Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Nutr., 22 August 2022
Sec. Nutrition and Food Science Technology
Volume 9 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.1000116

Biopolymer-based functional films for packaging applications: A review

Abdullah1 Jiyang Cai1 Muhammad Adnan Hafeez2 Qun Wang1 Shahzad Farooq3 Qingrong Huang4 Wenni Tian1 Jie Xiao1*
  • 1Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Functional Food Active Substances, College of Food Sciences, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
  • 2Department of Allied Health Sciences, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Superior University, Lahore, Pakistan
  • 3College of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
  • 4Department of Food Science, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States

Food packaging is a coordinated system comprising food processing, protection from contamination and adulteration, transportation and storage, and distribution and consumption at optimal cost with a minimum environmental impact to the packed food commodity. Active packaging involves deliberate addition of the functional ingredients either in the film or the package headspace to preserve the food quality, improve safety and nutrition aspects, and enhance the shelf-life. In this review, recent advances in the fabrication of biopolymer-based films, their classification (biodegradable-, active-, and intelligent packaging films), advanced fabrication strategies (composite-, multilayer-, and emulsified films), and special functions induced by the biopolymers to the film matrix (mechanical-, water resistance and gas barrier-, and optical properties, and bioactive compounds reservoir) were briefly discussed. A summary of conclusions and future perspectives of biopolymer-based packaging films as advanced biomaterial in preserving the food quality, improving safety and nutrition aspects, and enhancing shelf-life of the products was proposed.

Introduction

Food packaging is a coordinated system for the processing of food and its storage, transportation, distribution, retailing, and ultimate consumption by the end user at an optimal cost. It is also characterized as a tool to contain and protect the commodity with a minimum environmental impact (1). In the developed world, packaging industry contributes >2% of the gross national product, and the food packaging represents a half of this share (2). In 2018, global packaging industry has been reported to be worth of $931.1 billions, and predicted to reach $1177.7 billions in 2025. Interestingly, food packaging industry holds the largest portion costed $293 billions in 2018, which would be forecasted to worth of $423.27 billions in 2025 (3, 4).

The basic functions of packaging include protection to the commodity from external contamination and preservation for a longer period by minimizing the effects of external factors (e.g., moisture, heat, light, microorganisms, insects, and dust particles etc.). In addition, it also helps in preventing tampering and enhancing product traceability (5). Besides the provision of these basic functions, modern packaging technologies, i.e., active packaging interacts with the commodity to incorporate functional ingredients that can release or absorb compounds to or from the packaged commodity or the environment surrounding the commodity resulting in increased shelf-life, safety, and quality (6). Intelligent packaging performs functions and communicates with the consumers’ to facilitate in decision making on quality, safety, and shelf-life by monitoring the conditions (internal and external) of the package, and warns about problems by detecting, tracing, sensing, recording, and applying scientific logic (7, 8).

Among the different packaging materials, glass is considered as the best choice owing to its transparency, inertness, and good barrier properties, however, limitations, including poor portability, brittleness, and heaviness are associated with its usage. Similarly, metal and metal sheet lags were regarded as inappropriate materials due to low inertness, transparency, and portability challenges (9). Petroleum-based plastic films (e.g., polyethylene, polyvinyl chloride, and polypropylene) were widely used as packaging material due to easy availability, good mechanical [tensile strength (TS), elongation at break (EAB), and Young’s modulus], and functional properties (permeability to water vapors, oxygen, carbon dioxide, and aromatic compounds) (10). However, serious disposal problems and negative environmental impacts are associated with these plastics, since, such materials are non-biodegradable and also originate from non-renewable resources (11). Moreover, toxic chemical ingredients (flame retardants, pigments, and plasticizers etc.) used in the preparation of plastic packaging material and microplastics may migrate and contaminate the food stuff, resulting in adverse health effects. Furthermore, the microplastics and derived nanoparticles end up in the ocean, and being transformed into persistent organic pollutants that may enter into the food chain by consumption of the marine products (12). Moreover, old fashioned technologies used for the dumping of plastic materials, including landfilling and burning further aggravate the environmental and health risks (13). Regarding the application of petroleum-based films in food preservation, their incapability to incorporate active compounds do not satisfy the demand for achieving antimicrobial and/or antioxidative effects. The above-mentioned situation demands the researchers to fabricate eco-friendly packaging biomaterials from natural and renewable resources with biosafety, biocompatible, and biodegradable characteristics. In this regard, a large amount of agricultural by-products produced every year had the potential to be used in food packaging applications as biodegradable, renewable, and cost-competitive raw material.

The biopolymers (e.g., polysaccharides, proteins, and lipids) can be decomposed into CH4, CO2, H2O, and inorganic compounds mainly by the action of microorganisms (14). A large amount of agricultural by-products produced every year had the potential to be used in food packaging applications as biodegradable, renewable, and cost-competitive raw material (15). Biodegradable polymers possess esters and amide bonds in their chemical structure due to the presence of biodegradable functional groups. During the degradation process of aqueous and enzymatic hydrolysis, these biopolymers turns into shorter and water soluble polymers (16), and decomposed completely without producing any toxic and harmful substances (17). Therefore, application of biopolymers in developing packaging materials is considered highly promising owing to low risk of toxicity or harmful chemicals production, an easy break down into harmless end-products and subsequently become part of the soil (18).

Plant and animal based biopolymers such as polysaccharides, lipids, and proteins as well as different bioplastics produced by microbial synthesis have been used to develop eco-friendly food packaging material with promising potential such as carrier for functional compounds (1724). The provision of high quality safe food products with a longer shelf-life is another critical issue in packaged food (25). The functional ingredients loaded packaging films provided protection to food stuff from physical, chemical, and biological hazards (5, 6, 26). Moreover, the incorporation of various antimicrobial and antioxidant agents in packaging films offers potent antimicrobial and antioxidant activities (27). For instance, several research studies reported on the use of several metals and their oxides as nanomaterials, including Ag, Cu, CuO, TiO2, and ZnO, to form antimicrobial films (25, 2831). Recently, studies reported the fabrication of several biodegradable films having antifungal properties and subsequently prolonged the shelf-life of the packaged food (3235). Likewise, different types of antioxidant packaging materials have also been formulated using essential oils, plant extracts, and natural pigments such as curcumin, melanin, and anthocyanins (10, 26, 36, 37).

This review highlights the recent advances in the fabrication of biopolymer-based films for food packaging applications (Table 1). The different types of films (biodegradable-, active-, and intelligent packaging films), advanced fabrication strategies (composite-, multilayer-, and emulsified films) to achieve desired functionality of films, and functions induced by biopolymers to the matrix have been comprehensively discussed. This article also provides a detailed understanding of the special functions, including mechanical-, water resistance and gas barrier-, and optical properties, and bioactive compounds reservoir induced due to constitutive nature of the film matrix, i.e., biopolymers and functional ingredients (Figure 1). Current challenges faced in the production of biopolymer-based films and future perspectives emphasizing industrial applications to preserve the product quality, improve safety and nutrition aspects, and enhance shelf-life were also highlighted.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Biopolymer-based functional films for active packaging applications.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. An overview diagram elaborating biopolymer-based films, their classification, advance strategies to fulfill functionality of films, special functions induced by biopolymers to the films matrix, conclusions, and future aspects.

Classification of films

Biodegradable packaging films

The edible film and coating terms are referred as synonyms and can be defined as “a primary packaging material that is made up of edible ingredients,” however, they differ in mode of application. Briefly, the edible film is solidified before applying on the packaged commodity while coating is applied in liquid form and subsequently dried (38). Biodegradable films produced from the materials which can be decomposed into the soil after their intended use. In this regard, the use of natural biopolymers in the preparation of edible films has gained significant attention during the last two decades as a safe alternative to petroleum-based packaging materials due to their negative environmental impact and serious disposal problems (39). These polymers are mainly classified into three categories on the basis of their origin and method of production. The first category includes the biopolymers directly extracted from biomass (carbohydrates and proteins), and being widely used in food packaging applications due to their good barrier properties (40, 41). The second category of polymers were synthesized from biobased monomers by classical polymerization, such as polylactic acid (42), and the third category of polymers produced by the actions of microorganisms (43).

In recent years, applications of edible films have rapidly increased in the food industry due to their biodegradable property as well as increasing the shelf-life of packaged products (4446). Fruits and vegetables based biopolymers have been widely used in the preparation of biodegradable films, and such films successfully preserved the food quality as well as improved the shelf-life and sensory characteristics (4650). However, it has been reported that the films prepared from these biopolymers exhibited brittleness in their structure ascribed to extensive intermolecular forces which can be inhibited through plasticizer addition, although at the expense of a higher water vapor permeability (51). The addition of a plasticizer accelerates water vapor transmission by enhancing water vapor diffusivity through the polymeric structure by increasing the inter-chain spacing between polymer chains (52, 53).

This section summarizes the preparation and characterization of biodegradable films prepared from different fruits and vegetables such as apple (54, 55), banana (46, 56), guava (57), mango (47, 58), papaya (59, 60), tomato (61, 62), and sugar beetroot etc. (63). Shin et al. (54) developed apple peel powder and carboxymethyl cellulose based biodegradable packaging films by blending these biopolymers along with nanoclay (cloisite Na+) using high pressure homogenization technology. The resultant films exhibited good physical, mechanical, and functional properties such as transparency, thickness, EAB, and water vapor permeability ascribed to the formation of cloisite Na+ nanocomposite. The authors suggested that developing such novel biodegradable packaging films as a promising practical strategy to transform agricultural biomass into eco-friendly packaging materials with improved physicochemical properties. Shin et al. (55) developed apple peel powder based active edible coating by blending it with carboxymethyl cellulose and tartaric acid as an antimicrobial agent via high pressure homogenization technique. The results indicated that apple peel based active edible coatings proved highly effective in suppressing microbial growth (bacteria, mold, and yeast) and complete inhibition of lipid oxidation of the beef patties. Interestingly, the active coating solution could not affect the sensorial characteristics of the raw and cooked beef patties, thus, active edible coatings could possibly be used to improve microbiological safety, prevent deterioration, and extend shelf-life of food products. Du et al. (61) prepared a tomato puree-based edible film by incorporating allspice, garlic, and oregano essential oils. The obtained film exhibited desired mechanical properties, water resistance ability and optical property as well as showed remarkable antimicrobial activities against Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella enterica, and Listeria monocytogenes. Azeredo et al. (47) developed mango puree-based edible films and employed cellulose nanofibers for nanoreinforcement to improve the mechanical and barrier properties of films. The results indicated that the mango puree-based films showed better TS and water barrier ability after incorporation of cellulose nanofibers that led to the formation of a fibrillar network within the matrix.

Active packaging films

Modern definition of the active packaging is “any packaging system in which active ingredients have been deliberately added (in/on) either in the packaging material or the package headspace to improve the safety and stability of the packaged products (64, 65).” The basic principles of active packaging rely on the properties of the biopolymers that constitute packaging material and certain active substances (e.g., antimicrobials, antioxidants, phytochemicals, moisture absorbers, and probiotics) embedded inside the biopolymer-based matrix (6668). The package system has the ability to potentially release desirable active constituents as well as block gases, moisture, or other undesirable compounds (69). Briefly, the active packaging systems can be classified into two major categories depending upon their functionality; (i) emitters that release active substances with desirable activities to bring a positive impact in the package, and (ii) scavengers that reduce undesirable compounds, such as ethylene, carbon dioxide, oxygen, moisture, and off-odors within the packaging environment (6). In this regard, antioxidant-, antibacterial-, antifungal agents, and essential oils have been incorporated into the active films as functional ingredients. Among these active agents, the incorporation of antimicrobial and antioxidant agents into the active packaging films have been recognized as the most promising because they can enhance the shelf-life, preserve quality, and improve safety of products by inhibiting the growth and proliferation of food pathogens (70). Also, several studies have suggested that plant-based polyphenols can be used as a green alternative to synthetic antimicrobials and antioxidants possessing serious health risks (71).

Several bioactive ingredients have been explored to fabricate packaging films that showed potentials by imparting antioxidant (26, 72), antimicrobial (2, 73), antifungal (26, 74), and controlled release properties (11, 75). The bioactive phytochemicals have been reported to be a potential source of potent antioxidants (e.g., polyphenols, flavonoids, tannins), besides improving the antimicrobial and mechanical properties of biopolymer-based functional films (7). Priyadarshi et al. (76) prepared chitosan-based film via solvent casting as active food packaging material by incorporating apricot (Prunus armeniaca) kernel essential oil as the functional ingredient. When the chitosan to apricot kernel essential oil ratio was 1:1, the fabricated film showed following improvements: the water vapor barrier capacity increased by 41%, and TS by 94%, however, a proportional increment in the TS value was observed with the increasing oil concentration. Compared to neat chitosan film, the oil incorporated film presented excellent antimicrobial and antioxidant properties by virtue of N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone, a strong antimicrobial as well as antioxidant substance present in the oil. Briefly, when the formed film was tested as active food packaging material, it inhibited the growth of Bacillus subtilis (Gram-positive) and E. coli (Gram-negative) bacteria as well as Rhizopus stolonifer (bread mold fungi), indicating antimicrobial potential of film that could be used commercially to enhance the shelf-life of food products. Luzi et al. (77) fabricated poly (vinyl alcohol-co-ethylene) based films by solvent casting and extrusion methods comprising two bioactive compounds, including gallic acid and umbelliferone at 5wt% and 15wt%, respectively. The study results showed that active formulations loaded films successfully inhibited the formation of pathogenic bacterial biofilms (Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. vesicatoria CFBP3274, Pectobacterium carotovorum CFBP 1878T, and Erwinia carotovora CFBP 2577), and fungal growth (Botrytis cinerea CBS 120091) after 48 h and 7 days incubation, respectively. However, the addition of active ingredients had no significant impact on the films mechanical properties in terms of TS and elastic modulus, indicating films potential for food packaging applications to preserve the quality during processing, transportation, and storage. Kanatt (78) prepared an active packaging film using polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and gelatin (GE) biopolymers as matrix containing Amaranthus leaf extract (ALE). Their results indicated that the film thickness, TS, and puncture strength of extract incorporated films were increased from 100 to 160 μm, 15.8 to 19.2 MPa, and 1.7–1.95 N, respectively, as compared to films without ALE. Moreover, the water solubility and swelling capacity of extract containing films were found less by 35.03 and 42.84% compared to the neat film. The films containing extract presented excellent antibacterial properties: the inhibition zones recorded for Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus aureus, E. coli, and Pseudomonas fluorescens were 33 ± 2 mm, 30 ± 1 mm, 26 ± 1 mm, and 25 ± 1 mm, respectively, while neat films exhibited no antibacterial effects. In addition, the antioxidant activity evaluated by DPPH scavenging activity was significantly higher in extract containing film (42.58%) as compared to neat film (2.2%). Besides, when active film was applied on fish and chicken during chilled storage, it enhanced the shelf-life up to 12-days, while the neat film had a shelf-life of only 3-days. The lipid oxidation of fish and chicken stored in PVA-GE-based film increased to 2.89 and 1.25 mg MDA/kg, respectively after 3-days, while extract incorporated film (PVA-GE-ALE) showed an increase of 1.3 and 1.07 mg MDA/kg even after 12-days of storage. The study suggested that the PVA-GE-ALE films had better physical, mechanical, antibacterial, and antioxidant properties, as well as preserved the fish and chicken by retarding oxidative changes during chilled storage.

Riaz et al. (79) developed chitosan-based films via solvent casting method by incorporating Chinese chive root extract (1, 3, and 5% w/w) containing phenolic compounds. The resultant films properties were significantly improved as the water solubility, swelling degree, and water vapor permeability decreased from 31.6 to 18.7%, 57.4 to 40.5%, and 15.67 to 7.81 × 10–11 gm–1 s–1 Pa–1, respectively. Moreover, the antioxidant activities in terms of DPPH and ABTS free radicals scavenging capacity significantly increased from 6.95 to 47.05% and 11.98 to 57.38%, respectively. The color of the films became more yellowish and darker when the amount of Chinese chive root extract increased up to 5 percent. Regarding antimicrobial activity, the films containing 5% Chinese chive root extract had promising inhibitory effects against different bacteria, including B. cereus, S. aureus, E. coli, and Salmonella Typhimurium with zones of inhibition 18.79 ± 0.37 mm, 18.12 ± 0.36 mm, 16.21 ± 0.32 mm, and 14.91 ± 0.29 mm, respectively. The study’s findings showed that functional films exhibited promising antioxidant and antimicrobial properties that could possibly be used as a bio-composite packaging film for food packaging applications at commercial level.

Intelligent packaging films

Intelligent packaging is defined as “a coordinated system of food packaging that enables the consumers’ to obtain information about the quality in the food supply chain by monitoring the storage conditions of the packaged food” (80). This process is carried out with the aid of different sensors and indicators linked to the packaging system or by means of colorimetric changes (81, 82). The sensors identify, record, and transmit the quality changes and product information, while indicators monitor time, temperature, and pH (83). Figure 2 indicates several intelligent packaging systems such as gas, pH, time, temperature, and humidity sensors, being incorporated into or printed onto the food packaging materials in order to monitor the real time quality of the packaged food (84). In recent years, studies have also reported the development of biosensors being employed for the detection of pathogenic bacteria (85, 86).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Emerging industrial applications of biopolymer-based intelligent packaging films being employed for monitoring the quality of food such as fruits, meat, and dairy products.

Among the intelligent packaging systems, pH indicators are the most promising packaging systems comprising a pH sensitive solid base and a dye (87). The dyes used in this packaging system are extracted from fruits and vegetables. A change in pH occurs when a certain food starts its deterioration process, which indicates the quality changes with the change in pH (7). Ezati and Rhim (88) fabricated a chitosan-based packaging film through casting method with the inclusion of pH responsive alizarin and evaluated as intelligent packaging applications on fish. The alizarin incorporated chitosan film was proved to be sensitive to the ammonia vapors and a change in color from yellow to purple was observed with the change in pH from 4 to 10. The results suggested that the prepared composite film could be used to detect the onset of fish spoilage by monitoring color change from khaki to light brown as the pH of the packaged fish changed. Li et al. (89) formulated chitosan (CS) based colorimetric pH indicator as intelligent packaging film by incorporating different concentrations (10, 30, and 50%) of purple tomato anthocyanins (PTA) by casting method to evaluate milk and fish freshness/spoilage. The potential application of PTA-CS composite film as intelligent packaging to monitor food spoilage and freshness was confirmed, as the film with 10% PTA responded to the progressive spoilage of milk or fish with color changes (from pink → light purple → bright green → light green → light yellow at pH = 3, pH = 5, pH = 7, pH = 9, and pH = 11, respectively).

Pacquit et al. (90) formulated a smart packaging film to detect fish spoilage using bromocresol green (BCG) (sodium salt) as pH sensitive dye which is then spin-coated at 1,000, 2,000, and 3,000 rpm onto optically clear polyethylene terephthalate (PET) substrate disks. The results exhibited that with the increase in spin rate, the thickness of the sensor decreased (2.57, 1.36, and 1.01 μm at a spin rate of 1,000, 2,000, and 3,000 rpm, respectively). The thickest sensors, coated at 1,000 rpm reflected higher signal strength than others and a more intense color change was visible with the naked eye. Keeping in view this clear color indication of the said sensor, the authors further utilized this sensor for fish spoilage trials. The results showed that during fish spoilage trial, reflectance colorimeter was unable to detect any color change in the first 14 h. However, a significant increase in reflectance was observed at 16–18 h. As the sensor changed color from yellow to green and then blue at 43 h, and no further color change was observed. Conclusively, it was suggested that the prepared pH sensitive dye responded to the amines secreted from the fish with the change in color. Zhai et al. (91) developed a pH sensitive intelligent packaging film using gellan gum, gelatin, and red radish anthocyanins extract to monitor fish spoilage. The composite film showed an orange red to yellow color change in the pH range of 2–12. The authors explained that the fabricated composite film showed visible color changes during fish spoilage, besides its use as pH indicators as the intelligent packaging systems.

Besides, the pH and color indicators, recently food freshness indicators (FFI) and time-temperature indicators (TTI) have paved their way in the field of intelligent packaging system with the potential of rapid response to stored food quality and temperature changes through color changes. In this regard, electrospinning technology have been used in the recent years to fabricate FFI/TTI intelligent packaging owing to its higher porosity, higher molecular orientation, and higher level of versatility (92). Maftoonazad and Ramaswamy (93) formulated PVA based electrospun nanofibers with the incorporation of red cabbage extract (RCE) to assess its potential for the packaging and real time monitoring of fresh date fruits (rutab) during storage. The results of the colorimetric analysis explained that an intense color change was recorded in various pH values with the increase in anthocyanins concentration from 10 to 30%. The results suggested that the indicator color changed from blue to violet and then purple from the start of the storage time to the spoilage step, respectively. This change in color occurred due to the increased concentration of CO2 in the packaging headspace. In another study, Xu et al. (94) used electrospinning technique to develop an oxygen sensor to monitor the respiration and freshness of grapes. The authors used tris (4,7-diphenyl-1,10-phenanthroline) ruthenium (II) dichloride (RuDPP) as an oxygen-sensitive probe along with silane-functionalized carbon dots (SiCDs) as oxygen-insensitive luminophore in the said oxygen sensitive nanofibrous membranes. The luminescent emission intensity of the designed nanofiber mats increased with the decreased oxygen level and increased respiration rate. The fabricated FFI exhibited different colors starting from brilliant blue to purple and light red fluorescent on days 6 and 7 successively, indicating that the oxygen in the package had been exhausted and resulted in deterioration of grapes quality.

Advanced strategies to achieve functionality of films

Composite films

The formation of a composite film involves blending of two or more matrixes to form a monolayer film, and it is a well-used strategy to integrate the advantages and functionalities of different matrixes. The biopolymers being used in the production of composite films include proteins, polysaccharides, and lipids. In this section, only the hydrocolloids biopolymers (proteins and polysaccharides) were discussed, since they have emerged as a promising strategy to improve the mechanical and water barrier properties due to the molecular entanglements among the proteins and polysaccharides molecules (9597). The blending of hydrocolloids with lipids will be introduced in the section of emulsified films.

Yepes et al. (98) prepared a lentil protein-starch composite film by casting and extrusion/thermo-compression methods and concluded that the presence of protein improved the mechanical properties including Young’s modulus from 4.1 to 22 MPa, and stress at break from 2.8 to 2.4 MPa as well as water resistance decreased in terms of water vapor permeability from 2.8 × 10–10 to 1.4 × 10–10 gm–1 s–1 Pa–1. Recently, a new formulation of corn starch-chitosan with the addition of copolymer pluronic F127 was evaluated, and the resultant film showed improved TS (increased from 4.2 to 6.5 MPa), and water vapor barrier properties (water vapor permeability decreased from 21 × 10–11 to 3 × 10–14 gm–1 s–1 Pa–1) due to increased hydrophobicity of the film matrix ascribed to the addition of pluronic F127 (99). Our research group, Chen et al. (100) fabricated a zein-gelatin composite film with customized phase separation through the bench casting method. By tuning the mass ratio of zein to gelatin, different phase separation behaviors of the biopolymers were thoroughly observed. The hydrophobic essential oil and hydrophilic tea polyphenol (TP) can be simultaneously loaded into the composite film due to the phase separation of zein and gelatin matrixes. In addition, the controlled phase separation behaviors further modulated the proper mechanical property (TS of 14.13 MPa and EAB of 32.82%), and achieved the one-way moisture barrier properties (2.53 × 10–10 gm–1 s–1 Pa–1 at air side, 2.96 × 10–10 gm–1 s–1 Pa–1 at bottom side). Recently, Sood and Saini (101) designed a biopolymer film comprising red pomelo peel pectin, casein, and egg albumin, and the results showed that the incorporation of pectin endowed a smoother and more compact film structure. When the red pomelo peel pectin, casein, and egg albumin with ratio of 50:50:0 and 50:25:25 were used, the enhanced water resistance ability (water vapor permeability of 0.81–0.83 × 10–12 gm–1 s–1 Pa–1) and higher TS (4.03–4.10 MPa) were observed in the resulting films.

Multilayer films

Multilayer film consisting of two or more biopolymers, is one of the most effective approach to fabricate a biopolymer-based film with enhanced performance. Multilayer film integrates the advantages of different layers of the film made from different materials to improve the mechanical and functional properties, including TS, water barrier property, and simultaneous loading as well as controlled release of the bioactive compounds. Recently, interest in the industrial application of multilayer approach in the formation of films has attracted tremendous attention of researchers (102104).

Zhang et al. (105) developed a multilayer film by solvent casting, comprising chitosan and sodium alginate biopolymers containing cinnamon essential oil (CEO) as the antimicrobial agent. The results showed that the multilayer film not only improved the mechanical properties (TS, 78.58 MPa) compared to the film with a single layer (TS, 56.36 MPa), but also the release and retention parameters of the CEO (prevented the essential oil loss of up to 70%) were greatly improved. In our previous work, Xia et al. (106) fabricated multilayer film with the stacking order of zein as an outer layer, hybrid zein/gelatin as middle layer, and gelatin as an inner layer using the bench casting method. Briefly, the zein layer performed as a hydrophobic layer against the moisture migration and the gelatin layer acted as a hydrophilic layer for moisture absorption. Thus, the one-way water barrier property (3.00 × 10–10 gm–1 s–1 Pa–1 at air side, 1.70 × 10–10 gm–1 s–1 Pa–1 at bottom side) was gained by employing the multilayer approach. In addition, the TP with concentration gradient was then incorporated into the middle and inner layers, and later on successfully released in a sustained release manner. The TP-loaded film effectively retarded weight loss, rapid browning, and bacterial growth during the preservation of freshly cut fruits. We then, prepared a hydroxypropyl starch/zein bilayer film through a two-step solvent casting method, wherein the hydroxypropyl starch and zein solutions casting led to the formation of hydroxypropyl starch and zein layers (107). The results indicated significant improvements in film water resistance ability (water vapor permeability decreased from 3.38 × 10–10 to 2.00 × 10–10 gm–1 s–1 Pa–1) and mechanical property (TS increased from 14.65 to 17.35 MPa). Moreover, an adhesion interface was developed between the two layers due to the conjunction of starch and zein matrixes through hydrogen bonding. In addition, the antimicrobial or antioxidant bioactive compounds with various polarities can be simultaneously incorporated into the multilayer structures aiming controlled/sustainable release.

Another strategy to meet the market demand in developing efficient active films is to laminate the biopolymer film with the plastic substrate, which simultaneously combined the advantages of biobased film for loading and controlled release of natural active compounds and the excellent water resistance and mechanical properties of plastic ones. The development of biopolymer-plastic multilayer film is a feasible and promising approach in solving the difficulties involved in the production of biopolymer-based active films at the industrial scale. Heidemann et al. (108) fabricated multilayer films by the combination of starch with two synthetic biodegradable polymers including polycaprolactone (PCL) or poly (lactic acid) (PLA), using the cold plasma technique to improve the compatibility between two layers. The results showed that the moisture barrier property of the multilayer films was strongly improved (water vapor transfer rate, 0.145–0.146 gm–2 day–1) compared to the pure starch films (water vapor transfer rate, 2.8 gm–2 day–1), while the TS of multilayer films (15–18 MPa for PCL/starch films and 45–56 MPa for PLA/starch films) were comparable to that of PCL (19 MPa) or PLA (58 MPa) films. In another work, we combined the zein/gelatin biopolymers with commercial polyethylene (PE) film using an industrial dry laminator, and successfully prepared a novel biopolymer-coated active packaging (109). The obtained multilayer film exerted functionalities, including antimicrobial activity (lowest TPC of 4.9 and 4.3 log CFU/g for longan and strawberry, respectively), moisture absorption (12.7–21%), excellent moisture barrier (water vapor transfer rate, 10.3–11.2 gm–2 d–1), and mechanical properties (TS, 18.6–28.3 MPa, and EAB, 125–191%). Despite the advantages of improving the mechanical and functional attributes of biopolymer-based film, the production of multilayer film requires more casting time and high energy consumption compared to monolayer film. Nevertheless, the poor recyclability and degradability of plastic layer in multilayer film had adverse effects on the environment.

Emulsified films

The formation of an emulsified film involves dispersing lipids with biopolymers (polysaccharides or proteins hydrocolloids) to form a film with a monolayer or a bilayer structure (Figure 3). The biopolymer-based film originating from polysaccharides and proteins possesses a good film-forming property but poor moisture resistance ability. In comparison with the hydrocolloids, lipids, the naturally hydrophobic biopolymers present excellent moisture resistance ability, but their non-polymeric character limits their ability to form a free-standing film. One practice to circumvent this inherent drawback is the addition of hydrophobic substances such as lipid with the hydrophilic protein or polysaccharide biopolymers, by either laminating the lipid onto the film to form the bilayer film or emulsifying the lipid within the hydrocolloid matrix to develop emulsified film. In the formation of bilayer film, lipids were usually cast as the second layer over the protein or polysaccharide layer, which required several steps (two castings and two dryings) during the film casting process that consumed more energy and organic solvent. And bilayer films were easily subjected to delamination and crack over time (110, 111). As for emulsified film with monolayer structure, lipids were evenly distributed in the hydrocolloid matrix, and resultant films exhibited high productivity and low cost for industrial productions due to the one-step casting technique. However, their water resistance ability was much lower than the bilayer films. The emulsification process is necessary for the preparation of emulsified monolayer films. And the homogenization deeply affected the droplet size and distribution, which play an important role in the moisture barrier property of obtained emulsified monolayer films. In general, the smaller droplet size and narrower distribution lead to lower moisture permeability. Flores et al. (112) developed a chitosan-carvacrol monolayer emulsified film and investigated the effect of different homogenization process on the droplet size of oil phase and on the corresponding physicochemical properties. The results showed that high-pressure homogenization led to smaller droplet size and homogeneous distribution of carvacrol oil phase within the film matrix. As a consequence, the higher water barrier ability was obtained (about 2.10 × 10–10 gm–1 s–1 Pa–1), compared the film prepared by rotor-stator method (about 2.5 × 10–10 gm–1 s–1 Pa–1). Xue et al. (113) produced the essential oil loaded monolayer emulsified film, where the soy protein isolates-gum acacia used as the continuous phase and essential oils including oregano, lemon or grapefruit incorporated as dispersed phase. Among the formed films, the grapefruit essential oil-incorporated film exhibited the highest water barrier ability (1.66 × 10–10 gm–1 s–1 Pa–1) attributed to smaller droplet size of grapefruit essential oil and a more uniform oil distribution within the film matrix. In addition, the lipid polarity and fraction also play a key role in the functional property of emulsified monolayer film. Conclusively, the moisture barrier property of films was improved as the lipid fraction increased, but obtained films became more brittle and less stretchable (114).

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Schematic illustration of the advanced film forming strategies to fulfill functionality of biopolymer-based films with improved mechanical and functional properties for food packaging applications.

In recent years, the preparation of emulsified bilayer films using the “emulsion technique” has been proposed for the integration of advantages over bilayer films and monolayer emulsified film. The “emulsion technique” is a one-step approach that involves dispersion of the lipids within the hydrocolloid biopolymers solution forming an emulsion and inducing the demulsification of the emulsion during the film casting process, which resulted in the floating of lipids to form a successive layer. Compared to the emulsified monolayer films, the emulsified bilayer films exhibited a better moisture resistance ability. The moisture barrier properties of bilayer film depends on whether the resulting film had a successive lipid layer, indicating excellent water resistance capacity. Fabra et al. (115) fabricated a sodium caseinate emulsified film containing oleic and stearic acids, respectively. The results showed that when the oleic acid was loaded in the film, a bilayer-like structure developed and oleic acid was homogeneously distributed in the film matrix. And accordingly, the stearic acid-containing film showed a better water resistance ability (16.0 × 10–10 gm–1 s–1 Pa–1) than the oleic acid (24.1 × 10–10 gm–1 s–1 Pa–1), suggesting that the bilayer structure provided greater perpendicular resistance to the mass transfer of water molecules.

Numerous studies attempted to regulate the emulsion destabilization to form a successive lipid layer by tuning temperature, homogenization conditions, drying rate, viscosity, lipids concentration, interactions between components of films, and emulsifier application (115117). Zhang et al. (118) developed an agar/maltodextrin-beeswax emulsified film and investigated the effect of drying temperatures and homogenization conditions on the fabrication of bilayer films. The results showed that the pseudo-bilayer structure was obtained at higher drying temperature and lower homogenization intensity, and exhibited excellent water resistance ability (2.18 × 10–12 gm–1 s–1 Pa–1) and mechanical properties (TS of 20 MPa and EAB of 38.9%). Recently, we fabricated an emulsified film comprising zein, gelatin, and paraffin, and found that the distribution of lipids within zein/gelatin matrix could be controlled to form either the emulsified monolayer or bilayer films, via tuning the ratio of zein and gelatin (119). When the matrix was gelatin-dominated, the successive or partial bilayer films developed, while the monolayer films produced in zein-dominated matrix.

Functions induced by biopolymers to the film matrix

The functional properties induced by biopolymers to the films include mechanical strength, water resistance and gas permeability, transparency, and as bioactive compounds reservoir (Figure 4). These functional properties are of key importance to achieve desired performance and functionalities such as integrity of film matrix, controlling the mass transfer between food and external environment, enhancing the sensory attributes, and delivering the active compounds to interact with food. Therefore, assessing and rationally controlling the functional properties during fabrication of biopolymer-based films have great significance for a range of food packaging applications.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Special functions induced by biopolymers to the film matrix, including mechanical-, water and gas barrier-, and optical properties as well as bioactive compounds reservoir.

Mechanical properties

The mechanical properties, including TS, EAB, and Young’s modulus are the important properties for films being used in food packaging. The appropriate mechanical properties ensure functional material capacity to safeguard the food commodities during their transportation such as handling, storage, and distribution until consumption. Mechanical properties mainly depend on the composition and chemical nature of the biomaterials being used in the formation of films. Among the protein-, polysaccharide-, and lipid-based biopolymers, the lipids could not form a free-standing film, while the protein- and polysaccharide-based polymers exhibit excellent film-forming properties (120). However, the pure biopolymer-based films showed poor mechanical properties compared to the plastic polymers such as PE, PP, and PET.

In recent years, emerging trends that have been used to improve the mechanical properties of biopolymer-based films include not only the strategies to construct composite- and multilayer films discussed in Advanced Strategies to Achieve Functionality of Films, but also other methods such as the addition of nanoparticles or nanomaterials and the incorporation of nanofillers. In this regard, several research works used nanoparticles for reinforcement in the fabrication of biopolymer-based films. Gahruie et al. (121) selected basil seed gum as the film matrix, wherein the Zataria multiflora essential oil nanoemulsion was immobilized within the basil seed gum matrix. The results indicated that increase in the nanoemulsion concentration in basil seed gum matrix enhanced the mechanical property of films (TS increased from 19.74 to 34.64 MPa, EAB increased from 21.55 to 39.54 MPa). Besides, incorporation of nanofiller has also been widely reported to reinforce the biopolymer-based films. Chaichi et al. (122) added crystalline nanocellulose with three concentrations (2, 5, and 7% w/w) into edible pectin film and evaluated the reinforcement effects of nanocellulose on the mechanical properties of pectin film. The results indicated that the addition of nanocellulose simultaneously improved TS and EAB of composite film, and also improved the composite film water barrier properties. At 5% concentration of nanocellulose in the film-forming solution, the results showed that the film TS increased up to 84% and water vapor permeability decreased by 40%.

The incorporation of additives such as plasticizers and antimicrobial agents, may change the mechanical properties of biopolymer-based films, since the addition of these compounds led to changes in the intermolecular arrangement or cross-linking in the biopolymer molecules (123). Since, natural hydrocolloids exhibit brittle mechanical properties, therefore, plasticizers are usually added to the biopolymer-based film-forming solutions to improve flexibility in terms of increase in EAB value. Plasticizers are a class of small molecules with average molecular weights of between 300 and 600 Da that could reduce the tension of deformation, hardness, density of the biopolymer, and increase the chain flexibility of biopolymer by breaking the polymer-polymer interactions, and creating the polymer-plasticizer interactions (52, 53, 124). As a result, the addition of plasticizer endows the flexibility and softness to biopolymer-based films. In the formation of biopolymer-based films, food-grade plasticizers are usually used such as glycerol, polyethylene glycol (PEG), and sorbitol etc. Literature review showed that the incorporation of plasticizers increased the EAB and decreased the TS of the biopolymers (125). However, different studies had reported different results depending on the type and character of plasticizers and biopolymers, and their potential interactions. Laohakunjit and Noomhorm, (126) reported that glycerol and sorbitol made starch film softer (EAB increased from 1% to 12–24%), while the TS reduced from 9 to 1–3 MPa. In comparison, PEG 400 plasticized films showed poor mechanical properties, while the biopolymer plasticized by sugars such as fructose, maltose, sucrose, and D-allulose showed preferable mechanical properties including TS and EAB than the glycerol, sorbitol, and glycols (125, 127, 128).

Water resistance

Water resistance of films plays an important role in preventing deteriorative reactions in foods. Therefore, it is the most widely studied property of films. The biomacromolecules naturally exhibit a strong hydrophilic character, and this drawback limits their applications as the packaging material for food with high water activity. Generally, the efforts to improve the water resistance ability of the biopolymers are mainly through emulsified film strategies, i.e., addition of lipids and waxes as moisture barriers. Besides, other methods such as forming the multilayer- and composite films to improve the water barrier properties have also been practiced (discussed in Advanced Strategies to Achieve Functionality of Films). This phenomenon was mainly attributed to the fact that the inclusion of lipids increases the hydrophobic nature of films and the tortuosity for water transfer into the matrix.

The strategy of combining lipids with biopolymers in the preparation of multilayer or emulsified films has emerged as an important technique to improve the water resistance of the resultant films. For bilayer composite films, the polysaccharide or protein film layer is coated or dipped with the melted lipid or wax solution, forming the second lipid layer. Regarding the emulsified films, the lipid or wax is firstly dispersed in the polysaccharide or protein solution in the form of emulsion, and entrapped as the dispersed phase in the biopolymer matrix after casting. The bilayer film showed superior water resistance properties than the emulsified film, due to the perpendicular resistance of the successive lipid layer to water molecules (116, 117). However, the bilayer films were easily subjected to delamination and crack over time, and this technique required a two-step casting process that need more energy consumption. For the emulsified monolayer films, the effect of lipids and waxes on the improvement of water resistance is highly dependent on droplets size and distribution in the biopolymer matrix (129). The smaller droplet size or more narrow distribution of dispersed lipids, the better water resistance ability was observed in the emulsified films. Therefore, the emulsion destabilization phenomena such as flocculation, creaming and coalescence should be finely controlled during the casting process. Ma et al. (111) investigated the effect of homogenization conditions of film-forming solution on the lipid droplet size and physical property of gelatin-olive oil emulsified film. The results showed that microfluidizer with higher energy input produced narrow-sized lipids particles in the film, and subsequently improved the water barrier ability (water vapor permeability of 3.74 × 10–12 gm–1 s–1 Pa–1) and mechanical properties (TS of 24.2 MPa and EAB of 50.5%) Gul et al. (130) incorporated clove essential oil into the hazelnut meal protein using the ultrasound homogenization to obtain nanoemulsion film. The results showed that the ultrasound treatment enabled the film microstructure more homogeneous and reduced the droplet size of clove essential oil dispersing in film matrix. The water vapor permeability of obtained film significantly decreased to 2.8 g mm m–2 h–1 KPa–1, compared to control film (5.9 g mm m–2 h–1 KPa–1).

Gas barrier property

The gas concentration is highly correlated to the food quality including the aroma, flavor, color, texture, and nutrition. Therefore, the gas barrier properties of biopolymer-based films should be emphasized during the preservation of foods. Compared to the majority of plastic films, one advantage of the biopolymer-based films is their preferable gas barrier property, since the hydrocolloids polymers (proteins and polysaccharides) are naturally polar that impart good barrier properties to gases including O2 and CO2. The addition of lipids and hydrophobic antimicrobials (essential oils) have been reported to increase the O2 and CO2 permeability (109, 131, 132). However, the opposite results were also observed after incorporation of some oils, for example, carvacrol (133), citral, and lemongrass essential oils (134).

The gas barrier property of biopolymer-based films should be suitable for preserved food. For example, during the preservation of fruits and vegetables, suitable gas permeability of biopolymer-based films reduced the gas concentration inside the packaging and decreased the respiration rate of fruits and vegetables to a bearable value, which decreased weight loss and nutrition loss. However, excessively low gas barrier of biopolymer-based films would cause anaerobic respiration, leading to the production of off-flavor and deterioration of texture of the fruits and vegetables. Therefore, precise control of the gas permeability for the biopolymer films is quite important to maintain food quality (135). Sun et al. (136) developed a novel biopolymer-based film containing methylcellulose (continuous phase) and cellulose nanocrystals (dispersed phase). The obtained film increased the CO2/O2 selectivity (permeability ratio of CO2 to O2) due to the ability of film matrix to discriminate the molecular size of gases, and different affinity of polymers matrix toward gases, which was beneficial in decreasing the respiration rate of fruits. Zhou et al. (137) introduced a novel biomimetic strategy for the fabrication of plant leaf-mimetic films with controllable gas permeation. Wherein, the poly (L-lactic acid) (PLLA) or chitosan porous microspheres with nanosized pore structures exhibited different permeability to O2 and CO2, specifically, designed as the gas “switches” or “stomata” in a shellac film. The results showed that by incorporating different amounts of porous microspheres according to the respiratory rate of fruits, the O2, CO2, and H2O permeability and CO2/O2 selectivity of the novel film could be controlled, which showed exceptional preservation performance on five selected model fruits with different respiratory metabolisms.

Optical property

The optical property usually characterized by the transparency value is an important parameter for biopolymer-based film, since it affects the packed product appearance thus highly linked with the consumers’ acceptance. Pure hydrocolloid-based biopolymer usually exhibits high transparency, which is associated with the homogeneity of biopolymer matrix (138). After the addition of lipids, the transparency of biopolymer-based film decreased associated with the content of lipids added in the film-forming solution (139143). The presence of lipids creates heterogeneous networks within the hydrocolloid matrix, thereby resulting in the light scattering effect and lowering of transparency. Briefly, the influence of the lipid phase on the optical property of the biopolymer-based film usually depends on the lipid fraction, droplet size, and distribution with the matrix. Numerous studies have corroborated that larger-sized lipid droplets evoked more light scattering effect than smaller-ones, and consequently increased the opaque value (111, 115, 130).

Jiménez et al. (144) studied the effect of four saturated and unsaturated fatty acids on the hydroxypropyl-methylcellulose (HPMC) films. The results exhibited that upon the addition of saturated fatty acids, the transparency of films decreased with the increase in the size of lipid aggregates. Besides, other additives such as antimicrobials and antioxidants can also influence the optical property of biopolymer-based films. Malik and Mitra (145) developed an active packaging by incorporating the zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles as the antimicrobial agent into HPMC films. The results showed that when ZnO nanoparticles were added into HPMC matrix, the transparency of films significantly decreased since the incorporation of ZnO nanoparticles with white color increased the light scattering effect in film matrix. Acevedo-fani et al. (146) developed an alginate-based film by incorporating essential oil-loaded nanoemulsion to protect the essential oils degradation. The three essential oils were selected, including thyme (TH-EO), lemongrass (LG-EO), and sage (SG-EO). The edible film containing LG-EO showed the highest opaque value compared to other films, due to its coarse surface caused by the floating of oil droplets to film surface during the film drying process.

Bioactive compounds reservoir

Bioactive compounds application in active food packaging have rapidly increased due to their desirable preservative effects on the food quality compared to synthetic active compounds as well as due to their toxicological safety and exceptional functional (antimicrobial and antioxidant) properties. Recently, this practice has gained great interest in the field of active food packaging due to health-promoting benefits in addition to the preservative effects. The ability of biopolymer-based films for loading and controlled release of active compounds is an unparalleled superiority attracting current research interests compared to the plastic films with poor compatibility to bioactive compounds. Attributing to this trait, the bioactive compounds, including antimicrobials, antioxidants, flavors, natural pigments, and even pharmaceutical or nutraceutical ingredients can be efficiently loaded into biopolymer-based films to design active food packaging and cosmetics biomaterials.

The encapsulation and controlled release properties of active compounds from the films had great significance for the preservation of food. For example, the rapid release of active compounds would result in limited long-time antimicrobial effects for food preservations, while the slow release of active compounds may not reach the minimum inhibitory concentration value. Therefore, to rationally design the controlled release property of functional films has attracted the attention of researchers working in academia and industries to fulfill the consumers’ demand for “clean-label” food products. Extensive efforts have been made to achieve the controlled release of bioactive compounds via immobilization into nanoemulsions (147), Pickering emulsions and emulsion gels (148150), nanoliposomes (151), β-cyclodextrin (152), nanosphere (153), and using multilayer technique (105).

Yuan et al. (154) prepared a novel starch-based film loaded with thyme oil microemulsions or microcapsules. The results showed that the employment of microemulsions or microcapsules significantly decreased the release rate of thyme oil. The antibacterial activity of film containing microemulsions was stronger than the film containing microcapsules. The film containing microcapsules dramatically increased the shelf-life of chilled meat (14-days), compared to the blank control and the PE film with shelf-life of 6- and 10-days, respectively. Peretto et al. (155) developed a strawberry puree based edible film as carrier for loading carvacrol and methyl cinnamate. The results showed that the controlled release of the active compounds from the films contributed to retain the firmness and brightness, and also increased the total phenolics content and antioxidant activity of strawberries at the end time (10-days) of preservation, compared to the untreated strawberries. Esmaeili et al. (156) investigated the effect of chitosan and whey protein films loaded with nanoencapsulated garlic essential oil aimed to extend the shelf-life of refrigerated vacuum-packed sausages, wherein the nanoencapsulation enhanced the controlled release property of essential oil. The chitosan films loaded with nanoencapsulated garlic essential oil presented the promising preservative effects on sausages up to 50-days, measured in terms of the peroxide value (0.37 meq/kg lipid), thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (0.47 mg malondialdehyde/kg), and aerobic plate count (3.69 log CFU/g).

Conclusion and future perspectives

Biopolymer-based active packaging films have attracted increasing attention for packaging applications to meet consumers’ demand of “all natural” food products and the industrial drive of providing “clean-label” products. In recent years, applications of biopolymer-based films have rapidly increased for industrial applications due to their attractive properties, including nutrition value, improved mechanical and functional properties, biocompatibility and biodegradability, and source renewability and eco-friendly nature advantages. Moreover, biopolymers fabrication potential has boosted their applications in the food industry as packaging biomaterial that ideally suited to enable the incorporation of active compounds (e.g., emitters and scavengers) being used to preserve the food quality with enhanced shelf-life. The plant-derived bioactive ingredients, including polyphenols and essential oils not only inhibit and/or delay microbial spoilage, but possess biological properties such as antioxidant-, anti- inflammatory-, and anticancer activities.

Major challenges involved in the development of biopolymer-based films are their poor water resistance and mechanical properties. Though many approaches have been used to improve their final properties, however the obtained films properties were not comparable with their synthetic non-degradable or degradable counterparts. Therefore, significant technical breakthroughs are needed to improve the physicochemical, mechanical, and functional properties of biopolymer-based films in the future. Of course, it is also appealing to pave the way for their alternative applications, for instance, the poor water resistance and mechanical features may be desirable for some specific applications, when the films are supposed to be orally consumed with the packed food (e.g., packaging of nuts, candies, and snacks etc.) or to be dissolved upon cooking. Another obstacle that limits the applications of biopolymer-based films is the relatively high cost of raw materials. Feasible solutions to commercialize the biopolymer-based film products requires combined efforts from various aspects in terms of research endeavors in lowering the cost of raw materials, the government polices such as subsidies to promote biopolymer-based films usage, investment for film-production equipment, and elimination of manufacturer resistance. Moreover, public and private organizations should do joint ventures to increase the market appeal of biopolymer-based packaging films due to their preferable sensory attributes, nutritional, antioxidant, and antimicrobial properties.

Also, more attention should be paid to their potential toxicity and allergic reactions. To be specific, protein-based polymers (casein and gliadin) and polysaccharide-based polymers (starch), may trigger allergic reactions, therefore, in vitro and in vivo studies should be designed to address the biosafety issues. Moreover, the profound interest in functional films as active packaging biomaterial encapsulating bioactive ingredients, more work is needed to evaluate their pharmacokinetics, including bio-accessibility, digestion, cell absorption, biochemical transformations, and excretion etc. These aspects should be considered by manufactures to achieve the commercialization success for biopolymer-based packaging films.

Author contributions

Abdullah and JX: conceptualization. Abdullah, MAH, and JC: writing—original draft preparation. SF, QW, QH, and JX: writing—review and editing. JX: supervision and funding acquisition. All the authors have read, revised, and agreed to manuscript publication.

Funding

We would like to recognize the financial support of the Guangdong Introducing Innovative and Entrepreneurial Teams under Grant (No. 2019ZT08N291).

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the support of the South China Agricultural University, China.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Avinash P, Mittal K. Food packaging technology: Functions, materials and intelligent innovations. Int J Home Sci. (2019) 5:39–43.

Google Scholar

2. Roy S, Rhim JW. Carboxymethyl cellulose-based antioxidant and antimicrobial active packaging film incorporated with curcumin and zinc oxide. Int J Biol Macromol. (2020) 148:666–76. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.01.204

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Expresswire T. Global packaging materials market 2019 supply, consumption, cost and profit analysis and forecast to 2025. (2019). Available online at: https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/global-packaging-materials-market-2019-supply-consumption-cost-and-profit-analysis-and-forecast-to-2025-2019-11-20 (accessed April 26, 2022).

Google Scholar

4. Shahbandeh M. Global market value of food packaging from 2018-2025. (2019). Available online at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/876489/food-packaging-market-value-forecast-worldwide/ (accessed on April 26, 2022).

Google Scholar

5. Yildirim S, Röcker B, Pettersen MK, Nilsen-Nygaard J, Ayhan Z, Rutkaite R, et al. Active packaging applications for food. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. (2018) 17:165–99. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12322

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Wyrwa J, Barska A. Innovations in the food packaging market: Active packaging. Eur Food Res Technol. (2017) 243:1681–92. doi: 10.1007/s00217-017-2878-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Medina-Jaramillo C, Ochoa-Yepes O, Bernal C, Famá L. Active and smart biodegradable packaging based on starch and natural extracts. Carbohydr Polym. (2017) 176:187–94. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.08.079

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Müller P, Schmid M. Intelligent packaging in the food sector: A brief overview. Foods. (2019) 8:16. doi: 10.3390/foods8010016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Marsh K, Bugusu B. Food packaging – roles, materials, and environmental issues: Scientific status summary. J Food Sci. (2007) 72:R39–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00301.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Roy S, Rhim JW. Preparation of carrageenan-based functional nanocomposite films incorporated with melanin nanoparticles. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. (2019) 176:317–24. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.01.023

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Priyadarshi R, Rhim JW. Chitosan-based biodegradable functional films for food packaging applications. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. (2020) 62:102346. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2020.102346

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Hernández-García E, Vargas M, González-Martínez C, Chiralt A. Biodegradable antimicrobial films for food packaging: Effect of antimicrobials on degradation. Foods. (2021) 10:1256. doi: 10.3390/foods10061256

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Youssef AM, El-Sayed SM. Bionanocomposites materials for food packaging applications: Concepts and future outlook. Carbohydr Polym. (2018) 193:19–27. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.03.088

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Asadi S, Pirsa S. Production of biodegradable film based on polylactic acid, modified with lycopene pigment and TiO2 and studying its physicochemical properties. J Polym Environ. (2020) 28:433–44. doi: 10.1007/s10924-019-01618-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Xie Y, Niu X, Yang J, Fan R, Shi J, Ullah N, et al. Active biodegradable films based on the whole potato peel incorporated with bacterial cellulose and curcumin. Int J Biol Macromol. (2020) 150:480–91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.01.291

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Narancic T, Verstichel S, Reddy Chaganti S, Morales-Gamez L, Kenny ST, De Wilde B, et al. Biodegradable plastic blends create new possibilities for end-of-life management of plastics but they are not a panacea for plastic pollution. Environ Sci Technol. (2018) 52:10441–52. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b02963

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Pirsa S, Sharifi KA. A review of the applications of bioproteins in the preparation of biodegradable films and polymers. J Chem Lett. (2020) 1:47–58.

Google Scholar

18. Abdul-Khalil HPS, Banerjee A, Saurabh CK, Tye YY, Suriani AB, Mohamed A, et al. Biodegradable films for fruits and vegetables packaging application: Preparation and properties. Food Eng Rev. (2018) 10:139–53. doi: 10.1007/s12393-018-9180-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Oun AA, Rhim JW. Carrageenan-based hydrogels and films: Effect of ZnO and CuO nanoparticles on the physical, mechanical, and antimicrobial properties. Food Hydrocoll. (2017) 67:45–53. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.12.040

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Pirsa S, Karimi Sani I, Khodayvandi S. Design and fabrication of starch-nano clay composite films loaded with methyl orange and bromocresol green for determination of spoilage in milk package. Polym Adv Technol. (2018) 29:2750–8. doi: 10.1002/pat.4397

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Pirsa S, Shamusi T, Kia EM. Smart films based on bacterial cellulose nanofibers modified by conductive polypyrrole and zinc oxide nanoparticles. J Appl Polym Sci. (2018) 135:1–10. doi: 10.1002/app.46617

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Pirsa S, Chavoshizadeh S. Design of an optical sensor for ethylene based on nanofiber bacterial cellulose film and its application for determination of banana storage time. Polym Adv Technol. (2018) 29:1385–93. doi: 10.1002/pat.4250

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Riahi Z, Priyadarshi R, Rhim JW, Bagheri R. Gelatin-based functional films integrated with grapefruit seed extract and TiO2 for active food packaging applications. Food Hydrocoll. (2021) 112:106314. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.106314

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Shankar S, Rhim JW. Preparation and characterization of agar/lignin/silver nanoparticles composite films with ultraviolet light barrier and antibacterial properties. Food Hydrocoll. (2017) 71:76–84. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2017.05.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Priyadarshi R, Negi YS. Effect of varying filler concentration on zinc oxide nanoparticle embedded chitosan films as potential food packaging material. J Polym Environ. (2017) 25:1087–98. doi: 10.1007/s10924-016-0890-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Roy S, Rhim JW. Agar-based antioxidant composite films incorporated with melanin nanoparticles. Food Hydrocoll. (2019) 94:391–8. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.03.038

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Abdullah, Asghar A, Butt MS, Shahid M, Huang Q. Evaluating the antimicrobial potential of green cardamom essential oil focusing on quorum sensing inhibition of Chromobacterium violaceum. J Food Sci Technol. (2017) 54:2306–15. doi: 10.1007/s13197-017-2668-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Hoseinnejad M, Jafari SM, Katouzian I. Inorganic and metal nanoparticles and their antimicrobial activity in food packaging applications. Crit Rev Microbiol. (2018) 44:161–81. doi: 10.1080/1040841X.2017.1332001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Mihindukulasuriya SDF, Lim LT. Nanotechnology development in food packaging: A review. Trends Food Sci Technol. (2014) 40:149–67. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2014.09.009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Rhim JW, Park HM, Ha CS. Bio-nanocomposites for food packaging applications. Prog Polym Sci. (2013) 38:1629–52. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.05.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Roy S, Shankar S, Rhim JW. Melanin-mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticle and its use for the preparation of carrageenan-based antibacterial films. Food Hydrocoll. (2019) 88:237–46. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.10.013

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Castaño J, Guadarrama-Lezama AY, Hernández J, Colín-Cruz M, Muñoz M, Castillo S. Preparation, characterization and antifungal properties of polysaccharide–polysaccharide and polysaccharide–protein films. J Mater Sci. (2017) 52:353–66. doi: 10.1007/s10853-016-0336-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Salaberria AM, Diaz RH, Andrés MA, Fernandes SCM, Labidi J. The antifungal activity of functionalized chitin nanocrystals in poly (lactid acid) films. Materials. (2017) 10:1–16. doi: 10.3390/ma10050546

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Vanden BNL, Di Giorgio L, Aminahuel CA, Díaz Vergara LI, Martin Costa AO, Montenegro MA, et al. Antifungal whey protein films activated with low quantities of water soluble chitosan. Food Hydrocoll. (2021) 110:106156. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.106156

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Xu L, Zhang B, Qin Y, Li F, Yang S, Lu P, et al. Preparation and characterization of antifungal coating films composed of sodium alginate and cyclolipopeptides produced by Bacillus subtilis. Int J Biol Macromol. (2020) 143:602–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.12.051

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. De López Dicastillo C, Rodríguez F, Guarda A, Galotto MJ. Antioxidant films based on cross-linked methyl cellulose and native Chilean berry for food packaging applications. Carbohydr Polym. (2016) 136:1052–60. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.10.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Zia J, Paul UC, Heredia-Guerrero JA, Athanassiou A, Fragouli D. Low-density polyethylene/curcumin melt extruded composites with enhanced water vapor barrier and antioxidant properties for active food packaging. Polymer. (2019) 175:137–45. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2019.05.012

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Mohamed SAA, El-Sakhawy M, El-Sakhawy MAM. Polysaccharides, protein and lipid-based natural edible films in food packaging: A Review. Carbohydr Polym. (2020) 238:116178. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116178

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Brito TB, Carrajola JF, Gonçalves ECBA, Martelli-Tosi M, Ferreira MSL. Fruit and vegetable residues flours with different granulometry range as raw material for pectin-enriched biodegradable film preparation. Food Res Int. (2019) 121:412–21. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.03.058

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Avérous L, Pollet E. Environmental silicate nano-biocomposites: Green energy technology. London: Springer London Ltd (2012). doi: 10.1007/978-1-4471-4108-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Malathi AN, Santhosh KS, Udaykumar N. Recent trends of biodegradable polymer: Biodegradable films for food packaging and application of nanotechnology in biodegradable food packaging. AIMS Mol Sci. (2016) 3:73–9. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b04528

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Flieger M, Kantorová M, Prell A, Øezanka T, Votruba J. Biodegradable plastics from renewable sources. Folia Microbiol. (2003) 48:27–44. doi: 10.1007/BF02931273

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Tripathi A, Srivastava S, Yadav A. Biopolymers: Potential biodegradable packaging material for food industry. Polym Packag Appl. (2014):153–72.

Google Scholar

44. Dehghani S, Hosseini SV, Regenstein JM. Edible films and coatings in seafood preservation: A review. Food Chem. (2018) 240:505–13. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.07.034

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Fai AEC, de Alves Souza MR, de Barros ST, Bruno NV, Ferreira MSL, Gonçalves TCB, et al. Development and evaluation of biodegradable films and coatings obtained from fruit and vegetable residues applied to fresh-cut carrot (Daucus carota L.). Postharvest Biol Technol. (2016) 112:194–204. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2015.09.021

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Martelli MR, Barros TT, De Moura MR, Mattoso LHC, Assis OBG. Effect of chitosan nanoparticles and pectin content on mechanical properties and water vapor permeability of banana puree films. J Food Sci. (2013) 78:N98–104. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2012.03006.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Azeredo HMC, Mattoso LHC, Wood D, Williams TG, Avena-Bustillos RJ, McHugh TH. Nanocomposite edible films from mango puree reinforced with cellulose nanofibers. J Food Sci. (2009) 74:31–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01186.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Azeredo HMC, Miranda KWE, Rosa MF, Nascimento DM, de Moura MR. Edible films from alginate-acerola puree reinforced with cellulose whiskers. LWT Food Sci Technol. (2012) 46:294–7. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2011.09.016

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Du WX, Olsen CW, Avena-Bustillos RJ, Friedman M, McHugh TH. Physical and antibacterial properties of edible films formulated with apple skin polyphenols. J Food Sci. (2011) 76:M149–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.02012.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Galus S, Kadziñska J. Moisture sensitivity, optical, mechanical and structural properties of whey protein-based edible films incorporated with rapeseed oil. Food Technol Biotechnol. (2016) 54:78–89. doi: 10.17113/ftb.54.01.16.3889

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Sothornvit R, Krochta JM. Plasticizers in edible films and coatings. Innov Food Packag. (2005):403–33. doi: 10.1016/B978-012311632-1/50055-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Bertuzzi MA, Castro Vidaurre EF, Armada M, Gottifredi JC. Water vapor permeability of edible starch based films. J. Food Eng. (2007) 80:972–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.07.016

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Khwaldia K, Banon S, Perez C, Desobry S. Properties of sodium caseinate film-forming dispersions and films. J Dairy Sci. (2004) 87:2011–6. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-030270018-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Shin SH, Kim SJ, Lee SH, Park KM, Han J. Apple peel and carboxymethylcellulose-based nanocomposite films containing different nanoclays. J Food Sci. (2014) 79:E342–53. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.12356

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Shin SH, Chang Y, Lacroix M, Han J. Control of microbial growth and lipid oxidation on beef product using an apple peel-based edible coating treatment. LWT Food Sci Technol. (2017) 84:183–8. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2017.05.054

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Orsuwan A, Shankar S, Wang LF, Sothornvit R, Rhim JW. Preparation of antimicrobial agar/banana powder blend films reinforced with silver nanoparticles. Food Hydrocoll. (2016) 60:476–85. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.04.017

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Lorevice MV, De Moura MR, Aouada FA, Mattoso LHC. Development of novel guava puree films containing chitosan nanoparticles. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. (2012) 12:2711–7. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2012.5716

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Sothornvit R, Rodsamran P. Mango film coated for fresh-cut mango in modified atmosphere packaging. Int J Food Sci Technol. (2010) 45:1689–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2010.02316.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Otoni CG, Moura MRD, Aouada FA, Camilloto GP, Cruz RS, Lorevice MV, et al. Antimicrobial and physical-mechanical properties of pectin/papaya puree/cinnamaldehyde nanoemulsion edible composite films. Food Hydrocoll. (2014) 41:188–94. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.04.013

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Tulamandi S, Rangarajan V, Rizvi SSH, Singhal RS, Chattopadhyay SK, Saha NC. A biodegradable and edible packaging film based on papaya puree, gelatin, and defatted soy protein. Food Packag Shelf Life. (2016) 10:60–71. doi: 10.1016/j.fpsl.2016.10.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Du WX, Olsen CW, Avena-Bustillos RJ, McHugh TH, Levin CE, Mandrell R, et al. Antibacterial effects of allspice, garlic, and oregano essential oils in tomato films determined by overlay and vapor-phase methods. J Food Sci. (2009) 74:390–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01289.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Du WX, Avena-Bustillos RJ, Woods R, Breksa AP, McHugh TH, Friedman M, et al. Sensory evaluation of baked chicken wrapped with antimicrobial apple and tomato edible films formulated with cinnamaldehyde and carvacrol. J Agric Food Chem. (2012) 60:7799–804. doi: 10.1021/jf301281a

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

63. Liu B, Zhang J, Liu L, Hotchkiss AT. Preparation and properties of water and glycerol-plasticized sugar beet pulp plastics. J Polym Environ. (2011) 19:559–67. doi: 10.1007/s10924-011-0322-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Hassan B, Chatha SAS, Hussain AI, Zia KM, Akhtar N. Recent advances on polysaccharides, lipids and protein based edible films and coatings: A review. Int J Biol Macromole. (2018) 109:1095–107. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.11.097

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Janjarasskul T, Suppakul P. Active and intelligent packaging: The indication of quality and safety. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. (2018) 58:808–31. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2016.1225278

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Abdullah, Asghar A, Algburi A, Huang Q, Ahmad T, Zhong H, et al. Antibiofilm potential of Elletaria cardamomum essential oil against Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella Typhimurium JSG 1748. Front Microbiol. (2021) 12:620227. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.620227

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

67. Abdullah, Algburi A, Asghar A, Huang Q, Mustfa W, Javed HU, et al. Black cardamom essential oil prevents Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella Typhimurium JSG 1748 biofilm formation through inhibition of quorum sensing. J Food Sci Technol. (2021) 58:3183–91. doi: 10.1007/s13197-020-04821-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

68. Dobrucka R, Cierpiszewski R. Active and intelligent packaging food – research and development – A review. Pol J Food Nutr Sci. (2014) 64:7–15. doi: 10.2478/v10222

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

69. Majid I, Ahmad Nayik G, Mohammad Dar S, Nanda V. Novel food packaging technologies: Innovations and future prospective. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci. (2018) 17:454–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jssas.2016.11.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

70. Jideani VA, Vogt K. Antimicrobial packaging for extending the shelf life of bread—A review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. (2016) 56:1313–24. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2013.768198

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

71. Gaikwad KK, Singh S, Shin J, Lee YS. Novel polyisoprene based UV-activated oxygen scavenging films and their applications in packaging of beef jerky. LWT Food Sci Technol. (2020) 117:108643. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108643

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

72. Kadam AA, Singh S, Gaikwad KK. Chitosan based antioxidant films incorporated with pine needles (Cedrus deodara) extract for active food packaging applications. Food Control. (2021) 124:107877. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.107877

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

73. Raigond P, Sood A, Kalia A, Joshi A, Kaundal B, Raigond B, et al. Antimicrobial activity of potato starch-based active biodegradable nanocomposite films. Potato Res. (2019) 62:69–83. doi: 10.1007/s11540-018-9397-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

74. Abdolshahi A, Tabatabaei Yazdi F, Shabani AA, Mortazavi SA. Active gelatin-mannan film: Physicochemical, antifungal and aflatoxin binding properties. Int Food Res J. (2019) 26:1803–12.

Google Scholar

75. Jha P. Functional properties of starch-chitosan blend bionanocomposite films for food packaging: The influence of amylose-amylopectin ratios. J Food Sci Technol. (2021) 58:3368–78. doi: 10.1007/s13197-020-04908-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

76. Priyadarshi R, Sauraj, Kumar B, Deeba F, Kulshreshtha A, Negi YS. Chitosan films incorporated with Apricot (Prunus armeniaca) kernel essential oil as active food packaging material. Food Hydrocoll. (2018) 85:158–66. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.07.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

77. Luzi F, Puglia D, Dominici F, Fortunati E, Giovanale G, Balestra GM, et al. Effect of gallic acid and umbelliferone on thermal, mechanical, antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of poly (vinyl alcohol-co-ethylene) films. Polym Degrad Stab. (2018) 152:162–76. doi: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2018.04.015

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

78. Kanatt SR. Development of active / intelligent food packaging film containing Amaranthus leaf extract for shelf life extension of chicken / fish during chilled storage. Food Packag Shelf Life. (2020) 24:100506. doi: 10.1016/j.fpsl.2020.100506

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

79. Riaz A, Lagnika C, Luo H, Dai Z, Nie M, Muhammad M, et al. Chitosan-based biodegradable active food packaging film containing Chinese chive (Allium tuberosum) root extract for food application. Int J Biol Macromol. (2020) 150:595–604. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.02.078

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

80. Mohan CO, Ravishankar CN. Active and intelligent packaging materials. Compr Biotechnol. (2019) 1:688–702. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64046-8.00248-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

81. Hasan A, Nurunnabi M, Morshed M, Paul A, Polini A, Kuila T, et al. Recent advances in application of biosensors in tissue engineering. Biomed Res Int. (2014) 2014:307519. doi: 10.1155/2014/307519

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

82. Rotariu L, Lagarde F, Jaffrezic-Renault N, Bala C. Electrochemical biosensors for fast detection of food contaminants – trends and perspective. TrAC Trends Anal Chem. (2016) 79:80–7. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2015.12.017

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

83. Kuswandi B, Jumina.Active and intelligent packaging, safety, and quality controls. In Fresh-Cut Fruits and Vegetables: Technologies and Mechanisms for Safety Control. Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc (2019). doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-816184-5.00012-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

84. Dainelli D, Gontard N, Spyropoulos D, Zondervan-van den Beuken E, Tobback P. Active and intelligent food packaging: Legal aspects and safety concerns. Trends Food Sci Technol. (2008) 19:S103–12. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2008.09.011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

85. Abdullah, Liu L, Javed HU, Xiao J. Engineering emulsion gels as functional colloids emphasizing food applications: A review. Front Nutr. (2022) 9:890188. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.890188

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

86. Singh S, Gaikwad KK, Lee YS. Anthocyanin – a natural dye for smart food packaging systems. Korean J Packag Sci Technol. (2018) 24:167–80. doi: 10.20909/kopast.2018.24.3.167

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

87. Park YW, Kim SM, Lee JY, Jang W. Application of biosensors in smart packaging. Mol Cell Toxicol. (2015) 11:277–85. doi: 10.1007/s13273-015-0027-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

88. Ezati P, Rhim JW. pH-responsive chitosan-based film incorporated with alizarin for intelligent packaging applications. Food Hydrocoll. (2020) 102:105629. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.105629

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

89. Li Y, Wu K, Wang B, Li X. Colorimetric indicator based on purple tomato anthocyanins and chitosan for application in intelligent packaging. Int J Biol Macromol. (2021) 174:370–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.01.182

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

90. Pacquit A, Frisby J, Diamond D, Lau KT, Farrell A, Quilty B, et al. Development of a smart packaging for the monitoring of fish spoilage. Food Chem. (2007) 102:466–70. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.05.052

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

91. Zhai X, Li Z, Zhang J, Shi J, Zou X, Huang X, et al. Natural biomaterial-based edible and pH-sensitive films combined with electrochemical writing for intelligent food packaging. J Agric Food Chem. (2018) 66:12836–46. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.8b04932

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

92. Forghani S, Almasi H, Moradi M. Electrospun nanofibers as food freshness and time-temperature indicators?: A new approach in food intelligent packaging. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. (2021) 73:102804. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2021.102804

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

93. Maftoonazad N, Ramaswamy H. Design and testing of an electrospun nanofiber mat as a pH biosensor and monitor the pH associated quality in fresh date fruit (Rutab). Polym Test. (2019) 75:76–84. doi: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.01.011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

94. Xu Y, Yang D, Huo S, Ren J, Gao N, Chen Z, et al. Carbon dots and ruthenium doped oxygen sensitive nanofibrous membranes for monitoring the respiration of agricultural products. Polym Test. (2020) 93:106957. doi: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106957

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

95. Abugoch LE, Tapia C, Villamán MC, Yazdani-pedram M, Díaz-dosque M. Characterization of quinoa protein-chitosan blend edible films. Food Hydrocoll. (2011) 25:879–86. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2010.08.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

96. Bourtoom T, Chinnan MS. Preparation and properties of rice starch e chitosan blend biodegradable film. LWT Food Sci Technol. (2008) 41:1633–41. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2007.10.014

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

97. Sun Q, Sun C, Xiong L. Mechanical, barrier and morphological properties of pea starch and peanut protein isolate blend films. Carbohydr Polym. (2013) 98:630–7. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.06.040

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

98. Yepes OO, Giogio LD, Goyanes S, Mauri A, Famá L. Influence of process (extrusion/thermo-compression, casting) and lentil protein content on physicochemical properties of starch films. Carbohydr Polym. (2018) 208:221–31. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.12.030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

99. Fonseca-García A, Jim EJ, Aguirre-loredo RY. Preparation of a novel biodegradable packaging film based on corn starch-chitosan and poloxamers. Carbohydr Polym. (2021) 251:117009. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

100. Chen X, Xiao J, Cai J, Liu H. Phase separation behavior in zein-gelatin composite film and its modulation effects on retention and release of multiple bioactive compounds. Food Hydrocoll. (2020) 109:106105. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.106105

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

101. Sood A, Saini CS. Food hydrocolloids red pomelo peel pectin based edible composite films?: Effect of pectin incorporation on mechanical, structural, morphological and thermal properties of composite films. Food Hydrocoll. (2022) 123:107135. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.107135

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

102. Arnon H, Zaitsev Y, Porat R, Poverenov E. Postharvest biology and technology effects of carboxymethyl cellulose and chitosan bilayer edible coating on postharvest quality of citrus fruit. Postharvest Biol Technol. (2014) 87:21–6. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2013.08.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

103. Chen C, Du Y, Zuo G, Chen F, Liu K, Zhang L. Effect of storage condition on the physico-chemical properties of corn – wheat starch/zein edible bilayer films. R Soc Open Sci. (2020) 7:191777. doi: 10.1098/rsos.191777

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

104. Pereira G, Pereira M, Andrade D, Mendes L, Abel A, Rogério P, et al. Retail display of beef steaks coated with monolayer and bilayer chitosan– gelatin composites. Meat Sci. (2019) 152:20–30. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.02.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

105. Zhang W, Shu C, Chen Q, Cao J, Jiang W. The multi-layer film system improved the release and retention properties of cinnamon essential oil and its application as coating in inhibition to Penicillium expansion of apple fruit. Food Chem. (2019) 299:125109. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125109

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

106. Xia C, Wang W, Wang L, Liu H, Xiao J. Multilayer zein / gelatin films with tunable water barrier property and prolonged antioxidant activity. Food Packag Shelf Life. (2019) 19:76–85. doi: 10.1016/j.fpsl.2018.12.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

107. Chen X, Cui F, Zi H, Zhou Y, Liu H, Xiao J. Development and characterization of a hydroxypropyl starch/zein bilayer edible film. Int J Biol Macromol. (2019) 141:1175–82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.08.240

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

108. Heidemann HM, Dotto MER, Laurindo JB, Carcio BAM, Costa C. Cold plasma treatment to improve the adhesion of cassava starch fi lms onto PCL and PLA surface. Colloids Surfaces A. (2019) 580:123739. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.123739

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

109. Cai J, Lu W, Kan Q, Chen X, Cao Y, Xiao J. Volatile composition changes of fruits in a biopolymer-coated polyethylene active packaging: Effects of modified atmosphere. Food Res Int. (2022) 152:110843. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110843

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

110. Kamper SL. Water vapor permeability of edible bilayer films. J Food Sci. (1984) 49:1478–81.

Google Scholar

111. Ma W, Tang C, Yin S, Yang X, Qi J, Xia N. Effect of homogenization conditions on properties of gelatin – olive oil composite films. J Food Eng. (2012) 113:136–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2012.05.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

112. Flores Z, San-Martin D, Beldarraín-Iznaga T, Leiva-Vega J, Villalobos-Carvajal R. Effect of homogenization method and carvacrol content on microstructural and physical properties of chitosan-based films. Foods. (2021) 10:141. doi: 10.3390/foods10010141

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

113. Xue F, Gu Y, Wang Y, Li C, Adhikari B. Encapsulation of essential oil in emulsion based edible films prepared by soy protein isolate-gum acacia conjugates. Food Hydrocoll. (2019) 96:178–89. doi: 10.1016/J.FOODHYD.2019.05.014

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

114. Zhang Y, Simpson B. Effect of beeswax and carnauba wax addition on properties of gelatin films: A comparative study. Food Biosci. (2018) 26:88–95. doi: 10.1016/j.fbio.2018.09.011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

115. Fabra MJ, Talens P, Chiralt A. Influence of the homogenization conditions and lipid self-association on properties of sodium caseinate based films containing oleic and stearic acids. Food Hydrocoll. (2011) 25:1112–21. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2010.10.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

116. Debeaufort F, Voilley A. Effect of surfactants and drying rate on barrier properties of emulsified edible films. Int J Food Sci. Technol. (2007) 30:183–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1995.tb01370.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

117. Kowalczyk D, Baraniak B. Food hydrocolloids effect of candelilla wax on functional properties of biopolymer emulsion films - A comparative study. Food Hydrocoll. (2014) 41:195–209. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.04.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

118. Zhang R, Wang W, Zhang H, Dai Y, Dong H, Kong L, et al. Effects of preparation conditions on the properties of agar / maltodextrin- beeswax pseudo-bilayer films. Carbohydr Polym. (2020) 236:116029. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116029

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

119. Cai J, Xiao J, Chen X, Xu L, Cao Y. Spatial distribution of lipids modulated by phase separation in emulsified films and the effects on structure-function relationships. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. (2021) 69:102590. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2020.102590

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

120. Chhikara S, Kumar D. Edible coating and edible film as food packaging material: A review. J Package Technol Res. (2022) 6:1–10. doi: 10.1007/s41783-021-00129-w

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

121. Gahruie HH, Ziaee E, Eskandari MH, Mohammad S, Hosseini H. Characterization of basil seed gum-based edible films incorporated with Zataria multiflora essential oil nanoemulsion. Carbohydr Polym. (2017) 166:93–103. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.02.103

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

122. Chaichi M, Hashemi M, Badii F, Mohammadi A. Preparation and characterization of a novel bionanocomposite edible film based on pectin and crystalline nanocellulose. Carbohydr Polym. (2017) 157:167–75. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.09.062

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

123. Bastarrachea L, Dhawan S, Sablani SS. Engineering properties of polymeric-based antimicrobial films for food packaging. Food Eng Rev. (2011) 3:79–93. doi: 10.1007/s12393-011-9034-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

124. Brazel CS, Rosen SL. Fundamental principles of polymeric materials. 3rd ed. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons (2012).

Google Scholar

125. Ploypetchara T, Gohtani S. Effect of sugar on starch edible film properties?: Plasticized effect. J Food Sci Technol. (2018) 55:3757–66. doi: 10.1007/s13197-018-3307-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

126. Laohakunjit N, Noomhorm A. Effect of plasticizers on mechanical and barrier properties of rice starch film. Starch/Staerke. (2004) 56:348–56. doi: 10.1002/star.200300249

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

127. Edhirej A, Sapuan SM, Jawaid M, Zahari NI. Effect of various plasticizers and concentration on the physical, thermal, mechanical, and structural properties of cassava-starch-based films. Starch/Staerke. (2017) 69:1–11. doi: 10.1002/star.201500366

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

128. Saberi AB, Chockchaisawasdee S. Physical and mechanical properties of a new edible film made of pea starch and guar gum as affected by glycols, sugars and polyols. Int J Biol Macromol. (2017) 104:345–59. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.06.051

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

129. Shellhammer TH, Krochta JM. Whey protein emulsion film performance as affected by lipid type and amount. J Food Sci. (1997) 62:390–4.

Google Scholar

130. Gul O, Turker F, Besir A, Atalar I, Yazici F. Ultrasonics – sonochemistry effect of ultrasound treatment on the properties of nano-emulsion fi lms obtained from hazelnut meal protein and clove essential oil. Ultrasonics Sonochem. (2018) 41:466–74. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.10.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

131. Han Y, Yu M, Wang L. Physical and antimicrobial properties of sodium alginate / carboxymethyl cellulose fi lms incorporated with cinnamon essential oil. Food Packag Shelf Life. (2017) 15:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.fpsl.2017.11.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

132. Navarro-tarazaga ML, Massa A, Pérez-gago MB. LWT – food science and technology effect of beeswax content on hydroxypropyl methylcellulose-based edible fi lm properties and postharvest quality of coated plums (Cv. Angeleno). LWT Food Sci Technol. (2011) 44:2328–34. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2011.03.011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

133. Du WX, Olsen CW, Avena-Bustillos RJ, Mchugh TH, Levin CE, Mendel F. Storage stability and antibacterial activity against Escherichia coli O157?: H7 of carvacrol in edible apple films made by two different casting methods. J Agric Food Chem. (2008) 56:3082–8. doi: 10.1021/jf703629s

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

134. Rojas-grau MA, Avena-bustillos RJ, Olsen C, Friedman M, Henika PR, Martı O. Effects of plant essential oils and oil compounds on mechanical, barrier and antimicrobial properties of alginate – apple puree edible films. J Food Eng. (2007) 81:634–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.01.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

135. Lara I, Miro R, Fuentes T, Sayez G, Graell J, Lo’pez M. Biosynthesis of volatile aroma compounds in pear fruit stored under long-term controlled-atmosphere conditions. Postharvest Biol Technol. (2003) 29:29–39. doi: 10.1016/S0925-521400230-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

136. Sun B, Wang W, Zhang M, Sain M. Biomass-based edible film with enhanced mass barrier capacity and gas permeable selectivity. Cellulose. (2018) 25:5919–37. doi: 10.1007/s10570-018-1976-z

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

137. Zhou Z, Li K, Zhang W, Li K, Tu X, Liu L, et al. A plant leaf-mimetic membrane with controllable gas permeation for efficient preservation of perishable products. ACS Nano. (2021) 15:8742–52. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.1c00997

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

138. Ortega-toro R, Jiménez A, Talens P, Chiralt A. Food hydrocolloids effect of the incorporation of surfactants on the physical properties of corn starch films. Food Hydrocoll. (2014) 38:66–75. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.11.011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

139. Hopkins EJ, Chang C, Lam RS, Nickerson MT. Effects of flaxseed oil concentration on the performance of a soy protein isolate-based emulsion-type film. Food Res Int. (2015) 67:418–25.

Google Scholar

140. Kowalczyk D, Gustaw W, Zie E, Stadnik J, Baraniak B. Food hydrocolloids microstructure and functional properties of sorbitol-plasticized pea protein isolate emulsion fi lms?: Effect of lipid type and concentration. Food Hydrocoll. (2016) 60:353–5.

Google Scholar

141. Syahida N, Fitry I, Zuriyati A, Hanani N. Effects of palm wax on the physical, mechanical and water barrier properties of fish gelatin films for food packaging application. Food Packag Shelf Life. (2020) 23:100437. doi: 10.1016/j.fpsl.2019.100437

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

142. Vosoughi N, Gomarian M, Ghasemi Pirbalouti A, Khaghani S, Malekpoor F. Essential oil composition and total phenolic, flavonoid contents, and antioxidant activity of sage (Salvia officinalis L.) extract under chitosan application and irrigation frequencies. Ind Crops Prod. (2018) 117:366–74. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.03.021

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

143. Wang LF, Rhim JW. Isolation and characterization of melanin from black garlic and sepia ink. LWT Food Sci Technol. (2019) 99:17–23. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.09.033

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

144. Jiménez A, Fabra MJ, Talens P, Chiralt A. Effect of lipid self-association on the microstructure and physical properties of hydroxypropyl-methylcellulose edible films containing fatty acids. Carbohydr Polym. (2010) 82:585–93. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.05.014

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

145. Malik GK, Mitra J. Zinc oxide nanoparticle synthesis, characterization, and their effect on mechanical, barrier, and optical properties of HPMC-based edible film. Food Bioprocess Technol. (2021) 14:441–56.

Google Scholar

146. Acevedo-fani A, Salvia-trujillo L, Rojas-graü MA, Martín-belloso O. Edible films from essential-oil-loaded nanoemulsions?: Physicochemical characterization and antimicrobial properties. Food Hydrocoll. (2015) 47:168–77. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.01.032

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

147. Ranjbaryan S, Pourfathi B, Almasi H. Reinforcing and release controlling effect of cellulose nano fiber in sodium caseinate films activated by nanoemulsi fied cinnamon essential oil. Food Packag Shelf Life J. (2019) 21:100341. doi: 10.1016/j.fpsl.2019.100341

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

148. Abdullah, YuCheng Z, Farooq S, Walayat N, Zhang H, Faieta M, et al. Bio-aerogels: Fabrication, properties and food applications. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. (2022) 14:1–23. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2022.2037504

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

149. Abdullah, Weiss J, Ahmad T, Zhang C, Zhang H. A review of recent progress on high internal-phase Pickering emulsions in food science. Trends Food Sci Technol. (2020) 106:91–103. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.10.016

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

150. Liu Q-R, Wang W, Qi J, Huang Q, Xiao J. Oregano essential oil loaded soybean polysaccharide films: Effect of pickering type immobilization on physical and antimicrobial properties. Food Hydrocoll. (2018) 84:58–67. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.08.011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

151. Wu J, Liu H, Ge S, Wang S, Qin Z, Chen L, et al. The preparation, characterization, antimicrobial stability and in vitro release evaluation of fish gelatin films incorporated with cinnamon essential oil nanoliposomes. Food Hydrocoll. (2014) 43:427–35. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.06.017

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

152. Barba C, Eguinoa A, Ignacio J. Preparation and characterization of b-cyclodextrin inclusion complexes as a tool of a controlled antimicrobial release in whey protein edible films. LWT Food Sci Technol. (2015) 64:1362–9. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2015.07.060

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

153. Arcan I, Yemeniciog?lu A. Controlled release properties of zein-fatty acid blend films for multiple bioactive compounds. J Agri Food Chem. (2014) 62:8238–46. doi: 10.1021/jf500666w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

154. Yuan L, Feng W, Zhang Z, Peng Y, Xiao Y, Chen J. Effect of potato starch-based antibacterial composite films with thyme oil microemulsion or microcapsule on shelf life of chilled meat. LWT Food Sci Technol. (2021) 139:110462. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110462

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

155. Peretto G, Du W, Avena-bustillos RJ, Bouy S, Sarreal L, Sheng S, et al. Postharvest biology and technology increasing strawberry shelf-life with carvacrol and methyl cinnamate antimicrobial vapors released from edible films. Postharvest Biol Technol. (2014) 89:11–8. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2013.11.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

156. Esmaeili H, Cheraghi N, Khanjari A, Rezaeigolestani M, Akhondzadeh A, Kamkar A, et al. Incorporation of nanoencapsulated garlic essential oil into edible fi lms?: A novel approach for extending shelf life of vacuum-packed sausages. Meat Sci. (2020) 166:108135. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108135

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

157. Ezati P, Riahi Z, Rhim J. Carrageenan-based functional films integrated with CuO-Doped titanium nanotubes for active food packaging applications. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. (2021) 9:9300–7. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c01957

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

158. Namratha S, Sreejit V, Preetha R. Fabrication and evaluation of physicochemical properties of probiotic edible film based on pectin – alginate – casein composite. Int J Food Sci Technol. (2020) 55:1497–505. doi: 10.1111/ijfs.14550

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

159. Zhang X, Zhao Y, Li Y, Zhu L, Fang Z, Shi Q. Physicochemical, mechanical and structural properties of composite edible films based on whey protein isolate / psyllium seed gum. Int J Biol Macromol. (2020) 153:892–901. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.03.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

160. Riahi Z, Rhim JW, Bagheri R, Pircheraghi G, Lotfali E. Carboxymethyl cellulose-based functional film integrated with chitosan-based carbon quantum dots for active food packaging applications. Prog Organ Coat. (2022) 166:106794.

Google Scholar

161. Huang T, Lin J, Fang Z, Yu W, Li Z, Xu D, et al. Preparation and characterization of irradiated kafirin-quercetin film for packaging cod (Gadus morhua) during cold storage at 4 ° C. Food Bioprocess Technol. (2020) 13:522–32.

Google Scholar

162. Zhang L, Liu Z, Sun Y, Wang X, Li L. Combined antioxidant and sensory effects of active chitosan / zein film containing α-tocopherol on Agaricus bisporus. Food Packag Shelf Life. (2020) 24:100470. doi: 10.1016/j.fpsl.2020.100470

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

163. Farajpour R, Emam Z, Moeini S, Tavakolipour H, Safayan S. Structural and physico-mechanical properties of potato starch-olive oil edible films reinforced with zein nanoparticles. Int J Biol Macromol. (2020) 149:941–50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.01.175

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

164. Wang H, Gong X, Miao Y, Guo X, Liu C, Fan Y, et al. Preparation and characterization of multilayer films composed of chitosan, sodium alginate and carboxymethyl chitosan-ZnO nanoparticles. Food Chem. (2019) 283:397–403. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.01.022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

165. Chevalier E, Chaabani A, Assezat G, Prochazka F, Oulahal N. Casein/wax blend extrusion for production of edible fi lms as carriers of potassium sorbate — a comparative study of waxes and potassium sorbate effect. Food Packag Shelf Life. (2018) 16:41–50. doi: 10.1016/j.fpsl.2018.01.005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

166. Mushtaq M, Gani A, Gani A, Punoo HA, Masoodi FA. Use of pomegranate peel extract incorporated zein film with improved properties for prolonged shelf life of fresh Himalayan cheese (Kalari/kradi). Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. (2018) 48:25–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2018.04.020

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

167. Giteru SG, Oey I, Ali MA, Johnson SK, Fang Z. Effect of kafirin-based films incorporating citral and quercetin on storage of fresh chicken fillet. Food Control. (2017) 80:37–44. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.04.029

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

168. Xiao J, Shi C, Zheng H, Shi Z, Jiang D, Li Y, et al. Kafirin protein based electrospun fibers with tunable mechanical property, wettability and release profile. J Agric Food Chem. (2016) 64:3226–33. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b00388

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

169. Piermaria J, Diosma G, Aquino C, Garrote G, Abraham A. Edible kefiran films as vehicle for probiotic microorganisms. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. (2015) 32:193–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ifset.2015.09.009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: protein-based films, active packaging, intelligent packaging, advanced fabrication strategies, structural and functional properties, food applications

Citation: Abdullah, Cai J, Hafeez MA, Wang Q, Farooq S, Huang Q, Tian W and Xiao J (2022) Biopolymer-based functional films for packaging applications: A review. Front. Nutr. 9:1000116. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.1000116

Received: 21 July 2022; Accepted: 04 August 2022;
Published: 22 August 2022.

Edited by:

Husnain Raza, Shenzhen University, China

Reviewed by:

Hao Zhong, Zhejiang University of Technology, China
Zafarullah Muhammad, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences (GDAAS), China

Copyright © 2022 Abdullah, Cai, Hafeez, Wang, Farooq, Huang, Tian and Xiao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Jie Xiao, xiaojieacademic@163.com

Download