Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Microbiol., 24 June 2022
Sec. Evolutionary and Genomic Microbiology
This article is part of the Research Topic Acidobacteria – Towards Unraveling the Secrets of a Widespread, Though Enigmatic, Phylum View all 7 articles

Editorial: Acidobacteria – Towards Unraveling the Secrets of a Widespread, Though Enigmatic, Phylum

  • 1Department Microorganisms, Leibniz Institute DSMZ - German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures, Braunschweig, Germany
  • 2Institute for Microbiology, Technical University of Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany
  • 3Department of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, Centre for Microbiology and Environmental Systems Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • 4Graduate Program in Environmental Sciences, University Brazil, São Paulo, Brazil
  • 5Working Group Biobank, Research Unit Molecular Epidemiology, Institute of Epidemiology, Helmholtz Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany

The bacterial phylum, Acidobacteriota (Oren and Garrity, 2021) (formerly Acidobacteria) is a diverse and ubiquitous group of environmental bacteria originally discovered in the late 1990s (Kuske et al., 1997; Ludwig et al., 1997). Its members are prevalent in terrestrial environments, being the third most abundant soil phylum (Delgado-Baquerizo et al., 2018). Typically found in aquatic and terrestrial systems, they also occur in harsh environments such as acidic mine drainage (Kishimoto et al., 1991; Kleinsteuber et al., 2008; Falagán et al., 2017), rock faces (Zimmermann et al., 2006; Kelly et al., 2010; Marnocha and Dixon, 2014) or desert soil (Kuske et al., 1997; Dunbar et al., 2002). Despite their ubiquity and high 16S rRNA gene sequence abundance and diversity especially in soil habitats (Barns et al., 1999; Janssen, 2006; Fierer, 2017), knowledge on the ecology of Acidobacteriota is still surprisingly fragmentary, not least due to challenges in cultivating representative strains.

Nevertheless, the development of adapted cultivation media and techniques (Sait et al., 2002; Joseph et al., 2003; Davis et al., 2005; George et al., 2011), specific screening methods (Stevenson et al., 2004; Pankratov et al., 2008; Oberpaul et al., 2020), in addition to the rise of cultivation-independent, molecular approaches have provided insights into some key characteristics of single isolates and acidobacterial communities. Based on existing isolates with validated names and 16S rRNA database sequences from cultivation-independent studies, a provisional taxonomic system has been established, currently comprising 15 class-level units, only five of which contain described members (Dedysh and Yilmaz, 2018), namely the already earlier proposed classes “Acidobacteriae” (Oren et al., 2015), Blastocatellia (Pascual et al., 2015) and Holophagae (Fukunaga et al., 2008), as well as the two newly proposed Vicinamibacteria and Thermoanaerobaculia. As such, further efforts are needed to better understand the acidobacterial diversity, phylogeny and taxonomy, functional roles and reasons for the success of Acidobacteriota in the environment.

In this Research Topic further insights in diversity, ecology and evolution of the Acidobacteriota are presented in six original research articles. They touch topics as general as nutrient-cycling (Kristensen et al.) or ecological theories (Sikorski et al.), but also as specific as wastewater-treatment (Kristensen et al.), drought-resistance (Huber et al.) or host-association (Wang et al.). They not only span a variety of habitats from aquatic to terrestrial environments, but also provide insights into previously (Huber et al.; Saini et al.; Wang et al.) and newly (Kristensen et al.; Ruhl et al.; Wang et al.) discovered members of the phylum - from single species to whole clades.

Various edaphic properties have been investigated to better understand the factors that govern acidobacterial abundance and diversity in soils. More specifically, soil pH (Jones et al., 2009; Lauber et al., 2009), factors linked to soil acidity (Navarrete et al., 2015), carbon content (Eichorst et al., 2011), carbon and nitrogen content (Ivanova et al., 2020) and nutrient availability (Navarrete et al., 2015; de Chaves et al., 2019) have been identified as major determinants, showing both, positive and negative correlations to different taxa. Here Huber et al. expand on those observations and explore water limitation as one of the major factors potentially impacting Acidobacteriota in/from subtropical savannah soils by RNA-based community screening and physiological testing. Sikorski et al. use a culture-independent niche modeling approach to elucidate ecological adaptations and evolution of acidobacteria in German grassland soils. As seen earlier e.g., by Naether et al. (2012); Foesel et al. (2014), both showed group or even species-specific response or adaptation, respectively.

(Meta)genomic investigations of the Acidobacteriota have provided tremendous insights into their potential role(s) in the environment. Since the first genome data became available (Ward et al., 2009), Acidobacteriota have been postulated to play a role in global C- and N-cycling. Subsequent investigations have collaborated these postulates with further physiological and genomic evidence in regards to organic carbon degradation (Rawat et al., 2012; Kielak et al., 2016; Eichorst et al., 2018) and participation in the N-cycle via reduction of nitrate to nitrite in select isolates (Männistö et al., 2012; Huber et al., 2017). Additional “-omic” investigations, many of which were combined with physiological investigations, have identified select Acidobacteriota to be phototrophic (Bryant et al., 2007), microaerophilic (Trojan et al., 2021), able to reduce iron (Coates et al., 1999; Kulichevskaya et al., 2014; Falagán et al., 2017), involved in sulfur cycling (Hausmann et al., 2018; Flieder et al., 2021), able to oxidize atmospheric dihydrogen gas (Giguere et al., 2021), or produce secondary metabolites (Crits-Christoph et al., 2018). Kristensen et al. describe the high diversity and potential involvement of aquatic represent of the phylum Acidobacteriota in nitrogen and phosphorous removal along with iron reduction from activated sludge of Danish waste water treatment plants using a MAG-based approach. In doing so, they propose two novel candidate species within the genus Geothrix.

While most Acidobacteriota have been described as chemoorganoheterotrophic mesophiles, the genus Choracidobacterium is one of the few thermophilic and the first and until now sole genus in the phylum whose members perform chlorophyll-dependent phototrophy (Bryant et al., 2007; Tank and Bryant, 2015). Here, Saini et al. report on the isolation of 8 additional Chloracidobacterium strains using a defined growth medium. Based on genomic and phenotypic characterization of this extended collection of isolates two further species, “C. aggregatum” and “C. validum”, of the genus within the novel family “Chloracidobacteriaceae”, order Blastocatellales, class Blastocatellia are proposed. Another thermophilic group of Acidobacteriota in this article collection was reported by Ruhl et al. who explore the not yet cultivated “GAL08” group (Ackerman, 2006) from hot spring sediments of Dewar Creek, British Columbia, Canada (Sharp et al., 2014). Based on their findings the GAL08 clade represents a candidate order (Ca. Frugalibacteriales) affiliated with the class Blastotcatellia; genomic metabolic reconstruction predicts an aerobic heterotrophic metabolism, incomplete denitrification and fermentation. Environmental screening and laboratory enrichment suggest a thermophilic microaerophilic lifestyle for members of this clade.

While growth promoting effects of plant-associated acidobacteria already have been reported earlier (Kielak et al., 2016; Yoneda et al., 2021), Wang et al. for the first time studied animal-associated characteristics of Acidobacteriota isolated from a chiton. Using comparative genomics and high-throughput sequencing analyses, they compared one previously described (Fukunaga et al., 2008) and one novel Acanthopleuribacteraceae strain, proposed as “Sufidibacter corallicola”. That way, they identified genomic features that indicated these Acidobacteriota evolved/adapted to the animal host.

In conclusion, this collection of research articles expanded our knowledge and understanding into (potential) physiological traits of phylum Acidobacteriota members from individual acidobacterial strains to whole clades, novel phylogenetic and taxonomic insights, further clues on their ecology, diversity and abundance in selected habitats, and gives further evidence for the environmental relevance of this wide spread though still elusive phylum. Knowledge is expected to continue growing, as demonstrated by the articles in this collection, most likely through the combination of classical microbiological and modern molecular methods.

Author Contributions

BF organized this Research Topic and drafted the editorial article. All authors listed have made significant, intellectual contributions to organizing, and further developing the topic. All of them contributed to writing the editorial article and approved it for publication.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all authors, the external editors and all reviewers who have contributed to this Research Topic issue, as well as the financing agencies involved in this research. We also thank the Frontiers Editorial team for its constant support in managing the Research Topic.

References

Ackerman, G. G. (2006). Biogeochemical Gradients and Energetics in Geothermal Systems of Yellowstone National Park. Montana State University-Bozeman, College of Agriculture.

Google Scholar

Barns, S. M., Takala, S. L., and Kuske, C. R. (1999). Wide distribution and diversity of members of the bacterial kingdom Acidobacterium in the environment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65, 1731–1737. doi: 10.1128/AEM.65.4.1731-1737.1999

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bryant, D. A., Costas, A. M., Maresca, J. A., Chew, A. G., Klatt, C. G., Bateson, M. M., et al. (2007). Candidatus Chloracidobacterium thermophilum: an aerobic phototrophic Acidobacterium. Science 317, 523–526. doi: 10.1126/science.1143236

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Coates, J. D., Ellis, D. J., Gaw, C. V., and Lovley, D. R. (1999). Geothrix fermentans gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel Fe(III)-reducing bacterium from a hydrocarbon-contaminated aquifer. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 49, 1615–1622. doi: 10.1099/00207713-49-4-1615

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Crits-Christoph, A., Diamond, S., Butterfield, C. N., Thomas, B. C., and Banfield, J. F. (2018). Novel soil bacteria possess diverse genes for secondary metabolite biosynthesis. Nature 558, 440–444. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0207-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Davis, K. E. R., Joseph, S. J., and Janssen, P. H. (2005). Effects of growth medium, inoculum size, and incubation time on culturability and isolation of soil bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 826–834. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.2.826-834.2005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

de Chaves, M. G., Silva, G. G. Z., Rossetto, R., Edwards, R. A., Tsai, S. M., and Navarrete, A. A. (2019). Acidobacteria subgroups and their metabolic potential for carbon degradation in sugarcane soil amended with vinasse and nitrogen fertilizers. Front. Microbiol. 10. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01680

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dedysh, S. N., and Yilmaz, P. (2018). Refining the taxonomic structure of the phylum Acidobacteria. Int. J. System. Evolut. Microbiol. 68, 3796–806. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.003062

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Delgado-Baquerizo, M., Oliverio, A. M., Brewer, T. E., Benavent-González, A., Eldridge, D. J., Bardgett, R. D., et al. (2018). A global atlas of the dominant bacteria found in soil. Science 359, 320–325. doi: 10.1126/science.aap9516

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dunbar, J., Barns, S. M., Ticknor, L. O., and Kuske, C. R. (2002). Empirical and theoretical bacterial diversity in four arizona soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68, 3035–3045. doi: 10.1128/aem.68.6.3035-3045.2002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Eichorst, S. A., Kuske, C. R., and Schmidt, T. M. (2011). Influence of plant polymers on the distribution and cultivation of bacteria in the phylum Acidobacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 586–596. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01080-10

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Eichorst, S. A., Trojan, D., Roux, S., Herbold, C., Rattei, T., and Woebken, D. (2018). Genomic insights into the Acidobacteria reveal strategies for their success in terrestrial environments. Environ. Microbiol. 20, 1041–1063. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.14043

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Falagán, C., Foesel, B., and Johnson, B. (2017). Acidicapsa ferrireducens sp. nov., Acidicapsa acidiphila sp. nov., and Granulicella acidiphila sp. nov.: novel acidobacteria isolated from metal-rich acidic waters. Extremophiles 21, 459–469. doi: 10.1007/s00792-017-0916-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fierer, N. (2017). Embracing the unknown: disentangling the complexities of the soil microbiome. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 15, 579–590. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.87

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Flieder, M., Buongiorno, J., Herbold, C. W., Hausmann, B., Rattei, T., Lloyd, K. G., et al. (2021). Novel taxa of Acidobacteriota implicated in seafloor sulfur cycling. ISME J. 15, 3159–3180. doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-00992-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Foesel, B. U., Nägele, V., Naether, A., Wüst, P. K., Weinert, J., Bonkowski, M., et al. (2014). Determinants of Acidobacteria activity inferred from the relative abundances of 16S rRNA transcripts in German grassland and forest soils. Environ. Microbiol. 16, 658–675. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12162

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fukunaga, Y., Kurahashi, M., Yanagi, K., Yokota, A., and Harayama, S. (2008). Acanthopleuribacter pedis gen. nov., sp. nov., a marine bacterium isolated from a chiton, and description of Acanthopleuribacteraceae fam. nov., Acanthopleuribacterales ord. nov., Holophagaceae fam. nov., Holophagales ord. nov. and Holophagae classis nov. in the phylum 'Acidobacteria'. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 58, 2597–2601. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.65589-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

George, I. F., Hartmann, M., Liles, M. R., and Agathos, S. N. (2011). Recovery of as-yet-uncultured soil acidobacteria on dilute solid media. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 8184–8188. doi: 10.1128/AEM.05956-11

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Giguere, A. T., Eichorst, S. A., Meier, D. V., Herbold, C. W., Richter, A., Greening, C., et al. (2021). Acidobacteria are active and abundant members of diverse atmospheric H2-oxidizing communities detected in temperate soils. ISME J. 15, 363–376. doi: 10.1038/s41396-020-00750-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hausmann, B., Pelikan, C., Herbold, C. W., Köstlbacher, S., Albertsen, M., Eichorst, S. A., et al. (2018). Peatland Acidobacteria with a dissimilatory sulfur metabolism. ISME J. 12, 1729–1742. doi: 10.1038/s41396-018-0077-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huber, K. J., Geppert, A. M., Gro,ß, U., Luckner, M., Wanner, G., Cooper, P., et al. (2017). Aridibacter nitratireducens sp. nov., a member of the family Blastocatellaceae, class Blastocatellia, isolated from an African soil. Int. J. System. Evolut. Microbiol. 67, 4487–4493. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.002318

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ivanova, A. A., Zhelezova, A. D., Chernov, T. I., and Dedysh, S. N. (2020). Linking ecology and systematics of acidobacteria: Distinct habitat preferences of the Acidobacteriia and Blastocatellia in tundra soils. PLoS ONE. 15, e0230157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230157

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Janssen, P. H. (2006). Identifying the dominant soil bacterial taxa in libraries of 16S rRNA and 16S rRNA genes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 1719–1728. doi: 10.1128/AEM.72.3.1719-1728.2006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jones, R. T., Robeson, M. S., Lauber, C. L., Hamady, M., Knight, R., and Fierer, N. (2009). A comprehensive survey of soil acidobacterial diversity using pyrosequencing and clone library analyses. ISME J. 3, 442–453. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2008.127

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Joseph, S. J., Hugenholtz, P., Sangwan, P., Osborne, C. A., and Janssen, P. H. (2003). Laboratory cultivation of widespread and previously uncultured soil bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 7210–7215. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.12.7210-7215.2003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kelly, L. C., Cockell, C. S., Piceno, Y. M., Andersen, G. L., Thorsteinsson, T., and Marteinsson, V. (2010). Bacterial diversity of weathered terrestrial Icelandic volcanic glasses. Microb. Ecol. 60, 740–752. doi: 10.1007/s00248-010-9684-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kielak, A. M., Barreto, C. C., Kowalchuk, G. A., van Veen, J. A., and Kuramae, E. E. (2016). The Ecology of Acidobacteria: Moving beyond Genes and Genomes. Front. Microbiol. 7. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00744

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kishimoto, N., Kosako, Y., and Tano, T. (1991). Acidobacterium capsulatum gen. nov., sp. nov.: An acidophilic chemoorganotrophic bacterium containing menaquinone from acidic mineral environment. Curr. Microbiol. 22, 1–7. doi: 10.1007/BF02106205

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kleinsteuber, S., Müller, F. D., Chatzinotas, A., Wendt-Potthoff, K., and Harms, H. (2008). Diversity and in situ quantification of acidobacteria subdivision 1 in an acidic mining lake. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 63, 107–117. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2007.00402.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kulichevskaya, I. S., Suzina, N. E., Rijpstra, W. I. C., Damsté, J. S. S., and Dedysh, S. N. (2014). Paludibaculum fermentans gen. nov., sp. nov., a facultative anaerobe capable of dissimilatory iron reduction from subdivision 3 of the Acidobacteria. Int. J. System. Evolut. Microbiol. 64, 2857–2864. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.066175-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kuske, C. R., Barns, S. M., and Busch, J. D. (1997). Diverse uncultivated bacterial groups from soils of the arid southwestern United States that are present in many geographic regions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63, 3614–3621. doi: 10.1128/aem.63.9.3614-3621.1997

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lauber, C. L., Hamady, M., Knight, R., and Fierer, N. (2009). Pyrosequencing-based assessment of soil pH as a predictor of soil bacterial community structure at the continental scale. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 5111–5120. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00335-09

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ludwig, W., Bauer, S. H., Bauer, M., Held, I., Kirchhof, G., Schulze, R., et al. (1997). Detection and in situ identification of representatives of a widely distributed new bacterial phylum. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 153, 181–190. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1997.tb10480.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Männistö, M. K., Rawat, S., Starovoytov, V., and Häggblom, M. M. (2012). Granulicella arctica sp. nov., Granulicella mallensis sp. nov., Granulicella tundricola sp. nov. and Granulicella sapmiensis sp. nov., novel acidobacteria from tundra soil. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 62, 2097–2106. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.031864-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Marnocha, C. L., and Dixon, J. C. (2014). Endolithic bacterial communities in rock coatings from Kärkevagge, Swedish Lapland. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 90, 533–542. doi: 10.1111/1574-6941.12415

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Naether, A., Foesel, B. U., Naegele, V., Wüst, P. K., Weinert, J., Bonkowski, M., et al. (2012). Environmental factors affect acidobacterial communities below the subgroup level in grassland and forest soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78, 7398–7406. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01325-12

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Navarrete, A. A., Venturini, A. M., Meyer, K. M., Klein, A. M., Tiedje, J. M., Bohannan, B. J. M., et al. (2015). Differential response of acidobacteria subgroups to forest-to-pasture conversion and their biogeographic patterns in the Western Brazilian Amazon. Front. Microbiol. 6. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01443

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Oberpaul, M., Zumkeller, C. M., Culver, T., Spohn, M., Mihajlovic, S., Leis, B., et al. (2020). High-throughput cultivation for the selective isolation of acidobacteria from termite nests. Front. Microbiol. 11. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.597628

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Oren, A., da Costa, M. S., Garrity, G. M., Rainey, F. A., Rosselló-Móra, R., Schink, B., et al. (2015). Proposal to include the rank of phylum in the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 65, 4284–4287. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.000664

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Oren, A., and Garrity, G. M. (2021). Valid publication of the names of forty-two phyla of prokaryotes. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 71, 005056. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.005056

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pankratov, T. A., Serkebaeva, Y. M., Kulichevskaya, I. S., Liesack, W., and Dedysh, S. N. (2008). Substrate-induced growth and isolation of Acidobacteria from acidic Sphagnum peat. ISME J. 2, 551–560. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2008.7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pascual, J., Wüst, P. K., Geppert, A., Foesel, B. U., Huber, K. J., and Overmann, J. (2015). Novel isolates double the number of chemotrophic species and allow the first description of higher taxa in Acidobacteria subdivision 4. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 38, 534–544. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2015.08.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rawat, S. R., Männist,ö, M. K., Bromberg, Y., and Häggblom, M. M. (2012). Comparative genomic and physiological analysis provides insights into the role of Acidobacteria in organic carbon utilization in Arctic tundra soils. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 82, 341–355. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01381.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sait, M., Hugenholtz, P., and Janssen, P. H. (2002). Cultivation of globally distributed soil bacteria from phylogenetic lineages previously only detected in cultivation-independent surveys. Environ. Microbiol. 4, 654–666. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2002.00352.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sharp, C. E., Brady, A. L., Sharp, G. H., Grasby, S. E., Stott, M. B., and Dunfield, P. F. (2014). Humboldt's spa: microbial diversity is controlled by temperature in geothermal environments. Isme J. 8, 1166–1174. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2013.237

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stevenson, B. S., Eichorst, S. A., Wertz, J. T., Schmidt, T. M., and Breznak, J. A. (2004). New strategies for cultivation and detection of previously uncultured microbes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70, 4748–4755. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.8.4748-4755.2004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tank, M., and Bryant, D. A. (2015). Chloracidobacterium thermophilum gen. nov., sp. nov.: an anoxygenic microaerophilic chlorophotoheterotrophic acidobacterium. Int. J. System. Evolut. Microbiol. 65, 1426–1430. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.000113

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Trojan, D., Garcia-Robledo, E., Meier, D. V., Hausmann, B., Revsbech, N. P., Eichorst, S. A., et al. (2021). Microaerobic lifestyle at nanomolar O2 concentrations mediated by low-affinity terminal oxidases in abundant soil bacteria. mSystems 6, e00250–e00221. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00250-21

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ward, N. L., Challacombe, J. F., Janssen, P. H., Henrissat, B., Coutinho, P. M., Wu, M., et al. (2009). Three genomes from the phylum Acidobacteria provide insight into the lifestyles of these microorganisms in soils. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 2046–2056. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02294-08

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yoneda, Y., Yamamoto, K., Makino, A., Tanaka, Y., Meng, X. -Y., Hashimoto, J., et al. (2021). Novel plant-associated acidobacteria promotes growth of common floating aquatic plants, duckweeds. Microorganisms 9:1133. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9061133

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zimmermann, J., Gonzalez, J. M., and Saiz-Jimenez, C. (2006). Epilithic biofilms in saint callixtus catacombs (Rome) harbour a broad spectrum of acidobacteria. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 89, 203–208. doi: 10.1007/s10482-005-9020-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Acidobacteriota, phototrophy, phosphorus removal, niche adaptation, drought resistance, host-association, thermophile

Citation: Huber KJ, Pester M, Eichorst SA, Navarrete AA and Foesel BU (2022) Editorial: Acidobacteria – Towards Unraveling the Secrets of a Widespread, Though Enigmatic, Phylum. Front. Microbiol. 13:960602. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.960602

Received: 03 June 2022; Accepted: 06 June 2022;
Published: 24 June 2022.

Edited and reviewed by: Ludmila Chistoserdova, University of Washington, United States

Copyright © 2022 Huber, Pester, Eichorst, Navarrete and Foesel. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Bärbel U. Foesel, baerbel.foesel@helmholz-muenchen.de

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.