Next Article in Journal
Analysis of Morphokinetic Parameters of Feline Embryos Using a Time-Lapse System
Next Article in Special Issue
Clinical Value of CT-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration and Tissue-Core Biopsy of Thoracic Masses in the Dog and Cat
Previous Article in Journal
The Ultimate List of the Most Frightening and Disgusting Animals: Negative Emotions Elicited by Animals in Central European Respondents
Previous Article in Special Issue
Detection of Serum Allergen-Specific IgE in Atopic Dogs Tested in Northern Italy: Preliminary Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 11
Issue 3
10.3390/ani11030749
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Changes in Saliva Analytes in Dairy Cows during Peripartum: A Pilot Study

by
María D. Contreras-Aguilar
1,
Pedro J. Vallejo-Mateo
2,
Elsa Lamy
3,
Damián Escribano
1,4,
Jose J. Cerón
1,
Fernando Tecles
1,* and
Camila P. Rubio
1,5
1
Interdisciplinary Laboratory of Clinical Analysis (Interlab-UMU), Veterinary School, Regional Campus of International Excellence ‘Campus Mare Nostrum’, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain
2
Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Veterinary School, Campus Mare Nostrum, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain
3
MED—Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development, IIFA—Instituto de Investigação e Formação Avançada, University of Évora, Núcleo da Mitra, Apartado 94, 7006-554 Évora, Portugal
4
Department of Animal Production, Veterinary School, Regional Campus of International Excellence ‘Campus Mare Nostrum’, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain
5
Department of Veterinary Clinics, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu 18618-681, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2021, 11(3), 749; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11030749
Submission received: 24 January 2021 / Revised: 23 February 2021 / Accepted: 3 March 2021 / Published: 9 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Collection Clinical Pathology in Animals)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The use of saliva as a biological fluid to assess welfare and health status is gaining interest nowadays since it can be collected by non-invasive methods without specialized staff. The possibility of measuring analytes in saliva by techniques adapted to automated analyzers is cost-effective, reliable, and replicable. These analytes can provide information useful for the evaluation of welfare and health in dairy cows. In this pilot study, a total of 26 salivary analytes were measured in healthy dairy cows along their peripartum period to assess possible changes and associations with their inflammatory, energy, and milk yield status. Salivary analytes related to stress (cortisol, salivary alpha-amylase, butyrylcholinesterase, and total esterase), immunity (adenosine deaminase), oxidative status (Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity and the advanced oxidation protein products), and general metabolism (creatine kinase, γ-glutamyl transferase, urea, triglycerides, glucose, and lactate) had significant changes throughout this period. This study indicated that the saliva of dairy cows shows changes in its composition during the transition period and potentially can be a source of biomarkers for monitoring health and welfare.

Abstract

This pilot study aimed to study the possible changes in a profile of 26 salivary analytes in thirteen healthy dairy cows along their peripartum period. Analytes associated with the stress (salivary cortisol, salivary alpha-amylase, butyrylcholinesterase, and total esterase), inflammation (adenosine deaminase), oxidative status (total antioxidant capacity and the advanced oxidation protein products), and general metabolism (creatine kinase, γ-glutamyl transferase, urea, triglycerides, glucose, and lactate) varied along the sampling times. A positive correlation between the white blood cells counts, and the lipase, Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity, advanced oxidation protein products, and lactate levels in saliva were observed at the delivery. A linear association between selected salivary analytes at different sampling times and the milk yield after calving was observed. In conclusion, in our experimental conditions, it was observed that the peripartum period in dairy cows can induce changes in salivary analytes. Some of them were associated with inflammatory status and the capacity of milk production after calving.

1. Introduction

Nowadays, there is a growing number of studies in which saliva is being evaluated as a biomarker source since it contains biomolecules that change under some diseases or stress and inflammatory situations [1,2]. This is due to the fact that saliva can be easily collected by non-invasive and non-painful techniques, even at short-time intervals, and there is no need for specialized staff [3]. Recently, two studies where a biochemistry profile integrated by analytes that are usually measured in serum and plasma (called “sialochemistry”) was measured in the saliva of cows and reported changes in some of these analytes in lameness and mastitis [4,5].
The peripartum period in dairy cows, which is comprised approximately three weeks before and after calving, has a direct impact on their subsequent health status, production, and profitability. This period is considered the highest risk for developing infectious diseases and metabolic disorders and, therefore, compromised welfare, since they are submitted to a high metabolic challenge with significant physiological changes [6,7,8]. The welfare assessment in dairy cows can be made by behavioral (i.e., pain scales, stereotypes), physiological (i.e., heart rate variability), and performance (i.e., milk yield, fertility, dry matter intake, reduced body condition score-BCS-) parameters, but also by measurements in the blood hormone (i.e., cortisol, β-endorphin) and hematological and biochemical analytes (i.e., metabolites, leukocytes ratios, acute phase proteins, inflammatory products) [9]. However, to the best knowledge of these authors, there are no studies where the possible changes in salivary analytes have been evaluated during the peripartum period in dairy cows to assess whether the possible salivary analyte changes are in line with the previous changes reported in blood.
This study hypothesizes that the peripartum period would produce salivary changes in different analytes due to the physiological variations that dairy cows undergo during this period. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the changes in a profile of 26 analytes measured by automatized techniques in the saliva of dairy cows involving biomarkers of stress, immunity, oxidative status, and general metabolism during its transition period, from 3 weeks before to 3 weeks after calving.

2. Materials and Methods

Thirteen multiparous Holstein Friesian dairy cows (mean age = 4.7 ± 1.50; mean parity = 3.2 ± 1.46, min = 2, max = 7) in their last phase of gestation from a Spain commercial dairy herd (38°2′ N, 1°15′ W) were retrospectively selected according to a BCS > 3 at −20 ± 6.91 days relative to calving. In a previous sialochemistry study, ten cows gave adequate power [4]. An experienced veterinarian (PJV-M) checked all the cows, and no one showed any health issues (i.e., mastitis, metritis, ketosis, or lameness) and hematological and serum biochemical abnormalities in routine profiles. BCS was evaluated according to the visual five-point scale reported by Edmondson et al. [10] Samples were obtained between January and February of 2019 to avoid any change in the selected analytes due to seasonal reasons.
The feeding was based on a total mixed ration and was offered ad libitum at 08:30 am. The cows from −50 d relative to calving to pre-calving time received a far-off diet (1.49 Mcal/kg of dry matter, 9.4% rumen-degradable protein, and 5.3% rumen-undegradable protein) and were housed in small groups of 20–25 cows in sand-bedded free stalls (1.2 stalls/cow). Then, after 30 days post-calving, the cows were fed with a lactation diet (1.71 Mcal/kg of dry matter, 11.0% rumen-degradable protein, and 6.0% rumen-undegradable protein) and were housed in other free-stalls (1.1 stalls/cow) with straw. At this time, the cows were checked daily and milked two times a day. Water intake was available ad libitum. The farm was free of brucellosis, tuberculosis, Bovine Leukosis Virus, and pleuropneumonia. The cows were vaccinated for Bovine Viral Diarrhea, Infectious Bovine Rhinotracheitis, Bovine parainfluenza-3, and Bovine respiratory syncytial virus.
The saliva sampling was performed by introducing a sponge clipped to a flexible thin metal rod into the cow’s mouth. The sponge was then placed in a collection tube Salivette (Sarstedt, Aktiengesellschaft & Co., Nümbrecht, Germany). After that, blood was obtained by venipuncture in the vena caudal, and it was stored in a heparin device (LH/Li Heparin, Aquisel, Barcelona, Spain). The saliva and blood were obtained in the milking parlor when the milkers were removed and the nipples were post-dipped [4]. Cows were previously made accustomed to the procedure for saliva and blood sampling. Both saliva and blood devices were stored less than two hours in ice until the processing: the saliva was centrifuged at 3000× g for 10 min at 4 °C, and the blood analyzed for the white blood cell (WBC) count. Saliva specimens were stored for less than five months at −80 °C until analysis.
The salivary analytes evaluated in the chemistry profile were:
  • Stress biomarkers. Salivary cortisol (sCor), salivary alpha-amylase (sAA), butyrylcholinesterase (BChE), total esterase (TEA), and lipase (Lip) [11,12].
  • Immunity biomarkers. Adenosine deaminase (ADA) [13].
  • Oxidative status biomarkers. Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC), the ferric reducing ability of saliva (FRAS), the cupric reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC), uric acid, advanced oxidation protein products (AOPP), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) [14,15].
  • Biomarkers of general metabolism and liver, muscle, and renal damage (enzymes, proteins, and minerals). Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALP), γ-glutamyl transferase (gGT), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), creatine kinase (CK), creatinine, urea, triglycerides, glucose, lactate, total protein, albumin, phosphorus, and total calcium.
This salivary chemistry profile was analyzed in an automated chemistry analyzer using adapted kits to this fluid previously reported and validated [4,5,14,16]. The cortisol in saliva was analyzed according to Escribano et al., [17]. The WBC count was evaluated using an automated analyzer (ADVIA 120 Hematology System, Siemens Healthcare, Spain).
Saliva and blood samplings were carried out at −13 ± 6.91 days relative to calving (T − 13), within the 12 first hours after calving (T0), and seven days (T + 7) and 20 days (T + 20) after calving. Samples were obtained in the same period each day (from 10:30 am to 12:30 pm). The diagnostic of gestation was performed by rectal examination and ultrasounds at least 32 days post-insemination. Changes in the BCS was assessed as previously indicated. Milk yield and cow activity were evaluated as Contreras-Aguilar et al. described [4].
Firstly, the analytes showing a non-normal distribution using a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test were log-transformed [18] to restore normality. Data for all measured variables (salivary analytes, WBC count, milk yield, and BCS) were analyzed as repeated measures using the mixed linear model of SPSS in which time was considered as fixed factor, the BCS and the nested interaction on parity × age as random factors, and the BCS at T − 13 as covariate. Each analyzed variable was subjected to three covariance structures: compound symmetric, autoregressive order one, and unstructured covariance. The covariance structure with the lowest Akaike’s information criterion and Schwarz’s Bayesian criterion was considered the most desirable analysis [19]. The relationship between each salivary analyte at each time with the WBC count, milk yield, and BCS in the time of changing were assessed for correlation using Pearson correlation coefficients. Those salivary analytes being significantly correlated with the WBC count, milk yield, and BCS were then assessed by multiple linear regression models (milk yield) or multiple logistic regression analyses (WBC count [4.1–11.9 × 109 cel/L = 1 and ≤4.0 or ≥12.0 × 109 cel/L = 2 [20]], and BCS (no change = 1 and decreasing at T20 compared to T − 13 = 2). The age and/or parity were included as predictor variables in the multiple logistic regression analyses only if they showed an effect in the mixed linear model for each analyte. The statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS statistics package (IBM SPSS statistics version 24 for Mac, IBM Corporation, Arkmon, NY, USA). Figures were represented using the GraphPad Prism 9 statistics package (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). Significance was set for p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Salivary Chemistry Profile Changes

The plots from salivary analytes with significant changes are shown in Figure 1. Data of the salivary chemistry profile changes are shown in the Supplementary Table S1.
The salivary stress biomarkers that showed significant changes with time were sCor, sAA, BChE, and TEA. Salivary cortisol and BChE showed higher values at calving (T0) compared to before calving (T − 13; 1.49-fold, p = 0.023; 1.27-fold, p = 0.030), and seven (T + 7; 1.97-fold, p < 0.001; 1.53-fold, p < 0.001) and twenty (T + 20; 2.45-fold, p = 0.002; 1.35-fold, p = 0.012) days after calving. Salivary alpha-amylase activities were higher at T + 20 (1.71-fold, p = 0.040) compared to T − 13, while the TEA activities were higher at T − 13 (1.40-fold, p = 0.028) and T + 0 (1.25-fold, p = 0.028) compared to T + 7. Adenosine deaminase increased at T0 from T − 13 (4.90-fold, p = 0.010) decreasing then at T + 20 (−4.04-fold, p = 0.011).
The antioxidants TEAC (−6.00-fold, p = 0.002), FRAS (−4.05-fold, p = 0.008), and CUPRAC (−6.71-fold, p = 0.002) showed lower values at T0 compared to T − 13, as well as the AOPP (−3.17-fold, p = 0.050). The values of the enzymes CK (2.38-fold, p = 0.042) and gGT (2.59-fold, p = 0.004) were higher at T0 compared to T − 13, and in the case of gGT compared to T + 7 (−2.34-fold, p = 0.023) and T + 20 (−2.69-fold, p < 0.001). Concerning the metabolites, urea (−1.70-fold, p = 0.005), triglycerides (−3.86-fold, p = 0.036) and lactate (−7.81-fold, p = 0.006) showed lower values at T + 7 compared to T − 13, and glucose (−10.00-fold, p = 0.016) and lactate (−13.16-fold, p < 0.001) at T0 in relation to T − 13. Urea values were also lower at T + 7 (−1.38-fold, p = 0.026) compared to T0.

3.2. WBC Count, Milk Yield and BCS Changes

Cows showed a significant increase in the WBC count at T0 (p = 0.004) compared to T − 13, and in the milk yield at T7 (p < 0.001) and T20 (p < 0.001) with respect to T0 (Table 1). Otherwise, a decrease in the BCS was observed at T20 (p = 0.018) with respect T0.

3.3. Relationship between Salivary Analytes and WBC Count, Milk Yield and BCS

The correlation results are shown in Supplementary Table S2. The multiple logistic regression (Table 2) showed that Lip, lactate, TEAC, and AOPP showed association with the WBC values out of normal range at T0, whereas no significant associations were observed with a decreased BCS at T + 20 (Table 2).
The multiple linear regression models (Table 3) showed that the milk yield at T + 7 had a positive linear relationship with the values of sAA, CUPRAC, AOPP, H2O2, AST, lactate, and creatinine at T + 20, and the values of albumin at T + 7; and a negative linear relationship with the values of TEA and uric acid at T0. A negative linear relationship was observed between the milk yield at T + 20 and uric acid, AST, CK, creatinine, and urea at T0 (Table 3).

4. Discussion

In our experimental conditions, the decreases in BCS after the delivery in cows with high BCS before calving, and the rapid increases around the calving of blood polymorphonuclear leukocytes, decreasing transiently the first week after calving, are in line with the expected changes in this period as having been previously reported [19,21,22]. Besides, the WBC count observed on the day of calving compared to prepartum are similar to those obtained by Zachut et al. [23] in their cows during winter. Therefore, the healthy dairy cow population selected for this study showed the changes expected in this period regarding their BCS and leukocyte response.
In our study, various salivary stress biomarkers such as sCor, sAA, BChE, and TEA showed higher values the day of calving compared to prepartum and/or postpartum. Increases of the glucocorticoids and catecholamines around the time of calving by the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis and sympathetic nervous system (SNS) activation are associated with the delivery mechanisms [22,24] and could produce increases in cortisol and sAA [25]. BChE is also associated with the autonomic nervous system (ANS) in human beings [26] and increases in acute stress situations in pigs [27,28], sheep [11], and horses [12]. Salivary TEA, which also associated to the SNS activation [29], showed increases around thirteen days pre-calving and the day of calving, with median values similar to those reported in cows suffering lameness [4].
The ADA activity in saliva increased at calving. ADA activity has been associated with the immune system activation [30], with higher activities in T lymphocytes and macrophages [31], but also with the modulation of the inflammatory response regulating the extracellular levels of adenosine [32]. Therefore, increases in ADA activity could reflect the proinflammatory status in cows at calving [13,32].
The decreases in the salivary total antioxidant capacity measured by the TEAC, FRAS, and CUPRAC found in our study at calving and postpartum have been described in a previous study in the serum of cows [19,22], and might be due to different metabolic and endocrine mechanisms related to the fetus and mammary gland [19].
Creatinine kinase, gGT, urea, triglycerides, glucose and lactate showed significant changes during the transition period. The increases in CK and gGT could be related to the possible increases in blood due to muscle damage during the delivery [33] and the reduction of liver function usually observed in the early postpartum [6,8,18], respectively. However, they could be present in saliva due to a local salivary gland production, probably due to pain, as described in horses [16]. Reductions in the triglycerides and glucose concentrations in blood have been described during the post-partum period [34,35]. Similarly, urea remains low seven days post-partum [6] since the liver has a decreased capacity for urea synthesis due to the hepatocyte’s triglycerides accumulation, as can be observed in our study in saliva.
A correlation between altered values of WBC in blood and Lip, TEAC, AOPP, and lactate in saliva was detected on the day of calving. Recent research reported increases in salivary Lip in lameness dairy cows, indicating a possible relationship between this analyte in saliva and inflammatory or pain conditions [4]. AOPP might be a by-product of neutrophil activation being associated with inflammation [36]. Concerning the lactate in saliva, it is reported that lactate in the blood can come from muscle tissue or the mammary gland, modifying the inflammation affecting T cells and neutrophils function [37]. Besides, lactate concentration increases in the blood have been observed in dairy cows with retained placenta [37] and lameness [38] and in saliva from cows with mastitis [5]. From the 26 salivary analytes assessed at different sampling times, twelve analytes related to different situations such as pain-related stress, oxidative status, and metabolism had a linear association with the milk yield seven and twenty days after calving. Future studies should be undertaken to evaluate the possible use of these analytes as possible biomarkers of milk yield.
The results obtained in this study should be interpreted carefully due to some limitations. Only dairy cows from a particular breed and farm were enrolled, and no differences between cows of a different energy status or with different handling patterns (i.e., housed, milking, or nutrition handling) were taken into account. Therefore, other breeds and farming conditions should be tested. Otherwise, ideally the BCS would be assessed at least three times before calving to classify the cows correctly. In addition, a higher population should be evaluated to confirm these results and to assess possible differences in the sialochemistry profile between the healthy cows and dairy cows with common disorders observed during this period (e.g., ketosis, milk fever, retained fetal membranes and metritis, and displaced abomasum) [7]. Furthermore, it would be of interest to study the possible correlations between saliva and blood analytes; although, in a previous study in cows with mastitis, no evident correlations were found [5]. These additional studies in a large population and different farm conditions and diseases could elucidate whether the salivary analytes studied in this paper could be of interest as biomarkers for use in different situations, such as in the prevention or detection of selected diseases (i.e., in case of fatty acid mobilization imbalance) or situations of poor welfare or stress.

5. Conclusions

In this pilot study, the peripartum period in dairy cows induced changes in a profile of salivary analytes that could be associated with stress, changes in oxidative status or metabolism, and also with inflammation. The most striking changes were found in sAA, BChE, TEA, Lip, ADA, TEAC, FRAS, AOPP, gGT, and lactate. In addition, some salivary analytes at calving could be related to the milk yield. Therefore, this study indicated that saliva shows changes in its composition during the transition period in dairy cows and potentially could be a source of biomarkers for monitoring cows’ welfare and health.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/3/749/s1, Table S1: Mixed linear regression model results in the salivary chemistry profile. The salivary profile was composed of salivary cortisol (sCor), salivary alpha-amylase (sAA), butyrylcholinesterase (BChE), total esterase (TEA), lipase (Lip), adenosine deaminase (ADA), trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC), ferric reducing ability of saliva (FRAS), the cupric reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC), advanced oxidation protein products (AOPP), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), γ-glutamyl transferase (gGT), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), creatine kinase (CK), creatinine, urea, uric acid, triglycerides, glucose, lactate, total protein, albumin, phosphorus, and total calcium. Data were expressed as means (95% confidence interval (CI)) or medians (interquartile ranges, 25–75%) concerning the normal distribution. Letters show statistical analysis results in Bonferroni pairwise comparison; a p = 0.023 with T − 13; b p < 0.001 with T + 7; c p = 0.002 with T + 20; d p = 0.040 with T − 13; e p = 0.030 with T − 13; f p < 0.001 with T + 7; g p = 0.012 with T + 20; h p = 0.028 with T − 13; i p = 0.028 with T0; j p = 0.010 with T − 13; k p = 0.040 with T + 7; l p = 0.011 with T + 20; m p = 0.002 with T − 13; n p = 0.026 with T + 20; o p = 0.008 with T − 13; p p = 0.016 with T − 13; q p = 0.002 with T − 13; r p = 0.009 with T + 20; s p = 0.050 with T − 13; t p = 0.041 with T − 13; u p = 0.004 with T − 13; v p = 0.023 with T + 7; w p < 0.001 with T + 20; x p = 0.042 with T − 13; y p = 0.026 with T − 13; z p = 0.005 with T0; aa p = 0.036 with T − 13; bb p = 0.016 with T − 13; cc p = 0.050 with T + 20; dd p < 0.001 with T − 13; ee p = 0.006 with T − 13. Asterisks indicates statistically significant difference (Mixed lineal regression model); (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001). Table S2: Pearson correlation coefficients between each salivary analyte at each time with the white blood cell (WBC) count, milk yield, and body condition score (BCS), in the time of changing. The salivary profile was composed of salivary cortisol (sCor), salivary alpha-amylase (sAA), butyrylcholinesterase (BChE), total esterase (TEA), lipase (Lip), adenosine deaminase (ADA), trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC), ferric reducing ability of saliva (FRAS), the cupric reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC), advanced oxidation protein products (AOPP), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), γ-glutamyl transferase (gGT), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), creatine kinase (CK), creatinine, urea, uric acid, triglycerides, glucose, lactate, total protein, albumin, phosphorus, and total calcium. The times were T − 13: at −13 ± 6.91 days relative to calving; T0: within the 12 first hours after calving; T + 7: seven days after calving; T + 20: 20 days after calving. The correlation coefficients in bold showed significance (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.D.C.-A. and J.J.C.; methodology, M.D.C.-A., P.J.V.-M., E.L., F.T. and J.J.C.; formal analysis, M.D.C.-A., F.T. and C.P.R.; investigation, M.D.C.-A. and J.J.C.; resources, M.D.C.-A., P.J.V.-M., E.L., and D.E.; writing—original draft preparation, M.D.C.-A.; writing—review and editing, E.L., D.E., F.T., J.J.C. and C.P.R.; visualization, M.D.C.-A., P.J.V.-M., E.L., D.E., F.T., J.J.C. and C.P.R.; supervision, J.J.C. and F.T.; project administration, M.D.C.-A.; funding acquisition, M.D.C.-A., E.L., D.E. and C.P.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Seneca foundation of the Murcia Regional Government (Spain), grant number 19894/GERM/15. M.D.C.-A. was granted by the predoctoral contract “FPU” by the University of Murcia (Spain), grant number R-605/2016. D.E. was granted by the contract “Convocatoria Relevo generacional” by the University of Murcia (Spain), grant number R-1.437/2019. C.P.R. was granted by a postdoctoral fellowship under “CAPES-PrInt Project” of São Paulo State University (UNESP), grant number 03/2019. The FCT–Portuguese Science Foundation supported the study through the research contract CEECIND/04397/2017 to E.L.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The Bioethical Committee (“Comité Ético de Experimentación Animal”, CEEA) from Murcia University (Spain) with the number 171/2015 approved this study.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge Antonio Martínez Mercader (Farm ‘Las Pitufas’) for offering his cows for this study. The authors wish to thank Mama Traore for helping in sample collection.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Franco-Martínez, L.; Rubio, C.P.; Contreras-Aguilar, M.D. Methodology Assays for the Salivary Biomarkers’ Identification and Measurement. In Saliva in Health and Disease: The Present and Future of a Unique Sample for Diagnosis, 1st ed.; Tvarijonaviciute, A., Martínez-Subiela, S., López-Jornet, P., Lamy, E., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 67–95. [Google Scholar]
  2. Pedersen, A.M.; Bardow, A.; Jensen, S.B.; Nauntofte, B. Saliva and gastrointestinal functions of taste, mastication, swallowing and digestion. Oral Dis. 2002, 8, 117–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lamy, E.; Mau, M. Saliva proteomics as an emerging, non-invasive tool to study livestock physiology, nutrition and diseases. J. Proteom. 2012, 75, 4251–4258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Contreras-Aguilar, M.D.; Vallejo-Mateo, P.J.; Želvytè, R.; Tecles, F.; Rubio, C.P. Changes in Saliva Analytes Associated with Lameness in Cows: A Pilot Study. Animals 2020, 10, 2078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Contreras-Aguilar, M.D.; Monkeviciene, I.; Ceron, J.J.; Silinskas, I.; Vallejo-Mateo, P.J.; Tecles, F.; Martinez-Subiela, S.; Tvarijonaviciute, A.; Zelvyte, R. Biochemical changes in saliva of cows with inflammation: A pilot study. Res. Vet. Sci. 2019, 124, 383–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Drackley, J.K. Biology of Dairy Cows During the Transition Period: The Final Frontier? J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 82, 2259–2273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Piñeiro, J.M.; Menichetti, B.T.; Barragan, A.A.; Relling, A.E.; Weiss, W.P.; Bas, S.; Schuenemann, G.M. Associations of pre- and postpartum lying time with metabolic, inflammation, and health status of lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2019, 102, 3348–3361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Wittwer, F. Marcadores bioquímicos sanguíneos en el diagnóstico y control de trastornos metabólicos en vacas lecheras. In Proceedings of the Anais do 2o Simpósio Nacional da Vaca Leiteira; González, F., Mallmann, P., Eds.; Porto Alegre, Brazil, 2015; pp. 34–62. Available online: http://www2.ufpel.edu.br/nupeec/anexos/5d60e57a40.pdf#page=44 (accessed on 23 January 2021).
  9. Trevisi, E.; Bertoni, G. Some physiological and biochemical methods for acute and chronic stress evaluation in dairy cows. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2009, 8, 265–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Edmonson, A.J.; Lean, I.J.; Weaver, L.D.; Farver, T.; Webster, G. A Body Condition Scoring Chart for Holstein Dairy Cows. J. Dairy Sci. 1989, 72, 68–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Contreras-Aguilar, M.; Escribano, D.; Quiles, A.; López-Arjona, M.; Cerón, J.; Martínez-Subiela, S.; Hevia, M.L.; Tecles, F. Evaluation of new biomarkers of stress in saliva of sheep. Animal 2019, 13, 1278–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Contreras-Aguilar, M.; Henry, S.; Coste, C.; Tecles, F.; Escribano, D.; Cerón, J.; Hausberger, M. Changes in Saliva Analytes Correlate with Horses’ Behavioural Reactions to An Acute Stressor: A Pilot Study. Animals 2019, 9, 993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Contreras-Aguilar, M.D.; Tvarijonaviciute, A.; Monkeviciene, I.; Martín-Cuervo, M.; González-Arostegui, L.G.; Franco-Martínez, L.; Cerón, J.J.; Tecles, F.; Escribano, D. Characterization of total adenosine deaminase activity (ADA) and its isoenzymes in saliva and serum in health and inflammatory conditions in four different species: An analytical and clinical validation pilot study. BMC Vet. Res. 2020, 16, 384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rubio, C.P.; Contreras-Aguilar, M.D.; Quiles, A.; López-Arjona, M.; Cerón, J.J.; Martínez-Subiela, S.; Hevia, M.L.; Escribano, D.; Tecles, F. Biomarkers of oxidative stress in saliva of sheep: Analytical performance and changes after an experimentally induced stress. Res. Vet. Sci. 2019, 123, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Rubio, C.P.; Contreras-Aguilar, M.D.; Quiles, A.; López-Arjona, M.; Cerón, J.J.; Martínez-Subiela, S.; Hevia, M.L.; Escribano, D.; Tecles, F. Biomarkers of oxidative stress in saliva in pigs: Analytical validation and changes in lactation. Res. Vet. Sci. 2019, 123, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Contreras-Aguilar, M.; Escribano, D.; Martínez-Subiela, S.; Martín-Cuervo, M.; Lamy, E.; Tecles, F.; Cerón, J.J. Changes in saliva analytes in equine acute abdominal disease: A sialochemistry approach. BMC Vet. Res. 2019, 15, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Escribano, D.; Fuentes-Rubio, M.; Ceron, J.J. Validation of an automated chemiluminescent immunoassay for salivary cortisol measurements in pigs. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 2012, 24, 918–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Rohleder, N.; Wolf, J.M.; Maldonado, E.F.; Kirschbaum, C. The psychosocial stress-induced increase in salivary alpha-amylase is independent of saliva flow rate. Psychophysiology 2006, 43, 645–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bernabucci, U.; Ronchi, B.; Lacetera, N.; Nardone, A. Influence of Body Condition Score on Relationships Between Metabolic Status and Oxidative Stress in Periparturient Dairy Cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 88, 2017–2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Horadagoda, N.U.; Knox, K.M.; Gibbs, H.A.; Reid, S.W.; Horadagoda, A.; Edwards, S.E.; Eckersall, P.D. Acute phase proteins in cattle: Discrimination between acute and chronic inflammation. Vet. Rec. 1999, 144, 437–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Alharthi, A.; Zhou, Z.; Lopreiato, V.; Trevisi, E.; Loor, J.J. Body condition score prior to parturition is associated with plasma and adipose tissue biomarkers of lipid metabolism and inflammation in Holstein cows. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2018, 9, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Diez-Fraile, A.; Meyer, E.; Burvenich, C. Sympathoadrenal and immune system activation during the periparturient period and their association with bovine coliform mastitis. Rev. Vet. Q. 2003, 25, 31–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zachut, M.; Kra, G.; Nemes-Navon, N.; Ben-Aharon, N.; Moallem, U.; Lavon, Y.; Jacoby, S. Seasonal heat load is more potent than the degree of body weight loss in dysregulating immune function by reducing white blood cell populations and increasing inflammation in Holstein dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103, 10809–10822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Goff, J.P.; Kehrli, M.E.; Horst, R.L. Periparturient Hypocalcemia in Cows: Prevention Using Intramuscular Parathyroid Hormone. J. Dairy Sci. 1989, 72, 1182–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Contreras-Aguilar, M.D.; Gómez-García, F. Salivary Glands’ Anatomy and Physiology. In Saliva in Health and Disease: The Present and Future of a Unique Sample for Diagnosis, 1st ed.; Tvarijonaviciute, A., Martínez-Subiela, S., López-Jornet, P., Lamy, E., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 3–21. [Google Scholar]
  26. Fedorova, T.; Knudsen, C.S.; Mouridsen, K.; Nexo, E.; Borghammer, P. Salivary Acetylcholinesterase Activity Is Increased in Parkinson’s Disease: A Potential Marker of Parasympathetic Dysfunction. Park. Dis. 2015, 156479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Tecles, F.; Contreras-Aguilar, M.D.; Martínez-Miró, S.; Tvarijonaviciute, A.; Martínez-Subiela, S.; Escribano, D.; Cerón, J.J. Total esterase measurement in saliva of pigs: Validation of an automated assay, characterization and changes in stress and disease conditions. Res. Vet. Sci. 2017, 114, 170–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tecles, F.; Escribano, D.; Martínez-Miró, S.; Hernández, F.; Contreras, M.D.; Cerón, J.J. Cholinesterase in porcine saliva: Analytical characterization and behavior after experimental stress. Res. Vet. Sci. 2016, 106, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kivelä, J.; Parkkila, S.; Parkkila, A.K.; Leinonen, J.; Rajaniemi, H. Salivary carbonic anhydrase isoenzyme VI. J. Physiol. 1999, 520, 315–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dinjens, W.N.M.; Ten Kate, J.; Van Der Linden, E.P.M.; Wijnen, J.T.; Khan, P.M.; Bosman, F.T. Distribution of adenosine deaminase complexing protein (ADCP) in human tissues. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 1989, 37, 1869–1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. MacDermott, R.P.; Tritsch, G.L.; Formeister, J.F. Adenosine deaminase and nucleoside phosphorylase activities in normal human blood mononuclear cell subpopulations. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 1980, 42, 303–307. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  32. Fritzen, A.; Albani, K.D.; Machado, G.; Bottari, N.B.; Alves, M.S.; Schetinger, M.R.C.; Morsch, V.M.; Giuriatti, J.; da Silva, A.S. Relation between calcium levels and adenosine deaminase activity in serum in pre- and postpartum of dairy cow. Comp. Clin. Path. 2016, 25, 1201–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Conner, E.; Margulies, R.; Liu, M.; Smilen, S.W.; Porges, R.F.; Kwon, C. Vaginal delivery and serum markers of ischemia/reperfusion injury. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2006, 94, 96–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kulka, M.; Bełtowski, J.; Kluciński, W.; Orłowska, M.; Kołodziejska, J.; Kleczkowski, M. Serum paraoxonase-1 activity of dairy Holstein-Fresian cows in different lactation stages-preliminary study. Pol. J. Vet. Sci. 2014, 17, 143–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Weber, C.; Hametner, C.; Tuchscherer, A.; Losand, B.; Kanitz, E.; Otten, W.; Singh, S.P.; Bruckmaier, R.M.; Becker, F.; Kanitz, W.; et al. Variation in fat mobilization during early lactation differently affects feed intake, body condition, and lipid and glucose metabolism in high-yielding dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2013, 96, 165–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Celi, P. Biomarkers of oxidative stress in ruminant medicine. Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol. 2011, 33, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Dervishi, E.; Zhang, G.; Hailemariam, D.; Dunn, S.M.; Ametaj, B.N. Occurrence of retained placenta is preceded by an inflammatory state and alterations of energy metabolism in transition dairy cows. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2016, 7, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Zhang, G.; Hailemariam, D.; Dervishi, E.; Deng, Q.; Goldansaz, S.A.; Dunn, S.M.; Ametaj, B.N. Alterations of innate immunity reactants in transition dairy cows before clinical signs of lameness. Animals 2015, 5, 717–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Animals 11 00749 g001 550
Figure 1. Results of salivary cortisol (sCor), salivary alpha-amylase (sAA), butyrylcholinesterase (BChE), adenosine deaminase (ADA), Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC), ferric reducing ability of saliva (FRAS), cupric reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC), advanced oxidation protein products (AOPP), γ-glutamyl transferase (gGT), creatine kinase (CK), urea, triglycerides, glucose, and lactate in saliva of thirteen healthy dairy cows during their peripartum period (T − 13: at −13 ± 6.91 days relative to calving; T0: within the 12 first hours after calving; T + 7: seven days after calving; T + 20: 20 days after calving). The plots show the mean and 95% confidence interval (CI) (sCor, BChE, ADA, and CK) or the median and interquartile ranges (25–75%) (sAA, TEA, TEAC, FRAS, CUPRAC, AOPP, gGT, urea, triglycerides, glucose, and lactate). Asterisk indicates the statistically significant differences between times (Bonferroni pairwise comparison) (*: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01; ***: p < 0.001). Time, body condition score (BCS) at T − 13 as factors and BCS and age × parity covariable effects were evaluated by a mixed linear regression model.
Figure 1. Results of salivary cortisol (sCor), salivary alpha-amylase (sAA), butyrylcholinesterase (BChE), adenosine deaminase (ADA), Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC), ferric reducing ability of saliva (FRAS), cupric reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC), advanced oxidation protein products (AOPP), γ-glutamyl transferase (gGT), creatine kinase (CK), urea, triglycerides, glucose, and lactate in saliva of thirteen healthy dairy cows during their peripartum period (T − 13: at −13 ± 6.91 days relative to calving; T0: within the 12 first hours after calving; T + 7: seven days after calving; T + 20: 20 days after calving). The plots show the mean and 95% confidence interval (CI) (sCor, BChE, ADA, and CK) or the median and interquartile ranges (25–75%) (sAA, TEA, TEAC, FRAS, CUPRAC, AOPP, gGT, urea, triglycerides, glucose, and lactate). Asterisk indicates the statistically significant differences between times (Bonferroni pairwise comparison) (*: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01; ***: p < 0.001). Time, body condition score (BCS) at T − 13 as factors and BCS and age × parity covariable effects were evaluated by a mixed linear regression model.
Animals 11 00749 g001
Table
Table 1. White blood cell (WBC) count, milk yield and body condition score (BCS) changes during the transition period. Values were expressed as mean (standard deviation).
Table 1. White blood cell (WBC) count, milk yield and body condition score (BCS) changes during the transition period. Values were expressed as mean (standard deviation).
WBC Count (×109 cel/L)Milk Yield (kg/day)BCS (Score)
Time (days from calving)
−136.69 (1.44)ND 13.4 (0.65)
010.74 (4.12) a3.7 (2.43)3.5 (0.63)
+77.15 (2.17)35.5 (6.87) b3.0 (0.29)
+207.81 (2.97)38.5 (10.94) b2.9 (0.14) c
Mixed linear regression model
sampling time (F)8.55 **101.05 ***4.79 **
BCS at T − 13 (F)2.750.08
BCS (Wald Z)0.520.61
Parity × age (Wald Z)0.320.842.34 *
1 ND = no data. a,b,c Show statistical analysis results in Bonferroni pairwise comparison; a p = 0.004 with T − 13; b p < 0.001 with T − 13; c p = 0.018 with T − 13. * Asterisk indicates statistically significant difference (Mixed lineal regression model); (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001).
Table
Table 2. Multiple logistic regression analyses in 13 dairy cows during their peripartum period between the altered white blood cell (WBC) at T0 (≤4.0 or ≥12.0 × 109 cel/L [20]), and decreases in the body condition score (BCS) at T + 20 compared to T − 13 with some salivary analytes at different time of samplings. The times were T − 13: at −13 ± 6.91 days relative to calving; T0: within the 12 first hours after calving; T + 7: seven days after calving; T + 20: 20 days after calving. The analytical variable in bold showed significance.
Table 2. Multiple logistic regression analyses in 13 dairy cows during their peripartum period between the altered white blood cell (WBC) at T0 (≤4.0 or ≥12.0 × 109 cel/L [20]), and decreases in the body condition score (BCS) at T + 20 compared to T − 13 with some salivary analytes at different time of samplings. The times were T − 13: at −13 ± 6.91 days relative to calving; T0: within the 12 first hours after calving; T + 7: seven days after calving; T + 20: 20 days after calving. The analytical variable in bold showed significance.
Salivary Analytical VariableAltered Value of WBC at T0Salivary Analytical VariableDecreases of the BCS at T + 20 Compared to T − 13
Crude Odds Ratio 1 (95% CI2)p ValueCrude Odds Ratio (95% CI)p Value
TEA 3 T01.96 (0.53–7.32)0.315sAA10 T + 200.66 (0.17–2.64)0.561
Lip 4 T07.99 (1.01–64.82)0.050AST T02.97 (0.52–17.08)0.223
TEAC 5 T017.22 (1.00–297.12)0.050CK T01.74 (0.28–10.80)0.550
AOPP 6 T012.66 (1.02–156.93)0.048creatinine T011.63 (0.50–271.26)0.127
H2O2 7 T07.01 (0.72–68.36)0.112urea T01.07 (0.30–3.80)0.921
AST 8 T05.08 (0.64–40.54)0.125uric acid T02.27 (0.61–8.51)0.225
CK 9 T09.43 (0.78–114.99)0.077phosphorus T00.52 (0.12–2.22)0.378
lactate T04.63 (1.13–18.98)0.033phosphorus T + 200.57 (0.14–2.36)0.437
total calcium T06.09 (0.88–42.05)0.067
1 Crude odds ratio from the multiple logistic regression analyses. 2 CI = confidence interval. 3 TEA = total esterase. 4 Lip = lipase. 5 TEAC = trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity. 6 AOPP = advanced oxidation protein products. 7 H2O2 = hydrogen peroxide. 8 AST = aspartate aminotransferase. 9 CK = creatine kinase. 10 sAA = salivary alpha-amylase.
Table
Table 3. Multiple linear regression analyses in 13 dairy cows during their peripartum period between the dependent variable milk yield at T + 7 and T + 20, and some salivary analytes at different time of samplings as independent variables. The times were T − 13: at −13 ± 6.91 days relative to calving; T0: within the 12 first hours after calving; T + 7: seven days after calving; T + 20: 20 days after calving. The analytical variable in bold showed significance.
Table 3. Multiple linear regression analyses in 13 dairy cows during their peripartum period between the dependent variable milk yield at T + 7 and T + 20, and some salivary analytes at different time of samplings as independent variables. The times were T − 13: at −13 ± 6.91 days relative to calving; T0: within the 12 first hours after calving; T + 7: seven days after calving; T + 20: 20 days after calving. The analytical variable in bold showed significance.
Salivary Analytical
Variable		Milk Yield at T + 7Milk Yield at T + 20
Linear Regression EquationR2 1p ValueSalivary Analytical
Variable		Linear Regression EquationR2p Value
sAA 2 at T + 20y = 4.99x + 21.580.2560.045AST at T0y =−0.53x + 51.030.4160.014
TEA 3 at T0y =−13.11x + 93.690.4180.01gGT 9 at T + 20y =−2.36x + 45.240.0070.79
TEA at T + 20y =15.28x − 28.080.2580.044CK 10 at T0y =−1.38x + 49.550.4220.013
CUPRAC 4 at T + 20y =22.72x + 29.460.2480.048creatinine at T0y =−41.95x + 69.190.5890.004
AOPP 5 at T + 20y =4.70x + 10.990.3510.019uric acid at T0y =−109.17x + 64.340.510.005
H2O2 6 at T + 20y =5.01x + 16.240.380.015urea at T0y =−18.98x + 95.960.3340.029
AST 7 at T + 20y =0.80x + 25.910.310.027
LDH 8 at T0y =−0.06x + 40.280.1120.141
creatinine at T + 20y =20.68x + 23.480.3220.025
uric acid at T0y = −51.70x + 47.310.2790.037
lactate at T + 20y = 9.44x + 28.000.4520.007
albumin at T + 7y = −544.05x + 6.960.3770.015
1 Coefficient of determination; 2 sAA = salivary alpha-amylase; 3 TEA = total esterase; 4 CUPRAC = cupric reducing antioxidant capacity; 5 AOPP = advanced oxidation protein products; 6 H2O2 = hydrogen peroxide; 7 AST = aspartate aminotransferase; 8 LDH = lactate dehydrogenase; 9 gGT = γ-glutamyl transferase; 10 CK = creatine kinase.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Contreras-Aguilar, M.D.; Vallejo-Mateo, P.J.; Lamy, E.; Escribano, D.; Cerón, J.J.; Tecles, F.; Rubio, C.P. Changes in Saliva Analytes in Dairy Cows during Peripartum: A Pilot Study. Animals 2021, 11, 749. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11030749

AMA Style

Contreras-Aguilar MD, Vallejo-Mateo PJ, Lamy E, Escribano D, Cerón JJ, Tecles F, Rubio CP. Changes in Saliva Analytes in Dairy Cows during Peripartum: A Pilot Study. Animals. 2021; 11(3):749. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11030749

Chicago/Turabian Style

Contreras-Aguilar, María D., Pedro J. Vallejo-Mateo, Elsa Lamy, Damián Escribano, Jose J. Cerón, Fernando Tecles, and Camila P. Rubio. 2021. "Changes in Saliva Analytes in Dairy Cows during Peripartum: A Pilot Study" Animals 11, no. 3: 749. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11030749

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop