Harun Ilhan
Trevor Royce
Xuefeng Qiu
Constantinos Zamboglou- 1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwigs-Maximilian Universitaet (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
- 2Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
- 3Flatiron Health, New York, NY, United States
- 4Department of Urology, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
- 5Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- 6German Oncology Center, European University Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus
Editorial on the Research Topic
Exploring the Potential of PSMA-PET Imaging on Personalized Prostate Cancer Treatment
Introduction
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most frequent cancer diagnosis made in men worldwide (1). Accurate and reliable diagnostic medical imaging is a frequent prerequisite for personalized treatment approaches in patients with PCa by enabling, in part, (i) understanding extent of disease, (ii) accurate segmentation of PCa lesions and, (iii) non-invasive tumor characterization, for example, using radiomics or artificial intelligence tools (2).
Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) has been found to be selectively overexpressed in PCa cells (3) and can be traced by radio-labelled peptide ligands in positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET). First studies suggested excellent diagnostic accuracy and a major impact on therapeutic approaches for PSMA-PET in newly diagnosed (4), recurrent (5) or metastatic PCa patients (4). The goal of this Research Topic was to concentrate scientific contributions on the growing evidence of integrating PSMA-PET imaging in personalized PCa treatment concepts.
The Research Topic accepted 15 articles including a total of 126 authors, demonstrating the growing interest in the field of PSMA-PET imaging. The manuscripts of the Research Topic can be divided into the following topics.
PSMA-PET for Primary Localized PCa
The accurate segmentation of the intraprostatic tumor mass is a prerequisite for precise targeted-biopsy and focal therapy (FT) approaches in patients with localized PCa. The current imaging gold-standard for intraprostatic tumor detection and delineation is multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) (6, 7). However, mpMRI was reported to be associated with underestimation of the true intraprostatic PCa extent (Kramer et al.). Recently, it has been suggested that PSMA-PET might give complementary information for intraprostatic tumor detection (8) and guidance of FT (9). In this Research Topic, Spohn et al. compared manual and semi-automatic methods for intraprostatic tumor delineation based on 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT images. By using whole-section surgery specimen as the standard of reference the authors proposed several methods with high sensitivity or high specificity. In another work by Spohn et al. the authors used the same methodology in terms of histology reference to perform an in-silico radiotherapy planning study (The authors simulated a focal radiotherapy dose escalation based on PSMA-PET and mpMR images and demonstrated that a dosimetric sparing of the intraprostatic urethra might increase the therapeutic ratio.
PSMA-PET for Recurrent PCa
Biochemical recurrence (BCR) after primary curative intent radiotherapy or radical prostatectomy represents one of the major challenges in the management of PCa. In the recent years, multiple 68Ga- and 18F-labelled PSMA-targeting radiotracers have been introduced and recommended in several guidelines (10–12). Furthermore, 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 18F-DCFPyL received recent FDA-approval for imaging of BCR (13, 14).
This Research Topic includes two meta-analyses evaluating the value of several PET-radiopharmaceuticals for the detection of BCR. Wang et al. included 46 studies and compared the three 18F-labeled radiotracers 18F-choline targeting the phospholipid metabolism, the amino acid 8F-Fluciclovine, and 18F-labelled PSMA-targeting tracers including PSMA-1007, rhPSMA-7, and DCFPyL. Highest detection rates, even at low PSA levels were observed for 18F-PSMA tracers, with a sensitivity of 58% at PSA levels of <0.5 ng/ml compared to 35% and 23% for 18F-Choline and 18F-Fluciclovine, respectively. In a detailed review and meta-analysis on detection rates for 18F-DCFPyL, Sun et al. included 844 patients from 9 studies. With a pooled sensitivity of 88.8% at PSA levels ≥0.5 ng/ml and 47.2% at <0.5 ng/ml, 18F-DCFPyL provides high detection rates for BCR despite high heterogeneity in the overall cohort.
The impact of PSMA-PET imaging on the therapeutic management of PCa patients represents another major aspect of this Research Topic. In a multicenter retrospective analysis, Schmidt-Hegemann et al. evaluated biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) after salvage radiotherapy (RT) in a cohort of 459 patients without lymph node or distant metastasis determined by conventional imaging and additional 68Ga-PSMA-PET or conventional imaging alone. The authors did not find any significant impact of prior 68Ga-PSMA PET on BRFS despite more adverse clinical features in the PET cohort. These results indicate that salvage RT should not be postponed until a PSMA PET-positive result is observed in patients with BCR. Several work-groups all over the globe have evaluated the impact of different PSMA-PET tracers on salvage RT. The high sensitivity of PSMA-PET, specifically for small lymph node and bone metastases has a high impact on target volume definition. According the article by Bottke et al. including only patients with PSA levels ≤0.5 ng/ml, PSMA-PET has a major impact on the target volume definition in 17% and a minor impact in 11%. According to the authors, PSMA-PET based RT might have impact on patients survival. Vogel et al. evaluate the toxicity and outcome of dose escalated salvage RT (DE-SRT) after PSMA-PET compared to conventional salvage RT with. There were no significant differences regarding toxicity rates and the majority of patients should PSA response indicating the feasibility of DE-SRT for personalized RT planning.
Finally, this Research Topic also includes an article on the administrative challenges when imaging PCa patients with BCR. Young et al. provide a detailed description of a PSMA-PET registry in Ontario, Canada including the impact of PSMA-PET imaging on patient management, stakeholder perspectives and interviews. They provide data for 18F-DCFPyL in more than 1700 men since 2018. The main idea is to summarize important real world data to provide improved access to novel PET radiopharmaceuticals also in the future.
PSMA-PET for Metastatic PCa
Local therapy applications in the metastatic setting is one of the exciting developing frontiers of prostate cancer treatment; for example the randomized STOMP trial (15) which found an androgen deprivation therapy-free survival benefit with metastasis-directed therapy (e.g., ablation with stereotactic radiotherapy) for oligorecurrent prostate cancer. The improved performance of PSMA-based imaging techniques amplify this excitement, with the potential to detect earlier metastases. Henkenberens et al. add to the developing body of literature in this area by reporting their experience of 42 patients with oligometastatic CRPC (141 PSMA positive metastases) receiving radiation to all PSMA positive lesions. Their results further suggest such approaches may delay the need for systemic therapies (eg second-line systemic treatment free survival).
Beyond target delineation for the above local therapy applications, PSMA imaging will also likely be valuable in assessing systemic treatment response for metastatic disease. In this context it should be mentioned that PSMA theranostics may result in damage to some PSMA expressing normal tissues such as salivary glands during PSMA-radioligand therapy. Mittlmeier et al. put effort into characterizing and standardizing PSMA-measured metastatic lymph node treatment responses by correlating PSMA-based tumor volumes with a CT reference in fifty patients with metastatic prostate cancer. In their investigation, they derive a proposed SUV threshold value for this purpose. These sorts of investigations will lay the groundwork for future clinical research as PSMA-applications continue to expand. Importantly, these applications can enhance imaging performance by appropriately accounting for normal tissues (ie physiologic uptake of radiotracer). In this Research Topic, Shi et al. published their efforts into characterizing this as it relates to peripheral ganglia physiologic uptake versus pathologic lymph node metastases uptake among 138 prostate cancer patients who underwent both PSMA and FDG scans (Shi et al.; Shi et al.).
Conclusion
The evolving field of PSMA-targeted diagnostic imaging and therapeutics (theranostics) promise to advance the management of PCa patients in all stages of the disease. Exciting opportunities abound with PSMA-theranostics currently in the discovery pipeline. In a Mini Review by Ng et al. a vision for multidisciplinary use of PSMA theranostics was presented. We fully agree with Ng et al., who conclude by highlighting that the collaboration across the multidisciplinary prostate cancer team will be essential in maximizing the impact of these novel techniques.
Author Contributions
All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of Interest
Authors TR was employed by Flatiron Health.
The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Rawla P. Epidemiology of Prostate Cancer. World J Oncol (2019) 10(2):63–89. doi: 10.14740/wjon1191
2. Kostyszyn D, Fechter T, Bartl N, Grosu AL, Gratzke C, Sigle A, et al. Intraprostatic Tumor Segmentation on PSMA PET Images in Patients With Primary Prostate Cancer With a Convolutional Neural Network. J Nucl Med (2021) 62(6):823–8. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.120.254623
3. Bravaccini S, Puccetti M, Bocchini M, Ravaioli S, Celli M, Scarpi E, et al. PSMA Expression: A Potential Ally for the Pathologist in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis. Sci Rep (2018) 8(1):4254. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22594-1
4. Hofman MS, Lawrentschuk N, Francis RJ, Tang C, Vela I, Thomas P, et al. Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET-CT in Patients With High-Risk Prostate Cancer Before Curative-Intent Surgery or Radiotherapy (proPSMA): A Prospective, Randomised, Multicentre Study. Lancet (2020) 395(10231):1208–16. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30314-7
5. Fendler WP, Calais J, Eiber M, Flavell RR, Mishoe A, Feng FY, et al. Assessment of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET Accuracy in Localizing Recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Single-Arm Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol (2019) 5(6):856–63. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0096
6. Kerkmeijer LGW, Groen VH, Pos FJ, Haustermans K, Monninkhof EM, Smeenk RJ, et al. Focal Boost to the Intraprostatic Tumor in External Beam Radiotherapy for Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer: Results From the FLAME Randomized Phase III Trial. J Clin Oncol (2021) 39(7):787–96. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.02873
7. Ahdoot M, Wilbur AR, Reese SE, Lebastchi AH, Mehralivand S, Gomella PT, et al. MRI-Targeted, Systematic, and Combined Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis. N Engl J Med (2020) 382(10):917–28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910038
8. Lam TBL, MacLennan S, Willemse PM, Mason MD, Plass K, Shepherd R, et al. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Prostate Cancer Guideline Panel Consensus Statements for Deferred Treatment With Curative Intent for Localised Prostate Cancer From an International Collaborative Study (DETECTIVE Study). Eur Urol (2019) 76(6):790–813. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.09.020
9. Zamboglou C, Thomann B, Koubar K, Bronsert P, Krauss T, Rischke HC, et al. Focal Dose Escalation for Prostate Cancer Using (68)Ga-HBED-CC PSMA PET/CT and MRI: A Planning Study Based on Histology Reference. Radiat Oncol (2018) 13(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s13014-018-1036-8
10. Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, Van den Broeck T, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M, et al. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment With Curative Intent. Eur Urol (2021) 79(2):243–62. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.042
11. Parker C, Castro E, Fizazi K, Heidenreich A, Ost P, Procopio G, et al. Prostate Cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-Up. Ann Oncol (2020) 31(9):1119–34. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.06.011
12. Schaeffer E, Srinivas S, Antonarakis ES, Armstrong AJ, Bekelman JE, Cheng H, et al. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Prostate Cancer, Version 1.2021. J Natl Compr Canc Netw (2021) 19(2):134–43. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0008
13. Liu A, Han J, Nakano A, Konno H, Moriwaki H, Abe H, et al. New Pharmaceuticals Approved by FDA in 2020: Small-Molecule Drugs Derived From Amino Acids and Related Compounds. Chirality (2021). doi: 10.1002/chir.23376
14. Keam SJ. Piflufolastat F 18: Diagnostic First Approval. Mol Diagn Ther (2021) 25(5):647–56. doi: 10.1007/s40291-021-00548-0
Keywords: prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA), prostate cancer, personalized and precision medicine (PPM), surgery, radiotherapy
Citation: Ilhan H, Royce T, Qiu X and Zamboglou C (2022) Editorial: Exploring the Potential of PSMA-PET Imaging on Personalized Prostate Cancer Treatment. Front. Oncol. 12:832747. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.832747
Received: 10 December 2021; Accepted: 14 January 2022;
Published: 02 February 2022.
Edited and reviewed by:
Zaver Bhujwalla, Johns Hopkins University, United StatesCopyright © 2022 Ilhan, Royce, Qiu and Zamboglou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Constantinos Zamboglou, constantinos.zamboglou@uniklinik-freiburg.de; Harun Ilhan, harun.ilhan@med.uni-muenchen.de