Next Article in Journal
Effect of 50 Years of No-Tillage, Stubble Retention, and Nitrogen Fertilization on Soil Respiration, Easily Extractable Glomalin, and Nitrogen Mineralization
Previous Article in Journal
Absorption and Distribution of Calcium (45Ca) Applied to the Surface of Orange (Citrus sinensis) Fruits at Different Developmental Stages
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Se Application on Polyamines and Carbon–Nitrogen Metabolism of Pepper Plants Suffering from Cd Toxicity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mycorrhizal Fungi Inoculation Improves Capparis spinosa’s Yield, Nutrient Uptake and Photosynthetic Efficiency under Water Deficit

by
Mohammed Bouskout
1,
Mohammed Bourhia
1,
Mohamed Najib Al Feddy
2,
Hanane Dounas
1,
Ahmad Mohammad Salamatullah
3,
Walid Soufan
4,
Hiba-Allah Nafidi
5 and
Lahcen Ouahmane
1,*
1
Laboratory of Microbial Biotechnologies, AgroSciences and Environment, Labeled Research Unit-CNRST N° 4, Faculty of Sciences Semlalia, Cadi Ayyad University, Marrakesh 40000, Morocco
2
Laboratory of Phytobacteriology, Plant Protection Research Unit, National Institute of Agronomic Research, CRRA, Marrakech 40000, Morocco
3
Department of Food Science & Nutrition, College of Food and Agricultural Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
4
Plant Production Department, College of Food and Agricultural Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
5
Department of Food Science, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Université Laval, 2325 University Street, Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2022, 12(1), 149; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12010149
Submission received: 15 December 2021 / Revised: 29 December 2021 / Accepted: 6 January 2022 / Published: 8 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Improving Mineral Nutrition to Obtain Stress Tolerant Crops)

Abstract

:
Agricultural yields are under constant jeopardy as climate change and abiotic pressures spread worldwide. Using rhizospheric microbes as biostimulants/biofertilizers is one of the best ways to improve agro-agriculture in the face of these things. The purpose of this experiment was to investigate whether a native arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculum (AMF-complex) might improve caper (Capparis spinosa) seedlings’ nutritional status, their morphological/growth performance and photosynthetic efficiency under water-deficit stress (WDS). Thus, caper plantlets inoculated with or without an AMF complex (+AMF and −AMF, respectively) were grown under three gradually increasing WDS regimes, i.e., 75, 50 and 25% of field capacity (FC). Overall, measurements of morphological traits, biomass production and nutrient uptake (particularly P, K+, Mg2+, Fe2+ and Zn2+) showed that mycorrhizal fungi inoculation increased these variables significantly, notably in moderate and severe WDS conditions. The increased WDS levels reduced the photochemical efficiency indices (Fv/Fm and Fv/Fo) in −AMF plants, while AMF-complex application significantly augmented these parameters. Furthermore, the photosynthetic pigments content was substantially higher in +AMF seedlings than −AMF controls at all the WDS levels. Favorably, at 25% FC, AMF-colonized plants produce approximately twice as many carotenoids as non-colonized ones. In conclusion, AMF inoculation seems to be a powerful eco-engineering strategy for improving the caper seedling growth rate and drought tolerance in harsh environments.

1. Introduction

Caper-bush (Capparis spinosa L.), an orphan/indigenous medicinal and aromatic crop, is suited to the Mediterranean’s semi-arid and desert environments and is cultivated commonly by resource-constrained farmers. During dry seasons, caper cultivation provides a revenue stream for numerous farmers, compensating for yield losses from cereals and other crops. Morocco, Turkey, Italy and Spain are the world’s leading producers of capers (unopened immature flower buds) as well as caperberries (unripe fruit) [1,2]. It is a perennial spiny shrub with many branches that belongs to the Capparaceae or Capparidaceae family and the genus Capparis, which has around 350 species [3]. This species plays significant ecological and socio-economic functions, while also possessing important therapeutic virtues. Caper parts are rich in bioantioxidants, making them an excellent source of developing novel bioactive compounds with potent phytochemical and biological benefits [4]. They might also be used as a substitute for synthetic preservatives in food and pharmaceuticals/cosmetics products [5,6]. In addition to these very important and attractable potential nutrapharmaceuticals, C. spinosa plants may play a wide variety of ecological and environmental roles thanks to their xerophytic features. Indeed, the caper bush cultivation has always been valuable owing to its well-deserved reputation for growing in challenging conditions and on rough land, as well as agronomic characteristics associated with drought resistance and high-temperature tolerance. This makes it a good candidate for reclaiming land that does not have a lot of farming potential (marginal lands) [7]. In the field conditions, there exist different works conducted in order to comprehend the practical/advantageous strategies and mechanisms of caper tissue adaptation in response to drought stress. This xerophytic plant’s anatomical, morphological, physio-biochemical adaptations and survival strategies have been well described, allowing it to grow and successfully complete its life cycles in arid–semi-arid environments [3,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. Additionally, a transcriptome investigation of this xerophytic plant also indicates a molecular basis framework for its abiotic-stress resistance, hence the plant’s molecular plausible explanation for its ability to thrive in the desert [15].
In fact, as global warming continues to rise, the likelihood of extreme occurrences such as an extended duration and the greater intensity/severity of drought increases as well. This context projection is more likely to occur in the desert or semi-arid regions of the world, particularly in Eastern Asia, Africa and the Mediterranean basin, which represents the distribution and intensification area of C. spinosa [15]. Water scarcity, lack of rain and rising temperatures resulting from climate change render the earth drier. Increasing dryness is becoming a worldwide trend that is negatively influencing both socio-economic and agro-ecosystem aspects. The plants’ growth and yield of different crops are often affected by drought and nutritional disruptions such as environmental restrictions, which provide a growing global hazard that the COVID-19 pandemic conjecture eclipses today [16]. Droughts disturb the water balance and cause toxicity by altering ionic homeostasis, hence diminishing plant productivity. In this respect, environmental deterioration caused by protracted droughts, excessive soil erosion and poor soils productivity would limit the caper species’ ability to reach its optimal growth/yield and intensification potential. Earlier studies that looked at how abiotic stressors such as salt and drought affect Capparis spinosa seedlings found that growth and other qualities are considerably lower when there is not enough water. Plant height, leaf number, leaf length, both shoot fresh and dry weights and chlorophyll, as well as the relative content of leaf and root, were all significantly lower when water-deficit stress (WDS) increased [17,18]. Additionally, substantial losses in yield per hectare and water use efficiency were seen when WDS was imposed at various irrigation intervals. The carotenoids content and electrolyte leaks were also affected, and the detrimental effect of WDS contexts was compensated using a superabsorbent polymer [19].
On the other hand, inoculation with two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi species (AMF) promoted the growth and biomass of Capparis spinosa plants, its nutrient uptake (phosphate and nitrogen), and stimulated various biochemical and physiological traits [20]. According to Pugnaire and Esteban [21], phosphate and nitrogen fertilizers improve caper bush growth and the content of all the mineral nutrients in plant tissues; they also hypothesize that caper plants may flourish in nutrient-poor soils thanks to their extensive mycorrhizal root system. In fact, mycorrhizal fungi are a kind of ubiquitous rhizospheric soil microorganism that may establish symbiotic relationships with plant roots and govern plant development [22]. Interestingly, AMF have been proven to be one of the wonderful keys to optimizing most plant crop traits under diverse environmental stresses [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. Thus, biotechnology approaches might be effective in strengthening caper production and intensification in degraded habitats, as well as in attempting to unlock the full potential of this species to promote sustainable agriculture and accomplish the abovementioned ecological and socioeconomic advantages. AMF application may be a means of ensuring the sustained efficiency of commercial caper crops. Accordingly, to the best of our knowledge, no published research has looked into the effect of mycorrhizal fungi on the physiological and morphological performance of C. spinosa plants under water-deficit stress conditions. For these purposes, this study focused on C. spinosa and its associated microbiota, the native AMF complex in particular, to explore whether there was a potentially beneficial symbiotic association in improving the biomass production and nutritional status of mycorrhized seedlings, as well as their photosynthetic performance, under progressively reduced soil moisture levels to impose drought stress.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material

The caperberries (fruit) of capers (Capparis spinosa L.) were reaped from the Safi region of Morocco (32°12′12.0″ N; 9°09′04.6″ W) in July 2017. The seeds were then separated from the ripe fruit, cleaned in tap water, dried and stored in linen sacks at room temperature before they were sown. The seeds were chemically treated with a mix of sulfuric and gibberellic acid (H2SO4 and GA3) at the time of germination to break the dormancy they suffered. Subsequently, the seeds were disinfected with 3% sodium hypochlorite for 10 min, accompanied by three distilled water rinses [34]. They were put in Petri dishes (9 cm Ø) onto paper soaked in distilled water and incubated at 25 °C. The filter papers were replaced at frequent intervals to avoid contamination from yeasts. Pre-germinated seeds were then transferred into small polystyrene plastic containers full of sterilized black peat. They were transplanted again to other polystyrene pots (2 L) when young seedlings had four to five fully formed leaves.

2.2. Rhizospheric Soil Samples

Sandy loam soil was collected from two caper fields in the Safi area of Morocco at a depth of approximately 32–45 cm under mature and very well growing plants of C. spinosa. The soil samples were taken from the same seeds sampling site. The sieved (≤2 mm) and homogenized rhizospheric soil samples had 16.6 ± 1.06 (mS m−1) of electrical conductivity EC, 8.16 ± 0.09 of pH (H2O), 19.5 ± 2.72 (%) total carbonates (CaCO3), 2.16 ± 0.1 (%) of total organic carbon, 3.72 ± 0.15 (%) if organic matter, 1.83 ± 0.21 (mg g−1) of P-Olsen and 2.61 ± 0.14 (mg g−1) of total P. The soil texture consisted of 67.3% sand, 23.1% silt and 9.6% clay. In this experimentation, the physicochemically characterized rhizospheric soil samples were used as one-half of the substrate for cultivating each caper plantlet.

2.3. Mycorrhizal Fungi Inoculum

The mycorrhizal fungi inoculum (MFI) was made up of a mixture of indigenous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi spores (AMF complex) gained in rhizospheric soil samples taken underneath mature caper plants (Capparis spinosa) in Morocco’s Safi region. In this experiment, the trap culture technique was used [35]. The native AMF complex was propagated for 12 weeks on the maize roots (Zea mays L.) as a mycotrophic plant species. This trap culture was applied to amplify and enrich the amount of indigenous AMF complex associated with wild caper plants. Parallel to, prior to and after that, a preliminary examination of AMF spores complex at morphotype scale was conducted using a specific key [36] to monitor their quantitative and qualitative presence as well as their survival in abundance. Wet sieving (mesh 500 to 45 µm) 100 g of dry soil followed by the centrifugation (1500 rpm for 10 min) of the spores trapped in aqueous sucrose solution (50% w/v) resulted in the extraction of AMF spores from rhizospheric soil samples, as described by Ouahmane et al. [35]. With the use of a stereomicroscope, AMF spores were enumerated such that the prepared AMF inoculum contained ~615 ± 38 spores/100 g of trap culture assemblage. MFI mainly includes mycorrhizal spores, infected trap root segments and viable mycorrhizal hyphae that serve as active AM fungal propagules.

2.4. Experimental Design and Treatments

The experiment was set up as a two-factor interaction with a complete randomization (i.e., the inoculum of native AMF complex and water stress treatments). Ten replicates were performed for each treatment, giving sixty pots in total. Inoculated seedlings were cultivated on a substrate made of a mixture (1.5 kg) of sterilized river sand and sterilized sampled rhizospheric soil (1:1, v/v), as well as 5 g of freshly prepared MFI. The mycorrhizal inoculum was placed near each seedling root to maximize fungal colonization. The uninoculated plants (control) were grown in the same homogeneous substrate sterilized three times at 180 °C. Then, three-month-old healthy plantlets of the caper were randomly subjected to one of three irrigation water treatments. The gravimetric technique was employed to measure the soil field capacities applied in pots. At first, all dry pots were weighed (w1) and well-watered to saturate the substrate thoroughly, then weighed again (w2) when excess water had drained (after ~48 h). The difference between the two weights (w3 = w2 − w1) was used for achieving 75, 50 and 25% FC levels. All pots were adjusted twice daily at twelve-hour intervals. Cumulative water loss was supplemented to all pots every day during the experimental period to compensate for natural transpiration/soil evaporation and leaching/percolation processes, thus maintaining soil moisture conditions for each targeted FC level. The seedlings were grown in a sunny greenhouse under natural daylight. The temperature ranged from ~22 to ~38.1 °C throughout the experiment, with a relative humidity of ~60–70% and a photoperiod of approximately 12 h.

2.5. Growth Measurements

After twelve weeks of cultivation, the morphological traits and biomass characteristics of mycorrhizal (+AMF) and non-mycorrhizal (−AMF) caper plantlets were recorded during and after harvesting. Firstly, the height of seedlings was measured, as well as the number of leaves, nodes and branches on each shoot. The collar diameter was measured with the aid of a digital Vernier caliper. Afterward, all plantlets were gently withdrawn from the soils, and the shoot parts of ten randomly selected uprooted seedlings were carefully separated from their root systems. Following that, the fresh weights of shoots and roots were determined using an electronic precision balance (~0.001 g). At the same time, after all the samples were deposited for 24 h in a dry oven at 110 °C, their dry weights were estimated. The root-to-shoot (Rdw/Sdw) ratio index was then calculated for each plant sample by dividing root dry weight by shoot dry weight. The relative biomass allocation to roots was determined using the root weight ratio (RWR) parameter as total root dry weight (g) divided by total plant dry weight (g). The mycorrhizal dependency (MD%), which is the MFI’s contribution to seedlings growth, was calculated using the total dry weight (dry wt.) ratio of +AMF and −AMF caper plantlets as follows:
MD   %   = [ ( Total   dry   wt . of + AMF   plantlets Total   dry   wt .   of   AMF   plantlets ) ] Total   dry   wt . of + AMF   plantlets   ×   100  
The average values of morphological and biomass parameters of all plants were obtained using six replicates.

2.6. Plant Mineral Analysis

An aliquot of 500 mg of the aerial plant samples was dried (80 °C/24 h), calcined (at 550 °C/5 h) and digested by a freshly prepared mix diacid of 65% HNO3 and 37% HCl (1:3, v:v), respectively. By way of Whatman paper (no. 42), the resulting digested dry matter solutions were purified and then diluted to 50 mL with deionized water. The content of macronutrients (phosphorus, potassium, magnesium, sodium and calcium) and micronutrients (iron and zinc) of all samples were measured using an ICP-AES (ICPE-9000, Shimadzu Inc.) [37]. Nutrient content values were expressed as mg g−1. The average content of all macro- and micronutrients was determined using five replicates.

2.7. Chlorophyll Fluorescence

In vivo, special clips were mounted on the young leaves of five individual plantlets of each treatment to be adapted to the dark for 30 min between 10:00 and 12:30 a.m. After the excitation of the leaves with high-intensity actinic light for 0.1 s, the parameters of leaf chlorophyll fluorescence, especially Fo, Fv and Fm reflecting minimum, variable and maximum fluorescence yields, respectively, were determined automatically using a handheld chlorophyll fluorometer OS-30p+ (Opti-Sciences, Hudson, NY, USA). The calculated Fv/Fm ratio (Fm − Fo/Fm) represents the maximum quantum efficiency-(yield) of open photosystem II (PSII) centers. The Fv/Fo ratio changes, describing the basal quantum yield (maximum primary yield of PSII photochemistry), were also studied. The average values of each chlorophyll fluorescence parameter were determined using five biological replicates.

2.8. Content of Photosynthetic Pigments

Fresh leaves (~50 mg) were homogenized into 3 mL of ice-cold acetone (100%) for each sample. The extract was centrifuged for 10 min at 1000 rpm and incubated in the dark at 4 °C for 12 h. The collected supernatant was measured spectrophotometrically at 662, 645 and 470 nm for chlorophyll a (Chl a), chlorophyll b (Chl b) and total carotenoids (Cart), respectively. The calculation formulas of Lichtenthaler [38] were used and the results were expressed in mg pigment concentrations per gram of fresh leaf (mg g−1 FW). Six samples were analyzed to measure the mean amounts of every chlorophyll pigment parameter.

2.9. Symbiotic Development

For each mycorrhizal treatment (n = 3), very fine fresh roots were cleared with 10% (w/v) KOH (2.5 h at 90 °C) before being neutralized with a 5% solution of HCl. They were then stained at 90 °C for 30 min with trypan blue 0.05% (w/v) in lactoglycerol solution. After each step, each sample was adequately rinsed with distilled water to eliminate all traces of KOH, HCl and excess trypan blue [39]. Colored root fragments of 1 cm were mounted parallel on a microscope slide. The degree of mycorrhizal caper root colonization was then estimated according to the method defined by Trouvelot et al. [40] below a microscope at 40-X magnification. A sample (n = 3) of uninoculated roots (plantlets grown without AMF) was examined randomly to ensure favorable experimental conditions.

2.10. Statistical Analysis

All parameters were expressed as mean values ± standard deviations (SD). A two-way analysis of variance (2-way ANOVA) was conducted in order to determine if inoculation with AMF-complex (A) and soil WDS (W) levels had a statistically significant influence on all variables examined in caper plants, separately and/or in combination. All the data were first checked for normality (Shapiro–Wilk test) and homoscedasticity (Levene test) to ensure the conditions of the parametric ANOVA test. Tukey’s post hoc test subjected the averages of all parameters to multiple comparisons if the two factors (A × W) interacted significantly. Whenever p < 0.05, a difference was deemed to be statistically significant. Furthermore, the gathered data were examined using the correlation approach, which included the factorial analysis method with principal component extraction (PCA) and correlation analysis using the Pearson’ r coefficient to perceive different links among all studied variables and within factor treatments. The statistical analysis was conducted with the IBM SPSS version 23.0 package, and the graphs were made with GraphPad Prism 9 software.

3. Results

3.1. Mycorrhizal Colonization

The mycorrhizal infection of caper plantlet roots by the native AMF complex was effective, as highlighted by the mycorrhizal colonization (MC) frequency parameter (Figure 1). The lowest MC rates were registered in well-watered seedling roots (41.7%), which were found to be statistically different from those grown in moderate (55.3%) and extreme (51.7%) WDS conditions. The MC frequency first went up by ~32.6% with the rise in WDS levels from 75 to 50% FC and then started declining by ~6.5% after diminishing further field capacity from 50 to 25%. In contrast, no mycorrhizal colonization was found in the uninoculated plant roots under all the water regimes. The mycorrhizal dependency (MD) results, as a rate (%) indicator of the improvement in the total dry biomass of the caper plants in response to the AMF complex inoculation, followed the same variation trend as MC across different WDS treatments (Figure 1). MD rose significantly from 29.5% in well-watered conditions (75% FC) to 56.1% under moderate WDS (50% FC), then diminished insignificantly by 33.9% to attain 37% at severe WDS (25% FC).

3.2. Morphological Parameters

Table 1 displays the morphological traits measured after harvesting the mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal (−AMF) seedlings of C. spinosa that underwent three separate irrigation regimes (75, 50 and 25% of FC). Overall, the inoculated plantlets’ morphological characteristics at all irrigation levels were significantly better than those grown without the AMF complex (p < 0.0001). By comparison, the WDS factor, alone or in combination with the AMF treatment, did not influence all the morphological parameters statistically significantly. The elevated irrigation levels led to a gradual augmentation in stem elongation (maximum plant height) for both the mycorrhizal and −AMF plantlets; simultaneously, the WDS conditions have not affected this parameter seriously (p = 0.06), whereas the AMF complex treatment improved the caper plant height at all the FC levels. In all the watering conditions, the nodes number and thus the number of leaves under the presence of MFI were significantly very superior to those of uninoculated seedlings, becoming greater by ~172%/~117% and ~118%/~113%, respectively, at 50%/25% FC for both leaves and nodes number. In the absence of the AMF complex, the branches number decreased approximately two-fold at 75% FC and more than fourfold at 50% and 25% field capacity. The collar diameter of +AMF plants was considerably more vigorous than those of uninoculated seedlings at all the WDS levels, improving by ~18.04, ~25.13 and ~26.82 at 75, 50 and 25% FC, respectively.

3.3. Biomass Production

The mycorrhizal plants’ shoot fresh and dry weights (SFW and SDW) decrease marginally as the field capacity declines, unlike the AMF-untreated plantlets, their SFW and SDW decrease significantly (p < 0.001) once the levels of soil moisture decrease (Table 2). On the other side, as the WDS increases in mycorrhizal C. spinosa seedlings, the root fresh and dry weights (RFW and RDW) significantly boost (p < 0.001), with a slight rise but one that is not significant in −AMF plants. As a reaction to the dwindling soil moisture, the substantial increase in the RFW and the RDW in the mycorrhizal plants thus contributes to greater total fresh and dry weights (TFW and TDW). In contrast, −AMF seedlings maintain almost the same TFW and TDW under all the conditions of WDS. The maximum improvements in the RFW (13.88 g), RDW (4.33 g), TFW (19.40 g) and TDW (5.84 g) were obtained at 50% FC in the +AMF plants. All the biomass parameters of the −AMF plantlets, whatever the WDS level, were all significantly lower than those of the mycorrhizal seedlings (except the RDW at 75%) (p < 0.0001). In the absence of an AMF mixture at moderate and extreme WDS, the caper plants’ SFW fall markedly by approximately 105–64%, the SDW by 137–83%, the RFW by 135–76%, the RDW by 125–50% and then the TFW and TDW by 125–128% and 72–58%, respectively. Moreover, the root-to-shoot (Rdw/Sdw) ratio and the root weight ratio (RWR) were similar for both the +AMF and −AMF plants at all watering regimes. However, when the soil moisture was lower, these two parameters increased significantly. The water-deficit conditions greatly influenced all the biomass parameters (apart from TFW, p = 0.08), all of which were significantly positively affected by the AMF treatment alone (p < 0.0001) or in interaction with the WDS treatments (except Rdw/Sdw and RWR) (Table 2).

3.4. Macro- and Micromineral Nutrient Contents

Table 3 data illustrate how much the inoculation with a mixture of native AMF has improved the mineral uptake in droughted caper plantlets compared to −AMF ones. Overall, the mycorrhizal C. spinosa seedlings recorded the highest mineral contents at all soil moisture levels. The two-way ANOVA revealed that, apart from sodium (Na+) and calcium (Ca2+) (p > 0.05), the native AMF complex had a statistically positive significant effect on the variation of plantlet mineral nutrients, i.e., phosphorus (P), potassium (K+), magnesium (Mg2+), iron (Fe2+) (p < 0.0001) and zinc (Zn2+) (p < 0.01). Additionally, except for P (p < 0.001) and Fe2+ (p < 0.05), the WDS levels did not significantly affect the other mineral nutrients measured in caper shoots. By contrast, neither the AMF treatment (A) nor WDS conditions (W) nor their interaction (A × W) greatly affected the Na+ and Ca2+ amounts in the caper shoots. Only the P and Fe2+ concentrations were appreciably influenced by the interaction between the AMF inoculation and the soil moisture deficit conditions among the macro and micro-minerals examined. At 75, 50 and 25% of field capacity, the shoot P is ~44, ~52% and ~69% higher in the inoculated seedlings than in their counterparts grown in soil without the native AMF complex, respectively; similarly, K+ was elevated by ~45–40%, Mg2+ by ~45–55% and Zn2+ by ~53–66% at 50% and 25% FC, respectively, and the Fe2+ concentration increased approximately twice as the WDS increased.

3.5. Chlorophyll Fluorescence

The observed mean minimal (Fo), variable (Fv) and maximal (Fm) fluorescence values did not significantly differ at any water-deficit stress level in inoculated and non-inoculated C. spinosa dark-adapted leaf. In comparison to the −AMF seedlings (control), the AMF inoculation leads to a substantial increase (p < 0.05) in the mean PSII photochemical (Fv/Fm) maximum quantum efficiency ratio as well as the basal quantum efficiency (Fv/Fo) at both mild and extreme WDS conditions. The youngest C. spinosa leaves had a lower Fo but a higher Fv and Fm in the AMF-treated plantlets than in the control ones when the soil water deficit worsened. The water stress factor solely affected Fv and Fm (p < 0.05), whereas both Fv/Fm and Fv/Fo were considerably influenced by the AMF inoculation treatment alone or in combination with the WDS (p < 0.01) (Table 4).

3.6. Photosynthetic Pigments

Chlorophyll a (Chl a), chlorophyll b (Chl b), total chlorophyll (Chl a+b) and total carotenoids (Cart) were accumulated in both mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal C. spinosa seedlings when they were subjected to increasing water restrictions (Figure 2). All the photosynthetic pigment variables were considerably changed by the AMF-complex inoculation (A). The same goes for water-deficit conditions (W). In contrast, their interaction did not have a significant effect on the content of all the photosynthetic pigments. Moreover, the differences of the Chl a, Chl b and Chl a+b concentrations were significant between the AMF-inoculated and non-inoculated C. spinosa plantlets under all the irrigation levels, and just at 25% FC for Cart, based on Tukey’s post hoc test (at p < 0.05). Interestingly, the significance of the variations’ magnitude in Chl a+b concentrations between the +AMF and −AMF plantlets at all the levels of WDS is the same as that observed in Chl a, suggesting that this photosynthetic pigment may govern the total chlorophyll content. The increase in soil moisture-deficit from 75 to 50% and then to 25% of the FC led to a significant increase in the concentration of Chl b in the mycorrhizal seedlings compared to the −AMF ones, which, under all the FC conditions, had no significant change in Chl b but doubled their content at 25% FC. The Chl a/b ratio increased in the absence of the AMF complex and decreased with the severe WDS. Still, statistically, the interaction impact of AMF-inoculation status and different WDS conditions was insignificant (p = 0.98). The Chl a, Chl b, Chl a+b and Cart concentrations in the +AMF caper seedlings were ~98, ~155, ~110 and ~38% greater than those in the −AMF plantlets at both corresponding soil moisture levels of 75 and 50% FC, respectively, while at 25% FC, they were ~40, ~92, ~54 and ~80% higher (Figure 2).

3.7. Relationship between Caper Seedlings Traits

Figure 3 of Biplot, which focuses on the principal component analysis (PCA), depicts the variations of all the measured caper plant parameters allowing us to contemplate how interrelated the variables are to one another regarding each WDS level and AMF inoculation treatment. The first (PC1) and second (PC2) principal components clarify 60.39 and 14.20%, respectively, i.e., ~74.59% of the total variance. The PCA score plot clearly segregated all the AMF treatments along PC1, with mildly and extremely droughted mycorrhized caper plantlets positioned at the positive section of PC1 that is marked by the higher plantlets’ growth traits, and high levels of all the chlorophyll pigments, Fv/Fm, Fv/Fo, as well as all the mineral nutrients (Figure 3). RWR, Rdw/Sdw, Fm and Fo, on the other hand, had the highest load in the second component, which visibly separates all the water stress levels, while Fv, Fm and Ca2+ align with both. However, Chlorophyll a/b aligns somewhat more with a negative section of PC1.
In addition, we have determined the pairwise correlations between all of the measurements (Figure 4). Pearson’s correlation tests showed that almost all the plantlet morphological/biomass growth, chlorophyll pigments and nutrient contents had strong positive correlations with each other, except for some other traits such as RWR, Rdw/Sdw and Fo, and the Chl a/b ratio. In turn, the rate of mycorrhizal colonization (Myc %) correlates emphatically with all the morphological/biomass features, chlorophyll pigments and mineral macro- and micronutrients (such as P, K, Mg, Fe and Zn) (at p < 0.00001), Zn and RDW (at p < 0.001), Cart and Fv/Fo (at p < 0.001) and Fv, Fv/Fm, Na and Ca (at p < 0.05). Out of the 496 correlation tests, 81 were negative, with just twenty-eight being significant. Twenty-four were recorded for chlorophyll a/b with all the variables except Fo, Fv/Fo, Fv/Fm, SFW/SDW, RWR and the Rdw/Sdw ratio. Three were identified for Fo with Fm, Fv/Fo and Fv/Fm (p < 0.01), and one was marked between the root-to-shoot ratio and SRW (p < 0.0001). One was observed between Rdw/Sdw and SDW (p < 0.05) (Figure 4).

4. Discussion

This paper focuses on highlighting the potentially advantageous effect of AMF inoculation on caper plants’ adaptive response to different levels of soil water deficit. First of all, our findings show that the native AMF complex, originating from rhizospheric wild-caper soils in Morocco’s Safi region, successfully colonized all the inoculated C. spinosa plantlets. It remarkably boosted the chances and root colonization rate under stressful water-deficit conditions. Research by Liu and Ma [20] revealed that 39.15% is the topmost mycorrhizal infection rate (MC) of C. spinosa achieved by Glomus mosseae (G. mosseae) relative to that of Glomus versiforme (G. versiforme). At the same time, the native AMF complex, in the present study, enhanced this proportion to reach 55.3 and 51.7% at 50% FC and 25% FC, respectively. It is conceivable to speculate that the richness and abundance of indigenous AMF spores existing in the caper plants’ rhizospheric soil may be thought to increase the extent and occasions for root colonization, thereby raising their MC. Comparably, Shi et al. [31] observed that MC rose in desert ephemeral plants as soil moisture levels lowered. They partly explain these MC rates by inferring that the AM fungi pathway function of obtaining soil water to relieve plant water stress was no longer obliged when the soil moisture level increased. Hence, the results of mycorrhizal dependency supported this conclusion (Figure 1). Bethlenfalvay et al. [41] revealed that WDS did not dwindle the rate MC of soybean roots by G. mosseae; however, in severely droughted plants, the biomass and length of the extra-radical mycelium (ERM) formed by AMF were significantly higher. Drought may impact mycorrhizal colonization in experimental designs, including potted plants, such as the one used in our work, by encouraging rather than reducing root colonization [42]. Jadrane et al. [27] also found similar results recently, as they revealed an elevated colonization rate in mycorrhized carob seedlings as water-deficit levels progressed. Indeed, our results are in line with those reported in Zhang et al.’s [25] research, where mixed AMF inoculation provides a more important benefit than inoculation by single AMF species for the growth of Zenia insignia plants, notably in the presence of drought stress. Numerous studies have proven a substantial improvement in plants’ and trees’ development and survival thanks to inoculations with the native AMF mixture, especially in stressed/degraded sites [26,34,42,43,44]. The use of native soil AM fungi may be a handy alternative source to commercial AMF inocula in sustainable or organic farming systems. It may also generate relevant economic and ecological benefits in these Mediterranean soil systems [45].
Overall, the AMF complex colonization makes it possible to hugely improve the development of both caper seedlings’ morphological and biomass traits, regardless of the soil FC level. Mycorrhized caper plantlets became stronger under both mild and extreme WDS. They produced more dry and fresh biomass, suggesting that mycorrhizal symbiosis positively impacts the host plant’s growth, which is consistent with those of previous findings [13,24,25,27,31,32,42,46,47,48,49,50]. Concomitantly, whether in the absence or presence of MFI, caper plants’ morphological development and biomass produced under well-watered conditions were largely unaffected by the reduced soil FC. This is partly explained by their morpho-anatomical and physio-biochemical adaptation mechanisms that enable caper plants to endure certain water pressure forms [8,10,14]. In fact, plant resistance to water stress can be categorized into species that escape, avoid or tolerate drought stress following the characteristics of their adaptive mechanisms [51]. C. spinosa, as a species with the traits of xerophytic plants, is designated a drought-tolerant species. Among its tolerance mechanisms, Gan et al. [13] showed that wild caper uses various methods to respond to droughts, such as adjusting their root, stem and leaf structures.
Another pivotal mechanism is that the wild caper can restrict water loss and extract water from its surroundings thanks to its extensive/vigorous root system, quite dense cortical cell layers in both taproots and fibrous roots and a very high root-to-stem ratio (Rdw/Sdw) [8,9,14]. Additionally, when caper plants were grown at 50% FC rather than 100% FC, WDS boosted the root length (RL) by 70% [18] or remained unaffected in another piece of research [52]. In watermelon, for example, both the Rdw/Sdw and RL increased during WDS, with the rise being huge in +AMF seedlings [33]. As with our findings, WDS does not influence either the SFW or the SDW but considerably increases the RFW and the RDW as WDS grows [52]. After 4–5 months of development, the root system of the wild caper may account for up to 62.5% and sometimes 65% of the total plant biomass [3,10,53]. This proportion of root biomass is consistent with our results and is up to 71–75% under drought conditions. Remarkably, based on the obtained Rdw/Sdw ratio and RWR values at each level of WDS, we specifically observed that biomass is allocated to roots and shoots in roughly the same way in caper plantlets grown, whether in the absence or existence of AMF complex.
Although this biomass-partitioning rate did not differ in both treatments, AMF complex colonization greatly enhances both the above and belowground parts’ weights. In fact, drought resistance is bolstered by a rise in the Rdw/Sdw ratio caused by modifications in sugar partitioning, metabolism and transportation [54]. The Rdw/Sdw adjustment allows for a more efficient use of soil resources and improves the plant’s ability to withstand water stress [23]. In this environmental context, with the insufficiency of mineral elements, plants often devote the utmost of their biomass to the root compartment as an acclimation reaction [55]. Thus, this is explained by the theory of optimal partitioning, which states that plants must assign biomass to the vegetal organ that obtains the limited resources [56]. As a matter of fact, in uninoculated caper plantlets, the proportion of the root biomass relative to the total plant biomass grew somewhat. Then, it permitted both the Rdw/Sdw and the RWR to augment insignificantly slightly compared with the AMF-inoculated ones. This was conducted morphologically via the uninoculated plants’ economic tactic by reducing or preventing the development of branches and hence the number of nodes, principally under water constraints of 50 and 25% FC. On the contrary, at these FC ones, inoculation with the AMF complex made it possible to retain the same number of branches and nodes developed under well-watered conditions and, more than that, enabled a boost in the total plant traits and biomass present both above and below ground. AM inoculation would result in decreases in the Rdw/Sdw ratio through ameliorating the nutrition status of the plant species, and that this would occur irrespective of the fitness outcome of the symbiosis for the plant. Therefore, low Rdw/Sdw ratio values in AMF-mycorrhized caper plants may suggest the plant’s ability to withstand the effects of water stress perfectly, negating the requirement for greater root biomass [57].
In this study, AMF complex inoculation had a more useful impact on biomass growth under mild and severe drought levels than under well-watered conditions in C. spinosa seedlings. Even though AMF benefits plants heedlessly of soil moisture levels, Basyal and Emery [25] show that it is most beneficial at low-soil moisture levels by growing aboveground biomass and modifying many root architectural aspects, implying that the mycorrhizal association gains less at high soil moisture conditions. In conditions such as drought, AMF may change the root architecture, such as empowering the lateral root (LR) development or extending the LR and diameter, which may give more surface area and make it easier to absorb water and nutrients [25]. For example, drought stress importantly increased the root-hair length, density and diameter in taproot and lateral roots in mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal trifoliate orange (Poncirus trifoliata) plantings; further, inoculation by Funneliformis mosseae or Diversispora versiformis meaningfully raises all the root-hair features in undroughted and far more in droughted seedlings by upregulating/increasing the root endogenous phytohormones levels [49]. Drought tolerance in mycorrhized plants may be ascribed primarily to the vast layer of soil exploited by roots and the AM fungi’s ERM [29]. Indeed, the mycorrhizal relationship improves the host plants’ exploration of water and nutrients mainly through expanding the mycelial network in the rhizosphere zone, ultimately facilitating increased growth and biomass accumulation [46].
Besides being a conspicuous factor contributing to plant biomass growth in this experiment, the AMF complex colonization has also considerably boosted the caper plants’ nutrient uptake and hence their mineral composition. Caper seedlings grown in AMF colonized soil exhibited considerably higher levels of macronutrients such as phosphorus (P), potassium (K+) and magnesium (Mg2+) as well as micronutrients such as zinc (Zn) and iron (Fe) contents in their aboveground tissues at all soil moisture stress levels studied than those grown in non-colonized soil. Previously, in the presence of G. mosseae and G. versiforme, both the aerial and root parts of the AMF-inoculated C. spinosa plants showed a considerable rise in P and nitrogen (N) content [21]. Interestingly, according to Pugnaire and Esteban [21], supplementation with chemical fertilizers of inorganic phosphate (Pi) significantly enhanced the dry biomass production of caper shrub leaves (~61%) and P (~33%), Ca (~20%) and Mg (~30%) concentrations in nutritional tissue, implying that it is a growth-limiting nutrient in addition to the N element. Therewith, the same authors also reasoned that the caper shrub plants’ deep mycorrhizal root system enables them to thrive effectively in extremely infertile soils, maximize mineral uptake, aid in water absorption and withstand environmental stress. In this respect, our results have exclusively substantiated this viewpoint. Compared to their −AMF counterparts, the nutritional status of mycorrhizal caper plantlets makes us acknowledge that the indigenous AMF complex could behave as a biostimulant/biofertilizer with a high-profitable function in nutrient-deficient soils. Indeed, the P content increased as the soil moisture decreased in both the mycorrhized and non-mycorrhized caper plants, but substantially only in the AMF-inoculated plantlets under severe drought. In some contexts, when there is not sufficient water in the soil, it has been found that the plant roots can obtain the phosphorus they need. This is perhaps made prominent by the contribution of AM fungi [24,29,58]. In fact, AMF-colonized plants ideally have two paths of obtaining P and other mineral elements from the soil, the direct route conducted by root hairs/epidermis, and indirectly via a mycorrhizal pathway by means of either internal or external AM fungi hyphae into root cortical cells, where hyphal and/or arbuscules coils offer symbiotic interfaces [59,60]. It is estimated that the ERM network of AM fungus in the soil increases the absorption surface area by up to 100 times more than the root hair. This mycelial network extends far beyond the zone of depleted Pi. It may enter and exploit soil pores that are physically unreachable to roots, thus constituting an effective nutrient-absorption net [58]. AM fungus may provide up to about 70–90% of the plant’s P requirements [22,59]. In AMF-inoculated caper seedlings, as the soil moisture decreases, the AMF-colonization rate rises (Figure 1), the root system continues to grow greatly (Table 1) and, in fact, the ERM network is often elongating further; thus, that is why the two P absorption pathways evoked above will permit accumulating a high level of this major element. Alike, Püschel et al. [61] suggested that the direct hyphal absorption of P, as well as AMF’s indirect modification of substrate hydraulic properties, were responsible for a greater instantaneous P uptake by +AMF plants growing under mild/low moisture substrate levels in his experiment. It is expected that numerous essential P roles in cell and whole plant development processes (e.g., formation of roots, cell division, enlargement, respiration, photosynthesis, energy storage and transfer) improve with increased P in moderately/extremely water-stressed mycorrhizal caper plants. In this regard, our findings reveal that the P concentration and mycorrhizal colonization rate have a statistically very significant positive correlation with each other, as well as with all the morphological and biomass traits, chlorophyll pigments and mineral nutrients (Fe, Zn, Mg and K). Similar to P, the inoculation of caper plantlets with MFI substantially raised K+ content at all the soil moisture levels, whereas all the levels of the WDS factor do not influence the K+ concentrations in the two plant treatments (with or without MFI). Sometimes, the K content may even rise if the drought is low and short in both intensity and duration [62], denoting that these two criteria in our experiment do not stringently constitute the most severe drought contexts that may affect the absorption, transport and accumulation of K+ in caper seedlings. It has been observed that the higher the K+ absorption is, the better the drought-stressed plants may efficiently exploit soil moisture, as seems to be the scenario for the caper seedlings in our experiment when AMF inoculum is applied at all the WDS conditions. Hence, numerous critical functions in AMF-colonized caper plants, particularly those growing under low soil moisture, are expected to improve as K+ levels rise. Potassium’s beneficial and protective effects on WDS tolerance include the promotion of root growth, which leads to an increased nutrient and water absorption by plants, the reduction in transpiration water loss, the maintenance of osmotic potential and cell turgor, the regulation of stomatal performance and the enhancement of the photosynthesis rate, as well as the maintenance of a high pH in the stroma and against the photooxidative damage to chloroplasts [63]. The considerable accumulation of K+ in caper species has already been reported in the literature before. Among the twenty-one macro and micro minerals measured in samples of seeds, flower buds, caperberries and young shoots of a caper shrub, Özcan [64] found that the K+ concentration was greatest in the majority of these plant organs. Although K+ content is important in our study, it comes into order after the Na+ element. As a result of this observation, we can think of the possibility of a role substitution strategy between these two minerals, at least in the context of our experimental design and the soil nature. Na+ may fulfill some of the potassium’s physiological functions, such as an osmoticum in the vacuole. Additionally, Na+ uptake systems may be relevant for plant development when K+ availability is limited [65]. According to Pugnaire and Esteban [21], after chemical P fertilizer treatment, K+ and P have a significant antagonistic link; hence, the considerable rise in P in mycorrhizal caper plants may have changed the potassium balance. Indeed, the rhizosphere soil sampled, which we used as one-half of the substrate in this experiment, is typical of the caper plant’s soil in Morocco’s most significant area for its existence and production. Of particular interest to note, C. spinosa, which originated precisely in Morocco’s Safi region where the seeds and soil samples for this study were collected, is already internationally recognized for its high biological activity potential and rich bioactive chemicals when compared to those found in other Mediterranean areas [2,66]. Admittedly, this hints that the region’s soil physicochemical and biological characteristics (Safi, Morocco) remain distinct and unique, making C. spinosa grow and be characterized by required and valuable properties. Due to these and other considerations, in order to explore the favorable impact of native AMF and caper plantlets’ association under WDS, we opted to employ the rhizospheric soil as the principal source of AMF inoculum and as a cultivating substrate. The noticeable buildup of Na+ recorded in the current study is presumably attributable, first and foremost, to the permanent salinization of soils resulting from anthropogenic and/or natural factors in most agricultural and marginal land-soils, especially in semi-arid/arid Mediterranean environments [67,68], similar to the one in the Morocco-Safi area. Accordingly, C. spinosa may thrive in drought-prone soils and contain a certain degree of salt, as previously documented [17,18,52]. On the other hand, several evaluative studies found that chloride sodium (NaCl) plays a pivotal role in some species drought tolerance due to the plants’ capacity to absorb/accumulate high amounts of Na+ in the leaves and compartmentalize them into vacuoles, as well as the usage of Na+ as a low-cost physiological osmoregulator to diminish the osmotic potential [69,70,71,72,73]. Otherwise, neither WDS levels nor AMF-complex inoculation had a discernible effect on the Na+ and Ca2+ uptake/concentrations in dry caper shoots. Regardless, +AMF plants acquire these two nutrients at a higher rate than −AMF ones under all soil moisture levels. AMF colonization, for example, enhanced Ca2+ content in water-stressed citrus seedlings [74]. However, other research, such as that conducted by Kabir et al. [75], found that it had no impact. In our study, the Ca2+ content is also paramount compared to the other mineral elements. The Na+ content comes first, with Ca2+ larger than K+ in uninoculated plants and vice versa in those inoculated. This quantity variation between these two minerals grows with WDS in both +AMF seedlings and their control counterparts. The remarkable Ca2+ quantity observed in leaves’ dry matter is conceivably explained by the calcareous nature of the soil from which we took the rhizospheric soil samples, as well as by the calcicolous strategy that characterizes caper species. Pugnaire and Esteban [21] found the same and pointed out that high Ca2+ in addition to K+ levels will help to maintain hydric balance (water conservation and economy) and thorny stems in caper shrub. Moreover, several works, such as that by Khushboo et al. [76], reveal that exogenous Ca2+ application in plant species reduces the harmful effects of drought stress by regulating antioxidant machinery and improving osmoprotectant accumulation. It is implicated in signaling anti-drought responses. Preventing physiological disorders induced by adverse environmental circumstances is more manageable when optimizing each organ’s Ca2+ content and distribution in +AMF and −AMF plants [77]. Unlike Na+ and Ca2+, the AMF complex meaningfully augmented Fe2+ and Zn2+ amounts at all the WDS levels. Since Zn2+ deficiency is widespread in semi-arid–arid zones owing to the soil’s alkalinity/calcareousness, high pH and low organic matter, all of which reduce the Zn2+ phytoavailability and solubility [78], and because these same soil categories are also Fe2+ deficient, accounting for roughly one-third of the world’s cultivated soils [79], this improvement of Zn2+ and Fe2+ concentrations by inoculating caper plantlets with AMF is, therefore, enormously coveted. This is especially important when considering that these are the same soil properties where C. spinosa culture intensification occurs worldwide. According to previous research, Zn2+ and Fe2+ may be mobilized and taken up by AM fungi hyphae, thereby translocated to the host plants to raise these elements’ amount in the presence, or not, of WDS [22,30,48,80]. More outstandingly, it has been demonstrated that AMF-microbial (four Glomus spp.) supplementation markedly improved the Fe2+ and Zn2+ contents in sunflower roots and shoots under Fe deficiency conditions while also mitigating the severity of Fe-deficient symptoms by increasing ferric reductase activity and the corresponding gene’s expression as well as optimizing CAT and SOD activities [75].
Interestingly, the +AMF caper plantlets had considerably higher magnesium (Mg2+) concentrations than the non-mycorrhizal ones at all the soil moisture levels, notably when WDS was severe, as did P, K+ and Fe2+. Wu and Xia [74] obtained similar findings, in which MFI improved the Mg2+ content of seedlings subjected to WDS more than well-watered citrus seedlings. Figure 4 shows that all the mineral nutrient concentrations, notably Mg2+ and Fe2+, are strongly and significantly correlated with all the chlorophyll pigments, as well as chlorophyll fluorescence indicators (Fv/Fm and Fv/Fo). Fe2+ is, in fact, an indispensable component of electron carriers in the photosynthetic apparatus, and a shortage in this element has been shown to reduce the chlorophyll score, Fv/Fm and photosynthesis performance index in the leaves. In contrast, AMF supplementation restored these photosynthesis parameters to their pre-deficiency levels [75,81]. Since Mg2+ is a major chlorophyll component and is required for Rubisco activation (among other things), plants deficient in Mg manifest a decrease in Fv/Fm and a prolonged induction of photosynthetic parameters [81]. Mg2+-deficient citrus plants increased in Fo and Fm levels while lowering in Fv, leading to lower Fv/Fo and Fv/Fm ratios, which often trigger thylakoid structural alterations as well as photooxidative/photoinhibitive damage [82]. In our study, Fo peaked in non-mycorrhizal seedlings, while Fm, Fv/Fm and Fv/Fo hit their peak in AMF-colonized plants, demonstrating the AMF complex’s beneficial role in boosting photosynthetic performance. The significant improvement in Fv/Fm was made evident by the Fv/Fo, revealing that it is a better measure for discerning minor differences in PSII’s photosynthetic performance [57]. This gain became obvious and significant for the Fv/Fm and Fv/Fo barely under moderate and severe WDS conditions. Studies have shown that inoculation with AMF boosts photosynthetic activity and PSII performance under drought contexts by maintaining a better chloroplast ultrastructure, increasing the Rubisco concentration and diminishing the free radical buildup [24,34]. While at 25 and 50% FC, the observed reduction in Fv/Fm and Fv/Fo in the absence of AMF implies that WDS altered PSII’s photochemical efficiency and electron transport chain, possibly contributing to photoinhibition damage. At 75% FC, there is no substantial difference in all the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters between +AMF and −AMF plantlets. We also noticed that increasing the WDS gradient did not significantly affect Fv/Fm or Fv/Fo, either in the mycorrhizal or non-mycorrhizal seedlings. On this matter, even when WDS was induced by PEG treatment, Fv/Fm values decreased slightly with no notable difference between the control and droughted C. ovata leaves [83,84]. Additionally, there were no symptoms of photooxidative stress in caper leaves throughout the growing season (summer) due to a high Fv/Fm and xanthophyll cycle function [10]. Moreover, Zuo et al. [13] previously reported that the caper’s photosynthesis rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs), transpiration rate (E) and WUE were all better and, at the same time, superior to those of other desert plant species found in the same type of habitat. Furthermore, it is worth noting that AMF plant colonization favorably stimulates all of these GEPs, most notably under conditions of water limitation, as shown by Augé et al.’s meta-analysis [85]. Accordingly, the magnitude of this impact will be investigated in the future by examining the GEP in an AMF-inoculated caper shrub. In contrast, the biosynthesis and breakdown of chlorophyll are critical to the photosynthesis of plants because chlorophyll plays a vital role in absorbing and converting light energy [17]. Chlorophyll status is a key indicator for determining a plant’s photosynthetic efficiency and susceptibility to environmental stress. Our study detected a rise in all the chlorophyll pigments concentrations in C. spinosa seedlings with and without mycorrhizal symbiosis in response to increasing WDS levels, which is consistent with prior studies [52]. A previous study found that different parts of C. spinosa are rich in carotenoids in addition to tocopherols compounds, which might be a strategy of this species to deal with oxidative stress under stressful circumstances throughout the summer [6]. Remarkably, the AMF inoculation of caper plants significantly increases the total chlorophyll at all the WDS treatments, although the total carotenoid under severe WDS (25% FC) is greatly improved. Comparably, mycorrhizal symbiosis was observed to boost the accumulation of photosynthetic pigments, especially carotenoids and anthocyanin, in the leaves of two lettuce cultivars, with better improvement under water stress than ideal irrigation, according to a prior study [42]. By acting as non-enzymatic scavengers against the excessive accumulation of reactive oxygen species, increasing the carotenoid content helps plants battle the photodegradation and photoinhibition of pigments under stressful circumstances [31].

5. Conclusions

The native arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) complex’s advantageous influences on the caper plant’s growth characteristics were examined in this study, giving insight into how they acquire nutrients and adapt physiologically to cope with extreme water deficit circumstances. Overall, the inoculation of caper seedlings with a native AMF mixture during moderate (50% FC) and severe (25% FC) WDS has a significant beneficial effect on morphological growth, biomass production, nutrients uptake, chlorophyll pigments content and photosynthetic performance, thus greatly mitigating the detrimental influences of soil WDS. C. spinosa seems to be reliant on symbiotic relationships with its microbiota-mycorrhizal partners to survive perfectly in harsh Mediterranean environments, hence becoming more important when soil water levels drop, and soil quality deteriorates. The findings from this study may serve as a basis to develop a novel agronomic management approach for eco-friendly farming based on mycorrhiza technology to improve capers’ performance/production, yield and intensification in extremely droughted/degraded habitats and nutritionally poor soil, as well as reduce transplant shock in young seedlings. Nevertheless, thorough investigations might look at the effectiveness of specific AMF species or other inocula sources (e.g., a microbial consortium) in the presence of another abiotic stressor, as well as in conjunction with different caper cultivars’ experimental field conditions under a high intensity/period of stress.

Author Contributions

M.B. (Mohammed Bouskout) designed the study, collected and analyzed the data and produced the article. L.O. is in charge of the work’s supervision, validation and editing. M.B. (Mohammed Bourhia), M.N.A.F., H.D., A.M.S., W.S. and H.-A.N. contributed to the manuscript revision and edition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP-2021/390), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data are included in the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP-2021/390), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chedraoui, S.; Abi-Rizk, A.; El-Beyrouthy, M.; Chalak, L.; Ouaini, N.; Rajjou, L. Capparis spinosa L. in A Systematic Review: A Xerophilous Species of Multi Values and Promising Potentialities for Agrosystems under the Threat of Global Warming. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Stefanucci, A.; Zengin, G.; Locatelli, M.; Macedonio, G.; Wang, C.-K.; Novellino, E.; Mahomoodally, M.; Mollica, A. Impact of different geographical locations on varying profile of bioactives and associated functionalities of caper (Capparis spinosa L.). Food Chem. Toxicol. 2018, 118, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sozzi, G.O. Caper Bush: Botany and Horticulture. In Horticultural Reviews; Janick, J., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2001; Volume 27, pp. 125–188. ISBN 9780471387909. [Google Scholar]
  4. Saleem, H.; Khurshid, U.; Sarfraz, M.; Ahmad, I.; Alamri, A.; Anwar, S.; Alamri, A.S.; Locatelli, M.; Tartaglia, A.; Mahomoodally, M.F.; et al. Investigation into the biological properties, secondary metabolites composition, and toxicity of aerial and root parts of Capparis spinosa L.: An important medicinal food plant. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2021, 155, 112404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rajhi, I.; Hernandez-Ramos, F.; Abderrabba, M.; Ben Dhia, M.T.; Ayadi, S.; Labidi, J. Antioxidant, Antifungal and Phytochemical Investigations of Capparis spinosa L. Agriculture 2021, 11, 1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tlili, N.; Nasri, N.; Saadaoui, E.; Khaldi, A.; Triki, S. Carotenoid and Tocopherol Composition of Leaves, Buds, and Flowers of Capparis spinosa Grown Wild in Tunisia. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 5381–5385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. La Bella, S.; Rossini, F.; Licata, M.; Virga, G.; Ruggeri, R.; Iacuzzi, N.; Leto, C.; Tuttolomondo, T. Four-Year Study on the Bio-Agronomic Response of Biotypes of Capparis spinosa L. on the Island of Linosa (Italy). Agriculture 2021, 11, 327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rhizopoulou, S. Development and Structure of Drought-tolerant Leaves of the Mediterranean Shrub Capparis spinosa L. Ann. Bot. 2003, 92, 377–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Psaras, G.; Sofroniou, I. Wood Anatomy of Capparis Spinosa from an Ecological Perspective. IAWA J. 1999, 20, 419–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Levizou, E.; Drilias, P.; Kyparissis, A. Exceptional Photosynthetic Performance of Capparis spinosa L. Under Adverse Conditions of Mediterranean summer. Photosynthetica 2004, 42, 229–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, J.; Ma, M. Anatomical Characteristics of Capparis spinosa L. in Tibet. Bull. Bot. Res. 2012, 32, 392–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Levizou, E.; Kyparissis, A. A novel pattern of leaf movement: The case of Capparis spinosa L. Tree Physiol. 2016, 36, 1117–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Zuo, W.; Ma, M.; Ma, Z.; Gao, R.; Guo, Y.; Jiang, W.; Liu, J.; Tian, L. Study of Photosynthetic Physiological Characteristics of Desert Plant Capparis spinosa L. J. Shihezi Univ. (Nat. Sci.) 2021, 30, 282–288. Available online: http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-SHZN201203006.htm (accessed on 22 November 2021).
  14. Gan, L.; Zhang, C.; Yin, Y.; Lin, Z.; Huang, Y.; Xiang, J.; Fu, C.; Li, M. Anatomical adaptations of the xerophilous medicinal plant, Capparis spinosa, to drought conditions. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 2013, 54, 156–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mercati, F.; Fontana, I.; Gristina, A.S.; Martorana, A.; El Nagar, M.; De Michele, R.; Fici, S.; Carimi, F. Transcriptome analysis and codominant markers development in caper, a drought tolerant orphan crop with medicinal value. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 10411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Inès, S.; Talbi, O.; Nasreddine, Y.; Rouached, A.; Gharred, J.; Jdey, A.; Hanana, M.; Abdelly, C. Drought tolerance traits in Medicago species: A review. Arid. Land Res. Manag. 2021, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sadeghi, H.; Rostami, L. Changes in biochemical characteristics and Na and K content of caper (Capparis spinosa L.) seedlings under water and salt stress. J. Agric. Rural Dev. Trop. Subtrop. 2017, 118, 199–206. [Google Scholar]
  18. Sadeghi, H.; Rostami, L. Evaluating the physiological and hormonal responses of caper plant (Capparis spinosa) subjected to drought and salinity. Desert (Biaban) 2016, 21, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bagherifard, A.; Hamidoghli, Y.; Biglouei, M.H.; Ghaedi, M. Effects of drought stress and superabsorbent polymer on morpho-physiological and biochemical traits of Caper (Capparis spinosa L.). Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2020, 14, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, J.; Ma, M. Effects of Arbuscular Mycorrhiza Fungi on Growth and Some Physiological Indices of Capparis spinosa. Acta Agric. Boreali-Occident. Sin. 2013, 22, 158–162. Available online: http://caod.oriprobe.com/articles/41173394/Effects_of_Arbuscular_Mycorrhiza_Fungi_on_Growth_and_Some_Physiologica.htm (accessed on 5 October 2021).
  21. Pugnaire, F.I.; Esteban, E. Nutritional adaptations of caper shrub (Capparis Ovata Desf.) to environmental stress. J. Plant Nutr. 1991, 14, 151–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, W.; Shi, J.; Xie, Q.; Jiang, Y.; Yu, N.; Wang, E. Nutrient Exchange and Regulation in Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. Mol. Plant 2017, 10, 1147–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Meddad-Hamza, A.; Beddiar, A.; Gollotte, A.; Lemoine, M.C.; Kuszala, C.; Gianinazzi, S. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improve the growth of olive trees and their resistance to transplantation stress. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2010, 9, 1159–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Begum, N.; Ahanger, M.A.; Zhang, L. AMF inoculation and phosphorus supplementation alleviates drought induced growth and photosynthetic decline in Nicotiana tabacum by up-regulating antioxidant metabolism and osmolyte accumulation. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2020, 176, 104088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Xu, G.; Zhou, L.; Li, Y. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improve the growth and drought tolerance of Zenia insignis seedlings under drought stress. New For. 2018, 50, 593–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ouahmane, L.; Ndoye, I.; Morino, A.; Ferradous, A. Inoculation of Ceratonia siliqua L. with native arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi mixture improves seedling establishment under greenhouse conditions. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2012, 11, 16422–16426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jadrane, I.; Al Feddy, M.N.; Dounas, H.; Kouisni, L.; Aziz, F.; Ouahmane, L. Inoculation with selected indigenous mycorrhizal complex improves Ceratonia siliqua’s growth and response to drought stress. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 28, 825–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Begum, N.; Qin, C.; Ahanger, M.A.; Raza, S.; Khan, M.I.; Ashraf, M.; Ahmed, N.; Zhang, L. Role of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in Plant Growth Regulation: Implications in Abiotic Stress Tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Al-Karaki, G.N.; Clark, R.B. Growth, mineral acquisition, and water use by mycorrhizal wheat grown under water stress. J. Plant Nutr. 1998, 21, 263–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Asrar, A.-W.A.; Elhindi, K.M. Alleviation of drought stress of marigold (Tagetes erecta) plants by using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2011, 18, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Shi, Z.; Mickan, B.; Feng, G.; Chen, Y. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improved plant growth and nutrient acquisition of desert ephemeral Plantago minuta under variable soil water conditions. J. Arid. Land 2014, 7, 414–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mo, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yang, R.; Zheng, J.; Liu, C.; Li, H.; Ma, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wei, C.; Zhang, X. Regulation of Plant Growth, Photosynthesis, Antioxidation and Osmosis by an Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungus in Watermelon Seedlings under Well-Watered and Drought Conditions. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Basyal, B.; Emery, S.M. An arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus alters switchgrass growth, root architecture, and cell wall chemistry across a soil moisture gradient. Mycorrhiza 2020, 31, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Youssef, S.; Lahcen, O.; Abdelaziz, A. Breaking seed dormancy in Cupressus atlantica Gaussen, an endemic and threatened coniferous tree in Morocco. J. For. Res. 2012, 23, 385–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ouahmane, L.; Hafidi, M.; Thioulouse, J.; Ducousso, M.; Kisa, M.; Prin, Y.; Galiana, A.; Boumezzough, A.; Duponnois, R. Improvement of Cupressus atlantica Gaussen growth by inoculation with native arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 103, 683–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. INVAM. International Culture Collection of Vesicular Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi, Species Descriptions from Reference Cultures. 2019. Available online: http://fungi.invam.wvu.edu/the-fungi/species-descriptions.html (accessed on 10 November 2019).
  37. Uddin, A.H.; Khalid, R.S.; Alaama, M.; Abdualkader, A.M.; Kasmuri, A.; Abbas, S.A. Comparative study of three digestion methods for elemental analysis in traditional medicine products using atomic absorption spectrometry. J. Anal. Sci. Technol. 2016, 7, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Lichtenthaler, H.K.; Wellburn, A.R. Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 1983, 11, 591–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Phillips, J.M.; Hayman, D.S. Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1970, 55, 158-IN18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Trouvelot, A.; Kough, J.L.; Gianinazzi-Pearson, V. Mesure du taux de mycorhization VA d’un système radiculaire. Recherche de méthodes d’estimation ayant une signification fonctionnelle. In Physiological and Genetical Aspects of Mycorrhizae, Proceedings of the 1st European Symposium on Mycorrhizae, Dijon, France, 1–5 July 1985; Gianinazzi-Pearson, V., Gianinazzi, S., Eds.; INRA Press: Paris, France, 1986; pp. 217–221. [Google Scholar]
  41. Bethlenfalvay, G.J.; Brown, M.S.; Ames, R.N.; Thomas, R.S. Effects of drought on host and endophyte development in mycorrhizal soybeans in relation to water use and phosphate uptake. Physiol. Plant. 1988, 72, 565–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Baslam, M.; Goicoechea, N. Water deficit improved the capacity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) for inducing the accumulation of antioxidant compounds in lettuce leaves. Mycorrhiza 2011, 22, 347–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Greipsson, S.; El-Mayas, H. Arbuscular Mycorrhizae of Leymus arenarius on Coastal Sands and Reclamation Sites in Iceland and Response to Inoculation. Restor. Ecol. 2000, 8, 144–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Caravaca, F.; Barea, J.M.; Palenzuela, J.; Figueroa, D.; Alguacil, M.D.M.; Roldan, A. Establishment of shrub species in a degraded semiarid site after inoculation with native or allochthonous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2003, 22, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pellegrino, E.; Bedini, S.; Avio, L.; Bonari, E.; Giovannetti, M. Field inoculation effectiveness of native and exotic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a Mediterranean agricultural soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2011, 43, 367–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ouledali, S.; Ennajeh, M.; Zrig, A.; Gianinazzi, S.; Khemira, H. Estimating the contribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to drought tolerance of potted olive trees (Olea europaea). Acta Physiol. Plant. 2018, 40, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, F.; Wang, P.; Zou, Y.-N.; Wu, Q.-S.; Kuča, K. Effects of mycorrhizal fungi on root-hair growth and hormone levels of taproot and lateral roots in trifoliate orange under drought stress. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2019, 65, 1316–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Leventis, G.; Tsiknia, M.; Feka, M.; Ladikou, E.; Papadakis, I.; Chatzipavlidis, I.; Papadopoulou, K.; Ehaliotis, C. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhance growth of tomato under normal and drought conditions, via different water regulation mechanisms. Rhizosphere 2021, 19, 100394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wu, M.; Yan, Y.; Wang, Y.; Mao, Q.; Fu, Y.; Peng, X.; Yang, Z.; Ren, J.; Liu, A.; Chen, S.; et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for vegetable (VT) enhance resistance to Rhizoctonia solani in watermelon by alleviating oxidative stress. Biol. Control. 2020, 152, 104433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chen, W.; Meng, P.; Feng, H.; Wang, C. Effects of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on Growth and Physiological Performance of Catalpa bungei C.A.Mey. under Drought Stress. Forests 2020, 11, 1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Abobatta, W.F. Drought adaptive mechanisms of plants—A review. Adv. Agric. Environ. Sci. 2019, 2, 62–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Rostami, L.; Sadeghi, H.; Hosseini, S. Response of Caper Plant to Drought and Different Ratios of Calcium and Sodium Chloride1. Planta Daninha 2016, 34, 259–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Sozzi, G.O.; Peter, K.V.; Nirmal Babu, K.; Divakaran, M. Capers and caperberries. In Handbook of Herbs and Spices: Second Edition; Peter, K.V., Ed.; Woodhead: Abington Cambridge, UK, 2012; Volume 2, pp. 193–224. ISBN 9780857095688. [Google Scholar]
  54. Du, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Chen, L.; Yao, X.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, B.; Xie, F. Effect of drought stress on sugar metabolism in leaves and roots of soybean seedlings. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 146, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hermans, C.; Hammond, J.; White, P.; Verbruggen, N. How do plants respond to nutrient shortage by biomass allocation? Trends Plant Sci. 2006, 11, 610–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. McCarthy, M.C.; Enquist, B. Consistency between an allometric approach and optimal partitioning theory in global patterns of plant biomass allocation. Funct. Ecol. 2007, 21, 713–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Moustakas, M.; Bayçu, G.; Sperdouli, I.; Eroğlu, H.; Eleftheriou, E.P. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbiosis Enhances Photosynthesis in the Medicinal Herb Salvia fruticosa by Improving Photosystem II Photochemistry. Plants 2020, 9, 962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Lanfranco, L.; Fiorilli, V.; Gutjahr, C. Partner communication and role of nutrients in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. New Phytol. 2018, 220, 1031–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Smith, S.E.; Smith, F.A. Fresh perspectives on the roles of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in plant nutrition and growth. Mycologia 2012, 104, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Madrid-Delgado, G.; Orozco-Miranda, M.; Cruz-Osorio, M.; Hernández-Rodríguez, O.A.; Rodríguez-Heredia, R.; Roa-Huerta, M.; Avila-Quezada, G.D. Pathways of Phosphorus Absorption and Early Signaling between the Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plants. Phyton 2021, 90, 1321–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Püschel, D.; Bitterlich, M.; Rydlová, J.; Jansa, J. Drought accentuates the role of mycorrhiza in phosphorus uptake. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2021, 157, 108243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Rouphael, Y.; Cardarelli, M.; Schwarz, D.; Franken, P.; Colla, G. Plant responses to drought stress: From morphological to molecular features. In Plant Responses to Drought Stress: From Morphological to Molecular Features, 1st ed.; Aroca, R., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; pp. 171–195. [Google Scholar]
  63. Kaba, J.S.; Abunyewa, A.A.; Kugbe, J.; Kwashie, G.K.; Ansah, E.O.; Andoh, H. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and potassium fertilizer as plant biostimulants and alternative research for enhancing plants adaptation to drought stress: Opportunities for enhancing drought tolerance in cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.). Sustain. Environ. 2021, 7, 1963927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Özcan, M. Mineral Composition of Different Parts of Capparis ovata Desf. var. canescens (Coss.) Heywood Growing Wild in Turkey. J. Med. Food 2005, 8, 405–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Amo, J.; Lara, A.; Martínez-Martínez, A.; Martínez, V.; Rubio, F.; Nieves-Cordones, M. The protein kinase SlCIPK23 boosts K + and Na + uptake in tomato plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2021, 44, 3819–3835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Shahrajabian, M.H.; Sun, W.; Cheng, Q. Plant of the Millennium, Caper (Capparis spinosa L.), chemical composition and medicinal uses. Bull. Natl. Res. Cent. 2021, 45, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Aragüés, R.; Urdanoz, V.; Çetin, M.; Kirda, C.; Daghari, H.; Ltifi, W.; Lahlou, M.; Douaik, A. Soil salinity related to physical soil characteristics and irrigation management in four Mediterranean irrigation districts. Agric. Water Manag. 2011, 98, 959–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Ondrasek, G.; Rengel, Z. Environmental salinization processes: Detection, implications & solutions. Sci. Total. Environ. 2020, 754, 142432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wu, G.-Q.; Feng, R.-J.; Liang, N.; Yuan, H.-J.; Sun, W.-B. Sodium chloride stimulates growth and alleviates sorbitol-induced osmotic stress in sugar beet seedlings. Plant Growth Regul. 2014, 75, 307–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Huihui, Z.; Yuze, H.; Kaiwen, G.; Zisong, X.; Liu, S.; Wang, Q.; Wang, X.; Nan, X.; Wu, Y.; Guangyu, S. Na+ accumulation alleviates drought stress induced photosynthesis inhibition of PSII and PSI in leaves of Medicago sativa. J. Plant Interactions 2020, 16, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ma, Q.; Yue, L.-J.; Zhang, J.; Wu, G.-Q.; Bao, A.-K.; Wang, S.-M. Sodium chloride improves photosynthesis and water status in the succulent xerophyte Zygophyllum xanthoxylum. Tree Physiol. 2011, 32, 4–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. He, F.-L.; Bao, A.-K.; Wang, S.-M.; Jin, H.-X. NaCl stimulates growth and alleviates drought stress in the salt-secreting xerophyte Reaumuria soongorica. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2019, 162, 433–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Guo, H.; Cui, Y.-N.; Pan, Y.-Q.; Wang, S.-M.; Bao, A.-K. Sodium chloride facilitates the secretohalophyte Atriplex canescens adaptation to drought stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 150, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Wu, Q.-S.; Xia, R.-X. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi influence growth, osmotic adjustment and photosynthesis of citrus under well-watered and water stress conditions. J. Plant Physiol. 2006, 163, 417–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Kabir, A.H.; Debnath, T.; Das, U.; Prity, S.A.; Haque, A.; Rahman, M.; Parvez, S. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alleviate Fe-deficiency symptoms in sunflower by increasing iron uptake and its availability along with antioxidant defense. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 150, 254–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Khushboo; Bhardwaj, K.; Singh, P.; Raina, M.; Sharma, V.; Kumar, D. Exogenous application of calcium chloride in wheat genotypes alleviates negative effect of drought stress by modulating antioxidant machinery and enhanced osmolyte accumulation. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol.-Anim. 2018, 54, 495–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ruiz-Lozano, J.M.; Azcon, R. Effect of calcium application on the tolerance of mycorrhizal lettuce plants to polyethylene glycol-induced water stress. Symbiosis 1997, 23, 9–22. [Google Scholar]
  78. Saboor, A.; Ali, M.A.; Hussain, S.; El Enshasy, H.A.; Hussain, S.; Ahmed, N.; Gafur, A.; Sayyed, R.; Fahad, S.; Danish, S.; et al. Zinc nutrition and arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis effects on maize (Zea mays L.) growth and productivity. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 28, 6339–6351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kim, S.A.; Guerinot, M.L. Mining iron: Iron uptake and transport in plants. FEBS Lett. 2007, 581, 2273–2280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Al-Karaki, G.N.; Al-Raddad, A.; Clark, R.B. Water stress and mycorrhizal isolate effects on growth and nutrient acquisition of wheat. J. Plant Nutr. 1998, 21, 891–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Ohnishi, M.; Furutani, R.; Sohtome, T.; Suzuki, T.; Wada, S.; Tanaka, S.; Ifuku, K.; Ueno, D.; Miyake, C. Photosynthetic Parameters Show Specific Responses to Essential Mineral Deficiencies. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Jia, Y.; Xu, H.; Wang, Y.; Ye, X.; Lai, N.; Huang, Z.; Yang, L.; Li, Y.; Chen, L.-S.; Guo, J. Differences in morphological and physiological features of citrus seedlings are related to Mg transport from the parent to branch organs. BMC Plant Biol. 2021, 21, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Ilhan, S.; Ozdemir, F.; Bor, M. Contribution of trehalose biosynthetic pathway to drought stress tolerance of Capparis ovata Desf. Plant Biol. 2014, 17, 402–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Ozkur, O.; Ozdemir, F.; Bor, M.; Turkan, I. Physiochemical and antioxidant responses of the perennial xerophyte Capparis ovata Desf. to drought. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2009, 66, 487–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Augé, R.M.; Toler, H.D.; Saxton, A. Mycorrhizal Stimulation of Leaf Gas Exchange in Relation to Root Colonization, Shoot Size, Leaf Phosphorus and Nitrogen: A Quantitative Analysis of the Literature Using Meta-Regression. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Mycorrhizal colonization rate (MC (%), white bars) and mycorrhizal dependency (MD (%), grey bars) of C. spinosa +AMF seedlings at three levels of water-deficit conditions (D1—75%, D2—50% and D3—25% FC). The bar chart with error bars represents the means and SD of three replicates. Asterisks indicate significant differences between water-deficit stress treatments (α = 0.05), as determined using one-way ANOVA, followed by post hoc Tukey’s tests (*, p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Mycorrhizal colonization rate (MC (%), white bars) and mycorrhizal dependency (MD (%), grey bars) of C. spinosa +AMF seedlings at three levels of water-deficit conditions (D1—75%, D2—50% and D3—25% FC). The bar chart with error bars represents the means and SD of three replicates. Asterisks indicate significant differences between water-deficit stress treatments (α = 0.05), as determined using one-way ANOVA, followed by post hoc Tukey’s tests (*, p < 0.05).
Agronomy 12 00149 g001
Figure 2. Chlorophyll a (Chl a), chlorophyll b (Chl b), total chlorophyll (Chl a+b), carotenoids (Cart) content and chlorophyll a/b ratio (Chl a/b) of C. spinosa seedlings’ fresh leaves cultivated without (AMF, white bars) or with (AMF+, grey bars) native mycorrhizal fungi inoculum under three irrigation levels (% FC). The bars represent the mean ± SD of n = 6 replicates. Bars sharing a common lowercase letter reveal no significant difference according to Tukey’s post hoc test at p < 0.05. Asterisks denote the significance levels (P) of the effect of AMF (A), water-deficit (W) and their interaction (A × W) on each parameter measured, based on the 2-way ANOVA test: (**, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001 and ns, no-significance p > 0.05).
Figure 2. Chlorophyll a (Chl a), chlorophyll b (Chl b), total chlorophyll (Chl a+b), carotenoids (Cart) content and chlorophyll a/b ratio (Chl a/b) of C. spinosa seedlings’ fresh leaves cultivated without (AMF, white bars) or with (AMF+, grey bars) native mycorrhizal fungi inoculum under three irrigation levels (% FC). The bars represent the mean ± SD of n = 6 replicates. Bars sharing a common lowercase letter reveal no significant difference according to Tukey’s post hoc test at p < 0.05. Asterisks denote the significance levels (P) of the effect of AMF (A), water-deficit (W) and their interaction (A × W) on each parameter measured, based on the 2-way ANOVA test: (**, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001 and ns, no-significance p > 0.05).
Agronomy 12 00149 g002
Figure 3. Biplot of principal components analysis (PCA) based on all measured parameters of C. spinosa plantlets exposed to various levels of water-deficit conditions (75, 50 and 25% FC) and AMF treatment. The blue contour lines assign the variables, and the six colored forms-points symbolize all different treatment groups. Myc (%) = Mycorrhizal colonization rate, MD (%) = Mycorrhizal dependency, P-h = Plant height, L-n = Leaves no., B-n = Branches no., N-n = Nodes no., C-d = Collar-diameter, TFW = total fresh weight, TDW = Total dry weight, SFW = shoot fresh weight, SDW = Shoot dry weight, RFW = Root fresh weight, RDW = Root dry weight, R/S = Root-to-shoot ratio, RWR = Root weight ratio, K = Potassium, Mg = Magnesium, Fe = Iron, P = Phosphorus, Zn = Zinc, Na = Sodium, Ca = Calcium, Chl a = Chlorophyll a, Chl b = Chlorophyll b, Chl a+b = Total chlorophyll, Chl a/b = Chlorophyll a/b, Cart = Carotenoids, Fo, Fv, Fm, Fv/Fm and Fv/Fo = Chlorophyll fluorescence indices.
Figure 3. Biplot of principal components analysis (PCA) based on all measured parameters of C. spinosa plantlets exposed to various levels of water-deficit conditions (75, 50 and 25% FC) and AMF treatment. The blue contour lines assign the variables, and the six colored forms-points symbolize all different treatment groups. Myc (%) = Mycorrhizal colonization rate, MD (%) = Mycorrhizal dependency, P-h = Plant height, L-n = Leaves no., B-n = Branches no., N-n = Nodes no., C-d = Collar-diameter, TFW = total fresh weight, TDW = Total dry weight, SFW = shoot fresh weight, SDW = Shoot dry weight, RFW = Root fresh weight, RDW = Root dry weight, R/S = Root-to-shoot ratio, RWR = Root weight ratio, K = Potassium, Mg = Magnesium, Fe = Iron, P = Phosphorus, Zn = Zinc, Na = Sodium, Ca = Calcium, Chl a = Chlorophyll a, Chl b = Chlorophyll b, Chl a+b = Total chlorophyll, Chl a/b = Chlorophyll a/b, Cart = Carotenoids, Fo, Fv, Fm, Fv/Fm and Fv/Fo = Chlorophyll fluorescence indices.
Agronomy 12 00149 g003
Figure 4. Pearson correlation matrix representing by heatmap illustration of all measured parameters. Each box’s color intensity is directly commensurate with the Pearson’s r correlation coefficient-value between every two variables in row and column. R value ranges between −1 and 1 as presented in the heatmap legend. ns, *, **, ***, **** indicate no significant correlation, significant correlation at p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p < 0.001 and p < 0.0001 confidence level, respectively. Abbreviations for all parameters are noted above in Figure 3.
Figure 4. Pearson correlation matrix representing by heatmap illustration of all measured parameters. Each box’s color intensity is directly commensurate with the Pearson’s r correlation coefficient-value between every two variables in row and column. R value ranges between −1 and 1 as presented in the heatmap legend. ns, *, **, ***, **** indicate no significant correlation, significant correlation at p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p < 0.001 and p < 0.0001 confidence level, respectively. Abbreviations for all parameters are noted above in Figure 3.
Agronomy 12 00149 g004
Table 1. Morphological traits of C. spinosa seedlings grown without (−AMF) or with (+AMF) mycorrhizal fungi inoculum under three water stress levels (% FC).
Table 1. Morphological traits of C. spinosa seedlings grown without (−AMF) or with (+AMF) mycorrhizal fungi inoculum under three water stress levels (% FC).
TreatmentsPlant Height
(cm plant−1)
Leaves
(no. plant−1)
Branches
(no. plant−1)
Nodes
(no. plant−1)
Collar Diameter
(mm plant−1)
Water Stress (% FC)Mycorrhizal
Inoculation
75% FC−AMF14.9 ± 0.7 b21 ± 2.0 b3 ± 1.0 b31.7 ± 5.0 b5.4 ± 0.4 bc
+AMF24.2 ± 0.3 a43 ± 5.0 a6 ± 0.0 a52.3 ± 5.1 a6.4 ± 0.7 ab
50% FC−AMF13.7 ± 1.6 b18 ± 1.0 b1.3 ± 0.6 b25 ± 3.0 b5.6 ± 0.4 bc
+AMF22.7 ± 2.4 a49 ± 12.4 a6.3 ± 1.5 a58.7 ± 7.5 a7.0 ± 0.01 a
25% FC−AMF13.4 ± 1.2 b21.7 ± 1.5 b1.3 ± 0.6 b27 ± 1.0 b5.1 ± 0.1 c
+AMF21.4 ± 0.6 a47.3 ± 7.2 a5.7 ± 0.6 a53.3 ± 12.5 a6.4 ± 0.7 ab
Water stress (W)nsnsnsnsns
AMF inoculation (A)*******************
W × Ansnsnsnsns
Values are means ± SD (n = 6). The means of each morphological parameter in a single column followed by a similar letter, between both mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal plantlets at all levels of water-deficit conditions, are not significantly different according to Tukey’s post hoc test; Asterisks denote the significance levels of the effect of AMF (A), water-deficit (W) and their interaction (A × W) on each parameter measured, based on the 2-way ANOVA test: (***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001 and ns, no significance p > 0.05).
Table 2. Shoot fresh and dry weights (SFW and SDW), root fresh and dry weights (RFW and RDW), total fresh and dry biomass (TFW and TDW), root-shoot ratio (Rdw/Sdw) and root weight ratio (RWR) of non-mycorrhizal (−AMF) and (+AMF) mycorrhizal C. spinosa plantlets at three levels of water-deficit stress (% FC).
Table 2. Shoot fresh and dry weights (SFW and SDW), root fresh and dry weights (RFW and RDW), total fresh and dry biomass (TFW and TDW), root-shoot ratio (Rdw/Sdw) and root weight ratio (RWR) of non-mycorrhizal (−AMF) and (+AMF) mycorrhizal C. spinosa plantlets at three levels of water-deficit stress (% FC).
TreatmentsSFWRFWSDWRDWTFWTDWRdw/SdwRWR
Water Stress (% FC)Mycorrhizal
Inoculation
(g plant−1) (g g−1)
75% FC−AMF4.3 ± 0.3 b6.2 ± 0.8 c1.0 ± 0.2 bc1.6 ± 0.3 c10.4 ± 0.8 c2.6 ± 0.2 d1.6 ± 0.7 b0.60 ± 0.03 b
+AMF5.6 ± 0.4 a9.6 ±1.1 b1.5 ± 0.1 a2.1 ± 0.2 c15.2 ± 1.3 b3.6 ± 0.2 bc1.4 ± 0.2 b0.58 ± 0.04 b
50% FC−AMF2.7 ± 0.3 c5.90 ± 0.4 c0.6 ± 0.1 c1.9 ± 0.4 c8.6 ±0.1 c2.6 ± 0.6 d3.0 ± 0.1 a0.75 ± 0.01 a
+AMF5.5 ± 0.2 a13.9 ± 0.6 a1.5 ± 0.3 a4.3 ± 0.4 a19.4 ± 0.7 a5.8 ± 0.3 a2.9 ±0.6 a0.74 ± 0.04 a
25% FC−AMF3.1 ± 0.1 c6.9 ± 0.7 c0.7 ± 0.1 c2.1 ± 0.3 c10.0 ± 0.8 c2.8 ± 0.4 cd3.1 ± 0.2 a0.75 ± 0.02 a
+AMF5.1 ± 0.1 a12.2 ± 0.9 a1.3 ± 0.2 ab3.2 ± 0.2 b17.3 ± 1.0 ab4.5 ± 0.1 b2.6 ± 0.5 ab0.71 ± 0.04 a
Water stress (W)***********ns**********
AMF inoculation (A)************************nsns
W × A*****ns*********nsns
Means ± SD are the values of n = 6 replicates. According to Tukey’s post hoc test, means of each parameter followed by distinct letters in the same column, for +AMF and −AMF plantlets between all levels of water-deficit conditions, are significantly different; Asterisks denote the significance levels of the effect of AMF (A), water-stress (W) and their interaction (A × W) on each parameter measured, based on the 2-way ANOVA test: (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001 and ns, no-significance).
Table 3. Mineral macro- and micronutrients content of C. spinosa shoots cultivated without (−AMF) or with (+AMF) AMF-complex at three advancing water-deficit levels (% FC).
Table 3. Mineral macro- and micronutrients content of C. spinosa shoots cultivated without (−AMF) or with (+AMF) AMF-complex at three advancing water-deficit levels (% FC).
TreatmentsPK+Na+Ca++Mg++Fe++Zn++
Water Stress (% FC)Mycorrhizal
Inoculation
(mg.g−1)(mg.g−1)(mg.g−1)(mg.g−1)(mg.g−1)(mg.g−1)(mg.g−1)
75% FC−AMF1.4 ± 0.1 c11.1 ± 1.3 c27.5 ± 1.3 a11.6 ± 1.5 a3.4 ± 0.7 b0.8 ± 0.1 c0.05 ± 0.02 b
+AMF2.0 ± 0.3 b15.9 ± 0.9 ab29.5 ± 1.3 a13.4 ± 2.0 a4.6 ± 0.4 a1.6 ± 0.1 b0.07 ± 0.02 ab
50% FC−AMF1.4 ± 0.1 c11.3 ± 2.2 c27.0 ± 3.4 a12.1 ± 1.8 a3.4 ± 0.4 b0.9 ± 0.1 c0.04 ± 0.01 b
+AMF2.1 ± 0.1 b16.5 ± 1.4 a28.3 ± 1.6 a14.4 ± 2.3 a4.9 ± 0.3 a1.8 ± 0.1 a0.07 ± 0.01 ab
25%FC−AMF1.6 ± 0.1 c11.8 ± 1.6 bc28.3 ± 1.6 a13.9 ± 1.7 a3.2 ± 0.2 b0.9 ± 0.1 c0.05 ± 0.01 ab
+AMF2.7 ± 0.1 a16.6 ± 1.9 a30.9 ± 0.2 a14.9 ± 0.6 a4.9 ± 0.2 a1.9 ± 0.1 a0.08 ± 0.02 a
Water stress (W)***nsnsnsns*ns
AMF inoculation (A)********nsns**********
W × A*nsnsnsns*ns
Mean values (n = 5) ± SD for each mineral nutrient, for non-mycorrhizal ( ̶ AMF) and mycorrhizal (+AMF) C. spinosa plantlets between all levels of water-deficit conditions that do not share a letter significantly differ according to Tukey’s post hoc test; Asterisks denote the significance levels of the effect of AMF (A), water-deficit (W) and their interaction (A × W) on each parameter measured, based on the 2-way ANOVA test: (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001 and ns, no-significance p > 0.05).
Table 4. Changes of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in leaves of C. spinosa seedlings cultivated without (−AMF) or with (+AMF) AMF-complex under three irrigation levels (% FC) (Fo-initial fluorescence, Fv-variable fluorescence, Fm-maximum fluorescence, Fv/Fm-maximum quantum efficiency and Fv/Fo-basal quantum yield).
Table 4. Changes of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in leaves of C. spinosa seedlings cultivated without (−AMF) or with (+AMF) AMF-complex under three irrigation levels (% FC) (Fo-initial fluorescence, Fv-variable fluorescence, Fm-maximum fluorescence, Fv/Fm-maximum quantum efficiency and Fv/Fo-basal quantum yield).
TreatmentsFoFvFmFv/FmFv/Fo
Water Stress
(% FC)
Mycorrhizal
Inoculation
75%−AMF34.7 ± 10 b119 ± 29.5 a153.7 ± 39 a0.78 ± 0.02 abc3.5 ± 0.3 ab
+AMF43.7 ± 4.2 ab129.3 ± 5.9 a173 ± 9.5 a0.75 ± 0.01 abc3.0 ± 0.2 ab
50%−AMF48 ± 7.9 ab132 ± 19.9 a180 ± 27.9 a0.73 ± 0.01 bc2.8 ± 0.1 b
+AMF40.7 ± 2.1 ab162.3 ± 22 a203 ± 23.1 a0.80 ± 0.02 a4.0 ± 0.6 a
25%−AMF56.7 ± 9.5 a147.7 ± 10 a204.3 ± 6.0 a0.72 ± 0.05 c2.7 ± 0.6 b
+AMF42.3 ± 4.5 ab161 ± 14.2 a203.3 ± 18 a0.79 ± 0.01 ab3.8 ± 0.2 a
Water stress (W)ns**nsns
AMF inoculation (A)nsnsns****
W × A*nsns****
Means of n = 5 replicates ± SD. Means of each parameter accompanied by distinct letters in one column, for mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal C. spinosa plantlets between all levels of water-deficit conditions, are significantly different according to Tukey’s post hoc test; Asterisks denote the significance levels of the effect of AMF (A), Water-deficit (W) and their interaction (A × W) on each parameter measured, based on the 2-way ANOVA test: (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01 and ns, no-significance at p = 0.05).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bouskout, M.; Bourhia, M.; Al Feddy, M.N.; Dounas, H.; Salamatullah, A.M.; Soufan, W.; Nafidi, H.-A.; Ouahmane, L. Mycorrhizal Fungi Inoculation Improves Capparis spinosa’s Yield, Nutrient Uptake and Photosynthetic Efficiency under Water Deficit. Agronomy 2022, 12, 149. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12010149

AMA Style

Bouskout M, Bourhia M, Al Feddy MN, Dounas H, Salamatullah AM, Soufan W, Nafidi H-A, Ouahmane L. Mycorrhizal Fungi Inoculation Improves Capparis spinosa’s Yield, Nutrient Uptake and Photosynthetic Efficiency under Water Deficit. Agronomy. 2022; 12(1):149. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12010149

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bouskout, Mohammed, Mohammed Bourhia, Mohamed Najib Al Feddy, Hanane Dounas, Ahmad Mohammad Salamatullah, Walid Soufan, Hiba-Allah Nafidi, and Lahcen Ouahmane. 2022. "Mycorrhizal Fungi Inoculation Improves Capparis spinosa’s Yield, Nutrient Uptake and Photosynthetic Efficiency under Water Deficit" Agronomy 12, no. 1: 149. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12010149

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop