tannins. Agric. Res. 2013, 2, 189–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ozkose, E.; Kulolu, R.; Comlekcioglu, U.; Kar, B.; Ekinci, S. Effects of tannic acid on the fibrolytic enzyme activity and survival of some ruminal bacteria. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2011, 13, 386–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sathe, S.; Sze-Tao, K. Effects of sodium chloride, phytate and tannin on in vitro proteolysis of phaseolin. Food Chem. 1997, 59, 253–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, J.; Song, Y.; Yu, B.; He, J.; Zheng, P.; Mao, X.; Huang, Z.; Luo, Y.; Luo, J.; Yan, H.; et al. Tannic acid prevents post-weaning diarrhea by improving intestinal barrier integrity and function in weaned piglets. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2020, 11, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bee, G.; Silacci, P.; Ampuero-Kragten, S.; Čandek-Potokar, M.; Wealleans, A.; Litten-Brown, J.; Salminen, J.-P.; Mueller-Harvey, I. Hydrolysable tannin-based diet rich in gallotannins has a minimal impact on pig performance but significantly reduces salivary and bulbourethral gland size. Anim. An Int. J. Anim. Biosci. 2017, 11, 1617–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kotrotsios, N.V.; Christaki, E.V.; Bonos, E.M.; Florou-Paneri, P.C. The effect of dietary carob pods on nutrient digestibility in weaning, growing and fattening periods of pigs. J. Food Agric. Environ. 2010, 8, 779–782. [Google Scholar]
- Biagia, G.; Cipollini, I.; Paulicks, B.R.; Roth, F.X. Effect of tannins on growth performance and intestinal ecosystem in weaned piglets. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 2010, 64, 121–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Majewska, M.P.; Pająk, J.J.; Skomiał, J.; Miltko, R.; Kowalik, B. The effect of lingonberry leaves and oak cortex addition to sheep diets on pancreatic enzymes activity. J. Anim. Feed. Sci. 2017, 26, 354–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marín, L.; Miguélez, E.M.; Villar, C.J.; Lombó, F. Bioavailability of dietary polyphenols and gut microbiota metabolism: Antimicrobial properties. Biomed Res. Int. 2014, 905215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Madec, F.; Bridoux, N.; Bounaix, S.; Cariolet, R.; Duval-Iflah, Y.; Hampson, D.J.; Jestin, A. Experimental models of porcine post-weaning colibacillosis and their relationship to post-weaning diarrhoea and digestive disorders as encountered in the field. Veter Microbiol. 2000, 72, 295–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trckova, M.; Lorencova, A.; Babak, V.; Neca, J.; Ciganek, M. The effect of leonardite and lignite on the health of weaned piglets. Res. Veter Sci. 2018, 119, 134–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, M.-H.; Nan, Y.-L.; Ding, M.-M.; Hu, J.-B.; Liu, Q.; Wei, W.-H.; Yang, S.-M. Effects of dietary tannic acid on the growth, hepatic gene expression, and antioxidant enzyme activity in Brandt’s voles (Microtus brandti). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2016, 196–197, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chapman, M.A.S.; Grahn, M.F.; Hutton, M.; Williams, N.S. Butyrate metabolism in the terminal ileal mucosa of patients with ulcerative colitis. BJS 2005, 82, 36–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Riskin, A.; Agostoni, C.; Shamir, R. Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract; Springer: Milan, Italy, 2012; pp. 263–280. [Google Scholar]
- Van Ampting, M.T.J.; Schonewille, A.J.; Vink, C.; Brummer, R.J.M.; Van Der Meer, R.; Bovee-Oudenhoven, I.M.J. Damage to the Intestinal Epithelial Barrier by Antibiotic Pretreatment of Salmonella-Infected Rats Is Lessened by Dietary Calcium or Tannic Acid. J. Nutr. 2010, 140, 2167–2172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nagaraja, T.G.; Titgemeyer, E.C. Ruminal acidosis in beef cattle: The current microbiological and nutritional outlook. J. Dairy Sci. 2007, 90, E17–E38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Wang, K.J.; Zheng, M.L.; Ren, A.; Zhou, C.S.; Yan, Q.X.; Tan, Z.L.; Zhang, P.H.; Yi, K.L. Effects of high rice diet on growth performance, nutrients apparent digestibility, nitrogen metabolism, blood parameters and rumen fermentation in growing goats. Kafkas Univ. Vet. Fak. Derg. 2019, 25, 749–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Ji, H.; Wang, S.; Liu, H.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, D.; Wang, Y. Probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum Promotes Intestinal Barrier Function by Strengthening the Epithelium and Modulating Gut Microbiota. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Yang, F.; Li, J.; Pang, G.; Ren, F.; Fang, B. Effects of Diethyl Phosphate, a Non-Specific Metabolite of Organophosphorus Pesticides, on Serum Lipid, Hormones, Inflammation, and Gut Microbiota. Molecules 2019, 24, 2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Biddle, A.; Stewart, L.; Blanchard, J.L.; Leschine, S. Untangling the Genetic Basis of Fibrolytic Specialization by Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae in Diverse Gut Communities. Diversity 2013, 5, 627–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kameyama, K.; Fujii, T.; Nishikawa, S.; Kajiura, T.; Nakamura, E. Isolation of a novel indigenous Lachnospiraceae bacterium which induces the development of obesity and diabetes in gnotobiotic mice. Diabetes 2014, 63, A74. [Google Scholar]
- Surana, N.; Kasper, D. Lachnospiraceae protect from colitis by regulating colonic group 3 innate lymphoid cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 2016, 46, 346. [Google Scholar]
- Rodríguez-Sanoja, R.; Ruiz, B.; Guyot, J.P.; Sanchez, S. Starch-Binding Domain Affects Catalysis in Two Lactobacillus α-Amylases. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 297–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1.
Distribution of piglets’ cecal microflora at the phylum level. The stacked histogram shows the relative abundance of each cecal sample at the phylum level. CON, ZnO diet; GCT, hydrolyzed Chinese gallnut tannic acid diet.
Figure 1.
Distribution of piglets’ cecal microflora at the phylum level. The stacked histogram shows the relative abundance of each cecal sample at the phylum level. CON, ZnO diet; GCT, hydrolyzed Chinese gallnut tannic acid diet.
Figure 2.
Heatmap shows the top 30 species of bacteria in the cecum of piglets. CON and GCT represent the control group and GCT-treated group, respectively. Numbers represent individual animals.
Figure 2.
Heatmap shows the top 30 species of bacteria in the cecum of piglets. CON and GCT represent the control group and GCT-treated group, respectively. Numbers represent individual animals.
Figure 3.
The microbial richness of cecum community of piglets ranked according to the top 30 at species level. Red bar represents the control group, green bar represents the GCT-treated group. The rightmost side is p -Value, * means 0.01 < p < 0.05, ** means 0.001 < p < 0.01.
Figure 3.
The microbial richness of cecum community of piglets ranked according to the top 30 at species level. Red bar represents the control group, green bar represents the GCT-treated group. The rightmost side is p -Value, * means 0.01 < p < 0.05, ** means 0.001 < p < 0.01.
Figure 4.
Differences between bacterial taxa in control group and GCT-treated group. The histogram shows differentially rich bacteria in the control group and GCT-treated group ranked by linear discriminant analysis (LDA) scores. Red bars represent the bacteria in the control group are richer than in the GCT-treated group. Green bars represent the bacteria in the GCT-treated group are richer than in the control group; c: class level, o: order level, f: family level, g: genus level, s: species level.
Figure 4.
Differences between bacterial taxa in control group and GCT-treated group. The histogram shows differentially rich bacteria in the control group and GCT-treated group ranked by linear discriminant analysis (LDA) scores. Red bars represent the bacteria in the control group are richer than in the GCT-treated group. Green bars represent the bacteria in the GCT-treated group are richer than in the control group; c: class level, o: order level, f: family level, g: genus level, s: species level.
Table 1.
Ingredients and nutrient levels for weaned piglets.
| Composition (%) | Content | Nutrient Levels of Basal Diets | Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| Corn | 56.5 | Crude protein | 18.2 |
| Soybean meal | 10 | Crude fat | 6.2 |
| Puffed soybean | 8 | Crude fiber | 2.5 |
| Fermented soybean meal | 5 | Crude ash | 5 |
| Flour | 5 | Lysine | 1.35 |
| Fish meal | 4 | Chloride | 0.6 |
| Soybean oil | 3.5 | P | 0.55 |
| Glucose | 2.5 | Ca | 0.8 |
| Whey powder | 2.5 | Digestive energy (MJ/kg) | 14.23 |
| Premix A | 3 |
A Provided per kg diet: 150 mg of Fe (as FeSO4), 85 mg of Cu (as CuSO4), 80 mg of Mn, 10,000 IU of vitamin A, 1200 IU of vitamin D3, 30 IU of vitamin E, 1.5 mg of vitamin B1, 3.5 mg of vitamin B2, 1.4 mg of vitamin B6, 0.03 mg of vitamin B12, 30 mg of nicotinic acid, 15 mg of D-pantothenic acid, 0.14 mg of biotin.
Table 2.
Effect of GCT on production performance of weaned piglets.
| Item | CON | GCT | SEM | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial weight (kg) | 10.10 | 10.05 | 0.047 | 0.615 |
| Final weight (kg) | 18.83 | 18.95 | 0.075 | 0.469 |
| ADG (g/day) | 418.86 | 420.22 | 2.50 | 0.731 |
| ADFI (g/day) | 748.90 | 752.96 | 5.52 | 0.799 |
| FCR | 1.81 | 1.79 | 0.008 | 0.411 |
CON: ZnO diet; GCT: Hydrolyzed Chinese gallnut tannic acid diet; ADG: Average daily gain; ADFI: Average daily feed intake; FCR = ADG/ADFI.
Table 3.
Effect of GCT on diarrhea rate during the post weaning period in piglets.
| Item | CON | GCT | SEM | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0–7 days | 3.17% | 3.97% | 0.0095 | 0.383 |
| 7–14 days | 2.78% | 1.98% | 0.0059 | 0.263 |
| 14–21 days | 1.19% | 0 | 0.0031 | 0.049 |
CON: ZnO diet; GCT: Hydrolyzed Chinese gallnut tannic acid diet.
Table 4.
Effect of GCT on antioxidant capacity of weaned piglets.
| Item | CON | GCT | SEM | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSH (mg/mL) | 5.57 | 6.43 | 0.19 | 0.012 |
| MDA (nmol/mL) | 4.15 | 3.58 | 0.14 | 0.032 |
| SOD (U/mL) | 97.16 | 105.47 | 2.06 | 0.036 |
CON: ZnO diet; GCT: Hydrolyzed Chinese gallnut tannic acid diet; GSH: Glutathione; MDA: Malondialdehyde; SOD: Superoxide dismutase.
Table 5.
Intestinal barrier and intestinal morphology of weaned piglets.
| Item | CON | GCT | SEM | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Villus height (um) | ||||
| Duodenum | 454.25 | 401.02 | 15.63 | 0.088 |
| Jejunum | 422.44 | 410.70 | 16.99 | 0.747 |
| Ileum | 384.67 | 399.66 | 14.95 | 0.639 |
| Crypt depth (um) | ||||
| Duodenum | 142.70 | 148.20 | 2.90 | 0.367 |
| Jejunum | 159.04 | 150.06 | 4.02 | 0.284 |
| Ileum | 144.69 | 128.25 | 4.08 | 0.036 |
| D-lac | 1288 | 1106 | 36.29 | 0.004 |
CON: ZnO diet; GCT: Hydrolyzed Chinese gallnut tannic acid diet; D-lac: D-lactic acid; SEM: Standard error of the mean.
Table 6.
Effects of GCT on community richness, evenness, and diversity of cecum intestinal flora.
| Item | CON | GCT | SEM | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Community richness | ||||
| Sobs | 394.83 | 436.33 | 13.04 | 0.114 |
| Ace | 435.11 | 474.88 | 13.13 | 0.136 |
| Chao | 448.93 | 482.20 | 13.54 | 0.236 |
| Community evenness | ||||
| Heip | 0.15 | 0.165 | 0.0087 | 0.294 |
| Simpsoneven | 0.058 | 0.07 | 0.0057 | 0.358 |
| Shannoneven | 0.68 | 0.7 | 0.0098 | 0.251 |
| Community diversity | ||||
| Shannon | 4.05 | 4.26 | 0.072 | 0.152 |
| Simpson | 0.047 | 0.036 | 0.0046 | 0.236 |
CON: ZnO diet; GCT: Hydrolyzed Chinese gallnut tannic acid diet; Sobs, Chao and Ace are indices reflecting cecum community richness; Simpsoneven, Shannoneven and Heip are indices of community evenness; Shannon and Simpson are indices of community diversity.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Sun, J.; Wang, K.; Xu, B.; Peng, X.; Chai, B.; Nong, S.; Li, Z.; Shen, S.; Si, H. Use of Hydrolyzed Chinese Gallnut Tannic Acid in Weaned Piglets as an Alternative to Zinc Oxide: Overview on the Gut Microbiota. Animals 2021, 11, 2000. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11072000
AMA Style
Sun J, Wang K, Xu B, Peng X, Chai B, Nong S, Li Z, Shen S, Si H. Use of Hydrolyzed Chinese Gallnut Tannic Acid in Weaned Piglets as an Alternative to Zinc Oxide: Overview on the Gut Microbiota. Animals. 2021; 11(7):2000. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11072000
Chicago/Turabian StyleSun, Junying, Kaijun Wang, Baichang Xu, Xiaomin Peng, Beibei Chai, Siwei Nong, Zheng Li, Shuibao Shen, and Hongbin Si. 2021. "Use of Hydrolyzed Chinese Gallnut Tannic Acid in Weaned Piglets as an Alternative to Zinc Oxide: Overview on the Gut Microbiota" Animals 11, no. 7: 2000. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11072000
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
