Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Vet. Sci., 14 July 2022
Sec. Veterinary Neurology and Neurosurgery
Volume 9 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.908801

Neuroimaging in the Epileptic Baboon

C. Akos Szabo1* Felipe S. Salinas2,3
  • 1Department of Neurology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
  • 2Research Imaging Institute, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
  • 3Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States

Characterization of baboon model of genetic generalized epilepsy (GGE) is driven both electroclinically and by successful adoption of neuroimaging platforms, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET). Based upon its phylogenetic proximity and similar brain anatomy to humans, the epileptic baboon provides an excellent translational model. Its relatively large brain size compared to smaller nonhuman primates or rodents, a gyrencephalic structure compared to lissencephalic organization of rodent brains, and the availability of a large pedigreed colony allows exploration of neuroimaging markers of diseases. Similar to human idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE), structural imaging in the baboon is usually normal in individual subjects, but gray matter volume/concentration (GMV/GMC) changes are reported by statistical parametric mapping (SPM) analyses. Functional neuroimaging has been effective for mapping the photoepileptic responses, the epileptic network, altered functional connectivity of physiological networks, and the effects of anti-seizure therapies. This review will provide insights into our current understanding the baboon model of GGE through functional and structural imaging.

Introduction

Epilepsy is a condition of recurrent seizures or a single seizure in the setting of an epileptogenic lesions on a brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan or epileptiform abnormalities on a scalp electroencephalography (EEG) (1). Clinically, seizures are characterized by stereotyped, episodic changes in behavior. As seizures are rarely recorded in brief scalp EEG samples, clinicians rely on the detection of interictal (between seizures) epileptic discharges (IEDs), which can serve as markers for the seizure type. Epilepsies are classified mainly as focal, i.e., seizures beginning in one region of the brain, or generalized, i.e., seizures are associated with a simultaneous activation of both cerebral hemispheres (2). Developments in structural neuroimaging, intracranial EEG recordings, and analysis of histopathological samples collected by resective surgery in people with medically refractory epilepsy have provided important insights into the pathophysiology underlying focal epilepsies. Knowledge with regards to the mechanisms underlying generalized epilepsies (IGEs), are less apparent; they are mainly idiopathic (without a known etiology), not associated with neuroimaging abnormalities, and not amenable for intracranial EEG sampling or resective surgeries. While IGEs are presumed to be genetic in etiology, monogenetic mutations, mainly affecting ion channels, are encountered in only 3% of the cases (2). There is still a large gap for understanding likely polygenic affects underlying epileptogenesis in idiopathic (IGE) or genetic (GGE) generalized epilepsies, and animal models could provide new revelations with respect genetic and neurodevelopmental mechanisms.

Over fifty years ago, a prominent French neuroscientist, Robert Naquet, and his associates, Eva and Keith Killam et al. (3) first published their observations of photosensitivity, i.e., the predisposition of visual stimuli, such as flickering lights, to induce seizures. Photosensitivity of the baboon was quickly embraced for activation of seizures in a laboratory setting, allowing the recording of IEDs and seizures with scalp and intracranial EEG electrodes (46). The Senegalese Papio hamadryas papio (P.h. papio) appeared to be more photosensitive than other subspecies, including P.h. anubis and cynocephalus (7), remaining the preferred subspecies for electrophysiological evaluation and for testing the efficacy of known and novel anti-seizure medications. Photosensitivity was observed to be maximal in the morning hours and at intermittent photic stimulation (IPS) frequencies of 20–25 Hz. This model of photosensitivity was later adopted for testing known and novel anti-seizure medications (8, 9). However, technological improvements allowed electrophysiological investigations and anti-seizure medication testing in rodents and mice, decreasing interest for further developing the baboon model due to limitations related to cost and availability. Still, even after years of developing the baboon model, there is limited information regarding the underlying pathomechanisms and natural history.

Observation of spontaneous generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) in the largest captive baboon pedigree in the world, housed in the Southwest National Primate Research Center (SNPRC, Texas Biomedical Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas), reinvigorated research into this model. The pedigreed colony has 16,000 members over 6–8 generations, consisting mainly of P.h. anubis, cynocephalus and their hybrids; in contrast to the baboons studied in France, the founding members of this breeding colony originated from East Africa (10). On one hand, the pedigree presents a unique resource for evaluating the potential genetic effects of the epilepsy and led to the characterization of the epileptic phenotype. On the other hand, improved neuroimaging capabilities offers a new approach to evaluating underlying pathophysiology associated with this phenotype.

A retrospective case-detection survey of veterinary records between 1980 and 2007, demonstrated a prevalence of 26% for the expression GTCS or seizure-like behaviors in the pedigree (11). Forty-six spontaneous GTCS were recently semiologically characterized in 7 baboons; most of the seizures occurred in sleep or upon awakening (12). Preconvulsive semiologies were noted in 4 baboons, consisting of unilateral or bilateral rotatory behaviors and generalized or lateralized (myo)clonic activity; the ensuing convulsive portion of the seizures had a mean duration of 47 (+/-21) s. The total seizure duration was 54 (+/-21) s. Postictally, most of the baboons demonstrated myoclonus as they were recovering their upright posture following seizures (12). In addition to GTCS, generalized myoclonic, especially eyelid myoclonus, and absence seizures were recorded by on scalp video-EEG studies in 671 baboons (13). Generalized spike-and-wave discharges were noted in 324 (49%) baboons, and these were more commonly 4–6 Hz, but at times 2–3 Hz, frequency. Photoepileptic responses were recorded in 156 (23%) of the epileptic baboons. While these numbers may have been partially inflated with the use of low-dose ketamine (5–6 mg/kg) for sedation during scalp EEG studies; low-dose ketamine also activates generalized IEDs in asymptomatic animals predisposed to epilepsy. Nonetheless, these studies confirmed a genetic predisposition for epilepsy in this pedigree, and an electroclinical model that resembled juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME).

Only recently was a genetic etiology confirmed. Based upon whole genome sequencing in electroclinically well-characterized 42 epileptic and 19 controls, the RBFOX1 emerged as the only statistically significant association (14). RBFOX1 mutations have been identified in genetic focal and generalized epilepsies in humans and may act as a susceptibility gene in both humans and baboons (15, 16). RBFOX1 is an RNA-binding protein that regulates splicing of epilepsy candidate genes (e.g., GABRG2, SYN1, KCNQ2, SCN8A, SLC12A5) and plays a key role in neuronal excitation and may cerebral cortex development (17), changes to transcriptomic expression and splicing patterns of neuronal genes (18), and miRNA crosstalk that impacts homeostatic downscaling of excitatory synapses (19). As these gene interactions may be clinically relevant, larger samples of baboons will need to be studied in this pedigree. Furthermore, based upon a relatively consistent electroclinical phenotype within the pedigree, the epileptic baboon provides a suitable animal model for neuroimaging and evaluation of anti-seizure therapies.

This review will focus on the status of neuroimaging in the epileptic baboon. Based upon its phylogenetic proximity and similar brain anatomy to humans, the epileptic baboon provides an excellent translational model. Its relatively large brain size compared to smaller nonhuman primates or rodents, gyrencephalic structure compared to the lissencephalic brains of rodents and mice, and less variability in the cortical structures than humans, all contribute to the potential for identifying imaging biomarkers even in smaller cohorts than required for human studies. However, the studies described in this review were all performed in a single center, namely the SNPRC, and have not been validated by other centers. Nonetheless, because of the baboon's potential role in the neuroimaging of neurological disorders and treatment effects, several centers have developed PET and MRI templates. We will review the contribution of structural MRI as well as functional MRI and PET studies to our understanding of the baboon model, and more specifically the insights offered by functional imaging into the electrophysiological networks underlying photosensitivity, the epileptic network, and the effects of therapeutic interventions. We will also address gaps in the understanding of the structural and functional mechanisms, which will need to be addressed by prospective studies utilizing newly developed and/or complementary imaging techniques.

Present State of Neuroimaging in the Epileptic Baboon

PET and MRI Brain Templates

While the advantages of neuroimaging the epileptic baboons are numerous (described above), there are also many challenges. Some disadvantages to humans include the need to sedate or anesthetize baboons due to their size and strength, interference by the large snout and air-filled sinuses which can distort the acquisitions, and their smaller brain size. Nonetheless, due to the potential for translatability, several centers have developed neuroimaging platforms and brain atlases to facilitate neuroanatomical analyses.

These centers all strived to develop high-resolution neuroanatomical atlases to allow the identification of regions of interest and cortical/subcortical landmarks, based upon anatomical or MR templates that be co-registered with PET studies, and normalized to a standard space for whole brain analyses and statistical parametric mapping. Early templates were limited to axial sampling, using the anatomical segmentation of a single baboon brain, and were not electronically accessible. Riche et al. (20) produced an anatomical atlas cut into 15 mm thick slices in the orbitomeatal plane to simulate the transaxial PET acquisition and planar resolution. Subsequently, radioligand PET to identify and validate anatomically defined cortical or subcortical structures. Black et al. (21) published the first electronically accessible baboon template based upon the Davis and Huffman anatomical atlas from a single baboon and limited to the subcortical structures (22). Greer et al. (23) developed an MR-based high-resolution atlas (centered at the mid-sagittal line, AC-PC orientation), averaging 6 datasets that were reformatted using a voxel size of 0.5 mm3 to create representative MRI, that could be converted into PET space. A subsequent study aligned histological slices of baboon brain with anatomical MRI, first in two dimensions using block-face photographs of the brain slices, subsequently co-registering them in three dimensions with an in-vivo acquired MRI (24); this approach could link research relying on post-mortem microscopic material analysis with applications using in-vivo macroscopic imaging analysis. Further refinement of MRI templates was achieved by Love et al. (25), who created a template from 89 baboon brains of a heterogenous group of baboons based upon subspecies and sex to better represent their variability in brain morphometry. This template aimed to represent both hemispheres symmetrically to analyze side-to-side structural or functional differences and provided the first tissue probability maps, facilitating brain normalization or segmentation. Agaronyan et al. (26) created a fully segmented brain atlas, part semiautomatically, part manually, on an upscaled dataset using inter-slice interpolation. This atlas utilizes the earlier versions to guide segmentation, labeling and identification, hence achieving a higher resolution template to improve throughput analyses.

Structural MRI

While structural MRI scans are essentially normal in people with IGE, statistical parametric mapping first demonstrated increased regional gray matter concentrations (GMC) or volumes (GMV) in the frontoparietal cortices, but their cortical distribution varied among studies (2729). While histopathological substrate underlying increases of GMV or GMC is unknown, but it is thought to be related to cortical developmental effects or increased synaptic connectivity, potentially due to increased synaptic density and/or anomalous synaptic pruning in adolescence (30). Decreases in GMV have been also reported, most consistently affecting the thalami bilaterally (31, 32), suggesting chronic, seizure-induced damage.

The potential for correlating structural MRI findings with histopathology could allow the baboon model to provide insight into potential underlying neurodevelopmental abnormalities; however, until now histopathological studies have not demonstrated evidence of abnormal cortical development or dysplasia (33). The only common structural abnormalities are deviations in ventricular sized or shape. Occipital horn variants, including unilateral or bilateral elongation or enlargement (colpocephaly), occurred in 25% of MRI scans (T1-weighted three-dimensionally acquired) in 208 baboons (Figure 1B). Historically, colpocephaly is associated with craniofacial trauma, which are typically due to convulsive seizures leading to falls from elevations [Figure 1A; (34)]. Temporal horn enlargement is less common and lacks any association with trauma or epilepsy.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Craniofacial trauma and colpocephaly. (A) Demonstrates periorbital scarring due to repeated craniofacial trauma due to seizures. (B) Shows normal ventricular configuration (upper series) and enlarged occipital horns (lower series). Adapted from Comparative Medicine, references (33, 34), respectively.

Gyral and sulcal changes were compared between baboons with generalized interictal epileptic discharges (IEDs) on scalp EEG, some with witnessed seizures, others without, to those with normal scalp EEG and without witnessed seizures, using voxel-based morphometry [VBM, (35)]. Male brain volumes were ~15% larger than those of females. While no significant differences were noted between the IED+ and IED- groups, there was a subtle increase in brain volume in the baboons with IEDs. This finding was unexpected, but an increased thickness of the cerebral cortices, especially of the postcentral gyrus and associated parietal regions responsible for generating absence seizures, were also noted in the GAERS model (36). However, post-hoc analyses demonstrated significant decreases in sulcal areas involving the central, intraparietal and cingulate sulci [Figure 2C; (35)], all of which are associated with brain regions giving rise to generalized ictal and interictal discharges in rodent and humans IGEs (36, 37), suggesting either a neurodevelopmental abnormality or seizure-induced changes.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Morphometric MRI Analyses in the Epileptic Baboon. (A,B) demonstrate increases (blue) and decreases (red) in gray matter concentration in epileptic baboons compared to controls. (C) Demonstrate significant decreases (red) and marginally significant decreases (yellow) in sulcal areas of baboons with IEDs on scalp EEG compared to healthy controls [adapted from Epilepsy Research, references (35, 38), respectively].

GMC changes were also documented with VBM in epileptic baboons [Figures 2A,B; (38)]. GMC increases were noted in the frontopolar, orbitofrontal and anterolateral temporal cortices bilaterally. Decreases of GMC were noted in the primary visual cortices and thalamic nuclei, including reticular, anterior and medial dorsal nuclei. Increased GMC may reflect an underlying neurodevelopmental abnormality, either due increased cellularity or the absence of synaptic pruning (30); in adolescents with new onset JME, increased GMV is noted more diffusely, and decreases over time to a lesser extent than in age-matched healthy controls. As these baboons were mainly adults, it is possible that GMC increases were also more diffuse early on, but then normalized either as a function of cortical maturation or due to seizure-induced cell loss (38). The latter explanation is suggested by histopathological exams of two adult epileptic baboon brains, demonstrating evidence of decreased cortical cellularity, especially of neurons, in the frontoparietal cortices, though maximal in the sensorimotor region, while frontopolar, orbitofrontal and visual cortices were relatively spared (39). On the other hand, decreased GMC was encountered in the primary visual cortices of epileptic adult baboons (38), a brain region that is implicated in photosensitivity and participating as an integral part the baboon's epileptic network (40). Consistent with human studies (31, 32), thalamic GMC was also reduced in the baboons, and involve specifically the reticular, anterior and medial dorsal nuclei of the thalamus, all of which are involved in the generation of generalized spike-and-wave discharges (38). To determine whether the sulcal morphometric and GMC/GMV abnormalities are neurodevelopmental in etiology and/or evolve before and during epilepsy requires prospective, serial neuroimaging in larger samples of young epileptic baboons, ideally starting before the onset of epilepsy.

Microstructural differences had not been published in baboons so far, but could play an important role in determining connectivity differences that may pre-exist the onset of epilepsy and those that result from seizure-related injury. Fractional anisotropy (FA) appeared to be increased sensorimotor and premotor pathways in people with IGE, but decreased in the internal and external capsules, in one recent seed-based study human IGE, suggesting seizure related plasticity (41). Increased motor connectivity is also apparent in people with JME and their asymptomatic siblings, supporting genetic predisposition to connectivity (42, 43). Similar to human IGE, seed-based analyses in the genetic absence epilepsy in rats from Strasbourg (GAERS) model also showed decreases in FA in the corpus callosum and internal capsule, but researchers were also able to demonstrate correlation of FA changes with seizure activity (44). Furthermore, treatment with ethosuximide appeared to prevent microstructural damage in these pathways and/or restore connectivity (44). These comparisons across species demonstrate the unique ability of animal models to illuminate mechanisms and treatment effects. Reanalyzing the baboon imaging data in a larger and better selected cohort may help validate these findings.

Functional PET and MRI

Anesthesia

The advantage of performing functional PET or MRI studies in treatement-naïve baboons is counterbalanced by the need for sedation and anesthesia. Gas inhalant anesthesia using 1% isoflurane is particularly challenging, as the blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signal responses are progressively attenuated above 1.0 MAC. Ketamine, used at lower doses for sedation of baboons during scalp EEG recordings, does not attenuate BOLD or EEG signal and increases cerebral blood flow [CBF, (45)]. With prior EEG recordings used as a screening tool, an ideal infusion rate could be identified which would avoid activation of seizures as well as EEG suppression, usually between 4-6 mg/kg/hr, for functional imaging studies (46).

Photosensitivity

H215O-PET provides an excellent, minimally invasive method for studying cerebral blood flow (CBF) changes in association with visual stimulation in normal individuals (4750). Similar to BOLD-fMRI, H215O-PET takes advantage of neurovascular coupling to deliver visuospatial representations of brief electrophysiological events; the metabolic demand of activated or discharging neurons leads to localized changes in CBF and cerebral blood volume (47). H215O-PET provides a more direct measure of CBF than BOLD-fMRI which relies on deoxygenation of venous blood but does not have the same spatial or temporal resolution of BOLD-fMRI.

H215O-PET studies were performed in the morning, when the baboons are maximally photosensitive, utilizing IPS at 25 Hz, the frequency range most likely to activate photoepileptic responses (35). Six to eight injections are performed, about 10–12 min apart as the tracer's half-life is only 2 min in duration. During resting scans, CBF changes are recorded for 90-second radiotracer uptake period. For activation scans, IPS was typically started one minute prior to H215O-injection, as occipital CBF reaches a steady state after one minute of continuous stimulation (51). The averaged resting scans are subtracted from activation scans, and these PET images are either co-registered with the baboon's own MRI, or with an average MRI for group analyses (46).

The photosensitive group exhibited more diffuse frontotemporal cortical and subcortical activations than control group (Figure 3B). Symmetrical cortical activations were mainly noted in the orbitofrontal cortices and anterior cingulate gyri, as well as the medial and anterolateral temporal cortices. Other activations were less symmetric, initially with a predominantly left hemispheric lateralization of the parietal and sensorimotor cortices when sampling CBF changes at IPS onset (Figure 3A), but shifting more to the right hemisphere once achieving steady state (Figure 3B). Activations were noted in both conditions in the right medial frontal regions including right anterior cingulate and orbitofrontal cortices, as well as the right mesiodorsal nucleus, though more bilaterally over time, reflecting effects of early and sustained activation of generalized IEDs recorded by scalp EEG. Similarly, the left posterior cingulate was also suppressed in both states, a brain region which is activated in the controls during IPS. There was diffuse deactivation of the basal ganglia and cortices early on, where deactivations in steady state pertained mainly to the caudal brainstem and cerebellum. Also subcortically, activations were noted in the left putamen, compared to the right putamen in controls. Another unexpected finding was the absence of occipital lobe activation in the photosensitive baboons; in photosensitive humans, EEG-fMRI demonstrates consistent occipital activation at the onset of IPS (54). While there was diffuse occipitoparietal activation noted in the control baboons, photosensitive baboons only showed minimal occipital activation early on during IPS, suggesting the possibility of an endogenous cortical inhibition induced by IPS. Nigral inhibitory pathways were also activated, reflected by regional CBF increases noted in the midbrain and globus pallidum, in baboons exhibiting myoclonic seizures during the tracer uptake period compared to baboons with only IEDs (55). This appears to be an important inhibitory pathway; even structural MRI demonstrated enlargement of the globus pallidum in epileptic baboons compared to controls (38).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Regional CBF Changes with IPS, Correlated with IEDs, and during HF-VNS therapy. (A,B) Early and late CBF changes with IPS, (C) CBF changes correlated with interictal epileptic discharges, (D1,D2) CBF changes in a photosensitive baboon and a non-photosensitive animal related to HF microburst VNS Therapy at rest (compared to the resting-state average from nine epileptic baboons). L hemisphere is on the left. Adapted from references (46, 52, 53).

The Epileptic Network

With the help of EEG-fMRI, the epileptic network underlying absence seizures has been well-defined in humans and rodents (44, 56). The onset and resolution of paroxysmal generalized spike-and-wave complexes in people with absence and myoclonic seizures are associated with transient activation of the medial frontothalamic network (37, 56). BOLD changes precede the paroxysmal EEG discharge by about 15 s, with initial rises in BOLD signal occipitally, parietally and orbitofrontally (56, 57); nonetheless, the order latency of activations and deactivations can vary widely between subjects (57). The generalized spike-and-wave is followed by sustained decreases in BOLD signal across the frontoparietal cortices. This is one reason for overall decreases in frontoparietal BOLD signal during random sampling in IGE patients.

But even without EEG-fMRI, functional PET was able to demonstrate activation of the corticothalamic network during IPS (46). Furthermore, correlation analyses of CBF changes with resting IED rates also resulted in the activation of the posterior aspects epileptic network (Figure 3C; 56), which included symmetrical activations of the primary visual cortices, occipito- and temporo-parietal association cortices, insula, and sensorimotor cortices, all brain region that were active both ictally and interictally during intracranial EEG recordings (40). However, other brain regions that were activated by IPS and were electrophysiologically active on EEG, namely the anterior cingulate, orbitofrontal cortices, even the thalamus, were either deactivated or not activated. As suggested by EEG-fMRI recordings of absence seizures in humans, near-infrared recordings of oxyhemoglobin, deoxyhemoglobin and total hemoglobin in the GAERS cortex, deoxygenation and CBV are decreased before the onset and after the end of the generalized spike-and-wave discharge (58), which may account for the paradoxical deactivation is these brain regions. Subcortical CBF changes were mainly represented by deactivations in the left caudate and lateral pulvinar nucleus, which were activated during IPS, in the pontine nucle and cerebellum.

This network was also supported by FC analyses comparing 10 epileptic and 10 control baboons, matched for gender, age, and weight (59). Independent component analyses (ICA) identified 14 unique components/networks, and FC maps were generated for each group's brain networks (Figure 4). The epileptic group demonstrated network-specific differences in FC when compared to the control animals: sensitivity and specificity of the two groups' functional connectivity maps differed significantly in the visual, motor, amygdalar, insular, and default mode networks. Significant increases of FC were found in visual cortices of the epilepsy group's maps for the default mode, cingulate, anterior parietal, motor, visual, amygdalar, and thalamic networks. More importantly, Figure 4 demonstrates that the connectivity maps of the visual and parietal networks reconstitute the entire epileptic network, including for the corticothalamic pathways that express generalized ictal and interictal epileptic discharges.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Functional Connectivity Maps for the Visual and Anterior Parietal Networks. Functional connectivity maps are compared between asymptomatic healthy control (CTL) and epileptic (EPI) baboons. Note the increased connectivity of both visual and anterior partial networks to the medial thalamus and frontocentral cortices [Adapted from Epilepsia, reference (59)].

Treatment Effects

Functional neuroimaging can also be used to evaluate acute or chronic treatment effects for anti-seizure medications or devices. We compared FC changes after intravenous injection of valproic acid (VPA 20 mg/kg) and following 1-week of orally administered VPA (20–80 mg/kg/day) between epileptic and control baboons (60). Similar to study above (59), FC was increased in most cortical networks of the epilepsy group, but less so for the subcortical networks (60). After intravenous VPA, FC was increased for the basal ganglia network in the epileptic baboons with respect to the medial frontal cortices, but decreased for longer cortico-cortical pathways. Increased basal ganglia connectivity may reflect an acute upregulation of cortical inhibition by subcortical networks, while decreasing cortico-cortical connectivity is likely to reflect decreased activation of the larger epileptic network. Cortical and basal ganglia connectivity was also increased with pontine nuclei and cerebellum, supporting potential activation of another pathway modulating cortical excitability. After oral VPA therapy, FC in the epileptic baboons approached control values in the amygdalar, precuneus, left parieto-occipital, parietal, orbitofrontal, and secondary visual areas. Increases of FC were noted for the medial frontal/(peri)cingulate and pontine networks, which may reflect brainstem-mediated neuromodulation via activation of biogenic amine secretion and neurotransmission.

In a more recent study, H215O-PET changes were compared between high-frequency (HF; 300 Hz) microburst, and standard, low-frequency (LF; 30 Hz) Vagal Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Therapy in two baboons with GGE, including one with photosensitivity (53). The baboons were selected based on video recordings and scalp EEG studies. Both were implanted with Sentiva™ M1000 devices capable of stimulating at LF- and HF-frequencies. CBF changes were compared for both modes of stimulation and resting scans in the first study. While spontaneous scalp IEDs were reduced in both baboons by HF- and LF-therapies, HF-VNS Therapy completely suppressed IEDs in one baboon (D2). Regional CBF changes were overall consistent between the two modes of therapy in both baboons with respect to the activation of the superior colliculus and cerebellum (Figures 3D1,D2). IED suppression by HF-VNS Therapy in one baboon was associated with bilateral deactivations of the frontal and temporal cortices, anterior cingulate and striatum, and of the medial thalamus, while the pons and cerebellum were both activated (Figure 3D2). Some therapeutic targets for both LF- and HF-VNS Therapy appeared to be subcortical, including the superior colliculus, brainstem nuclei, as well as the cerebellum, all structures that were either deactivated or inactive during IPS or spontaneous IEDs.

Future Directions

Structural and functional neuroimaging has contributed to our understanding of brain networks and pathophysiology underlying GGEs in humans and baboons alike, and the potential for translation is extraordinary. As such, different modalities may be used to characterize brain developmental effects which may contribute to the expression of seizures as well as seizure-induced cortical and subcortical damage. Serial neuroimaging could lead to a new perspective on the natural history of GGE in the baboon and identify neuroimaging biomarkers for epileptogenesis and sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) (61). As demonstrated by the studies above, GMC/GMV measurements and FC connectivity changes could track the evolution of epileptic networks. Quantitative trait analyses could map genetic effects on brain development and connectivity (10, 62). Several newer PET-ligands could contribute to our understanding of neurodevelopmental mechanisms associated with epileptogenesis. As SV2A modulates the exocytosis of synaptic vesicles, SV2A-PET can quantify synapses and synaptic connectivity in the cerebral cortex (63, 64). Translocator protein or TSPO-PET, on the other hand, can evaluate inflammatory changes that may also contribute to epileptogenesis (65). Both can also be used to monitor seizure-related loss of cortical and brainstem neurons. Ultimately, the epileptic baboon model may be used to validate of neuroimaging markers by electrophysiological testing and the availability of brain tissue.

Author Contributions

CS and FS designed the studies and performed the research and analysis. CS wrote the review. FS provided critical input. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

The study utilized the SNPRC grant P51 RR013986 through the NCRR by the Office of Research Infrastructure Programs, P51 OD011133, and was conducted in facilities constructed with support from Research Facilities Improvement Grants C06 RR013556, C06 RR014578, and C06 RR015456. This study was supported by the National Institutes of Health research grants 1 R01 NS047755 to Jeff T. Williams, NIBIB K01 EB006395 to Peter Kochunov, NINDS F32 NS066694 to FS, and SNPRC (NIH) P51 RR013986, NINDS R21 NS065431 and R21 NS084198 and by Livanova (London, UK) to CS. The funders of the research performed by the authors were not involved in the study design, data collection, interpretation of the data, the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for publication.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Fisher RS, Cross JH, D'Souza C, French JA, Haut SR, Higurashi N, et al. Instruction manual for the ILAE 2017 operational classification of seizure types. Epilepsia. (2017) 58:531–42. doi: 10.1111/epi.13671

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Scheffer IE, Berkovic S, Capovilla G, Connolly MB, French J, Guilhoto L, et al. ILAE classification of the epilepsies: position paper of the ILAE commission for classification and terminology. Epilepsia. (2017) 58:512–21. doi: 10.1111/epi.13709

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Killam KF, Naquet R, Bert J. Paroxysmal responses to intermittent light stimulation in a population of baboons (Papio papio). Epilepsia. (1966) 7:215–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1966.tb03798.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Killam KF, Killam EK, Naquet R. An animal model of light sensitive epilepsy. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. (1967) 22:497–513. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(67)90058-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Fischer-Williams M, Poncet M, Riche D, Naquet R. Light-induced epilepsy in the baboon, Papio papio: cortical and depth recordings. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. (1968) 26:557–69. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(68)90235-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Wada JA, Terao A, Booker HE. Longitudinal correlative analysis of the epileptic baboon, Papio papio. Neurology. (1972) 22:1272–85. doi: 10.1212/WNL.22.12.1272

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Killam EK, Starck LG, Killam KF. Photic stimulation in three species of baboons. Life Sci. (1967) 6:1569–74. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(67)90165-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Meldrum BS, Anlezark G, Balzamo E, Horton RW, Trimble M. Photically induced epilepsy in Papio papio as a model for drug studies. In: Meldrum BS, Marsden CD, Editors. Advances in Neurology, Vol. 10. New York, NY: Raven Press (1975). p. 119–32.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

9. Killam EK. Measurement of anticonvulsant activity in the Papio papio model of epilepsy. Fed Proc. (1976) 35:2264–9.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

10. Cox LA, Comuzzie AG, Havill LM, Karere GM, Spradling KD, Mahaney MC, et al. Baboons as a model to study genetics and epigenetics of human diseases. ILAR J. (2013) 54:106–21. doi: 10.1093/ilar/ilt038

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Szabó CÁ, Knape KD, Leland MM, Cwikla DJ, Williams-Blangero S, Williams JT. Epidemiology and characterization of seizures in pedigreed baboon colony. Comp Med. (2012) 62:535–8.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

12. Szabó CÁ, Gonzalez DA, Koneru S. Semiology of spontaneous GTCS in seven epileptic baboons. Epilepsia Open. (2020) 5:213–9. doi: 10.1002/epi4.12388

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Szabó CÁ, Knape KD, Leland MM, Williams JT. Electroclinical phenotypes in a pedigreed baboon colony. Epilepsy Res. (2013) 105:77–85. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2013.02.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Kos MZ, Carless MA, Blondell L, Leland MM, Knape KD, Göring HHH, et al. Whole genome sequence data from captive baboons implicate RBFOX1 in epileptic seizure risk. Front Genet. (2021) 12:714282. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.714282

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Lal D, Trucks H, Møller RS, Hjalgrim H, Koeleman BP, de Kovel CG, et al. Rare exonic deletions of the RBFOX1 gene increase risk of idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Epilepsia. (2013) 54:265–71. doi: 10.1111/epi.12084

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Lal D, Pernhorst K, Klein KM, Reif P, Tozzi R, Toliat MR, et al. Extending the phenotypic spectrum of RBFOX1 deletions: sporadic focal epilepsy. Epilepsia. (2015) 56:e129–133. doi: 10.1111/epi.13076

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Hamada N, Ito H, Iwamoto I, Morishita R, Tabata H, Nagata K. Role of the cytoplasmic isoform of RBFOX1/A2BP1 in establishing the architecture of the developing cerebral cortex. Mol Autism. (2015) 6:56. doi: 10.1186/s13229-015-0049-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Fogel BL, Wexler E, Wahnich A, Friedrich T, Vijayendran C, Gao F, et al. RBFOX1 regulates both splicing and transcriptional networks in human neuronal development. Hum Mol Genet. (2012) 21:4171–86. doi: 10.1093/hmg/dds240

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Rajman M, Metge F, Fiore R, Khudayberdiev S, Aksoy-Aksel A, Bicker S, et al. A microRNA-129-5p/Rbfox crosstalk coordinates homeostatic downscaling of excitatory synapses. EMBO J. (2017) 36:1770–87. doi: 10.15252/embj.201695748

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Riche D, Hantraye P, Guibert B, Naquet R, Loc'h C, Mazière B, et al. Anatomical atlas of the baboon's brain in the orbito-meatal plane used in the experimental positron emission tomography. Brain Res Bull. (1988) 20:283–301. doi: 10.1016/0361-9230(88)90058-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Black KJ, Snyder AZ, Koller JM, Gado MH, Perlmutter JS. Template images for nonhuman primate neuroimaging: 1 baboon. NeuroImage. (2001) 14:736–43. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0752

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Davis R, Huffman RD, Southwest Foundation for Research and Education. A stereotaxic atlas of the brain of the baboon (Papio). Austin, TX: Published for the Southwest Foundation for Research and Education by the University of Texas Press (1968).

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

23. Greer PJ, Villemagne VL, Ruszkiewicz J, Graves AK, Meltzer CC, Mathis CA, et al. MR atlas of the baboon brain for functional neuroimaging. Brain Res Bull. (2002) 58:429–38. doi: 10.1016/S0361-9230(02)00810-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Dauguet J, Delzescaux T, Condé F, Mangin J-F, Ayache N, Hantraye P, et al. Three-dimensional reconstruction of stained histological slices and 3D non-linear registration with in-vivo MRI for whole baboon brain. J Neurosci Meth. (2007) 164:191–204. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.04.017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Love SA, Marie D, Roth M, Lacoste R, Nazarian B, Bertello A, et al. The average baboon brain: MRI templates and tissue probability maps from 89 individuals. Neuroimage. (2016) 132:526–33. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Agaronyan A, Syed R, Kim R, Hsu C-H, Love SA, Hooker JM, et al. A baboon brain atlas for magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography image analysis. Front Neuroanat. (2022) 15:778769. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2021.778769

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Woermann FG, Free SL, Koepp MJ, Sisodiya SM, Duncan JS. Abnormal cerebral structure in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy demonstrated with voxel-based analysis of MRI. Brain. (1999) 122:2101–8. doi: 10.1093/brain/122.11.2101

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Lin K, Jackowski AP, Carrete H, de Araújo Filho GM, Silva HH, Guaranha MS, et al. Voxel-based morphometry evaluation of patients with photosensitive juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. (2009) 86:138–45. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2009.05.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Ronan L, Alhusaini S, Scanlon C, Doherty CP, Delanty N, Fitzsimmons M. Widespread cortical morphologic changes in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy: evidence from structural MRI. Epilepsia. (2012) 53:651–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03413.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Lin JJ, Dabbs K, Riley JD, Jones JE, Jackson DC, Hsu DA, et al. Neurodevelopment in new-onset juvenile myoclonic epilepsy over the first 2 years. Ann Neurol. (2014) 76:660–8. doi: 10.1002/ana.24240

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Kim JH, Lee JK, Koh S-B, Lee S-A, Lee J-M, Sun SI, et al. Regional grey matter abnormalities in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy: a voxel-based morphometry study. Neuroimage. (2007) 37:1132–7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.06.025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Wang Z, Zhang Z, Jiao Q, Liao W, Chen G, Sun K, et al. Impairments of thalamic nuclei in idiopathic generalized epilepsy revealed by a study combining morphological and functional connectivity MRI. PLoS ONE. (2012) 7:e397–401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039701

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Szabó CÁ, De La Garza M, Rice K, Bazan C III, Salinas FS. Colpocephaly in a baboon (Papio hamadryas) pedigree: relationship to the epileptic phenotype. Comp Med. (2016) 66:241–5.

Google Scholar

34. Szabó CÁ, Knape KD, Leland MM, Bauer C, Williams JT. The significance of craniofacial trauma in a baboon colony: a clinical marker of seizures? Comp Med. (2014) 64:1–5.

Google Scholar

35. Szabó CÁ, Kochunov P, Knape KD, McCoy KJM, Leland MM, Lancaster JL, et al. Cortical sulcal areas in baboons (Papio hamadryas spp) with generalized interictal epileptic discharges on scalp EEG. Epilepsy Res. (2011) 93:91–5. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2010.10.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Jones NC, O'Brien TJ, Powell KL. Morphometric changes and molecular mechanisms in rat models of idiopathic generalized epilepsy with absence seizures. Neurosci Lett. (2011) 497:185–93. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.02.039

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Moeller F, Maneshi M, Pittau F, Gholipour T, Bellec P, Dubeau F, et al. Functional connectivity in patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Epilepsia. (2011) 52:515–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02938.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Szabó CÁ, Salinas FS. Voxel-based morphometry in epileptic baboons: parallels to human juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. (2016) 124:34–9. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2016.05.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Young NA, Szabó CÁ, Phelix CE, Fleherty DK, Foust-Yeoman KB, Collins E, et al. Epileptic baboons have lower numbers of neurons in specific areas of cortex. PNAS. (2013) 110:19107–12. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1318894110

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Szabó CÁ, Salinas FS, Leland MM, Caron JL, Narayana S, Hanes MA, et al. Baboon model of generalized epilepsy: continuous intracranial video-EEG monitoring with subdural electrodes. Epilepsy Res. (2012) 101:46–55. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2012.02.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Sinha N, Wang Y, Dauwels J, Kaiser M, Thesen T, Forsyth R, et al. Computer modelling of connectivity change suggests epileptogenesis mechanisms in idiopathic generalised epilepsy. NeuroImage. (2019) 21:101655. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101655

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Symms MR, Barker GJ. Thompson P, Kumari V, Stretton J, Duncan JS, et al. Altered microstructural connectivity in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy: the missing link. Neurol. (2012) 78:1555–9. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182563b44

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Wandschneider B, Centeno PJ, Vollmar C, Symms M, Thompson PJ, Duncan JS, et al. Motor co-activation in siblings of patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy: an imaging endophenotype? Brain. (2014) 137:2469–79. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu175

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Van Luijtelaar G, Mishra AM, Edelbroek P, Coman D, Frankenmolen N, Schnaapsmeerders P, et al. Anti-epilepitogenesis: electrophysiology, diffusion tensor imaging and behavior in a genetic absence model. Neurobiol Dis. (2013) 60:126–38. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2013.08.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Wey H-Y, Li J, Szabó CÁ, Fox PT, Leland MM, Jones L, et al. BOLD fMRI of visual and somatosensory-motor stimulations in baboons. Neuroimage. (2010) 52:1420–7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Szabó CÁ, Shalini Narayana, Kochunov PV, Franklin C, Knape K, Davis MD, et al. PET Imaging in the photosensitive baboon: a case-controlled study. Epilepsia. (2007) 48:245–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00949.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Fox PT, Raichle ME. Stimulus rate determines regional brain blood flow in striate cortex. Ann Neurol. (1985) 17:303–5. doi: 10.1002/ana.410170315

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Mentis MJ, Alexander GE, Grady CL, Horwitz B, Krasuski J, Pietrini P, et al. Frequency variation of a pattern-flash visual stimulus during PET differentially activates brain from striate through frontal cortex. Neuroimage. (1997) 5:116–28. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1997.0256

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Mintun MA, Fox PT, Raichle MEA. highly accurate method of localizing regions of neuronal activation in the human brain with positron emission tomography. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. (1989) 9:96–103. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.1989.13

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Mintun MA, Vlassenko AG, Shulman GL, Snyder AZ. Time-related increase of oxygen utilization in continuously activated human visual cortex. Neuroimage. (2002) 16:531–7. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1114

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Ito H, Takahashi K, Hatazawa J, Kim SG, Kanno I. Changes in human regional cerebral blood flow and cerebral blood volume during visual stimulation measured by positron emission tomography. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. (2001) 21:608–12. doi: 10.1097/00004647-200105000-00015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Szabó CÁ, Narayana S, Franklin C, Knape KD, Davis MD, Fox PT, et al. “Resting” CBF in the epileptic baboon: correlation with ketamine dose and interictal epileptic discharges. Epilepsy Res. (2008) 82:57–63. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2008.07.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Szabó CÁ, Akopian M, Papanastassiou AM, Salinas FS. Cerebral blood flow differences between high- vs low-frequency VNS Therapy in the epileptic baboon. Epilepsy Res. (2022) 180:106862. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2022.106862

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Moeller F, Siebner HR, Ahlgrimm N, Wolff S, Muhle H, Granert O, et al. fMRI activation during spike and wave discharges evoked by photic stimulation. Neuroimage. (2009) 48:682–95. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.07.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Szabó CÁ, Salinas FS, Narayana S. 2011. Functional PET evaluation of the photosensitive baboon. Open Neuroimag J. (2011) 5:206–15. doi: 10.2174/1874440001105010206

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Bai X, Vestal M, Berman R, Negishi M, Spann M, Vega C, et al. Dynamic time course of typical childhood absence seizures: EEG, behavior, and functional magnetic imaging. Neurosci. (2010) 30:5884–93. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5101-09.2010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Benuzzi F, Mirandola L, Pugnaghi M, Farinelli V, Tassinari CA, Capovilla G, et al. Increased cortical BOLD signal anticipates generalized spike and wave discharges in adolescents and adults with idiopathic generalized epilepsies. Epilepsia. (2012) 53:622–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.03385.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Roche-Labarbe N, Zaaimi B, Mahmoudzadeh M, Osharina V, Wallois A, Nehlig A, et al. NIRS-measured oxy- and deoxyhemoglobin changes associated with EEG spike-and-wave discharges in a genetic model of absence epilepsy: the GAERS. Epilepsia. (2010) 51:1374–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02574.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Salinas FS, Szabó CÁ. Resting-state functional connectivity in the baboon model of genetic generalized epilepsy. Epilepsia. (2015) 56:1580–9. doi: 10.1111/epi.13115

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Salinas FS, Szabó CÁ. Resting-state functional connectivity changes due to acute and short-term valproic acid administration in the baboon model of GGE. NeuroImage: Clin. (2017) 16:132–41. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.07.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Mishra AM, Bai H, Gribizis A, Blumenfeld H. Neuroimaging biomarkers of epileptogenesis. Neurosci Lett. (2011) 497:194–204. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.01.076

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Xu Z, Wu C, Pan W. Imaging-wide association study: integrating imaging 889 endophenotypes in GWAS. Neuroimage. (2017) 159:159–69. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.07.036

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Mercier J, Provins L, Valade A. Discovery and development of SV2A PET tracers: potential for imaging synaptic density and clinical applications. Drug Discov Today Technol. (2017) 25:45–52. doi: 10.1016/j.ddtec.2017.11.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Serrano ME, Bahri MA, Becker G, Seret A, Germonpré C, Lemaire C, et al. Exploring with [18F]UCB-H the in vivo variations in SV2A expression through the kainic acid rat model of temporal lobe epilepsy. Mol Imaging Biol. (2020) 22:1197–207. doi: 10.1007/s11307-020-01488-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Werry EL, Bright FM, Piguet O, Ittner LM, Halliday GM, Hodges JR, et al. Recent developments in TSPO PET Imaging as a biomarker of neuroinflammation in neurodegenerative disorders. Int J Mol Sci. (2019) 20:3161. doi: 10.3390/ijms20133161

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Glossary

Keywords: neuroimaging, genetic generalized epilepsy, baboon, PET, MRI

Citation: Szabo CA and Salinas FS (2022) Neuroimaging in the Epileptic Baboon. Front. Vet. Sci. 9:908801. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.908801

Received: 31 March 2022; Accepted: 23 June 2022;
Published: 14 July 2022.

Edited by:

Holger Andreas Volk, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Germany

Reviewed by:

Jens P. Bankstahl, Hannover Medical School, Germany
Sung-Ho Lee, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States
Shalini Narayana, University of Tennessee Health Science Center (UTHSC), United States

Copyright © 2022 Szabo and Salinas. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: C. Akos Szabo, szabo@uthscsa.edu

Download