Guillaume Decros1*
Pierre Baldet1
Bertrand Beauvoit1
Rebecca Stevens2Amélie Flandin1,3
Sophie Colombié1
Yves Gibon1,3
Pierre Pétriacq1,3*- 1UMR 1332 BFP, INRA, Univ. Bordeaux, Villenave d’Ornon, France
- 2UR-1052 GAFL, INRA, CS60094, Montfavet, France
- 3MetaboHUB-Bordeaux, MetaboHUB, Phenome-Emphasis, Villenave d’Ornon, France
Plant central metabolism generates reactive oxygen species (ROS), which are key regulators that mediate signalling pathways involved in developmental processes and plant responses to environmental fluctuations. These highly reactive metabolites can lead to cellular damage when the reduction-oxidation (redox) homeostasis becomes unbalanced. Whilst decades of research have studied redox homeostasis in leaves, fundamental knowledge in fruit biology is still fragmentary. This is even more surprising when considering the natural profusion of fruit antioxidants that can process ROS and benefit human health. In this review, we explore redox biology in fruit and provide an overview of fruit antioxidants with recent examples. We further examine the central role of the redox hub in signalling during development and stress, with particular emphasis on ascorbate, also referred to as vitamin C. Progress in understanding the molecular mechanisms involved in the redox regulations that are linked to central metabolism and stress pathways will help to define novel strategies for optimising fruit nutritional quality, fruit production and storage.
Introduction
Reduction-oxidation (redox) processes are a major consequence of the presence of ground-state oxygen gas (O2, constituting c.a. 20.8% of the atmosphere) as a natural oxidant on Earth. Photosynthetic organisms (e.g. cyanobacteria, green algae, plants) produced O2 by the light-driven splitting of water (H2O) during oxygenic photosynthesis (Foyer, 2018). In other words, photosynthesis functionally houses redox reactions in plants that are underpinned by the transfer of electrons between a donor and an acceptor. Consequently, this redox biochemistry generates the so-called reactive oxygen species (ROS). In tissues with low or no photosynthesis, such as roots and fruits, mitochondria can also drive the flow of electrons, thereby generating energy and ROS (Schertl and Braun, 2014).
Reactive oxygen species encompass highly reactive molecules that are partially reduced or excited forms of O2 including singlet oxygen (1O2), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), the superoxide anion (O2•−) and the hydroxyl radical (OH•) (Apel and Hirt, 2004) (Figure 1A). Decades of research on redox biology pointed to a dual role for ROS both as toxic by-products of aerobic metabolism and as powerful signals that modulate plant functions (Mittler et al., 2011; Mittler, 2017; Foyer, 2018). With respect to this ambivalent concept, several ROS (e.g. H2O2) are produced during plant metabolism and development and in response to a fluctuating environment.
Figure 1 Basics of ROS biology in plants. (A) Main reactive oxygen species (ROS) formed from atmospheric oxygen (O2). (B) Major sources of ROS in plant cells. Excited triplet chlorophylls (Chl) can exacerbate the formation of singlet oxygen, mostly by the photosystem (PS) II reaction centre by photodynamic activation of ground-state oxygen (Fischer et al., 2013). In addition to singlet oxygen, superoxide and hydrogen peroxide can be formed in the chloroplast through the reduction of molecular oxygen, especially by the PSI. The four main complexes (CI–CIV) of the mitochondrial electron transport chain (mtETC) and the ATP synthase (CV) are represented in yellow. Among these complexes, CI (EC 1.6.5.3, NADH: ubiquinone oxidoreductase), CII (EC 1.3.5.1, succinate dehydrogenase) and CIII (EC 1.10.2.2, ubiquinol: cytochrome C oxidoreductase) are ROS-generating systems (Quinlan et al., 2012). mtETC, mitochondrial electron transfer chain; PRX, peroxidase; TCA, tricarboxylic acid; CI-V, complex I-V; AOX, alternative oxidase; AltDH, alternative dehydrogenase; cyt. c, cytochrome c; RuBP, ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate; PGA, phosphoglycerate; Sugar-P, sugar-phosphate; PS, photosystem.
Fruits, including fleshy fruits, are peculiar plant organs of great economic importance (e.g. 866 Mt worldwide in 2016, www.fao.org/faostat). They constitute a remarkable source of food worldwide and contain a plethora of natural compounds with various benefits for human health and nutrition, including vitamins, nutrients, fibres, proteins and minerals (Baldet et al., 2014; Rodriguez-Casado, 2016; Padayachee et al., 2017). Despite having high concentrations in carbohydrates, fruits usually exhibit reduced photosynthetic activity, but sometimes high respiration rates, in particular for climacteric fruits, such as tomato (Roch et al., 2019). As for other vegetative plant tissues, fruit biology involves redox reactions and generates ROS. Some fruits are major sources of antioxidants, such as ascorbate, which scavenge ROS (Gest et al., 2013b; Smirnoff, 2018).
To date, there is no global overview of the involvement of oxidative metabolism in fruit biology, despite some fairly recent reviews on ripening and photo-oxidative stress (Tian et al., 2013; Osorio et al., 2013a; Cocaliadis et al., 2014; Muñoz and Munné-Bosch, 2018). This present review aims at updating our current knowledge on redox biology of fleshy fruits. We provide an overview of the profusion of natural compounds having antioxidant properties and examine the importance of redox regulation in plant metabolism for development and stress responses. We also discuss the relevance of metabolic modelling for the study of redox fluxes in plants, which should help to improve knowledge on the link between metabolism and cell redox status and therefore to evaluate strategies for optimal fruit production and storage.
The Basics of Redox Biology in Plant Cells
For decades, redox signalling has been perceived as a balance between low levels of ROS acting as signals to trigger signalling cascades that adjust plant functions and high levels of ROS causing oxidative cellular damage (Apel and Hirt, 2004). Currently, the paradigm of redox biology tends to display a bigger and clearer picture of the redox network, especially in plants where multiple sources of ROS are possible and associated with many ‘ROS-processing systems’ (Noctor et al., 2018). Spatial, temporal, metabolic and antioxidant specificities are multiple factors that can influence redox signalling. Whilst redox biology in fruit is clearly fragmentary, the concepts that originate from foliar tissues are useful whilst waiting for comprehensive studies that bring more substantial levels of knowledge. This section briefly describes the major sources of ROS that are found in plant cells and the systems that process them.
ROS Formation in Plants
The three main sources of plant ROS are the chloroplastic photosynthesis, the mitochondrial respiration and the peroxisomal photorespiration cycle (Figure 1B). The photosynthetic transport chain is assumed to be the major source of plant ROS in photosynthetic tissues. Superoxide can directly exert its signalling function or be chemically reduced or dismutated to H2O2. Dismutation of H2O2 can be accelerated by superoxide dismutases (SODs; EC 1.15.1.1), which are pivotal in regulating the redox status of the plant cell (Smirnoff and Arnaud, 2019). Importantly, H2O2 is more likely to trigger transduction signals over longer cellular distances (e.g. into the nucleus) as it has a longer lifespan, a greater diffusion distance and stability as compared to 1O2 (Exposito-Rodriguez et al., 2017; Mittler, 2017).
The photorespiratory cycle makes photosynthesis possible by scavenging 2-phosphoglycolate, which is toxic for the cell (Hodges et al., 2016). This highly compartmentalised pathway involving the chloroplast, peroxisome and mitochondrion is critical in generating H2O2 through the activity of peroxisomal glycolate oxidase (EC 1.1.3.15). Of course, the contribution of peroxisomal volume to total cell volume is small: 1% for peroxisomes compared to 12% for chloroplasts in leaves (Queval et al., 2011). Nonetheless, peroxisomes are predicted to be a major source of hydrogen peroxide in active photorespiratory cells. Furthermore, photorespiration-driven H2O2 is solely dismutated by peroxisomal catalase, which is commonly used as a redox marker of the peroxisome (Smirnoff and Arnaud, 2019, 202). In fruit, a high activity of the ascorbate recycling enzyme monodehydroascorbate reductase was observed in tomato fruit peroxisomes (Gest et al., 2013a), which supports the idea of an important role for peroxisomes in fruit redox homeostasis.
In nonphotosynthetic tissues, energy mostly originates from mitochondrial activity, which also contributes to generate ROS (Quinlan et al., 2012) (Figure 1B). The tricarboxylic acid cycle reduces NAD+ into NADH in the mitochondrion, which is fundamental to ensure that cellular respiration produces ATP via oxidative phosphorylation (Millar et al., 2011) (Figure 1B). Thus, mitochondria are tightly linked to NAD(H) turnover (Gakière et al., 2018a). As for the chloroplast, specific SODs dismutate rapidly O2•− into H2O2 (Smirnoff and Arnaud, 2019). Besides ROS-generating systems, plant mitochondria specifically harbour alternative NADP(H) dehydrogenases that face both the matrix and the intermembrane space, as well as alternative oxidase (AOX) (Figure 1B). These enzymes are alternative respiratory routes, which do not produce energy, but allow viability when the enzymes of the main pathway are affected (Rasmusson et al., 2008, Rasmusson et al., 2009; Schertl and Braun, 2014). Alternative NADP(H) dehydrogenases can remove excess of reducing power in the mitochondria, which will balance the redox poise.
In addition, plant ROS can originate from other ROS-generating systems, including NADPH and xanthine oxidases. The NADPH oxidases (EC 1.6.3.1) are well-studied key players in ROS production (Figure 1B), most particularly with respect to biotic and abiotic environmental stresses (Torres and Dangl, 2005; Suzuki et al., 2011; Mittler, 2017). Xanthine dehydrogenases (EC 1.17.1.4, XDH) are important enzymes involved in the hydroxylation of hypoxanthine to xanthine, but can also form O2•− when molecular oxygen is used as the electron acceptor. Whilst XDHs in mammals can be converted into xanthine oxidases that produce both O2•− and H2O2, plant XDHs only form O2•−, which can be swiftly dismutated into H2O2 (Yesbergenova et al., 2005; Ma et al., 2016). In complement, class III peroxidases (PXs; EC 1.11.1.7) are heme-containing enzymes that produce O2•− and H2O2 at the apoplast (Bindschedler et al., 2006; Cosio and Dunand, 2009; Daudi et al., 2012), although H2O2 formation is favoured at high pH in the presence of reductants (O’Brien et al., 2012). Peroxidases are also able to oxidise a donor and thereby process H2O2 (Lüthje and Martinez-Cortes, 2018).
For fruit tissues, however, knowledge is still lacking on the exact contribution of each source of ROS. Of course, due to low photosynthetic metabolism in fruit, one could predict different contributions than for leaves, which further depends on the plant species that exhibit diverse biochemical pathways able to scavenge and process cellular ROS. Even though mitochondria, peroxisomes and the apoplast are assumed to be leaders in ROS production in flowers and fruits (Qin et al., 2009a, Qin et al., 2009b; Rogers and Munné-Bosch, 2016), further research on fruit ROS is necessary to unveil the actual ROS-generating compartments and processes that mostly contribute to ROS production in fruit tissues.
Systems for ROS Scavenging and Processing in Plants
Reactive oxygen species produced in the plant cell can be scavenged, or processed, by highly efficient antioxidant systems. If this were not the case, ROS levels exceeding the requirement of metabolic processes would damage cellular structures and functions involving nucleic acids, proteins and lipids (Apel and Hirt, 2004; Muñoz and Munné-Bosch, 2018). Antioxidants include metabolites with antioxidant properties, which in fruit are profuse in their diversity and quantity and are found in all organelles. Besides metabolites, the antioxidant machinery is composed of a few major enzymes that rapidly process ROS, i.e. catalase (CAT; EC 1.11.1.21), SOD (EC 1.15.1.1), ascorbate peroxidase (APX; EC 1.11.1.11), monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDHAR; EC 1.6.5.4), dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR; EC 1.8.5.1), glutathione S-transferase (GST; EC 2.5.1.18), glutathione peroxidase (GPX; EC 1.11.1.9), glutathione reductase (GR; EC 1.8.1.7) and guaiacol peroxidase (GX; EC 1.11.1.7). Hence, redox biology presents another level of ambiguity as enzymes such as peroxidase or dismutase can be considered as both ROS-generating and ROS-processing components (Figure 2). These enzymes tightly link to the pool of the redox buffers ascorbate, glutathione and pyridine nucleotides, which serve as reductants to recycle repeatedly glutathione and ascorbate via the so-called Foyer-Halliwell (or ascorbate-glutathione) cycle (Foyer and Noctor, 2011) (Figure 2). In addition, thioredoxins (TRXs) are widely distributed small proteins, which modulate the redox state of target proteins via transfer reactions of thiol-disulphide using NADP(H) as a cofactor (Geigenberger et al., 2017). These ROS-processing systems are also important for fruit metabolism, and they could link to developmental processes or responses to environmental changes, as we detail further below.
Figure 2 Major cellular redox buffers: a ménage-à-trois to process ROS. Plain and dashed arrows represent enzymatic and nonenzymatic reactions, respectively. ASC, reduced ascorbate; APX, ascorbate peroxidase; CAT, catalase; DHA, dehydroascorbate; DHAR, dehydroascorbate reductase; GSH, reduced glutathione; GSSG, glutathione disulphide; GR, glutathione reductase; GRX, glutaredoxin; GST, glutathione S-transferase; MDHA, monodehydroascorbate; MDHAR, monodehydroascorbate reductase; PRX, GRX-dependent peroxiredoxin; ROH, organic compound with alcohol group; ROOH, organic compound with peroxide group; SOD, superoxide dismutase.
Fruit Antioxidants
Fruits, especially citrus and berry fruits, are well-known sources of antioxidants conferring plenty of beneficial effects for human health (Gomes-Rochette et al., 2016). Because of their intricate oxidative metabolism (ROS production, described above), plants have developed a wide range of antioxidant metabolites as well as pathways to synthetize, catabolise and regenerate them. Basically, antioxidants refer to all biomolecules, including metabolites, which can process ROS and/or reactive nitrogen species to delay or avoid cell damage and for signalling processes (Nimse and Pal, 2015). Antioxidants can be distributed into several biochemical classes (Figure 3), including phenolics, terpenoids, thiol derivatives and vitamins, for which common metabolites and their antioxidant mechanisms are listed in Table 1. Terpenoids, also known as isoprenoids for their core structure, can be divided into several classes based on their carbon skeleton, and among them, carotenoids are the main group with more than 600 having been identified and characterised (Graßmann, 2005). They are pigments used for light harvesting, preventing photo-oxidation and increasing fruit attractiveness for seed dispersion (Young and Lowe, 2018). Carotenoids among other terpenoids are widely studied with respect to their antioxidant properties and biological effects in plants and mammals. Whilst antioxidants are often shared by plant species, most plant families have developed their own range of specific antioxidant metabolites within their botanical taxa. Quite importantly, some major redox buffers shared between species, such as ferredoxins, pyridine nucleotides, TRXs, glutathione and ascorbate, can be distinguished as they play a fundamental role in the development of plants and their responses to the environment and thus in plant performance (Balmer et al., 2004; Geigenberger and Fernie, 2014; Geigenberger et al., 2017; Noctor et al., 2018;Gakière et al., 2018a).
Figure 3 Examples of fruit antioxidants. Chemical structures of several metabolites presenting antioxidant properties. The major redox buffers NAD+, ASC and GSH are also presented. For further detail, refer to Table 1. Individual structures were obtained from PubChem (pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/).
Table 1 Examples of major antioxidant metabolites present in fruits.
Due to the wide diversity of fruit metabolites harbouring antioxidant activity, fruit antioxidants can process ROS in many ways. Most antioxidants spontaneously react with ROS, although enzymes such as APXs and glutaredoxins (GRX) catalyse several reactions. As previously mentioned, antioxidants remarkably participate in recycling pathways, such as the glutathione-ascorbate cycle, to maintain the redox state of the main redox buffers through the activity of GR, DHAR and MDHAR (Figure 2). The importance of such systems for fruit biology is detailed in Section 4.
Three Major Cellular Redox Buffers: A Ménage-À-Trois to Manage ROS
Ascorbate (ASC) and glutathione (GSH) sit at the top of plant soluble antioxidants because they process ROS rapidly using specific enzymes such as peroxidases belonging to the ascorbate-glutathione pathway (Foyer and Noctor, 2011) (Figure 2). In brief, ROS react preferentially with GSH and ASC: the latter can reduce H2O2via APX to produce water and MDHA that will be reduced by MDHAR using NAD(P)H, or be transformed spontaneously in DHA that will be reduced by DHAR using GSH (Figure 2). These repetitive redox cycles allow for the regeneration of the pools and the maintenance of the cellular redox buffers in a highly reduced state in most cellular compartments under unstressed conditions. In addition, pyridine nucleotides (i.e. NAD(P)H and NAD(P)+; Figure 3) are crucial for the regeneration of GSH and ASC through GR and MDHAR enzymes as well as being involved in other metabolic pathways, thereby linking redox homeostasis to central metabolism (Gakière et al., 2018a). Strikingly, fruit-specific concentrations and redox states of the pools are difficult to find in the literature (Table 2). In unstressed conditions, ASC and GSH are in a highly reduced state (> 90%), NAD(H) is 60% to 65% reduced, and NADP(H) is at 90% reduced in red ripe tomato fruits (Araújo et al., 2012; Centeno et al., 2011; Jimenez et al., 2002). However, NAD(H) is 12% to 20% reduced, and NADP(H) is 50% to 55% reduced in orange, apple, pear and grapefruits (Bruemmer, 1969), which is congruent with the redox status of photosynthetic tissues (Gakière et al., 2018b). This clearly suggests a diversity in fruit redox homeostasis as fruit growth influences the redox state of pyridine nucleotides. Furthermore, these three major cellular redox buffers display distinct redox potential: −0.1, −0.23 and −0.32 mV for the ASC/DHA, GSH/GSSG and NAD(P)+/NAD(P)H couples, respectively (Figure 2). In this case, as pyridine nucleotides have a lower redox potential, they will be detrimental for electron transfer to GSH and ASC during redox mechanisms.
Table 2 Examples of ASC, GSH and NAD/P(H) sources in fruits.
The Importance of the Redox Hub for Fruit Signalling
The redox hub consists of all the molecular partners able to generate, process or trigger oxidative signals, whilst the resulting redox signalling can modulate the physiology of plant organs including fruits (Mittler, 2017; Noctor et al., 2018). Fruits are a major source of central metabolites (Osorio et al., 2013a; Roch et al., 2019), such as carbohydrates, lipids, amino and organic acids, but also vitamins and other antioxidant metabolites that play important roles in fruit biology (Figure 3). Besides, redox status is also at the heart of the control of metabolic processes (Geigenberger and Fernie, 2014). One among many reasons is the prominence of pyridine nucleotides (NAD/P(H)) as master regulators of hundreds of biochemical reactions (Gakière et al., 2018a), together with ascorbate/dehydroascorbate (ASC/DHA) and glutathione (GSH/GSSG) couples (Noctor et al., 2018). In this context, we will present recent advances in our understanding of key spatiotemporal redox signals that occur during developmental processes and in response to environmental changes, including redox buffers that balance the redox poise (Figure 4).
Figure 4 Pivotal role of redox signalling for fruit growth and stress responses. Fruits produce ROS and other redox signals during development and in response to environmental stress. Reactive oxygen species homeostasis is finely tuned between ROS production and processing. This involves several enzymatic and non-enzymatic mechanisms, including antioxidant metabolites and major redox buffers (NAD/P(H), ASC and GSH) that allow antioxidant cycles to process excess of ROS. When ROS levels are too high, the resulting oxidative stress would damage cellular structures.
Redox and Central Metabolism During Fruit Development
Fruit development comprises three main phases: cell division, cell expansion and ripening. As green organs, young fruits and leaves share some similarities due to the presence of photosynthetically active chloroplasts driving central metabolism, hence developmental processes (Cocaliadis et al., 2014). Fruit photosynthesis can contribute to the production of starch, which can then be turned into soluble carbohydrates during ripening. In tomato, a number of studies points towards the importance of the mitochondrial malate valve in transmitting redox status to the plastids, which will influence plastidial metabolism (Centeno et al., 2011; Osorio et al., 2013b). In fact, decreasing malate content in the growing fruit could stimulate the activation state of AGPase (EC 2.7.7.27), leading to increased starch and soluble sugar pools in ripening tomato. Intriguingly, such metabolic repercussions tend to provide tolerance of tomato to water loss, wrinkling and pathogenic infections. This supports the paradigm of a versatile role of redox signals in metabolic regulation throughout development and in response to stress (Tian et al., 2013). Another hallmark of this growth phase is when chloroplasts become chromoplasts by losing green chlorophylls at the expense of coloured antioxidants like carotenoids (Lado et al., 2015; Martí et al., 2009). Concomitantly, the expression of nuclear- and plastid-encoded photosynthetic genes drops as the fruit ripens. It is noteworthy that ROS synthesis influences the accumulation of carotenoids (Pan et al., 2009), which are major scavengers of singlet oxygen, specifically β-carotene, tocopherol and plastoquinone (Miret and Munné-Bosch, 2015). Besides carotenoids, anthocyanins can accumulate in the growing fruits and contribute to both red/purple/blue colours and antioxidant properties [Table 1; (Muñoz and Munné-Bosch, 2018)]. Whilst carotenoids accumulate primarily within lipophilic membranes, anthocyanins are stored in the vacuole where their colour depends on their chemical structure, which is influenced by vacuolar pH (Jaakola, 2013). In this context, recent studies have reported a critical role for epigenetic processes in growing tomato fruit by linking DNA demethylation levels with transcriptomic changes of genes involved in fruit antioxidant biosynthesis (e.g. flavonoids, carotenoids) (Lang et al., 2017). Conversely, however, development and ripening of orange, a nonclimacteric fruit, were correlated with an increase in DNA methylation levels, together with repression of photosynthetic genes (Huang et al., 2019). Thus, fruit development is likely to present remarkable discrepancies in terms of redox signals, their source (e.g. chloroplastic, mitochondrial, peroxisomal, apoplastic) and the duration and extent of oxidative stress, even at early stages of fruit growth in comparison to leaves (Muñoz and Munné-Bosch, 2018).
Ripening is an important end process of fruit development that involves multiple molecular regulations (Osorio et al., 2013a). It is mediated by redox signalling, more specifically during the chloroplast-to-chromoplast transition and in the mitochondrial compartment, where protein carbonylation occurs and respiration rates increase, thus affecting the redox state when sugar supply becomes limiting (Qin et al., 2009a; Tian et al., 2013). As the fruit ripens, oxidative stress progressively augments, like in peach, tomato, pepper and grape berries (Vitis vinifera), where H2O2 pools accumulate upon changes in skin colour (Jimenez et al., 2002; Martí et al., 2009; Qin et al., 2009a; Pilati et al., 2014; Kumar et al., 2016). In fact, it is assumed that ROS accumulation produces two distinct peaks during fruit growth: first at the onset of ripening and second at overripening either preharvest or postharvest (Muñoz and Munné-Bosch, 2018). It is possible that increased oxidative stress might favour fruit softening, which is beneficial for seed release (Jimenez et al., 2002). This would explain why short life tomato cultivars are redox-stressed and present lower antioxidant activities (Cocaliadis et al., 2014).
Because of ROS imbalance, oxidative signals need processing via cellular redox buffering and the antioxidant machinery to avoid cellular damage (Figure 4). In ripening grape berries, accumulated levels of H2O2 are accompanied with a concomitant stimulation of CAT activity (Pilati et al., 2014). Moreover, under oxidative stress, increases in activities of APX, MDHAR and GR are seen in peach (Camejo et al., 2010). Contrasting observations are reported for peroxidases: ripening phase is associated with increased PX activities in mango, apples and banana fruit, whilst tomato, strawberry and capsicum show a decline in these activities (Pandey et al., 2012, and references therein). The importance of antioxidant systems for ripening is also exemplified in grapevines where there is a strong developmental modulation of ASC metabolism at the biosynthetic, recycling and catabolic levels (Melino et al., 2009). Fruit growth of wine grapes can witness a gradual induction of ASC biosynthesis and subsequent changes in the accumulation of ASC and two derivatives: tartaric and oxalic acids. Whilst immature berries showed a swift accumulation of ASC together with a low ASC/DHA redox ratio, ripe fruits instead showed an increased accumulation of ASC and higher ASC/DHA ratio. Additionally, acerola, an exotic fruit cultivated mostly for its ascorbic acid content, shows differential regulation of MDHAR and DHAR genes during fruit ripening (Eltelib et al., 2011). A comparison of ASC metabolism in mandarin and orange, two citrus species harbouring different ASC contents in pulp, deepens our understanding of the differences in ASC concentrations in fruit (Yang et al., 2011b). This study revealed that higher ASC in ripening orange was associated with an augmented expression of four genes involved in ASC biosynthesis, encoding GDP-d-mannose-3′,5′-epimerase (EC 5.1.3.18), GDP-l-galactose-phosphorylase (EC 2.7.7.69), l-galactose dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.316) and l-galactono-1,4-lactone dehydrogenase (EC 1.3.2.3), together with attenuated activities of ASC oxidase and ASC peroxidase, which are involved in ASC degradation. Another elegant work on isolated mitochondria from ripening tomato fruits has reported a global stimulation of the ASC-GSH cycle at the enzyme level (López-Vidal et al., 2016). Recently, a system biology approach in tomato has been conducted based on large-scale transcriptomic, proteomic, metabolic and phenotypic data for orange fruit of RNAi lines for three enzymes involved in ASC metabolism (AO, GLD and MDHAR) (Stevens et al., 2018). The ASC redox state has been reported to influence the expression of genes involved in cellular protein synthesis and stability and ribosomal function. Besides redox functions, synthesis of ASC is also crucial for tomato fruit growth (Garcia et al., 2009; Mounet-Gilbert et al., 2016), as exemplified by profound growth stunting of tomato fruits silenced in mitochondrial ASC synthesis (Alhagdow et al., 2007). Another recent study of protein turnover at global scale in the developing tomato fruit revealed a stage-specific response of protein profiles that were associated to various redox functions (Belouah et al., 2019). Changes in redox-related proteins were represented in the young fruit (e.g. SOD, APX) and at ripening (e.g. MDHAR, GR). Hence, ASC metabolism appears to be central to redox homeostasis during fruit development.
Upon stress and senescence (i.e. ageing), oxidative alterations can drastically target proteins, resulting in conformational changes and thus impairing their catalytic functions. Methionine (Met) and cysteine, which contain sulphur, are probably the most susceptible to ROS oxidation (Davies, 2005). In the case of Met, oxidation can be reversed by Met sulphoxide reductase (MSR, EC 1.8.4.11/12) (Emes, 2009; Rey and Tarrago, 2018), which has been reported to play a role in senescing litchi fruit through down-regulation of MSR genes (Jiang et al., 2018). In leaves, previous works have suggested a link between MSR and the homeostasis and redox balance of NAD/P(H) (Pétriacq et al., 2012, Pétriacq et al., 2013). Besides MSR, a stimulation of the antioxidant systems in tomato fruit mitochondria has been reported to be associated with a differential carbonylation of mitochondrial proteins in breaker and light red tomato fruits, which might participate in protein degradation and cellular signalling (López-Vidal et al., 2016). Besides targeting proteins, aging of fruit encompasses other redox-related changes. In the pulp of Kyoho grape, postharvest senescence and rotting are accompanied by an accumulation of oxidative signals (e.g. malondialdehyde, hydrogen peroxide, superoxide anion) and a concomitant depletion of several antioxidant systems (e.g. ascorbate, flavonoids, total phenolics, reducing sugars) (Ni et al., 2016). Interestingly, exogenous treatment with hydrogen sulphide could alleviate those redox perturbations by enhancing the activity of antioxidant enzymes, such as CAT and APX, and by attenuating those of lipoxygenase in the pulp and peel of Kyoho grape.
Additionally, not only central metabolism links to redox signalling in fruit but also more specialised pathways involving phytohormones (Symons et al., 2012; Leng et al., 2013). In red raspberry, a nonclimacteric crop fruit, the stage of ripeness at the time of harvest determines the antioxidant contents (e.g. anthocyanins, ellagitannins, vitamins C and E, carotenoids) (Beekwilder et al., 2005; Miret and Munné-Bosch, 2016). Application of the carotenoid-derivative hormone ABA after fruit set modulates the ASC/DHA ratio in young berries and more than doubles ASC pools in ripe fruit. Such an effect was partially explained by alterations of ASC oxidation and recycling through the activities of AO, APX, DHAR and MDHAR (Miret and Munné-Bosch, 2016). In postharvest conditions, fruit decay is a major issue caused by perturbation of the redox balance, including ROS production (Pétriacq et al., 2018). Thus, antioxidant mechanisms (e.g. ASC total pool and redox state, ASC-GSH cycle) are important actors throughout fruit growth, which is further evidence for the idea that ROS act as metabolic by-products requiring a finely tuned homeostasis (Figure 4). In an agri-food context, further research is required to disentangle the implication of each redox event occurring during fruit development, so that efficient strategies can be adopted to improve fruit production and storage.
Nevertheless, the active depiction of redox fluxes by deciphering redox signatures in plant biology is extremely tedious, if not impossible, probably due to the extreme reactivity of ROS and related redox signals and to the intricacy of the redox hub. However, a very interesting and promising alternative to measurements of redox pools and antioxidant systems is the use of mathematical modelling of metabolism, in particular for redox branches. In the context of central metabolism, previous studies elegantly shed a different light on climacteric respiration in tomato fruit using stoichiometric models (Colombié et al., 2015, Colombié et al., 2017). Using a medium‐scale stoichiometric model, energy and the redox cofactors NAD(H) and NADP(H) were defined as internal metabolites and balanced so that constraining of the metabolic network was possible not only through C and N homeostasis, but also through the redox and energy status (Colombié et al., 2015). This model suggested a consistent requirement of NADPH for biomass synthesis and demonstrated that higher ATP hydrolysis was required for growth starting at the end of cell expansion and that a peak of CO2 was released at the end of tomato ripening. This coincided with climacteric respiration of tomato fruit and involved energy dissipation by the AOX (Figure 1B), a redox marker of the mitochondrial compartment (Polidoros et al., 2009; Pétriacq et al., 2016). This was further confirmed by a more detailed stoichiometric model of the respiratory pathway, including AOX and uncoupling proteins (Colombié et al., 2017). Moreover, the recent flux analysis performed with grape cells under nitrogen limitation showed differently regulated fluxes were involved in the flavonoid (phenylpropanoid) pathway and in major carbon fluxes supporting a strong link between central metabolism and cell redox status by energy (ATP) and reducing power equivalents (NADPH and NADH) (Soubeyrand et al., 2018). Thus, mitochondrial function plays a notable role along fruit development in mitigating the redox poise upon an imbalance between energy supply and demand. In complement, when omics strategies failed to measure oxidative fluxes accurately, kinetic modelling of metabolism has proven to be a complementary and promising approach as it offers, with enzymatic and metabolic parameters, the possibility to describe quantitatively fluxes of cycling pathways such as redox metabolism. For instance, this was achieved previously for sucrose metabolism in the developing tomato fruit via a model of 13 differential equations describing the variations of hexoses, hexoses-phosphates and sucrose as a function of 24 enzyme reactions (Beauvoit et al., 2014). Similar approaches to redox cycles are necessary to obtain novel insights into the active redox dynamics involved in fruit biology.
The Key Role of ROS and Cognate Redox Signals in Fruit Responses to Environmental Constraints
The generation of ROS is a crucial process in response of plants to a changing environment and contributes to establish adaptive signalling pathways (Noctor et al., 2014). Oxidative stress typically comes as a secondary stress after primary stresses, whether they are abiotic constraints (Figure 4), such as drought or flooding, wounding, high light, cold or heat stress or biotic stresses including pest attacks or bacterial and fungal infections. Fruits are no exception to this rule: ROS can originate from NADPH oxidases (Figure 1B), specifically with respect to biotic and abiotic environmental challenges (Torres and Dangl, 2005; Suzuki et al., 2011; Mittler, 2017). Upon cold stress in apple fruits, NADPH oxidases might function via a regulatory node that integrates ethylene and ROS signalling pathways (Zermiani et al., 2015). In strawberry fruits, recent identification of NAPDH oxidase genes indicated that FvRbohA and FvRbohD might be involved in cold stress and defence responses (Zhang et al., 2018).
At present, it is assumed that major redox couples (NAD/P(H), ASC, GSH) are integral regulators of stress responses in plants (Figure 4), including both abiotic and biotic stresses (Pétriacq et al., 2013; Noctor and Mhamdi, 2014; Smirnoff, 2018; Gakière et al., 2018a). For instance, exogenous application of NAD+ confers resistance to citrus canker disease in citrus (Alferez et al., 2018). In coherence with a modulation of these redox buffers, the antioxidant system further contributes in processing excess of ROS within stressed tissues (Foyer and Noctor, 2011; Smirnoff and Arnaud, 2019) (Figure 4). Additionally, redox processes dominate hormonal signalling via the stress hormones salicylic (SA), jasmonic (JA) and abscisic acids, which play a critical role in metabolic adjustments under stress conditions (Leng et al., 2013; Geigenberger and Fernie, 2014; Gakière et al., 2018a). Thus, a complex signalling network is devoted to shaping the fruit responses to stress. However, the interrelation between these multiple signalling partners is poorly understood, and its study will necessitate further research.
As for developmental processes (Figure 4), a hallmark of plant responses to stress is the activation of the ASC-GSH cycle (Figure 2). Upon arsenic and silicon exposure, fruits of two tomato cultivars exhibited different but profound redox perturbations of H2O2 and antioxidant contents (e.g. lycopene, carotenoids and phenolics), ASC and GSH redox states and lipid peroxidation (Marmiroli et al., 2017a). Alternatively, a detailed proteomic study on tomato fruit confirmed the implication of ASC- and GSH-related proteins in response to this abiotic stress (Marmiroli et al., 2017b). Some of these redox alterations (H2O2, ASC and GSH redox states, total carotenoids and phenolics) were proposed as reliable arsenic exposition biomarkers for further studies that could broaden our knowledge on arsenic-induced abiotic stress in fruit (Marmiroli et al., 2017a). Besides arsenic, hot air treatment of strawberry fruits directly triggered the induction of antioxidant enzymes (e.g. CAT, APX and SOD), which further leads to a reduction of necrotrophic lesions caused by the fungal pathogen Botrytis cinerea (Jin et al., 2016). Additionally, a study of cold and light stress in tomato fruit unveils an interaction between temperature and light to modulate synthesis, recycling and oxidation of ASC in fruit (Massot et al., 2013). Light promoted the accumulation of ASC and GSH in tomato fruit, thus supporting the hypothesis of a stimulation in ASC synthesis by light (Gautier et al., 2009; Massot et al., 2012; Baldet et al., 2013; Smirnoff, 2018).
Redox signalling is associated with physiological disorders in fruits stored under multiple environmental stresses, such as for pome fruit, where redox-related metabolites are likely to accumulate (e.g. γ-aminobutyrate [GABA]) or rapidly decline (e.g. ASC, GSH) after exposure to low O2 and/or elevated CO2 environments (Lum et al., 2016). This in turn results in disturbances of the energetic and oxidative balance. In this context, both GABA and antioxidant metabolism are regulated by NAD/P(H) ratios, which confirms the tight link between cellular redox buffers and the regulation of oxidative metabolism (Trobacher et al., 2013; Lum et al., 2016) (Figure 4). A characterisation of TRX genes in harvested banana fruit suggests that the protein MaTrx12 regulates redox homeostasis, which impacts chilling tolerance (Wu et al., 2016). In tomato fruit, a combination of deep sequencing and bioinformatics revealed 163 circular RNAs that exhibited chilling responsive expression, among them several ones predicted to be involved in redox reactions and various stress signalling pathways (e.g. heat/cold shock protein, energy metabolism, hormonal responses, salt stress, cold-responsive transcription factors) (Zuo et al., 2016).
Infection of fruits with pathogenic microbes is a pressing issue due to dramatic postharvest diseases that can claim up to 50% of the total production worldwide (Romanazzi et al., 2016; Pétriacq et al., 2018). Resistance inducers have been used as promising strategies to elicit fruit defences against phytopathogens (Pétriacq et al., 2018). A global transcriptional analysis of strawberry fruit has demonstrated that the fungal elicitor chitosan and the salicylate-mimicking compound benzothiadiazole modulate chloroplastic signals to trigger various defence responses through redox alterations (e.g. PX, GST, GRX) (Landi et al., 2017). Accordingly, induction of sweet orange with chitosan or salicylic acid also alters the redox status of the cell (e.g. TRX, SOD, PX), as exemplified through RNAseq data (Coqueiro et al., 2015). Another example comes from Peronophythora litchii–infected litchi fruits that exhibit lower infection symptoms after treatment with a novel chitosan formulation (Jiang et al., 2018). Disease tolerance was correlated in litchi pericarp with higher activities of defensive (e.g. chitinase, phenylalanine lyase, glucanase) and antioxidant enzymes (e.g. SOD, CAT, APX), a lower O2− generation rate and lower malondialdehyde levels and higher contents of redox buffers including ascorbic acid and glutathione and reducing power. Moreover, priming of tomato seedlings with β-aminobutyrate (BABA), a novel phytohormone (Thevenet et al., 2017), confers resistance of tomato fruits to the fungal pathogen B. cinerea through metabolic rearrangements including antioxidant (e.g. flavonoids, polyphenols) and ABA contents (Wilkinson et al., 2018). This resistance was also associated with a delay in fruit ripening, which suggests a metabolic trade-off for defence metabolism versus fruit growth. Together, phytopathologic studies confirm the trigger of an oxidative burst in infected fruit tissues, for which excess ROS are mitigated both by a stimulation of enzymatic antioxidant systems and nonenzymatic protective, scavenging molecules (Tian et al., 2013). Hence, unsurprisingly, induction of antioxidant functions has proven to be effective in controlling postharvest diseases in fruits (Romanazzi et al., 2016; Pétriacq et al., 2018).
Practical Applications Towards Modifying Redox Metabolism in Fruits
Although the precise functions of redox regulators remain to be evidenced, a few practical applications are currently explored towards modifying redox biology in fruits. From a human health perspective, fruit redox metabolism received much attention since fruits and vegetables are major sources of essential antioxidative metabolites and thus recommended in human diet (e.g. five a day, http://www.fao.org/). Due to the intensively studied health effects of antioxidants for their numerous benefits for aging, cancer and chronic disorders, research focused on strategies to increase the antioxidant contents in consumable product. Moderate success has been obtained in engineering plants to increase antioxidants content such as ASC, GSH and vitamin E (Wargovich et al., 2012; Gallie, 2013). However, the Golden Rice, enriched in β-carotene (provitamin A), remains a successful story for redox application in crops combining plant biotechnologies, antioxidant synthesis pathway and human health (Botella‐Pavía and Rodríguez‐Concepción, 2006). Nevertheless, due to the importance of ROS signalling in developmental processes, the modulation of oxidative mechanisms can alter fruit growth. For instance, engineering tomato fruits to increase levels of antioxidants by enhancing chloroplast functions results in longer-lasting and firmer fruits (Mehta et al., 2002; Zhang et al., 2013). Thus, future applications need to consider the spatial and temporal regulations of redox homeostasis during plant development to improve significantly plant productivity.
Fruit physiological disorders during storage under multiple environmental stresses are also associated with redox perturbations (Lum et al., 2016). Fruit decay is a major issue caused by changes of the redox balance, including ROS production, in postharvest conditions (Pétriacq et al., 2018). From an agri-food perspective, chilling stress is oxidative but also particularly critical as low temperatures are often used to delay senescence of many fruits (Lallu, 1997; Bustamante et al., 2016; Valenzuela et al., 2017; Alhassan et al., 2019). Reactive oxygen species accumulate during fruit overripening, which thus puts the improvement of fruit storage conditions in the forefront of redox signalling applications (Muñoz and Munné-Bosch, 2018). Furthermore, diverse chemical treatments have been identified to limit ROS accumulation by affecting either their production or processing. For instance, nitric oxide postharvest treatment in cucumber was associated with a decrease in ROS content and an increase of APX, CAT and SOD activities (Yang et al., 2011a; Liu et al., 2016). Other examples come from the use of chlorine dioxide fumigation in longan fruit that displays a reduction in enzymatic fruit browning (Saengnil et al., 2014) and ozone applications in citrus industry that allow to improve fruit shelf-life (Karaca, 2010). In addition, the plant defence hormones methyl-jasmonate (MeJA) and methyl-salicylate (MeSA) promote AOX gene expression in green pepper (Purvis, 1997). More recently, it was reported that MeJA also improved chilling tolerance of cucumber by increasing both CAT gene expression and enzyme activity (Liu et al., 2016). Biotechnological approaches have been further used to reduce oxidative stress in fruits mostly by overexpressing main ROS-processing enzymes (Figure 2) but also by increasing the total antioxidant content. In this context, anthocyanin- and flavonoids-enriched mango fruits have shown a better tolerance to cold during storage (Sudheeran et al., 2018).
Importantly, practical applications to modulate redox metabolism trigger plant resistance to biotic stresses. Fruits can suffer substantial yield losses from diseases as fruit decay at a postharvest level can claim up to 50% of the total production worldwide (Pétriacq et al., 2018). Given that ROS signalling is central to plant-pathogen interactions (Mittler, 2017), and main redox buffers are linked to defence hormonal signalling (Pétriacq et al., 2013; Pétriacq et al., 2016; Pétriacq et al., 2018), diverse treatment building on hormonal and redox signalling has shown a lower disease incidence and symptoms. For instance, nitric oxide treatment inhibits anthracnose (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides) in ripening mango (Hu et al., 2014) and further improves chilling tolerance in banana fruit via an induction of the antioxidative defence system (Wu et al., 2014). Additionally, MeSA and MeJA treatments can be used to stimulate pathogen resistance and increase the antioxidant content without affecting fruit quality in kiwi, tomato and peach (Tzortzakis and Economakis, 2007; Zhang et al., 2008; Fatemi et al., 2013).
Concluding Remarks and Future Outlooks
Not before time, the simple Manichean belief of ‘good’ reductants and ‘bad’ oxidants, such as ROS, has become erroneous. There is so much to learn from future molecular studies of redox metabolism, particularly in fruit, for which an obvious lack of fundamental knowledge needs to be addressed. Reactive oxygen species production and cognate redox signals are key to harmonious metabolism and contribute to establishing adaptive signalling pathways throughout development and in response of fruits to environmental events. Whilst redox buffers, specifically ascorbate, clearly appear at the forefront of oxidative regulation, these redox mechanisms also seem to depend on the fruit species. Recent years have witnessed a growing interest in developing both analytical technologies (e.g. LCMS, NMR, ROS detection, redox proteomics) and mathematical modelling to provide quantitative description of the central metabolism and specialised pathways including antioxidant processes (Qin et al., 2009a; Beauvoit et al., 2014; Colombié et al., 2015; Colombié et al., 2017; Deborde et al., 2017). In tomato fruit, for instance, spatially resolved distribution of metabolites including antioxidants will help to decipher the involvement of such redox compounds in physiological responses (Nakamura et al., 2017).
Studying key spatiotemporal redox processes involved in fruit is of paramount importance. Numerous fruits, such as the ones from the Solanaceae family (e.g. tomato, pepper, eggplant), not only contain a cocktail of antioxidants (vitamins A and C, flavonoids), but also domestication of these plants has reduced the content in prohealth molecules such as vitamin C. Indeed, ascorbate was higher in ancestral cultivars of tomato (Gest et al., 2013b; Palma et al., 2015). These are among the many reasons for ascorbate to be at the heart of research on the plant redox hub, where plant scientists endeavour to increase fruit ASC content, which should improve human nutrition and plant tolerance to stress (Macknight et al., 2017). Progress in understanding the molecular signatures involved in the redox regulations that link central metabolism and stress pathways will help to define novel strategies for optimal fruit production and storage (Beauvoit et al., 2018).
Author Contributions
All authors contributed to writing this review.
Funding
The authors are also grateful to the MetaboHUB (ANR-11-INBS-0010) and PHENOME (ANR-11-INBS-0012) projects for financial support. The doctoral school Sciences de la Vie et Santé at Université de Bordeaux is also acknowledged for granting PP with PhD funding for GD (bourse fléchée ministérielle 2018-2021).
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Dr. Annick Moing for the invitation to contribute to this special issue on fruit metabolism. The authors are also grateful to the MetaboHUB (ANR-11-INBS-0010) and PHENOME (ANR-11-INBS-0012) projects for financial support. The doctoral school Sciences de la Vie et Santé at Université de Bordeaux is also acknowledged for granting PP with PhD funding for GD (bourse fléchée ministérielle 2018-2021).
Abbreviations
ABA, Abscisic acid; AGPase, ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase; AltDH, Alternative dehydrogenases; AO, Ascorbate oxidase; AOX, Alternative oxidase; APX, Ascorbate peroxidase; ASC, Ascorbate; BABA, β-Aminobutyrate; CAT, Catalase; Chl, Chlorophyll; DHA, Dehydroascorbate; DHAR, Dehydroascorbate reductase; GABA, γ-Aminobutyrate; GP, Guaiacol peroxidase; GPX, Glutathione peroxidase; GR, Glutathione reductase; GRX, Glutaredoxins; GSH, Glutathione (reduced form); GSSG, Disulphide glutathione (oxidised form); GST, Glutathione S-transferase; JA, Jasmonic acid; LCMS, Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry; MDHA, Monodehydroascorbate; MDHAR: Monodehydroascorbate reductase; Met, Methionine; MSR, Met sulphoxide reductase; NAD, Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; NADP, Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate; NMR, Nuclear magnetic resonance; PS, Photosystem; PX, Peroxidase; RBOH, Respiratory burst oxidase homolog; ROS, Reactive oxygen species; 1O2, Singlet oxygen; H2O2, Hydrogen peroxide; O2•−, Superoxide anion; OH•, Hydroxyl radical; SA, Salicylic acid; SOD, Superoxide dismutase; TCA, Tricarboxylic acid; TRXs, Thioredoxins; XDH, Xanthine dehydrogenases.
References
Alferez, F. M., Gerberich, K. M., Li, J.-L., Zhang, Y., Graham, J. H., Mou, Z. (2018). Exogenous nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide induces resistance to citrus canker in citrus. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 1472. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01472
Alhagdow, M., Mounet, F., Gilbert, L., Nunes-Nesi, A., Garcia, V., Just, D., et al. (2007). Silencing of the mitochondrial ascorbate synthesizing enzyme l-galactono-1,4-lactone dehydrogenase affects plant and fruit development in tomato. Plant Physiol. 145, 1408–1422. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.106500
Alhassan, N., Golding, J. B., Wills, R. B. H., Bowyer, M. C., Pristijono, P. (2019). Long term exposure to low ethylene and storage temperatures delays calyx senescence and maintains ‘Afourer’ mandarins and navel oranges quality. Foods 8, 19. doi: 10.3390/foods8010019
Apel, K., Hirt, H. (2004). Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 55, 373–399. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141701
Araújo, W. L., Tohge, T., Osorio, S., Lohse, M., Balbo, I., Krahnert, I., et al. (2012). Antisense inhibition of the 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase complex in tomato demonstrates its importance for plant respiration and during leaf senescence and fruit maturation. Plant Cell 24, 2328–2351. doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.099002
Baldet, P., Bres, C., Okabe, Y., Mauxion, J.-P., Just, D., Bournonville, C., et al. (2013). Investigating the role of vitamin C in tomato through TILLING identification of ascorbate-deficient tomato mutants. Plant Biotechnol. 30, 309–314. doi: 10.5511/plantbiotechnology.13.0622b
Baldet, P., Ferrand, C., Rothan, C. (2014). “Vitamins in Fleshy Fruit,” in Fruit Ripening: Physiology, Signalling and Genomics, eds Nath, P., Bouzayen, M., Mattoo, A. K., Pech, J. C. (Wallingford: CABI), 127–150. doi: 10.1079/9781845939625.0127
Balmer, Y., Vensel, W. H., Tanaka, C. K., Hurkman, W. J., Gelhaye, E., Rouhier, N., et al. (2004). Thioredoxin links redox to the regulation of fundamental processes of plant mitochondria. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 101, 2642–2647. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0308583101
Beauvoit, B., Belouah, I., Bertin, N., Cakpo, C. B., Colombié, S., Dai, Z., et al. (2018). Putting primary metabolism into perspective to obtain better fruits. Ann. Bot. 122, 1–21. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcy057
Beauvoit, B. P., Colombié, S., Monier, A., Andrieu, M.-H., Biais, B., Bénard, C., et al. (2014). Model-assisted analysis of sugar metabolism throughout tomato fruit development reveals enzyme and carrier properties in relation to vacuole expansion. Plant Cell 26, 3224–3242. doi: 10.1105/tpc.114.127761
Beekwilder, J., Hall, R. D., Ric Vos, C. H. D. (2005). Identification and dietary relevance of antioxidants from raspberry. BioFactors 23, 197–205. doi: 10.1002/biof.5520230404
Belouah, I., Nazaret, C., Pétriacq, P., Prigent, S., Bénard, C., Mengin, V., et al. (2019). Modeling protein destiny in developing fruit. Plant Physiol. 180, 1709–1724 doi: 10.1104/pp.19.00086
Bindschedler, L. V., Dewdney, J., Blee, K. A., Stone, J. M., Asai, T., Plotnikov, J., et al. (2006). Peroxidase-dependent apoplastic oxidative burst in Arabidopsis required for pathogen resistance. Plant J. 47, 851–863. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02837.x
Botella-Pavía, P., Rodríguez-Concepción, M. (2006). Carotenoid biotechnology in plants for nutritionally improved foods. Physiol. Plant. 126, 369–381. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00632.x
Bruemmer, J. H. (1969). Redox state of nicotinamide-adenine dinucleotides in citrus fruit. J. Agric. Food Chem. 17, 1312–1315. doi: 10.1021/jf60166a023
Bustamante, C. A., Monti, L. L., Gabilondo, J., Scossa, F., Valentini, G., Budde, C. O., et al. (2016). Differential metabolic rearrangements after cold storage are correlated with chilling injury resistance of peach fruits. Front. Plant Sci. 7, 1478. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01478
Camejo, D., Martí, M. C., Román, P., Ortiz, A., Jiménez, A. (2010). Antioxidant system and protein pattern in peach fruits at two maturation stages. J. Agric. Food Chem. 58, 11140–11147. doi: 10.1021/jf102807t
Centeno, D. C., Osorio, S., Nunes-Nesi, A., Bertolo, A. L. F., Carneiro, R. T., Araújo, W. L., et al. (2011). Malate plays a crucial role in starch metabolism, ripening, and soluble solid content of tomato fruit and affects postharvest softening. Plant Cell 23, 162–184. doi: 10.1105/tpc.109.072231
Cervilla, L. M., Blasco, B., Rios, J. J., Romero, L., Ruiz, J. M. (2007). Oxidative Stress and Antioxidants in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) Plants Subjected to Boron Toxicity. Annals of Botany 100, 747–756. doi:10.1093/aob/mcm156.
Chaudhary, P., Sharma, A., Singh, B., Nagpal, A. K. (2018). Bioactivities of phytochemicals present in tomato. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 55(8), 2833–2849. doi: 10.1007/s13197-018-3221-z
Chun, J., Lee, J., Ye, L., Exler, J., Eitenmiller, R. R. (2006). Tocopherol and tocotrienol contents of raw and processed fruits and vegetables in the United States diet. J. Food Compost. Anal. 19, 196–204. doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2005.08.001
Cocaliadis, M. F., Fernández-Muñoz, R., Pons, C., Orzaez, D., Granell, A. (2014). Increasing tomato fruit quality by enhancing fruit chloroplast function. A double-edged sword? J. Exp. Bot. 65, 4589–4598. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru165
Colombié, S., Beauvoit, B., Nazaret, C., Bénard, C., Vercambre, G., Le Gall, S., et al. (2017). Respiration climacteric in tomato fruits elucidated by constraint-based modelling. New Phytol. 213, 1726–1739. doi: 10.1111/nph.14301
Colombié, S., Nazaret, C., Bénard, C., Biais, B., Mengin, V., Solé, M., et al. (2015). Modelling central metabolic fluxes by constraint-based optimization reveals metabolic reprogramming of developing Solanum lycopersicum (tomato) fruit. Plant J. 81, 24–39. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12685
Coqueiro, D. S. O., de Souza, A. A., Takita, M. A., Rodrigues, C. M., Kishi, L. T., Machado, M. A. (2015). Transcriptional profile of sweet orange in response to chitosan and salicylic acid. BMC Genomics 16, 288. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1440-5
Cory, H., Passarelli, S., Szeto, J., Tamez, M., Mattei, J. (2018). The Role of Polyphenols in Human Health and Food Systems: A Mini-Review. Frontiers in Nutrition, 5(September), 1–9. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2018.00087
Cosio, C., Dunand, C. (2009). Specific functions of individual class III peroxidase genes. J. Exp. Bot. 60, 391–408. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ern318
Dasgupta, A., Klein, K. (2014). “Antioxidant Vitamins and Minerals,” in Antioxidants in Food, Vitamins and Supplements (Elsevier), 277–294. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-405872-9.00015-X
Daudi, A., Cheng, Z., O’Brien, J. A., Mammarella, N., Khan, S., Ausubel, F. M., et al. (2012). The apoplastic oxidative burst peroxidase in Arabidopsis is a major component of pattern-triggered immunity. Plant Cell 24, 275–287. doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.093039
Davies, M. J. (2005). The oxidative environment and protein damage. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1703, 93–109. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2004.08.007
Deborde, C., Moing, A., Roch, L., Jacob, D., Rolin, D., Giraudeau, P. (2017). Plant metabolism as studied by NMR spectroscopy. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 10, 102–103. doi: 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2017.05.001
Ding, Z.-S., Tian, S.-P., Zheng, X.-L., Zhou, Z.-W., Xu, Y. (2007). Responses of reactive oxygen metabolism and quality in mango fruit to exogenous oxalic acid or salicylic acid under chilling temperature stress. Physiol. Plant. 130, 112–121. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2007.00893.x
Eldahshan, O. A., Nasser, A., Singab, B. (2013). Carotenoids. J Pharmacogn Phytochem, 8192(1), 2668735–5. doi 10.3945/an.113.004028
Eltelib, H. A., Badejo, A. A., Fujikawa, Y., Esaka, M. (2011). Gene expression of monodehydroascorbate reductase and dehydroascorbate reductase during fruit ripening and in response to environmental stresses in acerola (Malpighia glabra). J. Plant Physiol. 168, 619–627. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2010.09.003
Emes, M. J. (2009). Oxidation of methionine residues: the missing link between stress and signalling responses in plants. Biochem. J. 422, e1–e2. doi: 10.1042/BJ20091063
Erkan, M., Wang, S. Y., Wang, C. Y. (2008). Effect of UV treatment on antioxidant capacity, antioxidant enzyme activity and decay in strawberry fruit. Postharvest Biology and Technology 48, 163–171. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2007.09.028
Exposito-Rodriguez, M., Laissue, P. P., Yvon-Durocher, G., Smirnoff, N., Mullineaux, P. M. (2017). Photosynthesis-dependent H2O2 transfer from chloroplasts to nuclei provides a high-light signalling mechanism. Nat. Commun. 8, 49. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00074-w
Fatemi, H., Mohammadi, S., Aminifard, M. H. (2013). Effect of postharvest salicylic acid treatment on fungal decay and some postharvest quality factors of kiwi fruit. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot. 46, 1338–1345. doi: 10.1080/03235408.2013.767013
Fischer, B. B., Hideg, É., Krieger-Liszkay, A. (2013). Production, Detection, and Signaling of Singlet Oxygen in Photosynthetic Organisms. Antioxid. Redox Signal 18, 2145–2162. doi: 10.1089/ars.2012.5124
Fitzpatrick, T. B., Basset, G. J. C., Borel, P., Carrari, F., DellaPenna, D., Fraser, P. D., et al. (2012). Vitamin Deficiencies in Humans: Can Plant Science Help? Plant Cell 24, 395–414. doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.093120
Foyer, C. H. (2018). Reactive oxygen species, oxidative signaling and the regulation of photosynthesis. Environ. Exp. Bot. 154, 134–142. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.05.003
Foyer, C. H., Noctor, G. (2011). Ascorbate and glutathione: the heart of the redox hub. Plant Physiol. 155, 2. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.167569
Fraga, C. G., Oteiza, P. I., Galleano, M. (2018). Plant bioactives and redox signaling: (–)-Epicatechin as a paradigm. Mol. Aspects Med., 61, 31–40. doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2018.01.007
Fu, L., Xu, B.-T., Xu, X.-R., Gan, R.-Y., Zhang, Y., Xia, E.-Q., et al. (2011). Antioxidant capacities and total phenolic contents of 62 fruits. Food Chem. 129, 345–350. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.04.079
Gakière, B., Fernie, A. R., Pétriacq, P. (2018a). More to NAD+ than meets the eye: a regulator of metabolic pools and gene expression in Arabidopsis. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 122, 86–95 doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.01.003
Gakière, B., Hao, J., de Bont, L., Pétriacq, P., Nunes-Nesi, A., Fernie, A. R. (2018b). NAD + biosynthesis and signaling in plants. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 1–49. doi: 10.1080/07352689.2018.1505591
Gallie, D. R. (2013). Increasing vitamin C content in plant foods to improve their nutritional value—successes and challenges. Nutrients 5, 3424–3446. doi: 10.3390/nu5093424
Garcia, V., Stevens, R., Gil, L., Gilbert, L., Gest, N., Petit, J., et al. (2009). An integrative genomics approach for deciphering the complex interactions between ascorbate metabolism and fruit growth and composition in tomato. C. R. Biol. 332, 1007–1021. doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2009.09.013
Gautier, H., Massot, C., Stevens, R., Sérino, S., Génard, M. (2009). Regulation of tomato fruit ascorbate content is more highly dependent on fruit irradiance than leaf irradiance. Ann. Bot. 103, 495–504. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcn233
Geigenberger, P., Fernie, A. R. (2014). Metabolic control of redox and redox control of metabolism in plants. Antioxid. Redox Signaling 21, 1389–1421. doi: 10.1089/ars.2014.6018
Geigenberger, . P., Thormählen, I., Daloso, D. M., Fernie, A. R. (2017). The unprecedented versatility of the plant thioredoxin system. Trends Plant Sci. 22, 249–262. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.12.008
Gest, N., Garchery, C., Gautier, H., Jiménez, A., Stevens, R. (2013a). Light-dependent regulation of ascorbate in tomato by a monodehydroascorbate reductase localized in peroxisomes and the cytosol. Plant Biotechnol. J. 11, 344–354. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12020
Gest, N., Gautier, H., Stevens, R. (2013b). Ascorbate as seen through plant evolution: the rise of a successful molecule? J. Exp. Bot. 64, 33–53. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers297
Giovinazzo, G., D’Amico, L., Paradiso, A., Bollini, R., Sparvoli, F., DeGara, L. (2004). Antioxidant metabolite profiles in tomato fruit constitutively expressing the grapevine stilbene synthase gene: Antioxidant levels in tomato synthesizing resveratrol. Plant. Biotechnol. J. 3, 57–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2004.00099.x
Gomes-Rochette, N. F., Da Silveira Vasconcelos, M., Nabavi, S. M., Mota, E. F., Nunes-Pinheiro, D. C. S., Daglia, M., et al. (2016). Fruit as potent natural antioxidants and their biological effects. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 17, 986–993. doi: 10.2174/1389201017666160425115401
Graßmann, J. (2005). “Terpenoids as Plant Antioxidants,” in Vitamins & Hormones (Elsevier, London, UK). 72, 505–535. doi: 10.1016/S0083-6729(05)72015-X
Gugliandolo, A., Bramanti, P., Mazzon, E. (2017). Role of vitamin E in the treatment of alzheimer’s disease: evidence from animal models. IJMS 18, 2504. doi: 10.3390/ijms18122504
Hodges, M., Dellero, Y., Keech, O., Betti, M., Raghavendra, A. S., Sage, R., et al. (2016). Perspectives for a better understanding of the metabolic integration of photorespiration within a complex plant primary metabolism network. J. Exp. Bot. 67, 3015–3026. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw145
Hu, M., Yang, D., Huber, D. J., Jiang, Y., Li, M., Gao, Z., et al. (2014). Reduction of postharvest anthracnose and enhancement of disease resistance in ripening mango fruit by nitric oxide treatment. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 97, 115–122. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2014.06.013
Huang, H., Liu, R., Niu, Q., Tang, K., Zhang, B., Zhang, H., et al. (2019). Global increase in DNA methylation during orange fruit development and ripening. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 1430–1436 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1815441116
Jaakola, L. (2013). New insights into the regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis in fruits. Trends Plant Sci. 18, 477–483. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2013.06.003
Jiang, X., Lin, H., Lin, M., Chen, Y., Wang, H., Lin, Y., et al. (2018). A novel chitosan formulation treatment induces disease resistance of harvested litchi fruit to Peronophythora litchii in association with ROS metabolism. Food Chem. 266, 299–308. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.06.010
Jimenez, A., Creissen, G., Kular, B., Firmin, J., Robinson, S., Verhoeyen, M., et al. (2002). Changes in oxidative processes and components of the antioxidant system during tomato fruit ripening. Planta 214, 751–758. doi: 10.1007/s004250100667
Jin, P., Zheng, C., Huang, Y., Wang, X., Luo, Z., Zheng, Y. (2016). Hot air treatment activates defense responses and induces resistance against Botrytis cinerea in strawberry fruit. J. Integr. Agric. 15, 2658–2665. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61387-4
Justi, K. C., Visentainer, J.V., Evelazio de Souza, N, Matsushita, M. (2000). Nutritional composition and vitamin C stability in stored camu-camu (Myrciaria dubia) pulp. Arch Latinoam Nutr. 50, 405–408.
Karaca, H. (2010). Use of ozone in the citrus industry. Ozone: Sci. Eng. 32, 122–129. doi: 10.1080/01919510903520605
Keutgen, A. J., Pawelzik, E. (2007). Modifications of Strawberry Fruit Antioxidant Pools and Fruit Quality under NaCl Stress. J. Agric. Food Chem. 55, 4066–4072. doi: 10.1021/jf070010k
Khoo, H. E., Azlan, A., Tang, S. T., Lim, S. M. (2017). Anthocyanidins and anthocyanins: colored pigments as food, pharmaceutical ingredients, and the potential health benefits. Food & Nutr. Res., 61(1), 1361779. doi: 10.1080/16546628.2017.1361779
Knecht, K., Sandfuchs, K., Kulling, S. E., Bunzel, D. (2015). Tocopherol and tocotrienol analysis in raw and cooked vegetables: a validated method with emphasis on sample preparation. Food Chem. 169, 20–27. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.07.099
Kumar, V., Irfan, M., Ghosh, S., Chakraborty, N., Chakraborty, S., Datta, A. (2016). Fruit ripening mutants reveal cell metabolism and redox state during ripening. Protoplasma 253, 581–594. doi: 10.1007/s00709-015-0836-z
Lado, J., Zacarías, L., Gurrea, A., Page, A., Stead, A., Rodrigo, M. J. (2015). Exploring the diversity in Citrus fruit colouration to decipher the relationship between plastid ultrastructure and carotenoid composition. Planta 242, 645–661. doi: 10.1007/s00425-015-2370-9
Lallu, N. (1997). Low temperature breakdown in kiwifruit. Acta Hortic. 444, 579–586. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1997.444.89
Landi, L., De Miccolis Angelini, R. M., Pollastro, S., Feliziani, E., Faretra, F., Romanazzi, G. (2017). Global transcriptome analysis and identification of differentially expressed genes in strawberry after preharvest application of benzothiadiazole and chitosan. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 235. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00235
Lang, Z., Wang, Y., Tang, K., Tang, D., Datsenka, T., Cheng, J., et al. (2017). Critical roles of DNA demethylation in the activation of ripening-induced genes and inhibition of ripening-repressed genes in tomato fruit. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114, E4511–E4519. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1705233114
Leng, P., Yuan, B., Guo, Y. (2013). The role of abscisic acid in fruit ripening and responses to abiotic stress. J. Exp. Bot. 65, 4577–4588. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru204
Liu, Y., Yang, X., Zhu, S., Wang, Y. (2016). Postharvest application of MeJA and NO reduced chilling injury in cucumber (Cucumis sativus) through inhibition of H2O2 accumulation. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 119, 77–83. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2016.04.003
López-Vidal, O., Camejo, D., Rivera-Cabrera, F., Konigsberg, M., Villa-Hernández, J. M., Mendoza-Espinoza, J. A., et al. (2016). Mitochondrial ascorbate–glutathione cycle and proteomic analysis of carbonylated proteins during tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) fruit ripening. Food Chem. 194, 1064–1072. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.08.055
Lum, G. B., Shelp, B. J., DeEll, J. R., Bozzo, G. G. (2016). Oxidative metabolism is associated with physiological disorders in fruits stored under multiple environmental stresses. Plant Sci. 245, 143–152. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2016.02.005
Lüthje, S., Martinez-Cortes, T. (2018). Membrane-bound class III peroxidases: unexpected enzymes with exciting functions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 2876. doi: 10.3390/ijms19102876
Ma, X., Wang, W., Bittner, F., Schmidt, N., Berkey, R., Zhang, L., et al. (2016). Dual and opposing roles of xanthine dehydrogenase in defense-associated reactive oxygen species metabolism in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 28, 1108–1126. doi: 10.1105/tpc.15.00880
Macknight, R. C., Laing, W. A., Bulley, S. M., Broad, R. C., Johnson, A. A., Hellens, R. P. (2017). Increasing ascorbate levels in crops to enhance human nutrition and plant abiotic stress tolerance. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 44, 153–160. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2017.01.011
Marmiroli, M., Mussi, F., Imperiale, D., Lencioni, G., Marmiroli, N. (2017a). Abiotic stress response to As and As+Si, composite reprogramming of fruit metabolites in tomato cultivars. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 2201. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.02201
Marmiroli, M., Mussi, F., Imperiale, D., Marmiroli, N. (2017b). Target proteins reprogrammed by As and As + Si treatments in Solanum lycopersicum L. fruit. BMC Plant Biol. 17, 210. doi: 10.1186/s12870-017-1168-2
Martí, M. C., Camejo, D., Olmos, E., Sandalio, L. M., Fernández-García, N., Jiménez, A., et al. (2009). Characterisation and changes in the antioxidant system of chloroplasts and chromoplasts isolated from green and mature pepper fruits. Plant Biol. (Stuttg) 11, 613–624. doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2008.00149.x
Martí, R., Roselló, S., Cebolla-Cornejo, J. (2016). Tomato as a source of carotenoids and polyphenols targeted to cancer prevention. Cancers, 8, 58. doi: 10.3390/cancers8060058
Martins, L., Trujillo-Hernandez, J. A., Reichheld, J.-P. (2018). Thiol Based Redox Signaling in Plant Nucleus. Front. Plant Sci., 9(May), 1–9. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00705
Massot, C., Bancel, D., Lopez Lauri, F., Truffault, V., Baldet, P., Stevens, R., et al. (2013). High temperature inhibits ascorbate recycling and light stimulation of the ascorbate pool in tomato despite increased expression of biosynthesis genes. PLoS ONE 8, e84474. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084474
Massot, C., Stevens, R., Génard, M., Longuenesse, J.-J., Gautier, H. (2012). Light affects ascorbate content and ascorbate-related gene expression in tomato leaves more than in fruits. Planta 235, 153–163. doi: 10.1007/s00425-011-1493-x
Mehta, R. A., Cassol, T., Li, N., Ali, N., Handa, A. K., Mattoo, A. K. (2002). Engineered polyamine accumulation in tomato enhances phytonutrient content, juice quality, and vine life. Nat. Biotechnol. 20, 613–618. doi: 10.1038/nbt0602-613
Melino, V. J., Soole, K. L., Ford, C. M. (2009). Ascorbate metabolism and the developmental demand for tartaric and oxalic acids in ripening grape berries. BMC Plant Biol. 9, 145. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-9-145
Millar, A. H., Whelan, J., Soole, K. L., Day, D. A. (2011). Organization and regulation of mitochondrial respiration in plants. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 62, 79–104. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103857
Miret, J. A., Munné-Bosch, S. (2015). Redox signaling and stress tolerance in plants: a focus on vitamin E. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1340, 29–38. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12639
Miret, J. A., Munné-Bosch, S. (2016). Abscisic acid and pyrabactin improve vitamin C contents in raspberries. Food Chem. 203, 216–223. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.02.046
Mittler, R., Vanderauwera, S., Suzuki, N., Miller, G., Tognetti, V. B., Vandepoele, K., et al. (2011). ROS signaling: the new wave? Trends Plant Sci. 16, 300–309. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2011.03.007
Mounet-Gilbert, L., Dumont, M., Ferrand, C., Bournonville, C., Monier, A., Jorly, J., et al. (2016). Two tomato GDP-d-mannose epimerase isoforms involved in ascorbate biosynthesis play specific roles in cell wall biosynthesis and development. J. Exp. Bot. 67, 4767–4777. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw260
Muñoz, P., Munné-Bosch, S. (2018). Photo-oxidative stress during leaf, flower and fruit development. Plant Physiol. 176, 1004–1014. doi: 10.1104/pp.17.01127
Murillo, E., Meléndez-Martínez, A. J., Portugal, F. (2010). Screening of vegetables and fruits from Panama for rich sources of lutein and zeaxanthin. Food Chem. 122, 167–172. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.02.034
Nakamura, J., Morikawa-Ichinose, T., Fujimura, Y., Hayakawa, E., Takahashi, K., Ishii, T., et al. (2017). Spatially resolved metabolic distribution for unraveling the physiological change and responses in tomato fruit using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization–mass spectrometry imaging (MALDI–MSI). Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 409, 1697–1706. doi: 10.1007/s00216-016-0118-4
Ni, Z.-J., Hu, K.-D., Song, C.-B., Ma, R.-H., Li, Z.-R., Zheng, J.-L., et al. (2016). Hydrogen sulfide alleviates postharvest senescence of grape by modulating the antioxidant defenses. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longevity 2016, 1–14. doi: 10.1155/2016/4715651
Nimse, S. B., Pal, D. (2015). Free radicals, natural antioxidants, and their reaction mechanisms. RSC Adv. 5, 27986–28006. doi: 10.1039/C4RA13315C
Noctor, G., Mhamdi, A. (2014). Glutathione and NADPH in plant responses to H2O2. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 75 Suppl 1, S3–S4. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2014.10.830
Noctor, G., Mhamdi, A., Foyer, C. H. (2014). The roles of reactive oxygen metabolism in drought: not so cut and dried. Plant Physiol. 164, 1636–1648. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.233478
Noctor, G., Reichheld, J.-P., Foyer, C. H. (2018). ROS-related redox regulation and signaling in plants. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 80, 3–12. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.07.013
O’Brien, J. A., Daudi, A., Butt, V. S., Bolwell, G. P. (2012). Reactive oxygen species and their role in plant defence and cell wall metabolism. Planta 236, 765–779. doi: 10.1007/s00425-012-1696-9
Olas, B. (2018). Berry phenolic antioxidants - implications for human health? Front. Pharmacol., 9(MAR), 1–14. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00078
Osorio, S., Scossa, F., Fernie, A. R. (2013a). Molecular regulation of fruit ripening. Front. Plant Sci. 4, 198. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00198
Osorio, S., Vallarino, J. G., Szecowka, M., Ufaz, S., Tzin, V., Angelovici, R., et al. (2013b). Alteration of the interconversion of pyruvate and malate in the plastid or cytosol of ripening tomato fruit invokes diverse consequences on sugar but similar effects on cellular organic acid, metabolism, and transitory starch accumulation. Plant Physiol. 161, 628–643. doi: 10.1104/pp.112.211094
Padayachee, A., Day, L., Howell, K., Gidley, M. J. (2017). Complexity and health functionality of plant cell wall fibers from fruits and vegetables. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 57, 59–81. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2013.850652
Palma, J. M., Sevilla, F., Jiménez, A., del Río, L. A., Corpas, F. J., Álvarez de Morales, P., et al. (2015). Physiology of pepper fruit and the metabolism of antioxidants: chloroplasts, mitochondria and peroxisomes. Ann. Bot. 116, 627–636. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcv121
Pan, Z., Liu, Q., Yun, Z., Guan, R., Zeng, W., Xu, Q., et al. (2009). Comparative proteomics of a lycopene-accumulating mutant reveals the important role of oxidative stress on carotenogenesis in sweet orange (Citrus sinensis [L.] osbeck). Proteomics 9, 5455–5470. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200900092
Pandey, V. P., Singh, S., Singh, R., Dwivedi, U. N. (2012). Purification and characterization of peroxidase from papaya (Carica papaya) fruit. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 167, 367–376. doi: 10.1007/s12010-012-9672-1
Pétriacq, P., de Bont, L., Hager, J., Didierlaurent, L., Mauve, C., Guérard, F., et al. (2012). Inducible NAD overproduction in Arabidopsis alters metabolic pools and gene expression correlated with increased salicylate content and resistance to Pst-AvrRpm1. Plant J. 70, 650–665. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.04920.x
Pétriacq, P., de Bont, L., Tcherkez, G., Gakière, B. (2013). NAD: not just a pawn on the board of plant-pathogen interactions. Plant Signal Behav. 8, e22477. doi: 10.4161/psb.22477
Pétriacq, P., López, A., Luna, E. (2018). Fruit decay to diseases: can induced resistance and priming help? Plants 7, 77. doi: 10.3390/plants7040077
Pétriacq, P., Ton, J., Patrit, O., Tcherkez, G., Gakière, B. (2016). NAD acts as an integral regulator of multiple defense layers. Plant Physiol. 172, 1465–1479. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.00780
Pilati, S., Brazzale, D., Guella, G., Milli, A., Ruberti, C., Biasioli, F., et al. (2014). The onset of grapevine berry ripening is characterized by ROS accumulation and lipoxygenase-mediated membrane peroxidation in the skin. BMC Plant Biol. 14, 87. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-14-87
Polidoros, A. N., Mylona, P. V., Arnholdt-Schmitt, B. (2009). Aox gene structure, transcript variation and expression in plants. Physiol. Plant. 137, 342–353. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2009.01284.x
Purvis, A. C. (1997). Role of the alternative oxidase in limiting superoxide production by plant mitochondria. Physiol. Plant. 100, 165–170. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1997.tb03468.x
Qin, G., Meng, X., Wang, Q., Tian, S. (2009a). Oxidative damage of mitochondrial proteins contributes to fruit senescence: a redox proteomics analysis. J. Proteome Res. 8, 2449–2462. doi: 10.1021/pr801046m
Qin, G., Wang, Q., Liu, J., Li, B., Tian, S. (2009b). Proteomic analysis of changes in mitochondrial protein expression during fruit senescence. Proteomics 9, 4241–4253. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200900133
Queval, G., Jaillard, D., Zechmann, B., Noctor, G. (2011). Increased intracellular H2O2 availability preferentially drives glutathione accumulation in vacuoles and chloroplasts: Oxidative stress and glutathione compartmentation. Plant Cell and Environ. 34, 21–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02222.x
Quinlan, C. L., Treberg, J. R., Perevoshchikova, I. V., Orr, A. L., Brand, M. D. (2012). Native rates of superoxide production from multiple sites in isolated mitochondria measured using endogenous reporters. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 53, 1807–1817. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.08.015
Raiola, A., Tenore, G., Barone, A., Frusciante, L., Rigano, M. (2015). Vitamin E content and composition in tomato fruits: beneficial roles and bio-fortification. IJMS 16, 29250–29264. doi: 10.3390/ijms161226163
Rasmusson, A. G., Fernie, A. R., van Dongen, J. T. (2009). Alternative oxidase: a defence against metabolic fluctuations? Physiol. Plant. 137, 371–382. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2009.01252.x
Rasmusson, A. G., Geisler, D. A., Møller, I. M. (2008). The multiplicity of dehydrogenases in the electron transport chain of plant mitochondria. Mitochondrion 8, 47–60. doi: 10.1016/j.mito.2007.10.004
Rey, P., Tarrago, L. (2018). Physiological roles of plant methionine sulfoxide reductases in redox homeostasis and signaling. Antioxid. (Basel) 7. doi: 10.3390/antiox7090114
Riedl, K. M., Choksi, K., Wyzgoski, F. J., Scheerens, J. C., Schwartz, S. J., Reese, R. N. (2013). Variation in Lycopene and Lycopenoates, Antioxidant Capacity, and Fruit Quality of Buffaloberry ( Shepherdia argentea [Pursh]Nutt.) J. Food Sci. 78, C1673–C1679. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.12265
Roch, L., Dai, Z., Gomes, E., Bernillon, S., Wang, J., Gibon, Y., et al. (2019). Fruit salad in the lab: Comparing botanical species to help deciphering fruit primary metabolism. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 836. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00836
Rodriguez-Casado, A. (2016). The health potential of fruits and vegetables phytochemicals: notable examples. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 56, 1097–1107. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2012.755149
Rogers, H., Munné-Bosch, S. (2016). Production and scavenging of reactive oxygen species and redox signaling during leaf and flower senescence: similar but different. Plant Physiol. 171, 1560–1568. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.00163
Romanazzi, G., Sanzani, S. M., Bi, Y., Tian, S., Gutiérrez Martínez, P., Alkan, N. (2016). Induced resistance to control postharvest decay of fruit and vegetables. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 122, 82–94. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2016.08.003
Saengnil, K., Chumyam, A., Faiyue, B., Uthaibutra, J. (2014). Use of chlorine dioxide fumigation to alleviate enzymatic browning of harvested ‘Daw’ longan pericarp during storage under ambient conditions. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 91, 49–56. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2013.12.016
Sass-Kiss, A., Kiss, J., Milotay, P., Kerek, M. M., Toth-Markus, M. (2005). Differences in anthocyanin and carotenoid content of fruits and vegetables. Food Res. Int. 38, 1023–1029. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2005.03.014
Schertl, P., Braun, H.-P. (2014). Respiratory electron transfer pathways in plant mitochondria. Front. Plant Sci. 5, 163. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00163
Skupien, K., Oszmianski, J. (2004). Comparison of six cultivars of strawberries (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) grown in northwest Poland. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 219, 66–70. doi: 10.1007/s00217-004-0918-1
Smeyne, M., Smeyne, R. J. (2013). Glutathione metabolism and Parkinson’s disease. Free Radical Biology and Medicine 62, 13–25. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2013.05.001
Smirnoff, N. (2018). Ascorbic acid metabolism and functions: a comparison of plants and mammals. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 122, 116–129. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.03.033
Smirnoff, N., Arnaud, D. (2019). Hydrogen peroxide metabolism and functions in plants. New Phytol. 221, 1197–1214. doi: 10.1111/nph.15488.
Soubeyrand, E., Colombié, S., Beauvoit, B., Dai, Z., Cluzet, S., Hilbert, G., et al. (2018). Constraint-based modeling highlights cell energy, redox status and α-ketoglutarate availability as metabolic drivers for anthocyanin accumulation in grape cells under nitrogen limitation. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 421. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00421
Stevens, R., Buret, M., Duffé, P., Garchery, C., Baldet, P., Rothan, C., et al. (2007). Candidate Genes and Quantitative Trait Loci Affecting Fruit Ascorbic Acid Content in Three Tomato Populations. Plant Physiol. 143, 1943–1953. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.091413
Stevens, R. G., Baldet, P., Bouchet, J.-P., Causse, M., Deborde, C., Deschodt, C., et al. (2018). A systems biology study in tomato fruit reveals correlations between the ascorbate pool and genes involved in ribosome biogenesis, translation, and the heat-shock response. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 137. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00137
Sudheeran, P. K., Feygenberg, O., Maurer, D., Alkan, N. (2018). Improved cold tolerance of mango fruit with enhanced anthocyanin and flavonoid contents. Molecules 23, 1832. doi: 10.3390/molecules23071832
Suzuki, N., Miller, G., Morales, J., Shulaev, V., Torres, M. A., Mittler, R. (2011). Respiratory burst oxidases: the engines of ROS signaling. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 14, 691–699. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2011.07.014
Symons, G. M., Chua, Y.-J., Ross, J. J., Quittenden, L. J., Davies, N. W., Reid, J. B. (2012). Hormonal changes during non-climacteric ripening in strawberry. J. Exp. Bot. 63, 4741–4750. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers147
Thevenet, D., Pastor, V., Baccelli, I., Balmer, A., Vallat, A., Neier, R., et al. (2017). The priming molecule β-aminobutyric acid is naturally present in plants and is induced by stress. New Phytol. 213, 552–559. doi: 10.1111/nph.14298
Tian, S., Qin, G., Li, B. (2013). Reactive oxygen species involved in regulating fruit senescence and fungal pathogenicity. Plant Mol. Biol. 82, 593–602. doi: 10.1007/s11103-013-0035-2
Torres, M. A., Dangl, J. L. (2005). Functions of the respiratory burst oxidase in biotic interactions, abiotic stress and development. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 8, 397–403. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2005.05.014
Trobacher, C. P., Clark, S. M., Bozzo, G. G., Mullen, R. T., DeEll, J. R., Shelp, B. J. (2013). Catabolism of GABA in apple fruit: subcellular localization and biochemical characterization of two γ-aminobutyrate transaminases. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 75, 106–113. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2012.08.005
Tzortzakis, N. G., Economakis, C. D. (2007). Maintaining postharvest quality of the tomato fruit by employing methyl jasmonate and ethanol vapor treatment. J. Food Qual. 30, 567–580. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-4557.2007.00143.x
Valenzuela, J., Manzano, S., Palma, F., Carvajal, F., Garrido, D., Jamilena, M. (2017). Oxidative stress associated with chilling injury in immature fruit: postharvest technological and biotechnological solutions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18, 1467. doi: 10.3390/ijms18071467
Wada, L., Ou, B. (2002). Antioxidant Activity and Phenolic Content of Oregon Caneberries. J. Agric. Food Chem. 50, 3495–3500. doi: 10.1021/jf011405l
Wang, H., Guo, X., Hu, X., Li, T., Fu, X., Liu, R. H. (2017). Comparison of phytochemical profiles, antioxidant and cellular antioxidant activities of different varieties of blueberry (Vaccinium spp.). Food Chem., 217, 773–781. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.09.002
Wargovich, M. J., Morris, J., Moseley, V., Weber, R., Byrne, D. H. (2012). “Developing fruit cultivars with enhanced health properties,” in Fruit breeding. Handbook of plant breeding. Eds. Badenes, M. L., Byrne, D. H. (Boston, MA: Springer US), 37–68. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-0763-9_2
Wilkinson, S. W., Pastor, V., Paplauskas, S., Pétriacq, P., Luna, E. (2018). Long-lasting β-aminobutyric acid–induced resistance protects tomato fruit against Botrytis cinerea. Plant Pathol. 67, 30–41. doi: 10.1111/ppa.12725
Wolfe, K. L., Kang, X., He, X., Dong, M., Zhang, Q., Liu, R. H. (2008). Cellular Antioxidant Activity of Common Fruits. J. Agric. Food Chem., 56(18), 8418–8426. doi: 10.1021/jf801381y
Wu, B., Guo, Q., Li, Q., Ha, Y., Li, X., Chen, W. (2014). Impact of postharvest nitric oxide treatment on antioxidant enzymes and related genes in banana fruit in response to chilling tolerance. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 92, 157–163. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2014.01.017
Wu, F., Li, Q., Yan, H., Zhang, D., Jiang, G., Jiang, Y., et al. (2016). Characteristics of three thioredoxin genes and their role in chilling tolerance of harvested banana fruit. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 17, 1526. doi: 10.3390/ijms17091526
Yang, H., Wu, F., Cheng, J. (2011a). Reduced chilling injury in cucumber by nitric oxide and the antioxidant response. Food Chem. 127, 1237–1242. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.02.011
Yang, X.-Y., Xie, J.-X., Wang, F.-F., Zhong, J., Liu, Y.-Z., Li, G.-H., et al. (2011b). Comparison of ascorbate metabolism in fruits of two citrus species with obvious difference in ascorbate content in pulp. J. Plant Physiol. 168, 2196–2205. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2011.07.015
Yesbergenova, Z., Yang, G., Oron, E., Soffer, D., Fluhr, R., Sagi, M. (2005). The plant Mo-hydroxylases aldehyde oxidase and xanthine dehydrogenase have distinct reactive oxygen species signatures and are induced by drought and abscisic acid. Plant J. 42, 862–876. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02422.x
Young, A., Lowe, G. (2018). Carotenoids—antioxidant properties. Antioxidants 7, 28. doi: 10.3390/antiox7020028
Zermiani, M., Zonin, E., Nonis, A., Begheldo, M., Ceccato, L., Vezzaro, A., et al. (2015). Ethylene negatively regulates transcript abundance of ROP-GAP rheostat-encoding genes and affects apoplastic reactive oxygen species homeostasis in epicarps of cold stored apple fruits. J. Exp. Bot. 66, 7255–7270. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv422
Zhang, H., Ma, L., Wang, L., Jiang, S., Dong, Y., Zheng, X. (2008). Biocontrol of gray mold decay in peach fruit by integration of antagonistic yeast with salicylic acid and their effects on postharvest quality parameters. Biol. Control 47, 60–65. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2008.06.012
Zhang, Y., Butelli, E., De Stefano, R., Schoonbeek, H.-J., Magusin, A., Pagliarani, C., et al. (2013). Anthocyanins double the shelf life of tomatoes by delaying overripening and reducing susceptibility to gray mold. Curr. Biol. 23, 1094–1100. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.04.072
Zhang, Y., Li, Y., He, Y., Hu, W., Zhang, Y., Wang, X., et al. (2018). Identification of NADPH oxidase family members associated with cold stress in strawberry. FEBS Open Bio. 8, 593–605. doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.12393
Keywords: redox, fruit, ROS, metabolism, NAD, glutathione, tomato, ascorbate
Citation: Decros G, Baldet P, Beauvoit B, Stevens R, Flandin A, Colombié S, Gibon Y and Pétriacq P (2019) Get the Balance Right: ROS Homeostasis and Redox Signalling in Fruit. Front. Plant Sci. 10:1091. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01091
Received: 13 February 2019; Accepted: 09 August 2019;
Published: 18 September 2019.
Edited by:
Franco Famiani, University of Perugia, ItalyReviewed by:
Robert D. Hancock, The James Hutton Institute, United KingdomAdriano Sofo, University of Basilicata, Italy
Copyright © 2019 Decros, Baldet, Beauvoit, Stevens, Flandin, Colombié, Gibon and Pétriacq. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Guillaume Decros, guillaume.decros@inra.fr; Pierre Pétriacq, pierre.petriacq@inra.fr