Next Article in Journal
Predictive Model for Load-Carrying Capacity of Reinforced Concrete Beam–Column Joints Using Gene Expression Programming
Previous Article in Journal
Voltammetric Sensors for the Simultaneous Quantification of Natural Phenolics in Coffee and Citrus Juices
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Butyric Acid and Caproic Acid Production Using Single and Mixed Bacterial Cultures †

by
Young-Cheol Chang
1,* and
M. Venkateswar Reddy
2
1
Course of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Division of Sustainable and Environmental Engineering, Muroran Institute of Technology, Muroran 050-8585, Hokkaido, Japan
2
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 4th International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences, 27 October–10 November 2023; Available online: https://asec2023.sciforum.net/.
Eng. Proc. 2023, 56(1), 73; https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2023-15361
Published: 26 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 4th International Electronic Conference on Applied Sciences)

Abstract

:
In this study, we explored different bacterial strains (Clostridium beijerinckii, C. acetobutylicum, C. oryzae, and C. kainantoi) belonging to the Clostridium group and produced butyric acid (C4) using acetate as a carbon source. All the strains produced significant amounts of C4, but C. beijerinckii produced 1.54 g/L of C4, which is almost equivalent to the production capacity (1.63 g/L) of C. kluyveri. Further experiments were performed using diluted raw cheese whey (CW) by inoculating mixed bacterial cultures containing Clostridia, Bacillus, and Desulfobacteraceae groups. Clostridium kluyveri was added to the mixed culture, and it stimulated the caproic acid (C6) production. Mixed bacterial culture produced 13.97 g/L, 10.83 g/L, and 6.81 g/L of C6 when incubated with two times, five times, and ten times diluted CW, respectively, within a 20-day incubation period. Compared to our previous study, the C6 production was higher and faster. These results indicated the dilution ratio of CW is an important factor in facilitating the C6 production, and higher fatty acids are produced with mixed culture than that of a single culture, i.e., C. kluyveri. Results have depicted the potential of employing the bio-augmentation strategy for the valorization of bioresources into valuable products like butyric acid and caproic acid.

1. Introduction

Products derived from fossil fuels have brought stability and convenience to humans. However, fossil fuels are limited resources and depleting every year because of their consumption. Therefore, biomass-based renewable processes have been developed as an alternative to fossil fuel-derived processes, and bioethanol is the most known. However, it requires a distillation process with high energy consumption. As a process to solve this problem, researchers are producing volatile fatty acids (VFAs) using anaerobic mixed culture. VFAs can be used in various fields as precursors in dyes, pharmaceuticals, food additives, bioplastic production, etc. Butyric acid is a precursor of polyhydroxybutyric acid (PHB), which is a main component of bioplastics [1], and caproic acid is a precursor in the production of biodiesel and is now drawing attention [2].
Recently, Amabile et al. [3,4] used methane and VFAs from organic substrate digestion to produce poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate), which has mechanical and thermal properties comparable to fossil fuel-based plastics. They showed that VFAs can be used as building blocks for several biopolymers. Among the VFAs studied, valeric acid induced the highest accumulation of 3-hydroxyvalerate units. Cai et al. have demonstrated in particular that even-carbon VFAs (acetate and butyrate) synthesized only poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB), while the addition of odd-carbon VFAs (propionate and valerate) resulted in PHBV production [5]. Tian et al. also have mentioned that Photobacterium sp. TLY01 could effectively utilize plant oils or corn starch to synthesize poly-3-hydroxybutyrate (PHB). When propionate or valerate was added as secondary carbon source, poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) was produced [6].
Clostridium kluyveri is the most known bacteria producing fatty acids [7]. In previous studies, Clostridium kluyveri produced various fatty acids [8,9]. However, it is unknown whether Clostridium kluyveri is superior to other Clostridium group strains in the production of fatty acids. Hence, in this study, we explored different bacterial strains (C. beijerinckill, C. acetobutylicum, C. oryzae, and C. kainantoi) belonging to the Clostridium group and produced butyric acid (C4) using acetate as a carbon source. Further experiments were performed using diluted raw cheese whey (CW) by inoculating mixed bacterial cultures containing Clostridia, Bacillus, and Desulfobacteraceae groups. Clostridium kluyveri was added to the mixed culture to stimulate the production of caproic acid (C6).
Many efforts were made in recent years to lower the market price of PHB, and the possibility of using low-cost carbon sources was also explored [3,10,11,12,13]. Reports are also available for the valorization of CW into PHB [11,13]. CW is the liquid part of milk that is separated from the curd at the beginning of cheese manufacture, is available in large amounts as a by-product, and contains fermentable nutrients, such as lactose, lipids, and soluble proteins [11]. Its disposal as waste causes serious pollution problems. Therefore, the conversion of CW into a useful product, fatty acid, is a good option to reduce the environmental burden [13].
Numerous studies have been reported to produce VFAs as precursors in bioplastic production [8]. However, only a few studies succeeded in caproic acid production using CW [14,15,16,17]. Meanwhile, we reported that the dilution ratio of CW affected the PHB production ability [13]. Optimum substrate concentration may increase the productivity of valuable material. Therefore, this experiment seeks to improve the caproic acid content by diluting CW. The overview of fatty acid production by anaerobic mixed culture is shown in Figure 1.

2. Methods

2.1. Single Culture

The strains (Clostridium kluyveri NBRC 12016, C. beijerinckii NBRC 109359, C. acetobutylicum NBRC 13948, C. oryzae NBRC 110163, and C. kainantoi NBRC 3353) were used to investigate C4 production. The medium contained (per liter) the following: 7.5 g acetate; 10 g yeast extract; 2.6 g (NH4)2SO4; 0.25 g MgSO4·7H2O; 1.0 mL FeSO4 (0.02 mmol/L); 1.0 mL Na2MoO4 (0.01 mmol/L); and 1.0 mL/L MnSO4 (0.01 mmol/L). The medium (70 mL) was poured into 100 mL vials, sterilized by autoclave (121 °C, 20 min), and to it was added 4 mL/L ethanol and 0.25 g/L CaCl2·2H2O. The headspace was flushed with nitrogen for 10 min and capped with an aluminum cap and butyl stopper. Finally, the medium was inoculated at a 10% (v/v) concentration using a preculture of each strain, which was then incubated anaerobically under orbital shaking at 80 rpm for 40 days at 37 °C for C4 production. All the conditions were tested as biological triplicates (three bottles, n = 3) within a single experiment. The data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation.

2.2. Mixed Culture

CW was collected from a cheese-producing company in Hokkaido, Japan, and stored in the dark at 4 °C. CW was further diluted (two times, five times, and ten times) and underwent the process of anaerobic digestion by adding enrichment culture containing Anaerobaculum mobile, Actinomyces naturae, Bacterium, Bacillus cereus, Bacteroides fragilis, Clostridium glycolicum, Clostridium thiosulfatireducens, Clostridium sp. LZLJ009, Clostridium sp. E034, Desulfobacteraceae, Lactobacillus helveticus, Oscillibacter ruminantium, Sphingobacteriales (10% (v/v)), and Clostridium kluyveri (10% (v/v)). Ethanol (15 mL/L) was added as an electron donor to stimulate C6 generation. The vials containing CW (70 mL) and bacteria were incubated under anaerobic conditions for 20 days. The bottles were closed and capped tightly with butyl rubber stoppers and aluminum caps, and the headspace was purged with nitrogen gas for 10 min to maintain strict anaerobic conditions. The bottles were kept at 37 °C in a rotating shaker (80 rpm). All the conditions were tested as biological triplicates (three bottles, n = 3) within a single experiment. The data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation.

2.3. Analysis

The concentrations of C4 were analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with a refractive index (RI) detector and a Shim-pack SCR-102 (H) column (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) [9]. Filtered and degassed perchloric acid was used as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min. The column was maintained at a temperature of 40 °C in a thermostat chamber. C6 was estimated by a transesterification method. For the transesterification of C6, boron trifluoride (BF3) in methanol (14% w/v, GL series Inc. Tokyo, Japan) was used. C6 was analyzed by gas chromatography (GC, GC-2014, Shimadzu Co., Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a flame ionized detector (FID) and J&W DB-5 ms capillary column at a split rate of 10 and eluted with nitrogen as the carrier gas. Prepared samples were directly injected into the column at 40 °C. The column temperature was maintained at 40 °C for 2 min and then raised linearly at 10 °C /min to 150 °C. The detector and injector temperatures were 300 °C and 275 °C.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. C4 Production by Single Culture

In the first experiment, all the strains produced significant amounts of C4. On the 40th day, C. beijerinckii produced 1.54 g/L of C4, which is almost equivalent to the production capacity (1.63 g/L) of C. kluyveri (Figure 2). However, the maximum C4 production was accomplished within 5 days when C. kluyveri was used. This result indicated that C. kluyveri is the most useful bacterium among the tested Clostridium group.
The data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. The variation range of each condition on butyric acid production was 9–20%.

3.2. C6 Production by Mixed Culture

It has been reported that C. kluyveri can grow within pH range of 6.0–7.5, and that the optimum pH is 6.4 [18]. Therefore, pH measurement was performed to examine the change in pH. When the pH was below 6.0, pH adjustments were made with 5 M NaOH. Figure 3 shows the changes in pH values over the time in diluted cheese whey. Although the pH was 6.4 after the start of the culture, it decreased to pH 5.0 on the second day, so the pH was adjusted. After that, the pH was 6.0 or higher until the 6th day, so the pH was not adjusted. On the 8th day, the pH decreased to 6.0 or less, so the pH was adjusted again, no pH adjustment was performed afterwards. Interestingly, the difference in pH fluctuations pattern was insignificant at any dilution rate.
The data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. The pH variation range of each condition was 0.5–5.9%.
On the other hand, C6 was not observed when raw CW was used. However, mixed bacterial culture produced 13.97 g/L, 10.83 g/L, and 6.81 g/L of C6 when incubated with two times, five times, and ten times diluted CW, respectively, within a 20-day incubation period (Figure 4). Compared to our previous study (4.8 g/L on the 53rd day), C6 production was higher and faster [9]. These results indicated that the dilution ratio of CW is an important factor in facilitating C6 production, and higher fatty acids are produced in mixed culture compared to a single culture, i.e., C. kluyveri at 3.2 g/L with acetate [9]. Previous research reported on C6 production using various substrates. Production rates can be achieved from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste by applying a two-stage conversion, such as an acidification step followed by a chain elongation step. They reported the production of C6 (12.6 g/L) [19]. Domingos et al. reported the generation of C6 (4.0 g/L) using CW and mixed bacterial cultures [15]. Sarkar et al. produced C6 (13.02 g COD/L) by co-fermenting a brewery’s spent grains and CW [14]. Therefore, C6 production in this study (13.97 g/L) is superior to those of previous studies.
Substrate concentration is important to VFA composition during anaerobic fermentation [20]. Wang et al. [21] reported that chain elongation from acetate to n-butyrate played an important role with a substrate concentration of 200 g/L in the acidogenesis process. With a substrate concentration of 100 g/L, the obtained VFA production was low, and with a substrate concentration of 200 g/L, total VFA production clearly increased. When substrate concentration further increased to 300 and 400 g/L, the VFA production was inhibited, which might be attributed to the accumulation of lactate because of the rapid and easy lactate fermentation [22]. The experiment was performed under non-methanogenesis. Methanogenesis was not observed in our study. Substrate concentration as chemical oxygen demand (COD) at each dilution was 107 g/L (raw CW), 53.5 g/L (two-times-diluted CW), 21.4 g/L (five-times-diluted CW), 10.7 g/L (ten-times-diluted CW). When CW concentration increased from 21.4 g/L to 53.5 g/L, C6 production clearly increased (Figure 4). The C/N ratio is also an important factor in the production of VFAs [23]. However, in this study, all experiments were performed with the same C/N ratio, even though the dilution ratio of CW was different. Nitrogen concentration also affects VFA production [24]. In this study, nitrogen concentration as total nitrogen at each dilution was 1.4 g/L (raw CW), 0.7 g/L (two-times-diluted CW), 0.28 g/L (five-times-diluted CW), 0.14 g/L (ten-times-diluted CW). The highest C6 production was observed at 0.7 g/L (Figure 4). Kamzolova et al. [24] reported that nitrogen source concentrations limit the growth of Y. lipolytica, and nitrogen deficiency is the main cause of citric acid excretion. Citric acid was accumulated in meaningful quantities only in media containing 3–10 g/L (NH4)2SO4, with the maximum concentration of citric acid at 4 g/L ammonium sulfate.
On the other hand, Gildemyn et al. reported that a lower ethanol/substrate (acetic acid) ratio (3:1 instead of 10:1) enabled faster and more efficient n-caproic acid production [2]. A similar result was obtained in this study. The total concentration of substrates in raw CW is shown in Table 1. Ethanol/substrates ratio of two-times-, five-times*, and ten-times-diluted CW are calculated as (4.9:1.0), (12.3:1.0), and (24.7:1.0). Results have depicted the potential of employing the bio-augmentation strategy for the valorization of bioresources into valuable products like butyric acid and caproic acid.
The data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. The variation range of each condition on caproic acid production was 9.2–60%.

4. Conclusions

In this study, C4 production experiments were carried out using C. kluyveri, which are well known as single- and medium-chain fatty acid-producing strains, and the productibility of C4 was compared with other Clostridium strains. C. kluyveri produced higher C4 than other Clostridium group strains. Based on the above results, we conducted further experiments and produced C6 from cheese whey using mixed bacteria containing C. kluyveri. Cheese whey was diluted, and the ratio of ethanol to the substrate was controlled to examine the effect on C6 production. As a result, no C6 production was observed from the undiluted cheese whey, but it was found that the two-fold diluted conditions showed higher production than the five-fold and ten-fold diluted conditions. These results indicated that the ratio of ethanol to substrate is an essential factor for the elongation of fatty acids.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.-C.C.; methodology, Y.-C.C.; funding acquisition, Y.-C.C.; investigation, M.V.R. and Y.-C.C.; data curation, Y.-C.C.; writing—draft preparation, M.V.R.; review and editing, M.V.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Japan Science and Technology Agency (grant number VP29117937927). This work was also partially supported by funding from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) (grant number P15352).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Marang, L.; Jiang, Y.; Van Loosdrecht, M.C.; Kleerebezem, R. Butyrate as preferred substrate for polyhydroxybutyrate production. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 142, 232–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gildemyn, S.; Molitor, B.; Usack, J.G.; Nguyen, M.; Rabaey, k.; Angenent, L.T. Upgrading syngas fermentation effluent using Clostridium kluyveri in a continuous fermentation. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2017, 10, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Amabile, C.; Abate, T.; Crescenzo, C.D.; Muńoz, R.; Chianese, S.; Musmarra, D. An innovative and sustainable process for producing poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate): Simulating volatile fatty acid role and biodegradability. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 473, 145193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Amabile, C.; Abate, T.; Crescenzo, C.D.; Muńoz, R.; Chianese, S.; Musmarra, D. Sustainable process for the production of poly(3-hydroxybutyrateco-3-hydroxyvalerate) from renewable resources: A simulation study. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 14230–14239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Cai, F.; Lin, M.; Jin, W.; Chen, C.; Liu, G. Biosynthesis of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxvalerate) from volatile fatty acids by Cupriavidus necator. J. Basic Microbiol. 2023, 63, 128–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Tian, L.; Li, H.; Song, X.; Ma, L.; Li, Z.J. Production of polyhydroxyalkanoates by a novel strain of Photobacterium using soybean oil and corn starch. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 108342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Seedorf, H.; Florian, F.W.; Veith, B.; Brüggemann, H.; Liesegang, H.; Strittmatter, A.; Miethke, M.; Buckel, W.; Hinderberger, J.; Li, F.; et al. The genome of Clostridium kluyveri, a strict anaerobe with unique metabolic features. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 2128–2133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Reddy, M.V.; Reddy, V.U.N.; Chang, Y.C. Integration of anaerobic digestion and chain elongation technologies for biogas and carboxylic acids production from cheese whey. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 364, 132670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Reddy, M.V.; Mohan, S.V.; Chang, Y.C. Medium chain fatty acids (MCFA) production through anaerobic fermentation using Clostridium kluyveri: Effect of ethanol and acetate. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2018, 185, 594–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Castilho, L.R.; Mitchell, D.A.; Freire, D.M.G. Production of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) from waste materials and by-products by submerged and solid-state fermentation. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 5996–6009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Valta, K.; Damala, P.; Angeli, E.; Antonopoulou, G.; Malamis, D.; Haralambous, K.J. Current treatment technologies of cheese whey and wastewater by Greek cheese manufacturing units and potential valorization opportunities. Waste Biomass Valor. 2017, 8, 1649–1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Reddy, M.V.; Mawatari, Y.; Onodera, R.; Nakamura, Y.; Yajima, Y.; Chang, Y.C. Bacterial conversion of waste into polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB): A new approach of bio-circular economy for treating waste and energy generation. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2019, 7, 100246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chang, Y.C.; Reddy, M.V.; Imura, K.; Onodera, R.; Kamada, N.; Sano, Y. Two-Stage polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) production from cheese whey using Acetobacter pasteurianus C1 and Bacillus sp. CYR1. Bioengineering 2021, 8, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sarkar, O.; Rova, U.; Christakopoulos, P.; Matsakas, L. Green hydrogen and platform chemicals production from acidogenic conversion of brewery spent grains co-fermented with cheese whey wastewater: Adding value to acidogenic CO2. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2022, 6, 778–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Domingos, J.M.B.; Martinez, G.A.; Scoma, A.; Fraraccio, S.; Kerckhof, F.M.; Boon, N.; Reis, M.A.M.; Fava, F.; Bertin, L. Effect of operational parameters in the continuous anaerobic fermentation of cheese whey on titers, yields, productivities, and microbial community structures. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 1400–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chwialkowska, J.; Duber, A.; Zagrodnik, R.; Walkiewicz, F.; Łężyk, M.; Oleskowicz-Popie, P. Caproic acid production from acid whey via open culture fermentation—Evaluation of the role of electron donors and downstream processing. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 279, 74–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lagoa-Costa, B.; Kennes, C.; Veiga, M.C. Cheese whey fermentation into volatile fatty acids in an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 308, 123226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Weimer, P.J.; Stevenson, D.M. Isolation, characterization, and quantification of Clostridium kluyveri from the bovine rumen. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 94, 461–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Grootscholten, T.I.M.; Strik, D.P.B.T.B.; Steinbusch, K.J.J.; Buisman, C.J.N.; Hamelers, H.V.M. Two-stage medium chain fatty acid (MCFA) production from municipal solid waste and ethanol. Appl. Energy 2014, 116, 223–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Eryildiz, B.; Lukitawesa; Taherzadeh, M.J. Effect of pH, substrate loading, oxygen, and methanogens inhibitors on volatile fatty acid (VFA) production from citrus waste by anaerobic digestion. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 302, 122800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, Q.; Zhang, G.; Le Chen, L.; Yang, N.; Wu, Y.; Fang, W.; Zhang, R.; Wang, X.; Fu, C.; Zhang, P. Volatile fatty acid production in anaerobic fermentation of food waste saccharified residue: Effect of substrate concentration. Waste Manag. 2023, 164, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ohkouchi, Y.; Inoue, Y. Direct production of L(+)-lactic acid from starch and food wastes using Lactobacillus manihotivorans LMG18011. Bioresour. Technol. 2006, 97, 1554–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yin, Y.; Wang, J. Production of medium-chain fatty acids by co-fermentation of antibiotic fermentation residue with fallen Ginkgo leaves. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 360, 127607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kamzolova, S.V.; Lunina, J.N.; Samoilenko, V.A.; Morgunov, I.G. Effect of nitrogen concentration on the biosynthesis of citric acid, protein, and lipids in the Yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The overview of fatty acid production by anaerobic mixed culture.
Figure 1. The overview of fatty acid production by anaerobic mixed culture.
Engproc 56 00073 g001
Figure 2. The time course of C4 production by each species of the genus, Clostridium.
Figure 2. The time course of C4 production by each species of the genus, Clostridium.
Engproc 56 00073 g002
Figure 3. The time course of pH change in each CW dilution conditions.
Figure 3. The time course of pH change in each CW dilution conditions.
Engproc 56 00073 g003
Figure 4. The time course of C6 production by a mixed culture.
Figure 4. The time course of C6 production by a mixed culture.
Engproc 56 00073 g004
Table 1. Calculated concentration of each substrate in raw CW.
Table 1. Calculated concentration of each substrate in raw CW.
SubstratesConcentration (g/L)Concentration (mmol/L)
Lactose30.187.9
Lactic acid3.134.4
Acetic acid0.711.7
Propionic acid0.810.8
Butyric acid0.00.0
Total amount-144.8
Ethanol (in CW)1.430.4
Total amount (with addition of ethanol)16.4357
The data are presented as the mean of two samples. The variation range of each concentration was 0.5–5.8%.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chang, Y.-C.; Reddy, M.V. Butyric Acid and Caproic Acid Production Using Single and Mixed Bacterial Cultures. Eng. Proc. 2023, 56, 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2023-15361

AMA Style

Chang Y-C, Reddy MV. Butyric Acid and Caproic Acid Production Using Single and Mixed Bacterial Cultures. Engineering Proceedings. 2023; 56(1):73. https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2023-15361

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chang, Young-Cheol, and M. Venkateswar Reddy. 2023. "Butyric Acid and Caproic Acid Production Using Single and Mixed Bacterial Cultures" Engineering Proceedings 56, no. 1: 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/ASEC2023-15361

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop