Skip to main content

OPINION article

Front. Psychiatry, 24 July 2020
Sec. Psychopharmacology

Why Do Psychiatrists Still Prescribe Valproate to Women of Childbearing Potential?

  • Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia

Introduction

Valproic acid (VPA) is one of the most frequently prescribed anti-seizure medications (ASMs) (1). VPA has the widest spectrum of use among ASMs, being effective against all seizure types at an efficacy comparable to those of alternative ASMs. VPA is especially effective against absence seizures and juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (2). This drug is used widely in psychiatric practice, mainly in the treatment of acute episodes of bipolar disorder and for episode prophylaxis (3).

Teratogenicity of Valproate

The first observations of teratogenic effects of VPA were reported in the early 1980s (4, 5). Since that time, analyses of data from different pregnancy registries have consistently shown that maternal VPA use during pregnancy increases the risk of birth defects in fetuses and infants (68). VPA use during the first trimester of pregnancy is related to increased risks of spina bifida, craniosynostosis, cleft palate, hypospadias, atrial septal defects, and polydactyly. The risks of teratogenic side effects are generally two to three times greater for VPA than for other ASM monotherapies (9). The risk of fetal malformations associated with maternal polytherapy depends mainly on whether the regimen includes VPA (10, 11). Recent reports emphasize that the teratogenic effect of VPA is dose related; the risk of major congenital malformations associated with VPA doses < 700 mg/day seems to be comparable to those associated with other ASMs (12). There are reports of impaired intellectual and behavioral development among children who were exposed to VPA in utero. School-aged children of mothers who were treated with VPA during pregnancy are at increased risk of having lower verbal intelligence quotient scores than are children exposed to other ASMs, such as carbamazepine and phenytoin, and those with no ASM exposure (13). Studies have also demonstrated associations between fetal VPA exposure and the risks of autism and autism spectrum disorder (14). In addition, data from the Neurodevelopmental Effects of Antiepileptic Drugs study suggest that fetal VPA exposure is related to attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (15).

The precise molecular mechanism of VPA teratogenicity is unknown. VPA increases the formation of reactive oxygen species and induces apoptosis in post-implantation embryos (16), and it inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor expression and activity (17). It alters the Wnt and mTOR signaling pathways, which play important roles in the pathogenesis of autism spectrum disorder (18). However, the main cause of teratogenicity is probably VPA’s promotion of histone acetylation via histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibition. HDAC inhibition could affect the expression levels of 2%–5% of all genes (19). This characteristic of VPA appears to have significant impacts on embryogenesis (20), with an increased rate of teratogenic side effects among children exposed to this medication in utero (21).

Guidelines

Accumulating evidence regarding the teratogenicity of VPA has led to discussions in the medical and scientific communities in the last decade, which have resulted in regulatory agency actions. In 2013, the US Food and Drug Administration recommended not to use of VPA-based prescription to pregnant women and those of childbearing potential (22). In 2014, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) strengthened its warnings regarding VPA use by females. The agency proposed that, when treatment with VPA was unavoidable, women of childbearing potential should use effective contraception and VPA treatment should be managed by doctors experienced in treating the corresponding conditions. Thereafter, the Commission on European Affairs of the International League Against Epilepsy (CEA-ILAE) and the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) developed specific recommendations for the avoidance of VPA use in women of childbearing potential and VPA prescription as a first-line treatment for focal epilepsy. For epilepsy syndromes that are treated most effectively with VPA, the recommendations specify that this drug be offered to females only after risk–benefit assessment and discussion with the patient and/or her representatives. When possible, VPA doses not exceeding 500–600 mg/day are recommended, although higher doses may be used to achieve seizure freedom (23). After French national data showed unsatisfactory effects of the restrictions established in 2014 (24), the EMA adopted a new procedure that resulted in the publication of renewed restrictive measures in May 2018 (25, 26). The EMA prohibited the use of VPA for bipolar disorder and migraine, as well as VPA use for epilepsy during pregnancy, unless no alternative effective treatment was available. Many other national medicine agencies worldwide have issued similar recommendations in recent years; generally, VPA prescription to young females is allowed only in cases of diagnosed epilepsy in which seizures cannot be controlled by other ASMs (2729).

The Impact of Regulatory Restrictions on Valproate Prescriptions

During the last decade, several papers on the impacts of these restrictions on VPA prescription patterns were published. One of the first studies addressing this issue was conducted in Ireland, where VPA prescription trends were assessed during the period of 2008–2013. The rate of VPA prescription to women aged 15–44 years declined slightly from 3.5/1,000 eligible population in 2008 to 3.14/1,000 in 2013. This declining trend was more obvious for women with epilepsy, but VPA prescription rates for other indications increased (30). A report from the UK showed a significant increase in VPA prescription to young females with bipolar disorder from 1995 to 2007 (31). Similarly, US data on individual prescriptions given during patients’ visits to office-based physicians and outpatient clinics in 1996–2007 showed that 83% of VPA prescriptions were issued to females without epilepsy, and that 74% of these prescriptions were for psychiatric diagnoses. The rate of ASM prescription among women without epilepsy increased more than three times during the study period, whereas the VPA prescription rate remained relatively stable (32). In a Florida Medicaid study, despite the overall decline in VPA use among pregnant women, the use of VPA for psychiatric disorders remained stable (33). Data from the Australian Register of ASMs in Pregnancy for the period 1999–2007 showed that VPA prescription to pregnant women decreased over time, but that VPA prescription trends in the general population increased, possibly related to the expanded use of the drug for psychiatric indications, especially bipolar disorder (34). More recent data from Sweden showed that the 2014 regulation significantly influenced the rate of VPA prescription to young females with psychiatric diagnoses. A comparable decline in the rate of VPA prescription to females with epilepsy began earlier, suggesting that psychiatrists became aware of VPA-associated fetal risks significantly later than did neurologists. (35). A study from Estonia shows a similar phenomenon; the increasing trend in VPA utilization among reproductive-aged women ended after the 2014 publication of the EMA restrictions, due mainly to declines in neurologists’ prescription rates. However, this regulatory did not changed VPA prescription rates among psychiatrists (36). Despite the availability of a massive amount of information about VPA-related fetal risks, psychiatric disorders remain the indications prompting about 40%–50% (or even more) of prescriptions of the drug to young females in many countries (32, 3538). This phenomenon is incomprehensible and disturbing, as the drug is most effective in subgroups of patients with epilepsy (e.g., those with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy) and cannot be replaced among these patients without the risk of a significant increase in seizure frequency. However, no such subgroup of psychiatric patients is known; VPA can be replaced by lithium or antipsychotics for these patients. A meta-analysis of randomized control trials showed that VPA was probably less effective than haloperidol, olanzapine, and quetiapine as monotherapy for patients with acute mania episodes (39). In the treatment of bipolar depression, quetiapine, lurasidone, lithium, and lamotrigine in combination with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are at least as effective as VPA (4042). In addition, lamotrigine is known to have one of the lowest teratogenic potentials among studied ASMs (43).

Discussion

So, why do psychiatrists still prescribe VPA for the treatment of psychiatric disorders in women of childbearing potential? The reasons for such prescription are not clear, but several potential explanations can be offered. The discussion about risks associated with fetal VPA exposure has proceeded mainly in epilepsy-related medical journals, which are read by neurologists. Epileptologists did not agree with some of the recommendations included in the 2014 EMA warning. For example, the EMA recommended trying less-appropriate ASMs before VPA prescription to women with VPA-responsive epileptic syndrome. It also advised doctors to “consider treatment alternatives if a female becomes pregnant.” This recommendation could lead to attempts to replace VPA with other medications, which could result in increased seizure frequency during pregnancy. As a result of these concerns, the CEA-ILAE and EAN developed specific recommendations for VPA use by young females with epilepsy, which was covered widely in neurology-related journals and at international neurological meetings (23). Psychiatrists did not participate in this discussion; psychiatric journals contain only sporadic articles addressing this issue (3, 38, 44, 45). Another reason could be the inconsistency of recommendations in available guidelines. Although information about VPA-associated fetal risks exists and important advice is available, some guidelines lack a set of mandatory and binding rules. Some guidelines call for the discussion of VPA-associated risks with patients and attention to contraceptive and folic acid use (38), whereas others, such as those of The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, states that “VPA must not be used in women and girls of childbearing potential (including young girls who are likely to require treatment into their childbearing years), unless other options are unsuitable and a pregnancy prevention program is in place” (46). The majority of guidelines related to VPA-associated fetal risks focus on the treatment of women with epilepsy, explaining the greater awareness of these risks in the neurological community and lack of awareness among psychiatrists (38).

To conclude, medical specialists should be aware of the wide range of risks associated with VPA prescription to young females, especially when a broad range of alternative treatments is available. Relevant organizations should intensify their efforts to develop and implement strict and unified interdisciplinary guidelines regarding VPA use in women of childbearing potential. In addition, more efforts should focus on informing psychiatrists about VPA-related fetal risks.

Author Contributions

The author confirms being the sole contributor of this work and has approved it for publication.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

1. Perucca E. Pharmacological and therapeutic properties of valproate: a summary after 35 years of clinical experience. CNS Drugs (2002) 16(10):695–714. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200216100-00004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Glauser T, Ben-Menachem E, Bourgeois B, Cnaan A, Guerreiro C, Kalviainen R, et al. Updated ILAE evidence review of antiepileptic drug efficacy and effectiveness as initial monotherapy for epileptic seizures and syndromes. Epilepsia (2013) 54(3):551–63. doi: 10.1111/epi.12074

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Baldwin DS, Amaro HJF. Prescription of Valproate-Containing Medicines in Women of Childbearing Potential who have Psychiatric Disorders: Is It Worth the Risk? CNS Drugs (2020) 34(2):163–9. doi: 10.1007/s40263-019-00694-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Gomez MR. Possible teratogenicity of valproic acid. J Pediatr (1981) 98(3):508–9. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(81)80743-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Robert E, Guibaud P. Maternal valproic acid and congenital neural tube defects. Lancet (London England) (1982) 2(8304):937. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(82)90908-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Campbell E, Kennedy F, Russell A, Smithson WH, Parsons L, Morrison PJ, et al. Malformation risks of antiepileptic drug monotherapies in pregnancy: updated results from the UK and Ireland Epilepsy and Pregnancy Registers. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry (2014) 85(9):1029–34. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2013-306318

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Hernandez-Diaz S, Smith CR, Shen A, Mittendorf R, Hauser WA, Yerby M, et al. Comparative safety of antiepileptic drugs during pregnancy. Neurology (2012) 78(21):1692–9. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182574f39

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Tomson T, Battino D, Bonizzoni E, Craig J, Lindhout D, Sabers A, et al. Dose-dependent risk of malformations with antiepileptic drugs: an analysis of data from the EURAP epilepsy and pregnancy registry. Lancet Neurol (2011) 10(7):609–17. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70107-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Tomson T, Battino D, Perucca E. Valproic acid after five decades of use in epilepsy: time to reconsider the indications of a time-honoured drug. Lancet Neurol (2015) 15(2):210–8. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00314-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Holmes LB, Mittendorf R, Shen A, Smith CR, Hernandez-Diaz S. Fetal effects of anticonvulsant polytherapies: different risks from different drug combinations. Arch Neurol (2011) 68(10):1275–81. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2011.133

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Vajda FJ, Hitchcock AA, Graham J, O’Brien TJ, Lander CM, Eadie MJ. The teratogenic risk of antiepileptic drug polytherapy. Epilepsia (2010) 51(5):805–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02336.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Tomson T, Battino D, Bonizzoni E, Craig J, Lindhout D, Perucca E, et al. Dose-dependent teratogenicity of valproate in mono- and polytherapy: an observational study. Neurology (2015) 85(10):866–72. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001772

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Adab N, Kini U, Vinten J, Ayres J, Baker G, Clayton-Smith J, et al. The longer term outcome of children born to mothers with epilepsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry (2004) 75(11):1575–83. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2003.029132

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Christensen J, Gronborg TK, Sorensen MJ, Schendel D, Parner ET, Pedersen LH, et al. Prenatal valproate exposure and risk of autism spectrum disorders and childhood autism. Jama (2013) 309(16):1696–703. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.2270

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Cohen MJ, Meador KJ, Browning N, May R, Baker GA, Clayton-Smith J, et al. Fetal antiepileptic drug exposure: Adaptive and emotional/behavioral functioning at age 6years. Epilepsy Behav E&B (2013) 29(2):308–15. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2013.08.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Tung EW, Winn LM. Valproic acid increases formation of reactive oxygen species and induces apoptosis in postimplantation embryos: a role for oxidative stress in valproic acid-induced neural tube defects. Mol Pharmacol (2011) 80(6):979–87. doi: 10.1124/mol.111.072314

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Shiva Shankar TV, Willems L. Epigenetic modulators mitigate angiogenesis through a complex transcriptomic network. Vasc Pharmacol (2014) 60(2):57–66. doi: 10.1016/j.vph.2014.01.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Qin L, Dai X, Yin Y. Valproic acid exposure sequentially activates Wnt and mTOR pathways in rats. Mol Cell Neurosci (2016) 75:27–35. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2016.06.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Van Lint C, Emiliani S, Verdin E. The expression of a small fraction of cellular genes is changed in response to histone hyperacetylation. Gene Expression (1996) 5(4–5):245–53.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

20. Phiel CJ, Zhang F, Huang EY, Guenther MG, Lazar MA, Klein PS. Histone deacetylase is a direct target of valproic acid, a potent anticonvulsant, mood stabilizer, and teratogen. J Biol Chem (2001) 276(39):36734–41. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M101287200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Tomson T, Battino D. Teratogenic effects of antiepileptic drugs. Lancet Neurol (2012) 11(9):803–13. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70103-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. US Food and Drug Administration. (2013). Valproate Anti-seizure Products Contraindicated for Migraine Prevention in Pregnant Women due to Decreased IQ Scores in Exposed Children. US Food and Drug Administration. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-drug-safety-communication-valproate-anti-seizure-products-contraindicated-migraine-prevention

Google Scholar

23. Tomson T, Marson A, Boon P, Canevini MP, Covanis A, Gaily E, et al. Valproate in the treatment of epilepsy in girls and women of childbearing potential. Epilepsia (2015) 56(7):1006–19. doi: 10.1111/epi.13021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Degremont A, Le Nautout B, Oger E, Biraben A, Polard E, Nowak E. Impact of the French Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products communication on sodium valproate prescription in women of childbearing potential age. Rev D’Épidémiol Santé Publique (2018) 66:S426–S7. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2018.05.522

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. EMA/145600/2018. EMA. (2018). New measures to avoid valproate exposure in pregnancy endorsed. Member State representatives agree new restrictions and pregnancy prevention programme. European Medicines Agency (EMA). Available at: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/press-release/new-measures-avoid-valproate-exposure-pregnancy-endorsed_en.pdf

Google Scholar

26. EMA/375438/2018. EMA. (2018). New measures to avoid valproate exposure in pregnancy endorsed. Member State representatives agree new restrictions and pregnancy prevention programme. European Medicines Agency (EMA). Available at: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/referral/valproate-article-31-referral-new-measures-avoid-valproate-exposure-pregnancy-endorsed_en-0.pdf

Google Scholar

27. Malhi GS, Bassett D, Boyce P, Bryant R, Fitzgerald PB, Fritz K, et al. Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guidelines for mood disorders. Aust New Z J Psychiatry (2015) 49(12):1087–206. doi: 10.1177/0004867415617657

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. CADTH. (2011). Canadian Agency for Drug and Technologies in Health. Pharmacological treatments in patients with epilepsy: guidelines. Canadian Agency for Drug and Technologies in Health (CADTH). Available at: https://www.cadth.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/htis/april-2011/K0338_Guidelines_for_Treatment_of_Epilepsy_final.pdf

Google Scholar

29. MHRA. (2018). Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Valproate use by women and girls. Medicines and Health products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). Available at: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/valproate-use-by-women-and-girls

Google Scholar

30. Murphy S, Bennett K, Doherty CP. Prescribing trends for sodium valproate in Ireland. Seizure J Br Epilepsy Association (2016) 36:44–8. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2016.01.019

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Hayes J, Prah P, Nazareth I, King M, Walters K, Petersen I, et al. Prescribing trends in bipolar disorder: cohort study in the United Kingdom THIN primary care database 1995-2009. PloS One (2011) 6(12):e28725. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028725

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Adedinsewo DA, Thurman DJ, Luo YH, Williamson RS, Odewole OA, Oakley GP Jr. Valproate prescriptions for nonepilepsy disorders in reproductive-age women. Birth Defects Res Part A Clin Mol Teratol (2013) 97(6):403–8. doi: 10.1002/bdra.23147

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Wen X, Meador KJ, Hartzema A. Antiepileptic drug use by pregnant women enrolled in Florida Medicaid. Neurology (2015) 84(9):944–50. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001304

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Vajda FJ, Hollingworth S, Graham J, Hitchcock AA, O’Brien TJ, Lander CM, et al. Changing patterns of antiepileptic drug use in pregnant Australian women. Acta Neurol Scandinavica (2010) 121(2):89–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2009.01260.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Karlsson Lind L, Komen J, Wettermark B, von Euler M, Tomson T. Valproic acid utilization among girls and women in Stockholm: Impact of regulatory restrictions. Epilepsia Open (2018) 3(3):357–63. doi: 10.1002/epi4.12228

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Kurvits K, Laius O, Uuskula M, Haldre S, Rakitin A. Valproic acid prescription trends among females of childbearing age in Estonia: A 14-year nationwide prescription database study. Seizure J Br Epilepsy Association (2020) 76:28–31. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2020.01.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Virta LJ, Kalviainen R, Villikka K, Keranen T. Declining trend in valproate use in Finland among females of childbearing age in 2012-2016 - a nationwide registry-based outpatient study. Eur J Neurol (2018) 25(6):869–74. doi: 10.1111/ene.13610

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Gotlib D, Ramaswamy R, Kurlander JE, DeRiggi A, Riba M. Valproic Acid in Women and Girls of Childbearing Age. Curr Psychiatry Rep (2017) 19(9):58. doi: 10.1007/s11920-017-0809-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Cipriani A, Barbui C, Salanti G, Rendell J, Brown R, Stockton S, et al. Comparative efficacy and acceptability of antimanic drugs in acute mania: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis. Lancet (London England) (2011) 378(9799):1306–15. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60873-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Taylor DM, Cornelius V, Smith L, Young AH. Comparative efficacy and acceptability of drug treatments for bipolar depression: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis. Acta Psychiatr Scandinavica (2014) 130(6):452–69. doi: 10.1111/acps.12343

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Goodwin GM, Haddad PM, Ferrier IN, Aronson JK, Barnes T, Cipriani A, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for treating bipolar disorder: Revised third edition recommendations from the British Association for Psychopharmacology. J Psychopharmacol (Oxford England) (2016) 30(6):495–553. doi: 10.1177/0269881116636545

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Loebel A, Cucchiaro J, Silva R, Kroger H, Hsu J, Sarma K, et al. Lurasidone monotherapy in the treatment of bipolar I depression: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Am J Psychiatry (2014) 171(2):160–8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13070984

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Veroniki AA, Cogo E, Rios P, Straus SE, Finkelstein Y, Kealey R, et al. Comparative safety of anti-epileptic drugs during pregnancy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of congenital malformations and prenatal outcomes. BMC Med (2017) 15(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0845-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Owens DC. Sodium valproate in psychiatric practice: time for a change in perception. Br J Psychiatry J Ment Sci (2019) 215:516–8. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2019.137

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Wieck A, Rao S, Sein K, Haddad PM. A survey of antiepileptic prescribing to women of childbearing potential in psychiatry. Arch Women’s Ment Health (2007) 10(2):83–5. doi: 10.1007/s00737-007-0175-y

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. NICE. (2020). Bipolar disorder: the assessment and management. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg185

Google Scholar

Keywords: congenital malformation, valproate, valproat sodium, valproate (CID 3121), teratogenicity, fetal abnormalities

Citation: Rakitin A (2020) Why Do Psychiatrists Still Prescribe Valproate to Women of Childbearing Potential? Front. Psychiatry 11:739. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00739

Received: 23 May 2020; Accepted: 14 July 2020;
Published: 24 July 2020.

Edited by:

Mirko Manchia, University of Cagliari, Italy

Reviewed by:

Sarah Kittel-Schneider, University Hospital Würzburg, Germany

Copyright © 2020 Rakitin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Aleksei Rakitin, aleksei.rakitin@kliinikum.ee

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.