Next Article in Journal
Quality Improvement of Netted Melon (Cucumis melo L. var. reticulatus) through Precise Nitrogen and Potassium Management in a Hydroponic System
Next Article in Special Issue
Optimising Sample Preparation and Calibrations in EDXRF for Quantitative Soil Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Efficacy Determination of Commercial Deltamethrin-Treated Storage Bags on Trogoderma granarium Everts Adults and Larvae
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Different In Situ Remediation Strategies for an As-Polluted Soil on Human Health Risk, Soil Properties, and Vegetation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi as Potential Agents in Ameliorating Heavy Metal Stress in Plants

1
School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Shoolini University of Biotechnology and Management Sciences, Solan 173229 (H.P.), India
2
Faculty of Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, Shoolini University of Biotechnology and Management Sciences, Solan 173229 (H.P.), India
3
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Hradec Kralove, 50003 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
4
Department of Pharmacy, Life Science Faculty, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Science and Technology University, Gopalganj (Dhaka)-8100, Bangladesh
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2020, 10(6), 815; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10060815
Submission received: 25 April 2020 / Revised: 30 May 2020 / Accepted: 3 June 2020 / Published: 9 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remediation of Contaminated Soil for Food Security)

Abstract

:
Heavy metal accumulation in plants is a severe environmental problem, rising at an expeditious rate. Heavy metals such as cadmium, arsenic, mercury and lead are known environmental pollutants that exert noxious effects on the morpho-physiological and biological attributes of a plant. Due to their mobile nature, they have become an extended part of the food chain and affect human health. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi ameliorate metal toxicity as they intensify the plant’s ability to tolerate metal stress. Mycorrhizal fungi have vesicles, which are analogous to fungal vacuoles and accumulate massive amount of heavy metals in them. With the help of a pervasive hyphal network, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi help in the uptake of water and nutrients, thereby abating the use of chemical fertilizers on the plants. They also promote resistance parameters in the plants, secrete a glycoprotein named glomalin that reduces the metal uptake in plants by forming glycoprotein–metal complexes, and improve the quality of the soil. They also assist plants in phytoremediation by increasing the absorptive area, increase the antioxidant response, chelate heavy metals and stimulate genes for protein synthesis that reduce the damage caused by free radicals. The current manuscript focuses on the uptake of heavy metals, accumulation, and arbuscular mycorrhizal impact in ameliorating heavy metal stress in plants.

1. Introduction

A “heavy metal” is any element having metallic properties, with relatively high density, and is harmful at even low concentrations [1]. The most phytotoxic and non-essential heavy metals (HMs) found in the soil are lead (Pb), arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd) and mercury (Hg), which are highly mobile and are promptly absorbed by the plants. Besides these, there are other HMs (copper, chromium, zinc, selenium, molybdenum, tin, nickel etc.), which cause environmental contamination and health risks [2,3,4]. Generally, metal concentration is assessed by the amount of metal in the bedrock and its deposition from the atmosphere. Small amounts of these HMs are already present in the soil and atmosphere, but other things keep on adding these to the environment and include industrial and natural anthropogenic activities, fertilizers, polluted water, sewage sludge, the weathering of soil and minerals [5]. HMs have detrimental impacts on the plant metabolism, soil fertility, terrestrial ecosystems and human health [6]. The HMs get transferred to the human body through soil–plant–food interactions and cause exigent defects [7]. HMs cause harmful impacts on plant growth and productivity by many mechanisms, such as (i) interference with the activity of nutrients, which are essential for plant growth; (ii) effects on plant morphology and physiology; (iii) negative impacts on the soil microbes’ growth, including that of symbiotic microbes such as rhizobia; and (iv) effects on soil properties [8,9].
Most of the HMs on the soil surface occur naturally, but the condition becomes worse when these metals are added in surplus amounts in the surrounding atmosphere [10]. High amounts of HMs in plant tissue exert toxicity in plants, disrupt cell membrane permeability, inhibit photosynthesis and mineral uptake, affect plant morpho-physiological and biological processes and ultimately inhibit the growth rate [1,11]. They also result in the production of free radicals such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), superoxide radical (O2−) and hydroxyl radical (OH), which further react with cellular organelles and cause damage to the cell and DNA, inhibit ATP (adenosine triphosphate) production and cause lipid peroxidation [12,13]. HMs’ ability to cause damage relies on the already existing stage of stress exposure, its duration, the concentration of HMs and their bioavailability in plant organs [1,14]. Plants possess indigenous defense mechanisms, i.e., they have antioxidant enzymes that are involved in warding off HM stress. HMs produce ROS (reactive oxygen species), so at their highest concentration, these enzymes do not function. Numerous physical and chemical strategies have been used to ameliorate HM ion concentrations in soil [15,16]. These include soil washing, excavation, acidification, vitrification and land filling. These methods are observed to be expensive and alter the quality of the soil, which makes it unsuitable for the growth of rhizospheric microbial communities. Meanwhile, biological methods (the use of plants and microbes) have been proved to be an innovative solution as they are cost-effective, easy to implement and maintain the natural properties of the environment [9].
In a natural ecosystem, plants continually interact with a large number of microorganisms in the rhizosphere and create mutually beneficial alliances with them. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF)-like beneficial fungi develop a symbiotic association with the plant roots where photosynthetic products prepared by the plants are received by the fungus and, in turn, it helps the plant by enhancing nutrient uptake, protecting them from HM toxicity, enhancing biomass accumulation and improving photosynthesis [17,18]. Approximately 80% of terrestrial plant roots form symbiotic relations with fungi, where fungal hyphae percolate in the cortical cells of plant roots forming arbuscules, vesicles and hyphae [19]. They also render HMs immobile at the cortical region of roots by binding with them, prevent their translocation towards aerial parts of the plant and prevent leaf tissues from damage. AMF are a type of endomycorrhizal fungus (phylum Glomeromycota) that provides nutrients for plant growth, by ameliorating water uptake and controlling stomatal conductance [20]. AMF is considered as one of the best biological tools for enhancing plant growth and shoot biomass as it can detoxify HM-induced stress. AMF reduces HM stress by HM immobilization in fungal structure, precipitation and chelation in the rhizosphere, sequestration in vacuoles and activation of antioxidant mechanisms in plants [16]. The utilization of AMF is an ecofriendly approach and a useful component to attain sustainable productivity by improving soil health and protecting plants against abiotic and biotic stresses [18]. Thus, the main objective of this study is to review the role of AMF in maintaining a sustainable environment in an HM-contaminated ecosystem. It includes the HMs’ impact on human health and plants. At the same time, it also highlights various ways in which AMF minimizes the HMs’ impact on plants.

2. Heavy Metals (HMs) and Their Impacts

Heavy metals (HMs) such as As, Pb, Hg, Cd, Cr, Ni and Cu are the toxic metals that are listed as the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 7th, 17th, 58th and 120th most harmful substances by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, respectively, on the basis of their toxic effects on human beings [21]. Different sources of HMs and their impacts on human health are described in Table 1.
In the biological processes of organisms, metals play a vital role. Some metals serve as micronutrients and are essential, while others are toxic and have no biological role in organisms. Moreover, non-essential metal have a bad impact on the environment, thus decreasing the biological activity of the soil. They enter the food chain and affect human health. A worldwide map of heavy metals showing the countries where significant impact has been observed is represented in Figure 1.
Generally, HMs at their lowest concentrations have the potential to cause intense damage to plants as well as to human beings through the food chain [56]. According to the European Commission, the maximum levels of different HMs permitted in food items are as depicted in Table 2.
In the case of As, there is no maximum level, but the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Panel recommended to reduce the use of inorganic As for dietary exposure. According to EFSA, 0.20–0.30 µg kg−1 is the optimum/maximum level of As that should be present in food.

3. Sources of HMs

The HMs are naturally available in the soil, but their concentrations rise in the environment because of human activities that have an adverse impact on plants and humans. They are mobile between soil–plant systems and are frequently being added to the soil via several agricultural activities like agrochemical usage. Besides the natural weathering process, there are different sources of HMs in the soil like chimney emissions from factories, the excessive supplementation of phosphate fertilizers, additives in pigments and gasoline, pesticides, metal-polluted water and effluent from storage batteries [59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67]. A major source of Hg in the soil is power plants that burn coal for energy generation. The exhaust fumes of automobiles in urban areas contribute to atmospheric pollution. Plants growing along roadsides constitute a large quantity of HMs due to the combustion of gasoline in vehicles. The contamination of soils occurs by HM compounds like lead arsenate (PbHAsO4) and bordeaux mixture (CuSO4), which are used as a pesticides in orchards. The mining and smelting of metalliferous ores with fossil fuel combustion have globally increased the risk associated with HMs in the soil over the past few centuries.

4. Uptake, Translocation and Accumulation of HMs in Plants

Initially, HMs present in the soil are absorbed by the roots and can be translocated to the other parts of the plant. Very often, heavy metals remain in the roots because of the barrier effect. The uptake of HMs by plant roots depends on the bioavailability of the metal ions (i.e., not co-precipitated with oxides or adsorbed to organic matter) in the soil solution and is regulated by soil pH and carbonate contents [68]. The pathways through which HMs enter the roots include H+ ATPase/pumps, which help in maintaining the negative potential across the epidermal membrane in the roots; HM ions present in the soil make their entry into the plant epidermis either through ion channels or as organic compounds formed after combination with chelates released by plant roots in the soil, thus entering as metal–ligand complexes into the root epidermal layer [69]. Different transporters including members of the HM ATPases (HMA) family, Zrt/Irt protein (ZIP) family and natural resistance-associated macrophage protein (NRAMP) family are also involved in the uptake of HM ions in plants. Generally, root hairs enhance the surface area of roots for HM absorption so that ions migrate quickly inside the apoplast [70,71,72]. HM ions, once absorbed by the roots, are bound directly to the carboxyl groups of mucilage uronic acid or to the polysaccharides on the rhizodermis and show apoplastic movement from the root epidermis to the cortex region [73,74]. These ions primarily accumulate in root cells because of the obstruction in the apoplastic pathway at the endodermis by casparian strips. Later, after crossing the endodermis, HM ions travel by the symplastic pathway through vascular tissues, i.e., xylem and phloem and are translocated to the above-ground parts of the plant, as shown in Figure 2.
The absorption of HM ions does not remain uniform along the plant roots, as their concentration varies in root apices and other regions of the root. In the case of a HM such as Pb, the highest concentration of this HM was found in the young root cells having thin cell walls [75]. Limited transport of metal occurs from the roots to the above-ground parts of the plant, as during the translocation of HM ions between the roots and shoots, the endodermis acts as a partial barrier [76]. Some plant species transfer a large amount of Pb to their shoots [77]. Pb in the wheat roots remains in the cell wall and can only be isolated as a complex with citric acid [78]. Different Pb complexes were also observed in the stem and leaves of alfalfa [79]. In addition to this, Pb is transferred to the stem and leaves in Sesbania drummondii [80]. Pb transportation is limited in the different parts of the plant due to the immobilization of insoluble Pb salts as precipitates in intercellular spaces, fixation in the cell wall by negatively charged pectins, and accumulation in the vacuoles of cortical and rhizodermal cells and the plasma membranes of cells [81,82,83,84,85,86,87]. The minimum availability of heavy metals at higher trophic levels can be possible by their minimum uptake. Hyperaccumulator plants (e.g., Pteris vittata, P. cretica, P. biaurita, Sesbania drummondii, Helianthus annuus, Sedum alfredii, Atriplex halimus, Amanita muscaria and Polygonum aviculare) are required for soil remediation as these plants are capable of growing in high metal concentrations, absorbing them through their roots and translocating them with minimal or no toxicity to the aerial parts of the plant. The amount of HM ions that is taken up from the soil by the plants is measured by the transfer factor [88,89].
T r a n s f e r   F a c t o r = C o n c e n t r a t i o n   o f   H e a v y   m e t a l   i o n s   i n   s h o o t   C o n c e n t r a t i o n   o f   H e a v y   m e t a l   i o n s   i n   r o o t
A higher TF (Transfer Factor) value is observed in non-mycorrhizal fenugreek plants than in mycorrhizal ones [90]. Plants are classified on the basis of the transfer factor as its values are different in both hyperaccumulators (TF > 1) and non-hyperaccumulators (TF < 1) [91].

5. Impact of HMs on Plants in the Absence of AMF

Soil contaminated by toxic metals causes acute and chronic impacts on plant growth and productivity. Extreme concentrations of HMs affect the morphology of plants, which results in a decreased transpiration rate and damage to the root system [92,93]. Generally, HMs interact with the sulfhydryl group (–SH) of enzymes, which agitates chloroplast functioning by restricting the activities of enzymes related to chlorophyll biosynthesis, the aggregation of protein complexes involved in photosystems (PS), and carbon dioxide (CO2) fixation [94]. Metal stress decreases chlorophyll synthesis, which is an imperative pigment in photosynthesis, by reducing the supply of essential elements like magnesium, zinc and iron, eventually affecting the plant–nutrient relationship [90]. It has been reported that the level of chlorophyll decreased when the seedlings of Phaseolus vulgaris were treated with Cd [95,96,97]. Photosynthetic plants, upon exposure to HMs, experience harmful effects in respiration and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) content. With the increasing metal stress, the ratio of chlorophyll a/chlorophyll b decreases, which implies a shift in the ratio of PSII/PSI. The experimental results indicate that Cd and Pb stress decreases the photosynthetic pigments (chlorophyll and carotenoids content) in the host plant in the absence of AMF [98,99].
HMs interfere with protease and amylase enzymes, which prevents germination and the development of seedlings [100]. Pb exposure causes inhibition of the germination of seeds as reported in Oryza sativa, Pinus halepensis and Hordeum vulgare, whereas mercury also affects seed germination as described in the case of Enhalus Acoroides and Vigna radiata [81,100,101,102,103]. It is recorded that a high concentration of Cd affects the growth of lettuce plants [104]. Many changes take place in mitochondria as they lose cristae and undergo swelling, nuclei becomes deep-colored, plasma membranes get injured, and vacuolization takes place in dictyosomes and endoplasmic reticulum after 42–72 h of Pb exposure, particularly in Allium sativum. HMs also interact with the cytoplasmic proteins of the plant and decrease protein synthesis, which leads to physiological changes in the plant [85]. A reduction in protein pool also results from the different actions of Pb such as the oxidation of proteins, the stimulation of protein activity, an increase in ribonuclease activity and the modification of gene expression [105,106,107,108,109]. Some reports indicate that in the absence of AMF, Cd stress decreases chlorophyll content and growth and increases the accumulation of H2O2 in Solanum lycopersicum [110].
HMs reduce essential mineral uptake and the plasticity of the plant cell wall, which further influences the turgor pressure of the cell. In Helianthus annus, a reduction in mineral uptake was observed when the plant was exposed to cadmium stress [111]. Metal toxicity leads to the production of free radicals like ROS that are formed during cellular metabolic processes, and the overproduction of these species is considered as oxidative stress. Free radicals react with cell organelles, membranes, biomolecules like lipids, proteins and nucleic acids (e.g., DNA, RNA); reduce the normal functions of cells; and induce abnormality. Free radicals cause DNA damage and the inhibition of ATP and lipid peroxidation, thereby generating oxidative stress [112,113]. They also damage electron transport chains in chloroplasts and mitochondria, which leads to the disruption of proteins by oxidative reactions or proteolytic activity. A high concentration of toxic metals causes the membrane to rupture and results in cell death. Abscisic acid is a phytohormone responsible for the opening and closing of stomata [114]. HM ions cause the accumulation of abscisic acid in aerial plant parts and roots, which leads to the closing of stomata, limits gaseous exchange with the atmosphere and reduces the transpiration rate [115,116]. Various impacts of heavy metals on plants are shown in Figure 3.

6. Role of AMF in HM Detoxification in Plants

Once HMs have entered the soil, they have long-term effects on plants. AMF are an essential bioagent, as they can significantly enhance the efficiency of the ecosystem by producing fungal structures like arbuscules and aid in the exchange of inorganic compounds and minerals required for the growth of plants, thereby providing considerable strength to plants. They also act as a biological filter for HMs and help in mitigating them. They help the plant to grow actively under stressful conditions by assisting the plant through increased water uptake, photosynthetic rate and nutrition [118]. Generally, HMs get immobilized in the fungal hyphae living in symbiotic association with plants, which reduce their availability to plants by retaining the HMs in the cell wall, vacuole or cytoplasm by chelation, thus decreasing metal toxicity in the plants [119,120]. Various researchers have signified the beneficial impact of AMF on the growth and productivity of plants [121]. Several different strategies have been ratified for how AMF influence the uptake, translocation and accumulation of HMs and enhance plant tolerance to HM stress. These strategies include various steps viz. the retention of HMs in the mycorrhizal roots and external hyphae, the stimulation of nutrient absorption, the sequestration of HMs in vacuoles, the binding of HMs on the fungal cell wall, the protection of the reaction center and the rectification of gas exchange capacity, the increasing of the antioxidant response of plants, the chelation of HMs in the cytosol of fungi and the induction of glomalin by AMF, and AMF-mediated phytoremediation.

6.1. Retention of HMs in Mycorrhizal Roots and External Hyphae of AMF

AMF colonization with higher plant roots enables the plant to retain HMs in their roots and external mycelium. AMF shows a mechanism to ameliorate HM toxicity in plants by retaining HMs in mycorrhizal structures such as the fungal mycelium and vesicles, where high amounts of HMs are concentrated, which further prevents their mobilization to aerial plant tissues as shown in Figure 4 [122].
The fungal vesicles in mycorrhizal plants are analogous to the plant vacuoles, which are implicated in accumulating toxic compounds. The external mycelium of roots has a predominant effect on the immobilization of metals in the stressed soil because of its wider surface area, which makes them more efficient than the plant roots for absorbing metals. This retention mechanism by AMF decreases the translocation of HMs and protects leaf tissues from injury by retaining them in roots, therefore contributing to phytostabilization. In mycorrhizal plants, the HM tolerance potential is correlated with the yield of mycelial biomass and fungal growth, as metals remain accommodated in the fungal mycelium. Moreover, the vesicles in the fungi also increase with the increase in the concentration of HMs [99]. Pakchoi shoots were observed with significantly decreased concentrations of Pb upon the addition of mycorrhizal fungi, e.g., Rhizophagus intraradices, Glomus versiforme and Funneliformis mosseae [124]. The AMF colonization of Aster tripolium roots enabled the fungi to retain Cd in the mycelium and promoted plant tolerance to Cd [125]. The AMF inoculation of Melastoma malabathricum plants led to an increase in the absorption area of the roots in the soil and resulted in better plant growth [126].

6.2. AMF Promotes Nutrient Absorption in Plants

The AMF stimulate plant growth even in stressed conditions by modifying the soil structure. Generally, nutrients are absorbed from the soil by fungal hyphae and directed to the fungus–plant interface, where bidirectional exchange take place [127]. Under the influence of AMF, some enzyme characteristics are altered viz. the activity, quantity and number of enzymes in the soil, particularly the activity of acid phosphatase, which improves growth and nutrient uptake in the host plants [128]. A phosphate transporter is present in mycorrhizal fungi for the direct transport of inorganic phosphate (Pi) from the soil to the plants [129]. On the extraradial mycelium of Glomus mosseae, G. intraradices and G. versiforme, several genes encoding transporter proteins such as GmosPT, GiPT and GvPT have been identified that are involved in the uptake of phosphate [130,131,132]. AMF raise the concentration of phosphorus and other essential mineral nutrients in plants with enhancement in the uptake from soil, by extending beyond the limits of the plant roots and increasing the absorption area [133]. Higher contents of nitrogen, potassium and phosphorus have been observed in host plants subjected to HM stress in the presence of AMF [134,135,136].

6.3. AMF Sequester HMs in Vacuoles

Once HMs reach their target site, the mechanism of metal sequestration by polyphosphate granules in fungal vacuoles is activated [90,137]. Generally, sequestration limits the harmful effects of HMs, as the main compartment of HM storage in fungal and plant cells is the vacuole. Various reports have suggested that H+ pumps in the vacuole, especially vacuolar proton ATPase (V-ATPase) and vacuolar proton-pyrophosphatase (V-PPase), aid in the uptake of HMs in vacuoles. Symbiosis increases the phosphorus content in the host plant, which provides metabolic energy as adenosine triphosphate (ATP) for the sequestration of metals within the vacuoles of the cells, thus restricting them to a smaller area and preventing their translocation to the other parts of the plant, as shown in Figure 4 [138,139,140,141,142]. Sequestration allows the concentration of a large amount of HMs in the above-ground parts without any phytotoxic effects on the plants. The vacuoles of leaf cells are the sequestration sites for non-essential and essential HMs [143]. The regulation of metal transport across the membrane is a decisive element in the control of metal homeostasis.

6.4. AMF Assist in HM Binding on the Fungal Cell Walls

The fungal cell wall also helps in the adsorption of HM ions. The fungal cell wall is made up of chitin and polysaccharides that are used as a barricade for HM ions and other solutes to get into the cells, thereby regulating their adsorption. Various functional groups such as imidazole carboxyl groups, amino groups and free hydroxyl groups provide binding sites for HMs and form negatively charged structures that adsorb most of the metals in the soil and block their movement in plants [144]. In addition, AMF store metals in the spores [145,146]. Several authors have reported that with the increase in metal concentrations, the cell walls of fungi act as a first line of defense as they obstruct the entry of HMs [11,138]. AMF induces the biosynthesis of cell wall in the roots of the host plant, which promotes metal reduction because with the increase in the thickness of cell wall, the area for metal absorption also increases [147]. At high concentrations of metal ions, a few of them pass through the cell wall, get deposited in the cell membrane of the fungus or are transported to the fungal cytoplasm, thereby reducing the amount of metal ions in the plants.

6.5. AMF Protects the PSII Reaction Center and Rectifies the Gas Exchange Capacity

A high amount of HMs in the soil is translocated to other plant parts and affects the enzyme activity alliance with chlorophyll biosynthesis, which further affects the photosynthesis process, mainly the photosystem II reaction center. The inoculation of AMF increases the chlorophyll content, especially chlorophyll a, which is responsible for photosynthesis in the host plant. Several findings indicate higher chlorophyll synthesis in plants inoculated with AMF that results in improved photosynthesis [110,134]. It has also been studied that AMF promote the enhancement of chlorophyll biosynthesis by increasing the de novo synthesis of proteins, which has a direct impact on the uptake of essential elements such as Mg and Fe, which constitute an imperative part of the chlorophyll molecule [111]. AMF symbiosis ameliorates the photosynthetic capacity and phytochemical efficiency of the host plants. It also improves the gas exchange capacity by stomatal opening and increasing the transcription fluxes.

6.6. Heavy Metals Enhance the Antioxidant Responses of Plants

Plants have antioxidative defense systems to protect themselves against heavy metal stress. These defense systems of plants include various enzymatic ROS scavengers such as glutathione peroxidase (GPX), catalase (CAT), superoxidase dismutase (SOD), glutathione reductase (GR), peroxidase (POD) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX), which protect against disruption and dysfunction in plant cells [90,148]. These antioxidant enzymes are highly active during metal stress. Generally, SOD detoxifies superoxide radicals (O2−), thereby averting stress-induced cellular damage. SOD activity generates H2O2, which is transformed into water by APX or CAT [111,128]. Studies performed by various researchers have demonstrated that AMF have the ability to promote the synthesis of antioxidants and increase their activity under metal stress. For instance, Garg et al. (2013) reported that AMF, under oxidative stress, upregulate antioxidant enzyme activity and reduce ROS production in the host plant Cajanus cajan and aid in mitigating metal stress [149]. It has also been observed that the level of the antioxidant enzyme activities of APX, GR, CAT and SOD increases under cadmium stress [150]. Yang et al. (2015) demonstrated that AMF symbiosis with Robinia pseudoacacia improves ROS-scavenging capabilities and enhances the enzymatic activities under different concentrations of Pb stress [99]. It has also been reported that AMF activate and stimulate the antioxidant system in Cd-stressed soil in Trigonella plants [151].

6.7. AMF-Assisted HM Chelation

A unique amelioration strategy adopted by AMF is the chelation of HMs with ligands having high affinity for metal ions in the cytosol. The production of chelating compounds occurs if the concentration of toxic metals exceeds the threshold value inside the cells. Chelation helps in warding off HMs by rendering them less available in the cytoplasm and also by decreasing their solubility and reactivity. Various chelating agents are present in AMF and plants such as metallothioneins (MTs), organic acids, phytochelatins (PCs) and amino acids, which play a crucial role in the tolerance to HMs in plants by chelating these substances [2,152]. Generally, HMs enter the cytoplasm of plant cells through the Zrt-Irt proteins (ZIP) belonging to the family of metal transporters. The HM tolerance mechanism relates to the synthesis of thiol peptides called phytochelatins, which form complexes with HMs. AMF are capable of enhancing the synthesis of phytochelatins [153,154]. These peptides are synthesized enzymatically with glutathione (GSH) as a substrate, in the presence of the enzyme phytochelatin synthase (PCS), which is activated by the existence of HMs [155]. Phytochelatin (PC) is involved in metal–thiol binding. The metal chelator (HM-PC) complexes are destined to reach cell vacuoles by moving through cytoplasm and then tonoplasts [138]. The excess metal ions in plants and fungi are stored in cell vacuoles, and phytochelatin–metal complexes are pumped into the vacuoles, whereby the complexed metals are made inert by the P1B-ATPase transporter (ABC-P1B) and ATP-binding-cassette, as shown in Figure 5 [156].
Zhang et al. reported that mycorrhizal inoculation in Zea mays decreases Cd toxicity and mobility by transforming Cd into an inactive form, which might be ascribed to the increased content of PC and GSH [147]. As AMF increases the PCs biosynthesis so more PC-Cd complexes are formed and transferred to the vacuole, thereby decreasing their negative effect [157]. Reports indicate that inoculation with F. mosseae enhances the level of GSH in Nicotiana tabacum, further reducing the Cd and As content in the leaves and roots of the plant [158].
Another group, i.e., metallothioneins (MTs), is also involved in the sequestration of HMs. MTs are a group of proteins having a low molecular weight, high metal content and non-enzymatic, cysteine-rich, long polypeptide chains that consist of a large number of amino acids. They have a common sequence pattern, i.e., Cys-X-Cys where X is an amino acid other than cysteine. These are the metal ligands that bind metal ions in a metal thiolate in clusters in the cytosol or sub-cellular compartments for the accumulation and sequestration of HMs in plant vacuoles, as shown in Figure 4. Metallothioneins also have the competence to bind to HMs through the thiol group (-SH) of cysteine residues and help in protection against oxidative stress [159]. They are biosynthesized in mycorrhizal plants and AMF by certain hormones and HMs. Hasegawa et al. reported an increased Cd tolerance in cauliflower upon the insertion of CUP1 genes from yeast that, in response, enhanced its accumulation by 16-fold in plant tissues [160]. Some authors have found that various classes of MT genes are activated by HMs [161,162].

6.8. Glomalin-Induced Soil Metal Complexes

Glomalins are the glycoproteins produced by AMF and exist as homologs of heat shock protein 60 (hsp 60) that play a role in the immobilization of HMs [163]. Glomalin-related soil protein (GRSP) also exists as an alkaline soluble protein material with AMF. These are stable compounds impervious to heat degradation, generated mostly in the inner layer of the cell walls of mycorrhiza, and are released into the soil during hyphal turnover or after the death of the fungus [164]. Besides Glomeromycota, no other fungal group generates these glycoproteins in significant quantity [165]. The production of glomalin depends upon the level of metal ions present in the soil [165,166]. The symbiotic association between plants and the glomalin producers AMF enhances atmospheric CO2, which leads to an increase in the production of glomalin. When glomalin is released in the soil, it performs several functions such as improving the stability of soil aggregates, reducing soil erosion, enhances soil quality and forming protein–metal complexes, as shown in Figure 4, which decrease the content of metal ions in the soil. These proteins further aid in the wall binding and influence the plants and AMF to withstand metal stress. The presence of certain functional groups in the glomalin protein structure assists in binding with HMs. Glomalins help in retaining the water content in the soil by adjusting the frequency of water transport between plants and the soil, and ultimately increases the development of the plant. Different studies carried out by Chern et al. (2007) and Gonzalez-Chavez et al. (2009) explained the involvement of glomalin in reducing the toxicity of HMs [167,168].

6.9. AMF-Assisted Phytoremediation of HMs

Phytoremediation is a technique in which plant species known as hyper-accumulators are used for growing in HM-contaminated soil. Metal ions are absorbed through plant roots and translocated in plants with no or minimal toxicity. Plants used in the phytoremediation of As are Pteris vittata, P. cretica and P. biaurita [169]. Hyper-accumulator plants for Pb are Sesbania drummondii and Helianthus annuus, and, for Cd, Sedum alfredii, Sesbania drummondii and Atriplex halimus. Amanita muscaria and Polygonum aviculare are the known hyperaccumulator plants that can accumulate a large amount of Hg from the soil [170]. The efficiency of phytoremediation is increased by inoculating phytoremediator plants with the AMF (as they are considered as a biological tool for improving phytoremediation). AMF are the components of the soil microbiome that play a vital role in the mobilization and immobilization of metal ions and alter their availability to plants. Their contribution to the process of phytoremediation is assistance in the phytostabilization and phytoextraction steps [171,172]. Phytostabilization includes the immobilization of HMs in the roots or soil, thus decreasing their bioavailability and mobility, while phytoextraction identifies the HMs for uptake and transports them to above-ground parts of the plant [173]. Mycorrhizal colonization in plant roots allows the stabilization and retention of HMs in the plant roots and rhizospheric region. Several factors of AMF play a role in this process such as glomalin production, which helps in binding the soil–metal complexes, and extended hyphal growth, which increases the absorptive area of the plant roots. In AMF-colonized plants, the effectiveness of phytostabilization and phytoextraction also depends on the extent of colonization of AMF, the AMF species, growth, the biomass yield and the ability of hyperaccumulator plants [174].

7. Impact of AMF-Induced Genes on Metal Toxicity

Heavy metal efflux is a strategy used by AMF to protect plants from metal toxicity [137,175]. Several transcriptional genes from fungal cells are involved in HM efflux and get activated upon metal exposure. GmarMT1, a cDna-encoding metallothionein-like functional polypeptide was identified from the germinating spores of Gigaspora margarita to provide tolerance against Cu and Cd [176]. Furthermore, it has also been reported that exposure to HMs upregulates the expression of GmarMT1 in the symbiotic mycelium. GintABC1 was isolated as a putative ABC transporter from the extraradial mycelium of Glomus intraradices, involved in Cu and Cd mitigation [177]. Several genes are also involved in the maintenance of cellular homeostasis against HMs; those include GmarMT1, GintABC1, GrosMT1 and RintZnT1 [178]. GmarMT1 codes for MTs reported in G. margarita (BEG34), maintains the redox potential of the fungus and safeguards against oxidative stress. GintABC1 aids in the detoxification of zinc and copper [179]. A zinc transporter, RintZnT1, isolated from Rhizophagus intraradices is involved in the vacuolar sequestration of Zn [180]. In Gigaspora rosea, the expression of GrosMT1 was reported [181]. Benabdellah et al. (2009) indicated GintGRX1 as a multifunctional enzyme and the first glomeromycotan glutaredoxin that responds to oxidative stress [182]. RintPDX1 was isolated from Rhizophagus intraradices and is involved in the reduction of Cu and hydrogen peroxide [183]. The upregulation of various transcriptional factors activating zinc transporter and glutathione S-transferase was observed in the extra- and intra-mycelia of the AMF Glomus intraradices in response to metal stress [184].
Altogether, these results indicate that the molecular regulation of genes plays an important role in HM accumulation and detoxification in fungal cells, which further prevents their translocation toward the host plant.

8. Conclusions and Future Prospects

In the twenty-first century, one of the biggest challenges of humanity is to feed the growing population of the world without an increase in the present environmental problems. However, due to the advancement of industrialization and human-induced activities, HM toxicity in soil is increasing rapidly, which further affects morpho-physiological processes in plants. There are few metals that are beneficial, while some impart negative effects on the plant and also on human health through the food chain.
Under HM stress, an excessive amount of ROS is produced that reacts with cellular organelles and results in oxidative damage to plant cellular structures. In response, plants activate several antioxidant enzymes, which scavenge the generated ROS to protect the cells from damage. Moreover, several soil engineers and environmentalists have approved different strategies to overcome the challenges and ameliorate the adverse impacts of HMs on plants. Among these approaches, the use of AMF is considered as one of the most promising and effective strategies.
Several changes such as the enhancement of the antioxidant response and modification in root morphology are seen in plants due to the influence of AMF, and their symbiotic relations improve the growth of the plant by enhancing nutrient acquisition. They also act as a biofertilizer for plants and biosorbant for HMs and enhance plant performance via specific intrinsic molecular mechanisms. They help in improving soil aggregation by secreting glomalin, which forms protein–metal complexes, thereby restricting the entry of HMs into the plant. AMF also adsorb a large amount of HMs onto the fungal walls and also sequester them in fungal vacuoles (biological barriers). They also help in enhancing the phytoremediation of HMs and play a key role in the mobilization and immobilization of HMs. However, the signaling pathways and molecular mechanisms that are linked to the formation of successful mycorrhizal symbiosis need better understanding. Genomic knowledge regarding AMF is poor and needs to be unraveled.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.V., E.N. and K.K.; manuscript writing, R.D. and H.K.; manuscript editing, M.T.I. and D.K.; critical revising, R.V., E.N., K.K., M.T.I. and D.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Supported by University of Hradec Kralove (Faculty of Science, VT2019-2021).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Morkunas, I.; Woźniak, A.; Mai, V.C.; Rucińska-Sobkowiak, R.; Jeandet, P. The role of heavy metals in plant response to biotic stress. Molecules 2018, 23, 2320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Clemens, S. Toxic metal accumulation, responses to exposure and mechanisms of tolerance in plants. Biochimie 2006, 88, 1707–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hadi, P.; Gao, P.; Barford, J.P.; McKay, G. Novel application of the nonmetallic fraction of the recycled printed circuit boards as a toxic heavy metal adsorbent. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 252–253, 166–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Dago, A.; Gonzalez, I.; Arino, C.; Diaz-Cruz, J.; Esteban, M. Chemometrics applied to the analysis of induced phytochelatins in Hordeum vulgare plants stressed with various toxic non-essential metals and metalloids. Talanta 2014, 118, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gupta, N.; Khan, D.K.; Santra, S.C. Determination of public health hazard potential of wastewater reuse in crop production. World Rev. Sci. Technol. Sustain. Dev. 2010, 7, 328–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Grimm, N.B.; Foster, D.; Groffman, P.; Grove, J.M.; Hopkinson, C.S.; Nadelhoffer, K.J.; Pataki, D.E.; Peters, D.P. The changing landscape: Ecosystem responses to urbanization and pollution across climatic and societal gradients. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2008, 6, 264–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Liu, X.; Song, Q.; Tang, Y.; Li, W.; Xu, J.; Wu, J.; Wang, F.; Brookes, P.C. Human health risk assessment of heavy metals in soil–vegetable system: A multi-medium analysis. Sci. Total Environ 2013, 463–464, 530–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mittler, R. Abiotic stress, the field environment and stress combination. Trends Plant Sci. 2006, 11, 15–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Miransari, M. Soybean production and heavy metal stress. In Abiotic and Biotic Stresses in Soybean Production; Miransari, M., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA; Elsevier: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016; pp. 197–216. [Google Scholar]
  10. Singh, P.C.; Srivastava, S.; Shukla, D.; Bist, V.; Tripathi, P.; Anand, V.; Arkvanshi, S.K.; Kaur, J.; Srivastava, S. Mycoremediation mechanisms for heavy metal resistance/tolerance in plants. In Mycoremediation and Environmental Sustainability; Prasad, R., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 351–381. [Google Scholar]
  11. Emamverdian, A.; Ding, Y.; Mokhberdoran, F.; Xie, Y. Heavy metal stress and some mechanisms of plant defense response. Sci. World J. 2015, 2015, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Reddy, A.M.; Kumar, S.G.; Jyonthsnakumari, G.; Thimmanaik, S.; Sudhakar, C. Lead induced changes in antioxidant metabolism of horse gram (Macrotyloma uniflorum (Lam.) Verdc.) and Bengal gram (Cicer arietinum L.). Chemosphere 2005, 60, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Igiri, B.E.; Okoduwa, S.I.R.; Idoko, G.O.; Akabuogu, E.P.; Adeyi, A.O.; Ejiogu, I.K. Toxicity and bioremediation of heavy metals contaminated ecosystem from tannery wastewater: A review. J. Toxicol. 2018, 2018, 2568038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, J.; Yang, R.; Chen, R.; Peng, Y.; Wen, X.; Gao, L. Accumulation of heavy metals in tea leaves and potential health risk assessment: A case study from Puan County, Guizhou province, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Yao, Z.; Li, J.; Xie, H.; Yu, C. Review on remediation technologies of soil contaminated by heavy metals. Procedia Environ. Sci. 2012, 16, 722–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Mishra, A.; Bhattacharya, A.; Mishra, N. Mycorrhizal symbiosis: An effective tool for metal bioremediation. In New and Future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering; Singh, J.S., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 113–128. [Google Scholar]
  17. Chen, S.; Zhao, H.; Zou, C.; Li, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Liu, A.; Zhao, P.; Wang, M.; et al. Combined inoculation with multiple arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improves growth, nutrient uptake and photosynthesis in cucumber seedlings. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Mitra, D.; Uniyal, N.; Panneerselvam, P.; Senapati, A.; Ganeshamurthy, A.N. Role of mycorrhiza and its associated bacteria on plant growth promotion and nutrient management in sustainable agriculture. Int. J. Life Sci. Appl. Sci. 2019, 1, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  19. Verma, R.; Tapwal, A.; Kumar, D.; Parkash, V.; Puri, S. Vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal diversity in some important ethnomedicinal plants of Western Himalaya. Med. Plants 2019, 11, 279–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Schubler, A. Molecular phylogeny, taxonomy, and evolution of Geosiphon pyriformis and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Plant Soil 2001, 244, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). CERCLA Priority List. Available online: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/spl/resources/ATSDR_2017_SPL_Support_Document.pdf (accessed on 2 March 2019).
  22. Borzsonyi, M.; Bereczky, A.; Rudnai, P.; Csanady, M.; Horvath, A. Epidemiological studies on human subjects exposed to arsenic in drinking water in southeast Hungary. Arch. Toxicol. 1992, 66, 77–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hopenhayn-Rich, C.; Browning, S.R.; Hertz-Picciotto, I.; Ferreccio, C.; Peralta, C.; Gibb, H. Chronic arsenic exposure and risk of infant mortality in two areas of Chile. Environ. Health Perspect. 2000, 108, 667–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ahmad, S.A.; Sayed, M.H.; Barua, S.; Khan, M.H.; Faruquee, M.H.; Jalil, A.; Hadi, S.A.; Talukder, H.K. Arsenic in drinking water and pregnancy outcomes. Environ. Health Perspect. 2001, 109, 629–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yang, C.Y.; Chang, C.C.; Tsai, S.S.; Chuang, H.Y.; Ho, C.K.; Wu, T.N. Arsenic in drinking water and adverse pregnancy outcome in an arseniasis-endemic area in northeastern Taiwan. Environ. Res. 2003, 91, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Von Ehrenstein, O.S.; Guha-Mazumder, D.N.; Hira-Smith, M.; Ghosh, N.; Yuan, Y.; Windham, G.; Ghosh, A.; Haque, R.; Lahiri, S.; Kalman, D.; et al. Pregnancy outcomes, infant mortality, and arsenic in drinking water in West Bengal, India. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2006, 163, 662–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Liaw, J.; Marshall, G.; Yuan, Y.; Ferreccio, C.; Steinmaus, C.; Smith, A.H. Increased childhood liver cancer mortality and arsenic in drinking water in Northern Chile. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2008, 17, 1982–1987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Smith, A.H.; Goycolea, M.; Haque, R.; Biggs, M.L. Marked increase in bladder and lung cancer mortality in a region of Northern Chile due to arsenic in drinking water. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1998, 147, 660–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Parvez, F.; Chen, Y.; Brandt-Rauf, P.W.; Slavkovich, V.; Islam, T.; Ahmed, A.; Argos, M.; Hassan, R.; Yunus, M.; Haque, S.E.; et al. A prospective study of respiratory symptoms associated with chronic arsenic exposure in Bangladesh: Findings from the health effects of arsenic longitudinal study (HEALS). Thorax 2010, 65, 528–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Ma, H.Z.; Xia, Y.J.; Wu, K.G.; Sun, T.Z.; Mumford, J.L. Human exposure to arsenic and health effects in Bayingnormen, inner Mongolia. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Arsenic Exposure and Health Effects, San Diego, CA, USA, 12–15 July 1998; pp. 127–131. [Google Scholar]
  31. Wilberforce, J.O.; Nwabue, F.I. Heavy metals effect due to contamination of vegetables from Enyigba lead mine in Ebonyi State, Nigeria. Environ. Pollut. 2013, 2, 19. [Google Scholar]
  32. Fang, Y.; Sun, X.; Yang, W.; Ma, N.; Xin, Z.; Fu, J.; Liu, X.; Liu, M.; Mariga, A.M.; Zhu, X.; et al. Concentrations and health risks of lead, cadmium, arsenic, and mercury in rice and edible mushrooms in China. Food Chem. 2014, 147, 147–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Martorell, I.; Perelló, G.; Martí-Cid, R.; Llobet, J.M.; Castell, V.; Domingo, J.L. Human exposure to arsenic, cadmium, mercury, and lead from foods in Catalonia, Spain: Temporal trend. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2011, 142, 309–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Swaddiwudhipong, W.; Nguntra, P.; Kaewnate, Y.; Mahasakpan, P.; Limpatanachote, P.; Aunjai, T.; Jeekeeree, W.; Punta, B.; Funkhiew, T.; Phopueng, I. Human health effects from cadmium exposure: Comparison between persons living in cadmium-contaminated and non-contaminated areas in northwestern Thailand. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 2015, 46, 133–142. [Google Scholar]
  35. Akesson, A.; Lundh, T.; Vahter, M.; Bjellerup, P.; Lidfeldt, J.; Nerbrand, C.; Samsioe, G.; Strömberg, U.; Skerfving, S. Tubular and glomerular kidney effects in Swedish women with low environmental cadmium exposure. Environ. Health Perspect. 2005, 113, 1627–1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Interdonato, M.; Pizzino1, G.; Bitto, A.; Galfo, F.; Irrera, N.; Mecchio, A.; Pallio, G.; Ramistella, V.; Luca, D.F.; Santamaria, A.; et al. Cadmium delays puberty onset and testis growth in adolescents. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxford) 2015, 83, 357–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Türkdoğan, M.K.; Kilicel, F.; Kara, K.; Tuncer, I.; Uygan, I. Heavy metals in soil, vegetables and fruits in the endemic upper gastrointestinal cancer region of Turkey. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2003, 13, 175–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, X.; Sato, T.; Xing, B.; Tao, S. Health risks of heavy metals to the general public in Tianjin, China via consumption of vegetables and fish. Sci. Total Environ. 2005, 350, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jin, T.; Nordberg, M.; Frech, W.; Dumont, X.; Bernard, A.; Ye, T.T.; Kong, Q.; Wang, Z.; Li, P.; Lundstrom, N.G.; et al. Cadmium biomonitoring and renal dysfunction among a population environmentally exposed to cadmium from smelting in China (ChinaCad). Biometals 2002, 15, 397–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Sharma, P.; Bihari, V.; Agarwal, S.K.; Verma, V.; Kesavachandran, C.N.; Pangtey, B.S.; Mathur, N.; Singh, K.P.; Srivastava, M.; Goel, S.K. Groundwater contaminated with hexavalent chromium [Cr (VI)]: A health survey and clinical examination of community inhabitants (Kanpur, India). PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e47877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Hensawang, S.; Chanpiwat, P. Health impact assessment of arsenic and cadmium intake via rice consumption in Bangkok, Thailand. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2017, 189, 599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Huo, J.; Huang, Z.; Li, R.; Song, Y.; Lan, Z.; Ma, S.; Wu, Y.; Chen, J.; Zhang, L. Dietary cadmium exposure assessment in rural areas of Southwest China. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0201454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Cui, X.; Cheng, H.; Liu, X.; Giubilato, E.; Critto, A.; Sun, H.; Zhang, L. Cadmium exposure and early renal effects in the children and adults living in a tungsten-molybdenum mining areas of South China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 15089–15101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gibb, H.J.; Lees, P.S.J.; Pinsky, P.F.; Rooney, B.C. Clinical findings of irritation among chromium chemical production workers. Am. J. Ind. Med. 2000, 38, 127–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pizarro, F.; Olivares, M.; Uauy, C.; Contreras, P.; Rebelo, A.; Gidi, V. Acute gastrointestinal effects of graded levels of copper in drinking water. Environ. Health Perspect. 2001, 107, 117–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sarvestani, R.A.; Aghasi, M. Health risk assessment of heavy metals exposure (lead, cadmium, and copper) through drinking water consumption in Kerman city, Iran. Environ. Earth Sci. 2019, 78, 714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Islam, M.S.; Ahmed, M.K.; Habibullah-Al-Mamun, M. Determination of heavy metals in fish and vegetables in Bangladesh and health implications. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. An Int. J. 2015, 21, 986–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Iwata, T.; Sakamoto, M.; Feng, X.; Yoshida, M.; Liu, X.J.; Dakeishi, M.; Li, P.; Qiu, G.; Jiang, H.; Nakamura, M.; et al. Effects of mercury vapor exposure on neuromotor function in Chinese miners and smelters. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 2007, 80, 381–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Li, P.; Feng, X.; Qiu, G.; Li, Z.; Fu, X.; Sakamoto, M.; Liu, X.; Wang, D. Mercury exposures and symptoms in smelting workers of artisanal mercury mines in Wuchuan, Guizhou, China. Environ. Res. 2008, 107, 108–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Harada, M.; Nakanishi, J.; Yasoda, E.; Pinheiro, M.D.C.N.; Oikawa, T.; Guimarâes, G.D.A.; Cardoso, B.D.S.; Kizaki, T.; Ohno, H. Mercury pollution in the Tapajos River basin, Amazon mercury level of head hair and health effects. Environ. Int. 2001, 27, 285–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Murata, K.; Araki, S.; Yokoyama, K.; Nomiyama, K.; Nomiyama, H.; Tao, Y.X.; Liu, S.J. Autonomic and central nervous system effects of lead in female glass workers in China. Am. J. Ind. Med. 1995, 28, 233–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Gurer-Orhan, H.; Sabır, H.U.; Özgüneş, H. Correlation between clinical indicators of lead poisoning and oxidative stress parameters in controls and lead-exposed workers. Toxicology 2004, 195, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Dongre, N.N.; Suryakar, A.N.; Patil, A.J.; Ambekar, J.G.; Rathi, D.P. Biochemical effects of lead exposure on systolic & diastolic blood pressure, heme biosynthesis and hematological parameters in automobile workers of north Karnataka (India). Indian J. Clin. Biochem. 2011, 26, 400–406. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Cui, Y.; Zhu, Y.G.; Zhai, R.; Huang, Y.; Qiu, Y.; Liang, J. Exposure to metal mixtures and human health impacts in a contaminated area in Nanning, China. Environ. Int. 2005, 31, 784–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sarwar, N.; Saifullah Malhi, S.S.; Zia, M.H.; Naeem, A.; Bibi, S.; Farid, G. Role of plant nutrients in minimizing cadmium accumulation by plant. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2010, 90, 925–937. [Google Scholar]
  56. Chen, L.; Xu, Z.; Liu, M.; Huang, Y.; Fan, R.; Su, Y.; Hu, G.; Peng, X. Lead exposure assessment from study near a lead-acid battery factory in China. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 429, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Edelstein, M.; Ben-Hur, M. Heavy metals and metalloids: Sources, risks and strategies to reduce their accumulation in horticultural crops. Sci. Hortic. 2018, 234, 431–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ward, M.; Smith, G.; Tran, Q. This Report Contains Assessments of Commodity and Trade Issues Made by USDA Staff and Not Necessarily Statements of Official US Government Policy; USDA Foreign Agricultural Service: Washington, DC, USA, 2016; Volume 11.
  59. Chary, N.S.; Kamala, C.T.; Raj, D.S.S. Assessing risk of heavy metals from consuming food grow non sewage irrigated soils and food chain transfer. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2008, 69, 513–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Cai, Q.; Long, M.L.; Zhu, M.; Zhou, Q.Z.; Zhang, L.; Liu, J. Food chain transfer of cadmium and lead to cattle in a lead-zinc smelter in Guizhou, China. Environ. Pollut. 2009, 157, 3078–3082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Mansour, S.A.; Belal, M.H.; Abou-Arab, A.A.K.; Gad, M.F. Monitoring of pesticides and heavy metals in cucumber fruits produced from different farming systems. Chemosphere 2009, 75, 601–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Luo, L.; Ma, Y.; Zhang, S.; Wei, D.; Zhu, Y.G. An inventory of trace element inputs to agricultural soils in China. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90, 2524–2530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Lv, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Dai, J.; Dai, B.; Zhu, Y. Identifying the origins and spatial distributions of heavy metals in soils of Ju country (Eastern China) using multivariate and geostatistical approach. J. Soils Sediments 2014, 15, 163–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Gall, J.E.; Boyd, R.S.; Rajakaruna, N. Transfer of heavy metals through terrestrial food webs: A review. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2015, 187, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Elgallal, M.; Fletcher, L.; Evans, B. Assessment of potential risks associated with chemicals in waste water used for irrigation in arid and semiarid zones: A review. Agric. Water Manag. 2016, 177, 419–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Woldetsadik, D.; Drechsel, P.; Keraita, B.; Itanna, F.; Gebrekidan, H. Heavy metal accumulation and health risk assessment in wastewater-irrigated urban vegetable farming sites of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Int. J. Food Contam. 2017, 4, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. El-Kady, A.A.; Abdel-Wahhab, M.A. Occurrence of trace metals in foodstuffs and their health impact. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 75, 36–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Waterlot, C.; Pruvot, C.; Marot, F.; Douay, F. Impact of a phosphate amendment on the environmental availability and phytoavailability of Cd and Pb in moderately and highly carbonated kitchen garden soils. Pedosphere 2017, 27, 588–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Wang, H.; Shan, X.; Wen, B.; Owens, G.; Fang, J.; Zhang, S. Effect of indole-3-acetic acid on lead accumulation in maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings and the relevant antioxidant response. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2007, 61, 246–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Williams, L.E.; Pittman, J.K.; Hall, J.L. Emerging mechanisms for heavy metal transport in plants. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2000, 1465, 104–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Grennan, A.K. Identification of genes involved in metal transport in plants. Plant Physiol. 2009, 149, 1623–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Simões, C.C.; Melo, J.O.; Magalhães, J.V.; Guimarães, C.T. Genetic and molecular mechanisms of aluminum tolerance in plants. Genet. Mol. Res. 2012, 11, 1949–1957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Lane, S.D.; Martin, E.S. A histochemical investigation of lead uptake in Raphanus sativus. New Phytol. 1977, 79, 281–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Seregin, I.V.; Ivanov, V.B. Physiological aspects of cadmium and lead toxic effects on higher plants. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2001, 48, 523–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Seregin, I.V.; Shpigun, L.K.; Ivanov, V.B. Distribution and toxic effects of cadmium and lead on maize roots. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2004, 51, 525–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Verma, S.; Dubey, R.S. Lead toxicity induces lipid peroxidation and alters the activities of antioxidant enzymes in growing rice plants. Plant Sci. 2003, 164, 645–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Gupta, D.K.; Huang, H.G.; Corpas, F.J. Lead tolerance in plants: Strategies for phytoremediation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2013, 20, 2150–2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Varga, A.; Zaray, G.; Fodor, F.; Cseh, E. Study of interaction of iron and lead during their uptake process in wheat roots by total-reflection X-ray fluorescence spectrometry. Spectrochim. Acta Part B 1997, 52, 1027–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Lopez, M.L.; Peralta-Videa, J.R.; Parsons, J.G.; Gardea-Torresdey, J.L.; Duarte-Gardea, M. Effect of indole-3-acetic acid, kinetin, and ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid on plant growth and uptake and translocation of lead, micronutrients, and macronutrients in alfalfa plants. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2009, 11, 131–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Sharma, N.C.; Gardea-Torresdey, J.L.; Parsons, J.; Sahi, S.V. Chemical speciation and cellular deposition of lead in Sesbania drummondii. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2004, 23, 2068–2073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Islam, E.; Yang, X.; Li, T.; Liu, D.; Jin, X.; Meng, F. Effect of Pb toxicity on root morphology, physiology and ultrastructure in the two ecotypes of Elsholtzia argyi. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 147, 806–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Kopittke, P.M.; Asher, C.J.; Kopittke, R.A.; Menzies, N.W. Toxic effects of Pb2+ on growth of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Environ. Pollut. 2007, 150, 280–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Meyers, D.E.R.; Auchterlonie, G.J.; Webb, R.I.; Wood, B. Uptake and localisation of lead in the root system of Brassica juncea. Environ. Pollut. 2008, 153, 323–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Arias, J.A.; Peralta-Videa, J.R.; Ellzey, J.T.; Ren, M.; Viveros, M.N.; Gardea-Torresdey, J.L. Effects of Glomus deserticola inoculation on Prosopis: Enhancing chromium and lead uptake and translocation as confirmed by X-ray mapping, ICP-OES and TEM techniques. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2010, 68, 139–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Jiang, W.; Liu, D. Pb-induced cellular defense system in the root meristematic cells of Allium sativum L. BMC Plant Biol. 2010, 10, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Shahid, M.; Khalid, S.; Abbas, G.; Shahid, N.; Nadeem, M.; Sabir, M.; Aslam, M.; Dumat, C. Heavy metal stress and crop productivity. In Crop Production and Global Environmental Issues; Hakeem, K.R., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 1–26. [Google Scholar]
  87. Kushwaha, A.; Hans, N.; Kumar, S.; Rani, R. A critical review on speciation, mobilization and toxicity of lead in soil-microbe-plant system and bioremediation strategies. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 147, 1035–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Bi, X.; Ren, L.; Gong, M.; He, Y.; Wang, L.; Ma, Z. Transfer of cadmium and lead from soil to mangoes in an uncontaminated area, Hainan Island, China. Geoderma 2010, 155, 115–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Mirecki, N.; Agič, R.; Šunić, L.; Milenković, L.; Ilić, Z.S. Transfer factor as indicator of heavy metals content in plants. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 2015, 24, 4212–4218. [Google Scholar]
  90. Abdelhameed, R.E.; Metwally, R.A. Alleviation of cadmium stress by arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2019, 21, 663–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Arshad, M.; Silvestre, J.; Pinelli, E.; Kallerhoff, J.; Kaemmerer, M.; Tarigo, A.; Shahid, M.; Guiresse, M.; Pradere, P.; Dumat, C. A field study of lead phytoextraction by various scented Pelargonium cultivars. Chemosphere 2008, 71, 2187–2192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Brunet, J.; Varrault, G.; Zuily-Fodil, Y.; Repellin, A. Accumulation of lead in the roots of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) plants triggers systemic variation in gene expression in the shoots. Chemosphere 2009, 77, 1113–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Bini, C.; Wahsha, M.; Fontana, S.; Maleci, L. Effects of heavy metals on morphological characteristics of Taraxacum officinale Web growing on mine soils in NE Italy. J. Geochem. Explor. 2012, 123, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Sharma, P.; Dubey, R.S. Lead toxicity in plants. Braz. J. Plant Physiol. 2005, 17, 35–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Küpper, H.; Šetlik, I.; Spiller, M.; Kupper, F.C.; Prášil, O. Heavy metal-induced inhibition of photosynthesis: Targets of in vivo heavy metal chlorophyll formation. J. Phycol. 2002, 38, 429–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Küpper, H.; Šetlík, I.; Šetliková, E.; Ferimazova, N.; Spiller, M.; Küpper, F.C. Copper-induced inhibition of photosynthesis: Limiting steps of in vivo copper chlorophyll formation in Scenedesmus quadricauda. Funct. Plant Biol. 2003, 30, 1187–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Li, W.; Chen, T.; Chen, Y.; Lei, M. Role of trichome of Pteris vittata L. in arsenic hyper accumulation. Sci. China C Life Sci. 2005, 48, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  98. Rasouli-Sadaghiani, M.H.; Barin, M.; Khodaverdiloo, H.; Moghaddam, S.S.; Damalas, C.A.; Kazemalilou, S. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobacteria promote growth of Russian knapweed (Acroptilon repens L.) in a Cd-contaminated soil. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2019, 38, 113–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Yang, Y.; Han, X.; Liang, Y.; Ghosh, A.; Chen, J.; Tang, M. The Combined effectsof arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and lead (Pb) stresson Pb accumulation, plant growth parameters, photosynthesis, and antioxidant enzymesin Robinia pseudoacacia L. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0145726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Sengar, R.S.; Gautam, M.; Sengar, R.S.; Garg, S.K.; Sengar, K.; Chaudhary, R. Lead stress effects on physiobiochemical activities of higher plants. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2008, 196, 73–93. [Google Scholar]
  101. Bonifacio, R.S.; Montaño, M.N. Inhibitory effects of mercury and cadmium on seed germination of Enhalus acoroides (L.f.) Royle. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol 1998, 60, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  102. Tomulescu, I.M.; Radoviciu, E.M.; Merca, V.V.; Tuduce, A.D. Effect of copper, zinc and lead and their combinations on the germination capacity of two cereals. J. Agric. Sci. 2004, 15, 39–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Muhammad, Z.I.; Maria, K.S.; Mohammad, A.; Muhammad, S.; Zia-Ur-Rehman, F.; Muhammad, K. Effect of mercury on seed germination and seedling growth of Mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manag. 2015, 19, 191–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Monteiro, M.; Santos, C.; Mann, R.M.; Soares, A.M.V.M.; Lopes, T. Evaluation of cadmium genotoxicity in Lactuca sativa L. using nuclear microsatellites. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2007, 60, 421–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Roth, J.S.; Inglis, L.; Bachmurski, D. Ribonuclease: VIII studies on the inactive ribonuclease in rat liver the supernatant fraction of rat liver. J. Biol. Chem. 1958, 231, 1097–1106. [Google Scholar]
  106. Jana, S.; Choudhuri, M.A. Senescence in submerged aquatic angiosperms: Effects of heavy metals. New Phytol. 1982, 90, 477–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Kovalchuk, I.; Titov, V.; Hohn, B.; Kovalchuk, O. Transcriptome profiling reveals similarities and differences in plant responses to cadmium and lead. Mutat. Res. 2005, 570, 149–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Gopal, R.; Rizvi, A.H. Excess lead alters growth, metabolism and translocation of certain nutrients in radish. Chemosphere 2008, 70, 1539–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Flora, G.; Gupta, D.; Tiwari, A. Toxicity of lead: A review with recent updates. Interdiscip. Toxicol. 2012, 5, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Hashem, A.; Abd_Allah, E.F.; Alqarawi, A.A.; Al Huqail, A.A.; Egamberdieva, D.; Wirth, S. Alleviation of cadmium stress in Solanum lycopersicum L. by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi via induction of acquired systemic tolerance. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2016, 23, 272–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Abd-Allah, E.F.; Abeer, H.; Alqarawi, A.A.; Hend, A. Alleviation of adverse impact of cadmium stress in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Pak. J. Bot. 2015, 47, 785–795. [Google Scholar]
  112. Deng, H.; Li, M.S.; Chen, Y.X.; Luo, Y.P.; Yu, F.M. A new discovered manganese hyperaccumulator-Polygonum pubescens Blume. Fresenisu Environ Bull. 2010, 19, 94–99. [Google Scholar]
  113. Iannone, M.F.; Rosales, E.P.; Groppa, M.D.; Benavides, M.P. Reactive oxygen species formation and cell death in catalase-deficient tobacco leaf disks exposed to cadmium. Protoplasma 2010, 245, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Roelfsema, M.R.G.; Hedrich, R. In the light of stomatal opening: New insights into “the Watergate”. New Phytol. 2005, 167, 665–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Yang, H.M.; Zhang, X.Y.; Wang, G.X. Effects of heavy metals on stomatal movements in broad bean leaves. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2004, 51, 464–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Chandra, R.; Kang, H. Mixed heavy metal stress on photosynthesis, transpiration rate, and chlorophyll content in poplar hybrids. For. Sci. Technol. 2015, 12, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Ashraf, U.; Kanu, A.S.; Mo, Z.; Hussain, S.; Anjum, S.A.; Khan, I.; Abbas, R.N.; Tang, X. Lead toxicity in rice: Effects, mechanisms, and mitigation strategies—A mini review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 18318–18332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Birhane, E.; Sterck, F.J.; Fetene, M.; Bongers, F.; Kuyper, T.W. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhance photosynthesis, water use efficiency, and growth of frankincense seedlings under pulsed water availability conditions. Oecologia 2012, 169, 895–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  119. Ouziad, F.; Hildebrandt, U.; Schmelzer, E.; Bothe, H. Differential gene expressions in arbuscular mycorrhizal-colonized tomato grown under heavy metal stress. J. Plant Physiol. 2005, 162, 634–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  120. Punamiya, P.; Datta, R.; Sarkar, D.; Barber, S.; Patel, M.; Das, P. Symbiotic role of Glomusmosseae in phytoextraction of lead in vetiver grass Chrysopogon zizanioides L. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 177, 465–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Smith, S.E.; Read, D.J. The symbionts forming arbuscular mycorrhizas. In Mycorrhizal Symbiosis; Smith, E.S., Read, D.J., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2008; pp. 13–41. [Google Scholar]
  122. Vogel Mikuš, K.; Pongrac, P.; Kump, P.; Nečemer, M.; Regvar, M. Colonisation of a Zn, Cd and Pb hyper accumulator Thlaspi praecoxWulfen with indigenous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal mixture induces changes in heavy metal and nutrient uptake. Environ. Pollut. 2006, 139, 362–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Göhre, Y.; Paszkowski, U. Contribution of the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis to heavy metal phytoremediation. Planta 2006, 223, 1115–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. Zhipeng, W.U.; Weidong, W.U.; Shenglu, Z.H.O.U.; Shaohua, W.U. Mycorrhizal inoculation affects Pb and Cd accumulation and translocation in Pakchoi (Brassica chinensis L.). Pedosphere 2016, 26, 13–26. [Google Scholar]
  125. Carvalho, L.M.; Cacador, I.; Martins-Loucao, M.A. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhance root cadmium and copper accumulation in the roots of the salt marsh plant Aster tripolium L. Plant Soil 2006, 285, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Jankong, P.; Visoottiviseth, P. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation on plants growing on arsenic contaminated soil. Chemosphere 2008, 72, 1092–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Janeeshma, E.; Puthur, J.T. Direct and indirect influence of arbuscular mycorrhizae on enhancing metal tolerance of plants. Arch. Microbiol. 2020, 202, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Bi, Y.; Xiao, L.; Liu, R. Response of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and phosphorus solubilizing bacteria to remediation abandoned solid waste of coal mine. Int. J. Coal Sci. Technol. 2019, 6, 603–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Johri, A.K.; Oelmüller, R.; Dua, M.; Yadav, V.; Kumar, M.; Tuteja, N.; Varma, A.; Bonfante, P.; Persson, B.L.; Stroud, R.M. Fungal association and utilization of phosphate by plants: Success, limitations, and future prospects. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 16, 984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  130. Benedetto, A.; Magurno, F.; Bonfante, P.; Lanfranco, L. Expression profiles of a phosphate transporter gene (GmosPT) from the endomycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae. Mycorrhiza 2005, 15, 620–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Maldonado-Mendoza, I.E.; Dewbre, G.R.; Harrison, M.J. A phosphate transporter gene from the extra-radical mycelium of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices is regulated in response to phosphate in the environment. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2001, 14, 1140–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  132. Harrison, M.J.; van Buuren, M.L. A phosphate transporter from the mycorrhizal fungus Glomus versiforme. Nature 1995, 378, 626–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Porras-Soriano, L.Z.; Soriano-Martín, M.L.; Porras-Piedra, A.; Azcón, R. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increased growth, nutrient uptake and tolerance to salinity in olive trees under nursery conditions. J. Plant Physiol. 2009, 166, 1350–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Elhindi, K.M.; Al-Mana, F.A.; El-Hendawy, S.; Al-Selwey, W.A.; Elgorban, A.M. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi mitigates heavy metal toxicity adverse effects in sewage water contaminated soil on Tagetes erecta L. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2018, 64, 662–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Garg, N.; Singla, P.; Bhandari, P. Metal uptake, oxidative metabolism, and mycorrhization in pigeon pea and pea under arsenic and cadmium stress. Turk. J. Agric. For. 2015, 39, 234–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Garg, N.; Singla, P. The role of Glomus mosseae on key physiological and biochemical parameters of pea plants grown in arsenic contaminated soil. Sci. Hortic. 2012, 143, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Shi, W.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, S.; Polle, A.; Rennenberg, H.; Luo, Z.B. Physiological and molecular mechanisms of heavy metal accumulation in non mycorrhizal versus mycorrhizal plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2019, 42, 1087–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Hall, J.L. Cellular mechanisms for heavy metal detoxification and tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 2002, 53, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Ernst, W.H.O. Evolution of metal tolerance in higher plants. For. Snow Landsc. Res. 2006, 80, 251–274. [Google Scholar]
  140. Lux, A.; Martinka, M.; Vaculik, M.; White, P.J. Root responses to cadmium in the rhizosphere: A review. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 62, 21–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  141. Yang, Z.; Chu, C. Towards understanding plant response to heavy metal stress. In Abiotic Stress in Plants-Mechanisms and Adaptations; Shanker, A., Venkateswarlu, B., Eds.; InTech Open: London, UK, 2011; pp. 59–78. [Google Scholar]
  142. Soudek, P.; Petrova, S.; Vankova, R.; Song, J.; Vanek, T. Accumulation of heavy metals using Sorghum sp. Chemosphere 2014, 104, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Vogeli-Lange, R.; Wagner, G.J. Subcellular localization of cadmium and cadmium-binding peptides in tobacco leaves: Implication of a transport function for cadmium-binding peptides. Plant Physiol. 1990, 92, 1086–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  144. Joiner, E.J.; Briones, R.; Leyval, C. Metal binding capacity of arbuscular mycorrhizal mycelium. Plant Soil 2000, 226, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Cornejo, P.; Pérez-Tienda, J.; Meier, S.; Valderas, A.; Borie, F.; Azcón-Aguilar, C.; Ferrol, N. Copper compartmentalization in spores as a survival strategy of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in Cu-polluted environments. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2013, 57, 925–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Gonzalez-Guerrero, M.; Melville, L.H.; Ferrol, N.; Lott, J.N.; Azcon-Aguilar, C.; Peterson, R.L. Ultrastructural localization of heavy metals in the extraradical mycelium and spores of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices. Can. J. Microbiol. 2008, 54, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Zhang, X.F.; Hu, Z.H.; Yan, T.X.; Lu, R.R.; Peng, C.L.; Li, S.S.; Jing, Y.X. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alleviate Cd phytotoxicity by altering Cd subcellular distribution and chemical forms in Zea mays. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 171, 352–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Krishnamoorthy, R.; Venkatramanan, V.; Senthilkumar, M.; Anandham, R.; Kumutha, K.; Sa, T. Management of Heavy Metal Polluted Soils: Perspective of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi. In Sustainable Green Technologies for Environmental Management; Shah, S., Venkatramanan, V., Prasad, R., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 67–85. [Google Scholar]
  149. Wu, Q.S.; Zou, Y.N.; AbduAllah, E.F. Mycorrhizal association and ros in plants. In Oxidative Damage to Plants; Ahmad, P., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2014; pp. 453–475. [Google Scholar]
  150. Garg, N.; Kaur, H. Response of Antioxidant Enzymes, Phytochelatins and Glutathione Production Towards Cd and Zn Stresses in Cajanus cajan (L.) Mill sp. Genotypes Colonized by Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2013, 199, 118–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Hashem, A.; Abd_Allah, E.F.; Alqarawi, A.A.; Egamberdieva, D. Bioremediation of adverse impact of cadmium toxicity on Cassia italica Mill by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2016, 23, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  152. Anjum, N.A.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Hossain, M.A.; Thangavel, P.; Roychoudhury, A.; Gill, S.S.; Rodrigo, M.A.; Adam, V.; Fujita, M.; Kizek, R.; et al. Jacks of metal/metalloid chelation trade in plants-an overview. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  153. Garg, N.; Chandel, S. Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi on growth, cadmium uptake, osmolyte, and phytochelatin synthesis in Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. under NaCl and Cd stresses. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2012, 31, 292–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Begum, N.; Qin, C.; Ahanger, M.A.; Raza, S.; Khan, M.I.; Ashraf, M.; Ahmed, N.; Zhang, L. Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in plant growth regulation: Implications in abiotic stress tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  155. Grill, E.; Loffler, S.; Winnacker, E.L.; Zenk, M.H. Phytochelatins, the heavy-metal-binding peptides of plants, are synthesized from glutathione by a specific γ-glutamylcysteine dipeptidyl transpeptidase (phytochelatin synthase). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1989, 86, 6838–6842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  156. Yang, X.; Feng, Y.; He, Z.; Stoffella, P. Molecular mechanisms of heavy metal hyperaccumulation and phytoremediation. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2005, 18, 339–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Jiang, Q.Y.; Zhuo, F.; Long, S.H.; Zhao, H.D.; Yang, D.J.; Ye, Z.H.; Li, S.S.; Jing, Y.X. Can arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi reduce Cd uptake and alleviate Cd toxicity of Lonicera japonica grown in Cd-added soils? Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  158. Degola, F.; Fattorini, L.; Bona, E.; Sprimuto, C.T.; Argese, E.; Berta, G.; di Toppi, L.S. The symbiosis between Nicotiana tabacum and the endomycorrhizal fungus Funneliformis mosseae increases the plant glutathione level and decreases leaf cadmium and root arsenic contents. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 92, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  159. Jia, D.U.; Jing-Li, Y.; Cheng-Hao, L.I. Advances in metallothionein studies in forest trees. Plant Omics 2012, 5, 46–51. [Google Scholar]
  160. Hasegawa, I.; Terada, E.; Sunairi, M.; Wakita, H.; Shinmachi, F.; Noguchi, A.; Nakajima, M.; Yazaki, J. Genetic improvement of heavy metal tolerance in plants by transfer of the yeast metallothionein gene (CUP1). Plant Soil 1997, 196, 277–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Xu, Y.; Zhou, G.; Zhou, L.; Li, Y.; Liu, J. Expression patterns of the rice class I metallothionein gene family in response to lead stress in rice seedlings and functional complementation of its members in lead-sensitive yeast cells. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2007, 52, 2203–2209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Liu, T.; Liu, S.; Guan, H.; Ma, L.; Chen, Z.; Gu, H.; Qu, L.J. Transcriptional profiling of Arabidopsis seedlings in response to heavy metal lead (Pb). Environ. Exp. Bot. 2009, 67, 377–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Wright, S.F.; Upadhyaya, A. A survey of soils for aggregate stability and glomalin, a glycoprotein produced by hyphae of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Plant Soil 1998, 198, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Driver, J.D.; Holben, W.E.; Rillig, M.C. Characterization of glomalin as a hyphal wall component of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2005, 37, 101–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Singh, P.K.; Singh, M.; Tripathi, B.N. Glomalin: An arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal soil protein. Protoplasma 2012, 250, 663–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Sidhu, G.P.S.; Bali, A.S.; Bhardwaj, R. Use of fungi in mitigating cadmium toxicity in plants. In Cadmium Toxicity and Tolerance in Plants; Hasanuzzaman, M., Prasad, M.N.V., Fujita, M., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 397–426. [Google Scholar]
  167. Chern, E.C.; Tsai, D.W.; Ogunseitan, O.A. Deposition of glomalin-related soil protein and sequestered toxic metals into water sheds. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 3566–3572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Gonzalez-Chavez, M.C.; Carrillo-Gonzalez, R.; Gutierrez-Castorena, M.C. Natural attenuation in a slag heap contaminated with cadmium: The role of plants and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 161, 1288–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Ma, L.Q.; Komar, K.M.; Tu, C.; Zhang, W.; Cai, Y.; Kennelley, E.D. Erratum: A fern that hyperaccumulates arsenic. Nature 2001, 411, 438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  170. Malik, N.; Biswas, A.K. Role of higher plants in remediation of metal contaminated sites. Sci. Rev. Chem. Commun. 2012, 2, 141–146. [Google Scholar]
  171. Meier, S.; Borie, F.; Bolan, N.; Cornejo, P. Phytoremediation of metal-polluted soils by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 42, 741–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Zhang, Y.; Hu, J.; Bai, J.; Wang, J.; Yin, R.; Wang, J.; Lin, X. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alleviate the heavy metal toxicity on sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) plants cultivated on a heavily contaminated field soil at a WEEE-recycling site. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 628–629, 282–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Pivetz, B.E. Phytoremediation of Contaminated Soil and Ground Water at Hazardous Waste Sites; US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response: Washington, DC, USA, 2001. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-06/documents/epa_540_s01_500.pdf (accessed on 10 July 2019).
  174. Ma, Y.; Prasad, M.N.V.; Rajkumar, M.; Freitas, H. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and endophytes accelerate phytoremediation of metalliferous soils. Biotechnol. Adv. 2011, 29, 248–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Latef, A.A.H.A.; Hashem, A.; Rasool, S.; Abd_Allah, E.F.; Alqarawi, A.A.; Egamberdieva, D.; Jan, S.; Anjum, N.A.; Ahmad, P. Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis and abiotic stress in plants: A review. J. Plant Biol. 2016, 59, 407–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Lanfranco, L.; Bolchi, A.; Ros, E.C.; Ottonello, S.; Bonfante, P. Differential expression of a metallothionein gene during the presymbiotic versus the symbiotic phase of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. Plant Physiol. 2002, 130, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  177. González-Guerrero, M.; Benabdellah, K.; Valderas, A.; Azcón-Aguilar, C.; Ferrol, N. GintABC1 encodes a putative ABC transporter of the MRP subfamily induced by Cu, Cd, and oxidative stress in Glomus intraradices. Mycorrhiza 2010, 20, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Azcón, R.; Medina, A.; Aroca, R.; Ruiz-Lozano, J.M. Abiotic stress remediation by the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis and rhizosphere bacteria/yeast interactions. Mol. Microb. Ecol. Rhizosphere 2013, 1, 991–1002. [Google Scholar]
  179. González-Guerrero, M.; Cano, C.; Azcón-Aguilar, C.; Ferrol, N. GintMT1 encodes a functional metallothionein in Glomus intraradices that responds to oxidative stress. Mycorrhiza 2007, 17, 327–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. González-Guerrero, M.; Azcón-Aguilar, C.; Mooney, M.; Valderas, A.; MacDiarmid, C.W.; Eide, D.J.; Ferrol, N. Characterization of a Glomus intraradices gene encoding a putative Zn transporter of the cation diffusion facilitator family. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2005, 42, 130–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Stommel, M.; Mann, P.; Franken, P. EST-library construction using spore RNA of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Gigaspora rosea. Mycorrhiza 2001, 10, 281–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Benabdellah, K.; Merlos, M.Á.; Azcón-Aguilar, C.; Ferrol, N. GintGRX1, the first characterized glomeromycotan glutaredoxin, is a multifunctional enzyme that responds to oxidative stress. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2009, 46, 94–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Benabdellah, K.; Azcón-Aguilar, C.; Valderas, A.; Speziga, D.; Fitzpatrick, T.B.; Ferrol, N. GintPDX1 encodes a protein involved in vitamin B6 biosynthesis that is up-regulated by oxidative stress in the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices. New Phytol. 2009, 184, 682–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Hildebrandt, U.; Regvar, M.; Bothe, H. Arbuscular mycorrhiza and heavy metal tolerance. Phytochemistry 2007, 38, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Global map of heavy metals showing countries where significant impact has been observed.
Figure 1. Global map of heavy metals showing countries where significant impact has been observed.
Agronomy 10 00815 g001
Figure 2. Uptake, translocation and accumulation of heavy metal (HM) in plants.
Figure 2. Uptake, translocation and accumulation of heavy metal (HM) in plants.
Agronomy 10 00815 g002
Figure 3. Effects of heavy metals on plants [100,117].
Figure 3. Effects of heavy metals on plants [100,117].
Agronomy 10 00815 g003
Figure 4. Mechanism of heavy metal (HM) detoxification in plants by arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. (1) Chelating agents (phytochelatins and organic acids from the plant and glomalins from the fungus) bind with HM ions in the soil. (2–4) Transport of metal ions across the cell wall and plasma membrane (acting as selective barrier and with the help of transporters) of plants and fungi. (5) Chelation of HM ions in the cytosol. (6) Export of HMs via active or passive transport from plant or fungal cells. (7) Sequestration of HM ions in the vacuoles of plant and fungal cells. (8) Transport of HM ions in the fungal hyphae. (9) Export of HM ions from the fungus to plant cells via transporters in arbuscules. Modified from [123] with permission.
Figure 4. Mechanism of heavy metal (HM) detoxification in plants by arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. (1) Chelating agents (phytochelatins and organic acids from the plant and glomalins from the fungus) bind with HM ions in the soil. (2–4) Transport of metal ions across the cell wall and plasma membrane (acting as selective barrier and with the help of transporters) of plants and fungi. (5) Chelation of HM ions in the cytosol. (6) Export of HMs via active or passive transport from plant or fungal cells. (7) Sequestration of HM ions in the vacuoles of plant and fungal cells. (8) Transport of HM ions in the fungal hyphae. (9) Export of HM ions from the fungus to plant cells via transporters in arbuscules. Modified from [123] with permission.
Agronomy 10 00815 g004
Figure 5. Mitigation of heavy metal (HM) stress by chelating agents. The figure shows the uptake of HM that is mediated via zinc and iron like protein (ZIP) transporter and other ion channels; HM ions, when entering the cytosol, activate the enzyme phytochelatin synthase (PCS) and catalyze the formation of phytochelatins (PCs) from glutathione (GSH), which is synthesized from glutamate (Glu) and cysteine (Cys) by the transfer of γ glutamyl-cysteinyl (γ Glu-Cys) conjugates onto GSH via glutathione synthetase (GS); PCs binds with the cytosolic HM ions and form heavy metal–phytochelatin (HM-PC) complexes, which enter the vacuole via ATP-binding-cassette (ABC), P1B ATPase (P1B) and other transporters such as heavy metal ATPases (HMA), natural resistance-associated macrophage protein (NRAMP) and ZIP transporters. HM ions also lead to the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as superoxide radical (O2−), which is dismutated by superoxide dismutase (SOD) and produces hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), which is further broken down into water (H2O) by ascorbate peroxidase (APX) and catalase (CAT). Peroxidase (POD); glutathione peroxidase (GPX); glutathione reductase (GR).
Figure 5. Mitigation of heavy metal (HM) stress by chelating agents. The figure shows the uptake of HM that is mediated via zinc and iron like protein (ZIP) transporter and other ion channels; HM ions, when entering the cytosol, activate the enzyme phytochelatin synthase (PCS) and catalyze the formation of phytochelatins (PCs) from glutathione (GSH), which is synthesized from glutamate (Glu) and cysteine (Cys) by the transfer of γ glutamyl-cysteinyl (γ Glu-Cys) conjugates onto GSH via glutathione synthetase (GS); PCs binds with the cytosolic HM ions and form heavy metal–phytochelatin (HM-PC) complexes, which enter the vacuole via ATP-binding-cassette (ABC), P1B ATPase (P1B) and other transporters such as heavy metal ATPases (HMA), natural resistance-associated macrophage protein (NRAMP) and ZIP transporters. HM ions also lead to the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as superoxide radical (O2−), which is dismutated by superoxide dismutase (SOD) and produces hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), which is further broken down into water (H2O) by ascorbate peroxidase (APX) and catalase (CAT). Peroxidase (POD); glutathione peroxidase (GPX); glutathione reductase (GR).
Agronomy 10 00815 g005
Table 1. Health effects on humans of different heavy metals (NS—not specified).
Table 1. Health effects on humans of different heavy metals (NS—not specified).
Heavy MetalSourceCountryBiological EffectsRef
Arsenic (As)Drinking waterHungaryIncrease in stillbirths and spontaneous abortion[22]
Drinking waterChileIncrease in stillbirths and infant mortality[23]
Drinking waterBangladeshIncrease in spontaneous abortions, stillbirths and preterm births[24]
Drinking waterTaiwanReduced birth rate[25]
Drinking waterIndiaIncrease in stillbirths[26]
Drinking waterChileIncreased liver cancer mortality for ages 10–19[27]
Drinking waterChileIncreased lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) deaths for ages 30–39[28]
Drinking waterBangladeshChronic cough, breathing problems or blood in the sputum of 39 aged people[29]
Drinking waterMongoliaSkin hyperkeratosis, hyperpigmentation and depigmentation and other skin lesions among men[30]
Soil and vegetablesNigeriaLiver damage, gastro-intestinal effects, lung cancer and skin lesions[31]
Rice and edible mushroomsChinaNS[32]
FoodSpainNS[33]
Cadmium (Cd)SoilThailandHigh prevalence of renal dysfunction, bone mineral loss, hypertension and urinary stones[34]
NSSwedenTubular and glomerular kidney effects in women[35]
Industrial plantsItalyDelayed onset of puberty in male adolescents and impaired testicular growth[36]
Soil and vegetablesTurkeyGastro-intestinal, renal prostate and ovarian cancer[37]
SoilNigeriaDamage to central nervous system [31]
Rice and edible mushroomsChinaNS[32]
Vegetables and FishChinaNS[38]
FoodSpainNS[33]
SmeltingChinaRenal dysfunction[39]
RiceThailandKidney, lung and liver problems[40]
FoodSouth west chinaBone damage, kidney injury and cancer[41]
Mining areasSouth chinaRenal effects, particularly in children[42]
Drinking waterIranNS[43]
Chromium (Cr)Ground waterIndiaGastrointestinal and dermatological complaints and abnormal hematological function[44]
Chromate production plantUSANasal irritation and nasal ulceration[45]
VegetablesNigeriaRespiratory problems, lung cancer and skin rashes[31]
VegetablesChinaNS[38]
Copper (Cu)Drinking waterChileNausea, abdominal pain or vomiting[46]
VegetablesBangladeshKidney damage or tumors[47]
VegetablesChinaNS[38]
Drinking waterIranNS[43]
Mercury (Hg)Mercury mining sitesChinaPostural sway, as well as hand tremor, may be affected by elemental mercury vapor exposure [48]
Mercury minesChinaFinger and eyelid tremor, gingivitis, and typical darkline on gums[49]
Tapajos river basinBrazilSensory disturbance (especially glove-and-stocking type, which is characteristic of Minamata disease), tremor, failure in two-point discrimination, and slight balancing failure[50]
Rice and edible mushroomsChinaNS[32]
Lead (Pb)Glass work plantChinaSusceptible autonomic nervous function[51]
Battery plantTurkeyIncreased erythrocyte malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, catalase and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) activities, and decreased blood glutathione/glutathione disulfide ratio[52]
Automobile plantIndiaHigh blood pressure, less heme biosynthesis[53]
SoilChinaRenal dysfunction [54]
VegetablesNigeriaNeurological, immunological effects[31]
VegetablesChinaNS[38]
FoodSpainNS[33]
Battery plantChinaNeurological damage[55]
Drinking waterIranNS[43]
Table 2. Maximum level of heavy metals in food components (European Commission, 2006, 2015/1005, June 2015 and National Food Safety Standard (GB 2762-2012)).
Table 2. Maximum level of heavy metals in food components (European Commission, 2006, 2015/1005, June 2015 and National Food Safety Standard (GB 2762-2012)).
Heavy MetalsFood ComponentsMaximum Levels
(mg kg−1 wet weight)
Ref.
Lead (Pb)Leafy vegetables, brassica vegetables and a few fungi like Pleurotus ostreatus (oyster mushroom), Agaricus bisporus (common mushroom) and Lentinula edodes (shiitake mushroom)0.3[57] with permission
Vegetables (excluding fresh herbs and fungi, leafy vegetables and brassica vegetables)0.1
Berries and small fruits0.2
Cereals, pulses and legumes0.2
Fruits (excluding small fruits and berries)0.1
Mercury (Hg)Muscle meat of fish and fishery products0.50
Cadmium (Cd)Fresh herbs, leafy vegetables, celeriac and some fungi like Pleurotus ostreatus (oyster mushroom) and Agaricus bisporus (common mushroom)0.2
Potatoes and root and stem vegetables (excluding celeriac plants)0.1
Fruits and vegetables (excluding fresh herbs, root and stem vegetables, fungi, potatoes and leafy vegetables)0.05
Soybeans0.2
Cereals (excluding rice, wheat, germ and bran)0.1
Rice, wheat, germ and bran0.2
Tin (Sn)Canned food (except beverages)200
Canned beverages (including vegetable and fruit juices)100
Processed cereal based products (excluding powdered and dried products)50
Chromium (Cr)Fresh vegetables0.5[58]
Grains and its products1.0
Beans1.0
Meat and its products1.0
Nickel (Ni)Oil and its products (mainly hydrogenated vegetable oil)1.0

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dhalaria, R.; Kumar, D.; Kumar, H.; Nepovimova, E.; Kuča, K.; Torequl Islam, M.; Verma, R. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi as Potential Agents in Ameliorating Heavy Metal Stress in Plants. Agronomy 2020, 10, 815. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10060815

AMA Style

Dhalaria R, Kumar D, Kumar H, Nepovimova E, Kuča K, Torequl Islam M, Verma R. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi as Potential Agents in Ameliorating Heavy Metal Stress in Plants. Agronomy. 2020; 10(6):815. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10060815

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dhalaria, Rajni, Dinesh Kumar, Harsh Kumar, Eugenie Nepovimova, Kamil Kuča, Muhammad Torequl Islam, and Rachna Verma. 2020. "Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi as Potential Agents in Ameliorating Heavy Metal Stress in Plants" Agronomy 10, no. 6: 815. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10060815

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop