Next Article in Journal
Testimony: A Matter of Social Practices
Previous Article in Journal
IS4SI SUMMIT Berkeley 2019
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

A Step by Step Investigation of Cr(III) Recovery from Tannery Waste †

Laboratory of Chemical & Environmental Technology, Department of Chemistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 4th International Electronic Conference on Water Sciences, 13–29 November 2019; Available online: https://ecws-4.sciforum.net/.
Proceedings 2020, 48(1), 1; https://doi.org/10.3390/ECWS-4-06436
Published: 12 November 2019
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 4th International Electronic Conference on Water Sciences)

Abstract

:
The effluent of tanneries is a hazardous waste and a combination of physical-chemical and biological techniques is required for its treatment. As a result of the previous processes, a sludge with high chromium content is produced. So, the aim of this study is the hydrometallurgical recovery of chromium in the context of a circular economy. According to chemical characterization, the only form of metal that existed in the sludge was the trivalent, while its content was up to 14.8% w/w. Among the examined acids, the highest efficiency in Cr(III) leaching was achieved by the H2SO4 (93%), due to the formation of the soluble CrSO4+. Regarding the step of precipitation, no significant varions were observed between the two alkaline medias that were tested, namely NaOH and Ca(OH)2.

1. Introduction

Tannery waste treatment is a multi-step process, before it can be safely discharged into a body of water or into the landfield or reused. The goal is to reduce or remove organic load, solids, nutrients, chromium and other pollutants, as each recipient can accept specific amounts of them without being degraded. In order to reduce emissions, tannery waste treatment is mandatory, by a suitable combination of physical-chemical and biological techniques, inside and/or outside the facility [1].
Technologies that have been studied for chromium recovery from tannery wastewater include flocculation, chemical precipitation [2], adsorption [3,4], ion exchange resins [5], membrane use [6], and electrochemistry [7], as well as bioaccumulation in algae [8]. However, the high cost, fixed and operational, combined with the low efficiency and selectivity, make their application in the field unprofitable. Often, in order to optimize efficiency, the combination of two or more technologies was considered, resulting in additional cost increase [9,10]. The main technology used for tannery wastewater treatment is precipitation/flocculation; despite the fact that it has the lowest selectivity, it is a low cost and high efficiency technology in removing pollutants from the aqueous phase. Of course, it comprises the final stage of a typical tannery waste treatment plant, which produces a chromium-rich sludge.
The aim of this study is chromium recovery from the abovementioned tannery sludge by the principals of hydrometallurgy. Such a process consists of two steps—metal leaching from the sludge using an acidic media and then its precipitation using an alkaline media, in order to produce Cr(III) in a solid phase, which will be re-fed to tanneries.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Tannery Sludge

As a reference sample, we obtained tannery air-dried sludge from the central wastewater treatment plant (Figure 1) that serves the respective enterprises in the main industrial area of Thessaloniki (Sindos—Northern Greece). The initial sludge was ground and sieved (<0.5 mm), in order to be homogenized.

2.2. Sample Characterization

The chemical characterization was conducted by acid digestion, as required for the specific sample. In particular, 0.5 g of fine powder was placed in a 100 mL PTFE beaker with 20 mL of concentrated HNO3 and refluxed on a heated plate at 95 °C for 24 h. Contrary to the standard procedure, this was not followed by the addition of concentrated HCl, as in that case a significant portion of the hexavalent chromium, if contained in the sludge, would be reduced to its trivalent form. The major metals (Cr, Ca, Mg etc.) were determined by flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry, using a Perkin-Elmer AAnalyst 800 instrument [11], and Cr(VI) by the standard 1,5-diphenylcarbazide method, using a Hitachi U-2000 spectrophotometer at 540 nm [12]. The organic matter content and organic carbon were measured by the TOC-VCSH E200V Schimadzu TOC analyzer [13].

2.3. Hydrometallurgical Experiments

The leaching of chromium from the sample was conducted following the hydrometallurgical principals by applying various acidic medias. In a beaker was placed 1 g of the sample and the leaching media. The examined acids were HCl, HNO3 and H2SO4, in the concentration range 0.02–2 N. The rest of the experimental conditions remained stable: contact time at 60 min, temperature at 25 °C and liquid-to-solid ratio (L/S) equal to 25. After the extraction stage, the liquid phase separated by filtration under vacuum and the major metals concentration (namely Cr and Ca) were determined in the filtrate. The precipitation step was applied in the filtrate, using NaOH and Ca(OH)2 as alkaline medias, in the pH range of 6–9.5. In detail, 25 mL of chromium leachate was placed in a beaker and the desired pH was adjusted by adding the alkaline media dropwise, under stirring conditions. When the system reached equilibrium, stirring continued for an extra hour.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Sample Characterization

Through chemical characterization (Table 1), it was proven that tannery sludge contained a high amount of Cr(III) (14.1%), while the complete absence of the toxic Cr(VI) was confirmed. In addition, an equally high content was observed for Ca (14.8%), due to the usage of corresponding reagents during the tannin process. On the other hand, due to the nature of the raw material (leather), the organic matter was also high (22%). Other metals worth mentioning were Mg, Na, Al and Fe (<2.5%), but in any case their percentage in the sludge was much lower than the previous ones.

3.2. Leaching of Cr(III)

Hydrometallurgical recovery of Cr(III) from the tannery sludge mainly requires its leaching by an acidic media. When the three common acids (usually applied to these types of experiments) were examined, significant deviations were observed regarding their efficiency. As shown in Figure 2a, the maximum percentage of Cr(III) extraction (93%) was obtained by using 1 N H2SO4, compared with similar concentrations of HNO3 (73%) or HCl (65%). It is also noted that by increasing the acid’s concentration (normality), no further improvement in the extraction was found.
The leaching results are attributed to the solubility of the Cr(III) forms, as shown by the data extracted by the specialized software Visual MINTEQ version 3.1, according to which different chromium forms were obtained, using the experimental conditions of the present study. Although the CrNO32+ mode exhibits higher solubility than CrSO4+ or CrCl2+, the equilibrium conditions (i.e., pH, Cr and acid concentration) did not favor their formation [14]. In any case, the dominant species was the Cr3+ ion, but when 1 N H2SO4 was applied, about 16% of the total amount of chromium was obtained as CrSO4+, which has higher solubility than Cr3+. The latter was the only species when 1 N HNO3 was applied. Finally, 1 N HCl caused 44% formation of CrCl2+, which is the least soluble mode [15].

3.3. Selectivity

Since tannery sludge contains an even higher amount of calcium than chromium, its behavior was examined during the hydrometallurgical extraction with respect to the method’s selectivity. Figure 2b shows the percentage of Ca leached under the same conditions as before, i.e., Cr(III) recovery. When HNO3 and HCl were applied, the leaching of Ca was extremely high (~90%), due to the high solubility of its forms in the primary waste. In contrast, when H2SO4 was applied, only a small portion of Ca was leached (~30%), due to the formation of the insoluble in acidic media CaSO4 [16], according to software Visual MINTEQ.

3.4. Precipitation

In the process of recovering chromium from tannery sludge, the last and necessary step is precipitation. The experimental process was based on the low solubility of Cr(III) and hence its precipitation by increasing the leachate’s pH. The two tested reagents were Ca(OH)2 and NaOH, the most economical and widely used. The leachate had an initial concentration of 5.2 g Cr(III)/L, as obtained using 1 N H2SO4 for 1 h at 20 °C and a L/S ratio equal to 25.
According to Figure 3, almost the entire amount of Cr(III) was precipitated for pH values above 7 (<98%), and it separated from the aqueous phase. On the other hand, the efficiency was dramatically decreased for pH values below 7, especially when the NaOH was applied. The deviation between the two examined alkaline reagents was attributed to their chemical properties. Calcium is less soluble than sodium [14], so by following a co-precipitation mechanism, the less soluble Cr(III) remained by applying Ca(OH)2. In addition, Ca(OH)2 is a weaker base than NaOH, and therefore a proportionally higher amount was required for the desired pH adjustment. As a result, the corresponding precipitates differed both in color and volume (Figure 4). The chemical characterization of the precipitates, as obtained by applying the optimum conditions (pH 8), revealed that the use of NaOH had higher Cr(III) content (31%) than Ca(OH)2 (7.5%). Instead, Ca content had the opposite behavior (3.8% and 17%, respectively).

4. Conclusions

In this research, it was proved that chromium recovery from the air-dried tannery sludge is possible, promoting the sustainable management of this industrial waste. In particular, Cr(III) was leached by H2SO4 directly from the initial waste with high selectivity against the co-existing higher amount of Ca. Afterwards, by increasing the leachate’s pH with NaOH, a chromium-rich precipitate was obtained that can be fed back to the corresponding enterprises as a raw material.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge support of this work by the project “INVALOR: Research Infrastructure for Waste Valorization and Sustainable Management” (MIS 5002495) which is implemented under the Action “Reinforcement of the Research and Innovation Infrastructure”, funded by the Operational Programme “Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation” (NSRF 2014-2020) and co-financed by Greece and the European Union (European Regional Development Fund).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO). Introduction to Treatment of Tannery Effluents, What Every Tann. Should Know about Effl. Treat., Vienna, 2011. Available online: https://www.unido.org/sites/default/files/2011-11/Introduction_to_treatment_of_tannery_effluents_0.pdf (accessed on 13 September 2019).
  2. Guo, Z.R.; Zhang, G.; Fang, J.; Dou, X. Enhanced chromium recovery from tanning wastewater. J. Clean. Prod. 2006, 14, 75–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dahbi, S.; Azzi, M.; Saib, N.; De la Guardia, M.; Faure, R.; Durand, R. Removal of trivalent chromium from tannery waste waters using bone charcoal. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2002, 374, 540–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hintermeyer, B.H.; Lacour, N.A.; Perez Padilla, A.; Tavani, E.L. Separation of the chromium(III) present in a tanning wastewater by means of precipitation, reverse osmosis and adsorption. Lat. Am. Appl. Res. 2008, 38, 63–71. [Google Scholar]
  5. Sahu, S.K.; Meshram, P.; Pandey, B.D.; Kumar, V.; Mankhand, T.R. Removal of chromium(III) by cation exchange resin, Indion 790 for tannery waste treatment. Hydrometallurgy 2009, 99, 170–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cassano, A.; Molinari, R.; Romano, M.; Drioli, E. Treatment of aqueous effluents of the leather industry by membrane processes: A review. J. Memb. Sci. 2001, 181, 111–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sirajuddin Kakakhel, L.; Lutfullah, G.; Bhanger, M.I.; Shah, A.; Niaz, A. Electrolytic recovery of chromium salts from tannery wastewater. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 148, 560–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Aravindhan, R.; Madhan, B.; Rao, J.R.; Nair, B.U.; Ramasami, T. Bioaccumulation of Chromium from Tannery Wastewater: An Approach for Chrome Recovery and Reuse. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 300–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Fabiani, C.; Ruscio, F.; Spadoni, M.; Pizzichini, M. Chromium(III) salts recovery process from tannery wastewaters. Desalination 1997, 108, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. O’Dwyer, T.F.; Hodnett, B.K. Recovery of chromium from tannery effluents using a redox–adsorption approach. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 1995, 62, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Apha, Water Environment Federation, American Water Works Association, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (Part 4000–6000); Stand. Methods Exam; Water Wastewater: Washington DC, USA, 1999; ISBN 9780875532356.
  12. US EPA. Method 7196A for Chromium, Hexavalent (colorimetric). US EPA Method 7196: Washington DC, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  13. EN 13137, Chemical Analyses—Determination of Total Organic Carbon (TOC) in Waste, Sludges and Sediments, Draft European Standard; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2001.
  14. Lide, D.R. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics; Internet Version 2005; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kokkinos, E.; Proskynitopoulou, V.; Zouboulis, A. Chromium and energy recovery from tannery wastewater treatment waste: Investigation of major mechanisms in the framework of circular economy. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 103307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shen, S.B.; Tyagi, R.D.; Blais, J.F. Extraction of Cr(III) and other metals from tannery sludge by mineral acids. Environ. Technol. 2001, 22, 1007–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Air dried tannery sludge obtained from the respective wastewater treatment plant.
Figure 1. Air dried tannery sludge obtained from the respective wastewater treatment plant.
Proceedings 48 00001 g001
Figure 2. Cr(III) (a) and Ca (b) extraction from tannery waste by the use of different acids, applied in different (initial) concentrations.
Figure 2. Cr(III) (a) and Ca (b) extraction from tannery waste by the use of different acids, applied in different (initial) concentrations.
Proceedings 48 00001 g002
Figure 3. Percentage of Cr(III) precipitation by applying Ca(OH)2 and NaOH, in various pH.
Figure 3. Percentage of Cr(III) precipitation by applying Ca(OH)2 and NaOH, in various pH.
Proceedings 48 00001 g003
Figure 4. Precipitates by adding Ca(OH)2 and NaOH into the chromium’s leachate, as obtained by using 1 N H2SO4.
Figure 4. Precipitates by adding Ca(OH)2 and NaOH into the chromium’s leachate, as obtained by using 1 N H2SO4.
Proceedings 48 00001 g004
Table 1. Chemical composition of tannery sludge.
Table 1. Chemical composition of tannery sludge.
Cr(III)Cr(VI)CaMgNaAlFeOM
% w/w
14.1ND14.82.41.50.50.4622
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kokkinos, E.; Zouboulis, A. A Step by Step Investigation of Cr(III) Recovery from Tannery Waste. Proceedings 2020, 48, 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/ECWS-4-06436

AMA Style

Kokkinos E, Zouboulis A. A Step by Step Investigation of Cr(III) Recovery from Tannery Waste. Proceedings. 2020; 48(1):1. https://doi.org/10.3390/ECWS-4-06436

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kokkinos, Evgenios, and Anastasios Zouboulis. 2020. "A Step by Step Investigation of Cr(III) Recovery from Tannery Waste" Proceedings 48, no. 1: 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/ECWS-4-06436

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop