Next Article in Journal
Heart Failure is Highly Prevalent and Difficult to Diagnose in Severe Exacerbations of COPD Presenting to the Emergency Department
Next Article in Special Issue
Pancreatic Diseases and Microbiota: A Literature Review and Future Perspectives
Previous Article in Journal
The Clinical Significance of RAS, PIK3CA, and PTEN Mutations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Using Cell-Free DNA
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evolving Technologies in Gastrointestinal Microbiome Era and Their Potential Clinical Applications
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 9
Issue 8
10.3390/jcm9082643
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Gene Expression of Transient Receptor Potential Channels in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients

by
Taku Morita
1,
Keiichi Mitsuyama
1,2,*,
Hiroshi Yamasaki
1,2,
Atsushi Mori
1,2,
Tetsuhiro Yoshimura
1,2,
Toshihiro Araki
1,2,
Masaru Morita
1,2,
Kozo Tsuruta
1,2,
Sayo Yamasaki
1,
Kotaro Kuwaki
1,2,
Shinichiro Yoshioka
1,2,
Hidetoshi Takedatsu
1,2 and
Takuji Torimura
1
1
Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Kurume University, 67 Asahi-Machi, Kurume 830-0011, Japan
2
Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Kurume University Hospital, 67 Asahi-Machi, Kurume 830-0011, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(8), 2643; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082643
Submission received: 11 July 2020 / Revised: 2 August 2020 / Accepted: 12 August 2020 / Published: 14 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 3Ts in Gastrointestinal Microbiome Era: Technology, Translational Research and Transplant)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
We examined the expression profile of transient receptor potential (TRP) channels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). PBMCs were obtained from 41 ulcerative colitis (UC) patients, 34 Crohn’s disease (CD) patients, and 30 normal subjects. mRNA levels of TRP channels were measured using the quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, and correlation tests with disease ranking, as well as laboratory parameters, were performed. Compared with controls, TRPV2 and TRPC1 mRNA expression was lower, while that of TRPM2, was higher in PBMCs of UC and CD patients. Moreover, TRPV3 mRNA expression was lower, while that of TRPV4 was higher in CD patients. TRPC6 mRNA expression was higher in patients with CD than in patients with UC. There was also a tendency for the expression of TRPV2 mRNA to be negatively correlated with disease activity in patients with UC and CD, while that of TRPM4 mRNA was negatively correlated with disease activity only in patients with UC. PBMCs from patients with IBD exhibited varying mRNA expression levels of TRP channel members, which may play an important role in the progression of IBD.

1. Introduction

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), consisting primarily of ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD), represents a group of chronic inflammatory disorders involving the gastrointestinal tract. Its pathogenesis is complex; however, current research suggests that an intricate network of multiple interacting mechanisms in genetically susceptible individuals may orchestrate the dysregulation of immune and inflammatory responses [1,2].
The transient receptor potential (TRP) channel family, a diverse family of proteins that are reportedly expressed throughout the human body, have emerged as a novel and interrelated system to detect and respond to various environmental stimuli including mechanical, thermal, or chemical stimuli. With this function, they are likely to be sensors for monitoring specific responses to different exogenous and endogenous chemical and physical stimuli [3,4,5,6]. Members of the TRP superfamily are classified according to their amino acid sequences and structural similarities into canonical (TRPC), vanilloid (TRPV), melastatin (TRPM), ankyrin (TRPA), polycystin (TRPP), and mucolipin (TRPML) subfamilies [3,4,5]. It was recently revealed that the role of TRP channels reaches beyond the control of neuropeptide release from sensory nerves as they are also expressed in immune and resident tissue cells, such as epithelial cells, where they modulate many functions including cytokine production and migration. Therefore, a vital interplay between these cells appears to maintain homeostasis in the intestine, while the disruption of this interplay may be involved in the development and maintenance of IBD [7,8,9,10].
In the gut wall of IBD patients, immune cells migrating from systemic circulation release various inflammatory and immunoregulatory molecules, such as cytokines and free radicals, that modulate intestinal inflammation and tissue damage [11]. Therefore, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) are of particular interest due to their involvement in inflammatory and immune cell function. PBMCs may be in contact with multiple stimuli within the blood that have the potential to release TRP channels, resulting in modulation of intestinal inflammation. Therefore, an evaluation of TRP channel expression in PBMCs from IBD patients may provide insights regarding the disease pathogenesis; while changes in their expression level may mirror intestinal inflammation. Recently, the expression of these TRP channel members in PBMCs have been reported in healthy subjects and patients with various diseases [12,13,14,15]. However, to date no data regarding their expression in PBMCs from patients with IBD has been reported.
TRPV1–TRPV4; TRPM2, TRPM4, and TRPM5; and TRPC1 as well as TRPC3–TRPC7, are the most relevant TRP channels in immune cells under normal and specific disease conditions [12,13,14,15]. Therefore, this study focused on the expression profiles of these TRP channel members in PBMCs obtained from patients with IBD. Furthermore, the relationships between TRP channel levels and the disease activity index, as well as other laboratory parameters were investigated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethical Considerations

This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Kurume University (14253, 25 March 2015). Written informed consent was obtained from each subject before enrollment in the study.

2.2. Patients

This study was conducted at Kurume University Hospital between September 2011 and May 2016. A total of 105 subjects, including 41 patients with UC, 34 with CD, and 30 healthy subjects were enrolled. Prior to commencing the study, 19 subjects were excluded due to an insufficient sample volume. The patient diagnosis was based on characteristic clinical, endoscopic, radiological, and histological features. The patient characteristics and the medical therapy they received are summarized in Table 1.

2.3. Clinical Evaluations

For the evaluation of disease activity, clinical activity in patients with UC was graded using the partial Mayo score (PMS), with the inactive disease defined as a score ≤2, with no individual sub-score >1 point [16]. Patients with CD were graded according to the CD activity index (CDAI) comprised of eight factors, each added after adjustment with a weighted factor, with the inactive disease defined as a score <150 points [17].

2.4. Determination of Laboratory Parameters

Blood samples were collected from all patients and were used to measure the following laboratory parameters: Total leukocyte count, serum levels of hemoglobin, albumin, and C-reactive protein (CRP).

2.5. Separation of PBMCs and RNA Extraction

Blood samples (10 mL) were obtained by cubital venous puncture and collected in standard sterile polystyrene vacuum tubes with heparin. First, freshly drawn blood was diluted at a ratio of 1:2.5 with a phosphate buffered saline. PBMCs were isolated from the diluted blood by a Ficoll-Paque (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden) density gradient centrifugation according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PBMCs were pelleted, snap-frozen on dry ice, and stored at −80 °C until use [18]. RNA was extracted from PBMC samples following the protocol described for the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The quantity and purity of the RNA were determined for all samples on a Nanodrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The average yield was 23,000 ng. The purity, as measured by the A260/280 ratio, was between 1.91 and 1.95 [18].

2.6. Measurement of TRP Channel mRNA Expression Using Real-Time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (Real-Time qPCR)

Total RNA was converted into cDNA using the ReverTra Ace qPCR RT kit (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan). The generated cDNAs (25 ng) were stored at −20 °C. cDNA was added to the TaqMan Gene Expression Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). qPCR reactions (20 μL) composed of 2 μL cDNA template, TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix (2×, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Foster City, CA, USA), TaqMan assay (20×, Thermo Fisher Scientific), and H₂O. RT-PCR was performed using the StepOne Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). Reactions, run in triplicate, were incubated at 50 °C for 2 min and 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 1 min. The TaqMan probe and primer sets for the target genes used in this study are shown in Table 2.
GAPDH was used as the reference gene. Ct values for GAPDH mRNA of an individual PBMC per sample were calculated. The mean was calculated from experiments performed in duplicate. For data analysis, the StepOne software v2.1 was used. Data representing the relative expression of detected mRNA normalized to GAPDH mRNA was used as a calibrator for comparative analysis. RT-qPCR was performed in accordance with the Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments (MIQE) guidelines [19,20]. The relative expression data was calculated according to the 2-ΔΔCt method.

2.7. Statistical Analyses

Results were analyzed using the JMP v12 statistical package (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). The normality of distribution was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. As mRNA levels of each TRP channel were all not normally distributed, statistical analyses were performed using Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis H tests and correlation analysis was performed using Spearman’s rank correlation test. The Bonferroni-corrected Mann–Whitney U test was used to evaluate inter-group comparisons of the mean differences according to their distribution. Data are shown as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) or as correlation coefficients.

3. Results

3.1. TRP Channel Levels in IBD

The expression of TRP channels in PBMCs from the IBD and control groups are summarized in Figure 1. The observed fold changes in all TRP channel members were very small. However, when compared with mRNA expression levels in PBMCs from healthy controls (TRPV2, 1.54 ± 0.44; TRPV3, 0.15 ± 0.08; TRPV4, 0.95 ± 0.39; TRPM2, 1.54 ± 0.63; TRPC1, 1.73 ± 0.64), those of TRPV2 and TRPC1 were lower in both UC (1.11 ± 0.39 (0.72-fold), p < 0.0001 and 1.15 ± 0.65 (0.66-fold), p = 0.0002, respectively) and CD (1.18 ± 0.34 (0.77-fold), p = 0.0014 and 1.24 ± 0.65 (0.72-fold), p = 0.0021, respectively) groups, those of TRPM2 were higher in both UC (2.20 ± 0.76 (1.43-fold), p < 0.0001) and CD (2.28 ± 0.86 (1.47-fold), p < 0.0001) groups, those of TRPV3 were lower only in the CD group (0.09 ± 0.06 (0.58-fold), p = 0.001), and those of TRPV4 were higher only in the CD (1.40 ± 0.72 (1.48-fold), p = 0.0067) group.
Further, TRPC6 mRNA expression was higher in the CD group (1.68 ± 1.41 (1.79-fold), p = 0.0008) than in the UC group (0.94 ± 0.55).
In addition, the mRNA expression levels of each TRP channel in PBMCs from healthy controls were variable. We found that TRPV3 had the lowest (0.15-fold relative to GAPDH) and TRPC1 had the highest (1.73-fold relative to GAPDH) expression.

3.2. Relationship between TRP Channel Levels and Disease Activity

Figure 2 shows the relationship between the expression of each TRP channel member and the clinical disease progression, assessed using PMS for UC patients, and CDAI for CD patients. There was a tendency observed for the mRNA expression of TRPV2 to negatively correlate with disease activity in both UC and CD groups, while that of TRPM4 was negatively correlated with disease activity in only the UC group. However, the significance of these correlations is questionable since the R² values were <0.1.

3.3. Correlation between Expression of TRP Channels and Clinical Parameters

Table 3 summarizes the correlation coefficients and significance values for comparisons between the expression of each TRP channel member and the indicated laboratory parameters. In the UC group, mRNA expression of TRPV2 and TRPV3 negatively correlated with the leukocyte count, while that of TRPV4 and TRPM5 positively correlated with the serum albumin and hemoglobin levels, respectively. In the CD group, the expression of TRPV4 positively correlated with the CRP level.

3.4. Relationship between TRP Channel Expression and Medical Treatment

We also assessed the relationship between each TRP channel member and medical treatment received by the patient. Since the number of patients in each group was fairly small, no significant association was found between individual TRP channel members and specific medical treatments (Supplementary Figure S1).

4. Discussion

Recently, it was revealed that TRP channels are expressed throughout the human body, including in immune cells, sensory nerves, and resident tissue cells [4,5,6,7]. Saunders et al. examined the expression of TRPV1 and TRPV2 in PBMCs from healthy subjects and speculated that as they have a role in the detection of noxious stimuli in the blood or under pathological conditions, their upregulation acts as an indicator of inflammation [13,21]. However, to the best of our knowledge, the current study is the first to explore the relationships among the gene expression profiles of TRP channel members in PBMCs from patients with IBD.
TRPV1, a polymodal receptor involved in inflammation and nociception, plays an important role in visceral hypersensitivity [22]. Reportedly, TRPV1-immunoreactivity in colonic tissue is increased, and is correlated with the severity of abdominal pain in patients with IBD [22,23]. More recently, TRPV1 was shown to be expressed in CD4+ T cells, where it regulates cell activation and proinflammatory properties in IBD [24]. Meanwhile, a TRPV1 antagonist suppressed colitis and colorectal distension in animal models [25]. In a study, two-fold upregulation of the TRPV1 gene was found in PBMCs of patients hyposensitive to capsaicin, pain, and thermal stimuli [14]. However, in the present study, we did not observe any significant differences in TRPV1 expression in PBMCs from patients with IBD compared to healthy controls. Hence, further studies are needed to determine the role of the TRPV1 pathway in PBMCs from IBD patients using protein or functional data.
TRPV2 triggers a wide range of physiological actions including changes in the innate and adaptive immune system. It is expressed in granulocytes and monocytes/macrophages and contributes to phagocytosis, migration, and inflammatory cytokine production [26]. In PBMCs, the increased expression of TRPV2 was closely correlated with childhood asthma [15]. In TRPV2-knockout mice, colitis was less severe due to the reduced infiltration of macrophages [27], suggesting that the TRPV2 pathway plays a key role in the development of colitis. Our study showed that TRPV2 expression in PBMCs decreased in patients with UC and CD and was inversely correlated with disease activity. Based on these findings, a reduction in TRPV2 expression in PBMCs may hypothetically dampen the proinflammatory response and could possibly reduce the severity of intestinal inflammation. However, further investigations are required to confirm this hypothesis.
TRPV3 is broadly expressed in intestinal epithelial cells, possibly for nutrient sensing and digestion [28,29]; however, its precise function is not well understood. With the exception of one study reporting its association with a higher risk of colorectal cancer, none others have investigated the role of TRPV3 in gut disease [30]. Interestingly, a recent study demonstrated a decrease in the proliferation rate of oral epithelial cells in TRPV3-knockout mice [31], suggesting that TRPV3 may contribute to oral wound repair. Our data revealed that TRPV3 expression was only decreased in PBMCs of patients with CD, however, its function in PBMCs requires further investigation.
TRPV4 is expressed and is functional in intestinal epithelial cells, glial cells, and CD45+ leukocytes; its activation in the gut causes increased intracellular calcium concentrations and chemokine release [28]. Studies have indicated a strong role for TRPV4 in IBD with elevated expression of TRPV4 observed in the intestinal tissue of patients with UC and CD [32]. In animal models of colitis, TRPV4 activation causes inflammation [32], and its blockade alleviates inflammation [33]. In this study, we found that the expression of TRPV4 was also upregulated in PBMCs and was correlated with the CRP level in patients with CD. Although the correlations were quite weak, and conclusions cannot be drawn based on mRNA levels without protein and modulation data, our data suggests a potential role for leukocyte TRPV4 in the pathophysiology of CD.
Recent studies have also revealed the involvement of TRPM2 in various aspects of immunity [34]. In a colitis model, TRPM2 has been implicated in inflammatory pathways, specifically as a key participant in chemokine production [35]. Contrary to this proinflammatory action, TRPM2-knockout mice exhibited decreased survival after liver infection with Listeria monocytogenes [36]. Thus, TRPM2 may be detrimental or beneficial depending on the underlying disease. Although no information is available on TRPM2 expression in the intestinal tissue, its upregulation in PBMCs of patients with UC and CD is of particular interest as a participant in disease pathogenesis and as a promising marker for disease activity.
TRPM4 plays a predominant role as a negative feedback mechanism during calcium oscillations, which may be important for differential gene expression in T cells [37]. A recent study showed that TRPM4 plays an important role in the immune surveillance processes. It is essential for the proper functioning of monocytes/macrophages and the efficiency of the subsequent response to infection [38], as well as the migration of dendritic cells [39]. At present, no information is available on the role of TRPM4 in gut disease. Our study showed no alteration in TRPM4 expression in PBMCs from either UC or CD patients, however, further investigation is needed.
Knowledge of the role of TRPM5, predominantly expressed by tuft cells that are an intestinal epithelial subset [40], in gut disease is limited [41]. A recent report showed that the disruption of chemosensory signaling through the loss of TRPM5 abrogates the expansion of tuft cells [42]. Interestingly, the ablation of doublecortin-like kinase 1 (DCLK1), a marker of tuft cells, in the colonic epithelium exacerbates colitis in mice [43,44]. This finding suggests that TRPM5 plays an important role in regulating the intestinal inflammatory response and epithelial integrity. Another study showed that the number of DCLK1-positive cells decreased in intestinal tissue from patients with celiac disease [45]. Meanwhile, our study found no alteration in TRPM5 expression in PBMCs from either UC or CD patients, warranting further investigation.
The TRPC subfamily comprises six members (TRPC1, TRPC3–7) in humans, many of which are ubiquitously expressed in tissues and modulate a multitude of cellular responses [46]. Of these, TRPC1, TRPC3, and TRPC6 were detectable in this study. As TRPC1 controls the release of interleukin-1 from macrophages [47] and that of tumor necrosis factor-α from mast cells [48], its decreased expression in PBMCs from patients with UC and CD seen in our study may enhance disease development. Moreover, the expression of TRPC6 was upregulated in PBMCs from patients with CD but not those with UC in this study. These results, together with those of a previous study reporting increased TRPC6 mRNA levels in stenotic areas of patients with CD [49], suggest that TRPC6 may be associated with excessive CD fibrosis.
To date, the mechanisms of TRP channel expression in PBMCs from patients with IBD remain elusive. TRP channels in PBMCs may respond to multiple stimuli present in the peripheral circulation of these patients. The different expression levels of these TRP channels may suggest a possible role as an indicator of inflammation at secondary sites, as well as involvement in IBD pathophysiology. Additionally, the difference in expression of TRPV channels in UC and CD patients may result from differences in the disease pathogenesis. Recent studies have also shown that lipopolysaccharide (LPS) activates several members of the TRP channel family, such as TRPV4 and TRPA1, as well as the Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), suggesting the role of TRP channels as sensors of bacterial endotoxins, and therefore, as crucial players in innate immunity. Moreover, since TRP channel and TLR expression overlap in many cell types, including immune cells and epithelial cells, it would be of interest to explore the crosstalk between intracellular signaling pathways initiated by TLR activation and TRP channel activation in patients with IBD [50]. Understanding the involvement of TRP channel members in IBD will be crucial to evaluate the potential for manipulating TRP activity as a therapeutic intervention [51,52].
As the majority of our patients were receiving medications, we assessed whether medical treatment may affect the expression of TRP channel family in PBMCs. A subgroup analysis among patients with untreated and treated IBD showed that the use of medications had no significant effect on mRNA levels of any TRP. Future studies sequentially assessing mRNA levels of TRPs in the same patient are required to confirm this lack of association.
This study had certain limitations. First, it was conducted at a single center and involved a limited number of patients, which could cause a β-error, particularly for the analysis of the medical treatment. Second, as this study analyzed the gene expression of all PBMCs, the PBMC subsets that actually express TRP channels remain to be determined. Third, this study characterized the TRP expression at the mRNA level only. To support any conclusion on the role of TRP channels in PBMCs in IBD, the evaluation of TRP channel protein levels (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or immunocytochemistry), as well as modulation experiments (specific activation/inhibition, knockdown/knockout in vitro, and/or in animal models) are required. Fourth, the changes in expression levels and correlation strengths observed were very small, hence, careful attention should be paid in interpreting the data. Fifth, correlations between each TRP channel and laboratory parameters did not clearly implicate functional relationships, particularly in TRPV3, TRPV4, and TRPM5 in UC, therefore, follow up studies are needed. Finally, this study analyzed leukocytes obtained from the peripheral circulation, and not from the diseased intestine. A comparison of gene expression at these two sites could help advance our understanding of the pathophysiology of IBD.
The present results indicate, for the first time, that PBMCs from patients with IBD express different mRNA levels of TRP channel members, which may play an important role in the progression of IBD. Furthermore, their expression levels in PBMCs are a promising marker for IBD. Further studies are needed to determine the clinical and pathogenic role of TRP channels in IBD.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/8/2643/s1, Figure S1: Comparison of TRP channel expression according to the current use of medications in patients with (a) ulcerative colitis (UC) and (b) Crohn’s disease (CD) (b). Some of the patients received more than one category of treatment. Bars represent the median. 5ASA: 5-aminosalicylic acid; PSL: Prednisolone; IM: Immunomodulator; TNF: Tumor necrosis factor.

Author Contributions

K.M. designed the research; T.M., K.M., H.Y., A.M., T.Y., T.A., M.M., K.T., S.Y. (Sayo Yamasaki), K.K., S.Y. (Shinichiro Yoshioka), and H.T. performed the study and analyzed the data; K.M. and T.T. supervised the project; T.M. and K.M. co-wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported partly by a Grant-in-Aid from the Ministry of Science and Education and by Health and Labour Sciences Research Grants for research on intractable diseases from the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare of Japan.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Khor, B.; Gardet, A.; Xavier, R.J. Genetics and pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Nature 2011, 474, 307–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Maloy, K.J.; Powrie, F. Intestinal homeostasis and its breakdown in inflammatory bowel disease. Nature 2011, 474, 298–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Moran, M.M.; McAlexander, M.A.; Biro, T.; Szallasi, A. Transient receptor potential channels as therapeutic targets. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2011, 10, 601–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Billeter, A.T.; Hellmann, J.L.; Bhatnagar, A.; Polk, H.C., Jr. Transient receptor potential ion channels: Powerful regulators of cell function. Ann. Surg. 2014, 259, 229–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Parenti, A.; De Logu, F.; Geppetti, P.; Benemei, S. What is the evidence for the role of TRP channels in inflammatory and immune cells? Br. J. Pharmacol. 2016, 173, 953–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sousa-Valente, J.; Andreou, A.P.; Urban, L.; Nagy, I. Transient receptor potential ion channels in primary sensory neurons as targets for novel analgesics. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2014, 171, 2508–2527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kaneko, Y.; Szallasi, A. Transient receptor potential (TRP) channels: A clinical perspective. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2014, 171, 2474–2507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nilius, B.; Owsianik, G.; Voets, T.; Peters, J.A. Transient receptor potential cation channels in disease. Physiol. Rev. 2007, 87, 165–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Allais, L.; De Smet, R.; Verschuere, S.; Talavera, K.; Cuvelier, C.A.; Maes, T. Transient Receptor Potential Channels in Intestinal Inflammation: What Is the Impact of Cigarette Smoking? Pathobiology 2017, 84, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zielinska, M.; Jarmuz, A.; Wasilewski, A.; Salaga, M.; Fichna, J. Role of transient receptor potential channels in intestinal inflammation and visceral pain: Novel targets in inflammatory bowel diseases. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2015, 21, 419–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rugtveit, J.; Brandtzaeg, P.; Halstensen, T.S.; Fausa, O.; Scott, H. Increased macrophage subset in inflammatory bowel disease: Apparent recruitment from peripheral blood monocytes. Gut 1994, 35, 669–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Schwarz, E.C.; Wolfs, M.J.; Tonner, S.; Wenning, A.S.; Quintana, A.; Griesemer, D.; Hoth, M. TRP channels in lymphocytes. In Transient Receptor Potential (TRP) Channels; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007; pp. 445–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Saunders, C.I.; Kunde, D.A.; Crawford, A.; Geraghty, D.P. Expression of transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) and 2 (TRPV2) in human peripheral blood. Mol. Immunol. 2007, 44, 1429–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Spinsanti, G.; Zannolli, R.; Panti, C.; Ceccarelli, I.; Marsili, L.; Bachiocco, V.; Frati, F.; Aloisi, A.M. Quantitative Real-Time PCR detection of TRPV1-4 gene expression in human leukocytes from healthy and hyposensitive subjects. Mol. Pain 2008, 4, 1744–8069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Cai, X.; Yang, Y.C.; Wang, J.F.; Wang, Q.; Gao, J.; Fu, W.L.; Zhu, Z.Y.; Wang, Y.Y.; Zou, M.J.; Wang, J.X.; et al. Transient receptor potential vanilloid 2 (TRPV2), a potential novel biomarker in childhood asthma. J. Asthma 2013, 50, 209–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Schroeder, K.W.; Tremaine, W.J.; Ilstrup, D.M. Coated oral 5-aminosalicylic acid therapy for mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis. A randomized study. N. Engl. J. Med. 1987, 317, 1625–1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Best, W.R.; Becktel, J.M.; Singleton, J.W. Rederived values of the eight coefficients of the Crohn’s Disease Activity Index (CDAI). Gastroenterology 1979, 77, 843–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Boyd, M.; Thodberg, M.; Vitezic, M.; Bornholdt, J.; Vitting-Seerup, K.; Chen, Y.; Coskun, M.; Li, Y.; Lo, B.Z.S.; Klausen, P.; et al. Characterization of the enhancer and promoter landscape of inflammatory bowel disease from human colon biopsies. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Santos, F.; Marini, N.; Santos, R.S.D.; Hoffman, B.S.F.; Alves-Ferreira, M.; de Oliveira, A.C. Selection and testing of reference genes for accurate RT-qPCR in rice seedlings under iron toxicity. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0193418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Bustin, S.A.; Benes, V.; Garson, J.A.; Hellemans, J.; Huggett, J.; Kubista, M.; Mueller, R.; Nolan, T.; Pfaffl, M.W.; Shipley, G.L.; et al. The MIQE guidelines: Minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin. Chem. 2009, 55, 611–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Vandewauw, I.; Owsianik, G.; Voets, T. Systematic and quantitative mRNA expression analysis of TRP channel genes at the single trigeminal and dorsal root ganglion level in mouse. BMC Neurosci. 2013, 14, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Yiangou, Y.; Facer, P.; Dyer, N.H.; Chan, C.L.; Knowles, C.; Williams, N.S.; Anand, P. Vanilloid receptor 1 immunoreactivity in inflamed human bowel. Lancet 2001, 357, 1338–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Akbar, A.; Yiangou, Y.; Facer, P.; Brydon, W.G.; Walters, J.R.; Anand, P.; Ghosh, S. Expression of the TRPV1 receptor differs in quiescent inflammatory bowel disease with or without abdominal pain. Gut 2010, 59, 767–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Bertin, S.; Aoki-Nonaka, Y.; Lee, J.; de Jong, P.R.; Kim, P.; Han, T.; Yu, T.; To, K.; Takahashi, N.; Boland, B.S.; et al. The TRPA1 ion channel is expressed in CD4+ T cells and restrains T-cell-mediated colitis through inhibition of TRPV1. Gut 2017, 66, 1584–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Miranda, A.; Nordstrom, E.; Mannem, A.; Smith, C.; Banerjee, B.; Sengupta, J.N. The role of transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 in mechanical and chemical visceral hyperalgesia following experimental colitis. Neuroscience 2007, 148, 1021–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Santoni, G.; Farfariello, V.; Liberati, S.; Morelli, M.B.; Nabissi, M.; Santoni, M.; Amantini, C. The role of transient receptor potential vanilloid type-2 ion channels in innate and adaptive immune responses. Front. Immunol. 2013, 4, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Issa, C.M.; Hambly, B.D.; Wang, Y.; Maleki, S.; Wang, W.; Fei, J.; Bao, S. TRPV2 in the development of experimental colitis. Scand. J. Immunol. 2014, 80, 307–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. De Petrocellis, L.; Orlando, P.; Moriello, A.S.; Aviello, G.; Stott, C.; Izzo, A.A.; Di Marzo, V. Cannabinoid actions at TRPV channels: Effects on TRPV3 and TRPV4 and their potential relevance to gastrointestinal inflammation. Acta Physiol. (Oxf.) 2012, 204, 255–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ueda, T.; Yamada, T.; Ugawa, S.; Ishida, Y.; Shimada, S. TRPV3, a thermosensitive channel is expressed in mouse distal colon epithelium. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009, 383, 130–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hoeft, B.; Linseisen, J.; Beckmann, L.; Muller-Decker, K.; Canzian, F.; Husing, A.; Kaaks, R.; Vogel, U.; Jakobsen, M.U.; Overvad, K.; et al. Polymorphisms in fatty-acid-metabolism-related genes are associated with colorectal cancer risk. Carcinogenesis 2010, 31, 466–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Aijima, R.; Wang, B.; Takao, T.; Mihara, H.; Kashio, M.; Ohsaki, Y.; Zhang, J.Q.; Mizuno, A.; Suzuki, M.; Yamashita, Y.; et al. The thermosensitive TRPV3 channel contributes to rapid wound healing in oral epithelia. FASEB J. 2015, 29, 182–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. D’Aldebert, E.; Cenac, N.; Rousset, P.; Martin, L.; Rolland, C.; Chapman, K.; Selves, J.; Alric, L.; Vinel, J.P.; Vergnolle, N. Transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 activated inflammatory signals by intestinal epithelial cells and colitis in mice. Gastroenterology 2011, 140, 275–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Fichna, J.; Mokrowiecka, A.; Cygankiewicz, A.I.; Zakrzewski, P.K.; Malecka-Panas, E.; Janecka, A.; Krajewska, W.M.; Storr, M.A. Transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 blockade protects against experimental colitis in mice: A new strategy for inflammatory bowel diseases treatment? Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2012, 24, e557–e560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Foroutan, F.; Jokerst, J.V.; Gambhir, S.S.; Vermesh, O.; Kim, H.W.; Knowles, J.C. Sol-gel synthesis and electrospraying of biodegradable (P2O5)55-(CaO)30-(Na2O)15 glass nanospheres as a transient contrast agent for ultrasound stem cell imaging. ACS Nano. 2015, 9, 1868–1877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Yamamoto, S.; Shimizu, S.; Kiyonaka, S.; Takahashi, N.; Wajima, T.; Hara, Y.; Negoro, T.; Hiroi, T.; Kiuchi, Y.; Okada, T.; et al. TRPM2-mediated Ca2+ influx induces chemokine production in monocytes that aggravates inflammatory neutrophil infiltration. Nat. Med. 2008, 14, 738–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Knowles, H.; Heizer, J.W.; Li, Y.; Chapman, K.; Ogden, C.A.; Andreasen, K.; Shapland, E.; Kucera, G.; Mogan, J.; Humann, J.; et al. Transient Receptor Potential Melastatin 2 (TRPM2) ion channel is required for innate immunity against Listeria monocytogenes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 11578–11583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Launay, P.; Cheng, H.; Srivatsan, S.; Penner, R.; Fleig, A.; Kinet, J.P. TRPM4 regulates calcium oscillations after T cell activation. Science 2004, 306, 1374–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Serafini, N.; Dahdah, A.; Barbet, G.; Demion, M.; Attout, T.; Gautier, G.; Arcos-Fajardo, M.; Souchet, H.; Jouvin, M.H.; Vrtovsnik, F.; et al. The TRPM4 channel controls monocyte and macrophage, but not neutrophil, function for survival in sepsis. J. Immunol. 2012, 189, 3689–3699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Barbet, G.; Demion, M.; Moura, I.C.; Serafini, N.; Leger, T.; Vrtovsnik, F.; Monteiro, R.C.; Guinamard, R.; Kinet, J.P.; Launay, P. The calcium-activated nonselective cation channel TRPM4 is essential for the migration but not the maturation of dendritic cells. Nat. Immunol. 2008, 9, 1148–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Harris, N. The enigmatic tuft cell in immunity. Science 2016, 351, 1264–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bezencon, C.; le Coutre, J.; Damak, S. Taste-signaling proteins are coexpressed in solitary intestinal epithelial cells. Chem. Senses 2007, 32, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Gerbe, F.; Sidot, E.; Smyth, D.J.; Ohmoto, M.; Matsumoto, I.; Dardalhon, V.; Cesses, P.; Garnier, L.; Pouzolles, M.; Brulin, B.; et al. Intestinal epithelial tuft cells initiate type 2 mucosal immunity to helminth parasites. Nature 2016, 529, 226–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Qu, D.; Weygant, N.; May, R.; Chandrakesan, P.; Madhoun, M.; Ali, N.; Sureban, S.M.; An, G.; Schlosser, M.J.; Houchen, C.W. Ablation of Doublecortin-Like Kinase 1 in the Colonic Epithelium Exacerbates Dextran Sulfate Sodium-Induced Colitis. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0134212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Steele, S.P.; Melchor, S.J.; Petri, W.A., Jr. Tuft Cells: New Players in Colitis. Trends Mol. Med. 2016, 22, 921–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Leppanen, J.; Helminen, O.; Huhta, H.; Kauppila, J.H.; Miinalainen, I.; Ronkainen, V.P.; Saarnio, J.; Lehenkari, P.P.; Karttunen, T.J. Doublecortin-like kinase 1-positive enterocyte‒A new cell type in human intestine. APMIS 2016, 124, 958–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Nilius, B.; Owsianik, G. The transient receptor potential family of ion channels. Genome Biol. 2011, 12, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Py, B.F.; Jin, M.; Desai, B.N.; Penumaka, A.; Zhu, H.; Kober, M.; Dietrich, A.; Lipinski, M.M.; Henry, T.; Clapham, D.E.; et al. Caspase-11 controls interleukin-1beta release through degradation of TRPC1. Cell Rep. 2014, 6, 1122–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Medic, N.; Desai, A.; Olivera, A.; Abramowitz, J.; Birnbaumer, L.; Beaven, M.A.; Gilfillan, A.M.; Metcalfe, D.D. Knockout of the Trpc1 gene reveals that TRPC1 can promote recovery from anaphylaxis by negatively regulating mast cell TNF-alpha production. Cell Calcium 2013, 53, 315–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Kurahara, L.H.; Sumiyoshi, M.; Aoyagi, K.; Hiraishi, K.; Nakajima, K.; Nakagawa, M.; Hu, Y.; Inoue, R. Intestinal myofibroblast TRPC6 channel may contribute to stenotic fibrosis in Crohn’s disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2015, 21, 496–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Boonen, B.; Alpizar, Y.A.; Meseguer, V.M.; Talavera, K. TRP Channels as Sensors of Bacterial Endotoxins. Toxins (Basel) 2018, 10, 326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Holzer, P. Transient receptor potential (TRP) channels as drug targets for diseases of the digestive system. Pharmacol. Ther. 2011, 131, 142–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Boesmans, W.; Owsianik, G.; Tack, J.; Voets, T.; Vanden Berghe, P. TRP channels in neurogastroenterology: Opportunities for therapeutic intervention. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2011, 162, 18–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Jcm 09 02643 g001 550
Figure 1. Expression of transient receptor potential (TRP) channels in healthy subjects, patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD). Bars represent mean ± SD. N: Number of subjects. Inter-group significance, Bonferroni-corrected Mann–Whitney U test, p < 0.01.
Figure 1. Expression of transient receptor potential (TRP) channels in healthy subjects, patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD). Bars represent mean ± SD. N: Number of subjects. Inter-group significance, Bonferroni-corrected Mann–Whitney U test, p < 0.01.
Jcm 09 02643 g001
Jcm 09 02643 g002 550
Figure 2. Correlation between TRP channel expression and clinical disease progression in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD). Clinical disease progression was assessed using the partial Mayo score (PMS) for patients with UC and the CD activity index (CDAI) for patients with CD. N: Number of patients.
Figure 2. Correlation between TRP channel expression and clinical disease progression in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD). Clinical disease progression was assessed using the partial Mayo score (PMS) for patients with UC and the CD activity index (CDAI) for patients with CD. N: Number of patients.
Jcm 09 02643 g002
Table
Table 1. Patient characteristics.
Table 1. Patient characteristics.
Healthy VolunteersUlcerative ColitisCrohn’s Diseasep-Value
(n = 30)(n = 41)(n = 34)
Sex, male/female13/1719/2212/120.61
Age, years3941350.17
(median, IQR)(32–44)(29–58)(27–47)
Area involved total colitis/ileitis/
left-side colitis/ileocolitis/
proctitiscolitis
26/8/74/23/7
Disease duration, months 811060.19
(median, IQR)(60.5–171.5)(60.9–274.2)
Treatments
No medication2 (4.9)0 (0.0)0.19
5-aminosalicylic acid (%) 36 (87.8)25 (73.5)0.11
Prednisolone (%) 7 (17.1)3 (8.8)0.3
Immunomodulator (%) 7 (17.1)9 (26.5)0.32
Leukocytapheresis (%) 2 (4.9)0 (0.0)0.19
Nutrition therapy (%) 0 (0.0)21 (61.8)<0.01
Anti-tumor necrosis factor (%)3 (7.3)24 (70.6)<0.01
Surgery (%) 0 (0.0)15 (44.1)<0.01
IQR: Interquartile range.
Table
Table 2. Details of TaqMan probes and primers used in this study.
Table 2. Details of TaqMan probes and primers used in this study.
GeneAccession NumberAssay
GAPDHNM_001256799.2Hs02786624_g1
NM_001289745.1
NM_001289746.1
NM_002046.5
TRPV1NM_018727.5Hs00218912_m1
NM_080704.3
NM_080705.3
NM_080706.3
TRPV2NM_016113.4Hs00901648_m1
TRPV3NM_001258205.1Hs00376854_m1
NM_145068.3
TRPV4NM_001177428.1Hs01099348_m1
NM_001177431.1
NM_001177433.1
NM_021625.4
NM_147204.2
TRPM2NM_001320350.1Hs01066091_m1
NM_001320351.1
NM_001320352.1
NM_003307.3
TRPM4NM_001195227.1Hs00214167_m1
NM_001321281.1
NM_001321282.1
NM_001321283.1
NM_001321285.1
NM_017636.3
TRPM5NM_014555.3Hs00175822_m1
TRPC1NM_001251845.1Hs00608195_m1
NM_003304.4
TRPC3NM_001130698.1Hs00162985_m1
NM_003305.2
TRPC4NM_001135955.1Hs01077392_m1
NM_001135956.1
NM_001135957.1
NM_001135958.1
NM_003306.1
TRPC5NM_012471.2Hs00202960_m1
TRPC6NM_004621.5Hs00988479_m1
TRPC7NM_001167576.1Hs00220638_m1
NM_001167577.2
NM_020389.2
GAPDH: Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase; TRP: Transient receptor potential.
Table
Table 3. Correlation coefficients and significance of differences between each transient receptor potential (TRP) channel expression and laboratory parameters in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn’s disease (CD).
Table 3. Correlation coefficients and significance of differences between each transient receptor potential (TRP) channel expression and laboratory parameters in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn’s disease (CD).
UC CD
CRPAlbWBCHbCRPAlbWBCHb
TRPV10.0110.009−0.2060.116−0.1740.224−0.2750.0461
TRPV2−0.111−0.01−0.500 **−0.151−0.2750.039−0.205−0.199
TRPV30.0890.079−0.399 *0.129−0.2160.346−0.1460.1235
TRPV40.1050.432 *−0.0270.3410.355 *−0.2290.1670.1165
TRPM2−0.282−0.0950.285−0.2130.315−0.0640.0320.0448
TRPM4−0.011−0.030.161−0.196−0.1250.004−0.1930.0211
TRPM5−0.070.24−0.0130.378 *−0.2680.283−0.344−0.128
TRPC1−0.1250.0310.033−0.0620.327−0.2950.262−0.132
TRPC3−0.177−0.0440.2960.11−0.182−0.0090.197−0.196
TRPC60.038−0.1060.052−0.121−0.0570.3470.0560.515 **
Alb: Albumin; CRP: C-reactive protein; Hb: Hemoglobin; WBC: White blood cell. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.005.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Morita, T.; Mitsuyama, K.; Yamasaki, H.; Mori, A.; Yoshimura, T.; Araki, T.; Morita, M.; Tsuruta, K.; Yamasaki, S.; Kuwaki, K.; et al. Gene Expression of Transient Receptor Potential Channels in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 2643. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082643

AMA Style

Morita T, Mitsuyama K, Yamasaki H, Mori A, Yoshimura T, Araki T, Morita M, Tsuruta K, Yamasaki S, Kuwaki K, et al. Gene Expression of Transient Receptor Potential Channels in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020; 9(8):2643. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082643

Chicago/Turabian Style

Morita, Taku, Keiichi Mitsuyama, Hiroshi Yamasaki, Atsushi Mori, Tetsuhiro Yoshimura, Toshihiro Araki, Masaru Morita, Kozo Tsuruta, Sayo Yamasaki, Kotaro Kuwaki, and et al. 2020. "Gene Expression of Transient Receptor Potential Channels in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients" Journal of Clinical Medicine 9, no. 8: 2643. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082643

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop